Datasets:
mfromm
/
AMSR

Dataset card Data Studio Files
xet
Community
1
text
stringlengths
0
1.96k
"Pros: 1- If this approach is accepted by the community, it could remove the need for additional training to the pathologists" "['non', 'non', 'non', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro']" "paper quality"
"2- It is not clear why the histology images were used for denoising network training" "['non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"3- The description of the network architecture is not clear for the reader" "['non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"Are the results on Table 1 heavily dependent on use of these masks" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"Authors explicitly that the work is not intended for segmentation, but many previous shape modeling works (including SSMs) were used as regularization in segmentation" "['non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"Further, there is always the chance that authors are not aware of every piece of related literature (in all of computer graphics), as it might be the case here." "['non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non']" "paper quality"
"While I agree that the linear latent space assumption of PCA is too simplistic and the global effect of PCA latents on the whole shape often undesirable, the ordering of latents according to ""percent of variance explained"" is actually desirable in terms of interpretability" "['non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"Not 100% clear if the IMM method used in the experiments is the method described in section 3.2 (alpha=1/T) ?" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non']" "paper quality"
"The methodological novelty seems insignificant" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"You do not report results for the embryologist trained LSTM , so what do you use this LSTM for?" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non']" "paper quality"
"A mior nitpick: You define all abbreviations except for UBar" "['non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"The introduction and description of the state of the art, in addition to the main limitations of popular algorithms is very clear and interesting to read" "['pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro']" "paper quality"
"The experiments are clearly explained and the results are well presented." "['pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro']" "paper quality"
"Note: the abstract is not included in the PDF" "['non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"The boxplot shows that six outliers are resolved by the AF-Net, so it can be debated if that is clinically relevant to reduce (6/435=)1.4% of the errors" "['non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"It is strange that the T1, T2 generalize well to the validation set but not to the test" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"Opposite to the Method part, it's hard to read the abstract and introduction" "['non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"Some typo problems lie here" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"Overall, the problem the paper tackles is critical, and the proposed network component is effective to some extent" "['non', 'non', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro']" "paper quality"
"On the positive side, the extension of the Gessert model to motion forecasting seems like a useful one" "['non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro']" "paper quality"
"The discussion of the results reveals findings that may well be of interest to others" "['pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro']" "paper quality"
"Section 2: In description of n-Path-CNN3D, extent should be extend Section 2 , Dataset: For data generation, we consider various smooth curved trajectories with different motion magnitudes this is a bit vague , can you provide more information?" "['non', 'non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non']" "paper quality"
"Section 3: combing should be combining" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"Also, I would be convinced that the variance would increase for out of distribution test samples because you used a prior that enforced uncertainty of all labels" "['non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"Now, it is difficult to connect use of prior and improvement in ECE." "['non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"Did you train on some other dataset and test on skin lesion dataset" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"However, if different models were trained for predicting each parameter, not only training but also prediction would not be efficient" "['non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"The model and implementation make sense as far as I can tell from this brief submission." "['pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non']" "paper quality"
"What precisely about predictive coding makes the similarity to brain data expected" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"While it does not seemingly add anything conceptual , the exact implementation is arguably new" "['non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'non', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro']" "paper quality"
"Paper is clear and quite readable" "['pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro']" "paper quality"
"So it fits well with the workshop theme" "['non', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro']" "paper quality"
"Authors could also add some context by considering related works in the computational neuroscience literature , e.g. Stroud et al. Nature Neurosciencevolume 21, pages 17741783 (2018) and pseudo-url (though the latter is very recent)." "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non']" "paper quality"
"While the question of how neural networks may act over concept space is important , I dont think the approach used by the authors correctly adress this question" "['pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"I dont see how the current work adds more clarity to this research direction" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"It would be good to compare and fit the proposed models to real human/primate behavior in normal and pathological conditions and make testable predictions" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"They show images of a single reconstruction but no quantification of reconstruction quality or comparison to previous methods" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"Their statement of the novelty of their method: (1) allowing each feature to have its own transformation was not clear" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"Comprehensive data measurement and modelling pipeline" "['pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro']" "paper quality"
"Very well written" "['pro', 'pro', 'pro']" "paper quality"
"Clear presentation of thorough work, exploring an important question" "['pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro']" "paper quality"
"Would have been great to include another Imagenet-trained architecture, since different architectures have widely varying macaque brain predictivity, and that of VGG16 is not particularly high (Schrimpf et al., 2018 BrainScore)." "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non']" "paper quality"
"It doesn't provide any additional information to the data lines themselves, and it leads the reader to expect these indicate statistically significant comparisons" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"The basic premise is very strange" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"Overall the technical aspects of this paper seem sound" "['pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro']" "paper quality"
"Which leads me to a few concerns" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"Claims of efficiency of more brain-like approaches compared to AI are disingenuous" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"But the individual statements are sometimes seductive" "['non', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro']" "paper quality"
"While it covers important ground , I think the arguments need more refinement and focus before they can inspire productive discussion" "['non', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"It also would have been nice to comment on the relationship of this work to unsupervised (e.g. Hebbian-based) learning rules." "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non']" "paper quality"