Datasets:
mfromm
/
AMSR

Dataset card Data Studio Files
xet
Community
1
text
stringlengths
0
1.96k
"If there is an issue with Tran et al you should state it clearly, if not, you should accept their results" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"It is fine that you give your method a name (although I personally dislike it), but a bit weird not to explain it" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"Finally, I would very much have liked to to see a frame from one of the videos" "['non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"The decision to supervised the feature extraction in a multi-task setting is good and makes sense" "['pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro']" "paper quality"
"Good and convincing results when compared to competing methods * Strong validation * It is a shame that the Kaplan-Meier estimator was not repeated for all baselines to further illustrate the strength of the multi-task features * There are many more TUPAC16 results [pseudo-url." "['pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'non', 'pro', 'pro', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"pseudo-url] yet the presented method is benchmarked only against 3" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"It would be helpful to put the results in context with all other methods such as automatic and semi-automatic methods" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"Moreover, is there is a reason you did not validate on all TUPAC16 tasks The is well written paper with a clear description of the state of the art and the reasoning behind the presented method" "['non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro']" "paper quality"
"The method is well explained and the validation is strong with convincing results versus state of the art methods." "['pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro']" "paper quality"
"The work also raises some interesting points regarding multi-task training for pathology and with further work could be a good paper" "['pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro']" "paper quality"
"The motivation and methodology are well explained with proper reference works" "['pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro']" "paper quality"
"Improvement on plaque detection is signification" "['pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro']" "paper quality"
"Comment: It would nice if the authors could also show some visualisations of the latent space, with comparisons between with and without the constraint" "['non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"Main problem: The authors mention ""the AF are sonographer dependent, and its accuracy depends on the sonographer's experience" "['non', 'non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"If a sonographer is able to acquire these images, they are also able to perform these measurements" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"It is an interesting idea and the quality is overall rather good for an abstract paper" "['pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'non', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro']" "paper quality"
"Some points to address are listed in the following: The early stopping is not clear" "['non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"It is not clear whether T1 and T2 is available for all cases (mostly) In Table 1, bold results are not always the best, this is very misleading" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"The idea of learning convolution weights for different input image quality is novel" "['pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro']" "paper quality"
"The method part is well-written and easy to understand" "['pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro']" "paper quality"
"It conducts extensive experiments for three different settings and the results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method .1)." "['pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'non', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'non', 'non', 'non']" "paper quality"
"The authors do not compare the inference speed of the proposed method with others" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"Results show the effectiveness of the proposed method" "['pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro']" "paper quality"
"But the writing needs to be improved" "['non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"The novelty of the proposed framework is to take the label structure into account and to learn label dependencies, based on the idea of conditional learning in (Chen et al., 2019) and the lung disease hierarchy of the CheXpert dataset (Irvin and al., 2019)." "['pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non']" "paper quality"
"The method is then shown to significantly outperform the state-of-the-art methods of (Irvin and al., 2019; Allaouzi and Ahmed, 2019)." "['pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non']" "paper quality"
"The paper reads well and the methodology seems to be interesting" "['pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'non', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro']" "paper quality"
"I only regret the fact that this is a short paper , and there is therefore not enough space for a more formal description and discussion of the methodology" "['non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"Meanwhile, a few clarifications may be necessary: 1) in term of runtime, does the addition of GRUs take much more training time and memory comparing to the concatenation of 3D volumes?" "['non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"2) what is the dimension of input, is it W D or H W D$ ?" "['non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"If it's the latter one, is the convolution done with a 4D filter" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"3) more details about the convGRU may be useful, for example its architecture." "['non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"The conclusion is more like a validation for the usefulness of the temporal information, while technical novelty may not be very sufficient in this case" "['non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"The methods employed seem reasonable and quantitative evaluation is performed to compare them" "['pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'non', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro']" "paper quality"
"However, one weakness of the paper was that the details of the experimental setup for data generation were not clear without following up the Gessert et al (2019) reference" "['non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"Other specific suggestions: Section 2: region of interest (ROI) performing motions does not make sense to me" "['non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"From table 1, it is clear that ECE is much lower for the proposed method" "['pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro']" "paper quality"
"It is not clear why calibration is reported and not simple measures of uncertainty like variance or entropy" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"What is the experimental setup" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"Overall, the idea is fine ." "['non', 'non', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'non']" "paper quality"
"The paper is written very well , the implementation details are provided to help reproducing the results" "['pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'non', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro']" "paper quality"
"The method was tested on two different datasets, which is impressive" "['pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro']" "paper quality"
"If this is true, the model is not efficient" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"Contrast normalization yielded the best results for detecting meniscus tears, and layer normalization for detecting the remaining pathologies.The algorithm was explained very well" "['non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro']" "paper quality"
"The results are also very nice" "['pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro']" "paper quality"
"automatic patient data anonymity and data cleansing are important topics - the results look good with a big but (see below) - this is clearly an application paper, testing well known methods in a new scenario." "['non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non']" "paper quality"
"No effort has been made to fuse the proposed pipeline into a medical-image analysis specific methodological contribution" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"Why is for example the output temporally smoothed instead of using spatio-temporal consistency in higher dimensional networks?" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"Why hasn't the semi-supervised paradigm be explored in more detail instead of only using a few biasing iterations with user input?" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"A radical ablation study is clearly missing here" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"