premise
stringlengths 923
1.41k
| hypothesis
stringlengths 11
33
| label
stringclasses 4
values |
|---|---|---|
Cuthbert is not attentive.
Herbert is not chestnut.
Luna is weak.
Luna is not expensive.
Cuthbert is chestnut.
Chester is expensive.
Cuthbert is not versatile.
Rosie is not chestnut.
Herbert is not weak.
Rosie is expensive.
Rosie is sweet.
Uriah is chestnut.Someone being both not sweet and chestnut is equivalent to being attentive and not expensive.
Someone who is sweet or versatile is always not attentive and not expensive.
Someone being both expensive and weak is equivalent to being not chestnut.
If Herbert is not attentive or Uriah is not versatile, then Caldwell is weak.
if there is at least one people who is expensive and not chestnut, then Rosie is not versatile and Luna is not attentive.
It can be concluded that Luna is not attentive once knowing that Chester is not chestnut.
If there is at least one people who is both versatile and sweet, then Rosie is weak.
If there is at least one people who is both not sweet and chestnut, then Cuthbert is not weak.
Cuthbert being chestnut implies that Uriah is weak and Uriah is sweet.
If there is at least one people who is expensive, then Cuthbert is not weak and Uriah is not chestnut.
If someone is expensive, then he is not weak.
Someone who is eithor expensive or not sweet is always not chestnut. | Herbert is not versatile. | neutral |
Cuthbert is not attentive.
Herbert is not chestnut.
Luna is weak.
Luna is not expensive.
Cuthbert is chestnut.
Chester is expensive.
Cuthbert is not versatile.
Rosie is not chestnut.
Herbert is not weak.
Rosie is expensive.
Rosie is sweet.
Uriah is chestnut.Someone being both not sweet and chestnut is equivalent to being attentive and not expensive.
Someone who is sweet or versatile is always not attentive and not expensive.
Someone being both expensive and weak is equivalent to being not chestnut.
If Herbert is not attentive or Uriah is not versatile, then Caldwell is weak.
if there is at least one people who is expensive and not chestnut, then Rosie is not versatile and Luna is not attentive.
It can be concluded that Luna is not attentive once knowing that Chester is not chestnut.
If there is at least one people who is both versatile and sweet, then Rosie is weak.
If there is at least one people who is both not sweet and chestnut, then Cuthbert is not weak.
Cuthbert being chestnut implies that Uriah is weak and Uriah is sweet.
If there is at least one people who is expensive, then Cuthbert is not weak and Uriah is not chestnut.
If someone is expensive, then he is not weak.
Someone who is eithor expensive or not sweet is always not chestnut. | Rosie is not sweet. | contradiction |
Cuthbert is not attentive.
Herbert is not chestnut.
Luna is weak.
Luna is not expensive.
Cuthbert is chestnut.
Chester is expensive.
Cuthbert is not versatile.
Rosie is not chestnut.
Herbert is not weak.
Rosie is expensive.
Rosie is sweet.
Uriah is chestnut.Someone being both not sweet and chestnut is equivalent to being attentive and not expensive.
Someone who is sweet or versatile is always not attentive and not expensive.
Someone being both expensive and weak is equivalent to being not chestnut.
If Herbert is not attentive or Uriah is not versatile, then Caldwell is weak.
if there is at least one people who is expensive and not chestnut, then Rosie is not versatile and Luna is not attentive.
It can be concluded that Luna is not attentive once knowing that Chester is not chestnut.
If there is at least one people who is both versatile and sweet, then Rosie is weak.
If there is at least one people who is both not sweet and chestnut, then Cuthbert is not weak.
Cuthbert being chestnut implies that Uriah is weak and Uriah is sweet.
If there is at least one people who is expensive, then Cuthbert is not weak and Uriah is not chestnut.
If someone is expensive, then he is not weak.
Someone who is eithor expensive or not sweet is always not chestnut. | Cuthbert is versatile. | contradiction |
Cuthbert is not attentive.
Herbert is not chestnut.
Luna is weak.
Luna is not expensive.
Cuthbert is chestnut.
Chester is expensive.
Cuthbert is not versatile.
Rosie is not chestnut.
Herbert is not weak.
Rosie is expensive.
Rosie is sweet.
Uriah is chestnut.Someone being both not sweet and chestnut is equivalent to being attentive and not expensive.
Someone who is sweet or versatile is always not attentive and not expensive.
Someone being both expensive and weak is equivalent to being not chestnut.
If Herbert is not attentive or Uriah is not versatile, then Caldwell is weak.
if there is at least one people who is expensive and not chestnut, then Rosie is not versatile and Luna is not attentive.
It can be concluded that Luna is not attentive once knowing that Chester is not chestnut.
If there is at least one people who is both versatile and sweet, then Rosie is weak.
If there is at least one people who is both not sweet and chestnut, then Cuthbert is not weak.
Cuthbert being chestnut implies that Uriah is weak and Uriah is sweet.
If there is at least one people who is expensive, then Cuthbert is not weak and Uriah is not chestnut.
If someone is expensive, then he is not weak.
Someone who is eithor expensive or not sweet is always not chestnut. | Herbert is versatile. | neutral |
Cuthbert is not attentive.
Herbert is not chestnut.
Luna is weak.
Luna is not expensive.
Cuthbert is chestnut.
Chester is expensive.
Cuthbert is not versatile.
Rosie is not chestnut.
Herbert is not weak.
Rosie is expensive.
Rosie is sweet.
Uriah is chestnut.Someone being both not sweet and chestnut is equivalent to being attentive and not expensive.
Someone who is sweet or versatile is always not attentive and not expensive.
Someone being both expensive and weak is equivalent to being not chestnut.
If Herbert is not attentive or Uriah is not versatile, then Caldwell is weak.
if there is at least one people who is expensive and not chestnut, then Rosie is not versatile and Luna is not attentive.
It can be concluded that Luna is not attentive once knowing that Chester is not chestnut.
If there is at least one people who is both versatile and sweet, then Rosie is weak.
If there is at least one people who is both not sweet and chestnut, then Cuthbert is not weak.
Cuthbert being chestnut implies that Uriah is weak and Uriah is sweet.
If there is at least one people who is expensive, then Cuthbert is not weak and Uriah is not chestnut.
If someone is expensive, then he is not weak.
Someone who is eithor expensive or not sweet is always not chestnut. | Uriah is not sweet. | contradiction |
Cuthbert is not attentive.
Herbert is not chestnut.
Luna is weak.
Luna is not expensive.
Cuthbert is chestnut.
Chester is expensive.
Cuthbert is not versatile.
Rosie is not chestnut.
Herbert is not weak.
Rosie is expensive.
Rosie is sweet.
Uriah is chestnut.Someone being both not sweet and chestnut is equivalent to being attentive and not expensive.
Someone who is sweet or versatile is always not attentive and not expensive.
Someone being both expensive and weak is equivalent to being not chestnut.
If Herbert is not attentive or Uriah is not versatile, then Caldwell is weak.
if there is at least one people who is expensive and not chestnut, then Rosie is not versatile and Luna is not attentive.
It can be concluded that Luna is not attentive once knowing that Chester is not chestnut.
If there is at least one people who is both versatile and sweet, then Rosie is weak.
If there is at least one people who is both not sweet and chestnut, then Cuthbert is not weak.
Cuthbert being chestnut implies that Uriah is weak and Uriah is sweet.
If there is at least one people who is expensive, then Cuthbert is not weak and Uriah is not chestnut.
If someone is expensive, then he is not weak.
Someone who is eithor expensive or not sweet is always not chestnut. | Herbert is chestnut. | contradiction |
Cuthbert is not attentive.
Herbert is not chestnut.
Luna is weak.
Luna is not expensive.
Cuthbert is chestnut.
Chester is expensive.
Cuthbert is not versatile.
Rosie is not chestnut.
Herbert is not weak.
Rosie is expensive.
Rosie is sweet.
Uriah is chestnut.Someone being both not sweet and chestnut is equivalent to being attentive and not expensive.
Someone who is sweet or versatile is always not attentive and not expensive.
Someone being both expensive and weak is equivalent to being not chestnut.
If Herbert is not attentive or Uriah is not versatile, then Caldwell is weak.
if there is at least one people who is expensive and not chestnut, then Rosie is not versatile and Luna is not attentive.
It can be concluded that Luna is not attentive once knowing that Chester is not chestnut.
If there is at least one people who is both versatile and sweet, then Rosie is weak.
If there is at least one people who is both not sweet and chestnut, then Cuthbert is not weak.
Cuthbert being chestnut implies that Uriah is weak and Uriah is sweet.
If there is at least one people who is expensive, then Cuthbert is not weak and Uriah is not chestnut.
If someone is expensive, then he is not weak.
Someone who is eithor expensive or not sweet is always not chestnut. | Cuthbert is not attentive. | entailment |
Cuthbert is not attentive.
Herbert is not chestnut.
Luna is weak.
Luna is not expensive.
Cuthbert is chestnut.
Chester is expensive.
Cuthbert is not versatile.
Rosie is not chestnut.
Herbert is not weak.
Rosie is expensive.
Rosie is sweet.
Uriah is chestnut.Someone being both not sweet and chestnut is equivalent to being attentive and not expensive.
Someone who is sweet or versatile is always not attentive and not expensive.
Someone being both expensive and weak is equivalent to being not chestnut.
If Herbert is not attentive or Uriah is not versatile, then Caldwell is weak.
if there is at least one people who is expensive and not chestnut, then Rosie is not versatile and Luna is not attentive.
It can be concluded that Luna is not attentive once knowing that Chester is not chestnut.
If there is at least one people who is both versatile and sweet, then Rosie is weak.
If there is at least one people who is both not sweet and chestnut, then Cuthbert is not weak.
Cuthbert being chestnut implies that Uriah is weak and Uriah is sweet.
If there is at least one people who is expensive, then Cuthbert is not weak and Uriah is not chestnut.
If someone is expensive, then he is not weak.
Someone who is eithor expensive or not sweet is always not chestnut. | Chester is not sweet. | neutral |
Cuthbert is not attentive.
Herbert is not chestnut.
Luna is weak.
Luna is not expensive.
Cuthbert is chestnut.
Chester is expensive.
Cuthbert is not versatile.
Rosie is not chestnut.
Herbert is not weak.
Rosie is expensive.
Rosie is sweet.
Uriah is chestnut.Someone being both not sweet and chestnut is equivalent to being attentive and not expensive.
Someone who is sweet or versatile is always not attentive and not expensive.
Someone being both expensive and weak is equivalent to being not chestnut.
If Herbert is not attentive or Uriah is not versatile, then Caldwell is weak.
if there is at least one people who is expensive and not chestnut, then Rosie is not versatile and Luna is not attentive.
It can be concluded that Luna is not attentive once knowing that Chester is not chestnut.
If there is at least one people who is both versatile and sweet, then Rosie is weak.
If there is at least one people who is both not sweet and chestnut, then Cuthbert is not weak.
Cuthbert being chestnut implies that Uriah is weak and Uriah is sweet.
If there is at least one people who is expensive, then Cuthbert is not weak and Uriah is not chestnut.
If someone is expensive, then he is not weak.
Someone who is eithor expensive or not sweet is always not chestnut. | Chester is not attentive. | neutral |
Cuthbert is not attentive.
Herbert is not chestnut.
Luna is weak.
Luna is not expensive.
Cuthbert is chestnut.
Chester is expensive.
Cuthbert is not versatile.
Rosie is not chestnut.
Herbert is not weak.
Rosie is expensive.
Rosie is sweet.
Uriah is chestnut.Someone being both not sweet and chestnut is equivalent to being attentive and not expensive.
Someone who is sweet or versatile is always not attentive and not expensive.
Someone being both expensive and weak is equivalent to being not chestnut.
If Herbert is not attentive or Uriah is not versatile, then Caldwell is weak.
if there is at least one people who is expensive and not chestnut, then Rosie is not versatile and Luna is not attentive.
It can be concluded that Luna is not attentive once knowing that Chester is not chestnut.
If there is at least one people who is both versatile and sweet, then Rosie is weak.
If there is at least one people who is both not sweet and chestnut, then Cuthbert is not weak.
Cuthbert being chestnut implies that Uriah is weak and Uriah is sweet.
If there is at least one people who is expensive, then Cuthbert is not weak and Uriah is not chestnut.
If someone is expensive, then he is not weak.
Someone who is eithor expensive or not sweet is always not chestnut. | Rosie is not chestnut. | entailment |
Cuthbert is not attentive.
Herbert is not chestnut.
Luna is weak.
Luna is not expensive.
Cuthbert is chestnut.
Chester is expensive.
Cuthbert is not versatile.
Rosie is not chestnut.
Herbert is not weak.
Rosie is expensive.
Rosie is sweet.
Uriah is chestnut.Someone being both not sweet and chestnut is equivalent to being attentive and not expensive.
Someone who is sweet or versatile is always not attentive and not expensive.
Someone being both expensive and weak is equivalent to being not chestnut.
If Herbert is not attentive or Uriah is not versatile, then Caldwell is weak.
if there is at least one people who is expensive and not chestnut, then Rosie is not versatile and Luna is not attentive.
It can be concluded that Luna is not attentive once knowing that Chester is not chestnut.
If there is at least one people who is both versatile and sweet, then Rosie is weak.
If there is at least one people who is both not sweet and chestnut, then Cuthbert is not weak.
Cuthbert being chestnut implies that Uriah is weak and Uriah is sweet.
If there is at least one people who is expensive, then Cuthbert is not weak and Uriah is not chestnut.
If someone is expensive, then he is not weak.
Someone who is eithor expensive or not sweet is always not chestnut. | Uriah is weak. | self_contradiction |
Cuthbert is not attentive.
Herbert is not chestnut.
Luna is weak.
Luna is not expensive.
Cuthbert is chestnut.
Chester is expensive.
Cuthbert is not versatile.
Rosie is not chestnut.
Herbert is not weak.
Rosie is expensive.
Rosie is sweet.
Uriah is chestnut.Someone being both not sweet and chestnut is equivalent to being attentive and not expensive.
Someone who is sweet or versatile is always not attentive and not expensive.
Someone being both expensive and weak is equivalent to being not chestnut.
If Herbert is not attentive or Uriah is not versatile, then Caldwell is weak.
if there is at least one people who is expensive and not chestnut, then Rosie is not versatile and Luna is not attentive.
It can be concluded that Luna is not attentive once knowing that Chester is not chestnut.
