premise
stringlengths 923
1.41k
| hypothesis
stringlengths 11
33
| label
stringclasses 4
values |
|---|---|---|
Kendrick is not adventurous.
Alfred is not silly.
Hadden is adventurous.
Hadden is nutty.
Alfred is nutty.
Ross is not crazy.
Ross is not rude.
Alfred is scary.
Timothy is scary.
Timothy is not silly.
Timothy is not adventurous.
Timothy is crazy.If someone is not adventurous or he is not nutty, then he is scary.
If someone is not scary, then he is not silly, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not nutty, then Hadden is rude.
If there is someone who is scary, then Gloria is not nutty and Joe is silly.
If there is someone who is crazy, then Kendrick is scary.
If there is at least one people who is both silly and adventurous, then Timothy is not rude.
Gloria being not nutty and Kendrick being silly imply that Joe is rude and Timothy is scary.
If someone is not adventurous, then he is not crazy, and vice versa.
If Kendrick is not silly, then Kendrick is not nutty, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not nutty or not crazy, then Joe is scary.
Ross being not silly implies that Ross is adventurous and Gloria is scary.
Someone is not adventurous and not scary if and only if he is crazy and rude. | Hadden is not nutty. | contradiction |
Kendrick is not adventurous.
Alfred is not silly.
Hadden is adventurous.
Hadden is nutty.
Alfred is nutty.
Ross is not crazy.
Ross is not rude.
Alfred is scary.
Timothy is scary.
Timothy is not silly.
Timothy is not adventurous.
Timothy is crazy.If someone is not adventurous or he is not nutty, then he is scary.
If someone is not scary, then he is not silly, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not nutty, then Hadden is rude.
If there is someone who is scary, then Gloria is not nutty and Joe is silly.
If there is someone who is crazy, then Kendrick is scary.
If there is at least one people who is both silly and adventurous, then Timothy is not rude.
Gloria being not nutty and Kendrick being silly imply that Joe is rude and Timothy is scary.
If someone is not adventurous, then he is not crazy, and vice versa.
If Kendrick is not silly, then Kendrick is not nutty, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not nutty or not crazy, then Joe is scary.
Ross being not silly implies that Ross is adventurous and Gloria is scary.
Someone is not adventurous and not scary if and only if he is crazy and rude. | Alfred is scary. | self_contradiction |
Kendrick is not adventurous.
Alfred is not silly.
Hadden is adventurous.
Hadden is nutty.
Alfred is nutty.
Ross is not crazy.
Ross is not rude.
Alfred is scary.
Timothy is scary.
Timothy is not silly.
Timothy is not adventurous.
Timothy is crazy.If someone is not adventurous or he is not nutty, then he is scary.
If someone is not scary, then he is not silly, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not nutty, then Hadden is rude.
If there is someone who is scary, then Gloria is not nutty and Joe is silly.
If there is someone who is crazy, then Kendrick is scary.
If there is at least one people who is both silly and adventurous, then Timothy is not rude.
Gloria being not nutty and Kendrick being silly imply that Joe is rude and Timothy is scary.
If someone is not adventurous, then he is not crazy, and vice versa.
If Kendrick is not silly, then Kendrick is not nutty, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not nutty or not crazy, then Joe is scary.
Ross being not silly implies that Ross is adventurous and Gloria is scary.
Someone is not adventurous and not scary if and only if he is crazy and rude. | Alfred is not crazy. | neutral |
Kendrick is not adventurous.
Alfred is not silly.
Hadden is adventurous.
Hadden is nutty.
Alfred is nutty.
Ross is not crazy.
Ross is not rude.
Alfred is scary.
Timothy is scary.
Timothy is not silly.
Timothy is not adventurous.
Timothy is crazy.If someone is not adventurous or he is not nutty, then he is scary.
If someone is not scary, then he is not silly, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not nutty, then Hadden is rude.
If there is someone who is scary, then Gloria is not nutty and Joe is silly.
If there is someone who is crazy, then Kendrick is scary.
If there is at least one people who is both silly and adventurous, then Timothy is not rude.
Gloria being not nutty and Kendrick being silly imply that Joe is rude and Timothy is scary.
If someone is not adventurous, then he is not crazy, and vice versa.
If Kendrick is not silly, then Kendrick is not nutty, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not nutty or not crazy, then Joe is scary.
Ross being not silly implies that Ross is adventurous and Gloria is scary.
Someone is not adventurous and not scary if and only if he is crazy and rude. | Timothy is not rude. | contradiction |
Kendrick is not adventurous.
Alfred is not silly.
Hadden is adventurous.
Hadden is nutty.
Alfred is nutty.
Ross is not crazy.
Ross is not rude.
Alfred is scary.
Timothy is scary.
Timothy is not silly.
Timothy is not adventurous.
Timothy is crazy.If someone is not adventurous or he is not nutty, then he is scary.
If someone is not scary, then he is not silly, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not nutty, then Hadden is rude.
If there is someone who is scary, then Gloria is not nutty and Joe is silly.
If there is someone who is crazy, then Kendrick is scary.
If there is at least one people who is both silly and adventurous, then Timothy is not rude.
Gloria being not nutty and Kendrick being silly imply that Joe is rude and Timothy is scary.
If someone is not adventurous, then he is not crazy, and vice versa.
If Kendrick is not silly, then Kendrick is not nutty, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not nutty or not crazy, then Joe is scary.
Ross being not silly implies that Ross is adventurous and Gloria is scary.
Someone is not adventurous and not scary if and only if he is crazy and rude. | Alfred is crazy. | neutral |
Kendrick is not adventurous.
Alfred is not silly.
Hadden is adventurous.
Hadden is nutty.
Alfred is nutty.
Ross is not crazy.
Ross is not rude.
Alfred is scary.
Timothy is scary.
Timothy is not silly.
Timothy is not adventurous.
Timothy is crazy.If someone is not adventurous or he is not nutty, then he is scary.
If someone is not scary, then he is not silly, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not nutty, then Hadden is rude.
If there is someone who is scary, then Gloria is not nutty and Joe is silly.
If there is someone who is crazy, then Kendrick is scary.
If there is at least one people who is both silly and adventurous, then Timothy is not rude.
Gloria being not nutty and Kendrick being silly imply that Joe is rude and Timothy is scary.
If someone is not adventurous, then he is not crazy, and vice versa.
If Kendrick is not silly, then Kendrick is not nutty, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not nutty or not crazy, then Joe is scary.
Ross being not silly implies that Ross is adventurous and Gloria is scary.
Someone is not adventurous and not scary if and only if he is crazy and rude. | Timothy is silly. | contradiction |
Kendrick is not adventurous.
Alfred is not silly.
Hadden is adventurous.
Hadden is nutty.
Alfred is nutty.
Ross is not crazy.
Ross is not rude.
Alfred is scary.
Timothy is scary.
Timothy is not silly.
Timothy is not adventurous.
Timothy is crazy.If someone is not adventurous or he is not nutty, then he is scary.
If someone is not scary, then he is not silly, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not nutty, then Hadden is rude.
If there is someone who is scary, then Gloria is not nutty and Joe is silly.
If there is someone who is crazy, then Kendrick is scary.
If there is at least one people who is both silly and adventurous, then Timothy is not rude.
Gloria being not nutty and Kendrick being silly imply that Joe is rude and Timothy is scary.
If someone is not adventurous, then he is not crazy, and vice versa.
If Kendrick is not silly, then Kendrick is not nutty, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not nutty or not crazy, then Joe is scary.
Ross being not silly implies that Ross is adventurous and Gloria is scary.
Someone is not adventurous and not scary if and only if he is crazy and rude. | Ross is not rude. | entailment |
Kendrick is not adventurous.
Alfred is not silly.
Hadden is adventurous.
Hadden is nutty.
Alfred is nutty.
Ross is not crazy.
Ross is not rude.
Alfred is scary.
Timothy is scary.
Timothy is not silly.
Timothy is not adventurous.
Timothy is crazy.If someone is not adventurous or he is not nutty, then he is scary.
If someone is not scary, then he is not silly, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not nutty, then Hadden is rude.
If there is someone who is scary, then Gloria is not nutty and Joe is silly.
If there is someone who is crazy, then Kendrick is scary.
If there is at least one people who is both silly and adventurous, then Timothy is not rude.
Gloria being not nutty and Kendrick being silly imply that Joe is rude and Timothy is scary.
If someone is not adventurous, then he is not crazy, and vice versa.
If Kendrick is not silly, then Kendrick is not nutty, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not nutty or not crazy, then Joe is scary.
Ross being not silly implies that Ross is adventurous and Gloria is scary.
Someone is not adventurous and not scary if and only if he is crazy and rude. | Timothy is scary. | self_contradiction |
Kendrick is not adventurous.
Alfred is not silly.
Hadden is adventurous.
Hadden is nutty.
Alfred is nutty.
Ross is not crazy.
Ross is not rude.
Alfred is scary.
Timothy is scary.
Timothy is not silly.
Timothy is not adventurous.
Timothy is crazy.If someone is not adventurous or he is not nutty, then he is scary.
If someone is not scary, then he is not silly, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not nutty, then Hadden is rude.
If there is someone who is scary, then Gloria is not nutty and Joe is silly.
If there is someone who is crazy, then Kendrick is scary.
If there is at least one people who is both silly and adventurous, then Timothy is not rude.
Gloria being not nutty and Kendrick being silly imply that Joe is rude and Timothy is scary.
If someone is not adventurous, then he is not crazy, and vice versa.
If Kendrick is not silly, then Kendrick is not nutty, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not nutty or not crazy, then Joe is scary.
Ross being not silly implies that Ross is adventurous and Gloria is scary.
Someone is not adventurous and not scary if and only if he is crazy and rude. | Timothy is crazy. | self_contradiction |
Kendrick is not adventurous.
Alfred is not silly.
Hadden is adventurous.
Hadden is nutty.
Alfred is nutty.
Ross is not crazy.
Ross is not rude.
Alfred is scary.
Timothy is scary.
Timothy is not silly.
Timothy is not adventurous.
Timothy is crazy.If someone is not adventurous or he is not nutty, then he is scary.
If someone is not scary, then he is not silly, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not nutty, then Hadden is rude.
If there is someone who is scary, then Gloria is not nutty and Joe is silly.
If there is someone who is crazy, then Kendrick is scary.
If there is at least one people who is both silly and adventurous, then Timothy is not rude.
Gloria being not nutty and Kendrick being silly imply that Joe is rude and Timothy is scary.
If someone is not adventurous, then he is not crazy, and vice versa.
If Kendrick is not silly, then Kendrick is not nutty, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not nutty or not crazy, then Joe is scary.
Ross being not silly implies that Ross is adventurous and Gloria is scary.
Someone is not adventurous and not scary if and only if he is crazy and rude. | Ross is not adventurous. | entailment |
Kendrick is not adventurous.
Alfred is not silly.
Hadden is adventurous.
Hadden is nutty.
Alfred is nutty.
Ross is not crazy.
Ross is not rude.
Alfred is scary.
Timothy is scary.
Timothy is not silly.
Timothy is not adventurous.
Timothy is crazy.If someone is not adventurous or he is not nutty, then he is scary.
If someone is not scary, then he is not silly, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not nutty, then Hadden is rude.
If there is someone who is scary, then Gloria is not nutty and Joe is silly.
If there is someone who is crazy, then Kendrick is scary.
If there is at least one people who is both silly and adventurous, then Timothy is not rude.
Gloria being not nutty and Kendrick being silly imply that Joe is rude and Timothy is scary.
If someone is not adventurous, then he is not crazy, and vice versa.
If Kendrick is not silly, then Kendrick is not nutty, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not nutty or not crazy, then Joe is scary.
Ross being not silly implies that Ross is adventurous and Gloria is scary.
Someone is not adventurous and not scary if and only if he is crazy and rude. | Joe is not adventurous. | neutral |
Kendrick is not adventurous.
Alfred is not silly.
Hadden is adventurous.
Hadden is nutty.
Alfred is nutty.
Ross is not crazy.
Ross is not rude.
Alfred is scary.
Timothy is scary.
Timothy is not silly.
Timothy is not adventurous.
Timothy is crazy.If someone is not adventurous or he is not nutty, then he is scary.
If someone is not scary, then he is not silly, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not nutty, then Hadden is rude.
If there is someone who is scary, then Gloria is not nutty and Joe is silly.
If there is someone who is crazy, then Kendrick is scary.
If there is at least one people who is both silly and adventurous, then Timothy is not rude.
Gloria being not nutty and Kendrick being silly imply that Joe is rude and Timothy is scary.
If someone is not adventurous, then he is not crazy, and vice versa.
If Kendrick is not silly, then Kendrick is not nutty, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not nutty or not crazy, then Joe is scary.
Ross being not silly implies that Ross is adventurous and Gloria is scary.
Someone is not adventurous and not scary if and only if he is crazy and rude. | Kendrick is crazy. | contradiction |
Kendrick is not adventurous.
Alfred is not silly.
Hadden is adventurous.
Hadden is nutty.
Alfred is nutty.
Ross is not crazy.
Ross is not rude.
Alfred is scary.
Timothy is scary.
Timothy is not silly.
Timothy is not adventurous.
Timothy is crazy.If someone is not adventurous or he is not nutty, then he is scary.
If someone is not scary, then he is not silly, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not nutty, then Hadden is rude.
If there is someone who is scary, then Gloria is not nutty and Joe is silly.
If there is someone who is crazy, then Kendrick is scary.
If there is at least one people who is both silly and adventurous, then Timothy is not rude.
Gloria being not nutty and Kendrick being silly imply that Joe is rude and Timothy is scary.
If someone is not adventurous, then he is not crazy, and vice versa.
If Kendrick is not silly, then Kendrick is not nutty, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not nutty or not crazy, then Joe is scary.
Ross being not silly implies that Ross is adventurous and Gloria is scary.
Someone is not adventurous and not scary if and only if he is crazy and rude. | Timothy is not nutty. | neutral |
Kendrick is not adventurous.
Alfred is not silly.
Hadden is adventurous.
