premise
stringlengths 923
1.41k
| hypothesis
stringlengths 11
33
| label
stringclasses 4
values |
|---|---|---|
Robert is not healthy.
Rodney is not healthy.
Bruno is not friendly.
Marlon is not healthy.
Marlon is not scary.
Roland is scary.
Marlon is not exuberant.
Marlon is not relevant.
Bruno is scary.
Rufus is friendly.
Melville is not friendly.
Robert is not polite.Someone being both not polite and not scary is equivalent to being healthy.
Someone being both not relevant and exuberant is equivalent to being not healthy and scary.
Someone who is both not healthy and exuberant is always not scary.
If everyone is not friendly, then Roland is scary and Rodney is polite.
It can be concluded that Melville is not relevant once knowing that Rodney is healthy and Roland is not friendly.
If someone is exuberant and scary, then he is both polite and not relevant, and vice versa.
If someone is not relevant and healthy, then he is not polite, and vice versa.
If Roland is healthy, then Marlon is polite and Bruno is scary, and vice versa.
If someone is not polite or he is healthy, then he is not relevant.
Melville being friendly is equivalent to Rodney being not exuberant.
Someone who is not polite is always scary.
Someone who is friendly is always not healthy. | Marlon is scary. | contradiction |
Robert is not healthy.
Rodney is not healthy.
Bruno is not friendly.
Marlon is not healthy.
Marlon is not scary.
Roland is scary.
Marlon is not exuberant.
Marlon is not relevant.
Bruno is scary.
Rufus is friendly.
Melville is not friendly.
Robert is not polite.Someone being both not polite and not scary is equivalent to being healthy.
Someone being both not relevant and exuberant is equivalent to being not healthy and scary.
Someone who is both not healthy and exuberant is always not scary.
If everyone is not friendly, then Roland is scary and Rodney is polite.
It can be concluded that Melville is not relevant once knowing that Rodney is healthy and Roland is not friendly.
If someone is exuberant and scary, then he is both polite and not relevant, and vice versa.
If someone is not relevant and healthy, then he is not polite, and vice versa.
If Roland is healthy, then Marlon is polite and Bruno is scary, and vice versa.
If someone is not polite or he is healthy, then he is not relevant.
Melville being friendly is equivalent to Rodney being not exuberant.
Someone who is not polite is always scary.
Someone who is friendly is always not healthy. | Roland is exuberant. | neutral |
Robert is not healthy.
Rodney is not healthy.
Bruno is not friendly.
Marlon is not healthy.
Marlon is not scary.
Roland is scary.
Marlon is not exuberant.
Marlon is not relevant.
Bruno is scary.
Rufus is friendly.
Melville is not friendly.
Robert is not polite.Someone being both not polite and not scary is equivalent to being healthy.
Someone being both not relevant and exuberant is equivalent to being not healthy and scary.
Someone who is both not healthy and exuberant is always not scary.
If everyone is not friendly, then Roland is scary and Rodney is polite.
It can be concluded that Melville is not relevant once knowing that Rodney is healthy and Roland is not friendly.
If someone is exuberant and scary, then he is both polite and not relevant, and vice versa.
If someone is not relevant and healthy, then he is not polite, and vice versa.
If Roland is healthy, then Marlon is polite and Bruno is scary, and vice versa.
If someone is not polite or he is healthy, then he is not relevant.
Melville being friendly is equivalent to Rodney being not exuberant.
Someone who is not polite is always scary.
Someone who is friendly is always not healthy. | Robert is not exuberant. | contradiction |
Robert is not healthy.
Rodney is not healthy.
Bruno is not friendly.
Marlon is not healthy.
Marlon is not scary.
Roland is scary.
Marlon is not exuberant.
Marlon is not relevant.
Bruno is scary.
Rufus is friendly.
Melville is not friendly.
Robert is not polite.Someone being both not polite and not scary is equivalent to being healthy.
Someone being both not relevant and exuberant is equivalent to being not healthy and scary.
Someone who is both not healthy and exuberant is always not scary.
If everyone is not friendly, then Roland is scary and Rodney is polite.
It can be concluded that Melville is not relevant once knowing that Rodney is healthy and Roland is not friendly.
If someone is exuberant and scary, then he is both polite and not relevant, and vice versa.
If someone is not relevant and healthy, then he is not polite, and vice versa.
If Roland is healthy, then Marlon is polite and Bruno is scary, and vice versa.
If someone is not polite or he is healthy, then he is not relevant.
Melville being friendly is equivalent to Rodney being not exuberant.
Someone who is not polite is always scary.
Someone who is friendly is always not healthy. | Rufus is not friendly. | contradiction |
Robert is not healthy.
Rodney is not healthy.
Bruno is not friendly.
Marlon is not healthy.
Marlon is not scary.
Roland is scary.
Marlon is not exuberant.
Marlon is not relevant.
Bruno is scary.
Rufus is friendly.
Melville is not friendly.
Robert is not polite.Someone being both not polite and not scary is equivalent to being healthy.
Someone being both not relevant and exuberant is equivalent to being not healthy and scary.
Someone who is both not healthy and exuberant is always not scary.
If everyone is not friendly, then Roland is scary and Rodney is polite.
It can be concluded that Melville is not relevant once knowing that Rodney is healthy and Roland is not friendly.
If someone is exuberant and scary, then he is both polite and not relevant, and vice versa.
If someone is not relevant and healthy, then he is not polite, and vice versa.
If Roland is healthy, then Marlon is polite and Bruno is scary, and vice versa.
If someone is not polite or he is healthy, then he is not relevant.
Melville being friendly is equivalent to Rodney being not exuberant.
Someone who is not polite is always scary.
Someone who is friendly is always not healthy. | Robert is polite. | self_contradiction |
Robert is not healthy.
Rodney is not healthy.
Bruno is not friendly.
Marlon is not healthy.
Marlon is not scary.
Roland is scary.
Marlon is not exuberant.
Marlon is not relevant.
Bruno is scary.
Rufus is friendly.
Melville is not friendly.
Robert is not polite.Someone being both not polite and not scary is equivalent to being healthy.
Someone being both not relevant and exuberant is equivalent to being not healthy and scary.
Someone who is both not healthy and exuberant is always not scary.
If everyone is not friendly, then Roland is scary and Rodney is polite.
It can be concluded that Melville is not relevant once knowing that Rodney is healthy and Roland is not friendly.
If someone is exuberant and scary, then he is both polite and not relevant, and vice versa.
If someone is not relevant and healthy, then he is not polite, and vice versa.
If Roland is healthy, then Marlon is polite and Bruno is scary, and vice versa.
If someone is not polite or he is healthy, then he is not relevant.
Melville being friendly is equivalent to Rodney being not exuberant.
Someone who is not polite is always scary.
Someone who is friendly is always not healthy. | Marlon is not scary. | entailment |
Robert is not healthy.
Rodney is not healthy.
Bruno is not friendly.
Marlon is not healthy.
Marlon is not scary.
Roland is scary.
Marlon is not exuberant.
Marlon is not relevant.
Bruno is scary.
Rufus is friendly.
Melville is not friendly.
Robert is not polite.Someone being both not polite and not scary is equivalent to being healthy.
Someone being both not relevant and exuberant is equivalent to being not healthy and scary.
Someone who is both not healthy and exuberant is always not scary.
If everyone is not friendly, then Roland is scary and Rodney is polite.
It can be concluded that Melville is not relevant once knowing that Rodney is healthy and Roland is not friendly.
If someone is exuberant and scary, then he is both polite and not relevant, and vice versa.
If someone is not relevant and healthy, then he is not polite, and vice versa.
If Roland is healthy, then Marlon is polite and Bruno is scary, and vice versa.
If someone is not polite or he is healthy, then he is not relevant.
Melville being friendly is equivalent to Rodney being not exuberant.
Someone who is not polite is always scary.
Someone who is friendly is always not healthy. | Robert is friendly. | neutral |
Robert is not healthy.
Rodney is not healthy.
Bruno is not friendly.
Marlon is not healthy.
Marlon is not scary.
Roland is scary.
Marlon is not exuberant.
Marlon is not relevant.
Bruno is scary.
Rufus is friendly.
Melville is not friendly.
Robert is not polite.Someone being both not polite and not scary is equivalent to being healthy.
Someone being both not relevant and exuberant is equivalent to being not healthy and scary.
Someone who is both not healthy and exuberant is always not scary.
If everyone is not friendly, then Roland is scary and Rodney is polite.
It can be concluded that Melville is not relevant once knowing that Rodney is healthy and Roland is not friendly.
If someone is exuberant and scary, then he is both polite and not relevant, and vice versa.
If someone is not relevant and healthy, then he is not polite, and vice versa.
If Roland is healthy, then Marlon is polite and Bruno is scary, and vice versa.
If someone is not polite or he is healthy, then he is not relevant.
Melville being friendly is equivalent to Rodney being not exuberant.
Someone who is not polite is always scary.
Someone who is friendly is always not healthy. | Marlon is not relevant. | entailment |
Robert is not healthy.
Rodney is not healthy.
Bruno is not friendly.
Marlon is not healthy.
Marlon is not scary.
Roland is scary.
Marlon is not exuberant.
Marlon is not relevant.
Bruno is scary.
Rufus is friendly.
Melville is not friendly.
Robert is not polite.Someone being both not polite and not scary is equivalent to being healthy.
Someone being both not relevant and exuberant is equivalent to being not healthy and scary.
Someone who is both not healthy and exuberant is always not scary.
If everyone is not friendly, then Roland is scary and Rodney is polite.
It can be concluded that Melville is not relevant once knowing that Rodney is healthy and Roland is not friendly.
If someone is exuberant and scary, then he is both polite and not relevant, and vice versa.
If someone is not relevant and healthy, then he is not polite, and vice versa.
If Roland is healthy, then Marlon is polite and Bruno is scary, and vice versa.
If someone is not polite or he is healthy, then he is not relevant.
Melville being friendly is equivalent to Rodney being not exuberant.
Someone who is not polite is always scary.
Someone who is friendly is always not healthy. | Robert is exuberant. | entailment |
Robert is not healthy.
Rodney is not healthy.
Bruno is not friendly.
Marlon is not healthy.
Marlon is not scary.
Roland is scary.
Marlon is not exuberant.
Marlon is not relevant.
Bruno is scary.
Rufus is friendly.
Melville is not friendly.
Robert is not polite.Someone being both not polite and not scary is equivalent to being healthy.
Someone being both not relevant and exuberant is equivalent to being not healthy and scary.
Someone who is both not healthy and exuberant is always not scary.
If everyone is not friendly, then Roland is scary and Rodney is polite.
It can be concluded that Melville is not relevant once knowing that Rodney is healthy and Roland is not friendly.
If someone is exuberant and scary, then he is both polite and not relevant, and vice versa.
If someone is not relevant and healthy, then he is not polite, and vice versa.
If Roland is healthy, then Marlon is polite and Bruno is scary, and vice versa.
If someone is not polite or he is healthy, then he is not relevant.
Melville being friendly is equivalent to Rodney being not exuberant.
Someone who is not polite is always scary.
Someone who is friendly is always not healthy. | Melville is friendly. | contradiction |
Robert is not healthy.
Rodney is not healthy.
Bruno is not friendly.
Marlon is not healthy.
Marlon is not scary.
Roland is scary.
Marlon is not exuberant.
Marlon is not relevant.
Bruno is scary.
Rufus is friendly.
Melville is not friendly.
Robert is not polite.Someone being both not polite and not scary is equivalent to being healthy.
Someone being both not relevant and exuberant is equivalent to being not healthy and scary.
Someone who is both not healthy and exuberant is always not scary.
If everyone is not friendly, then Roland is scary and Rodney is polite.
It can be concluded that Melville is not relevant once knowing that Rodney is healthy and Roland is not friendly.
If someone is exuberant and scary, then he is both polite and not relevant, and vice versa.
If someone is not relevant and healthy, then he is not polite, and vice versa.
If Roland is healthy, then Marlon is polite and Bruno is scary, and vice versa.
If someone is not polite or he is healthy, then he is not relevant.
Melville being friendly is equivalent to Rodney being not exuberant.
Someone who is not polite is always scary.
Someone who is friendly is always not healthy. | Rodney is exuberant. | neutral |
Robert is not healthy.
Rodney is not healthy.
Bruno is not friendly.
Marlon is not healthy.
Marlon is not scary.
Roland is scary.
Marlon is not exuberant.
Marlon is not relevant.
Bruno is scary.
Rufus is friendly.
Melville is not friendly.
Robert is not polite.Someone being both not polite and not scary is equivalent to being healthy.
Someone being both not relevant and exuberant is equivalent to being not healthy and scary.
Someone who is both not healthy and exuberant is always not scary.
If everyone is not friendly, then Roland is scary and Rodney is polite.
It can be concluded that Melville is not relevant once knowing that Rodney is healthy and Roland is not friendly.
If someone is exuberant and scary, then he is both polite and not relevant, and vice versa.
If someone is not relevant and healthy, then he is not polite, and vice versa.
If Roland is healthy, then Marlon is polite and Bruno is scary, and vice versa.
If someone is not polite or he is healthy, then he is not relevant.
Melville being friendly is equivalent to Rodney being not exuberant.
Someone who is not polite is always scary.
Someone who is friendly is always not healthy. | Roland is scary. | entailment |
Robert is not healthy.
Rodney is not healthy.
Bruno is not friendly.
Marlon is not healthy.
Marlon is not scary.
Roland is scary.
Marlon is not exuberant.
Marlon is not relevant.
Bruno is scary.
Rufus is friendly.
Melville is not friendly.
Robert is not polite.Someone being both not polite and not scary is equivalent to being healthy.
Someone being both not relevant and exuberant is equivalent to being not healthy and scary.
Someone who is both not healthy and exuberant is always not scary.
If everyone is not friendly, then Roland is scary and Rodney is polite.