If there is at least one people who is both versatile and sweet, then Rosie is weak.
If there is at least one people who is both not sweet and chestnut, then Cuthbert is not weak.
Cuthbert being chestnut implies that Uriah is weak and Uriah is sweet.
If there is at least one people who is expensive, then Cuthbert is not weak and Uriah is not chestnut.
If someone is expensive, then he is not weak.
Someone who is eithor expensive or not sweet is always not chestnut. | Rosie is sweet. | entailment |
Cuthbert is not attentive.
Herbert is not chestnut.
Luna is weak.
Luna is not expensive.
Cuthbert is chestnut.
Chester is expensive.
Cuthbert is not versatile.
Rosie is not chestnut.
Herbert is not weak.
Rosie is expensive.
Rosie is sweet.
Uriah is chestnut.Someone being both not sweet and chestnut is equivalent to being attentive and not expensive.
Someone who is sweet or versatile is always not attentive and not expensive.
Someone being both expensive and weak is equivalent to being not chestnut.
If Herbert is not attentive or Uriah is not versatile, then Caldwell is weak.
if there is at least one people who is expensive and not chestnut, then Rosie is not versatile and Luna is not attentive.
It can be concluded that Luna is not attentive once knowing that Chester is not chestnut.
If there is at least one people who is both versatile and sweet, then Rosie is weak.
If there is at least one people who is both not sweet and chestnut, then Cuthbert is not weak.
Cuthbert being chestnut implies that Uriah is weak and Uriah is sweet.
If there is at least one people who is expensive, then Cuthbert is not weak and Uriah is not chestnut.
If someone is expensive, then he is not weak.
Someone who is eithor expensive or not sweet is always not chestnut. | Herbert is not weak. | self_contradiction |
Cuthbert is not attentive.
Herbert is not chestnut.
Luna is weak.
Luna is not expensive.
Cuthbert is chestnut.
Chester is expensive.
Cuthbert is not versatile.
Rosie is not chestnut.
Herbert is not weak.
Rosie is expensive.
Rosie is sweet.
Uriah is chestnut.Someone being both not sweet and chestnut is equivalent to being attentive and not expensive.
Someone who is sweet or versatile is always not attentive and not expensive.
Someone being both expensive and weak is equivalent to being not chestnut.
If Herbert is not attentive or Uriah is not versatile, then Caldwell is weak.
if there is at least one people who is expensive and not chestnut, then Rosie is not versatile and Luna is not attentive.
It can be concluded that Luna is not attentive once knowing that Chester is not chestnut.
If there is at least one people who is both versatile and sweet, then Rosie is weak.
If there is at least one people who is both not sweet and chestnut, then Cuthbert is not weak.
Cuthbert being chestnut implies that Uriah is weak and Uriah is sweet.
If there is at least one people who is expensive, then Cuthbert is not weak and Uriah is not chestnut.
If someone is expensive, then he is not weak.
Someone who is eithor expensive or not sweet is always not chestnut. | Rosie is not weak. | self_contradiction |
Cuthbert is not attentive.
Herbert is not chestnut.
Luna is weak.
Luna is not expensive.
Cuthbert is chestnut.
Chester is expensive.
Cuthbert is not versatile.
Rosie is not chestnut.
Herbert is not weak.
Rosie is expensive.
Rosie is sweet.
Uriah is chestnut.Someone being both not sweet and chestnut is equivalent to being attentive and not expensive.
Someone who is sweet or versatile is always not attentive and not expensive.
Someone being both expensive and weak is equivalent to being not chestnut.
If Herbert is not attentive or Uriah is not versatile, then Caldwell is weak.
if there is at least one people who is expensive and not chestnut, then Rosie is not versatile and Luna is not attentive.
It can be concluded that Luna is not attentive once knowing that Chester is not chestnut.
If there is at least one people who is both versatile and sweet, then Rosie is weak.
If there is at least one people who is both not sweet and chestnut, then Cuthbert is not weak.
Cuthbert being chestnut implies that Uriah is weak and Uriah is sweet.
If there is at least one people who is expensive, then Cuthbert is not weak and Uriah is not chestnut.
If someone is expensive, then he is not weak.
Someone who is eithor expensive or not sweet is always not chestnut. | Uriah is not chestnut. | self_contradiction |
Cuthbert is not attentive.
Herbert is not chestnut.
Luna is weak.
Luna is not expensive.
Cuthbert is chestnut.
Chester is expensive.
Cuthbert is not versatile.
Rosie is not chestnut.
Herbert is not weak.
Rosie is expensive.
Rosie is sweet.
Uriah is chestnut.Someone being both not sweet and chestnut is equivalent to being attentive and not expensive.
Someone who is sweet or versatile is always not attentive and not expensive.
Someone being both expensive and weak is equivalent to being not chestnut.
If Herbert is not attentive or Uriah is not versatile, then Caldwell is weak.
if there is at least one people who is expensive and not chestnut, then Rosie is not versatile and Luna is not attentive.
It can be concluded that Luna is not attentive once knowing that Chester is not chestnut.
If there is at least one people who is both versatile and sweet, then Rosie is weak.
If there is at least one people who is both not sweet and chestnut, then Cuthbert is not weak.
Cuthbert being chestnut implies that Uriah is weak and Uriah is sweet.
If there is at least one people who is expensive, then Cuthbert is not weak and Uriah is not chestnut.
If someone is expensive, then he is not weak.
Someone who is eithor expensive or not sweet is always not chestnut. | Chester is chestnut. | contradiction |
Cuthbert is not attentive.
Herbert is not chestnut.
Luna is weak.
Luna is not expensive.
Cuthbert is chestnut.
Chester is expensive.
Cuthbert is not versatile.
Rosie is not chestnut.
Herbert is not weak.
Rosie is expensive.
Rosie is sweet.
Uriah is chestnut.Someone being both not sweet and chestnut is equivalent to being attentive and not expensive.
Someone who is sweet or versatile is always not attentive and not expensive.
Someone being both expensive and weak is equivalent to being not chestnut.
If Herbert is not attentive or Uriah is not versatile, then Caldwell is weak.
if there is at least one people who is expensive and not chestnut, then Rosie is not versatile and Luna is not attentive.
It can be concluded that Luna is not attentive once knowing that Chester is not chestnut.
If there is at least one people who is both versatile and sweet, then Rosie is weak.
If there is at least one people who is both not sweet and chestnut, then Cuthbert is not weak.
Cuthbert being chestnut implies that Uriah is weak and Uriah is sweet.
If there is at least one people who is expensive, then Cuthbert is not weak and Uriah is not chestnut.
If someone is expensive, then he is not weak.
Someone who is eithor expensive or not sweet is always not chestnut. | Caldwell is expensive. | neutral |
Cuthbert is not attentive.
Herbert is not chestnut.
Luna is weak.
Luna is not expensive.
Cuthbert is chestnut.
Chester is expensive.
Cuthbert is not versatile.
Rosie is not chestnut.
Herbert is not weak.
Rosie is expensive.
Rosie is sweet.
Uriah is chestnut.Someone being both not sweet and chestnut is equivalent to being attentive and not expensive.
Someone who is sweet or versatile is always not attentive and not expensive.
Someone being both expensive and weak is equivalent to being not chestnut.
If Herbert is not attentive or Uriah is not versatile, then Caldwell is weak.
if there is at least one people who is expensive and not chestnut, then Rosie is not versatile and Luna is not attentive.
It can be concluded that Luna is not attentive once knowing that Chester is not chestnut.
If there is at least one people who is both versatile and sweet, then Rosie is weak.
If there is at least one people who is both not sweet and chestnut, then Cuthbert is not weak.
Cuthbert being chestnut implies that Uriah is weak and Uriah is sweet.
If there is at least one people who is expensive, then Cuthbert is not weak and Uriah is not chestnut.
If someone is expensive, then he is not weak.
Someone who is eithor expensive or not sweet is always not chestnut. | Luna is not expensive. | entailment |
Cuthbert is not attentive.
Herbert is not chestnut.
Luna is weak.
Luna is not expensive.
Cuthbert is chestnut.
Chester is expensive.
Cuthbert is not versatile.
Rosie is not chestnut.
Herbert is not weak.
Rosie is expensive.
Rosie is sweet.
Uriah is chestnut.Someone being both not sweet and chestnut is equivalent to being attentive and not expensive.
Someone who is sweet or versatile is always not attentive and not expensive.
Someone being both expensive and weak is equivalent to being not chestnut.
If Herbert is not attentive or Uriah is not versatile, then Caldwell is weak.
if there is at least one people who is expensive and not chestnut, then Rosie is not versatile and Luna is not attentive.
It can be concluded that Luna is not attentive once knowing that Chester is not chestnut.
If there is at least one people who is both versatile and sweet, then Rosie is weak.
If there is at least one people who is both not sweet and chestnut, then Cuthbert is not weak.
Cuthbert being chestnut implies that Uriah is weak and Uriah is sweet.
If there is at least one people who is expensive, then Cuthbert is not weak and Uriah is not chestnut.
If someone is expensive, then he is not weak.
Someone who is eithor expensive or not sweet is always not chestnut. | Chester is not chestnut. | entailment |
Cuthbert is not attentive.
Herbert is not chestnut.
Luna is weak.
Luna is not expensive.
Cuthbert is chestnut.
Chester is expensive.
Cuthbert is not versatile.
Rosie is not chestnut.
Herbert is not weak.
Rosie is expensive.
Rosie is sweet.
Uriah is chestnut.Someone being both not sweet and chestnut is equivalent to being attentive and not expensive.
Someone who is sweet or versatile is always not attentive and not expensive.
Someone being both expensive and weak is equivalent to being not chestnut.
If Herbert is not attentive or Uriah is not versatile, then Caldwell is weak.
if there is at least one people who is expensive and not chestnut, then Rosie is not versatile and Luna is not attentive.
It can be concluded that Luna is not attentive once knowing that Chester is not chestnut.
If there is at least one people who is both versatile and sweet, then Rosie is weak.
If there is at least one people who is both not sweet and chestnut, then Cuthbert is not weak.
Cuthbert being chestnut implies that Uriah is weak and Uriah is sweet.
If there is at least one people who is expensive, then Cuthbert is not weak and Uriah is not chestnut.
If someone is expensive, then he is not weak.
Someone who is eithor expensive or not sweet is always not chestnut. | Rosie is not expensive. | self_contradiction |
Silvia is not excited.
Curt is not legal.
Alfred is horrible.
Curt is not depressed.
Gloria is not depressed.
Alfred is depressed.
Curt is horrible.
Kendall is legal.
Gloria is not miniscule.
Alfred is excited.
Philbert is excited.
Arthur is excited.If Arthur is not depressed, then Curt is light and Curt is horrible.
If someone is not legal and miniscule, then he is both not excited and horrible, and vice versa.
If Kendall is not legal, then Philbert is excited, and vice versa.
As long as someone is horrible, he is legal and not excited.
If someone is not depressed or he is not legal, then he is not miniscule.
Someone being both depressed and excited is equivalent to being not miniscule.
Gloria being not excited is equivalent to Arthur being not horrible and Gloria being depressed.
It can be concluded that Kendall is not depressed once knowing that Arthur is not legal or Philbert is not miniscule.
If all people are not light or miniscule, then Kendall is depressed.
Someone who is both not light and depressed is always not legal.
Arthur being miniscule is equivalent to Alfred being not light.
Someone who is light is always not excited. | Philbert is not excited. | contradiction |
Silvia is not excited.
Curt is not legal.
Alfred is horrible.
Curt is not depressed.
Gloria is not depressed.
Alfred is depressed.
Curt is horrible.
Kendall is legal.
Gloria is not miniscule.
Alfred is excited.
Philbert is excited.
Arthur is excited.If Arthur is not depressed, then Curt is light and Curt is horrible.
If someone is not legal and miniscule, then he is both not excited and horrible, and vice versa.
If Kendall is not legal, then Philbert is excited, and vice versa.
As long as someone is horrible, he is legal and not excited.
If someone is not depressed or he is not legal, then he is not miniscule.
Someone being both depressed and excited is equivalent to being not miniscule.
Gloria being not excited is equivalent to Arthur being not horrible and Gloria being depressed.
It can be concluded that Kendall is not depressed once knowing that Arthur is not legal or Philbert is not miniscule.
If all people are not light or miniscule, then Kendall is depressed.
Someone who is both not light and depressed is always not legal.
Arthur being miniscule is equivalent to Alfred being not light.
Someone who is light is always not excited. | Philbert is not depressed. | neutral |
Silvia is not excited.
Curt is not legal.
Alfred is horrible.
Curt is not depressed.
Gloria is not depressed.
Alfred is depressed.
Curt is horrible.
Kendall is legal.
Gloria is not miniscule.
Alfred is excited.
Philbert is excited.
Arthur is excited.If Arthur is not depressed, then Curt is light and Curt is horrible.
If someone is not legal and miniscule, then he is both not excited and horrible, and vice versa.
If Kendall is not legal, then Philbert is excited, and vice versa.
As long as someone is horrible, he is legal and not excited.
If someone is not depressed or he is not legal, then he is not miniscule.
Someone being both depressed and excited is equivalent to being not miniscule.
Gloria being not excited is equivalent to Arthur being not horrible and Gloria being depressed.
It can be concluded that Kendall is not depressed once knowing that Arthur is not legal or Philbert is not miniscule.
If all people are not light or miniscule, then Kendall is depressed.
Someone who is both not light and depressed is always not legal.
Arthur being miniscule is equivalent to Alfred being not light.
Someone who is light is always not excited. | Kendall is not depressed. | contradiction |
Silvia is not excited.
Curt is not legal.
Alfred is horrible.
Curt is not depressed.
Gloria is not depressed.
Alfred is depressed.
Curt is horrible.
Kendall is legal.
Gloria is not miniscule.
Alfred is excited.
Philbert is excited.
Arthur is excited.If Arthur is not depressed, then Curt is light and Curt is horrible.
If someone is not legal and miniscule, then he is both not excited and horrible, and vice versa.
If Kendall is not legal, then Philbert is excited, and vice versa.
As long as someone is horrible, he is legal and not excited.
If someone is not depressed or he is not legal, then he is not miniscule.
Someone being both depressed and excited is equivalent to being not miniscule.
Gloria being not excited is equivalent to Arthur being not horrible and Gloria being depressed.
It can be concluded that Kendall is not depressed once knowing that Arthur is not legal or Philbert is not miniscule.
If all people are not light or miniscule, then Kendall is depressed.