Hadden is nutty.
Alfred is nutty.
Ross is not crazy.
Ross is not rude.
Alfred is scary.
Timothy is scary.
Timothy is not silly.
Timothy is not adventurous.
Timothy is crazy.If someone is not adventurous or he is not nutty, then he is scary.
If someone is not scary, then he is not silly, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not nutty, then Hadden is rude.
If there is someone who is scary, then Gloria is not nutty and Joe is silly.
If there is someone who is crazy, then Kendrick is scary.
If there is at least one people who is both silly and adventurous, then Timothy is not rude.
Gloria being not nutty and Kendrick being silly imply that Joe is rude and Timothy is scary.
If someone is not adventurous, then he is not crazy, and vice versa.
If Kendrick is not silly, then Kendrick is not nutty, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not nutty or not crazy, then Joe is scary.
Ross being not silly implies that Ross is adventurous and Gloria is scary.
Someone is not adventurous and not scary if and only if he is crazy and rude. | Alfred is not scary. | self_contradiction |
Kendrick is not adventurous.
Alfred is not silly.
Hadden is adventurous.
Hadden is nutty.
Alfred is nutty.
Ross is not crazy.
Ross is not rude.
Alfred is scary.
Timothy is scary.
Timothy is not silly.
Timothy is not adventurous.
Timothy is crazy.If someone is not adventurous or he is not nutty, then he is scary.
If someone is not scary, then he is not silly, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not nutty, then Hadden is rude.
If there is someone who is scary, then Gloria is not nutty and Joe is silly.
If there is someone who is crazy, then Kendrick is scary.
If there is at least one people who is both silly and adventurous, then Timothy is not rude.
Gloria being not nutty and Kendrick being silly imply that Joe is rude and Timothy is scary.
If someone is not adventurous, then he is not crazy, and vice versa.
If Kendrick is not silly, then Kendrick is not nutty, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not nutty or not crazy, then Joe is scary.
Ross being not silly implies that Ross is adventurous and Gloria is scary.
Someone is not adventurous and not scary if and only if he is crazy and rude. | Timothy is not adventurous. | entailment |
Kendrick is not adventurous.
Alfred is not silly.
Hadden is adventurous.
Hadden is nutty.
Alfred is nutty.
Ross is not crazy.
Ross is not rude.
Alfred is scary.
Timothy is scary.
Timothy is not silly.
Timothy is not adventurous.
Timothy is crazy.If someone is not adventurous or he is not nutty, then he is scary.
If someone is not scary, then he is not silly, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not nutty, then Hadden is rude.
If there is someone who is scary, then Gloria is not nutty and Joe is silly.
If there is someone who is crazy, then Kendrick is scary.
If there is at least one people who is both silly and adventurous, then Timothy is not rude.
Gloria being not nutty and Kendrick being silly imply that Joe is rude and Timothy is scary.
If someone is not adventurous, then he is not crazy, and vice versa.
If Kendrick is not silly, then Kendrick is not nutty, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not nutty or not crazy, then Joe is scary.
Ross being not silly implies that Ross is adventurous and Gloria is scary.
Someone is not adventurous and not scary if and only if he is crazy and rude. | Alfred is nutty. | entailment |
Kendrick is not adventurous.
Alfred is not silly.
Hadden is adventurous.
Hadden is nutty.
Alfred is nutty.
Ross is not crazy.
Ross is not rude.
Alfred is scary.
Timothy is scary.
Timothy is not silly.
Timothy is not adventurous.
Timothy is crazy.If someone is not adventurous or he is not nutty, then he is scary.
If someone is not scary, then he is not silly, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not nutty, then Hadden is rude.
If there is someone who is scary, then Gloria is not nutty and Joe is silly.
If there is someone who is crazy, then Kendrick is scary.
If there is at least one people who is both silly and adventurous, then Timothy is not rude.
Gloria being not nutty and Kendrick being silly imply that Joe is rude and Timothy is scary.
If someone is not adventurous, then he is not crazy, and vice versa.
If Kendrick is not silly, then Kendrick is not nutty, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not nutty or not crazy, then Joe is scary.
Ross being not silly implies that Ross is adventurous and Gloria is scary.
Someone is not adventurous and not scary if and only if he is crazy and rude. | Timothy is not scary. | self_contradiction |
Kendrick is not adventurous.
Alfred is not silly.
Hadden is adventurous.
Hadden is nutty.
Alfred is nutty.
Ross is not crazy.
Ross is not rude.
Alfred is scary.
Timothy is scary.
Timothy is not silly.
Timothy is not adventurous.
Timothy is crazy.If someone is not adventurous or he is not nutty, then he is scary.
If someone is not scary, then he is not silly, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not nutty, then Hadden is rude.
If there is someone who is scary, then Gloria is not nutty and Joe is silly.
If there is someone who is crazy, then Kendrick is scary.
If there is at least one people who is both silly and adventurous, then Timothy is not rude.
Gloria being not nutty and Kendrick being silly imply that Joe is rude and Timothy is scary.
If someone is not adventurous, then he is not crazy, and vice versa.
If Kendrick is not silly, then Kendrick is not nutty, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not nutty or not crazy, then Joe is scary.
Ross being not silly implies that Ross is adventurous and Gloria is scary.
Someone is not adventurous and not scary if and only if he is crazy and rude. | Timothy is adventurous. | contradiction |
Kendrick is not adventurous.
Alfred is not silly.
Hadden is adventurous.
Hadden is nutty.
Alfred is nutty.
Ross is not crazy.
Ross is not rude.
Alfred is scary.
Timothy is scary.
Timothy is not silly.
Timothy is not adventurous.
Timothy is crazy.If someone is not adventurous or he is not nutty, then he is scary.
If someone is not scary, then he is not silly, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not nutty, then Hadden is rude.
If there is someone who is scary, then Gloria is not nutty and Joe is silly.
If there is someone who is crazy, then Kendrick is scary.
If there is at least one people who is both silly and adventurous, then Timothy is not rude.
Gloria being not nutty and Kendrick being silly imply that Joe is rude and Timothy is scary.
If someone is not adventurous, then he is not crazy, and vice versa.
If Kendrick is not silly, then Kendrick is not nutty, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not nutty or not crazy, then Joe is scary.
Ross being not silly implies that Ross is adventurous and Gloria is scary.
Someone is not adventurous and not scary if and only if he is crazy and rude. | Gloria is not adventurous. | neutral |
Kendrick is not adventurous.
Alfred is not silly.
Hadden is adventurous.
Hadden is nutty.
Alfred is nutty.
Ross is not crazy.
Ross is not rude.
Alfred is scary.
Timothy is scary.
Timothy is not silly.
Timothy is not adventurous.
Timothy is crazy.If someone is not adventurous or he is not nutty, then he is scary.
If someone is not scary, then he is not silly, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not nutty, then Hadden is rude.
If there is someone who is scary, then Gloria is not nutty and Joe is silly.
If there is someone who is crazy, then Kendrick is scary.
If there is at least one people who is both silly and adventurous, then Timothy is not rude.
Gloria being not nutty and Kendrick being silly imply that Joe is rude and Timothy is scary.
If someone is not adventurous, then he is not crazy, and vice versa.
If Kendrick is not silly, then Kendrick is not nutty, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not nutty or not crazy, then Joe is scary.
Ross being not silly implies that Ross is adventurous and Gloria is scary.
Someone is not adventurous and not scary if and only if he is crazy and rude. | Alfred is not silly. | entailment |
Keene is easy.
Adrian is quaint.
Hubert is panicky.
Sherard is quaint.
Uriah is tired.
Sherard is informal.
Sherard is panicky.
Adrian is not easy.
Uriah is not informal.
Trevor is not embarrassed.
Uriah is panicky.
Hubert is not quaint.As long as someone is not tired, he is informal and not quaint.
If someone is either not informal or not embarrassed, then he is not quaint and panicky.
If there is someone who is both not informal and not easy, then Adrian is tired.
If there is at least one people who is both informal and not embarrassed, then Keene is panicky.
If someone is panicky, then he is informal.
Someone who is not informal and panicky is always not embarrassed and easy.
It can be concluded that Trevor is not embarrassed and Sherard is panicky once knowing that Adrian is not tired.
Someone is not tired and not easy if and only if he is quaint.
Hubert is panicky and Adrian is quaint if and only if Hubert is not easy and Uriah is not tired.
Uriah being embarrassed or Trevor being quaint implies that Keene is informal.
Uriah being informal is equivalent to Keene being not panicky.
Keene is tired if and only if Uriah is panicky and Luisa is easy. | Adrian is quaint. | self_contradiction |
Keene is easy.
Adrian is quaint.
Hubert is panicky.
Sherard is quaint.
Uriah is tired.
Sherard is informal.
Sherard is panicky.
Adrian is not easy.
Uriah is not informal.
Trevor is not embarrassed.
Uriah is panicky.
Hubert is not quaint.As long as someone is not tired, he is informal and not quaint.
If someone is either not informal or not embarrassed, then he is not quaint and panicky.
If there is someone who is both not informal and not easy, then Adrian is tired.
If there is at least one people who is both informal and not embarrassed, then Keene is panicky.
If someone is panicky, then he is informal.
Someone who is not informal and panicky is always not embarrassed and easy.
It can be concluded that Trevor is not embarrassed and Sherard is panicky once knowing that Adrian is not tired.
Someone is not tired and not easy if and only if he is quaint.
Hubert is panicky and Adrian is quaint if and only if Hubert is not easy and Uriah is not tired.
Uriah being embarrassed or Trevor being quaint implies that Keene is informal.
Uriah being informal is equivalent to Keene being not panicky.
Keene is tired if and only if Uriah is panicky and Luisa is easy. | Uriah is quaint. | contradiction |
Keene is easy.
Adrian is quaint.
Hubert is panicky.
Sherard is quaint.
Uriah is tired.
Sherard is informal.
Sherard is panicky.
Adrian is not easy.
Uriah is not informal.
Trevor is not embarrassed.
Uriah is panicky.
Hubert is not quaint.As long as someone is not tired, he is informal and not quaint.
If someone is either not informal or not embarrassed, then he is not quaint and panicky.
If there is someone who is both not informal and not easy, then Adrian is tired.
If there is at least one people who is both informal and not embarrassed, then Keene is panicky.
If someone is panicky, then he is informal.
Someone who is not informal and panicky is always not embarrassed and easy.
It can be concluded that Trevor is not embarrassed and Sherard is panicky once knowing that Adrian is not tired.
Someone is not tired and not easy if and only if he is quaint.
Hubert is panicky and Adrian is quaint if and only if Hubert is not easy and Uriah is not tired.
Uriah being embarrassed or Trevor being quaint implies that Keene is informal.
Uriah being informal is equivalent to Keene being not panicky.
Keene is tired if and only if Uriah is panicky and Luisa is easy. | Sherard is informal. | entailment |
Keene is easy.
Adrian is quaint.
Hubert is panicky.
Sherard is quaint.
Uriah is tired.
Sherard is informal.
Sherard is panicky.
Adrian is not easy.
Uriah is not informal.
Trevor is not embarrassed.
Uriah is panicky.
Hubert is not quaint.As long as someone is not tired, he is informal and not quaint.
If someone is either not informal or not embarrassed, then he is not quaint and panicky.
If there is someone who is both not informal and not easy, then Adrian is tired.
If there is at least one people who is both informal and not embarrassed, then Keene is panicky.
If someone is panicky, then he is informal.
Someone who is not informal and panicky is always not embarrassed and easy.
It can be concluded that Trevor is not embarrassed and Sherard is panicky once knowing that Adrian is not tired.
Someone is not tired and not easy if and only if he is quaint.
Hubert is panicky and Adrian is quaint if and only if Hubert is not easy and Uriah is not tired.
Uriah being embarrassed or Trevor being quaint implies that Keene is informal.
Uriah being informal is equivalent to Keene being not panicky.
Keene is tired if and only if Uriah is panicky and Luisa is easy. | Uriah is not informal. | self_contradiction |
Keene is easy.
Adrian is quaint.
Hubert is panicky.
Sherard is quaint.
Uriah is tired.
Sherard is informal.
Sherard is panicky.
Adrian is not easy.
Uriah is not informal.
Trevor is not embarrassed.
Uriah is panicky.
Hubert is not quaint.As long as someone is not tired, he is informal and not quaint.
If someone is either not informal or not embarrassed, then he is not quaint and panicky.
If there is someone who is both not informal and not easy, then Adrian is tired.
If there is at least one people who is both informal and not embarrassed, then Keene is panicky.
If someone is panicky, then he is informal.
Someone who is not informal and panicky is always not embarrassed and easy.
It can be concluded that Trevor is not embarrassed and Sherard is panicky once knowing that Adrian is not tired.
Someone is not tired and not easy if and only if he is quaint.
Hubert is panicky and Adrian is quaint if and only if Hubert is not easy and Uriah is not tired.
Uriah being embarrassed or Trevor being quaint implies that Keene is informal.
Uriah being informal is equivalent to Keene being not panicky.
Keene is tired if and only if Uriah is panicky and Luisa is easy. | Keene is tired. | neutral |
Keene is easy.
Adrian is quaint.
Hubert is panicky.
Sherard is quaint.
Uriah is tired.
Sherard is informal.
Sherard is panicky.
Adrian is not easy.
Uriah is not informal.
Trevor is not embarrassed.
Uriah is panicky.
Hubert is not quaint.As long as someone is not tired, he is informal and not quaint.
If someone is either not informal or not embarrassed, then he is not quaint and panicky.
If there is someone who is both not informal and not easy, then Adrian is tired.
If there is at least one people who is both informal and not embarrassed, then Keene is panicky.
If someone is panicky, then he is informal.
Someone who is not informal and panicky is always not embarrassed and easy.
It can be concluded that Trevor is not embarrassed and Sherard is panicky once knowing that Adrian is not tired.
Someone is not tired and not easy if and only if he is quaint.
Hubert is panicky and Adrian is quaint if and only if Hubert is not easy and Uriah is not tired.
Uriah being embarrassed or Trevor being quaint implies that Keene is informal.
