text
stringlengths 0
23.7k
| label
stringclasses 4
values | dataType
stringclasses 2
values | communityName
stringclasses 4
values | datetime
stringclasses 95
values |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Literally all it takes. Every factory/manufacturing job I've worked has safety/QA procedures to follow. They're the first to get skipped when a deadline starts to approach. Its never the leads or supervisors who do this. Always some jackass from the office. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-08-06 |
After the Starliner launch this week I bought some puts. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-08-06 |
i mean nobody would do any business if that were the case, but seriously people know this is an issue and just accepted somebody would die from it (not them). | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-09-06 |
I find the flex on the composite wings to be much more adept at absorbing shocks during turbulence than prior mainly aluminum ones. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-09-06 |
And have a 90% chance of burning to the ground with all occupants inside due to a freak 'lightning strike.' | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-09-06 |
I wonder how he's going to die. It'll be soon, no doubt. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-09-06 |
I don't discount that as implausible, but you're through the AV geek looking glass if you're making that determination from personal experience after a single flight. That just doesn't make any sense. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-09-06 |
Here I thought Western nations were fighting to get *away* from the death penalty. China is NOT a model citizen here. You're ignoring mass nepotism, mass government corruption, horrific worker exploitation, and more to make a very weird point that we don't even have a lot of great data for.
You're using the exact same logic Republicans use to justify executing other criminals. "If you wag death in front of them, they'll stop." | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-09-06 |
Man I thought last thread I saw like this most people were realizing how brain-dead stupid the conspiracy theories sounded but I guess we're back at it.
One guy wasn't even testifying for whistleblowing. The other guy died of an infection and he wasn't testifying either. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-09-06 |
Yeah Boeing totally went and injected that guy with pneumonia....
/s | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-09-06 |
I don't know why you'd worry. Flying on a Boeing plane carries a 0.00003% increased risk over the next-safest aircraft, and both are virtually entirely harmless if you're in the Western world. Almost all other issues stem from poor piloting or poor maintenance/operations.
It's insane that this negative media hype has people genuinely concerned about flying again (not that you're genuinely concerned, but it's out there all over social media, and some people have started changing planes if they can).
More aisle seats for me, I guess? | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-09-06 |
Except that all of these were investigated and publicly reported on.
And none of them have been Fed-worthy. One guy died of suicide before a totally unrelated/personal testimonial and the other died of pneumonia... | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-09-06 |
0.00003% increased risk when flying Boeing. Literally irrelevant. Go fly and stop listening to the internet.
That saying "touch grass" doesn't exist to cyberbully aimlessly. It exists because the internet is loaded with people who genuinely don't get out much and do not speak accurately about the real world outside.
Not telling you to touch grass--telling you to stop listening to the people who need to touch grass. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-09-06 |
It’s coming down to PROFIT over risk. For example a large firm buys a business, executives are told to cut the nuts out of everything, materials, seasoned employees, etc. Previous material cost was $250k now it’s $200k, had 40 employees that took pride in their work @ $26hr. Those are gone and now you have a steady stream of 28 employees at $19hr who try to mean well, but get pushed to their limits end up becoming disgruntled and don’t give a shit | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-09-06 |
This dude better get his affairs in order… 👀 | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-09-06 |
You can't get mad at business people for being greedy when they're not getting punished.
The trick is to make unsafe choices unprofitable. Market forces don't make planes safe, it takes strong regulation. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-09-06 |
McDonnell Douglas is a literal cancer on Boeing. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-09-06 |
I feel like I need to ask the airlines who makes their jets now. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-10-06 |
r/technology | post | r/technology | 2024-08-06 |
|
r/technology | post | r/technology | 2024-08-06 |
|
Will I be able to say "Siri, never offer to change my wallpaper on the lock screen again!" ? | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-09-06 |
The OCD in me would want to vet so many of these things before the AI actions them. What if Mike already owns the anime thing it picked out? What if it was a waifu body pillow? What if it was a waifu body pillow he already owned?! | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-09-06 |
r/technology | post | r/technology | 2024-08-06 |
|
Yep. Put the solar farms in the fucking desert and pipe the power where you need it with HVDC.
This is just another backwater French mayor lining his pockets. It’s rife in that region—or maybe all of France. I mostly lived in Provence. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-09-06 |
They already USE nuclear. This is just typical *bakshish* of the South of France. I bet his friend was the agent for the no-bid contract to do that. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-09-06 |
or parking lots, would be a lot easier and stop cars from getting hot af in the sun | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-09-06 |
France isn't "pushing" for nuclear, they are clinging to a dead idea that clearly did not work. Nuclear is a horrible option. Its so expensive as to be a resource sink that starves out better alternatives. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-09-06 |
And raising a forest when there are better alternatives is still wasteful and bad for the environment.
