premise
stringlengths 923
1.41k
| hypothesis
stringlengths 11
33
| label
stringclasses 4
values |
|---|---|---|
Ives is not upset.
Morton is selfish.
Merlin is outstanding.
Martin is not selfish.
Kendall is cotton.
Shawn is cotton.
Martin is upset.
Kendall is selfish.
Shawn is not selfish.
Ives is not odd.
Ives is cotton.
Ives is selfish.If there is someone who is either not realistic or upset, then Kurt is selfish.
If Shawn is upset, then Merlin is odd, and vice versa.
If everyone is not cotton, then Martin is not outstanding.
It can be concluded that Morton is not cotton once knowing that Martin is not odd or Shawn is not selfish.
If there is someone who is not odd, then Kendall is not upset and Kurt is cotton.
Martin being upset is equivalent to Kendall being not selfish and Morton being not cotton.
Martin being not realistic or Morton being not odd implies that Morton is selfish.
Ives being realistic and Martin being upset imply that Merlin is not cotton.
Someone who is both not cotton and not odd is always not outstanding.
Someone who is eithor not upset or not outstanding is always not cotton.
It can be concluded that Morton is not odd and Kendall is selfish once knowing that Shawn is realistic.
If someone is not outstanding or realistic, then he is not odd. | Shawn is not upset. | neutral |
Ives is not upset.
Morton is selfish.
Merlin is outstanding.
Martin is not selfish.
Kendall is cotton.
Shawn is cotton.
Martin is upset.
Kendall is selfish.
Shawn is not selfish.
Ives is not odd.
Ives is cotton.
Ives is selfish.If there is someone who is either not realistic or upset, then Kurt is selfish.
If Shawn is upset, then Merlin is odd, and vice versa.
If everyone is not cotton, then Martin is not outstanding.
It can be concluded that Morton is not cotton once knowing that Martin is not odd or Shawn is not selfish.
If there is someone who is not odd, then Kendall is not upset and Kurt is cotton.
Martin being upset is equivalent to Kendall being not selfish and Morton being not cotton.
Martin being not realistic or Morton being not odd implies that Morton is selfish.
Ives being realistic and Martin being upset imply that Merlin is not cotton.
Someone who is both not cotton and not odd is always not outstanding.
Someone who is eithor not upset or not outstanding is always not cotton.
It can be concluded that Morton is not odd and Kendall is selfish once knowing that Shawn is realistic.
If someone is not outstanding or realistic, then he is not odd. | Ives is selfish. | entailment |
Ives is not upset.
Morton is selfish.
Merlin is outstanding.
Martin is not selfish.
Kendall is cotton.
Shawn is cotton.
Martin is upset.
Kendall is selfish.
Shawn is not selfish.
Ives is not odd.
Ives is cotton.
Ives is selfish.If there is someone who is either not realistic or upset, then Kurt is selfish.
If Shawn is upset, then Merlin is odd, and vice versa.
If everyone is not cotton, then Martin is not outstanding.
It can be concluded that Morton is not cotton once knowing that Martin is not odd or Shawn is not selfish.
If there is someone who is not odd, then Kendall is not upset and Kurt is cotton.
Martin being upset is equivalent to Kendall being not selfish and Morton being not cotton.
Martin being not realistic or Morton being not odd implies that Morton is selfish.
Ives being realistic and Martin being upset imply that Merlin is not cotton.
Someone who is both not cotton and not odd is always not outstanding.
Someone who is eithor not upset or not outstanding is always not cotton.
It can be concluded that Morton is not odd and Kendall is selfish once knowing that Shawn is realistic.
If someone is not outstanding or realistic, then he is not odd. | Kurt is not selfish. | contradiction |
Ives is not upset.
Morton is selfish.
Merlin is outstanding.
Martin is not selfish.
Kendall is cotton.
Shawn is cotton.
Martin is upset.
Kendall is selfish.
Shawn is not selfish.
Ives is not odd.
Ives is cotton.
Ives is selfish.If there is someone who is either not realistic or upset, then Kurt is selfish.
If Shawn is upset, then Merlin is odd, and vice versa.
If everyone is not cotton, then Martin is not outstanding.
It can be concluded that Morton is not cotton once knowing that Martin is not odd or Shawn is not selfish.
If there is someone who is not odd, then Kendall is not upset and Kurt is cotton.
Martin being upset is equivalent to Kendall being not selfish and Morton being not cotton.
Martin being not realistic or Morton being not odd implies that Morton is selfish.
Ives being realistic and Martin being upset imply that Merlin is not cotton.
Someone who is both not cotton and not odd is always not outstanding.
Someone who is eithor not upset or not outstanding is always not cotton.
It can be concluded that Morton is not odd and Kendall is selfish once knowing that Shawn is realistic.
If someone is not outstanding or realistic, then he is not odd. | Ives is outstanding. | contradiction |
Ives is not upset.
Morton is selfish.
Merlin is outstanding.
Martin is not selfish.
Kendall is cotton.
Shawn is cotton.
Martin is upset.
Kendall is selfish.
Shawn is not selfish.
Ives is not odd.
Ives is cotton.
Ives is selfish.If there is someone who is either not realistic or upset, then Kurt is selfish.
If Shawn is upset, then Merlin is odd, and vice versa.
If everyone is not cotton, then Martin is not outstanding.
It can be concluded that Morton is not cotton once knowing that Martin is not odd or Shawn is not selfish.
If there is someone who is not odd, then Kendall is not upset and Kurt is cotton.
Martin being upset is equivalent to Kendall being not selfish and Morton being not cotton.
Martin being not realistic or Morton being not odd implies that Morton is selfish.
Ives being realistic and Martin being upset imply that Merlin is not cotton.
Someone who is both not cotton and not odd is always not outstanding.
Someone who is eithor not upset or not outstanding is always not cotton.
It can be concluded that Morton is not odd and Kendall is selfish once knowing that Shawn is realistic.
If someone is not outstanding or realistic, then he is not odd. | Merlin is not outstanding. | contradiction |
Ives is not upset.
Morton is selfish.
Merlin is outstanding.
Martin is not selfish.
Kendall is cotton.
Shawn is cotton.
Martin is upset.
Kendall is selfish.
Shawn is not selfish.
Ives is not odd.
Ives is cotton.
Ives is selfish.If there is someone who is either not realistic or upset, then Kurt is selfish.
If Shawn is upset, then Merlin is odd, and vice versa.
If everyone is not cotton, then Martin is not outstanding.
It can be concluded that Morton is not cotton once knowing that Martin is not odd or Shawn is not selfish.
If there is someone who is not odd, then Kendall is not upset and Kurt is cotton.
Martin being upset is equivalent to Kendall being not selfish and Morton being not cotton.
Martin being not realistic or Morton being not odd implies that Morton is selfish.
Ives being realistic and Martin being upset imply that Merlin is not cotton.
Someone who is both not cotton and not odd is always not outstanding.
Someone who is eithor not upset or not outstanding is always not cotton.
It can be concluded that Morton is not odd and Kendall is selfish once knowing that Shawn is realistic.
If someone is not outstanding or realistic, then he is not odd. | Ives is not cotton. | self_contradiction |
Ives is not upset.
Morton is selfish.
Merlin is outstanding.
Martin is not selfish.
Kendall is cotton.
Shawn is cotton.
Martin is upset.
Kendall is selfish.
Shawn is not selfish.
Ives is not odd.
Ives is cotton.
Ives is selfish.If there is someone who is either not realistic or upset, then Kurt is selfish.
If Shawn is upset, then Merlin is odd, and vice versa.
If everyone is not cotton, then Martin is not outstanding.
It can be concluded that Morton is not cotton once knowing that Martin is not odd or Shawn is not selfish.
If there is someone who is not odd, then Kendall is not upset and Kurt is cotton.
Martin being upset is equivalent to Kendall being not selfish and Morton being not cotton.
Martin being not realistic or Morton being not odd implies that Morton is selfish.
Ives being realistic and Martin being upset imply that Merlin is not cotton.
Someone who is both not cotton and not odd is always not outstanding.
Someone who is eithor not upset or not outstanding is always not cotton.
It can be concluded that Morton is not odd and Kendall is selfish once knowing that Shawn is realistic.
If someone is not outstanding or realistic, then he is not odd. | Kendall is not selfish. | self_contradiction |
Ives is not upset.
Morton is selfish.
Merlin is outstanding.
Martin is not selfish.
Kendall is cotton.
Shawn is cotton.
Martin is upset.
Kendall is selfish.
Shawn is not selfish.
Ives is not odd.
Ives is cotton.
Ives is selfish.If there is someone who is either not realistic or upset, then Kurt is selfish.
If Shawn is upset, then Merlin is odd, and vice versa.
If everyone is not cotton, then Martin is not outstanding.
It can be concluded that Morton is not cotton once knowing that Martin is not odd or Shawn is not selfish.
If there is someone who is not odd, then Kendall is not upset and Kurt is cotton.
Martin being upset is equivalent to Kendall being not selfish and Morton being not cotton.
Martin being not realistic or Morton being not odd implies that Morton is selfish.
Ives being realistic and Martin being upset imply that Merlin is not cotton.
Someone who is both not cotton and not odd is always not outstanding.
Someone who is eithor not upset or not outstanding is always not cotton.
It can be concluded that Morton is not odd and Kendall is selfish once knowing that Shawn is realistic.
If someone is not outstanding or realistic, then he is not odd. | Shawn is cotton. | entailment |
Ives is not upset.
Morton is selfish.
Merlin is outstanding.
Martin is not selfish.
Kendall is cotton.
Shawn is cotton.
Martin is upset.
Kendall is selfish.
Shawn is not selfish.
Ives is not odd.
Ives is cotton.
Ives is selfish.If there is someone who is either not realistic or upset, then Kurt is selfish.
If Shawn is upset, then Merlin is odd, and vice versa.
If everyone is not cotton, then Martin is not outstanding.
It can be concluded that Morton is not cotton once knowing that Martin is not odd or Shawn is not selfish.
If there is someone who is not odd, then Kendall is not upset and Kurt is cotton.
Martin being upset is equivalent to Kendall being not selfish and Morton being not cotton.
Martin being not realistic or Morton being not odd implies that Morton is selfish.
Ives being realistic and Martin being upset imply that Merlin is not cotton.
Someone who is both not cotton and not odd is always not outstanding.
Someone who is eithor not upset or not outstanding is always not cotton.
It can be concluded that Morton is not odd and Kendall is selfish once knowing that Shawn is realistic.
If someone is not outstanding or realistic, then he is not odd. | Kendall is selfish. | self_contradiction |
Ives is not upset.
Morton is selfish.
Merlin is outstanding.
Martin is not selfish.
Kendall is cotton.
Shawn is cotton.
Martin is upset.
Kendall is selfish.
Shawn is not selfish.
Ives is not odd.
Ives is cotton.
Ives is selfish.If there is someone who is either not realistic or upset, then Kurt is selfish.
If Shawn is upset, then Merlin is odd, and vice versa.
If everyone is not cotton, then Martin is not outstanding.
It can be concluded that Morton is not cotton once knowing that Martin is not odd or Shawn is not selfish.
If there is someone who is not odd, then Kendall is not upset and Kurt is cotton.
Martin being upset is equivalent to Kendall being not selfish and Morton being not cotton.
Martin being not realistic or Morton being not odd implies that Morton is selfish.
Ives being realistic and Martin being upset imply that Merlin is not cotton.
Someone who is both not cotton and not odd is always not outstanding.
Someone who is eithor not upset or not outstanding is always not cotton.
It can be concluded that Morton is not odd and Kendall is selfish once knowing that Shawn is realistic.
If someone is not outstanding or realistic, then he is not odd. | Kurt is not cotton. | contradiction |
Ives is not upset.
Morton is selfish.
Merlin is outstanding.
Martin is not selfish.
Kendall is cotton.
Shawn is cotton.
Martin is upset.
Kendall is selfish.
Shawn is not selfish.
Ives is not odd.
Ives is cotton.
Ives is selfish.If there is someone who is either not realistic or upset, then Kurt is selfish.
If Shawn is upset, then Merlin is odd, and vice versa.
If everyone is not cotton, then Martin is not outstanding.
It can be concluded that Morton is not cotton once knowing that Martin is not odd or Shawn is not selfish.
If there is someone who is not odd, then Kendall is not upset and Kurt is cotton.
Martin being upset is equivalent to Kendall being not selfish and Morton being not cotton.
Martin being not realistic or Morton being not odd implies that Morton is selfish.
Ives being realistic and Martin being upset imply that Merlin is not cotton.
Someone who is both not cotton and not odd is always not outstanding.
Someone who is eithor not upset or not outstanding is always not cotton.
It can be concluded that Morton is not odd and Kendall is selfish once knowing that Shawn is realistic.
If someone is not outstanding or realistic, then he is not odd. | Morton is selfish. | entailment |
Ives is not upset.
Morton is selfish.
Merlin is outstanding.
Martin is not selfish.
Kendall is cotton.
Shawn is cotton.
Martin is upset.
Kendall is selfish.
Shawn is not selfish.
Ives is not odd.
Ives is cotton.
Ives is selfish.If there is someone who is either not realistic or upset, then Kurt is selfish.
If Shawn is upset, then Merlin is odd, and vice versa.
If everyone is not cotton, then Martin is not outstanding.
It can be concluded that Morton is not cotton once knowing that Martin is not odd or Shawn is not selfish.
If there is someone who is not odd, then Kendall is not upset and Kurt is cotton.
Martin being upset is equivalent to Kendall being not selfish and Morton being not cotton.
Martin being not realistic or Morton being not odd implies that Morton is selfish.
Ives being realistic and Martin being upset imply that Merlin is not cotton.
Someone who is both not cotton and not odd is always not outstanding.