It can be concluded that Melville is not relevant once knowing that Rodney is healthy and Roland is not friendly.
If someone is exuberant and scary, then he is both polite and not relevant, and vice versa.
If someone is not relevant and healthy, then he is not polite, and vice versa.
If Roland is healthy, then Marlon is polite and Bruno is scary, and vice versa.
If someone is not polite or he is healthy, then he is not relevant.
Melville being friendly is equivalent to Rodney being not exuberant.
Someone who is not polite is always scary.
Someone who is friendly is always not healthy. | Roland is not polite. | neutral |
Robert is not healthy.
Rodney is not healthy.
Bruno is not friendly.
Marlon is not healthy.
Marlon is not scary.
Roland is scary.
Marlon is not exuberant.
Marlon is not relevant.
Bruno is scary.
Rufus is friendly.
Melville is not friendly.
Robert is not polite.Someone being both not polite and not scary is equivalent to being healthy.
Someone being both not relevant and exuberant is equivalent to being not healthy and scary.
Someone who is both not healthy and exuberant is always not scary.
If everyone is not friendly, then Roland is scary and Rodney is polite.
It can be concluded that Melville is not relevant once knowing that Rodney is healthy and Roland is not friendly.
If someone is exuberant and scary, then he is both polite and not relevant, and vice versa.
If someone is not relevant and healthy, then he is not polite, and vice versa.
If Roland is healthy, then Marlon is polite and Bruno is scary, and vice versa.
If someone is not polite or he is healthy, then he is not relevant.
Melville being friendly is equivalent to Rodney being not exuberant.
Someone who is not polite is always scary.
Someone who is friendly is always not healthy. | Robert is not healthy. | self_contradiction |
Robert is not healthy.
Rodney is not healthy.
Bruno is not friendly.
Marlon is not healthy.
Marlon is not scary.
Roland is scary.
Marlon is not exuberant.
Marlon is not relevant.
Bruno is scary.
Rufus is friendly.
Melville is not friendly.
Robert is not polite.Someone being both not polite and not scary is equivalent to being healthy.
Someone being both not relevant and exuberant is equivalent to being not healthy and scary.
Someone who is both not healthy and exuberant is always not scary.
If everyone is not friendly, then Roland is scary and Rodney is polite.
It can be concluded that Melville is not relevant once knowing that Rodney is healthy and Roland is not friendly.
If someone is exuberant and scary, then he is both polite and not relevant, and vice versa.
If someone is not relevant and healthy, then he is not polite, and vice versa.
If Roland is healthy, then Marlon is polite and Bruno is scary, and vice versa.
If someone is not polite or he is healthy, then he is not relevant.
Melville being friendly is equivalent to Rodney being not exuberant.
Someone who is not polite is always scary.
Someone who is friendly is always not healthy. | Bruno is healthy. | neutral |
Robert is not healthy.
Rodney is not healthy.
Bruno is not friendly.
Marlon is not healthy.
Marlon is not scary.
Roland is scary.
Marlon is not exuberant.
Marlon is not relevant.
Bruno is scary.
Rufus is friendly.
Melville is not friendly.
Robert is not polite.Someone being both not polite and not scary is equivalent to being healthy.
Someone being both not relevant and exuberant is equivalent to being not healthy and scary.
Someone who is both not healthy and exuberant is always not scary.
If everyone is not friendly, then Roland is scary and Rodney is polite.
It can be concluded that Melville is not relevant once knowing that Rodney is healthy and Roland is not friendly.
If someone is exuberant and scary, then he is both polite and not relevant, and vice versa.
If someone is not relevant and healthy, then he is not polite, and vice versa.
If Roland is healthy, then Marlon is polite and Bruno is scary, and vice versa.
If someone is not polite or he is healthy, then he is not relevant.
Melville being friendly is equivalent to Rodney being not exuberant.
Someone who is not polite is always scary.
Someone who is friendly is always not healthy. | Marlon is not healthy. | entailment |
Robert is not healthy.
Rodney is not healthy.
Bruno is not friendly.
Marlon is not healthy.
Marlon is not scary.
Roland is scary.
Marlon is not exuberant.
Marlon is not relevant.
Bruno is scary.
Rufus is friendly.
Melville is not friendly.
Robert is not polite.Someone being both not polite and not scary is equivalent to being healthy.
Someone being both not relevant and exuberant is equivalent to being not healthy and scary.
Someone who is both not healthy and exuberant is always not scary.
If everyone is not friendly, then Roland is scary and Rodney is polite.
It can be concluded that Melville is not relevant once knowing that Rodney is healthy and Roland is not friendly.
If someone is exuberant and scary, then he is both polite and not relevant, and vice versa.
If someone is not relevant and healthy, then he is not polite, and vice versa.
If Roland is healthy, then Marlon is polite and Bruno is scary, and vice versa.
If someone is not polite or he is healthy, then he is not relevant.
Melville being friendly is equivalent to Rodney being not exuberant.
Someone who is not polite is always scary.
Someone who is friendly is always not healthy. | Robert is scary. | self_contradiction |
Robert is not healthy.
Rodney is not healthy.
Bruno is not friendly.
Marlon is not healthy.
Marlon is not scary.
Roland is scary.
Marlon is not exuberant.
Marlon is not relevant.
Bruno is scary.
Rufus is friendly.
Melville is not friendly.
Robert is not polite.Someone being both not polite and not scary is equivalent to being healthy.
Someone being both not relevant and exuberant is equivalent to being not healthy and scary.
Someone who is both not healthy and exuberant is always not scary.
If everyone is not friendly, then Roland is scary and Rodney is polite.
It can be concluded that Melville is not relevant once knowing that Rodney is healthy and Roland is not friendly.
If someone is exuberant and scary, then he is both polite and not relevant, and vice versa.
If someone is not relevant and healthy, then he is not polite, and vice versa.
If Roland is healthy, then Marlon is polite and Bruno is scary, and vice versa.
If someone is not polite or he is healthy, then he is not relevant.
Melville being friendly is equivalent to Rodney being not exuberant.
Someone who is not polite is always scary.
Someone who is friendly is always not healthy. | Robert is healthy. | self_contradiction |
Robert is not healthy.
Rodney is not healthy.
Bruno is not friendly.
Marlon is not healthy.
Marlon is not scary.
Roland is scary.
Marlon is not exuberant.
Marlon is not relevant.
Bruno is scary.
Rufus is friendly.
Melville is not friendly.
Robert is not polite.Someone being both not polite and not scary is equivalent to being healthy.
Someone being both not relevant and exuberant is equivalent to being not healthy and scary.
Someone who is both not healthy and exuberant is always not scary.
If everyone is not friendly, then Roland is scary and Rodney is polite.
It can be concluded that Melville is not relevant once knowing that Rodney is healthy and Roland is not friendly.
If someone is exuberant and scary, then he is both polite and not relevant, and vice versa.
If someone is not relevant and healthy, then he is not polite, and vice versa.
If Roland is healthy, then Marlon is polite and Bruno is scary, and vice versa.
If someone is not polite or he is healthy, then he is not relevant.
Melville being friendly is equivalent to Rodney being not exuberant.
Someone who is not polite is always scary.
Someone who is friendly is always not healthy. | Marlon is healthy. | contradiction |
Robert is not healthy.
Rodney is not healthy.
Bruno is not friendly.
Marlon is not healthy.
Marlon is not scary.
Roland is scary.
Marlon is not exuberant.
Marlon is not relevant.
Bruno is scary.
Rufus is friendly.
Melville is not friendly.
Robert is not polite.Someone being both not polite and not scary is equivalent to being healthy.
Someone being both not relevant and exuberant is equivalent to being not healthy and scary.
Someone who is both not healthy and exuberant is always not scary.
If everyone is not friendly, then Roland is scary and Rodney is polite.
It can be concluded that Melville is not relevant once knowing that Rodney is healthy and Roland is not friendly.
If someone is exuberant and scary, then he is both polite and not relevant, and vice versa.
If someone is not relevant and healthy, then he is not polite, and vice versa.
If Roland is healthy, then Marlon is polite and Bruno is scary, and vice versa.
If someone is not polite or he is healthy, then he is not relevant.
Melville being friendly is equivalent to Rodney being not exuberant.
Someone who is not polite is always scary.
Someone who is friendly is always not healthy. | Robert is not polite. | self_contradiction |
Eunice is not intelligent.
Ross is cotton.
Ross is intelligent.
Alisa is not cotton.
Odessa is cotton.
Odessa is not unable.
Stanley is expensive.
Teresa is powerful.
Eunice is powerful.
Eunice is not expensive.
Odessa is not powerful.
Addison is not powerful.If there is at least one people who is unable or not powerful, then Ross is cotton.
Someone being both cotton and not puzzled is equivalent to being not intelligent and not expensive.
Someone is cotton if and only if he is powerful.
If there is at least one people who is powerful, then Stanley is puzzled and Addison is intelligent.
Someone who is not unable is always both not intelligent and cotton.
It can be concluded that Ross is cotton once knowing that Stanley is not unable and Eunice is not expensive.
Someone is cotton if and only if he is not intelligent.
If there is someone who is both not expensive and powerful, then Addison is unable.
All not powerful people are not puzzled.
Someone is not intelligent if and only if he is powerful.
It can be concluded that Alisa is cotton once knowing that Eunice is not puzzled or Teresa is intelligent.
If there is someone who is puzzled, then Addison is not powerful. | Alisa is not cotton. | self_contradiction |
Eunice is not intelligent.
Ross is cotton.
Ross is intelligent.
Alisa is not cotton.
Odessa is cotton.
Odessa is not unable.
Stanley is expensive.
Teresa is powerful.
Eunice is powerful.
Eunice is not expensive.
Odessa is not powerful.
Addison is not powerful.If there is at least one people who is unable or not powerful, then Ross is cotton.
Someone being both cotton and not puzzled is equivalent to being not intelligent and not expensive.
Someone is cotton if and only if he is powerful.
If there is at least one people who is powerful, then Stanley is puzzled and Addison is intelligent.
Someone who is not unable is always both not intelligent and cotton.
It can be concluded that Ross is cotton once knowing that Stanley is not unable and Eunice is not expensive.
Someone is cotton if and only if he is not intelligent.
If there is someone who is both not expensive and powerful, then Addison is unable.
All not powerful people are not puzzled.
Someone is not intelligent if and only if he is powerful.
It can be concluded that Alisa is cotton once knowing that Eunice is not puzzled or Teresa is intelligent.
If there is someone who is puzzled, then Addison is not powerful. | Ross is not powerful. | contradiction |
Eunice is not intelligent.
Ross is cotton.
Ross is intelligent.
Alisa is not cotton.
Odessa is cotton.
Odessa is not unable.
Stanley is expensive.
Teresa is powerful.
Eunice is powerful.
Eunice is not expensive.
Odessa is not powerful.
Addison is not powerful.If there is at least one people who is unable or not powerful, then Ross is cotton.
Someone being both cotton and not puzzled is equivalent to being not intelligent and not expensive.
Someone is cotton if and only if he is powerful.
If there is at least one people who is powerful, then Stanley is puzzled and Addison is intelligent.
Someone who is not unable is always both not intelligent and cotton.
It can be concluded that Ross is cotton once knowing that Stanley is not unable and Eunice is not expensive.
Someone is cotton if and only if he is not intelligent.
If there is someone who is both not expensive and powerful, then Addison is unable.
All not powerful people are not puzzled.
Someone is not intelligent if and only if he is powerful.
It can be concluded that Alisa is cotton once knowing that Eunice is not puzzled or Teresa is intelligent.
If there is someone who is puzzled, then Addison is not powerful. | Ross is not intelligent. | self_contradiction |
Eunice is not intelligent.
Ross is cotton.
Ross is intelligent.
Alisa is not cotton.
Odessa is cotton.
Odessa is not unable.
Stanley is expensive.
Teresa is powerful.
Eunice is powerful.
Eunice is not expensive.
Odessa is not powerful.
Addison is not powerful.If there is at least one people who is unable or not powerful, then Ross is cotton.
Someone being both cotton and not puzzled is equivalent to being not intelligent and not expensive.
Someone is cotton if and only if he is powerful.
If there is at least one people who is powerful, then Stanley is puzzled and Addison is intelligent.
Someone who is not unable is always both not intelligent and cotton.
It can be concluded that Ross is cotton once knowing that Stanley is not unable and Eunice is not expensive.
Someone is cotton if and only if he is not intelligent.
If there is someone who is both not expensive and powerful, then Addison is unable.
All not powerful people are not puzzled.
Someone is not intelligent if and only if he is powerful.
It can be concluded that Alisa is cotton once knowing that Eunice is not puzzled or Teresa is intelligent.
If there is someone who is puzzled, then Addison is not powerful. | Alisa is not intelligent. | entailment |
Eunice is not intelligent.
Ross is cotton.
Ross is intelligent.
Alisa is not cotton.
Odessa is cotton.
Odessa is not unable.
Stanley is expensive.
Teresa is powerful.
Eunice is powerful.
Eunice is not expensive.
Odessa is not powerful.
Addison is not powerful.If there is at least one people who is unable or not powerful, then Ross is cotton.
Someone being both cotton and not puzzled is equivalent to being not intelligent and not expensive.
Someone is cotton if and only if he is powerful.
If there is at least one people who is powerful, then Stanley is puzzled and Addison is intelligent.
Someone who is not unable is always both not intelligent and cotton.
It can be concluded that Ross is cotton once knowing that Stanley is not unable and Eunice is not expensive.
Someone is cotton if and only if he is not intelligent.
If there is someone who is both not expensive and powerful, then Addison is unable.
All not powerful people are not puzzled.
Someone is not intelligent if and only if he is powerful.
It can be concluded that Alisa is cotton once knowing that Eunice is not puzzled or Teresa is intelligent.
If there is someone who is puzzled, then Addison is not powerful. | Eunice is expensive. | contradiction |
Eunice is not intelligent.
Ross is cotton.
