premise
stringlengths 923
1.41k
| hypothesis
stringlengths 11
33
| label
stringclasses 4
values |
|---|---|---|
Kingston is healthy.
Norman is impartial.
Kingston is weak.
Charlie is not weak.
Norman is not dull.
Ramsey is not jealous.
Arthur is weak.
Kingston is political.
Arthur is not impartial.
Norman is weak.
Harmony is political.
Charlie is dull.Harmony is healthy if and only if Kingston is dull.
If there is someone who is both healthy and political, then Norman is not weak.
Kingston is not jealous if and only if Ramsey is political and Arthur is not weak.
It can be concluded that Charlie is political once knowing that Hardy is impartial or Hardy is dull.
If there is at least one people who is both weak and not political, then Ramsey is not dull.
If Norman is impartial, then Kingston is not jealous, and vice versa.
Someone who is not dull is always not weak.
Someone being both not impartial and dull is equivalent to being not weak.
If there is at least one people who is both not weak and not impartial, then Charlie is not dull.
Ramsey being not impartial implies that Kingston is political and Norman is not healthy.
It can be concluded that Norman is healthy once knowing that Arthur is impartial and Hardy is not weak.
If Kingston is dull, then Ramsey is not healthy. | Norman is dull. | self_contradiction |
Kingston is healthy.
Norman is impartial.
Kingston is weak.
Charlie is not weak.
Norman is not dull.
Ramsey is not jealous.
Arthur is weak.
Kingston is political.
Arthur is not impartial.
Norman is weak.
Harmony is political.
Charlie is dull.Harmony is healthy if and only if Kingston is dull.
If there is someone who is both healthy and political, then Norman is not weak.
Kingston is not jealous if and only if Ramsey is political and Arthur is not weak.
It can be concluded that Charlie is political once knowing that Hardy is impartial or Hardy is dull.
If there is at least one people who is both weak and not political, then Ramsey is not dull.
If Norman is impartial, then Kingston is not jealous, and vice versa.
Someone who is not dull is always not weak.
Someone being both not impartial and dull is equivalent to being not weak.
If there is at least one people who is both not weak and not impartial, then Charlie is not dull.
Ramsey being not impartial implies that Kingston is political and Norman is not healthy.
It can be concluded that Norman is healthy once knowing that Arthur is impartial and Hardy is not weak.
If Kingston is dull, then Ramsey is not healthy. | Arthur is not political. | neutral |
Kingston is healthy.
Norman is impartial.
Kingston is weak.
Charlie is not weak.
Norman is not dull.
Ramsey is not jealous.
Arthur is weak.
Kingston is political.
Arthur is not impartial.
Norman is weak.
Harmony is political.
Charlie is dull.Harmony is healthy if and only if Kingston is dull.
If there is someone who is both healthy and political, then Norman is not weak.
Kingston is not jealous if and only if Ramsey is political and Arthur is not weak.
It can be concluded that Charlie is political once knowing that Hardy is impartial or Hardy is dull.
If there is at least one people who is both weak and not political, then Ramsey is not dull.
If Norman is impartial, then Kingston is not jealous, and vice versa.
Someone who is not dull is always not weak.
Someone being both not impartial and dull is equivalent to being not weak.
If there is at least one people who is both not weak and not impartial, then Charlie is not dull.
Ramsey being not impartial implies that Kingston is political and Norman is not healthy.
It can be concluded that Norman is healthy once knowing that Arthur is impartial and Hardy is not weak.
If Kingston is dull, then Ramsey is not healthy. | Arthur is impartial. | contradiction |
Kingston is healthy.
Norman is impartial.
Kingston is weak.
Charlie is not weak.
Norman is not dull.
Ramsey is not jealous.
Arthur is weak.
Kingston is political.
Arthur is not impartial.
Norman is weak.
Harmony is political.
Charlie is dull.Harmony is healthy if and only if Kingston is dull.
If there is someone who is both healthy and political, then Norman is not weak.
Kingston is not jealous if and only if Ramsey is political and Arthur is not weak.
It can be concluded that Charlie is political once knowing that Hardy is impartial or Hardy is dull.
If there is at least one people who is both weak and not political, then Ramsey is not dull.
If Norman is impartial, then Kingston is not jealous, and vice versa.
Someone who is not dull is always not weak.
Someone being both not impartial and dull is equivalent to being not weak.
If there is at least one people who is both not weak and not impartial, then Charlie is not dull.
Ramsey being not impartial implies that Kingston is political and Norman is not healthy.
It can be concluded that Norman is healthy once knowing that Arthur is impartial and Hardy is not weak.
If Kingston is dull, then Ramsey is not healthy. | Norman is impartial. | self_contradiction |
Kingston is healthy.
Norman is impartial.
Kingston is weak.
Charlie is not weak.
Norman is not dull.
Ramsey is not jealous.
Arthur is weak.
Kingston is political.
Arthur is not impartial.
Norman is weak.
Harmony is political.
Charlie is dull.Harmony is healthy if and only if Kingston is dull.
If there is someone who is both healthy and political, then Norman is not weak.
Kingston is not jealous if and only if Ramsey is political and Arthur is not weak.
It can be concluded that Charlie is political once knowing that Hardy is impartial or Hardy is dull.
If there is at least one people who is both weak and not political, then Ramsey is not dull.
If Norman is impartial, then Kingston is not jealous, and vice versa.
Someone who is not dull is always not weak.
Someone being both not impartial and dull is equivalent to being not weak.
If there is at least one people who is both not weak and not impartial, then Charlie is not dull.
Ramsey being not impartial implies that Kingston is political and Norman is not healthy.
It can be concluded that Norman is healthy once knowing that Arthur is impartial and Hardy is not weak.
If Kingston is dull, then Ramsey is not healthy. | Ramsey is weak. | neutral |
Kingston is healthy.
Norman is impartial.
Kingston is weak.
Charlie is not weak.
Norman is not dull.
Ramsey is not jealous.
Arthur is weak.
Kingston is political.
Arthur is not impartial.
Norman is weak.
Harmony is political.
Charlie is dull.Harmony is healthy if and only if Kingston is dull.
If there is someone who is both healthy and political, then Norman is not weak.
Kingston is not jealous if and only if Ramsey is political and Arthur is not weak.
It can be concluded that Charlie is political once knowing that Hardy is impartial or Hardy is dull.
If there is at least one people who is both weak and not political, then Ramsey is not dull.
If Norman is impartial, then Kingston is not jealous, and vice versa.
Someone who is not dull is always not weak.
Someone being both not impartial and dull is equivalent to being not weak.
If there is at least one people who is both not weak and not impartial, then Charlie is not dull.
Ramsey being not impartial implies that Kingston is political and Norman is not healthy.
It can be concluded that Norman is healthy once knowing that Arthur is impartial and Hardy is not weak.
If Kingston is dull, then Ramsey is not healthy. | Kingston is jealous. | contradiction |
Kingston is healthy.
Norman is impartial.
Kingston is weak.
Charlie is not weak.
Norman is not dull.
Ramsey is not jealous.
Arthur is weak.
Kingston is political.
Arthur is not impartial.
Norman is weak.
Harmony is political.
Charlie is dull.Harmony is healthy if and only if Kingston is dull.
If there is someone who is both healthy and political, then Norman is not weak.
Kingston is not jealous if and only if Ramsey is political and Arthur is not weak.
It can be concluded that Charlie is political once knowing that Hardy is impartial or Hardy is dull.
If there is at least one people who is both weak and not political, then Ramsey is not dull.
If Norman is impartial, then Kingston is not jealous, and vice versa.
Someone who is not dull is always not weak.
Someone being both not impartial and dull is equivalent to being not weak.
If there is at least one people who is both not weak and not impartial, then Charlie is not dull.
Ramsey being not impartial implies that Kingston is political and Norman is not healthy.
It can be concluded that Norman is healthy once knowing that Arthur is impartial and Hardy is not weak.
If Kingston is dull, then Ramsey is not healthy. | Harmony is dull. | neutral |
Kingston is healthy.
Norman is impartial.
Kingston is weak.
Charlie is not weak.
Norman is not dull.
Ramsey is not jealous.
Arthur is weak.
Kingston is political.
Arthur is not impartial.
Norman is weak.
Harmony is political.
Charlie is dull.Harmony is healthy if and only if Kingston is dull.
If there is someone who is both healthy and political, then Norman is not weak.
Kingston is not jealous if and only if Ramsey is political and Arthur is not weak.
It can be concluded that Charlie is political once knowing that Hardy is impartial or Hardy is dull.
If there is at least one people who is both weak and not political, then Ramsey is not dull.
If Norman is impartial, then Kingston is not jealous, and vice versa.
Someone who is not dull is always not weak.
Someone being both not impartial and dull is equivalent to being not weak.
If there is at least one people who is both not weak and not impartial, then Charlie is not dull.
Ramsey being not impartial implies that Kingston is political and Norman is not healthy.
It can be concluded that Norman is healthy once knowing that Arthur is impartial and Hardy is not weak.
If Kingston is dull, then Ramsey is not healthy. | Hardy is political. | neutral |
Kingston is healthy.
Norman is impartial.
Kingston is weak.
Charlie is not weak.
Norman is not dull.
Ramsey is not jealous.
Arthur is weak.
Kingston is political.
Arthur is not impartial.
Norman is weak.
Harmony is political.
Charlie is dull.Harmony is healthy if and only if Kingston is dull.
If there is someone who is both healthy and political, then Norman is not weak.
Kingston is not jealous if and only if Ramsey is political and Arthur is not weak.
It can be concluded that Charlie is political once knowing that Hardy is impartial or Hardy is dull.
If there is at least one people who is both weak and not political, then Ramsey is not dull.
If Norman is impartial, then Kingston is not jealous, and vice versa.
Someone who is not dull is always not weak.
Someone being both not impartial and dull is equivalent to being not weak.
If there is at least one people who is both not weak and not impartial, then Charlie is not dull.
Ramsey being not impartial implies that Kingston is political and Norman is not healthy.
It can be concluded that Norman is healthy once knowing that Arthur is impartial and Hardy is not weak.
If Kingston is dull, then Ramsey is not healthy. | Norman is not dull. | self_contradiction |
Kingston is healthy.
Norman is impartial.
Kingston is weak.
Charlie is not weak.
Norman is not dull.
Ramsey is not jealous.
Arthur is weak.
Kingston is political.
Arthur is not impartial.
Norman is weak.
Harmony is political.
Charlie is dull.Harmony is healthy if and only if Kingston is dull.
If there is someone who is both healthy and political, then Norman is not weak.
Kingston is not jealous if and only if Ramsey is political and Arthur is not weak.
It can be concluded that Charlie is political once knowing that Hardy is impartial or Hardy is dull.
If there is at least one people who is both weak and not political, then Ramsey is not dull.
If Norman is impartial, then Kingston is not jealous, and vice versa.
Someone who is not dull is always not weak.
Someone being both not impartial and dull is equivalent to being not weak.
If there is at least one people who is both not weak and not impartial, then Charlie is not dull.
Ramsey being not impartial implies that Kingston is political and Norman is not healthy.
It can be concluded that Norman is healthy once knowing that Arthur is impartial and Hardy is not weak.
If Kingston is dull, then Ramsey is not healthy. | Ramsey is not jealous. | entailment |
Kingston is healthy.
Norman is impartial.
Kingston is weak.
Charlie is not weak.
Norman is not dull.
Ramsey is not jealous.
Arthur is weak.
Kingston is political.
Arthur is not impartial.
Norman is weak.
Harmony is political.
Charlie is dull.Harmony is healthy if and only if Kingston is dull.
If there is someone who is both healthy and political, then Norman is not weak.
Kingston is not jealous if and only if Ramsey is political and Arthur is not weak.
It can be concluded that Charlie is political once knowing that Hardy is impartial or Hardy is dull.
If there is at least one people who is both weak and not political, then Ramsey is not dull.
If Norman is impartial, then Kingston is not jealous, and vice versa.
Someone who is not dull is always not weak.
Someone being both not impartial and dull is equivalent to being not weak.
If there is at least one people who is both not weak and not impartial, then Charlie is not dull.
Ramsey being not impartial implies that Kingston is political and Norman is not healthy.
It can be concluded that Norman is healthy once knowing that Arthur is impartial and Hardy is not weak.
If Kingston is dull, then Ramsey is not healthy. | Charlie is not dull. | self_contradiction |
Kingston is healthy.
Norman is impartial.
Kingston is weak.
Charlie is not weak.
Norman is not dull.
Ramsey is not jealous.
Arthur is weak.
Kingston is political.
Arthur is not impartial.
Norman is weak.
Harmony is political.
Charlie is dull.Harmony is healthy if and only if Kingston is dull.
If there is someone who is both healthy and political, then Norman is not weak.
Kingston is not jealous if and only if Ramsey is political and Arthur is not weak.
It can be concluded that Charlie is political once knowing that Hardy is impartial or Hardy is dull.
If there is at least one people who is both weak and not political, then Ramsey is not dull.
If Norman is impartial, then Kingston is not jealous, and vice versa.
Someone who is not dull is always not weak.
Someone being both not impartial and dull is equivalent to being not weak.
If there is at least one people who is both not weak and not impartial, then Charlie is not dull.
Ramsey being not impartial implies that Kingston is political and Norman is not healthy.
It can be concluded that Norman is healthy once knowing that Arthur is impartial and Hardy is not weak.
If Kingston is dull, then Ramsey is not healthy. | Norman is not weak. | self_contradiction |
Kingston is healthy.
Norman is impartial.
Kingston is weak.
Charlie is not weak.
Norman is not dull.
Ramsey is not jealous.
Arthur is weak.
Kingston is political.
Arthur is not impartial.
Norman is weak.
Harmony is political.
Charlie is dull.Harmony is healthy if and only if Kingston is dull.
If there is someone who is both healthy and political, then Norman is not weak.
Kingston is not jealous if and only if Ramsey is political and Arthur is not weak.