Uriah being informal is equivalent to Keene being not panicky.
Keene is tired if and only if Uriah is panicky and Luisa is easy. | Adrian is not informal. | contradiction |
Keene is easy.
Adrian is quaint.
Hubert is panicky.
Sherard is quaint.
Uriah is tired.
Sherard is informal.
Sherard is panicky.
Adrian is not easy.
Uriah is not informal.
Trevor is not embarrassed.
Uriah is panicky.
Hubert is not quaint.As long as someone is not tired, he is informal and not quaint.
If someone is either not informal or not embarrassed, then he is not quaint and panicky.
If there is someone who is both not informal and not easy, then Adrian is tired.
If there is at least one people who is both informal and not embarrassed, then Keene is panicky.
If someone is panicky, then he is informal.
Someone who is not informal and panicky is always not embarrassed and easy.
It can be concluded that Trevor is not embarrassed and Sherard is panicky once knowing that Adrian is not tired.
Someone is not tired and not easy if and only if he is quaint.
Hubert is panicky and Adrian is quaint if and only if Hubert is not easy and Uriah is not tired.
Uriah being embarrassed or Trevor being quaint implies that Keene is informal.
Uriah being informal is equivalent to Keene being not panicky.
Keene is tired if and only if Uriah is panicky and Luisa is easy. | Luisa is informal. | neutral |
Keene is easy.
Adrian is quaint.
Hubert is panicky.
Sherard is quaint.
Uriah is tired.
Sherard is informal.
Sherard is panicky.
Adrian is not easy.
Uriah is not informal.
Trevor is not embarrassed.
Uriah is panicky.
Hubert is not quaint.As long as someone is not tired, he is informal and not quaint.
If someone is either not informal or not embarrassed, then he is not quaint and panicky.
If there is someone who is both not informal and not easy, then Adrian is tired.
If there is at least one people who is both informal and not embarrassed, then Keene is panicky.
If someone is panicky, then he is informal.
Someone who is not informal and panicky is always not embarrassed and easy.
It can be concluded that Trevor is not embarrassed and Sherard is panicky once knowing that Adrian is not tired.
Someone is not tired and not easy if and only if he is quaint.
Hubert is panicky and Adrian is quaint if and only if Hubert is not easy and Uriah is not tired.
Uriah being embarrassed or Trevor being quaint implies that Keene is informal.
Uriah being informal is equivalent to Keene being not panicky.
Keene is tired if and only if Uriah is panicky and Luisa is easy. | Sherard is panicky. | entailment |
Keene is easy.
Adrian is quaint.
Hubert is panicky.
Sherard is quaint.
Uriah is tired.
Sherard is informal.
Sherard is panicky.
Adrian is not easy.
Uriah is not informal.
Trevor is not embarrassed.
Uriah is panicky.
Hubert is not quaint.As long as someone is not tired, he is informal and not quaint.
If someone is either not informal or not embarrassed, then he is not quaint and panicky.
If there is someone who is both not informal and not easy, then Adrian is tired.
If there is at least one people who is both informal and not embarrassed, then Keene is panicky.
If someone is panicky, then he is informal.
Someone who is not informal and panicky is always not embarrassed and easy.
It can be concluded that Trevor is not embarrassed and Sherard is panicky once knowing that Adrian is not tired.
Someone is not tired and not easy if and only if he is quaint.
Hubert is panicky and Adrian is quaint if and only if Hubert is not easy and Uriah is not tired.
Uriah being embarrassed or Trevor being quaint implies that Keene is informal.
Uriah being informal is equivalent to Keene being not panicky.
Keene is tired if and only if Uriah is panicky and Luisa is easy. | Hubert is not tired. | neutral |
Keene is easy.
Adrian is quaint.
Hubert is panicky.
Sherard is quaint.
Uriah is tired.
Sherard is informal.
Sherard is panicky.
Adrian is not easy.
Uriah is not informal.
Trevor is not embarrassed.
Uriah is panicky.
Hubert is not quaint.As long as someone is not tired, he is informal and not quaint.
If someone is either not informal or not embarrassed, then he is not quaint and panicky.
If there is someone who is both not informal and not easy, then Adrian is tired.
If there is at least one people who is both informal and not embarrassed, then Keene is panicky.
If someone is panicky, then he is informal.
Someone who is not informal and panicky is always not embarrassed and easy.
It can be concluded that Trevor is not embarrassed and Sherard is panicky once knowing that Adrian is not tired.
Someone is not tired and not easy if and only if he is quaint.
Hubert is panicky and Adrian is quaint if and only if Hubert is not easy and Uriah is not tired.
Uriah being embarrassed or Trevor being quaint implies that Keene is informal.
Uriah being informal is equivalent to Keene being not panicky.
Keene is tired if and only if Uriah is panicky and Luisa is easy. | Trevor is embarrassed. | contradiction |
Keene is easy.
Adrian is quaint.
Hubert is panicky.
Sherard is quaint.
Uriah is tired.
Sherard is informal.
Sherard is panicky.
Adrian is not easy.
Uriah is not informal.
Trevor is not embarrassed.
Uriah is panicky.
Hubert is not quaint.As long as someone is not tired, he is informal and not quaint.
If someone is either not informal or not embarrassed, then he is not quaint and panicky.
If there is someone who is both not informal and not easy, then Adrian is tired.
If there is at least one people who is both informal and not embarrassed, then Keene is panicky.
If someone is panicky, then he is informal.
Someone who is not informal and panicky is always not embarrassed and easy.
It can be concluded that Trevor is not embarrassed and Sherard is panicky once knowing that Adrian is not tired.
Someone is not tired and not easy if and only if he is quaint.
Hubert is panicky and Adrian is quaint if and only if Hubert is not easy and Uriah is not tired.
Uriah being embarrassed or Trevor being quaint implies that Keene is informal.
Uriah being informal is equivalent to Keene being not panicky.
Keene is tired if and only if Uriah is panicky and Luisa is easy. | Uriah is not tired. | self_contradiction |
Keene is easy.
Adrian is quaint.
Hubert is panicky.
Sherard is quaint.
Uriah is tired.
Sherard is informal.
Sherard is panicky.
Adrian is not easy.
Uriah is not informal.
Trevor is not embarrassed.
Uriah is panicky.
Hubert is not quaint.As long as someone is not tired, he is informal and not quaint.
If someone is either not informal or not embarrassed, then he is not quaint and panicky.
If there is someone who is both not informal and not easy, then Adrian is tired.
If there is at least one people who is both informal and not embarrassed, then Keene is panicky.
If someone is panicky, then he is informal.
Someone who is not informal and panicky is always not embarrassed and easy.
It can be concluded that Trevor is not embarrassed and Sherard is panicky once knowing that Adrian is not tired.
Someone is not tired and not easy if and only if he is quaint.
Hubert is panicky and Adrian is quaint if and only if Hubert is not easy and Uriah is not tired.
Uriah being embarrassed or Trevor being quaint implies that Keene is informal.
Uriah being informal is equivalent to Keene being not panicky.
Keene is tired if and only if Uriah is panicky and Luisa is easy. | Uriah is informal. | self_contradiction |
Keene is easy.
Adrian is quaint.
Hubert is panicky.
Sherard is quaint.
Uriah is tired.
Sherard is informal.
Sherard is panicky.
Adrian is not easy.
Uriah is not informal.
Trevor is not embarrassed.
Uriah is panicky.
Hubert is not quaint.As long as someone is not tired, he is informal and not quaint.
If someone is either not informal or not embarrassed, then he is not quaint and panicky.
If there is someone who is both not informal and not easy, then Adrian is tired.
If there is at least one people who is both informal and not embarrassed, then Keene is panicky.
If someone is panicky, then he is informal.
Someone who is not informal and panicky is always not embarrassed and easy.
It can be concluded that Trevor is not embarrassed and Sherard is panicky once knowing that Adrian is not tired.
Someone is not tired and not easy if and only if he is quaint.
Hubert is panicky and Adrian is quaint if and only if Hubert is not easy and Uriah is not tired.
Uriah being embarrassed or Trevor being quaint implies that Keene is informal.
Uriah being informal is equivalent to Keene being not panicky.
Keene is tired if and only if Uriah is panicky and Luisa is easy. | Keene is informal. | neutral |
Keene is easy.
Adrian is quaint.
Hubert is panicky.
Sherard is quaint.
Uriah is tired.
Sherard is informal.
Sherard is panicky.
Adrian is not easy.
Uriah is not informal.
Trevor is not embarrassed.
Uriah is panicky.
Hubert is not quaint.As long as someone is not tired, he is informal and not quaint.
If someone is either not informal or not embarrassed, then he is not quaint and panicky.
If there is someone who is both not informal and not easy, then Adrian is tired.
If there is at least one people who is both informal and not embarrassed, then Keene is panicky.
If someone is panicky, then he is informal.
Someone who is not informal and panicky is always not embarrassed and easy.
It can be concluded that Trevor is not embarrassed and Sherard is panicky once knowing that Adrian is not tired.
Someone is not tired and not easy if and only if he is quaint.
Hubert is panicky and Adrian is quaint if and only if Hubert is not easy and Uriah is not tired.
Uriah being embarrassed or Trevor being quaint implies that Keene is informal.
Uriah being informal is equivalent to Keene being not panicky.
Keene is tired if and only if Uriah is panicky and Luisa is easy. | Uriah is easy. | entailment |
Keene is easy.
Adrian is quaint.
Hubert is panicky.
Sherard is quaint.
Uriah is tired.
Sherard is informal.
Sherard is panicky.
Adrian is not easy.
Uriah is not informal.
Trevor is not embarrassed.
Uriah is panicky.
Hubert is not quaint.As long as someone is not tired, he is informal and not quaint.
If someone is either not informal or not embarrassed, then he is not quaint and panicky.
If there is someone who is both not informal and not easy, then Adrian is tired.
If there is at least one people who is both informal and not embarrassed, then Keene is panicky.
If someone is panicky, then he is informal.
Someone who is not informal and panicky is always not embarrassed and easy.
It can be concluded that Trevor is not embarrassed and Sherard is panicky once knowing that Adrian is not tired.
Someone is not tired and not easy if and only if he is quaint.
Hubert is panicky and Adrian is quaint if and only if Hubert is not easy and Uriah is not tired.
Uriah being embarrassed or Trevor being quaint implies that Keene is informal.
Uriah being informal is equivalent to Keene being not panicky.
Keene is tired if and only if Uriah is panicky and Luisa is easy. | Trevor is quaint. | contradiction |
Keene is easy.
Adrian is quaint.
Hubert is panicky.
Sherard is quaint.
Uriah is tired.
Sherard is informal.
Sherard is panicky.
Adrian is not easy.
Uriah is not informal.
Trevor is not embarrassed.
Uriah is panicky.
Hubert is not quaint.As long as someone is not tired, he is informal and not quaint.
If someone is either not informal or not embarrassed, then he is not quaint and panicky.
If there is someone who is both not informal and not easy, then Adrian is tired.
If there is at least one people who is both informal and not embarrassed, then Keene is panicky.
If someone is panicky, then he is informal.
Someone who is not informal and panicky is always not embarrassed and easy.
It can be concluded that Trevor is not embarrassed and Sherard is panicky once knowing that Adrian is not tired.
Someone is not tired and not easy if and only if he is quaint.
Hubert is panicky and Adrian is quaint if and only if Hubert is not easy and Uriah is not tired.
Uriah being embarrassed or Trevor being quaint implies that Keene is informal.
Uriah being informal is equivalent to Keene being not panicky.
Keene is tired if and only if Uriah is panicky and Luisa is easy. | Luisa is quaint. | neutral |
Keene is easy.
Adrian is quaint.
Hubert is panicky.
Sherard is quaint.
Uriah is tired.
Sherard is informal.
Sherard is panicky.
Adrian is not easy.
Uriah is not informal.
Trevor is not embarrassed.
Uriah is panicky.
Hubert is not quaint.As long as someone is not tired, he is informal and not quaint.
If someone is either not informal or not embarrassed, then he is not quaint and panicky.
If there is someone who is both not informal and not easy, then Adrian is tired.
If there is at least one people who is both informal and not embarrassed, then Keene is panicky.
If someone is panicky, then he is informal.
Someone who is not informal and panicky is always not embarrassed and easy.
It can be concluded that Trevor is not embarrassed and Sherard is panicky once knowing that Adrian is not tired.
Someone is not tired and not easy if and only if he is quaint.
Hubert is panicky and Adrian is quaint if and only if Hubert is not easy and Uriah is not tired.
Uriah being embarrassed or Trevor being quaint implies that Keene is informal.
Uriah being informal is equivalent to Keene being not panicky.
Keene is tired if and only if Uriah is panicky and Luisa is easy. | Uriah is panicky. | entailment |
Keene is easy.
Adrian is quaint.
Hubert is panicky.
Sherard is quaint.
Uriah is tired.
Sherard is informal.
Sherard is panicky.
Adrian is not easy.
Uriah is not informal.
Trevor is not embarrassed.
Uriah is panicky.
Hubert is not quaint.As long as someone is not tired, he is informal and not quaint.
If someone is either not informal or not embarrassed, then he is not quaint and panicky.
If there is someone who is both not informal and not easy, then Adrian is tired.
If there is at least one people who is both informal and not embarrassed, then Keene is panicky.
If someone is panicky, then he is informal.
Someone who is not informal and panicky is always not embarrassed and easy.
It can be concluded that Trevor is not embarrassed and Sherard is panicky once knowing that Adrian is not tired.
Someone is not tired and not easy if and only if he is quaint.
Hubert is panicky and Adrian is quaint if and only if Hubert is not easy and Uriah is not tired.
Uriah being embarrassed or Trevor being quaint implies that Keene is informal.
Uriah being informal is equivalent to Keene being not panicky.
Keene is tired if and only if Uriah is panicky and Luisa is easy. | Adrian is not quaint. | self_contradiction |
Keene is easy.
Adrian is quaint.
Hubert is panicky.
Sherard is quaint.
Uriah is tired.
Sherard is informal.
