premise
stringlengths 923
1.41k
| hypothesis
stringlengths 11
33
| label
stringclasses 4
values |
|---|---|---|
Corwin is helpful.
Garrick is not encouraging.
Garrick is helpful.
Bert is not nice.
Anthony is encouraging.
Homer is not courageous.
Bruce is not nice.
Corwin is not encouraging.
Homer is important.
Homer is nice.
Garrick is not impressive.
Bert is encouraging.Someone is not impressive and not encouraging if and only if he is nice and important.
It can be concluded that Garrick is courageous once knowing that John is helpful or Anthony is nice.
If all people are not nice, then Bruce is not important.
If someone who is not courageous is also not impressive, then he is not nice.
If someone is encouraging or not impressive, then he is helpful.
If there is someone who is both courageous and not helpful, then Garrick is encouraging and Bert is important.
Someone being both encouraging and not nice is equivalent to being not important.
John is not nice if and only if Homer is not important and Anthony is not helpful.
If there is someone who is either not helpful or nice, then John is not important and Corwin is not courageous.
If Corwin is courageous, then Bruce is not nice.
Someone who is nice is always encouraging.
If everyone is helpful or not nice, then Garrick is not important. | Garrick is not impressive. | entailment |
Corwin is helpful.
Garrick is not encouraging.
Garrick is helpful.
Bert is not nice.
Anthony is encouraging.
Homer is not courageous.
Bruce is not nice.
Corwin is not encouraging.
Homer is important.
Homer is nice.
Garrick is not impressive.
Bert is encouraging.Someone is not impressive and not encouraging if and only if he is nice and important.
It can be concluded that Garrick is courageous once knowing that John is helpful or Anthony is nice.
If all people are not nice, then Bruce is not important.
If someone who is not courageous is also not impressive, then he is not nice.
If someone is encouraging or not impressive, then he is helpful.
If there is someone who is both courageous and not helpful, then Garrick is encouraging and Bert is important.
Someone being both encouraging and not nice is equivalent to being not important.
John is not nice if and only if Homer is not important and Anthony is not helpful.
If there is someone who is either not helpful or nice, then John is not important and Corwin is not courageous.
If Corwin is courageous, then Bruce is not nice.
Someone who is nice is always encouraging.
If everyone is helpful or not nice, then Garrick is not important. | Garrick is encouraging. | self_contradiction |
Corwin is helpful.
Garrick is not encouraging.
Garrick is helpful.
Bert is not nice.
Anthony is encouraging.
Homer is not courageous.
Bruce is not nice.
Corwin is not encouraging.
Homer is important.
Homer is nice.
Garrick is not impressive.
Bert is encouraging.Someone is not impressive and not encouraging if and only if he is nice and important.
It can be concluded that Garrick is courageous once knowing that John is helpful or Anthony is nice.
If all people are not nice, then Bruce is not important.
If someone who is not courageous is also not impressive, then he is not nice.
If someone is encouraging or not impressive, then he is helpful.
If there is someone who is both courageous and not helpful, then Garrick is encouraging and Bert is important.
Someone being both encouraging and not nice is equivalent to being not important.
John is not nice if and only if Homer is not important and Anthony is not helpful.
If there is someone who is either not helpful or nice, then John is not important and Corwin is not courageous.
If Corwin is courageous, then Bruce is not nice.
Someone who is nice is always encouraging.
If everyone is helpful or not nice, then Garrick is not important. | Homer is encouraging. | self_contradiction |
Corwin is helpful.
Garrick is not encouraging.
Garrick is helpful.
Bert is not nice.
Anthony is encouraging.
Homer is not courageous.
Bruce is not nice.
Corwin is not encouraging.
Homer is important.
Homer is nice.
Garrick is not impressive.
Bert is encouraging.Someone is not impressive and not encouraging if and only if he is nice and important.
It can be concluded that Garrick is courageous once knowing that John is helpful or Anthony is nice.
If all people are not nice, then Bruce is not important.
If someone who is not courageous is also not impressive, then he is not nice.
If someone is encouraging or not impressive, then he is helpful.
If there is someone who is both courageous and not helpful, then Garrick is encouraging and Bert is important.
Someone being both encouraging and not nice is equivalent to being not important.
John is not nice if and only if Homer is not important and Anthony is not helpful.
If there is someone who is either not helpful or nice, then John is not important and Corwin is not courageous.
If Corwin is courageous, then Bruce is not nice.
Someone who is nice is always encouraging.
If everyone is helpful or not nice, then Garrick is not important. | Bruce is not nice. | entailment |
Corwin is helpful.
Garrick is not encouraging.
Garrick is helpful.
Bert is not nice.
Anthony is encouraging.
Homer is not courageous.
Bruce is not nice.
Corwin is not encouraging.
Homer is important.
Homer is nice.
Garrick is not impressive.
Bert is encouraging.Someone is not impressive and not encouraging if and only if he is nice and important.
It can be concluded that Garrick is courageous once knowing that John is helpful or Anthony is nice.
If all people are not nice, then Bruce is not important.
If someone who is not courageous is also not impressive, then he is not nice.
If someone is encouraging or not impressive, then he is helpful.
If there is someone who is both courageous and not helpful, then Garrick is encouraging and Bert is important.
Someone being both encouraging and not nice is equivalent to being not important.
John is not nice if and only if Homer is not important and Anthony is not helpful.
If there is someone who is either not helpful or nice, then John is not important and Corwin is not courageous.
If Corwin is courageous, then Bruce is not nice.
Someone who is nice is always encouraging.
If everyone is helpful or not nice, then Garrick is not important. | Homer is not nice. | self_contradiction |
Corwin is helpful.
Garrick is not encouraging.
Garrick is helpful.
Bert is not nice.
Anthony is encouraging.
Homer is not courageous.
Bruce is not nice.
Corwin is not encouraging.
Homer is important.
Homer is nice.
Garrick is not impressive.
Bert is encouraging.Someone is not impressive and not encouraging if and only if he is nice and important.
It can be concluded that Garrick is courageous once knowing that John is helpful or Anthony is nice.
If all people are not nice, then Bruce is not important.
If someone who is not courageous is also not impressive, then he is not nice.
If someone is encouraging or not impressive, then he is helpful.
If there is someone who is both courageous and not helpful, then Garrick is encouraging and Bert is important.
Someone being both encouraging and not nice is equivalent to being not important.
John is not nice if and only if Homer is not important and Anthony is not helpful.
If there is someone who is either not helpful or nice, then John is not important and Corwin is not courageous.
If Corwin is courageous, then Bruce is not nice.
Someone who is nice is always encouraging.
If everyone is helpful or not nice, then Garrick is not important. | Corwin is courageous. | contradiction |
Corwin is helpful.
Garrick is not encouraging.
Garrick is helpful.
Bert is not nice.
Anthony is encouraging.
Homer is not courageous.
Bruce is not nice.
Corwin is not encouraging.
Homer is important.
Homer is nice.
Garrick is not impressive.
Bert is encouraging.Someone is not impressive and not encouraging if and only if he is nice and important.
It can be concluded that Garrick is courageous once knowing that John is helpful or Anthony is nice.
If all people are not nice, then Bruce is not important.
If someone who is not courageous is also not impressive, then he is not nice.
If someone is encouraging or not impressive, then he is helpful.
If there is someone who is both courageous and not helpful, then Garrick is encouraging and Bert is important.
Someone being both encouraging and not nice is equivalent to being not important.
John is not nice if and only if Homer is not important and Anthony is not helpful.
If there is someone who is either not helpful or nice, then John is not important and Corwin is not courageous.
If Corwin is courageous, then Bruce is not nice.
Someone who is nice is always encouraging.
If everyone is helpful or not nice, then Garrick is not important. | Garrick is not nice. | contradiction |
Corwin is helpful.
Garrick is not encouraging.
Garrick is helpful.
Bert is not nice.
Anthony is encouraging.
Homer is not courageous.
Bruce is not nice.
Corwin is not encouraging.
Homer is important.
Homer is nice.
Garrick is not impressive.
Bert is encouraging.Someone is not impressive and not encouraging if and only if he is nice and important.
It can be concluded that Garrick is courageous once knowing that John is helpful or Anthony is nice.
If all people are not nice, then Bruce is not important.
If someone who is not courageous is also not impressive, then he is not nice.
If someone is encouraging or not impressive, then he is helpful.
If there is someone who is both courageous and not helpful, then Garrick is encouraging and Bert is important.
Someone being both encouraging and not nice is equivalent to being not important.
John is not nice if and only if Homer is not important and Anthony is not helpful.
If there is someone who is either not helpful or nice, then John is not important and Corwin is not courageous.
If Corwin is courageous, then Bruce is not nice.
Someone who is nice is always encouraging.
If everyone is helpful or not nice, then Garrick is not important. | Corwin is helpful. | entailment |
Corwin is helpful.
Garrick is not encouraging.
Garrick is helpful.
Bert is not nice.
Anthony is encouraging.
Homer is not courageous.
Bruce is not nice.
Corwin is not encouraging.
Homer is important.
Homer is nice.
Garrick is not impressive.
Bert is encouraging.Someone is not impressive and not encouraging if and only if he is nice and important.
It can be concluded that Garrick is courageous once knowing that John is helpful or Anthony is nice.
If all people are not nice, then Bruce is not important.
If someone who is not courageous is also not impressive, then he is not nice.
If someone is encouraging or not impressive, then he is helpful.
If there is someone who is both courageous and not helpful, then Garrick is encouraging and Bert is important.
Someone being both encouraging and not nice is equivalent to being not important.
John is not nice if and only if Homer is not important and Anthony is not helpful.
If there is someone who is either not helpful or nice, then John is not important and Corwin is not courageous.
If Corwin is courageous, then Bruce is not nice.
Someone who is nice is always encouraging.
If everyone is helpful or not nice, then Garrick is not important. | John is nice. | contradiction |
Corwin is helpful.
Garrick is not encouraging.
Garrick is helpful.
Bert is not nice.
Anthony is encouraging.
Homer is not courageous.
Bruce is not nice.
Corwin is not encouraging.
Homer is important.
Homer is nice.
Garrick is not impressive.
Bert is encouraging.Someone is not impressive and not encouraging if and only if he is nice and important.
It can be concluded that Garrick is courageous once knowing that John is helpful or Anthony is nice.
If all people are not nice, then Bruce is not important.
If someone who is not courageous is also not impressive, then he is not nice.
If someone is encouraging or not impressive, then he is helpful.
If there is someone who is both courageous and not helpful, then Garrick is encouraging and Bert is important.
Someone being both encouraging and not nice is equivalent to being not important.
John is not nice if and only if Homer is not important and Anthony is not helpful.
If there is someone who is either not helpful or nice, then John is not important and Corwin is not courageous.
If Corwin is courageous, then Bruce is not nice.
Someone who is nice is always encouraging.
If everyone is helpful or not nice, then Garrick is not important. | Bert is not impressive. | neutral |
Corwin is helpful.
Garrick is not encouraging.
Garrick is helpful.
Bert is not nice.
Anthony is encouraging.
Homer is not courageous.
Bruce is not nice.
Corwin is not encouraging.
Homer is important.
Homer is nice.
Garrick is not impressive.
Bert is encouraging.Someone is not impressive and not encouraging if and only if he is nice and important.
It can be concluded that Garrick is courageous once knowing that John is helpful or Anthony is nice.
If all people are not nice, then Bruce is not important.
If someone who is not courageous is also not impressive, then he is not nice.
If someone is encouraging or not impressive, then he is helpful.
If there is someone who is both courageous and not helpful, then Garrick is encouraging and Bert is important.
Someone being both encouraging and not nice is equivalent to being not important.
John is not nice if and only if Homer is not important and Anthony is not helpful.
If there is someone who is either not helpful or nice, then John is not important and Corwin is not courageous.
If Corwin is courageous, then Bruce is not nice.
Someone who is nice is always encouraging.
If everyone is helpful or not nice, then Garrick is not important. | Anthony is helpful. | self_contradiction |
Corwin is helpful.
Garrick is not encouraging.
Garrick is helpful.
Bert is not nice.
Anthony is encouraging.
Homer is not courageous.
Bruce is not nice.
Corwin is not encouraging.
Homer is important.
Homer is nice.
Garrick is not impressive.
Bert is encouraging.Someone is not impressive and not encouraging if and only if he is nice and important.
It can be concluded that Garrick is courageous once knowing that John is helpful or Anthony is nice.
If all people are not nice, then Bruce is not important.
If someone who is not courageous is also not impressive, then he is not nice.
If someone is encouraging or not impressive, then he is helpful.
If there is someone who is both courageous and not helpful, then Garrick is encouraging and Bert is important.
Someone being both encouraging and not nice is equivalent to being not important.
John is not nice if and only if Homer is not important and Anthony is not helpful.
If there is someone who is either not helpful or nice, then John is not important and Corwin is not courageous.
If Corwin is courageous, then Bruce is not nice.
Someone who is nice is always encouraging.
If everyone is helpful or not nice, then Garrick is not important. | Bruce is not courageous. | neutral |
Corwin is helpful.
Garrick is not encouraging.
