text
stringlengths
0
23.7k
label
stringclasses
4 values
dataType
stringclasses
2 values
communityName
stringclasses
4 values
datetime
stringclasses
95 values
It was calculating in Imperial instead of SI units, right? And they copied the source code into future probe landing guidance computers? /s I know the actual reason.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
r/technology
post
r/technology
2024-17-06
> "It was a problem back then, getting people off old versions," he said. "And I think it has to do with, you know, what's the main reason you run a relational database? It's to build apps on top of it. And the stickiness of those applications is what's causing this." Or just the stupid fucking pricing?
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
The pricing of SQL 2024 is nothing compare with disaster that can happen with these old system
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
Oh, for sure! I used to work with a guy who now has his own gig doing nothing but supporting Dynamics SL 6.5/7, SQL 2000-2007, SharePoint 2003/2007/2010 and a couple older niche ERPs. I dubbed him Peter Pan because he hasn't grown up. And he has used this as a selling point to new clients who also haven't grown up! It's a niche, for sure. But it's REAL. Some companies don't want the money or time distraction that it costs to upgrade one system - it multiplies if that system requires others to also be upgraded or replaced. He's certainly lost some clients who realized what year it was, but he has connections that he suggests to help them transition.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
Can confirm. 30% of our database servers (including production workloads) are running SQL 2005.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
So 80% is still supported? I'm impressed. Anyway, good luck hackers, please make those 20% have a good reason to upgrade
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
Yeah, it used to be the case for us until a few years ago. Our insurance now requires all IT software to be up to date and compliant (signed https, SSL, sftp, etc.) as well. This means all my SQL Server instances are at the very least at the last Security Update available. We just moved our last SQL 2014 instances to SQL 2022 because everything was working fine on it. I'm the defacto part-time DBA since it used to be my previous job before moving to BI at this company.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-18-06
20% of MS SQL servers, important distinction. Most SQL servers really are doing just fine. The number is likely much lower.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-18-06
r/technology
post
r/technology
2024-17-06
So it could manipulate Apple stocks, rather than TDK's.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
No…. This article is not trying to manipulate apples stock. It’s just trying to get people to read it and have context for the changes.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
Well, I as a layman can also state that.. Cpt. Obvious TDK..
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
r/technology
post
r/technology
2024-17-06
“Photosynthesis produces oxygen and electrons. Our model traps the electrons, which allows us to generate electricity. So more than being a zero-emission technology, it’s a negative carbon emission technology: it absorbs carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and gives you a current. Its only byproduct is water.” “Our system does not use any of the hazardous gases or microfibres needed for the silicon fabrication technology that photovoltaic cells rely on. Furthermore, disposing of silicon computer chips is not easy. We use biocompatible polymers, so the whole system is easily decomposable and very cheap to manufacture.” What a great finding. Hopefully this gets the funding it deserves!
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
r/technology
post
r/technology
2024-17-06
Clearly there's bias because the talking meat judged it.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
That's an interesting story. Reminds me of the time everyone started dumping money into Tesla stock because robo drivers were about to displace all the truck drivers.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
You present a problem to the AI and AI solves it. Great. You still need a human to say, yes, that's a good solution. No machine can do that right now. Do you want AI reading your MRI then just passing it along to treatment, skipping your oncologist, or do you want your oncologist to have the best information for your treatment? Can't figure out how to pay your parking ticket? AI should do that. And if your job was, literally, helping people find the right screen on a website then you were on your way to being rolled off the contract anyway. Do you think you can type: Write a story about a boy and a girl that fall in love in a canning factory. Then just send it to the printers? OR do you need a writer and an editor to look at it and make adjustments, fix it, make it interesting? Can you use it to make a BETTER story from what the writer submits? Yes. So, is it cool? Yes. Is it powerful? Yes. Is it transformative? Yes. Disruptive? Yes. But NOT in the way where you're all, meh, screw that fire everyone.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
“Humans are stealing the jobs from AI”
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
I'd like to stay at the upside down pyramid hotel. Will it have a pool?
