premise
stringlengths 923
1.41k
| hypothesis
stringlengths 11
33
| label
stringclasses 4
values |
|---|---|---|
Melville is cooperative.
Jason is not hard-working.
Titus is adventurous.
Kurt is gentle.
Kurt is not adventurous.
Jason is adventurous.
Kirk is not puny.
Kurt is courteous.
Hanna is not adventurous.
Kurt is not hard-working.
Hanna is puny.
Kirk is courteous.If Jason is puny and Hanna is hard-working, then Hanna is gentle and Jason is not cooperative, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not cooperative and not puny, then Hanna is courteous.
If Hanna is puny, then Kurt is adventurous and Melville is not courteous.
It can be concluded that Kurt is not courteous once knowing that Kurt is cooperative or Jason is hard-working.
If someone is cooperative or he is not puny, then he is not hard-working.
If there is someone who is both puny and not courteous, then Melville is not cooperative.
If Hanna is courteous, then Jason is cooperative, and vice versa.
Someone being both not cooperative and courteous is equivalent to being adventurous.
If there is someone who is both puny and cooperative, then Titus is not gentle and Kurt is courteous.
Someone is hard-working and not gentle if and only if he is not courteous.
Someone being both not courteous and hard-working is equivalent to being adventurous and cooperative.
Someone who is not courteous is always not adventurous. | Hanna is hard-working. | neutral |
Melville is cooperative.
Jason is not hard-working.
Titus is adventurous.
Kurt is gentle.
Kurt is not adventurous.
Jason is adventurous.
Kirk is not puny.
Kurt is courteous.
Hanna is not adventurous.
Kurt is not hard-working.
Hanna is puny.
Kirk is courteous.If Jason is puny and Hanna is hard-working, then Hanna is gentle and Jason is not cooperative, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not cooperative and not puny, then Hanna is courteous.
If Hanna is puny, then Kurt is adventurous and Melville is not courteous.
It can be concluded that Kurt is not courteous once knowing that Kurt is cooperative or Jason is hard-working.
If someone is cooperative or he is not puny, then he is not hard-working.
If there is someone who is both puny and not courteous, then Melville is not cooperative.
If Hanna is courteous, then Jason is cooperative, and vice versa.
Someone being both not cooperative and courteous is equivalent to being adventurous.
If there is someone who is both puny and cooperative, then Titus is not gentle and Kurt is courteous.
Someone is hard-working and not gentle if and only if he is not courteous.
Someone being both not courteous and hard-working is equivalent to being adventurous and cooperative.
Someone who is not courteous is always not adventurous. | Jason is puny. | neutral |
Melville is cooperative.
Jason is not hard-working.
Titus is adventurous.
Kurt is gentle.
Kurt is not adventurous.
Jason is adventurous.
Kirk is not puny.
Kurt is courteous.
Hanna is not adventurous.
Kurt is not hard-working.
Hanna is puny.
Kirk is courteous.If Jason is puny and Hanna is hard-working, then Hanna is gentle and Jason is not cooperative, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not cooperative and not puny, then Hanna is courteous.
If Hanna is puny, then Kurt is adventurous and Melville is not courteous.
It can be concluded that Kurt is not courteous once knowing that Kurt is cooperative or Jason is hard-working.
If someone is cooperative or he is not puny, then he is not hard-working.
If there is someone who is both puny and not courteous, then Melville is not cooperative.
If Hanna is courteous, then Jason is cooperative, and vice versa.
Someone being both not cooperative and courteous is equivalent to being adventurous.
If there is someone who is both puny and cooperative, then Titus is not gentle and Kurt is courteous.
Someone is hard-working and not gentle if and only if he is not courteous.
Someone being both not courteous and hard-working is equivalent to being adventurous and cooperative.
Someone who is not courteous is always not adventurous. | Melville is adventurous. | self_contradiction |
Melville is cooperative.
Jason is not hard-working.
Titus is adventurous.
Kurt is gentle.
Kurt is not adventurous.
Jason is adventurous.
Kirk is not puny.
Kurt is courteous.
Hanna is not adventurous.
Kurt is not hard-working.
Hanna is puny.
Kirk is courteous.If Jason is puny and Hanna is hard-working, then Hanna is gentle and Jason is not cooperative, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not cooperative and not puny, then Hanna is courteous.
If Hanna is puny, then Kurt is adventurous and Melville is not courteous.
It can be concluded that Kurt is not courteous once knowing that Kurt is cooperative or Jason is hard-working.
If someone is cooperative or he is not puny, then he is not hard-working.
If there is someone who is both puny and not courteous, then Melville is not cooperative.
If Hanna is courteous, then Jason is cooperative, and vice versa.
Someone being both not cooperative and courteous is equivalent to being adventurous.
If there is someone who is both puny and cooperative, then Titus is not gentle and Kurt is courteous.
Someone is hard-working and not gentle if and only if he is not courteous.
Someone being both not courteous and hard-working is equivalent to being adventurous and cooperative.
Someone who is not courteous is always not adventurous. | Titus is not gentle. | neutral |
Melville is cooperative.
Jason is not hard-working.
Titus is adventurous.
Kurt is gentle.
Kurt is not adventurous.
Jason is adventurous.
Kirk is not puny.
Kurt is courteous.
Hanna is not adventurous.
Kurt is not hard-working.
Hanna is puny.
Kirk is courteous.If Jason is puny and Hanna is hard-working, then Hanna is gentle and Jason is not cooperative, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not cooperative and not puny, then Hanna is courteous.
If Hanna is puny, then Kurt is adventurous and Melville is not courteous.
It can be concluded that Kurt is not courteous once knowing that Kurt is cooperative or Jason is hard-working.
If someone is cooperative or he is not puny, then he is not hard-working.
If there is someone who is both puny and not courteous, then Melville is not cooperative.
If Hanna is courteous, then Jason is cooperative, and vice versa.
Someone being both not cooperative and courteous is equivalent to being adventurous.
If there is someone who is both puny and cooperative, then Titus is not gentle and Kurt is courteous.
Someone is hard-working and not gentle if and only if he is not courteous.
Someone being both not courteous and hard-working is equivalent to being adventurous and cooperative.
Someone who is not courteous is always not adventurous. | Hanna is not puny. | contradiction |
Melville is cooperative.
Jason is not hard-working.
Titus is adventurous.
Kurt is gentle.
Kurt is not adventurous.
Jason is adventurous.
Kirk is not puny.
Kurt is courteous.
Hanna is not adventurous.
Kurt is not hard-working.
Hanna is puny.
Kirk is courteous.If Jason is puny and Hanna is hard-working, then Hanna is gentle and Jason is not cooperative, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not cooperative and not puny, then Hanna is courteous.
If Hanna is puny, then Kurt is adventurous and Melville is not courteous.
It can be concluded that Kurt is not courteous once knowing that Kurt is cooperative or Jason is hard-working.
If someone is cooperative or he is not puny, then he is not hard-working.
If there is someone who is both puny and not courteous, then Melville is not cooperative.
If Hanna is courteous, then Jason is cooperative, and vice versa.
Someone being both not cooperative and courteous is equivalent to being adventurous.
If there is someone who is both puny and cooperative, then Titus is not gentle and Kurt is courteous.
Someone is hard-working and not gentle if and only if he is not courteous.
Someone being both not courteous and hard-working is equivalent to being adventurous and cooperative.
Someone who is not courteous is always not adventurous. | Kirk is courteous. | entailment |
Melville is cooperative.
Jason is not hard-working.
Titus is adventurous.
Kurt is gentle.
Kurt is not adventurous.
Jason is adventurous.
Kirk is not puny.
Kurt is courteous.
Hanna is not adventurous.
Kurt is not hard-working.
Hanna is puny.
Kirk is courteous.If Jason is puny and Hanna is hard-working, then Hanna is gentle and Jason is not cooperative, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not cooperative and not puny, then Hanna is courteous.
If Hanna is puny, then Kurt is adventurous and Melville is not courteous.
It can be concluded that Kurt is not courteous once knowing that Kurt is cooperative or Jason is hard-working.
If someone is cooperative or he is not puny, then he is not hard-working.
If there is someone who is both puny and not courteous, then Melville is not cooperative.
If Hanna is courteous, then Jason is cooperative, and vice versa.
Someone being both not cooperative and courteous is equivalent to being adventurous.
If there is someone who is both puny and cooperative, then Titus is not gentle and Kurt is courteous.
Someone is hard-working and not gentle if and only if he is not courteous.
Someone being both not courteous and hard-working is equivalent to being adventurous and cooperative.
Someone who is not courteous is always not adventurous. | Kurt is adventurous. | self_contradiction |
Melville is cooperative.
Jason is not hard-working.
Titus is adventurous.
Kurt is gentle.
Kurt is not adventurous.
Jason is adventurous.
Kirk is not puny.
Kurt is courteous.
Hanna is not adventurous.
Kurt is not hard-working.
Hanna is puny.
Kirk is courteous.If Jason is puny and Hanna is hard-working, then Hanna is gentle and Jason is not cooperative, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not cooperative and not puny, then Hanna is courteous.
If Hanna is puny, then Kurt is adventurous and Melville is not courteous.
It can be concluded that Kurt is not courteous once knowing that Kurt is cooperative or Jason is hard-working.
If someone is cooperative or he is not puny, then he is not hard-working.
If there is someone who is both puny and not courteous, then Melville is not cooperative.
If Hanna is courteous, then Jason is cooperative, and vice versa.
Someone being both not cooperative and courteous is equivalent to being adventurous.
If there is someone who is both puny and cooperative, then Titus is not gentle and Kurt is courteous.
Someone is hard-working and not gentle if and only if he is not courteous.
Someone being both not courteous and hard-working is equivalent to being adventurous and cooperative.
Someone who is not courteous is always not adventurous. | Melville is gentle. | contradiction |
Melville is cooperative.
Jason is not hard-working.
Titus is adventurous.
Kurt is gentle.
Kurt is not adventurous.
Jason is adventurous.
Kirk is not puny.
Kurt is courteous.
Hanna is not adventurous.
Kurt is not hard-working.
Hanna is puny.
Kirk is courteous.If Jason is puny and Hanna is hard-working, then Hanna is gentle and Jason is not cooperative, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not cooperative and not puny, then Hanna is courteous.
If Hanna is puny, then Kurt is adventurous and Melville is not courteous.
It can be concluded that Kurt is not courteous once knowing that Kurt is cooperative or Jason is hard-working.
If someone is cooperative or he is not puny, then he is not hard-working.
If there is someone who is both puny and not courteous, then Melville is not cooperative.
If Hanna is courteous, then Jason is cooperative, and vice versa.
Someone being both not cooperative and courteous is equivalent to being adventurous.
If there is someone who is both puny and cooperative, then Titus is not gentle and Kurt is courteous.
Someone is hard-working and not gentle if and only if he is not courteous.
Someone being both not courteous and hard-working is equivalent to being adventurous and cooperative.
Someone who is not courteous is always not adventurous. | Kirk is not courteous. | contradiction |
Melville is cooperative.
Jason is not hard-working.
Titus is adventurous.
Kurt is gentle.
Kurt is not adventurous.
Jason is adventurous.
Kirk is not puny.
Kurt is courteous.
Hanna is not adventurous.
Kurt is not hard-working.
Hanna is puny.
Kirk is courteous.If Jason is puny and Hanna is hard-working, then Hanna is gentle and Jason is not cooperative, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not cooperative and not puny, then Hanna is courteous.
If Hanna is puny, then Kurt is adventurous and Melville is not courteous.
It can be concluded that Kurt is not courteous once knowing that Kurt is cooperative or Jason is hard-working.
If someone is cooperative or he is not puny, then he is not hard-working.
If there is someone who is both puny and not courteous, then Melville is not cooperative.
If Hanna is courteous, then Jason is cooperative, and vice versa.
Someone being both not cooperative and courteous is equivalent to being adventurous.
If there is someone who is both puny and cooperative, then Titus is not gentle and Kurt is courteous.
Someone is hard-working and not gentle if and only if he is not courteous.
Someone being both not courteous and hard-working is equivalent to being adventurous and cooperative.
Someone who is not courteous is always not adventurous. | Kurt is not adventurous. | self_contradiction |
Melville is cooperative.
Jason is not hard-working.
Titus is adventurous.
Kurt is gentle.
Kurt is not adventurous.
Jason is adventurous.
Kirk is not puny.
Kurt is courteous.
Hanna is not adventurous.
Kurt is not hard-working.
Hanna is puny.
Kirk is courteous.If Jason is puny and Hanna is hard-working, then Hanna is gentle and Jason is not cooperative, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not cooperative and not puny, then Hanna is courteous.
If Hanna is puny, then Kurt is adventurous and Melville is not courteous.
It can be concluded that Kurt is not courteous once knowing that Kurt is cooperative or Jason is hard-working.
If someone is cooperative or he is not puny, then he is not hard-working.
If there is someone who is both puny and not courteous, then Melville is not cooperative.
If Hanna is courteous, then Jason is cooperative, and vice versa.
Someone being both not cooperative and courteous is equivalent to being adventurous.
If there is someone who is both puny and cooperative, then Titus is not gentle and Kurt is courteous.
Someone is hard-working and not gentle if and only if he is not courteous.
Someone being both not courteous and hard-working is equivalent to being adventurous and cooperative.
Someone who is not courteous is always not adventurous. | Jason is not cooperative. | entailment |
Melville is cooperative.
Jason is not hard-working.
Titus is adventurous.
Kurt is gentle.
Kurt is not adventurous.
Jason is adventurous.
Kirk is not puny.
Kurt is courteous.
Hanna is not adventurous.
Kurt is not hard-working.
Hanna is puny.
Kirk is courteous.If Jason is puny and Hanna is hard-working, then Hanna is gentle and Jason is not cooperative, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not cooperative and not puny, then Hanna is courteous.
If Hanna is puny, then Kurt is adventurous and Melville is not courteous.