It can be concluded that Charlie is political once knowing that Hardy is impartial or Hardy is dull.
If there is at least one people who is both weak and not political, then Ramsey is not dull.
If Norman is impartial, then Kingston is not jealous, and vice versa.
Someone who is not dull is always not weak.
Someone being both not impartial and dull is equivalent to being not weak.
If there is at least one people who is both not weak and not impartial, then Charlie is not dull.
Ramsey being not impartial implies that Kingston is political and Norman is not healthy.
It can be concluded that Norman is healthy once knowing that Arthur is impartial and Hardy is not weak.
If Kingston is dull, then Ramsey is not healthy. | Kingston is not weak. | contradiction |
Kingston is healthy.
Norman is impartial.
Kingston is weak.
Charlie is not weak.
Norman is not dull.
Ramsey is not jealous.
Arthur is weak.
Kingston is political.
Arthur is not impartial.
Norman is weak.
Harmony is political.
Charlie is dull.Harmony is healthy if and only if Kingston is dull.
If there is someone who is both healthy and political, then Norman is not weak.
Kingston is not jealous if and only if Ramsey is political and Arthur is not weak.
It can be concluded that Charlie is political once knowing that Hardy is impartial or Hardy is dull.
If there is at least one people who is both weak and not political, then Ramsey is not dull.
If Norman is impartial, then Kingston is not jealous, and vice versa.
Someone who is not dull is always not weak.
Someone being both not impartial and dull is equivalent to being not weak.
If there is at least one people who is both not weak and not impartial, then Charlie is not dull.
Ramsey being not impartial implies that Kingston is political and Norman is not healthy.
It can be concluded that Norman is healthy once knowing that Arthur is impartial and Hardy is not weak.
If Kingston is dull, then Ramsey is not healthy. | Arthur is dull. | entailment |
Kingston is healthy.
Norman is impartial.
Kingston is weak.
Charlie is not weak.
Norman is not dull.
Ramsey is not jealous.
Arthur is weak.
Kingston is political.
Arthur is not impartial.
Norman is weak.
Harmony is political.
Charlie is dull.Harmony is healthy if and only if Kingston is dull.
If there is someone who is both healthy and political, then Norman is not weak.
Kingston is not jealous if and only if Ramsey is political and Arthur is not weak.
It can be concluded that Charlie is political once knowing that Hardy is impartial or Hardy is dull.
If there is at least one people who is both weak and not political, then Ramsey is not dull.
If Norman is impartial, then Kingston is not jealous, and vice versa.
Someone who is not dull is always not weak.
Someone being both not impartial and dull is equivalent to being not weak.
If there is at least one people who is both not weak and not impartial, then Charlie is not dull.
Ramsey being not impartial implies that Kingston is political and Norman is not healthy.
It can be concluded that Norman is healthy once knowing that Arthur is impartial and Hardy is not weak.
If Kingston is dull, then Ramsey is not healthy. | Hardy is not healthy. | neutral |
Kingston is healthy.
Norman is impartial.
Kingston is weak.
Charlie is not weak.
Norman is not dull.
Ramsey is not jealous.
Arthur is weak.
Kingston is political.
Arthur is not impartial.
Norman is weak.
Harmony is political.
Charlie is dull.Harmony is healthy if and only if Kingston is dull.
If there is someone who is both healthy and political, then Norman is not weak.
Kingston is not jealous if and only if Ramsey is political and Arthur is not weak.
It can be concluded that Charlie is political once knowing that Hardy is impartial or Hardy is dull.
If there is at least one people who is both weak and not political, then Ramsey is not dull.
If Norman is impartial, then Kingston is not jealous, and vice versa.
Someone who is not dull is always not weak.
Someone being both not impartial and dull is equivalent to being not weak.
If there is at least one people who is both not weak and not impartial, then Charlie is not dull.
Ramsey being not impartial implies that Kingston is political and Norman is not healthy.
It can be concluded that Norman is healthy once knowing that Arthur is impartial and Hardy is not weak.
If Kingston is dull, then Ramsey is not healthy. | Harmony is not political. | contradiction |
Kingston is healthy.
Norman is impartial.
Kingston is weak.
Charlie is not weak.
Norman is not dull.
Ramsey is not jealous.
Arthur is weak.
Kingston is political.
Arthur is not impartial.
Norman is weak.
Harmony is political.
Charlie is dull.Harmony is healthy if and only if Kingston is dull.
If there is someone who is both healthy and political, then Norman is not weak.
Kingston is not jealous if and only if Ramsey is political and Arthur is not weak.
It can be concluded that Charlie is political once knowing that Hardy is impartial or Hardy is dull.
If there is at least one people who is both weak and not political, then Ramsey is not dull.
If Norman is impartial, then Kingston is not jealous, and vice versa.
Someone who is not dull is always not weak.
Someone being both not impartial and dull is equivalent to being not weak.
If there is at least one people who is both not weak and not impartial, then Charlie is not dull.
Ramsey being not impartial implies that Kingston is political and Norman is not healthy.
It can be concluded that Norman is healthy once knowing that Arthur is impartial and Hardy is not weak.
If Kingston is dull, then Ramsey is not healthy. | Harmony is political. | entailment |
Kingston is healthy.
Norman is impartial.
Kingston is weak.
Charlie is not weak.
Norman is not dull.
Ramsey is not jealous.
Arthur is weak.
Kingston is political.
Arthur is not impartial.
Norman is weak.
Harmony is political.
Charlie is dull.Harmony is healthy if and only if Kingston is dull.
If there is someone who is both healthy and political, then Norman is not weak.
Kingston is not jealous if and only if Ramsey is political and Arthur is not weak.
It can be concluded that Charlie is political once knowing that Hardy is impartial or Hardy is dull.
If there is at least one people who is both weak and not political, then Ramsey is not dull.
If Norman is impartial, then Kingston is not jealous, and vice versa.
Someone who is not dull is always not weak.
Someone being both not impartial and dull is equivalent to being not weak.
If there is at least one people who is both not weak and not impartial, then Charlie is not dull.
Ramsey being not impartial implies that Kingston is political and Norman is not healthy.
It can be concluded that Norman is healthy once knowing that Arthur is impartial and Hardy is not weak.
If Kingston is dull, then Ramsey is not healthy. | Kingston is not jealous. | entailment |
Kingston is healthy.
Norman is impartial.
Kingston is weak.
Charlie is not weak.
Norman is not dull.
Ramsey is not jealous.
Arthur is weak.
Kingston is political.
Arthur is not impartial.
Norman is weak.
Harmony is political.
Charlie is dull.Harmony is healthy if and only if Kingston is dull.
If there is someone who is both healthy and political, then Norman is not weak.
Kingston is not jealous if and only if Ramsey is political and Arthur is not weak.
It can be concluded that Charlie is political once knowing that Hardy is impartial or Hardy is dull.
If there is at least one people who is both weak and not political, then Ramsey is not dull.
If Norman is impartial, then Kingston is not jealous, and vice versa.
Someone who is not dull is always not weak.
Someone being both not impartial and dull is equivalent to being not weak.
If there is at least one people who is both not weak and not impartial, then Charlie is not dull.
Ramsey being not impartial implies that Kingston is political and Norman is not healthy.
It can be concluded that Norman is healthy once knowing that Arthur is impartial and Hardy is not weak.
If Kingston is dull, then Ramsey is not healthy. | Kingston is weak. | entailment |
Kingston is healthy.
Norman is impartial.
Kingston is weak.
Charlie is not weak.
Norman is not dull.
Ramsey is not jealous.
Arthur is weak.
Kingston is political.
Arthur is not impartial.
Norman is weak.
Harmony is political.
Charlie is dull.Harmony is healthy if and only if Kingston is dull.
If there is someone who is both healthy and political, then Norman is not weak.
Kingston is not jealous if and only if Ramsey is political and Arthur is not weak.
It can be concluded that Charlie is political once knowing that Hardy is impartial or Hardy is dull.
If there is at least one people who is both weak and not political, then Ramsey is not dull.
If Norman is impartial, then Kingston is not jealous, and vice versa.
Someone who is not dull is always not weak.
Someone being both not impartial and dull is equivalent to being not weak.
If there is at least one people who is both not weak and not impartial, then Charlie is not dull.
Ramsey being not impartial implies that Kingston is political and Norman is not healthy.
It can be concluded that Norman is healthy once knowing that Arthur is impartial and Hardy is not weak.
If Kingston is dull, then Ramsey is not healthy. | Ramsey is jealous. | contradiction |
Hector is not uptight.
Hector is not gifted.
Milton is depressed.
Samson is motionless.
Milton is not motionless.
Hector is not depressed.
Hunter is motionless.
Milton is discreet.
Hunter is not discreet.
Hector is not plain.
Hunter is uptight.
Justin is motionless.If there is someone who is discreet, then Justin is gifted.
If Samson is motionless, then Justin is plain.
If someone is not uptight, then he is not plain, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not uptight, then Hector is gifted.
It can be concluded that Carroll is gifted once knowing that Justin is not plain and Carroll is uptight.
If someone is depressed, then he is uptight, and vice versa.
Justin being not depressed is equivalent to Milton being plain.
If Milton is not depressed or Grant is uptight, then Hector is discreet.
Hunter being depressed is equivalent to Samson being motionless.
If there is at least one people who is discreet, then Hunter is not gifted and Milton is depressed.
Someone who is plain is always both not discreet and not motionless.
Someone is not motionless if and only if he is discreet. | Hector is not depressed. | entailment |
Hector is not uptight.
Hector is not gifted.
Milton is depressed.
Samson is motionless.
Milton is not motionless.
Hector is not depressed.
Hunter is motionless.
Milton is discreet.
Hunter is not discreet.
Hector is not plain.
Hunter is uptight.
Justin is motionless.If there is someone who is discreet, then Justin is gifted.
If Samson is motionless, then Justin is plain.
If someone is not uptight, then he is not plain, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not uptight, then Hector is gifted.
It can be concluded that Carroll is gifted once knowing that Justin is not plain and Carroll is uptight.
If someone is depressed, then he is uptight, and vice versa.
Justin being not depressed is equivalent to Milton being plain.
If Milton is not depressed or Grant is uptight, then Hector is discreet.
Hunter being depressed is equivalent to Samson being motionless.
If there is at least one people who is discreet, then Hunter is not gifted and Milton is depressed.
Someone who is plain is always both not discreet and not motionless.
Someone is not motionless if and only if he is discreet. | Hunter is gifted. | contradiction |
Hector is not uptight.
Hector is not gifted.
Milton is depressed.
Samson is motionless.
Milton is not motionless.
Hector is not depressed.
Hunter is motionless.
Milton is discreet.
Hunter is not discreet.
Hector is not plain.
Hunter is uptight.
Justin is motionless.If there is someone who is discreet, then Justin is gifted.
If Samson is motionless, then Justin is plain.
If someone is not uptight, then he is not plain, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not uptight, then Hector is gifted.
It can be concluded that Carroll is gifted once knowing that Justin is not plain and Carroll is uptight.
If someone is depressed, then he is uptight, and vice versa.
Justin being not depressed is equivalent to Milton being plain.
If Milton is not depressed or Grant is uptight, then Hector is discreet.
Hunter being depressed is equivalent to Samson being motionless.
If there is at least one people who is discreet, then Hunter is not gifted and Milton is depressed.
Someone who is plain is always both not discreet and not motionless.
Someone is not motionless if and only if he is discreet. | Hector is not uptight. | entailment |
Hector is not uptight.
Hector is not gifted.
Milton is depressed.
Samson is motionless.
Milton is not motionless.
Hector is not depressed.
Hunter is motionless.
Milton is discreet.
Hunter is not discreet.
Hector is not plain.
Hunter is uptight.
Justin is motionless.If there is someone who is discreet, then Justin is gifted.
If Samson is motionless, then Justin is plain.
If someone is not uptight, then he is not plain, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not uptight, then Hector is gifted.
It can be concluded that Carroll is gifted once knowing that Justin is not plain and Carroll is uptight.
If someone is depressed, then he is uptight, and vice versa.
Justin being not depressed is equivalent to Milton being plain.
If Milton is not depressed or Grant is uptight, then Hector is discreet.
Hunter being depressed is equivalent to Samson being motionless.
If there is at least one people who is discreet, then Hunter is not gifted and Milton is depressed.
Someone who is plain is always both not discreet and not motionless.
Someone is not motionless if and only if he is discreet. | Samson is not plain. | neutral |
Hector is not uptight.
Hector is not gifted.
Milton is depressed.
Samson is motionless.
Milton is not motionless.
Hector is not depressed.
Hunter is motionless.
Milton is discreet.
Hunter is not discreet.
Hector is not plain.
Hunter is uptight.
Justin is motionless.If there is someone who is discreet, then Justin is gifted.
If Samson is motionless, then Justin is plain.
If someone is not uptight, then he is not plain, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not uptight, then Hector is gifted.
It can be concluded that Carroll is gifted once knowing that Justin is not plain and Carroll is uptight.
If someone is depressed, then he is uptight, and vice versa.
Justin being not depressed is equivalent to Milton being plain.
If Milton is not depressed or Grant is uptight, then Hector is discreet.
Hunter being depressed is equivalent to Samson being motionless.
If there is at least one people who is discreet, then Hunter is not gifted and Milton is depressed.
Someone who is plain is always both not discreet and not motionless.
Someone is not motionless if and only if he is discreet. | Hunter is not discreet. | entailment |
Hector is not uptight.
Hector is not gifted.
Milton is depressed.
Samson is motionless.
Milton is not motionless.
Hector is not depressed.
Hunter is motionless.
Milton is discreet.
Hunter is not discreet.
Hector is not plain.
Hunter is uptight.
Justin is motionless.If there is someone who is discreet, then Justin is gifted.
If Samson is motionless, then Justin is plain.
If someone is not uptight, then he is not plain, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not uptight, then Hector is gifted.
It can be concluded that Carroll is gifted once knowing that Justin is not plain and Carroll is uptight.