Sherard is panicky.
Adrian is not easy.
Uriah is not informal.
Trevor is not embarrassed.
Uriah is panicky.
Hubert is not quaint.As long as someone is not tired, he is informal and not quaint.
If someone is either not informal or not embarrassed, then he is not quaint and panicky.
If there is someone who is both not informal and not easy, then Adrian is tired.
If there is at least one people who is both informal and not embarrassed, then Keene is panicky.
If someone is panicky, then he is informal.
Someone who is not informal and panicky is always not embarrassed and easy.
It can be concluded that Trevor is not embarrassed and Sherard is panicky once knowing that Adrian is not tired.
Someone is not tired and not easy if and only if he is quaint.
Hubert is panicky and Adrian is quaint if and only if Hubert is not easy and Uriah is not tired.
Uriah being embarrassed or Trevor being quaint implies that Keene is informal.
Uriah being informal is equivalent to Keene being not panicky.
Keene is tired if and only if Uriah is panicky and Luisa is easy. | Trevor is not embarrassed. | entailment |
Keene is easy.
Adrian is quaint.
Hubert is panicky.
Sherard is quaint.
Uriah is tired.
Sherard is informal.
Sherard is panicky.
Adrian is not easy.
Uriah is not informal.
Trevor is not embarrassed.
Uriah is panicky.
Hubert is not quaint.As long as someone is not tired, he is informal and not quaint.
If someone is either not informal or not embarrassed, then he is not quaint and panicky.
If there is someone who is both not informal and not easy, then Adrian is tired.
If there is at least one people who is both informal and not embarrassed, then Keene is panicky.
If someone is panicky, then he is informal.
Someone who is not informal and panicky is always not embarrassed and easy.
It can be concluded that Trevor is not embarrassed and Sherard is panicky once knowing that Adrian is not tired.
Someone is not tired and not easy if and only if he is quaint.
Hubert is panicky and Adrian is quaint if and only if Hubert is not easy and Uriah is not tired.
Uriah being embarrassed or Trevor being quaint implies that Keene is informal.
Uriah being informal is equivalent to Keene being not panicky.
Keene is tired if and only if Uriah is panicky and Luisa is easy. | Keene is not easy. | contradiction |
Cadman is gentle.
Solomon is not helpless.
Stefan is compassionate.
Stefan is exuberant.
Cadman is not puny.
Stefan is puny.
Stanley is not compassionate.
Stefan is skinny.
Cadman is skinny.
Stanley is gentle.
Solomon is not compassionate.
Solomon is not puny.If someone is gentle, then he is compassionate.
Cedric being gentle is equivalent to Cadman being not skinny.
If someone is not compassionate, then he is not helpless, and vice versa.
If Cedric is not skinny, then Cadman is not exuberant and Stanley is not helpless, and vice versa.
Robyn being not exuberant implies that Cedric is not skinny and Cadman is not helpless.
Solomon being puny is equivalent to Aedan being compassionate.
If someone is both not skinny and helpless, then he is not exuberant.
If there is someone who is exuberant, then Stanley is not helpless.
If someone is not gentle, then he is both puny and skinny.
Someone who is compassionate is always both exuberant and not gentle.
Solomon being not exuberant and Stefan being helpless imply that Cadman is not compassionate.
Someone being both not gentle and not skinny is equivalent to being helpless and compassionate. | Stanley is compassionate. | self_contradiction |
Cadman is gentle.
Solomon is not helpless.
Stefan is compassionate.
Stefan is exuberant.
Cadman is not puny.
Stefan is puny.
Stanley is not compassionate.
Stefan is skinny.
Cadman is skinny.
Stanley is gentle.
Solomon is not compassionate.
Solomon is not puny.If someone is gentle, then he is compassionate.
Cedric being gentle is equivalent to Cadman being not skinny.
If someone is not compassionate, then he is not helpless, and vice versa.
If Cedric is not skinny, then Cadman is not exuberant and Stanley is not helpless, and vice versa.
Robyn being not exuberant implies that Cedric is not skinny and Cadman is not helpless.
Solomon being puny is equivalent to Aedan being compassionate.
If someone is both not skinny and helpless, then he is not exuberant.
If there is someone who is exuberant, then Stanley is not helpless.
If someone is not gentle, then he is both puny and skinny.
Someone who is compassionate is always both exuberant and not gentle.
Solomon being not exuberant and Stefan being helpless imply that Cadman is not compassionate.
Someone being both not gentle and not skinny is equivalent to being helpless and compassionate. | Stefan is skinny. | entailment |
Cadman is gentle.
Solomon is not helpless.
Stefan is compassionate.
Stefan is exuberant.
Cadman is not puny.
Stefan is puny.
Stanley is not compassionate.
Stefan is skinny.
Cadman is skinny.
Stanley is gentle.
Solomon is not compassionate.
Solomon is not puny.If someone is gentle, then he is compassionate.
Cedric being gentle is equivalent to Cadman being not skinny.
If someone is not compassionate, then he is not helpless, and vice versa.
If Cedric is not skinny, then Cadman is not exuberant and Stanley is not helpless, and vice versa.
Robyn being not exuberant implies that Cedric is not skinny and Cadman is not helpless.
Solomon being puny is equivalent to Aedan being compassionate.
If someone is both not skinny and helpless, then he is not exuberant.
If there is someone who is exuberant, then Stanley is not helpless.
If someone is not gentle, then he is both puny and skinny.
Someone who is compassionate is always both exuberant and not gentle.
Solomon being not exuberant and Stefan being helpless imply that Cadman is not compassionate.
Someone being both not gentle and not skinny is equivalent to being helpless and compassionate. | Solomon is exuberant. | neutral |
Cadman is gentle.
Solomon is not helpless.
Stefan is compassionate.
Stefan is exuberant.
Cadman is not puny.
Stefan is puny.
Stanley is not compassionate.
Stefan is skinny.
Cadman is skinny.
Stanley is gentle.
Solomon is not compassionate.
Solomon is not puny.If someone is gentle, then he is compassionate.
Cedric being gentle is equivalent to Cadman being not skinny.
If someone is not compassionate, then he is not helpless, and vice versa.
If Cedric is not skinny, then Cadman is not exuberant and Stanley is not helpless, and vice versa.
Robyn being not exuberant implies that Cedric is not skinny and Cadman is not helpless.
Solomon being puny is equivalent to Aedan being compassionate.
If someone is both not skinny and helpless, then he is not exuberant.
If there is someone who is exuberant, then Stanley is not helpless.
If someone is not gentle, then he is both puny and skinny.
Someone who is compassionate is always both exuberant and not gentle.
Solomon being not exuberant and Stefan being helpless imply that Cadman is not compassionate.
Someone being both not gentle and not skinny is equivalent to being helpless and compassionate. | Cedric is not compassionate. | neutral |
Cadman is gentle.
Solomon is not helpless.
Stefan is compassionate.
Stefan is exuberant.
Cadman is not puny.
Stefan is puny.
Stanley is not compassionate.
Stefan is skinny.
Cadman is skinny.
Stanley is gentle.
Solomon is not compassionate.
Solomon is not puny.If someone is gentle, then he is compassionate.
Cedric being gentle is equivalent to Cadman being not skinny.
If someone is not compassionate, then he is not helpless, and vice versa.
If Cedric is not skinny, then Cadman is not exuberant and Stanley is not helpless, and vice versa.
Robyn being not exuberant implies that Cedric is not skinny and Cadman is not helpless.
Solomon being puny is equivalent to Aedan being compassionate.
If someone is both not skinny and helpless, then he is not exuberant.
If there is someone who is exuberant, then Stanley is not helpless.
If someone is not gentle, then he is both puny and skinny.
Someone who is compassionate is always both exuberant and not gentle.
Solomon being not exuberant and Stefan being helpless imply that Cadman is not compassionate.
Someone being both not gentle and not skinny is equivalent to being helpless and compassionate. | Solomon is not skinny. | neutral |
Cadman is gentle.
Solomon is not helpless.
Stefan is compassionate.
Stefan is exuberant.
Cadman is not puny.
Stefan is puny.
Stanley is not compassionate.
Stefan is skinny.
Cadman is skinny.
Stanley is gentle.
Solomon is not compassionate.
Solomon is not puny.If someone is gentle, then he is compassionate.
Cedric being gentle is equivalent to Cadman being not skinny.
If someone is not compassionate, then he is not helpless, and vice versa.
If Cedric is not skinny, then Cadman is not exuberant and Stanley is not helpless, and vice versa.
Robyn being not exuberant implies that Cedric is not skinny and Cadman is not helpless.
Solomon being puny is equivalent to Aedan being compassionate.
If someone is both not skinny and helpless, then he is not exuberant.
If there is someone who is exuberant, then Stanley is not helpless.
If someone is not gentle, then he is both puny and skinny.
Someone who is compassionate is always both exuberant and not gentle.
Solomon being not exuberant and Stefan being helpless imply that Cadman is not compassionate.
Someone being both not gentle and not skinny is equivalent to being helpless and compassionate. | Stanley is gentle. | self_contradiction |
Cadman is gentle.
Solomon is not helpless.
Stefan is compassionate.
Stefan is exuberant.
Cadman is not puny.
Stefan is puny.
Stanley is not compassionate.
Stefan is skinny.
Cadman is skinny.
Stanley is gentle.
Solomon is not compassionate.
Solomon is not puny.If someone is gentle, then he is compassionate.
Cedric being gentle is equivalent to Cadman being not skinny.
If someone is not compassionate, then he is not helpless, and vice versa.
If Cedric is not skinny, then Cadman is not exuberant and Stanley is not helpless, and vice versa.
Robyn being not exuberant implies that Cedric is not skinny and Cadman is not helpless.
Solomon being puny is equivalent to Aedan being compassionate.
If someone is both not skinny and helpless, then he is not exuberant.
If there is someone who is exuberant, then Stanley is not helpless.
If someone is not gentle, then he is both puny and skinny.
Someone who is compassionate is always both exuberant and not gentle.
Solomon being not exuberant and Stefan being helpless imply that Cadman is not compassionate.
Someone being both not gentle and not skinny is equivalent to being helpless and compassionate. | Cadman is not gentle. | self_contradiction |
Cadman is gentle.
Solomon is not helpless.
Stefan is compassionate.
Stefan is exuberant.
Cadman is not puny.
Stefan is puny.
Stanley is not compassionate.
Stefan is skinny.
Cadman is skinny.
Stanley is gentle.
Solomon is not compassionate.
Solomon is not puny.If someone is gentle, then he is compassionate.
Cedric being gentle is equivalent to Cadman being not skinny.
If someone is not compassionate, then he is not helpless, and vice versa.
If Cedric is not skinny, then Cadman is not exuberant and Stanley is not helpless, and vice versa.
Robyn being not exuberant implies that Cedric is not skinny and Cadman is not helpless.
Solomon being puny is equivalent to Aedan being compassionate.
If someone is both not skinny and helpless, then he is not exuberant.
If there is someone who is exuberant, then Stanley is not helpless.
If someone is not gentle, then he is both puny and skinny.
Someone who is compassionate is always both exuberant and not gentle.
Solomon being not exuberant and Stefan being helpless imply that Cadman is not compassionate.
Someone being both not gentle and not skinny is equivalent to being helpless and compassionate. | Stefan is not compassionate. | contradiction |
Cadman is gentle.
Solomon is not helpless.
Stefan is compassionate.
Stefan is exuberant.
Cadman is not puny.
Stefan is puny.
Stanley is not compassionate.
Stefan is skinny.
Cadman is skinny.
Stanley is gentle.
Solomon is not compassionate.
Solomon is not puny.If someone is gentle, then he is compassionate.
Cedric being gentle is equivalent to Cadman being not skinny.
If someone is not compassionate, then he is not helpless, and vice versa.
If Cedric is not skinny, then Cadman is not exuberant and Stanley is not helpless, and vice versa.
Robyn being not exuberant implies that Cedric is not skinny and Cadman is not helpless.
Solomon being puny is equivalent to Aedan being compassionate.
If someone is both not skinny and helpless, then he is not exuberant.
If there is someone who is exuberant, then Stanley is not helpless.
If someone is not gentle, then he is both puny and skinny.
Someone who is compassionate is always both exuberant and not gentle.
Solomon being not exuberant and Stefan being helpless imply that Cadman is not compassionate.
Someone being both not gentle and not skinny is equivalent to being helpless and compassionate. | Cadman is compassionate. | entailment |
Cadman is gentle.
Solomon is not helpless.
Stefan is compassionate.
Stefan is exuberant.
Cadman is not puny.
Stefan is puny.
Stanley is not compassionate.
Stefan is skinny.
Cadman is skinny.
Stanley is gentle.
Solomon is not compassionate.
Solomon is not puny.If someone is gentle, then he is compassionate.
Cedric being gentle is equivalent to Cadman being not skinny.
If someone is not compassionate, then he is not helpless, and vice versa.
If Cedric is not skinny, then Cadman is not exuberant and Stanley is not helpless, and vice versa.
Robyn being not exuberant implies that Cedric is not skinny and Cadman is not helpless.
Solomon being puny is equivalent to Aedan being compassionate.
If someone is both not skinny and helpless, then he is not exuberant.
If there is someone who is exuberant, then Stanley is not helpless.
If someone is not gentle, then he is both puny and skinny.
Someone who is compassionate is always both exuberant and not gentle.
Solomon being not exuberant and Stefan being helpless imply that Cadman is not compassionate.
Someone being both not gentle and not skinny is equivalent to being helpless and compassionate. | Stanley is not puny. | contradiction |
Cadman is gentle.
Solomon is not helpless.
Stefan is compassionate.
Stefan is exuberant.
Cadman is not puny.
Stefan is puny.
Stanley is not compassionate.
Stefan is skinny.
Cadman is skinny.
Stanley is gentle.
Solomon is not compassionate.
Solomon is not puny.If someone is gentle, then he is compassionate.
Cedric being gentle is equivalent to Cadman being not skinny.
If someone is not compassionate, then he is not helpless, and vice versa.
