text
stringlengths 0
23.7k
| label
stringclasses 4
values | dataType
stringclasses 2
values | communityName
stringclasses 4
values | datetime
stringclasses 95
values |
---|---|---|---|---|
Google awkward (tm) unlike Alzheimers it remembers your worst faux pas for profit. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-09-06 |
r/technology | post | r/technology | 2024-06-06 |
|
Ya but you know the booster has to be caught. It can’t land on a barge | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-06-06 |
Yeah. It's designed to be caught.
So whether it can land on a barge seems like it would depend on what's on the barge.
I kind of figured they would land on the some other piece of land. One that is downrange.
Obviously not soon. They have a lot of other things to work out before worrying about how to get to max payload. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-06-06 |
You're missing that the person you're responding to is arguing against the other person above saying the technology hasn't improved. So in response they said it had improved.
The person you were responding to wasn't saying, like, "haha yeah fuck the 60s!"
It would be like if we had:
A: We had computers 50 years ago, modern computers are unimpressive.
B: Modern computers can predict protein folding better than humans.
C: You're comparing now to 50 years ago, that's disingenuous.
Here, the comments from A and C are unreasonable. Thank you for coming to my TED talk. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-06-06 |
And that was likely the most incredible achievement of humanity, so far.
That being said, Apollo transported essentially three chairs worth of living space to the moon. Starship has multiple decently sized apartments internal volume, and it's reusable. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-06-06 |
The fin actually still worked. It looked like a zombie coming back to life. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-06-06 |
People spend hours putting their soul into development. If they see their part working as a part of a bigger project, you gotta be hyped. No one is forcing that cheering. I see how it subtly resembles NK, but it is in no way forced. It’s just like sports events. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-07-06 |
Notice the total lack of rebuttal to any of the listed massive boneheaded mistakes Musk has made in the past year. Seriously in denial. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-07-06 |
They might, but I suspect in this case they have enough they can still learn with the V1's that they don't do that. I.e. they haven't even attempted an in-flight relight yet, and depending on how that goes they may need to do some tweaking for V2, so launching the V1's to get that data would be useful. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-07-06 |
I've been following SpaceX with glee since some of the very first Falcon 9 trials, long before they were landing reliably (or in one piece). That they continue to push the boundaries of rocketry and space travel is nothing short of incredible. But Elon revealing himself to be... whatever you want to call him at this point... and, most of the excitement is just gone. It's one thing to separate him from their achievements, but it is another to feel great about those successes when they are inextricably linked to Elon's personal enrichment and public relevance. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-07-06 |
I get that. You can cheer, you can clap, you can pump your fist, high five and all sorts of normal things. When you look like the audience of a 70s studio audience for a gameshow like Price Is Right, what the fuck man...
Instead of like Scientology, they are SpaceXtology. Scary cult of personality NPCs.
I truly hope it was a bit or they were like "don't show up if you aren't going to cheer wildly" but it is almost too orchestrated, both hands in the air? No one does that for long.
I'd feel better if they did like a towel thing or something that sports does but even then people are more individual.
The control room just after that link shows normal celebration. It is mostly elation and smiles, high fives, looking around etc. This was all two handed NPC jumps facing forward.
I'd be scared if I went to like a small town and everyone was doing that in an auditorium, I'd be like "Get Out!" | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-07-06 |
looks like they have a big impact mate, truly company-threatening.
[https://www.cnbc.com/2024/06/06/spacex-starship-fourth-test-spaceflight.html](https://www.cnbc.com/2024/06/06/spacex-starship-fourth-test-spaceflight.html)
I ain't gonna rebuke each of your claims, I simply don't care enough about those specific situations to look them up, but they clearly don't matter.
SpaceX is doing amazing, Tesla is doing Amazing, nothing matters about this, if you don't like him, or you do, whatever, chill out. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-07-06 |
Yup. It's still a waste of money because the taxpayer is paying Boeing double what they're paying SpaceX per launch for the six non-test missions from now until 2030, all for something Boeing is 100% going to abandon after its contractual obligations are up. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-07-06 |
When I think health, I think Boeing. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-07-06 |
I think we've found the delusion right here. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-07-06 |
Elon owns 40% of SpaceX shares and has 71% voting majority in the company. He kinda *is* SpaceX. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-07-06 |
If Boeing held up the deal. At the moment with Atlas retired there are zero human rated compatible rockets available except Falcon 9. And obviously Falcon 9 doesn't offer the desired dual source because it flies the Dragon. If the rocket is grounded from human spaceflight then neither could launch. So when their Atlas supply runs out, that is probably the end for their Starliner.
On the other hand it seems that ISS is past its best by date and will probably be retired before this becomes a critical issue. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-07-06 |
Of its Falcon 9.
