premise
stringlengths 923
1.41k
| hypothesis
stringlengths 11
33
| label
stringclasses 4
values |
|---|---|---|
James is not large.
Collier is old-fashioned.
James is not warm-hearted.
Martin is not warm-hearted.
James is rich.
Fred is not sensible.
Martin is large.
Hadley is rich.
Kelvin is not mean.
Hadley is not mean.
Fred is large.
Fred is not warm-hearted.If all people are old-fashioned or mean, then James is not rich.
If there is someone who is either not sensible or rich, then Collier is not mean.
If someone is not mean or warm-hearted, then he is not sensible.
If Martin is warm-hearted, then Martin is not old-fashioned and Hadley is mean, and vice versa.
Kelvin is rich if and only if Martin is not old-fashioned.
If someone is not warm-hearted, then he is large.
All not warm-hearted people are not sensible.
if there is at least one people who is not old-fashioned and not sensible, then James is not large and Hadley is mean.
If someone is not sensible or he is not old-fashioned, then he is rich.
If there is at least one people who is both old-fashioned and not mean, then Kelvin is large.
Someone who is not warm-hearted is always both not old-fashioned and not rich.
Someone is not sensible and not large if and only if he is old-fashioned. | Hadley is mean. | self_contradiction |
James is not large.
Collier is old-fashioned.
James is not warm-hearted.
Martin is not warm-hearted.
James is rich.
Fred is not sensible.
Martin is large.
Hadley is rich.
Kelvin is not mean.
Hadley is not mean.
Fred is large.
Fred is not warm-hearted.If all people are old-fashioned or mean, then James is not rich.
If there is someone who is either not sensible or rich, then Collier is not mean.
If someone is not mean or warm-hearted, then he is not sensible.
If Martin is warm-hearted, then Martin is not old-fashioned and Hadley is mean, and vice versa.
Kelvin is rich if and only if Martin is not old-fashioned.
If someone is not warm-hearted, then he is large.
All not warm-hearted people are not sensible.
if there is at least one people who is not old-fashioned and not sensible, then James is not large and Hadley is mean.
If someone is not sensible or he is not old-fashioned, then he is rich.
If there is at least one people who is both old-fashioned and not mean, then Kelvin is large.
Someone who is not warm-hearted is always both not old-fashioned and not rich.
Someone is not sensible and not large if and only if he is old-fashioned. | Collier is large. | contradiction |
James is not large.
Collier is old-fashioned.
James is not warm-hearted.
Martin is not warm-hearted.
James is rich.
Fred is not sensible.
Martin is large.
Hadley is rich.
Kelvin is not mean.
Hadley is not mean.
Fred is large.
Fred is not warm-hearted.If all people are old-fashioned or mean, then James is not rich.
If there is someone who is either not sensible or rich, then Collier is not mean.
If someone is not mean or warm-hearted, then he is not sensible.
If Martin is warm-hearted, then Martin is not old-fashioned and Hadley is mean, and vice versa.
Kelvin is rich if and only if Martin is not old-fashioned.
If someone is not warm-hearted, then he is large.
All not warm-hearted people are not sensible.
if there is at least one people who is not old-fashioned and not sensible, then James is not large and Hadley is mean.
If someone is not sensible or he is not old-fashioned, then he is rich.
If there is at least one people who is both old-fashioned and not mean, then Kelvin is large.
Someone who is not warm-hearted is always both not old-fashioned and not rich.
Someone is not sensible and not large if and only if he is old-fashioned. | Fred is not old-fashioned. | entailment |
James is not large.
Collier is old-fashioned.
James is not warm-hearted.
Martin is not warm-hearted.
James is rich.
Fred is not sensible.
Martin is large.
Hadley is rich.
Kelvin is not mean.
Hadley is not mean.
Fred is large.
Fred is not warm-hearted.If all people are old-fashioned or mean, then James is not rich.
If there is someone who is either not sensible or rich, then Collier is not mean.
If someone is not mean or warm-hearted, then he is not sensible.
If Martin is warm-hearted, then Martin is not old-fashioned and Hadley is mean, and vice versa.
Kelvin is rich if and only if Martin is not old-fashioned.
If someone is not warm-hearted, then he is large.
All not warm-hearted people are not sensible.
if there is at least one people who is not old-fashioned and not sensible, then James is not large and Hadley is mean.
If someone is not sensible or he is not old-fashioned, then he is rich.
If there is at least one people who is both old-fashioned and not mean, then Kelvin is large.
Someone who is not warm-hearted is always both not old-fashioned and not rich.
Someone is not sensible and not large if and only if he is old-fashioned. | Silvia is old-fashioned. | neutral |
James is not large.
Collier is old-fashioned.
James is not warm-hearted.
Martin is not warm-hearted.
James is rich.
Fred is not sensible.
Martin is large.
Hadley is rich.
Kelvin is not mean.
Hadley is not mean.
Fred is large.
Fred is not warm-hearted.If all people are old-fashioned or mean, then James is not rich.
If there is someone who is either not sensible or rich, then Collier is not mean.
If someone is not mean or warm-hearted, then he is not sensible.
If Martin is warm-hearted, then Martin is not old-fashioned and Hadley is mean, and vice versa.
Kelvin is rich if and only if Martin is not old-fashioned.
If someone is not warm-hearted, then he is large.
All not warm-hearted people are not sensible.
if there is at least one people who is not old-fashioned and not sensible, then James is not large and Hadley is mean.
If someone is not sensible or he is not old-fashioned, then he is rich.
If there is at least one people who is both old-fashioned and not mean, then Kelvin is large.
Someone who is not warm-hearted is always both not old-fashioned and not rich.
Someone is not sensible and not large if and only if he is old-fashioned. | James is warm-hearted. | contradiction |
James is not large.
Collier is old-fashioned.
James is not warm-hearted.
Martin is not warm-hearted.
James is rich.
Fred is not sensible.
Martin is large.
Hadley is rich.
Kelvin is not mean.
Hadley is not mean.
Fred is large.
Fred is not warm-hearted.If all people are old-fashioned or mean, then James is not rich.
If there is someone who is either not sensible or rich, then Collier is not mean.
If someone is not mean or warm-hearted, then he is not sensible.
If Martin is warm-hearted, then Martin is not old-fashioned and Hadley is mean, and vice versa.
Kelvin is rich if and only if Martin is not old-fashioned.
If someone is not warm-hearted, then he is large.
All not warm-hearted people are not sensible.
if there is at least one people who is not old-fashioned and not sensible, then James is not large and Hadley is mean.
If someone is not sensible or he is not old-fashioned, then he is rich.
If there is at least one people who is both old-fashioned and not mean, then Kelvin is large.
Someone who is not warm-hearted is always both not old-fashioned and not rich.
Someone is not sensible and not large if and only if he is old-fashioned. | Kelvin is not rich. | contradiction |
James is not large.
Collier is old-fashioned.
James is not warm-hearted.
Martin is not warm-hearted.
James is rich.
Fred is not sensible.
Martin is large.
Hadley is rich.
Kelvin is not mean.
Hadley is not mean.
Fred is large.
Fred is not warm-hearted.If all people are old-fashioned or mean, then James is not rich.
If there is someone who is either not sensible or rich, then Collier is not mean.
If someone is not mean or warm-hearted, then he is not sensible.
If Martin is warm-hearted, then Martin is not old-fashioned and Hadley is mean, and vice versa.
Kelvin is rich if and only if Martin is not old-fashioned.
If someone is not warm-hearted, then he is large.
All not warm-hearted people are not sensible.
if there is at least one people who is not old-fashioned and not sensible, then James is not large and Hadley is mean.
If someone is not sensible or he is not old-fashioned, then he is rich.
If there is at least one people who is both old-fashioned and not mean, then Kelvin is large.
Someone who is not warm-hearted is always both not old-fashioned and not rich.
Someone is not sensible and not large if and only if he is old-fashioned. | Hadley is not sensible. | entailment |
James is not large.
Collier is old-fashioned.
James is not warm-hearted.
Martin is not warm-hearted.
James is rich.
Fred is not sensible.
Martin is large.
Hadley is rich.
Kelvin is not mean.
Hadley is not mean.
Fred is large.
Fred is not warm-hearted.If all people are old-fashioned or mean, then James is not rich.
If there is someone who is either not sensible or rich, then Collier is not mean.
If someone is not mean or warm-hearted, then he is not sensible.
If Martin is warm-hearted, then Martin is not old-fashioned and Hadley is mean, and vice versa.
Kelvin is rich if and only if Martin is not old-fashioned.
If someone is not warm-hearted, then he is large.
All not warm-hearted people are not sensible.
if there is at least one people who is not old-fashioned and not sensible, then James is not large and Hadley is mean.
If someone is not sensible or he is not old-fashioned, then he is rich.
If there is at least one people who is both old-fashioned and not mean, then Kelvin is large.
Someone who is not warm-hearted is always both not old-fashioned and not rich.
Someone is not sensible and not large if and only if he is old-fashioned. | Kelvin is not old-fashioned. | neutral |
James is not large.
Collier is old-fashioned.
James is not warm-hearted.
Martin is not warm-hearted.
James is rich.
Fred is not sensible.
Martin is large.
Hadley is rich.
Kelvin is not mean.
Hadley is not mean.
Fred is large.
Fred is not warm-hearted.If all people are old-fashioned or mean, then James is not rich.
If there is someone who is either not sensible or rich, then Collier is not mean.
If someone is not mean or warm-hearted, then he is not sensible.
If Martin is warm-hearted, then Martin is not old-fashioned and Hadley is mean, and vice versa.
Kelvin is rich if and only if Martin is not old-fashioned.
If someone is not warm-hearted, then he is large.
All not warm-hearted people are not sensible.
if there is at least one people who is not old-fashioned and not sensible, then James is not large and Hadley is mean.
If someone is not sensible or he is not old-fashioned, then he is rich.
If there is at least one people who is both old-fashioned and not mean, then Kelvin is large.
Someone who is not warm-hearted is always both not old-fashioned and not rich.
Someone is not sensible and not large if and only if he is old-fashioned. | Fred is large. | entailment |
James is not large.
Collier is old-fashioned.
James is not warm-hearted.
Martin is not warm-hearted.
James is rich.
Fred is not sensible.
Martin is large.
Hadley is rich.
Kelvin is not mean.
Hadley is not mean.
Fred is large.
Fred is not warm-hearted.If all people are old-fashioned or mean, then James is not rich.
If there is someone who is either not sensible or rich, then Collier is not mean.
If someone is not mean or warm-hearted, then he is not sensible.
If Martin is warm-hearted, then Martin is not old-fashioned and Hadley is mean, and vice versa.
Kelvin is rich if and only if Martin is not old-fashioned.
If someone is not warm-hearted, then he is large.
All not warm-hearted people are not sensible.
if there is at least one people who is not old-fashioned and not sensible, then James is not large and Hadley is mean.
If someone is not sensible or he is not old-fashioned, then he is rich.
If there is at least one people who is both old-fashioned and not mean, then Kelvin is large.
Someone who is not warm-hearted is always both not old-fashioned and not rich.
Someone is not sensible and not large if and only if he is old-fashioned. | James is old-fashioned. | self_contradiction |
James is not large.
Collier is old-fashioned.
James is not warm-hearted.
Martin is not warm-hearted.
James is rich.
Fred is not sensible.
Martin is large.
Hadley is rich.
Kelvin is not mean.
Hadley is not mean.
Fred is large.
Fred is not warm-hearted.If all people are old-fashioned or mean, then James is not rich.
If there is someone who is either not sensible or rich, then Collier is not mean.
If someone is not mean or warm-hearted, then he is not sensible.
If Martin is warm-hearted, then Martin is not old-fashioned and Hadley is mean, and vice versa.
Kelvin is rich if and only if Martin is not old-fashioned.
If someone is not warm-hearted, then he is large.
All not warm-hearted people are not sensible.
if there is at least one people who is not old-fashioned and not sensible, then James is not large and Hadley is mean.
If someone is not sensible or he is not old-fashioned, then he is rich.
If there is at least one people who is both old-fashioned and not mean, then Kelvin is large.
Someone who is not warm-hearted is always both not old-fashioned and not rich.
Someone is not sensible and not large if and only if he is old-fashioned. | Silvia is warm-hearted. | neutral |
James is not large.
Collier is old-fashioned.
James is not warm-hearted.
Martin is not warm-hearted.
James is rich.
Fred is not sensible.
Martin is large.
Hadley is rich.
Kelvin is not mean.
Hadley is not mean.
Fred is large.
Fred is not warm-hearted.If all people are old-fashioned or mean, then James is not rich.
If there is someone who is either not sensible or rich, then Collier is not mean.
If someone is not mean or warm-hearted, then he is not sensible.
If Martin is warm-hearted, then Martin is not old-fashioned and Hadley is mean, and vice versa.
Kelvin is rich if and only if Martin is not old-fashioned.
If someone is not warm-hearted, then he is large.
All not warm-hearted people are not sensible.
if there is at least one people who is not old-fashioned and not sensible, then James is not large and Hadley is mean.
If someone is not sensible or he is not old-fashioned, then he is rich.
If there is at least one people who is both old-fashioned and not mean, then Kelvin is large.
Someone who is not warm-hearted is always both not old-fashioned and not rich.
Someone is not sensible and not large if and only if he is old-fashioned. | Silvia is not old-fashioned. | neutral |
James is not large.
Collier is old-fashioned.
James is not warm-hearted.
Martin is not warm-hearted.
James is rich.
Fred is not sensible.
Martin is large.
Hadley is rich.
Kelvin is not mean.
Hadley is not mean.
Fred is large.
Fred is not warm-hearted.If all people are old-fashioned or mean, then James is not rich.
If there is someone who is either not sensible or rich, then Collier is not mean.
If someone is not mean or warm-hearted, then he is not sensible.
If Martin is warm-hearted, then Martin is not old-fashioned and Hadley is mean, and vice versa.
Kelvin is rich if and only if Martin is not old-fashioned.
If someone is not warm-hearted, then he is large.