If Cedric is not skinny, then Cadman is not exuberant and Stanley is not helpless, and vice versa.
Robyn being not exuberant implies that Cedric is not skinny and Cadman is not helpless.
Solomon being puny is equivalent to Aedan being compassionate.
If someone is both not skinny and helpless, then he is not exuberant.
If there is someone who is exuberant, then Stanley is not helpless.
If someone is not gentle, then he is both puny and skinny.
Someone who is compassionate is always both exuberant and not gentle.
Solomon being not exuberant and Stefan being helpless imply that Cadman is not compassionate.
Someone being both not gentle and not skinny is equivalent to being helpless and compassionate. | Cadman is puny. | self_contradiction |
Cadman is gentle.
Solomon is not helpless.
Stefan is compassionate.
Stefan is exuberant.
Cadman is not puny.
Stefan is puny.
Stanley is not compassionate.
Stefan is skinny.
Cadman is skinny.
Stanley is gentle.
Solomon is not compassionate.
Solomon is not puny.If someone is gentle, then he is compassionate.
Cedric being gentle is equivalent to Cadman being not skinny.
If someone is not compassionate, then he is not helpless, and vice versa.
If Cedric is not skinny, then Cadman is not exuberant and Stanley is not helpless, and vice versa.
Robyn being not exuberant implies that Cedric is not skinny and Cadman is not helpless.
Solomon being puny is equivalent to Aedan being compassionate.
If someone is both not skinny and helpless, then he is not exuberant.
If there is someone who is exuberant, then Stanley is not helpless.
If someone is not gentle, then he is both puny and skinny.
Someone who is compassionate is always both exuberant and not gentle.
Solomon being not exuberant and Stefan being helpless imply that Cadman is not compassionate.
Someone being both not gentle and not skinny is equivalent to being helpless and compassionate. | Stanley is skinny. | entailment |
Cadman is gentle.
Solomon is not helpless.
Stefan is compassionate.
Stefan is exuberant.
Cadman is not puny.
Stefan is puny.
Stanley is not compassionate.
Stefan is skinny.
Cadman is skinny.
Stanley is gentle.
Solomon is not compassionate.
Solomon is not puny.If someone is gentle, then he is compassionate.
Cedric being gentle is equivalent to Cadman being not skinny.
If someone is not compassionate, then he is not helpless, and vice versa.
If Cedric is not skinny, then Cadman is not exuberant and Stanley is not helpless, and vice versa.
Robyn being not exuberant implies that Cedric is not skinny and Cadman is not helpless.
Solomon being puny is equivalent to Aedan being compassionate.
If someone is both not skinny and helpless, then he is not exuberant.
If there is someone who is exuberant, then Stanley is not helpless.
If someone is not gentle, then he is both puny and skinny.
Someone who is compassionate is always both exuberant and not gentle.
Solomon being not exuberant and Stefan being helpless imply that Cadman is not compassionate.
Someone being both not gentle and not skinny is equivalent to being helpless and compassionate. | Solomon is not gentle. | neutral |
Cadman is gentle.
Solomon is not helpless.
Stefan is compassionate.
Stefan is exuberant.
Cadman is not puny.
Stefan is puny.
Stanley is not compassionate.
Stefan is skinny.
Cadman is skinny.
Stanley is gentle.
Solomon is not compassionate.
Solomon is not puny.If someone is gentle, then he is compassionate.
Cedric being gentle is equivalent to Cadman being not skinny.
If someone is not compassionate, then he is not helpless, and vice versa.
If Cedric is not skinny, then Cadman is not exuberant and Stanley is not helpless, and vice versa.
Robyn being not exuberant implies that Cedric is not skinny and Cadman is not helpless.
Solomon being puny is equivalent to Aedan being compassionate.
If someone is both not skinny and helpless, then he is not exuberant.
If there is someone who is exuberant, then Stanley is not helpless.
If someone is not gentle, then he is both puny and skinny.
Someone who is compassionate is always both exuberant and not gentle.
Solomon being not exuberant and Stefan being helpless imply that Cadman is not compassionate.
Someone being both not gentle and not skinny is equivalent to being helpless and compassionate. | Stanley is helpless. | contradiction |
Cadman is gentle.
Solomon is not helpless.
Stefan is compassionate.
Stefan is exuberant.
Cadman is not puny.
Stefan is puny.
Stanley is not compassionate.
Stefan is skinny.
Cadman is skinny.
Stanley is gentle.
Solomon is not compassionate.
Solomon is not puny.If someone is gentle, then he is compassionate.
Cedric being gentle is equivalent to Cadman being not skinny.
If someone is not compassionate, then he is not helpless, and vice versa.
If Cedric is not skinny, then Cadman is not exuberant and Stanley is not helpless, and vice versa.
Robyn being not exuberant implies that Cedric is not skinny and Cadman is not helpless.
Solomon being puny is equivalent to Aedan being compassionate.
If someone is both not skinny and helpless, then he is not exuberant.
If there is someone who is exuberant, then Stanley is not helpless.
If someone is not gentle, then he is both puny and skinny.
Someone who is compassionate is always both exuberant and not gentle.
Solomon being not exuberant and Stefan being helpless imply that Cadman is not compassionate.
Someone being both not gentle and not skinny is equivalent to being helpless and compassionate. | Cadman is not skinny. | contradiction |
Cadman is gentle.
Solomon is not helpless.
Stefan is compassionate.
Stefan is exuberant.
Cadman is not puny.
Stefan is puny.
Stanley is not compassionate.
Stefan is skinny.
Cadman is skinny.
Stanley is gentle.
Solomon is not compassionate.
Solomon is not puny.If someone is gentle, then he is compassionate.
Cedric being gentle is equivalent to Cadman being not skinny.
If someone is not compassionate, then he is not helpless, and vice versa.
If Cedric is not skinny, then Cadman is not exuberant and Stanley is not helpless, and vice versa.
Robyn being not exuberant implies that Cedric is not skinny and Cadman is not helpless.
Solomon being puny is equivalent to Aedan being compassionate.
If someone is both not skinny and helpless, then he is not exuberant.
If there is someone who is exuberant, then Stanley is not helpless.
If someone is not gentle, then he is both puny and skinny.
Someone who is compassionate is always both exuberant and not gentle.
Solomon being not exuberant and Stefan being helpless imply that Cadman is not compassionate.
Someone being both not gentle and not skinny is equivalent to being helpless and compassionate. | Solomon is not compassionate. | entailment |
Cadman is gentle.
Solomon is not helpless.
Stefan is compassionate.
Stefan is exuberant.
Cadman is not puny.
Stefan is puny.
Stanley is not compassionate.
Stefan is skinny.
Cadman is skinny.
Stanley is gentle.
Solomon is not compassionate.
Solomon is not puny.If someone is gentle, then he is compassionate.
Cedric being gentle is equivalent to Cadman being not skinny.
If someone is not compassionate, then he is not helpless, and vice versa.
If Cedric is not skinny, then Cadman is not exuberant and Stanley is not helpless, and vice versa.
Robyn being not exuberant implies that Cedric is not skinny and Cadman is not helpless.
Solomon being puny is equivalent to Aedan being compassionate.
If someone is both not skinny and helpless, then he is not exuberant.
If there is someone who is exuberant, then Stanley is not helpless.
If someone is not gentle, then he is both puny and skinny.
Someone who is compassionate is always both exuberant and not gentle.
Solomon being not exuberant and Stefan being helpless imply that Cadman is not compassionate.
Someone being both not gentle and not skinny is equivalent to being helpless and compassionate. | Cadman is not compassionate. | contradiction |
Cadman is gentle.
Solomon is not helpless.
Stefan is compassionate.
Stefan is exuberant.
Cadman is not puny.
Stefan is puny.
Stanley is not compassionate.
Stefan is skinny.
Cadman is skinny.
Stanley is gentle.
Solomon is not compassionate.
Solomon is not puny.If someone is gentle, then he is compassionate.
Cedric being gentle is equivalent to Cadman being not skinny.
If someone is not compassionate, then he is not helpless, and vice versa.
If Cedric is not skinny, then Cadman is not exuberant and Stanley is not helpless, and vice versa.
Robyn being not exuberant implies that Cedric is not skinny and Cadman is not helpless.
Solomon being puny is equivalent to Aedan being compassionate.
If someone is both not skinny and helpless, then he is not exuberant.
If there is someone who is exuberant, then Stanley is not helpless.
If someone is not gentle, then he is both puny and skinny.
Someone who is compassionate is always both exuberant and not gentle.
Solomon being not exuberant and Stefan being helpless imply that Cadman is not compassionate.
Someone being both not gentle and not skinny is equivalent to being helpless and compassionate. | Stanley is not gentle. | self_contradiction |
Cadman is gentle.
Solomon is not helpless.
Stefan is compassionate.
Stefan is exuberant.
Cadman is not puny.
Stefan is puny.
Stanley is not compassionate.
Stefan is skinny.
Cadman is skinny.
Stanley is gentle.
Solomon is not compassionate.
Solomon is not puny.If someone is gentle, then he is compassionate.
Cedric being gentle is equivalent to Cadman being not skinny.
If someone is not compassionate, then he is not helpless, and vice versa.
If Cedric is not skinny, then Cadman is not exuberant and Stanley is not helpless, and vice versa.
Robyn being not exuberant implies that Cedric is not skinny and Cadman is not helpless.
Solomon being puny is equivalent to Aedan being compassionate.
If someone is both not skinny and helpless, then he is not exuberant.
If there is someone who is exuberant, then Stanley is not helpless.
If someone is not gentle, then he is both puny and skinny.
Someone who is compassionate is always both exuberant and not gentle.
Solomon being not exuberant and Stefan being helpless imply that Cadman is not compassionate.
Someone being both not gentle and not skinny is equivalent to being helpless and compassionate. | Cadman is skinny. | entailment |
Cadman is gentle.
Solomon is not helpless.
Stefan is compassionate.
Stefan is exuberant.
Cadman is not puny.
Stefan is puny.
Stanley is not compassionate.
Stefan is skinny.
Cadman is skinny.
Stanley is gentle.
Solomon is not compassionate.
Solomon is not puny.If someone is gentle, then he is compassionate.
Cedric being gentle is equivalent to Cadman being not skinny.
If someone is not compassionate, then he is not helpless, and vice versa.
If Cedric is not skinny, then Cadman is not exuberant and Stanley is not helpless, and vice versa.
Robyn being not exuberant implies that Cedric is not skinny and Cadman is not helpless.
Solomon being puny is equivalent to Aedan being compassionate.
If someone is both not skinny and helpless, then he is not exuberant.
If there is someone who is exuberant, then Stanley is not helpless.
If someone is not gentle, then he is both puny and skinny.
Someone who is compassionate is always both exuberant and not gentle.
Solomon being not exuberant and Stefan being helpless imply that Cadman is not compassionate.
Someone being both not gentle and not skinny is equivalent to being helpless and compassionate. | Robyn is not skinny. | neutral |
Carroll is not dull.
Baldwin is not zealous.
Carroll is odd.
Baldwin is not powerful.
Chapman is powerful.
Bud is not dull.
Chapman is bumpy.
Baldwin is not odd.
Jarvis is dull.
Bud is bumpy.
Jarvis is not federal.
Andrew is not zealous.As long as someone is bumpy, he is federal and zealous.
If someone is not federal and odd, then he is bumpy and not dull.
If Baldwin is dull, then Carroll is bumpy.
It can be concluded that Baldwin is bumpy and Andrew is not dull once knowing that Travis is not odd.
Someone who is dull is always not zealous.
Chapman being zealous and Jarvis being not odd imply that Chapman is powerful.
If all people are not odd, then Travis is federal.
If someone is odd or he is not bumpy, then he is powerful.
Bud being zealous is equivalent to Carroll being not bumpy.
If someone is both not dull and bumpy, then he is not odd.
If someone is not odd and bumpy, then he is not dull, and vice versa.
If someone is either odd or bumpy, then he is not federal and zealous. | Carroll is not federal. | self_contradiction |
Carroll is not dull.
Baldwin is not zealous.
Carroll is odd.
Baldwin is not powerful.
Chapman is powerful.
Bud is not dull.
Chapman is bumpy.
Baldwin is not odd.
Jarvis is dull.
Bud is bumpy.
Jarvis is not federal.
Andrew is not zealous.As long as someone is bumpy, he is federal and zealous.
If someone is not federal and odd, then he is bumpy and not dull.
If Baldwin is dull, then Carroll is bumpy.
It can be concluded that Baldwin is bumpy and Andrew is not dull once knowing that Travis is not odd.
Someone who is dull is always not zealous.
Chapman being zealous and Jarvis being not odd imply that Chapman is powerful.
If all people are not odd, then Travis is federal.
If someone is odd or he is not bumpy, then he is powerful.
Bud being zealous is equivalent to Carroll being not bumpy.
If someone is both not dull and bumpy, then he is not odd.
If someone is not odd and bumpy, then he is not dull, and vice versa.
If someone is either odd or bumpy, then he is not federal and zealous. | Carroll is bumpy. | self_contradiction |
Carroll is not dull.
Baldwin is not zealous.
Carroll is odd.
Baldwin is not powerful.
Chapman is powerful.
Bud is not dull.
Chapman is bumpy.
Baldwin is not odd.
Jarvis is dull.
Bud is bumpy.
Jarvis is not federal.
Andrew is not zealous.As long as someone is bumpy, he is federal and zealous.
If someone is not federal and odd, then he is bumpy and not dull.
If Baldwin is dull, then Carroll is bumpy.
It can be concluded that Baldwin is bumpy and Andrew is not dull once knowing that Travis is not odd.
Someone who is dull is always not zealous.
Chapman being zealous and Jarvis being not odd imply that Chapman is powerful.
If all people are not odd, then Travis is federal.
If someone is odd or he is not bumpy, then he is powerful.
Bud being zealous is equivalent to Carroll being not bumpy.
If someone is both not dull and bumpy, then he is not odd.
If someone is not odd and bumpy, then he is not dull, and vice versa.