What about all of the biodiversity that is lost in these sorts of projects? When you start looking at ethics as balancing some sort of equation, you have already lost sight of the actual goal. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-09-06 |
Distributed power is more complicated, yes, but only for the grid operators, who can bear the expense of the added complexity.
Getting a fresh shot at how we design power infrastructure then going back to destructive profiteering over a more ethical solution is beyond maddening. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-09-06 |
It's not like nuclear means you can't do solar energy too though. And the places where you build a nuclear reactor and those that are suitable for solar farms are geographically very different so it's not like it means one or the other.
Not quite sure why they are so vastly against it here tbh | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-09-06 |
Because the person I spoke to is talking generally about radioactive materials used in nuclear fission power plants, and the most common of those is U-235.
That's cool to know, so its not a case of how much radioactivity it has, but how quickly it releases! Thanks! | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-10-06 |
r/technology | post | r/technology | 2024-08-06 |
|
r/technology | post | r/technology | 2024-08-06 |
|
I’m sorry to have offended you.
Maybe you can get AI to summarize our exchange and point out how you acted stupidly? | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-08-06 |
Well, that's perplexing. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-08-06 |
well i pay for 2 newspapers not to mention others on substack. what about you? | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-08-06 |
The war on credibility was lost a long time ago, back when news outlets were questioning Obama birth place like it was a legit line of inquiry. The line from there, to Trump trashing all media as if they’re the national enquirer is a straight line. What we’re looking at now with click bait orgs looking to sell their souls AI content curation is what we get when we value clicks over nuance and truth. Sadly, we don’t value either as a society | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-09-06 |
Where else would it get the information from? Of course it is. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-09-06 |
Most academic institutions and journals consider it plagiarism. You can’t have 70% of your paper be other people’s words just because you cite them, for example | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-09-06 |
The **intelligent** component of AI is just human intelligence — plagiarised. When Chat GPT provides an opinion it does so by aggregating literature written by humans and passes it off as its own thought. When Suno makes music it’s just copying the brilliance of humans and passing it off as its own creation. When you dig down into these large language models it’s just billions of people’s work being syphoned off for some dickhead company’s profit. They’re literally stealing our work without any compensation, royalty, or credit otherwise and our lawmakers are too feeble or corrupted to stop them from making everyone poor through job losses. It’s making me ill. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-09-06 |
Ok? Thats not what I was saying. I’m responding to a comment *deriding current journalistic practices*
You’re coming in mid conversation and acting like my comment has no context… | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-09-06 |
r/technology | post | r/technology | 2024-08-06 |
|
Siri is hot garbage. The only app that makes me want to smash my iPhone into little pieces. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-10-06 |
You don't get to erase your fuckups by saying it wasn't the "real" one | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-10-06 |
r/technology | post | r/technology | 2024-08-06 |
|
They’re not related in any way whatsoever lmao
Phones don’t have HDDs either | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-08-06 |
Did you write this comment with Apple Intelligence | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-08-06 |
I mean, they can run local models for performance/ux reasons, and then later upload a batch of previous prompts(and results/reactions) for training purposes
A whole month of prompts is likely smaller than a single hi res photo auto-uploaded to iCloud | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-08-06 |
What? There's no way in hell I am trusting a giant company to go "Don't worry about our AI software uploading stuff you're doing OFFLINE to our servers. We totally take your privacy seriously!" Sorry but fuck that. If there isn't an option to TURN THIS OFF, then people really need to wake up about how little Apple actually cares about your privacy. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-08-06 |
Source for this? And if it is not Opt-In, then I have ZERO faith in Apple not to go the Microsoft route and eventually keep turning it on or bugging you to turn it on with subsequent iOS updates.
I went to iOS and MacOS away from Android and Windows to ***get away from EXACTLY this type of shit.*** | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-08-06 |
Imagine giving up your privacy so you can set timers. Lmao | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-08-06 |
it’s reportedly opt-in, so very much like siri which can be kept off at the initial setup. and i don’t see how apple wouldn’t make this opt-in given how they’ve been careful when it comes to privacy stuff like this regardless of whether you believe their privacy claims are genuine, they at least always make these things optional | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-08-06 |
Is it me or the A.I. of things isn’t exciting or interesting after all.