If someone is depressed, then he is uptight, and vice versa.
Justin being not depressed is equivalent to Milton being plain.
If Milton is not depressed or Grant is uptight, then Hector is discreet.
Hunter being depressed is equivalent to Samson being motionless.
If there is at least one people who is discreet, then Hunter is not gifted and Milton is depressed.
Someone who is plain is always both not discreet and not motionless.
Someone is not motionless if and only if he is discreet. | Milton is not discreet. | contradiction |
Hector is not uptight.
Hector is not gifted.
Milton is depressed.
Samson is motionless.
Milton is not motionless.
Hector is not depressed.
Hunter is motionless.
Milton is discreet.
Hunter is not discreet.
Hector is not plain.
Hunter is uptight.
Justin is motionless.If there is someone who is discreet, then Justin is gifted.
If Samson is motionless, then Justin is plain.
If someone is not uptight, then he is not plain, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not uptight, then Hector is gifted.
It can be concluded that Carroll is gifted once knowing that Justin is not plain and Carroll is uptight.
If someone is depressed, then he is uptight, and vice versa.
Justin being not depressed is equivalent to Milton being plain.
If Milton is not depressed or Grant is uptight, then Hector is discreet.
Hunter being depressed is equivalent to Samson being motionless.
If there is at least one people who is discreet, then Hunter is not gifted and Milton is depressed.
Someone who is plain is always both not discreet and not motionless.
Someone is not motionless if and only if he is discreet. | Justin is not discreet. | self_contradiction |
Hector is not uptight.
Hector is not gifted.
Milton is depressed.
Samson is motionless.
Milton is not motionless.
Hector is not depressed.
Hunter is motionless.
Milton is discreet.
Hunter is not discreet.
Hector is not plain.
Hunter is uptight.
Justin is motionless.If there is someone who is discreet, then Justin is gifted.
If Samson is motionless, then Justin is plain.
If someone is not uptight, then he is not plain, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not uptight, then Hector is gifted.
It can be concluded that Carroll is gifted once knowing that Justin is not plain and Carroll is uptight.
If someone is depressed, then he is uptight, and vice versa.
Justin being not depressed is equivalent to Milton being plain.
If Milton is not depressed or Grant is uptight, then Hector is discreet.
Hunter being depressed is equivalent to Samson being motionless.
If there is at least one people who is discreet, then Hunter is not gifted and Milton is depressed.
Someone who is plain is always both not discreet and not motionless.
Someone is not motionless if and only if he is discreet. | Hector is not gifted. | self_contradiction |
Hector is not uptight.
Hector is not gifted.
Milton is depressed.
Samson is motionless.
Milton is not motionless.
Hector is not depressed.
Hunter is motionless.
Milton is discreet.
Hunter is not discreet.
Hector is not plain.
Hunter is uptight.
Justin is motionless.If there is someone who is discreet, then Justin is gifted.
If Samson is motionless, then Justin is plain.
If someone is not uptight, then he is not plain, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not uptight, then Hector is gifted.
It can be concluded that Carroll is gifted once knowing that Justin is not plain and Carroll is uptight.
If someone is depressed, then he is uptight, and vice versa.
Justin being not depressed is equivalent to Milton being plain.
If Milton is not depressed or Grant is uptight, then Hector is discreet.
Hunter being depressed is equivalent to Samson being motionless.
If there is at least one people who is discreet, then Hunter is not gifted and Milton is depressed.
Someone who is plain is always both not discreet and not motionless.
Someone is not motionless if and only if he is discreet. | Hector is plain. | contradiction |
Hector is not uptight.
Hector is not gifted.
Milton is depressed.
Samson is motionless.
Milton is not motionless.
Hector is not depressed.
Hunter is motionless.
Milton is discreet.
Hunter is not discreet.
Hector is not plain.
Hunter is uptight.
Justin is motionless.If there is someone who is discreet, then Justin is gifted.
If Samson is motionless, then Justin is plain.
If someone is not uptight, then he is not plain, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not uptight, then Hector is gifted.
It can be concluded that Carroll is gifted once knowing that Justin is not plain and Carroll is uptight.
If someone is depressed, then he is uptight, and vice versa.
Justin being not depressed is equivalent to Milton being plain.
If Milton is not depressed or Grant is uptight, then Hector is discreet.
Hunter being depressed is equivalent to Samson being motionless.
If there is at least one people who is discreet, then Hunter is not gifted and Milton is depressed.
Someone who is plain is always both not discreet and not motionless.
Someone is not motionless if and only if he is discreet. | Justin is discreet. | self_contradiction |
Hector is not uptight.
Hector is not gifted.
Milton is depressed.
Samson is motionless.
Milton is not motionless.
Hector is not depressed.
Hunter is motionless.
Milton is discreet.
Hunter is not discreet.
Hector is not plain.
Hunter is uptight.
Justin is motionless.If there is someone who is discreet, then Justin is gifted.
If Samson is motionless, then Justin is plain.
If someone is not uptight, then he is not plain, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not uptight, then Hector is gifted.
It can be concluded that Carroll is gifted once knowing that Justin is not plain and Carroll is uptight.
If someone is depressed, then he is uptight, and vice versa.
Justin being not depressed is equivalent to Milton being plain.
If Milton is not depressed or Grant is uptight, then Hector is discreet.
Hunter being depressed is equivalent to Samson being motionless.
If there is at least one people who is discreet, then Hunter is not gifted and Milton is depressed.
Someone who is plain is always both not discreet and not motionless.
Someone is not motionless if and only if he is discreet. | Justin is motionless. | self_contradiction |
Hector is not uptight.
Hector is not gifted.
Milton is depressed.
Samson is motionless.
Milton is not motionless.
Hector is not depressed.
Hunter is motionless.
Milton is discreet.
Hunter is not discreet.
Hector is not plain.
Hunter is uptight.
Justin is motionless.If there is someone who is discreet, then Justin is gifted.
If Samson is motionless, then Justin is plain.
If someone is not uptight, then he is not plain, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not uptight, then Hector is gifted.
It can be concluded that Carroll is gifted once knowing that Justin is not plain and Carroll is uptight.
If someone is depressed, then he is uptight, and vice versa.
Justin being not depressed is equivalent to Milton being plain.
If Milton is not depressed or Grant is uptight, then Hector is discreet.
Hunter being depressed is equivalent to Samson being motionless.
If there is at least one people who is discreet, then Hunter is not gifted and Milton is depressed.
Someone who is plain is always both not discreet and not motionless.
Someone is not motionless if and only if he is discreet. | Samson is motionless. | entailment |
Hector is not uptight.
Hector is not gifted.
Milton is depressed.
Samson is motionless.
Milton is not motionless.
Hector is not depressed.
Hunter is motionless.
Milton is discreet.
Hunter is not discreet.
Hector is not plain.
Hunter is uptight.
Justin is motionless.If there is someone who is discreet, then Justin is gifted.
If Samson is motionless, then Justin is plain.
If someone is not uptight, then he is not plain, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not uptight, then Hector is gifted.
It can be concluded that Carroll is gifted once knowing that Justin is not plain and Carroll is uptight.
If someone is depressed, then he is uptight, and vice versa.
Justin being not depressed is equivalent to Milton being plain.
If Milton is not depressed or Grant is uptight, then Hector is discreet.
Hunter being depressed is equivalent to Samson being motionless.
If there is at least one people who is discreet, then Hunter is not gifted and Milton is depressed.
Someone who is plain is always both not discreet and not motionless.
Someone is not motionless if and only if he is discreet. | Hector is gifted. | self_contradiction |
Hector is not uptight.
Hector is not gifted.
Milton is depressed.
Samson is motionless.
Milton is not motionless.
Hector is not depressed.
Hunter is motionless.
Milton is discreet.
Hunter is not discreet.
Hector is not plain.
Hunter is uptight.
Justin is motionless.If there is someone who is discreet, then Justin is gifted.
If Samson is motionless, then Justin is plain.
If someone is not uptight, then he is not plain, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not uptight, then Hector is gifted.
It can be concluded that Carroll is gifted once knowing that Justin is not plain and Carroll is uptight.
If someone is depressed, then he is uptight, and vice versa.
Justin being not depressed is equivalent to Milton being plain.
If Milton is not depressed or Grant is uptight, then Hector is discreet.
Hunter being depressed is equivalent to Samson being motionless.
If there is at least one people who is discreet, then Hunter is not gifted and Milton is depressed.
Someone who is plain is always both not discreet and not motionless.
Someone is not motionless if and only if he is discreet. | Hunter is not gifted. | entailment |
Hector is not uptight.
Hector is not gifted.
Milton is depressed.
Samson is motionless.
Milton is not motionless.
Hector is not depressed.
Hunter is motionless.
Milton is discreet.
Hunter is not discreet.
Hector is not plain.
Hunter is uptight.
Justin is motionless.If there is someone who is discreet, then Justin is gifted.
If Samson is motionless, then Justin is plain.
If someone is not uptight, then he is not plain, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not uptight, then Hector is gifted.
It can be concluded that Carroll is gifted once knowing that Justin is not plain and Carroll is uptight.
If someone is depressed, then he is uptight, and vice versa.
Justin being not depressed is equivalent to Milton being plain.
If Milton is not depressed or Grant is uptight, then Hector is discreet.
Hunter being depressed is equivalent to Samson being motionless.
If there is at least one people who is discreet, then Hunter is not gifted and Milton is depressed.
Someone who is plain is always both not discreet and not motionless.
Someone is not motionless if and only if he is discreet. | Hector is uptight. | contradiction |
Hector is not uptight.
Hector is not gifted.
Milton is depressed.
Samson is motionless.
Milton is not motionless.
Hector is not depressed.
Hunter is motionless.
Milton is discreet.
Hunter is not discreet.
Hector is not plain.
Hunter is uptight.
Justin is motionless.If there is someone who is discreet, then Justin is gifted.
If Samson is motionless, then Justin is plain.
If someone is not uptight, then he is not plain, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not uptight, then Hector is gifted.
It can be concluded that Carroll is gifted once knowing that Justin is not plain and Carroll is uptight.
If someone is depressed, then he is uptight, and vice versa.
Justin being not depressed is equivalent to Milton being plain.
If Milton is not depressed or Grant is uptight, then Hector is discreet.
Hunter being depressed is equivalent to Samson being motionless.
If there is at least one people who is discreet, then Hunter is not gifted and Milton is depressed.
Someone who is plain is always both not discreet and not motionless.
Someone is not motionless if and only if he is discreet. | Carroll is not depressed. | neutral |
Hector is not uptight.
Hector is not gifted.
Milton is depressed.
Samson is motionless.
Milton is not motionless.
Hector is not depressed.
Hunter is motionless.
Milton is discreet.
Hunter is not discreet.
Hector is not plain.
Hunter is uptight.
Justin is motionless.If there is someone who is discreet, then Justin is gifted.
If Samson is motionless, then Justin is plain.
If someone is not uptight, then he is not plain, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not uptight, then Hector is gifted.
It can be concluded that Carroll is gifted once knowing that Justin is not plain and Carroll is uptight.
If someone is depressed, then he is uptight, and vice versa.
Justin being not depressed is equivalent to Milton being plain.
If Milton is not depressed or Grant is uptight, then Hector is discreet.
Hunter being depressed is equivalent to Samson being motionless.
If there is at least one people who is discreet, then Hunter is not gifted and Milton is depressed.
Someone who is plain is always both not discreet and not motionless.
Someone is not motionless if and only if he is discreet. | Hector is discreet. | neutral |
Hector is not uptight.
Hector is not gifted.
Milton is depressed.
Samson is motionless.
Milton is not motionless.
Hector is not depressed.
Hunter is motionless.
Milton is discreet.
Hunter is not discreet.
Hector is not plain.
Hunter is uptight.
Justin is motionless.If there is someone who is discreet, then Justin is gifted.
If Samson is motionless, then Justin is plain.
If someone is not uptight, then he is not plain, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not uptight, then Hector is gifted.
It can be concluded that Carroll is gifted once knowing that Justin is not plain and Carroll is uptight.
If someone is depressed, then he is uptight, and vice versa.
Justin being not depressed is equivalent to Milton being plain.
If Milton is not depressed or Grant is uptight, then Hector is discreet.
Hunter being depressed is equivalent to Samson being motionless.
If there is at least one people who is discreet, then Hunter is not gifted and Milton is depressed.
Someone who is plain is always both not discreet and not motionless.
Someone is not motionless if and only if he is discreet. | Milton is motionless. | contradiction |
Hector is not uptight.
Hector is not gifted.
Milton is depressed.
Samson is motionless.
Milton is not motionless.
Hector is not depressed.
Hunter is motionless.
Milton is discreet.
Hunter is not discreet.
Hector is not plain.
Hunter is uptight.
Justin is motionless.If there is someone who is discreet, then Justin is gifted.
If Samson is motionless, then Justin is plain.
If someone is not uptight, then he is not plain, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not uptight, then Hector is gifted.
It can be concluded that Carroll is gifted once knowing that Justin is not plain and Carroll is uptight.
If someone is depressed, then he is uptight, and vice versa.
Justin being not depressed is equivalent to Milton being plain.
If Milton is not depressed or Grant is uptight, then Hector is discreet.
Hunter being depressed is equivalent to Samson being motionless.
If there is at least one people who is discreet, then Hunter is not gifted and Milton is depressed.
Someone who is plain is always both not discreet and not motionless.
Someone is not motionless if and only if he is discreet. | Hector is not motionless. | neutral |
Hector is not uptight.
Hector is not gifted.
Milton is depressed.
Samson is motionless.
Milton is not motionless.
Hector is not depressed.
Hunter is motionless.
Milton is discreet.
Hunter is not discreet.
Hector is not plain.
Hunter is uptight.
Justin is motionless.If there is someone who is discreet, then Justin is gifted.
If Samson is motionless, then Justin is plain.
If someone is not uptight, then he is not plain, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not uptight, then Hector is gifted.