It can be concluded that Kurt is not courteous once knowing that Kurt is cooperative or Jason is hard-working.
If someone is cooperative or he is not puny, then he is not hard-working.
If there is someone who is both puny and not courteous, then Melville is not cooperative.
If Hanna is courteous, then Jason is cooperative, and vice versa.
Someone being both not cooperative and courteous is equivalent to being adventurous.
If there is someone who is both puny and cooperative, then Titus is not gentle and Kurt is courteous.
Someone is hard-working and not gentle if and only if he is not courteous.
Someone being both not courteous and hard-working is equivalent to being adventurous and cooperative.
Someone who is not courteous is always not adventurous. | Kurt is gentle. | entailment |
Melville is cooperative.
Jason is not hard-working.
Titus is adventurous.
Kurt is gentle.
Kurt is not adventurous.
Jason is adventurous.
Kirk is not puny.
Kurt is courteous.
Hanna is not adventurous.
Kurt is not hard-working.
Hanna is puny.
Kirk is courteous.If Jason is puny and Hanna is hard-working, then Hanna is gentle and Jason is not cooperative, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not cooperative and not puny, then Hanna is courteous.
If Hanna is puny, then Kurt is adventurous and Melville is not courteous.
It can be concluded that Kurt is not courteous once knowing that Kurt is cooperative or Jason is hard-working.
If someone is cooperative or he is not puny, then he is not hard-working.
If there is someone who is both puny and not courteous, then Melville is not cooperative.
If Hanna is courteous, then Jason is cooperative, and vice versa.
Someone being both not cooperative and courteous is equivalent to being adventurous.
If there is someone who is both puny and cooperative, then Titus is not gentle and Kurt is courteous.
Someone is hard-working and not gentle if and only if he is not courteous.
Someone being both not courteous and hard-working is equivalent to being adventurous and cooperative.
Someone who is not courteous is always not adventurous. | Jason is not adventurous. | contradiction |
Melville is cooperative.
Jason is not hard-working.
Titus is adventurous.
Kurt is gentle.
Kurt is not adventurous.
Jason is adventurous.
Kirk is not puny.
Kurt is courteous.
Hanna is not adventurous.
Kurt is not hard-working.
Hanna is puny.
Kirk is courteous.If Jason is puny and Hanna is hard-working, then Hanna is gentle and Jason is not cooperative, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not cooperative and not puny, then Hanna is courteous.
If Hanna is puny, then Kurt is adventurous and Melville is not courteous.
It can be concluded that Kurt is not courteous once knowing that Kurt is cooperative or Jason is hard-working.
If someone is cooperative or he is not puny, then he is not hard-working.
If there is someone who is both puny and not courteous, then Melville is not cooperative.
If Hanna is courteous, then Jason is cooperative, and vice versa.
Someone being both not cooperative and courteous is equivalent to being adventurous.
If there is someone who is both puny and cooperative, then Titus is not gentle and Kurt is courteous.
Someone is hard-working and not gentle if and only if he is not courteous.
Someone being both not courteous and hard-working is equivalent to being adventurous and cooperative.
Someone who is not courteous is always not adventurous. | Jason is not gentle. | neutral |
Melville is cooperative.
Jason is not hard-working.
Titus is adventurous.
Kurt is gentle.
Kurt is not adventurous.
Jason is adventurous.
Kirk is not puny.
Kurt is courteous.
Hanna is not adventurous.
Kurt is not hard-working.
Hanna is puny.
Kirk is courteous.If Jason is puny and Hanna is hard-working, then Hanna is gentle and Jason is not cooperative, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not cooperative and not puny, then Hanna is courteous.
If Hanna is puny, then Kurt is adventurous and Melville is not courteous.
It can be concluded that Kurt is not courteous once knowing that Kurt is cooperative or Jason is hard-working.
If someone is cooperative or he is not puny, then he is not hard-working.
If there is someone who is both puny and not courteous, then Melville is not cooperative.
If Hanna is courteous, then Jason is cooperative, and vice versa.
Someone being both not cooperative and courteous is equivalent to being adventurous.
If there is someone who is both puny and cooperative, then Titus is not gentle and Kurt is courteous.
Someone is hard-working and not gentle if and only if he is not courteous.
Someone being both not courteous and hard-working is equivalent to being adventurous and cooperative.
Someone who is not courteous is always not adventurous. | Melville is not cooperative. | self_contradiction |
Melville is cooperative.
Jason is not hard-working.
Titus is adventurous.
Kurt is gentle.
Kurt is not adventurous.
Jason is adventurous.
Kirk is not puny.
Kurt is courteous.
Hanna is not adventurous.
Kurt is not hard-working.
Hanna is puny.
Kirk is courteous.If Jason is puny and Hanna is hard-working, then Hanna is gentle and Jason is not cooperative, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not cooperative and not puny, then Hanna is courteous.
If Hanna is puny, then Kurt is adventurous and Melville is not courteous.
It can be concluded that Kurt is not courteous once knowing that Kurt is cooperative or Jason is hard-working.
If someone is cooperative or he is not puny, then he is not hard-working.
If there is someone who is both puny and not courteous, then Melville is not cooperative.
If Hanna is courteous, then Jason is cooperative, and vice versa.
Someone being both not cooperative and courteous is equivalent to being adventurous.
If there is someone who is both puny and cooperative, then Titus is not gentle and Kurt is courteous.
Someone is hard-working and not gentle if and only if he is not courteous.
Someone being both not courteous and hard-working is equivalent to being adventurous and cooperative.
Someone who is not courteous is always not adventurous. | Melville is courteous. | self_contradiction |
Melville is cooperative.
Jason is not hard-working.
Titus is adventurous.
Kurt is gentle.
Kurt is not adventurous.
Jason is adventurous.
Kirk is not puny.
Kurt is courteous.
Hanna is not adventurous.
Kurt is not hard-working.
Hanna is puny.
Kirk is courteous.If Jason is puny and Hanna is hard-working, then Hanna is gentle and Jason is not cooperative, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not cooperative and not puny, then Hanna is courteous.
If Hanna is puny, then Kurt is adventurous and Melville is not courteous.
It can be concluded that Kurt is not courteous once knowing that Kurt is cooperative or Jason is hard-working.
If someone is cooperative or he is not puny, then he is not hard-working.
If there is someone who is both puny and not courteous, then Melville is not cooperative.
If Hanna is courteous, then Jason is cooperative, and vice versa.
Someone being both not cooperative and courteous is equivalent to being adventurous.
If there is someone who is both puny and cooperative, then Titus is not gentle and Kurt is courteous.
Someone is hard-working and not gentle if and only if he is not courteous.
Someone being both not courteous and hard-working is equivalent to being adventurous and cooperative.
Someone who is not courteous is always not adventurous. | Titus is courteous. | entailment |
Melville is cooperative.
Jason is not hard-working.
Titus is adventurous.
Kurt is gentle.
Kurt is not adventurous.
Jason is adventurous.
Kirk is not puny.
Kurt is courteous.
Hanna is not adventurous.
Kurt is not hard-working.
Hanna is puny.
Kirk is courteous.If Jason is puny and Hanna is hard-working, then Hanna is gentle and Jason is not cooperative, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not cooperative and not puny, then Hanna is courteous.
If Hanna is puny, then Kurt is adventurous and Melville is not courteous.
It can be concluded that Kurt is not courteous once knowing that Kurt is cooperative or Jason is hard-working.
If someone is cooperative or he is not puny, then he is not hard-working.
If there is someone who is both puny and not courteous, then Melville is not cooperative.
If Hanna is courteous, then Jason is cooperative, and vice versa.
Someone being both not cooperative and courteous is equivalent to being adventurous.
If there is someone who is both puny and cooperative, then Titus is not gentle and Kurt is courteous.
Someone is hard-working and not gentle if and only if he is not courteous.
Someone being both not courteous and hard-working is equivalent to being adventurous and cooperative.
Someone who is not courteous is always not adventurous. | Melville is not gentle. | entailment |
Melville is cooperative.
Jason is not hard-working.
Titus is adventurous.
Kurt is gentle.
Kurt is not adventurous.
Jason is adventurous.
Kirk is not puny.
Kurt is courteous.
Hanna is not adventurous.
Kurt is not hard-working.
Hanna is puny.
Kirk is courteous.If Jason is puny and Hanna is hard-working, then Hanna is gentle and Jason is not cooperative, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not cooperative and not puny, then Hanna is courteous.
If Hanna is puny, then Kurt is adventurous and Melville is not courteous.
It can be concluded that Kurt is not courteous once knowing that Kurt is cooperative or Jason is hard-working.
If someone is cooperative or he is not puny, then he is not hard-working.
If there is someone who is both puny and not courteous, then Melville is not cooperative.
If Hanna is courteous, then Jason is cooperative, and vice versa.
Someone being both not cooperative and courteous is equivalent to being adventurous.
If there is someone who is both puny and cooperative, then Titus is not gentle and Kurt is courteous.
Someone is hard-working and not gentle if and only if he is not courteous.
Someone being both not courteous and hard-working is equivalent to being adventurous and cooperative.
Someone who is not courteous is always not adventurous. | Alberto is not courteous. | neutral |
Melville is cooperative.
Jason is not hard-working.
Titus is adventurous.
Kurt is gentle.
Kurt is not adventurous.
Jason is adventurous.
Kirk is not puny.
Kurt is courteous.
Hanna is not adventurous.
Kurt is not hard-working.
Hanna is puny.
Kirk is courteous.If Jason is puny and Hanna is hard-working, then Hanna is gentle and Jason is not cooperative, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not cooperative and not puny, then Hanna is courteous.
If Hanna is puny, then Kurt is adventurous and Melville is not courteous.
It can be concluded that Kurt is not courteous once knowing that Kurt is cooperative or Jason is hard-working.
If someone is cooperative or he is not puny, then he is not hard-working.
If there is someone who is both puny and not courteous, then Melville is not cooperative.
If Hanna is courteous, then Jason is cooperative, and vice versa.
Someone being both not cooperative and courteous is equivalent to being adventurous.
If there is someone who is both puny and cooperative, then Titus is not gentle and Kurt is courteous.
Someone is hard-working and not gentle if and only if he is not courteous.
Someone being both not courteous and hard-working is equivalent to being adventurous and cooperative.
Someone who is not courteous is always not adventurous. | Kurt is cooperative. | contradiction |
Luna is not helpful.
Arvel is motionless.
Shelley is not annoying.
Hadwin is motionless.
Homer is not annoying.
Shelley is not untidy.
Hadwin is not cute.
Hadwin is not helpful.
Luna is annoying.
Shelley is not better.
Luna is untidy.
Luna is motionless.If there is someone who is not cute, then Homer is not untidy and Robyn is not helpful.
If someone who is not annoying is also not untidy, then he is better.
Someone who is not better is always not untidy.
If there is at least one people who is both better and motionless, then Theobold is not helpful.
If there is at least one people who is untidy, then Homer is not helpful.
Someone being better is equivalent to being motionless.
Someone being both not motionless and better is equivalent to being helpful.
Someone who is not untidy is always better.
Shelley being better implies that Arvel is not annoying.
Someone being both not helpful and motionless is equivalent to being cute and not better.
Luna being not helpful implies that Theobold is not untidy.
If Robyn is not cute, then Hadwin is better. | Hadwin is cute. | self_contradiction |
Luna is not helpful.
Arvel is motionless.
Shelley is not annoying.
Hadwin is motionless.
Homer is not annoying.
Shelley is not untidy.
Hadwin is not cute.
Hadwin is not helpful.
Luna is annoying.
Shelley is not better.
Luna is untidy.
Luna is motionless.If there is someone who is not cute, then Homer is not untidy and Robyn is not helpful.
If someone who is not annoying is also not untidy, then he is better.
Someone who is not better is always not untidy.
If there is at least one people who is both better and motionless, then Theobold is not helpful.
If there is at least one people who is untidy, then Homer is not helpful.
Someone being better is equivalent to being motionless.
Someone being both not motionless and better is equivalent to being helpful.
Someone who is not untidy is always better.
Shelley being better implies that Arvel is not annoying.
Someone being both not helpful and motionless is equivalent to being cute and not better.
Luna being not helpful implies that Theobold is not untidy.
If Robyn is not cute, then Hadwin is better. | Robyn is motionless. | neutral |
Luna is not helpful.
Arvel is motionless.
Shelley is not annoying.
Hadwin is motionless.
Homer is not annoying.
Shelley is not untidy.
Hadwin is not cute.
Hadwin is not helpful.
Luna is annoying.
Shelley is not better.
Luna is untidy.
Luna is motionless.If there is someone who is not cute, then Homer is not untidy and Robyn is not helpful.
If someone who is not annoying is also not untidy, then he is better.
Someone who is not better is always not untidy.
If there is at least one people who is both better and motionless, then Theobold is not helpful.
If there is at least one people who is untidy, then Homer is not helpful.
Someone being better is equivalent to being motionless.
Someone being both not motionless and better is equivalent to being helpful.
Someone who is not untidy is always better.
Shelley being better implies that Arvel is not annoying.
Someone being both not helpful and motionless is equivalent to being cute and not better.
Luna being not helpful implies that Theobold is not untidy.
If Robyn is not cute, then Hadwin is better. | Robyn is not better. | neutral |
Luna is not helpful.
Arvel is motionless.
Shelley is not annoying.
Hadwin is motionless.
Homer is not annoying.
Shelley is not untidy.
Hadwin is not cute.
Hadwin is not helpful.
Luna is annoying.
Shelley is not better.
Luna is untidy.
Luna is motionless.If there is someone who is not cute, then Homer is not untidy and Robyn is not helpful.
If someone who is not annoying is also not untidy, then he is better.
Someone who is not better is always not untidy.
If there is at least one people who is both better and motionless, then Theobold is not helpful.
If there is at least one people who is untidy, then Homer is not helpful.
Someone being better is equivalent to being motionless.