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
Cope harder, AI, but you got SMACKED
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
What took 10 people before now takes 1 person with AI. That's definitely not firing everyone, but that's little consolation to the 9.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
Theres AI laundering where they have AI create something and turn get a human to take credit. They make a paper trail with invoices, payments, etc.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
A photographer often can’t paint a landscape; they need their camera to capture it. The necessity of the tool in the process does not negate the skill required of the operator or the need for a discerning eye to separate something worth capturing out of so much chaff.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
To be fair, we’ll all forget the entire thing within a week. No one really gives a shit about any of this lol
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
Weirdly enough, premise that "humans are the only one who make art as a form of communication "is false. The strongest example is the songbirds. They are taught their particular brand of songs at a young age, which both functions as an art form to impress future mates and to communicate simple information. It's a full fledged language.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
Songbirds do not encode meaning into their songs. They do not have the mental capacity to formulate actual language. If you've got credible sources for songbirds having a "full fledged language" I'd _really_ like to see that, because a language being "fully fledged" implies a level of complex thought that songbirds are not capable of. You could not, for example, argue with a songbird about if songbird songs are a language or not. But the crux of the matter is more simple. You are confusing beauty for art.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
> The definition of photograph: Language changes. A Telephone is, for example, now only rarely used for telephony.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
You really underestimate the mental capacity of some birds, and i got the receipts to prove it. Songs are not genetically encoded, they are a cultural thing learned and actively critiqued by the elder of the species. It differs from species to species, but generally they learn songs from a" tutor". Songs can denote danger, territory, or desire to mate, and are specific to the species or subculture of birds. This is about how birds learn song and how it parallels how humans learn speech. https://www.nature.com/scitable/knowledge/library/the-development-of-birdsong-16133266/#:~:text=Birds%20first%20memorize%20a%20tutor,the%20songs%20(sensorimotor%20phase). This is a study on how zebra finch learn specifically from their mothers. https://cogsci.cornell.edu/news/psychologists-solve-mystery-songbird-learning So bird song is definitely an intentional thing on most birds part. and if not learned properly, will socially stunt said bird. I would consider that deliberate communication , and going by your definition, art.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
Cameras have burst for a reason.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
There's a lot of art. So far it's only digital art. I think "art" overall will be fine. "Art" is soa broad.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-18-06
My definition of a photograph came from Websters Dictionary. I get the telephone is a rarely used for calling and is technically a device. But my point is a prompt is not using a lens of any sort. It’s a composite of copied images from the web. We can agree to disagree but the fact that there’s a photo contest of purely AI images is the dumbest fucking thing I’ve heard all day.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-18-06
Dictionaries tend to lag behind where society is going. Webster doesn’t even define phone as “a pocket sized, general purpose computer”. >the fact that there’s a photo contest of purely AI images is the dumbest fucking thing I’ve heard all day You think that's dumb? People use "terrific" to mean "fantastic" instead of "terrifying".
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-18-06
I already forgot about it until you just commented this and I got the notification lol
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-18-06
It only came in bird place
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-18-06
A lot of programs already do that lol.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-18-06
r/technology
post
r/technology
2024-17-06
r/technology
post
r/technology
2024-17-06
r/technology
post
r/technology
2024-17-06
How likely is it that the hackers have full access to the router hardware and the software updates won’t do anything?
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
r/technology
post
r/technology
2024-17-06
r/technology
post
r/technology
2024-17-06
agree. but if the notes can only be read upon clicking into the video and adding to their view counts, clickbaits, ragebaits..all kinds of baits are still gonna run rampant, because oh you wanna read the notes? come, click on my video first ;)
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
You think adding down votes will only hurt real misinformation? Can I get some of what you’re smoking and or snorting? Because a bunch of crazy anti vaxers or MAGA trump supporters down voting everything real would totally make it better.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
Well, maybe they should stop posting the equivalent of corporate masturbation, then. No one gives a flying fuck about Rewind other than YouTube themselves.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
Is this a combat misinformation angle or this enrich the video with additional information for training data angle?