Garrick is helpful.
Bert is not nice.
Anthony is encouraging.
Homer is not courageous.
Bruce is not nice.
Corwin is not encouraging.
Homer is important.
Homer is nice.
Garrick is not impressive.
Bert is encouraging.Someone is not impressive and not encouraging if and only if he is nice and important.
It can be concluded that Garrick is courageous once knowing that John is helpful or Anthony is nice.
If all people are not nice, then Bruce is not important.
If someone who is not courageous is also not impressive, then he is not nice.
If someone is encouraging or not impressive, then he is helpful.
If there is someone who is both courageous and not helpful, then Garrick is encouraging and Bert is important.
Someone being both encouraging and not nice is equivalent to being not important.
John is not nice if and only if Homer is not important and Anthony is not helpful.
If there is someone who is either not helpful or nice, then John is not important and Corwin is not courageous.
If Corwin is courageous, then Bruce is not nice.
Someone who is nice is always encouraging.
If everyone is helpful or not nice, then Garrick is not important. | Bruce is not important. | neutral |
Corwin is helpful.
Garrick is not encouraging.
Garrick is helpful.
Bert is not nice.
Anthony is encouraging.
Homer is not courageous.
Bruce is not nice.
Corwin is not encouraging.
Homer is important.
Homer is nice.
Garrick is not impressive.
Bert is encouraging.Someone is not impressive and not encouraging if and only if he is nice and important.
It can be concluded that Garrick is courageous once knowing that John is helpful or Anthony is nice.
If all people are not nice, then Bruce is not important.
If someone who is not courageous is also not impressive, then he is not nice.
If someone is encouraging or not impressive, then he is helpful.
If there is someone who is both courageous and not helpful, then Garrick is encouraging and Bert is important.
Someone being both encouraging and not nice is equivalent to being not important.
John is not nice if and only if Homer is not important and Anthony is not helpful.
If there is someone who is either not helpful or nice, then John is not important and Corwin is not courageous.
If Corwin is courageous, then Bruce is not nice.
Someone who is nice is always encouraging.
If everyone is helpful or not nice, then Garrick is not important. | John is not nice. | entailment |
Corwin is helpful.
Garrick is not encouraging.
Garrick is helpful.
Bert is not nice.
Anthony is encouraging.
Homer is not courageous.
Bruce is not nice.
Corwin is not encouraging.
Homer is important.
Homer is nice.
Garrick is not impressive.
Bert is encouraging.Someone is not impressive and not encouraging if and only if he is nice and important.
It can be concluded that Garrick is courageous once knowing that John is helpful or Anthony is nice.
If all people are not nice, then Bruce is not important.
If someone who is not courageous is also not impressive, then he is not nice.
If someone is encouraging or not impressive, then he is helpful.
If there is someone who is both courageous and not helpful, then Garrick is encouraging and Bert is important.
Someone being both encouraging and not nice is equivalent to being not important.
John is not nice if and only if Homer is not important and Anthony is not helpful.
If there is someone who is either not helpful or nice, then John is not important and Corwin is not courageous.
If Corwin is courageous, then Bruce is not nice.
Someone who is nice is always encouraging.
If everyone is helpful or not nice, then Garrick is not important. | John is not important. | entailment |
Corwin is helpful.
Garrick is not encouraging.
Garrick is helpful.
Bert is not nice.
Anthony is encouraging.
Homer is not courageous.
Bruce is not nice.
Corwin is not encouraging.
Homer is important.
Homer is nice.
Garrick is not impressive.
Bert is encouraging.Someone is not impressive and not encouraging if and only if he is nice and important.
It can be concluded that Garrick is courageous once knowing that John is helpful or Anthony is nice.
If all people are not nice, then Bruce is not important.
If someone who is not courageous is also not impressive, then he is not nice.
If someone is encouraging or not impressive, then he is helpful.
If there is someone who is both courageous and not helpful, then Garrick is encouraging and Bert is important.
Someone being both encouraging and not nice is equivalent to being not important.
John is not nice if and only if Homer is not important and Anthony is not helpful.
If there is someone who is either not helpful or nice, then John is not important and Corwin is not courageous.
If Corwin is courageous, then Bruce is not nice.
Someone who is nice is always encouraging.
If everyone is helpful or not nice, then Garrick is not important. | Anthony is impressive. | neutral |
Corwin is helpful.
Garrick is not encouraging.
Garrick is helpful.
Bert is not nice.
Anthony is encouraging.
Homer is not courageous.
Bruce is not nice.
Corwin is not encouraging.
Homer is important.
Homer is nice.
Garrick is not impressive.
Bert is encouraging.Someone is not impressive and not encouraging if and only if he is nice and important.
It can be concluded that Garrick is courageous once knowing that John is helpful or Anthony is nice.
If all people are not nice, then Bruce is not important.
If someone who is not courageous is also not impressive, then he is not nice.
If someone is encouraging or not impressive, then he is helpful.
If there is someone who is both courageous and not helpful, then Garrick is encouraging and Bert is important.
Someone being both encouraging and not nice is equivalent to being not important.
John is not nice if and only if Homer is not important and Anthony is not helpful.
If there is someone who is either not helpful or nice, then John is not important and Corwin is not courageous.
If Corwin is courageous, then Bruce is not nice.
Someone who is nice is always encouraging.
If everyone is helpful or not nice, then Garrick is not important. | Homer is important. | self_contradiction |
Corwin is helpful.
Garrick is not encouraging.
Garrick is helpful.
Bert is not nice.
Anthony is encouraging.
Homer is not courageous.
Bruce is not nice.
Corwin is not encouraging.
Homer is important.
Homer is nice.
Garrick is not impressive.
Bert is encouraging.Someone is not impressive and not encouraging if and only if he is nice and important.
It can be concluded that Garrick is courageous once knowing that John is helpful or Anthony is nice.
If all people are not nice, then Bruce is not important.
If someone who is not courageous is also not impressive, then he is not nice.
If someone is encouraging or not impressive, then he is helpful.
If there is someone who is both courageous and not helpful, then Garrick is encouraging and Bert is important.
Someone being both encouraging and not nice is equivalent to being not important.
John is not nice if and only if Homer is not important and Anthony is not helpful.
If there is someone who is either not helpful or nice, then John is not important and Corwin is not courageous.
If Corwin is courageous, then Bruce is not nice.
Someone who is nice is always encouraging.
If everyone is helpful or not nice, then Garrick is not important. | Homer is impressive. | contradiction |
Corwin is helpful.
Garrick is not encouraging.
Garrick is helpful.
Bert is not nice.
Anthony is encouraging.
Homer is not courageous.
Bruce is not nice.
Corwin is not encouraging.
Homer is important.
Homer is nice.
Garrick is not impressive.
Bert is encouraging.Someone is not impressive and not encouraging if and only if he is nice and important.
It can be concluded that Garrick is courageous once knowing that John is helpful or Anthony is nice.
If all people are not nice, then Bruce is not important.
If someone who is not courageous is also not impressive, then he is not nice.
If someone is encouraging or not impressive, then he is helpful.
If there is someone who is both courageous and not helpful, then Garrick is encouraging and Bert is important.
Someone being both encouraging and not nice is equivalent to being not important.
John is not nice if and only if Homer is not important and Anthony is not helpful.
If there is someone who is either not helpful or nice, then John is not important and Corwin is not courageous.
If Corwin is courageous, then Bruce is not nice.
Someone who is nice is always encouraging.
If everyone is helpful or not nice, then Garrick is not important. | Bert is nice. | contradiction |
Corwin is helpful.
Garrick is not encouraging.
Garrick is helpful.
Bert is not nice.
Anthony is encouraging.
Homer is not courageous.
Bruce is not nice.
Corwin is not encouraging.
Homer is important.
Homer is nice.
Garrick is not impressive.
Bert is encouraging.Someone is not impressive and not encouraging if and only if he is nice and important.
It can be concluded that Garrick is courageous once knowing that John is helpful or Anthony is nice.
If all people are not nice, then Bruce is not important.
If someone who is not courageous is also not impressive, then he is not nice.
If someone is encouraging or not impressive, then he is helpful.
If there is someone who is both courageous and not helpful, then Garrick is encouraging and Bert is important.
Someone being both encouraging and not nice is equivalent to being not important.
John is not nice if and only if Homer is not important and Anthony is not helpful.
If there is someone who is either not helpful or nice, then John is not important and Corwin is not courageous.
If Corwin is courageous, then Bruce is not nice.
Someone who is nice is always encouraging.
If everyone is helpful or not nice, then Garrick is not important. | Corwin is not important. | neutral |
Michael is not open.
Michael is realistic.
Jed is thoughtless.
Matthew is thoughtless.
Michael is not frail.
Maggie is not thoughtless.
Matthew is not wet.
Michael is not careful.
Jed is not wet.
Sherard is wet.
Michael is thoughtless.
Sherard is open.If there is someone who is thoughtless, then Katrina is wet and Sherard is careful.
If Michael is wet, then Katrina is not frail and Kingsley is realistic.
If there is at least one people who is not frail or not realistic, then Jed is thoughtless.
Someone who is both realistic and not wet is always open.
If someone is thoughtless, then he is careful, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is frail, then Katrina is realistic.
Someone being both not thoughtless and frail is equivalent to being not careful.
If someone is not realistic, then he is not careful.
If there is at least one people who is not wet or not open, then Kingsley is frail.
Someone is wet and careful if and only if he is realistic and open.
If there is at least one people who is careful, then Matthew is not frail.
If someone is realistic or he is not wet, then he is not open. | Sherard is thoughtless. | entailment |
Michael is not open.
Michael is realistic.
Jed is thoughtless.
Matthew is thoughtless.
Michael is not frail.
Maggie is not thoughtless.
Matthew is not wet.
Michael is not careful.
Jed is not wet.
Sherard is wet.
Michael is thoughtless.
Sherard is open.If there is someone who is thoughtless, then Katrina is wet and Sherard is careful.
If Michael is wet, then Katrina is not frail and Kingsley is realistic.
If there is at least one people who is not frail or not realistic, then Jed is thoughtless.
Someone who is both realistic and not wet is always open.
If someone is thoughtless, then he is careful, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is frail, then Katrina is realistic.
Someone being both not thoughtless and frail is equivalent to being not careful.
If someone is not realistic, then he is not careful.
If there is at least one people who is not wet or not open, then Kingsley is frail.
Someone is wet and careful if and only if he is realistic and open.
If there is at least one people who is careful, then Matthew is not frail.
If someone is realistic or he is not wet, then he is not open. | Kingsley is thoughtless. | neutral |
Michael is not open.
Michael is realistic.
Jed is thoughtless.
Matthew is thoughtless.
Michael is not frail.
Maggie is not thoughtless.
Matthew is not wet.
Michael is not careful.
Jed is not wet.
Sherard is wet.
Michael is thoughtless.
Sherard is open.If there is someone who is thoughtless, then Katrina is wet and Sherard is careful.
If Michael is wet, then Katrina is not frail and Kingsley is realistic.
If there is at least one people who is not frail or not realistic, then Jed is thoughtless.
Someone who is both realistic and not wet is always open.
If someone is thoughtless, then he is careful, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is frail, then Katrina is realistic.
Someone being both not thoughtless and frail is equivalent to being not careful.
If someone is not realistic, then he is not careful.
If there is at least one people who is not wet or not open, then Kingsley is frail.
Someone is wet and careful if and only if he is realistic and open.
If there is at least one people who is careful, then Matthew is not frail.
If someone is realistic or he is not wet, then he is not open. | Matthew is careful. | entailment |
Michael is not open.
Michael is realistic.
Jed is thoughtless.
Matthew is thoughtless.
Michael is not frail.
Maggie is not thoughtless.
Matthew is not wet.
Michael is not careful.
Jed is not wet.
Sherard is wet.
Michael is thoughtless.
Sherard is open.If there is someone who is thoughtless, then Katrina is wet and Sherard is careful.
If Michael is wet, then Katrina is not frail and Kingsley is realistic.
If there is at least one people who is not frail or not realistic, then Jed is thoughtless.
Someone who is both realistic and not wet is always open.
If someone is thoughtless, then he is careful, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is frail, then Katrina is realistic.
Someone being both not thoughtless and frail is equivalent to being not careful.
If someone is not realistic, then he is not careful.
If there is at least one people who is not wet or not open, then Kingsley is frail.
Someone is wet and careful if and only if he is realistic and open.
If there is at least one people who is careful, then Matthew is not frail.
If someone is realistic or he is not wet, then he is not open. | Katrina is not wet. | contradiction |
Michael is not open.
Michael is realistic.
Jed is thoughtless.
Matthew is thoughtless.
Michael is not frail.
Maggie is not thoughtless.
Matthew is not wet.
Michael is not careful.
Jed is not wet.
Sherard is wet.
Michael is thoughtless.
Sherard is open.If there is someone who is thoughtless, then Katrina is wet and Sherard is careful.
If Michael is wet, then Katrina is not frail and Kingsley is realistic.
If there is at least one people who is not frail or not realistic, then Jed is thoughtless.
Someone who is both realistic and not wet is always open.