The level of fundamental issues it reveals and the fact that none seems to be addressed by either the corporation and the public is actually very worrying.
I am already sick of A.I. visuals. They literally bring nothing. The tech is interesting but the actual applications are pretty dystopian.
Compared to the issues the world and society are facing, A.I. seems off. I don’t care about it. I feel that’s really not what the world needs.
🤷🏻♂️ | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-08-06 |
Don't worry. Just means you won't be able to use the on-device AI either. It'll be either all or nothing.
Do people still GENUIINELY believe Apple is your friend and actually gives two shits about your privacy?? | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-08-06 |
nobody was saying apple is our friend. funny i simply stated a fact that siri is optional, and that the ai feature has been reported to be opt-in too like other stuff they’ve been doing, and some people think i consider apple to be a friend lmao
do people really have difficulty processing simple logic like this? just because you state a fact doesn’t mean you’re supporting or opposing something, it’s merely stating a fact | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-08-06 |
Good, I don't need my car soaking up all the info on my phone too, or vice-versa | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-08-06 |
People laughed at Jack Ma for calling AI "Alibaba Intelligence". | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-08-06 |
https://youtu.be/ulqRsqD0R64?si=Z5NF87WAgIQXeiJr | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-08-06 |
You can call emergency services via voice, send texts via voice and music control for perfectly hands free driving, get search results with spoken responses. I don’t really get the hate; what kind of intelligence do people expect so far? | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-08-06 |
I’m sure it will be as useful as Siri is now. /s | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-09-06 |
Some of your favorite Apple features are AI, just not gen AI. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-09-06 |
It’s opt in so off by default | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-09-06 |
I just hope it’s better than Siri. A cat has more intelligence than Siri. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-09-06 |
I’m curious to see how they’ll try to sell this as their exclusive, innovative idea as if they were breaking new ground in technology.
- Sent from my iPhone | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-09-06 |
Hyundai or literal law? Some countries have it illegal to operate your phone or use a vehicle touchscreen to change media while driving. Ya know, BECAUSE OF ALL THE FUCKING FATAL ACCIDENTS.
Jesus fuck, put your goddamn phone down and pay the fuck attention to the goddamn road. 99.99999999999999% chance the only limitation is you can’t change shit while the vehicle is moving and you fucking hate everyone so much you’ll gladly increase their risk so you can change songs. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-09-06 |
Oh, you mean Foxconn? | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-09-06 |
Yeah but it takes all the fun away, that is what the other guy really is complaining about.
Instead of creating his own code he now has to review the AI's code. Instead of thinking he now merely has to ask the AI fot a specific algorithm and so on.
Thats why many devs are dismissive of it, it turns creative people into code review monkeys. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-09-06 |
I think Apple’s new AI features will probably be lackluster, but my guess is it’s honest to the capabilities of the state of the art. They’ll err on the side of caution. I think generative AI will only be a small portion. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-09-06 |
It’s a fallacy to assume the past is an indication of the future in such a basic way.
However, in general, but particularly with tech, as tech tends to bring about innovations that converge in an eventual ideal form. AI, both narrow and AGI, seem to be exhibiting that pattern.
So if you are going to invoke that argument, then the scope of time is relevant. If you zoom in too myopically your stance seems correct. If you look at the pattern over thousands or tens of thousands of years you are wrong. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-09-06 |
That's the entire point. You might have to wait until we are both in nursing homes for LLMs to achieve the same level of future improvement as they've had in just the past few years.
Diminishing returns hit all technological paradigms that have undergone hyperexponential improvement, LLMs are not special | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-09-06 |
Our thinnest degree of innovation yet | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-09-06 |
Because humans want a challenge, we need it even, most of us. Job content kind of is irrelevant, as long as it challenges us and makes us grow.
AI takes that away, completely. Its the death of the knowledge worker and the dawn of the drone | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-09-06 |
That’s a good one too, a quick note or reminder. Also reading texts out loud, had a car that would do that over Bluetooth. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-09-06 |
Just did a search for my options. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-11-06 |
r/technology | post | r/technology | 2024-08-06 |
|
This is about keyboards, not wide screens, wrong sub | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-09-06 |
r/technology | post | r/technology | 2024-08-06 |
|
r/technology | post | r/technology | 2024-08-06 |
|
It will always just be a complicated algorithm. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-08-06 |
Without even referring to specific use cases, you can see where this is going when it's being applied to all the data processing in every single field including and especially, the very field that makes AI work. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-08-06 |
This just shows a bad grasp on what AI is. Which is somewhat understandable because its overused and everything is basically AI.