Someone being both not motionless and better is equivalent to being helpful.
Someone who is not untidy is always better.
Shelley being better implies that Arvel is not annoying.
Someone being both not helpful and motionless is equivalent to being cute and not better.
Luna being not helpful implies that Theobold is not untidy.
If Robyn is not cute, then Hadwin is better. | Hadwin is untidy. | contradiction |
Luna is not helpful.
Arvel is motionless.
Shelley is not annoying.
Hadwin is motionless.
Homer is not annoying.
Shelley is not untidy.
Hadwin is not cute.
Hadwin is not helpful.
Luna is annoying.
Shelley is not better.
Luna is untidy.
Luna is motionless.If there is someone who is not cute, then Homer is not untidy and Robyn is not helpful.
If someone who is not annoying is also not untidy, then he is better.
Someone who is not better is always not untidy.
If there is at least one people who is both better and motionless, then Theobold is not helpful.
If there is at least one people who is untidy, then Homer is not helpful.
Someone being better is equivalent to being motionless.
Someone being both not motionless and better is equivalent to being helpful.
Someone who is not untidy is always better.
Shelley being better implies that Arvel is not annoying.
Someone being both not helpful and motionless is equivalent to being cute and not better.
Luna being not helpful implies that Theobold is not untidy.
If Robyn is not cute, then Hadwin is better. | Homer is not better. | self_contradiction |
Luna is not helpful.
Arvel is motionless.
Shelley is not annoying.
Hadwin is motionless.
Homer is not annoying.
Shelley is not untidy.
Hadwin is not cute.
Hadwin is not helpful.
Luna is annoying.
Shelley is not better.
Luna is untidy.
Luna is motionless.If there is someone who is not cute, then Homer is not untidy and Robyn is not helpful.
If someone who is not annoying is also not untidy, then he is better.
Someone who is not better is always not untidy.
If there is at least one people who is both better and motionless, then Theobold is not helpful.
If there is at least one people who is untidy, then Homer is not helpful.
Someone being better is equivalent to being motionless.
Someone being both not motionless and better is equivalent to being helpful.
Someone who is not untidy is always better.
Shelley being better implies that Arvel is not annoying.
Someone being both not helpful and motionless is equivalent to being cute and not better.
Luna being not helpful implies that Theobold is not untidy.
If Robyn is not cute, then Hadwin is better. | Shelley is not better. | self_contradiction |
Luna is not helpful.
Arvel is motionless.
Shelley is not annoying.
Hadwin is motionless.
Homer is not annoying.
Shelley is not untidy.
Hadwin is not cute.
Hadwin is not helpful.
Luna is annoying.
Shelley is not better.
Luna is untidy.
Luna is motionless.If there is someone who is not cute, then Homer is not untidy and Robyn is not helpful.
If someone who is not annoying is also not untidy, then he is better.
Someone who is not better is always not untidy.
If there is at least one people who is both better and motionless, then Theobold is not helpful.
If there is at least one people who is untidy, then Homer is not helpful.
Someone being better is equivalent to being motionless.
Someone being both not motionless and better is equivalent to being helpful.
Someone who is not untidy is always better.
Shelley being better implies that Arvel is not annoying.
Someone being both not helpful and motionless is equivalent to being cute and not better.
Luna being not helpful implies that Theobold is not untidy.
If Robyn is not cute, then Hadwin is better. | Homer is not motionless. | contradiction |
Luna is not helpful.
Arvel is motionless.
Shelley is not annoying.
Hadwin is motionless.
Homer is not annoying.
Shelley is not untidy.
Hadwin is not cute.
Hadwin is not helpful.
Luna is annoying.
Shelley is not better.
Luna is untidy.
Luna is motionless.If there is someone who is not cute, then Homer is not untidy and Robyn is not helpful.
If someone who is not annoying is also not untidy, then he is better.
Someone who is not better is always not untidy.
If there is at least one people who is both better and motionless, then Theobold is not helpful.
If there is at least one people who is untidy, then Homer is not helpful.
Someone being better is equivalent to being motionless.
Someone being both not motionless and better is equivalent to being helpful.
Someone who is not untidy is always better.
Shelley being better implies that Arvel is not annoying.
Someone being both not helpful and motionless is equivalent to being cute and not better.
Luna being not helpful implies that Theobold is not untidy.
If Robyn is not cute, then Hadwin is better. | Robyn is not untidy. | neutral |
Luna is not helpful.
Arvel is motionless.
Shelley is not annoying.
Hadwin is motionless.
Homer is not annoying.
Shelley is not untidy.
Hadwin is not cute.
Hadwin is not helpful.
Luna is annoying.
Shelley is not better.
Luna is untidy.
Luna is motionless.If there is someone who is not cute, then Homer is not untidy and Robyn is not helpful.
If someone who is not annoying is also not untidy, then he is better.
Someone who is not better is always not untidy.
If there is at least one people who is both better and motionless, then Theobold is not helpful.
If there is at least one people who is untidy, then Homer is not helpful.
Someone being better is equivalent to being motionless.
Someone being both not motionless and better is equivalent to being helpful.
Someone who is not untidy is always better.
Shelley being better implies that Arvel is not annoying.
Someone being both not helpful and motionless is equivalent to being cute and not better.
Luna being not helpful implies that Theobold is not untidy.
If Robyn is not cute, then Hadwin is better. | Shelley is annoying. | contradiction |
Luna is not helpful.
Arvel is motionless.
Shelley is not annoying.
Hadwin is motionless.
Homer is not annoying.
Shelley is not untidy.
Hadwin is not cute.
Hadwin is not helpful.
Luna is annoying.
Shelley is not better.
Luna is untidy.
Luna is motionless.If there is someone who is not cute, then Homer is not untidy and Robyn is not helpful.
If someone who is not annoying is also not untidy, then he is better.
Someone who is not better is always not untidy.
If there is at least one people who is both better and motionless, then Theobold is not helpful.
If there is at least one people who is untidy, then Homer is not helpful.
Someone being better is equivalent to being motionless.
Someone being both not motionless and better is equivalent to being helpful.
Someone who is not untidy is always better.
Shelley being better implies that Arvel is not annoying.
Someone being both not helpful and motionless is equivalent to being cute and not better.
Luna being not helpful implies that Theobold is not untidy.
If Robyn is not cute, then Hadwin is better. | Homer is annoying. | contradiction |
Luna is not helpful.
Arvel is motionless.
Shelley is not annoying.
Hadwin is motionless.
Homer is not annoying.
Shelley is not untidy.
Hadwin is not cute.
Hadwin is not helpful.
Luna is annoying.
Shelley is not better.
Luna is untidy.
Luna is motionless.If there is someone who is not cute, then Homer is not untidy and Robyn is not helpful.
If someone who is not annoying is also not untidy, then he is better.
Someone who is not better is always not untidy.
If there is at least one people who is both better and motionless, then Theobold is not helpful.
If there is at least one people who is untidy, then Homer is not helpful.
Someone being better is equivalent to being motionless.
Someone being both not motionless and better is equivalent to being helpful.
Someone who is not untidy is always better.
Shelley being better implies that Arvel is not annoying.
Someone being both not helpful and motionless is equivalent to being cute and not better.
Luna being not helpful implies that Theobold is not untidy.
If Robyn is not cute, then Hadwin is better. | Theobold is not untidy. | entailment |
Luna is not helpful.
Arvel is motionless.
Shelley is not annoying.
Hadwin is motionless.
Homer is not annoying.
Shelley is not untidy.
Hadwin is not cute.
Hadwin is not helpful.
Luna is annoying.
Shelley is not better.
Luna is untidy.
Luna is motionless.If there is someone who is not cute, then Homer is not untidy and Robyn is not helpful.
If someone who is not annoying is also not untidy, then he is better.
Someone who is not better is always not untidy.
If there is at least one people who is both better and motionless, then Theobold is not helpful.
If there is at least one people who is untidy, then Homer is not helpful.
Someone being better is equivalent to being motionless.
Someone being both not motionless and better is equivalent to being helpful.
Someone who is not untidy is always better.
Shelley being better implies that Arvel is not annoying.
Someone being both not helpful and motionless is equivalent to being cute and not better.
Luna being not helpful implies that Theobold is not untidy.
If Robyn is not cute, then Hadwin is better. | Hadwin is not untidy. | entailment |
Luna is not helpful.
Arvel is motionless.
Shelley is not annoying.
Hadwin is motionless.
Homer is not annoying.
Shelley is not untidy.
Hadwin is not cute.
Hadwin is not helpful.
Luna is annoying.
Shelley is not better.
Luna is untidy.
Luna is motionless.If there is someone who is not cute, then Homer is not untidy and Robyn is not helpful.
If someone who is not annoying is also not untidy, then he is better.
Someone who is not better is always not untidy.
If there is at least one people who is both better and motionless, then Theobold is not helpful.
If there is at least one people who is untidy, then Homer is not helpful.
Someone being better is equivalent to being motionless.
Someone being both not motionless and better is equivalent to being helpful.
Someone who is not untidy is always better.
Shelley being better implies that Arvel is not annoying.
Someone being both not helpful and motionless is equivalent to being cute and not better.
Luna being not helpful implies that Theobold is not untidy.
If Robyn is not cute, then Hadwin is better. | Theobold is better. | self_contradiction |
Luna is not helpful.
Arvel is motionless.
Shelley is not annoying.
Hadwin is motionless.
Homer is not annoying.
Shelley is not untidy.
Hadwin is not cute.
Hadwin is not helpful.
Luna is annoying.
Shelley is not better.
Luna is untidy.
Luna is motionless.If there is someone who is not cute, then Homer is not untidy and Robyn is not helpful.
If someone who is not annoying is also not untidy, then he is better.
Someone who is not better is always not untidy.
If there is at least one people who is both better and motionless, then Theobold is not helpful.
If there is at least one people who is untidy, then Homer is not helpful.
Someone being better is equivalent to being motionless.
Someone being both not motionless and better is equivalent to being helpful.
Someone who is not untidy is always better.
Shelley being better implies that Arvel is not annoying.
Someone being both not helpful and motionless is equivalent to being cute and not better.
Luna being not helpful implies that Theobold is not untidy.
If Robyn is not cute, then Hadwin is better. | Homer is cute. | entailment |
Luna is not helpful.
Arvel is motionless.
Shelley is not annoying.
Hadwin is motionless.
Homer is not annoying.
Shelley is not untidy.
Hadwin is not cute.
Hadwin is not helpful.
Luna is annoying.
Shelley is not better.
Luna is untidy.
Luna is motionless.If there is someone who is not cute, then Homer is not untidy and Robyn is not helpful.
If someone who is not annoying is also not untidy, then he is better.
Someone who is not better is always not untidy.
If there is at least one people who is both better and motionless, then Theobold is not helpful.
If there is at least one people who is untidy, then Homer is not helpful.
Someone being better is equivalent to being motionless.
Someone being both not motionless and better is equivalent to being helpful.
Someone who is not untidy is always better.
Shelley being better implies that Arvel is not annoying.
Someone being both not helpful and motionless is equivalent to being cute and not better.
Luna being not helpful implies that Theobold is not untidy.
If Robyn is not cute, then Hadwin is better. | Robyn is not motionless. | neutral |
Luna is not helpful.
Arvel is motionless.
Shelley is not annoying.
Hadwin is motionless.
Homer is not annoying.
Shelley is not untidy.
Hadwin is not cute.
Hadwin is not helpful.
Luna is annoying.
Shelley is not better.
Luna is untidy.
Luna is motionless.If there is someone who is not cute, then Homer is not untidy and Robyn is not helpful.
If someone who is not annoying is also not untidy, then he is better.
Someone who is not better is always not untidy.
If there is at least one people who is both better and motionless, then Theobold is not helpful.
If there is at least one people who is untidy, then Homer is not helpful.
Someone being better is equivalent to being motionless.
Someone being both not motionless and better is equivalent to being helpful.
Someone who is not untidy is always better.
Shelley being better implies that Arvel is not annoying.
Someone being both not helpful and motionless is equivalent to being cute and not better.
Luna being not helpful implies that Theobold is not untidy.
If Robyn is not cute, then Hadwin is better. | Luna is not untidy. | self_contradiction |
Luna is not helpful.
Arvel is motionless.
Shelley is not annoying.
Hadwin is motionless.
Homer is not annoying.
Shelley is not untidy.
Hadwin is not cute.
Hadwin is not helpful.
Luna is annoying.
Shelley is not better.
Luna is untidy.
Luna is motionless.If there is someone who is not cute, then Homer is not untidy and Robyn is not helpful.
If someone who is not annoying is also not untidy, then he is better.
Someone who is not better is always not untidy.
If there is at least one people who is both better and motionless, then Theobold is not helpful.
If there is at least one people who is untidy, then Homer is not helpful.
Someone being better is equivalent to being motionless.
Someone being both not motionless and better is equivalent to being helpful.
Someone who is not untidy is always better.
Shelley being better implies that Arvel is not annoying.
Someone being both not helpful and motionless is equivalent to being cute and not better.
Luna being not helpful implies that Theobold is not untidy.
If Robyn is not cute, then Hadwin is better. | Robyn is untidy. | neutral |
Luna is not helpful.
Arvel is motionless.
Shelley is not annoying.
Hadwin is motionless.
Homer is not annoying.
Shelley is not untidy.
Hadwin is not cute.
Hadwin is not helpful.
Luna is annoying.
Shelley is not better.
Luna is untidy.
Luna is motionless.If there is someone who is not cute, then Homer is not untidy and Robyn is not helpful.
If someone who is not annoying is also not untidy, then he is better.
Someone who is not better is always not untidy.
If there is at least one people who is both better and motionless, then Theobold is not helpful.
If there is at least one people who is untidy, then Homer is not helpful.
Someone being better is equivalent to being motionless.
Someone being both not motionless and better is equivalent to being helpful.
Someone who is not untidy is always better.
Shelley being better implies that Arvel is not annoying.