It can be concluded that Carroll is gifted once knowing that Justin is not plain and Carroll is uptight.
If someone is depressed, then he is uptight, and vice versa.
Justin being not depressed is equivalent to Milton being plain.
If Milton is not depressed or Grant is uptight, then Hector is discreet.
Hunter being depressed is equivalent to Samson being motionless.
If there is at least one people who is discreet, then Hunter is not gifted and Milton is depressed.
Someone who is plain is always both not discreet and not motionless.
Someone is not motionless if and only if he is discreet. | Milton is not plain. | neutral |
Fred is not accurate.
Fred is not used.
Claudia is not accurate.
Ridley is rainy.
Alastair is rainy.
Claudia is rainy.
Lars is adventurous.
Fred is not cotton.
Alastair is accurate.
Alastair is not used.
Benton is rainy.
Marshall is impossible.All not impossible people are not rainy.
If someone is not accurate, then he is not rainy, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is impossible, then Lars is adventurous.
Ridley being not cotton or Lars being used implies that Lars is not adventurous.
If all people are used or impossible, then Claudia is not rainy.
If there is someone who is either not cotton or used, then Lars is not rainy.
As long as someone is not impossible, he is not cotton and not accurate.
Someone being both not accurate and not cotton is equivalent to being rainy.
If someone is not impossible and rainy, then he is both not accurate and not adventurous, and vice versa.
If Benton is used, then Alastair is not cotton.
Someone being both accurate and rainy is equivalent to being impossible.
If there is someone who is both accurate and not rainy, then Marshall is impossible. | Fred is accurate. | contradiction |
Fred is not accurate.
Fred is not used.
Claudia is not accurate.
Ridley is rainy.
Alastair is rainy.
Claudia is rainy.
Lars is adventurous.
Fred is not cotton.
Alastair is accurate.
Alastair is not used.
Benton is rainy.
Marshall is impossible.All not impossible people are not rainy.
If someone is not accurate, then he is not rainy, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is impossible, then Lars is adventurous.
Ridley being not cotton or Lars being used implies that Lars is not adventurous.
If all people are used or impossible, then Claudia is not rainy.
If there is someone who is either not cotton or used, then Lars is not rainy.
As long as someone is not impossible, he is not cotton and not accurate.
Someone being both not accurate and not cotton is equivalent to being rainy.
If someone is not impossible and rainy, then he is both not accurate and not adventurous, and vice versa.
If Benton is used, then Alastair is not cotton.
Someone being both accurate and rainy is equivalent to being impossible.
If there is someone who is both accurate and not rainy, then Marshall is impossible. | Ridley is rainy. | self_contradiction |
Fred is not accurate.
Fred is not used.
Claudia is not accurate.
Ridley is rainy.
Alastair is rainy.
Claudia is rainy.
Lars is adventurous.
Fred is not cotton.
Alastair is accurate.
Alastair is not used.
Benton is rainy.
Marshall is impossible.All not impossible people are not rainy.
If someone is not accurate, then he is not rainy, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is impossible, then Lars is adventurous.
Ridley being not cotton or Lars being used implies that Lars is not adventurous.
If all people are used or impossible, then Claudia is not rainy.
If there is someone who is either not cotton or used, then Lars is not rainy.
As long as someone is not impossible, he is not cotton and not accurate.
Someone being both not accurate and not cotton is equivalent to being rainy.
If someone is not impossible and rainy, then he is both not accurate and not adventurous, and vice versa.
If Benton is used, then Alastair is not cotton.
Someone being both accurate and rainy is equivalent to being impossible.
If there is someone who is both accurate and not rainy, then Marshall is impossible. | Marshall is not impossible. | contradiction |
Fred is not accurate.
Fred is not used.
Claudia is not accurate.
Ridley is rainy.
Alastair is rainy.
Claudia is rainy.
Lars is adventurous.
Fred is not cotton.
Alastair is accurate.
Alastair is not used.
Benton is rainy.
Marshall is impossible.All not impossible people are not rainy.
If someone is not accurate, then he is not rainy, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is impossible, then Lars is adventurous.
Ridley being not cotton or Lars being used implies that Lars is not adventurous.
If all people are used or impossible, then Claudia is not rainy.
If there is someone who is either not cotton or used, then Lars is not rainy.
As long as someone is not impossible, he is not cotton and not accurate.
Someone being both not accurate and not cotton is equivalent to being rainy.
If someone is not impossible and rainy, then he is both not accurate and not adventurous, and vice versa.
If Benton is used, then Alastair is not cotton.
Someone being both accurate and rainy is equivalent to being impossible.
If there is someone who is both accurate and not rainy, then Marshall is impossible. | Alastair is not impossible. | contradiction |
Fred is not accurate.
Fred is not used.
Claudia is not accurate.
Ridley is rainy.
Alastair is rainy.
Claudia is rainy.
Lars is adventurous.
Fred is not cotton.
Alastair is accurate.
Alastair is not used.
Benton is rainy.
Marshall is impossible.All not impossible people are not rainy.
If someone is not accurate, then he is not rainy, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is impossible, then Lars is adventurous.
Ridley being not cotton or Lars being used implies that Lars is not adventurous.
If all people are used or impossible, then Claudia is not rainy.
If there is someone who is either not cotton or used, then Lars is not rainy.
As long as someone is not impossible, he is not cotton and not accurate.
Someone being both not accurate and not cotton is equivalent to being rainy.
If someone is not impossible and rainy, then he is both not accurate and not adventurous, and vice versa.
If Benton is used, then Alastair is not cotton.
Someone being both accurate and rainy is equivalent to being impossible.
If there is someone who is both accurate and not rainy, then Marshall is impossible. | Fred is cotton. | contradiction |
Fred is not accurate.
Fred is not used.
Claudia is not accurate.
Ridley is rainy.
Alastair is rainy.
Claudia is rainy.
Lars is adventurous.
Fred is not cotton.
Alastair is accurate.
Alastair is not used.
Benton is rainy.
Marshall is impossible.All not impossible people are not rainy.
If someone is not accurate, then he is not rainy, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is impossible, then Lars is adventurous.
Ridley being not cotton or Lars being used implies that Lars is not adventurous.
If all people are used or impossible, then Claudia is not rainy.
If there is someone who is either not cotton or used, then Lars is not rainy.
As long as someone is not impossible, he is not cotton and not accurate.
Someone being both not accurate and not cotton is equivalent to being rainy.
If someone is not impossible and rainy, then he is both not accurate and not adventurous, and vice versa.
If Benton is used, then Alastair is not cotton.
Someone being both accurate and rainy is equivalent to being impossible.
If there is someone who is both accurate and not rainy, then Marshall is impossible. | Benton is not accurate. | entailment |
Fred is not accurate.
Fred is not used.
Claudia is not accurate.
Ridley is rainy.
Alastair is rainy.
Claudia is rainy.
Lars is adventurous.
Fred is not cotton.
Alastair is accurate.
Alastair is not used.
Benton is rainy.
Marshall is impossible.All not impossible people are not rainy.
If someone is not accurate, then he is not rainy, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is impossible, then Lars is adventurous.
Ridley being not cotton or Lars being used implies that Lars is not adventurous.
If all people are used or impossible, then Claudia is not rainy.
If there is someone who is either not cotton or used, then Lars is not rainy.
As long as someone is not impossible, he is not cotton and not accurate.
Someone being both not accurate and not cotton is equivalent to being rainy.
If someone is not impossible and rainy, then he is both not accurate and not adventurous, and vice versa.
If Benton is used, then Alastair is not cotton.
Someone being both accurate and rainy is equivalent to being impossible.
If there is someone who is both accurate and not rainy, then Marshall is impossible. | Lars is adventurous. | self_contradiction |
Fred is not accurate.
Fred is not used.
Claudia is not accurate.
Ridley is rainy.
Alastair is rainy.
Claudia is rainy.
Lars is adventurous.
Fred is not cotton.
Alastair is accurate.
Alastair is not used.
Benton is rainy.
Marshall is impossible.All not impossible people are not rainy.
If someone is not accurate, then he is not rainy, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is impossible, then Lars is adventurous.
Ridley being not cotton or Lars being used implies that Lars is not adventurous.
If all people are used or impossible, then Claudia is not rainy.
If there is someone who is either not cotton or used, then Lars is not rainy.
As long as someone is not impossible, he is not cotton and not accurate.
Someone being both not accurate and not cotton is equivalent to being rainy.
If someone is not impossible and rainy, then he is both not accurate and not adventurous, and vice versa.
If Benton is used, then Alastair is not cotton.
Someone being both accurate and rainy is equivalent to being impossible.
If there is someone who is both accurate and not rainy, then Marshall is impossible. | Alastair is cotton. | contradiction |
Fred is not accurate.
Fred is not used.
Claudia is not accurate.
Ridley is rainy.
Alastair is rainy.
Claudia is rainy.
Lars is adventurous.
Fred is not cotton.
Alastair is accurate.
Alastair is not used.
Benton is rainy.
Marshall is impossible.All not impossible people are not rainy.
If someone is not accurate, then he is not rainy, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is impossible, then Lars is adventurous.
Ridley being not cotton or Lars being used implies that Lars is not adventurous.
If all people are used or impossible, then Claudia is not rainy.
If there is someone who is either not cotton or used, then Lars is not rainy.
As long as someone is not impossible, he is not cotton and not accurate.
Someone being both not accurate and not cotton is equivalent to being rainy.
If someone is not impossible and rainy, then he is both not accurate and not adventurous, and vice versa.
If Benton is used, then Alastair is not cotton.
Someone being both accurate and rainy is equivalent to being impossible.
If there is someone who is both accurate and not rainy, then Marshall is impossible. | Fred is not used. | entailment |
Fred is not accurate.
Fred is not used.
Claudia is not accurate.
Ridley is rainy.
Alastair is rainy.
Claudia is rainy.
Lars is adventurous.
Fred is not cotton.
Alastair is accurate.
Alastair is not used.
Benton is rainy.
Marshall is impossible.All not impossible people are not rainy.
If someone is not accurate, then he is not rainy, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is impossible, then Lars is adventurous.
Ridley being not cotton or Lars being used implies that Lars is not adventurous.
If all people are used or impossible, then Claudia is not rainy.
If there is someone who is either not cotton or used, then Lars is not rainy.
As long as someone is not impossible, he is not cotton and not accurate.
Someone being both not accurate and not cotton is equivalent to being rainy.
If someone is not impossible and rainy, then he is both not accurate and not adventurous, and vice versa.
If Benton is used, then Alastair is not cotton.
Someone being both accurate and rainy is equivalent to being impossible.
If there is someone who is both accurate and not rainy, then Marshall is impossible. | Alastair is not cotton. | entailment |
Fred is not accurate.
Fred is not used.
Claudia is not accurate.
Ridley is rainy.
Alastair is rainy.
Claudia is rainy.
Lars is adventurous.
Fred is not cotton.
Alastair is accurate.
Alastair is not used.
Benton is rainy.
Marshall is impossible.All not impossible people are not rainy.
If someone is not accurate, then he is not rainy, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is impossible, then Lars is adventurous.
Ridley being not cotton or Lars being used implies that Lars is not adventurous.
If all people are used or impossible, then Claudia is not rainy.
If there is someone who is either not cotton or used, then Lars is not rainy.
As long as someone is not impossible, he is not cotton and not accurate.
Someone being both not accurate and not cotton is equivalent to being rainy.
If someone is not impossible and rainy, then he is both not accurate and not adventurous, and vice versa.
If Benton is used, then Alastair is not cotton.
Someone being both accurate and rainy is equivalent to being impossible.
If there is someone who is both accurate and not rainy, then Marshall is impossible. | Benton is not rainy. | self_contradiction |
Fred is not accurate.
Fred is not used.
Claudia is not accurate.
Ridley is rainy.
Alastair is rainy.
Claudia is rainy.
Lars is adventurous.
Fred is not cotton.
Alastair is accurate.
Alastair is not used.
Benton is rainy.
Marshall is impossible.All not impossible people are not rainy.
If someone is not accurate, then he is not rainy, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is impossible, then Lars is adventurous.
Ridley being not cotton or Lars being used implies that Lars is not adventurous.
If all people are used or impossible, then Claudia is not rainy.
If there is someone who is either not cotton or used, then Lars is not rainy.
As long as someone is not impossible, he is not cotton and not accurate.
Someone being both not accurate and not cotton is equivalent to being rainy.
If someone is not impossible and rainy, then he is both not accurate and not adventurous, and vice versa.
If Benton is used, then Alastair is not cotton.
Someone being both accurate and rainy is equivalent to being impossible.
If there is someone who is both accurate and not rainy, then Marshall is impossible. | Marshall is rainy. | self_contradiction |
Fred is not accurate.
Fred is not used.
Claudia is not accurate.
Ridley is rainy.
Alastair is rainy.
Claudia is rainy.
Lars is adventurous.
Fred is not cotton.
Alastair is accurate.
Alastair is not used.
Benton is rainy.
Marshall is impossible.All not impossible people are not rainy.
If someone is not accurate, then he is not rainy, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is impossible, then Lars is adventurous.
Ridley being not cotton or Lars being used implies that Lars is not adventurous.
If all people are used or impossible, then Claudia is not rainy.
If there is someone who is either not cotton or used, then Lars is not rainy.
As long as someone is not impossible, he is not cotton and not accurate.
Someone being both not accurate and not cotton is equivalent to being rainy.
If someone is not impossible and rainy, then he is both not accurate and not adventurous, and vice versa.
If Benton is used, then Alastair is not cotton.
Someone being both accurate and rainy is equivalent to being impossible.
If there is someone who is both accurate and not rainy, then Marshall is impossible. | Ridley is impossible. | neutral |
Fred is not accurate.
Fred is not used.
Claudia is not accurate.
Ridley is rainy.
Alastair is rainy.
Claudia is rainy.
Lars is adventurous.
Fred is not cotton.
Alastair is accurate.