Someone who is both not light and depressed is always not legal.
Arthur being miniscule is equivalent to Alfred being not light.
Someone who is light is always not excited. | Silvia is not depressed. | neutral |
Silvia is not excited.
Curt is not legal.
Alfred is horrible.
Curt is not depressed.
Gloria is not depressed.
Alfred is depressed.
Curt is horrible.
Kendall is legal.
Gloria is not miniscule.
Alfred is excited.
Philbert is excited.
Arthur is excited.If Arthur is not depressed, then Curt is light and Curt is horrible.
If someone is not legal and miniscule, then he is both not excited and horrible, and vice versa.
If Kendall is not legal, then Philbert is excited, and vice versa.
As long as someone is horrible, he is legal and not excited.
If someone is not depressed or he is not legal, then he is not miniscule.
Someone being both depressed and excited is equivalent to being not miniscule.
Gloria being not excited is equivalent to Arthur being not horrible and Gloria being depressed.
It can be concluded that Kendall is not depressed once knowing that Arthur is not legal or Philbert is not miniscule.
If all people are not light or miniscule, then Kendall is depressed.
Someone who is both not light and depressed is always not legal.
Arthur being miniscule is equivalent to Alfred being not light.
Someone who is light is always not excited. | Arthur is excited. | entailment |
Silvia is not excited.
Curt is not legal.
Alfred is horrible.
Curt is not depressed.
Gloria is not depressed.
Alfred is depressed.
Curt is horrible.
Kendall is legal.
Gloria is not miniscule.
Alfred is excited.
Philbert is excited.
Arthur is excited.If Arthur is not depressed, then Curt is light and Curt is horrible.
If someone is not legal and miniscule, then he is both not excited and horrible, and vice versa.
If Kendall is not legal, then Philbert is excited, and vice versa.
As long as someone is horrible, he is legal and not excited.
If someone is not depressed or he is not legal, then he is not miniscule.
Someone being both depressed and excited is equivalent to being not miniscule.
Gloria being not excited is equivalent to Arthur being not horrible and Gloria being depressed.
It can be concluded that Kendall is not depressed once knowing that Arthur is not legal or Philbert is not miniscule.
If all people are not light or miniscule, then Kendall is depressed.
Someone who is both not light and depressed is always not legal.
Arthur being miniscule is equivalent to Alfred being not light.
Someone who is light is always not excited. | Philbert is depressed. | neutral |
Silvia is not excited.
Curt is not legal.
Alfred is horrible.
Curt is not depressed.
Gloria is not depressed.
Alfred is depressed.
Curt is horrible.
Kendall is legal.
Gloria is not miniscule.
Alfred is excited.
Philbert is excited.
Arthur is excited.If Arthur is not depressed, then Curt is light and Curt is horrible.
If someone is not legal and miniscule, then he is both not excited and horrible, and vice versa.
If Kendall is not legal, then Philbert is excited, and vice versa.
As long as someone is horrible, he is legal and not excited.
If someone is not depressed or he is not legal, then he is not miniscule.
Someone being both depressed and excited is equivalent to being not miniscule.
Gloria being not excited is equivalent to Arthur being not horrible and Gloria being depressed.
It can be concluded that Kendall is not depressed once knowing that Arthur is not legal or Philbert is not miniscule.
If all people are not light or miniscule, then Kendall is depressed.
Someone who is both not light and depressed is always not legal.
Arthur being miniscule is equivalent to Alfred being not light.
Someone who is light is always not excited. | Curt is legal. | self_contradiction |
Silvia is not excited.
Curt is not legal.
Alfred is horrible.
Curt is not depressed.
Gloria is not depressed.
Alfred is depressed.
Curt is horrible.
Kendall is legal.
Gloria is not miniscule.
Alfred is excited.
Philbert is excited.
Arthur is excited.If Arthur is not depressed, then Curt is light and Curt is horrible.
If someone is not legal and miniscule, then he is both not excited and horrible, and vice versa.
If Kendall is not legal, then Philbert is excited, and vice versa.
As long as someone is horrible, he is legal and not excited.
If someone is not depressed or he is not legal, then he is not miniscule.
Someone being both depressed and excited is equivalent to being not miniscule.
Gloria being not excited is equivalent to Arthur being not horrible and Gloria being depressed.
It can be concluded that Kendall is not depressed once knowing that Arthur is not legal or Philbert is not miniscule.
If all people are not light or miniscule, then Kendall is depressed.
Someone who is both not light and depressed is always not legal.
Arthur being miniscule is equivalent to Alfred being not light.
Someone who is light is always not excited. | Curt is not horrible. | contradiction |
Silvia is not excited.
Curt is not legal.
Alfred is horrible.
Curt is not depressed.
Gloria is not depressed.
Alfred is depressed.
Curt is horrible.
Kendall is legal.
Gloria is not miniscule.
Alfred is excited.
Philbert is excited.
Arthur is excited.If Arthur is not depressed, then Curt is light and Curt is horrible.
If someone is not legal and miniscule, then he is both not excited and horrible, and vice versa.
If Kendall is not legal, then Philbert is excited, and vice versa.
As long as someone is horrible, he is legal and not excited.
If someone is not depressed or he is not legal, then he is not miniscule.
Someone being both depressed and excited is equivalent to being not miniscule.
Gloria being not excited is equivalent to Arthur being not horrible and Gloria being depressed.
It can be concluded that Kendall is not depressed once knowing that Arthur is not legal or Philbert is not miniscule.
If all people are not light or miniscule, then Kendall is depressed.
Someone who is both not light and depressed is always not legal.
Arthur being miniscule is equivalent to Alfred being not light.
Someone who is light is always not excited. | Gloria is not depressed. | self_contradiction |
Silvia is not excited.
Curt is not legal.
Alfred is horrible.
Curt is not depressed.
Gloria is not depressed.
Alfred is depressed.
Curt is horrible.
Kendall is legal.
Gloria is not miniscule.
Alfred is excited.
Philbert is excited.
Arthur is excited.If Arthur is not depressed, then Curt is light and Curt is horrible.
If someone is not legal and miniscule, then he is both not excited and horrible, and vice versa.
If Kendall is not legal, then Philbert is excited, and vice versa.
As long as someone is horrible, he is legal and not excited.
If someone is not depressed or he is not legal, then he is not miniscule.
Someone being both depressed and excited is equivalent to being not miniscule.
Gloria being not excited is equivalent to Arthur being not horrible and Gloria being depressed.
It can be concluded that Kendall is not depressed once knowing that Arthur is not legal or Philbert is not miniscule.
If all people are not light or miniscule, then Kendall is depressed.
Someone who is both not light and depressed is always not legal.
Arthur being miniscule is equivalent to Alfred being not light.
Someone who is light is always not excited. | Gloria is not excited. | contradiction |
Silvia is not excited.
Curt is not legal.
Alfred is horrible.
Curt is not depressed.
Gloria is not depressed.
Alfred is depressed.
Curt is horrible.
Kendall is legal.
Gloria is not miniscule.
Alfred is excited.
Philbert is excited.
Arthur is excited.If Arthur is not depressed, then Curt is light and Curt is horrible.
If someone is not legal and miniscule, then he is both not excited and horrible, and vice versa.
If Kendall is not legal, then Philbert is excited, and vice versa.
As long as someone is horrible, he is legal and not excited.
If someone is not depressed or he is not legal, then he is not miniscule.
Someone being both depressed and excited is equivalent to being not miniscule.
Gloria being not excited is equivalent to Arthur being not horrible and Gloria being depressed.
It can be concluded that Kendall is not depressed once knowing that Arthur is not legal or Philbert is not miniscule.
If all people are not light or miniscule, then Kendall is depressed.
Someone who is both not light and depressed is always not legal.
Arthur being miniscule is equivalent to Alfred being not light.
Someone who is light is always not excited. | Alfred is horrible. | entailment |
Silvia is not excited.
Curt is not legal.
Alfred is horrible.
Curt is not depressed.
Gloria is not depressed.
Alfred is depressed.
Curt is horrible.
Kendall is legal.
Gloria is not miniscule.
Alfred is excited.
Philbert is excited.
Arthur is excited.If Arthur is not depressed, then Curt is light and Curt is horrible.
If someone is not legal and miniscule, then he is both not excited and horrible, and vice versa.
If Kendall is not legal, then Philbert is excited, and vice versa.
As long as someone is horrible, he is legal and not excited.
If someone is not depressed or he is not legal, then he is not miniscule.
Someone being both depressed and excited is equivalent to being not miniscule.
Gloria being not excited is equivalent to Arthur being not horrible and Gloria being depressed.
It can be concluded that Kendall is not depressed once knowing that Arthur is not legal or Philbert is not miniscule.
If all people are not light or miniscule, then Kendall is depressed.
Someone who is both not light and depressed is always not legal.
Arthur being miniscule is equivalent to Alfred being not light.
Someone who is light is always not excited. | Kendall is not legal. | self_contradiction |
Silvia is not excited.
Curt is not legal.
Alfred is horrible.
Curt is not depressed.
Gloria is not depressed.
Alfred is depressed.
Curt is horrible.
Kendall is legal.
Gloria is not miniscule.
Alfred is excited.
Philbert is excited.
Arthur is excited.If Arthur is not depressed, then Curt is light and Curt is horrible.
If someone is not legal and miniscule, then he is both not excited and horrible, and vice versa.
If Kendall is not legal, then Philbert is excited, and vice versa.
As long as someone is horrible, he is legal and not excited.
If someone is not depressed or he is not legal, then he is not miniscule.
Someone being both depressed and excited is equivalent to being not miniscule.
Gloria being not excited is equivalent to Arthur being not horrible and Gloria being depressed.
It can be concluded that Kendall is not depressed once knowing that Arthur is not legal or Philbert is not miniscule.
If all people are not light or miniscule, then Kendall is depressed.
Someone who is both not light and depressed is always not legal.
Arthur being miniscule is equivalent to Alfred being not light.
Someone who is light is always not excited. | Alfred is miniscule. | self_contradiction |
Silvia is not excited.
Curt is not legal.
Alfred is horrible.
Curt is not depressed.
Gloria is not depressed.
Alfred is depressed.
Curt is horrible.
Kendall is legal.
Gloria is not miniscule.
Alfred is excited.
Philbert is excited.
Arthur is excited.If Arthur is not depressed, then Curt is light and Curt is horrible.
If someone is not legal and miniscule, then he is both not excited and horrible, and vice versa.
If Kendall is not legal, then Philbert is excited, and vice versa.
As long as someone is horrible, he is legal and not excited.
If someone is not depressed or he is not legal, then he is not miniscule.
Someone being both depressed and excited is equivalent to being not miniscule.
Gloria being not excited is equivalent to Arthur being not horrible and Gloria being depressed.
It can be concluded that Kendall is not depressed once knowing that Arthur is not legal or Philbert is not miniscule.
If all people are not light or miniscule, then Kendall is depressed.
Someone who is both not light and depressed is always not legal.
Arthur being miniscule is equivalent to Alfred being not light.
Someone who is light is always not excited. | Kendall is horrible. | neutral |
Silvia is not excited.
Curt is not legal.
Alfred is horrible.
Curt is not depressed.
Gloria is not depressed.
Alfred is depressed.
Curt is horrible.
Kendall is legal.
Gloria is not miniscule.
Alfred is excited.
Philbert is excited.
Arthur is excited.If Arthur is not depressed, then Curt is light and Curt is horrible.
If someone is not legal and miniscule, then he is both not excited and horrible, and vice versa.
If Kendall is not legal, then Philbert is excited, and vice versa.
As long as someone is horrible, he is legal and not excited.
If someone is not depressed or he is not legal, then he is not miniscule.
Someone being both depressed and excited is equivalent to being not miniscule.
Gloria being not excited is equivalent to Arthur being not horrible and Gloria being depressed.
It can be concluded that Kendall is not depressed once knowing that Arthur is not legal or Philbert is not miniscule.
If all people are not light or miniscule, then Kendall is depressed.
Someone who is both not light and depressed is always not legal.
Arthur being miniscule is equivalent to Alfred being not light.
Someone who is light is always not excited. | Philbert is not horrible. | neutral |
Silvia is not excited.
Curt is not legal.
Alfred is horrible.
Curt is not depressed.
Gloria is not depressed.
Alfred is depressed.
Curt is horrible.
Kendall is legal.
Gloria is not miniscule.
Alfred is excited.
Philbert is excited.
Arthur is excited.If Arthur is not depressed, then Curt is light and Curt is horrible.
If someone is not legal and miniscule, then he is both not excited and horrible, and vice versa.
If Kendall is not legal, then Philbert is excited, and vice versa.
As long as someone is horrible, he is legal and not excited.
If someone is not depressed or he is not legal, then he is not miniscule.
Someone being both depressed and excited is equivalent to being not miniscule.
Gloria being not excited is equivalent to Arthur being not horrible and Gloria being depressed.
It can be concluded that Kendall is not depressed once knowing that Arthur is not legal or Philbert is not miniscule.
If all people are not light or miniscule, then Kendall is depressed.
Someone who is both not light and depressed is always not legal.
Arthur being miniscule is equivalent to Alfred being not light.
Someone who is light is always not excited. | Alfred is not horrible. | contradiction |
Silvia is not excited.
Curt is not legal.
Alfred is horrible.
Curt is not depressed.
Gloria is not depressed.
Alfred is depressed.
Curt is horrible.
Kendall is legal.
Gloria is not miniscule.
Alfred is excited.
Philbert is excited.
Arthur is excited.If Arthur is not depressed, then Curt is light and Curt is horrible.
If someone is not legal and miniscule, then he is both not excited and horrible, and vice versa.
If Kendall is not legal, then Philbert is excited, and vice versa.
As long as someone is horrible, he is legal and not excited.
If someone is not depressed or he is not legal, then he is not miniscule.
Someone being both depressed and excited is equivalent to being not miniscule.
Gloria being not excited is equivalent to Arthur being not horrible and Gloria being depressed.
It can be concluded that Kendall is not depressed once knowing that Arthur is not legal or Philbert is not miniscule.
If all people are not light or miniscule, then Kendall is depressed.
Someone who is both not light and depressed is always not legal.
Arthur being miniscule is equivalent to Alfred being not light.
Someone who is light is always not excited. | Alfred is depressed. | entailment |
Silvia is not excited.
Curt is not legal.
Alfred is horrible.
Curt is not depressed.
Gloria is not depressed.
Alfred is depressed.
Curt is horrible.
Kendall is legal.