Someone being both not helpful and motionless is equivalent to being cute and not better.
Luna being not helpful implies that Theobold is not untidy.
If Robyn is not cute, then Hadwin is better. | Theobold is motionless. | entailment |
Luna is not helpful.
Arvel is motionless.
Shelley is not annoying.
Hadwin is motionless.
Homer is not annoying.
Shelley is not untidy.
Hadwin is not cute.
Hadwin is not helpful.
Luna is annoying.
Shelley is not better.
Luna is untidy.
Luna is motionless.If there is someone who is not cute, then Homer is not untidy and Robyn is not helpful.
If someone who is not annoying is also not untidy, then he is better.
Someone who is not better is always not untidy.
If there is at least one people who is both better and motionless, then Theobold is not helpful.
If there is at least one people who is untidy, then Homer is not helpful.
Someone being better is equivalent to being motionless.
Someone being both not motionless and better is equivalent to being helpful.
Someone who is not untidy is always better.
Shelley being better implies that Arvel is not annoying.
Someone being both not helpful and motionless is equivalent to being cute and not better.
Luna being not helpful implies that Theobold is not untidy.
If Robyn is not cute, then Hadwin is better. | Homer is not annoying. | entailment |
Luna is not helpful.
Arvel is motionless.
Shelley is not annoying.
Hadwin is motionless.
Homer is not annoying.
Shelley is not untidy.
Hadwin is not cute.
Hadwin is not helpful.
Luna is annoying.
Shelley is not better.
Luna is untidy.
Luna is motionless.If there is someone who is not cute, then Homer is not untidy and Robyn is not helpful.
If someone who is not annoying is also not untidy, then he is better.
Someone who is not better is always not untidy.
If there is at least one people who is both better and motionless, then Theobold is not helpful.
If there is at least one people who is untidy, then Homer is not helpful.
Someone being better is equivalent to being motionless.
Someone being both not motionless and better is equivalent to being helpful.
Someone who is not untidy is always better.
Shelley being better implies that Arvel is not annoying.
Someone being both not helpful and motionless is equivalent to being cute and not better.
Luna being not helpful implies that Theobold is not untidy.
If Robyn is not cute, then Hadwin is better. | Homer is untidy. | contradiction |
Marlon is not hard-working.
Stefan is not intellectual.
Albert is successful.
Albert is not gifted.
Kirk is not successful.
Kirk is gifted.
Pierce is not successful.
Pierce is not gifted.
Marlon is intellectual.
Marlon is sharp.
Marlon is not successful.
Calvin is not hard-working.If there is someone who is both successful and not massive, then Marlon is not sharp.
If there is at least one people who is both hard-working and not gifted, then Stefan is sharp.
Someone is not massive and not sharp if and only if he is intellectual and hard-working.
Someone being hard-working is equivalent to being not intellectual.
Someone being both massive and sharp is equivalent to being not successful and not gifted.
Debra being not successful or Calvin being not hard-working implies that Debra is not gifted.
If someone is sharp or he is not successful, then he is not massive.
If there is at least one people who is massive, then Calvin is sharp.
If someone is not gifted, then he is hard-working.
If Kirk is not successful, then Calvin is hard-working and Marlon is intellectual.
If someone is intellectual and successful, then he is both gifted and hard-working, and vice versa.
If someone is not sharp or he is not gifted, then he is not successful. | Stefan is gifted. | neutral |
Marlon is not hard-working.
Stefan is not intellectual.
Albert is successful.
Albert is not gifted.
Kirk is not successful.
Kirk is gifted.
Pierce is not successful.
Pierce is not gifted.
Marlon is intellectual.
Marlon is sharp.
Marlon is not successful.
Calvin is not hard-working.If there is someone who is both successful and not massive, then Marlon is not sharp.
If there is at least one people who is both hard-working and not gifted, then Stefan is sharp.
Someone is not massive and not sharp if and only if he is intellectual and hard-working.
Someone being hard-working is equivalent to being not intellectual.
Someone being both massive and sharp is equivalent to being not successful and not gifted.
Debra being not successful or Calvin being not hard-working implies that Debra is not gifted.
If someone is sharp or he is not successful, then he is not massive.
If there is at least one people who is massive, then Calvin is sharp.
If someone is not gifted, then he is hard-working.
If Kirk is not successful, then Calvin is hard-working and Marlon is intellectual.
If someone is intellectual and successful, then he is both gifted and hard-working, and vice versa.
If someone is not sharp or he is not gifted, then he is not successful. | Debra is massive. | self_contradiction |
Marlon is not hard-working.
Stefan is not intellectual.
Albert is successful.
Albert is not gifted.
Kirk is not successful.
Kirk is gifted.
Pierce is not successful.
Pierce is not gifted.
Marlon is intellectual.
Marlon is sharp.
Marlon is not successful.
Calvin is not hard-working.If there is someone who is both successful and not massive, then Marlon is not sharp.
If there is at least one people who is both hard-working and not gifted, then Stefan is sharp.
Someone is not massive and not sharp if and only if he is intellectual and hard-working.
Someone being hard-working is equivalent to being not intellectual.
Someone being both massive and sharp is equivalent to being not successful and not gifted.
Debra being not successful or Calvin being not hard-working implies that Debra is not gifted.
If someone is sharp or he is not successful, then he is not massive.
If there is at least one people who is massive, then Calvin is sharp.
If someone is not gifted, then he is hard-working.
If Kirk is not successful, then Calvin is hard-working and Marlon is intellectual.
If someone is intellectual and successful, then he is both gifted and hard-working, and vice versa.
If someone is not sharp or he is not gifted, then he is not successful. | Calvin is not hard-working. | self_contradiction |
Marlon is not hard-working.
Stefan is not intellectual.
Albert is successful.
Albert is not gifted.
Kirk is not successful.
Kirk is gifted.
Pierce is not successful.
Pierce is not gifted.
Marlon is intellectual.
Marlon is sharp.
Marlon is not successful.
Calvin is not hard-working.If there is someone who is both successful and not massive, then Marlon is not sharp.
If there is at least one people who is both hard-working and not gifted, then Stefan is sharp.
Someone is not massive and not sharp if and only if he is intellectual and hard-working.
Someone being hard-working is equivalent to being not intellectual.
Someone being both massive and sharp is equivalent to being not successful and not gifted.
Debra being not successful or Calvin being not hard-working implies that Debra is not gifted.
If someone is sharp or he is not successful, then he is not massive.
If there is at least one people who is massive, then Calvin is sharp.
If someone is not gifted, then he is hard-working.
If Kirk is not successful, then Calvin is hard-working and Marlon is intellectual.
If someone is intellectual and successful, then he is both gifted and hard-working, and vice versa.
If someone is not sharp or he is not gifted, then he is not successful. | Stefan is not successful. | neutral |
Marlon is not hard-working.
Stefan is not intellectual.
Albert is successful.
Albert is not gifted.
Kirk is not successful.
Kirk is gifted.
Pierce is not successful.
Pierce is not gifted.
Marlon is intellectual.
Marlon is sharp.
Marlon is not successful.
Calvin is not hard-working.If there is someone who is both successful and not massive, then Marlon is not sharp.
If there is at least one people who is both hard-working and not gifted, then Stefan is sharp.
Someone is not massive and not sharp if and only if he is intellectual and hard-working.
Someone being hard-working is equivalent to being not intellectual.
Someone being both massive and sharp is equivalent to being not successful and not gifted.
Debra being not successful or Calvin being not hard-working implies that Debra is not gifted.
If someone is sharp or he is not successful, then he is not massive.
If there is at least one people who is massive, then Calvin is sharp.
If someone is not gifted, then he is hard-working.
If Kirk is not successful, then Calvin is hard-working and Marlon is intellectual.
If someone is intellectual and successful, then he is both gifted and hard-working, and vice versa.
If someone is not sharp or he is not gifted, then he is not successful. | Debra is successful. | contradiction |
Marlon is not hard-working.
Stefan is not intellectual.
Albert is successful.
Albert is not gifted.
Kirk is not successful.
Kirk is gifted.
Pierce is not successful.
Pierce is not gifted.
Marlon is intellectual.
Marlon is sharp.
Marlon is not successful.
Calvin is not hard-working.If there is someone who is both successful and not massive, then Marlon is not sharp.
If there is at least one people who is both hard-working and not gifted, then Stefan is sharp.
Someone is not massive and not sharp if and only if he is intellectual and hard-working.
Someone being hard-working is equivalent to being not intellectual.
Someone being both massive and sharp is equivalent to being not successful and not gifted.
Debra being not successful or Calvin being not hard-working implies that Debra is not gifted.
If someone is sharp or he is not successful, then he is not massive.
If there is at least one people who is massive, then Calvin is sharp.
If someone is not gifted, then he is hard-working.
If Kirk is not successful, then Calvin is hard-working and Marlon is intellectual.
If someone is intellectual and successful, then he is both gifted and hard-working, and vice versa.
If someone is not sharp or he is not gifted, then he is not successful. | Albert is not gifted. | entailment |
Marlon is not hard-working.
Stefan is not intellectual.
Albert is successful.
Albert is not gifted.
Kirk is not successful.
Kirk is gifted.
Pierce is not successful.
Pierce is not gifted.
Marlon is intellectual.
Marlon is sharp.
Marlon is not successful.
Calvin is not hard-working.If there is someone who is both successful and not massive, then Marlon is not sharp.
If there is at least one people who is both hard-working and not gifted, then Stefan is sharp.
Someone is not massive and not sharp if and only if he is intellectual and hard-working.
Someone being hard-working is equivalent to being not intellectual.
Someone being both massive and sharp is equivalent to being not successful and not gifted.
Debra being not successful or Calvin being not hard-working implies that Debra is not gifted.
If someone is sharp or he is not successful, then he is not massive.
If there is at least one people who is massive, then Calvin is sharp.
If someone is not gifted, then he is hard-working.
If Kirk is not successful, then Calvin is hard-working and Marlon is intellectual.
If someone is intellectual and successful, then he is both gifted and hard-working, and vice versa.
If someone is not sharp or he is not gifted, then he is not successful. | Albert is successful. | self_contradiction |
Marlon is not hard-working.
Stefan is not intellectual.
Albert is successful.
Albert is not gifted.
Kirk is not successful.
Kirk is gifted.
Pierce is not successful.
Pierce is not gifted.
Marlon is intellectual.
Marlon is sharp.
Marlon is not successful.
Calvin is not hard-working.If there is someone who is both successful and not massive, then Marlon is not sharp.
If there is at least one people who is both hard-working and not gifted, then Stefan is sharp.
Someone is not massive and not sharp if and only if he is intellectual and hard-working.
Someone being hard-working is equivalent to being not intellectual.
Someone being both massive and sharp is equivalent to being not successful and not gifted.
Debra being not successful or Calvin being not hard-working implies that Debra is not gifted.
If someone is sharp or he is not successful, then he is not massive.
If there is at least one people who is massive, then Calvin is sharp.
If someone is not gifted, then he is hard-working.
If Kirk is not successful, then Calvin is hard-working and Marlon is intellectual.
If someone is intellectual and successful, then he is both gifted and hard-working, and vice versa.
If someone is not sharp or he is not gifted, then he is not successful. | Pierce is massive. | self_contradiction |
Marlon is not hard-working.
Stefan is not intellectual.
Albert is successful.
Albert is not gifted.
Kirk is not successful.
Kirk is gifted.
Pierce is not successful.
Pierce is not gifted.
Marlon is intellectual.
Marlon is sharp.
Marlon is not successful.
Calvin is not hard-working.If there is someone who is both successful and not massive, then Marlon is not sharp.
If there is at least one people who is both hard-working and not gifted, then Stefan is sharp.
Someone is not massive and not sharp if and only if he is intellectual and hard-working.
Someone being hard-working is equivalent to being not intellectual.
Someone being both massive and sharp is equivalent to being not successful and not gifted.
Debra being not successful or Calvin being not hard-working implies that Debra is not gifted.
If someone is sharp or he is not successful, then he is not massive.
If there is at least one people who is massive, then Calvin is sharp.
If someone is not gifted, then he is hard-working.
If Kirk is not successful, then Calvin is hard-working and Marlon is intellectual.
If someone is intellectual and successful, then he is both gifted and hard-working, and vice versa.
If someone is not sharp or he is not gifted, then he is not successful. | Debra is not hard-working. | contradiction |
Marlon is not hard-working.
Stefan is not intellectual.
Albert is successful.
Albert is not gifted.
Kirk is not successful.
Kirk is gifted.
Pierce is not successful.
Pierce is not gifted.
Marlon is intellectual.
Marlon is sharp.
Marlon is not successful.
Calvin is not hard-working.If there is someone who is both successful and not massive, then Marlon is not sharp.
If there is at least one people who is both hard-working and not gifted, then Stefan is sharp.
Someone is not massive and not sharp if and only if he is intellectual and hard-working.
Someone being hard-working is equivalent to being not intellectual.
Someone being both massive and sharp is equivalent to being not successful and not gifted.
Debra being not successful or Calvin being not hard-working implies that Debra is not gifted.
If someone is sharp or he is not successful, then he is not massive.
If there is at least one people who is massive, then Calvin is sharp.
If someone is not gifted, then he is hard-working.
If Kirk is not successful, then Calvin is hard-working and Marlon is intellectual.
If someone is intellectual and successful, then he is both gifted and hard-working, and vice versa.
If someone is not sharp or he is not gifted, then he is not successful. | Marlon is hard-working. | contradiction |
Marlon is not hard-working.
Stefan is not intellectual.
Albert is successful.
Albert is not gifted.
Kirk is not successful.
Kirk is gifted.
Pierce is not successful.
Pierce is not gifted.
Marlon is intellectual.
Marlon is sharp.
Marlon is not successful.
Calvin is not hard-working.If there is someone who is both successful and not massive, then Marlon is not sharp.
If there is at least one people who is both hard-working and not gifted, then Stefan is sharp.