All not warm-hearted people are not sensible.
if there is at least one people who is not old-fashioned and not sensible, then James is not large and Hadley is mean.
If someone is not sensible or he is not old-fashioned, then he is rich.
If there is at least one people who is both old-fashioned and not mean, then Kelvin is large.
Someone who is not warm-hearted is always both not old-fashioned and not rich.
Someone is not sensible and not large if and only if he is old-fashioned. | Martin is not rich. | self_contradiction |
James is not large.
Collier is old-fashioned.
James is not warm-hearted.
Martin is not warm-hearted.
James is rich.
Fred is not sensible.
Martin is large.
Hadley is rich.
Kelvin is not mean.
Hadley is not mean.
Fred is large.
Fred is not warm-hearted.If all people are old-fashioned or mean, then James is not rich.
If there is someone who is either not sensible or rich, then Collier is not mean.
If someone is not mean or warm-hearted, then he is not sensible.
If Martin is warm-hearted, then Martin is not old-fashioned and Hadley is mean, and vice versa.
Kelvin is rich if and only if Martin is not old-fashioned.
If someone is not warm-hearted, then he is large.
All not warm-hearted people are not sensible.
if there is at least one people who is not old-fashioned and not sensible, then James is not large and Hadley is mean.
If someone is not sensible or he is not old-fashioned, then he is rich.
If there is at least one people who is both old-fashioned and not mean, then Kelvin is large.
Someone who is not warm-hearted is always both not old-fashioned and not rich.
Someone is not sensible and not large if and only if he is old-fashioned. | Fred is rich. | self_contradiction |
James is not large.
Collier is old-fashioned.
James is not warm-hearted.
Martin is not warm-hearted.
James is rich.
Fred is not sensible.
Martin is large.
Hadley is rich.
Kelvin is not mean.
Hadley is not mean.
Fred is large.
Fred is not warm-hearted.If all people are old-fashioned or mean, then James is not rich.
If there is someone who is either not sensible or rich, then Collier is not mean.
If someone is not mean or warm-hearted, then he is not sensible.
If Martin is warm-hearted, then Martin is not old-fashioned and Hadley is mean, and vice versa.
Kelvin is rich if and only if Martin is not old-fashioned.
If someone is not warm-hearted, then he is large.
All not warm-hearted people are not sensible.
if there is at least one people who is not old-fashioned and not sensible, then James is not large and Hadley is mean.
If someone is not sensible or he is not old-fashioned, then he is rich.
If there is at least one people who is both old-fashioned and not mean, then Kelvin is large.
Someone who is not warm-hearted is always both not old-fashioned and not rich.
Someone is not sensible and not large if and only if he is old-fashioned. | Kelvin is warm-hearted. | neutral |
James is not large.
Collier is old-fashioned.
James is not warm-hearted.
Martin is not warm-hearted.
James is rich.
Fred is not sensible.
Martin is large.
Hadley is rich.
Kelvin is not mean.
Hadley is not mean.
Fred is large.
Fred is not warm-hearted.If all people are old-fashioned or mean, then James is not rich.
If there is someone who is either not sensible or rich, then Collier is not mean.
If someone is not mean or warm-hearted, then he is not sensible.
If Martin is warm-hearted, then Martin is not old-fashioned and Hadley is mean, and vice versa.
Kelvin is rich if and only if Martin is not old-fashioned.
If someone is not warm-hearted, then he is large.
All not warm-hearted people are not sensible.
if there is at least one people who is not old-fashioned and not sensible, then James is not large and Hadley is mean.
If someone is not sensible or he is not old-fashioned, then he is rich.
If there is at least one people who is both old-fashioned and not mean, then Kelvin is large.
Someone who is not warm-hearted is always both not old-fashioned and not rich.
Someone is not sensible and not large if and only if he is old-fashioned. | James is not old-fashioned. | self_contradiction |
James is not large.
Collier is old-fashioned.
James is not warm-hearted.
Martin is not warm-hearted.
James is rich.
Fred is not sensible.
Martin is large.
Hadley is rich.
Kelvin is not mean.
Hadley is not mean.
Fred is large.
Fred is not warm-hearted.If all people are old-fashioned or mean, then James is not rich.
If there is someone who is either not sensible or rich, then Collier is not mean.
If someone is not mean or warm-hearted, then he is not sensible.
If Martin is warm-hearted, then Martin is not old-fashioned and Hadley is mean, and vice versa.
Kelvin is rich if and only if Martin is not old-fashioned.
If someone is not warm-hearted, then he is large.
All not warm-hearted people are not sensible.
if there is at least one people who is not old-fashioned and not sensible, then James is not large and Hadley is mean.
If someone is not sensible or he is not old-fashioned, then he is rich.
If there is at least one people who is both old-fashioned and not mean, then Kelvin is large.
Someone who is not warm-hearted is always both not old-fashioned and not rich.
Someone is not sensible and not large if and only if he is old-fashioned. | Martin is large. | entailment |
James is not large.
Collier is old-fashioned.
James is not warm-hearted.
Martin is not warm-hearted.
James is rich.
Fred is not sensible.
Martin is large.
Hadley is rich.
Kelvin is not mean.
Hadley is not mean.
Fred is large.
Fred is not warm-hearted.If all people are old-fashioned or mean, then James is not rich.
If there is someone who is either not sensible or rich, then Collier is not mean.
If someone is not mean or warm-hearted, then he is not sensible.
If Martin is warm-hearted, then Martin is not old-fashioned and Hadley is mean, and vice versa.
Kelvin is rich if and only if Martin is not old-fashioned.
If someone is not warm-hearted, then he is large.
All not warm-hearted people are not sensible.
if there is at least one people who is not old-fashioned and not sensible, then James is not large and Hadley is mean.
If someone is not sensible or he is not old-fashioned, then he is rich.
If there is at least one people who is both old-fashioned and not mean, then Kelvin is large.
Someone who is not warm-hearted is always both not old-fashioned and not rich.
Someone is not sensible and not large if and only if he is old-fashioned. | Martin is not old-fashioned. | entailment |
James is not large.
Collier is old-fashioned.
James is not warm-hearted.
Martin is not warm-hearted.
James is rich.
Fred is not sensible.
Martin is large.
Hadley is rich.
Kelvin is not mean.
Hadley is not mean.
Fred is large.
Fred is not warm-hearted.If all people are old-fashioned or mean, then James is not rich.
If there is someone who is either not sensible or rich, then Collier is not mean.
If someone is not mean or warm-hearted, then he is not sensible.
If Martin is warm-hearted, then Martin is not old-fashioned and Hadley is mean, and vice versa.
Kelvin is rich if and only if Martin is not old-fashioned.
If someone is not warm-hearted, then he is large.
All not warm-hearted people are not sensible.
if there is at least one people who is not old-fashioned and not sensible, then James is not large and Hadley is mean.
If someone is not sensible or he is not old-fashioned, then he is rich.
If there is at least one people who is both old-fashioned and not mean, then Kelvin is large.
Someone who is not warm-hearted is always both not old-fashioned and not rich.
Someone is not sensible and not large if and only if he is old-fashioned. | James is sensible. | contradiction |
James is not large.
Collier is old-fashioned.
James is not warm-hearted.
Martin is not warm-hearted.
James is rich.
Fred is not sensible.
Martin is large.
Hadley is rich.
Kelvin is not mean.
Hadley is not mean.
Fred is large.
Fred is not warm-hearted.If all people are old-fashioned or mean, then James is not rich.
If there is someone who is either not sensible or rich, then Collier is not mean.
If someone is not mean or warm-hearted, then he is not sensible.
If Martin is warm-hearted, then Martin is not old-fashioned and Hadley is mean, and vice versa.
Kelvin is rich if and only if Martin is not old-fashioned.
If someone is not warm-hearted, then he is large.
All not warm-hearted people are not sensible.
if there is at least one people who is not old-fashioned and not sensible, then James is not large and Hadley is mean.
If someone is not sensible or he is not old-fashioned, then he is rich.
If there is at least one people who is both old-fashioned and not mean, then Kelvin is large.
Someone who is not warm-hearted is always both not old-fashioned and not rich.
Someone is not sensible and not large if and only if he is old-fashioned. | Martin is sensible. | contradiction |
Shelley is additional.
Alston is additional.
Shelley is adventurous.
Otis is not disturbed.
Brian is not adventurous.
Shelley is disturbed.
Casper is disturbed.
Otis is adventurous.
Otis is additional.
Kimberly is uninterested.
Brian is not disturbed.
Carlos is not every.Otis being adventurous and Kimberly being not additional imply that Brian is uninterested.
If Brian is disturbed, then Shelley is every and Kimberly is uninterested.
It can be concluded that Brian is not every once knowing that Carlos is not elated.
If someone is not uninterested or every, then he is not additional.
It can be concluded that Alston is adventurous once knowing that Alston is every and Carlos is uninterested.
If there is someone who is not uninterested, then Carlos is every.
Someone who is eithor not additional or adventurous is always not disturbed.
If Kimberly is not disturbed, then Alston is not uninterested, and vice versa.
If someone is additional, then he is both not disturbed and uninterested.
If there is at least one people who is not elated or not additional, then Alston is not every.
If someone is adventurous and additional, then he is both disturbed and uninterested, and vice versa.
Someone being both disturbed and additional is equivalent to being every. | Brian is not disturbed. | entailment |
Shelley is additional.
Alston is additional.
Shelley is adventurous.
Otis is not disturbed.
Brian is not adventurous.
Shelley is disturbed.
Casper is disturbed.
Otis is adventurous.
Otis is additional.
Kimberly is uninterested.
Brian is not disturbed.
Carlos is not every.Otis being adventurous and Kimberly being not additional imply that Brian is uninterested.
If Brian is disturbed, then Shelley is every and Kimberly is uninterested.
It can be concluded that Brian is not every once knowing that Carlos is not elated.
If someone is not uninterested or every, then he is not additional.
It can be concluded that Alston is adventurous once knowing that Alston is every and Carlos is uninterested.
If there is someone who is not uninterested, then Carlos is every.
Someone who is eithor not additional or adventurous is always not disturbed.
If Kimberly is not disturbed, then Alston is not uninterested, and vice versa.
If someone is additional, then he is both not disturbed and uninterested.
If there is at least one people who is not elated or not additional, then Alston is not every.
If someone is adventurous and additional, then he is both disturbed and uninterested, and vice versa.
Someone being both disturbed and additional is equivalent to being every. | Carlos is not every. | entailment |
Shelley is additional.
Alston is additional.
Shelley is adventurous.
Otis is not disturbed.
Brian is not adventurous.
Shelley is disturbed.
Casper is disturbed.
Otis is adventurous.
Otis is additional.
Kimberly is uninterested.
Brian is not disturbed.
Carlos is not every.Otis being adventurous and Kimberly being not additional imply that Brian is uninterested.
If Brian is disturbed, then Shelley is every and Kimberly is uninterested.
It can be concluded that Brian is not every once knowing that Carlos is not elated.
If someone is not uninterested or every, then he is not additional.
It can be concluded that Alston is adventurous once knowing that Alston is every and Carlos is uninterested.
If there is someone who is not uninterested, then Carlos is every.
Someone who is eithor not additional or adventurous is always not disturbed.
If Kimberly is not disturbed, then Alston is not uninterested, and vice versa.
If someone is additional, then he is both not disturbed and uninterested.
If there is at least one people who is not elated or not additional, then Alston is not every.
If someone is adventurous and additional, then he is both disturbed and uninterested, and vice versa.
Someone being both disturbed and additional is equivalent to being every. | Shelley is not disturbed. | self_contradiction |
Shelley is additional.
Alston is additional.
Shelley is adventurous.
Otis is not disturbed.
Brian is not adventurous.
Shelley is disturbed.
Casper is disturbed.
Otis is adventurous.
Otis is additional.
Kimberly is uninterested.
Brian is not disturbed.
Carlos is not every.Otis being adventurous and Kimberly being not additional imply that Brian is uninterested.
If Brian is disturbed, then Shelley is every and Kimberly is uninterested.
It can be concluded that Brian is not every once knowing that Carlos is not elated.
If someone is not uninterested or every, then he is not additional.
It can be concluded that Alston is adventurous once knowing that Alston is every and Carlos is uninterested.
If there is someone who is not uninterested, then Carlos is every.
Someone who is eithor not additional or adventurous is always not disturbed.
If Kimberly is not disturbed, then Alston is not uninterested, and vice versa.
If someone is additional, then he is both not disturbed and uninterested.
If there is at least one people who is not elated or not additional, then Alston is not every.
If someone is adventurous and additional, then he is both disturbed and uninterested, and vice versa.
Someone being both disturbed and additional is equivalent to being every. | Shelley is not uninterested. | contradiction |
Shelley is additional.
Alston is additional.
Shelley is adventurous.
Otis is not disturbed.
Brian is not adventurous.
Shelley is disturbed.
Casper is disturbed.
Otis is adventurous.
Otis is additional.
Kimberly is uninterested.
Brian is not disturbed.
Carlos is not every.Otis being adventurous and Kimberly being not additional imply that Brian is uninterested.
If Brian is disturbed, then Shelley is every and Kimberly is uninterested.
It can be concluded that Brian is not every once knowing that Carlos is not elated.
If someone is not uninterested or every, then he is not additional.
It can be concluded that Alston is adventurous once knowing that Alston is every and Carlos is uninterested.
If there is someone who is not uninterested, then Carlos is every.
Someone who is eithor not additional or adventurous is always not disturbed.
If Kimberly is not disturbed, then Alston is not uninterested, and vice versa.
If someone is additional, then he is both not disturbed and uninterested.
If there is at least one people who is not elated or not additional, then Alston is not every.
If someone is adventurous and additional, then he is both disturbed and uninterested, and vice versa.
Someone being both disturbed and additional is equivalent to being every. | Shelley is additional. | self_contradiction |
Shelley is additional.
Alston is additional.
Shelley is adventurous.
Otis is not disturbed.
Brian is not adventurous.
Shelley is disturbed.