Ross is intelligent.
Alisa is not cotton.
Odessa is cotton.
Odessa is not unable.
Stanley is expensive.
Teresa is powerful.
Eunice is powerful.
Eunice is not expensive.
Odessa is not powerful.
Addison is not powerful.If there is at least one people who is unable or not powerful, then Ross is cotton.
Someone being both cotton and not puzzled is equivalent to being not intelligent and not expensive.
Someone is cotton if and only if he is powerful.
If there is at least one people who is powerful, then Stanley is puzzled and Addison is intelligent.
Someone who is not unable is always both not intelligent and cotton.
It can be concluded that Ross is cotton once knowing that Stanley is not unable and Eunice is not expensive.
Someone is cotton if and only if he is not intelligent.
If there is someone who is both not expensive and powerful, then Addison is unable.
All not powerful people are not puzzled.
Someone is not intelligent if and only if he is powerful.
It can be concluded that Alisa is cotton once knowing that Eunice is not puzzled or Teresa is intelligent.
If there is someone who is puzzled, then Addison is not powerful. | Odessa is not unable. | entailment |
Eunice is not intelligent.
Ross is cotton.
Ross is intelligent.
Alisa is not cotton.
Odessa is cotton.
Odessa is not unable.
Stanley is expensive.
Teresa is powerful.
Eunice is powerful.
Eunice is not expensive.
Odessa is not powerful.
Addison is not powerful.If there is at least one people who is unable or not powerful, then Ross is cotton.
Someone being both cotton and not puzzled is equivalent to being not intelligent and not expensive.
Someone is cotton if and only if he is powerful.
If there is at least one people who is powerful, then Stanley is puzzled and Addison is intelligent.
Someone who is not unable is always both not intelligent and cotton.
It can be concluded that Ross is cotton once knowing that Stanley is not unable and Eunice is not expensive.
Someone is cotton if and only if he is not intelligent.
If there is someone who is both not expensive and powerful, then Addison is unable.
All not powerful people are not puzzled.
Someone is not intelligent if and only if he is powerful.
It can be concluded that Alisa is cotton once knowing that Eunice is not puzzled or Teresa is intelligent.
If there is someone who is puzzled, then Addison is not powerful. | Alisa is expensive. | neutral |
Eunice is not intelligent.
Ross is cotton.
Ross is intelligent.
Alisa is not cotton.
Odessa is cotton.
Odessa is not unable.
Stanley is expensive.
Teresa is powerful.
Eunice is powerful.
Eunice is not expensive.
Odessa is not powerful.
Addison is not powerful.If there is at least one people who is unable or not powerful, then Ross is cotton.
Someone being both cotton and not puzzled is equivalent to being not intelligent and not expensive.
Someone is cotton if and only if he is powerful.
If there is at least one people who is powerful, then Stanley is puzzled and Addison is intelligent.
Someone who is not unable is always both not intelligent and cotton.
It can be concluded that Ross is cotton once knowing that Stanley is not unable and Eunice is not expensive.
Someone is cotton if and only if he is not intelligent.
If there is someone who is both not expensive and powerful, then Addison is unable.
All not powerful people are not puzzled.
Someone is not intelligent if and only if he is powerful.
It can be concluded that Alisa is cotton once knowing that Eunice is not puzzled or Teresa is intelligent.
If there is someone who is puzzled, then Addison is not powerful. | Stanley is not unable. | neutral |
Eunice is not intelligent.
Ross is cotton.
Ross is intelligent.
Alisa is not cotton.
Odessa is cotton.
Odessa is not unable.
Stanley is expensive.
Teresa is powerful.
Eunice is powerful.
Eunice is not expensive.
Odessa is not powerful.
Addison is not powerful.If there is at least one people who is unable or not powerful, then Ross is cotton.
Someone being both cotton and not puzzled is equivalent to being not intelligent and not expensive.
Someone is cotton if and only if he is powerful.
If there is at least one people who is powerful, then Stanley is puzzled and Addison is intelligent.
Someone who is not unable is always both not intelligent and cotton.
It can be concluded that Ross is cotton once knowing that Stanley is not unable and Eunice is not expensive.
Someone is cotton if and only if he is not intelligent.
If there is someone who is both not expensive and powerful, then Addison is unable.
All not powerful people are not puzzled.
Someone is not intelligent if and only if he is powerful.
It can be concluded that Alisa is cotton once knowing that Eunice is not puzzled or Teresa is intelligent.
If there is someone who is puzzled, then Addison is not powerful. | Stanley is not cotton. | neutral |
Eunice is not intelligent.
Ross is cotton.
Ross is intelligent.
Alisa is not cotton.
Odessa is cotton.
Odessa is not unable.
Stanley is expensive.
Teresa is powerful.
Eunice is powerful.
Eunice is not expensive.
Odessa is not powerful.
Addison is not powerful.If there is at least one people who is unable or not powerful, then Ross is cotton.
Someone being both cotton and not puzzled is equivalent to being not intelligent and not expensive.
Someone is cotton if and only if he is powerful.
If there is at least one people who is powerful, then Stanley is puzzled and Addison is intelligent.
Someone who is not unable is always both not intelligent and cotton.
It can be concluded that Ross is cotton once knowing that Stanley is not unable and Eunice is not expensive.
Someone is cotton if and only if he is not intelligent.
If there is someone who is both not expensive and powerful, then Addison is unable.
All not powerful people are not puzzled.
Someone is not intelligent if and only if he is powerful.
It can be concluded that Alisa is cotton once knowing that Eunice is not puzzled or Teresa is intelligent.
If there is someone who is puzzled, then Addison is not powerful. | Teresa is not cotton. | contradiction |
Eunice is not intelligent.
Ross is cotton.
Ross is intelligent.
Alisa is not cotton.
Odessa is cotton.
Odessa is not unable.
Stanley is expensive.
Teresa is powerful.
Eunice is powerful.
Eunice is not expensive.
Odessa is not powerful.
Addison is not powerful.If there is at least one people who is unable or not powerful, then Ross is cotton.
Someone being both cotton and not puzzled is equivalent to being not intelligent and not expensive.
Someone is cotton if and only if he is powerful.
If there is at least one people who is powerful, then Stanley is puzzled and Addison is intelligent.
Someone who is not unable is always both not intelligent and cotton.
It can be concluded that Ross is cotton once knowing that Stanley is not unable and Eunice is not expensive.
Someone is cotton if and only if he is not intelligent.
If there is someone who is both not expensive and powerful, then Addison is unable.
All not powerful people are not puzzled.
Someone is not intelligent if and only if he is powerful.
It can be concluded that Alisa is cotton once knowing that Eunice is not puzzled or Teresa is intelligent.
If there is someone who is puzzled, then Addison is not powerful. | Eunice is cotton. | entailment |
Eunice is not intelligent.
Ross is cotton.
Ross is intelligent.
Alisa is not cotton.
Odessa is cotton.
Odessa is not unable.
Stanley is expensive.
Teresa is powerful.
Eunice is powerful.
Eunice is not expensive.
Odessa is not powerful.
Addison is not powerful.If there is at least one people who is unable or not powerful, then Ross is cotton.
Someone being both cotton and not puzzled is equivalent to being not intelligent and not expensive.
Someone is cotton if and only if he is powerful.
If there is at least one people who is powerful, then Stanley is puzzled and Addison is intelligent.
Someone who is not unable is always both not intelligent and cotton.
It can be concluded that Ross is cotton once knowing that Stanley is not unable and Eunice is not expensive.
Someone is cotton if and only if he is not intelligent.
If there is someone who is both not expensive and powerful, then Addison is unable.
All not powerful people are not puzzled.
Someone is not intelligent if and only if he is powerful.
It can be concluded that Alisa is cotton once knowing that Eunice is not puzzled or Teresa is intelligent.
If there is someone who is puzzled, then Addison is not powerful. | Ross is not expensive. | neutral |
Eunice is not intelligent.
Ross is cotton.
Ross is intelligent.
Alisa is not cotton.
Odessa is cotton.
Odessa is not unable.
Stanley is expensive.
Teresa is powerful.
Eunice is powerful.
Eunice is not expensive.
Odessa is not powerful.
Addison is not powerful.If there is at least one people who is unable or not powerful, then Ross is cotton.
Someone being both cotton and not puzzled is equivalent to being not intelligent and not expensive.
Someone is cotton if and only if he is powerful.
If there is at least one people who is powerful, then Stanley is puzzled and Addison is intelligent.
Someone who is not unable is always both not intelligent and cotton.
It can be concluded that Ross is cotton once knowing that Stanley is not unable and Eunice is not expensive.
Someone is cotton if and only if he is not intelligent.
If there is someone who is both not expensive and powerful, then Addison is unable.
All not powerful people are not puzzled.
Someone is not intelligent if and only if he is powerful.
It can be concluded that Alisa is cotton once knowing that Eunice is not puzzled or Teresa is intelligent.
If there is someone who is puzzled, then Addison is not powerful. | Stanley is not puzzled. | contradiction |
Eunice is not intelligent.
Ross is cotton.
Ross is intelligent.
Alisa is not cotton.
Odessa is cotton.
Odessa is not unable.
Stanley is expensive.
Teresa is powerful.
Eunice is powerful.
Eunice is not expensive.
Odessa is not powerful.
Addison is not powerful.If there is at least one people who is unable or not powerful, then Ross is cotton.
Someone being both cotton and not puzzled is equivalent to being not intelligent and not expensive.
Someone is cotton if and only if he is powerful.
If there is at least one people who is powerful, then Stanley is puzzled and Addison is intelligent.
Someone who is not unable is always both not intelligent and cotton.
It can be concluded that Ross is cotton once knowing that Stanley is not unable and Eunice is not expensive.
Someone is cotton if and only if he is not intelligent.
If there is someone who is both not expensive and powerful, then Addison is unable.
All not powerful people are not puzzled.
Someone is not intelligent if and only if he is powerful.
It can be concluded that Alisa is cotton once knowing that Eunice is not puzzled or Teresa is intelligent.
If there is someone who is puzzled, then Addison is not powerful. | Alisa is not unable. | neutral |
Eunice is not intelligent.
Ross is cotton.
Ross is intelligent.
Alisa is not cotton.
Odessa is cotton.
Odessa is not unable.
Stanley is expensive.
Teresa is powerful.
Eunice is powerful.
Eunice is not expensive.
Odessa is not powerful.
Addison is not powerful.If there is at least one people who is unable or not powerful, then Ross is cotton.
Someone being both cotton and not puzzled is equivalent to being not intelligent and not expensive.
Someone is cotton if and only if he is powerful.
If there is at least one people who is powerful, then Stanley is puzzled and Addison is intelligent.
Someone who is not unable is always both not intelligent and cotton.
It can be concluded that Ross is cotton once knowing that Stanley is not unable and Eunice is not expensive.
Someone is cotton if and only if he is not intelligent.
If there is someone who is both not expensive and powerful, then Addison is unable.
All not powerful people are not puzzled.
Someone is not intelligent if and only if he is powerful.
It can be concluded that Alisa is cotton once knowing that Eunice is not puzzled or Teresa is intelligent.
If there is someone who is puzzled, then Addison is not powerful. | Odessa is not intelligent. | entailment |
Eunice is not intelligent.
Ross is cotton.
Ross is intelligent.
Alisa is not cotton.
Odessa is cotton.
Odessa is not unable.
Stanley is expensive.
Teresa is powerful.
Eunice is powerful.
Eunice is not expensive.
Odessa is not powerful.
Addison is not powerful.If there is at least one people who is unable or not powerful, then Ross is cotton.
Someone being both cotton and not puzzled is equivalent to being not intelligent and not expensive.
Someone is cotton if and only if he is powerful.
If there is at least one people who is powerful, then Stanley is puzzled and Addison is intelligent.
Someone who is not unable is always both not intelligent and cotton.
It can be concluded that Ross is cotton once knowing that Stanley is not unable and Eunice is not expensive.
Someone is cotton if and only if he is not intelligent.
If there is someone who is both not expensive and powerful, then Addison is unable.
All not powerful people are not puzzled.
Someone is not intelligent if and only if he is powerful.
It can be concluded that Alisa is cotton once knowing that Eunice is not puzzled or Teresa is intelligent.
If there is someone who is puzzled, then Addison is not powerful. | Odessa is not expensive. | entailment |
Eunice is not intelligent.
Ross is cotton.
Ross is intelligent.
Alisa is not cotton.
Odessa is cotton.
Odessa is not unable.
Stanley is expensive.
Teresa is powerful.
Eunice is powerful.
Eunice is not expensive.
Odessa is not powerful.
Addison is not powerful.If there is at least one people who is unable or not powerful, then Ross is cotton.
Someone being both cotton and not puzzled is equivalent to being not intelligent and not expensive.
Someone is cotton if and only if he is powerful.
If there is at least one people who is powerful, then Stanley is puzzled and Addison is intelligent.
Someone who is not unable is always both not intelligent and cotton.
It can be concluded that Ross is cotton once knowing that Stanley is not unable and Eunice is not expensive.
Someone is cotton if and only if he is not intelligent.
If there is someone who is both not expensive and powerful, then Addison is unable.
All not powerful people are not puzzled.
Someone is not intelligent if and only if he is powerful.
It can be concluded that Alisa is cotton once knowing that Eunice is not puzzled or Teresa is intelligent.
If there is someone who is puzzled, then Addison is not powerful. | Ross is intelligent. | self_contradiction |
Eunice is not intelligent.
Ross is cotton.
Ross is intelligent.
Alisa is not cotton.
Odessa is cotton.
Odessa is not unable.
Stanley is expensive.
Teresa is powerful.
Eunice is powerful.
Eunice is not expensive.
Odessa is not powerful.
Addison is not powerful.If there is at least one people who is unable or not powerful, then Ross is cotton.
Someone being both cotton and not puzzled is equivalent to being not intelligent and not expensive.
Someone is cotton if and only if he is powerful.