Someone is not massive and not sharp if and only if he is intellectual and hard-working.
Someone being hard-working is equivalent to being not intellectual.
Someone being both massive and sharp is equivalent to being not successful and not gifted.
Debra being not successful or Calvin being not hard-working implies that Debra is not gifted.
If someone is sharp or he is not successful, then he is not massive.
If there is at least one people who is massive, then Calvin is sharp.
If someone is not gifted, then he is hard-working.
If Kirk is not successful, then Calvin is hard-working and Marlon is intellectual.
If someone is intellectual and successful, then he is both gifted and hard-working, and vice versa.
If someone is not sharp or he is not gifted, then he is not successful. | Marlon is sharp. | entailment |
Marlon is not hard-working.
Stefan is not intellectual.
Albert is successful.
Albert is not gifted.
Kirk is not successful.
Kirk is gifted.
Pierce is not successful.
Pierce is not gifted.
Marlon is intellectual.
Marlon is sharp.
Marlon is not successful.
Calvin is not hard-working.If there is someone who is both successful and not massive, then Marlon is not sharp.
If there is at least one people who is both hard-working and not gifted, then Stefan is sharp.
Someone is not massive and not sharp if and only if he is intellectual and hard-working.
Someone being hard-working is equivalent to being not intellectual.
Someone being both massive and sharp is equivalent to being not successful and not gifted.
Debra being not successful or Calvin being not hard-working implies that Debra is not gifted.
If someone is sharp or he is not successful, then he is not massive.
If there is at least one people who is massive, then Calvin is sharp.
If someone is not gifted, then he is hard-working.
If Kirk is not successful, then Calvin is hard-working and Marlon is intellectual.
If someone is intellectual and successful, then he is both gifted and hard-working, and vice versa.
If someone is not sharp or he is not gifted, then he is not successful. | Debra is not intellectual. | entailment |
Marlon is not hard-working.
Stefan is not intellectual.
Albert is successful.
Albert is not gifted.
Kirk is not successful.
Kirk is gifted.
Pierce is not successful.
Pierce is not gifted.
Marlon is intellectual.
Marlon is sharp.
Marlon is not successful.
Calvin is not hard-working.If there is someone who is both successful and not massive, then Marlon is not sharp.
If there is at least one people who is both hard-working and not gifted, then Stefan is sharp.
Someone is not massive and not sharp if and only if he is intellectual and hard-working.
Someone being hard-working is equivalent to being not intellectual.
Someone being both massive and sharp is equivalent to being not successful and not gifted.
Debra being not successful or Calvin being not hard-working implies that Debra is not gifted.
If someone is sharp or he is not successful, then he is not massive.
If there is at least one people who is massive, then Calvin is sharp.
If someone is not gifted, then he is hard-working.
If Kirk is not successful, then Calvin is hard-working and Marlon is intellectual.
If someone is intellectual and successful, then he is both gifted and hard-working, and vice versa.
If someone is not sharp or he is not gifted, then he is not successful. | Stefan is not massive. | neutral |
Marlon is not hard-working.
Stefan is not intellectual.
Albert is successful.
Albert is not gifted.
Kirk is not successful.
Kirk is gifted.
Pierce is not successful.
Pierce is not gifted.
Marlon is intellectual.
Marlon is sharp.
Marlon is not successful.
Calvin is not hard-working.If there is someone who is both successful and not massive, then Marlon is not sharp.
If there is at least one people who is both hard-working and not gifted, then Stefan is sharp.
Someone is not massive and not sharp if and only if he is intellectual and hard-working.
Someone being hard-working is equivalent to being not intellectual.
Someone being both massive and sharp is equivalent to being not successful and not gifted.
Debra being not successful or Calvin being not hard-working implies that Debra is not gifted.
If someone is sharp or he is not successful, then he is not massive.
If there is at least one people who is massive, then Calvin is sharp.
If someone is not gifted, then he is hard-working.
If Kirk is not successful, then Calvin is hard-working and Marlon is intellectual.
If someone is intellectual and successful, then he is both gifted and hard-working, and vice versa.
If someone is not sharp or he is not gifted, then he is not successful. | Calvin is gifted. | neutral |
Marlon is not hard-working.
Stefan is not intellectual.
Albert is successful.
Albert is not gifted.
Kirk is not successful.
Kirk is gifted.
Pierce is not successful.
Pierce is not gifted.
Marlon is intellectual.
Marlon is sharp.
Marlon is not successful.
Calvin is not hard-working.If there is someone who is both successful and not massive, then Marlon is not sharp.
If there is at least one people who is both hard-working and not gifted, then Stefan is sharp.
Someone is not massive and not sharp if and only if he is intellectual and hard-working.
Someone being hard-working is equivalent to being not intellectual.
Someone being both massive and sharp is equivalent to being not successful and not gifted.
Debra being not successful or Calvin being not hard-working implies that Debra is not gifted.
If someone is sharp or he is not successful, then he is not massive.
If there is at least one people who is massive, then Calvin is sharp.
If someone is not gifted, then he is hard-working.
If Kirk is not successful, then Calvin is hard-working and Marlon is intellectual.
If someone is intellectual and successful, then he is both gifted and hard-working, and vice versa.
If someone is not sharp or he is not gifted, then he is not successful. | Marlon is not gifted. | neutral |
Marlon is not hard-working.
Stefan is not intellectual.
Albert is successful.
Albert is not gifted.
Kirk is not successful.
Kirk is gifted.
Pierce is not successful.
Pierce is not gifted.
Marlon is intellectual.
Marlon is sharp.
Marlon is not successful.
Calvin is not hard-working.If there is someone who is both successful and not massive, then Marlon is not sharp.
If there is at least one people who is both hard-working and not gifted, then Stefan is sharp.
Someone is not massive and not sharp if and only if he is intellectual and hard-working.
Someone being hard-working is equivalent to being not intellectual.
Someone being both massive and sharp is equivalent to being not successful and not gifted.
Debra being not successful or Calvin being not hard-working implies that Debra is not gifted.
If someone is sharp or he is not successful, then he is not massive.
If there is at least one people who is massive, then Calvin is sharp.
If someone is not gifted, then he is hard-working.
If Kirk is not successful, then Calvin is hard-working and Marlon is intellectual.
If someone is intellectual and successful, then he is both gifted and hard-working, and vice versa.
If someone is not sharp or he is not gifted, then he is not successful. | Kirk is not gifted. | contradiction |
Marlon is not hard-working.
Stefan is not intellectual.
Albert is successful.
Albert is not gifted.
Kirk is not successful.
Kirk is gifted.
Pierce is not successful.
Pierce is not gifted.
Marlon is intellectual.
Marlon is sharp.
Marlon is not successful.
Calvin is not hard-working.If there is someone who is both successful and not massive, then Marlon is not sharp.
If there is at least one people who is both hard-working and not gifted, then Stefan is sharp.
Someone is not massive and not sharp if and only if he is intellectual and hard-working.
Someone being hard-working is equivalent to being not intellectual.
Someone being both massive and sharp is equivalent to being not successful and not gifted.
Debra being not successful or Calvin being not hard-working implies that Debra is not gifted.
If someone is sharp or he is not successful, then he is not massive.
If there is at least one people who is massive, then Calvin is sharp.
If someone is not gifted, then he is hard-working.
If Kirk is not successful, then Calvin is hard-working and Marlon is intellectual.
If someone is intellectual and successful, then he is both gifted and hard-working, and vice versa.
If someone is not sharp or he is not gifted, then he is not successful. | Albert is massive. | self_contradiction |
Marlon is not hard-working.
Stefan is not intellectual.
Albert is successful.
Albert is not gifted.
Kirk is not successful.
Kirk is gifted.
Pierce is not successful.
Pierce is not gifted.
Marlon is intellectual.
Marlon is sharp.
Marlon is not successful.
Calvin is not hard-working.If there is someone who is both successful and not massive, then Marlon is not sharp.
If there is at least one people who is both hard-working and not gifted, then Stefan is sharp.
Someone is not massive and not sharp if and only if he is intellectual and hard-working.
Someone being hard-working is equivalent to being not intellectual.
Someone being both massive and sharp is equivalent to being not successful and not gifted.
Debra being not successful or Calvin being not hard-working implies that Debra is not gifted.
If someone is sharp or he is not successful, then he is not massive.
If there is at least one people who is massive, then Calvin is sharp.
If someone is not gifted, then he is hard-working.
If Kirk is not successful, then Calvin is hard-working and Marlon is intellectual.
If someone is intellectual and successful, then he is both gifted and hard-working, and vice versa.
If someone is not sharp or he is not gifted, then he is not successful. | Kirk is not massive. | entailment |
Marlon is not hard-working.
Stefan is not intellectual.
Albert is successful.
Albert is not gifted.
Kirk is not successful.
Kirk is gifted.
Pierce is not successful.
Pierce is not gifted.
Marlon is intellectual.
Marlon is sharp.
Marlon is not successful.
Calvin is not hard-working.If there is someone who is both successful and not massive, then Marlon is not sharp.
If there is at least one people who is both hard-working and not gifted, then Stefan is sharp.
Someone is not massive and not sharp if and only if he is intellectual and hard-working.
Someone being hard-working is equivalent to being not intellectual.
Someone being both massive and sharp is equivalent to being not successful and not gifted.
Debra being not successful or Calvin being not hard-working implies that Debra is not gifted.
If someone is sharp or he is not successful, then he is not massive.
If there is at least one people who is massive, then Calvin is sharp.
If someone is not gifted, then he is hard-working.
If Kirk is not successful, then Calvin is hard-working and Marlon is intellectual.
If someone is intellectual and successful, then he is both gifted and hard-working, and vice versa.
If someone is not sharp or he is not gifted, then he is not successful. | Marlon is not massive. | entailment |
Marlon is not hard-working.
Stefan is not intellectual.
Albert is successful.
Albert is not gifted.
Kirk is not successful.
Kirk is gifted.
Pierce is not successful.
Pierce is not gifted.
Marlon is intellectual.
Marlon is sharp.
Marlon is not successful.
Calvin is not hard-working.If there is someone who is both successful and not massive, then Marlon is not sharp.
If there is at least one people who is both hard-working and not gifted, then Stefan is sharp.
Someone is not massive and not sharp if and only if he is intellectual and hard-working.
Someone being hard-working is equivalent to being not intellectual.
Someone being both massive and sharp is equivalent to being not successful and not gifted.
Debra being not successful or Calvin being not hard-working implies that Debra is not gifted.
If someone is sharp or he is not successful, then he is not massive.
If there is at least one people who is massive, then Calvin is sharp.
If someone is not gifted, then he is hard-working.
If Kirk is not successful, then Calvin is hard-working and Marlon is intellectual.
If someone is intellectual and successful, then he is both gifted and hard-working, and vice versa.
If someone is not sharp or he is not gifted, then he is not successful. | Debra is intellectual. | contradiction |
Harris is not mad.
Lucia is obedient.
Pierce is severe.
Pierce is wandering.
Aldis is not mad.
Pierce is obedient.
Chandler is not obedient.
Aldis is not wandering.
Chandler is not powerful.
Chandler is competitive.
Chapman is powerful.
Pierce is not competitive.If all people are not mad, then Aldis is powerful and Aldis is competitive.
Chapman being not mad or Chapman being competitive implies that Chandler is not wandering.
Someone being not competitive is equivalent to being not powerful.
If there is at least one people who is not wandering or not severe, then Aldis is not mad.
Chandler being not powerful is equivalent to Harris being not mad and Pierce being competitive.
Someone who is eithor competitive or mad is always wandering.
If Chandler is not wandering and Chapman is not competitive, then Spencer is not powerful.
Chandler being not mad is equivalent to Aldis being wandering and Chandler being not powerful.
If someone is not obedient, then he is both powerful and not severe.
Someone who is powerful is always not severe.
Aldis being not mad implies that Aldis is wandering.
If Harris is mad, then Aldis is obedient, and vice versa. | Pierce is powerful. | contradiction |
Harris is not mad.
Lucia is obedient.
Pierce is severe.
Pierce is wandering.
Aldis is not mad.
Pierce is obedient.
Chandler is not obedient.
Aldis is not wandering.
Chandler is not powerful.
Chandler is competitive.
Chapman is powerful.
Pierce is not competitive.If all people are not mad, then Aldis is powerful and Aldis is competitive.
Chapman being not mad or Chapman being competitive implies that Chandler is not wandering.
Someone being not competitive is equivalent to being not powerful.
If there is at least one people who is not wandering or not severe, then Aldis is not mad.
Chandler being not powerful is equivalent to Harris being not mad and Pierce being competitive.
Someone who is eithor competitive or mad is always wandering.
If Chandler is not wandering and Chapman is not competitive, then Spencer is not powerful.
Chandler being not mad is equivalent to Aldis being wandering and Chandler being not powerful.
If someone is not obedient, then he is both powerful and not severe.
Someone who is powerful is always not severe.
Aldis being not mad implies that Aldis is wandering.
If Harris is mad, then Aldis is obedient, and vice versa. | Pierce is severe. | entailment |
Harris is not mad.
Lucia is obedient.
Pierce is severe.
Pierce is wandering.
Aldis is not mad.
Pierce is obedient.
Chandler is not obedient.
Aldis is not wandering.
Chandler is not powerful.
Chandler is competitive.
Chapman is powerful.
Pierce is not competitive.If all people are not mad, then Aldis is powerful and Aldis is competitive.
Chapman being not mad or Chapman being competitive implies that Chandler is not wandering.
Someone being not competitive is equivalent to being not powerful.
If there is at least one people who is not wandering or not severe, then Aldis is not mad.
Chandler being not powerful is equivalent to Harris being not mad and Pierce being competitive.
Someone who is eithor competitive or mad is always wandering.
If Chandler is not wandering and Chapman is not competitive, then Spencer is not powerful.
Chandler being not mad is equivalent to Aldis being wandering and Chandler being not powerful.