Someone who is eithor not upset or not outstanding is always not cotton.
It can be concluded that Morton is not odd and Kendall is selfish once knowing that Shawn is realistic.
If someone is not outstanding or realistic, then he is not odd. | Merlin is realistic. | neutral |
Ives is not upset.
Morton is selfish.
Merlin is outstanding.
Martin is not selfish.
Kendall is cotton.
Shawn is cotton.
Martin is upset.
Kendall is selfish.
Shawn is not selfish.
Ives is not odd.
Ives is cotton.
Ives is selfish.If there is someone who is either not realistic or upset, then Kurt is selfish.
If Shawn is upset, then Merlin is odd, and vice versa.
If everyone is not cotton, then Martin is not outstanding.
It can be concluded that Morton is not cotton once knowing that Martin is not odd or Shawn is not selfish.
If there is someone who is not odd, then Kendall is not upset and Kurt is cotton.
Martin being upset is equivalent to Kendall being not selfish and Morton being not cotton.
Martin being not realistic or Morton being not odd implies that Morton is selfish.
Ives being realistic and Martin being upset imply that Merlin is not cotton.
Someone who is both not cotton and not odd is always not outstanding.
Someone who is eithor not upset or not outstanding is always not cotton.
It can be concluded that Morton is not odd and Kendall is selfish once knowing that Shawn is realistic.
If someone is not outstanding or realistic, then he is not odd. | Kendall is not outstanding. | neutral |
Ives is not upset.
Morton is selfish.
Merlin is outstanding.
Martin is not selfish.
Kendall is cotton.
Shawn is cotton.
Martin is upset.
Kendall is selfish.
Shawn is not selfish.
Ives is not odd.
Ives is cotton.
Ives is selfish.If there is someone who is either not realistic or upset, then Kurt is selfish.
If Shawn is upset, then Merlin is odd, and vice versa.
If everyone is not cotton, then Martin is not outstanding.
It can be concluded that Morton is not cotton once knowing that Martin is not odd or Shawn is not selfish.
If there is someone who is not odd, then Kendall is not upset and Kurt is cotton.
Martin being upset is equivalent to Kendall being not selfish and Morton being not cotton.
Martin being not realistic or Morton being not odd implies that Morton is selfish.
Ives being realistic and Martin being upset imply that Merlin is not cotton.
Someone who is both not cotton and not odd is always not outstanding.
Someone who is eithor not upset or not outstanding is always not cotton.
It can be concluded that Morton is not odd and Kendall is selfish once knowing that Shawn is realistic.
If someone is not outstanding or realistic, then he is not odd. | Kurt is not outstanding. | neutral |
Ives is not upset.
Morton is selfish.
Merlin is outstanding.
Martin is not selfish.
Kendall is cotton.
Shawn is cotton.
Martin is upset.
Kendall is selfish.
Shawn is not selfish.
Ives is not odd.
Ives is cotton.
Ives is selfish.If there is someone who is either not realistic or upset, then Kurt is selfish.
If Shawn is upset, then Merlin is odd, and vice versa.
If everyone is not cotton, then Martin is not outstanding.
It can be concluded that Morton is not cotton once knowing that Martin is not odd or Shawn is not selfish.
If there is someone who is not odd, then Kendall is not upset and Kurt is cotton.
Martin being upset is equivalent to Kendall being not selfish and Morton being not cotton.
Martin being not realistic or Morton being not odd implies that Morton is selfish.
Ives being realistic and Martin being upset imply that Merlin is not cotton.
Someone who is both not cotton and not odd is always not outstanding.
Someone who is eithor not upset or not outstanding is always not cotton.
It can be concluded that Morton is not odd and Kendall is selfish once knowing that Shawn is realistic.
If someone is not outstanding or realistic, then he is not odd. | Ives is cotton. | self_contradiction |
Ives is not upset.
Morton is selfish.
Merlin is outstanding.
Martin is not selfish.
Kendall is cotton.
Shawn is cotton.
Martin is upset.
Kendall is selfish.
Shawn is not selfish.
Ives is not odd.
Ives is cotton.
Ives is selfish.If there is someone who is either not realistic or upset, then Kurt is selfish.
If Shawn is upset, then Merlin is odd, and vice versa.
If everyone is not cotton, then Martin is not outstanding.
It can be concluded that Morton is not cotton once knowing that Martin is not odd or Shawn is not selfish.
If there is someone who is not odd, then Kendall is not upset and Kurt is cotton.
Martin being upset is equivalent to Kendall being not selfish and Morton being not cotton.
Martin being not realistic or Morton being not odd implies that Morton is selfish.
Ives being realistic and Martin being upset imply that Merlin is not cotton.
Someone who is both not cotton and not odd is always not outstanding.
Someone who is eithor not upset or not outstanding is always not cotton.
It can be concluded that Morton is not odd and Kendall is selfish once knowing that Shawn is realistic.
If someone is not outstanding or realistic, then he is not odd. | Shawn is not selfish. | entailment |
Ives is not upset.
Morton is selfish.
Merlin is outstanding.
Martin is not selfish.
Kendall is cotton.
Shawn is cotton.
Martin is upset.
Kendall is selfish.
Shawn is not selfish.
Ives is not odd.
Ives is cotton.
Ives is selfish.If there is someone who is either not realistic or upset, then Kurt is selfish.
If Shawn is upset, then Merlin is odd, and vice versa.
If everyone is not cotton, then Martin is not outstanding.
It can be concluded that Morton is not cotton once knowing that Martin is not odd or Shawn is not selfish.
If there is someone who is not odd, then Kendall is not upset and Kurt is cotton.
Martin being upset is equivalent to Kendall being not selfish and Morton being not cotton.
Martin being not realistic or Morton being not odd implies that Morton is selfish.
Ives being realistic and Martin being upset imply that Merlin is not cotton.
Someone who is both not cotton and not odd is always not outstanding.
Someone who is eithor not upset or not outstanding is always not cotton.
It can be concluded that Morton is not odd and Kendall is selfish once knowing that Shawn is realistic.
If someone is not outstanding or realistic, then he is not odd. | Morton is not outstanding. | neutral |
Ives is not upset.
Morton is selfish.
Merlin is outstanding.
Martin is not selfish.
Kendall is cotton.
Shawn is cotton.
Martin is upset.
Kendall is selfish.
Shawn is not selfish.
Ives is not odd.
Ives is cotton.
Ives is selfish.If there is someone who is either not realistic or upset, then Kurt is selfish.
If Shawn is upset, then Merlin is odd, and vice versa.
If everyone is not cotton, then Martin is not outstanding.
It can be concluded that Morton is not cotton once knowing that Martin is not odd or Shawn is not selfish.
If there is someone who is not odd, then Kendall is not upset and Kurt is cotton.
Martin being upset is equivalent to Kendall being not selfish and Morton being not cotton.
Martin being not realistic or Morton being not odd implies that Morton is selfish.
Ives being realistic and Martin being upset imply that Merlin is not cotton.
Someone who is both not cotton and not odd is always not outstanding.
Someone who is eithor not upset or not outstanding is always not cotton.
It can be concluded that Morton is not odd and Kendall is selfish once knowing that Shawn is realistic.
If someone is not outstanding or realistic, then he is not odd. | Shawn is not cotton. | contradiction |
Ives is not upset.
Morton is selfish.
Merlin is outstanding.
Martin is not selfish.
Kendall is cotton.
Shawn is cotton.
Martin is upset.
Kendall is selfish.
Shawn is not selfish.
Ives is not odd.
Ives is cotton.
Ives is selfish.If there is someone who is either not realistic or upset, then Kurt is selfish.
If Shawn is upset, then Merlin is odd, and vice versa.
If everyone is not cotton, then Martin is not outstanding.
It can be concluded that Morton is not cotton once knowing that Martin is not odd or Shawn is not selfish.
If there is someone who is not odd, then Kendall is not upset and Kurt is cotton.
Martin being upset is equivalent to Kendall being not selfish and Morton being not cotton.
Martin being not realistic or Morton being not odd implies that Morton is selfish.
Ives being realistic and Martin being upset imply that Merlin is not cotton.
Someone who is both not cotton and not odd is always not outstanding.
Someone who is eithor not upset or not outstanding is always not cotton.
It can be concluded that Morton is not odd and Kendall is selfish once knowing that Shawn is realistic.
If someone is not outstanding or realistic, then he is not odd. | Kurt is selfish. | entailment |
Ives is not upset.
Morton is selfish.
Merlin is outstanding.
Martin is not selfish.
Kendall is cotton.
Shawn is cotton.
Martin is upset.
Kendall is selfish.
Shawn is not selfish.
Ives is not odd.
Ives is cotton.
Ives is selfish.If there is someone who is either not realistic or upset, then Kurt is selfish.
If Shawn is upset, then Merlin is odd, and vice versa.
If everyone is not cotton, then Martin is not outstanding.
It can be concluded that Morton is not cotton once knowing that Martin is not odd or Shawn is not selfish.
If there is someone who is not odd, then Kendall is not upset and Kurt is cotton.
Martin being upset is equivalent to Kendall being not selfish and Morton being not cotton.
Martin being not realistic or Morton being not odd implies that Morton is selfish.
Ives being realistic and Martin being upset imply that Merlin is not cotton.
Someone who is both not cotton and not odd is always not outstanding.
Someone who is eithor not upset or not outstanding is always not cotton.
It can be concluded that Morton is not odd and Kendall is selfish once knowing that Shawn is realistic.
If someone is not outstanding or realistic, then he is not odd. | Kendall is not cotton. | self_contradiction |
Lucy is helpless.
Paxton is not cool.
Roland is acceptable.
Lucy is dusty.
Culver is not helpless.
Bryant is not acceptable.
Della is not ambitious.
Roland is not ambitious.
Mark is not nice.
Bryant is not cool.
Lucy is ambitious.
Roland is dusty.Someone who is not dusty is always nice.
If someone is both not helpless and cool, then he is not dusty.
Bryant being dusty implies that Della is not acceptable and Roland is helpless.
If someone is both helpless and not dusty, then he is not ambitious.
If someone is acceptable, then he is both cool and ambitious.
As long as someone is not helpless, he is not ambitious and not nice.
If someone is ambitious or he is cool, then he is not helpless.
If there is at least one people who is not nice, then Bryant is not cool.
Roland being not dusty is equivalent to Lucy being not helpless and Lucy being ambitious.
if there is at least one people who is acceptable and not nice, then Mark is not dusty and Roland is helpless.
Della being not acceptable is equivalent to Bryant being not helpless.
If all people are dusty, then Bryant is not cool and Della is not nice. | Culver is helpless. | contradiction |
Lucy is helpless.
Paxton is not cool.
Roland is acceptable.
Lucy is dusty.
Culver is not helpless.
Bryant is not acceptable.
Della is not ambitious.
Roland is not ambitious.
Mark is not nice.
Bryant is not cool.
Lucy is ambitious.
Roland is dusty.Someone who is not dusty is always nice.
If someone is both not helpless and cool, then he is not dusty.
Bryant being dusty implies that Della is not acceptable and Roland is helpless.
If someone is both helpless and not dusty, then he is not ambitious.
If someone is acceptable, then he is both cool and ambitious.
As long as someone is not helpless, he is not ambitious and not nice.
If someone is ambitious or he is cool, then he is not helpless.
If there is at least one people who is not nice, then Bryant is not cool.
Roland being not dusty is equivalent to Lucy being not helpless and Lucy being ambitious.
if there is at least one people who is acceptable and not nice, then Mark is not dusty and Roland is helpless.
Della being not acceptable is equivalent to Bryant being not helpless.
If all people are dusty, then Bryant is not cool and Della is not nice. | Paxton is nice. | neutral |
Lucy is helpless.
Paxton is not cool.
Roland is acceptable.
Lucy is dusty.
Culver is not helpless.
Bryant is not acceptable.
Della is not ambitious.
Roland is not ambitious.
Mark is not nice.
Bryant is not cool.
Lucy is ambitious.
Roland is dusty.Someone who is not dusty is always nice.
If someone is both not helpless and cool, then he is not dusty.
Bryant being dusty implies that Della is not acceptable and Roland is helpless.
If someone is both helpless and not dusty, then he is not ambitious.
If someone is acceptable, then he is both cool and ambitious.
As long as someone is not helpless, he is not ambitious and not nice.
If someone is ambitious or he is cool, then he is not helpless.
If there is at least one people who is not nice, then Bryant is not cool.
Roland being not dusty is equivalent to Lucy being not helpless and Lucy being ambitious.
if there is at least one people who is acceptable and not nice, then Mark is not dusty and Roland is helpless.
Della being not acceptable is equivalent to Bryant being not helpless.
If all people are dusty, then Bryant is not cool and Della is not nice. | Mark is not nice. | entailment |
Lucy is helpless.
Paxton is not cool.
Roland is acceptable.
Lucy is dusty.
Culver is not helpless.
Bryant is not acceptable.
Della is not ambitious.
Roland is not ambitious.
Mark is not nice.
Bryant is not cool.
Lucy is ambitious.
Roland is dusty.Someone who is not dusty is always nice.
If someone is both not helpless and cool, then he is not dusty.
Bryant being dusty implies that Della is not acceptable and Roland is helpless.
If someone is both helpless and not dusty, then he is not ambitious.
If someone is acceptable, then he is both cool and ambitious.
As long as someone is not helpless, he is not ambitious and not nice.
If someone is ambitious or he is cool, then he is not helpless.
If there is at least one people who is not nice, then Bryant is not cool.
Roland being not dusty is equivalent to Lucy being not helpless and Lucy being ambitious.
if there is at least one people who is acceptable and not nice, then Mark is not dusty and Roland is helpless.
Della being not acceptable is equivalent to Bryant being not helpless.