Casper is disturbed.
Otis is adventurous.
Otis is additional.
Kimberly is uninterested.
Brian is not disturbed.
Carlos is not every.Otis being adventurous and Kimberly being not additional imply that Brian is uninterested.
If Brian is disturbed, then Shelley is every and Kimberly is uninterested.
It can be concluded that Brian is not every once knowing that Carlos is not elated.
If someone is not uninterested or every, then he is not additional.
It can be concluded that Alston is adventurous once knowing that Alston is every and Carlos is uninterested.
If there is someone who is not uninterested, then Carlos is every.
Someone who is eithor not additional or adventurous is always not disturbed.
If Kimberly is not disturbed, then Alston is not uninterested, and vice versa.
If someone is additional, then he is both not disturbed and uninterested.
If there is at least one people who is not elated or not additional, then Alston is not every.
If someone is adventurous and additional, then he is both disturbed and uninterested, and vice versa.
Someone being both disturbed and additional is equivalent to being every. | Casper is not uninterested. | neutral |
Shelley is additional.
Alston is additional.
Shelley is adventurous.
Otis is not disturbed.
Brian is not adventurous.
Shelley is disturbed.
Casper is disturbed.
Otis is adventurous.
Otis is additional.
Kimberly is uninterested.
Brian is not disturbed.
Carlos is not every.Otis being adventurous and Kimberly being not additional imply that Brian is uninterested.
If Brian is disturbed, then Shelley is every and Kimberly is uninterested.
It can be concluded that Brian is not every once knowing that Carlos is not elated.
If someone is not uninterested or every, then he is not additional.
It can be concluded that Alston is adventurous once knowing that Alston is every and Carlos is uninterested.
If there is someone who is not uninterested, then Carlos is every.
Someone who is eithor not additional or adventurous is always not disturbed.
If Kimberly is not disturbed, then Alston is not uninterested, and vice versa.
If someone is additional, then he is both not disturbed and uninterested.
If there is at least one people who is not elated or not additional, then Alston is not every.
If someone is adventurous and additional, then he is both disturbed and uninterested, and vice versa.
Someone being both disturbed and additional is equivalent to being every. | Alston is not additional. | contradiction |
Shelley is additional.
Alston is additional.
Shelley is adventurous.
Otis is not disturbed.
Brian is not adventurous.
Shelley is disturbed.
Casper is disturbed.
Otis is adventurous.
Otis is additional.
Kimberly is uninterested.
Brian is not disturbed.
Carlos is not every.Otis being adventurous and Kimberly being not additional imply that Brian is uninterested.
If Brian is disturbed, then Shelley is every and Kimberly is uninterested.
It can be concluded that Brian is not every once knowing that Carlos is not elated.
If someone is not uninterested or every, then he is not additional.
It can be concluded that Alston is adventurous once knowing that Alston is every and Carlos is uninterested.
If there is someone who is not uninterested, then Carlos is every.
Someone who is eithor not additional or adventurous is always not disturbed.
If Kimberly is not disturbed, then Alston is not uninterested, and vice versa.
If someone is additional, then he is both not disturbed and uninterested.
If there is at least one people who is not elated or not additional, then Alston is not every.
If someone is adventurous and additional, then he is both disturbed and uninterested, and vice versa.
Someone being both disturbed and additional is equivalent to being every. | Otis is not additional. | self_contradiction |
Shelley is additional.
Alston is additional.
Shelley is adventurous.
Otis is not disturbed.
Brian is not adventurous.
Shelley is disturbed.
Casper is disturbed.
Otis is adventurous.
Otis is additional.
Kimberly is uninterested.
Brian is not disturbed.
Carlos is not every.Otis being adventurous and Kimberly being not additional imply that Brian is uninterested.
If Brian is disturbed, then Shelley is every and Kimberly is uninterested.
It can be concluded that Brian is not every once knowing that Carlos is not elated.
If someone is not uninterested or every, then he is not additional.
It can be concluded that Alston is adventurous once knowing that Alston is every and Carlos is uninterested.
If there is someone who is not uninterested, then Carlos is every.
Someone who is eithor not additional or adventurous is always not disturbed.
If Kimberly is not disturbed, then Alston is not uninterested, and vice versa.
If someone is additional, then he is both not disturbed and uninterested.
If there is at least one people who is not elated or not additional, then Alston is not every.
If someone is adventurous and additional, then he is both disturbed and uninterested, and vice versa.
Someone being both disturbed and additional is equivalent to being every. | Otis is not adventurous. | contradiction |
Shelley is additional.
Alston is additional.
Shelley is adventurous.
Otis is not disturbed.
Brian is not adventurous.
Shelley is disturbed.
Casper is disturbed.
Otis is adventurous.
Otis is additional.
Kimberly is uninterested.
Brian is not disturbed.
Carlos is not every.Otis being adventurous and Kimberly being not additional imply that Brian is uninterested.
If Brian is disturbed, then Shelley is every and Kimberly is uninterested.
It can be concluded that Brian is not every once knowing that Carlos is not elated.
If someone is not uninterested or every, then he is not additional.
It can be concluded that Alston is adventurous once knowing that Alston is every and Carlos is uninterested.
If there is someone who is not uninterested, then Carlos is every.
Someone who is eithor not additional or adventurous is always not disturbed.
If Kimberly is not disturbed, then Alston is not uninterested, and vice versa.
If someone is additional, then he is both not disturbed and uninterested.
If there is at least one people who is not elated or not additional, then Alston is not every.
If someone is adventurous and additional, then he is both disturbed and uninterested, and vice versa.
Someone being both disturbed and additional is equivalent to being every. | Otis is adventurous. | entailment |
Shelley is additional.
Alston is additional.
Shelley is adventurous.
Otis is not disturbed.
Brian is not adventurous.
Shelley is disturbed.
Casper is disturbed.
Otis is adventurous.
Otis is additional.
Kimberly is uninterested.
Brian is not disturbed.
Carlos is not every.Otis being adventurous and Kimberly being not additional imply that Brian is uninterested.
If Brian is disturbed, then Shelley is every and Kimberly is uninterested.
It can be concluded that Brian is not every once knowing that Carlos is not elated.
If someone is not uninterested or every, then he is not additional.
It can be concluded that Alston is adventurous once knowing that Alston is every and Carlos is uninterested.
If there is someone who is not uninterested, then Carlos is every.
Someone who is eithor not additional or adventurous is always not disturbed.
If Kimberly is not disturbed, then Alston is not uninterested, and vice versa.
If someone is additional, then he is both not disturbed and uninterested.
If there is at least one people who is not elated or not additional, then Alston is not every.
If someone is adventurous and additional, then he is both disturbed and uninterested, and vice versa.
Someone being both disturbed and additional is equivalent to being every. | Carlos is adventurous. | neutral |
Shelley is additional.
Alston is additional.
Shelley is adventurous.
Otis is not disturbed.
Brian is not adventurous.
Shelley is disturbed.
Casper is disturbed.
Otis is adventurous.
Otis is additional.
Kimberly is uninterested.
Brian is not disturbed.
Carlos is not every.Otis being adventurous and Kimberly being not additional imply that Brian is uninterested.
If Brian is disturbed, then Shelley is every and Kimberly is uninterested.
It can be concluded that Brian is not every once knowing that Carlos is not elated.
If someone is not uninterested or every, then he is not additional.
It can be concluded that Alston is adventurous once knowing that Alston is every and Carlos is uninterested.
If there is someone who is not uninterested, then Carlos is every.
Someone who is eithor not additional or adventurous is always not disturbed.
If Kimberly is not disturbed, then Alston is not uninterested, and vice versa.
If someone is additional, then he is both not disturbed and uninterested.
If there is at least one people who is not elated or not additional, then Alston is not every.
If someone is adventurous and additional, then he is both disturbed and uninterested, and vice versa.
Someone being both disturbed and additional is equivalent to being every. | Alston is not disturbed. | entailment |
Shelley is additional.
Alston is additional.
Shelley is adventurous.
Otis is not disturbed.
Brian is not adventurous.
Shelley is disturbed.
Casper is disturbed.
Otis is adventurous.
Otis is additional.
Kimberly is uninterested.
Brian is not disturbed.
Carlos is not every.Otis being adventurous and Kimberly being not additional imply that Brian is uninterested.
If Brian is disturbed, then Shelley is every and Kimberly is uninterested.
It can be concluded that Brian is not every once knowing that Carlos is not elated.
If someone is not uninterested or every, then he is not additional.
It can be concluded that Alston is adventurous once knowing that Alston is every and Carlos is uninterested.
If there is someone who is not uninterested, then Carlos is every.
Someone who is eithor not additional or adventurous is always not disturbed.
If Kimberly is not disturbed, then Alston is not uninterested, and vice versa.
If someone is additional, then he is both not disturbed and uninterested.
If there is at least one people who is not elated or not additional, then Alston is not every.
If someone is adventurous and additional, then he is both disturbed and uninterested, and vice versa.
Someone being both disturbed and additional is equivalent to being every. | Kimberly is not elated. | neutral |
Shelley is additional.
Alston is additional.
Shelley is adventurous.
Otis is not disturbed.
Brian is not adventurous.
Shelley is disturbed.
Casper is disturbed.
Otis is adventurous.
Otis is additional.
Kimberly is uninterested.
Brian is not disturbed.
Carlos is not every.Otis being adventurous and Kimberly being not additional imply that Brian is uninterested.
If Brian is disturbed, then Shelley is every and Kimberly is uninterested.
It can be concluded that Brian is not every once knowing that Carlos is not elated.
If someone is not uninterested or every, then he is not additional.
It can be concluded that Alston is adventurous once knowing that Alston is every and Carlos is uninterested.
If there is someone who is not uninterested, then Carlos is every.
Someone who is eithor not additional or adventurous is always not disturbed.
If Kimberly is not disturbed, then Alston is not uninterested, and vice versa.
If someone is additional, then he is both not disturbed and uninterested.
If there is at least one people who is not elated or not additional, then Alston is not every.
If someone is adventurous and additional, then he is both disturbed and uninterested, and vice versa.
Someone being both disturbed and additional is equivalent to being every. | Carlos is uninterested. | neutral |
Shelley is additional.
Alston is additional.
Shelley is adventurous.
Otis is not disturbed.
Brian is not adventurous.
Shelley is disturbed.
Casper is disturbed.
Otis is adventurous.
Otis is additional.
Kimberly is uninterested.
Brian is not disturbed.
Carlos is not every.Otis being adventurous and Kimberly being not additional imply that Brian is uninterested.
If Brian is disturbed, then Shelley is every and Kimberly is uninterested.
It can be concluded that Brian is not every once knowing that Carlos is not elated.
If someone is not uninterested or every, then he is not additional.
It can be concluded that Alston is adventurous once knowing that Alston is every and Carlos is uninterested.
If there is someone who is not uninterested, then Carlos is every.
Someone who is eithor not additional or adventurous is always not disturbed.
If Kimberly is not disturbed, then Alston is not uninterested, and vice versa.
If someone is additional, then he is both not disturbed and uninterested.
If there is at least one people who is not elated or not additional, then Alston is not every.
If someone is adventurous and additional, then he is both disturbed and uninterested, and vice versa.
Someone being both disturbed and additional is equivalent to being every. | Alston is adventurous. | neutral |
Shelley is additional.
Alston is additional.
Shelley is adventurous.
Otis is not disturbed.
Brian is not adventurous.
Shelley is disturbed.
Casper is disturbed.
Otis is adventurous.
Otis is additional.
Kimberly is uninterested.
Brian is not disturbed.
Carlos is not every.Otis being adventurous and Kimberly being not additional imply that Brian is uninterested.
If Brian is disturbed, then Shelley is every and Kimberly is uninterested.
It can be concluded that Brian is not every once knowing that Carlos is not elated.
If someone is not uninterested or every, then he is not additional.
It can be concluded that Alston is adventurous once knowing that Alston is every and Carlos is uninterested.
If there is someone who is not uninterested, then Carlos is every.
Someone who is eithor not additional or adventurous is always not disturbed.
If Kimberly is not disturbed, then Alston is not uninterested, and vice versa.
If someone is additional, then he is both not disturbed and uninterested.
If there is at least one people who is not elated or not additional, then Alston is not every.
If someone is adventurous and additional, then he is both disturbed and uninterested, and vice versa.
Someone being both disturbed and additional is equivalent to being every. | Carlos is every. | contradiction |
Shelley is additional.
Alston is additional.
Shelley is adventurous.
Otis is not disturbed.
Brian is not adventurous.
Shelley is disturbed.
Casper is disturbed.
Otis is adventurous.
Otis is additional.
Kimberly is uninterested.
Brian is not disturbed.
Carlos is not every.Otis being adventurous and Kimberly being not additional imply that Brian is uninterested.
If Brian is disturbed, then Shelley is every and Kimberly is uninterested.
It can be concluded that Brian is not every once knowing that Carlos is not elated.
If someone is not uninterested or every, then he is not additional.
It can be concluded that Alston is adventurous once knowing that Alston is every and Carlos is uninterested.
If there is someone who is not uninterested, then Carlos is every.
Someone who is eithor not additional or adventurous is always not disturbed.
If Kimberly is not disturbed, then Alston is not uninterested, and vice versa.
If someone is additional, then he is both not disturbed and uninterested.
If there is at least one people who is not elated or not additional, then Alston is not every.
If someone is adventurous and additional, then he is both disturbed and uninterested, and vice versa.
Someone being both disturbed and additional is equivalent to being every. | Otis is not disturbed. | self_contradiction |
Shelley is additional.
Alston is additional.
Shelley is adventurous.
Otis is not disturbed.
Brian is not adventurous.
Shelley is disturbed.
Casper is disturbed.
Otis is adventurous.
Otis is additional.
Kimberly is uninterested.
Brian is not disturbed.
Carlos is not every.Otis being adventurous and Kimberly being not additional imply that Brian is uninterested.
If Brian is disturbed, then Shelley is every and Kimberly is uninterested.
It can be concluded that Brian is not every once knowing that Carlos is not elated.
