text
stringlengths 0
44.4k
|
---|
We next observe that if the Crhave theQ-QTproperty they must, in particular, |
be Hermitian. It turns out that that is, by itself, already a very str ong constraint. |
Before stating the result it may be helpful if we explain the essential idea on |
which it depends. Although we have not done so before, and will not d o so again, it |
will be convenient to make use of the covariant/contravariantinde x notation which |
is often used to describe the structure constants. Define the me tric tensor |
Mrs= Tr(LrLs) (179) |
and letMrsbe its inverse. So |
d2/summationdisplay |
t=1MrtMts=Mr |
s=/braceleftigg |
1r=s |
0r/ne}ationslash=s(180) |
We can use these tensors to raise and lower indices (we use the Hilber t-Schmidt |
inner product for this purpose because the fact that gl( d,C) is not semi-simple |
means that its Killing form is degenerate [ 52–55]). In particular, the matrices |
Lr=d2/summationdisplay |
t=1MrsLs (181) |
are the basis dual to the Lr: |
Tr(LrLs) =Mr |
s (182) |
Suppose we now define structure constants ˜Crstby |
[Lr,Ls] =d2/summationdisplay |
t=1˜CrstLt(183) |
(so in terms of the Crstwe have ˜Ct |
rs=Crst). It follows from the relation |
˜Crst= Tr/parenleftbig |
[Lr,Ls]Lt/parenrightbig |
= Tr/parenleftbig |
Lr[Ls,Lt]/parenrightbig |
(184) |
that the ˜Crstare completely antisymmetric for any choice of the Lr. If we now |
require that the matrices Crbe Hermitian it means that, not only the ˜Crst, but |
also theCrstmust be completely antisymmetric. Since the two quantities are |
related by |
˜Crst=d2/summationdisplay |
u=1CrsuMut (185)25 |
this is a very strong requirement. It means that the Lrmust, in a certain sense, |
be close to orthonormal (relative to the Hilbert-Schmidt inner prod uct). More |
precisely, it means we have the following lemma: |
Lemma 9. LetLr,CrstandCrbe defined as in the statement of Theorem 7, and |
letlr= Tr(Lr). Then the Crare Hermitian if and only if |
Tr(LrLs) =βδrs+γlrls (186) |
whereβ,γare real constants such that β >0andγ <1 |
d. |
If this condition is satisfied we also have |
d2/summationdisplay |
r=1lrLr=β |
1−dγI (187) |
d2/summationdisplay |
r=1l2 |
r=dβ |
1−dγ(188) |
Proof.To prove sufficiency observe that, in view of Eq. ( 185), the condition means |
˜Crst=βCrst+γltd2/summationdisplay |
u=1Crsulu (189) |
In view of Lemma 8, and the fact that β/ne}ationslash= 0, this implies |
Crst=1 |
β˜Crst (190) |
Since the ˜Crstare completely antisymmetric we conclude that the Crstmust be |
also. It follows that the Crare Hermitian. |
To prove necessity let ˜Cr(respectively M) be the matrix whose matrix elements |
are˜Crst(respectively Mst). Then Eq. ( 185) can be written |
˜Cr=CrM (191) |
Taking the transpose (or, equivalently, the Hermitian conjugate) on both sides of |
this equation we find |
˜Cr=MCr (192) |
implying |
[M,Cr] = 0 (193) |
for allr. Since the Lrare a basis for gl( d,C) we deduce |
[M,adA] = 0 (194) |
for allA∈gl(d,C). Eq. (186) is a straightforward consequence of this, the fact |
that gl(d,C) has the direct sum decomposition CI⊕sl(d,C), the fact that sl( d,C) |
is simple, and Schur’s lemma [ 52–55]. However, for the benefit of the reader who is |
not so familiar with the theory of Lie algebras we will give the argument in a little |
more detail.26 |
Given arbitrary A=/summationtextd2 |
r=1arLr, let/bardblA/an}bracketri}ht/an}bracketri}htdenote the column vector |
/bardblA/an}bracketri}ht/an}bracketri}ht= |
a1 |
a2 |
... |
ad2 |
(195) |
So |
/bardblLr/an}bracketri}ht/an}bracketri}ht= |
1 |
0 |
... |
0 |
/bardblL2/an}bracketri}ht/an}bracketri}ht= |
0 |
1 |
... |
0 |
/bardblLd2/an}bracketri}ht/an}bracketri}ht= |
0 |
0 |
... |
1 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.