If someone is thoughtless, then he is careful, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is frail, then Katrina is realistic.
Someone being both not thoughtless and frail is equivalent to being not careful.
If someone is not realistic, then he is not careful.
If there is at least one people who is not wet or not open, then Kingsley is frail.
Someone is wet and careful if and only if he is realistic and open.
If there is at least one people who is careful, then Matthew is not frail.
If someone is realistic or he is not wet, then he is not open. | Michael is not frail. | self_contradiction |
Michael is not open.
Michael is realistic.
Jed is thoughtless.
Matthew is thoughtless.
Michael is not frail.
Maggie is not thoughtless.
Matthew is not wet.
Michael is not careful.
Jed is not wet.
Sherard is wet.
Michael is thoughtless.
Sherard is open.If there is someone who is thoughtless, then Katrina is wet and Sherard is careful.
If Michael is wet, then Katrina is not frail and Kingsley is realistic.
If there is at least one people who is not frail or not realistic, then Jed is thoughtless.
Someone who is both realistic and not wet is always open.
If someone is thoughtless, then he is careful, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is frail, then Katrina is realistic.
Someone being both not thoughtless and frail is equivalent to being not careful.
If someone is not realistic, then he is not careful.
If there is at least one people who is not wet or not open, then Kingsley is frail.
Someone is wet and careful if and only if he is realistic and open.
If there is at least one people who is careful, then Matthew is not frail.
If someone is realistic or he is not wet, then he is not open. | Matthew is thoughtless. | entailment |
Michael is not open.
Michael is realistic.
Jed is thoughtless.
Matthew is thoughtless.
Michael is not frail.
Maggie is not thoughtless.
Matthew is not wet.
Michael is not careful.
Jed is not wet.
Sherard is wet.
Michael is thoughtless.
Sherard is open.If there is someone who is thoughtless, then Katrina is wet and Sherard is careful.
If Michael is wet, then Katrina is not frail and Kingsley is realistic.
If there is at least one people who is not frail or not realistic, then Jed is thoughtless.
Someone who is both realistic and not wet is always open.
If someone is thoughtless, then he is careful, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is frail, then Katrina is realistic.
Someone being both not thoughtless and frail is equivalent to being not careful.
If someone is not realistic, then he is not careful.
If there is at least one people who is not wet or not open, then Kingsley is frail.
Someone is wet and careful if and only if he is realistic and open.
If there is at least one people who is careful, then Matthew is not frail.
If someone is realistic or he is not wet, then he is not open. | Katrina is not open. | entailment |
Michael is not open.
Michael is realistic.
Jed is thoughtless.
Matthew is thoughtless.
Michael is not frail.
Maggie is not thoughtless.
Matthew is not wet.
Michael is not careful.
Jed is not wet.
Sherard is wet.
Michael is thoughtless.
Sherard is open.If there is someone who is thoughtless, then Katrina is wet and Sherard is careful.
If Michael is wet, then Katrina is not frail and Kingsley is realistic.
If there is at least one people who is not frail or not realistic, then Jed is thoughtless.
Someone who is both realistic and not wet is always open.
If someone is thoughtless, then he is careful, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is frail, then Katrina is realistic.
Someone being both not thoughtless and frail is equivalent to being not careful.
If someone is not realistic, then he is not careful.
If there is at least one people who is not wet or not open, then Kingsley is frail.
Someone is wet and careful if and only if he is realistic and open.
If there is at least one people who is careful, then Matthew is not frail.
If someone is realistic or he is not wet, then he is not open. | Sherard is not open. | self_contradiction |
Michael is not open.
Michael is realistic.
Jed is thoughtless.
Matthew is thoughtless.
Michael is not frail.
Maggie is not thoughtless.
Matthew is not wet.
Michael is not careful.
Jed is not wet.
Sherard is wet.
Michael is thoughtless.
Sherard is open.If there is someone who is thoughtless, then Katrina is wet and Sherard is careful.
If Michael is wet, then Katrina is not frail and Kingsley is realistic.
If there is at least one people who is not frail or not realistic, then Jed is thoughtless.
Someone who is both realistic and not wet is always open.
If someone is thoughtless, then he is careful, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is frail, then Katrina is realistic.
Someone being both not thoughtless and frail is equivalent to being not careful.
If someone is not realistic, then he is not careful.
If there is at least one people who is not wet or not open, then Kingsley is frail.
Someone is wet and careful if and only if he is realistic and open.
If there is at least one people who is careful, then Matthew is not frail.
If someone is realistic or he is not wet, then he is not open. | Kingsley is not open. | neutral |
Michael is not open.
Michael is realistic.
Jed is thoughtless.
Matthew is thoughtless.
Michael is not frail.
Maggie is not thoughtless.
Matthew is not wet.
Michael is not careful.
Jed is not wet.
Sherard is wet.
Michael is thoughtless.
Sherard is open.If there is someone who is thoughtless, then Katrina is wet and Sherard is careful.
If Michael is wet, then Katrina is not frail and Kingsley is realistic.
If there is at least one people who is not frail or not realistic, then Jed is thoughtless.
Someone who is both realistic and not wet is always open.
If someone is thoughtless, then he is careful, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is frail, then Katrina is realistic.
Someone being both not thoughtless and frail is equivalent to being not careful.
If someone is not realistic, then he is not careful.
If there is at least one people who is not wet or not open, then Kingsley is frail.
Someone is wet and careful if and only if he is realistic and open.
If there is at least one people who is careful, then Matthew is not frail.
If someone is realistic or he is not wet, then he is not open. | Matthew is realistic. | neutral |
Michael is not open.
Michael is realistic.
Jed is thoughtless.
Matthew is thoughtless.
Michael is not frail.
Maggie is not thoughtless.
Matthew is not wet.
Michael is not careful.
Jed is not wet.
Sherard is wet.
Michael is thoughtless.
Sherard is open.If there is someone who is thoughtless, then Katrina is wet and Sherard is careful.
If Michael is wet, then Katrina is not frail and Kingsley is realistic.
If there is at least one people who is not frail or not realistic, then Jed is thoughtless.
Someone who is both realistic and not wet is always open.
If someone is thoughtless, then he is careful, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is frail, then Katrina is realistic.
Someone being both not thoughtless and frail is equivalent to being not careful.
If someone is not realistic, then he is not careful.
If there is at least one people who is not wet or not open, then Kingsley is frail.
Someone is wet and careful if and only if he is realistic and open.
If there is at least one people who is careful, then Matthew is not frail.
If someone is realistic or he is not wet, then he is not open. | Sherard is not thoughtless. | contradiction |
Michael is not open.
Michael is realistic.
Jed is thoughtless.
Matthew is thoughtless.
Michael is not frail.
Maggie is not thoughtless.
Matthew is not wet.
Michael is not careful.
Jed is not wet.
Sherard is wet.
Michael is thoughtless.
Sherard is open.If there is someone who is thoughtless, then Katrina is wet and Sherard is careful.
If Michael is wet, then Katrina is not frail and Kingsley is realistic.
If there is at least one people who is not frail or not realistic, then Jed is thoughtless.
Someone who is both realistic and not wet is always open.
If someone is thoughtless, then he is careful, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is frail, then Katrina is realistic.
Someone being both not thoughtless and frail is equivalent to being not careful.
If someone is not realistic, then he is not careful.
If there is at least one people who is not wet or not open, then Kingsley is frail.
Someone is wet and careful if and only if he is realistic and open.
If there is at least one people who is careful, then Matthew is not frail.
If someone is realistic or he is not wet, then he is not open. | Michael is frail. | self_contradiction |
Michael is not open.
Michael is realistic.
Jed is thoughtless.
Matthew is thoughtless.
Michael is not frail.
Maggie is not thoughtless.
Matthew is not wet.
Michael is not careful.
Jed is not wet.
Sherard is wet.
Michael is thoughtless.
Sherard is open.If there is someone who is thoughtless, then Katrina is wet and Sherard is careful.
If Michael is wet, then Katrina is not frail and Kingsley is realistic.
If there is at least one people who is not frail or not realistic, then Jed is thoughtless.
Someone who is both realistic and not wet is always open.
If someone is thoughtless, then he is careful, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is frail, then Katrina is realistic.
Someone being both not thoughtless and frail is equivalent to being not careful.
If someone is not realistic, then he is not careful.
If there is at least one people who is not wet or not open, then Kingsley is frail.
Someone is wet and careful if and only if he is realistic and open.
If there is at least one people who is careful, then Matthew is not frail.
If someone is realistic or he is not wet, then he is not open. | Michael is not careful. | self_contradiction |
Michael is not open.
Michael is realistic.
Jed is thoughtless.
Matthew is thoughtless.
Michael is not frail.
Maggie is not thoughtless.
Matthew is not wet.
Michael is not careful.
Jed is not wet.
Sherard is wet.
Michael is thoughtless.
Sherard is open.If there is someone who is thoughtless, then Katrina is wet and Sherard is careful.
If Michael is wet, then Katrina is not frail and Kingsley is realistic.
If there is at least one people who is not frail or not realistic, then Jed is thoughtless.
Someone who is both realistic and not wet is always open.
If someone is thoughtless, then he is careful, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is frail, then Katrina is realistic.
Someone being both not thoughtless and frail is equivalent to being not careful.
If someone is not realistic, then he is not careful.
If there is at least one people who is not wet or not open, then Kingsley is frail.
Someone is wet and careful if and only if he is realistic and open.
If there is at least one people who is careful, then Matthew is not frail.
If someone is realistic or he is not wet, then he is not open. | Matthew is not careful. | contradiction |
Michael is not open.
Michael is realistic.
Jed is thoughtless.
Matthew is thoughtless.
Michael is not frail.
Maggie is not thoughtless.
Matthew is not wet.
Michael is not careful.
Jed is not wet.
Sherard is wet.
Michael is thoughtless.
Sherard is open.If there is someone who is thoughtless, then Katrina is wet and Sherard is careful.
If Michael is wet, then Katrina is not frail and Kingsley is realistic.
If there is at least one people who is not frail or not realistic, then Jed is thoughtless.
Someone who is both realistic and not wet is always open.
If someone is thoughtless, then he is careful, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is frail, then Katrina is realistic.
Someone being both not thoughtless and frail is equivalent to being not careful.
If someone is not realistic, then he is not careful.
If there is at least one people who is not wet or not open, then Kingsley is frail.
Someone is wet and careful if and only if he is realistic and open.
If there is at least one people who is careful, then Matthew is not frail.
If someone is realistic or he is not wet, then he is not open. | Kingsley is not careful. | neutral |
Michael is not open.
Michael is realistic.
Jed is thoughtless.
Matthew is thoughtless.
Michael is not frail.
Maggie is not thoughtless.
Matthew is not wet.
Michael is not careful.
Jed is not wet.
Sherard is wet.
Michael is thoughtless.
Sherard is open.If there is someone who is thoughtless, then Katrina is wet and Sherard is careful.
If Michael is wet, then Katrina is not frail and Kingsley is realistic.
If there is at least one people who is not frail or not realistic, then Jed is thoughtless.
Someone who is both realistic and not wet is always open.
If someone is thoughtless, then he is careful, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is frail, then Katrina is realistic.
Someone being both not thoughtless and frail is equivalent to being not careful.
If someone is not realistic, then he is not careful.
If there is at least one people who is not wet or not open, then Kingsley is frail.
Someone is wet and careful if and only if he is realistic and open.
If there is at least one people who is careful, then Matthew is not frail.
If someone is realistic or he is not wet, then he is not open. | Sherard is not wet. | contradiction |
Michael is not open.
Michael is realistic.
Jed is thoughtless.
Matthew is thoughtless.
Michael is not frail.
Maggie is not thoughtless.
Matthew is not wet.
Michael is not careful.
Jed is not wet.
Sherard is wet.
Michael is thoughtless.
Sherard is open.If there is someone who is thoughtless, then Katrina is wet and Sherard is careful.
If Michael is wet, then Katrina is not frail and Kingsley is realistic.
If there is at least one people who is not frail or not realistic, then Jed is thoughtless.
Someone who is both realistic and not wet is always open.
If someone is thoughtless, then he is careful, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is frail, then Katrina is realistic.
Someone being both not thoughtless and frail is equivalent to being not careful.
If someone is not realistic, then he is not careful.
If there is at least one people who is not wet or not open, then Kingsley is frail.
Someone is wet and careful if and only if he is realistic and open.
If there is at least one people who is careful, then Matthew is not frail.
If someone is realistic or he is not wet, then he is not open. | Sherard is careful. | entailment |
Michael is not open.
Michael is realistic.
Jed is thoughtless.
Matthew is thoughtless.
Michael is not frail.
Maggie is not thoughtless.
Matthew is not wet.
Michael is not careful.
Jed is not wet.
Sherard is wet.
Michael is thoughtless.
Sherard is open.If there is someone who is thoughtless, then Katrina is wet and Sherard is careful.
If Michael is wet, then Katrina is not frail and Kingsley is realistic.
If there is at least one people who is not frail or not realistic, then Jed is thoughtless.
Someone who is both realistic and not wet is always open.
If someone is thoughtless, then he is careful, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is frail, then Katrina is realistic.