If all people are dusty, then Bryant is not cool and Della is not nice. | Roland is ambitious. | self_contradiction |
Lucy is helpless.
Paxton is not cool.
Roland is acceptable.
Lucy is dusty.
Culver is not helpless.
Bryant is not acceptable.
Della is not ambitious.
Roland is not ambitious.
Mark is not nice.
Bryant is not cool.
Lucy is ambitious.
Roland is dusty.Someone who is not dusty is always nice.
If someone is both not helpless and cool, then he is not dusty.
Bryant being dusty implies that Della is not acceptable and Roland is helpless.
If someone is both helpless and not dusty, then he is not ambitious.
If someone is acceptable, then he is both cool and ambitious.
As long as someone is not helpless, he is not ambitious and not nice.
If someone is ambitious or he is cool, then he is not helpless.
If there is at least one people who is not nice, then Bryant is not cool.
Roland being not dusty is equivalent to Lucy being not helpless and Lucy being ambitious.
if there is at least one people who is acceptable and not nice, then Mark is not dusty and Roland is helpless.
Della being not acceptable is equivalent to Bryant being not helpless.
If all people are dusty, then Bryant is not cool and Della is not nice. | Della is helpless. | neutral |
Lucy is helpless.
Paxton is not cool.
Roland is acceptable.
Lucy is dusty.
Culver is not helpless.
Bryant is not acceptable.
Della is not ambitious.
Roland is not ambitious.
Mark is not nice.
Bryant is not cool.
Lucy is ambitious.
Roland is dusty.Someone who is not dusty is always nice.
If someone is both not helpless and cool, then he is not dusty.
Bryant being dusty implies that Della is not acceptable and Roland is helpless.
If someone is both helpless and not dusty, then he is not ambitious.
If someone is acceptable, then he is both cool and ambitious.
As long as someone is not helpless, he is not ambitious and not nice.
If someone is ambitious or he is cool, then he is not helpless.
If there is at least one people who is not nice, then Bryant is not cool.
Roland being not dusty is equivalent to Lucy being not helpless and Lucy being ambitious.
if there is at least one people who is acceptable and not nice, then Mark is not dusty and Roland is helpless.
Della being not acceptable is equivalent to Bryant being not helpless.
If all people are dusty, then Bryant is not cool and Della is not nice. | Bryant is not acceptable. | entailment |
Lucy is helpless.
Paxton is not cool.
Roland is acceptable.
Lucy is dusty.
Culver is not helpless.
Bryant is not acceptable.
Della is not ambitious.
Roland is not ambitious.
Mark is not nice.
Bryant is not cool.
Lucy is ambitious.
Roland is dusty.Someone who is not dusty is always nice.
If someone is both not helpless and cool, then he is not dusty.
Bryant being dusty implies that Della is not acceptable and Roland is helpless.
If someone is both helpless and not dusty, then he is not ambitious.
If someone is acceptable, then he is both cool and ambitious.
As long as someone is not helpless, he is not ambitious and not nice.
If someone is ambitious or he is cool, then he is not helpless.
If there is at least one people who is not nice, then Bryant is not cool.
Roland being not dusty is equivalent to Lucy being not helpless and Lucy being ambitious.
if there is at least one people who is acceptable and not nice, then Mark is not dusty and Roland is helpless.
Della being not acceptable is equivalent to Bryant being not helpless.
If all people are dusty, then Bryant is not cool and Della is not nice. | Paxton is cool. | contradiction |
Lucy is helpless.
Paxton is not cool.
Roland is acceptable.
Lucy is dusty.
Culver is not helpless.
Bryant is not acceptable.
Della is not ambitious.
Roland is not ambitious.
Mark is not nice.
Bryant is not cool.
Lucy is ambitious.
Roland is dusty.Someone who is not dusty is always nice.
If someone is both not helpless and cool, then he is not dusty.
Bryant being dusty implies that Della is not acceptable and Roland is helpless.
If someone is both helpless and not dusty, then he is not ambitious.
If someone is acceptable, then he is both cool and ambitious.
As long as someone is not helpless, he is not ambitious and not nice.
If someone is ambitious or he is cool, then he is not helpless.
If there is at least one people who is not nice, then Bryant is not cool.
Roland being not dusty is equivalent to Lucy being not helpless and Lucy being ambitious.
if there is at least one people who is acceptable and not nice, then Mark is not dusty and Roland is helpless.
Della being not acceptable is equivalent to Bryant being not helpless.
If all people are dusty, then Bryant is not cool and Della is not nice. | Paxton is not cool. | entailment |
Lucy is helpless.
Paxton is not cool.
Roland is acceptable.
Lucy is dusty.
Culver is not helpless.
Bryant is not acceptable.
Della is not ambitious.
Roland is not ambitious.
Mark is not nice.
Bryant is not cool.
Lucy is ambitious.
Roland is dusty.Someone who is not dusty is always nice.
If someone is both not helpless and cool, then he is not dusty.
Bryant being dusty implies that Della is not acceptable and Roland is helpless.
If someone is both helpless and not dusty, then he is not ambitious.
If someone is acceptable, then he is both cool and ambitious.
As long as someone is not helpless, he is not ambitious and not nice.
If someone is ambitious or he is cool, then he is not helpless.
If there is at least one people who is not nice, then Bryant is not cool.
Roland being not dusty is equivalent to Lucy being not helpless and Lucy being ambitious.
if there is at least one people who is acceptable and not nice, then Mark is not dusty and Roland is helpless.
Della being not acceptable is equivalent to Bryant being not helpless.
If all people are dusty, then Bryant is not cool and Della is not nice. | Della is ambitious. | contradiction |
Lucy is helpless.
Paxton is not cool.
Roland is acceptable.
Lucy is dusty.
Culver is not helpless.
Bryant is not acceptable.
Della is not ambitious.
Roland is not ambitious.
Mark is not nice.
Bryant is not cool.
Lucy is ambitious.
Roland is dusty.Someone who is not dusty is always nice.
If someone is both not helpless and cool, then he is not dusty.
Bryant being dusty implies that Della is not acceptable and Roland is helpless.
If someone is both helpless and not dusty, then he is not ambitious.
If someone is acceptable, then he is both cool and ambitious.
As long as someone is not helpless, he is not ambitious and not nice.
If someone is ambitious or he is cool, then he is not helpless.
If there is at least one people who is not nice, then Bryant is not cool.
Roland being not dusty is equivalent to Lucy being not helpless and Lucy being ambitious.
if there is at least one people who is acceptable and not nice, then Mark is not dusty and Roland is helpless.
Della being not acceptable is equivalent to Bryant being not helpless.
If all people are dusty, then Bryant is not cool and Della is not nice. | Mark is nice. | contradiction |
Lucy is helpless.
Paxton is not cool.
Roland is acceptable.
Lucy is dusty.
Culver is not helpless.
Bryant is not acceptable.
Della is not ambitious.
Roland is not ambitious.
Mark is not nice.
Bryant is not cool.
Lucy is ambitious.
Roland is dusty.Someone who is not dusty is always nice.
If someone is both not helpless and cool, then he is not dusty.
Bryant being dusty implies that Della is not acceptable and Roland is helpless.
If someone is both helpless and not dusty, then he is not ambitious.
If someone is acceptable, then he is both cool and ambitious.
As long as someone is not helpless, he is not ambitious and not nice.
If someone is ambitious or he is cool, then he is not helpless.
If there is at least one people who is not nice, then Bryant is not cool.
Roland being not dusty is equivalent to Lucy being not helpless and Lucy being ambitious.
if there is at least one people who is acceptable and not nice, then Mark is not dusty and Roland is helpless.
Della being not acceptable is equivalent to Bryant being not helpless.
If all people are dusty, then Bryant is not cool and Della is not nice. | Lucy is ambitious. | self_contradiction |
Lucy is helpless.
Paxton is not cool.
Roland is acceptable.
Lucy is dusty.
Culver is not helpless.
Bryant is not acceptable.
Della is not ambitious.
Roland is not ambitious.
Mark is not nice.
Bryant is not cool.
Lucy is ambitious.
Roland is dusty.Someone who is not dusty is always nice.
If someone is both not helpless and cool, then he is not dusty.
Bryant being dusty implies that Della is not acceptable and Roland is helpless.
If someone is both helpless and not dusty, then he is not ambitious.
If someone is acceptable, then he is both cool and ambitious.
As long as someone is not helpless, he is not ambitious and not nice.
If someone is ambitious or he is cool, then he is not helpless.
If there is at least one people who is not nice, then Bryant is not cool.
Roland being not dusty is equivalent to Lucy being not helpless and Lucy being ambitious.
if there is at least one people who is acceptable and not nice, then Mark is not dusty and Roland is helpless.
Della being not acceptable is equivalent to Bryant being not helpless.
If all people are dusty, then Bryant is not cool and Della is not nice. | Lucy is dusty. | entailment |
Lucy is helpless.
Paxton is not cool.
Roland is acceptable.
Lucy is dusty.
Culver is not helpless.
Bryant is not acceptable.
Della is not ambitious.
Roland is not ambitious.
Mark is not nice.
Bryant is not cool.
Lucy is ambitious.
Roland is dusty.Someone who is not dusty is always nice.
If someone is both not helpless and cool, then he is not dusty.
Bryant being dusty implies that Della is not acceptable and Roland is helpless.
If someone is both helpless and not dusty, then he is not ambitious.
If someone is acceptable, then he is both cool and ambitious.
As long as someone is not helpless, he is not ambitious and not nice.
If someone is ambitious or he is cool, then he is not helpless.
If there is at least one people who is not nice, then Bryant is not cool.
Roland being not dusty is equivalent to Lucy being not helpless and Lucy being ambitious.
if there is at least one people who is acceptable and not nice, then Mark is not dusty and Roland is helpless.
Della being not acceptable is equivalent to Bryant being not helpless.
If all people are dusty, then Bryant is not cool and Della is not nice. | Roland is not ambitious. | self_contradiction |
Lucy is helpless.
Paxton is not cool.
Roland is acceptable.
Lucy is dusty.
Culver is not helpless.
Bryant is not acceptable.
Della is not ambitious.
Roland is not ambitious.
Mark is not nice.
Bryant is not cool.
Lucy is ambitious.
Roland is dusty.Someone who is not dusty is always nice.
If someone is both not helpless and cool, then he is not dusty.
Bryant being dusty implies that Della is not acceptable and Roland is helpless.
If someone is both helpless and not dusty, then he is not ambitious.
If someone is acceptable, then he is both cool and ambitious.
As long as someone is not helpless, he is not ambitious and not nice.
If someone is ambitious or he is cool, then he is not helpless.
If there is at least one people who is not nice, then Bryant is not cool.
Roland being not dusty is equivalent to Lucy being not helpless and Lucy being ambitious.
if there is at least one people who is acceptable and not nice, then Mark is not dusty and Roland is helpless.
Della being not acceptable is equivalent to Bryant being not helpless.
If all people are dusty, then Bryant is not cool and Della is not nice. | Mark is helpless. | neutral |
Lucy is helpless.
Paxton is not cool.
Roland is acceptable.
Lucy is dusty.
Culver is not helpless.
Bryant is not acceptable.
Della is not ambitious.
Roland is not ambitious.
Mark is not nice.
Bryant is not cool.
Lucy is ambitious.
Roland is dusty.Someone who is not dusty is always nice.
If someone is both not helpless and cool, then he is not dusty.
Bryant being dusty implies that Della is not acceptable and Roland is helpless.
If someone is both helpless and not dusty, then he is not ambitious.
If someone is acceptable, then he is both cool and ambitious.
As long as someone is not helpless, he is not ambitious and not nice.
If someone is ambitious or he is cool, then he is not helpless.
If there is at least one people who is not nice, then Bryant is not cool.
Roland being not dusty is equivalent to Lucy being not helpless and Lucy being ambitious.
if there is at least one people who is acceptable and not nice, then Mark is not dusty and Roland is helpless.
Della being not acceptable is equivalent to Bryant being not helpless.
If all people are dusty, then Bryant is not cool and Della is not nice. | Lucy is not helpless. | self_contradiction |
Lucy is helpless.
Paxton is not cool.
Roland is acceptable.
Lucy is dusty.
Culver is not helpless.
Bryant is not acceptable.
Della is not ambitious.
Roland is not ambitious.
Mark is not nice.
Bryant is not cool.
Lucy is ambitious.
Roland is dusty.Someone who is not dusty is always nice.
If someone is both not helpless and cool, then he is not dusty.
Bryant being dusty implies that Della is not acceptable and Roland is helpless.
If someone is both helpless and not dusty, then he is not ambitious.
If someone is acceptable, then he is both cool and ambitious.
As long as someone is not helpless, he is not ambitious and not nice.
If someone is ambitious or he is cool, then he is not helpless.
If there is at least one people who is not nice, then Bryant is not cool.
Roland being not dusty is equivalent to Lucy being not helpless and Lucy being ambitious.
if there is at least one people who is acceptable and not nice, then Mark is not dusty and Roland is helpless.
Della being not acceptable is equivalent to Bryant being not helpless.
If all people are dusty, then Bryant is not cool and Della is not nice. | Della is not cool. | neutral |
Lucy is helpless.
Paxton is not cool.
Roland is acceptable.
Lucy is dusty.
Culver is not helpless.
Bryant is not acceptable.
Della is not ambitious.
Roland is not ambitious.
Mark is not nice.
Bryant is not cool.
Lucy is ambitious.
Roland is dusty.Someone who is not dusty is always nice.
If someone is both not helpless and cool, then he is not dusty.
Bryant being dusty implies that Della is not acceptable and Roland is helpless.
If someone is both helpless and not dusty, then he is not ambitious.
If someone is acceptable, then he is both cool and ambitious.
As long as someone is not helpless, he is not ambitious and not nice.