If someone is not obedient, then he is both powerful and not severe.
Someone who is powerful is always not severe.
Aldis being not mad implies that Aldis is wandering.
If Harris is mad, then Aldis is obedient, and vice versa. | Pierce is competitive. | self_contradiction |
Harris is not mad.
Lucia is obedient.
Pierce is severe.
Pierce is wandering.
Aldis is not mad.
Pierce is obedient.
Chandler is not obedient.
Aldis is not wandering.
Chandler is not powerful.
Chandler is competitive.
Chapman is powerful.
Pierce is not competitive.If all people are not mad, then Aldis is powerful and Aldis is competitive.
Chapman being not mad or Chapman being competitive implies that Chandler is not wandering.
Someone being not competitive is equivalent to being not powerful.
If there is at least one people who is not wandering or not severe, then Aldis is not mad.
Chandler being not powerful is equivalent to Harris being not mad and Pierce being competitive.
Someone who is eithor competitive or mad is always wandering.
If Chandler is not wandering and Chapman is not competitive, then Spencer is not powerful.
Chandler being not mad is equivalent to Aldis being wandering and Chandler being not powerful.
If someone is not obedient, then he is both powerful and not severe.
Someone who is powerful is always not severe.
Aldis being not mad implies that Aldis is wandering.
If Harris is mad, then Aldis is obedient, and vice versa. | Lucia is severe. | neutral |
Harris is not mad.
Lucia is obedient.
Pierce is severe.
Pierce is wandering.
Aldis is not mad.
Pierce is obedient.
Chandler is not obedient.
Aldis is not wandering.
Chandler is not powerful.
Chandler is competitive.
Chapman is powerful.
Pierce is not competitive.If all people are not mad, then Aldis is powerful and Aldis is competitive.
Chapman being not mad or Chapman being competitive implies that Chandler is not wandering.
Someone being not competitive is equivalent to being not powerful.
If there is at least one people who is not wandering or not severe, then Aldis is not mad.
Chandler being not powerful is equivalent to Harris being not mad and Pierce being competitive.
Someone who is eithor competitive or mad is always wandering.
If Chandler is not wandering and Chapman is not competitive, then Spencer is not powerful.
Chandler being not mad is equivalent to Aldis being wandering and Chandler being not powerful.
If someone is not obedient, then he is both powerful and not severe.
Someone who is powerful is always not severe.
Aldis being not mad implies that Aldis is wandering.
If Harris is mad, then Aldis is obedient, and vice versa. | Chandler is wandering. | entailment |
Harris is not mad.
Lucia is obedient.
Pierce is severe.
Pierce is wandering.
Aldis is not mad.
Pierce is obedient.
Chandler is not obedient.
Aldis is not wandering.
Chandler is not powerful.
Chandler is competitive.
Chapman is powerful.
Pierce is not competitive.If all people are not mad, then Aldis is powerful and Aldis is competitive.
Chapman being not mad or Chapman being competitive implies that Chandler is not wandering.
Someone being not competitive is equivalent to being not powerful.
If there is at least one people who is not wandering or not severe, then Aldis is not mad.
Chandler being not powerful is equivalent to Harris being not mad and Pierce being competitive.
Someone who is eithor competitive or mad is always wandering.
If Chandler is not wandering and Chapman is not competitive, then Spencer is not powerful.
Chandler being not mad is equivalent to Aldis being wandering and Chandler being not powerful.
If someone is not obedient, then he is both powerful and not severe.
Someone who is powerful is always not severe.
Aldis being not mad implies that Aldis is wandering.
If Harris is mad, then Aldis is obedient, and vice versa. | Spencer is not competitive. | neutral |
Harris is not mad.
Lucia is obedient.
Pierce is severe.
Pierce is wandering.
Aldis is not mad.
Pierce is obedient.
Chandler is not obedient.
Aldis is not wandering.
Chandler is not powerful.
Chandler is competitive.
Chapman is powerful.
Pierce is not competitive.If all people are not mad, then Aldis is powerful and Aldis is competitive.
Chapman being not mad or Chapman being competitive implies that Chandler is not wandering.
Someone being not competitive is equivalent to being not powerful.
If there is at least one people who is not wandering or not severe, then Aldis is not mad.
Chandler being not powerful is equivalent to Harris being not mad and Pierce being competitive.
Someone who is eithor competitive or mad is always wandering.
If Chandler is not wandering and Chapman is not competitive, then Spencer is not powerful.
Chandler being not mad is equivalent to Aldis being wandering and Chandler being not powerful.
If someone is not obedient, then he is both powerful and not severe.
Someone who is powerful is always not severe.
Aldis being not mad implies that Aldis is wandering.
If Harris is mad, then Aldis is obedient, and vice versa. | Harris is not mad. | entailment |
Harris is not mad.
Lucia is obedient.
Pierce is severe.
Pierce is wandering.
Aldis is not mad.
Pierce is obedient.
Chandler is not obedient.
Aldis is not wandering.
Chandler is not powerful.
Chandler is competitive.
Chapman is powerful.
Pierce is not competitive.If all people are not mad, then Aldis is powerful and Aldis is competitive.
Chapman being not mad or Chapman being competitive implies that Chandler is not wandering.
Someone being not competitive is equivalent to being not powerful.
If there is at least one people who is not wandering or not severe, then Aldis is not mad.
Chandler being not powerful is equivalent to Harris being not mad and Pierce being competitive.
Someone who is eithor competitive or mad is always wandering.
If Chandler is not wandering and Chapman is not competitive, then Spencer is not powerful.
Chandler being not mad is equivalent to Aldis being wandering and Chandler being not powerful.
If someone is not obedient, then he is both powerful and not severe.
Someone who is powerful is always not severe.
Aldis being not mad implies that Aldis is wandering.
If Harris is mad, then Aldis is obedient, and vice versa. | Lucia is not obedient. | contradiction |
Harris is not mad.
Lucia is obedient.
Pierce is severe.
Pierce is wandering.
Aldis is not mad.
Pierce is obedient.
Chandler is not obedient.
Aldis is not wandering.
Chandler is not powerful.
Chandler is competitive.
Chapman is powerful.
Pierce is not competitive.If all people are not mad, then Aldis is powerful and Aldis is competitive.
Chapman being not mad or Chapman being competitive implies that Chandler is not wandering.
Someone being not competitive is equivalent to being not powerful.
If there is at least one people who is not wandering or not severe, then Aldis is not mad.
Chandler being not powerful is equivalent to Harris being not mad and Pierce being competitive.
Someone who is eithor competitive or mad is always wandering.
If Chandler is not wandering and Chapman is not competitive, then Spencer is not powerful.
Chandler being not mad is equivalent to Aldis being wandering and Chandler being not powerful.
If someone is not obedient, then he is both powerful and not severe.
Someone who is powerful is always not severe.
Aldis being not mad implies that Aldis is wandering.
If Harris is mad, then Aldis is obedient, and vice versa. | Chandler is powerful. | self_contradiction |
Harris is not mad.
Lucia is obedient.
Pierce is severe.
Pierce is wandering.
Aldis is not mad.
Pierce is obedient.
Chandler is not obedient.
Aldis is not wandering.
Chandler is not powerful.
Chandler is competitive.
Chapman is powerful.
Pierce is not competitive.If all people are not mad, then Aldis is powerful and Aldis is competitive.
Chapman being not mad or Chapman being competitive implies that Chandler is not wandering.
Someone being not competitive is equivalent to being not powerful.
If there is at least one people who is not wandering or not severe, then Aldis is not mad.
Chandler being not powerful is equivalent to Harris being not mad and Pierce being competitive.
Someone who is eithor competitive or mad is always wandering.
If Chandler is not wandering and Chapman is not competitive, then Spencer is not powerful.
Chandler being not mad is equivalent to Aldis being wandering and Chandler being not powerful.
If someone is not obedient, then he is both powerful and not severe.
Someone who is powerful is always not severe.
Aldis being not mad implies that Aldis is wandering.
If Harris is mad, then Aldis is obedient, and vice versa. | Chapman is severe. | contradiction |
Harris is not mad.
Lucia is obedient.
Pierce is severe.
Pierce is wandering.
Aldis is not mad.
Pierce is obedient.
Chandler is not obedient.
Aldis is not wandering.
Chandler is not powerful.
Chandler is competitive.
Chapman is powerful.
Pierce is not competitive.If all people are not mad, then Aldis is powerful and Aldis is competitive.
Chapman being not mad or Chapman being competitive implies that Chandler is not wandering.
Someone being not competitive is equivalent to being not powerful.
If there is at least one people who is not wandering or not severe, then Aldis is not mad.
Chandler being not powerful is equivalent to Harris being not mad and Pierce being competitive.
Someone who is eithor competitive or mad is always wandering.
If Chandler is not wandering and Chapman is not competitive, then Spencer is not powerful.
Chandler being not mad is equivalent to Aldis being wandering and Chandler being not powerful.
If someone is not obedient, then he is both powerful and not severe.
Someone who is powerful is always not severe.
Aldis being not mad implies that Aldis is wandering.
If Harris is mad, then Aldis is obedient, and vice versa. | Harris is mad. | contradiction |
Harris is not mad.
Lucia is obedient.
Pierce is severe.
Pierce is wandering.
Aldis is not mad.
Pierce is obedient.
Chandler is not obedient.
Aldis is not wandering.
Chandler is not powerful.
Chandler is competitive.
Chapman is powerful.
Pierce is not competitive.If all people are not mad, then Aldis is powerful and Aldis is competitive.
Chapman being not mad or Chapman being competitive implies that Chandler is not wandering.
Someone being not competitive is equivalent to being not powerful.
If there is at least one people who is not wandering or not severe, then Aldis is not mad.
Chandler being not powerful is equivalent to Harris being not mad and Pierce being competitive.
Someone who is eithor competitive or mad is always wandering.
If Chandler is not wandering and Chapman is not competitive, then Spencer is not powerful.
Chandler being not mad is equivalent to Aldis being wandering and Chandler being not powerful.
If someone is not obedient, then he is both powerful and not severe.
Someone who is powerful is always not severe.
Aldis being not mad implies that Aldis is wandering.
If Harris is mad, then Aldis is obedient, and vice versa. | Aldis is wandering. | self_contradiction |
Harris is not mad.
Lucia is obedient.
Pierce is severe.
Pierce is wandering.
Aldis is not mad.
Pierce is obedient.
Chandler is not obedient.
Aldis is not wandering.
Chandler is not powerful.
Chandler is competitive.
Chapman is powerful.
Pierce is not competitive.If all people are not mad, then Aldis is powerful and Aldis is competitive.
Chapman being not mad or Chapman being competitive implies that Chandler is not wandering.
Someone being not competitive is equivalent to being not powerful.
If there is at least one people who is not wandering or not severe, then Aldis is not mad.
Chandler being not powerful is equivalent to Harris being not mad and Pierce being competitive.
Someone who is eithor competitive or mad is always wandering.
If Chandler is not wandering and Chapman is not competitive, then Spencer is not powerful.
Chandler being not mad is equivalent to Aldis being wandering and Chandler being not powerful.
If someone is not obedient, then he is both powerful and not severe.
Someone who is powerful is always not severe.
Aldis being not mad implies that Aldis is wandering.
If Harris is mad, then Aldis is obedient, and vice versa. | Lucia is obedient. | entailment |
Harris is not mad.
Lucia is obedient.
Pierce is severe.
Pierce is wandering.
Aldis is not mad.
Pierce is obedient.
Chandler is not obedient.
Aldis is not wandering.
Chandler is not powerful.
Chandler is competitive.
Chapman is powerful.
Pierce is not competitive.If all people are not mad, then Aldis is powerful and Aldis is competitive.
Chapman being not mad or Chapman being competitive implies that Chandler is not wandering.
Someone being not competitive is equivalent to being not powerful.
If there is at least one people who is not wandering or not severe, then Aldis is not mad.
Chandler being not powerful is equivalent to Harris being not mad and Pierce being competitive.
Someone who is eithor competitive or mad is always wandering.
If Chandler is not wandering and Chapman is not competitive, then Spencer is not powerful.
Chandler being not mad is equivalent to Aldis being wandering and Chandler being not powerful.
If someone is not obedient, then he is both powerful and not severe.
Someone who is powerful is always not severe.
Aldis being not mad implies that Aldis is wandering.
If Harris is mad, then Aldis is obedient, and vice versa. | Spencer is obedient. | neutral |
Harris is not mad.
Lucia is obedient.
Pierce is severe.
Pierce is wandering.
Aldis is not mad.
Pierce is obedient.
Chandler is not obedient.
Aldis is not wandering.
Chandler is not powerful.
Chandler is competitive.
Chapman is powerful.
Pierce is not competitive.If all people are not mad, then Aldis is powerful and Aldis is competitive.
Chapman being not mad or Chapman being competitive implies that Chandler is not wandering.
Someone being not competitive is equivalent to being not powerful.
If there is at least one people who is not wandering or not severe, then Aldis is not mad.
Chandler being not powerful is equivalent to Harris being not mad and Pierce being competitive.
Someone who is eithor competitive or mad is always wandering.
If Chandler is not wandering and Chapman is not competitive, then Spencer is not powerful.
Chandler being not mad is equivalent to Aldis being wandering and Chandler being not powerful.
If someone is not obedient, then he is both powerful and not severe.
Someone who is powerful is always not severe.
Aldis being not mad implies that Aldis is wandering.
If Harris is mad, then Aldis is obedient, and vice versa. | Chandler is competitive. | self_contradiction |
Harris is not mad.
Lucia is obedient.
Pierce is severe.
Pierce is wandering.
Aldis is not mad.
Pierce is obedient.
Chandler is not obedient.
Aldis is not wandering.
Chandler is not powerful.
Chandler is competitive.
Chapman is powerful.
Pierce is not competitive.If all people are not mad, then Aldis is powerful and Aldis is competitive.