Alastair is not used.
Benton is rainy.
Marshall is impossible.All not impossible people are not rainy.
If someone is not accurate, then he is not rainy, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is impossible, then Lars is adventurous.
Ridley being not cotton or Lars being used implies that Lars is not adventurous.
If all people are used or impossible, then Claudia is not rainy.
If there is someone who is either not cotton or used, then Lars is not rainy.
As long as someone is not impossible, he is not cotton and not accurate.
Someone being both not accurate and not cotton is equivalent to being rainy.
If someone is not impossible and rainy, then he is both not accurate and not adventurous, and vice versa.
If Benton is used, then Alastair is not cotton.
Someone being both accurate and rainy is equivalent to being impossible.
If there is someone who is both accurate and not rainy, then Marshall is impossible. | Fred is not impossible. | neutral |
Fred is not accurate.
Fred is not used.
Claudia is not accurate.
Ridley is rainy.
Alastair is rainy.
Claudia is rainy.
Lars is adventurous.
Fred is not cotton.
Alastair is accurate.
Alastair is not used.
Benton is rainy.
Marshall is impossible.All not impossible people are not rainy.
If someone is not accurate, then he is not rainy, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is impossible, then Lars is adventurous.
Ridley being not cotton or Lars being used implies that Lars is not adventurous.
If all people are used or impossible, then Claudia is not rainy.
If there is someone who is either not cotton or used, then Lars is not rainy.
As long as someone is not impossible, he is not cotton and not accurate.
Someone being both not accurate and not cotton is equivalent to being rainy.
If someone is not impossible and rainy, then he is both not accurate and not adventurous, and vice versa.
If Benton is used, then Alastair is not cotton.
Someone being both accurate and rainy is equivalent to being impossible.
If there is someone who is both accurate and not rainy, then Marshall is impossible. | Alastair is not rainy. | self_contradiction |
Fred is not accurate.
Fred is not used.
Claudia is not accurate.
Ridley is rainy.
Alastair is rainy.
Claudia is rainy.
Lars is adventurous.
Fred is not cotton.
Alastair is accurate.
Alastair is not used.
Benton is rainy.
Marshall is impossible.All not impossible people are not rainy.
If someone is not accurate, then he is not rainy, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is impossible, then Lars is adventurous.
Ridley being not cotton or Lars being used implies that Lars is not adventurous.
If all people are used or impossible, then Claudia is not rainy.
If there is someone who is either not cotton or used, then Lars is not rainy.
As long as someone is not impossible, he is not cotton and not accurate.
Someone being both not accurate and not cotton is equivalent to being rainy.
If someone is not impossible and rainy, then he is both not accurate and not adventurous, and vice versa.
If Benton is used, then Alastair is not cotton.
Someone being both accurate and rainy is equivalent to being impossible.
If there is someone who is both accurate and not rainy, then Marshall is impossible. | Lars is not used. | neutral |
Fred is not accurate.
Fred is not used.
Claudia is not accurate.
Ridley is rainy.
Alastair is rainy.
Claudia is rainy.
Lars is adventurous.
Fred is not cotton.
Alastair is accurate.
Alastair is not used.
Benton is rainy.
Marshall is impossible.All not impossible people are not rainy.
If someone is not accurate, then he is not rainy, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is impossible, then Lars is adventurous.
Ridley being not cotton or Lars being used implies that Lars is not adventurous.
If all people are used or impossible, then Claudia is not rainy.
If there is someone who is either not cotton or used, then Lars is not rainy.
As long as someone is not impossible, he is not cotton and not accurate.
Someone being both not accurate and not cotton is equivalent to being rainy.
If someone is not impossible and rainy, then he is both not accurate and not adventurous, and vice versa.
If Benton is used, then Alastair is not cotton.
Someone being both accurate and rainy is equivalent to being impossible.
If there is someone who is both accurate and not rainy, then Marshall is impossible. | Benton is adventurous. | neutral |
Fred is not accurate.
Fred is not used.
Claudia is not accurate.
Ridley is rainy.
Alastair is rainy.
Claudia is rainy.
Lars is adventurous.
Fred is not cotton.
Alastair is accurate.
Alastair is not used.
Benton is rainy.
Marshall is impossible.All not impossible people are not rainy.
If someone is not accurate, then he is not rainy, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is impossible, then Lars is adventurous.
Ridley being not cotton or Lars being used implies that Lars is not adventurous.
If all people are used or impossible, then Claudia is not rainy.
If there is someone who is either not cotton or used, then Lars is not rainy.
As long as someone is not impossible, he is not cotton and not accurate.
Someone being both not accurate and not cotton is equivalent to being rainy.
If someone is not impossible and rainy, then he is both not accurate and not adventurous, and vice versa.
If Benton is used, then Alastair is not cotton.
Someone being both accurate and rainy is equivalent to being impossible.
If there is someone who is both accurate and not rainy, then Marshall is impossible. | Claudia is not cotton. | entailment |
Fred is not accurate.
Fred is not used.
Claudia is not accurate.
Ridley is rainy.
Alastair is rainy.
Claudia is rainy.
Lars is adventurous.
Fred is not cotton.
Alastair is accurate.
Alastair is not used.
Benton is rainy.
Marshall is impossible.All not impossible people are not rainy.
If someone is not accurate, then he is not rainy, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is impossible, then Lars is adventurous.
Ridley being not cotton or Lars being used implies that Lars is not adventurous.
If all people are used or impossible, then Claudia is not rainy.
If there is someone who is either not cotton or used, then Lars is not rainy.
As long as someone is not impossible, he is not cotton and not accurate.
Someone being both not accurate and not cotton is equivalent to being rainy.
If someone is not impossible and rainy, then he is both not accurate and not adventurous, and vice versa.
If Benton is used, then Alastair is not cotton.
Someone being both accurate and rainy is equivalent to being impossible.
If there is someone who is both accurate and not rainy, then Marshall is impossible. | Lars is not impossible. | entailment |
Fred is not accurate.
Fred is not used.
Claudia is not accurate.
Ridley is rainy.
Alastair is rainy.
Claudia is rainy.
Lars is adventurous.
Fred is not cotton.
Alastair is accurate.
Alastair is not used.
Benton is rainy.
Marshall is impossible.All not impossible people are not rainy.
If someone is not accurate, then he is not rainy, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is impossible, then Lars is adventurous.
Ridley being not cotton or Lars being used implies that Lars is not adventurous.
If all people are used or impossible, then Claudia is not rainy.
If there is someone who is either not cotton or used, then Lars is not rainy.
As long as someone is not impossible, he is not cotton and not accurate.
Someone being both not accurate and not cotton is equivalent to being rainy.
If someone is not impossible and rainy, then he is both not accurate and not adventurous, and vice versa.
If Benton is used, then Alastair is not cotton.
Someone being both accurate and rainy is equivalent to being impossible.
If there is someone who is both accurate and not rainy, then Marshall is impossible. | Marshall is not adventurous. | neutral |
Albert is wild.
Albert is not tremendous.
Blanche is not acceptable.
Blanche is not tremendous.
Albert is acceptable.
Albion is not acceptable.
Quinn is not condemned.
Jimmy is healthy.
Blanche is wild.
Albert is swift.
Chester is not acceptable.
Quinn is acceptable.If someone is tremendous and not acceptable, then he is not condemned and not healthy.
If there is someone who is both healthy and not tremendous, then Kendall is swift.
Jimmy being wild or Quinn being not tremendous implies that Jimmy is healthy.
If there is someone who is either not condemned or not wild, then Albion is acceptable and Quinn is tremendous.
Kendall being not acceptable implies that Blanche is swift.
If there is someone who is not healthy, then Jimmy is not condemned.
Chester being condemned is equivalent to Quinn being not swift and Chester being not healthy.
Jimmy is healthy if and only if Chester is not tremendous.
If there is at least one people who is condemned or not healthy, then Albion is not swift.
Blanche being swift and Albert being not acceptable imply that Jimmy is not healthy.
Someone being both not condemned and not tremendous is equivalent to being not wild and swift.
If someone is condemned or he is not tremendous, then he is not wild. | Quinn is not tremendous. | contradiction |
Albert is wild.
Albert is not tremendous.
Blanche is not acceptable.
Blanche is not tremendous.
Albert is acceptable.
Albion is not acceptable.
Quinn is not condemned.
Jimmy is healthy.
Blanche is wild.
Albert is swift.
Chester is not acceptable.
Quinn is acceptable.If someone is tremendous and not acceptable, then he is not condemned and not healthy.
If there is someone who is both healthy and not tremendous, then Kendall is swift.
Jimmy being wild or Quinn being not tremendous implies that Jimmy is healthy.
If there is someone who is either not condemned or not wild, then Albion is acceptable and Quinn is tremendous.
Kendall being not acceptable implies that Blanche is swift.
If there is someone who is not healthy, then Jimmy is not condemned.
Chester being condemned is equivalent to Quinn being not swift and Chester being not healthy.
Jimmy is healthy if and only if Chester is not tremendous.
If there is at least one people who is condemned or not healthy, then Albion is not swift.
Blanche being swift and Albert being not acceptable imply that Jimmy is not healthy.
Someone being both not condemned and not tremendous is equivalent to being not wild and swift.
If someone is condemned or he is not tremendous, then he is not wild. | Albert is not condemned. | entailment |
Albert is wild.
Albert is not tremendous.
Blanche is not acceptable.
Blanche is not tremendous.
Albert is acceptable.
Albion is not acceptable.
Quinn is not condemned.
Jimmy is healthy.
Blanche is wild.
Albert is swift.
Chester is not acceptable.
Quinn is acceptable.If someone is tremendous and not acceptable, then he is not condemned and not healthy.
If there is someone who is both healthy and not tremendous, then Kendall is swift.
Jimmy being wild or Quinn being not tremendous implies that Jimmy is healthy.
If there is someone who is either not condemned or not wild, then Albion is acceptable and Quinn is tremendous.
Kendall being not acceptable implies that Blanche is swift.
If there is someone who is not healthy, then Jimmy is not condemned.
Chester being condemned is equivalent to Quinn being not swift and Chester being not healthy.
Jimmy is healthy if and only if Chester is not tremendous.
If there is at least one people who is condemned or not healthy, then Albion is not swift.
Blanche being swift and Albert being not acceptable imply that Jimmy is not healthy.
Someone being both not condemned and not tremendous is equivalent to being not wild and swift.
If someone is condemned or he is not tremendous, then he is not wild. | Albert is not wild. | self_contradiction |
Albert is wild.
Albert is not tremendous.
Blanche is not acceptable.
Blanche is not tremendous.
Albert is acceptable.
Albion is not acceptable.
Quinn is not condemned.
Jimmy is healthy.
Blanche is wild.
Albert is swift.
Chester is not acceptable.
Quinn is acceptable.If someone is tremendous and not acceptable, then he is not condemned and not healthy.
If there is someone who is both healthy and not tremendous, then Kendall is swift.
Jimmy being wild or Quinn being not tremendous implies that Jimmy is healthy.
If there is someone who is either not condemned or not wild, then Albion is acceptable and Quinn is tremendous.
Kendall being not acceptable implies that Blanche is swift.
If there is someone who is not healthy, then Jimmy is not condemned.
Chester being condemned is equivalent to Quinn being not swift and Chester being not healthy.
Jimmy is healthy if and only if Chester is not tremendous.
If there is at least one people who is condemned or not healthy, then Albion is not swift.
Blanche being swift and Albert being not acceptable imply that Jimmy is not healthy.
Someone being both not condemned and not tremendous is equivalent to being not wild and swift.
If someone is condemned or he is not tremendous, then he is not wild. | Chester is not healthy. | neutral |
Albert is wild.
Albert is not tremendous.
Blanche is not acceptable.
Blanche is not tremendous.
Albert is acceptable.
Albion is not acceptable.
Quinn is not condemned.
Jimmy is healthy.
Blanche is wild.
Albert is swift.
Chester is not acceptable.
Quinn is acceptable.If someone is tremendous and not acceptable, then he is not condemned and not healthy.
If there is someone who is both healthy and not tremendous, then Kendall is swift.
Jimmy being wild or Quinn being not tremendous implies that Jimmy is healthy.
If there is someone who is either not condemned or not wild, then Albion is acceptable and Quinn is tremendous.
Kendall being not acceptable implies that Blanche is swift.
If there is someone who is not healthy, then Jimmy is not condemned.
Chester being condemned is equivalent to Quinn being not swift and Chester being not healthy.
Jimmy is healthy if and only if Chester is not tremendous.
If there is at least one people who is condemned or not healthy, then Albion is not swift.
Blanche being swift and Albert being not acceptable imply that Jimmy is not healthy.
Someone being both not condemned and not tremendous is equivalent to being not wild and swift.
If someone is condemned or he is not tremendous, then he is not wild. | Blanche is not tremendous. | entailment |
Albert is wild.
Albert is not tremendous.
Blanche is not acceptable.
Blanche is not tremendous.
Albert is acceptable.
Albion is not acceptable.
Quinn is not condemned.
Jimmy is healthy.
Blanche is wild.
Albert is swift.
Chester is not acceptable.
Quinn is acceptable.If someone is tremendous and not acceptable, then he is not condemned and not healthy.
If there is someone who is both healthy and not tremendous, then Kendall is swift.
Jimmy being wild or Quinn being not tremendous implies that Jimmy is healthy.
If there is someone who is either not condemned or not wild, then Albion is acceptable and Quinn is tremendous.
Kendall being not acceptable implies that Blanche is swift.
If there is someone who is not healthy, then Jimmy is not condemned.
Chester being condemned is equivalent to Quinn being not swift and Chester being not healthy.
Jimmy is healthy if and only if Chester is not tremendous.
If there is at least one people who is condemned or not healthy, then Albion is not swift.
Blanche being swift and Albert being not acceptable imply that Jimmy is not healthy.
Someone being both not condemned and not tremendous is equivalent to being not wild and swift.