Someone being both not thoughtless and frail is equivalent to being not careful.
If someone is not realistic, then he is not careful.
If there is at least one people who is not wet or not open, then Kingsley is frail.
Someone is wet and careful if and only if he is realistic and open.
If there is at least one people who is careful, then Matthew is not frail.
If someone is realistic or he is not wet, then he is not open. | Maggie is wet. | neutral |
Michael is not open.
Michael is realistic.
Jed is thoughtless.
Matthew is thoughtless.
Michael is not frail.
Maggie is not thoughtless.
Matthew is not wet.
Michael is not careful.
Jed is not wet.
Sherard is wet.
Michael is thoughtless.
Sherard is open.If there is someone who is thoughtless, then Katrina is wet and Sherard is careful.
If Michael is wet, then Katrina is not frail and Kingsley is realistic.
If there is at least one people who is not frail or not realistic, then Jed is thoughtless.
Someone who is both realistic and not wet is always open.
If someone is thoughtless, then he is careful, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is frail, then Katrina is realistic.
Someone being both not thoughtless and frail is equivalent to being not careful.
If someone is not realistic, then he is not careful.
If there is at least one people who is not wet or not open, then Kingsley is frail.
Someone is wet and careful if and only if he is realistic and open.
If there is at least one people who is careful, then Matthew is not frail.
If someone is realistic or he is not wet, then he is not open. | Michael is not thoughtless. | self_contradiction |
Michael is not open.
Michael is realistic.
Jed is thoughtless.
Matthew is thoughtless.
Michael is not frail.
Maggie is not thoughtless.
Matthew is not wet.
Michael is not careful.
Jed is not wet.
Sherard is wet.
Michael is thoughtless.
Sherard is open.If there is someone who is thoughtless, then Katrina is wet and Sherard is careful.
If Michael is wet, then Katrina is not frail and Kingsley is realistic.
If there is at least one people who is not frail or not realistic, then Jed is thoughtless.
Someone who is both realistic and not wet is always open.
If someone is thoughtless, then he is careful, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is frail, then Katrina is realistic.
Someone being both not thoughtless and frail is equivalent to being not careful.
If someone is not realistic, then he is not careful.
If there is at least one people who is not wet or not open, then Kingsley is frail.
Someone is wet and careful if and only if he is realistic and open.
If there is at least one people who is careful, then Matthew is not frail.
If someone is realistic or he is not wet, then he is not open. | Jed is not careful. | contradiction |
Robert is not rude.
Rupert is ugly.
Chandler is not ugly.
Calvert is excited.
Rupert is rude.
Robert is not obedient.
Calvert is obedient.
Hadden is misty.
Chandler is not obedient.
Rupert is not misty.
Michael is obedient.
Michael is mental.If Michael is rude, then Calvert is obedient and Robert is ugly.
Someone who is not misty is always both mental and rude.
If Igor is not ugly and Calvert is not obedient, then Hadden is excited.
If there is someone who is either obedient or misty, then Hadden is not mental.
If there is someone who is both rude and obedient, then Igor is not excited and Chandler is ugly.
Michael is not ugly if and only if Rupert is obedient.
Someone who is not excited is always misty.
Someone is obedient and not rude if and only if he is not excited.
If Calvert is rude, then Rupert is not obedient and Calvert is mental, and vice versa.
Calvert being ugly implies that Igor is misty and Igor is not mental.
If someone is rude, then he is both not excited and mental.
Someone is rude if and only if he is mental. | Rupert is misty. | self_contradiction |
Robert is not rude.
Rupert is ugly.
Chandler is not ugly.
Calvert is excited.
Rupert is rude.
Robert is not obedient.
Calvert is obedient.
Hadden is misty.
Chandler is not obedient.
Rupert is not misty.
Michael is obedient.
Michael is mental.If Michael is rude, then Calvert is obedient and Robert is ugly.
Someone who is not misty is always both mental and rude.
If Igor is not ugly and Calvert is not obedient, then Hadden is excited.
If there is someone who is either obedient or misty, then Hadden is not mental.
If there is someone who is both rude and obedient, then Igor is not excited and Chandler is ugly.
Michael is not ugly if and only if Rupert is obedient.
Someone who is not excited is always misty.
Someone is obedient and not rude if and only if he is not excited.
If Calvert is rude, then Rupert is not obedient and Calvert is mental, and vice versa.
Calvert being ugly implies that Igor is misty and Igor is not mental.
If someone is rude, then he is both not excited and mental.
Someone is rude if and only if he is mental. | Calvert is not obedient. | contradiction |
Robert is not rude.
Rupert is ugly.
Chandler is not ugly.
Calvert is excited.
Rupert is rude.
Robert is not obedient.
Calvert is obedient.
Hadden is misty.
Chandler is not obedient.
Rupert is not misty.
Michael is obedient.
Michael is mental.If Michael is rude, then Calvert is obedient and Robert is ugly.
Someone who is not misty is always both mental and rude.
If Igor is not ugly and Calvert is not obedient, then Hadden is excited.
If there is someone who is either obedient or misty, then Hadden is not mental.
If there is someone who is both rude and obedient, then Igor is not excited and Chandler is ugly.
Michael is not ugly if and only if Rupert is obedient.
Someone who is not excited is always misty.
Someone is obedient and not rude if and only if he is not excited.
If Calvert is rude, then Rupert is not obedient and Calvert is mental, and vice versa.
Calvert being ugly implies that Igor is misty and Igor is not mental.
If someone is rude, then he is both not excited and mental.
Someone is rude if and only if he is mental. | Igor is not mental. | neutral |
Robert is not rude.
Rupert is ugly.
Chandler is not ugly.
Calvert is excited.
Rupert is rude.
Robert is not obedient.
Calvert is obedient.
Hadden is misty.
Chandler is not obedient.
Rupert is not misty.
Michael is obedient.
Michael is mental.If Michael is rude, then Calvert is obedient and Robert is ugly.
Someone who is not misty is always both mental and rude.
If Igor is not ugly and Calvert is not obedient, then Hadden is excited.
If there is someone who is either obedient or misty, then Hadden is not mental.
If there is someone who is both rude and obedient, then Igor is not excited and Chandler is ugly.
Michael is not ugly if and only if Rupert is obedient.
Someone who is not excited is always misty.
Someone is obedient and not rude if and only if he is not excited.
If Calvert is rude, then Rupert is not obedient and Calvert is mental, and vice versa.
Calvert being ugly implies that Igor is misty and Igor is not mental.
If someone is rude, then he is both not excited and mental.
Someone is rude if and only if he is mental. | Robert is not rude. | entailment |
Robert is not rude.
Rupert is ugly.
Chandler is not ugly.
Calvert is excited.
Rupert is rude.
Robert is not obedient.
Calvert is obedient.
Hadden is misty.
Chandler is not obedient.
Rupert is not misty.
Michael is obedient.
Michael is mental.If Michael is rude, then Calvert is obedient and Robert is ugly.
Someone who is not misty is always both mental and rude.
If Igor is not ugly and Calvert is not obedient, then Hadden is excited.
If there is someone who is either obedient or misty, then Hadden is not mental.
If there is someone who is both rude and obedient, then Igor is not excited and Chandler is ugly.
Michael is not ugly if and only if Rupert is obedient.
Someone who is not excited is always misty.
Someone is obedient and not rude if and only if he is not excited.
If Calvert is rude, then Rupert is not obedient and Calvert is mental, and vice versa.
Calvert being ugly implies that Igor is misty and Igor is not mental.
If someone is rude, then he is both not excited and mental.
Someone is rude if and only if he is mental. | Chandler is ugly. | self_contradiction |
Robert is not rude.
Rupert is ugly.
Chandler is not ugly.
Calvert is excited.
Rupert is rude.
Robert is not obedient.
Calvert is obedient.
Hadden is misty.
Chandler is not obedient.
Rupert is not misty.
Michael is obedient.
Michael is mental.If Michael is rude, then Calvert is obedient and Robert is ugly.
Someone who is not misty is always both mental and rude.
If Igor is not ugly and Calvert is not obedient, then Hadden is excited.
If there is someone who is either obedient or misty, then Hadden is not mental.
If there is someone who is both rude and obedient, then Igor is not excited and Chandler is ugly.
Michael is not ugly if and only if Rupert is obedient.
Someone who is not excited is always misty.
Someone is obedient and not rude if and only if he is not excited.
If Calvert is rude, then Rupert is not obedient and Calvert is mental, and vice versa.
Calvert being ugly implies that Igor is misty and Igor is not mental.
If someone is rude, then he is both not excited and mental.
Someone is rude if and only if he is mental. | Calvert is not rude. | neutral |
Robert is not rude.
Rupert is ugly.
Chandler is not ugly.
Calvert is excited.
Rupert is rude.
Robert is not obedient.
Calvert is obedient.
Hadden is misty.
Chandler is not obedient.
Rupert is not misty.
Michael is obedient.
Michael is mental.If Michael is rude, then Calvert is obedient and Robert is ugly.
Someone who is not misty is always both mental and rude.
If Igor is not ugly and Calvert is not obedient, then Hadden is excited.
If there is someone who is either obedient or misty, then Hadden is not mental.
If there is someone who is both rude and obedient, then Igor is not excited and Chandler is ugly.
Michael is not ugly if and only if Rupert is obedient.
Someone who is not excited is always misty.
Someone is obedient and not rude if and only if he is not excited.
If Calvert is rude, then Rupert is not obedient and Calvert is mental, and vice versa.
Calvert being ugly implies that Igor is misty and Igor is not mental.
If someone is rude, then he is both not excited and mental.
Someone is rude if and only if he is mental. | Michael is not mental. | contradiction |
Robert is not rude.
Rupert is ugly.
Chandler is not ugly.
Calvert is excited.
Rupert is rude.
Robert is not obedient.
Calvert is obedient.
Hadden is misty.
Chandler is not obedient.
Rupert is not misty.
Michael is obedient.
Michael is mental.If Michael is rude, then Calvert is obedient and Robert is ugly.
Someone who is not misty is always both mental and rude.
If Igor is not ugly and Calvert is not obedient, then Hadden is excited.
If there is someone who is either obedient or misty, then Hadden is not mental.
If there is someone who is both rude and obedient, then Igor is not excited and Chandler is ugly.
Michael is not ugly if and only if Rupert is obedient.
Someone who is not excited is always misty.
Someone is obedient and not rude if and only if he is not excited.
If Calvert is rude, then Rupert is not obedient and Calvert is mental, and vice versa.
Calvert being ugly implies that Igor is misty and Igor is not mental.
If someone is rude, then he is both not excited and mental.
Someone is rude if and only if he is mental. | Igor is not rude. | entailment |
Robert is not rude.
Rupert is ugly.
Chandler is not ugly.
Calvert is excited.
Rupert is rude.
Robert is not obedient.
Calvert is obedient.
Hadden is misty.
Chandler is not obedient.
Rupert is not misty.
Michael is obedient.
Michael is mental.If Michael is rude, then Calvert is obedient and Robert is ugly.
Someone who is not misty is always both mental and rude.
If Igor is not ugly and Calvert is not obedient, then Hadden is excited.
If there is someone who is either obedient or misty, then Hadden is not mental.
If there is someone who is both rude and obedient, then Igor is not excited and Chandler is ugly.
Michael is not ugly if and only if Rupert is obedient.
Someone who is not excited is always misty.
Someone is obedient and not rude if and only if he is not excited.
If Calvert is rude, then Rupert is not obedient and Calvert is mental, and vice versa.
Calvert being ugly implies that Igor is misty and Igor is not mental.
If someone is rude, then he is both not excited and mental.
Someone is rude if and only if he is mental. | Chandler is not ugly. | self_contradiction |
Robert is not rude.
Rupert is ugly.
Chandler is not ugly.
Calvert is excited.
Rupert is rude.
Robert is not obedient.
Calvert is obedient.
Hadden is misty.
Chandler is not obedient.
Rupert is not misty.
Michael is obedient.
Michael is mental.If Michael is rude, then Calvert is obedient and Robert is ugly.
Someone who is not misty is always both mental and rude.
If Igor is not ugly and Calvert is not obedient, then Hadden is excited.
If there is someone who is either obedient or misty, then Hadden is not mental.
If there is someone who is both rude and obedient, then Igor is not excited and Chandler is ugly.
Michael is not ugly if and only if Rupert is obedient.
Someone who is not excited is always misty.
Someone is obedient and not rude if and only if he is not excited.
If Calvert is rude, then Rupert is not obedient and Calvert is mental, and vice versa.
Calvert being ugly implies that Igor is misty and Igor is not mental.
If someone is rude, then he is both not excited and mental.
Someone is rude if and only if he is mental. | Michael is rude. | self_contradiction |
Robert is not rude.
Rupert is ugly.
Chandler is not ugly.
Calvert is excited.
Rupert is rude.
Robert is not obedient.
Calvert is obedient.
Hadden is misty.
Chandler is not obedient.
Rupert is not misty.
Michael is obedient.
Michael is mental.If Michael is rude, then Calvert is obedient and Robert is ugly.
Someone who is not misty is always both mental and rude.