If there is at least one people who is powerful, then Stanley is puzzled and Addison is intelligent.
Someone who is not unable is always both not intelligent and cotton.
It can be concluded that Ross is cotton once knowing that Stanley is not unable and Eunice is not expensive.
Someone is cotton if and only if he is not intelligent.
If there is someone who is both not expensive and powerful, then Addison is unable.
All not powerful people are not puzzled.
Someone is not intelligent if and only if he is powerful.
It can be concluded that Alisa is cotton once knowing that Eunice is not puzzled or Teresa is intelligent.
If there is someone who is puzzled, then Addison is not powerful. | Addison is not intelligent. | contradiction |
Eunice is not intelligent.
Ross is cotton.
Ross is intelligent.
Alisa is not cotton.
Odessa is cotton.
Odessa is not unable.
Stanley is expensive.
Teresa is powerful.
Eunice is powerful.
Eunice is not expensive.
Odessa is not powerful.
Addison is not powerful.If there is at least one people who is unable or not powerful, then Ross is cotton.
Someone being both cotton and not puzzled is equivalent to being not intelligent and not expensive.
Someone is cotton if and only if he is powerful.
If there is at least one people who is powerful, then Stanley is puzzled and Addison is intelligent.
Someone who is not unable is always both not intelligent and cotton.
It can be concluded that Ross is cotton once knowing that Stanley is not unable and Eunice is not expensive.
Someone is cotton if and only if he is not intelligent.
If there is someone who is both not expensive and powerful, then Addison is unable.
All not powerful people are not puzzled.
Someone is not intelligent if and only if he is powerful.
It can be concluded that Alisa is cotton once knowing that Eunice is not puzzled or Teresa is intelligent.
If there is someone who is puzzled, then Addison is not powerful. | Odessa is powerful. | self_contradiction |
Eunice is not intelligent.
Ross is cotton.
Ross is intelligent.
Alisa is not cotton.
Odessa is cotton.
Odessa is not unable.
Stanley is expensive.
Teresa is powerful.
Eunice is powerful.
Eunice is not expensive.
Odessa is not powerful.
Addison is not powerful.If there is at least one people who is unable or not powerful, then Ross is cotton.
Someone being both cotton and not puzzled is equivalent to being not intelligent and not expensive.
Someone is cotton if and only if he is powerful.
If there is at least one people who is powerful, then Stanley is puzzled and Addison is intelligent.
Someone who is not unable is always both not intelligent and cotton.
It can be concluded that Ross is cotton once knowing that Stanley is not unable and Eunice is not expensive.
Someone is cotton if and only if he is not intelligent.
If there is someone who is both not expensive and powerful, then Addison is unable.
All not powerful people are not puzzled.
Someone is not intelligent if and only if he is powerful.
It can be concluded that Alisa is cotton once knowing that Eunice is not puzzled or Teresa is intelligent.
If there is someone who is puzzled, then Addison is not powerful. | Alisa is cotton. | self_contradiction |
Norman is not breakable.
Hector is not naughty.
Alton is naughty.
Kingston is not sufficient.
Hector is breakable.
Alton is not breakable.
Kingston is plastic.
Michael is fine.
Norman is not sufficient.
Michael is important.
Kingston is not breakable.
Michael is not sufficient.If there is at least one people who is breakable, then Alton is not naughty and Alton is important.
If someone is not plastic, then he is sufficient.
Someone who is eithor not fine or not important is always not breakable.
Someone who is eithor not breakable or plastic is always not naughty.
Someone is not breakable and sufficient if and only if he is fine.
Alberto is not important if and only if Alberto is not breakable and Alton is fine.
Someone being important is equivalent to being not fine.
If there is at least one people who is both not sufficient and not breakable, then Norman is not plastic.
If Kingston is naughty, then Kingston is not breakable and Alton is not fine.
If there is someone who is fine, then Kingston is plastic and Norman is important.
Someone who is important is always both not plastic and breakable.
If Hector is not plastic and Norman is not important, then Alberto is not naughty. | Norman is breakable. | self_contradiction |
Norman is not breakable.
Hector is not naughty.
Alton is naughty.
Kingston is not sufficient.
Hector is breakable.
Alton is not breakable.
Kingston is plastic.
Michael is fine.
Norman is not sufficient.
Michael is important.
Kingston is not breakable.
Michael is not sufficient.If there is at least one people who is breakable, then Alton is not naughty and Alton is important.
If someone is not plastic, then he is sufficient.
Someone who is eithor not fine or not important is always not breakable.
Someone who is eithor not breakable or plastic is always not naughty.
Someone is not breakable and sufficient if and only if he is fine.
Alberto is not important if and only if Alberto is not breakable and Alton is fine.
Someone being important is equivalent to being not fine.
If there is at least one people who is both not sufficient and not breakable, then Norman is not plastic.
If Kingston is naughty, then Kingston is not breakable and Alton is not fine.
If there is someone who is fine, then Kingston is plastic and Norman is important.
Someone who is important is always both not plastic and breakable.
If Hector is not plastic and Norman is not important, then Alberto is not naughty. | Irvin is sufficient. | neutral |
Norman is not breakable.
Hector is not naughty.
Alton is naughty.
Kingston is not sufficient.
Hector is breakable.
Alton is not breakable.
Kingston is plastic.
Michael is fine.
Norman is not sufficient.
Michael is important.
Kingston is not breakable.
Michael is not sufficient.If there is at least one people who is breakable, then Alton is not naughty and Alton is important.
If someone is not plastic, then he is sufficient.
Someone who is eithor not fine or not important is always not breakable.
Someone who is eithor not breakable or plastic is always not naughty.
Someone is not breakable and sufficient if and only if he is fine.
Alberto is not important if and only if Alberto is not breakable and Alton is fine.
Someone being important is equivalent to being not fine.
If there is at least one people who is both not sufficient and not breakable, then Norman is not plastic.
If Kingston is naughty, then Kingston is not breakable and Alton is not fine.
If there is someone who is fine, then Kingston is plastic and Norman is important.
Someone who is important is always both not plastic and breakable.
If Hector is not plastic and Norman is not important, then Alberto is not naughty. | Kingston is not plastic. | contradiction |
Norman is not breakable.
Hector is not naughty.
Alton is naughty.
Kingston is not sufficient.
Hector is breakable.
Alton is not breakable.
Kingston is plastic.
Michael is fine.
Norman is not sufficient.
Michael is important.
Kingston is not breakable.
Michael is not sufficient.If there is at least one people who is breakable, then Alton is not naughty and Alton is important.
If someone is not plastic, then he is sufficient.
Someone who is eithor not fine or not important is always not breakable.
Someone who is eithor not breakable or plastic is always not naughty.
Someone is not breakable and sufficient if and only if he is fine.
Alberto is not important if and only if Alberto is not breakable and Alton is fine.
Someone being important is equivalent to being not fine.
If there is at least one people who is both not sufficient and not breakable, then Norman is not plastic.
If Kingston is naughty, then Kingston is not breakable and Alton is not fine.
If there is someone who is fine, then Kingston is plastic and Norman is important.
Someone who is important is always both not plastic and breakable.
If Hector is not plastic and Norman is not important, then Alberto is not naughty. | Michael is important. | entailment |
Norman is not breakable.
Hector is not naughty.
Alton is naughty.
Kingston is not sufficient.
Hector is breakable.
Alton is not breakable.
Kingston is plastic.
Michael is fine.
Norman is not sufficient.
Michael is important.
Kingston is not breakable.
Michael is not sufficient.If there is at least one people who is breakable, then Alton is not naughty and Alton is important.
If someone is not plastic, then he is sufficient.
Someone who is eithor not fine or not important is always not breakable.
Someone who is eithor not breakable or plastic is always not naughty.
Someone is not breakable and sufficient if and only if he is fine.
Alberto is not important if and only if Alberto is not breakable and Alton is fine.
Someone being important is equivalent to being not fine.
If there is at least one people who is both not sufficient and not breakable, then Norman is not plastic.
If Kingston is naughty, then Kingston is not breakable and Alton is not fine.
If there is someone who is fine, then Kingston is plastic and Norman is important.
Someone who is important is always both not plastic and breakable.
If Hector is not plastic and Norman is not important, then Alberto is not naughty. | Hector is not fine. | neutral |
Norman is not breakable.
Hector is not naughty.
Alton is naughty.
Kingston is not sufficient.
Hector is breakable.
Alton is not breakable.
Kingston is plastic.
Michael is fine.
Norman is not sufficient.
Michael is important.
Kingston is not breakable.
Michael is not sufficient.If there is at least one people who is breakable, then Alton is not naughty and Alton is important.
If someone is not plastic, then he is sufficient.
Someone who is eithor not fine or not important is always not breakable.
Someone who is eithor not breakable or plastic is always not naughty.
Someone is not breakable and sufficient if and only if he is fine.
Alberto is not important if and only if Alberto is not breakable and Alton is fine.
Someone being important is equivalent to being not fine.
If there is at least one people who is both not sufficient and not breakable, then Norman is not plastic.
If Kingston is naughty, then Kingston is not breakable and Alton is not fine.
If there is someone who is fine, then Kingston is plastic and Norman is important.
Someone who is important is always both not plastic and breakable.
If Hector is not plastic and Norman is not important, then Alberto is not naughty. | Kingston is not breakable. | entailment |
Norman is not breakable.
Hector is not naughty.
Alton is naughty.
Kingston is not sufficient.
Hector is breakable.
Alton is not breakable.
Kingston is plastic.
Michael is fine.
Norman is not sufficient.
Michael is important.
Kingston is not breakable.
Michael is not sufficient.If there is at least one people who is breakable, then Alton is not naughty and Alton is important.
If someone is not plastic, then he is sufficient.
Someone who is eithor not fine or not important is always not breakable.
Someone who is eithor not breakable or plastic is always not naughty.
Someone is not breakable and sufficient if and only if he is fine.
Alberto is not important if and only if Alberto is not breakable and Alton is fine.
Someone being important is equivalent to being not fine.
If there is at least one people who is both not sufficient and not breakable, then Norman is not plastic.
If Kingston is naughty, then Kingston is not breakable and Alton is not fine.
If there is someone who is fine, then Kingston is plastic and Norman is important.
Someone who is important is always both not plastic and breakable.
If Hector is not plastic and Norman is not important, then Alberto is not naughty. | Michael is not sufficient. | self_contradiction |
Norman is not breakable.
Hector is not naughty.
Alton is naughty.
Kingston is not sufficient.
Hector is breakable.
Alton is not breakable.
Kingston is plastic.
Michael is fine.
Norman is not sufficient.
Michael is important.
Kingston is not breakable.
Michael is not sufficient.If there is at least one people who is breakable, then Alton is not naughty and Alton is important.
If someone is not plastic, then he is sufficient.
Someone who is eithor not fine or not important is always not breakable.
Someone who is eithor not breakable or plastic is always not naughty.
Someone is not breakable and sufficient if and only if he is fine.
Alberto is not important if and only if Alberto is not breakable and Alton is fine.
Someone being important is equivalent to being not fine.
If there is at least one people who is both not sufficient and not breakable, then Norman is not plastic.
If Kingston is naughty, then Kingston is not breakable and Alton is not fine.
If there is someone who is fine, then Kingston is plastic and Norman is important.
Someone who is important is always both not plastic and breakable.
If Hector is not plastic and Norman is not important, then Alberto is not naughty. | Norman is plastic. | contradiction |
Norman is not breakable.
Hector is not naughty.
Alton is naughty.
Kingston is not sufficient.
Hector is breakable.
Alton is not breakable.
Kingston is plastic.
Michael is fine.
Norman is not sufficient.
Michael is important.
Kingston is not breakable.
Michael is not sufficient.If there is at least one people who is breakable, then Alton is not naughty and Alton is important.
If someone is not plastic, then he is sufficient.
Someone who is eithor not fine or not important is always not breakable.
Someone who is eithor not breakable or plastic is always not naughty.
Someone is not breakable and sufficient if and only if he is fine.
Alberto is not important if and only if Alberto is not breakable and Alton is fine.
Someone being important is equivalent to being not fine.
If there is at least one people who is both not sufficient and not breakable, then Norman is not plastic.
If Kingston is naughty, then Kingston is not breakable and Alton is not fine.
If there is someone who is fine, then Kingston is plastic and Norman is important.
Someone who is important is always both not plastic and breakable.
If Hector is not plastic and Norman is not important, then Alberto is not naughty. | Norman is not important. | contradiction |
Norman is not breakable.
Hector is not naughty.
Alton is naughty.
Kingston is not sufficient.
Hector is breakable.
Alton is not breakable.
Kingston is plastic.
Michael is fine.
Norman is not sufficient.
Michael is important.
Kingston is not breakable.
Michael is not sufficient.If there is at least one people who is breakable, then Alton is not naughty and Alton is important.
If someone is not plastic, then he is sufficient.
Someone who is eithor not fine or not important is always not breakable.
Someone who is eithor not breakable or plastic is always not naughty.
Someone is not breakable and sufficient if and only if he is fine.
Alberto is not important if and only if Alberto is not breakable and Alton is fine.
Someone being important is equivalent to being not fine.
If there is at least one people who is both not sufficient and not breakable, then Norman is not plastic.
If Kingston is naughty, then Kingston is not breakable and Alton is not fine.
If there is someone who is fine, then Kingston is plastic and Norman is important.
Someone who is important is always both not plastic and breakable.
If Hector is not plastic and Norman is not important, then Alberto is not naughty. | Alton is sufficient. | entailment |
Norman is not breakable.
Hector is not naughty.
Alton is naughty.
Kingston is not sufficient.
Hector is breakable.
Alton is not breakable.
Kingston is plastic.
Michael is fine.
Norman is not sufficient.
Michael is important.
Kingston is not breakable.
Michael is not sufficient.If there is at least one people who is breakable, then Alton is not naughty and Alton is important.
If someone is not plastic, then he is sufficient.