If someone is condemned or he is not tremendous, then he is not wild. | Quinn is not acceptable. | contradiction |
Albert is wild.
Albert is not tremendous.
Blanche is not acceptable.
Blanche is not tremendous.
Albert is acceptable.
Albion is not acceptable.
Quinn is not condemned.
Jimmy is healthy.
Blanche is wild.
Albert is swift.
Chester is not acceptable.
Quinn is acceptable.If someone is tremendous and not acceptable, then he is not condemned and not healthy.
If there is someone who is both healthy and not tremendous, then Kendall is swift.
Jimmy being wild or Quinn being not tremendous implies that Jimmy is healthy.
If there is someone who is either not condemned or not wild, then Albion is acceptable and Quinn is tremendous.
Kendall being not acceptable implies that Blanche is swift.
If there is someone who is not healthy, then Jimmy is not condemned.
Chester being condemned is equivalent to Quinn being not swift and Chester being not healthy.
Jimmy is healthy if and only if Chester is not tremendous.
If there is at least one people who is condemned or not healthy, then Albion is not swift.
Blanche being swift and Albert being not acceptable imply that Jimmy is not healthy.
Someone being both not condemned and not tremendous is equivalent to being not wild and swift.
If someone is condemned or he is not tremendous, then he is not wild. | Jimmy is not healthy. | contradiction |
Albert is wild.
Albert is not tremendous.
Blanche is not acceptable.
Blanche is not tremendous.
Albert is acceptable.
Albion is not acceptable.
Quinn is not condemned.
Jimmy is healthy.
Blanche is wild.
Albert is swift.
Chester is not acceptable.
Quinn is acceptable.If someone is tremendous and not acceptable, then he is not condemned and not healthy.
If there is someone who is both healthy and not tremendous, then Kendall is swift.
Jimmy being wild or Quinn being not tremendous implies that Jimmy is healthy.
If there is someone who is either not condemned or not wild, then Albion is acceptable and Quinn is tremendous.
Kendall being not acceptable implies that Blanche is swift.
If there is someone who is not healthy, then Jimmy is not condemned.
Chester being condemned is equivalent to Quinn being not swift and Chester being not healthy.
Jimmy is healthy if and only if Chester is not tremendous.
If there is at least one people who is condemned or not healthy, then Albion is not swift.
Blanche being swift and Albert being not acceptable imply that Jimmy is not healthy.
Someone being both not condemned and not tremendous is equivalent to being not wild and swift.
If someone is condemned or he is not tremendous, then he is not wild. | Blanche is not wild. | self_contradiction |
Albert is wild.
Albert is not tremendous.
Blanche is not acceptable.
Blanche is not tremendous.
Albert is acceptable.
Albion is not acceptable.
Quinn is not condemned.
Jimmy is healthy.
Blanche is wild.
Albert is swift.
Chester is not acceptable.
Quinn is acceptable.If someone is tremendous and not acceptable, then he is not condemned and not healthy.
If there is someone who is both healthy and not tremendous, then Kendall is swift.
Jimmy being wild or Quinn being not tremendous implies that Jimmy is healthy.
If there is someone who is either not condemned or not wild, then Albion is acceptable and Quinn is tremendous.
Kendall being not acceptable implies that Blanche is swift.
If there is someone who is not healthy, then Jimmy is not condemned.
Chester being condemned is equivalent to Quinn being not swift and Chester being not healthy.
Jimmy is healthy if and only if Chester is not tremendous.
If there is at least one people who is condemned or not healthy, then Albion is not swift.
Blanche being swift and Albert being not acceptable imply that Jimmy is not healthy.
Someone being both not condemned and not tremendous is equivalent to being not wild and swift.
If someone is condemned or he is not tremendous, then he is not wild. | Albion is not acceptable. | self_contradiction |
Albert is wild.
Albert is not tremendous.
Blanche is not acceptable.
Blanche is not tremendous.
Albert is acceptable.
Albion is not acceptable.
Quinn is not condemned.
Jimmy is healthy.
Blanche is wild.
Albert is swift.
Chester is not acceptable.
Quinn is acceptable.If someone is tremendous and not acceptable, then he is not condemned and not healthy.
If there is someone who is both healthy and not tremendous, then Kendall is swift.
Jimmy being wild or Quinn being not tremendous implies that Jimmy is healthy.
If there is someone who is either not condemned or not wild, then Albion is acceptable and Quinn is tremendous.
Kendall being not acceptable implies that Blanche is swift.
If there is someone who is not healthy, then Jimmy is not condemned.
Chester being condemned is equivalent to Quinn being not swift and Chester being not healthy.
Jimmy is healthy if and only if Chester is not tremendous.
If there is at least one people who is condemned or not healthy, then Albion is not swift.
Blanche being swift and Albert being not acceptable imply that Jimmy is not healthy.
Someone being both not condemned and not tremendous is equivalent to being not wild and swift.
If someone is condemned or he is not tremendous, then he is not wild. | Albion is not tremendous. | neutral |
Albert is wild.
Albert is not tremendous.
Blanche is not acceptable.
Blanche is not tremendous.
Albert is acceptable.
Albion is not acceptable.
Quinn is not condemned.
Jimmy is healthy.
Blanche is wild.
Albert is swift.
Chester is not acceptable.
Quinn is acceptable.If someone is tremendous and not acceptable, then he is not condemned and not healthy.
If there is someone who is both healthy and not tremendous, then Kendall is swift.
Jimmy being wild or Quinn being not tremendous implies that Jimmy is healthy.
If there is someone who is either not condemned or not wild, then Albion is acceptable and Quinn is tremendous.
Kendall being not acceptable implies that Blanche is swift.
If there is someone who is not healthy, then Jimmy is not condemned.
Chester being condemned is equivalent to Quinn being not swift and Chester being not healthy.
Jimmy is healthy if and only if Chester is not tremendous.
If there is at least one people who is condemned or not healthy, then Albion is not swift.
Blanche being swift and Albert being not acceptable imply that Jimmy is not healthy.
Someone being both not condemned and not tremendous is equivalent to being not wild and swift.
If someone is condemned or he is not tremendous, then he is not wild. | Quinn is not swift. | neutral |
Albert is wild.
Albert is not tremendous.
Blanche is not acceptable.
Blanche is not tremendous.
Albert is acceptable.
Albion is not acceptable.
Quinn is not condemned.
Jimmy is healthy.
Blanche is wild.
Albert is swift.
Chester is not acceptable.
Quinn is acceptable.If someone is tremendous and not acceptable, then he is not condemned and not healthy.
If there is someone who is both healthy and not tremendous, then Kendall is swift.
Jimmy being wild or Quinn being not tremendous implies that Jimmy is healthy.
If there is someone who is either not condemned or not wild, then Albion is acceptable and Quinn is tremendous.
Kendall being not acceptable implies that Blanche is swift.
If there is someone who is not healthy, then Jimmy is not condemned.
Chester being condemned is equivalent to Quinn being not swift and Chester being not healthy.
Jimmy is healthy if and only if Chester is not tremendous.
If there is at least one people who is condemned or not healthy, then Albion is not swift.
Blanche being swift and Albert being not acceptable imply that Jimmy is not healthy.
Someone being both not condemned and not tremendous is equivalent to being not wild and swift.
If someone is condemned or he is not tremendous, then he is not wild. | Kendall is tremendous. | neutral |
Albert is wild.
Albert is not tremendous.
Blanche is not acceptable.
Blanche is not tremendous.
Albert is acceptable.
Albion is not acceptable.
Quinn is not condemned.
Jimmy is healthy.
Blanche is wild.
Albert is swift.
Chester is not acceptable.
Quinn is acceptable.If someone is tremendous and not acceptable, then he is not condemned and not healthy.
If there is someone who is both healthy and not tremendous, then Kendall is swift.
Jimmy being wild or Quinn being not tremendous implies that Jimmy is healthy.
If there is someone who is either not condemned or not wild, then Albion is acceptable and Quinn is tremendous.
Kendall being not acceptable implies that Blanche is swift.
If there is someone who is not healthy, then Jimmy is not condemned.
Chester being condemned is equivalent to Quinn being not swift and Chester being not healthy.
Jimmy is healthy if and only if Chester is not tremendous.
If there is at least one people who is condemned or not healthy, then Albion is not swift.
Blanche being swift and Albert being not acceptable imply that Jimmy is not healthy.
Someone being both not condemned and not tremendous is equivalent to being not wild and swift.
If someone is condemned or he is not tremendous, then he is not wild. | Albert is wild. | self_contradiction |
Albert is wild.
Albert is not tremendous.
Blanche is not acceptable.
Blanche is not tremendous.
Albert is acceptable.
Albion is not acceptable.
Quinn is not condemned.
Jimmy is healthy.
Blanche is wild.
Albert is swift.
Chester is not acceptable.
Quinn is acceptable.If someone is tremendous and not acceptable, then he is not condemned and not healthy.
If there is someone who is both healthy and not tremendous, then Kendall is swift.
Jimmy being wild or Quinn being not tremendous implies that Jimmy is healthy.
If there is someone who is either not condemned or not wild, then Albion is acceptable and Quinn is tremendous.
Kendall being not acceptable implies that Blanche is swift.
If there is someone who is not healthy, then Jimmy is not condemned.
Chester being condemned is equivalent to Quinn being not swift and Chester being not healthy.
Jimmy is healthy if and only if Chester is not tremendous.
If there is at least one people who is condemned or not healthy, then Albion is not swift.
Blanche being swift and Albert being not acceptable imply that Jimmy is not healthy.
Someone being both not condemned and not tremendous is equivalent to being not wild and swift.
If someone is condemned or he is not tremendous, then he is not wild. | Blanche is not acceptable. | entailment |
Albert is wild.
Albert is not tremendous.
Blanche is not acceptable.
Blanche is not tremendous.
Albert is acceptable.
Albion is not acceptable.
Quinn is not condemned.
Jimmy is healthy.
Blanche is wild.
Albert is swift.
Chester is not acceptable.
Quinn is acceptable.If someone is tremendous and not acceptable, then he is not condemned and not healthy.
If there is someone who is both healthy and not tremendous, then Kendall is swift.
Jimmy being wild or Quinn being not tremendous implies that Jimmy is healthy.
If there is someone who is either not condemned or not wild, then Albion is acceptable and Quinn is tremendous.
Kendall being not acceptable implies that Blanche is swift.
If there is someone who is not healthy, then Jimmy is not condemned.
Chester being condemned is equivalent to Quinn being not swift and Chester being not healthy.
Jimmy is healthy if and only if Chester is not tremendous.
If there is at least one people who is condemned or not healthy, then Albion is not swift.
Blanche being swift and Albert being not acceptable imply that Jimmy is not healthy.
Someone being both not condemned and not tremendous is equivalent to being not wild and swift.
If someone is condemned or he is not tremendous, then he is not wild. | Jimmy is healthy. | entailment |
Albert is wild.
Albert is not tremendous.
Blanche is not acceptable.
Blanche is not tremendous.
Albert is acceptable.
Albion is not acceptable.
Quinn is not condemned.
Jimmy is healthy.
Blanche is wild.
Albert is swift.
Chester is not acceptable.
Quinn is acceptable.If someone is tremendous and not acceptable, then he is not condemned and not healthy.
If there is someone who is both healthy and not tremendous, then Kendall is swift.
Jimmy being wild or Quinn being not tremendous implies that Jimmy is healthy.
If there is someone who is either not condemned or not wild, then Albion is acceptable and Quinn is tremendous.
Kendall being not acceptable implies that Blanche is swift.
If there is someone who is not healthy, then Jimmy is not condemned.
Chester being condemned is equivalent to Quinn being not swift and Chester being not healthy.
Jimmy is healthy if and only if Chester is not tremendous.
If there is at least one people who is condemned or not healthy, then Albion is not swift.
Blanche being swift and Albert being not acceptable imply that Jimmy is not healthy.
Someone being both not condemned and not tremendous is equivalent to being not wild and swift.
If someone is condemned or he is not tremendous, then he is not wild. | Albert is swift. | entailment |
Albert is wild.
Albert is not tremendous.
Blanche is not acceptable.
Blanche is not tremendous.
Albert is acceptable.
Albion is not acceptable.
Quinn is not condemned.
Jimmy is healthy.
Blanche is wild.
Albert is swift.
Chester is not acceptable.
Quinn is acceptable.If someone is tremendous and not acceptable, then he is not condemned and not healthy.
If there is someone who is both healthy and not tremendous, then Kendall is swift.
Jimmy being wild or Quinn being not tremendous implies that Jimmy is healthy.
If there is someone who is either not condemned or not wild, then Albion is acceptable and Quinn is tremendous.
Kendall being not acceptable implies that Blanche is swift.
If there is someone who is not healthy, then Jimmy is not condemned.
Chester being condemned is equivalent to Quinn being not swift and Chester being not healthy.
Jimmy is healthy if and only if Chester is not tremendous.
If there is at least one people who is condemned or not healthy, then Albion is not swift.
Blanche being swift and Albert being not acceptable imply that Jimmy is not healthy.
Someone being both not condemned and not tremendous is equivalent to being not wild and swift.
If someone is condemned or he is not tremendous, then he is not wild. | Blanche is wild. | self_contradiction |
Albert is wild.
Albert is not tremendous.
Blanche is not acceptable.
Blanche is not tremendous.
Albert is acceptable.
Albion is not acceptable.
Quinn is not condemned.
Jimmy is healthy.
Blanche is wild.
Albert is swift.
Chester is not acceptable.
Quinn is acceptable.If someone is tremendous and not acceptable, then he is not condemned and not healthy.
If there is someone who is both healthy and not tremendous, then Kendall is swift.
Jimmy being wild or Quinn being not tremendous implies that Jimmy is healthy.
If there is someone who is either not condemned or not wild, then Albion is acceptable and Quinn is tremendous.
Kendall being not acceptable implies that Blanche is swift.
If there is someone who is not healthy, then Jimmy is not condemned.