This is Starship, a new rocket and is the largest and most powerful rocket ever designed. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-07-06 |
This is a huge step forward for their Mars missions and beyond. Exciting times ahead for space travel! | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-07-06 |
There are other rockets that could reasonably become human-rated: Vulcan most plausibly, but also New Glenn, Terran R, and heck, even Ariane 6 -- once those fly for a few times, of course. Will take a bit of effort, though, and it's a plausible outcome that Boeing will just retire Starliner after the ISS contract runs out. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-07-06 |
In fact, Boeing signing on to the commercial crewed transport program was likely what actually got the program off the ground in the first place -- congress was very leery of funding the relatively untested newcomer SpaceX, but once the venerable and trusted Boeing signed on, the tides turned. Turned out a little different from what was expected, of course... | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-07-06 |
Well, you should be glad for this one then -- this is the first rocket in history that aims to drop no waste in the ocean at all. It just takes a while to get the landing process down, which is why they are testing the first prototypes by landing them into the ocean, so as not to damage the critical rocket launch infrastructure.
Every single other rocket type ever made has been single-use at least in some significant aspects, dropping its spent stages in the ocean or deserts (or on top of sparsely populated countryside in some notable examples from China). | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-07-06 |
> would you say the same when mechanics celebrate at the finish line when they're winning a race in F1?
Those reactions are much more natural. They aren't all facing the camera, they are true joy between the crew, not just forward facing Mii NPCs for the camera. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-07-06 |
Yes but it's not the same rocket, it takes bare minimum of 28 days to turn one of those around.
Also it will be longer than three days, it will be that much for launch prep of a rocket this big, also there won't be any other customers. Only starlink cares about that much payload, everything else uses their other rockets. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-07-06 |
The switch to Stainless was done back in the span of 2018 to 2019 when Starship was just starting to be called Starship (everyone called it BFR back then).
The truth is that the advantages of steel can be seen and were seen in yesterday’s flight when even after sustaining damage the flap still worked and brought S29 to a successful soft water landing.
I am genuinely happy that even though Elon does show involvement in SpaceX, this involvement is **visibly way less** than in his other companies like Tesla and X. This is probably one of the reasons SpaceX is so successful at what it does. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-07-06 |
They are set in their thoughts and can only double down. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-15-06 |
They aren’t doing this. There are no barge landings for the Starship system. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-15-06 |
r/technology | post | r/technology | 2024-06-06 |
|
who cares? enough problems on earth, who cares if billionaires are playing space explorers? | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-06-06 |
Just the long term survival of our species. If you think our problems are bad wait until you see what our grandchildren are gonna have to deal with. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-06-06 |
sure and Space X is not NASA
whatever spaceX develops, it's going to be private, secret and locked | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-06-06 |
I think it’s cool as shit that y’all are just casually talking about rocket science. Whether it’s useful to you or not, that’s sick | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-07-06 |
I'm not disputing explosions, I said some of those explosion were required by law. The craft wasn't certified for orbit, so it had to come back down hard and vaporize, safest way to do it. Other explosions were the result of it being a test regime for a new rocket. If things don't fail you don't learn anything, and with the sheer scale of the rocket there's bound to be things that go wrong.
"there are explosions" isn't a credible arugment against the development of a rocket | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-08-06 |
If things don't explode you learned that your calculations and manufacturing processes were correct. That is the goal. The goal is never an explosion. You are coping and watching too many YouTubers astronauts. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-08-06 |
No the goal is effectively an explosion. SpaceX knew the rocket wasn’t capable of a perfect missions. That’s not their goal. They are launching multiple rockets to test different parts. Initially they were just seeing if the design could lift off. Success. Then they want to test stage separations. Success. Then they wanted to test the boost back burn and some stuff in orbit. Success. Their last test was testing a soft landing for the booster and testing how the heat shield worked. Success.
