Datasets:
mfromm
/
AMSR

Dataset card Data Studio Files
xet
Community
1
text
stringlengths
0
1.96k
"Moreover, instead of showing the consistent benefits of large batch, the authors tune the batchsize as a hyperparameter for different experiments" "['non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"Regarding the theoretical part, I still do not follow the authors' explanation" "['non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"I think it could at least be improved for clarity ." "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'non']" "paper quality"
"Im not sure how impressed I should be by these results" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"Please provide variance measures on your results (within model configuration, across scene examples)." "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non']" "paper quality"
"Are the machinemachine pairs consistently performing well together" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"Framing: there is a lot of work in collaborative / multi-agent dialogue models which you have missed see refs below to start" "['non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"Because of that, the experimental evaluation remains vague as well, as the criteria are tested on one data set by visual inspection" "['non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"Additionally, only one type of regularization was assumed, namely l1-regularization, though other types are arguably more common in the deep (convolutional) learning literature" "['non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"Overall, I think this paper is not fit for publication, because the contributions of the paper seem very vague and are neither thoroughly defined nor tested" "['non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"Detailed remarks: General: A proper definition or at least a somewhat better notion of overfitting would have benefitted the paper" "['non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"You mention complexity of data and model several times in the paper but never define what you mean by that" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"What do you mean by the data being independent" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"I dont understand the assumptions" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"And how do you use that later" "['non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"Although you didnt show anything but only state assumptions or claims (which may be reasonable but are not backed up here)" "['non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"I actually dont understand the purpose of this paragraph" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"Section 3.3 is confusing to me" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"But you state it as if those measures are actually correct, which you didnt show yet" "['non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"My main concern here, besides the motivations that I did not fully understand (s.b." "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"is the lack of measurable criteria" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"While for criterion 1 you define overfitting as 'above the diagonal line and underfitting as below the line, which is at least measurable depending on sample density of the randomization, such criteria are missing for C2 and C3" "['non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"Instead, you present vague of sharp drops and two modes but do not present rigorous definitions" "['non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"You present a number for C2 in Section 5, but that is only applicable to the present data set (i.e. assuming that training accuracy is 1)." "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non']" "paper quality"
"Criterion 2 (b) is not clear" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"I neither understand ""As the accuracy curve is also monotone decreasing with increasing regularization we will also detect the convexity by a steep drop in accuracy as depicted by the marked point in the Figure 1(b)"" nor do I understand ""accuracy over regularization curve (plotted in log-log space) is constant ""?" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'non', 'non']" "paper quality"
"Due to the lack of numerical measures , the experimental evaluation necessarily remains vague by showing some graphs that show that all criteria are roughly met by regularization parameter on the cifar data set" "['non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"In my view, this evaluation of the (vague) criteria is not fit for showing their possible merit ." "['non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'non']" "paper quality"
"Although the concept of normalizing flow is simple, and it has been applied to other models such as VAE , there seems no work on applying it for policy optimization" "['non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro']" "paper quality"
"Thus I think this method is itself interesting" "['non', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro']" "paper quality"
"However, I find the paper written in a way assuming readers very familiar with related concept and algorithms in reinforcement learning" "['non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"Thus although one can get the general idea on how the method works , it might be difficult to get a deeper understanding on some details" "['non', 'non', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"For example, normalizing flows are defined in Section 4, and then it is directly claimed that normalizing flows can be applied to policy optimization, without giving details on how it is actually applied, e.g., what is the objective function" "['non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"Also, in the experiments, it is said that one can combing normalizing flows with TRPO without describing the details" "['non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"The experiments also talk about 2D bandit problem, and again, without any descriptions" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"It seems that the authors only use the basic normalizing flow structures studied in Rezende&Mohamed (2015) and Dinh et al (2016)" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"However, there are more powerful variants of normalizing flows such as the Multiplicative Normalizing Flows or the Glow" "['non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"Update: I feel the idea of this paper is straightforward, and the contribution is incremental" "['non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"To improve the paper, stronger experiments need to be performed ." "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'non']" "paper quality"
"The paper is fairly well written and structured, and it seems technically sound" "['pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro']" "paper quality"
"Experiments are convincing" "['pro', 'pro', 'pro']" "paper quality"
"Some minor issues: Figure 2 is not referenced anywhere in the main text" "['non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"Figure 5 is referenced in the main text after figure 6" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"Even if intuitively understandable, all parameters in equations should be explicitly described (e.g., h,w,H,W in eq.1)" "['non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non']" "paper quality"
"This idea is simple and works well" "['pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro']" "paper quality"
"Since the method requires updating multiple Q-functions, it may cost much more time for each RL time step, so Im not sure whether the ensemble method can outperform the non-ensemble one within the same time period" "['non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"However, the authors didnt show these results in the paper" "['non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"Minor things: + The main idea is described too sketchily" "['non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"I think more examples, such as in section 8.1, should be put in the main text" "['non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"STRENGTHS + Decoupling instruction-to-action mapping by introducing goals as a learned intermediate representation has advantages, particularly for goal-directed instructions" "['non', 'non', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro']" "paper quality"