If someone is ambitious or he is cool, then he is not helpless.
If there is at least one people who is not nice, then Bryant is not cool.
Roland being not dusty is equivalent to Lucy being not helpless and Lucy being ambitious.
if there is at least one people who is acceptable and not nice, then Mark is not dusty and Roland is helpless.
Della being not acceptable is equivalent to Bryant being not helpless.
If all people are dusty, then Bryant is not cool and Della is not nice. | Bryant is ambitious. | neutral |
Lucy is helpless.
Paxton is not cool.
Roland is acceptable.
Lucy is dusty.
Culver is not helpless.
Bryant is not acceptable.
Della is not ambitious.
Roland is not ambitious.
Mark is not nice.
Bryant is not cool.
Lucy is ambitious.
Roland is dusty.Someone who is not dusty is always nice.
If someone is both not helpless and cool, then he is not dusty.
Bryant being dusty implies that Della is not acceptable and Roland is helpless.
If someone is both helpless and not dusty, then he is not ambitious.
If someone is acceptable, then he is both cool and ambitious.
As long as someone is not helpless, he is not ambitious and not nice.
If someone is ambitious or he is cool, then he is not helpless.
If there is at least one people who is not nice, then Bryant is not cool.
Roland being not dusty is equivalent to Lucy being not helpless and Lucy being ambitious.
if there is at least one people who is acceptable and not nice, then Mark is not dusty and Roland is helpless.
Della being not acceptable is equivalent to Bryant being not helpless.
If all people are dusty, then Bryant is not cool and Della is not nice. | Roland is dusty. | self_contradiction |
Lucy is helpless.
Paxton is not cool.
Roland is acceptable.
Lucy is dusty.
Culver is not helpless.
Bryant is not acceptable.
Della is not ambitious.
Roland is not ambitious.
Mark is not nice.
Bryant is not cool.
Lucy is ambitious.
Roland is dusty.Someone who is not dusty is always nice.
If someone is both not helpless and cool, then he is not dusty.
Bryant being dusty implies that Della is not acceptable and Roland is helpless.
If someone is both helpless and not dusty, then he is not ambitious.
If someone is acceptable, then he is both cool and ambitious.
As long as someone is not helpless, he is not ambitious and not nice.
If someone is ambitious or he is cool, then he is not helpless.
If there is at least one people who is not nice, then Bryant is not cool.
Roland being not dusty is equivalent to Lucy being not helpless and Lucy being ambitious.
if there is at least one people who is acceptable and not nice, then Mark is not dusty and Roland is helpless.
Della being not acceptable is equivalent to Bryant being not helpless.
If all people are dusty, then Bryant is not cool and Della is not nice. | Lucy is nice. | contradiction |
Lucy is helpless.
Paxton is not cool.
Roland is acceptable.
Lucy is dusty.
Culver is not helpless.
Bryant is not acceptable.
Della is not ambitious.
Roland is not ambitious.
Mark is not nice.
Bryant is not cool.
Lucy is ambitious.
Roland is dusty.Someone who is not dusty is always nice.
If someone is both not helpless and cool, then he is not dusty.
Bryant being dusty implies that Della is not acceptable and Roland is helpless.
If someone is both helpless and not dusty, then he is not ambitious.
If someone is acceptable, then he is both cool and ambitious.
As long as someone is not helpless, he is not ambitious and not nice.
If someone is ambitious or he is cool, then he is not helpless.
If there is at least one people who is not nice, then Bryant is not cool.
Roland being not dusty is equivalent to Lucy being not helpless and Lucy being ambitious.
if there is at least one people who is acceptable and not nice, then Mark is not dusty and Roland is helpless.
Della being not acceptable is equivalent to Bryant being not helpless.
If all people are dusty, then Bryant is not cool and Della is not nice. | Roland is not helpless. | entailment |
Guy is fine.
Ian is powerful.
Ian is various.
Gardner is not loyal.
Ian is loyal.
Guy is not light.
Baird is wrong.
Kirby is not powerful.
Guy is wrong.
Kirby is loyal.
Gardner is not light.
Ian is fine.If someone is fine, then he is not loyal, and vice versa.
If Guy is fine, then Sidney is light, and vice versa.
As long as someone is wrong and not powerful, he is light and fine.
Kirby being loyal or Kirby being not fine implies that Sidney is not wrong.
It can be concluded that Guy is not light and Kirby is loyal once knowing that Kirby is fine and Kirby is powerful.
If Baird is not fine or Baird is not wrong, then Ian is loyal.
Someone being both light and wrong is equivalent to being not loyal and powerful.
If there is at least one people who is both not wrong and not fine, then Guy is not various.
Baird being not powerful is equivalent to Baird being not light.
Someone is wrong and light if and only if he is powerful.
If Kirby is not powerful, then Kirby is wrong and Mila is various.
If there is at least one people who is powerful or not fine, then Ian is not various. | Baird is wrong. | entailment |
Guy is fine.
Ian is powerful.
Ian is various.
Gardner is not loyal.
Ian is loyal.
Guy is not light.
Baird is wrong.
Kirby is not powerful.
Guy is wrong.
Kirby is loyal.
Gardner is not light.
Ian is fine.If someone is fine, then he is not loyal, and vice versa.
If Guy is fine, then Sidney is light, and vice versa.
As long as someone is wrong and not powerful, he is light and fine.
Kirby being loyal or Kirby being not fine implies that Sidney is not wrong.
It can be concluded that Guy is not light and Kirby is loyal once knowing that Kirby is fine and Kirby is powerful.
If Baird is not fine or Baird is not wrong, then Ian is loyal.
Someone being both light and wrong is equivalent to being not loyal and powerful.
If there is at least one people who is both not wrong and not fine, then Guy is not various.
Baird being not powerful is equivalent to Baird being not light.
Someone is wrong and light if and only if he is powerful.
If Kirby is not powerful, then Kirby is wrong and Mila is various.
If there is at least one people who is powerful or not fine, then Ian is not various. | Kirby is wrong. | entailment |
Guy is fine.
Ian is powerful.
Ian is various.
Gardner is not loyal.
Ian is loyal.
Guy is not light.
Baird is wrong.
Kirby is not powerful.
Guy is wrong.
Kirby is loyal.
Gardner is not light.
Ian is fine.If someone is fine, then he is not loyal, and vice versa.
If Guy is fine, then Sidney is light, and vice versa.
As long as someone is wrong and not powerful, he is light and fine.
Kirby being loyal or Kirby being not fine implies that Sidney is not wrong.
It can be concluded that Guy is not light and Kirby is loyal once knowing that Kirby is fine and Kirby is powerful.
If Baird is not fine or Baird is not wrong, then Ian is loyal.
Someone being both light and wrong is equivalent to being not loyal and powerful.
If there is at least one people who is both not wrong and not fine, then Guy is not various.
Baird being not powerful is equivalent to Baird being not light.
Someone is wrong and light if and only if he is powerful.
If Kirby is not powerful, then Kirby is wrong and Mila is various.
If there is at least one people who is powerful or not fine, then Ian is not various. | Kirby is loyal. | self_contradiction |
Guy is fine.
Ian is powerful.
Ian is various.
Gardner is not loyal.
Ian is loyal.
Guy is not light.
Baird is wrong.
Kirby is not powerful.
Guy is wrong.
Kirby is loyal.
Gardner is not light.
Ian is fine.If someone is fine, then he is not loyal, and vice versa.
If Guy is fine, then Sidney is light, and vice versa.
As long as someone is wrong and not powerful, he is light and fine.
Kirby being loyal or Kirby being not fine implies that Sidney is not wrong.
It can be concluded that Guy is not light and Kirby is loyal once knowing that Kirby is fine and Kirby is powerful.
If Baird is not fine or Baird is not wrong, then Ian is loyal.
Someone being both light and wrong is equivalent to being not loyal and powerful.
If there is at least one people who is both not wrong and not fine, then Guy is not various.
Baird being not powerful is equivalent to Baird being not light.
Someone is wrong and light if and only if he is powerful.
If Kirby is not powerful, then Kirby is wrong and Mila is various.
If there is at least one people who is powerful or not fine, then Ian is not various. | Kirby is powerful. | self_contradiction |
Guy is fine.
Ian is powerful.
Ian is various.
Gardner is not loyal.
Ian is loyal.
Guy is not light.
Baird is wrong.
Kirby is not powerful.
Guy is wrong.
Kirby is loyal.
Gardner is not light.
Ian is fine.If someone is fine, then he is not loyal, and vice versa.
If Guy is fine, then Sidney is light, and vice versa.
As long as someone is wrong and not powerful, he is light and fine.
Kirby being loyal or Kirby being not fine implies that Sidney is not wrong.
It can be concluded that Guy is not light and Kirby is loyal once knowing that Kirby is fine and Kirby is powerful.
If Baird is not fine or Baird is not wrong, then Ian is loyal.
Someone being both light and wrong is equivalent to being not loyal and powerful.
If there is at least one people who is both not wrong and not fine, then Guy is not various.
Baird being not powerful is equivalent to Baird being not light.
Someone is wrong and light if and only if he is powerful.
If Kirby is not powerful, then Kirby is wrong and Mila is various.
If there is at least one people who is powerful or not fine, then Ian is not various. | Guy is not fine. | contradiction |
Guy is fine.
Ian is powerful.
Ian is various.
Gardner is not loyal.
Ian is loyal.
Guy is not light.
Baird is wrong.
Kirby is not powerful.
Guy is wrong.
Kirby is loyal.
Gardner is not light.
Ian is fine.If someone is fine, then he is not loyal, and vice versa.
If Guy is fine, then Sidney is light, and vice versa.
As long as someone is wrong and not powerful, he is light and fine.
Kirby being loyal or Kirby being not fine implies that Sidney is not wrong.
It can be concluded that Guy is not light and Kirby is loyal once knowing that Kirby is fine and Kirby is powerful.
If Baird is not fine or Baird is not wrong, then Ian is loyal.
Someone being both light and wrong is equivalent to being not loyal and powerful.
If there is at least one people who is both not wrong and not fine, then Guy is not various.
Baird being not powerful is equivalent to Baird being not light.
Someone is wrong and light if and only if he is powerful.
If Kirby is not powerful, then Kirby is wrong and Mila is various.
If there is at least one people who is powerful or not fine, then Ian is not various. | Guy is various. | neutral |
Guy is fine.
Ian is powerful.
Ian is various.
Gardner is not loyal.
Ian is loyal.
Guy is not light.
Baird is wrong.
Kirby is not powerful.
Guy is wrong.
Kirby is loyal.
Gardner is not light.
Ian is fine.If someone is fine, then he is not loyal, and vice versa.
If Guy is fine, then Sidney is light, and vice versa.
As long as someone is wrong and not powerful, he is light and fine.
Kirby being loyal or Kirby being not fine implies that Sidney is not wrong.
It can be concluded that Guy is not light and Kirby is loyal once knowing that Kirby is fine and Kirby is powerful.
If Baird is not fine or Baird is not wrong, then Ian is loyal.
Someone being both light and wrong is equivalent to being not loyal and powerful.
If there is at least one people who is both not wrong and not fine, then Guy is not various.
Baird being not powerful is equivalent to Baird being not light.
Someone is wrong and light if and only if he is powerful.
If Kirby is not powerful, then Kirby is wrong and Mila is various.
If there is at least one people who is powerful or not fine, then Ian is not various. | Baird is fine. | neutral |
Guy is fine.
Ian is powerful.
Ian is various.
Gardner is not loyal.
Ian is loyal.
Guy is not light.
Baird is wrong.
Kirby is not powerful.
Guy is wrong.
Kirby is loyal.
Gardner is not light.
Ian is fine.If someone is fine, then he is not loyal, and vice versa.
If Guy is fine, then Sidney is light, and vice versa.
As long as someone is wrong and not powerful, he is light and fine.
Kirby being loyal or Kirby being not fine implies that Sidney is not wrong.
It can be concluded that Guy is not light and Kirby is loyal once knowing that Kirby is fine and Kirby is powerful.
If Baird is not fine or Baird is not wrong, then Ian is loyal.
Someone being both light and wrong is equivalent to being not loyal and powerful.
If there is at least one people who is both not wrong and not fine, then Guy is not various.
Baird being not powerful is equivalent to Baird being not light.
Someone is wrong and light if and only if he is powerful.
If Kirby is not powerful, then Kirby is wrong and Mila is various.
If there is at least one people who is powerful or not fine, then Ian is not various. | Ian is not light. | contradiction |
Guy is fine.
Ian is powerful.
Ian is various.
Gardner is not loyal.
Ian is loyal.
Guy is not light.
Baird is wrong.
Kirby is not powerful.
Guy is wrong.
Kirby is loyal.
Gardner is not light.
Ian is fine.If someone is fine, then he is not loyal, and vice versa.
If Guy is fine, then Sidney is light, and vice versa.
As long as someone is wrong and not powerful, he is light and fine.
Kirby being loyal or Kirby being not fine implies that Sidney is not wrong.
It can be concluded that Guy is not light and Kirby is loyal once knowing that Kirby is fine and Kirby is powerful.
If Baird is not fine or Baird is not wrong, then Ian is loyal.
Someone being both light and wrong is equivalent to being not loyal and powerful.
If there is at least one people who is both not wrong and not fine, then Guy is not various.
Baird being not powerful is equivalent to Baird being not light.
Someone is wrong and light if and only if he is powerful.
If Kirby is not powerful, then Kirby is wrong and Mila is various.
If there is at least one people who is powerful or not fine, then Ian is not various. | Sidney is various. | neutral |
Guy is fine.
Ian is powerful.
Ian is various.
Gardner is not loyal.
Ian is loyal.
Guy is not light.
Baird is wrong.
Kirby is not powerful.
Guy is wrong.