If someone is either odd or bumpy, then he is not federal and zealous. | Travis is zealous. | neutral |
Carroll is not dull.
Baldwin is not zealous.
Carroll is odd.
Baldwin is not powerful.
Chapman is powerful.
Bud is not dull.
Chapman is bumpy.
Baldwin is not odd.
Jarvis is dull.
Bud is bumpy.
Jarvis is not federal.
Andrew is not zealous.As long as someone is bumpy, he is federal and zealous.
If someone is not federal and odd, then he is bumpy and not dull.
If Baldwin is dull, then Carroll is bumpy.
It can be concluded that Baldwin is bumpy and Andrew is not dull once knowing that Travis is not odd.
Someone who is dull is always not zealous.
Chapman being zealous and Jarvis being not odd imply that Chapman is powerful.
If all people are not odd, then Travis is federal.
If someone is odd or he is not bumpy, then he is powerful.
Bud being zealous is equivalent to Carroll being not bumpy.
If someone is both not dull and bumpy, then he is not odd.
If someone is not odd and bumpy, then he is not dull, and vice versa.
If someone is either odd or bumpy, then he is not federal and zealous. | Baldwin is odd. | contradiction |
Carroll is not dull.
Baldwin is not zealous.
Carroll is odd.
Baldwin is not powerful.
Chapman is powerful.
Bud is not dull.
Chapman is bumpy.
Baldwin is not odd.
Jarvis is dull.
Bud is bumpy.
Jarvis is not federal.
Andrew is not zealous.As long as someone is bumpy, he is federal and zealous.
If someone is not federal and odd, then he is bumpy and not dull.
If Baldwin is dull, then Carroll is bumpy.
It can be concluded that Baldwin is bumpy and Andrew is not dull once knowing that Travis is not odd.
Someone who is dull is always not zealous.
Chapman being zealous and Jarvis being not odd imply that Chapman is powerful.
If all people are not odd, then Travis is federal.
If someone is odd or he is not bumpy, then he is powerful.
Bud being zealous is equivalent to Carroll being not bumpy.
If someone is both not dull and bumpy, then he is not odd.
If someone is not odd and bumpy, then he is not dull, and vice versa.
If someone is either odd or bumpy, then he is not federal and zealous. | Carroll is not bumpy. | self_contradiction |
Carroll is not dull.
Baldwin is not zealous.
Carroll is odd.
Baldwin is not powerful.
Chapman is powerful.
Bud is not dull.
Chapman is bumpy.
Baldwin is not odd.
Jarvis is dull.
Bud is bumpy.
Jarvis is not federal.
Andrew is not zealous.As long as someone is bumpy, he is federal and zealous.
If someone is not federal and odd, then he is bumpy and not dull.
If Baldwin is dull, then Carroll is bumpy.
It can be concluded that Baldwin is bumpy and Andrew is not dull once knowing that Travis is not odd.
Someone who is dull is always not zealous.
Chapman being zealous and Jarvis being not odd imply that Chapman is powerful.
If all people are not odd, then Travis is federal.
If someone is odd or he is not bumpy, then he is powerful.
Bud being zealous is equivalent to Carroll being not bumpy.
If someone is both not dull and bumpy, then he is not odd.
If someone is not odd and bumpy, then he is not dull, and vice versa.
If someone is either odd or bumpy, then he is not federal and zealous. | Jarvis is not federal. | entailment |
Carroll is not dull.
Baldwin is not zealous.
Carroll is odd.
Baldwin is not powerful.
Chapman is powerful.
Bud is not dull.
Chapman is bumpy.
Baldwin is not odd.
Jarvis is dull.
Bud is bumpy.
Jarvis is not federal.
Andrew is not zealous.As long as someone is bumpy, he is federal and zealous.
If someone is not federal and odd, then he is bumpy and not dull.
If Baldwin is dull, then Carroll is bumpy.
It can be concluded that Baldwin is bumpy and Andrew is not dull once knowing that Travis is not odd.
Someone who is dull is always not zealous.
Chapman being zealous and Jarvis being not odd imply that Chapman is powerful.
If all people are not odd, then Travis is federal.
If someone is odd or he is not bumpy, then he is powerful.
Bud being zealous is equivalent to Carroll being not bumpy.
If someone is both not dull and bumpy, then he is not odd.
If someone is not odd and bumpy, then he is not dull, and vice versa.
If someone is either odd or bumpy, then he is not federal and zealous. | Carroll is odd. | self_contradiction |
Carroll is not dull.
Baldwin is not zealous.
Carroll is odd.
Baldwin is not powerful.
Chapman is powerful.
Bud is not dull.
Chapman is bumpy.
Baldwin is not odd.
Jarvis is dull.
Bud is bumpy.
Jarvis is not federal.
Andrew is not zealous.As long as someone is bumpy, he is federal and zealous.
If someone is not federal and odd, then he is bumpy and not dull.
If Baldwin is dull, then Carroll is bumpy.
It can be concluded that Baldwin is bumpy and Andrew is not dull once knowing that Travis is not odd.
Someone who is dull is always not zealous.
Chapman being zealous and Jarvis being not odd imply that Chapman is powerful.
If all people are not odd, then Travis is federal.
If someone is odd or he is not bumpy, then he is powerful.
Bud being zealous is equivalent to Carroll being not bumpy.
If someone is both not dull and bumpy, then he is not odd.
If someone is not odd and bumpy, then he is not dull, and vice versa.
If someone is either odd or bumpy, then he is not federal and zealous. | Travis is not odd. | neutral |
Carroll is not dull.
Baldwin is not zealous.
Carroll is odd.
Baldwin is not powerful.
Chapman is powerful.
Bud is not dull.
Chapman is bumpy.
Baldwin is not odd.
Jarvis is dull.
Bud is bumpy.
Jarvis is not federal.
Andrew is not zealous.As long as someone is bumpy, he is federal and zealous.
If someone is not federal and odd, then he is bumpy and not dull.
If Baldwin is dull, then Carroll is bumpy.
It can be concluded that Baldwin is bumpy and Andrew is not dull once knowing that Travis is not odd.
Someone who is dull is always not zealous.
Chapman being zealous and Jarvis being not odd imply that Chapman is powerful.
If all people are not odd, then Travis is federal.
If someone is odd or he is not bumpy, then he is powerful.
Bud being zealous is equivalent to Carroll being not bumpy.
If someone is both not dull and bumpy, then he is not odd.
If someone is not odd and bumpy, then he is not dull, and vice versa.
If someone is either odd or bumpy, then he is not federal and zealous. | Andrew is federal. | neutral |
Carroll is not dull.
Baldwin is not zealous.
Carroll is odd.
Baldwin is not powerful.
Chapman is powerful.
Bud is not dull.
Chapman is bumpy.
Baldwin is not odd.
Jarvis is dull.
Bud is bumpy.
Jarvis is not federal.
Andrew is not zealous.As long as someone is bumpy, he is federal and zealous.
If someone is not federal and odd, then he is bumpy and not dull.
If Baldwin is dull, then Carroll is bumpy.
It can be concluded that Baldwin is bumpy and Andrew is not dull once knowing that Travis is not odd.
Someone who is dull is always not zealous.
Chapman being zealous and Jarvis being not odd imply that Chapman is powerful.
If all people are not odd, then Travis is federal.
If someone is odd or he is not bumpy, then he is powerful.
Bud being zealous is equivalent to Carroll being not bumpy.
If someone is both not dull and bumpy, then he is not odd.
If someone is not odd and bumpy, then he is not dull, and vice versa.
If someone is either odd or bumpy, then he is not federal and zealous. | Jarvis is dull. | entailment |
Carroll is not dull.
Baldwin is not zealous.
Carroll is odd.
Baldwin is not powerful.
Chapman is powerful.
Bud is not dull.
Chapman is bumpy.
Baldwin is not odd.
Jarvis is dull.
Bud is bumpy.
Jarvis is not federal.
Andrew is not zealous.As long as someone is bumpy, he is federal and zealous.
If someone is not federal and odd, then he is bumpy and not dull.
If Baldwin is dull, then Carroll is bumpy.
It can be concluded that Baldwin is bumpy and Andrew is not dull once knowing that Travis is not odd.
Someone who is dull is always not zealous.
Chapman being zealous and Jarvis being not odd imply that Chapman is powerful.
If all people are not odd, then Travis is federal.
If someone is odd or he is not bumpy, then he is powerful.
Bud being zealous is equivalent to Carroll being not bumpy.
If someone is both not dull and bumpy, then he is not odd.
If someone is not odd and bumpy, then he is not dull, and vice versa.
If someone is either odd or bumpy, then he is not federal and zealous. | Jarvis is zealous. | contradiction |
Carroll is not dull.
Baldwin is not zealous.
Carroll is odd.
Baldwin is not powerful.
Chapman is powerful.
Bud is not dull.
Chapman is bumpy.
Baldwin is not odd.
Jarvis is dull.
Bud is bumpy.
Jarvis is not federal.
Andrew is not zealous.As long as someone is bumpy, he is federal and zealous.
If someone is not federal and odd, then he is bumpy and not dull.
If Baldwin is dull, then Carroll is bumpy.
It can be concluded that Baldwin is bumpy and Andrew is not dull once knowing that Travis is not odd.
Someone who is dull is always not zealous.
Chapman being zealous and Jarvis being not odd imply that Chapman is powerful.
If all people are not odd, then Travis is federal.
If someone is odd or he is not bumpy, then he is powerful.
Bud being zealous is equivalent to Carroll being not bumpy.
If someone is both not dull and bumpy, then he is not odd.
If someone is not odd and bumpy, then he is not dull, and vice versa.
If someone is either odd or bumpy, then he is not federal and zealous. | Travis is not bumpy. | neutral |
Carroll is not dull.
Baldwin is not zealous.
Carroll is odd.
Baldwin is not powerful.
Chapman is powerful.
Bud is not dull.
Chapman is bumpy.
Baldwin is not odd.
Jarvis is dull.
Bud is bumpy.
Jarvis is not federal.
Andrew is not zealous.As long as someone is bumpy, he is federal and zealous.
If someone is not federal and odd, then he is bumpy and not dull.
If Baldwin is dull, then Carroll is bumpy.
It can be concluded that Baldwin is bumpy and Andrew is not dull once knowing that Travis is not odd.
Someone who is dull is always not zealous.
Chapman being zealous and Jarvis being not odd imply that Chapman is powerful.
If all people are not odd, then Travis is federal.
If someone is odd or he is not bumpy, then he is powerful.
Bud being zealous is equivalent to Carroll being not bumpy.
If someone is both not dull and bumpy, then he is not odd.
If someone is not odd and bumpy, then he is not dull, and vice versa.
If someone is either odd or bumpy, then he is not federal and zealous. | Baldwin is not zealous. | entailment |
Carroll is not dull.
Baldwin is not zealous.
Carroll is odd.
Baldwin is not powerful.
Chapman is powerful.
Bud is not dull.
Chapman is bumpy.
Baldwin is not odd.
Jarvis is dull.
Bud is bumpy.
Jarvis is not federal.
Andrew is not zealous.As long as someone is bumpy, he is federal and zealous.
If someone is not federal and odd, then he is bumpy and not dull.
If Baldwin is dull, then Carroll is bumpy.
It can be concluded that Baldwin is bumpy and Andrew is not dull once knowing that Travis is not odd.
Someone who is dull is always not zealous.
Chapman being zealous and Jarvis being not odd imply that Chapman is powerful.
If all people are not odd, then Travis is federal.
If someone is odd or he is not bumpy, then he is powerful.
Bud being zealous is equivalent to Carroll being not bumpy.
If someone is both not dull and bumpy, then he is not odd.
If someone is not odd and bumpy, then he is not dull, and vice versa.
If someone is either odd or bumpy, then he is not federal and zealous. | Carroll is not odd. | self_contradiction |
Carroll is not dull.
Baldwin is not zealous.
Carroll is odd.
Baldwin is not powerful.
Chapman is powerful.
Bud is not dull.
Chapman is bumpy.
Baldwin is not odd.
Jarvis is dull.
Bud is bumpy.
Jarvis is not federal.
Andrew is not zealous.As long as someone is bumpy, he is federal and zealous.
If someone is not federal and odd, then he is bumpy and not dull.
If Baldwin is dull, then Carroll is bumpy.
It can be concluded that Baldwin is bumpy and Andrew is not dull once knowing that Travis is not odd.
Someone who is dull is always not zealous.
Chapman being zealous and Jarvis being not odd imply that Chapman is powerful.
If all people are not odd, then Travis is federal.
If someone is odd or he is not bumpy, then he is powerful.
Bud being zealous is equivalent to Carroll being not bumpy.
If someone is both not dull and bumpy, then he is not odd.
If someone is not odd and bumpy, then he is not dull, and vice versa.
If someone is either odd or bumpy, then he is not federal and zealous. | Jarvis is not dull. | contradiction |
Carroll is not dull.
Baldwin is not zealous.
Carroll is odd.
Baldwin is not powerful.
Chapman is powerful.
Bud is not dull.
Chapman is bumpy.
Baldwin is not odd.
Jarvis is dull.
Bud is bumpy.
Jarvis is not federal.
Andrew is not zealous.As long as someone is bumpy, he is federal and zealous.
If someone is not federal and odd, then he is bumpy and not dull.
If Baldwin is dull, then Carroll is bumpy.
It can be concluded that Baldwin is bumpy and Andrew is not dull once knowing that Travis is not odd.
Someone who is dull is always not zealous.
Chapman being zealous and Jarvis being not odd imply that Chapman is powerful.
If all people are not odd, then Travis is federal.
If someone is odd or he is not bumpy, then he is powerful.
Bud being zealous is equivalent to Carroll being not bumpy.
If someone is both not dull and bumpy, then he is not odd.
If someone is not odd and bumpy, then he is not dull, and vice versa.
If someone is either odd or bumpy, then he is not federal and zealous. | Bud is not dull. | entailment |
Carroll is not dull.
Baldwin is not zealous.
Carroll is odd.
Baldwin is not powerful.
Chapman is powerful.
Bud is not dull.