They are doing iterative development. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-15-06 |
No. Starlink was never active over Crimea due to sanctions the US had put in place a decade ago. Do you really want Musk to just violate US sanctions when he sees fit? Stop falling for Russian propaganda. Your government can’t get enough of Starlink as it’s insanely useful. Many of their military allies are also testing it out because again it’s insanely useful. Countless industries are testing or already using Starlink. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-15-06 |
r/technology | post | r/technology | 2024-06-06 |
|
I'll give ya t'ree fiddy. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-06-06 |
Yeah. Usually when you're looking to get bought you've done the legwork of proving there's a market to sell to. These guys just hopped on the AI hype train and created a worse smartphone that costs just as much and isn't reviewing well. There's cool future potential if the AI is improved and maybe not so dependent on the network, but that's a much harder sell. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-06-06 |
A device u pin on your clothes. Yeah terrible idea | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-06-06 |
Most unrealistic part, they definitely would just shake hands and the seller would leave and they’d put up a clip of them going “those guys just don’t understand what something like this is worth” | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-06-06 |
The reviews I saw mentioned it had a pretty novel way of navigating through menus by detecting the movements of the hand it was being projected on. No idea of they patented it though. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-06-06 |
Practically knocked out the umpire? It killed the umpire and knocked him into something causing a chain reaction that lit the stadium on fire. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-06-06 |
10,000? Who, why? | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-07-06 |
I’m genuinely surprised they sold 10,000 units. Although I’m not really sure what they have that’s worth a billion dollars. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-07-06 |
They must have insane IP to justify a $1 billion dollar deal | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-07-06 |
Who’s paying that? | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-07-06 |
Would this have been a killer add-on device to iOS devices with MagSafe? An AI module on an iPhone, with a projector, and can be detachable to live on its own on your clothes? Can’t help but think this could be an extension of iOS similar to Apple Watch. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-07-06 |
I hear you. It can be overwhelming when AI seems to permeate every aspect of life. What's been bothering you the most about it? | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-07-06 |
I don't think they're deluded. They're grifters. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-07-06 |
Bubble doesn’t mean useless. When the Dotcom bubble popped, we still had the internet. The internet is bigger than before the bubble burst. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-07-06 |
Money laundering never changes | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-07-06 |
An Alexa you can wear, is my guess? | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-07-06 |
I will take few hundred less | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-07-06 |
It sounds like you're feeling overwhelmed by the constant bombardment of AI talk and the hype surrounding it. It's understandable to feel that way, especially when buzzwords become so prevalent that they lose their meaning. Is there something specific you'd like to discuss or learn about that isn't related to AI? | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-07-06 |
Buzzwords, and they pushed it hard to tech tubers (who all hated it). | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-07-06 |
These are perfect for enterprise application like customer support | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-07-06 |
Hu.. So just replace the whole eyeball lenses assembly with a pinhole camera and a fixed focus projector? | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-07-06 |
How bout tree-fiddy? | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-07-06 |
I seem to remember that being the case in the early episodes, before they started pre-screaning everything. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-07-06 |
Mostly because people only remember it blew up. The thing with single-product failure is that everybody is connected to the failure. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-07-06 |
Tbf Steve Jobs seems like he was kind of insufferable. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-07-06 |
Classic startup dream. Not gonna lie I’d aim to do the same thing. Highly doubt it will work though. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-07-06 |
I too am seeking a $1B buyout. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-07-06 |
It's... not special though. Projectors like this have existed for awhile now in that size. You just never see them because who would want to rely on a mini-profector instead of a screen? What exactly is special about it? | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-07-06 |
Apple let Bethany and Imran leave with some ideas that became early Humane parents. They clearly did not want what this would become. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-07-06 |
When was the last time you applied for a job?
Automatic screening is a relatively recent invention | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-07-06 |
You’re proving my point. Most recruiters or hiring managers don’t even bother to look at the prior employer and ATS doesn’t even consider it. Unless it’s a top name in that industry, they don’t care. If you’re qualified based on experience in your resume and have references to back it up, no one cares.
No recruiter or hiring manager thinks a low-level employee could possibly be bad enough to take down a whole company or product. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-07-06 |
No I'm saying they don't approach it with as much nuance as you're thinking they do.
They read skills and past projects and move on.
If one of your past projects was a total shitshow it's still best to just not list it. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-07-06 |
Ha yesterday. I’m well aware of ATS and it isn’t new (though I’m sure LLMs are impacting it somewhat).
Can gaps get you weeded out by the ATS? 100%. But if you’re otherwise a strong candidate for the job, you can still get through. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-07-06 |
Again, you’re proving my point. Prospective employers care about projects, not past employers. This discussion is about past employers, not projects. A failure of a company or the company’s product does not mean that all projects within the company or within that product were failures. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-07-06 |
I think that was the point of the comment. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-07-06 |
Microsoft seems to be making lots of poor decisions these days... | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-09-06 |
r/technology | post | r/technology | 2024-06-06 |
|
Plus it’s not just about messaging. It’s about groups. Feeds. And especially being independent of phone numbers. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-06-06 |
r/technology | post | r/technology | 2024-06-06 |
|
Guy you just straight up lied and got caught and now you're trying to change the argument because you got caught lying....
Like you're not trying to disprove me you're just trying to insult me and change the argument because you got caught. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-06-06 |
If you needed a truck you wouldn't use a model y....but magically you're getting by....
Or just buy crossover problem solved.... | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-06-06 |
I love comments like this because it's so nonsensical.