Kirby is loyal.
Gardner is not light.
Ian is fine.If someone is fine, then he is not loyal, and vice versa.
If Guy is fine, then Sidney is light, and vice versa.
As long as someone is wrong and not powerful, he is light and fine.
Kirby being loyal or Kirby being not fine implies that Sidney is not wrong.
It can be concluded that Guy is not light and Kirby is loyal once knowing that Kirby is fine and Kirby is powerful.
If Baird is not fine or Baird is not wrong, then Ian is loyal.
Someone being both light and wrong is equivalent to being not loyal and powerful.
If there is at least one people who is both not wrong and not fine, then Guy is not various.
Baird being not powerful is equivalent to Baird being not light.
Someone is wrong and light if and only if he is powerful.
If Kirby is not powerful, then Kirby is wrong and Mila is various.
If there is at least one people who is powerful or not fine, then Ian is not various. | Kirby is not various. | neutral |
Guy is fine.
Ian is powerful.
Ian is various.
Gardner is not loyal.
Ian is loyal.
Guy is not light.
Baird is wrong.
Kirby is not powerful.
Guy is wrong.
Kirby is loyal.
Gardner is not light.
Ian is fine.If someone is fine, then he is not loyal, and vice versa.
If Guy is fine, then Sidney is light, and vice versa.
As long as someone is wrong and not powerful, he is light and fine.
Kirby being loyal or Kirby being not fine implies that Sidney is not wrong.
It can be concluded that Guy is not light and Kirby is loyal once knowing that Kirby is fine and Kirby is powerful.
If Baird is not fine or Baird is not wrong, then Ian is loyal.
Someone being both light and wrong is equivalent to being not loyal and powerful.
If there is at least one people who is both not wrong and not fine, then Guy is not various.
Baird being not powerful is equivalent to Baird being not light.
Someone is wrong and light if and only if he is powerful.
If Kirby is not powerful, then Kirby is wrong and Mila is various.
If there is at least one people who is powerful or not fine, then Ian is not various. | Gardner is light. | contradiction |
Guy is fine.
Ian is powerful.
Ian is various.
Gardner is not loyal.
Ian is loyal.
Guy is not light.
Baird is wrong.
Kirby is not powerful.
Guy is wrong.
Kirby is loyal.
Gardner is not light.
Ian is fine.If someone is fine, then he is not loyal, and vice versa.
If Guy is fine, then Sidney is light, and vice versa.
As long as someone is wrong and not powerful, he is light and fine.
Kirby being loyal or Kirby being not fine implies that Sidney is not wrong.
It can be concluded that Guy is not light and Kirby is loyal once knowing that Kirby is fine and Kirby is powerful.
If Baird is not fine or Baird is not wrong, then Ian is loyal.
Someone being both light and wrong is equivalent to being not loyal and powerful.
If there is at least one people who is both not wrong and not fine, then Guy is not various.
Baird being not powerful is equivalent to Baird being not light.
Someone is wrong and light if and only if he is powerful.
If Kirby is not powerful, then Kirby is wrong and Mila is various.
If there is at least one people who is powerful or not fine, then Ian is not various. | Kirby is light. | entailment |
Guy is fine.
Ian is powerful.
Ian is various.
Gardner is not loyal.
Ian is loyal.
Guy is not light.
Baird is wrong.
Kirby is not powerful.
Guy is wrong.
Kirby is loyal.
Gardner is not light.
Ian is fine.If someone is fine, then he is not loyal, and vice versa.
If Guy is fine, then Sidney is light, and vice versa.
As long as someone is wrong and not powerful, he is light and fine.
Kirby being loyal or Kirby being not fine implies that Sidney is not wrong.
It can be concluded that Guy is not light and Kirby is loyal once knowing that Kirby is fine and Kirby is powerful.
If Baird is not fine or Baird is not wrong, then Ian is loyal.
Someone being both light and wrong is equivalent to being not loyal and powerful.
If there is at least one people who is both not wrong and not fine, then Guy is not various.
Baird being not powerful is equivalent to Baird being not light.
Someone is wrong and light if and only if he is powerful.
If Kirby is not powerful, then Kirby is wrong and Mila is various.
If there is at least one people who is powerful or not fine, then Ian is not various. | Kirby is not loyal. | self_contradiction |
Guy is fine.
Ian is powerful.
Ian is various.
Gardner is not loyal.
Ian is loyal.
Guy is not light.
Baird is wrong.
Kirby is not powerful.
Guy is wrong.
Kirby is loyal.
Gardner is not light.
Ian is fine.If someone is fine, then he is not loyal, and vice versa.
If Guy is fine, then Sidney is light, and vice versa.
As long as someone is wrong and not powerful, he is light and fine.
Kirby being loyal or Kirby being not fine implies that Sidney is not wrong.
It can be concluded that Guy is not light and Kirby is loyal once knowing that Kirby is fine and Kirby is powerful.
If Baird is not fine or Baird is not wrong, then Ian is loyal.
Someone being both light and wrong is equivalent to being not loyal and powerful.
If there is at least one people who is both not wrong and not fine, then Guy is not various.
Baird being not powerful is equivalent to Baird being not light.
Someone is wrong and light if and only if he is powerful.
If Kirby is not powerful, then Kirby is wrong and Mila is various.
If there is at least one people who is powerful or not fine, then Ian is not various. | Kirby is fine. | entailment |
Guy is fine.
Ian is powerful.
Ian is various.
Gardner is not loyal.
Ian is loyal.
Guy is not light.
Baird is wrong.
Kirby is not powerful.
Guy is wrong.
Kirby is loyal.
Gardner is not light.
Ian is fine.If someone is fine, then he is not loyal, and vice versa.
If Guy is fine, then Sidney is light, and vice versa.
As long as someone is wrong and not powerful, he is light and fine.
Kirby being loyal or Kirby being not fine implies that Sidney is not wrong.
It can be concluded that Guy is not light and Kirby is loyal once knowing that Kirby is fine and Kirby is powerful.
If Baird is not fine or Baird is not wrong, then Ian is loyal.
Someone being both light and wrong is equivalent to being not loyal and powerful.
If there is at least one people who is both not wrong and not fine, then Guy is not various.
Baird being not powerful is equivalent to Baird being not light.
Someone is wrong and light if and only if he is powerful.
If Kirby is not powerful, then Kirby is wrong and Mila is various.
If there is at least one people who is powerful or not fine, then Ian is not various. | Ian is not various. | self_contradiction |
Guy is fine.
Ian is powerful.
Ian is various.
Gardner is not loyal.
Ian is loyal.
Guy is not light.
Baird is wrong.
Kirby is not powerful.
Guy is wrong.
Kirby is loyal.
Gardner is not light.
Ian is fine.If someone is fine, then he is not loyal, and vice versa.
If Guy is fine, then Sidney is light, and vice versa.
As long as someone is wrong and not powerful, he is light and fine.
Kirby being loyal or Kirby being not fine implies that Sidney is not wrong.
It can be concluded that Guy is not light and Kirby is loyal once knowing that Kirby is fine and Kirby is powerful.
If Baird is not fine or Baird is not wrong, then Ian is loyal.
Someone being both light and wrong is equivalent to being not loyal and powerful.
If there is at least one people who is both not wrong and not fine, then Guy is not various.
Baird being not powerful is equivalent to Baird being not light.
Someone is wrong and light if and only if he is powerful.
If Kirby is not powerful, then Kirby is wrong and Mila is various.
If there is at least one people who is powerful or not fine, then Ian is not various. | Ian is not loyal. | self_contradiction |
Guy is fine.
Ian is powerful.
Ian is various.
Gardner is not loyal.
Ian is loyal.
Guy is not light.
Baird is wrong.
Kirby is not powerful.
Guy is wrong.
Kirby is loyal.
Gardner is not light.
Ian is fine.If someone is fine, then he is not loyal, and vice versa.
If Guy is fine, then Sidney is light, and vice versa.
As long as someone is wrong and not powerful, he is light and fine.
Kirby being loyal or Kirby being not fine implies that Sidney is not wrong.
It can be concluded that Guy is not light and Kirby is loyal once knowing that Kirby is fine and Kirby is powerful.
If Baird is not fine or Baird is not wrong, then Ian is loyal.
Someone being both light and wrong is equivalent to being not loyal and powerful.
If there is at least one people who is both not wrong and not fine, then Guy is not various.
Baird being not powerful is equivalent to Baird being not light.
Someone is wrong and light if and only if he is powerful.
If Kirby is not powerful, then Kirby is wrong and Mila is various.
If there is at least one people who is powerful or not fine, then Ian is not various. | Gardner is not light. | entailment |
Guy is fine.
Ian is powerful.
Ian is various.
Gardner is not loyal.
Ian is loyal.
Guy is not light.
Baird is wrong.
Kirby is not powerful.
Guy is wrong.
Kirby is loyal.
Gardner is not light.
Ian is fine.If someone is fine, then he is not loyal, and vice versa.
If Guy is fine, then Sidney is light, and vice versa.
As long as someone is wrong and not powerful, he is light and fine.
Kirby being loyal or Kirby being not fine implies that Sidney is not wrong.
It can be concluded that Guy is not light and Kirby is loyal once knowing that Kirby is fine and Kirby is powerful.
If Baird is not fine or Baird is not wrong, then Ian is loyal.
Someone being both light and wrong is equivalent to being not loyal and powerful.
If there is at least one people who is both not wrong and not fine, then Guy is not various.
Baird being not powerful is equivalent to Baird being not light.
Someone is wrong and light if and only if he is powerful.
If Kirby is not powerful, then Kirby is wrong and Mila is various.
If there is at least one people who is powerful or not fine, then Ian is not various. | Guy is light. | contradiction |
Guy is fine.
Ian is powerful.
Ian is various.
Gardner is not loyal.
Ian is loyal.
Guy is not light.
Baird is wrong.
Kirby is not powerful.
Guy is wrong.
Kirby is loyal.
Gardner is not light.
Ian is fine.If someone is fine, then he is not loyal, and vice versa.
If Guy is fine, then Sidney is light, and vice versa.
As long as someone is wrong and not powerful, he is light and fine.
Kirby being loyal or Kirby being not fine implies that Sidney is not wrong.
It can be concluded that Guy is not light and Kirby is loyal once knowing that Kirby is fine and Kirby is powerful.
If Baird is not fine or Baird is not wrong, then Ian is loyal.
Someone being both light and wrong is equivalent to being not loyal and powerful.
If there is at least one people who is both not wrong and not fine, then Guy is not various.
Baird being not powerful is equivalent to Baird being not light.
Someone is wrong and light if and only if he is powerful.
If Kirby is not powerful, then Kirby is wrong and Mila is various.
If there is at least one people who is powerful or not fine, then Ian is not various. | Sidney is wrong. | contradiction |
Guy is fine.
Ian is powerful.
Ian is various.
Gardner is not loyal.
Ian is loyal.
Guy is not light.
Baird is wrong.
Kirby is not powerful.
Guy is wrong.
Kirby is loyal.
Gardner is not light.
Ian is fine.If someone is fine, then he is not loyal, and vice versa.
If Guy is fine, then Sidney is light, and vice versa.
As long as someone is wrong and not powerful, he is light and fine.
Kirby being loyal or Kirby being not fine implies that Sidney is not wrong.
It can be concluded that Guy is not light and Kirby is loyal once knowing that Kirby is fine and Kirby is powerful.
If Baird is not fine or Baird is not wrong, then Ian is loyal.
Someone being both light and wrong is equivalent to being not loyal and powerful.
If there is at least one people who is both not wrong and not fine, then Guy is not various.
Baird being not powerful is equivalent to Baird being not light.
Someone is wrong and light if and only if he is powerful.
If Kirby is not powerful, then Kirby is wrong and Mila is various.
If there is at least one people who is powerful or not fine, then Ian is not various. | Baird is not powerful. | neutral |
Spencer is not political.
Lucy is worried.
Spencer is not worried.
Brian is not ugly.
Spencer is placid.
Herbert is determined.
Lucy is not hurt.
Richard is determined.
Lucy is not determined.
Liam is not placid.
Spencer is not hurt.
Lucy is placid.As long as someone is not determined, he is not hurt and not ugly.
Someone who is both ugly and not political is always not determined.
If there is someone who is placid, then Richard is not hurt and Lucy is not ugly.
If there is someone who is not determined, then Brian is ugly and Liam is not placid.
Someone is not placid if and only if he is not determined.
If there is someone who is determined, then Kiefer is not worried and Spencer is placid.
If there is at least one people who is hurt or placid, then Kiefer is political.
Someone being both not political and placid is equivalent to being ugly.
Brian being not political is equivalent to Brian being not worried and Richard being determined.
If someone who is placid is also not determined, then he is hurt.
If there is someone who is both not hurt and determined, then Kiefer is not ugly.
Spencer being worried is equivalent to Herbert being not determined and Richard being placid. | Kiefer is not worried. | entailment |
Spencer is not political.
Lucy is worried.
Spencer is not worried.
Brian is not ugly.
Spencer is placid.
Herbert is determined.
Lucy is not hurt.
Richard is determined.
Lucy is not determined.
Liam is not placid.
Spencer is not hurt.
Lucy is placid.As long as someone is not determined, he is not hurt and not ugly.
Someone who is both ugly and not political is always not determined.
If there is someone who is placid, then Richard is not hurt and Lucy is not ugly.
If there is someone who is not determined, then Brian is ugly and Liam is not placid.
Someone is not placid if and only if he is not determined.
If there is someone who is determined, then Kiefer is not worried and Spencer is placid.
If there is at least one people who is hurt or placid, then Kiefer is political.
Someone being both not political and placid is equivalent to being ugly.
Brian being not political is equivalent to Brian being not worried and Richard being determined.
If someone who is placid is also not determined, then he is hurt.