If someone is not uninterested or every, then he is not additional.
It can be concluded that Alston is adventurous once knowing that Alston is every and Carlos is uninterested.
If there is someone who is not uninterested, then Carlos is every.
Someone who is eithor not additional or adventurous is always not disturbed.
If Kimberly is not disturbed, then Alston is not uninterested, and vice versa.
If someone is additional, then he is both not disturbed and uninterested.
If there is at least one people who is not elated or not additional, then Alston is not every.
If someone is adventurous and additional, then he is both disturbed and uninterested, and vice versa.
Someone being both disturbed and additional is equivalent to being every. | Brian is disturbed. | contradiction |
Shelley is additional.
Alston is additional.
Shelley is adventurous.
Otis is not disturbed.
Brian is not adventurous.
Shelley is disturbed.
Casper is disturbed.
Otis is adventurous.
Otis is additional.
Kimberly is uninterested.
Brian is not disturbed.
Carlos is not every.Otis being adventurous and Kimberly being not additional imply that Brian is uninterested.
If Brian is disturbed, then Shelley is every and Kimberly is uninterested.
It can be concluded that Brian is not every once knowing that Carlos is not elated.
If someone is not uninterested or every, then he is not additional.
It can be concluded that Alston is adventurous once knowing that Alston is every and Carlos is uninterested.
If there is someone who is not uninterested, then Carlos is every.
Someone who is eithor not additional or adventurous is always not disturbed.
If Kimberly is not disturbed, then Alston is not uninterested, and vice versa.
If someone is additional, then he is both not disturbed and uninterested.
If there is at least one people who is not elated or not additional, then Alston is not every.
If someone is adventurous and additional, then he is both disturbed and uninterested, and vice versa.
Someone being both disturbed and additional is equivalent to being every. | Shelley is not additional. | self_contradiction |
Shelley is additional.
Alston is additional.
Shelley is adventurous.
Otis is not disturbed.
Brian is not adventurous.
Shelley is disturbed.
Casper is disturbed.
Otis is adventurous.
Otis is additional.
Kimberly is uninterested.
Brian is not disturbed.
Carlos is not every.Otis being adventurous and Kimberly being not additional imply that Brian is uninterested.
If Brian is disturbed, then Shelley is every and Kimberly is uninterested.
It can be concluded that Brian is not every once knowing that Carlos is not elated.
If someone is not uninterested or every, then he is not additional.
It can be concluded that Alston is adventurous once knowing that Alston is every and Carlos is uninterested.
If there is someone who is not uninterested, then Carlos is every.
Someone who is eithor not additional or adventurous is always not disturbed.
If Kimberly is not disturbed, then Alston is not uninterested, and vice versa.
If someone is additional, then he is both not disturbed and uninterested.
If there is at least one people who is not elated or not additional, then Alston is not every.
If someone is adventurous and additional, then he is both disturbed and uninterested, and vice versa.
Someone being both disturbed and additional is equivalent to being every. | Shelley is uninterested. | entailment |
Olaf is similar.
Liam is not aggressive.
Ridley is not courageous.
Reginald is serious.
Blanca is not aggressive.
Liam is courageous.
Ridley is aggressive.
Olaf is aggressive.
Liam is similar.
Blanca is not oak.
Horace is similar.
Harley is similar.If there is at least one people who is serious or aggressive, then Horace is not solid.
If someone is not similar and courageous, then he is both not serious and solid, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not similar and not oak, then Reginald is not courageous.
If there is at least one people who is both aggressive and not solid, then Liam is oak.
If Olaf is serious and Olaf is aggressive, then Blanca is solid and Horace is courageous.
Someone being both not solid and not oak is equivalent to being courageous and similar.
If Horace is oak and Harley is aggressive, then Reginald is not courageous.
If someone is similar and serious, then he is both not oak and courageous, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not oak or courageous, then Olaf is not similar.
As long as someone is not oak, he is solid and aggressive.
If there is someone who is not aggressive, then Olaf is not courageous and Olaf is oak.
If there is at least one people who is not serious, then Olaf is not solid. | Horace is similar. | entailment |
Olaf is similar.
Liam is not aggressive.
Ridley is not courageous.
Reginald is serious.
Blanca is not aggressive.
Liam is courageous.
Ridley is aggressive.
Olaf is aggressive.
Liam is similar.
Blanca is not oak.
Horace is similar.
Harley is similar.If there is at least one people who is serious or aggressive, then Horace is not solid.
If someone is not similar and courageous, then he is both not serious and solid, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not similar and not oak, then Reginald is not courageous.
If there is at least one people who is both aggressive and not solid, then Liam is oak.
If Olaf is serious and Olaf is aggressive, then Blanca is solid and Horace is courageous.
Someone being both not solid and not oak is equivalent to being courageous and similar.
If Horace is oak and Harley is aggressive, then Reginald is not courageous.
If someone is similar and serious, then he is both not oak and courageous, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not oak or courageous, then Olaf is not similar.
As long as someone is not oak, he is solid and aggressive.
If there is someone who is not aggressive, then Olaf is not courageous and Olaf is oak.
If there is at least one people who is not serious, then Olaf is not solid. | Horace is solid. | contradiction |
Olaf is similar.
Liam is not aggressive.
Ridley is not courageous.
Reginald is serious.
Blanca is not aggressive.
Liam is courageous.
Ridley is aggressive.
Olaf is aggressive.
Liam is similar.
Blanca is not oak.
Horace is similar.
Harley is similar.If there is at least one people who is serious or aggressive, then Horace is not solid.
If someone is not similar and courageous, then he is both not serious and solid, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not similar and not oak, then Reginald is not courageous.
If there is at least one people who is both aggressive and not solid, then Liam is oak.
If Olaf is serious and Olaf is aggressive, then Blanca is solid and Horace is courageous.
Someone being both not solid and not oak is equivalent to being courageous and similar.
If Horace is oak and Harley is aggressive, then Reginald is not courageous.
If someone is similar and serious, then he is both not oak and courageous, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not oak or courageous, then Olaf is not similar.
As long as someone is not oak, he is solid and aggressive.
If there is someone who is not aggressive, then Olaf is not courageous and Olaf is oak.
If there is at least one people who is not serious, then Olaf is not solid. | Ridley is not courageous. | entailment |
Olaf is similar.
Liam is not aggressive.
Ridley is not courageous.
Reginald is serious.
Blanca is not aggressive.
Liam is courageous.
Ridley is aggressive.
Olaf is aggressive.
Liam is similar.
Blanca is not oak.
Horace is similar.
Harley is similar.If there is at least one people who is serious or aggressive, then Horace is not solid.
If someone is not similar and courageous, then he is both not serious and solid, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not similar and not oak, then Reginald is not courageous.
If there is at least one people who is both aggressive and not solid, then Liam is oak.
If Olaf is serious and Olaf is aggressive, then Blanca is solid and Horace is courageous.
Someone being both not solid and not oak is equivalent to being courageous and similar.
If Horace is oak and Harley is aggressive, then Reginald is not courageous.
If someone is similar and serious, then he is both not oak and courageous, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not oak or courageous, then Olaf is not similar.
As long as someone is not oak, he is solid and aggressive.
If there is someone who is not aggressive, then Olaf is not courageous and Olaf is oak.
If there is at least one people who is not serious, then Olaf is not solid. | Horace is not oak. | neutral |
Olaf is similar.
Liam is not aggressive.
Ridley is not courageous.
Reginald is serious.
Blanca is not aggressive.
Liam is courageous.
Ridley is aggressive.
Olaf is aggressive.
Liam is similar.
Blanca is not oak.
Horace is similar.
Harley is similar.If there is at least one people who is serious or aggressive, then Horace is not solid.
If someone is not similar and courageous, then he is both not serious and solid, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not similar and not oak, then Reginald is not courageous.
If there is at least one people who is both aggressive and not solid, then Liam is oak.
If Olaf is serious and Olaf is aggressive, then Blanca is solid and Horace is courageous.
Someone being both not solid and not oak is equivalent to being courageous and similar.
If Horace is oak and Harley is aggressive, then Reginald is not courageous.
If someone is similar and serious, then he is both not oak and courageous, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not oak or courageous, then Olaf is not similar.
As long as someone is not oak, he is solid and aggressive.
If there is someone who is not aggressive, then Olaf is not courageous and Olaf is oak.
If there is at least one people who is not serious, then Olaf is not solid. | Olaf is not similar. | self_contradiction |
Olaf is similar.
Liam is not aggressive.
Ridley is not courageous.
Reginald is serious.
Blanca is not aggressive.
Liam is courageous.
Ridley is aggressive.
Olaf is aggressive.
Liam is similar.
Blanca is not oak.
Horace is similar.
Harley is similar.If there is at least one people who is serious or aggressive, then Horace is not solid.
If someone is not similar and courageous, then he is both not serious and solid, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not similar and not oak, then Reginald is not courageous.
If there is at least one people who is both aggressive and not solid, then Liam is oak.
If Olaf is serious and Olaf is aggressive, then Blanca is solid and Horace is courageous.
Someone being both not solid and not oak is equivalent to being courageous and similar.
If Horace is oak and Harley is aggressive, then Reginald is not courageous.
If someone is similar and serious, then he is both not oak and courageous, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not oak or courageous, then Olaf is not similar.
As long as someone is not oak, he is solid and aggressive.
If there is someone who is not aggressive, then Olaf is not courageous and Olaf is oak.
If there is at least one people who is not serious, then Olaf is not solid. | Ridley is serious. | neutral |
Olaf is similar.
Liam is not aggressive.
Ridley is not courageous.
Reginald is serious.
Blanca is not aggressive.
Liam is courageous.
Ridley is aggressive.
Olaf is aggressive.
Liam is similar.
Blanca is not oak.
Horace is similar.
Harley is similar.If there is at least one people who is serious or aggressive, then Horace is not solid.
If someone is not similar and courageous, then he is both not serious and solid, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not similar and not oak, then Reginald is not courageous.
If there is at least one people who is both aggressive and not solid, then Liam is oak.
If Olaf is serious and Olaf is aggressive, then Blanca is solid and Horace is courageous.
Someone being both not solid and not oak is equivalent to being courageous and similar.
If Horace is oak and Harley is aggressive, then Reginald is not courageous.
If someone is similar and serious, then he is both not oak and courageous, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not oak or courageous, then Olaf is not similar.
As long as someone is not oak, he is solid and aggressive.
If there is someone who is not aggressive, then Olaf is not courageous and Olaf is oak.
If there is at least one people who is not serious, then Olaf is not solid. | Harley is not oak. | neutral |
Olaf is similar.
Liam is not aggressive.
Ridley is not courageous.
Reginald is serious.
Blanca is not aggressive.
Liam is courageous.
Ridley is aggressive.
Olaf is aggressive.
Liam is similar.
Blanca is not oak.
Horace is similar.
Harley is similar.If there is at least one people who is serious or aggressive, then Horace is not solid.
If someone is not similar and courageous, then he is both not serious and solid, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not similar and not oak, then Reginald is not courageous.
If there is at least one people who is both aggressive and not solid, then Liam is oak.
If Olaf is serious and Olaf is aggressive, then Blanca is solid and Horace is courageous.
Someone being both not solid and not oak is equivalent to being courageous and similar.
If Horace is oak and Harley is aggressive, then Reginald is not courageous.
If someone is similar and serious, then he is both not oak and courageous, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not oak or courageous, then Olaf is not similar.
As long as someone is not oak, he is solid and aggressive.
If there is someone who is not aggressive, then Olaf is not courageous and Olaf is oak.
If there is at least one people who is not serious, then Olaf is not solid. | Reginald is courageous. | contradiction |
Olaf is similar.
Liam is not aggressive.
Ridley is not courageous.
Reginald is serious.
Blanca is not aggressive.
Liam is courageous.
Ridley is aggressive.
Olaf is aggressive.
Liam is similar.
Blanca is not oak.
Horace is similar.
Harley is similar.If there is at least one people who is serious or aggressive, then Horace is not solid.
If someone is not similar and courageous, then he is both not serious and solid, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not similar and not oak, then Reginald is not courageous.
If there is at least one people who is both aggressive and not solid, then Liam is oak.
If Olaf is serious and Olaf is aggressive, then Blanca is solid and Horace is courageous.
Someone being both not solid and not oak is equivalent to being courageous and similar.
If Horace is oak and Harley is aggressive, then Reginald is not courageous.
If someone is similar and serious, then he is both not oak and courageous, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not oak or courageous, then Olaf is not similar.
As long as someone is not oak, he is solid and aggressive.
If there is someone who is not aggressive, then Olaf is not courageous and Olaf is oak.
If there is at least one people who is not serious, then Olaf is not solid. | Olaf is similar. | self_contradiction |
Olaf is similar.
Liam is not aggressive.
Ridley is not courageous.
Reginald is serious.
Blanca is not aggressive.
Liam is courageous.
Ridley is aggressive.
Olaf is aggressive.
Liam is similar.
Blanca is not oak.
Horace is similar.
Harley is similar.If there is at least one people who is serious or aggressive, then Horace is not solid.
If someone is not similar and courageous, then he is both not serious and solid, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not similar and not oak, then Reginald is not courageous.
If there is at least one people who is both aggressive and not solid, then Liam is oak.
If Olaf is serious and Olaf is aggressive, then Blanca is solid and Horace is courageous.
Someone being both not solid and not oak is equivalent to being courageous and similar.
If Horace is oak and Harley is aggressive, then Reginald is not courageous.
If someone is similar and serious, then he is both not oak and courageous, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not oak or courageous, then Olaf is not similar.
As long as someone is not oak, he is solid and aggressive.
If there is someone who is not aggressive, then Olaf is not courageous and Olaf is oak.
If there is at least one people who is not serious, then Olaf is not solid. | Liam is solid. | self_contradiction |
Olaf is similar.
Liam is not aggressive.
Ridley is not courageous.
Reginald is serious.
Blanca is not aggressive.
Liam is courageous.
Ridley is aggressive.
Olaf is aggressive.