Someone who is eithor not fine or not important is always not breakable.
Someone who is eithor not breakable or plastic is always not naughty.
Someone is not breakable and sufficient if and only if he is fine.
Alberto is not important if and only if Alberto is not breakable and Alton is fine.
Someone being important is equivalent to being not fine.
If there is at least one people who is both not sufficient and not breakable, then Norman is not plastic.
If Kingston is naughty, then Kingston is not breakable and Alton is not fine.
If there is someone who is fine, then Kingston is plastic and Norman is important.
Someone who is important is always both not plastic and breakable.
If Hector is not plastic and Norman is not important, then Alberto is not naughty. | Michael is naughty. | contradiction |
Norman is not breakable.
Hector is not naughty.
Alton is naughty.
Kingston is not sufficient.
Hector is breakable.
Alton is not breakable.
Kingston is plastic.
Michael is fine.
Norman is not sufficient.
Michael is important.
Kingston is not breakable.
Michael is not sufficient.If there is at least one people who is breakable, then Alton is not naughty and Alton is important.
If someone is not plastic, then he is sufficient.
Someone who is eithor not fine or not important is always not breakable.
Someone who is eithor not breakable or plastic is always not naughty.
Someone is not breakable and sufficient if and only if he is fine.
Alberto is not important if and only if Alberto is not breakable and Alton is fine.
Someone being important is equivalent to being not fine.
If there is at least one people who is both not sufficient and not breakable, then Norman is not plastic.
If Kingston is naughty, then Kingston is not breakable and Alton is not fine.
If there is someone who is fine, then Kingston is plastic and Norman is important.
Someone who is important is always both not plastic and breakable.
If Hector is not plastic and Norman is not important, then Alberto is not naughty. | Alton is breakable. | self_contradiction |
Norman is not breakable.
Hector is not naughty.
Alton is naughty.
Kingston is not sufficient.
Hector is breakable.
Alton is not breakable.
Kingston is plastic.
Michael is fine.
Norman is not sufficient.
Michael is important.
Kingston is not breakable.
Michael is not sufficient.If there is at least one people who is breakable, then Alton is not naughty and Alton is important.
If someone is not plastic, then he is sufficient.
Someone who is eithor not fine or not important is always not breakable.
Someone who is eithor not breakable or plastic is always not naughty.
Someone is not breakable and sufficient if and only if he is fine.
Alberto is not important if and only if Alberto is not breakable and Alton is fine.
Someone being important is equivalent to being not fine.
If there is at least one people who is both not sufficient and not breakable, then Norman is not plastic.
If Kingston is naughty, then Kingston is not breakable and Alton is not fine.
If there is someone who is fine, then Kingston is plastic and Norman is important.
Someone who is important is always both not plastic and breakable.
If Hector is not plastic and Norman is not important, then Alberto is not naughty. | Alton is not plastic. | entailment |
Norman is not breakable.
Hector is not naughty.
Alton is naughty.
Kingston is not sufficient.
Hector is breakable.
Alton is not breakable.
Kingston is plastic.
Michael is fine.
Norman is not sufficient.
Michael is important.
Kingston is not breakable.
Michael is not sufficient.If there is at least one people who is breakable, then Alton is not naughty and Alton is important.
If someone is not plastic, then he is sufficient.
Someone who is eithor not fine or not important is always not breakable.
Someone who is eithor not breakable or plastic is always not naughty.
Someone is not breakable and sufficient if and only if he is fine.
Alberto is not important if and only if Alberto is not breakable and Alton is fine.
Someone being important is equivalent to being not fine.
If there is at least one people who is both not sufficient and not breakable, then Norman is not plastic.
If Kingston is naughty, then Kingston is not breakable and Alton is not fine.
If there is someone who is fine, then Kingston is plastic and Norman is important.
Someone who is important is always both not plastic and breakable.
If Hector is not plastic and Norman is not important, then Alberto is not naughty. | Alberto is important. | neutral |
Norman is not breakable.
Hector is not naughty.
Alton is naughty.
Kingston is not sufficient.
Hector is breakable.
Alton is not breakable.
Kingston is plastic.
Michael is fine.
Norman is not sufficient.
Michael is important.
Kingston is not breakable.
Michael is not sufficient.If there is at least one people who is breakable, then Alton is not naughty and Alton is important.
If someone is not plastic, then he is sufficient.
Someone who is eithor not fine or not important is always not breakable.
Someone who is eithor not breakable or plastic is always not naughty.
Someone is not breakable and sufficient if and only if he is fine.
Alberto is not important if and only if Alberto is not breakable and Alton is fine.
Someone being important is equivalent to being not fine.
If there is at least one people who is both not sufficient and not breakable, then Norman is not plastic.
If Kingston is naughty, then Kingston is not breakable and Alton is not fine.
If there is someone who is fine, then Kingston is plastic and Norman is important.
Someone who is important is always both not plastic and breakable.
If Hector is not plastic and Norman is not important, then Alberto is not naughty. | Irvin is not sufficient. | neutral |
Norman is not breakable.
Hector is not naughty.
Alton is naughty.
Kingston is not sufficient.
Hector is breakable.
Alton is not breakable.
Kingston is plastic.
Michael is fine.
Norman is not sufficient.
Michael is important.
Kingston is not breakable.
Michael is not sufficient.If there is at least one people who is breakable, then Alton is not naughty and Alton is important.
If someone is not plastic, then he is sufficient.
Someone who is eithor not fine or not important is always not breakable.
Someone who is eithor not breakable or plastic is always not naughty.
Someone is not breakable and sufficient if and only if he is fine.
Alberto is not important if and only if Alberto is not breakable and Alton is fine.
Someone being important is equivalent to being not fine.
If there is at least one people who is both not sufficient and not breakable, then Norman is not plastic.
If Kingston is naughty, then Kingston is not breakable and Alton is not fine.
If there is someone who is fine, then Kingston is plastic and Norman is important.
Someone who is important is always both not plastic and breakable.
If Hector is not plastic and Norman is not important, then Alberto is not naughty. | Alton is naughty. | self_contradiction |
Norman is not breakable.
Hector is not naughty.
Alton is naughty.
Kingston is not sufficient.
Hector is breakable.
Alton is not breakable.
Kingston is plastic.
Michael is fine.
Norman is not sufficient.
Michael is important.
Kingston is not breakable.
Michael is not sufficient.If there is at least one people who is breakable, then Alton is not naughty and Alton is important.
If someone is not plastic, then he is sufficient.
Someone who is eithor not fine or not important is always not breakable.
Someone who is eithor not breakable or plastic is always not naughty.
Someone is not breakable and sufficient if and only if he is fine.
Alberto is not important if and only if Alberto is not breakable and Alton is fine.
Someone being important is equivalent to being not fine.
If there is at least one people who is both not sufficient and not breakable, then Norman is not plastic.
If Kingston is naughty, then Kingston is not breakable and Alton is not fine.
If there is someone who is fine, then Kingston is plastic and Norman is important.
Someone who is important is always both not plastic and breakable.
If Hector is not plastic and Norman is not important, then Alberto is not naughty. | Norman is important. | entailment |
Norman is not breakable.
Hector is not naughty.
Alton is naughty.
Kingston is not sufficient.
Hector is breakable.
Alton is not breakable.
Kingston is plastic.
Michael is fine.
Norman is not sufficient.
Michael is important.
Kingston is not breakable.
Michael is not sufficient.If there is at least one people who is breakable, then Alton is not naughty and Alton is important.
If someone is not plastic, then he is sufficient.
Someone who is eithor not fine or not important is always not breakable.
Someone who is eithor not breakable or plastic is always not naughty.
Someone is not breakable and sufficient if and only if he is fine.
Alberto is not important if and only if Alberto is not breakable and Alton is fine.
Someone being important is equivalent to being not fine.
If there is at least one people who is both not sufficient and not breakable, then Norman is not plastic.
If Kingston is naughty, then Kingston is not breakable and Alton is not fine.
If there is someone who is fine, then Kingston is plastic and Norman is important.
Someone who is important is always both not plastic and breakable.
If Hector is not plastic and Norman is not important, then Alberto is not naughty. | Alton is fine. | self_contradiction |
Norman is not breakable.
Hector is not naughty.
Alton is naughty.
Kingston is not sufficient.
Hector is breakable.
Alton is not breakable.
Kingston is plastic.
Michael is fine.
Norman is not sufficient.
Michael is important.
Kingston is not breakable.
Michael is not sufficient.If there is at least one people who is breakable, then Alton is not naughty and Alton is important.
If someone is not plastic, then he is sufficient.
Someone who is eithor not fine or not important is always not breakable.
Someone who is eithor not breakable or plastic is always not naughty.
Someone is not breakable and sufficient if and only if he is fine.
Alberto is not important if and only if Alberto is not breakable and Alton is fine.
Someone being important is equivalent to being not fine.
If there is at least one people who is both not sufficient and not breakable, then Norman is not plastic.
If Kingston is naughty, then Kingston is not breakable and Alton is not fine.
If there is someone who is fine, then Kingston is plastic and Norman is important.
Someone who is important is always both not plastic and breakable.
If Hector is not plastic and Norman is not important, then Alberto is not naughty. | Alberto is breakable. | neutral |
Norman is not breakable.
Hector is not naughty.
Alton is naughty.
Kingston is not sufficient.
Hector is breakable.
Alton is not breakable.
Kingston is plastic.
Michael is fine.
Norman is not sufficient.
Michael is important.
Kingston is not breakable.
Michael is not sufficient.If there is at least one people who is breakable, then Alton is not naughty and Alton is important.
If someone is not plastic, then he is sufficient.
Someone who is eithor not fine or not important is always not breakable.
Someone who is eithor not breakable or plastic is always not naughty.
Someone is not breakable and sufficient if and only if he is fine.
Alberto is not important if and only if Alberto is not breakable and Alton is fine.
Someone being important is equivalent to being not fine.
If there is at least one people who is both not sufficient and not breakable, then Norman is not plastic.
If Kingston is naughty, then Kingston is not breakable and Alton is not fine.
If there is someone who is fine, then Kingston is plastic and Norman is important.
Someone who is important is always both not plastic and breakable.
If Hector is not plastic and Norman is not important, then Alberto is not naughty. | Alton is not sufficient. | contradiction |
Valentina is not versatile.
Rory is not cold.
Royce is odd.
Angelique is tart.
Rory is not odd.
Katrina is not versatile.
Valentina is cold.
Solomon is not comprehensive.
Scott is versatile.
Royce is not comprehensive.
Rory is versatile.
Valentina is comprehensive.Angelique being cold implies that Solomon is not odd.
Valentina is tart if and only if Scott is not tan.
It can be concluded that Katrina is not tart and Katrina is cold once knowing that Valentina is not comprehensive and Royce is versatile.
Someone who is not comprehensive is always both tart and tan.
Someone is not odd and not versatile if and only if he is not cold.
If there is at least one people who is comprehensive, then Rory is tan.
If there is someone who is not cold, then Katrina is tan and Rory is not versatile.
Someone is not tan and not cold if and only if he is tart and odd.
Someone being both versatile and tart is equivalent to being cold and not odd.
If Katrina is not cold or Rory is not tart, then Angelique is odd.
Valentina is not cold if and only if Royce is not tart and Royce is not odd.
Katrina being not comprehensive or Solomon being tan implies that Angelique is odd. | Solomon is not tan. | contradiction |
Valentina is not versatile.
Rory is not cold.
Royce is odd.
Angelique is tart.
Rory is not odd.
Katrina is not versatile.
Valentina is cold.
Solomon is not comprehensive.
Scott is versatile.
Royce is not comprehensive.
Rory is versatile.
Valentina is comprehensive.Angelique being cold implies that Solomon is not odd.
Valentina is tart if and only if Scott is not tan.
It can be concluded that Katrina is not tart and Katrina is cold once knowing that Valentina is not comprehensive and Royce is versatile.
Someone who is not comprehensive is always both tart and tan.
Someone is not odd and not versatile if and only if he is not cold.
If there is at least one people who is comprehensive, then Rory is tan.
If there is someone who is not cold, then Katrina is tan and Rory is not versatile.
Someone is not tan and not cold if and only if he is tart and odd.
Someone being both versatile and tart is equivalent to being cold and not odd.
If Katrina is not cold or Rory is not tart, then Angelique is odd.
Valentina is not cold if and only if Royce is not tart and Royce is not odd.
Katrina being not comprehensive or Solomon being tan implies that Angelique is odd. | Solomon is tan. | entailment |
Valentina is not versatile.
Rory is not cold.
Royce is odd.
Angelique is tart.
Rory is not odd.
Katrina is not versatile.
Valentina is cold.
Solomon is not comprehensive.
Scott is versatile.
Royce is not comprehensive.
Rory is versatile.
Valentina is comprehensive.Angelique being cold implies that Solomon is not odd.
Valentina is tart if and only if Scott is not tan.
It can be concluded that Katrina is not tart and Katrina is cold once knowing that Valentina is not comprehensive and Royce is versatile.
Someone who is not comprehensive is always both tart and tan.
Someone is not odd and not versatile if and only if he is not cold.
If there is at least one people who is comprehensive, then Rory is tan.
If there is someone who is not cold, then Katrina is tan and Rory is not versatile.
Someone is not tan and not cold if and only if he is tart and odd.
Someone being both versatile and tart is equivalent to being cold and not odd.
If Katrina is not cold or Rory is not tart, then Angelique is odd.
Valentina is not cold if and only if Royce is not tart and Royce is not odd.
Katrina being not comprehensive or Solomon being tan implies that Angelique is odd. | Angelique is tan. | contradiction |
Valentina is not versatile.
Rory is not cold.
Royce is odd.
Angelique is tart.
Rory is not odd.
Katrina is not versatile.
Valentina is cold.
Solomon is not comprehensive.
Scott is versatile.
Royce is not comprehensive.
Rory is versatile.
Valentina is comprehensive.Angelique being cold implies that Solomon is not odd.