If there is someone who is both not hurt and determined, then Kiefer is not ugly.
Spencer being worried is equivalent to Herbert being not determined and Richard being placid. | Lucy is determined. | contradiction |
Spencer is not political.
Lucy is worried.
Spencer is not worried.
Brian is not ugly.
Spencer is placid.
Herbert is determined.
Lucy is not hurt.
Richard is determined.
Lucy is not determined.
Liam is not placid.
Spencer is not hurt.
Lucy is placid.As long as someone is not determined, he is not hurt and not ugly.
Someone who is both ugly and not political is always not determined.
If there is someone who is placid, then Richard is not hurt and Lucy is not ugly.
If there is someone who is not determined, then Brian is ugly and Liam is not placid.
Someone is not placid if and only if he is not determined.
If there is someone who is determined, then Kiefer is not worried and Spencer is placid.
If there is at least one people who is hurt or placid, then Kiefer is political.
Someone being both not political and placid is equivalent to being ugly.
Brian being not political is equivalent to Brian being not worried and Richard being determined.
If someone who is placid is also not determined, then he is hurt.
If there is someone who is both not hurt and determined, then Kiefer is not ugly.
Spencer being worried is equivalent to Herbert being not determined and Richard being placid. | Brian is ugly. | self_contradiction |
Spencer is not political.
Lucy is worried.
Spencer is not worried.
Brian is not ugly.
Spencer is placid.
Herbert is determined.
Lucy is not hurt.
Richard is determined.
Lucy is not determined.
Liam is not placid.
Spencer is not hurt.
Lucy is placid.As long as someone is not determined, he is not hurt and not ugly.
Someone who is both ugly and not political is always not determined.
If there is someone who is placid, then Richard is not hurt and Lucy is not ugly.
If there is someone who is not determined, then Brian is ugly and Liam is not placid.
Someone is not placid if and only if he is not determined.
If there is someone who is determined, then Kiefer is not worried and Spencer is placid.
If there is at least one people who is hurt or placid, then Kiefer is political.
Someone being both not political and placid is equivalent to being ugly.
Brian being not political is equivalent to Brian being not worried and Richard being determined.
If someone who is placid is also not determined, then he is hurt.
If there is someone who is both not hurt and determined, then Kiefer is not ugly.
Spencer being worried is equivalent to Herbert being not determined and Richard being placid. | Liam is determined. | contradiction |
Spencer is not political.
Lucy is worried.
Spencer is not worried.
Brian is not ugly.
Spencer is placid.
Herbert is determined.
Lucy is not hurt.
Richard is determined.
Lucy is not determined.
Liam is not placid.
Spencer is not hurt.
Lucy is placid.As long as someone is not determined, he is not hurt and not ugly.
Someone who is both ugly and not political is always not determined.
If there is someone who is placid, then Richard is not hurt and Lucy is not ugly.
If there is someone who is not determined, then Brian is ugly and Liam is not placid.
Someone is not placid if and only if he is not determined.
If there is someone who is determined, then Kiefer is not worried and Spencer is placid.
If there is at least one people who is hurt or placid, then Kiefer is political.
Someone being both not political and placid is equivalent to being ugly.
Brian being not political is equivalent to Brian being not worried and Richard being determined.
If someone who is placid is also not determined, then he is hurt.
If there is someone who is both not hurt and determined, then Kiefer is not ugly.
Spencer being worried is equivalent to Herbert being not determined and Richard being placid. | Kiefer is worried. | contradiction |
Spencer is not political.
Lucy is worried.
Spencer is not worried.
Brian is not ugly.
Spencer is placid.
Herbert is determined.
Lucy is not hurt.
Richard is determined.
Lucy is not determined.
Liam is not placid.
Spencer is not hurt.
Lucy is placid.As long as someone is not determined, he is not hurt and not ugly.
Someone who is both ugly and not political is always not determined.
If there is someone who is placid, then Richard is not hurt and Lucy is not ugly.
If there is someone who is not determined, then Brian is ugly and Liam is not placid.
Someone is not placid if and only if he is not determined.
If there is someone who is determined, then Kiefer is not worried and Spencer is placid.
If there is at least one people who is hurt or placid, then Kiefer is political.
Someone being both not political and placid is equivalent to being ugly.
Brian being not political is equivalent to Brian being not worried and Richard being determined.
If someone who is placid is also not determined, then he is hurt.
If there is someone who is both not hurt and determined, then Kiefer is not ugly.
Spencer being worried is equivalent to Herbert being not determined and Richard being placid. | Richard is determined. | entailment |
Spencer is not political.
Lucy is worried.
Spencer is not worried.
Brian is not ugly.
Spencer is placid.
Herbert is determined.
Lucy is not hurt.
Richard is determined.
Lucy is not determined.
Liam is not placid.
Spencer is not hurt.
Lucy is placid.As long as someone is not determined, he is not hurt and not ugly.
Someone who is both ugly and not political is always not determined.
If there is someone who is placid, then Richard is not hurt and Lucy is not ugly.
If there is someone who is not determined, then Brian is ugly and Liam is not placid.
Someone is not placid if and only if he is not determined.
If there is someone who is determined, then Kiefer is not worried and Spencer is placid.
If there is at least one people who is hurt or placid, then Kiefer is political.
Someone being both not political and placid is equivalent to being ugly.
Brian being not political is equivalent to Brian being not worried and Richard being determined.
If someone who is placid is also not determined, then he is hurt.
If there is someone who is both not hurt and determined, then Kiefer is not ugly.
Spencer being worried is equivalent to Herbert being not determined and Richard being placid. | Herbert is not ugly. | neutral |
Spencer is not political.
Lucy is worried.
Spencer is not worried.
Brian is not ugly.
Spencer is placid.
Herbert is determined.
Lucy is not hurt.
Richard is determined.
Lucy is not determined.
Liam is not placid.
Spencer is not hurt.
Lucy is placid.As long as someone is not determined, he is not hurt and not ugly.
Someone who is both ugly and not political is always not determined.
If there is someone who is placid, then Richard is not hurt and Lucy is not ugly.
If there is someone who is not determined, then Brian is ugly and Liam is not placid.
Someone is not placid if and only if he is not determined.
If there is someone who is determined, then Kiefer is not worried and Spencer is placid.
If there is at least one people who is hurt or placid, then Kiefer is political.
Someone being both not political and placid is equivalent to being ugly.
Brian being not political is equivalent to Brian being not worried and Richard being determined.
If someone who is placid is also not determined, then he is hurt.
If there is someone who is both not hurt and determined, then Kiefer is not ugly.
Spencer being worried is equivalent to Herbert being not determined and Richard being placid. | Liam is hurt. | contradiction |
Spencer is not political.
Lucy is worried.
Spencer is not worried.
Brian is not ugly.
Spencer is placid.
Herbert is determined.
Lucy is not hurt.
Richard is determined.
Lucy is not determined.
Liam is not placid.
Spencer is not hurt.
Lucy is placid.As long as someone is not determined, he is not hurt and not ugly.
Someone who is both ugly and not political is always not determined.
If there is someone who is placid, then Richard is not hurt and Lucy is not ugly.
If there is someone who is not determined, then Brian is ugly and Liam is not placid.
Someone is not placid if and only if he is not determined.
If there is someone who is determined, then Kiefer is not worried and Spencer is placid.
If there is at least one people who is hurt or placid, then Kiefer is political.
Someone being both not political and placid is equivalent to being ugly.
Brian being not political is equivalent to Brian being not worried and Richard being determined.
If someone who is placid is also not determined, then he is hurt.
If there is someone who is both not hurt and determined, then Kiefer is not ugly.
Spencer being worried is equivalent to Herbert being not determined and Richard being placid. | Liam is placid. | contradiction |
Spencer is not political.
Lucy is worried.
Spencer is not worried.
Brian is not ugly.
Spencer is placid.
Herbert is determined.
Lucy is not hurt.
Richard is determined.
Lucy is not determined.
Liam is not placid.
Spencer is not hurt.
Lucy is placid.As long as someone is not determined, he is not hurt and not ugly.
Someone who is both ugly and not political is always not determined.
If there is someone who is placid, then Richard is not hurt and Lucy is not ugly.
If there is someone who is not determined, then Brian is ugly and Liam is not placid.
Someone is not placid if and only if he is not determined.
If there is someone who is determined, then Kiefer is not worried and Spencer is placid.
If there is at least one people who is hurt or placid, then Kiefer is political.
Someone being both not political and placid is equivalent to being ugly.
Brian being not political is equivalent to Brian being not worried and Richard being determined.
If someone who is placid is also not determined, then he is hurt.
If there is someone who is both not hurt and determined, then Kiefer is not ugly.
Spencer being worried is equivalent to Herbert being not determined and Richard being placid. | Richard is ugly. | neutral |
Spencer is not political.
Lucy is worried.
Spencer is not worried.
Brian is not ugly.
Spencer is placid.
Herbert is determined.
Lucy is not hurt.
Richard is determined.
Lucy is not determined.
Liam is not placid.
Spencer is not hurt.
Lucy is placid.As long as someone is not determined, he is not hurt and not ugly.
Someone who is both ugly and not political is always not determined.
If there is someone who is placid, then Richard is not hurt and Lucy is not ugly.
If there is someone who is not determined, then Brian is ugly and Liam is not placid.
Someone is not placid if and only if he is not determined.
If there is someone who is determined, then Kiefer is not worried and Spencer is placid.
If there is at least one people who is hurt or placid, then Kiefer is political.
Someone being both not political and placid is equivalent to being ugly.
Brian being not political is equivalent to Brian being not worried and Richard being determined.
If someone who is placid is also not determined, then he is hurt.
If there is someone who is both not hurt and determined, then Kiefer is not ugly.
Spencer being worried is equivalent to Herbert being not determined and Richard being placid. | Herbert is worried. | neutral |
Spencer is not political.
Lucy is worried.
Spencer is not worried.
Brian is not ugly.
Spencer is placid.
Herbert is determined.
Lucy is not hurt.
Richard is determined.
Lucy is not determined.
Liam is not placid.
Spencer is not hurt.
Lucy is placid.As long as someone is not determined, he is not hurt and not ugly.
Someone who is both ugly and not political is always not determined.
If there is someone who is placid, then Richard is not hurt and Lucy is not ugly.
If there is someone who is not determined, then Brian is ugly and Liam is not placid.
Someone is not placid if and only if he is not determined.
If there is someone who is determined, then Kiefer is not worried and Spencer is placid.
If there is at least one people who is hurt or placid, then Kiefer is political.
Someone being both not political and placid is equivalent to being ugly.
Brian being not political is equivalent to Brian being not worried and Richard being determined.
If someone who is placid is also not determined, then he is hurt.
If there is someone who is both not hurt and determined, then Kiefer is not ugly.
Spencer being worried is equivalent to Herbert being not determined and Richard being placid. | Lucy is hurt. | self_contradiction |
Spencer is not political.
Lucy is worried.
Spencer is not worried.
Brian is not ugly.
Spencer is placid.
Herbert is determined.
Lucy is not hurt.
Richard is determined.
Lucy is not determined.
Liam is not placid.
Spencer is not hurt.
Lucy is placid.As long as someone is not determined, he is not hurt and not ugly.
Someone who is both ugly and not political is always not determined.
If there is someone who is placid, then Richard is not hurt and Lucy is not ugly.
If there is someone who is not determined, then Brian is ugly and Liam is not placid.
Someone is not placid if and only if he is not determined.
If there is someone who is determined, then Kiefer is not worried and Spencer is placid.
If there is at least one people who is hurt or placid, then Kiefer is political.
Someone being both not political and placid is equivalent to being ugly.
Brian being not political is equivalent to Brian being not worried and Richard being determined.
If someone who is placid is also not determined, then he is hurt.
If there is someone who is both not hurt and determined, then Kiefer is not ugly.
Spencer being worried is equivalent to Herbert being not determined and Richard being placid. | Brian is not determined. | entailment |
Spencer is not political.
Lucy is worried.
Spencer is not worried.
Brian is not ugly.
Spencer is placid.
Herbert is determined.
Lucy is not hurt.
Richard is determined.
Lucy is not determined.
Liam is not placid.
Spencer is not hurt.
Lucy is placid.As long as someone is not determined, he is not hurt and not ugly.
Someone who is both ugly and not political is always not determined.
If there is someone who is placid, then Richard is not hurt and Lucy is not ugly.
If there is someone who is not determined, then Brian is ugly and Liam is not placid.
Someone is not placid if and only if he is not determined.
If there is someone who is determined, then Kiefer is not worried and Spencer is placid.
If there is at least one people who is hurt or placid, then Kiefer is political.
Someone being both not political and placid is equivalent to being ugly.
Brian being not political is equivalent to Brian being not worried and Richard being determined.
If someone who is placid is also not determined, then he is hurt.
If there is someone who is both not hurt and determined, then Kiefer is not ugly.
Spencer being worried is equivalent to Herbert being not determined and Richard being placid. | Brian is not placid. | self_contradiction |
Spencer is not political.
Lucy is worried.
Spencer is not worried.
Brian is not ugly.
Spencer is placid.
Herbert is determined.
Lucy is not hurt.
Richard is determined.
Lucy is not determined.
Liam is not placid.
Spencer is not hurt.
Lucy is placid.As long as someone is not determined, he is not hurt and not ugly.
Someone who is both ugly and not political is always not determined.
If there is someone who is placid, then Richard is not hurt and Lucy is not ugly.
If there is someone who is not determined, then Brian is ugly and Liam is not placid.
Someone is not placid if and only if he is not determined.
If there is someone who is determined, then Kiefer is not worried and Spencer is placid.
If there is at least one people who is hurt or placid, then Kiefer is political.
Someone being both not political and placid is equivalent to being ugly.