Chapman is bumpy.
Baldwin is not odd.
Jarvis is dull.
Bud is bumpy.
Jarvis is not federal.
Andrew is not zealous.As long as someone is bumpy, he is federal and zealous.
If someone is not federal and odd, then he is bumpy and not dull.
If Baldwin is dull, then Carroll is bumpy.
It can be concluded that Baldwin is bumpy and Andrew is not dull once knowing that Travis is not odd.
Someone who is dull is always not zealous.
Chapman being zealous and Jarvis being not odd imply that Chapman is powerful.
If all people are not odd, then Travis is federal.
If someone is odd or he is not bumpy, then he is powerful.
Bud being zealous is equivalent to Carroll being not bumpy.
If someone is both not dull and bumpy, then he is not odd.
If someone is not odd and bumpy, then he is not dull, and vice versa.
If someone is either odd or bumpy, then he is not federal and zealous. | Jarvis is federal. | contradiction |
Carroll is not dull.
Baldwin is not zealous.
Carroll is odd.
Baldwin is not powerful.
Chapman is powerful.
Bud is not dull.
Chapman is bumpy.
Baldwin is not odd.
Jarvis is dull.
Bud is bumpy.
Jarvis is not federal.
Andrew is not zealous.As long as someone is bumpy, he is federal and zealous.
If someone is not federal and odd, then he is bumpy and not dull.
If Baldwin is dull, then Carroll is bumpy.
It can be concluded that Baldwin is bumpy and Andrew is not dull once knowing that Travis is not odd.
Someone who is dull is always not zealous.
Chapman being zealous and Jarvis being not odd imply that Chapman is powerful.
If all people are not odd, then Travis is federal.
If someone is odd or he is not bumpy, then he is powerful.
Bud being zealous is equivalent to Carroll being not bumpy.
If someone is both not dull and bumpy, then he is not odd.
If someone is not odd and bumpy, then he is not dull, and vice versa.
If someone is either odd or bumpy, then he is not federal and zealous. | Bud is not zealous. | contradiction |
Carroll is not dull.
Baldwin is not zealous.
Carroll is odd.
Baldwin is not powerful.
Chapman is powerful.
Bud is not dull.
Chapman is bumpy.
Baldwin is not odd.
Jarvis is dull.
Bud is bumpy.
Jarvis is not federal.
Andrew is not zealous.As long as someone is bumpy, he is federal and zealous.
If someone is not federal and odd, then he is bumpy and not dull.
If Baldwin is dull, then Carroll is bumpy.
It can be concluded that Baldwin is bumpy and Andrew is not dull once knowing that Travis is not odd.
Someone who is dull is always not zealous.
Chapman being zealous and Jarvis being not odd imply that Chapman is powerful.
If all people are not odd, then Travis is federal.
If someone is odd or he is not bumpy, then he is powerful.
Bud being zealous is equivalent to Carroll being not bumpy.
If someone is both not dull and bumpy, then he is not odd.
If someone is not odd and bumpy, then he is not dull, and vice versa.
If someone is either odd or bumpy, then he is not federal and zealous. | Andrew is dull. | neutral |
Carroll is not dull.
Baldwin is not zealous.
Carroll is odd.
Baldwin is not powerful.
Chapman is powerful.
Bud is not dull.
Chapman is bumpy.
Baldwin is not odd.
Jarvis is dull.
Bud is bumpy.
Jarvis is not federal.
Andrew is not zealous.As long as someone is bumpy, he is federal and zealous.
If someone is not federal and odd, then he is bumpy and not dull.
If Baldwin is dull, then Carroll is bumpy.
It can be concluded that Baldwin is bumpy and Andrew is not dull once knowing that Travis is not odd.
Someone who is dull is always not zealous.
Chapman being zealous and Jarvis being not odd imply that Chapman is powerful.
If all people are not odd, then Travis is federal.
If someone is odd or he is not bumpy, then he is powerful.
Bud being zealous is equivalent to Carroll being not bumpy.
If someone is both not dull and bumpy, then he is not odd.
If someone is not odd and bumpy, then he is not dull, and vice versa.
If someone is either odd or bumpy, then he is not federal and zealous. | Carroll is powerful. | entailment |
Maddox is not foolish.
Chandler is not ugly.
Andrew is foolish.
Chandler is unhappy.
Andrew is not relevant.
Maddox is not depressed.
Chandler is relevant.
Carroll is relevant.
Gale is not relevant.
Chalmers is ugly.
Carroll is not depressed.
Chandler is not depressed.If Chalmers is relevant or Carroll is foolish, then Bud is not ugly.
If there is at least one people who is unhappy, then Andrew is foolish and Gale is ugly.
Someone being unhappy is equivalent to being depressed.
If someone is both depressed and ugly, then he is disobedient.
Gale being not disobedient implies that Bud is unhappy and Chalmers is ugly.
Someone being both not disobedient and depressed is equivalent to being unhappy.
Someone who is unhappy is always both disobedient and not relevant.
Carroll being disobedient or Gale being depressed implies that Carroll is foolish.
If Andrew is unhappy and Gale is disobedient, then Chandler is depressed and Bud is not foolish, and vice versa.
If all people are not foolish, then Gale is disobedient.
Gale being disobedient and Andrew being not depressed imply that Chalmers is unhappy.
If there is someone who is both ugly and relevant, then Maddox is disobedient. | Chalmers is not foolish. | neutral |
Maddox is not foolish.
Chandler is not ugly.
Andrew is foolish.
Chandler is unhappy.
Andrew is not relevant.
Maddox is not depressed.
Chandler is relevant.
Carroll is relevant.
Gale is not relevant.
Chalmers is ugly.
Carroll is not depressed.
Chandler is not depressed.If Chalmers is relevant or Carroll is foolish, then Bud is not ugly.
If there is at least one people who is unhappy, then Andrew is foolish and Gale is ugly.
Someone being unhappy is equivalent to being depressed.
If someone is both depressed and ugly, then he is disobedient.
Gale being not disobedient implies that Bud is unhappy and Chalmers is ugly.
Someone being both not disobedient and depressed is equivalent to being unhappy.
Someone who is unhappy is always both disobedient and not relevant.
Carroll being disobedient or Gale being depressed implies that Carroll is foolish.
If Andrew is unhappy and Gale is disobedient, then Chandler is depressed and Bud is not foolish, and vice versa.
If all people are not foolish, then Gale is disobedient.
Gale being disobedient and Andrew being not depressed imply that Chalmers is unhappy.
If there is someone who is both ugly and relevant, then Maddox is disobedient. | Gale is relevant. | contradiction |
Maddox is not foolish.
Chandler is not ugly.
Andrew is foolish.
Chandler is unhappy.
Andrew is not relevant.
Maddox is not depressed.
Chandler is relevant.
Carroll is relevant.
Gale is not relevant.
Chalmers is ugly.
Carroll is not depressed.
Chandler is not depressed.If Chalmers is relevant or Carroll is foolish, then Bud is not ugly.
If there is at least one people who is unhappy, then Andrew is foolish and Gale is ugly.
Someone being unhappy is equivalent to being depressed.
If someone is both depressed and ugly, then he is disobedient.
Gale being not disobedient implies that Bud is unhappy and Chalmers is ugly.
Someone being both not disobedient and depressed is equivalent to being unhappy.
Someone who is unhappy is always both disobedient and not relevant.
Carroll being disobedient or Gale being depressed implies that Carroll is foolish.
If Andrew is unhappy and Gale is disobedient, then Chandler is depressed and Bud is not foolish, and vice versa.
If all people are not foolish, then Gale is disobedient.
Gale being disobedient and Andrew being not depressed imply that Chalmers is unhappy.
If there is someone who is both ugly and relevant, then Maddox is disobedient. | Chalmers is ugly. | entailment |
Maddox is not foolish.
Chandler is not ugly.
Andrew is foolish.
Chandler is unhappy.
Andrew is not relevant.
Maddox is not depressed.
Chandler is relevant.
Carroll is relevant.
Gale is not relevant.
Chalmers is ugly.
Carroll is not depressed.
Chandler is not depressed.If Chalmers is relevant or Carroll is foolish, then Bud is not ugly.
If there is at least one people who is unhappy, then Andrew is foolish and Gale is ugly.
Someone being unhappy is equivalent to being depressed.
If someone is both depressed and ugly, then he is disobedient.
Gale being not disobedient implies that Bud is unhappy and Chalmers is ugly.
Someone being both not disobedient and depressed is equivalent to being unhappy.
Someone who is unhappy is always both disobedient and not relevant.
Carroll being disobedient or Gale being depressed implies that Carroll is foolish.
If Andrew is unhappy and Gale is disobedient, then Chandler is depressed and Bud is not foolish, and vice versa.
If all people are not foolish, then Gale is disobedient.
Gale being disobedient and Andrew being not depressed imply that Chalmers is unhappy.
If there is someone who is both ugly and relevant, then Maddox is disobedient. | Maddox is unhappy. | neutral |
Maddox is not foolish.
Chandler is not ugly.
Andrew is foolish.
Chandler is unhappy.
Andrew is not relevant.
Maddox is not depressed.
Chandler is relevant.
Carroll is relevant.
Gale is not relevant.
Chalmers is ugly.
Carroll is not depressed.
Chandler is not depressed.If Chalmers is relevant or Carroll is foolish, then Bud is not ugly.
If there is at least one people who is unhappy, then Andrew is foolish and Gale is ugly.
Someone being unhappy is equivalent to being depressed.
If someone is both depressed and ugly, then he is disobedient.
Gale being not disobedient implies that Bud is unhappy and Chalmers is ugly.
Someone being both not disobedient and depressed is equivalent to being unhappy.
Someone who is unhappy is always both disobedient and not relevant.
Carroll being disobedient or Gale being depressed implies that Carroll is foolish.
If Andrew is unhappy and Gale is disobedient, then Chandler is depressed and Bud is not foolish, and vice versa.
If all people are not foolish, then Gale is disobedient.
Gale being disobedient and Andrew being not depressed imply that Chalmers is unhappy.
If there is someone who is both ugly and relevant, then Maddox is disobedient. | Andrew is not foolish. | contradiction |
Maddox is not foolish.
Chandler is not ugly.
Andrew is foolish.
Chandler is unhappy.
Andrew is not relevant.
Maddox is not depressed.
Chandler is relevant.
Carroll is relevant.
Gale is not relevant.
Chalmers is ugly.
Carroll is not depressed.
Chandler is not depressed.If Chalmers is relevant or Carroll is foolish, then Bud is not ugly.
If there is at least one people who is unhappy, then Andrew is foolish and Gale is ugly.
Someone being unhappy is equivalent to being depressed.
If someone is both depressed and ugly, then he is disobedient.
Gale being not disobedient implies that Bud is unhappy and Chalmers is ugly.
Someone being both not disobedient and depressed is equivalent to being unhappy.
Someone who is unhappy is always both disobedient and not relevant.
Carroll being disobedient or Gale being depressed implies that Carroll is foolish.
If Andrew is unhappy and Gale is disobedient, then Chandler is depressed and Bud is not foolish, and vice versa.
If all people are not foolish, then Gale is disobedient.
Gale being disobedient and Andrew being not depressed imply that Chalmers is unhappy.
If there is someone who is both ugly and relevant, then Maddox is disobedient. | Gale is not relevant. | entailment |
Maddox is not foolish.
Chandler is not ugly.
Andrew is foolish.
Chandler is unhappy.
Andrew is not relevant.
Maddox is not depressed.
Chandler is relevant.
Carroll is relevant.
Gale is not relevant.
Chalmers is ugly.
Carroll is not depressed.
Chandler is not depressed.If Chalmers is relevant or Carroll is foolish, then Bud is not ugly.
If there is at least one people who is unhappy, then Andrew is foolish and Gale is ugly.
Someone being unhappy is equivalent to being depressed.
If someone is both depressed and ugly, then he is disobedient.
Gale being not disobedient implies that Bud is unhappy and Chalmers is ugly.
Someone being both not disobedient and depressed is equivalent to being unhappy.
Someone who is unhappy is always both disobedient and not relevant.
Carroll being disobedient or Gale being depressed implies that Carroll is foolish.
If Andrew is unhappy and Gale is disobedient, then Chandler is depressed and Bud is not foolish, and vice versa.
If all people are not foolish, then Gale is disobedient.
Gale being disobedient and Andrew being not depressed imply that Chalmers is unhappy.
If there is someone who is both ugly and relevant, then Maddox is disobedient. | Carroll is not foolish. | neutral |
Maddox is not foolish.
Chandler is not ugly.
Andrew is foolish.
Chandler is unhappy.
Andrew is not relevant.
Maddox is not depressed.
Chandler is relevant.
Carroll is relevant.
Gale is not relevant.
Chalmers is ugly.
Carroll is not depressed.
Chandler is not depressed.If Chalmers is relevant or Carroll is foolish, then Bud is not ugly.
If there is at least one people who is unhappy, then Andrew is foolish and Gale is ugly.
Someone being unhappy is equivalent to being depressed.
If someone is both depressed and ugly, then he is disobedient.
Gale being not disobedient implies that Bud is unhappy and Chalmers is ugly.
Someone being both not disobedient and depressed is equivalent to being unhappy.
Someone who is unhappy is always both disobedient and not relevant.
Carroll being disobedient or Gale being depressed implies that Carroll is foolish.
If Andrew is unhappy and Gale is disobedient, then Chandler is depressed and Bud is not foolish, and vice versa.
If all people are not foolish, then Gale is disobedient.
Gale being disobedient and Andrew being not depressed imply that Chalmers is unhappy.
If there is someone who is both ugly and relevant, then Maddox is disobedient. | Gale is not depressed. | neutral |
Maddox is not foolish.
Chandler is not ugly.
Andrew is foolish.
Chandler is unhappy.
Andrew is not relevant.
Maddox is not depressed.
Chandler is relevant.
Carroll is relevant.
Gale is not relevant.
Chalmers is ugly.
Carroll is not depressed.
Chandler is not depressed.If Chalmers is relevant or Carroll is foolish, then Bud is not ugly.
