Datasets:
mfromm
/
AMSR

Dataset card Data Studio Files
xet
Community
1
text
stringlengths
0
1.96k
"However, it does not clearly explain the key insights of why it could perform better" "['non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"How could it improve over the traditional tree policy (e.g., UCT) for the selection step in MCTS" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"For example, in line 8 of Algorithm 2, why only the top 3 child nodes are added to the queue" "['non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"The complexity bound in Theorem 1 is hard to understand" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"It does not give the explicit relations of the sample complexity with respect to different quantities in the algorithms" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"In particular, the probability in the second term of Theorem 1 is hard to parse" "['non', 'non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"The authors give some concrete examples in Section 6.2 for these bounds" "['pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro']" "paper quality"
"However, it would be better to have some discussion earlier right after these theorems are presented" "['non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"The experimental results are carried out under the very simplified settings for both the proposed algorithm and the baseline MCTS" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"It is not clear whether such assumptions hold for practical problems" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"In practice, this is not true because even at the leaf node the value could still be estimated by an inaccurate value network (e.g., AlphaGo or AlphaZero)." "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non']" "paper quality"
"In the first paragraph of Section 6.2, there is a typo : V*=V_{l*}=\eta should be V*-V_{l*}=\eta ?" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non']" "paper quality"
"b) In the related work section, very little is said about Bin Packing Problems" "['non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"Again, a brief discussion about those results would be relevant" "['non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"d) The problem formulation is very unclear" "['non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"Namely, the state representation is ambiguous: pseudo-formula is obviously not a boolean variable, but a boolean vector (where each component is associated with an item)" "['non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"Nothing is said about actions and transitions and rewards (we have to read the AC framework in order to get a clue of these components)." "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non']" "paper quality"
"e) The Actor-Critic framework, coupled with a conditional query learning algorithm, is unfortunately unintelligible due to the fact that many notations are left unspecified" "['non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"For example, in Eq (1) what are the dimensions K and V" "['non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"In Eq (2) what is d_i" "['non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"In the algorithm what is n_{gae}" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"Also in the algorithm, what are l_i, w_i and h_i" "['non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"The structure of the paper is strange because it discusses attribution priors but then they are not used for the method" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"The paper should have a single focus" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"It is not clear which model is used in Figure 2" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"It is also not clear from the literature if these models are really working so I think these results should be presented in a more detail" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"As I understand it, real improvements in predicting clinical variables has not been shown to be reproducible so this would be a significant claim of this paper" "['non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"It is not clear if the paper is presenting ""expected gradients"" or existing attribution priors" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"Is it just smoothing ?" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'non']" "paper quality"
"For the negative phase, the authors use two separate variational approximations, one of which involves the modeling of the latent variable prior under the approximating distribution, The approach is novel , as far as I know, though not particularly so, and I view this as one of the weak point of the paper" "['non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"That said, it does seems like a fairly creative combination of existing approaches" "['non', 'non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"The result is fairly obvious , but the conditions for validity have interesting consequences for the training algorithm, as it relates the approximation error to the norm of the gradient of the ELBO loss" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'non', 'non', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro']" "paper quality"
"I have a minor issue with the discussion (in the last paragraph of sec. 3.2) stating that the theoretical statement of the proposed objective relies on a much weaker assumption than the nonparametric assumption made in the theoretical justification of GANs" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"Clarity: I found the paper to be very well written with a clear exposition of the material and sound development of the technical details" "['non', 'non', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro']" "paper quality"
"What is unique about the MRF formalism that -- for practical applications -- could not be effectively captured in a directed graphical model" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"I note that I am aware of the theoretical representation differences between directed and undirected models, I am wondering how these differences actually matter in practical applications at scale" "['non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"Experiments: The authors show the empirical advantages offered by the proposed method over the existing literature" "['non', 'non', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro']" "paper quality"
"Its absence seems like a serious omission" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"I am somewhat alarmed at the use of 100 updates of the joint model q(v,h) (K1 = 100) for every update of the other parameters" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"The comparison to PCD-1 in Fig. 3 seems a bit unfair in that the learning curve ends at 8000 iterations, while PCD-1 continues to improve NLL" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"I would like to see this curve extended until we start to see signs of overfitting" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"I would also like to see a comparison to CD-k, which often outperforms PCD-k" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"While I understand the stance taken by the authors that these methods leverage the tractability of the conditional distributions, these strategies are sufficiently general to be considered widely applicable and a true competitor for AdVIL" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"With respect to Deep Boltzmann Machine (DBM), I would prefer to see quantitative comparisons against published results" "['non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"Here again, MNIST would be a useful dataset" "['non', 'non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"It seems as though, in the application of AdVIL to the DBM, the authors are exploiting the structure of the model in how they define their sampling procedure" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"More detail for this application of AdVIL would be nice" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"Also, I would like to see the test estimated NLL (via AIS) learning curves for VCD and AdVIL" "['non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"Given the comparison to PCD in the RBM setting, I am somewhat surprised that AdVIL is so competitive with VCD in the case of the DBM ." "['pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'non']" "paper quality"
"Strenghts: + the paper proposes a reasonable way to try to improve accuracy by identifying hard-negative examples + the paper is well written , but it would benefit from another round of proofreading for grammar and clarity Weaknesses: - performance of the proposed method highly depends on labels of hard-negative examples" "['non', 'non', 'non', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'non', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"