If Igor is not ugly and Calvert is not obedient, then Hadden is excited.
If there is someone who is either obedient or misty, then Hadden is not mental.
If there is someone who is both rude and obedient, then Igor is not excited and Chandler is ugly.
Michael is not ugly if and only if Rupert is obedient.
Someone who is not excited is always misty.
Someone is obedient and not rude if and only if he is not excited.
If Calvert is rude, then Rupert is not obedient and Calvert is mental, and vice versa.
Calvert being ugly implies that Igor is misty and Igor is not mental.
If someone is rude, then he is both not excited and mental.
Someone is rude if and only if he is mental. | Hadden is obedient. | neutral |
Robert is not rude.
Rupert is ugly.
Chandler is not ugly.
Calvert is excited.
Rupert is rude.
Robert is not obedient.
Calvert is obedient.
Hadden is misty.
Chandler is not obedient.
Rupert is not misty.
Michael is obedient.
Michael is mental.If Michael is rude, then Calvert is obedient and Robert is ugly.
Someone who is not misty is always both mental and rude.
If Igor is not ugly and Calvert is not obedient, then Hadden is excited.
If there is someone who is either obedient or misty, then Hadden is not mental.
If there is someone who is both rude and obedient, then Igor is not excited and Chandler is ugly.
Michael is not ugly if and only if Rupert is obedient.
Someone who is not excited is always misty.
Someone is obedient and not rude if and only if he is not excited.
If Calvert is rude, then Rupert is not obedient and Calvert is mental, and vice versa.
Calvert being ugly implies that Igor is misty and Igor is not mental.
If someone is rude, then he is both not excited and mental.
Someone is rude if and only if he is mental. | Rupert is not excited. | entailment |
Robert is not rude.
Rupert is ugly.
Chandler is not ugly.
Calvert is excited.
Rupert is rude.
Robert is not obedient.
Calvert is obedient.
Hadden is misty.
Chandler is not obedient.
Rupert is not misty.
Michael is obedient.
Michael is mental.If Michael is rude, then Calvert is obedient and Robert is ugly.
Someone who is not misty is always both mental and rude.
If Igor is not ugly and Calvert is not obedient, then Hadden is excited.
If there is someone who is either obedient or misty, then Hadden is not mental.
If there is someone who is both rude and obedient, then Igor is not excited and Chandler is ugly.
Michael is not ugly if and only if Rupert is obedient.
Someone who is not excited is always misty.
Someone is obedient and not rude if and only if he is not excited.
If Calvert is rude, then Rupert is not obedient and Calvert is mental, and vice versa.
Calvert being ugly implies that Igor is misty and Igor is not mental.
If someone is rude, then he is both not excited and mental.
Someone is rude if and only if he is mental. | Calvert is not mental. | neutral |
Robert is not rude.
Rupert is ugly.
Chandler is not ugly.
Calvert is excited.
Rupert is rude.
Robert is not obedient.
Calvert is obedient.
Hadden is misty.
Chandler is not obedient.
Rupert is not misty.
Michael is obedient.
Michael is mental.If Michael is rude, then Calvert is obedient and Robert is ugly.
Someone who is not misty is always both mental and rude.
If Igor is not ugly and Calvert is not obedient, then Hadden is excited.
If there is someone who is either obedient or misty, then Hadden is not mental.
If there is someone who is both rude and obedient, then Igor is not excited and Chandler is ugly.
Michael is not ugly if and only if Rupert is obedient.
Someone who is not excited is always misty.
Someone is obedient and not rude if and only if he is not excited.
If Calvert is rude, then Rupert is not obedient and Calvert is mental, and vice versa.
Calvert being ugly implies that Igor is misty and Igor is not mental.
If someone is rude, then he is both not excited and mental.
Someone is rude if and only if he is mental. | Robert is not ugly. | contradiction |
Robert is not rude.
Rupert is ugly.
Chandler is not ugly.
Calvert is excited.
Rupert is rude.
Robert is not obedient.
Calvert is obedient.
Hadden is misty.
Chandler is not obedient.
Rupert is not misty.
Michael is obedient.
Michael is mental.If Michael is rude, then Calvert is obedient and Robert is ugly.
Someone who is not misty is always both mental and rude.
If Igor is not ugly and Calvert is not obedient, then Hadden is excited.
If there is someone who is either obedient or misty, then Hadden is not mental.
If there is someone who is both rude and obedient, then Igor is not excited and Chandler is ugly.
Michael is not ugly if and only if Rupert is obedient.
Someone who is not excited is always misty.
Someone is obedient and not rude if and only if he is not excited.
If Calvert is rude, then Rupert is not obedient and Calvert is mental, and vice versa.
Calvert being ugly implies that Igor is misty and Igor is not mental.
If someone is rude, then he is both not excited and mental.
Someone is rude if and only if he is mental. | Michael is not obedient. | contradiction |
Robert is not rude.
Rupert is ugly.
Chandler is not ugly.
Calvert is excited.
Rupert is rude.
Robert is not obedient.
Calvert is obedient.
Hadden is misty.
Chandler is not obedient.
Rupert is not misty.
Michael is obedient.
Michael is mental.If Michael is rude, then Calvert is obedient and Robert is ugly.
Someone who is not misty is always both mental and rude.
If Igor is not ugly and Calvert is not obedient, then Hadden is excited.
If there is someone who is either obedient or misty, then Hadden is not mental.
If there is someone who is both rude and obedient, then Igor is not excited and Chandler is ugly.
Michael is not ugly if and only if Rupert is obedient.
Someone who is not excited is always misty.
Someone is obedient and not rude if and only if he is not excited.
If Calvert is rude, then Rupert is not obedient and Calvert is mental, and vice versa.
Calvert being ugly implies that Igor is misty and Igor is not mental.
If someone is rude, then he is both not excited and mental.
Someone is rude if and only if he is mental. | Igor is misty. | entailment |
Robert is not rude.
Rupert is ugly.
Chandler is not ugly.
Calvert is excited.
Rupert is rude.
Robert is not obedient.
Calvert is obedient.
Hadden is misty.
Chandler is not obedient.
Rupert is not misty.
Michael is obedient.
Michael is mental.If Michael is rude, then Calvert is obedient and Robert is ugly.
Someone who is not misty is always both mental and rude.
If Igor is not ugly and Calvert is not obedient, then Hadden is excited.
If there is someone who is either obedient or misty, then Hadden is not mental.
If there is someone who is both rude and obedient, then Igor is not excited and Chandler is ugly.
Michael is not ugly if and only if Rupert is obedient.
Someone who is not excited is always misty.
Someone is obedient and not rude if and only if he is not excited.
If Calvert is rude, then Rupert is not obedient and Calvert is mental, and vice versa.
Calvert being ugly implies that Igor is misty and Igor is not mental.
If someone is rude, then he is both not excited and mental.
Someone is rude if and only if he is mental. | Rupert is not rude. | self_contradiction |
Robert is not rude.
Rupert is ugly.
Chandler is not ugly.
Calvert is excited.
Rupert is rude.
Robert is not obedient.
Calvert is obedient.
Hadden is misty.
Chandler is not obedient.
Rupert is not misty.
Michael is obedient.
Michael is mental.If Michael is rude, then Calvert is obedient and Robert is ugly.
Someone who is not misty is always both mental and rude.
If Igor is not ugly and Calvert is not obedient, then Hadden is excited.
If there is someone who is either obedient or misty, then Hadden is not mental.
If there is someone who is both rude and obedient, then Igor is not excited and Chandler is ugly.
Michael is not ugly if and only if Rupert is obedient.
Someone who is not excited is always misty.
Someone is obedient and not rude if and only if he is not excited.
If Calvert is rude, then Rupert is not obedient and Calvert is mental, and vice versa.
Calvert being ugly implies that Igor is misty and Igor is not mental.
If someone is rude, then he is both not excited and mental.
Someone is rude if and only if he is mental. | Hadden is not obedient. | neutral |
Robert is not rude.
Rupert is ugly.
Chandler is not ugly.
Calvert is excited.
Rupert is rude.
Robert is not obedient.
Calvert is obedient.
Hadden is misty.
Chandler is not obedient.
Rupert is not misty.
Michael is obedient.
Michael is mental.If Michael is rude, then Calvert is obedient and Robert is ugly.
Someone who is not misty is always both mental and rude.
If Igor is not ugly and Calvert is not obedient, then Hadden is excited.
If there is someone who is either obedient or misty, then Hadden is not mental.
If there is someone who is both rude and obedient, then Igor is not excited and Chandler is ugly.
Michael is not ugly if and only if Rupert is obedient.
Someone who is not excited is always misty.
Someone is obedient and not rude if and only if he is not excited.
If Calvert is rude, then Rupert is not obedient and Calvert is mental, and vice versa.
Calvert being ugly implies that Igor is misty and Igor is not mental.
If someone is rude, then he is both not excited and mental.
Someone is rude if and only if he is mental. | Robert is ugly. | entailment |
Robert is not rude.
Rupert is ugly.
Chandler is not ugly.
Calvert is excited.
Rupert is rude.
Robert is not obedient.
Calvert is obedient.
Hadden is misty.
Chandler is not obedient.
Rupert is not misty.
Michael is obedient.
Michael is mental.If Michael is rude, then Calvert is obedient and Robert is ugly.
Someone who is not misty is always both mental and rude.
If Igor is not ugly and Calvert is not obedient, then Hadden is excited.
If there is someone who is either obedient or misty, then Hadden is not mental.
If there is someone who is both rude and obedient, then Igor is not excited and Chandler is ugly.
Michael is not ugly if and only if Rupert is obedient.
Someone who is not excited is always misty.
Someone is obedient and not rude if and only if he is not excited.
If Calvert is rude, then Rupert is not obedient and Calvert is mental, and vice versa.
Calvert being ugly implies that Igor is misty and Igor is not mental.
If someone is rude, then he is both not excited and mental.
Someone is rude if and only if he is mental. | Robert is obedient. | contradiction |
Kerwin is not charming.
Morris is not salty.
Gifford is not naughty.
Gifford is charming.
Harvey is not confident.
Morris is visible.
Charlie is naughty.
Hardy is salty.
Gifford is not depressed.
Charlie is confident.
Morris is naughty.
Harvey is charming.Someone being both depressed and not salty is equivalent to being not naughty and not charming.
If someone is both not charming and visible, then he is naughty.
Morris is not confident if and only if Hardy is naughty and Charlie is not salty.
If someone who is not visible is also not depressed, then he is confident.
If someone is not naughty or charming, then he is not salty.
If there is someone who is not charming, then Morris is not visible.
Hardy being not charming and Hardy being not visible imply that Gifford is salty.
If someone is not naughty or depressed, then he is charming.
If there is someone who is charming, then Harris is not depressed.
It can be concluded that Morris is not visible once knowing that Harris is not salty or Kerwin is naughty.
If someone is visible and depressed, then he is naughty, and vice versa.
All naughty people are not salty. | Gifford is confident. | neutral |
Kerwin is not charming.
Morris is not salty.
Gifford is not naughty.
Gifford is charming.
Harvey is not confident.
Morris is visible.
Charlie is naughty.
Hardy is salty.
Gifford is not depressed.
Charlie is confident.
Morris is naughty.
Harvey is charming.Someone being both depressed and not salty is equivalent to being not naughty and not charming.
If someone is both not charming and visible, then he is naughty.
Morris is not confident if and only if Hardy is naughty and Charlie is not salty.
If someone who is not visible is also not depressed, then he is confident.
If someone is not naughty or charming, then he is not salty.
If there is someone who is not charming, then Morris is not visible.
Hardy being not charming and Hardy being not visible imply that Gifford is salty.
If someone is not naughty or depressed, then he is charming.
If there is someone who is charming, then Harris is not depressed.
It can be concluded that Morris is not visible once knowing that Harris is not salty or Kerwin is naughty.
If someone is visible and depressed, then he is naughty, and vice versa.
All naughty people are not salty. | Charlie is not visible. | contradiction |
Kerwin is not charming.
Morris is not salty.
Gifford is not naughty.
Gifford is charming.
Harvey is not confident.
Morris is visible.
Charlie is naughty.
Hardy is salty.
Gifford is not depressed.
Charlie is confident.
Morris is naughty.
Harvey is charming.Someone being both depressed and not salty is equivalent to being not naughty and not charming.
If someone is both not charming and visible, then he is naughty.
Morris is not confident if and only if Hardy is naughty and Charlie is not salty.
If someone who is not visible is also not depressed, then he is confident.
If someone is not naughty or charming, then he is not salty.
If there is someone who is not charming, then Morris is not visible.
Hardy being not charming and Hardy being not visible imply that Gifford is salty.
If someone is not naughty or depressed, then he is charming.
If there is someone who is charming, then Harris is not depressed.
It can be concluded that Morris is not visible once knowing that Harris is not salty or Kerwin is naughty.
If someone is visible and depressed, then he is naughty, and vice versa.
All naughty people are not salty. | Hardy is naughty. | neutral |
Kerwin is not charming.
Morris is not salty.
Gifford is not naughty.
Gifford is charming.
Harvey is not confident.
Morris is visible.
Charlie is naughty.