Chapman being not mad or Chapman being competitive implies that Chandler is not wandering.
Someone being not competitive is equivalent to being not powerful.
If there is at least one people who is not wandering or not severe, then Aldis is not mad.
Chandler being not powerful is equivalent to Harris being not mad and Pierce being competitive.
Someone who is eithor competitive or mad is always wandering.
If Chandler is not wandering and Chapman is not competitive, then Spencer is not powerful.
Chandler being not mad is equivalent to Aldis being wandering and Chandler being not powerful.
If someone is not obedient, then he is both powerful and not severe.
Someone who is powerful is always not severe.
Aldis being not mad implies that Aldis is wandering.
If Harris is mad, then Aldis is obedient, and vice versa. | Pierce is not competitive. | self_contradiction |
Harris is not mad.
Lucia is obedient.
Pierce is severe.
Pierce is wandering.
Aldis is not mad.
Pierce is obedient.
Chandler is not obedient.
Aldis is not wandering.
Chandler is not powerful.
Chandler is competitive.
Chapman is powerful.
Pierce is not competitive.If all people are not mad, then Aldis is powerful and Aldis is competitive.
Chapman being not mad or Chapman being competitive implies that Chandler is not wandering.
Someone being not competitive is equivalent to being not powerful.
If there is at least one people who is not wandering or not severe, then Aldis is not mad.
Chandler being not powerful is equivalent to Harris being not mad and Pierce being competitive.
Someone who is eithor competitive or mad is always wandering.
If Chandler is not wandering and Chapman is not competitive, then Spencer is not powerful.
Chandler being not mad is equivalent to Aldis being wandering and Chandler being not powerful.
If someone is not obedient, then he is both powerful and not severe.
Someone who is powerful is always not severe.
Aldis being not mad implies that Aldis is wandering.
If Harris is mad, then Aldis is obedient, and vice versa. | Pierce is obedient. | entailment |
Harris is not mad.
Lucia is obedient.
Pierce is severe.
Pierce is wandering.
Aldis is not mad.
Pierce is obedient.
Chandler is not obedient.
Aldis is not wandering.
Chandler is not powerful.
Chandler is competitive.
Chapman is powerful.
Pierce is not competitive.If all people are not mad, then Aldis is powerful and Aldis is competitive.
Chapman being not mad or Chapman being competitive implies that Chandler is not wandering.
Someone being not competitive is equivalent to being not powerful.
If there is at least one people who is not wandering or not severe, then Aldis is not mad.
Chandler being not powerful is equivalent to Harris being not mad and Pierce being competitive.
Someone who is eithor competitive or mad is always wandering.
If Chandler is not wandering and Chapman is not competitive, then Spencer is not powerful.
Chandler being not mad is equivalent to Aldis being wandering and Chandler being not powerful.
If someone is not obedient, then he is both powerful and not severe.
Someone who is powerful is always not severe.
Aldis being not mad implies that Aldis is wandering.
If Harris is mad, then Aldis is obedient, and vice versa. | Aldis is not powerful. | neutral |
Harris is not mad.
Lucia is obedient.
Pierce is severe.
Pierce is wandering.
Aldis is not mad.
Pierce is obedient.
Chandler is not obedient.
Aldis is not wandering.
Chandler is not powerful.
Chandler is competitive.
Chapman is powerful.
Pierce is not competitive.If all people are not mad, then Aldis is powerful and Aldis is competitive.
Chapman being not mad or Chapman being competitive implies that Chandler is not wandering.
Someone being not competitive is equivalent to being not powerful.
If there is at least one people who is not wandering or not severe, then Aldis is not mad.
Chandler being not powerful is equivalent to Harris being not mad and Pierce being competitive.
Someone who is eithor competitive or mad is always wandering.
If Chandler is not wandering and Chapman is not competitive, then Spencer is not powerful.
Chandler being not mad is equivalent to Aldis being wandering and Chandler being not powerful.
If someone is not obedient, then he is both powerful and not severe.
Someone who is powerful is always not severe.
Aldis being not mad implies that Aldis is wandering.
If Harris is mad, then Aldis is obedient, and vice versa. | Harris is not competitive. | neutral |
Harris is not mad.
Lucia is obedient.
Pierce is severe.
Pierce is wandering.
Aldis is not mad.
Pierce is obedient.
Chandler is not obedient.
Aldis is not wandering.
Chandler is not powerful.
Chandler is competitive.
Chapman is powerful.
Pierce is not competitive.If all people are not mad, then Aldis is powerful and Aldis is competitive.
Chapman being not mad or Chapman being competitive implies that Chandler is not wandering.
Someone being not competitive is equivalent to being not powerful.
If there is at least one people who is not wandering or not severe, then Aldis is not mad.
Chandler being not powerful is equivalent to Harris being not mad and Pierce being competitive.
Someone who is eithor competitive or mad is always wandering.
If Chandler is not wandering and Chapman is not competitive, then Spencer is not powerful.
Chandler being not mad is equivalent to Aldis being wandering and Chandler being not powerful.
If someone is not obedient, then he is both powerful and not severe.
Someone who is powerful is always not severe.
Aldis being not mad implies that Aldis is wandering.
If Harris is mad, then Aldis is obedient, and vice versa. | Chandler is obedient. | contradiction |
Clifford is not additional.
Sherman is ugliest.
Raymond is cute.
Raymond is tall.
Guy is not friendly.
Sherman is not cute.
Sherman is not conscious.
Sherman is tall.
Raymond is friendly.
Abraham is tall.
Konrad is not ugliest.
Guy is tall.It can be concluded that Konrad is not cute once knowing that Guy is not tall and Abraham is ugliest.
If Guy is not tall and Clifford is not ugliest, then Sherman is additional.
If someone who is tall is also additional, then he is cute.
If there is at least one people who is both not ugliest and friendly, then Clifford is not tall.
Martin being ugliest or Abraham being not conscious implies that Abraham is not friendly.
It can be concluded that Abraham is not tall once knowing that Raymond is not additional.
Someone is not cute and conscious if and only if he is tall.
As long as someone is tall and not conscious, he is not friendly and not ugliest.
If there is someone who is friendly, then Martin is not conscious and Raymond is ugliest.
Someone is cute if and only if he is conscious.
If someone is friendly or tall, then he is ugliest.
Abraham being not tall and Sherman being additional imply that Martin is not ugliest. | Clifford is cute. | neutral |
Clifford is not additional.
Sherman is ugliest.
Raymond is cute.
Raymond is tall.
Guy is not friendly.
Sherman is not cute.
Sherman is not conscious.
Sherman is tall.
Raymond is friendly.
Abraham is tall.
Konrad is not ugliest.
Guy is tall.It can be concluded that Konrad is not cute once knowing that Guy is not tall and Abraham is ugliest.
If Guy is not tall and Clifford is not ugliest, then Sherman is additional.
If someone who is tall is also additional, then he is cute.
If there is at least one people who is both not ugliest and friendly, then Clifford is not tall.
Martin being ugliest or Abraham being not conscious implies that Abraham is not friendly.
It can be concluded that Abraham is not tall once knowing that Raymond is not additional.
Someone is not cute and conscious if and only if he is tall.
As long as someone is tall and not conscious, he is not friendly and not ugliest.
If there is someone who is friendly, then Martin is not conscious and Raymond is ugliest.
Someone is cute if and only if he is conscious.
If someone is friendly or tall, then he is ugliest.
Abraham being not tall and Sherman being additional imply that Martin is not ugliest. | Martin is not conscious. | entailment |
Clifford is not additional.
Sherman is ugliest.
Raymond is cute.
Raymond is tall.
Guy is not friendly.
Sherman is not cute.
Sherman is not conscious.
Sherman is tall.
Raymond is friendly.
Abraham is tall.
Konrad is not ugliest.
Guy is tall.It can be concluded that Konrad is not cute once knowing that Guy is not tall and Abraham is ugliest.
If Guy is not tall and Clifford is not ugliest, then Sherman is additional.
If someone who is tall is also additional, then he is cute.
If there is at least one people who is both not ugliest and friendly, then Clifford is not tall.
Martin being ugliest or Abraham being not conscious implies that Abraham is not friendly.
It can be concluded that Abraham is not tall once knowing that Raymond is not additional.
Someone is not cute and conscious if and only if he is tall.
As long as someone is tall and not conscious, he is not friendly and not ugliest.
If there is someone who is friendly, then Martin is not conscious and Raymond is ugliest.
Someone is cute if and only if he is conscious.
If someone is friendly or tall, then he is ugliest.
Abraham being not tall and Sherman being additional imply that Martin is not ugliest. | Konrad is tall. | neutral |
Clifford is not additional.
Sherman is ugliest.
Raymond is cute.
Raymond is tall.
Guy is not friendly.
Sherman is not cute.
Sherman is not conscious.
Sherman is tall.
Raymond is friendly.
Abraham is tall.
Konrad is not ugliest.
Guy is tall.It can be concluded that Konrad is not cute once knowing that Guy is not tall and Abraham is ugliest.
If Guy is not tall and Clifford is not ugliest, then Sherman is additional.
If someone who is tall is also additional, then he is cute.
If there is at least one people who is both not ugliest and friendly, then Clifford is not tall.
Martin being ugliest or Abraham being not conscious implies that Abraham is not friendly.
It can be concluded that Abraham is not tall once knowing that Raymond is not additional.
Someone is not cute and conscious if and only if he is tall.
As long as someone is tall and not conscious, he is not friendly and not ugliest.
If there is someone who is friendly, then Martin is not conscious and Raymond is ugliest.
Someone is cute if and only if he is conscious.
If someone is friendly or tall, then he is ugliest.
Abraham being not tall and Sherman being additional imply that Martin is not ugliest. | Guy is cute. | self_contradiction |
Clifford is not additional.
Sherman is ugliest.
Raymond is cute.
Raymond is tall.
Guy is not friendly.
Sherman is not cute.
Sherman is not conscious.
Sherman is tall.
Raymond is friendly.
Abraham is tall.
Konrad is not ugliest.
Guy is tall.It can be concluded that Konrad is not cute once knowing that Guy is not tall and Abraham is ugliest.
If Guy is not tall and Clifford is not ugliest, then Sherman is additional.
If someone who is tall is also additional, then he is cute.
If there is at least one people who is both not ugliest and friendly, then Clifford is not tall.
Martin being ugliest or Abraham being not conscious implies that Abraham is not friendly.
It can be concluded that Abraham is not tall once knowing that Raymond is not additional.
Someone is not cute and conscious if and only if he is tall.
As long as someone is tall and not conscious, he is not friendly and not ugliest.
If there is someone who is friendly, then Martin is not conscious and Raymond is ugliest.
Someone is cute if and only if he is conscious.
If someone is friendly or tall, then he is ugliest.
Abraham being not tall and Sherman being additional imply that Martin is not ugliest. | Raymond is tall. | entailment |
Clifford is not additional.
Sherman is ugliest.
Raymond is cute.
Raymond is tall.
Guy is not friendly.
Sherman is not cute.
Sherman is not conscious.
Sherman is tall.
Raymond is friendly.
Abraham is tall.
Konrad is not ugliest.
Guy is tall.It can be concluded that Konrad is not cute once knowing that Guy is not tall and Abraham is ugliest.
If Guy is not tall and Clifford is not ugliest, then Sherman is additional.
If someone who is tall is also additional, then he is cute.
If there is at least one people who is both not ugliest and friendly, then Clifford is not tall.
Martin being ugliest or Abraham being not conscious implies that Abraham is not friendly.
It can be concluded that Abraham is not tall once knowing that Raymond is not additional.
Someone is not cute and conscious if and only if he is tall.
As long as someone is tall and not conscious, he is not friendly and not ugliest.
If there is someone who is friendly, then Martin is not conscious and Raymond is ugliest.
Someone is cute if and only if he is conscious.
If someone is friendly or tall, then he is ugliest.
Abraham being not tall and Sherman being additional imply that Martin is not ugliest. | Sherman is not tall. | contradiction |
Clifford is not additional.
Sherman is ugliest.
Raymond is cute.
Raymond is tall.
Guy is not friendly.
Sherman is not cute.
Sherman is not conscious.
Sherman is tall.
Raymond is friendly.
Abraham is tall.
Konrad is not ugliest.
Guy is tall.It can be concluded that Konrad is not cute once knowing that Guy is not tall and Abraham is ugliest.
If Guy is not tall and Clifford is not ugliest, then Sherman is additional.
If someone who is tall is also additional, then he is cute.
If there is at least one people who is both not ugliest and friendly, then Clifford is not tall.
Martin being ugliest or Abraham being not conscious implies that Abraham is not friendly.
It can be concluded that Abraham is not tall once knowing that Raymond is not additional.
Someone is not cute and conscious if and only if he is tall.
As long as someone is tall and not conscious, he is not friendly and not ugliest.
If there is someone who is friendly, then Martin is not conscious and Raymond is ugliest.
Someone is cute if and only if he is conscious.
If someone is friendly or tall, then he is ugliest.
Abraham being not tall and Sherman being additional imply that Martin is not ugliest. | Guy is not conscious. | contradiction |
Clifford is not additional.
Sherman is ugliest.
Raymond is cute.
Raymond is tall.
Guy is not friendly.
Sherman is not cute.
Sherman is not conscious.
Sherman is tall.
Raymond is friendly.
Abraham is tall.
Konrad is not ugliest.
Guy is tall.It can be concluded that Konrad is not cute once knowing that Guy is not tall and Abraham is ugliest.
If Guy is not tall and Clifford is not ugliest, then Sherman is additional.
If someone who is tall is also additional, then he is cute.
If there is at least one people who is both not ugliest and friendly, then Clifford is not tall.
Martin being ugliest or Abraham being not conscious implies that Abraham is not friendly.
It can be concluded that Abraham is not tall once knowing that Raymond is not additional.
Someone is not cute and conscious if and only if he is tall.
As long as someone is tall and not conscious, he is not friendly and not ugliest.