The same logic as saying "i need to buy a excavator because I might need one in the future" | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-06-06 |
its a small/mid size truck.. you are digging yourself a bigger hole. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-06-06 |
there is no might.... i do frequently. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-06-06 |
Again, you dont know anything about me. I go to the mountains between 7 and 10 times per year minimum, the roads i take are very unpaved, quite a few are two-rut, when theyre not icy and/or snowed on. My wife and i have one vehicle, its a pickup truck. We use the bed pretty often, find it very useful. We're gonna keep driving trucks, and if that makes you think weird thoughts, wellp that's a you problem.
I don't know why youre attacking randos on reddit for liking trucks, dunno who made you the gatekeeper of who drives what, and im not even sure what you're doing here. Don't much care, to be honest. But on the off chance you're not trolling, seek help. What you're doing isn't healthy. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-06-06 |
SURE you do....
Let me guess it's mainly buying bags of stuff like dirt? You know something ANY vehicle....not to mention if you actually needed more space for stuff like that the logical option is a crossover...
I also like how you disproved your own argument of needing one because if you're still doing it when a sedan you didn't need a truck... | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-06-06 |
To be completely honest, it's fantastic.
I've been driving a Golf (I work in a city) before I got the Rivian. I like the tiny car because parking is easy, it gets good mileage, and it's super maneuverable (plus it's cheap so I don't care when it gets door dinged). The Rivian is about the same size as the Tacoma. It has fantastic power, it has a very very nice interior, and it is sooooo quiet and serene inside. The only thing I can complain about is the lack of dial by voice (it might be able to do that but you need Alexa). Also when I was exploring the back country out between NV and CA, the nav didn't work because it's cellular based.
My wife and I have taken it on a bunch of medium to long roadtrips. It's been great. The charging has been great (except LA. Charging at public chargers sucks donkey balls in LA.)
The bad news is that someone hit me in a parking lot and caved in one of my bedsides. The Rivian certified shop is charging 18k to replace that (the bedside is one piece that includes the A, B, and C pillars and the door surrounds). Outside of that, I've only had one real problem, which was the AC not working, but that got fixed under warranty in a day. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-07-06 |
I need them to change the unibody paneling of the R1. A small fender bender shouldn’t result in a $50,000 bill | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-07-06 |
r/technology | post | r/technology | 2024-06-06 |
|
Hello! **Please read this message very carefully.**
Unfortunately, since [your account has less than 10 combined karma](/u/me) and spam from new accounts makes up a significant portion of all spam, your post was automatically, temporarily removed. **Have a tech support question?** Please head over to /r/techsupport, /r/asktechnology, or other tech-centric subreddits listed on the sidebar.
You may still contribute and earn some karma by *commenting* on other existing posts in /r/technology instead. Additionally, you may make meaningful contributions to [other subreddits](/subreddits) to increase your karma count. Tech support questions/opinions/suggestion requests, surveys, blogs, and videos will **NOT** be approved. If this is a legitimate submission that is not covered in the previously listed criteria, please message the moderators to have them manually review your post, or wait a few days and try again.
Thank you!
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/technology) if you have any questions or concerns.* | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-06-06 |
r/technology | post | r/technology | 2024-06-06 |
|
The open scholarly content is not coming fast enough because facts and science take time. Private high quality content creators (publishers of all types) want to be paid. The whole thing seems to feeding on itself now and crashing but they will never admit it because there is too much investor cash on the table. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-07-06 |
r/technology | post | r/technology | 2024-06-06 |
|
I liked Minus One and what it did with that budget is next to extraordinary, but to say it’s better than anything Hollywood has put out in years is a complete overstatement. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-07-06 |
Not at the scale generative AI will generate. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-07-06 |
I mean, he isn't wrong in the sense that it's going to automate and skip many, many steps... It is going to require the industry to adapt and improve because there's going to be those who can use less budget and produce more. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-07-06 |
r/technology | post | r/technology | 2024-06-06 |
|
r/technology | post | r/technology | 2024-06-06 |
|
Sure… “mouse” friction | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-07-06 |
I knew a programmer who worked for a major oil company. Back in the 1980s, his employer envisioned an AI for the mainframe that would run an entire refinery, and would have the ability to over-ride users who might be giving bad instructions in an emergency. The computer would also be able to decide to disregard irregular commands from admins, even if they had all the correct login information and were using the secure terminal.
He finally convinced them that he wouldn't do it, but he never convinced them why it was a bad idea. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-07-06 |
"Doktor, turn off my cringe inhibitors, and inject the AI directly into my cock!" | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-07-06 |
That's because there's no set definition for AI. Artificial intelligence, sure, but it seems like ai now just means a computer doing something. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-07-06 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.