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
Or unban the comment section
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
I get that having channels pay for their video storage would disincentivize uploading multiple videos, but I don't know why Google won't monetize the channels using their bandwidth and storage space.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
Honestly as much as I hate almost everything Musk has done with Twitter, community notes is actually a pretty cool and useful feature
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
The most common note in repair threads "jump to 10:53 for how to actually get your coffee maker working again"
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
Maybe this is more about you not being as observant or having lower standards than those people? If you use YouTube for lots of How To videos, you realize VERY fast how much you miss the dislike button, because it saved you time not watching those bad videos that waste your time or cause you to damage something with misinformation.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
Everyone can still thumbs down/dislike, I just don’t find myself looking for them. I feel like I usually hear people mention to-do videos, but even those I feel like even if I saw dislikes I would still skip a couple minutes into the video and check comments if it was niche enough that I didn’t have confidence the algorithm brought up a decent video.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
Meant for creators dog. No one deserves to put shit on any video I make.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
Eh, I can see the reason it's gone. Yeah yeah, advertiser stuff, yadda yadda, but there are also legitimate user reasons too - mainly that users abuse the shit out of it to bully people or give false impressions of bad content simply because they disagree with something in the video. This then becomes a feedback loop regardless of what the content in the video is, and it keeps growing in dislikes. You see this happen on Reddit, too - someone makes a great comment on a post, but if 5 or more absolute shitters get in there first and downvote it to hell, it's almost certainly only going to keep going down. People who like it will just assume they misunderstood something that explains why it's so downvoted so they will neither comment or upvote it, or they will misunderstand it themselves because that misunderstanding explains the negative response. It's just easier for any platform to pull out of even offering that negative response and just show the positive stuff.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
Scammers would use it to link to malicious websites. It was poorly moderated. The click box was the size of the video and if you paused it you would be redirected to a non-YouTube website. They would even add boxes on boxes.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
Fu-lfilling their wishes is important. /s
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
youtube wants humans to tell AI what video is about so AI can learn to do it themselves... they don't want to pay people to do it so they call it a feature and ask us to do it for them for free....
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
Then they should make better products lmao
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
*demonetization hammer halts halfway down*
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
no one wants to hear this but this feature works really well on X
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
The real issue is that Elon Musk fucks the platform to spread his own nonsense, and I'm guessing recently decided community notes were getting in the way of that. For example, people might notice that a *lot* of Republican nonsense is no longer getting noted. Doesn't matter how absolutely insane the lie is, there will not be a note on a huge amount of this content. I'm thinking he flagged specific Republican political accounts to be un-noteable.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
Not better at all. Imagine a political video. One side of the political spectrum will thumbs-up, the other thumbs-down. Someone who isn't clear on what's right or true won't get ANY useful information from seeing a thumbs count, up or down. But a notes feature would be incredibly helpful if it provides well-sourced information debunking false claims or conspiracies, for example. Honestly, Reddit should be proof enough that upvotes and downvotes are a garbage system. Plenty of times someone is right but downvoted because people don't like what they said. tl;dr: Notes is information, thumbs is sentiment. Thumbs-down being better than information is nonsensical. The top comment serves as an example.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
I’m going to get downvoted for this but it’s because the dislike bar was fucking worthless. It was only ever used for review bombing CoD trailers and Justin Bieber videos. Every other video on the site had a like to dislike ratio of like 75:25 regardless of quality. The idea that “you could tell what tutorials were actually good” is fucking bullshit too, plenty of worthless tutorials for projects had the same like to dislike ratio, and many of those channels just manipulated the comments and likes with bots, it’s why every bad tutorial channel has cookie cutter positive comments. The other excuse people give is “they were pissed everyone disliked YouTube rewind” which yeah, you were misusing the like feature, people flooded the video downvoted it without watching and left because they were stupid enough to be shocked that a corporation made a corporate feeling video.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
You'd think *good* advertisers would love it because having a video with lots of likes means people will inherently trust the ad more.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
I'm laughing at the idea of an uploader of a political hit piece using his own description box to fact check and debunk his own video
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
Won't somebody puh-LEEZE think of the poor starving billionaire CEOs?