Brian being not political is equivalent to Brian being not worried and Richard being determined.
If someone who is placid is also not determined, then he is hurt.
If there is someone who is both not hurt and determined, then Kiefer is not ugly.
Spencer being worried is equivalent to Herbert being not determined and Richard being placid. | Lucy is placid. | self_contradiction |
Spencer is not political.
Lucy is worried.
Spencer is not worried.
Brian is not ugly.
Spencer is placid.
Herbert is determined.
Lucy is not hurt.
Richard is determined.
Lucy is not determined.
Liam is not placid.
Spencer is not hurt.
Lucy is placid.As long as someone is not determined, he is not hurt and not ugly.
Someone who is both ugly and not political is always not determined.
If there is someone who is placid, then Richard is not hurt and Lucy is not ugly.
If there is someone who is not determined, then Brian is ugly and Liam is not placid.
Someone is not placid if and only if he is not determined.
If there is someone who is determined, then Kiefer is not worried and Spencer is placid.
If there is at least one people who is hurt or placid, then Kiefer is political.
Someone being both not political and placid is equivalent to being ugly.
Brian being not political is equivalent to Brian being not worried and Richard being determined.
If someone who is placid is also not determined, then he is hurt.
If there is someone who is both not hurt and determined, then Kiefer is not ugly.
Spencer being worried is equivalent to Herbert being not determined and Richard being placid. | Kiefer is placid. | neutral |
Spencer is not political.
Lucy is worried.
Spencer is not worried.
Brian is not ugly.
Spencer is placid.
Herbert is determined.
Lucy is not hurt.
Richard is determined.
Lucy is not determined.
Liam is not placid.
Spencer is not hurt.
Lucy is placid.As long as someone is not determined, he is not hurt and not ugly.
Someone who is both ugly and not political is always not determined.
If there is someone who is placid, then Richard is not hurt and Lucy is not ugly.
If there is someone who is not determined, then Brian is ugly and Liam is not placid.
Someone is not placid if and only if he is not determined.
If there is someone who is determined, then Kiefer is not worried and Spencer is placid.
If there is at least one people who is hurt or placid, then Kiefer is political.
Someone being both not political and placid is equivalent to being ugly.
Brian being not political is equivalent to Brian being not worried and Richard being determined.
If someone who is placid is also not determined, then he is hurt.
If there is someone who is both not hurt and determined, then Kiefer is not ugly.
Spencer being worried is equivalent to Herbert being not determined and Richard being placid. | Lucy is not ugly. | entailment |
Spencer is not political.
Lucy is worried.
Spencer is not worried.
Brian is not ugly.
Spencer is placid.
Herbert is determined.
Lucy is not hurt.
Richard is determined.
Lucy is not determined.
Liam is not placid.
Spencer is not hurt.
Lucy is placid.As long as someone is not determined, he is not hurt and not ugly.
Someone who is both ugly and not political is always not determined.
If there is someone who is placid, then Richard is not hurt and Lucy is not ugly.
If there is someone who is not determined, then Brian is ugly and Liam is not placid.
Someone is not placid if and only if he is not determined.
If there is someone who is determined, then Kiefer is not worried and Spencer is placid.
If there is at least one people who is hurt or placid, then Kiefer is political.
Someone being both not political and placid is equivalent to being ugly.
Brian being not political is equivalent to Brian being not worried and Richard being determined.
If someone who is placid is also not determined, then he is hurt.
If there is someone who is both not hurt and determined, then Kiefer is not ugly.
Spencer being worried is equivalent to Herbert being not determined and Richard being placid. | Brian is not worried. | entailment |
Spencer is not political.
Lucy is worried.
Spencer is not worried.
Brian is not ugly.
Spencer is placid.
Herbert is determined.
Lucy is not hurt.
Richard is determined.
Lucy is not determined.
Liam is not placid.
Spencer is not hurt.
Lucy is placid.As long as someone is not determined, he is not hurt and not ugly.
Someone who is both ugly and not political is always not determined.
If there is someone who is placid, then Richard is not hurt and Lucy is not ugly.
If there is someone who is not determined, then Brian is ugly and Liam is not placid.
Someone is not placid if and only if he is not determined.
If there is someone who is determined, then Kiefer is not worried and Spencer is placid.
If there is at least one people who is hurt or placid, then Kiefer is political.
Someone being both not political and placid is equivalent to being ugly.
Brian being not political is equivalent to Brian being not worried and Richard being determined.
If someone who is placid is also not determined, then he is hurt.
If there is someone who is both not hurt and determined, then Kiefer is not ugly.
Spencer being worried is equivalent to Herbert being not determined and Richard being placid. | Lucy is not placid. | self_contradiction |
Spencer is not political.
Lucy is worried.
Spencer is not worried.
Brian is not ugly.
Spencer is placid.
Herbert is determined.
Lucy is not hurt.
Richard is determined.
Lucy is not determined.
Liam is not placid.
Spencer is not hurt.
Lucy is placid.As long as someone is not determined, he is not hurt and not ugly.
Someone who is both ugly and not political is always not determined.
If there is someone who is placid, then Richard is not hurt and Lucy is not ugly.
If there is someone who is not determined, then Brian is ugly and Liam is not placid.
Someone is not placid if and only if he is not determined.
If there is someone who is determined, then Kiefer is not worried and Spencer is placid.
If there is at least one people who is hurt or placid, then Kiefer is political.
Someone being both not political and placid is equivalent to being ugly.
Brian being not political is equivalent to Brian being not worried and Richard being determined.
If someone who is placid is also not determined, then he is hurt.
If there is someone who is both not hurt and determined, then Kiefer is not ugly.
Spencer being worried is equivalent to Herbert being not determined and Richard being placid. | Herbert is not hurt. | neutral |
Konrad is not latter.
Alice is not friendly.
Cedric is not sincere.
Konrad is sincere.
Hannah is not scary.
Ian is friendly.
Hamlin is not weak.
Konrad is not friendly.
Cedric is not yellow.
Hannah is friendly.
Cedric is weak.
Herbert is weak.If Ian is latter, then Cedric is not weak, and vice versa.
As long as someone is weak, he is not scary and not sincere.
Cedric being not yellow is equivalent to Cedric being scary and Ian being not latter.
Alice is not yellow if and only if Konrad is latter.
If there is at least one people who is not sincere, then Ian is not latter and Hannah is not yellow.
If Alice is not friendly, then Hamlin is weak.
If Alice is weak, then Hannah is not yellow and Konrad is sincere.
If Ian is sincere and Herbert is not latter, then Hannah is not scary.
If there is at least one people who is yellow, then Hannah is scary and Ian is not latter.
Someone who is friendly is always both scary and weak.
As long as someone is weak, he is not friendly and sincere.
If there is someone who is scary, then Konrad is latter and Alice is weak. | Hamlin is yellow. | neutral |
Konrad is not latter.
Alice is not friendly.
Cedric is not sincere.
Konrad is sincere.
Hannah is not scary.
Ian is friendly.
Hamlin is not weak.
Konrad is not friendly.
Cedric is not yellow.
Hannah is friendly.
Cedric is weak.
Herbert is weak.If Ian is latter, then Cedric is not weak, and vice versa.
As long as someone is weak, he is not scary and not sincere.
Cedric being not yellow is equivalent to Cedric being scary and Ian being not latter.
Alice is not yellow if and only if Konrad is latter.
If there is at least one people who is not sincere, then Ian is not latter and Hannah is not yellow.
If Alice is not friendly, then Hamlin is weak.
If Alice is weak, then Hannah is not yellow and Konrad is sincere.
If Ian is sincere and Herbert is not latter, then Hannah is not scary.
If there is at least one people who is yellow, then Hannah is scary and Ian is not latter.
Someone who is friendly is always both scary and weak.
As long as someone is weak, he is not friendly and sincere.
If there is someone who is scary, then Konrad is latter and Alice is weak. | Hannah is not latter. | neutral |
Konrad is not latter.
Alice is not friendly.
Cedric is not sincere.
Konrad is sincere.
Hannah is not scary.
Ian is friendly.
Hamlin is not weak.
Konrad is not friendly.
Cedric is not yellow.
Hannah is friendly.
Cedric is weak.
Herbert is weak.If Ian is latter, then Cedric is not weak, and vice versa.
As long as someone is weak, he is not scary and not sincere.
Cedric being not yellow is equivalent to Cedric being scary and Ian being not latter.
Alice is not yellow if and only if Konrad is latter.
If there is at least one people who is not sincere, then Ian is not latter and Hannah is not yellow.
If Alice is not friendly, then Hamlin is weak.
If Alice is weak, then Hannah is not yellow and Konrad is sincere.
If Ian is sincere and Herbert is not latter, then Hannah is not scary.
If there is at least one people who is yellow, then Hannah is scary and Ian is not latter.
Someone who is friendly is always both scary and weak.
As long as someone is weak, he is not friendly and sincere.
If there is someone who is scary, then Konrad is latter and Alice is weak. | Konrad is not friendly. | entailment |
Konrad is not latter.
Alice is not friendly.
Cedric is not sincere.
Konrad is sincere.
Hannah is not scary.
Ian is friendly.
Hamlin is not weak.
Konrad is not friendly.
Cedric is not yellow.
Hannah is friendly.
Cedric is weak.
Herbert is weak.If Ian is latter, then Cedric is not weak, and vice versa.
As long as someone is weak, he is not scary and not sincere.
Cedric being not yellow is equivalent to Cedric being scary and Ian being not latter.
Alice is not yellow if and only if Konrad is latter.
If there is at least one people who is not sincere, then Ian is not latter and Hannah is not yellow.
If Alice is not friendly, then Hamlin is weak.
If Alice is weak, then Hannah is not yellow and Konrad is sincere.
If Ian is sincere and Herbert is not latter, then Hannah is not scary.
If there is at least one people who is yellow, then Hannah is scary and Ian is not latter.
Someone who is friendly is always both scary and weak.
As long as someone is weak, he is not friendly and sincere.
If there is someone who is scary, then Konrad is latter and Alice is weak. | Alice is scary. | contradiction |
Konrad is not latter.
Alice is not friendly.
Cedric is not sincere.
Konrad is sincere.
Hannah is not scary.
Ian is friendly.
Hamlin is not weak.
Konrad is not friendly.
Cedric is not yellow.
Hannah is friendly.
Cedric is weak.
Herbert is weak.If Ian is latter, then Cedric is not weak, and vice versa.
As long as someone is weak, he is not scary and not sincere.
Cedric being not yellow is equivalent to Cedric being scary and Ian being not latter.
Alice is not yellow if and only if Konrad is latter.
If there is at least one people who is not sincere, then Ian is not latter and Hannah is not yellow.
If Alice is not friendly, then Hamlin is weak.
If Alice is weak, then Hannah is not yellow and Konrad is sincere.
If Ian is sincere and Herbert is not latter, then Hannah is not scary.
If there is at least one people who is yellow, then Hannah is scary and Ian is not latter.
Someone who is friendly is always both scary and weak.
As long as someone is weak, he is not friendly and sincere.
If there is someone who is scary, then Konrad is latter and Alice is weak. | Hannah is sincere. | self_contradiction |
Konrad is not latter.
Alice is not friendly.
Cedric is not sincere.
Konrad is sincere.
Hannah is not scary.
Ian is friendly.
Hamlin is not weak.
Konrad is not friendly.
Cedric is not yellow.
Hannah is friendly.
Cedric is weak.
Herbert is weak.If Ian is latter, then Cedric is not weak, and vice versa.
As long as someone is weak, he is not scary and not sincere.
Cedric being not yellow is equivalent to Cedric being scary and Ian being not latter.
Alice is not yellow if and only if Konrad is latter.
If there is at least one people who is not sincere, then Ian is not latter and Hannah is not yellow.
If Alice is not friendly, then Hamlin is weak.
If Alice is weak, then Hannah is not yellow and Konrad is sincere.
If Ian is sincere and Herbert is not latter, then Hannah is not scary.
If there is at least one people who is yellow, then Hannah is scary and Ian is not latter.
Someone who is friendly is always both scary and weak.
As long as someone is weak, he is not friendly and sincere.
If there is someone who is scary, then Konrad is latter and Alice is weak. | Konrad is not weak. | neutral |
Konrad is not latter.
Alice is not friendly.
Cedric is not sincere.
Konrad is sincere.
Hannah is not scary.
Ian is friendly.
Hamlin is not weak.
Konrad is not friendly.
Cedric is not yellow.
Hannah is friendly.
Cedric is weak.
Herbert is weak.If Ian is latter, then Cedric is not weak, and vice versa.
As long as someone is weak, he is not scary and not sincere.
Cedric being not yellow is equivalent to Cedric being scary and Ian being not latter.
Alice is not yellow if and only if Konrad is latter.
If there is at least one people who is not sincere, then Ian is not latter and Hannah is not yellow.
If Alice is not friendly, then Hamlin is weak.
If Alice is weak, then Hannah is not yellow and Konrad is sincere.
If Ian is sincere and Herbert is not latter, then Hannah is not scary.
If there is at least one people who is yellow, then Hannah is scary and Ian is not latter.
Someone who is friendly is always both scary and weak.
As long as someone is weak, he is not friendly and sincere.
If there is someone who is scary, then Konrad is latter and Alice is weak. | Ian is not weak. | contradiction |
Konrad is not latter.
Alice is not friendly.
Cedric is not sincere.
Konrad is sincere.
Hannah is not scary.
Ian is friendly.
Hamlin is not weak.
Konrad is not friendly.
Cedric is not yellow.
Hannah is friendly.
Cedric is weak.
Herbert is weak.If Ian is latter, then Cedric is not weak, and vice versa.
As long as someone is weak, he is not scary and not sincere.
Cedric being not yellow is equivalent to Cedric being scary and Ian being not latter.