Gloria is not miniscule.
Alfred is excited.
Philbert is excited.
Arthur is excited.If Arthur is not depressed, then Curt is light and Curt is horrible.
If someone is not legal and miniscule, then he is both not excited and horrible, and vice versa.
If Kendall is not legal, then Philbert is excited, and vice versa.
As long as someone is horrible, he is legal and not excited.
If someone is not depressed or he is not legal, then he is not miniscule.
Someone being both depressed and excited is equivalent to being not miniscule.
Gloria being not excited is equivalent to Arthur being not horrible and Gloria being depressed.
It can be concluded that Kendall is not depressed once knowing that Arthur is not legal or Philbert is not miniscule.
If all people are not light or miniscule, then Kendall is depressed.
Someone who is both not light and depressed is always not legal.
Arthur being miniscule is equivalent to Alfred being not light.
Someone who is light is always not excited. | Curt is miniscule. | self_contradiction |
Silvia is not excited.
Curt is not legal.
Alfred is horrible.
Curt is not depressed.
Gloria is not depressed.
Alfred is depressed.
Curt is horrible.
Kendall is legal.
Gloria is not miniscule.
Alfred is excited.
Philbert is excited.
Arthur is excited.If Arthur is not depressed, then Curt is light and Curt is horrible.
If someone is not legal and miniscule, then he is both not excited and horrible, and vice versa.
If Kendall is not legal, then Philbert is excited, and vice versa.
As long as someone is horrible, he is legal and not excited.
If someone is not depressed or he is not legal, then he is not miniscule.
Someone being both depressed and excited is equivalent to being not miniscule.
Gloria being not excited is equivalent to Arthur being not horrible and Gloria being depressed.
It can be concluded that Kendall is not depressed once knowing that Arthur is not legal or Philbert is not miniscule.
If all people are not light or miniscule, then Kendall is depressed.
Someone who is both not light and depressed is always not legal.
Arthur being miniscule is equivalent to Alfred being not light.
Someone who is light is always not excited. | Gloria is excited. | entailment |
Silvia is not excited.
Curt is not legal.
Alfred is horrible.
Curt is not depressed.
Gloria is not depressed.
Alfred is depressed.
Curt is horrible.
Kendall is legal.
Gloria is not miniscule.
Alfred is excited.
Philbert is excited.
Arthur is excited.If Arthur is not depressed, then Curt is light and Curt is horrible.
If someone is not legal and miniscule, then he is both not excited and horrible, and vice versa.
If Kendall is not legal, then Philbert is excited, and vice versa.
As long as someone is horrible, he is legal and not excited.
If someone is not depressed or he is not legal, then he is not miniscule.
Someone being both depressed and excited is equivalent to being not miniscule.
Gloria being not excited is equivalent to Arthur being not horrible and Gloria being depressed.
It can be concluded that Kendall is not depressed once knowing that Arthur is not legal or Philbert is not miniscule.
If all people are not light or miniscule, then Kendall is depressed.
Someone who is both not light and depressed is always not legal.
Arthur being miniscule is equivalent to Alfred being not light.
Someone who is light is always not excited. | Kendall is not miniscule. | entailment |
Hamlin is bright.
Aedan is worried.
Aubrey is not naughty.
Roy is crazy.
Roy is not worried.
Hamlin is naughty.
Martin is naughty.
Hamlin is not worried.
Martin is not dusty.
Roy is not naughty.
Roy is dusty.
Aedan is not dusty.If there is someone who is either not bright or dusty, then Hamlin is lonely.
If someone is not naughty and lonely, then he is bright, and vice versa.
If Martin is not crazy, then Aedan is not worried, and vice versa.
If all people are not dusty, then Kyle is lonely and Aedan is not bright.
Kyle is dusty if and only if Hamlin is worried and Goddard is bright.
Aubrey is naughty if and only if Aedan is not dusty.
If there is at least one people who is not bright or not worried, then Goddard is not lonely.
If someone is not bright or he is naughty, then he is not lonely.
If Kyle is bright or Hamlin is not dusty, then Goddard is not worried.
Aedan being not crazy implies that Kyle is not worried and Aubrey is not naughty.
If there is at least one people who is not lonely, then Kyle is not worried.
If someone is both not dusty and naughty, then he is not bright. | Aubrey is not naughty. | self_contradiction |
Hamlin is bright.
Aedan is worried.
Aubrey is not naughty.
Roy is crazy.
Roy is not worried.
Hamlin is naughty.
Martin is naughty.
Hamlin is not worried.
Martin is not dusty.
Roy is not naughty.
Roy is dusty.
Aedan is not dusty.If there is someone who is either not bright or dusty, then Hamlin is lonely.
If someone is not naughty and lonely, then he is bright, and vice versa.
If Martin is not crazy, then Aedan is not worried, and vice versa.
If all people are not dusty, then Kyle is lonely and Aedan is not bright.
Kyle is dusty if and only if Hamlin is worried and Goddard is bright.
Aubrey is naughty if and only if Aedan is not dusty.
If there is at least one people who is not bright or not worried, then Goddard is not lonely.
If someone is not bright or he is naughty, then he is not lonely.
If Kyle is bright or Hamlin is not dusty, then Goddard is not worried.
Aedan being not crazy implies that Kyle is not worried and Aubrey is not naughty.
If there is at least one people who is not lonely, then Kyle is not worried.
If someone is both not dusty and naughty, then he is not bright. | Hamlin is not naughty. | self_contradiction |
Hamlin is bright.
Aedan is worried.
Aubrey is not naughty.
Roy is crazy.
Roy is not worried.
Hamlin is naughty.
Martin is naughty.
Hamlin is not worried.
Martin is not dusty.
Roy is not naughty.
Roy is dusty.
Aedan is not dusty.If there is someone who is either not bright or dusty, then Hamlin is lonely.
If someone is not naughty and lonely, then he is bright, and vice versa.
If Martin is not crazy, then Aedan is not worried, and vice versa.
If all people are not dusty, then Kyle is lonely and Aedan is not bright.
Kyle is dusty if and only if Hamlin is worried and Goddard is bright.
Aubrey is naughty if and only if Aedan is not dusty.
If there is at least one people who is not bright or not worried, then Goddard is not lonely.
If someone is not bright or he is naughty, then he is not lonely.
If Kyle is bright or Hamlin is not dusty, then Goddard is not worried.
Aedan being not crazy implies that Kyle is not worried and Aubrey is not naughty.
If there is at least one people who is not lonely, then Kyle is not worried.
If someone is both not dusty and naughty, then he is not bright. | Hamlin is lonely. | self_contradiction |
Hamlin is bright.
Aedan is worried.
Aubrey is not naughty.
Roy is crazy.
Roy is not worried.
Hamlin is naughty.
Martin is naughty.
Hamlin is not worried.
Martin is not dusty.
Roy is not naughty.
Roy is dusty.
Aedan is not dusty.If there is someone who is either not bright or dusty, then Hamlin is lonely.
If someone is not naughty and lonely, then he is bright, and vice versa.
If Martin is not crazy, then Aedan is not worried, and vice versa.
If all people are not dusty, then Kyle is lonely and Aedan is not bright.
Kyle is dusty if and only if Hamlin is worried and Goddard is bright.
Aubrey is naughty if and only if Aedan is not dusty.
If there is at least one people who is not bright or not worried, then Goddard is not lonely.
If someone is not bright or he is naughty, then he is not lonely.
If Kyle is bright or Hamlin is not dusty, then Goddard is not worried.
Aedan being not crazy implies that Kyle is not worried and Aubrey is not naughty.
If there is at least one people who is not lonely, then Kyle is not worried.
If someone is both not dusty and naughty, then he is not bright. | Aubrey is naughty. | self_contradiction |
Hamlin is bright.
Aedan is worried.
Aubrey is not naughty.
Roy is crazy.
Roy is not worried.
Hamlin is naughty.
Martin is naughty.
Hamlin is not worried.
Martin is not dusty.
Roy is not naughty.
Roy is dusty.
Aedan is not dusty.If there is someone who is either not bright or dusty, then Hamlin is lonely.
If someone is not naughty and lonely, then he is bright, and vice versa.
If Martin is not crazy, then Aedan is not worried, and vice versa.
If all people are not dusty, then Kyle is lonely and Aedan is not bright.
Kyle is dusty if and only if Hamlin is worried and Goddard is bright.
Aubrey is naughty if and only if Aedan is not dusty.
If there is at least one people who is not bright or not worried, then Goddard is not lonely.
If someone is not bright or he is naughty, then he is not lonely.
If Kyle is bright or Hamlin is not dusty, then Goddard is not worried.
Aedan being not crazy implies that Kyle is not worried and Aubrey is not naughty.
If there is at least one people who is not lonely, then Kyle is not worried.
If someone is both not dusty and naughty, then he is not bright. | Martin is bright. | contradiction |
Hamlin is bright.
Aedan is worried.
Aubrey is not naughty.
Roy is crazy.
Roy is not worried.
Hamlin is naughty.
Martin is naughty.
Hamlin is not worried.
Martin is not dusty.
Roy is not naughty.
Roy is dusty.
Aedan is not dusty.If there is someone who is either not bright or dusty, then Hamlin is lonely.
If someone is not naughty and lonely, then he is bright, and vice versa.
If Martin is not crazy, then Aedan is not worried, and vice versa.
If all people are not dusty, then Kyle is lonely and Aedan is not bright.
Kyle is dusty if and only if Hamlin is worried and Goddard is bright.
Aubrey is naughty if and only if Aedan is not dusty.
If there is at least one people who is not bright or not worried, then Goddard is not lonely.
If someone is not bright or he is naughty, then he is not lonely.
If Kyle is bright or Hamlin is not dusty, then Goddard is not worried.
Aedan being not crazy implies that Kyle is not worried and Aubrey is not naughty.
If there is at least one people who is not lonely, then Kyle is not worried.
If someone is both not dusty and naughty, then he is not bright. | Goddard is crazy. | neutral |
Hamlin is bright.
Aedan is worried.
Aubrey is not naughty.
Roy is crazy.
Roy is not worried.
Hamlin is naughty.
Martin is naughty.
Hamlin is not worried.
Martin is not dusty.
Roy is not naughty.
Roy is dusty.
Aedan is not dusty.If there is someone who is either not bright or dusty, then Hamlin is lonely.
If someone is not naughty and lonely, then he is bright, and vice versa.
If Martin is not crazy, then Aedan is not worried, and vice versa.
If all people are not dusty, then Kyle is lonely and Aedan is not bright.
Kyle is dusty if and only if Hamlin is worried and Goddard is bright.
Aubrey is naughty if and only if Aedan is not dusty.
If there is at least one people who is not bright or not worried, then Goddard is not lonely.
If someone is not bright or he is naughty, then he is not lonely.
If Kyle is bright or Hamlin is not dusty, then Goddard is not worried.
Aedan being not crazy implies that Kyle is not worried and Aubrey is not naughty.
If there is at least one people who is not lonely, then Kyle is not worried.
If someone is both not dusty and naughty, then he is not bright. | Aubrey is lonely. | contradiction |
Hamlin is bright.
Aedan is worried.
Aubrey is not naughty.
Roy is crazy.
Roy is not worried.
Hamlin is naughty.
Martin is naughty.
Hamlin is not worried.
Martin is not dusty.
Roy is not naughty.
Roy is dusty.
Aedan is not dusty.If there is someone who is either not bright or dusty, then Hamlin is lonely.
If someone is not naughty and lonely, then he is bright, and vice versa.
If Martin is not crazy, then Aedan is not worried, and vice versa.
If all people are not dusty, then Kyle is lonely and Aedan is not bright.
Kyle is dusty if and only if Hamlin is worried and Goddard is bright.
Aubrey is naughty if and only if Aedan is not dusty.
If there is at least one people who is not bright or not worried, then Goddard is not lonely.
If someone is not bright or he is naughty, then he is not lonely.
If Kyle is bright or Hamlin is not dusty, then Goddard is not worried.
Aedan being not crazy implies that Kyle is not worried and Aubrey is not naughty.
If there is at least one people who is not lonely, then Kyle is not worried.
If someone is both not dusty and naughty, then he is not bright. | Roy is not naughty. | entailment |
Hamlin is bright.
Aedan is worried.
Aubrey is not naughty.
Roy is crazy.
Roy is not worried.
Hamlin is naughty.
Martin is naughty.
Hamlin is not worried.
Martin is not dusty.
Roy is not naughty.
Roy is dusty.
Aedan is not dusty.If there is someone who is either not bright or dusty, then Hamlin is lonely.
If someone is not naughty and lonely, then he is bright, and vice versa.
If Martin is not crazy, then Aedan is not worried, and vice versa.
If all people are not dusty, then Kyle is lonely and Aedan is not bright.
Kyle is dusty if and only if Hamlin is worried and Goddard is bright.
Aubrey is naughty if and only if Aedan is not dusty.
If there is at least one people who is not bright or not worried, then Goddard is not lonely.
If someone is not bright or he is naughty, then he is not lonely.
If Kyle is bright or Hamlin is not dusty, then Goddard is not worried.
Aedan being not crazy implies that Kyle is not worried and Aubrey is not naughty.
If there is at least one people who is not lonely, then Kyle is not worried.
If someone is both not dusty and naughty, then he is not bright. | Kyle is worried. | contradiction |
Hamlin is bright.
Aedan is worried.
Aubrey is not naughty.
Roy is crazy.
Roy is not worried.
Hamlin is naughty.
Martin is naughty.
Hamlin is not worried.
Martin is not dusty.
Roy is not naughty.
Roy is dusty.
Aedan is not dusty.If there is someone who is either not bright or dusty, then Hamlin is lonely.
If someone is not naughty and lonely, then he is bright, and vice versa.
If Martin is not crazy, then Aedan is not worried, and vice versa.
If all people are not dusty, then Kyle is lonely and Aedan is not bright.
Kyle is dusty if and only if Hamlin is worried and Goddard is bright.
Aubrey is naughty if and only if Aedan is not dusty.
If there is at least one people who is not bright or not worried, then Goddard is not lonely.
If someone is not bright or he is naughty, then he is not lonely.
If Kyle is bright or Hamlin is not dusty, then Goddard is not worried.
Aedan being not crazy implies that Kyle is not worried and Aubrey is not naughty.
If there is at least one people who is not lonely, then Kyle is not worried.
If someone is both not dusty and naughty, then he is not bright. | Hamlin is naughty. | self_contradiction |
Hamlin is bright.
Aedan is worried.