If there is someone who is friendly, then Martin is not conscious and Raymond is ugliest.
Someone is cute if and only if he is conscious.
If someone is friendly or tall, then he is ugliest.
Abraham being not tall and Sherman being additional imply that Martin is not ugliest. | Raymond is not ugliest. | contradiction |
Clifford is not additional.
Sherman is ugliest.
Raymond is cute.
Raymond is tall.
Guy is not friendly.
Sherman is not cute.
Sherman is not conscious.
Sherman is tall.
Raymond is friendly.
Abraham is tall.
Konrad is not ugliest.
Guy is tall.It can be concluded that Konrad is not cute once knowing that Guy is not tall and Abraham is ugliest.
If Guy is not tall and Clifford is not ugliest, then Sherman is additional.
If someone who is tall is also additional, then he is cute.
If there is at least one people who is both not ugliest and friendly, then Clifford is not tall.
Martin being ugliest or Abraham being not conscious implies that Abraham is not friendly.
It can be concluded that Abraham is not tall once knowing that Raymond is not additional.
Someone is not cute and conscious if and only if he is tall.
As long as someone is tall and not conscious, he is not friendly and not ugliest.
If there is someone who is friendly, then Martin is not conscious and Raymond is ugliest.
Someone is cute if and only if he is conscious.
If someone is friendly or tall, then he is ugliest.
Abraham being not tall and Sherman being additional imply that Martin is not ugliest. | Guy is not cute. | self_contradiction |
Clifford is not additional.
Sherman is ugliest.
Raymond is cute.
Raymond is tall.
Guy is not friendly.
Sherman is not cute.
Sherman is not conscious.
Sherman is tall.
Raymond is friendly.
Abraham is tall.
Konrad is not ugliest.
Guy is tall.It can be concluded that Konrad is not cute once knowing that Guy is not tall and Abraham is ugliest.
If Guy is not tall and Clifford is not ugliest, then Sherman is additional.
If someone who is tall is also additional, then he is cute.
If there is at least one people who is both not ugliest and friendly, then Clifford is not tall.
Martin being ugliest or Abraham being not conscious implies that Abraham is not friendly.
It can be concluded that Abraham is not tall once knowing that Raymond is not additional.
Someone is not cute and conscious if and only if he is tall.
As long as someone is tall and not conscious, he is not friendly and not ugliest.
If there is someone who is friendly, then Martin is not conscious and Raymond is ugliest.
Someone is cute if and only if he is conscious.
If someone is friendly or tall, then he is ugliest.
Abraham being not tall and Sherman being additional imply that Martin is not ugliest. | Konrad is not ugliest. | entailment |
Clifford is not additional.
Sherman is ugliest.
Raymond is cute.
Raymond is tall.
Guy is not friendly.
Sherman is not cute.
Sherman is not conscious.
Sherman is tall.
Raymond is friendly.
Abraham is tall.
Konrad is not ugliest.
Guy is tall.It can be concluded that Konrad is not cute once knowing that Guy is not tall and Abraham is ugliest.
If Guy is not tall and Clifford is not ugliest, then Sherman is additional.
If someone who is tall is also additional, then he is cute.
If there is at least one people who is both not ugliest and friendly, then Clifford is not tall.
Martin being ugliest or Abraham being not conscious implies that Abraham is not friendly.
It can be concluded that Abraham is not tall once knowing that Raymond is not additional.
Someone is not cute and conscious if and only if he is tall.
As long as someone is tall and not conscious, he is not friendly and not ugliest.
If there is someone who is friendly, then Martin is not conscious and Raymond is ugliest.
Someone is cute if and only if he is conscious.
If someone is friendly or tall, then he is ugliest.
Abraham being not tall and Sherman being additional imply that Martin is not ugliest. | Raymond is not conscious. | contradiction |
Clifford is not additional.
Sherman is ugliest.
Raymond is cute.
Raymond is tall.
Guy is not friendly.
Sherman is not cute.
Sherman is not conscious.
Sherman is tall.
Raymond is friendly.
Abraham is tall.
Konrad is not ugliest.
Guy is tall.It can be concluded that Konrad is not cute once knowing that Guy is not tall and Abraham is ugliest.
If Guy is not tall and Clifford is not ugliest, then Sherman is additional.
If someone who is tall is also additional, then he is cute.
If there is at least one people who is both not ugliest and friendly, then Clifford is not tall.
Martin being ugliest or Abraham being not conscious implies that Abraham is not friendly.
It can be concluded that Abraham is not tall once knowing that Raymond is not additional.
Someone is not cute and conscious if and only if he is tall.
As long as someone is tall and not conscious, he is not friendly and not ugliest.
If there is someone who is friendly, then Martin is not conscious and Raymond is ugliest.
Someone is cute if and only if he is conscious.
If someone is friendly or tall, then he is ugliest.
Abraham being not tall and Sherman being additional imply that Martin is not ugliest. | Raymond is friendly. | entailment |
Clifford is not additional.
Sherman is ugliest.
Raymond is cute.
Raymond is tall.
Guy is not friendly.
Sherman is not cute.
Sherman is not conscious.
Sherman is tall.
Raymond is friendly.
Abraham is tall.
Konrad is not ugliest.
Guy is tall.It can be concluded that Konrad is not cute once knowing that Guy is not tall and Abraham is ugliest.
If Guy is not tall and Clifford is not ugliest, then Sherman is additional.
If someone who is tall is also additional, then he is cute.
If there is at least one people who is both not ugliest and friendly, then Clifford is not tall.
Martin being ugliest or Abraham being not conscious implies that Abraham is not friendly.
It can be concluded that Abraham is not tall once knowing that Raymond is not additional.
Someone is not cute and conscious if and only if he is tall.
As long as someone is tall and not conscious, he is not friendly and not ugliest.
If there is someone who is friendly, then Martin is not conscious and Raymond is ugliest.
Someone is cute if and only if he is conscious.
If someone is friendly or tall, then he is ugliest.
Abraham being not tall and Sherman being additional imply that Martin is not ugliest. | Konrad is ugliest. | contradiction |
Clifford is not additional.
Sherman is ugliest.
Raymond is cute.
Raymond is tall.
Guy is not friendly.
Sherman is not cute.
Sherman is not conscious.
Sherman is tall.
Raymond is friendly.
Abraham is tall.
Konrad is not ugliest.
Guy is tall.It can be concluded that Konrad is not cute once knowing that Guy is not tall and Abraham is ugliest.
If Guy is not tall and Clifford is not ugliest, then Sherman is additional.
If someone who is tall is also additional, then he is cute.
If there is at least one people who is both not ugliest and friendly, then Clifford is not tall.
Martin being ugliest or Abraham being not conscious implies that Abraham is not friendly.
It can be concluded that Abraham is not tall once knowing that Raymond is not additional.
Someone is not cute and conscious if and only if he is tall.
As long as someone is tall and not conscious, he is not friendly and not ugliest.
If there is someone who is friendly, then Martin is not conscious and Raymond is ugliest.
Someone is cute if and only if he is conscious.
If someone is friendly or tall, then he is ugliest.
Abraham being not tall and Sherman being additional imply that Martin is not ugliest. | Clifford is conscious. | neutral |
Clifford is not additional.
Sherman is ugliest.
Raymond is cute.
Raymond is tall.
Guy is not friendly.
Sherman is not cute.
Sherman is not conscious.
Sherman is tall.
Raymond is friendly.
Abraham is tall.
Konrad is not ugliest.
Guy is tall.It can be concluded that Konrad is not cute once knowing that Guy is not tall and Abraham is ugliest.
If Guy is not tall and Clifford is not ugliest, then Sherman is additional.
If someone who is tall is also additional, then he is cute.
If there is at least one people who is both not ugliest and friendly, then Clifford is not tall.
Martin being ugliest or Abraham being not conscious implies that Abraham is not friendly.
It can be concluded that Abraham is not tall once knowing that Raymond is not additional.
Someone is not cute and conscious if and only if he is tall.
As long as someone is tall and not conscious, he is not friendly and not ugliest.
If there is someone who is friendly, then Martin is not conscious and Raymond is ugliest.
Someone is cute if and only if he is conscious.
If someone is friendly or tall, then he is ugliest.
Abraham being not tall and Sherman being additional imply that Martin is not ugliest. | Sherman is not conscious. | self_contradiction |
Clifford is not additional.
Sherman is ugliest.
Raymond is cute.
Raymond is tall.
Guy is not friendly.
Sherman is not cute.
Sherman is not conscious.
Sherman is tall.
Raymond is friendly.
Abraham is tall.
Konrad is not ugliest.
Guy is tall.It can be concluded that Konrad is not cute once knowing that Guy is not tall and Abraham is ugliest.
If Guy is not tall and Clifford is not ugliest, then Sherman is additional.
If someone who is tall is also additional, then he is cute.
If there is at least one people who is both not ugliest and friendly, then Clifford is not tall.
Martin being ugliest or Abraham being not conscious implies that Abraham is not friendly.
It can be concluded that Abraham is not tall once knowing that Raymond is not additional.
Someone is not cute and conscious if and only if he is tall.
As long as someone is tall and not conscious, he is not friendly and not ugliest.
If there is someone who is friendly, then Martin is not conscious and Raymond is ugliest.
Someone is cute if and only if he is conscious.
If someone is friendly or tall, then he is ugliest.
Abraham being not tall and Sherman being additional imply that Martin is not ugliest. | Abraham is not cute. | self_contradiction |
Clifford is not additional.
Sherman is ugliest.
Raymond is cute.
Raymond is tall.
Guy is not friendly.
Sherman is not cute.
Sherman is not conscious.
Sherman is tall.
Raymond is friendly.
Abraham is tall.
Konrad is not ugliest.
Guy is tall.It can be concluded that Konrad is not cute once knowing that Guy is not tall and Abraham is ugliest.
If Guy is not tall and Clifford is not ugliest, then Sherman is additional.
If someone who is tall is also additional, then he is cute.
If there is at least one people who is both not ugliest and friendly, then Clifford is not tall.
Martin being ugliest or Abraham being not conscious implies that Abraham is not friendly.
It can be concluded that Abraham is not tall once knowing that Raymond is not additional.
Someone is not cute and conscious if and only if he is tall.
As long as someone is tall and not conscious, he is not friendly and not ugliest.
If there is someone who is friendly, then Martin is not conscious and Raymond is ugliest.
Someone is cute if and only if he is conscious.
If someone is friendly or tall, then he is ugliest.
Abraham being not tall and Sherman being additional imply that Martin is not ugliest. | Abraham is conscious. | entailment |
Clifford is not additional.
Sherman is ugliest.
Raymond is cute.
Raymond is tall.
Guy is not friendly.
Sherman is not cute.
Sherman is not conscious.
Sherman is tall.
Raymond is friendly.
Abraham is tall.
Konrad is not ugliest.
Guy is tall.It can be concluded that Konrad is not cute once knowing that Guy is not tall and Abraham is ugliest.
If Guy is not tall and Clifford is not ugliest, then Sherman is additional.
If someone who is tall is also additional, then he is cute.
If there is at least one people who is both not ugliest and friendly, then Clifford is not tall.
Martin being ugliest or Abraham being not conscious implies that Abraham is not friendly.
It can be concluded that Abraham is not tall once knowing that Raymond is not additional.
Someone is not cute and conscious if and only if he is tall.
As long as someone is tall and not conscious, he is not friendly and not ugliest.
If there is someone who is friendly, then Martin is not conscious and Raymond is ugliest.
Someone is cute if and only if he is conscious.
If someone is friendly or tall, then he is ugliest.
Abraham being not tall and Sherman being additional imply that Martin is not ugliest. | Konrad is not conscious. | neutral |
Clifford is not additional.
Sherman is ugliest.
Raymond is cute.
Raymond is tall.
Guy is not friendly.
Sherman is not cute.
Sherman is not conscious.
Sherman is tall.
Raymond is friendly.
Abraham is tall.
Konrad is not ugliest.
Guy is tall.It can be concluded that Konrad is not cute once knowing that Guy is not tall and Abraham is ugliest.
If Guy is not tall and Clifford is not ugliest, then Sherman is additional.
If someone who is tall is also additional, then he is cute.
If there is at least one people who is both not ugliest and friendly, then Clifford is not tall.
Martin being ugliest or Abraham being not conscious implies that Abraham is not friendly.
It can be concluded that Abraham is not tall once knowing that Raymond is not additional.
Someone is not cute and conscious if and only if he is tall.
As long as someone is tall and not conscious, he is not friendly and not ugliest.
If there is someone who is friendly, then Martin is not conscious and Raymond is ugliest.
Someone is cute if and only if he is conscious.
If someone is friendly or tall, then he is ugliest.
Abraham being not tall and Sherman being additional imply that Martin is not ugliest. | Guy is not additional. | neutral |
Clifford is not additional.
Sherman is ugliest.
Raymond is cute.
Raymond is tall.
Guy is not friendly.
Sherman is not cute.
Sherman is not conscious.
Sherman is tall.
Raymond is friendly.
Abraham is tall.
Konrad is not ugliest.
Guy is tall.It can be concluded that Konrad is not cute once knowing that Guy is not tall and Abraham is ugliest.
If Guy is not tall and Clifford is not ugliest, then Sherman is additional.
If someone who is tall is also additional, then he is cute.
If there is at least one people who is both not ugliest and friendly, then Clifford is not tall.
Martin being ugliest or Abraham being not conscious implies that Abraham is not friendly.
It can be concluded that Abraham is not tall once knowing that Raymond is not additional.
Someone is not cute and conscious if and only if he is tall.
As long as someone is tall and not conscious, he is not friendly and not ugliest.
If there is someone who is friendly, then Martin is not conscious and Raymond is ugliest.
Someone is cute if and only if he is conscious.
If someone is friendly or tall, then he is ugliest.
Abraham being not tall and Sherman being additional imply that Martin is not ugliest. | Raymond is cute. | self_contradiction |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.