Chester being condemned is equivalent to Quinn being not swift and Chester being not healthy.
Jimmy is healthy if and only if Chester is not tremendous.
If there is at least one people who is condemned or not healthy, then Albion is not swift.
Blanche being swift and Albert being not acceptable imply that Jimmy is not healthy.
Someone being both not condemned and not tremendous is equivalent to being not wild and swift.
If someone is condemned or he is not tremendous, then he is not wild. | Kendall is wild. | neutral |
Albert is wild.
Albert is not tremendous.
Blanche is not acceptable.
Blanche is not tremendous.
Albert is acceptable.
Albion is not acceptable.
Quinn is not condemned.
Jimmy is healthy.
Blanche is wild.
Albert is swift.
Chester is not acceptable.
Quinn is acceptable.If someone is tremendous and not acceptable, then he is not condemned and not healthy.
If there is someone who is both healthy and not tremendous, then Kendall is swift.
Jimmy being wild or Quinn being not tremendous implies that Jimmy is healthy.
If there is someone who is either not condemned or not wild, then Albion is acceptable and Quinn is tremendous.
Kendall being not acceptable implies that Blanche is swift.
If there is someone who is not healthy, then Jimmy is not condemned.
Chester being condemned is equivalent to Quinn being not swift and Chester being not healthy.
Jimmy is healthy if and only if Chester is not tremendous.
If there is at least one people who is condemned or not healthy, then Albion is not swift.
Blanche being swift and Albert being not acceptable imply that Jimmy is not healthy.
Someone being both not condemned and not tremendous is equivalent to being not wild and swift.
If someone is condemned or he is not tremendous, then he is not wild. | Chester is wild. | contradiction |
Albert is wild.
Albert is not tremendous.
Blanche is not acceptable.
Blanche is not tremendous.
Albert is acceptable.
Albion is not acceptable.
Quinn is not condemned.
Jimmy is healthy.
Blanche is wild.
Albert is swift.
Chester is not acceptable.
Quinn is acceptable.If someone is tremendous and not acceptable, then he is not condemned and not healthy.
If there is someone who is both healthy and not tremendous, then Kendall is swift.
Jimmy being wild or Quinn being not tremendous implies that Jimmy is healthy.
If there is someone who is either not condemned or not wild, then Albion is acceptable and Quinn is tremendous.
Kendall being not acceptable implies that Blanche is swift.
If there is someone who is not healthy, then Jimmy is not condemned.
Chester being condemned is equivalent to Quinn being not swift and Chester being not healthy.
Jimmy is healthy if and only if Chester is not tremendous.
If there is at least one people who is condemned or not healthy, then Albion is not swift.
Blanche being swift and Albert being not acceptable imply that Jimmy is not healthy.
Someone being both not condemned and not tremendous is equivalent to being not wild and swift.
If someone is condemned or he is not tremendous, then he is not wild. | Quinn is condemned. | contradiction |
Aldis is small.
Shawn is puzzled.
Aedan is cloudy.
Carter is small.
Bevis is zealous.
Carter is not curious.
Kimberly is cloudy.
Carter is puzzled.
Bevis is not curious.
Aldis is not curious.
Aedan is small.
Aedan is not zealous.If Shawn is not zealous and Kimberly is curious, then Philbert is not basic and Shawn is not cloudy, and vice versa.
If Philbert is curious or Shawn is not puzzled, then Carter is small.
Kimberly being not zealous implies that Bevis is not cloudy.
If there is at least one people who is not basic, then Kimberly is curious.
It can be concluded that Shawn is not puzzled and Aldis is basic once knowing that Bevis is not curious.
Carter being not puzzled is equivalent to Aedan being cloudy.
If there is at least one people who is not small, then Shawn is not curious and Bevis is not basic.
If someone is both basic and zealous, then he is not cloudy.
If someone is both cloudy and not zealous, then he is small.
If there is someone who is zealous, then Aedan is not cloudy and Carter is puzzled.
It can be concluded that Aldis is zealous once knowing that Philbert is cloudy.
It can be concluded that Aedan is not small and Shawn is not cloudy once knowing that Philbert is basic and Shawn is zealous. | Philbert is zealous. | neutral |
Aldis is small.
Shawn is puzzled.
Aedan is cloudy.
Carter is small.
Bevis is zealous.
Carter is not curious.
Kimberly is cloudy.
Carter is puzzled.
Bevis is not curious.
Aldis is not curious.
Aedan is small.
Aedan is not zealous.If Shawn is not zealous and Kimberly is curious, then Philbert is not basic and Shawn is not cloudy, and vice versa.
If Philbert is curious or Shawn is not puzzled, then Carter is small.
Kimberly being not zealous implies that Bevis is not cloudy.
If there is at least one people who is not basic, then Kimberly is curious.
It can be concluded that Shawn is not puzzled and Aldis is basic once knowing that Bevis is not curious.
Carter being not puzzled is equivalent to Aedan being cloudy.
If there is at least one people who is not small, then Shawn is not curious and Bevis is not basic.
If someone is both basic and zealous, then he is not cloudy.
If someone is both cloudy and not zealous, then he is small.
If there is someone who is zealous, then Aedan is not cloudy and Carter is puzzled.
It can be concluded that Aldis is zealous once knowing that Philbert is cloudy.
It can be concluded that Aedan is not small and Shawn is not cloudy once knowing that Philbert is basic and Shawn is zealous. | Aldis is not small. | contradiction |
Aldis is small.
Shawn is puzzled.
Aedan is cloudy.
Carter is small.
Bevis is zealous.
Carter is not curious.
Kimberly is cloudy.
Carter is puzzled.
Bevis is not curious.
Aldis is not curious.
Aedan is small.
Aedan is not zealous.If Shawn is not zealous and Kimberly is curious, then Philbert is not basic and Shawn is not cloudy, and vice versa.
If Philbert is curious or Shawn is not puzzled, then Carter is small.
Kimberly being not zealous implies that Bevis is not cloudy.
If there is at least one people who is not basic, then Kimberly is curious.
It can be concluded that Shawn is not puzzled and Aldis is basic once knowing that Bevis is not curious.
Carter being not puzzled is equivalent to Aedan being cloudy.
If there is at least one people who is not small, then Shawn is not curious and Bevis is not basic.
If someone is both basic and zealous, then he is not cloudy.
If someone is both cloudy and not zealous, then he is small.
If there is someone who is zealous, then Aedan is not cloudy and Carter is puzzled.
It can be concluded that Aldis is zealous once knowing that Philbert is cloudy.
It can be concluded that Aedan is not small and Shawn is not cloudy once knowing that Philbert is basic and Shawn is zealous. | Philbert is not basic. | neutral |
Aldis is small.
Shawn is puzzled.
Aedan is cloudy.
Carter is small.
Bevis is zealous.
Carter is not curious.
Kimberly is cloudy.
Carter is puzzled.
Bevis is not curious.
Aldis is not curious.
Aedan is small.
Aedan is not zealous.If Shawn is not zealous and Kimberly is curious, then Philbert is not basic and Shawn is not cloudy, and vice versa.
If Philbert is curious or Shawn is not puzzled, then Carter is small.
Kimberly being not zealous implies that Bevis is not cloudy.
If there is at least one people who is not basic, then Kimberly is curious.
It can be concluded that Shawn is not puzzled and Aldis is basic once knowing that Bevis is not curious.
Carter being not puzzled is equivalent to Aedan being cloudy.
If there is at least one people who is not small, then Shawn is not curious and Bevis is not basic.
If someone is both basic and zealous, then he is not cloudy.
If someone is both cloudy and not zealous, then he is small.
If there is someone who is zealous, then Aedan is not cloudy and Carter is puzzled.
It can be concluded that Aldis is zealous once knowing that Philbert is cloudy.
It can be concluded that Aedan is not small and Shawn is not cloudy once knowing that Philbert is basic and Shawn is zealous. | Carter is not puzzled. | self_contradiction |
Aldis is small.
Shawn is puzzled.
Aedan is cloudy.
Carter is small.
Bevis is zealous.
Carter is not curious.
Kimberly is cloudy.
Carter is puzzled.
Bevis is not curious.
Aldis is not curious.
Aedan is small.
Aedan is not zealous.If Shawn is not zealous and Kimberly is curious, then Philbert is not basic and Shawn is not cloudy, and vice versa.
If Philbert is curious or Shawn is not puzzled, then Carter is small.
Kimberly being not zealous implies that Bevis is not cloudy.
If there is at least one people who is not basic, then Kimberly is curious.
It can be concluded that Shawn is not puzzled and Aldis is basic once knowing that Bevis is not curious.
Carter being not puzzled is equivalent to Aedan being cloudy.
If there is at least one people who is not small, then Shawn is not curious and Bevis is not basic.
If someone is both basic and zealous, then he is not cloudy.
If someone is both cloudy and not zealous, then he is small.
If there is someone who is zealous, then Aedan is not cloudy and Carter is puzzled.
It can be concluded that Aldis is zealous once knowing that Philbert is cloudy.
It can be concluded that Aedan is not small and Shawn is not cloudy once knowing that Philbert is basic and Shawn is zealous. | Aedan is not zealous. | entailment |
Aldis is small.
Shawn is puzzled.
Aedan is cloudy.
Carter is small.
Bevis is zealous.
Carter is not curious.
Kimberly is cloudy.
Carter is puzzled.
Bevis is not curious.
Aldis is not curious.
Aedan is small.
Aedan is not zealous.If Shawn is not zealous and Kimberly is curious, then Philbert is not basic and Shawn is not cloudy, and vice versa.
If Philbert is curious or Shawn is not puzzled, then Carter is small.
Kimberly being not zealous implies that Bevis is not cloudy.
If there is at least one people who is not basic, then Kimberly is curious.
It can be concluded that Shawn is not puzzled and Aldis is basic once knowing that Bevis is not curious.
Carter being not puzzled is equivalent to Aedan being cloudy.
If there is at least one people who is not small, then Shawn is not curious and Bevis is not basic.
If someone is both basic and zealous, then he is not cloudy.
If someone is both cloudy and not zealous, then he is small.
If there is someone who is zealous, then Aedan is not cloudy and Carter is puzzled.
It can be concluded that Aldis is zealous once knowing that Philbert is cloudy.
It can be concluded that Aedan is not small and Shawn is not cloudy once knowing that Philbert is basic and Shawn is zealous. | Aedan is small. | entailment |
Aldis is small.
Shawn is puzzled.
Aedan is cloudy.
Carter is small.
Bevis is zealous.
Carter is not curious.
Kimberly is cloudy.
Carter is puzzled.
Bevis is not curious.
Aldis is not curious.
Aedan is small.
Aedan is not zealous.If Shawn is not zealous and Kimberly is curious, then Philbert is not basic and Shawn is not cloudy, and vice versa.
If Philbert is curious or Shawn is not puzzled, then Carter is small.
Kimberly being not zealous implies that Bevis is not cloudy.
If there is at least one people who is not basic, then Kimberly is curious.
It can be concluded that Shawn is not puzzled and Aldis is basic once knowing that Bevis is not curious.
Carter being not puzzled is equivalent to Aedan being cloudy.
If there is at least one people who is not small, then Shawn is not curious and Bevis is not basic.
If someone is both basic and zealous, then he is not cloudy.
If someone is both cloudy and not zealous, then he is small.
If there is someone who is zealous, then Aedan is not cloudy and Carter is puzzled.
It can be concluded that Aldis is zealous once knowing that Philbert is cloudy.
It can be concluded that Aedan is not small and Shawn is not cloudy once knowing that Philbert is basic and Shawn is zealous. | Carter is not small. | contradiction |
Aldis is small.
Shawn is puzzled.
Aedan is cloudy.
Carter is small.
Bevis is zealous.
Carter is not curious.
Kimberly is cloudy.
Carter is puzzled.
Bevis is not curious.
Aldis is not curious.
Aedan is small.
Aedan is not zealous.If Shawn is not zealous and Kimberly is curious, then Philbert is not basic and Shawn is not cloudy, and vice versa.
If Philbert is curious or Shawn is not puzzled, then Carter is small.
Kimberly being not zealous implies that Bevis is not cloudy.
If there is at least one people who is not basic, then Kimberly is curious.
It can be concluded that Shawn is not puzzled and Aldis is basic once knowing that Bevis is not curious.
Carter being not puzzled is equivalent to Aedan being cloudy.
If there is at least one people who is not small, then Shawn is not curious and Bevis is not basic.
If someone is both basic and zealous, then he is not cloudy.
If someone is both cloudy and not zealous, then he is small.
If there is someone who is zealous, then Aedan is not cloudy and Carter is puzzled.
It can be concluded that Aldis is zealous once knowing that Philbert is cloudy.
It can be concluded that Aedan is not small and Shawn is not cloudy once knowing that Philbert is basic and Shawn is zealous. | Bevis is not curious. | entailment |
Aldis is small.
Shawn is puzzled.
Aedan is cloudy.
Carter is small.
Bevis is zealous.
Carter is not curious.
Kimberly is cloudy.
Carter is puzzled.
Bevis is not curious.
Aldis is not curious.
Aedan is small.
Aedan is not zealous.If Shawn is not zealous and Kimberly is curious, then Philbert is not basic and Shawn is not cloudy, and vice versa.
If Philbert is curious or Shawn is not puzzled, then Carter is small.
Kimberly being not zealous implies that Bevis is not cloudy.
If there is at least one people who is not basic, then Kimberly is curious.
It can be concluded that Shawn is not puzzled and Aldis is basic once knowing that Bevis is not curious.
Carter being not puzzled is equivalent to Aedan being cloudy.
If there is at least one people who is not small, then Shawn is not curious and Bevis is not basic.
If someone is both basic and zealous, then he is not cloudy.
If someone is both cloudy and not zealous, then he is small.
If there is someone who is zealous, then Aedan is not cloudy and Carter is puzzled.
It can be concluded that Aldis is zealous once knowing that Philbert is cloudy.