Hardy is salty.
Gifford is not depressed.
Charlie is confident.
Morris is naughty.
Harvey is charming.Someone being both depressed and not salty is equivalent to being not naughty and not charming.
If someone is both not charming and visible, then he is naughty.
Morris is not confident if and only if Hardy is naughty and Charlie is not salty.
If someone who is not visible is also not depressed, then he is confident.
If someone is not naughty or charming, then he is not salty.
If there is someone who is not charming, then Morris is not visible.
Hardy being not charming and Hardy being not visible imply that Gifford is salty.
If someone is not naughty or depressed, then he is charming.
If there is someone who is charming, then Harris is not depressed.
It can be concluded that Morris is not visible once knowing that Harris is not salty or Kerwin is naughty.
If someone is visible and depressed, then he is naughty, and vice versa.
All naughty people are not salty. | Charlie is not salty. | entailment |
Kerwin is not charming.
Morris is not salty.
Gifford is not naughty.
Gifford is charming.
Harvey is not confident.
Morris is visible.
Charlie is naughty.
Hardy is salty.
Gifford is not depressed.
Charlie is confident.
Morris is naughty.
Harvey is charming.Someone being both depressed and not salty is equivalent to being not naughty and not charming.
If someone is both not charming and visible, then he is naughty.
Morris is not confident if and only if Hardy is naughty and Charlie is not salty.
If someone who is not visible is also not depressed, then he is confident.
If someone is not naughty or charming, then he is not salty.
If there is someone who is not charming, then Morris is not visible.
Hardy being not charming and Hardy being not visible imply that Gifford is salty.
If someone is not naughty or depressed, then he is charming.
If there is someone who is charming, then Harris is not depressed.
It can be concluded that Morris is not visible once knowing that Harris is not salty or Kerwin is naughty.
If someone is visible and depressed, then he is naughty, and vice versa.
All naughty people are not salty. | Charlie is not naughty. | self_contradiction |
Kerwin is not charming.
Morris is not salty.
Gifford is not naughty.
Gifford is charming.
Harvey is not confident.
Morris is visible.
Charlie is naughty.
Hardy is salty.
Gifford is not depressed.
Charlie is confident.
Morris is naughty.
Harvey is charming.Someone being both depressed and not salty is equivalent to being not naughty and not charming.
If someone is both not charming and visible, then he is naughty.
Morris is not confident if and only if Hardy is naughty and Charlie is not salty.
If someone who is not visible is also not depressed, then he is confident.
If someone is not naughty or charming, then he is not salty.
If there is someone who is not charming, then Morris is not visible.
Hardy being not charming and Hardy being not visible imply that Gifford is salty.
If someone is not naughty or depressed, then he is charming.
If there is someone who is charming, then Harris is not depressed.
It can be concluded that Morris is not visible once knowing that Harris is not salty or Kerwin is naughty.
If someone is visible and depressed, then he is naughty, and vice versa.
All naughty people are not salty. | Charlie is not charming. | self_contradiction |
Kerwin is not charming.
Morris is not salty.
Gifford is not naughty.
Gifford is charming.
Harvey is not confident.
Morris is visible.
Charlie is naughty.
Hardy is salty.
Gifford is not depressed.
Charlie is confident.
Morris is naughty.
Harvey is charming.Someone being both depressed and not salty is equivalent to being not naughty and not charming.
If someone is both not charming and visible, then he is naughty.
Morris is not confident if and only if Hardy is naughty and Charlie is not salty.
If someone who is not visible is also not depressed, then he is confident.
If someone is not naughty or charming, then he is not salty.
If there is someone who is not charming, then Morris is not visible.
Hardy being not charming and Hardy being not visible imply that Gifford is salty.
If someone is not naughty or depressed, then he is charming.
If there is someone who is charming, then Harris is not depressed.
It can be concluded that Morris is not visible once knowing that Harris is not salty or Kerwin is naughty.
If someone is visible and depressed, then he is naughty, and vice versa.
All naughty people are not salty. | Gifford is not salty. | entailment |
Kerwin is not charming.
Morris is not salty.
Gifford is not naughty.
Gifford is charming.
Harvey is not confident.
Morris is visible.
Charlie is naughty.
Hardy is salty.
Gifford is not depressed.
Charlie is confident.
Morris is naughty.
Harvey is charming.Someone being both depressed and not salty is equivalent to being not naughty and not charming.
If someone is both not charming and visible, then he is naughty.
Morris is not confident if and only if Hardy is naughty and Charlie is not salty.
If someone who is not visible is also not depressed, then he is confident.
If someone is not naughty or charming, then he is not salty.
If there is someone who is not charming, then Morris is not visible.
Hardy being not charming and Hardy being not visible imply that Gifford is salty.
If someone is not naughty or depressed, then he is charming.
If there is someone who is charming, then Harris is not depressed.
It can be concluded that Morris is not visible once knowing that Harris is not salty or Kerwin is naughty.
If someone is visible and depressed, then he is naughty, and vice versa.
All naughty people are not salty. | Kerwin is naughty. | neutral |
Kerwin is not charming.
Morris is not salty.
Gifford is not naughty.
Gifford is charming.
Harvey is not confident.
Morris is visible.
Charlie is naughty.
Hardy is salty.
Gifford is not depressed.
Charlie is confident.
Morris is naughty.
Harvey is charming.Someone being both depressed and not salty is equivalent to being not naughty and not charming.
If someone is both not charming and visible, then he is naughty.
Morris is not confident if and only if Hardy is naughty and Charlie is not salty.
If someone who is not visible is also not depressed, then he is confident.
If someone is not naughty or charming, then he is not salty.
If there is someone who is not charming, then Morris is not visible.
Hardy being not charming and Hardy being not visible imply that Gifford is salty.
If someone is not naughty or depressed, then he is charming.
If there is someone who is charming, then Harris is not depressed.
It can be concluded that Morris is not visible once knowing that Harris is not salty or Kerwin is naughty.
If someone is visible and depressed, then he is naughty, and vice versa.
All naughty people are not salty. | Morris is naughty. | self_contradiction |
Kerwin is not charming.
Morris is not salty.
Gifford is not naughty.
Gifford is charming.
Harvey is not confident.
Morris is visible.
Charlie is naughty.
Hardy is salty.
Gifford is not depressed.
Charlie is confident.
Morris is naughty.
Harvey is charming.Someone being both depressed and not salty is equivalent to being not naughty and not charming.
If someone is both not charming and visible, then he is naughty.
Morris is not confident if and only if Hardy is naughty and Charlie is not salty.
If someone who is not visible is also not depressed, then he is confident.
If someone is not naughty or charming, then he is not salty.
If there is someone who is not charming, then Morris is not visible.
Hardy being not charming and Hardy being not visible imply that Gifford is salty.
If someone is not naughty or depressed, then he is charming.
If there is someone who is charming, then Harris is not depressed.
It can be concluded that Morris is not visible once knowing that Harris is not salty or Kerwin is naughty.
If someone is visible and depressed, then he is naughty, and vice versa.
All naughty people are not salty. | Morris is not visible. | self_contradiction |
Kerwin is not charming.
Morris is not salty.
Gifford is not naughty.
Gifford is charming.
Harvey is not confident.
Morris is visible.
Charlie is naughty.
Hardy is salty.
Gifford is not depressed.
Charlie is confident.
Morris is naughty.
Harvey is charming.Someone being both depressed and not salty is equivalent to being not naughty and not charming.
If someone is both not charming and visible, then he is naughty.
Morris is not confident if and only if Hardy is naughty and Charlie is not salty.
If someone who is not visible is also not depressed, then he is confident.
If someone is not naughty or charming, then he is not salty.
If there is someone who is not charming, then Morris is not visible.
Hardy being not charming and Hardy being not visible imply that Gifford is salty.
If someone is not naughty or depressed, then he is charming.
If there is someone who is charming, then Harris is not depressed.
It can be concluded that Morris is not visible once knowing that Harris is not salty or Kerwin is naughty.
If someone is visible and depressed, then he is naughty, and vice versa.
All naughty people are not salty. | Gifford is salty. | contradiction |
Kerwin is not charming.
Morris is not salty.
Gifford is not naughty.
Gifford is charming.
Harvey is not confident.
Morris is visible.
Charlie is naughty.
Hardy is salty.
Gifford is not depressed.
Charlie is confident.
Morris is naughty.
Harvey is charming.Someone being both depressed and not salty is equivalent to being not naughty and not charming.
If someone is both not charming and visible, then he is naughty.
Morris is not confident if and only if Hardy is naughty and Charlie is not salty.
If someone who is not visible is also not depressed, then he is confident.
If someone is not naughty or charming, then he is not salty.
If there is someone who is not charming, then Morris is not visible.
Hardy being not charming and Hardy being not visible imply that Gifford is salty.
If someone is not naughty or depressed, then he is charming.
If there is someone who is charming, then Harris is not depressed.
It can be concluded that Morris is not visible once knowing that Harris is not salty or Kerwin is naughty.
If someone is visible and depressed, then he is naughty, and vice versa.
All naughty people are not salty. | Gifford is depressed. | contradiction |
Kerwin is not charming.
Morris is not salty.
Gifford is not naughty.
Gifford is charming.
Harvey is not confident.
Morris is visible.
Charlie is naughty.
Hardy is salty.
Gifford is not depressed.
Charlie is confident.
Morris is naughty.
Harvey is charming.Someone being both depressed and not salty is equivalent to being not naughty and not charming.
If someone is both not charming and visible, then he is naughty.
Morris is not confident if and only if Hardy is naughty and Charlie is not salty.
If someone who is not visible is also not depressed, then he is confident.
If someone is not naughty or charming, then he is not salty.
If there is someone who is not charming, then Morris is not visible.
Hardy being not charming and Hardy being not visible imply that Gifford is salty.
If someone is not naughty or depressed, then he is charming.
If there is someone who is charming, then Harris is not depressed.
It can be concluded that Morris is not visible once knowing that Harris is not salty or Kerwin is naughty.
If someone is visible and depressed, then he is naughty, and vice versa.
All naughty people are not salty. | Harvey is naughty. | neutral |
Kerwin is not charming.
Morris is not salty.
Gifford is not naughty.
Gifford is charming.
Harvey is not confident.
Morris is visible.
Charlie is naughty.
Hardy is salty.
Gifford is not depressed.
Charlie is confident.
Morris is naughty.
Harvey is charming.Someone being both depressed and not salty is equivalent to being not naughty and not charming.
If someone is both not charming and visible, then he is naughty.
Morris is not confident if and only if Hardy is naughty and Charlie is not salty.
If someone who is not visible is also not depressed, then he is confident.
If someone is not naughty or charming, then he is not salty.
If there is someone who is not charming, then Morris is not visible.
Hardy being not charming and Hardy being not visible imply that Gifford is salty.
If someone is not naughty or depressed, then he is charming.
If there is someone who is charming, then Harris is not depressed.
It can be concluded that Morris is not visible once knowing that Harris is not salty or Kerwin is naughty.
If someone is visible and depressed, then he is naughty, and vice versa.
All naughty people are not salty. | Hardy is salty. | entailment |
Kerwin is not charming.
Morris is not salty.
Gifford is not naughty.
Gifford is charming.
Harvey is not confident.
Morris is visible.
Charlie is naughty.
Hardy is salty.
Gifford is not depressed.
Charlie is confident.
Morris is naughty.
Harvey is charming.Someone being both depressed and not salty is equivalent to being not naughty and not charming.
If someone is both not charming and visible, then he is naughty.
Morris is not confident if and only if Hardy is naughty and Charlie is not salty.
If someone who is not visible is also not depressed, then he is confident.
If someone is not naughty or charming, then he is not salty.
If there is someone who is not charming, then Morris is not visible.
Hardy being not charming and Hardy being not visible imply that Gifford is salty.
If someone is not naughty or depressed, then he is charming.
If there is someone who is charming, then Harris is not depressed.
It can be concluded that Morris is not visible once knowing that Harris is not salty or Kerwin is naughty.
If someone is visible and depressed, then he is naughty, and vice versa.
All naughty people are not salty. | Morris is not depressed. | contradiction |
Kerwin is not charming.
Morris is not salty.
Gifford is not naughty.
Gifford is charming.
Harvey is not confident.
Morris is visible.
Charlie is naughty.
Hardy is salty.
Gifford is not depressed.
Charlie is confident.
Morris is naughty.
Harvey is charming.Someone being both depressed and not salty is equivalent to being not naughty and not charming.
If someone is both not charming and visible, then he is naughty.
Morris is not confident if and only if Hardy is naughty and Charlie is not salty.
If someone who is not visible is also not depressed, then he is confident.
If someone is not naughty or charming, then he is not salty.
If there is someone who is not charming, then Morris is not visible.
Hardy being not charming and Hardy being not visible imply that Gifford is salty.
If someone is not naughty or depressed, then he is charming.
If there is someone who is charming, then Harris is not depressed.
It can be concluded that Morris is not visible once knowing that Harris is not salty or Kerwin is naughty.
If someone is visible and depressed, then he is naughty, and vice versa.
All naughty people are not salty. | Harvey is not confident. | entailment |
Kerwin is not charming.