Liam is similar.
Blanca is not oak.
Horace is similar.
Harley is similar.If there is at least one people who is serious or aggressive, then Horace is not solid.
If someone is not similar and courageous, then he is both not serious and solid, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not similar and not oak, then Reginald is not courageous.
If there is at least one people who is both aggressive and not solid, then Liam is oak.
If Olaf is serious and Olaf is aggressive, then Blanca is solid and Horace is courageous.
Someone being both not solid and not oak is equivalent to being courageous and similar.
If Horace is oak and Harley is aggressive, then Reginald is not courageous.
If someone is similar and serious, then he is both not oak and courageous, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not oak or courageous, then Olaf is not similar.
As long as someone is not oak, he is solid and aggressive.
If there is someone who is not aggressive, then Olaf is not courageous and Olaf is oak.
If there is at least one people who is not serious, then Olaf is not solid. | Liam is not solid. | self_contradiction |
Olaf is similar.
Liam is not aggressive.
Ridley is not courageous.
Reginald is serious.
Blanca is not aggressive.
Liam is courageous.
Ridley is aggressive.
Olaf is aggressive.
Liam is similar.
Blanca is not oak.
Horace is similar.
Harley is similar.If there is at least one people who is serious or aggressive, then Horace is not solid.
If someone is not similar and courageous, then he is both not serious and solid, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not similar and not oak, then Reginald is not courageous.
If there is at least one people who is both aggressive and not solid, then Liam is oak.
If Olaf is serious and Olaf is aggressive, then Blanca is solid and Horace is courageous.
Someone being both not solid and not oak is equivalent to being courageous and similar.
If Horace is oak and Harley is aggressive, then Reginald is not courageous.
If someone is similar and serious, then he is both not oak and courageous, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not oak or courageous, then Olaf is not similar.
As long as someone is not oak, he is solid and aggressive.
If there is someone who is not aggressive, then Olaf is not courageous and Olaf is oak.
If there is at least one people who is not serious, then Olaf is not solid. | Liam is not aggressive. | self_contradiction |
Olaf is similar.
Liam is not aggressive.
Ridley is not courageous.
Reginald is serious.
Blanca is not aggressive.
Liam is courageous.
Ridley is aggressive.
Olaf is aggressive.
Liam is similar.
Blanca is not oak.
Horace is similar.
Harley is similar.If there is at least one people who is serious or aggressive, then Horace is not solid.
If someone is not similar and courageous, then he is both not serious and solid, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not similar and not oak, then Reginald is not courageous.
If there is at least one people who is both aggressive and not solid, then Liam is oak.
If Olaf is serious and Olaf is aggressive, then Blanca is solid and Horace is courageous.
Someone being both not solid and not oak is equivalent to being courageous and similar.
If Horace is oak and Harley is aggressive, then Reginald is not courageous.
If someone is similar and serious, then he is both not oak and courageous, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not oak or courageous, then Olaf is not similar.
As long as someone is not oak, he is solid and aggressive.
If there is someone who is not aggressive, then Olaf is not courageous and Olaf is oak.
If there is at least one people who is not serious, then Olaf is not solid. | Liam is not serious. | contradiction |
Olaf is similar.
Liam is not aggressive.
Ridley is not courageous.
Reginald is serious.
Blanca is not aggressive.
Liam is courageous.
Ridley is aggressive.
Olaf is aggressive.
Liam is similar.
Blanca is not oak.
Horace is similar.
Harley is similar.If there is at least one people who is serious or aggressive, then Horace is not solid.
If someone is not similar and courageous, then he is both not serious and solid, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not similar and not oak, then Reginald is not courageous.
If there is at least one people who is both aggressive and not solid, then Liam is oak.
If Olaf is serious and Olaf is aggressive, then Blanca is solid and Horace is courageous.
Someone being both not solid and not oak is equivalent to being courageous and similar.
If Horace is oak and Harley is aggressive, then Reginald is not courageous.
If someone is similar and serious, then he is both not oak and courageous, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not oak or courageous, then Olaf is not similar.
As long as someone is not oak, he is solid and aggressive.
If there is someone who is not aggressive, then Olaf is not courageous and Olaf is oak.
If there is at least one people who is not serious, then Olaf is not solid. | Ridley is not aggressive. | contradiction |
Olaf is similar.
Liam is not aggressive.
Ridley is not courageous.
Reginald is serious.
Blanca is not aggressive.
Liam is courageous.
Ridley is aggressive.
Olaf is aggressive.
Liam is similar.
Blanca is not oak.
Horace is similar.
Harley is similar.If there is at least one people who is serious or aggressive, then Horace is not solid.
If someone is not similar and courageous, then he is both not serious and solid, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not similar and not oak, then Reginald is not courageous.
If there is at least one people who is both aggressive and not solid, then Liam is oak.
If Olaf is serious and Olaf is aggressive, then Blanca is solid and Horace is courageous.
Someone being both not solid and not oak is equivalent to being courageous and similar.
If Horace is oak and Harley is aggressive, then Reginald is not courageous.
If someone is similar and serious, then he is both not oak and courageous, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not oak or courageous, then Olaf is not similar.
As long as someone is not oak, he is solid and aggressive.
If there is someone who is not aggressive, then Olaf is not courageous and Olaf is oak.
If there is at least one people who is not serious, then Olaf is not solid. | Olaf is not oak. | contradiction |
Olaf is similar.
Liam is not aggressive.
Ridley is not courageous.
Reginald is serious.
Blanca is not aggressive.
Liam is courageous.
Ridley is aggressive.
Olaf is aggressive.
Liam is similar.
Blanca is not oak.
Horace is similar.
Harley is similar.If there is at least one people who is serious or aggressive, then Horace is not solid.
If someone is not similar and courageous, then he is both not serious and solid, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not similar and not oak, then Reginald is not courageous.
If there is at least one people who is both aggressive and not solid, then Liam is oak.
If Olaf is serious and Olaf is aggressive, then Blanca is solid and Horace is courageous.
Someone being both not solid and not oak is equivalent to being courageous and similar.
If Horace is oak and Harley is aggressive, then Reginald is not courageous.
If someone is similar and serious, then he is both not oak and courageous, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not oak or courageous, then Olaf is not similar.
As long as someone is not oak, he is solid and aggressive.
If there is someone who is not aggressive, then Olaf is not courageous and Olaf is oak.
If there is at least one people who is not serious, then Olaf is not solid. | Blanca is solid. | entailment |
Olaf is similar.
Liam is not aggressive.
Ridley is not courageous.
Reginald is serious.
Blanca is not aggressive.
Liam is courageous.
Ridley is aggressive.
Olaf is aggressive.
Liam is similar.
Blanca is not oak.
Horace is similar.
Harley is similar.If there is at least one people who is serious or aggressive, then Horace is not solid.
If someone is not similar and courageous, then he is both not serious and solid, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not similar and not oak, then Reginald is not courageous.
If there is at least one people who is both aggressive and not solid, then Liam is oak.
If Olaf is serious and Olaf is aggressive, then Blanca is solid and Horace is courageous.
Someone being both not solid and not oak is equivalent to being courageous and similar.
If Horace is oak and Harley is aggressive, then Reginald is not courageous.
If someone is similar and serious, then he is both not oak and courageous, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not oak or courageous, then Olaf is not similar.
As long as someone is not oak, he is solid and aggressive.
If there is someone who is not aggressive, then Olaf is not courageous and Olaf is oak.
If there is at least one people who is not serious, then Olaf is not solid. | Olaf is not courageous. | entailment |
Olaf is similar.
Liam is not aggressive.
Ridley is not courageous.
Reginald is serious.
Blanca is not aggressive.
Liam is courageous.
Ridley is aggressive.
Olaf is aggressive.
Liam is similar.
Blanca is not oak.
Horace is similar.
Harley is similar.If there is at least one people who is serious or aggressive, then Horace is not solid.
If someone is not similar and courageous, then he is both not serious and solid, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not similar and not oak, then Reginald is not courageous.
If there is at least one people who is both aggressive and not solid, then Liam is oak.
If Olaf is serious and Olaf is aggressive, then Blanca is solid and Horace is courageous.
Someone being both not solid and not oak is equivalent to being courageous and similar.
If Horace is oak and Harley is aggressive, then Reginald is not courageous.
If someone is similar and serious, then he is both not oak and courageous, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not oak or courageous, then Olaf is not similar.
As long as someone is not oak, he is solid and aggressive.
If there is someone who is not aggressive, then Olaf is not courageous and Olaf is oak.
If there is at least one people who is not serious, then Olaf is not solid. | Blanca is not courageous. | neutral |
Olaf is similar.
Liam is not aggressive.
Ridley is not courageous.
Reginald is serious.
Blanca is not aggressive.
Liam is courageous.
Ridley is aggressive.
Olaf is aggressive.
Liam is similar.
Blanca is not oak.
Horace is similar.
Harley is similar.If there is at least one people who is serious or aggressive, then Horace is not solid.
If someone is not similar and courageous, then he is both not serious and solid, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not similar and not oak, then Reginald is not courageous.
If there is at least one people who is both aggressive and not solid, then Liam is oak.
If Olaf is serious and Olaf is aggressive, then Blanca is solid and Horace is courageous.
Someone being both not solid and not oak is equivalent to being courageous and similar.
If Horace is oak and Harley is aggressive, then Reginald is not courageous.
If someone is similar and serious, then he is both not oak and courageous, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not oak or courageous, then Olaf is not similar.
As long as someone is not oak, he is solid and aggressive.
If there is someone who is not aggressive, then Olaf is not courageous and Olaf is oak.
If there is at least one people who is not serious, then Olaf is not solid. | Blanca is courageous. | neutral |
Olaf is similar.
Liam is not aggressive.
Ridley is not courageous.
Reginald is serious.
Blanca is not aggressive.
Liam is courageous.
Ridley is aggressive.
Olaf is aggressive.
Liam is similar.
Blanca is not oak.
Horace is similar.
Harley is similar.If there is at least one people who is serious or aggressive, then Horace is not solid.
If someone is not similar and courageous, then he is both not serious and solid, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is both not similar and not oak, then Reginald is not courageous.
If there is at least one people who is both aggressive and not solid, then Liam is oak.
If Olaf is serious and Olaf is aggressive, then Blanca is solid and Horace is courageous.
Someone being both not solid and not oak is equivalent to being courageous and similar.
If Horace is oak and Harley is aggressive, then Reginald is not courageous.
If someone is similar and serious, then he is both not oak and courageous, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not oak or courageous, then Olaf is not similar.
As long as someone is not oak, he is solid and aggressive.
If there is someone who is not aggressive, then Olaf is not courageous and Olaf is oak.
If there is at least one people who is not serious, then Olaf is not solid. | Reginald is not courageous. | entailment |
Roswell is not global.
Rufus is global.
Abraham is not chestnut.
Bruce is not chestnut.
Brooke is not rare.
Rufus is popular.
Rex is wooden.
Roswell is rare.
Brooke is silly.
Rex is not chestnut.
Johnny is not silly.
Abraham is popular.Rufus being not silly implies that Abraham is wooden.
Rex being wooden and Bruce being chestnut imply that Rex is global.
It can be concluded that Johnny is not wooden once knowing that Brooke is popular or Brooke is chestnut.
Someone is silly and not popular if and only if he is global.
If someone who is popular is also rare, then he is not silly.
Someone who is not silly is always not wooden.
Someone who is both global and silly is always not wooden.
If there is someone who is rare, then Abraham is silly.
If someone is rare, then he is both popular and wooden.
If Abraham is wooden, then Rufus is popular and Abraham is not global.
If there is someone who is not silly, then Bruce is not rare and Brooke is chestnut.
If there is someone who is both not chestnut and not wooden, then Johnny is not rare and Abraham is not silly. | Roswell is not rare. | contradiction |
Roswell is not global.
Rufus is global.
Abraham is not chestnut.
Bruce is not chestnut.
Brooke is not rare.
Rufus is popular.
Rex is wooden.
Roswell is rare.
Brooke is silly.
Rex is not chestnut.
Johnny is not silly.
Abraham is popular.Rufus being not silly implies that Abraham is wooden.
Rex being wooden and Bruce being chestnut imply that Rex is global.
It can be concluded that Johnny is not wooden once knowing that Brooke is popular or Brooke is chestnut.
Someone is silly and not popular if and only if he is global.
If someone who is popular is also rare, then he is not silly.
Someone who is not silly is always not wooden.
Someone who is both global and silly is always not wooden.
If there is someone who is rare, then Abraham is silly.
If someone is rare, then he is both popular and wooden.
If Abraham is wooden, then Rufus is popular and Abraham is not global.
If there is someone who is not silly, then Bruce is not rare and Brooke is chestnut.
If there is someone who is both not chestnut and not wooden, then Johnny is not rare and Abraham is not silly. | Rex is silly. | neutral |
Roswell is not global.
Rufus is global.
Abraham is not chestnut.
Bruce is not chestnut.
Brooke is not rare.
Rufus is popular.
Rex is wooden.
Roswell is rare.
Brooke is silly.
Rex is not chestnut.
Johnny is not silly.
Abraham is popular.Rufus being not silly implies that Abraham is wooden.
Rex being wooden and Bruce being chestnut imply that Rex is global.
It can be concluded that Johnny is not wooden once knowing that Brooke is popular or Brooke is chestnut.
Someone is silly and not popular if and only if he is global.
If someone who is popular is also rare, then he is not silly.
Someone who is not silly is always not wooden.
Someone who is both global and silly is always not wooden.
If there is someone who is rare, then Abraham is silly.
If someone is rare, then he is both popular and wooden.
If Abraham is wooden, then Rufus is popular and Abraham is not global.
If there is someone who is not silly, then Bruce is not rare and Brooke is chestnut.
If there is someone who is both not chestnut and not wooden, then Johnny is not rare and Abraham is not silly. | Rufus is not wooden. | entailment |
Roswell is not global.
Rufus is global.
Abraham is not chestnut.
Bruce is not chestnut.
Brooke is not rare.
Rufus is popular.