Aubrey is not naughty.
Roy is crazy.
Roy is not worried.
Hamlin is naughty.
Martin is naughty.
Hamlin is not worried.
Martin is not dusty.
Roy is not naughty.
Roy is dusty.
Aedan is not dusty.If there is someone who is either not bright or dusty, then Hamlin is lonely.
If someone is not naughty and lonely, then he is bright, and vice versa.
If Martin is not crazy, then Aedan is not worried, and vice versa.
If all people are not dusty, then Kyle is lonely and Aedan is not bright.
Kyle is dusty if and only if Hamlin is worried and Goddard is bright.
Aubrey is naughty if and only if Aedan is not dusty.
If there is at least one people who is not bright or not worried, then Goddard is not lonely.
If someone is not bright or he is naughty, then he is not lonely.
If Kyle is bright or Hamlin is not dusty, then Goddard is not worried.
Aedan being not crazy implies that Kyle is not worried and Aubrey is not naughty.
If there is at least one people who is not lonely, then Kyle is not worried.
If someone is both not dusty and naughty, then he is not bright. | Martin is dusty. | contradiction |
Hamlin is bright.
Aedan is worried.
Aubrey is not naughty.
Roy is crazy.
Roy is not worried.
Hamlin is naughty.
Martin is naughty.
Hamlin is not worried.
Martin is not dusty.
Roy is not naughty.
Roy is dusty.
Aedan is not dusty.If there is someone who is either not bright or dusty, then Hamlin is lonely.
If someone is not naughty and lonely, then he is bright, and vice versa.
If Martin is not crazy, then Aedan is not worried, and vice versa.
If all people are not dusty, then Kyle is lonely and Aedan is not bright.
Kyle is dusty if and only if Hamlin is worried and Goddard is bright.
Aubrey is naughty if and only if Aedan is not dusty.
If there is at least one people who is not bright or not worried, then Goddard is not lonely.
If someone is not bright or he is naughty, then he is not lonely.
If Kyle is bright or Hamlin is not dusty, then Goddard is not worried.
Aedan being not crazy implies that Kyle is not worried and Aubrey is not naughty.
If there is at least one people who is not lonely, then Kyle is not worried.
If someone is both not dusty and naughty, then he is not bright. | Roy is not crazy. | contradiction |
Hamlin is bright.
Aedan is worried.
Aubrey is not naughty.
Roy is crazy.
Roy is not worried.
Hamlin is naughty.
Martin is naughty.
Hamlin is not worried.
Martin is not dusty.
Roy is not naughty.
Roy is dusty.
Aedan is not dusty.If there is someone who is either not bright or dusty, then Hamlin is lonely.
If someone is not naughty and lonely, then he is bright, and vice versa.
If Martin is not crazy, then Aedan is not worried, and vice versa.
If all people are not dusty, then Kyle is lonely and Aedan is not bright.
Kyle is dusty if and only if Hamlin is worried and Goddard is bright.
Aubrey is naughty if and only if Aedan is not dusty.
If there is at least one people who is not bright or not worried, then Goddard is not lonely.
If someone is not bright or he is naughty, then he is not lonely.
If Kyle is bright or Hamlin is not dusty, then Goddard is not worried.
Aedan being not crazy implies that Kyle is not worried and Aubrey is not naughty.
If there is at least one people who is not lonely, then Kyle is not worried.
If someone is both not dusty and naughty, then he is not bright. | Martin is not dusty. | entailment |
Hamlin is bright.
Aedan is worried.
Aubrey is not naughty.
Roy is crazy.
Roy is not worried.
Hamlin is naughty.
Martin is naughty.
Hamlin is not worried.
Martin is not dusty.
Roy is not naughty.
Roy is dusty.
Aedan is not dusty.If there is someone who is either not bright or dusty, then Hamlin is lonely.
If someone is not naughty and lonely, then he is bright, and vice versa.
If Martin is not crazy, then Aedan is not worried, and vice versa.
If all people are not dusty, then Kyle is lonely and Aedan is not bright.
Kyle is dusty if and only if Hamlin is worried and Goddard is bright.
Aubrey is naughty if and only if Aedan is not dusty.
If there is at least one people who is not bright or not worried, then Goddard is not lonely.
If someone is not bright or he is naughty, then he is not lonely.
If Kyle is bright or Hamlin is not dusty, then Goddard is not worried.
Aedan being not crazy implies that Kyle is not worried and Aubrey is not naughty.
If there is at least one people who is not lonely, then Kyle is not worried.
If someone is both not dusty and naughty, then he is not bright. | Kyle is crazy. | neutral |
Hamlin is bright.
Aedan is worried.
Aubrey is not naughty.
Roy is crazy.
Roy is not worried.
Hamlin is naughty.
Martin is naughty.
Hamlin is not worried.
Martin is not dusty.
Roy is not naughty.
Roy is dusty.
Aedan is not dusty.If there is someone who is either not bright or dusty, then Hamlin is lonely.
If someone is not naughty and lonely, then he is bright, and vice versa.
If Martin is not crazy, then Aedan is not worried, and vice versa.
If all people are not dusty, then Kyle is lonely and Aedan is not bright.
Kyle is dusty if and only if Hamlin is worried and Goddard is bright.
Aubrey is naughty if and only if Aedan is not dusty.
If there is at least one people who is not bright or not worried, then Goddard is not lonely.
If someone is not bright or he is naughty, then he is not lonely.
If Kyle is bright or Hamlin is not dusty, then Goddard is not worried.
Aedan being not crazy implies that Kyle is not worried and Aubrey is not naughty.
If there is at least one people who is not lonely, then Kyle is not worried.
If someone is both not dusty and naughty, then he is not bright. | Aedan is worried. | entailment |
Hamlin is bright.
Aedan is worried.
Aubrey is not naughty.
Roy is crazy.
Roy is not worried.
Hamlin is naughty.
Martin is naughty.
Hamlin is not worried.
Martin is not dusty.
Roy is not naughty.
Roy is dusty.
Aedan is not dusty.If there is someone who is either not bright or dusty, then Hamlin is lonely.
If someone is not naughty and lonely, then he is bright, and vice versa.
If Martin is not crazy, then Aedan is not worried, and vice versa.
If all people are not dusty, then Kyle is lonely and Aedan is not bright.
Kyle is dusty if and only if Hamlin is worried and Goddard is bright.
Aubrey is naughty if and only if Aedan is not dusty.
If there is at least one people who is not bright or not worried, then Goddard is not lonely.
If someone is not bright or he is naughty, then he is not lonely.
If Kyle is bright or Hamlin is not dusty, then Goddard is not worried.
Aedan being not crazy implies that Kyle is not worried and Aubrey is not naughty.
If there is at least one people who is not lonely, then Kyle is not worried.
If someone is both not dusty and naughty, then he is not bright. | Kyle is not worried. | entailment |
Hamlin is bright.
Aedan is worried.
Aubrey is not naughty.
Roy is crazy.
Roy is not worried.
Hamlin is naughty.
Martin is naughty.
Hamlin is not worried.
Martin is not dusty.
Roy is not naughty.
Roy is dusty.
Aedan is not dusty.If there is someone who is either not bright or dusty, then Hamlin is lonely.
If someone is not naughty and lonely, then he is bright, and vice versa.
If Martin is not crazy, then Aedan is not worried, and vice versa.
If all people are not dusty, then Kyle is lonely and Aedan is not bright.
Kyle is dusty if and only if Hamlin is worried and Goddard is bright.
Aubrey is naughty if and only if Aedan is not dusty.
If there is at least one people who is not bright or not worried, then Goddard is not lonely.
If someone is not bright or he is naughty, then he is not lonely.
If Kyle is bright or Hamlin is not dusty, then Goddard is not worried.
Aedan being not crazy implies that Kyle is not worried and Aubrey is not naughty.
If there is at least one people who is not lonely, then Kyle is not worried.
If someone is both not dusty and naughty, then he is not bright. | Kyle is dusty. | neutral |
Hamlin is bright.
Aedan is worried.
Aubrey is not naughty.
Roy is crazy.
Roy is not worried.
Hamlin is naughty.
Martin is naughty.
Hamlin is not worried.
Martin is not dusty.
Roy is not naughty.
Roy is dusty.
Aedan is not dusty.If there is someone who is either not bright or dusty, then Hamlin is lonely.
If someone is not naughty and lonely, then he is bright, and vice versa.
If Martin is not crazy, then Aedan is not worried, and vice versa.
If all people are not dusty, then Kyle is lonely and Aedan is not bright.
Kyle is dusty if and only if Hamlin is worried and Goddard is bright.
Aubrey is naughty if and only if Aedan is not dusty.
If there is at least one people who is not bright or not worried, then Goddard is not lonely.
If someone is not bright or he is naughty, then he is not lonely.
If Kyle is bright or Hamlin is not dusty, then Goddard is not worried.
Aedan being not crazy implies that Kyle is not worried and Aubrey is not naughty.
If there is at least one people who is not lonely, then Kyle is not worried.
If someone is both not dusty and naughty, then he is not bright. | Kyle is bright. | neutral |
Hamlin is bright.
Aedan is worried.
Aubrey is not naughty.
Roy is crazy.
Roy is not worried.
Hamlin is naughty.
Martin is naughty.
Hamlin is not worried.
Martin is not dusty.
Roy is not naughty.
Roy is dusty.
Aedan is not dusty.If there is someone who is either not bright or dusty, then Hamlin is lonely.
If someone is not naughty and lonely, then he is bright, and vice versa.
If Martin is not crazy, then Aedan is not worried, and vice versa.
If all people are not dusty, then Kyle is lonely and Aedan is not bright.
Kyle is dusty if and only if Hamlin is worried and Goddard is bright.
Aubrey is naughty if and only if Aedan is not dusty.
If there is at least one people who is not bright or not worried, then Goddard is not lonely.
If someone is not bright or he is naughty, then he is not lonely.
If Kyle is bright or Hamlin is not dusty, then Goddard is not worried.
Aedan being not crazy implies that Kyle is not worried and Aubrey is not naughty.
If there is at least one people who is not lonely, then Kyle is not worried.
If someone is both not dusty and naughty, then he is not bright. | Aubrey is worried. | neutral |
Hamlin is bright.
Aedan is worried.
Aubrey is not naughty.
Roy is crazy.
Roy is not worried.
Hamlin is naughty.
Martin is naughty.
Hamlin is not worried.
Martin is not dusty.
Roy is not naughty.
Roy is dusty.
Aedan is not dusty.If there is someone who is either not bright or dusty, then Hamlin is lonely.
If someone is not naughty and lonely, then he is bright, and vice versa.
If Martin is not crazy, then Aedan is not worried, and vice versa.
If all people are not dusty, then Kyle is lonely and Aedan is not bright.
Kyle is dusty if and only if Hamlin is worried and Goddard is bright.
Aubrey is naughty if and only if Aedan is not dusty.
If there is at least one people who is not bright or not worried, then Goddard is not lonely.
If someone is not bright or he is naughty, then he is not lonely.
If Kyle is bright or Hamlin is not dusty, then Goddard is not worried.
Aedan being not crazy implies that Kyle is not worried and Aubrey is not naughty.
If there is at least one people who is not lonely, then Kyle is not worried.
If someone is both not dusty and naughty, then he is not bright. | Martin is naughty. | entailment |
Hadley is clever.
Theodore is not nice.
Hadley is not hypocritical.
Nicholas is obedient.
Amos is hypocritical.
Abner is clever.
Gardner is nice.
Hardy is not nice.
Abner is not hypocritical.
Hardy is not superior.
Abner is not superior.
Theodore is hypocritical.If Abner is not clever, then Nicholas is conscientious and Abner is not nice.
Nicholas being not conscientious implies that Gardner is superior.
Someone being both clever and conscientious is equivalent to being not obedient and not superior.
If someone who is not clever is also hypocritical, then he is not superior.
Nicholas being not superior is equivalent to Gardner being not conscientious.
If Theodore is clever, then Hardy is not hypocritical.
If there is at least one people who is either not superior or conscientious, then Hardy is clever and Abner is nice.
Someone being both not clever and superior is equivalent to being not nice and hypocritical.
Someone who is clever is always both hypocritical and obedient.
If there is at least one people who is nice, then Hadley is not superior and Amos is conscientious.
If there is someone who is nice, then Nicholas is not hypocritical.
It can be concluded that Gardner is nice once knowing that Abner is not obedient or Theodore is superior. | Gardner is not clever. | neutral |
Hadley is clever.
Theodore is not nice.
Hadley is not hypocritical.
Nicholas is obedient.
Amos is hypocritical.
Abner is clever.
Gardner is nice.
Hardy is not nice.
Abner is not hypocritical.
Hardy is not superior.
Abner is not superior.
Theodore is hypocritical.If Abner is not clever, then Nicholas is conscientious and Abner is not nice.
Nicholas being not conscientious implies that Gardner is superior.
Someone being both clever and conscientious is equivalent to being not obedient and not superior.
If someone who is not clever is also hypocritical, then he is not superior.
Nicholas being not superior is equivalent to Gardner being not conscientious.
If Theodore is clever, then Hardy is not hypocritical.
If there is at least one people who is either not superior or conscientious, then Hardy is clever and Abner is nice.
Someone being both not clever and superior is equivalent to being not nice and hypocritical.
Someone who is clever is always both hypocritical and obedient.
If there is at least one people who is nice, then Hadley is not superior and Amos is conscientious.
If there is someone who is nice, then Nicholas is not hypocritical.
It can be concluded that Gardner is nice once knowing that Abner is not obedient or Theodore is superior. | Abner is not hypocritical. | self_contradiction |
Hadley is clever.
Theodore is not nice.
Hadley is not hypocritical.
Nicholas is obedient.
Amos is hypocritical.
Abner is clever.
Gardner is nice.
Hardy is not nice.
Abner is not hypocritical.
Hardy is not superior.
Abner is not superior.
Theodore is hypocritical.If Abner is not clever, then Nicholas is conscientious and Abner is not nice.
Nicholas being not conscientious implies that Gardner is superior.
Someone being both clever and conscientious is equivalent to being not obedient and not superior.
If someone who is not clever is also hypocritical, then he is not superior.
Nicholas being not superior is equivalent to Gardner being not conscientious.
If Theodore is clever, then Hardy is not hypocritical.
If there is at least one people who is either not superior or conscientious, then Hardy is clever and Abner is nice.
Someone being both not clever and superior is equivalent to being not nice and hypocritical.