Morris is not salty.
Gifford is not naughty.
Gifford is charming.
Harvey is not confident.
Morris is visible.
Charlie is naughty.
Hardy is salty.
Gifford is not depressed.
Charlie is confident.
Morris is naughty.
Harvey is charming.Someone being both depressed and not salty is equivalent to being not naughty and not charming.
If someone is both not charming and visible, then he is naughty.
Morris is not confident if and only if Hardy is naughty and Charlie is not salty.
If someone who is not visible is also not depressed, then he is confident.
If someone is not naughty or charming, then he is not salty.
If there is someone who is not charming, then Morris is not visible.
Hardy being not charming and Hardy being not visible imply that Gifford is salty.
If someone is not naughty or depressed, then he is charming.
If there is someone who is charming, then Harris is not depressed.
It can be concluded that Morris is not visible once knowing that Harris is not salty or Kerwin is naughty.
If someone is visible and depressed, then he is naughty, and vice versa.
All naughty people are not salty. | Morris is depressed. | entailment |
Kerwin is not charming.
Morris is not salty.
Gifford is not naughty.
Gifford is charming.
Harvey is not confident.
Morris is visible.
Charlie is naughty.
Hardy is salty.
Gifford is not depressed.
Charlie is confident.
Morris is naughty.
Harvey is charming.Someone being both depressed and not salty is equivalent to being not naughty and not charming.
If someone is both not charming and visible, then he is naughty.
Morris is not confident if and only if Hardy is naughty and Charlie is not salty.
If someone who is not visible is also not depressed, then he is confident.
If someone is not naughty or charming, then he is not salty.
If there is someone who is not charming, then Morris is not visible.
Hardy being not charming and Hardy being not visible imply that Gifford is salty.
If someone is not naughty or depressed, then he is charming.
If there is someone who is charming, then Harris is not depressed.
It can be concluded that Morris is not visible once knowing that Harris is not salty or Kerwin is naughty.
If someone is visible and depressed, then he is naughty, and vice versa.
All naughty people are not salty. | Kerwin is visible. | neutral |
Kerwin is not charming.
Morris is not salty.
Gifford is not naughty.
Gifford is charming.
Harvey is not confident.
Morris is visible.
Charlie is naughty.
Hardy is salty.
Gifford is not depressed.
Charlie is confident.
Morris is naughty.
Harvey is charming.Someone being both depressed and not salty is equivalent to being not naughty and not charming.
If someone is both not charming and visible, then he is naughty.
Morris is not confident if and only if Hardy is naughty and Charlie is not salty.
If someone who is not visible is also not depressed, then he is confident.
If someone is not naughty or charming, then he is not salty.
If there is someone who is not charming, then Morris is not visible.
Hardy being not charming and Hardy being not visible imply that Gifford is salty.
If someone is not naughty or depressed, then he is charming.
If there is someone who is charming, then Harris is not depressed.
It can be concluded that Morris is not visible once knowing that Harris is not salty or Kerwin is naughty.
If someone is visible and depressed, then he is naughty, and vice versa.
All naughty people are not salty. | Harvey is not charming. | contradiction |
Kerwin is not charming.
Morris is not salty.
Gifford is not naughty.
Gifford is charming.
Harvey is not confident.
Morris is visible.
Charlie is naughty.
Hardy is salty.
Gifford is not depressed.
Charlie is confident.
Morris is naughty.
Harvey is charming.Someone being both depressed and not salty is equivalent to being not naughty and not charming.
If someone is both not charming and visible, then he is naughty.
Morris is not confident if and only if Hardy is naughty and Charlie is not salty.
If someone who is not visible is also not depressed, then he is confident.
If someone is not naughty or charming, then he is not salty.
If there is someone who is not charming, then Morris is not visible.
Hardy being not charming and Hardy being not visible imply that Gifford is salty.
If someone is not naughty or depressed, then he is charming.
If there is someone who is charming, then Harris is not depressed.
It can be concluded that Morris is not visible once knowing that Harris is not salty or Kerwin is naughty.
If someone is visible and depressed, then he is naughty, and vice versa.
All naughty people are not salty. | Charlie is charming. | self_contradiction |
Jason is not self-disciplined.
Sophie is clever.
Leith is helpful.
Leith is self-disciplined.
Jason is inner.
Jason is helpful.
Sophie is not aggressive.
Marshall is not helpful.
Leith is not mental.
Quimby is mental.
Gilbert is not inner.
Rufus is self-disciplined.If there is someone who is both self-disciplined and not helpful, then Jason is not mental.
Leith being not clever implies that Leith is inner.
It can be concluded that Marshall is aggressive once knowing that Jason is helpful.
If all people are not clever, then Gilbert is not aggressive.
If there is someone who is both mental and self-disciplined, then Quimby is not aggressive.
If there is at least one people who is self-disciplined or helpful, then Sophie is mental.
Someone who is helpful is always not inner.
If someone is not inner, then he is not self-disciplined.
If someone is both not self-disciplined and not mental, then he is not helpful.
Someone is not clever and not self-disciplined if and only if he is inner and not aggressive.
It can be concluded that Quimby is not mental once knowing that Leith is not inner and Marshall is helpful.
If someone is clever, then he is both not mental and inner. | Leith is not self-disciplined. | self_contradiction |
Jason is not self-disciplined.
Sophie is clever.
Leith is helpful.
Leith is self-disciplined.
Jason is inner.
Jason is helpful.
Sophie is not aggressive.
Marshall is not helpful.
Leith is not mental.
Quimby is mental.
Gilbert is not inner.
Rufus is self-disciplined.If there is someone who is both self-disciplined and not helpful, then Jason is not mental.
Leith being not clever implies that Leith is inner.
It can be concluded that Marshall is aggressive once knowing that Jason is helpful.
If all people are not clever, then Gilbert is not aggressive.
If there is someone who is both mental and self-disciplined, then Quimby is not aggressive.
If there is at least one people who is self-disciplined or helpful, then Sophie is mental.
Someone who is helpful is always not inner.
If someone is not inner, then he is not self-disciplined.
If someone is both not self-disciplined and not mental, then he is not helpful.
Someone is not clever and not self-disciplined if and only if he is inner and not aggressive.
It can be concluded that Quimby is not mental once knowing that Leith is not inner and Marshall is helpful.
If someone is clever, then he is both not mental and inner. | Rufus is clever. | neutral |
Jason is not self-disciplined.
Sophie is clever.
Leith is helpful.
Leith is self-disciplined.
Jason is inner.
Jason is helpful.
Sophie is not aggressive.
Marshall is not helpful.
Leith is not mental.
Quimby is mental.
Gilbert is not inner.
Rufus is self-disciplined.If there is someone who is both self-disciplined and not helpful, then Jason is not mental.
Leith being not clever implies that Leith is inner.
It can be concluded that Marshall is aggressive once knowing that Jason is helpful.
If all people are not clever, then Gilbert is not aggressive.
If there is someone who is both mental and self-disciplined, then Quimby is not aggressive.
If there is at least one people who is self-disciplined or helpful, then Sophie is mental.
Someone who is helpful is always not inner.
If someone is not inner, then he is not self-disciplined.
If someone is both not self-disciplined and not mental, then he is not helpful.
Someone is not clever and not self-disciplined if and only if he is inner and not aggressive.
It can be concluded that Quimby is not mental once knowing that Leith is not inner and Marshall is helpful.
If someone is clever, then he is both not mental and inner. | Sophie is not clever. | self_contradiction |
Jason is not self-disciplined.
Sophie is clever.
Leith is helpful.
Leith is self-disciplined.
Jason is inner.
Jason is helpful.
Sophie is not aggressive.
Marshall is not helpful.
Leith is not mental.
Quimby is mental.
Gilbert is not inner.
Rufus is self-disciplined.If there is someone who is both self-disciplined and not helpful, then Jason is not mental.
Leith being not clever implies that Leith is inner.
It can be concluded that Marshall is aggressive once knowing that Jason is helpful.
If all people are not clever, then Gilbert is not aggressive.
If there is someone who is both mental and self-disciplined, then Quimby is not aggressive.
If there is at least one people who is self-disciplined or helpful, then Sophie is mental.
Someone who is helpful is always not inner.
If someone is not inner, then he is not self-disciplined.
If someone is both not self-disciplined and not mental, then he is not helpful.
Someone is not clever and not self-disciplined if and only if he is inner and not aggressive.
It can be concluded that Quimby is not mental once knowing that Leith is not inner and Marshall is helpful.
If someone is clever, then he is both not mental and inner. | Sophie is not helpful. | entailment |
Jason is not self-disciplined.
Sophie is clever.
Leith is helpful.
Leith is self-disciplined.
Jason is inner.
Jason is helpful.
Sophie is not aggressive.
Marshall is not helpful.
Leith is not mental.
Quimby is mental.
Gilbert is not inner.
Rufus is self-disciplined.If there is someone who is both self-disciplined and not helpful, then Jason is not mental.
Leith being not clever implies that Leith is inner.
It can be concluded that Marshall is aggressive once knowing that Jason is helpful.
If all people are not clever, then Gilbert is not aggressive.
If there is someone who is both mental and self-disciplined, then Quimby is not aggressive.
If there is at least one people who is self-disciplined or helpful, then Sophie is mental.
Someone who is helpful is always not inner.
If someone is not inner, then he is not self-disciplined.
If someone is both not self-disciplined and not mental, then he is not helpful.
Someone is not clever and not self-disciplined if and only if he is inner and not aggressive.
It can be concluded that Quimby is not mental once knowing that Leith is not inner and Marshall is helpful.
If someone is clever, then he is both not mental and inner. | Sophie is not aggressive. | entailment |
Jason is not self-disciplined.
Sophie is clever.
Leith is helpful.
Leith is self-disciplined.
Jason is inner.
Jason is helpful.
Sophie is not aggressive.
Marshall is not helpful.
Leith is not mental.
Quimby is mental.
Gilbert is not inner.
Rufus is self-disciplined.If there is someone who is both self-disciplined and not helpful, then Jason is not mental.
Leith being not clever implies that Leith is inner.
It can be concluded that Marshall is aggressive once knowing that Jason is helpful.
If all people are not clever, then Gilbert is not aggressive.
If there is someone who is both mental and self-disciplined, then Quimby is not aggressive.
If there is at least one people who is self-disciplined or helpful, then Sophie is mental.
Someone who is helpful is always not inner.
If someone is not inner, then he is not self-disciplined.
If someone is both not self-disciplined and not mental, then he is not helpful.
Someone is not clever and not self-disciplined if and only if he is inner and not aggressive.
It can be concluded that Quimby is not mental once knowing that Leith is not inner and Marshall is helpful.
If someone is clever, then he is both not mental and inner. | Jason is self-disciplined. | contradiction |
Jason is not self-disciplined.
Sophie is clever.
Leith is helpful.
Leith is self-disciplined.
Jason is inner.
Jason is helpful.
Sophie is not aggressive.
Marshall is not helpful.
Leith is not mental.
Quimby is mental.
Gilbert is not inner.
Rufus is self-disciplined.If there is someone who is both self-disciplined and not helpful, then Jason is not mental.
Leith being not clever implies that Leith is inner.
It can be concluded that Marshall is aggressive once knowing that Jason is helpful.
If all people are not clever, then Gilbert is not aggressive.
If there is someone who is both mental and self-disciplined, then Quimby is not aggressive.
If there is at least one people who is self-disciplined or helpful, then Sophie is mental.
Someone who is helpful is always not inner.
If someone is not inner, then he is not self-disciplined.
If someone is both not self-disciplined and not mental, then he is not helpful.
Someone is not clever and not self-disciplined if and only if he is inner and not aggressive.
It can be concluded that Quimby is not mental once knowing that Leith is not inner and Marshall is helpful.
If someone is clever, then he is both not mental and inner. | Gilbert is not clever. | neutral |
Jason is not self-disciplined.
Sophie is clever.
Leith is helpful.
Leith is self-disciplined.
Jason is inner.
Jason is helpful.
Sophie is not aggressive.
Marshall is not helpful.
Leith is not mental.
Quimby is mental.
Gilbert is not inner.
Rufus is self-disciplined.If there is someone who is both self-disciplined and not helpful, then Jason is not mental.
Leith being not clever implies that Leith is inner.
It can be concluded that Marshall is aggressive once knowing that Jason is helpful.
If all people are not clever, then Gilbert is not aggressive.
If there is someone who is both mental and self-disciplined, then Quimby is not aggressive.
If there is at least one people who is self-disciplined or helpful, then Sophie is mental.
Someone who is helpful is always not inner.
If someone is not inner, then he is not self-disciplined.
If someone is both not self-disciplined and not mental, then he is not helpful.
Someone is not clever and not self-disciplined if and only if he is inner and not aggressive.
It can be concluded that Quimby is not mental once knowing that Leith is not inner and Marshall is helpful.
If someone is clever, then he is both not mental and inner. | Sophie is self-disciplined. | contradiction |
Jason is not self-disciplined.
Sophie is clever.
Leith is helpful.
Leith is self-disciplined.
Jason is inner.
Jason is helpful.
Sophie is not aggressive.