Rex is wooden.
Roswell is rare.
Brooke is silly.
Rex is not chestnut.
Johnny is not silly.
Abraham is popular.Rufus being not silly implies that Abraham is wooden.
Rex being wooden and Bruce being chestnut imply that Rex is global.
It can be concluded that Johnny is not wooden once knowing that Brooke is popular or Brooke is chestnut.
Someone is silly and not popular if and only if he is global.
If someone who is popular is also rare, then he is not silly.
Someone who is not silly is always not wooden.
Someone who is both global and silly is always not wooden.
If there is someone who is rare, then Abraham is silly.
If someone is rare, then he is both popular and wooden.
If Abraham is wooden, then Rufus is popular and Abraham is not global.
If there is someone who is not silly, then Bruce is not rare and Brooke is chestnut.
If there is someone who is both not chestnut and not wooden, then Johnny is not rare and Abraham is not silly. | Rex is not global. | neutral |
Roswell is not global.
Rufus is global.
Abraham is not chestnut.
Bruce is not chestnut.
Brooke is not rare.
Rufus is popular.
Rex is wooden.
Roswell is rare.
Brooke is silly.
Rex is not chestnut.
Johnny is not silly.
Abraham is popular.Rufus being not silly implies that Abraham is wooden.
Rex being wooden and Bruce being chestnut imply that Rex is global.
It can be concluded that Johnny is not wooden once knowing that Brooke is popular or Brooke is chestnut.
Someone is silly and not popular if and only if he is global.
If someone who is popular is also rare, then he is not silly.
Someone who is not silly is always not wooden.
Someone who is both global and silly is always not wooden.
If there is someone who is rare, then Abraham is silly.
If someone is rare, then he is both popular and wooden.
If Abraham is wooden, then Rufus is popular and Abraham is not global.
If there is someone who is not silly, then Bruce is not rare and Brooke is chestnut.
If there is someone who is both not chestnut and not wooden, then Johnny is not rare and Abraham is not silly. | Abraham is not wooden. | entailment |
Roswell is not global.
Rufus is global.
Abraham is not chestnut.
Bruce is not chestnut.
Brooke is not rare.
Rufus is popular.
Rex is wooden.
Roswell is rare.
Brooke is silly.
Rex is not chestnut.
Johnny is not silly.
Abraham is popular.Rufus being not silly implies that Abraham is wooden.
Rex being wooden and Bruce being chestnut imply that Rex is global.
It can be concluded that Johnny is not wooden once knowing that Brooke is popular or Brooke is chestnut.
Someone is silly and not popular if and only if he is global.
If someone who is popular is also rare, then he is not silly.
Someone who is not silly is always not wooden.
Someone who is both global and silly is always not wooden.
If there is someone who is rare, then Abraham is silly.
If someone is rare, then he is both popular and wooden.
If Abraham is wooden, then Rufus is popular and Abraham is not global.
If there is someone who is not silly, then Bruce is not rare and Brooke is chestnut.
If there is someone who is both not chestnut and not wooden, then Johnny is not rare and Abraham is not silly. | Rufus is not popular. | self_contradiction |
Roswell is not global.
Rufus is global.
Abraham is not chestnut.
Bruce is not chestnut.
Brooke is not rare.
Rufus is popular.
Rex is wooden.
Roswell is rare.
Brooke is silly.
Rex is not chestnut.
Johnny is not silly.
Abraham is popular.Rufus being not silly implies that Abraham is wooden.
Rex being wooden and Bruce being chestnut imply that Rex is global.
It can be concluded that Johnny is not wooden once knowing that Brooke is popular or Brooke is chestnut.
Someone is silly and not popular if and only if he is global.
If someone who is popular is also rare, then he is not silly.
Someone who is not silly is always not wooden.
Someone who is both global and silly is always not wooden.
If there is someone who is rare, then Abraham is silly.
If someone is rare, then he is both popular and wooden.
If Abraham is wooden, then Rufus is popular and Abraham is not global.
If there is someone who is not silly, then Bruce is not rare and Brooke is chestnut.
If there is someone who is both not chestnut and not wooden, then Johnny is not rare and Abraham is not silly. | Roswell is not wooden. | self_contradiction |
Roswell is not global.
Rufus is global.
Abraham is not chestnut.
Bruce is not chestnut.
Brooke is not rare.
Rufus is popular.
Rex is wooden.
Roswell is rare.
Brooke is silly.
Rex is not chestnut.
Johnny is not silly.
Abraham is popular.Rufus being not silly implies that Abraham is wooden.
Rex being wooden and Bruce being chestnut imply that Rex is global.
It can be concluded that Johnny is not wooden once knowing that Brooke is popular or Brooke is chestnut.
Someone is silly and not popular if and only if he is global.
If someone who is popular is also rare, then he is not silly.
Someone who is not silly is always not wooden.
Someone who is both global and silly is always not wooden.
If there is someone who is rare, then Abraham is silly.
If someone is rare, then he is both popular and wooden.
If Abraham is wooden, then Rufus is popular and Abraham is not global.
If there is someone who is not silly, then Bruce is not rare and Brooke is chestnut.
If there is someone who is both not chestnut and not wooden, then Johnny is not rare and Abraham is not silly. | Rex is global. | neutral |
Roswell is not global.
Rufus is global.
Abraham is not chestnut.
Bruce is not chestnut.
Brooke is not rare.
Rufus is popular.
Rex is wooden.
Roswell is rare.
Brooke is silly.
Rex is not chestnut.
Johnny is not silly.
Abraham is popular.Rufus being not silly implies that Abraham is wooden.
Rex being wooden and Bruce being chestnut imply that Rex is global.
It can be concluded that Johnny is not wooden once knowing that Brooke is popular or Brooke is chestnut.
Someone is silly and not popular if and only if he is global.
If someone who is popular is also rare, then he is not silly.
Someone who is not silly is always not wooden.
Someone who is both global and silly is always not wooden.
If there is someone who is rare, then Abraham is silly.
If someone is rare, then he is both popular and wooden.
If Abraham is wooden, then Rufus is popular and Abraham is not global.
If there is someone who is not silly, then Bruce is not rare and Brooke is chestnut.
If there is someone who is both not chestnut and not wooden, then Johnny is not rare and Abraham is not silly. | Roswell is wooden. | self_contradiction |
Roswell is not global.
Rufus is global.
Abraham is not chestnut.
Bruce is not chestnut.
Brooke is not rare.
Rufus is popular.
Rex is wooden.
Roswell is rare.
Brooke is silly.
Rex is not chestnut.
Johnny is not silly.
Abraham is popular.Rufus being not silly implies that Abraham is wooden.
Rex being wooden and Bruce being chestnut imply that Rex is global.
It can be concluded that Johnny is not wooden once knowing that Brooke is popular or Brooke is chestnut.
Someone is silly and not popular if and only if he is global.
If someone who is popular is also rare, then he is not silly.
Someone who is not silly is always not wooden.
Someone who is both global and silly is always not wooden.
If there is someone who is rare, then Abraham is silly.
If someone is rare, then he is both popular and wooden.
If Abraham is wooden, then Rufus is popular and Abraham is not global.
If there is someone who is not silly, then Bruce is not rare and Brooke is chestnut.
If there is someone who is both not chestnut and not wooden, then Johnny is not rare and Abraham is not silly. | Bruce is global. | neutral |
Roswell is not global.
Rufus is global.
Abraham is not chestnut.
Bruce is not chestnut.
Brooke is not rare.
Rufus is popular.
Rex is wooden.
Roswell is rare.
Brooke is silly.
Rex is not chestnut.
Johnny is not silly.
Abraham is popular.Rufus being not silly implies that Abraham is wooden.
Rex being wooden and Bruce being chestnut imply that Rex is global.
It can be concluded that Johnny is not wooden once knowing that Brooke is popular or Brooke is chestnut.
Someone is silly and not popular if and only if he is global.
If someone who is popular is also rare, then he is not silly.
Someone who is not silly is always not wooden.
Someone who is both global and silly is always not wooden.
If there is someone who is rare, then Abraham is silly.
If someone is rare, then he is both popular and wooden.
If Abraham is wooden, then Rufus is popular and Abraham is not global.
If there is someone who is not silly, then Bruce is not rare and Brooke is chestnut.
If there is someone who is both not chestnut and not wooden, then Johnny is not rare and Abraham is not silly. | Brooke is not wooden. | neutral |
Roswell is not global.
Rufus is global.
Abraham is not chestnut.
Bruce is not chestnut.
Brooke is not rare.
Rufus is popular.
Rex is wooden.
Roswell is rare.
Brooke is silly.
Rex is not chestnut.
Johnny is not silly.
Abraham is popular.Rufus being not silly implies that Abraham is wooden.
Rex being wooden and Bruce being chestnut imply that Rex is global.
It can be concluded that Johnny is not wooden once knowing that Brooke is popular or Brooke is chestnut.
Someone is silly and not popular if and only if he is global.
If someone who is popular is also rare, then he is not silly.
Someone who is not silly is always not wooden.
Someone who is both global and silly is always not wooden.
If there is someone who is rare, then Abraham is silly.
If someone is rare, then he is both popular and wooden.
If Abraham is wooden, then Rufus is popular and Abraham is not global.
If there is someone who is not silly, then Bruce is not rare and Brooke is chestnut.
If there is someone who is both not chestnut and not wooden, then Johnny is not rare and Abraham is not silly. | Brooke is silly. | entailment |
Roswell is not global.
Rufus is global.
Abraham is not chestnut.
Bruce is not chestnut.
Brooke is not rare.
Rufus is popular.
Rex is wooden.
Roswell is rare.
Brooke is silly.
Rex is not chestnut.
Johnny is not silly.
Abraham is popular.Rufus being not silly implies that Abraham is wooden.
Rex being wooden and Bruce being chestnut imply that Rex is global.
It can be concluded that Johnny is not wooden once knowing that Brooke is popular or Brooke is chestnut.
Someone is silly and not popular if and only if he is global.
If someone who is popular is also rare, then he is not silly.
Someone who is not silly is always not wooden.
Someone who is both global and silly is always not wooden.
If there is someone who is rare, then Abraham is silly.
If someone is rare, then he is both popular and wooden.
If Abraham is wooden, then Rufus is popular and Abraham is not global.
If there is someone who is not silly, then Bruce is not rare and Brooke is chestnut.
If there is someone who is both not chestnut and not wooden, then Johnny is not rare and Abraham is not silly. | Roswell is silly. | contradiction |
Roswell is not global.
Rufus is global.
Abraham is not chestnut.
Bruce is not chestnut.
Brooke is not rare.
Rufus is popular.
Rex is wooden.
Roswell is rare.
Brooke is silly.
Rex is not chestnut.
Johnny is not silly.
Abraham is popular.Rufus being not silly implies that Abraham is wooden.
Rex being wooden and Bruce being chestnut imply that Rex is global.
It can be concluded that Johnny is not wooden once knowing that Brooke is popular or Brooke is chestnut.
Someone is silly and not popular if and only if he is global.
If someone who is popular is also rare, then he is not silly.
Someone who is not silly is always not wooden.
Someone who is both global and silly is always not wooden.
If there is someone who is rare, then Abraham is silly.
If someone is rare, then he is both popular and wooden.
If Abraham is wooden, then Rufus is popular and Abraham is not global.
If there is someone who is not silly, then Bruce is not rare and Brooke is chestnut.
If there is someone who is both not chestnut and not wooden, then Johnny is not rare and Abraham is not silly. | Bruce is rare. | contradiction |
Roswell is not global.
Rufus is global.
Abraham is not chestnut.
Bruce is not chestnut.
Brooke is not rare.
Rufus is popular.
Rex is wooden.
Roswell is rare.
Brooke is silly.
Rex is not chestnut.
Johnny is not silly.
Abraham is popular.Rufus being not silly implies that Abraham is wooden.
Rex being wooden and Bruce being chestnut imply that Rex is global.
It can be concluded that Johnny is not wooden once knowing that Brooke is popular or Brooke is chestnut.
Someone is silly and not popular if and only if he is global.
If someone who is popular is also rare, then he is not silly.
Someone who is not silly is always not wooden.
Someone who is both global and silly is always not wooden.
If there is someone who is rare, then Abraham is silly.
If someone is rare, then he is both popular and wooden.
If Abraham is wooden, then Rufus is popular and Abraham is not global.
If there is someone who is not silly, then Bruce is not rare and Brooke is chestnut.
If there is someone who is both not chestnut and not wooden, then Johnny is not rare and Abraham is not silly. | Rufus is popular. | self_contradiction |
Roswell is not global.
Rufus is global.
Abraham is not chestnut.
Bruce is not chestnut.
Brooke is not rare.
Rufus is popular.
Rex is wooden.
Roswell is rare.
Brooke is silly.
Rex is not chestnut.
Johnny is not silly.
Abraham is popular.Rufus being not silly implies that Abraham is wooden.
Rex being wooden and Bruce being chestnut imply that Rex is global.
It can be concluded that Johnny is not wooden once knowing that Brooke is popular or Brooke is chestnut.
Someone is silly and not popular if and only if he is global.
If someone who is popular is also rare, then he is not silly.
Someone who is not silly is always not wooden.
Someone who is both global and silly is always not wooden.
If there is someone who is rare, then Abraham is silly.
If someone is rare, then he is both popular and wooden.
If Abraham is wooden, then Rufus is popular and Abraham is not global.
If there is someone who is not silly, then Bruce is not rare and Brooke is chestnut.
If there is someone who is both not chestnut and not wooden, then Johnny is not rare and Abraham is not silly. | Brooke is rare. | contradiction |
Roswell is not global.
Rufus is global.
Abraham is not chestnut.
Bruce is not chestnut.
Brooke is not rare.
Rufus is popular.
Rex is wooden.
Roswell is rare.
Brooke is silly.
Rex is not chestnut.
Johnny is not silly.
Abraham is popular.Rufus being not silly implies that Abraham is wooden.
Rex being wooden and Bruce being chestnut imply that Rex is global.