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
If you find that someone is accurate in their notes, you can weight them higher. Do this to enough people and you no longer have to vet every single video, but a tiny amount of users. It also means moderation is easier, as you can clear out an individual Notes user, rather than go through thousands or millions of mislabeled videos by hand.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
They were abused like crazy, made videos often look worse and they didn’t work on mobile. So they weee dropped.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
It'd be worse without them.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
Who asked for this feature?
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
Nothing to do with him. That feature was being developed before he bought it
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
I meant more in the sense of musks "X", ofc it was not him engineering it
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
People who complain about advertisers are the same people who completely refuse to pay for YouTube premium. You're an interesting breed indeed
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
How is that better than adding context to a video? If a video is majority thumbs down it would be nice to have context as to why.  Think of a news clip showing a political candidate giving a speech. Is the thumbs down because they are lying? Because they are unpopular? Because the video was shot with bad quality? There are so many reasons why a video can be “bad”. 
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
They're still salty about Youtube Rewind 2018 being the most disliked video of all time.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
The bomb is not legitimate feedback. You might dislike certain decisions but that doesn't make a piece of content 1/10. Also, review bombers aren't always acting in good faith and they don't always represent the larger community accurately
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
This shit went from "Hey, YouTube is trying something" to " need to be executed" pretty fast
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
As a transgender comment creator, this is going to be a goddamn dumpster fire based on the comments I already get.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
Sounds like comments that pop up obtrusively while you're watching karate videos. Sounds great, the people who pay comments on YouTube videos are generally very rational and not racist.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
This could potentially be really cool, and it's immediately going to be used to ruin every video because people are awful.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
Here's a better idea: tamper monkey script to just remove all nodes flagged as advertisements and/or add dislikes to advertisements. Sure it'll only show for people who have it installed, but as time goes on that number of people will shrink until it hits zero with the way the walmartization of the internet is going.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
<sniffsShirt> <smellsHorrible> <continuesSniffingShirt> <elaine'sThoughtBubble> Why do I keep smelling this shirt?!
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
>Censorship is not quality control. Censorship is sewing someones asshole shut - Violent J
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
It's got a self-selecting bias built in.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
Sounds like **free** *data annotation* to me…🤔
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
That’s exactly what I thought of at first
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-18-06
the bombs only come with the media being reviewed wasn't made in good faith. as such, the bombs *are* the feedback, and very much legitimate.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-18-06
That's factually wrong. I can guarantee you that the acolyte is not the worst show ever made, by any metric (if you are rational) When people review bomb, they vote excessively low scores in order to drown out other voices. You are basically saying your opinion is worth more than the opinions of other people. That's not a legitimate review
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-18-06
I think it was related to flash. And we’re going to run into issues as mobile devices started to take off. I think when they moved to more HTML 5 porting them over was gonna be a pain in the arse so they just got rid of them all together.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-18-06
>When people review bomb, they vote excessively low scores in order to drown out other voices. see, this is why you don't get it. you can't do that if there are enough voices to the contrary. the only way what you're saying works, is that almost nobody likes the turd.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-18-06
Just got my next start up idea
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-18-06
Sounds like you just have unpopular tastes. Or the uncharitable way to interpret it, like you seem to do to those who disagree by accusing them of bad faith, would be to just write you off as some shill who will swallow any mediocre corporate tripe just because it's new product. At any rate, people disliking something you like doesn't make them bad.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-18-06
And video replies.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-18-06
I’m just hoping that it will debunk conspiracy theorist videos, not used to bully small business channels
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-18-06
This'll end well....
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-18-06
r/technology
post
r/technology
2024-17-06
r/technology
post
r/technology
2024-17-06
You telling me laying off huge amount of people who have some to a lot of expertise in your company isnt the best idea? How else will upper managment get their bonuses!?
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06
🤷‍♂️everybody starts from somewhere. They still aren’t new. They’ve been in the industry for a long time and they weren’t fueled by stock market investors trying to make massive profits year after year. It’s like saying Arrowhead Studios is a new company…. Even though they have had a library of successful games in the past. Not as mega as Helldivers 2. But for a indie studio. It’s massive. From Software was basically an indie developer with a huge cult following. Which had a firm fan base. I’ve been a fan of their games since ps2 days, and they never let the fans down.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-17-06