It can be concluded that Aedan is not small and Shawn is not cloudy once knowing that Philbert is basic and Shawn is zealous. | Bevis is not cloudy. | neutral |
Aldis is small.
Shawn is puzzled.
Aedan is cloudy.
Carter is small.
Bevis is zealous.
Carter is not curious.
Kimberly is cloudy.
Carter is puzzled.
Bevis is not curious.
Aldis is not curious.
Aedan is small.
Aedan is not zealous.If Shawn is not zealous and Kimberly is curious, then Philbert is not basic and Shawn is not cloudy, and vice versa.
If Philbert is curious or Shawn is not puzzled, then Carter is small.
Kimberly being not zealous implies that Bevis is not cloudy.
If there is at least one people who is not basic, then Kimberly is curious.
It can be concluded that Shawn is not puzzled and Aldis is basic once knowing that Bevis is not curious.
Carter being not puzzled is equivalent to Aedan being cloudy.
If there is at least one people who is not small, then Shawn is not curious and Bevis is not basic.
If someone is both basic and zealous, then he is not cloudy.
If someone is both cloudy and not zealous, then he is small.
If there is someone who is zealous, then Aedan is not cloudy and Carter is puzzled.
It can be concluded that Aldis is zealous once knowing that Philbert is cloudy.
It can be concluded that Aedan is not small and Shawn is not cloudy once knowing that Philbert is basic and Shawn is zealous. | Shawn is not puzzled. | self_contradiction |
Aldis is small.
Shawn is puzzled.
Aedan is cloudy.
Carter is small.
Bevis is zealous.
Carter is not curious.
Kimberly is cloudy.
Carter is puzzled.
Bevis is not curious.
Aldis is not curious.
Aedan is small.
Aedan is not zealous.If Shawn is not zealous and Kimberly is curious, then Philbert is not basic and Shawn is not cloudy, and vice versa.
If Philbert is curious or Shawn is not puzzled, then Carter is small.
Kimberly being not zealous implies that Bevis is not cloudy.
If there is at least one people who is not basic, then Kimberly is curious.
It can be concluded that Shawn is not puzzled and Aldis is basic once knowing that Bevis is not curious.
Carter being not puzzled is equivalent to Aedan being cloudy.
If there is at least one people who is not small, then Shawn is not curious and Bevis is not basic.
If someone is both basic and zealous, then he is not cloudy.
If someone is both cloudy and not zealous, then he is small.
If there is someone who is zealous, then Aedan is not cloudy and Carter is puzzled.
It can be concluded that Aldis is zealous once knowing that Philbert is cloudy.
It can be concluded that Aedan is not small and Shawn is not cloudy once knowing that Philbert is basic and Shawn is zealous. | Aedan is not cloudy. | self_contradiction |
Aldis is small.
Shawn is puzzled.
Aedan is cloudy.
Carter is small.
Bevis is zealous.
Carter is not curious.
Kimberly is cloudy.
Carter is puzzled.
Bevis is not curious.
Aldis is not curious.
Aedan is small.
Aedan is not zealous.If Shawn is not zealous and Kimberly is curious, then Philbert is not basic and Shawn is not cloudy, and vice versa.
If Philbert is curious or Shawn is not puzzled, then Carter is small.
Kimberly being not zealous implies that Bevis is not cloudy.
If there is at least one people who is not basic, then Kimberly is curious.
It can be concluded that Shawn is not puzzled and Aldis is basic once knowing that Bevis is not curious.
Carter being not puzzled is equivalent to Aedan being cloudy.
If there is at least one people who is not small, then Shawn is not curious and Bevis is not basic.
If someone is both basic and zealous, then he is not cloudy.
If someone is both cloudy and not zealous, then he is small.
If there is someone who is zealous, then Aedan is not cloudy and Carter is puzzled.
It can be concluded that Aldis is zealous once knowing that Philbert is cloudy.
It can be concluded that Aedan is not small and Shawn is not cloudy once knowing that Philbert is basic and Shawn is zealous. | Carter is puzzled. | self_contradiction |
Aldis is small.
Shawn is puzzled.
Aedan is cloudy.
Carter is small.
Bevis is zealous.
Carter is not curious.
Kimberly is cloudy.
Carter is puzzled.
Bevis is not curious.
Aldis is not curious.
Aedan is small.
Aedan is not zealous.If Shawn is not zealous and Kimberly is curious, then Philbert is not basic and Shawn is not cloudy, and vice versa.
If Philbert is curious or Shawn is not puzzled, then Carter is small.
Kimberly being not zealous implies that Bevis is not cloudy.
If there is at least one people who is not basic, then Kimberly is curious.
It can be concluded that Shawn is not puzzled and Aldis is basic once knowing that Bevis is not curious.
Carter being not puzzled is equivalent to Aedan being cloudy.
If there is at least one people who is not small, then Shawn is not curious and Bevis is not basic.
If someone is both basic and zealous, then he is not cloudy.
If someone is both cloudy and not zealous, then he is small.
If there is someone who is zealous, then Aedan is not cloudy and Carter is puzzled.
It can be concluded that Aldis is zealous once knowing that Philbert is cloudy.
It can be concluded that Aedan is not small and Shawn is not cloudy once knowing that Philbert is basic and Shawn is zealous. | Aedan is not small. | contradiction |
Aldis is small.
Shawn is puzzled.
Aedan is cloudy.
Carter is small.
Bevis is zealous.
Carter is not curious.
Kimberly is cloudy.
Carter is puzzled.
Bevis is not curious.
Aldis is not curious.
Aedan is small.
Aedan is not zealous.If Shawn is not zealous and Kimberly is curious, then Philbert is not basic and Shawn is not cloudy, and vice versa.
If Philbert is curious or Shawn is not puzzled, then Carter is small.
Kimberly being not zealous implies that Bevis is not cloudy.
If there is at least one people who is not basic, then Kimberly is curious.
It can be concluded that Shawn is not puzzled and Aldis is basic once knowing that Bevis is not curious.
Carter being not puzzled is equivalent to Aedan being cloudy.
If there is at least one people who is not small, then Shawn is not curious and Bevis is not basic.
If someone is both basic and zealous, then he is not cloudy.
If someone is both cloudy and not zealous, then he is small.
If there is someone who is zealous, then Aedan is not cloudy and Carter is puzzled.
It can be concluded that Aldis is zealous once knowing that Philbert is cloudy.
It can be concluded that Aedan is not small and Shawn is not cloudy once knowing that Philbert is basic and Shawn is zealous. | Kimberly is curious. | neutral |
Aldis is small.
Shawn is puzzled.
Aedan is cloudy.
Carter is small.
Bevis is zealous.
Carter is not curious.
Kimberly is cloudy.
Carter is puzzled.
Bevis is not curious.
Aldis is not curious.
Aedan is small.
Aedan is not zealous.If Shawn is not zealous and Kimberly is curious, then Philbert is not basic and Shawn is not cloudy, and vice versa.
If Philbert is curious or Shawn is not puzzled, then Carter is small.
Kimberly being not zealous implies that Bevis is not cloudy.
If there is at least one people who is not basic, then Kimberly is curious.
It can be concluded that Shawn is not puzzled and Aldis is basic once knowing that Bevis is not curious.
Carter being not puzzled is equivalent to Aedan being cloudy.
If there is at least one people who is not small, then Shawn is not curious and Bevis is not basic.
If someone is both basic and zealous, then he is not cloudy.
If someone is both cloudy and not zealous, then he is small.
If there is someone who is zealous, then Aedan is not cloudy and Carter is puzzled.
It can be concluded that Aldis is zealous once knowing that Philbert is cloudy.
It can be concluded that Aedan is not small and Shawn is not cloudy once knowing that Philbert is basic and Shawn is zealous. | Bevis is cloudy. | neutral |
Aldis is small.
Shawn is puzzled.
Aedan is cloudy.
Carter is small.
Bevis is zealous.
Carter is not curious.
Kimberly is cloudy.
Carter is puzzled.
Bevis is not curious.
Aldis is not curious.
Aedan is small.
Aedan is not zealous.If Shawn is not zealous and Kimberly is curious, then Philbert is not basic and Shawn is not cloudy, and vice versa.
If Philbert is curious or Shawn is not puzzled, then Carter is small.
Kimberly being not zealous implies that Bevis is not cloudy.
If there is at least one people who is not basic, then Kimberly is curious.
It can be concluded that Shawn is not puzzled and Aldis is basic once knowing that Bevis is not curious.
Carter being not puzzled is equivalent to Aedan being cloudy.
If there is at least one people who is not small, then Shawn is not curious and Bevis is not basic.
If someone is both basic and zealous, then he is not cloudy.
If someone is both cloudy and not zealous, then he is small.
If there is someone who is zealous, then Aedan is not cloudy and Carter is puzzled.
It can be concluded that Aldis is zealous once knowing that Philbert is cloudy.
It can be concluded that Aedan is not small and Shawn is not cloudy once knowing that Philbert is basic and Shawn is zealous. | Carter is curious. | contradiction |
Aldis is small.
Shawn is puzzled.
Aedan is cloudy.
Carter is small.
Bevis is zealous.
Carter is not curious.
Kimberly is cloudy.
Carter is puzzled.
Bevis is not curious.
Aldis is not curious.
Aedan is small.
Aedan is not zealous.If Shawn is not zealous and Kimberly is curious, then Philbert is not basic and Shawn is not cloudy, and vice versa.
If Philbert is curious or Shawn is not puzzled, then Carter is small.
Kimberly being not zealous implies that Bevis is not cloudy.
If there is at least one people who is not basic, then Kimberly is curious.
It can be concluded that Shawn is not puzzled and Aldis is basic once knowing that Bevis is not curious.
Carter being not puzzled is equivalent to Aedan being cloudy.
If there is at least one people who is not small, then Shawn is not curious and Bevis is not basic.
If someone is both basic and zealous, then he is not cloudy.
If someone is both cloudy and not zealous, then he is small.
If there is someone who is zealous, then Aedan is not cloudy and Carter is puzzled.
It can be concluded that Aldis is zealous once knowing that Philbert is cloudy.
It can be concluded that Aedan is not small and Shawn is not cloudy once knowing that Philbert is basic and Shawn is zealous. | Aldis is not curious. | entailment |
Aldis is small.
Shawn is puzzled.
Aedan is cloudy.
Carter is small.
Bevis is zealous.
Carter is not curious.
Kimberly is cloudy.
Carter is puzzled.
Bevis is not curious.
Aldis is not curious.
Aedan is small.
Aedan is not zealous.If Shawn is not zealous and Kimberly is curious, then Philbert is not basic and Shawn is not cloudy, and vice versa.
If Philbert is curious or Shawn is not puzzled, then Carter is small.
Kimberly being not zealous implies that Bevis is not cloudy.
If there is at least one people who is not basic, then Kimberly is curious.
It can be concluded that Shawn is not puzzled and Aldis is basic once knowing that Bevis is not curious.
Carter being not puzzled is equivalent to Aedan being cloudy.
If there is at least one people who is not small, then Shawn is not curious and Bevis is not basic.
If someone is both basic and zealous, then he is not cloudy.
If someone is both cloudy and not zealous, then he is small.
If there is someone who is zealous, then Aedan is not cloudy and Carter is puzzled.
It can be concluded that Aldis is zealous once knowing that Philbert is cloudy.
It can be concluded that Aedan is not small and Shawn is not cloudy once knowing that Philbert is basic and Shawn is zealous. | Shawn is puzzled. | self_contradiction |
Aldis is small.
Shawn is puzzled.
Aedan is cloudy.
Carter is small.
Bevis is zealous.
Carter is not curious.
Kimberly is cloudy.
Carter is puzzled.
Bevis is not curious.
Aldis is not curious.
Aedan is small.
Aedan is not zealous.If Shawn is not zealous and Kimberly is curious, then Philbert is not basic and Shawn is not cloudy, and vice versa.
If Philbert is curious or Shawn is not puzzled, then Carter is small.
Kimberly being not zealous implies that Bevis is not cloudy.
If there is at least one people who is not basic, then Kimberly is curious.
It can be concluded that Shawn is not puzzled and Aldis is basic once knowing that Bevis is not curious.
Carter being not puzzled is equivalent to Aedan being cloudy.
If there is at least one people who is not small, then Shawn is not curious and Bevis is not basic.
If someone is both basic and zealous, then he is not cloudy.
If someone is both cloudy and not zealous, then he is small.
If there is someone who is zealous, then Aedan is not cloudy and Carter is puzzled.
It can be concluded that Aldis is zealous once knowing that Philbert is cloudy.
It can be concluded that Aedan is not small and Shawn is not cloudy once knowing that Philbert is basic and Shawn is zealous. | Aldis is basic. | entailment |
Aldis is small.
Shawn is puzzled.
Aedan is cloudy.
Carter is small.
Bevis is zealous.
Carter is not curious.
Kimberly is cloudy.
Carter is puzzled.
Bevis is not curious.
Aldis is not curious.
Aedan is small.
Aedan is not zealous.If Shawn is not zealous and Kimberly is curious, then Philbert is not basic and Shawn is not cloudy, and vice versa.
If Philbert is curious or Shawn is not puzzled, then Carter is small.
Kimberly being not zealous implies that Bevis is not cloudy.
If there is at least one people who is not basic, then Kimberly is curious.
It can be concluded that Shawn is not puzzled and Aldis is basic once knowing that Bevis is not curious.
Carter being not puzzled is equivalent to Aedan being cloudy.
If there is at least one people who is not small, then Shawn is not curious and Bevis is not basic.
If someone is both basic and zealous, then he is not cloudy.
If someone is both cloudy and not zealous, then he is small.
If there is someone who is zealous, then Aedan is not cloudy and Carter is puzzled.
It can be concluded that Aldis is zealous once knowing that Philbert is cloudy.
It can be concluded that Aedan is not small and Shawn is not cloudy once knowing that Philbert is basic and Shawn is zealous. | Bevis is not zealous. | contradiction |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.