Valentina is tart if and only if Scott is not tan.
It can be concluded that Katrina is not tart and Katrina is cold once knowing that Valentina is not comprehensive and Royce is versatile.
Someone who is not comprehensive is always both tart and tan.
Someone is not odd and not versatile if and only if he is not cold.
If there is at least one people who is comprehensive, then Rory is tan.
If there is someone who is not cold, then Katrina is tan and Rory is not versatile.
Someone is not tan and not cold if and only if he is tart and odd.
Someone being both versatile and tart is equivalent to being cold and not odd.
If Katrina is not cold or Rory is not tart, then Angelique is odd.
Valentina is not cold if and only if Royce is not tart and Royce is not odd.
Katrina being not comprehensive or Solomon being tan implies that Angelique is odd. | Angelique is comprehensive. | neutral |
Valentina is not versatile.
Rory is not cold.
Royce is odd.
Angelique is tart.
Rory is not odd.
Katrina is not versatile.
Valentina is cold.
Solomon is not comprehensive.
Scott is versatile.
Royce is not comprehensive.
Rory is versatile.
Valentina is comprehensive.Angelique being cold implies that Solomon is not odd.
Valentina is tart if and only if Scott is not tan.
It can be concluded that Katrina is not tart and Katrina is cold once knowing that Valentina is not comprehensive and Royce is versatile.
Someone who is not comprehensive is always both tart and tan.
Someone is not odd and not versatile if and only if he is not cold.
If there is at least one people who is comprehensive, then Rory is tan.
If there is someone who is not cold, then Katrina is tan and Rory is not versatile.
Someone is not tan and not cold if and only if he is tart and odd.
Someone being both versatile and tart is equivalent to being cold and not odd.
If Katrina is not cold or Rory is not tart, then Angelique is odd.
Valentina is not cold if and only if Royce is not tart and Royce is not odd.
Katrina being not comprehensive or Solomon being tan implies that Angelique is odd. | Rory is not versatile. | self_contradiction |
Valentina is not versatile.
Rory is not cold.
Royce is odd.
Angelique is tart.
Rory is not odd.
Katrina is not versatile.
Valentina is cold.
Solomon is not comprehensive.
Scott is versatile.
Royce is not comprehensive.
Rory is versatile.
Valentina is comprehensive.Angelique being cold implies that Solomon is not odd.
Valentina is tart if and only if Scott is not tan.
It can be concluded that Katrina is not tart and Katrina is cold once knowing that Valentina is not comprehensive and Royce is versatile.
Someone who is not comprehensive is always both tart and tan.
Someone is not odd and not versatile if and only if he is not cold.
If there is at least one people who is comprehensive, then Rory is tan.
If there is someone who is not cold, then Katrina is tan and Rory is not versatile.
Someone is not tan and not cold if and only if he is tart and odd.
Someone being both versatile and tart is equivalent to being cold and not odd.
If Katrina is not cold or Rory is not tart, then Angelique is odd.
Valentina is not cold if and only if Royce is not tart and Royce is not odd.
Katrina being not comprehensive or Solomon being tan implies that Angelique is odd. | Royce is odd. | self_contradiction |
Valentina is not versatile.
Rory is not cold.
Royce is odd.
Angelique is tart.
Rory is not odd.
Katrina is not versatile.
Valentina is cold.
Solomon is not comprehensive.
Scott is versatile.
Royce is not comprehensive.
Rory is versatile.
Valentina is comprehensive.Angelique being cold implies that Solomon is not odd.
Valentina is tart if and only if Scott is not tan.
It can be concluded that Katrina is not tart and Katrina is cold once knowing that Valentina is not comprehensive and Royce is versatile.
Someone who is not comprehensive is always both tart and tan.
Someone is not odd and not versatile if and only if he is not cold.
If there is at least one people who is comprehensive, then Rory is tan.
If there is someone who is not cold, then Katrina is tan and Rory is not versatile.
Someone is not tan and not cold if and only if he is tart and odd.
Someone being both versatile and tart is equivalent to being cold and not odd.
If Katrina is not cold or Rory is not tart, then Angelique is odd.
Valentina is not cold if and only if Royce is not tart and Royce is not odd.
Katrina being not comprehensive or Solomon being tan implies that Angelique is odd. | Solomon is versatile. | neutral |
Valentina is not versatile.
Rory is not cold.
Royce is odd.
Angelique is tart.
Rory is not odd.
Katrina is not versatile.
Valentina is cold.
Solomon is not comprehensive.
Scott is versatile.
Royce is not comprehensive.
Rory is versatile.
Valentina is comprehensive.Angelique being cold implies that Solomon is not odd.
Valentina is tart if and only if Scott is not tan.
It can be concluded that Katrina is not tart and Katrina is cold once knowing that Valentina is not comprehensive and Royce is versatile.
Someone who is not comprehensive is always both tart and tan.
Someone is not odd and not versatile if and only if he is not cold.
If there is at least one people who is comprehensive, then Rory is tan.
If there is someone who is not cold, then Katrina is tan and Rory is not versatile.
Someone is not tan and not cold if and only if he is tart and odd.
Someone being both versatile and tart is equivalent to being cold and not odd.
If Katrina is not cold or Rory is not tart, then Angelique is odd.
Valentina is not cold if and only if Royce is not tart and Royce is not odd.
Katrina being not comprehensive or Solomon being tan implies that Angelique is odd. | Royce is tan. | self_contradiction |
Valentina is not versatile.
Rory is not cold.
Royce is odd.
Angelique is tart.
Rory is not odd.
Katrina is not versatile.
Valentina is cold.
Solomon is not comprehensive.
Scott is versatile.
Royce is not comprehensive.
Rory is versatile.
Valentina is comprehensive.Angelique being cold implies that Solomon is not odd.
Valentina is tart if and only if Scott is not tan.
It can be concluded that Katrina is not tart and Katrina is cold once knowing that Valentina is not comprehensive and Royce is versatile.
Someone who is not comprehensive is always both tart and tan.
Someone is not odd and not versatile if and only if he is not cold.
If there is at least one people who is comprehensive, then Rory is tan.
If there is someone who is not cold, then Katrina is tan and Rory is not versatile.
Someone is not tan and not cold if and only if he is tart and odd.
Someone being both versatile and tart is equivalent to being cold and not odd.
If Katrina is not cold or Rory is not tart, then Angelique is odd.
Valentina is not cold if and only if Royce is not tart and Royce is not odd.
Katrina being not comprehensive or Solomon being tan implies that Angelique is odd. | Rory is cold. | contradiction |
Valentina is not versatile.
Rory is not cold.
Royce is odd.
Angelique is tart.
Rory is not odd.
Katrina is not versatile.
Valentina is cold.
Solomon is not comprehensive.
Scott is versatile.
Royce is not comprehensive.
Rory is versatile.
Valentina is comprehensive.Angelique being cold implies that Solomon is not odd.
Valentina is tart if and only if Scott is not tan.
It can be concluded that Katrina is not tart and Katrina is cold once knowing that Valentina is not comprehensive and Royce is versatile.
Someone who is not comprehensive is always both tart and tan.
Someone is not odd and not versatile if and only if he is not cold.
If there is at least one people who is comprehensive, then Rory is tan.
If there is someone who is not cold, then Katrina is tan and Rory is not versatile.
Someone is not tan and not cold if and only if he is tart and odd.
Someone being both versatile and tart is equivalent to being cold and not odd.
If Katrina is not cold or Rory is not tart, then Angelique is odd.
Valentina is not cold if and only if Royce is not tart and Royce is not odd.
Katrina being not comprehensive or Solomon being tan implies that Angelique is odd. | Katrina is not cold. | neutral |
Valentina is not versatile.
Rory is not cold.
Royce is odd.
Angelique is tart.
Rory is not odd.
Katrina is not versatile.
Valentina is cold.
Solomon is not comprehensive.
Scott is versatile.
Royce is not comprehensive.
Rory is versatile.
Valentina is comprehensive.Angelique being cold implies that Solomon is not odd.
Valentina is tart if and only if Scott is not tan.
It can be concluded that Katrina is not tart and Katrina is cold once knowing that Valentina is not comprehensive and Royce is versatile.
Someone who is not comprehensive is always both tart and tan.
Someone is not odd and not versatile if and only if he is not cold.
If there is at least one people who is comprehensive, then Rory is tan.
If there is someone who is not cold, then Katrina is tan and Rory is not versatile.
Someone is not tan and not cold if and only if he is tart and odd.
Someone being both versatile and tart is equivalent to being cold and not odd.
If Katrina is not cold or Rory is not tart, then Angelique is odd.
Valentina is not cold if and only if Royce is not tart and Royce is not odd.
Katrina being not comprehensive or Solomon being tan implies that Angelique is odd. | Katrina is not tart. | neutral |
Valentina is not versatile.
Rory is not cold.
Royce is odd.
Angelique is tart.
Rory is not odd.
Katrina is not versatile.
Valentina is cold.
Solomon is not comprehensive.
Scott is versatile.
Royce is not comprehensive.
Rory is versatile.
Valentina is comprehensive.Angelique being cold implies that Solomon is not odd.
Valentina is tart if and only if Scott is not tan.
It can be concluded that Katrina is not tart and Katrina is cold once knowing that Valentina is not comprehensive and Royce is versatile.
Someone who is not comprehensive is always both tart and tan.
Someone is not odd and not versatile if and only if he is not cold.
If there is at least one people who is comprehensive, then Rory is tan.
If there is someone who is not cold, then Katrina is tan and Rory is not versatile.
Someone is not tan and not cold if and only if he is tart and odd.
Someone being both versatile and tart is equivalent to being cold and not odd.
If Katrina is not cold or Rory is not tart, then Angelique is odd.
Valentina is not cold if and only if Royce is not tart and Royce is not odd.
Katrina being not comprehensive or Solomon being tan implies that Angelique is odd. | Rory is tan. | entailment |
Valentina is not versatile.
Rory is not cold.
Royce is odd.
Angelique is tart.
Rory is not odd.
Katrina is not versatile.
Valentina is cold.
Solomon is not comprehensive.
Scott is versatile.
Royce is not comprehensive.
Rory is versatile.
Valentina is comprehensive.Angelique being cold implies that Solomon is not odd.
Valentina is tart if and only if Scott is not tan.
It can be concluded that Katrina is not tart and Katrina is cold once knowing that Valentina is not comprehensive and Royce is versatile.
Someone who is not comprehensive is always both tart and tan.
Someone is not odd and not versatile if and only if he is not cold.
If there is at least one people who is comprehensive, then Rory is tan.
If there is someone who is not cold, then Katrina is tan and Rory is not versatile.
Someone is not tan and not cold if and only if he is tart and odd.
Someone being both versatile and tart is equivalent to being cold and not odd.
If Katrina is not cold or Rory is not tart, then Angelique is odd.
Valentina is not cold if and only if Royce is not tart and Royce is not odd.
Katrina being not comprehensive or Solomon being tan implies that Angelique is odd. | Rory is odd. | contradiction |
Valentina is not versatile.
Rory is not cold.
Royce is odd.
Angelique is tart.
Rory is not odd.
Katrina is not versatile.
Valentina is cold.
Solomon is not comprehensive.
Scott is versatile.
Royce is not comprehensive.
Rory is versatile.
Valentina is comprehensive.Angelique being cold implies that Solomon is not odd.
Valentina is tart if and only if Scott is not tan.
It can be concluded that Katrina is not tart and Katrina is cold once knowing that Valentina is not comprehensive and Royce is versatile.
Someone who is not comprehensive is always both tart and tan.
Someone is not odd and not versatile if and only if he is not cold.
If there is at least one people who is comprehensive, then Rory is tan.
If there is someone who is not cold, then Katrina is tan and Rory is not versatile.
Someone is not tan and not cold if and only if he is tart and odd.
Someone being both versatile and tart is equivalent to being cold and not odd.
If Katrina is not cold or Rory is not tart, then Angelique is odd.
Valentina is not cold if and only if Royce is not tart and Royce is not odd.
Katrina being not comprehensive or Solomon being tan implies that Angelique is odd. | Angelique is odd. | self_contradiction |
Valentina is not versatile.
Rory is not cold.
Royce is odd.
Angelique is tart.
Rory is not odd.
Katrina is not versatile.
Valentina is cold.
Solomon is not comprehensive.
Scott is versatile.
Royce is not comprehensive.
Rory is versatile.
Valentina is comprehensive.Angelique being cold implies that Solomon is not odd.
Valentina is tart if and only if Scott is not tan.
It can be concluded that Katrina is not tart and Katrina is cold once knowing that Valentina is not comprehensive and Royce is versatile.
Someone who is not comprehensive is always both tart and tan.
Someone is not odd and not versatile if and only if he is not cold.
If there is at least one people who is comprehensive, then Rory is tan.
If there is someone who is not cold, then Katrina is tan and Rory is not versatile.
Someone is not tan and not cold if and only if he is tart and odd.
Someone being both versatile and tart is equivalent to being cold and not odd.
If Katrina is not cold or Rory is not tart, then Angelique is odd.
Valentina is not cold if and only if Royce is not tart and Royce is not odd.
Katrina being not comprehensive or Solomon being tan implies that Angelique is odd. | Solomon is not comprehensive. | entailment |
Valentina is not versatile.
Rory is not cold.
Royce is odd.
Angelique is tart.
Rory is not odd.
Katrina is not versatile.
Valentina is cold.
Solomon is not comprehensive.
Scott is versatile.
Royce is not comprehensive.
Rory is versatile.
Valentina is comprehensive.Angelique being cold implies that Solomon is not odd.
Valentina is tart if and only if Scott is not tan.
It can be concluded that Katrina is not tart and Katrina is cold once knowing that Valentina is not comprehensive and Royce is versatile.
Someone who is not comprehensive is always both tart and tan.
Someone is not odd and not versatile if and only if he is not cold.