It can be concluded that Johnny is not wooden once knowing that Brooke is popular or Brooke is chestnut.
Someone is silly and not popular if and only if he is global.
If someone who is popular is also rare, then he is not silly.
Someone who is not silly is always not wooden.
Someone who is both global and silly is always not wooden.
If there is someone who is rare, then Abraham is silly.
If someone is rare, then he is both popular and wooden.
If Abraham is wooden, then Rufus is popular and Abraham is not global.
If there is someone who is not silly, then Bruce is not rare and Brooke is chestnut.
If there is someone who is both not chestnut and not wooden, then Johnny is not rare and Abraham is not silly. | Abraham is wooden. | contradiction |
Roswell is not global.
Rufus is global.
Abraham is not chestnut.
Bruce is not chestnut.
Brooke is not rare.
Rufus is popular.
Rex is wooden.
Roswell is rare.
Brooke is silly.
Rex is not chestnut.
Johnny is not silly.
Abraham is popular.Rufus being not silly implies that Abraham is wooden.
Rex being wooden and Bruce being chestnut imply that Rex is global.
It can be concluded that Johnny is not wooden once knowing that Brooke is popular or Brooke is chestnut.
Someone is silly and not popular if and only if he is global.
If someone who is popular is also rare, then he is not silly.
Someone who is not silly is always not wooden.
Someone who is both global and silly is always not wooden.
If there is someone who is rare, then Abraham is silly.
If someone is rare, then he is both popular and wooden.
If Abraham is wooden, then Rufus is popular and Abraham is not global.
If there is someone who is not silly, then Bruce is not rare and Brooke is chestnut.
If there is someone who is both not chestnut and not wooden, then Johnny is not rare and Abraham is not silly. | Abraham is popular. | entailment |
Roswell is not global.
Rufus is global.
Abraham is not chestnut.
Bruce is not chestnut.
Brooke is not rare.
Rufus is popular.
Rex is wooden.
Roswell is rare.
Brooke is silly.
Rex is not chestnut.
Johnny is not silly.
Abraham is popular.Rufus being not silly implies that Abraham is wooden.
Rex being wooden and Bruce being chestnut imply that Rex is global.
It can be concluded that Johnny is not wooden once knowing that Brooke is popular or Brooke is chestnut.
Someone is silly and not popular if and only if he is global.
If someone who is popular is also rare, then he is not silly.
Someone who is not silly is always not wooden.
Someone who is both global and silly is always not wooden.
If there is someone who is rare, then Abraham is silly.
If someone is rare, then he is both popular and wooden.
If Abraham is wooden, then Rufus is popular and Abraham is not global.
If there is someone who is not silly, then Bruce is not rare and Brooke is chestnut.
If there is someone who is both not chestnut and not wooden, then Johnny is not rare and Abraham is not silly. | Abraham is not chestnut. | entailment |
Roswell is not global.
Rufus is global.
Abraham is not chestnut.
Bruce is not chestnut.
Brooke is not rare.
Rufus is popular.
Rex is wooden.
Roswell is rare.
Brooke is silly.
Rex is not chestnut.
Johnny is not silly.
Abraham is popular.Rufus being not silly implies that Abraham is wooden.
Rex being wooden and Bruce being chestnut imply that Rex is global.
It can be concluded that Johnny is not wooden once knowing that Brooke is popular or Brooke is chestnut.
Someone is silly and not popular if and only if he is global.
If someone who is popular is also rare, then he is not silly.
Someone who is not silly is always not wooden.
Someone who is both global and silly is always not wooden.
If there is someone who is rare, then Abraham is silly.
If someone is rare, then he is both popular and wooden.
If Abraham is wooden, then Rufus is popular and Abraham is not global.
If there is someone who is not silly, then Bruce is not rare and Brooke is chestnut.
If there is someone who is both not chestnut and not wooden, then Johnny is not rare and Abraham is not silly. | Abraham is silly. | self_contradiction |
Stuart is not embarrassed.
Melody is silly.
Stuart is lucky.
Bowen is not lucky.
Hannah is dishonest.
Bowen is silly.
Laurence is not remarkable.
Laurence is lucky.
Laurence is dark.
Spencer is not embarrassed.
Bowen is dark.
Laurence is not silly.Maribel is not remarkable if and only if Laurence is not embarrassed.
Laurence being not dishonest and Stuart being remarkable imply that Hannah is embarrassed.
If Spencer is not embarrassed, then Spencer is not silly and Hannah is not lucky.
Someone is not lucky and not dishonest if and only if he is dark and not silly.
If there is someone who is both not silly and dark, then Melody is dishonest.
If there is someone who is remarkable, then Melody is lucky and Stuart is embarrassed.
Someone is dark and not silly if and only if he is not embarrassed.
Someone being both remarkable and not silly is equivalent to being lucky and not embarrassed.
Someone who is embarrassed is always both not dark and remarkable.
It can be concluded that Stuart is silly once knowing that Hannah is not embarrassed.
Someone being silly is equivalent to being not embarrassed.
Maribel being not lucky is equivalent to Stuart being remarkable and Melody being not embarrassed. | Stuart is not embarrassed. | self_contradiction |
Stuart is not embarrassed.
Melody is silly.
Stuart is lucky.
Bowen is not lucky.
Hannah is dishonest.
Bowen is silly.
Laurence is not remarkable.
Laurence is lucky.
Laurence is dark.
Spencer is not embarrassed.
Bowen is dark.
Laurence is not silly.Maribel is not remarkable if and only if Laurence is not embarrassed.
Laurence being not dishonest and Stuart being remarkable imply that Hannah is embarrassed.
If Spencer is not embarrassed, then Spencer is not silly and Hannah is not lucky.
Someone is not lucky and not dishonest if and only if he is dark and not silly.
If there is someone who is both not silly and dark, then Melody is dishonest.
If there is someone who is remarkable, then Melody is lucky and Stuart is embarrassed.
Someone is dark and not silly if and only if he is not embarrassed.
Someone being both remarkable and not silly is equivalent to being lucky and not embarrassed.
Someone who is embarrassed is always both not dark and remarkable.
It can be concluded that Stuart is silly once knowing that Hannah is not embarrassed.
Someone being silly is equivalent to being not embarrassed.
Maribel being not lucky is equivalent to Stuart being remarkable and Melody being not embarrassed. | Maribel is silly. | neutral |
Stuart is not embarrassed.
Melody is silly.
Stuart is lucky.
Bowen is not lucky.
Hannah is dishonest.
Bowen is silly.
Laurence is not remarkable.
Laurence is lucky.
Laurence is dark.
Spencer is not embarrassed.
Bowen is dark.
Laurence is not silly.Maribel is not remarkable if and only if Laurence is not embarrassed.
Laurence being not dishonest and Stuart being remarkable imply that Hannah is embarrassed.
If Spencer is not embarrassed, then Spencer is not silly and Hannah is not lucky.
Someone is not lucky and not dishonest if and only if he is dark and not silly.
If there is someone who is both not silly and dark, then Melody is dishonest.
If there is someone who is remarkable, then Melody is lucky and Stuart is embarrassed.
Someone is dark and not silly if and only if he is not embarrassed.
Someone being both remarkable and not silly is equivalent to being lucky and not embarrassed.
Someone who is embarrassed is always both not dark and remarkable.
It can be concluded that Stuart is silly once knowing that Hannah is not embarrassed.
Someone being silly is equivalent to being not embarrassed.
Maribel being not lucky is equivalent to Stuart being remarkable and Melody being not embarrassed. | Laurence is dishonest. | contradiction |
Stuart is not embarrassed.
Melody is silly.
Stuart is lucky.
Bowen is not lucky.
Hannah is dishonest.
Bowen is silly.
Laurence is not remarkable.
Laurence is lucky.
Laurence is dark.
Spencer is not embarrassed.
Bowen is dark.
Laurence is not silly.Maribel is not remarkable if and only if Laurence is not embarrassed.
Laurence being not dishonest and Stuart being remarkable imply that Hannah is embarrassed.
If Spencer is not embarrassed, then Spencer is not silly and Hannah is not lucky.
Someone is not lucky and not dishonest if and only if he is dark and not silly.
If there is someone who is both not silly and dark, then Melody is dishonest.
If there is someone who is remarkable, then Melody is lucky and Stuart is embarrassed.
Someone is dark and not silly if and only if he is not embarrassed.
Someone being both remarkable and not silly is equivalent to being lucky and not embarrassed.
Someone who is embarrassed is always both not dark and remarkable.
It can be concluded that Stuart is silly once knowing that Hannah is not embarrassed.
Someone being silly is equivalent to being not embarrassed.
Maribel being not lucky is equivalent to Stuart being remarkable and Melody being not embarrassed. | Bowen is dark. | entailment |
Stuart is not embarrassed.
Melody is silly.
Stuart is lucky.
Bowen is not lucky.
Hannah is dishonest.
Bowen is silly.
Laurence is not remarkable.
Laurence is lucky.
Laurence is dark.
Spencer is not embarrassed.
Bowen is dark.
Laurence is not silly.Maribel is not remarkable if and only if Laurence is not embarrassed.
Laurence being not dishonest and Stuart being remarkable imply that Hannah is embarrassed.
If Spencer is not embarrassed, then Spencer is not silly and Hannah is not lucky.
Someone is not lucky and not dishonest if and only if he is dark and not silly.
If there is someone who is both not silly and dark, then Melody is dishonest.
If there is someone who is remarkable, then Melody is lucky and Stuart is embarrassed.
Someone is dark and not silly if and only if he is not embarrassed.
Someone being both remarkable and not silly is equivalent to being lucky and not embarrassed.
Someone who is embarrassed is always both not dark and remarkable.
It can be concluded that Stuart is silly once knowing that Hannah is not embarrassed.
Someone being silly is equivalent to being not embarrassed.
Maribel being not lucky is equivalent to Stuart being remarkable and Melody being not embarrassed. | Spencer is not remarkable. | neutral |
Stuart is not embarrassed.
Melody is silly.
Stuart is lucky.
Bowen is not lucky.
Hannah is dishonest.
Bowen is silly.
Laurence is not remarkable.
Laurence is lucky.
Laurence is dark.
Spencer is not embarrassed.
Bowen is dark.
Laurence is not silly.Maribel is not remarkable if and only if Laurence is not embarrassed.
Laurence being not dishonest and Stuart being remarkable imply that Hannah is embarrassed.
If Spencer is not embarrassed, then Spencer is not silly and Hannah is not lucky.
Someone is not lucky and not dishonest if and only if he is dark and not silly.
If there is someone who is both not silly and dark, then Melody is dishonest.
If there is someone who is remarkable, then Melody is lucky and Stuart is embarrassed.
Someone is dark and not silly if and only if he is not embarrassed.
Someone being both remarkable and not silly is equivalent to being lucky and not embarrassed.
Someone who is embarrassed is always both not dark and remarkable.
It can be concluded that Stuart is silly once knowing that Hannah is not embarrassed.
Someone being silly is equivalent to being not embarrassed.
Maribel being not lucky is equivalent to Stuart being remarkable and Melody being not embarrassed. | Hannah is not lucky. | entailment |
Stuart is not embarrassed.
Melody is silly.
Stuart is lucky.
Bowen is not lucky.
Hannah is dishonest.
Bowen is silly.
Laurence is not remarkable.
Laurence is lucky.
Laurence is dark.
Spencer is not embarrassed.
Bowen is dark.
Laurence is not silly.Maribel is not remarkable if and only if Laurence is not embarrassed.
Laurence being not dishonest and Stuart being remarkable imply that Hannah is embarrassed.
If Spencer is not embarrassed, then Spencer is not silly and Hannah is not lucky.
Someone is not lucky and not dishonest if and only if he is dark and not silly.
If there is someone who is both not silly and dark, then Melody is dishonest.
If there is someone who is remarkable, then Melody is lucky and Stuart is embarrassed.
Someone is dark and not silly if and only if he is not embarrassed.
Someone being both remarkable and not silly is equivalent to being lucky and not embarrassed.
Someone who is embarrassed is always both not dark and remarkable.
It can be concluded that Stuart is silly once knowing that Hannah is not embarrassed.
Someone being silly is equivalent to being not embarrassed.
Maribel being not lucky is equivalent to Stuart being remarkable and Melody being not embarrassed. | Laurence is not remarkable. | self_contradiction |
Stuart is not embarrassed.
Melody is silly.
Stuart is lucky.
Bowen is not lucky.
Hannah is dishonest.
Bowen is silly.
Laurence is not remarkable.
Laurence is lucky.
Laurence is dark.
Spencer is not embarrassed.
Bowen is dark.
Laurence is not silly.Maribel is not remarkable if and only if Laurence is not embarrassed.
Laurence being not dishonest and Stuart being remarkable imply that Hannah is embarrassed.
If Spencer is not embarrassed, then Spencer is not silly and Hannah is not lucky.
Someone is not lucky and not dishonest if and only if he is dark and not silly.
If there is someone who is both not silly and dark, then Melody is dishonest.
If there is someone who is remarkable, then Melody is lucky and Stuart is embarrassed.
Someone is dark and not silly if and only if he is not embarrassed.
Someone being both remarkable and not silly is equivalent to being lucky and not embarrassed.
Someone who is embarrassed is always both not dark and remarkable.
It can be concluded that Stuart is silly once knowing that Hannah is not embarrassed.
Someone being silly is equivalent to being not embarrassed.
Maribel being not lucky is equivalent to Stuart being remarkable and Melody being not embarrassed. | Spencer is silly. | self_contradiction |
Stuart is not embarrassed.
Melody is silly.
Stuart is lucky.
Bowen is not lucky.
Hannah is dishonest.
Bowen is silly.
Laurence is not remarkable.
Laurence is lucky.
Laurence is dark.
Spencer is not embarrassed.
Bowen is dark.
Laurence is not silly.Maribel is not remarkable if and only if Laurence is not embarrassed.
Laurence being not dishonest and Stuart being remarkable imply that Hannah is embarrassed.
If Spencer is not embarrassed, then Spencer is not silly and Hannah is not lucky.