If there is at least one people who is unhappy, then Andrew is foolish and Gale is ugly.
Someone being unhappy is equivalent to being depressed.
If someone is both depressed and ugly, then he is disobedient.
Gale being not disobedient implies that Bud is unhappy and Chalmers is ugly.
Someone being both not disobedient and depressed is equivalent to being unhappy.
Someone who is unhappy is always both disobedient and not relevant.
Carroll being disobedient or Gale being depressed implies that Carroll is foolish.
If Andrew is unhappy and Gale is disobedient, then Chandler is depressed and Bud is not foolish, and vice versa.
If all people are not foolish, then Gale is disobedient.
Gale being disobedient and Andrew being not depressed imply that Chalmers is unhappy.
If there is someone who is both ugly and relevant, then Maddox is disobedient. | Andrew is foolish. | entailment |
Maddox is not foolish.
Chandler is not ugly.
Andrew is foolish.
Chandler is unhappy.
Andrew is not relevant.
Maddox is not depressed.
Chandler is relevant.
Carroll is relevant.
Gale is not relevant.
Chalmers is ugly.
Carroll is not depressed.
Chandler is not depressed.If Chalmers is relevant or Carroll is foolish, then Bud is not ugly.
If there is at least one people who is unhappy, then Andrew is foolish and Gale is ugly.
Someone being unhappy is equivalent to being depressed.
If someone is both depressed and ugly, then he is disobedient.
Gale being not disobedient implies that Bud is unhappy and Chalmers is ugly.
Someone being both not disobedient and depressed is equivalent to being unhappy.
Someone who is unhappy is always both disobedient and not relevant.
Carroll being disobedient or Gale being depressed implies that Carroll is foolish.
If Andrew is unhappy and Gale is disobedient, then Chandler is depressed and Bud is not foolish, and vice versa.
If all people are not foolish, then Gale is disobedient.
Gale being disobedient and Andrew being not depressed imply that Chalmers is unhappy.
If there is someone who is both ugly and relevant, then Maddox is disobedient. | Chalmers is not ugly. | contradiction |
Maddox is not foolish.
Chandler is not ugly.
Andrew is foolish.
Chandler is unhappy.
Andrew is not relevant.
Maddox is not depressed.
Chandler is relevant.
Carroll is relevant.
Gale is not relevant.
Chalmers is ugly.
Carroll is not depressed.
Chandler is not depressed.If Chalmers is relevant or Carroll is foolish, then Bud is not ugly.
If there is at least one people who is unhappy, then Andrew is foolish and Gale is ugly.
Someone being unhappy is equivalent to being depressed.
If someone is both depressed and ugly, then he is disobedient.
Gale being not disobedient implies that Bud is unhappy and Chalmers is ugly.
Someone being both not disobedient and depressed is equivalent to being unhappy.
Someone who is unhappy is always both disobedient and not relevant.
Carroll being disobedient or Gale being depressed implies that Carroll is foolish.
If Andrew is unhappy and Gale is disobedient, then Chandler is depressed and Bud is not foolish, and vice versa.
If all people are not foolish, then Gale is disobedient.
Gale being disobedient and Andrew being not depressed imply that Chalmers is unhappy.
If there is someone who is both ugly and relevant, then Maddox is disobedient. | Chandler is depressed. | self_contradiction |
Maddox is not foolish.
Chandler is not ugly.
Andrew is foolish.
Chandler is unhappy.
Andrew is not relevant.
Maddox is not depressed.
Chandler is relevant.
Carroll is relevant.
Gale is not relevant.
Chalmers is ugly.
Carroll is not depressed.
Chandler is not depressed.If Chalmers is relevant or Carroll is foolish, then Bud is not ugly.
If there is at least one people who is unhappy, then Andrew is foolish and Gale is ugly.
Someone being unhappy is equivalent to being depressed.
If someone is both depressed and ugly, then he is disobedient.
Gale being not disobedient implies that Bud is unhappy and Chalmers is ugly.
Someone being both not disobedient and depressed is equivalent to being unhappy.
Someone who is unhappy is always both disobedient and not relevant.
Carroll being disobedient or Gale being depressed implies that Carroll is foolish.
If Andrew is unhappy and Gale is disobedient, then Chandler is depressed and Bud is not foolish, and vice versa.
If all people are not foolish, then Gale is disobedient.
Gale being disobedient and Andrew being not depressed imply that Chalmers is unhappy.
If there is someone who is both ugly and relevant, then Maddox is disobedient. | Chandler is not disobedient. | self_contradiction |
Maddox is not foolish.
Chandler is not ugly.
Andrew is foolish.
Chandler is unhappy.
Andrew is not relevant.
Maddox is not depressed.
Chandler is relevant.
Carroll is relevant.
Gale is not relevant.
Chalmers is ugly.
Carroll is not depressed.
Chandler is not depressed.If Chalmers is relevant or Carroll is foolish, then Bud is not ugly.
If there is at least one people who is unhappy, then Andrew is foolish and Gale is ugly.
Someone being unhappy is equivalent to being depressed.
If someone is both depressed and ugly, then he is disobedient.
Gale being not disobedient implies that Bud is unhappy and Chalmers is ugly.
Someone being both not disobedient and depressed is equivalent to being unhappy.
Someone who is unhappy is always both disobedient and not relevant.
Carroll being disobedient or Gale being depressed implies that Carroll is foolish.
If Andrew is unhappy and Gale is disobedient, then Chandler is depressed and Bud is not foolish, and vice versa.
If all people are not foolish, then Gale is disobedient.
Gale being disobedient and Andrew being not depressed imply that Chalmers is unhappy.
If there is someone who is both ugly and relevant, then Maddox is disobedient. | Chandler is not depressed. | self_contradiction |
Maddox is not foolish.
Chandler is not ugly.
Andrew is foolish.
Chandler is unhappy.
Andrew is not relevant.
Maddox is not depressed.
Chandler is relevant.
Carroll is relevant.
Gale is not relevant.
Chalmers is ugly.
Carroll is not depressed.
Chandler is not depressed.If Chalmers is relevant or Carroll is foolish, then Bud is not ugly.
If there is at least one people who is unhappy, then Andrew is foolish and Gale is ugly.
Someone being unhappy is equivalent to being depressed.
If someone is both depressed and ugly, then he is disobedient.
Gale being not disobedient implies that Bud is unhappy and Chalmers is ugly.
Someone being both not disobedient and depressed is equivalent to being unhappy.
Someone who is unhappy is always both disobedient and not relevant.
Carroll being disobedient or Gale being depressed implies that Carroll is foolish.
If Andrew is unhappy and Gale is disobedient, then Chandler is depressed and Bud is not foolish, and vice versa.
If all people are not foolish, then Gale is disobedient.
Gale being disobedient and Andrew being not depressed imply that Chalmers is unhappy.
If there is someone who is both ugly and relevant, then Maddox is disobedient. | Maddox is not disobedient. | contradiction |
Maddox is not foolish.
Chandler is not ugly.
Andrew is foolish.
Chandler is unhappy.
Andrew is not relevant.
Maddox is not depressed.
Chandler is relevant.
Carroll is relevant.
Gale is not relevant.
Chalmers is ugly.
Carroll is not depressed.
Chandler is not depressed.If Chalmers is relevant or Carroll is foolish, then Bud is not ugly.
If there is at least one people who is unhappy, then Andrew is foolish and Gale is ugly.
Someone being unhappy is equivalent to being depressed.
If someone is both depressed and ugly, then he is disobedient.
Gale being not disobedient implies that Bud is unhappy and Chalmers is ugly.
Someone being both not disobedient and depressed is equivalent to being unhappy.
Someone who is unhappy is always both disobedient and not relevant.
Carroll being disobedient or Gale being depressed implies that Carroll is foolish.
If Andrew is unhappy and Gale is disobedient, then Chandler is depressed and Bud is not foolish, and vice versa.
If all people are not foolish, then Gale is disobedient.
Gale being disobedient and Andrew being not depressed imply that Chalmers is unhappy.
If there is someone who is both ugly and relevant, then Maddox is disobedient. | Chandler is relevant. | self_contradiction |
Maddox is not foolish.
Chandler is not ugly.
Andrew is foolish.
Chandler is unhappy.
Andrew is not relevant.
Maddox is not depressed.
Chandler is relevant.
Carroll is relevant.
Gale is not relevant.
Chalmers is ugly.
Carroll is not depressed.
Chandler is not depressed.If Chalmers is relevant or Carroll is foolish, then Bud is not ugly.
If there is at least one people who is unhappy, then Andrew is foolish and Gale is ugly.
Someone being unhappy is equivalent to being depressed.
If someone is both depressed and ugly, then he is disobedient.
Gale being not disobedient implies that Bud is unhappy and Chalmers is ugly.
Someone being both not disobedient and depressed is equivalent to being unhappy.
Someone who is unhappy is always both disobedient and not relevant.
Carroll being disobedient or Gale being depressed implies that Carroll is foolish.
If Andrew is unhappy and Gale is disobedient, then Chandler is depressed and Bud is not foolish, and vice versa.
If all people are not foolish, then Gale is disobedient.
Gale being disobedient and Andrew being not depressed imply that Chalmers is unhappy.
If there is someone who is both ugly and relevant, then Maddox is disobedient. | Maddox is disobedient. | entailment |
Maddox is not foolish.
Chandler is not ugly.
Andrew is foolish.
Chandler is unhappy.
Andrew is not relevant.
Maddox is not depressed.
Chandler is relevant.
Carroll is relevant.
Gale is not relevant.
Chalmers is ugly.
Carroll is not depressed.
Chandler is not depressed.If Chalmers is relevant or Carroll is foolish, then Bud is not ugly.
If there is at least one people who is unhappy, then Andrew is foolish and Gale is ugly.
Someone being unhappy is equivalent to being depressed.
If someone is both depressed and ugly, then he is disobedient.
Gale being not disobedient implies that Bud is unhappy and Chalmers is ugly.
Someone being both not disobedient and depressed is equivalent to being unhappy.
Someone who is unhappy is always both disobedient and not relevant.
Carroll being disobedient or Gale being depressed implies that Carroll is foolish.
If Andrew is unhappy and Gale is disobedient, then Chandler is depressed and Bud is not foolish, and vice versa.
If all people are not foolish, then Gale is disobedient.
Gale being disobedient and Andrew being not depressed imply that Chalmers is unhappy.
If there is someone who is both ugly and relevant, then Maddox is disobedient. | Carroll is unhappy. | neutral |
Maddox is not foolish.
Chandler is not ugly.
Andrew is foolish.
Chandler is unhappy.
Andrew is not relevant.
Maddox is not depressed.
Chandler is relevant.
Carroll is relevant.
Gale is not relevant.
Chalmers is ugly.
Carroll is not depressed.
Chandler is not depressed.If Chalmers is relevant or Carroll is foolish, then Bud is not ugly.
If there is at least one people who is unhappy, then Andrew is foolish and Gale is ugly.
Someone being unhappy is equivalent to being depressed.
If someone is both depressed and ugly, then he is disobedient.
Gale being not disobedient implies that Bud is unhappy and Chalmers is ugly.
Someone being both not disobedient and depressed is equivalent to being unhappy.
Someone who is unhappy is always both disobedient and not relevant.
Carroll being disobedient or Gale being depressed implies that Carroll is foolish.
If Andrew is unhappy and Gale is disobedient, then Chandler is depressed and Bud is not foolish, and vice versa.
If all people are not foolish, then Gale is disobedient.
Gale being disobedient and Andrew being not depressed imply that Chalmers is unhappy.
If there is someone who is both ugly and relevant, then Maddox is disobedient. | Chandler is disobedient. | self_contradiction |
Maddox is not foolish.
Chandler is not ugly.
Andrew is foolish.
Chandler is unhappy.
Andrew is not relevant.
Maddox is not depressed.
Chandler is relevant.
Carroll is relevant.
Gale is not relevant.
Chalmers is ugly.
Carroll is not depressed.
Chandler is not depressed.If Chalmers is relevant or Carroll is foolish, then Bud is not ugly.
If there is at least one people who is unhappy, then Andrew is foolish and Gale is ugly.
Someone being unhappy is equivalent to being depressed.
If someone is both depressed and ugly, then he is disobedient.
Gale being not disobedient implies that Bud is unhappy and Chalmers is ugly.
Someone being both not disobedient and depressed is equivalent to being unhappy.
Someone who is unhappy is always both disobedient and not relevant.
Carroll being disobedient or Gale being depressed implies that Carroll is foolish.
If Andrew is unhappy and Gale is disobedient, then Chandler is depressed and Bud is not foolish, and vice versa.
If all people are not foolish, then Gale is disobedient.
Gale being disobedient and Andrew being not depressed imply that Chalmers is unhappy.
If there is someone who is both ugly and relevant, then Maddox is disobedient. | Chandler is unhappy. | entailment |
Maddox is not foolish.
Chandler is not ugly.
Andrew is foolish.
Chandler is unhappy.
Andrew is not relevant.
Maddox is not depressed.
Chandler is relevant.
Carroll is relevant.
Gale is not relevant.
Chalmers is ugly.
Carroll is not depressed.
Chandler is not depressed.If Chalmers is relevant or Carroll is foolish, then Bud is not ugly.
If there is at least one people who is unhappy, then Andrew is foolish and Gale is ugly.
Someone being unhappy is equivalent to being depressed.
If someone is both depressed and ugly, then he is disobedient.
Gale being not disobedient implies that Bud is unhappy and Chalmers is ugly.
Someone being both not disobedient and depressed is equivalent to being unhappy.
Someone who is unhappy is always both disobedient and not relevant.
Carroll being disobedient or Gale being depressed implies that Carroll is foolish.
If Andrew is unhappy and Gale is disobedient, then Chandler is depressed and Bud is not foolish, and vice versa.
If all people are not foolish, then Gale is disobedient.
Gale being disobedient and Andrew being not depressed imply that Chalmers is unhappy.
If there is someone who is both ugly and relevant, then Maddox is disobedient. | Chandler is ugly. | contradiction |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.