Calling it a hype based on some GPT usage is ignorant though. You say LLMs while the article says AI. But there is a lot more going on than just LLMs. Look towards Alphafold and other medicinal appliances of AIs amongst many real life uses.
Issue with the article and your own commentary is that you base it on using GPT and not being aware of the development going on in the field. Concepts as self play alone can potentially be big drivers.
Calling regular scripts and algos AI is hurting the cause sure, but AI is much more than LLMs. Its been in development for decades, GPT has popularized it. There is hype of course, but it also has a ton of substance. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-08-06 |
It’s less Theranos and more Crypto, without quite being NFT.
“AI” has uses, but it isn’t anywhere close to being a paradigm shift. Within 2 years Samsung Fridges will claim to be using “AI” but in a way that benefits no one and does nothing consumers wanted. In 5 years they’ll be onto the next trend. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-08-06 |
nah, that was still pretty early in the blockchain hype cycle. feels more like the day when my mom asked me if she needed bitcoins. that was much later than 2011. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-08-06 |
No I mean when someone turns off the power. It’s just a machine. You can switch it back on and back off and you can do that as much as you want.
When your heart stops it can’t just be switched back on. You might restart it but it’s not the same. Just because it sounds organic is only because it was trained on organic input | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-09-06 |
I don’t take it literally. In fact I thought it was a poor analogy so I provided the literal translation | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-09-06 |
Yeah tried codeium as well and I think it can't have access to all your files at once and that's why it comes up with functions that don't even exist.
But sometimes it does a good job at auto complete. For example I was gonna do a test assert with some weird array offsets and math and it did all that for me in one auto complete.
But for the most part I can't tell it to do anything specific then it just hallucinates weird shit that no one would code. It also loves repeating itself writing the same stuff over and over again. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-09-06 |
u/Chicano_Ducky I am not sure what you mean by not being able to reply when blocked because I certainly don't have you blocked. And here is the [proof](https://imgur.com/mmgNpMi).
But back onto the point of my response. He was in fact correct in saying that the field of medicine is applying AI technologies to great effect. [Here](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10302550/table/tbl0030/?report=objectonly) are some examples. [Here](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10302550/) is the whole paper in case you are interested.
But this is not the only place where AI tech is being used to great effect. It has been applied to Astronomy and cosmology to yield results that would otherwise be unlikely at best. Through [digital sky surveys](https://www.sdss.org/), applications of ML(Machine Learning) to searching for gravitational lensing, ML applications for estimating of photometric redshifts and more. These programs drastically save time for researchers and progress the fields of their respective sciences at speeds otherwise unattainable.
While I get that you didn't say anything about Astronomy. You did say a lot about the medical AI area. And I am hoping that you should now understand that you were simply unaware of the many applications that it CURRENTLY has in those fields.
I understand hating on the current trendy LLM's. But everyone should at least get educated on the actual useful projects before they start saying "AI as a concept is bad because _insert company here_ is cutting corners". | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-09-06 |
The point was you can switch off the power for humans. Yes, you can turn machines back on but you still have memory loss. Data stored in RAM is lost.
When your heart stops, and is restarted, that is quite literally switching it back on.
Humans only know English because they were trained on English. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-09-06 |
The race of AI is to be the first to create something that can automate a massive job fully in any sector and dominate that space. This isn't an if it's a when.
If the hype is telling you it's today, sure it's hype, but if the hype is telling you 5-10 years it's probably not hype. I'm a software engineer for 12 years and I already see the new juniors being left behind as they don't get to do critical thinking of code anymore with the AI assistance just giving them working solutions and pump out generic garbage.
Writing is on the wall my job will disappear, I'm just hoping it's close to retirement and not in 5-10 years, AI experts want me to believe it's 5 years.
Everyone should have a plan for a career transition should your job be automated before retirement, if you are in a target field. My plan is to either have a business and use he AI or become a sparky. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-09-06 |
I did prompt based engineering and it a full file of code that I proofread and made modifications to. Saved me a ton of time as a side project and I suspect and hope others take advantage of it.
This will, of course, mean that everyone who uses AI will be more efficient, if they choose to integrate it.