If there is at least one people who is comprehensive, then Rory is tan.
If there is someone who is not cold, then Katrina is tan and Rory is not versatile.
Someone is not tan and not cold if and only if he is tart and odd.
Someone being both versatile and tart is equivalent to being cold and not odd.
If Katrina is not cold or Rory is not tart, then Angelique is odd.
Valentina is not cold if and only if Royce is not tart and Royce is not odd.
Katrina being not comprehensive or Solomon being tan implies that Angelique is odd. | Angelique is not odd. | self_contradiction |
Valentina is not versatile.
Rory is not cold.
Royce is odd.
Angelique is tart.
Rory is not odd.
Katrina is not versatile.
Valentina is cold.
Solomon is not comprehensive.
Scott is versatile.
Royce is not comprehensive.
Rory is versatile.
Valentina is comprehensive.Angelique being cold implies that Solomon is not odd.
Valentina is tart if and only if Scott is not tan.
It can be concluded that Katrina is not tart and Katrina is cold once knowing that Valentina is not comprehensive and Royce is versatile.
Someone who is not comprehensive is always both tart and tan.
Someone is not odd and not versatile if and only if he is not cold.
If there is at least one people who is comprehensive, then Rory is tan.
If there is someone who is not cold, then Katrina is tan and Rory is not versatile.
Someone is not tan and not cold if and only if he is tart and odd.
Someone being both versatile and tart is equivalent to being cold and not odd.
If Katrina is not cold or Rory is not tart, then Angelique is odd.
Valentina is not cold if and only if Royce is not tart and Royce is not odd.
Katrina being not comprehensive or Solomon being tan implies that Angelique is odd. | Valentina is not comprehensive. | contradiction |
Valentina is not versatile.
Rory is not cold.
Royce is odd.
Angelique is tart.
Rory is not odd.
Katrina is not versatile.
Valentina is cold.
Solomon is not comprehensive.
Scott is versatile.
Royce is not comprehensive.
Rory is versatile.
Valentina is comprehensive.Angelique being cold implies that Solomon is not odd.
Valentina is tart if and only if Scott is not tan.
It can be concluded that Katrina is not tart and Katrina is cold once knowing that Valentina is not comprehensive and Royce is versatile.
Someone who is not comprehensive is always both tart and tan.
Someone is not odd and not versatile if and only if he is not cold.
If there is at least one people who is comprehensive, then Rory is tan.
If there is someone who is not cold, then Katrina is tan and Rory is not versatile.
Someone is not tan and not cold if and only if he is tart and odd.
Someone being both versatile and tart is equivalent to being cold and not odd.
If Katrina is not cold or Rory is not tart, then Angelique is odd.
Valentina is not cold if and only if Royce is not tart and Royce is not odd.
Katrina being not comprehensive or Solomon being tan implies that Angelique is odd. | Valentina is not versatile. | entailment |
Valentina is not versatile.
Rory is not cold.
Royce is odd.
Angelique is tart.
Rory is not odd.
Katrina is not versatile.
Valentina is cold.
Solomon is not comprehensive.
Scott is versatile.
Royce is not comprehensive.
Rory is versatile.
Valentina is comprehensive.Angelique being cold implies that Solomon is not odd.
Valentina is tart if and only if Scott is not tan.
It can be concluded that Katrina is not tart and Katrina is cold once knowing that Valentina is not comprehensive and Royce is versatile.
Someone who is not comprehensive is always both tart and tan.
Someone is not odd and not versatile if and only if he is not cold.
If there is at least one people who is comprehensive, then Rory is tan.
If there is someone who is not cold, then Katrina is tan and Rory is not versatile.
Someone is not tan and not cold if and only if he is tart and odd.
Someone being both versatile and tart is equivalent to being cold and not odd.
If Katrina is not cold or Rory is not tart, then Angelique is odd.
Valentina is not cold if and only if Royce is not tart and Royce is not odd.
Katrina being not comprehensive or Solomon being tan implies that Angelique is odd. | Angelique is not tan. | entailment |
Valentina is not versatile.
Rory is not cold.
Royce is odd.
Angelique is tart.
Rory is not odd.
Katrina is not versatile.
Valentina is cold.
Solomon is not comprehensive.
Scott is versatile.
Royce is not comprehensive.
Rory is versatile.
Valentina is comprehensive.Angelique being cold implies that Solomon is not odd.
Valentina is tart if and only if Scott is not tan.
It can be concluded that Katrina is not tart and Katrina is cold once knowing that Valentina is not comprehensive and Royce is versatile.
Someone who is not comprehensive is always both tart and tan.
Someone is not odd and not versatile if and only if he is not cold.
If there is at least one people who is comprehensive, then Rory is tan.
If there is someone who is not cold, then Katrina is tan and Rory is not versatile.
Someone is not tan and not cold if and only if he is tart and odd.
Someone being both versatile and tart is equivalent to being cold and not odd.
If Katrina is not cold or Rory is not tart, then Angelique is odd.
Valentina is not cold if and only if Royce is not tart and Royce is not odd.
Katrina being not comprehensive or Solomon being tan implies that Angelique is odd. | Scott is tan. | neutral |
Lucy is guilty.
Alisa is tall.
Lucy is not tall.
Alisa is not delightful.
Quinlan is not guilty.
Lucy is boring.
Quinlan is not serious.
Eunice is crazy.
Quinlan is not tall.
Quinlan is crazy.
Eunice is not serious.
Alisa is guilty.Someone who is eithor not delightful or not tall is always guilty.
All guilty people are not tall.
It can be concluded that Braden is guilty and Eunice is not boring once knowing that Alisa is delightful.
If there is someone who is tall, then Alisa is not crazy and Braden is delightful.
Caleb is serious if and only if Eunice is guilty and Caleb is boring.
If someone is guilty, then he is delightful.
If there is at least one people who is either not crazy or boring, then Eunice is not tall and Eunice is serious.
Someone is tall if and only if he is not crazy.
If someone is delightful and not serious, then he is both guilty and crazy, and vice versa.
Quinlan being not guilty and Caleb being not serious imply that Caleb is boring and Lucy is not tall.
If someone is boring, then he is tall, and vice versa.
Quinlan being not crazy and Lucy being serious imply that Alisa is not guilty. | Braden is not tall. | entailment |
Lucy is guilty.
Alisa is tall.
Lucy is not tall.
Alisa is not delightful.
Quinlan is not guilty.
Lucy is boring.
Quinlan is not serious.
Eunice is crazy.
Quinlan is not tall.
Quinlan is crazy.
Eunice is not serious.
Alisa is guilty.Someone who is eithor not delightful or not tall is always guilty.
All guilty people are not tall.
It can be concluded that Braden is guilty and Eunice is not boring once knowing that Alisa is delightful.
If there is someone who is tall, then Alisa is not crazy and Braden is delightful.
Caleb is serious if and only if Eunice is guilty and Caleb is boring.
If someone is guilty, then he is delightful.
If there is at least one people who is either not crazy or boring, then Eunice is not tall and Eunice is serious.
Someone is tall if and only if he is not crazy.
If someone is delightful and not serious, then he is both guilty and crazy, and vice versa.
Quinlan being not guilty and Caleb being not serious imply that Caleb is boring and Lucy is not tall.
If someone is boring, then he is tall, and vice versa.
Quinlan being not crazy and Lucy being serious imply that Alisa is not guilty. | Quinlan is not delightful. | contradiction |
Lucy is guilty.
Alisa is tall.
Lucy is not tall.
Alisa is not delightful.
Quinlan is not guilty.
Lucy is boring.
Quinlan is not serious.
Eunice is crazy.
Quinlan is not tall.
Quinlan is crazy.
Eunice is not serious.
Alisa is guilty.Someone who is eithor not delightful or not tall is always guilty.
All guilty people are not tall.
It can be concluded that Braden is guilty and Eunice is not boring once knowing that Alisa is delightful.
If there is someone who is tall, then Alisa is not crazy and Braden is delightful.
Caleb is serious if and only if Eunice is guilty and Caleb is boring.
If someone is guilty, then he is delightful.
If there is at least one people who is either not crazy or boring, then Eunice is not tall and Eunice is serious.
Someone is tall if and only if he is not crazy.
If someone is delightful and not serious, then he is both guilty and crazy, and vice versa.
Quinlan being not guilty and Caleb being not serious imply that Caleb is boring and Lucy is not tall.
If someone is boring, then he is tall, and vice versa.
Quinlan being not crazy and Lucy being serious imply that Alisa is not guilty. | Olaf is boring. | neutral |
Lucy is guilty.
Alisa is tall.
Lucy is not tall.
Alisa is not delightful.
Quinlan is not guilty.
Lucy is boring.
Quinlan is not serious.
Eunice is crazy.
Quinlan is not tall.
Quinlan is crazy.
Eunice is not serious.
Alisa is guilty.Someone who is eithor not delightful or not tall is always guilty.
All guilty people are not tall.
It can be concluded that Braden is guilty and Eunice is not boring once knowing that Alisa is delightful.
If there is someone who is tall, then Alisa is not crazy and Braden is delightful.
Caleb is serious if and only if Eunice is guilty and Caleb is boring.
If someone is guilty, then he is delightful.
If there is at least one people who is either not crazy or boring, then Eunice is not tall and Eunice is serious.
Someone is tall if and only if he is not crazy.
If someone is delightful and not serious, then he is both guilty and crazy, and vice versa.
Quinlan being not guilty and Caleb being not serious imply that Caleb is boring and Lucy is not tall.
If someone is boring, then he is tall, and vice versa.
Quinlan being not crazy and Lucy being serious imply that Alisa is not guilty. | Caleb is not tall. | neutral |
Lucy is guilty.
Alisa is tall.
Lucy is not tall.
Alisa is not delightful.
Quinlan is not guilty.
Lucy is boring.
Quinlan is not serious.
Eunice is crazy.
Quinlan is not tall.
Quinlan is crazy.
Eunice is not serious.
Alisa is guilty.Someone who is eithor not delightful or not tall is always guilty.
All guilty people are not tall.
It can be concluded that Braden is guilty and Eunice is not boring once knowing that Alisa is delightful.
If there is someone who is tall, then Alisa is not crazy and Braden is delightful.
Caleb is serious if and only if Eunice is guilty and Caleb is boring.
If someone is guilty, then he is delightful.
If there is at least one people who is either not crazy or boring, then Eunice is not tall and Eunice is serious.
Someone is tall if and only if he is not crazy.
If someone is delightful and not serious, then he is both guilty and crazy, and vice versa.
Quinlan being not guilty and Caleb being not serious imply that Caleb is boring and Lucy is not tall.
If someone is boring, then he is tall, and vice versa.
Quinlan being not crazy and Lucy being serious imply that Alisa is not guilty. | Lucy is boring. | entailment |
Lucy is guilty.
Alisa is tall.
Lucy is not tall.
Alisa is not delightful.
Quinlan is not guilty.
Lucy is boring.
Quinlan is not serious.
Eunice is crazy.
Quinlan is not tall.
Quinlan is crazy.
Eunice is not serious.
Alisa is guilty.Someone who is eithor not delightful or not tall is always guilty.
All guilty people are not tall.
It can be concluded that Braden is guilty and Eunice is not boring once knowing that Alisa is delightful.
If there is someone who is tall, then Alisa is not crazy and Braden is delightful.
Caleb is serious if and only if Eunice is guilty and Caleb is boring.
If someone is guilty, then he is delightful.
If there is at least one people who is either not crazy or boring, then Eunice is not tall and Eunice is serious.
Someone is tall if and only if he is not crazy.
If someone is delightful and not serious, then he is both guilty and crazy, and vice versa.
Quinlan being not guilty and Caleb being not serious imply that Caleb is boring and Lucy is not tall.
If someone is boring, then he is tall, and vice versa.
Quinlan being not crazy and Lucy being serious imply that Alisa is not guilty. | Olaf is not tall. | neutral |
Lucy is guilty.
Alisa is tall.
Lucy is not tall.
Alisa is not delightful.
Quinlan is not guilty.
Lucy is boring.
Quinlan is not serious.
Eunice is crazy.
Quinlan is not tall.
Quinlan is crazy.
Eunice is not serious.
Alisa is guilty.Someone who is eithor not delightful or not tall is always guilty.
All guilty people are not tall.
It can be concluded that Braden is guilty and Eunice is not boring once knowing that Alisa is delightful.
If there is someone who is tall, then Alisa is not crazy and Braden is delightful.
Caleb is serious if and only if Eunice is guilty and Caleb is boring.
If someone is guilty, then he is delightful.
If there is at least one people who is either not crazy or boring, then Eunice is not tall and Eunice is serious.
Someone is tall if and only if he is not crazy.
If someone is delightful and not serious, then he is both guilty and crazy, and vice versa.
Quinlan being not guilty and Caleb being not serious imply that Caleb is boring and Lucy is not tall.
If someone is boring, then he is tall, and vice versa.
Quinlan being not crazy and Lucy being serious imply that Alisa is not guilty. | Braden is not delightful. | contradiction |
Lucy is guilty.
Alisa is tall.
Lucy is not tall.
Alisa is not delightful.
Quinlan is not guilty.
Lucy is boring.
Quinlan is not serious.
Eunice is crazy.
Quinlan is not tall.
Quinlan is crazy.
Eunice is not serious.
Alisa is guilty.Someone who is eithor not delightful or not tall is always guilty.
All guilty people are not tall.
It can be concluded that Braden is guilty and Eunice is not boring once knowing that Alisa is delightful.
If there is someone who is tall, then Alisa is not crazy and Braden is delightful.
Caleb is serious if and only if Eunice is guilty and Caleb is boring.
If someone is guilty, then he is delightful.
If there is at least one people who is either not crazy or boring, then Eunice is not tall and Eunice is serious.
Someone is tall if and only if he is not crazy.
If someone is delightful and not serious, then he is both guilty and crazy, and vice versa.
