Datasets:
mfromm
/
AMSR

Dataset card Data Studio Files
xet
Community
1
text
stringlengths
0
1.96k
"We need more detail to determine whether what the data suggest reflect the subjective perspective of the different users that participated in the study" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"Thirdly, from the discussion of the findings, quotes appear unpacked" "['non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"How representative is it , whats the bigger picture , can it be generalised to other not known scenarios" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"Overall, the analysis lacks clarity, rigour and situated in the literature" "['non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"With a few grammatical typos, it reads as a thread of different perspective, with little grounding in HCI and related field" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"This makes the paper weak, lacking impactful significance , and thus leaning would not argue strongly towards acceptance." "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non']" "paper quality"
"I enjoyed the paper" "['pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro']" "paper quality"
"It is a qualitatively-driven paper , but I believe it provides much insight into what providers would like in patient visualizes, and takes into account how patients already record their information" "['pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro']" "paper quality"
"The writing is clear and the paper is easy to read" "['pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'non', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro']" "paper quality"
"There are a few comments I have about the paper that I describe below." "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non']" "paper quality"
"While identifying the uniqueness of each patients medical conditions and how/why they record information is important , I think this could be greatly shortened to the most pertinent points to demonstrate the differences" "['non', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"Another concern I have is about the disparity between the emphasis on how each patients medical history (and in turn, visualization) is unique, and then the proposal of general design guidelines for creating patient visualizations" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"Overall, I found the design of the study to be sound , as is the data analysis and modeling methodology." "['non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non']" "paper quality"
"I also think that the overall motivation of understanding whether interfaces with distinct visual and motor widths (to use the paper's terms) is interesting" "['non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro']" "paper quality"
"Or, put in a different way, I'm not sure if the study results are all that valuable for designers (given that it's looking at 1D pointing), or whether this type of interface is common enough that it's useful to have a new Fitts' law formula to account for it" "['non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"It seems awkward to use such a similar term here, when C-D manipulation is not the focus" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"This is a nice paper that I believe proposes and novel and useful visualization scheme" "['pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro']" "paper quality"
"However, there is one key weakness which prevents me from being more positive with respect to acceptance : an evaluation of the proposed visualization in practical use through a user study is absent" "['non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"The benefits of the visualization are only demonstrated through qualitative results" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"The paper would have been significantly stronger if the expected benefits were measured in a practical scenario" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"The tool is a very useful and novel contribution , although I have some questions about the validity of the use case scenario" "['pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"The paper further assessed the tool in an exploratory study looking at usability and induced workload, with promising results" "['pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro']" "paper quality"
"Some issues in the study reporting: - What was the scale range for the prior experience questions" "['non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"The actual discussion of the results unfortunately is very limited (especially because large parts of it consist of qualitative reporting), and are mostly a summary, rather than a contextualization of the results within existing work, or statements on implications of the results" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"The paper does discuss limitations , but I think that this section should also address the fact that the study was largely preliminary / exploratory in nature ; there was no comparison condition, nor a discussion of what a baseline condition might look like for this context" "['pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"Despite these weaknesses with regards to the study reporting and discussion, the paper is interesting and showcases good and novel work and I think the GI community would benefit from its presentation (albeit with some changes as suggested above)." "['non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non']" "paper quality"
"However, the paper is weakened by several writing and organizational aspects, and by an odd off-hand report of user feedback" "['non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"The basics of the technique are well-described : the user draws a shape that the system then selects matches for, based on two similarity metrics (one calculated by Pearson's coefficient and the other by a PCA algorithm)." "['pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non']" "paper quality"
"As these two metrics deliver different candidates, the resulting set of trajectories is provided to the user in a set of small multiples illustrating the selected trajectories and sorted by similarity; the user can refine selections, although it was not clear how" "['non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"One main weakness of the paper is manifested here: I found the description of the bins, and how they are calculated, quite confusing" "['non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"I had to re read the paper back and forward to finally tease out what I think is the way it works" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"But this is not clear" "['non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"IN fact, the whole way the user draws the shape is poorly described" "['non', 'non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"The nice video provided was helpful in showing this technique" "['pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro']" "paper quality"
"However, the video alludes to something not mentioned in the paper about directionality : only the Pearson algorithm identifies direction, and even from the video it was not clear how the user selected it" "['non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"These critical areas of confusion around how the process actually unfolds from start to finish should have been more clearly described" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"One would expect that trying some combination would be an obvious step , especially given the unclear feedback from the expert review." "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non']" "paper quality"
"Why dont they include the feedback" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"It sounds like a classic case of theres nothing wrong with our system, just change the user" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"Clarity The presentation is very clear, with pertinent textual and visual explanations" "['non', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro']" "paper quality"
"Originality The review of related work is varied across relative disciplines and well positioned" "['non', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro']" "paper quality"
"ABSTRACT Abstract provides information that is ideally expected : one sentence of context, summary of contribution, explanation of system and methodology." "['non', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non']" "paper quality"
"Obtained results are supported with clear metrics" "['pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro']" "paper quality"
"RELATED WORK The related work is well balanced with a review on visualization dashboards and visualization in medical training with references from diverse related research communities" "['non', 'non', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro']" "paper quality"
"The passive voice of the sentence does not help to identify who posited this reason : the authors of the submission or Vieira et al. [36]?" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non']" "paper quality"
"Also, before initiating collaborations, I would say that all parties must first be aware of each others contributions, so I would rephrase the reason as a ""lack of communication"" among them" "['non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"APPLICATION BACKGROUND This section conveniently introduces domain-specific terms and thus contributes to make the paper standalone in understanding the context" "['non', 'non', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro']" "paper quality"
"Requirement analysis was conducted through focus groups including active participation of domain experts (including involving them in sketching their desired features for data presentation)" "['pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro']" "paper quality"
"Data characterization is assorted with visibly clear understanding and explanation of the domain" "['pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro']" "paper quality"
"Q1 can be reformulated with plural to avoid gender bias (so that this is harmonized with similar efforts along the paper)" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"