This is similar to what happened to the army of lawyers for class action suits once the case files were searchable via Google. A lot fewer jobs and needs for lawyers. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-09-06 |
I tried an AI therapist because I have no money. It was pretty good till it started to prescribe me medicine. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-09-06 |
Much like blockchain, all interesting use cases are being ignored as companies mostly focus on fairly pointless, but money-making uses like AI girlfriends, lifeless art, nudes, scams, shitty support bots, and other use cases that make the world a worse place to live. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-09-06 |
this is the best illustration of my gripes with it. people have been given essentially a 'calculator' for a tonne of tech based tasks, and instead of using it to improve the onerous and repetitive parts thereby ameliorating the process, devs of both AI and software have opted to remove processes all together and just produce whatever the fuck hallucination the ai has. i wish it could be implemented as you say, use it on the simple things but leave the big picture aspect out of the equation, it's like when they created electricity someone trying to say electricity itself would turn on the light, and do the washing, without recognising that its utility is its ubiquity, and someone else needs to develop a lightbulb and washing machine to properly channel the power. the end users are gonna determine how they use the power. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-09-06 |
>The current form of AI cannot work without ingesting massive amounts of data, and that data has to come from somewhere.
And? That still doesn't mean it's plagiarism in the way you're claiming.
>It cannot produce novel works.
This is highly debatable. Hell, it's philosophically debatable whether humans can create a fully original idea.
>It’s generously the equivalent of giving someone a book and a pair of scissors and asking them to make a new story by cutting out sentences and gluing them back together in a different order. Amazingly, even that overstates the creativity “AI” is capable of.
You legitimately do not understand how generative AI works based on this example.
>“AI” evangelists love to claim that this is no different than a human finding inspiration in other works of art, but it ignores the fact that a child can draw a picture without ever seeing other works of art first. “AI” cannot. It needs existing material as a starting point from which to plagiarize.
Well sure, because a child has eyeballs and other senses to take in information to recreate. A blind human wouldn't be able to accurately draw a sunset either.
I'm not sure how or why you think this is some kind of gotcha. Almost anything creative requires some kind of input or starting point.
>It’s literally bitcoin all over again, with the same contingent of tech bros explaining that the blockchain is going to revolutionize finance and banking, followed by every other facet of life.
Everyone knew blockchain was a joke from the beginning. But anyone with half a clue can see how AI is vastly different. Keep your head in the sand, luddite. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-09-06 |
No. Tech is too focused on money and numbers that they can doctor and show in a meeting of stockholders. It all seems like an elaborate trick because it kinda is, the focus is not in the right place to make the best out of it and they have to keep playing this game of trying to keep up one illusion for the stockholders and another illusion for the end user.
There's some development but it's always the minimum necessary to achieve the illusions, other than that it's all just a giant sales pitch | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-09-06 |
I don’t think anyone is saying AI is currently or *about to be* dangerous but talking about is as a possibility further down the line | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-09-06 |
That’s because AI isn’t anywhere close to being actually intelligent and it’s not clear that we’re actually capable of designing an actually intelligent AI given that we don’t really understand intelligence in living creatures.
I’ve been saying this for years and everyone disagrees. Tesla has failed with self-driving because they underestimated how intelligent the average human actually is. The only company making full self-driving work is Waymo who actually only operates in areas they’ve fully mapped aka it’s not AI it’s just a fancy train on tracks. The industry has all but explicitly admitted they vastly underestimated the problem.
Since AI isn’t actually sentient much less sapient, it can’t create. It just steals from humans, jumbles the content it stole, and presents it as “original”. That’s why AI “images” are so obviously AI images and AI articles are so poorly written. It has no fucking clue what anything even is so it’s just an advanced copier.
We have not created anything even remotely resembling an artificial intelligence. We’ve just created more complex basic machines that combine the capabilities of lower tech basic machines. There is no AI and there never has been.
And the real threat is AI companies lying about the capabilities of their products to people who put it in charge of our most essential things because they don’t know any better and/or are greedy as fuck. AI WILL crash the stock market in the next 10 years, for example. It’s guaranteed. High frequency algorithmic trading already crashed the market in the 80s. We’re gonna do it again because we’re fucking idiots, the lot of us.
Again, there is no AI and it’s very possible there never will be. Sapience is a helluva a lot more than just doing lots of things quickly and a real AI is gonna need sapience. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-09-06 |
Of course, AI is a false god because there are ***NO REAL GODS***.
The hype is real because AI finally exist and it has been improving with time. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-09-06 |
Oh god, same. I was trying to comp the word ‘comfy’ as if it were made of pillows. Any human reading this can instantly picture this in their mind. Not AI. It’s all hype, just like the metaverse. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-09-06 |
AI is dumber than a child still and will never be much smarter. It doesn't understand the info it gives you so it will always make mistakes. | r/technology | comment | r/technology | 2024-09-06 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.