Alice is not yellow if and only if Konrad is latter.
If there is at least one people who is not sincere, then Ian is not latter and Hannah is not yellow.
If Alice is not friendly, then Hamlin is weak.
If Alice is weak, then Hannah is not yellow and Konrad is sincere.
If Ian is sincere and Herbert is not latter, then Hannah is not scary.
If there is at least one people who is yellow, then Hannah is scary and Ian is not latter.
Someone who is friendly is always both scary and weak.
As long as someone is weak, he is not friendly and sincere.
If there is someone who is scary, then Konrad is latter and Alice is weak. | Hannah is not yellow. | entailment |
Konrad is not latter.
Alice is not friendly.
Cedric is not sincere.
Konrad is sincere.
Hannah is not scary.
Ian is friendly.
Hamlin is not weak.
Konrad is not friendly.
Cedric is not yellow.
Hannah is friendly.
Cedric is weak.
Herbert is weak.If Ian is latter, then Cedric is not weak, and vice versa.
As long as someone is weak, he is not scary and not sincere.
Cedric being not yellow is equivalent to Cedric being scary and Ian being not latter.
Alice is not yellow if and only if Konrad is latter.
If there is at least one people who is not sincere, then Ian is not latter and Hannah is not yellow.
If Alice is not friendly, then Hamlin is weak.
If Alice is weak, then Hannah is not yellow and Konrad is sincere.
If Ian is sincere and Herbert is not latter, then Hannah is not scary.
If there is at least one people who is yellow, then Hannah is scary and Ian is not latter.
Someone who is friendly is always both scary and weak.
As long as someone is weak, he is not friendly and sincere.
If there is someone who is scary, then Konrad is latter and Alice is weak. | Hamlin is not yellow. | neutral |
Konrad is not latter.
Alice is not friendly.
Cedric is not sincere.
Konrad is sincere.
Hannah is not scary.
Ian is friendly.
Hamlin is not weak.
Konrad is not friendly.
Cedric is not yellow.
Hannah is friendly.
Cedric is weak.
Herbert is weak.If Ian is latter, then Cedric is not weak, and vice versa.
As long as someone is weak, he is not scary and not sincere.
Cedric being not yellow is equivalent to Cedric being scary and Ian being not latter.
Alice is not yellow if and only if Konrad is latter.
If there is at least one people who is not sincere, then Ian is not latter and Hannah is not yellow.
If Alice is not friendly, then Hamlin is weak.
If Alice is weak, then Hannah is not yellow and Konrad is sincere.
If Ian is sincere and Herbert is not latter, then Hannah is not scary.
If there is at least one people who is yellow, then Hannah is scary and Ian is not latter.
Someone who is friendly is always both scary and weak.
As long as someone is weak, he is not friendly and sincere.
If there is someone who is scary, then Konrad is latter and Alice is weak. | Cedric is not friendly. | entailment |
Konrad is not latter.
Alice is not friendly.
Cedric is not sincere.
Konrad is sincere.
Hannah is not scary.
Ian is friendly.
Hamlin is not weak.
Konrad is not friendly.
Cedric is not yellow.
Hannah is friendly.
Cedric is weak.
Herbert is weak.If Ian is latter, then Cedric is not weak, and vice versa.
As long as someone is weak, he is not scary and not sincere.
Cedric being not yellow is equivalent to Cedric being scary and Ian being not latter.
Alice is not yellow if and only if Konrad is latter.
If there is at least one people who is not sincere, then Ian is not latter and Hannah is not yellow.
If Alice is not friendly, then Hamlin is weak.
If Alice is weak, then Hannah is not yellow and Konrad is sincere.
If Ian is sincere and Herbert is not latter, then Hannah is not scary.
If there is at least one people who is yellow, then Hannah is scary and Ian is not latter.
Someone who is friendly is always both scary and weak.
As long as someone is weak, he is not friendly and sincere.
If there is someone who is scary, then Konrad is latter and Alice is weak. | Hamlin is not latter. | neutral |
Konrad is not latter.
Alice is not friendly.
Cedric is not sincere.
Konrad is sincere.
Hannah is not scary.
Ian is friendly.
Hamlin is not weak.
Konrad is not friendly.
Cedric is not yellow.
Hannah is friendly.
Cedric is weak.
Herbert is weak.If Ian is latter, then Cedric is not weak, and vice versa.
As long as someone is weak, he is not scary and not sincere.
Cedric being not yellow is equivalent to Cedric being scary and Ian being not latter.
Alice is not yellow if and only if Konrad is latter.
If there is at least one people who is not sincere, then Ian is not latter and Hannah is not yellow.
If Alice is not friendly, then Hamlin is weak.
If Alice is weak, then Hannah is not yellow and Konrad is sincere.
If Ian is sincere and Herbert is not latter, then Hannah is not scary.
If there is at least one people who is yellow, then Hannah is scary and Ian is not latter.
Someone who is friendly is always both scary and weak.
As long as someone is weak, he is not friendly and sincere.
If there is someone who is scary, then Konrad is latter and Alice is weak. | Hannah is yellow. | contradiction |
Konrad is not latter.
Alice is not friendly.
Cedric is not sincere.
Konrad is sincere.
Hannah is not scary.
Ian is friendly.
Hamlin is not weak.
Konrad is not friendly.
Cedric is not yellow.
Hannah is friendly.
Cedric is weak.
Herbert is weak.If Ian is latter, then Cedric is not weak, and vice versa.
As long as someone is weak, he is not scary and not sincere.
Cedric being not yellow is equivalent to Cedric being scary and Ian being not latter.
Alice is not yellow if and only if Konrad is latter.
If there is at least one people who is not sincere, then Ian is not latter and Hannah is not yellow.
If Alice is not friendly, then Hamlin is weak.
If Alice is weak, then Hannah is not yellow and Konrad is sincere.
If Ian is sincere and Herbert is not latter, then Hannah is not scary.
If there is at least one people who is yellow, then Hannah is scary and Ian is not latter.
Someone who is friendly is always both scary and weak.
As long as someone is weak, he is not friendly and sincere.
If there is someone who is scary, then Konrad is latter and Alice is weak. | Konrad is sincere. | entailment |
Konrad is not latter.
Alice is not friendly.
Cedric is not sincere.
Konrad is sincere.
Hannah is not scary.
Ian is friendly.
Hamlin is not weak.
Konrad is not friendly.
Cedric is not yellow.
Hannah is friendly.
Cedric is weak.
Herbert is weak.If Ian is latter, then Cedric is not weak, and vice versa.
As long as someone is weak, he is not scary and not sincere.
Cedric being not yellow is equivalent to Cedric being scary and Ian being not latter.
Alice is not yellow if and only if Konrad is latter.
If there is at least one people who is not sincere, then Ian is not latter and Hannah is not yellow.
If Alice is not friendly, then Hamlin is weak.
If Alice is weak, then Hannah is not yellow and Konrad is sincere.
If Ian is sincere and Herbert is not latter, then Hannah is not scary.
If there is at least one people who is yellow, then Hannah is scary and Ian is not latter.
Someone who is friendly is always both scary and weak.
As long as someone is weak, he is not friendly and sincere.
If there is someone who is scary, then Konrad is latter and Alice is weak. | Hamlin is friendly. | contradiction |
Konrad is not latter.
Alice is not friendly.
Cedric is not sincere.
Konrad is sincere.
Hannah is not scary.
Ian is friendly.
Hamlin is not weak.
Konrad is not friendly.
Cedric is not yellow.
Hannah is friendly.
Cedric is weak.
Herbert is weak.If Ian is latter, then Cedric is not weak, and vice versa.
As long as someone is weak, he is not scary and not sincere.
Cedric being not yellow is equivalent to Cedric being scary and Ian being not latter.
Alice is not yellow if and only if Konrad is latter.
If there is at least one people who is not sincere, then Ian is not latter and Hannah is not yellow.
If Alice is not friendly, then Hamlin is weak.
If Alice is weak, then Hannah is not yellow and Konrad is sincere.
If Ian is sincere and Herbert is not latter, then Hannah is not scary.
If there is at least one people who is yellow, then Hannah is scary and Ian is not latter.
Someone who is friendly is always both scary and weak.
As long as someone is weak, he is not friendly and sincere.
If there is someone who is scary, then Konrad is latter and Alice is weak. | Herbert is sincere. | self_contradiction |
Konrad is not latter.
Alice is not friendly.
Cedric is not sincere.
Konrad is sincere.
Hannah is not scary.
Ian is friendly.
Hamlin is not weak.
Konrad is not friendly.
Cedric is not yellow.
Hannah is friendly.
Cedric is weak.
Herbert is weak.If Ian is latter, then Cedric is not weak, and vice versa.
As long as someone is weak, he is not scary and not sincere.
Cedric being not yellow is equivalent to Cedric being scary and Ian being not latter.
Alice is not yellow if and only if Konrad is latter.
If there is at least one people who is not sincere, then Ian is not latter and Hannah is not yellow.
If Alice is not friendly, then Hamlin is weak.
If Alice is weak, then Hannah is not yellow and Konrad is sincere.
If Ian is sincere and Herbert is not latter, then Hannah is not scary.
If there is at least one people who is yellow, then Hannah is scary and Ian is not latter.
Someone who is friendly is always both scary and weak.
As long as someone is weak, he is not friendly and sincere.
If there is someone who is scary, then Konrad is latter and Alice is weak. | Hannah is scary. | self_contradiction |
Konrad is not latter.
Alice is not friendly.
Cedric is not sincere.
Konrad is sincere.
Hannah is not scary.
Ian is friendly.
Hamlin is not weak.
Konrad is not friendly.
Cedric is not yellow.
Hannah is friendly.
Cedric is weak.
Herbert is weak.If Ian is latter, then Cedric is not weak, and vice versa.
As long as someone is weak, he is not scary and not sincere.
Cedric being not yellow is equivalent to Cedric being scary and Ian being not latter.
Alice is not yellow if and only if Konrad is latter.
If there is at least one people who is not sincere, then Ian is not latter and Hannah is not yellow.
If Alice is not friendly, then Hamlin is weak.
If Alice is weak, then Hannah is not yellow and Konrad is sincere.
If Ian is sincere and Herbert is not latter, then Hannah is not scary.
If there is at least one people who is yellow, then Hannah is scary and Ian is not latter.
Someone who is friendly is always both scary and weak.
As long as someone is weak, he is not friendly and sincere.
If there is someone who is scary, then Konrad is latter and Alice is weak. | Ian is not sincere. | self_contradiction |
Konrad is not latter.
Alice is not friendly.
Cedric is not sincere.
Konrad is sincere.
Hannah is not scary.
Ian is friendly.
Hamlin is not weak.
Konrad is not friendly.
Cedric is not yellow.
Hannah is friendly.
Cedric is weak.
Herbert is weak.If Ian is latter, then Cedric is not weak, and vice versa.
As long as someone is weak, he is not scary and not sincere.
Cedric being not yellow is equivalent to Cedric being scary and Ian being not latter.
Alice is not yellow if and only if Konrad is latter.
If there is at least one people who is not sincere, then Ian is not latter and Hannah is not yellow.
If Alice is not friendly, then Hamlin is weak.
If Alice is weak, then Hannah is not yellow and Konrad is sincere.
If Ian is sincere and Herbert is not latter, then Hannah is not scary.
If there is at least one people who is yellow, then Hannah is scary and Ian is not latter.
Someone who is friendly is always both scary and weak.
As long as someone is weak, he is not friendly and sincere.
If there is someone who is scary, then Konrad is latter and Alice is weak. | Ian is not friendly. | self_contradiction |
Konrad is not latter.
Alice is not friendly.
Cedric is not sincere.
Konrad is sincere.
Hannah is not scary.
Ian is friendly.
Hamlin is not weak.
Konrad is not friendly.
Cedric is not yellow.
Hannah is friendly.
Cedric is weak.
Herbert is weak.If Ian is latter, then Cedric is not weak, and vice versa.
As long as someone is weak, he is not scary and not sincere.
Cedric being not yellow is equivalent to Cedric being scary and Ian being not latter.
Alice is not yellow if and only if Konrad is latter.
If there is at least one people who is not sincere, then Ian is not latter and Hannah is not yellow.
If Alice is not friendly, then Hamlin is weak.
If Alice is weak, then Hannah is not yellow and Konrad is sincere.
If Ian is sincere and Herbert is not latter, then Hannah is not scary.
If there is at least one people who is yellow, then Hannah is scary and Ian is not latter.
Someone who is friendly is always both scary and weak.
As long as someone is weak, he is not friendly and sincere.
If there is someone who is scary, then Konrad is latter and Alice is weak. | Hannah is not weak. | contradiction |
Konrad is not latter.
Alice is not friendly.
Cedric is not sincere.
Konrad is sincere.
Hannah is not scary.
Ian is friendly.
Hamlin is not weak.
Konrad is not friendly.
Cedric is not yellow.
Hannah is friendly.
Cedric is weak.
Herbert is weak.If Ian is latter, then Cedric is not weak, and vice versa.
As long as someone is weak, he is not scary and not sincere.
Cedric being not yellow is equivalent to Cedric being scary and Ian being not latter.
Alice is not yellow if and only if Konrad is latter.
If there is at least one people who is not sincere, then Ian is not latter and Hannah is not yellow.
If Alice is not friendly, then Hamlin is weak.
If Alice is weak, then Hannah is not yellow and Konrad is sincere.
If Ian is sincere and Herbert is not latter, then Hannah is not scary.
If there is at least one people who is yellow, then Hannah is scary and Ian is not latter.
Someone who is friendly is always both scary and weak.
As long as someone is weak, he is not friendly and sincere.
If there is someone who is scary, then Konrad is latter and Alice is weak. | Hannah is weak. | entailment |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.