Marshall is not helpful.
Leith is not mental.
Quimby is mental.
Gilbert is not inner.
Rufus is self-disciplined.If there is someone who is both self-disciplined and not helpful, then Jason is not mental.
Leith being not clever implies that Leith is inner.
It can be concluded that Marshall is aggressive once knowing that Jason is helpful.
If all people are not clever, then Gilbert is not aggressive.
If there is someone who is both mental and self-disciplined, then Quimby is not aggressive.
If there is at least one people who is self-disciplined or helpful, then Sophie is mental.
Someone who is helpful is always not inner.
If someone is not inner, then he is not self-disciplined.
If someone is both not self-disciplined and not mental, then he is not helpful.
Someone is not clever and not self-disciplined if and only if he is inner and not aggressive.
It can be concluded that Quimby is not mental once knowing that Leith is not inner and Marshall is helpful.
If someone is clever, then he is both not mental and inner. | Jason is helpful. | entailment |
Jason is not self-disciplined.
Sophie is clever.
Leith is helpful.
Leith is self-disciplined.
Jason is inner.
Jason is helpful.
Sophie is not aggressive.
Marshall is not helpful.
Leith is not mental.
Quimby is mental.
Gilbert is not inner.
Rufus is self-disciplined.If there is someone who is both self-disciplined and not helpful, then Jason is not mental.
Leith being not clever implies that Leith is inner.
It can be concluded that Marshall is aggressive once knowing that Jason is helpful.
If all people are not clever, then Gilbert is not aggressive.
If there is someone who is both mental and self-disciplined, then Quimby is not aggressive.
If there is at least one people who is self-disciplined or helpful, then Sophie is mental.
Someone who is helpful is always not inner.
If someone is not inner, then he is not self-disciplined.
If someone is both not self-disciplined and not mental, then he is not helpful.
Someone is not clever and not self-disciplined if and only if he is inner and not aggressive.
It can be concluded that Quimby is not mental once knowing that Leith is not inner and Marshall is helpful.
If someone is clever, then he is both not mental and inner. | Rufus is helpful. | neutral |
Jason is not self-disciplined.
Sophie is clever.
Leith is helpful.
Leith is self-disciplined.
Jason is inner.
Jason is helpful.
Sophie is not aggressive.
Marshall is not helpful.
Leith is not mental.
Quimby is mental.
Gilbert is not inner.
Rufus is self-disciplined.If there is someone who is both self-disciplined and not helpful, then Jason is not mental.
Leith being not clever implies that Leith is inner.
It can be concluded that Marshall is aggressive once knowing that Jason is helpful.
If all people are not clever, then Gilbert is not aggressive.
If there is someone who is both mental and self-disciplined, then Quimby is not aggressive.
If there is at least one people who is self-disciplined or helpful, then Sophie is mental.
Someone who is helpful is always not inner.
If someone is not inner, then he is not self-disciplined.
If someone is both not self-disciplined and not mental, then he is not helpful.
Someone is not clever and not self-disciplined if and only if he is inner and not aggressive.
It can be concluded that Quimby is not mental once knowing that Leith is not inner and Marshall is helpful.
If someone is clever, then he is both not mental and inner. | Gilbert is self-disciplined. | contradiction |
Jason is not self-disciplined.
Sophie is clever.
Leith is helpful.
Leith is self-disciplined.
Jason is inner.
Jason is helpful.
Sophie is not aggressive.
Marshall is not helpful.
Leith is not mental.
Quimby is mental.
Gilbert is not inner.
Rufus is self-disciplined.If there is someone who is both self-disciplined and not helpful, then Jason is not mental.
Leith being not clever implies that Leith is inner.
It can be concluded that Marshall is aggressive once knowing that Jason is helpful.
If all people are not clever, then Gilbert is not aggressive.
If there is someone who is both mental and self-disciplined, then Quimby is not aggressive.
If there is at least one people who is self-disciplined or helpful, then Sophie is mental.
Someone who is helpful is always not inner.
If someone is not inner, then he is not self-disciplined.
If someone is both not self-disciplined and not mental, then he is not helpful.
Someone is not clever and not self-disciplined if and only if he is inner and not aggressive.
It can be concluded that Quimby is not mental once knowing that Leith is not inner and Marshall is helpful.
If someone is clever, then he is both not mental and inner. | Marshall is not helpful. | entailment |
Jason is not self-disciplined.
Sophie is clever.
Leith is helpful.
Leith is self-disciplined.
Jason is inner.
Jason is helpful.
Sophie is not aggressive.
Marshall is not helpful.
Leith is not mental.
Quimby is mental.
Gilbert is not inner.
Rufus is self-disciplined.If there is someone who is both self-disciplined and not helpful, then Jason is not mental.
Leith being not clever implies that Leith is inner.
It can be concluded that Marshall is aggressive once knowing that Jason is helpful.
If all people are not clever, then Gilbert is not aggressive.
If there is someone who is both mental and self-disciplined, then Quimby is not aggressive.
If there is at least one people who is self-disciplined or helpful, then Sophie is mental.
Someone who is helpful is always not inner.
If someone is not inner, then he is not self-disciplined.
If someone is both not self-disciplined and not mental, then he is not helpful.
Someone is not clever and not self-disciplined if and only if he is inner and not aggressive.
It can be concluded that Quimby is not mental once knowing that Leith is not inner and Marshall is helpful.
If someone is clever, then he is both not mental and inner. | Quimby is mental. | entailment |
Jason is not self-disciplined.
Sophie is clever.
Leith is helpful.
Leith is self-disciplined.
Jason is inner.
Jason is helpful.
Sophie is not aggressive.
Marshall is not helpful.
Leith is not mental.
Quimby is mental.
Gilbert is not inner.
Rufus is self-disciplined.If there is someone who is both self-disciplined and not helpful, then Jason is not mental.
Leith being not clever implies that Leith is inner.
It can be concluded that Marshall is aggressive once knowing that Jason is helpful.
If all people are not clever, then Gilbert is not aggressive.
If there is someone who is both mental and self-disciplined, then Quimby is not aggressive.
If there is at least one people who is self-disciplined or helpful, then Sophie is mental.
Someone who is helpful is always not inner.
If someone is not inner, then he is not self-disciplined.
If someone is both not self-disciplined and not mental, then he is not helpful.
Someone is not clever and not self-disciplined if and only if he is inner and not aggressive.
It can be concluded that Quimby is not mental once knowing that Leith is not inner and Marshall is helpful.
If someone is clever, then he is both not mental and inner. | Quimby is not mental. | contradiction |
Jason is not self-disciplined.
Sophie is clever.
Leith is helpful.
Leith is self-disciplined.
Jason is inner.
Jason is helpful.
Sophie is not aggressive.
Marshall is not helpful.
Leith is not mental.
Quimby is mental.
Gilbert is not inner.
Rufus is self-disciplined.If there is someone who is both self-disciplined and not helpful, then Jason is not mental.
Leith being not clever implies that Leith is inner.
It can be concluded that Marshall is aggressive once knowing that Jason is helpful.
If all people are not clever, then Gilbert is not aggressive.
If there is someone who is both mental and self-disciplined, then Quimby is not aggressive.
If there is at least one people who is self-disciplined or helpful, then Sophie is mental.
Someone who is helpful is always not inner.
If someone is not inner, then he is not self-disciplined.
If someone is both not self-disciplined and not mental, then he is not helpful.
Someone is not clever and not self-disciplined if and only if he is inner and not aggressive.
It can be concluded that Quimby is not mental once knowing that Leith is not inner and Marshall is helpful.
If someone is clever, then he is both not mental and inner. | Leith is clever. | neutral |
Jason is not self-disciplined.
Sophie is clever.
Leith is helpful.
Leith is self-disciplined.
Jason is inner.
Jason is helpful.
Sophie is not aggressive.
Marshall is not helpful.
Leith is not mental.
Quimby is mental.
Gilbert is not inner.
Rufus is self-disciplined.If there is someone who is both self-disciplined and not helpful, then Jason is not mental.
Leith being not clever implies that Leith is inner.
It can be concluded that Marshall is aggressive once knowing that Jason is helpful.
If all people are not clever, then Gilbert is not aggressive.
If there is someone who is both mental and self-disciplined, then Quimby is not aggressive.
If there is at least one people who is self-disciplined or helpful, then Sophie is mental.
Someone who is helpful is always not inner.
If someone is not inner, then he is not self-disciplined.
If someone is both not self-disciplined and not mental, then he is not helpful.
Someone is not clever and not self-disciplined if and only if he is inner and not aggressive.
It can be concluded that Quimby is not mental once knowing that Leith is not inner and Marshall is helpful.
If someone is clever, then he is both not mental and inner. | Sophie is not mental. | self_contradiction |
Jason is not self-disciplined.
Sophie is clever.
Leith is helpful.
Leith is self-disciplined.
Jason is inner.
Jason is helpful.
Sophie is not aggressive.
Marshall is not helpful.
Leith is not mental.
Quimby is mental.
Gilbert is not inner.
Rufus is self-disciplined.If there is someone who is both self-disciplined and not helpful, then Jason is not mental.
Leith being not clever implies that Leith is inner.
It can be concluded that Marshall is aggressive once knowing that Jason is helpful.
If all people are not clever, then Gilbert is not aggressive.
If there is someone who is both mental and self-disciplined, then Quimby is not aggressive.
If there is at least one people who is self-disciplined or helpful, then Sophie is mental.
Someone who is helpful is always not inner.
If someone is not inner, then he is not self-disciplined.
If someone is both not self-disciplined and not mental, then he is not helpful.
Someone is not clever and not self-disciplined if and only if he is inner and not aggressive.
It can be concluded that Quimby is not mental once knowing that Leith is not inner and Marshall is helpful.
If someone is clever, then he is both not mental and inner. | Quimby is not helpful. | neutral |
Jason is not self-disciplined.
Sophie is clever.
Leith is helpful.
Leith is self-disciplined.
Jason is inner.
Jason is helpful.
Sophie is not aggressive.
Marshall is not helpful.
Leith is not mental.
Quimby is mental.
Gilbert is not inner.
Rufus is self-disciplined.If there is someone who is both self-disciplined and not helpful, then Jason is not mental.
Leith being not clever implies that Leith is inner.
It can be concluded that Marshall is aggressive once knowing that Jason is helpful.
If all people are not clever, then Gilbert is not aggressive.
If there is someone who is both mental and self-disciplined, then Quimby is not aggressive.
If there is at least one people who is self-disciplined or helpful, then Sophie is mental.
Someone who is helpful is always not inner.
If someone is not inner, then he is not self-disciplined.
If someone is both not self-disciplined and not mental, then he is not helpful.
Someone is not clever and not self-disciplined if and only if he is inner and not aggressive.
It can be concluded that Quimby is not mental once knowing that Leith is not inner and Marshall is helpful.
If someone is clever, then he is both not mental and inner. | Sophie is mental. | self_contradiction |
Jason is not self-disciplined.
Sophie is clever.
Leith is helpful.
Leith is self-disciplined.
Jason is inner.
Jason is helpful.
Sophie is not aggressive.
Marshall is not helpful.
Leith is not mental.
Quimby is mental.
Gilbert is not inner.
Rufus is self-disciplined.If there is someone who is both self-disciplined and not helpful, then Jason is not mental.
Leith being not clever implies that Leith is inner.
It can be concluded that Marshall is aggressive once knowing that Jason is helpful.
If all people are not clever, then Gilbert is not aggressive.
If there is someone who is both mental and self-disciplined, then Quimby is not aggressive.
If there is at least one people who is self-disciplined or helpful, then Sophie is mental.
Someone who is helpful is always not inner.
If someone is not inner, then he is not self-disciplined.
If someone is both not self-disciplined and not mental, then he is not helpful.
Someone is not clever and not self-disciplined if and only if he is inner and not aggressive.
It can be concluded that Quimby is not mental once knowing that Leith is not inner and Marshall is helpful.
If someone is clever, then he is both not mental and inner. | Sophie is aggressive. | contradiction |
Jason is not self-disciplined.
Sophie is clever.
Leith is helpful.
Leith is self-disciplined.
Jason is inner.
Jason is helpful.
Sophie is not aggressive.
Marshall is not helpful.
Leith is not mental.
Quimby is mental.
Gilbert is not inner.
Rufus is self-disciplined.If there is someone who is both self-disciplined and not helpful, then Jason is not mental.
Leith being not clever implies that Leith is inner.
It can be concluded that Marshall is aggressive once knowing that Jason is helpful.
If all people are not clever, then Gilbert is not aggressive.
If there is someone who is both mental and self-disciplined, then Quimby is not aggressive.
If there is at least one people who is self-disciplined or helpful, then Sophie is mental.
Someone who is helpful is always not inner.
If someone is not inner, then he is not self-disciplined.
If someone is both not self-disciplined and not mental, then he is not helpful.
Someone is not clever and not self-disciplined if and only if he is inner and not aggressive.
It can be concluded that Quimby is not mental once knowing that Leith is not inner and Marshall is helpful.
If someone is clever, then he is both not mental and inner. | Leith is self-disciplined. | self_contradiction |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.