Quinlan being not guilty and Caleb being not serious imply that Caleb is boring and Lucy is not tall.
If someone is boring, then he is tall, and vice versa.
Quinlan being not crazy and Lucy being serious imply that Alisa is not guilty. | Lucy is delightful. | entailment |
Lucy is guilty.
Alisa is tall.
Lucy is not tall.
Alisa is not delightful.
Quinlan is not guilty.
Lucy is boring.
Quinlan is not serious.
Eunice is crazy.
Quinlan is not tall.
Quinlan is crazy.
Eunice is not serious.
Alisa is guilty.Someone who is eithor not delightful or not tall is always guilty.
All guilty people are not tall.
It can be concluded that Braden is guilty and Eunice is not boring once knowing that Alisa is delightful.
If there is someone who is tall, then Alisa is not crazy and Braden is delightful.
Caleb is serious if and only if Eunice is guilty and Caleb is boring.
If someone is guilty, then he is delightful.
If there is at least one people who is either not crazy or boring, then Eunice is not tall and Eunice is serious.
Someone is tall if and only if he is not crazy.
If someone is delightful and not serious, then he is both guilty and crazy, and vice versa.
Quinlan being not guilty and Caleb being not serious imply that Caleb is boring and Lucy is not tall.
If someone is boring, then he is tall, and vice versa.
Quinlan being not crazy and Lucy being serious imply that Alisa is not guilty. | Lucy is not tall. | self_contradiction |
Lucy is guilty.
Alisa is tall.
Lucy is not tall.
Alisa is not delightful.
Quinlan is not guilty.
Lucy is boring.
Quinlan is not serious.
Eunice is crazy.
Quinlan is not tall.
Quinlan is crazy.
Eunice is not serious.
Alisa is guilty.Someone who is eithor not delightful or not tall is always guilty.
All guilty people are not tall.
It can be concluded that Braden is guilty and Eunice is not boring once knowing that Alisa is delightful.
If there is someone who is tall, then Alisa is not crazy and Braden is delightful.
Caleb is serious if and only if Eunice is guilty and Caleb is boring.
If someone is guilty, then he is delightful.
If there is at least one people who is either not crazy or boring, then Eunice is not tall and Eunice is serious.
Someone is tall if and only if he is not crazy.
If someone is delightful and not serious, then he is both guilty and crazy, and vice versa.
Quinlan being not guilty and Caleb being not serious imply that Caleb is boring and Lucy is not tall.
If someone is boring, then he is tall, and vice versa.
Quinlan being not crazy and Lucy being serious imply that Alisa is not guilty. | Braden is serious. | neutral |
Lucy is guilty.
Alisa is tall.
Lucy is not tall.
Alisa is not delightful.
Quinlan is not guilty.
Lucy is boring.
Quinlan is not serious.
Eunice is crazy.
Quinlan is not tall.
Quinlan is crazy.
Eunice is not serious.
Alisa is guilty.Someone who is eithor not delightful or not tall is always guilty.
All guilty people are not tall.
It can be concluded that Braden is guilty and Eunice is not boring once knowing that Alisa is delightful.
If there is someone who is tall, then Alisa is not crazy and Braden is delightful.
Caleb is serious if and only if Eunice is guilty and Caleb is boring.
If someone is guilty, then he is delightful.
If there is at least one people who is either not crazy or boring, then Eunice is not tall and Eunice is serious.
Someone is tall if and only if he is not crazy.
If someone is delightful and not serious, then he is both guilty and crazy, and vice versa.
Quinlan being not guilty and Caleb being not serious imply that Caleb is boring and Lucy is not tall.
If someone is boring, then he is tall, and vice versa.
Quinlan being not crazy and Lucy being serious imply that Alisa is not guilty. | Quinlan is not serious. | entailment |
Lucy is guilty.
Alisa is tall.
Lucy is not tall.
Alisa is not delightful.
Quinlan is not guilty.
Lucy is boring.
Quinlan is not serious.
Eunice is crazy.
Quinlan is not tall.
Quinlan is crazy.
Eunice is not serious.
Alisa is guilty.Someone who is eithor not delightful or not tall is always guilty.
All guilty people are not tall.
It can be concluded that Braden is guilty and Eunice is not boring once knowing that Alisa is delightful.
If there is someone who is tall, then Alisa is not crazy and Braden is delightful.
Caleb is serious if and only if Eunice is guilty and Caleb is boring.
If someone is guilty, then he is delightful.
If there is at least one people who is either not crazy or boring, then Eunice is not tall and Eunice is serious.
Someone is tall if and only if he is not crazy.
If someone is delightful and not serious, then he is both guilty and crazy, and vice versa.
Quinlan being not guilty and Caleb being not serious imply that Caleb is boring and Lucy is not tall.
If someone is boring, then he is tall, and vice versa.
Quinlan being not crazy and Lucy being serious imply that Alisa is not guilty. | Eunice is serious. | self_contradiction |
Lucy is guilty.
Alisa is tall.
Lucy is not tall.
Alisa is not delightful.
Quinlan is not guilty.
Lucy is boring.
Quinlan is not serious.
Eunice is crazy.
Quinlan is not tall.
Quinlan is crazy.
Eunice is not serious.
Alisa is guilty.Someone who is eithor not delightful or not tall is always guilty.
All guilty people are not tall.
It can be concluded that Braden is guilty and Eunice is not boring once knowing that Alisa is delightful.
If there is someone who is tall, then Alisa is not crazy and Braden is delightful.
Caleb is serious if and only if Eunice is guilty and Caleb is boring.
If someone is guilty, then he is delightful.
If there is at least one people who is either not crazy or boring, then Eunice is not tall and Eunice is serious.
Someone is tall if and only if he is not crazy.
If someone is delightful and not serious, then he is both guilty and crazy, and vice versa.
Quinlan being not guilty and Caleb being not serious imply that Caleb is boring and Lucy is not tall.
If someone is boring, then he is tall, and vice versa.
Quinlan being not crazy and Lucy being serious imply that Alisa is not guilty. | Eunice is crazy. | entailment |
Lucy is guilty.
Alisa is tall.
Lucy is not tall.
Alisa is not delightful.
Quinlan is not guilty.
Lucy is boring.
Quinlan is not serious.
Eunice is crazy.
Quinlan is not tall.
Quinlan is crazy.
Eunice is not serious.
Alisa is guilty.Someone who is eithor not delightful or not tall is always guilty.
All guilty people are not tall.
It can be concluded that Braden is guilty and Eunice is not boring once knowing that Alisa is delightful.
If there is someone who is tall, then Alisa is not crazy and Braden is delightful.
Caleb is serious if and only if Eunice is guilty and Caleb is boring.
If someone is guilty, then he is delightful.
If there is at least one people who is either not crazy or boring, then Eunice is not tall and Eunice is serious.
Someone is tall if and only if he is not crazy.
If someone is delightful and not serious, then he is both guilty and crazy, and vice versa.
Quinlan being not guilty and Caleb being not serious imply that Caleb is boring and Lucy is not tall.
If someone is boring, then he is tall, and vice versa.
Quinlan being not crazy and Lucy being serious imply that Alisa is not guilty. | Quinlan is guilty. | self_contradiction |
Lucy is guilty.
Alisa is tall.
Lucy is not tall.
Alisa is not delightful.
Quinlan is not guilty.
Lucy is boring.
Quinlan is not serious.
Eunice is crazy.
Quinlan is not tall.
Quinlan is crazy.
Eunice is not serious.
Alisa is guilty.Someone who is eithor not delightful or not tall is always guilty.
All guilty people are not tall.
It can be concluded that Braden is guilty and Eunice is not boring once knowing that Alisa is delightful.
If there is someone who is tall, then Alisa is not crazy and Braden is delightful.
Caleb is serious if and only if Eunice is guilty and Caleb is boring.
If someone is guilty, then he is delightful.
If there is at least one people who is either not crazy or boring, then Eunice is not tall and Eunice is serious.
Someone is tall if and only if he is not crazy.
If someone is delightful and not serious, then he is both guilty and crazy, and vice versa.
Quinlan being not guilty and Caleb being not serious imply that Caleb is boring and Lucy is not tall.
If someone is boring, then he is tall, and vice versa.
Quinlan being not crazy and Lucy being serious imply that Alisa is not guilty. | Alisa is crazy. | contradiction |
Lucy is guilty.
Alisa is tall.
Lucy is not tall.
Alisa is not delightful.
Quinlan is not guilty.
Lucy is boring.
Quinlan is not serious.
Eunice is crazy.
Quinlan is not tall.
Quinlan is crazy.
Eunice is not serious.
Alisa is guilty.Someone who is eithor not delightful or not tall is always guilty.
All guilty people are not tall.
It can be concluded that Braden is guilty and Eunice is not boring once knowing that Alisa is delightful.
If there is someone who is tall, then Alisa is not crazy and Braden is delightful.
Caleb is serious if and only if Eunice is guilty and Caleb is boring.
If someone is guilty, then he is delightful.
If there is at least one people who is either not crazy or boring, then Eunice is not tall and Eunice is serious.
Someone is tall if and only if he is not crazy.
If someone is delightful and not serious, then he is both guilty and crazy, and vice versa.
Quinlan being not guilty and Caleb being not serious imply that Caleb is boring and Lucy is not tall.
If someone is boring, then he is tall, and vice versa.
Quinlan being not crazy and Lucy being serious imply that Alisa is not guilty. | Olaf is not crazy. | neutral |
Lucy is guilty.
Alisa is tall.
Lucy is not tall.
Alisa is not delightful.
Quinlan is not guilty.
Lucy is boring.
Quinlan is not serious.
Eunice is crazy.
Quinlan is not tall.
Quinlan is crazy.
Eunice is not serious.
Alisa is guilty.Someone who is eithor not delightful or not tall is always guilty.
All guilty people are not tall.
It can be concluded that Braden is guilty and Eunice is not boring once knowing that Alisa is delightful.
If there is someone who is tall, then Alisa is not crazy and Braden is delightful.
Caleb is serious if and only if Eunice is guilty and Caleb is boring.
If someone is guilty, then he is delightful.
If there is at least one people who is either not crazy or boring, then Eunice is not tall and Eunice is serious.
Someone is tall if and only if he is not crazy.
If someone is delightful and not serious, then he is both guilty and crazy, and vice versa.
Quinlan being not guilty and Caleb being not serious imply that Caleb is boring and Lucy is not tall.
If someone is boring, then he is tall, and vice versa.
Quinlan being not crazy and Lucy being serious imply that Alisa is not guilty. | Alisa is delightful. | self_contradiction |
Lucy is guilty.
Alisa is tall.
Lucy is not tall.
Alisa is not delightful.
Quinlan is not guilty.
Lucy is boring.
Quinlan is not serious.
Eunice is crazy.
Quinlan is not tall.
Quinlan is crazy.
Eunice is not serious.
Alisa is guilty.Someone who is eithor not delightful or not tall is always guilty.
All guilty people are not tall.
It can be concluded that Braden is guilty and Eunice is not boring once knowing that Alisa is delightful.
If there is someone who is tall, then Alisa is not crazy and Braden is delightful.
Caleb is serious if and only if Eunice is guilty and Caleb is boring.
If someone is guilty, then he is delightful.
If there is at least one people who is either not crazy or boring, then Eunice is not tall and Eunice is serious.
Someone is tall if and only if he is not crazy.
If someone is delightful and not serious, then he is both guilty and crazy, and vice versa.
Quinlan being not guilty and Caleb being not serious imply that Caleb is boring and Lucy is not tall.
If someone is boring, then he is tall, and vice versa.
Quinlan being not crazy and Lucy being serious imply that Alisa is not guilty. | Lucy is not guilty. | contradiction |
Lucy is guilty.
Alisa is tall.
Lucy is not tall.
Alisa is not delightful.
Quinlan is not guilty.
Lucy is boring.
Quinlan is not serious.
Eunice is crazy.
Quinlan is not tall.
Quinlan is crazy.
Eunice is not serious.
Alisa is guilty.Someone who is eithor not delightful or not tall is always guilty.
All guilty people are not tall.
It can be concluded that Braden is guilty and Eunice is not boring once knowing that Alisa is delightful.
If there is someone who is tall, then Alisa is not crazy and Braden is delightful.
Caleb is serious if and only if Eunice is guilty and Caleb is boring.
If someone is guilty, then he is delightful.
If there is at least one people who is either not crazy or boring, then Eunice is not tall and Eunice is serious.
Someone is tall if and only if he is not crazy.
If someone is delightful and not serious, then he is both guilty and crazy, and vice versa.
Quinlan being not guilty and Caleb being not serious imply that Caleb is boring and Lucy is not tall.
If someone is boring, then he is tall, and vice versa.
Quinlan being not crazy and Lucy being serious imply that Alisa is not guilty. | Lucy is tall. | self_contradiction |
Lucy is guilty.
Alisa is tall.
Lucy is not tall.
Alisa is not delightful.
Quinlan is not guilty.
Lucy is boring.
Quinlan is not serious.
Eunice is crazy.
Quinlan is not tall.
Quinlan is crazy.
Eunice is not serious.
Alisa is guilty.Someone who is eithor not delightful or not tall is always guilty.
All guilty people are not tall.
It can be concluded that Braden is guilty and Eunice is not boring once knowing that Alisa is delightful.
If there is someone who is tall, then Alisa is not crazy and Braden is delightful.
Caleb is serious if and only if Eunice is guilty and Caleb is boring.
If someone is guilty, then he is delightful.
If there is at least one people who is either not crazy or boring, then Eunice is not tall and Eunice is serious.
Someone is tall if and only if he is not crazy.
If someone is delightful and not serious, then he is both guilty and crazy, and vice versa.
Quinlan being not guilty and Caleb being not serious imply that Caleb is boring and Lucy is not tall.
If someone is boring, then he is tall, and vice versa.
Quinlan being not crazy and Lucy being serious imply that Alisa is not guilty. | Alisa is not boring. | contradiction |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.