Someone is not lucky and not dishonest if and only if he is dark and not silly.
If there is someone who is both not silly and dark, then Melody is dishonest.
If there is someone who is remarkable, then Melody is lucky and Stuart is embarrassed.
Someone is dark and not silly if and only if he is not embarrassed.
Someone being both remarkable and not silly is equivalent to being lucky and not embarrassed.
Someone who is embarrassed is always both not dark and remarkable.
It can be concluded that Stuart is silly once knowing that Hannah is not embarrassed.
Someone being silly is equivalent to being not embarrassed.
Maribel being not lucky is equivalent to Stuart being remarkable and Melody being not embarrassed. | Maribel is not remarkable. | entailment |
Stuart is not embarrassed.
Melody is silly.
Stuart is lucky.
Bowen is not lucky.
Hannah is dishonest.
Bowen is silly.
Laurence is not remarkable.
Laurence is lucky.
Laurence is dark.
Spencer is not embarrassed.
Bowen is dark.
Laurence is not silly.Maribel is not remarkable if and only if Laurence is not embarrassed.
Laurence being not dishonest and Stuart being remarkable imply that Hannah is embarrassed.
If Spencer is not embarrassed, then Spencer is not silly and Hannah is not lucky.
Someone is not lucky and not dishonest if and only if he is dark and not silly.
If there is someone who is both not silly and dark, then Melody is dishonest.
If there is someone who is remarkable, then Melody is lucky and Stuart is embarrassed.
Someone is dark and not silly if and only if he is not embarrassed.
Someone being both remarkable and not silly is equivalent to being lucky and not embarrassed.
Someone who is embarrassed is always both not dark and remarkable.
It can be concluded that Stuart is silly once knowing that Hannah is not embarrassed.
Someone being silly is equivalent to being not embarrassed.
Maribel being not lucky is equivalent to Stuart being remarkable and Melody being not embarrassed. | Stuart is remarkable. | entailment |
Stuart is not embarrassed.
Melody is silly.
Stuart is lucky.
Bowen is not lucky.
Hannah is dishonest.
Bowen is silly.
Laurence is not remarkable.
Laurence is lucky.
Laurence is dark.
Spencer is not embarrassed.
Bowen is dark.
Laurence is not silly.Maribel is not remarkable if and only if Laurence is not embarrassed.
Laurence being not dishonest and Stuart being remarkable imply that Hannah is embarrassed.
If Spencer is not embarrassed, then Spencer is not silly and Hannah is not lucky.
Someone is not lucky and not dishonest if and only if he is dark and not silly.
If there is someone who is both not silly and dark, then Melody is dishonest.
If there is someone who is remarkable, then Melody is lucky and Stuart is embarrassed.
Someone is dark and not silly if and only if he is not embarrassed.
Someone being both remarkable and not silly is equivalent to being lucky and not embarrassed.
Someone who is embarrassed is always both not dark and remarkable.
It can be concluded that Stuart is silly once knowing that Hannah is not embarrassed.
Someone being silly is equivalent to being not embarrassed.
Maribel being not lucky is equivalent to Stuart being remarkable and Melody being not embarrassed. | Stuart is embarrassed. | self_contradiction |
Stuart is not embarrassed.
Melody is silly.
Stuart is lucky.
Bowen is not lucky.
Hannah is dishonest.
Bowen is silly.
Laurence is not remarkable.
Laurence is lucky.
Laurence is dark.
Spencer is not embarrassed.
Bowen is dark.
Laurence is not silly.Maribel is not remarkable if and only if Laurence is not embarrassed.
Laurence being not dishonest and Stuart being remarkable imply that Hannah is embarrassed.
If Spencer is not embarrassed, then Spencer is not silly and Hannah is not lucky.
Someone is not lucky and not dishonest if and only if he is dark and not silly.
If there is someone who is both not silly and dark, then Melody is dishonest.
If there is someone who is remarkable, then Melody is lucky and Stuart is embarrassed.
Someone is dark and not silly if and only if he is not embarrassed.
Someone being both remarkable and not silly is equivalent to being lucky and not embarrassed.
Someone who is embarrassed is always both not dark and remarkable.
It can be concluded that Stuart is silly once knowing that Hannah is not embarrassed.
Someone being silly is equivalent to being not embarrassed.
Maribel being not lucky is equivalent to Stuart being remarkable and Melody being not embarrassed. | Spencer is remarkable. | neutral |
Stuart is not embarrassed.
Melody is silly.
Stuart is lucky.
Bowen is not lucky.
Hannah is dishonest.
Bowen is silly.
Laurence is not remarkable.
Laurence is lucky.
Laurence is dark.
Spencer is not embarrassed.
Bowen is dark.
Laurence is not silly.Maribel is not remarkable if and only if Laurence is not embarrassed.
Laurence being not dishonest and Stuart being remarkable imply that Hannah is embarrassed.
If Spencer is not embarrassed, then Spencer is not silly and Hannah is not lucky.
Someone is not lucky and not dishonest if and only if he is dark and not silly.
If there is someone who is both not silly and dark, then Melody is dishonest.
If there is someone who is remarkable, then Melody is lucky and Stuart is embarrassed.
Someone is dark and not silly if and only if he is not embarrassed.
Someone being both remarkable and not silly is equivalent to being lucky and not embarrassed.
Someone who is embarrassed is always both not dark and remarkable.
It can be concluded that Stuart is silly once knowing that Hannah is not embarrassed.
Someone being silly is equivalent to being not embarrassed.
Maribel being not lucky is equivalent to Stuart being remarkable and Melody being not embarrassed. | Laurence is not dark. | contradiction |
Stuart is not embarrassed.
Melody is silly.
Stuart is lucky.
Bowen is not lucky.
Hannah is dishonest.
Bowen is silly.
Laurence is not remarkable.
Laurence is lucky.
Laurence is dark.
Spencer is not embarrassed.
Bowen is dark.
Laurence is not silly.Maribel is not remarkable if and only if Laurence is not embarrassed.
Laurence being not dishonest and Stuart being remarkable imply that Hannah is embarrassed.
If Spencer is not embarrassed, then Spencer is not silly and Hannah is not lucky.
Someone is not lucky and not dishonest if and only if he is dark and not silly.
If there is someone who is both not silly and dark, then Melody is dishonest.
If there is someone who is remarkable, then Melody is lucky and Stuart is embarrassed.
Someone is dark and not silly if and only if he is not embarrassed.
Someone being both remarkable and not silly is equivalent to being lucky and not embarrassed.
Someone who is embarrassed is always both not dark and remarkable.
It can be concluded that Stuart is silly once knowing that Hannah is not embarrassed.
Someone being silly is equivalent to being not embarrassed.
Maribel being not lucky is equivalent to Stuart being remarkable and Melody being not embarrassed. | Melody is not silly. | self_contradiction |
Stuart is not embarrassed.
Melody is silly.
Stuart is lucky.
Bowen is not lucky.
Hannah is dishonest.
Bowen is silly.
Laurence is not remarkable.
Laurence is lucky.
Laurence is dark.
Spencer is not embarrassed.
Bowen is dark.
Laurence is not silly.Maribel is not remarkable if and only if Laurence is not embarrassed.
Laurence being not dishonest and Stuart being remarkable imply that Hannah is embarrassed.
If Spencer is not embarrassed, then Spencer is not silly and Hannah is not lucky.
Someone is not lucky and not dishonest if and only if he is dark and not silly.
If there is someone who is both not silly and dark, then Melody is dishonest.
If there is someone who is remarkable, then Melody is lucky and Stuart is embarrassed.
Someone is dark and not silly if and only if he is not embarrassed.
Someone being both remarkable and not silly is equivalent to being lucky and not embarrassed.
Someone who is embarrassed is always both not dark and remarkable.
It can be concluded that Stuart is silly once knowing that Hannah is not embarrassed.
Someone being silly is equivalent to being not embarrassed.
Maribel being not lucky is equivalent to Stuart being remarkable and Melody being not embarrassed. | Bowen is remarkable. | neutral |
Stuart is not embarrassed.
Melody is silly.
Stuart is lucky.
Bowen is not lucky.
Hannah is dishonest.
Bowen is silly.
Laurence is not remarkable.
Laurence is lucky.
Laurence is dark.
Spencer is not embarrassed.
Bowen is dark.
Laurence is not silly.Maribel is not remarkable if and only if Laurence is not embarrassed.
Laurence being not dishonest and Stuart being remarkable imply that Hannah is embarrassed.
If Spencer is not embarrassed, then Spencer is not silly and Hannah is not lucky.
Someone is not lucky and not dishonest if and only if he is dark and not silly.
If there is someone who is both not silly and dark, then Melody is dishonest.
If there is someone who is remarkable, then Melody is lucky and Stuart is embarrassed.
Someone is dark and not silly if and only if he is not embarrassed.
Someone being both remarkable and not silly is equivalent to being lucky and not embarrassed.
Someone who is embarrassed is always both not dark and remarkable.
It can be concluded that Stuart is silly once knowing that Hannah is not embarrassed.
Someone being silly is equivalent to being not embarrassed.
Maribel being not lucky is equivalent to Stuart being remarkable and Melody being not embarrassed. | Laurence is embarrassed. | contradiction |
Stuart is not embarrassed.
Melody is silly.
Stuart is lucky.
Bowen is not lucky.
Hannah is dishonest.
Bowen is silly.
Laurence is not remarkable.
Laurence is lucky.
Laurence is dark.
Spencer is not embarrassed.
Bowen is dark.
Laurence is not silly.Maribel is not remarkable if and only if Laurence is not embarrassed.
Laurence being not dishonest and Stuart being remarkable imply that Hannah is embarrassed.
If Spencer is not embarrassed, then Spencer is not silly and Hannah is not lucky.
Someone is not lucky and not dishonest if and only if he is dark and not silly.
If there is someone who is both not silly and dark, then Melody is dishonest.
If there is someone who is remarkable, then Melody is lucky and Stuart is embarrassed.
Someone is dark and not silly if and only if he is not embarrassed.
Someone being both remarkable and not silly is equivalent to being lucky and not embarrassed.
Someone who is embarrassed is always both not dark and remarkable.
It can be concluded that Stuart is silly once knowing that Hannah is not embarrassed.
Someone being silly is equivalent to being not embarrassed.
Maribel being not lucky is equivalent to Stuart being remarkable and Melody being not embarrassed. | Maribel is remarkable. | contradiction |
Stuart is not embarrassed.
Melody is silly.
Stuart is lucky.
Bowen is not lucky.
Hannah is dishonest.
Bowen is silly.
Laurence is not remarkable.
Laurence is lucky.
Laurence is dark.
Spencer is not embarrassed.
Bowen is dark.
Laurence is not silly.Maribel is not remarkable if and only if Laurence is not embarrassed.
Laurence being not dishonest and Stuart being remarkable imply that Hannah is embarrassed.
If Spencer is not embarrassed, then Spencer is not silly and Hannah is not lucky.
Someone is not lucky and not dishonest if and only if he is dark and not silly.
If there is someone who is both not silly and dark, then Melody is dishonest.
If there is someone who is remarkable, then Melody is lucky and Stuart is embarrassed.
Someone is dark and not silly if and only if he is not embarrassed.
Someone being both remarkable and not silly is equivalent to being lucky and not embarrassed.
Someone who is embarrassed is always both not dark and remarkable.
It can be concluded that Stuart is silly once knowing that Hannah is not embarrassed.
Someone being silly is equivalent to being not embarrassed.
Maribel being not lucky is equivalent to Stuart being remarkable and Melody being not embarrassed. | Hannah is lucky. | contradiction |
Stuart is not embarrassed.
Melody is silly.
Stuart is lucky.
Bowen is not lucky.
Hannah is dishonest.
Bowen is silly.
Laurence is not remarkable.
Laurence is lucky.
Laurence is dark.
Spencer is not embarrassed.
Bowen is dark.
Laurence is not silly.Maribel is not remarkable if and only if Laurence is not embarrassed.
Laurence being not dishonest and Stuart being remarkable imply that Hannah is embarrassed.
If Spencer is not embarrassed, then Spencer is not silly and Hannah is not lucky.
Someone is not lucky and not dishonest if and only if he is dark and not silly.
If there is someone who is both not silly and dark, then Melody is dishonest.
If there is someone who is remarkable, then Melody is lucky and Stuart is embarrassed.
Someone is dark and not silly if and only if he is not embarrassed.
Someone being both remarkable and not silly is equivalent to being lucky and not embarrassed.
Someone who is embarrassed is always both not dark and remarkable.
It can be concluded that Stuart is silly once knowing that Hannah is not embarrassed.
Someone being silly is equivalent to being not embarrassed.
Maribel being not lucky is equivalent to Stuart being remarkable and Melody being not embarrassed. | Bowen is not lucky. | entailment |
Stuart is not embarrassed.
Melody is silly.
Stuart is lucky.
Bowen is not lucky.
Hannah is dishonest.
Bowen is silly.
Laurence is not remarkable.
Laurence is lucky.
Laurence is dark.
Spencer is not embarrassed.
Bowen is dark.
Laurence is not silly.Maribel is not remarkable if and only if Laurence is not embarrassed.
Laurence being not dishonest and Stuart being remarkable imply that Hannah is embarrassed.
If Spencer is not embarrassed, then Spencer is not silly and Hannah is not lucky.
Someone is not lucky and not dishonest if and only if he is dark and not silly.
If there is someone who is both not silly and dark, then Melody is dishonest.
If there is someone who is remarkable, then Melody is lucky and Stuart is embarrassed.
Someone is dark and not silly if and only if he is not embarrassed.
Someone being both remarkable and not silly is equivalent to being lucky and not embarrassed.
Someone who is embarrassed is always both not dark and remarkable.
It can be concluded that Stuart is silly once knowing that Hannah is not embarrassed.
Someone being silly is equivalent to being not embarrassed.
Maribel being not lucky is equivalent to Stuart being remarkable and Melody being not embarrassed. | Maribel is embarrassed. | neutral |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.