Someone who is clever is always both hypocritical and obedient.
If there is at least one people who is nice, then Hadley is not superior and Amos is conscientious.
If there is someone who is nice, then Nicholas is not hypocritical.
It can be concluded that Gardner is nice once knowing that Abner is not obedient or Theodore is superior. | Theodore is superior. | self_contradiction |
Hadley is clever.
Theodore is not nice.
Hadley is not hypocritical.
Nicholas is obedient.
Amos is hypocritical.
Abner is clever.
Gardner is nice.
Hardy is not nice.
Abner is not hypocritical.
Hardy is not superior.
Abner is not superior.
Theodore is hypocritical.If Abner is not clever, then Nicholas is conscientious and Abner is not nice.
Nicholas being not conscientious implies that Gardner is superior.
Someone being both clever and conscientious is equivalent to being not obedient and not superior.
If someone who is not clever is also hypocritical, then he is not superior.
Nicholas being not superior is equivalent to Gardner being not conscientious.
If Theodore is clever, then Hardy is not hypocritical.
If there is at least one people who is either not superior or conscientious, then Hardy is clever and Abner is nice.
Someone being both not clever and superior is equivalent to being not nice and hypocritical.
Someone who is clever is always both hypocritical and obedient.
If there is at least one people who is nice, then Hadley is not superior and Amos is conscientious.
If there is someone who is nice, then Nicholas is not hypocritical.
It can be concluded that Gardner is nice once knowing that Abner is not obedient or Theodore is superior. | Abner is clever. | entailment |
Hadley is clever.
Theodore is not nice.
Hadley is not hypocritical.
Nicholas is obedient.
Amos is hypocritical.
Abner is clever.
Gardner is nice.
Hardy is not nice.
Abner is not hypocritical.
Hardy is not superior.
Abner is not superior.
Theodore is hypocritical.If Abner is not clever, then Nicholas is conscientious and Abner is not nice.
Nicholas being not conscientious implies that Gardner is superior.
Someone being both clever and conscientious is equivalent to being not obedient and not superior.
If someone who is not clever is also hypocritical, then he is not superior.
Nicholas being not superior is equivalent to Gardner being not conscientious.
If Theodore is clever, then Hardy is not hypocritical.
If there is at least one people who is either not superior or conscientious, then Hardy is clever and Abner is nice.
Someone being both not clever and superior is equivalent to being not nice and hypocritical.
Someone who is clever is always both hypocritical and obedient.
If there is at least one people who is nice, then Hadley is not superior and Amos is conscientious.
If there is someone who is nice, then Nicholas is not hypocritical.
It can be concluded that Gardner is nice once knowing that Abner is not obedient or Theodore is superior. | Theodore is clever. | contradiction |
Hadley is clever.
Theodore is not nice.
Hadley is not hypocritical.
Nicholas is obedient.
Amos is hypocritical.
Abner is clever.
Gardner is nice.
Hardy is not nice.
Abner is not hypocritical.
Hardy is not superior.
Abner is not superior.
Theodore is hypocritical.If Abner is not clever, then Nicholas is conscientious and Abner is not nice.
Nicholas being not conscientious implies that Gardner is superior.
Someone being both clever and conscientious is equivalent to being not obedient and not superior.
If someone who is not clever is also hypocritical, then he is not superior.
Nicholas being not superior is equivalent to Gardner being not conscientious.
If Theodore is clever, then Hardy is not hypocritical.
If there is at least one people who is either not superior or conscientious, then Hardy is clever and Abner is nice.
Someone being both not clever and superior is equivalent to being not nice and hypocritical.
Someone who is clever is always both hypocritical and obedient.
If there is at least one people who is nice, then Hadley is not superior and Amos is conscientious.
If there is someone who is nice, then Nicholas is not hypocritical.
It can be concluded that Gardner is nice once knowing that Abner is not obedient or Theodore is superior. | Amos is clever. | neutral |
Hadley is clever.
Theodore is not nice.
Hadley is not hypocritical.
Nicholas is obedient.
Amos is hypocritical.
Abner is clever.
Gardner is nice.
Hardy is not nice.
Abner is not hypocritical.
Hardy is not superior.
Abner is not superior.
Theodore is hypocritical.If Abner is not clever, then Nicholas is conscientious and Abner is not nice.
Nicholas being not conscientious implies that Gardner is superior.
Someone being both clever and conscientious is equivalent to being not obedient and not superior.
If someone who is not clever is also hypocritical, then he is not superior.
Nicholas being not superior is equivalent to Gardner being not conscientious.
If Theodore is clever, then Hardy is not hypocritical.
If there is at least one people who is either not superior or conscientious, then Hardy is clever and Abner is nice.
Someone being both not clever and superior is equivalent to being not nice and hypocritical.
Someone who is clever is always both hypocritical and obedient.
If there is at least one people who is nice, then Hadley is not superior and Amos is conscientious.
If there is someone who is nice, then Nicholas is not hypocritical.
It can be concluded that Gardner is nice once knowing that Abner is not obedient or Theodore is superior. | Hadley is not superior. | entailment |
Hadley is clever.
Theodore is not nice.
Hadley is not hypocritical.
Nicholas is obedient.
Amos is hypocritical.
Abner is clever.
Gardner is nice.
Hardy is not nice.
Abner is not hypocritical.
Hardy is not superior.
Abner is not superior.
Theodore is hypocritical.If Abner is not clever, then Nicholas is conscientious and Abner is not nice.
Nicholas being not conscientious implies that Gardner is superior.
Someone being both clever and conscientious is equivalent to being not obedient and not superior.
If someone who is not clever is also hypocritical, then he is not superior.
Nicholas being not superior is equivalent to Gardner being not conscientious.
If Theodore is clever, then Hardy is not hypocritical.
If there is at least one people who is either not superior or conscientious, then Hardy is clever and Abner is nice.
Someone being both not clever and superior is equivalent to being not nice and hypocritical.
Someone who is clever is always both hypocritical and obedient.
If there is at least one people who is nice, then Hadley is not superior and Amos is conscientious.
If there is someone who is nice, then Nicholas is not hypocritical.
It can be concluded that Gardner is nice once knowing that Abner is not obedient or Theodore is superior. | Theodore is not superior. | self_contradiction |
Hadley is clever.
Theodore is not nice.
Hadley is not hypocritical.
Nicholas is obedient.
Amos is hypocritical.
Abner is clever.
Gardner is nice.
Hardy is not nice.
Abner is not hypocritical.
Hardy is not superior.
Abner is not superior.
Theodore is hypocritical.If Abner is not clever, then Nicholas is conscientious and Abner is not nice.
Nicholas being not conscientious implies that Gardner is superior.
Someone being both clever and conscientious is equivalent to being not obedient and not superior.
If someone who is not clever is also hypocritical, then he is not superior.
Nicholas being not superior is equivalent to Gardner being not conscientious.
If Theodore is clever, then Hardy is not hypocritical.
If there is at least one people who is either not superior or conscientious, then Hardy is clever and Abner is nice.
Someone being both not clever and superior is equivalent to being not nice and hypocritical.
Someone who is clever is always both hypocritical and obedient.
If there is at least one people who is nice, then Hadley is not superior and Amos is conscientious.
If there is someone who is nice, then Nicholas is not hypocritical.
It can be concluded that Gardner is nice once knowing that Abner is not obedient or Theodore is superior. | Hardy is not conscientious. | neutral |
Hadley is clever.
Theodore is not nice.
Hadley is not hypocritical.
Nicholas is obedient.
Amos is hypocritical.
Abner is clever.
Gardner is nice.
Hardy is not nice.
Abner is not hypocritical.
Hardy is not superior.
Abner is not superior.
Theodore is hypocritical.If Abner is not clever, then Nicholas is conscientious and Abner is not nice.
Nicholas being not conscientious implies that Gardner is superior.
Someone being both clever and conscientious is equivalent to being not obedient and not superior.
If someone who is not clever is also hypocritical, then he is not superior.
Nicholas being not superior is equivalent to Gardner being not conscientious.
If Theodore is clever, then Hardy is not hypocritical.
If there is at least one people who is either not superior or conscientious, then Hardy is clever and Abner is nice.
Someone being both not clever and superior is equivalent to being not nice and hypocritical.
Someone who is clever is always both hypocritical and obedient.
If there is at least one people who is nice, then Hadley is not superior and Amos is conscientious.
If there is someone who is nice, then Nicholas is not hypocritical.
It can be concluded that Gardner is nice once knowing that Abner is not obedient or Theodore is superior. | Nicholas is not hypocritical. | entailment |
Hadley is clever.
Theodore is not nice.
Hadley is not hypocritical.
Nicholas is obedient.
Amos is hypocritical.
Abner is clever.
Gardner is nice.
Hardy is not nice.
Abner is not hypocritical.
Hardy is not superior.
Abner is not superior.
Theodore is hypocritical.If Abner is not clever, then Nicholas is conscientious and Abner is not nice.
Nicholas being not conscientious implies that Gardner is superior.
Someone being both clever and conscientious is equivalent to being not obedient and not superior.
If someone who is not clever is also hypocritical, then he is not superior.
Nicholas being not superior is equivalent to Gardner being not conscientious.
If Theodore is clever, then Hardy is not hypocritical.
If there is at least one people who is either not superior or conscientious, then Hardy is clever and Abner is nice.
Someone being both not clever and superior is equivalent to being not nice and hypocritical.
Someone who is clever is always both hypocritical and obedient.
If there is at least one people who is nice, then Hadley is not superior and Amos is conscientious.
If there is someone who is nice, then Nicholas is not hypocritical.
It can be concluded that Gardner is nice once knowing that Abner is not obedient or Theodore is superior. | Hadley is hypocritical. | self_contradiction |
Hadley is clever.
Theodore is not nice.
Hadley is not hypocritical.
Nicholas is obedient.
Amos is hypocritical.
Abner is clever.
Gardner is nice.
Hardy is not nice.
Abner is not hypocritical.
Hardy is not superior.
Abner is not superior.
Theodore is hypocritical.If Abner is not clever, then Nicholas is conscientious and Abner is not nice.
Nicholas being not conscientious implies that Gardner is superior.
Someone being both clever and conscientious is equivalent to being not obedient and not superior.
If someone who is not clever is also hypocritical, then he is not superior.
Nicholas being not superior is equivalent to Gardner being not conscientious.
If Theodore is clever, then Hardy is not hypocritical.
If there is at least one people who is either not superior or conscientious, then Hardy is clever and Abner is nice.
Someone being both not clever and superior is equivalent to being not nice and hypocritical.
Someone who is clever is always both hypocritical and obedient.
If there is at least one people who is nice, then Hadley is not superior and Amos is conscientious.
If there is someone who is nice, then Nicholas is not hypocritical.
It can be concluded that Gardner is nice once knowing that Abner is not obedient or Theodore is superior. | Amos is conscientious. | entailment |
Hadley is clever.
Theodore is not nice.
Hadley is not hypocritical.
Nicholas is obedient.
Amos is hypocritical.
Abner is clever.
Gardner is nice.
Hardy is not nice.
Abner is not hypocritical.
Hardy is not superior.
Abner is not superior.
Theodore is hypocritical.If Abner is not clever, then Nicholas is conscientious and Abner is not nice.
Nicholas being not conscientious implies that Gardner is superior.
Someone being both clever and conscientious is equivalent to being not obedient and not superior.
If someone who is not clever is also hypocritical, then he is not superior.
Nicholas being not superior is equivalent to Gardner being not conscientious.
If Theodore is clever, then Hardy is not hypocritical.
If there is at least one people who is either not superior or conscientious, then Hardy is clever and Abner is nice.
Someone being both not clever and superior is equivalent to being not nice and hypocritical.
Someone who is clever is always both hypocritical and obedient.
If there is at least one people who is nice, then Hadley is not superior and Amos is conscientious.
If there is someone who is nice, then Nicholas is not hypocritical.
It can be concluded that Gardner is nice once knowing that Abner is not obedient or Theodore is superior. | Amos is not conscientious. | contradiction |
Hadley is clever.
Theodore is not nice.
Hadley is not hypocritical.
Nicholas is obedient.
Amos is hypocritical.
Abner is clever.
Gardner is nice.
Hardy is not nice.
Abner is not hypocritical.
Hardy is not superior.
Abner is not superior.
Theodore is hypocritical.If Abner is not clever, then Nicholas is conscientious and Abner is not nice.
Nicholas being not conscientious implies that Gardner is superior.
Someone being both clever and conscientious is equivalent to being not obedient and not superior.
If someone who is not clever is also hypocritical, then he is not superior.
Nicholas being not superior is equivalent to Gardner being not conscientious.
If Theodore is clever, then Hardy is not hypocritical.
If there is at least one people who is either not superior or conscientious, then Hardy is clever and Abner is nice.
Someone being both not clever and superior is equivalent to being not nice and hypocritical.
Someone who is clever is always both hypocritical and obedient.
If there is at least one people who is nice, then Hadley is not superior and Amos is conscientious.
If there is someone who is nice, then Nicholas is not hypocritical.
It can be concluded that Gardner is nice once knowing that Abner is not obedient or Theodore is superior. | Hardy is not clever. | self_contradiction |
Hadley is clever.
Theodore is not nice.
Hadley is not hypocritical.
Nicholas is obedient.
Amos is hypocritical.
Abner is clever.
Gardner is nice.
Hardy is not nice.
Abner is not hypocritical.
Hardy is not superior.
Abner is not superior.
Theodore is hypocritical.If Abner is not clever, then Nicholas is conscientious and Abner is not nice.
Nicholas being not conscientious implies that Gardner is superior.
Someone being both clever and conscientious is equivalent to being not obedient and not superior.
If someone who is not clever is also hypocritical, then he is not superior.
Nicholas being not superior is equivalent to Gardner being not conscientious.
If Theodore is clever, then Hardy is not hypocritical.
If there is at least one people who is either not superior or conscientious, then Hardy is clever and Abner is nice.
Someone being both not clever and superior is equivalent to being not nice and hypocritical.
Someone who is clever is always both hypocritical and obedient.
If there is at least one people who is nice, then Hadley is not superior and Amos is conscientious.
If there is someone who is nice, then Nicholas is not hypocritical.
It can be concluded that Gardner is nice once knowing that Abner is not obedient or Theodore is superior. | Nicholas is not clever. | neutral |
Hadley is clever.
Theodore is not nice.
Hadley is not hypocritical.
Nicholas is obedient.
Amos is hypocritical.
Abner is clever.
Gardner is nice.
Hardy is not nice.
Abner is not hypocritical.
Hardy is not superior.
Abner is not superior.
Theodore is hypocritical.If Abner is not clever, then Nicholas is conscientious and Abner is not nice.
Nicholas being not conscientious implies that Gardner is superior.
Someone being both clever and conscientious is equivalent to being not obedient and not superior.
If someone who is not clever is also hypocritical, then he is not superior.
Nicholas being not superior is equivalent to Gardner being not conscientious.
If Theodore is clever, then Hardy is not hypocritical.
If there is at least one people who is either not superior or conscientious, then Hardy is clever and Abner is nice.
Someone being both not clever and superior is equivalent to being not nice and hypocritical.
Someone who is clever is always both hypocritical and obedient.
If there is at least one people who is nice, then Hadley is not superior and Amos is conscientious.
If there is someone who is nice, then Nicholas is not hypocritical.
It can be concluded that Gardner is nice once knowing that Abner is not obedient or Theodore is superior. | Abner is not superior. | entailment |
Hadley is clever.
Theodore is not nice.
Hadley is not hypocritical.
Nicholas is obedient.
Amos is hypocritical.
Abner is clever.
Gardner is nice.
Hardy is not nice.
Abner is not hypocritical.
Hardy is not superior.
Abner is not superior.
Theodore is hypocritical.If Abner is not clever, then Nicholas is conscientious and Abner is not nice.
Nicholas being not conscientious implies that Gardner is superior.
Someone being both clever and conscientious is equivalent to being not obedient and not superior.
If someone who is not clever is also hypocritical, then he is not superior.
Nicholas being not superior is equivalent to Gardner being not conscientious.
If Theodore is clever, then Hardy is not hypocritical.
If there is at least one people who is either not superior or conscientious, then Hardy is clever and Abner is nice.
Someone being both not clever and superior is equivalent to being not nice and hypocritical.
Someone who is clever is always both hypocritical and obedient.
If there is at least one people who is nice, then Hadley is not superior and Amos is conscientious.
If there is someone who is nice, then Nicholas is not hypocritical.
It can be concluded that Gardner is nice once knowing that Abner is not obedient or Theodore is superior. | Amos is not obedient. | neutral |
Hadley is clever.
Theodore is not nice.
Hadley is not hypocritical.
Nicholas is obedient.
Amos is hypocritical.
Abner is clever.
Gardner is nice.
Hardy is not nice.
Abner is not hypocritical.
Hardy is not superior.
Abner is not superior.
Theodore is hypocritical.If Abner is not clever, then Nicholas is conscientious and Abner is not nice.
Nicholas being not conscientious implies that Gardner is superior.
Someone being both clever and conscientious is equivalent to being not obedient and not superior.
If someone who is not clever is also hypocritical, then he is not superior.
Nicholas being not superior is equivalent to Gardner being not conscientious.
If Theodore is clever, then Hardy is not hypocritical.
If there is at least one people who is either not superior or conscientious, then Hardy is clever and Abner is nice.
Someone being both not clever and superior is equivalent to being not nice and hypocritical.
Someone who is clever is always both hypocritical and obedient.
If there is at least one people who is nice, then Hadley is not superior and Amos is conscientious.
If there is someone who is nice, then Nicholas is not hypocritical.
It can be concluded that Gardner is nice once knowing that Abner is not obedient or Theodore is superior. | Abner is superior. | contradiction |
Hadley is clever.
Theodore is not nice.
Hadley is not hypocritical.
Nicholas is obedient.
Amos is hypocritical.
Abner is clever.
Gardner is nice.
Hardy is not nice.
Abner is not hypocritical.
Hardy is not superior.
Abner is not superior.
Theodore is hypocritical.If Abner is not clever, then Nicholas is conscientious and Abner is not nice.
Nicholas being not conscientious implies that Gardner is superior.
Someone being both clever and conscientious is equivalent to being not obedient and not superior.
If someone who is not clever is also hypocritical, then he is not superior.
Nicholas being not superior is equivalent to Gardner being not conscientious.
If Theodore is clever, then Hardy is not hypocritical.
If there is at least one people who is either not superior or conscientious, then Hardy is clever and Abner is nice.
Someone being both not clever and superior is equivalent to being not nice and hypocritical.
Someone who is clever is always both hypocritical and obedient.
If there is at least one people who is nice, then Hadley is not superior and Amos is conscientious.
If there is someone who is nice, then Nicholas is not hypocritical.
It can be concluded that Gardner is nice once knowing that Abner is not obedient or Theodore is superior. | Hardy is not obedient. | contradiction |
Hadley is clever.
Theodore is not nice.
Hadley is not hypocritical.
Nicholas is obedient.
Amos is hypocritical.
Abner is clever.
Gardner is nice.
Hardy is not nice.
Abner is not hypocritical.
Hardy is not superior.
Abner is not superior.
Theodore is hypocritical.If Abner is not clever, then Nicholas is conscientious and Abner is not nice.
Nicholas being not conscientious implies that Gardner is superior.
Someone being both clever and conscientious is equivalent to being not obedient and not superior.
If someone who is not clever is also hypocritical, then he is not superior.
Nicholas being not superior is equivalent to Gardner being not conscientious.
If Theodore is clever, then Hardy is not hypocritical.
If there is at least one people who is either not superior or conscientious, then Hardy is clever and Abner is nice.
Someone being both not clever and superior is equivalent to being not nice and hypocritical.
Someone who is clever is always both hypocritical and obedient.
If there is at least one people who is nice, then Hadley is not superior and Amos is conscientious.
If there is someone who is nice, then Nicholas is not hypocritical.
It can be concluded that Gardner is nice once knowing that Abner is not obedient or Theodore is superior. | Hadley is superior. | contradiction |
Janet is not hilarious.
Raymond is not black.
Carlton is not dynamic.
Shamus is not hilarious.
Shamus is not dynamic.
Janet is not dynamic.
Raymond is not happy.
Johnny is happy.
Aiken is remarkable.
Aiken is not disgusted.
Carlton is black.
Shamus is disgusted.Someone is not happy and dynamic if and only if he is remarkable.
If there is someone who is remarkable, then Aiken is not happy.
If there is at least one people who is not remarkable or disgusted, then Johnny is happy.
Someone is hilarious and not disgusted if and only if he is black.
If there is someone who is either not hilarious or not black, then Johnny is remarkable and Janet is not disgusted.
If someone is hilarious or not disgusted, then he is remarkable.
If Aiken is not happy, then Clifford is remarkable.
If Johnny is not hilarious, then Janet is not black, and vice versa.
If Shamus is black or Janet is disgusted, then Johnny is not remarkable.
If there is someone who is not remarkable, then Raymond is disgusted and Johnny is black.
Clifford being black and Clifford being disgusted imply that Janet is hilarious.
If there is at least one people who is both hilarious and black, then Aiken is not happy. | Clifford is dynamic. | entailment |
Janet is not hilarious.
Raymond is not black.
Carlton is not dynamic.
Shamus is not hilarious.
Shamus is not dynamic.
Janet is not dynamic.
Raymond is not happy.
Johnny is happy.
Aiken is remarkable.
Aiken is not disgusted.
Carlton is black.
Shamus is disgusted.Someone is not happy and dynamic if and only if he is remarkable.
If there is someone who is remarkable, then Aiken is not happy.
If there is at least one people who is not remarkable or disgusted, then Johnny is happy.
Someone is hilarious and not disgusted if and only if he is black.
If there is someone who is either not hilarious or not black, then Johnny is remarkable and Janet is not disgusted.
If someone is hilarious or not disgusted, then he is remarkable.
If Aiken is not happy, then Clifford is remarkable.
If Johnny is not hilarious, then Janet is not black, and vice versa.
If Shamus is black or Janet is disgusted, then Johnny is not remarkable.
If there is someone who is not remarkable, then Raymond is disgusted and Johnny is black.
Clifford being black and Clifford being disgusted imply that Janet is hilarious.
If there is at least one people who is both hilarious and black, then Aiken is not happy. | Shamus is dynamic. | contradiction |
Janet is not hilarious.
Raymond is not black.
Carlton is not dynamic.
Shamus is not hilarious.
Shamus is not dynamic.
Janet is not dynamic.
Raymond is not happy.
Johnny is happy.
Aiken is remarkable.
Aiken is not disgusted.
Carlton is black.
Shamus is disgusted.Someone is not happy and dynamic if and only if he is remarkable.
If there is someone who is remarkable, then Aiken is not happy.
If there is at least one people who is not remarkable or disgusted, then Johnny is happy.
Someone is hilarious and not disgusted if and only if he is black.
If there is someone who is either not hilarious or not black, then Johnny is remarkable and Janet is not disgusted.
If someone is hilarious or not disgusted, then he is remarkable.
If Aiken is not happy, then Clifford is remarkable.
If Johnny is not hilarious, then Janet is not black, and vice versa.
If Shamus is black or Janet is disgusted, then Johnny is not remarkable.
If there is someone who is not remarkable, then Raymond is disgusted and Johnny is black.
Clifford being black and Clifford being disgusted imply that Janet is hilarious.
If there is at least one people who is both hilarious and black, then Aiken is not happy. | Carlton is dynamic. | self_contradiction |
Janet is not hilarious.
Raymond is not black.
Carlton is not dynamic.
Shamus is not hilarious.
Shamus is not dynamic.
Janet is not dynamic.
Raymond is not happy.
Johnny is happy.
Aiken is remarkable.
Aiken is not disgusted.
Carlton is black.
Shamus is disgusted.Someone is not happy and dynamic if and only if he is remarkable.
If there is someone who is remarkable, then Aiken is not happy.
If there is at least one people who is not remarkable or disgusted, then Johnny is happy.
Someone is hilarious and not disgusted if and only if he is black.
If there is someone who is either not hilarious or not black, then Johnny is remarkable and Janet is not disgusted.
If someone is hilarious or not disgusted, then he is remarkable.
If Aiken is not happy, then Clifford is remarkable.
If Johnny is not hilarious, then Janet is not black, and vice versa.
If Shamus is black or Janet is disgusted, then Johnny is not remarkable.
If there is someone who is not remarkable, then Raymond is disgusted and Johnny is black.
Clifford being black and Clifford being disgusted imply that Janet is hilarious.
If there is at least one people who is both hilarious and black, then Aiken is not happy. | Aiken is disgusted. | contradiction |
Janet is not hilarious.
Raymond is not black.
Carlton is not dynamic.
Shamus is not hilarious.
Shamus is not dynamic.
Janet is not dynamic.
Raymond is not happy.
Johnny is happy.
Aiken is remarkable.
Aiken is not disgusted.
Carlton is black.
Shamus is disgusted.Someone is not happy and dynamic if and only if he is remarkable.
If there is someone who is remarkable, then Aiken is not happy.
If there is at least one people who is not remarkable or disgusted, then Johnny is happy.
Someone is hilarious and not disgusted if and only if he is black.
If there is someone who is either not hilarious or not black, then Johnny is remarkable and Janet is not disgusted.
If someone is hilarious or not disgusted, then he is remarkable.
If Aiken is not happy, then Clifford is remarkable.
If Johnny is not hilarious, then Janet is not black, and vice versa.
If Shamus is black or Janet is disgusted, then Johnny is not remarkable.
If there is someone who is not remarkable, then Raymond is disgusted and Johnny is black.
Clifford being black and Clifford being disgusted imply that Janet is hilarious.
If there is at least one people who is both hilarious and black, then Aiken is not happy. | Shamus is not happy. | neutral |
Janet is not hilarious.
Raymond is not black.
Carlton is not dynamic.
Shamus is not hilarious.
Shamus is not dynamic.
Janet is not dynamic.
Raymond is not happy.
Johnny is happy.
Aiken is remarkable.
Aiken is not disgusted.
Carlton is black.
Shamus is disgusted.Someone is not happy and dynamic if and only if he is remarkable.
If there is someone who is remarkable, then Aiken is not happy.
If there is at least one people who is not remarkable or disgusted, then Johnny is happy.
Someone is hilarious and not disgusted if and only if he is black.
If there is someone who is either not hilarious or not black, then Johnny is remarkable and Janet is not disgusted.
If someone is hilarious or not disgusted, then he is remarkable.
If Aiken is not happy, then Clifford is remarkable.
If Johnny is not hilarious, then Janet is not black, and vice versa.
If Shamus is black or Janet is disgusted, then Johnny is not remarkable.
If there is someone who is not remarkable, then Raymond is disgusted and Johnny is black.
Clifford being black and Clifford being disgusted imply that Janet is hilarious.
If there is at least one people who is both hilarious and black, then Aiken is not happy. | Carlton is black. | entailment |
Janet is not hilarious.
Raymond is not black.
Carlton is not dynamic.
Shamus is not hilarious.
Shamus is not dynamic.
Janet is not dynamic.
Raymond is not happy.
Johnny is happy.
Aiken is remarkable.
Aiken is not disgusted.
Carlton is black.
Shamus is disgusted.Someone is not happy and dynamic if and only if he is remarkable.
If there is someone who is remarkable, then Aiken is not happy.
If there is at least one people who is not remarkable or disgusted, then Johnny is happy.
Someone is hilarious and not disgusted if and only if he is black.
If there is someone who is either not hilarious or not black, then Johnny is remarkable and Janet is not disgusted.
If someone is hilarious or not disgusted, then he is remarkable.
If Aiken is not happy, then Clifford is remarkable.
If Johnny is not hilarious, then Janet is not black, and vice versa.
If Shamus is black or Janet is disgusted, then Johnny is not remarkable.
If there is someone who is not remarkable, then Raymond is disgusted and Johnny is black.
Clifford being black and Clifford being disgusted imply that Janet is hilarious.
If there is at least one people who is both hilarious and black, then Aiken is not happy. | Johnny is black. | neutral |
Janet is not hilarious.
Raymond is not black.
Carlton is not dynamic.
Shamus is not hilarious.
Shamus is not dynamic.
Janet is not dynamic.
Raymond is not happy.
Johnny is happy.
Aiken is remarkable.
Aiken is not disgusted.
Carlton is black.
Shamus is disgusted.Someone is not happy and dynamic if and only if he is remarkable.
If there is someone who is remarkable, then Aiken is not happy.
If there is at least one people who is not remarkable or disgusted, then Johnny is happy.
Someone is hilarious and not disgusted if and only if he is black.
If there is someone who is either not hilarious or not black, then Johnny is remarkable and Janet is not disgusted.
If someone is hilarious or not disgusted, then he is remarkable.
If Aiken is not happy, then Clifford is remarkable.
If Johnny is not hilarious, then Janet is not black, and vice versa.
If Shamus is black or Janet is disgusted, then Johnny is not remarkable.
If there is someone who is not remarkable, then Raymond is disgusted and Johnny is black.
Clifford being black and Clifford being disgusted imply that Janet is hilarious.
If there is at least one people who is both hilarious and black, then Aiken is not happy. | Carlton is not hilarious. | contradiction |
Janet is not hilarious.
Raymond is not black.
Carlton is not dynamic.
Shamus is not hilarious.
Shamus is not dynamic.
Janet is not dynamic.
Raymond is not happy.
Johnny is happy.
Aiken is remarkable.
Aiken is not disgusted.
Carlton is black.
Shamus is disgusted.Someone is not happy and dynamic if and only if he is remarkable.
If there is someone who is remarkable, then Aiken is not happy.
If there is at least one people who is not remarkable or disgusted, then Johnny is happy.
Someone is hilarious and not disgusted if and only if he is black.
If there is someone who is either not hilarious or not black, then Johnny is remarkable and Janet is not disgusted.
If someone is hilarious or not disgusted, then he is remarkable.
If Aiken is not happy, then Clifford is remarkable.
If Johnny is not hilarious, then Janet is not black, and vice versa.
If Shamus is black or Janet is disgusted, then Johnny is not remarkable.
If there is someone who is not remarkable, then Raymond is disgusted and Johnny is black.
Clifford being black and Clifford being disgusted imply that Janet is hilarious.
If there is at least one people who is both hilarious and black, then Aiken is not happy. | Johnny is remarkable. | entailment |
Janet is not hilarious.
Raymond is not black.
Carlton is not dynamic.
Shamus is not hilarious.
Shamus is not dynamic.
Janet is not dynamic.
Raymond is not happy.
Johnny is happy.
Aiken is remarkable.
Aiken is not disgusted.
Carlton is black.
Shamus is disgusted.Someone is not happy and dynamic if and only if he is remarkable.
If there is someone who is remarkable, then Aiken is not happy.
If there is at least one people who is not remarkable or disgusted, then Johnny is happy.
Someone is hilarious and not disgusted if and only if he is black.
If there is someone who is either not hilarious or not black, then Johnny is remarkable and Janet is not disgusted.
If someone is hilarious or not disgusted, then he is remarkable.
If Aiken is not happy, then Clifford is remarkable.
If Johnny is not hilarious, then Janet is not black, and vice versa.
If Shamus is black or Janet is disgusted, then Johnny is not remarkable.
If there is someone who is not remarkable, then Raymond is disgusted and Johnny is black.
Clifford being black and Clifford being disgusted imply that Janet is hilarious.
If there is at least one people who is both hilarious and black, then Aiken is not happy. | Janet is dynamic. | self_contradiction |
Janet is not hilarious.
Raymond is not black.
Carlton is not dynamic.
Shamus is not hilarious.
Shamus is not dynamic.
Janet is not dynamic.
Raymond is not happy.
Johnny is happy.
Aiken is remarkable.
Aiken is not disgusted.
Carlton is black.
Shamus is disgusted.Someone is not happy and dynamic if and only if he is remarkable.
If there is someone who is remarkable, then Aiken is not happy.
If there is at least one people who is not remarkable or disgusted, then Johnny is happy.
Someone is hilarious and not disgusted if and only if he is black.
If there is someone who is either not hilarious or not black, then Johnny is remarkable and Janet is not disgusted.
If someone is hilarious or not disgusted, then he is remarkable.
If Aiken is not happy, then Clifford is remarkable.
If Johnny is not hilarious, then Janet is not black, and vice versa.
If Shamus is black or Janet is disgusted, then Johnny is not remarkable.
If there is someone who is not remarkable, then Raymond is disgusted and Johnny is black.
Clifford being black and Clifford being disgusted imply that Janet is hilarious.
If there is at least one people who is both hilarious and black, then Aiken is not happy. | Johnny is not black. | neutral |
Janet is not hilarious.
Raymond is not black.
Carlton is not dynamic.
Shamus is not hilarious.
Shamus is not dynamic.
Janet is not dynamic.
Raymond is not happy.
Johnny is happy.
Aiken is remarkable.
Aiken is not disgusted.
Carlton is black.
Shamus is disgusted.Someone is not happy and dynamic if and only if he is remarkable.
If there is someone who is remarkable, then Aiken is not happy.
If there is at least one people who is not remarkable or disgusted, then Johnny is happy.
Someone is hilarious and not disgusted if and only if he is black.
If there is someone who is either not hilarious or not black, then Johnny is remarkable and Janet is not disgusted.
If someone is hilarious or not disgusted, then he is remarkable.
If Aiken is not happy, then Clifford is remarkable.
If Johnny is not hilarious, then Janet is not black, and vice versa.
If Shamus is black or Janet is disgusted, then Johnny is not remarkable.
If there is someone who is not remarkable, then Raymond is disgusted and Johnny is black.
Clifford being black and Clifford being disgusted imply that Janet is hilarious.
If there is at least one people who is both hilarious and black, then Aiken is not happy. | Johnny is not happy. | self_contradiction |
Janet is not hilarious.
Raymond is not black.
Carlton is not dynamic.
Shamus is not hilarious.
Shamus is not dynamic.
Janet is not dynamic.
Raymond is not happy.
Johnny is happy.
Aiken is remarkable.
Aiken is not disgusted.
Carlton is black.
Shamus is disgusted.Someone is not happy and dynamic if and only if he is remarkable.
If there is someone who is remarkable, then Aiken is not happy.
If there is at least one people who is not remarkable or disgusted, then Johnny is happy.
Someone is hilarious and not disgusted if and only if he is black.
If there is someone who is either not hilarious or not black, then Johnny is remarkable and Janet is not disgusted.
If someone is hilarious or not disgusted, then he is remarkable.
If Aiken is not happy, then Clifford is remarkable.
If Johnny is not hilarious, then Janet is not black, and vice versa.
If Shamus is black or Janet is disgusted, then Johnny is not remarkable.
If there is someone who is not remarkable, then Raymond is disgusted and Johnny is black.
Clifford being black and Clifford being disgusted imply that Janet is hilarious.
If there is at least one people who is both hilarious and black, then Aiken is not happy. | Carlton is not dynamic. | self_contradiction |
Janet is not hilarious.
Raymond is not black.
Carlton is not dynamic.
Shamus is not hilarious.
Shamus is not dynamic.
Janet is not dynamic.
Raymond is not happy.
Johnny is happy.
Aiken is remarkable.
Aiken is not disgusted.
Carlton is black.
Shamus is disgusted.Someone is not happy and dynamic if and only if he is remarkable.
If there is someone who is remarkable, then Aiken is not happy.
If there is at least one people who is not remarkable or disgusted, then Johnny is happy.
Someone is hilarious and not disgusted if and only if he is black.
If there is someone who is either not hilarious or not black, then Johnny is remarkable and Janet is not disgusted.
If someone is hilarious or not disgusted, then he is remarkable.
If Aiken is not happy, then Clifford is remarkable.
If Johnny is not hilarious, then Janet is not black, and vice versa.
If Shamus is black or Janet is disgusted, then Johnny is not remarkable.
If there is someone who is not remarkable, then Raymond is disgusted and Johnny is black.
Clifford being black and Clifford being disgusted imply that Janet is hilarious.
If there is at least one people who is both hilarious and black, then Aiken is not happy. | Johnny is happy. | self_contradiction |
Janet is not hilarious.
Raymond is not black.
Carlton is not dynamic.
Shamus is not hilarious.
Shamus is not dynamic.
Janet is not dynamic.
Raymond is not happy.
Johnny is happy.
Aiken is remarkable.
Aiken is not disgusted.
Carlton is black.
Shamus is disgusted.Someone is not happy and dynamic if and only if he is remarkable.
If there is someone who is remarkable, then Aiken is not happy.
If there is at least one people who is not remarkable or disgusted, then Johnny is happy.
Someone is hilarious and not disgusted if and only if he is black.
If there is someone who is either not hilarious or not black, then Johnny is remarkable and Janet is not disgusted.
If someone is hilarious or not disgusted, then he is remarkable.
If Aiken is not happy, then Clifford is remarkable.
If Johnny is not hilarious, then Janet is not black, and vice versa.
If Shamus is black or Janet is disgusted, then Johnny is not remarkable.
If there is someone who is not remarkable, then Raymond is disgusted and Johnny is black.
Clifford being black and Clifford being disgusted imply that Janet is hilarious.
If there is at least one people who is both hilarious and black, then Aiken is not happy. | Shamus is not hilarious. | entailment |
Janet is not hilarious.
Raymond is not black.
Carlton is not dynamic.
Shamus is not hilarious.
Shamus is not dynamic.
Janet is not dynamic.
Raymond is not happy.
Johnny is happy.
Aiken is remarkable.
Aiken is not disgusted.
Carlton is black.
Shamus is disgusted.Someone is not happy and dynamic if and only if he is remarkable.
If there is someone who is remarkable, then Aiken is not happy.
If there is at least one people who is not remarkable or disgusted, then Johnny is happy.
Someone is hilarious and not disgusted if and only if he is black.
If there is someone who is either not hilarious or not black, then Johnny is remarkable and Janet is not disgusted.
If someone is hilarious or not disgusted, then he is remarkable.
If Aiken is not happy, then Clifford is remarkable.
If Johnny is not hilarious, then Janet is not black, and vice versa.
If Shamus is black or Janet is disgusted, then Johnny is not remarkable.
If there is someone who is not remarkable, then Raymond is disgusted and Johnny is black.
Clifford being black and Clifford being disgusted imply that Janet is hilarious.
If there is at least one people who is both hilarious and black, then Aiken is not happy. | Shamus is hilarious. | contradiction |
Janet is not hilarious.
Raymond is not black.
Carlton is not dynamic.
Shamus is not hilarious.
Shamus is not dynamic.
Janet is not dynamic.
Raymond is not happy.
Johnny is happy.
Aiken is remarkable.
Aiken is not disgusted.
Carlton is black.
Shamus is disgusted.Someone is not happy and dynamic if and only if he is remarkable.
If there is someone who is remarkable, then Aiken is not happy.
If there is at least one people who is not remarkable or disgusted, then Johnny is happy.
Someone is hilarious and not disgusted if and only if he is black.
If there is someone who is either not hilarious or not black, then Johnny is remarkable and Janet is not disgusted.
If someone is hilarious or not disgusted, then he is remarkable.
If Aiken is not happy, then Clifford is remarkable.
If Johnny is not hilarious, then Janet is not black, and vice versa.
If Shamus is black or Janet is disgusted, then Johnny is not remarkable.
If there is someone who is not remarkable, then Raymond is disgusted and Johnny is black.
Clifford being black and Clifford being disgusted imply that Janet is hilarious.
If there is at least one people who is both hilarious and black, then Aiken is not happy. | Aiken is not happy. | entailment |
Janet is not hilarious.
Raymond is not black.
Carlton is not dynamic.
Shamus is not hilarious.
Shamus is not dynamic.
Janet is not dynamic.
Raymond is not happy.
Johnny is happy.
Aiken is remarkable.
Aiken is not disgusted.
Carlton is black.
Shamus is disgusted.Someone is not happy and dynamic if and only if he is remarkable.
If there is someone who is remarkable, then Aiken is not happy.
If there is at least one people who is not remarkable or disgusted, then Johnny is happy.
Someone is hilarious and not disgusted if and only if he is black.
If there is someone who is either not hilarious or not black, then Johnny is remarkable and Janet is not disgusted.
If someone is hilarious or not disgusted, then he is remarkable.
If Aiken is not happy, then Clifford is remarkable.
If Johnny is not hilarious, then Janet is not black, and vice versa.
If Shamus is black or Janet is disgusted, then Johnny is not remarkable.
If there is someone who is not remarkable, then Raymond is disgusted and Johnny is black.
Clifford being black and Clifford being disgusted imply that Janet is hilarious.
If there is at least one people who is both hilarious and black, then Aiken is not happy. | Clifford is hilarious. | neutral |
Janet is not hilarious.
Raymond is not black.
Carlton is not dynamic.
Shamus is not hilarious.
Shamus is not dynamic.
Janet is not dynamic.
Raymond is not happy.
Johnny is happy.
Aiken is remarkable.
Aiken is not disgusted.
Carlton is black.
Shamus is disgusted.Someone is not happy and dynamic if and only if he is remarkable.
If there is someone who is remarkable, then Aiken is not happy.
If there is at least one people who is not remarkable or disgusted, then Johnny is happy.
Someone is hilarious and not disgusted if and only if he is black.
If there is someone who is either not hilarious or not black, then Johnny is remarkable and Janet is not disgusted.
If someone is hilarious or not disgusted, then he is remarkable.
If Aiken is not happy, then Clifford is remarkable.
If Johnny is not hilarious, then Janet is not black, and vice versa.
If Shamus is black or Janet is disgusted, then Johnny is not remarkable.
If there is someone who is not remarkable, then Raymond is disgusted and Johnny is black.
Clifford being black and Clifford being disgusted imply that Janet is hilarious.
If there is at least one people who is both hilarious and black, then Aiken is not happy. | Raymond is dynamic. | neutral |
Janet is not hilarious.
Raymond is not black.
Carlton is not dynamic.
Shamus is not hilarious.
Shamus is not dynamic.
Janet is not dynamic.
Raymond is not happy.
Johnny is happy.
Aiken is remarkable.
Aiken is not disgusted.
Carlton is black.
Shamus is disgusted.Someone is not happy and dynamic if and only if he is remarkable.
If there is someone who is remarkable, then Aiken is not happy.
If there is at least one people who is not remarkable or disgusted, then Johnny is happy.
Someone is hilarious and not disgusted if and only if he is black.
If there is someone who is either not hilarious or not black, then Johnny is remarkable and Janet is not disgusted.
If someone is hilarious or not disgusted, then he is remarkable.
If Aiken is not happy, then Clifford is remarkable.
If Johnny is not hilarious, then Janet is not black, and vice versa.
If Shamus is black or Janet is disgusted, then Johnny is not remarkable.
If there is someone who is not remarkable, then Raymond is disgusted and Johnny is black.
Clifford being black and Clifford being disgusted imply that Janet is hilarious.
If there is at least one people who is both hilarious and black, then Aiken is not happy. | Aiken is happy. | contradiction |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.