premise
stringlengths 923
1.41k
| hypothesis
stringlengths 11
33
| label
stringclasses 4
values |
|---|---|---|
Raymond is not tender.
Andrew is messy.
Raymond is not lively.
Raymond is not unpleasant.
Kane is every.
Kane is not unpleasant.
Kane is not lively.
Harvey is lively.
Kane is not clever.
Mila is not clever.
Kane is tender.
Kingston is unpleasant.If there is at least one people who is both not lively and not clever, then Andrew is unpleasant.
If there is at least one people who is tender, then Andrew is lively.
If Kane is not unpleasant and Raymond is not lively, then Raymond is clever.
If Mila is not tender, then Harvey is not clever, and vice versa.
Someone being messy is equivalent to being unpleasant.
If there is at least one people who is tender, then Kane is not unpleasant and Harvey is every.
It can be concluded that Kingston is clever and Andrew is tender once knowing that Kingston is not unpleasant and Kane is every.
If there is someone who is both unpleasant and clever, then Kingston is not every.
If someone is messy, then he is not unpleasant, and vice versa.
If Kane is every, then Kingston is messy and Sherman is unpleasant.
If there is at least one people who is lively or not tender, then Kane is every.
If Mila is messy or Andrew is clever, then Raymond is not every. | Kingston is not every. | entailment |
Raymond is not tender.
Andrew is messy.
Raymond is not lively.
Raymond is not unpleasant.
Kane is every.
Kane is not unpleasant.
Kane is not lively.
Harvey is lively.
Kane is not clever.
Mila is not clever.
Kane is tender.
Kingston is unpleasant.If there is at least one people who is both not lively and not clever, then Andrew is unpleasant.
If there is at least one people who is tender, then Andrew is lively.
If Kane is not unpleasant and Raymond is not lively, then Raymond is clever.
If Mila is not tender, then Harvey is not clever, and vice versa.
Someone being messy is equivalent to being unpleasant.
If there is at least one people who is tender, then Kane is not unpleasant and Harvey is every.
It can be concluded that Kingston is clever and Andrew is tender once knowing that Kingston is not unpleasant and Kane is every.
If there is someone who is both unpleasant and clever, then Kingston is not every.
If someone is messy, then he is not unpleasant, and vice versa.
If Kane is every, then Kingston is messy and Sherman is unpleasant.
If there is at least one people who is lively or not tender, then Kane is every.
If Mila is messy or Andrew is clever, then Raymond is not every. | Harvey is not messy. | neutral |
Raymond is not tender.
Andrew is messy.
Raymond is not lively.
Raymond is not unpleasant.
Kane is every.
Kane is not unpleasant.
Kane is not lively.
Harvey is lively.
Kane is not clever.
Mila is not clever.
Kane is tender.
Kingston is unpleasant.If there is at least one people who is both not lively and not clever, then Andrew is unpleasant.
If there is at least one people who is tender, then Andrew is lively.
If Kane is not unpleasant and Raymond is not lively, then Raymond is clever.
If Mila is not tender, then Harvey is not clever, and vice versa.
Someone being messy is equivalent to being unpleasant.
If there is at least one people who is tender, then Kane is not unpleasant and Harvey is every.
It can be concluded that Kingston is clever and Andrew is tender once knowing that Kingston is not unpleasant and Kane is every.
If there is someone who is both unpleasant and clever, then Kingston is not every.
If someone is messy, then he is not unpleasant, and vice versa.
If Kane is every, then Kingston is messy and Sherman is unpleasant.
If there is at least one people who is lively or not tender, then Kane is every.
If Mila is messy or Andrew is clever, then Raymond is not every. | Raymond is not tender. | entailment |
Raymond is not tender.
Andrew is messy.
Raymond is not lively.
Raymond is not unpleasant.
Kane is every.
Kane is not unpleasant.
Kane is not lively.
Harvey is lively.
Kane is not clever.
Mila is not clever.
Kane is tender.
Kingston is unpleasant.If there is at least one people who is both not lively and not clever, then Andrew is unpleasant.
If there is at least one people who is tender, then Andrew is lively.
If Kane is not unpleasant and Raymond is not lively, then Raymond is clever.
If Mila is not tender, then Harvey is not clever, and vice versa.
Someone being messy is equivalent to being unpleasant.
If there is at least one people who is tender, then Kane is not unpleasant and Harvey is every.
It can be concluded that Kingston is clever and Andrew is tender once knowing that Kingston is not unpleasant and Kane is every.
If there is someone who is both unpleasant and clever, then Kingston is not every.
If someone is messy, then he is not unpleasant, and vice versa.
If Kane is every, then Kingston is messy and Sherman is unpleasant.
If there is at least one people who is lively or not tender, then Kane is every.
If Mila is messy or Andrew is clever, then Raymond is not every. | Sherman is unpleasant. | self_contradiction |
Raymond is not tender.
Andrew is messy.
Raymond is not lively.
Raymond is not unpleasant.
Kane is every.
Kane is not unpleasant.
Kane is not lively.
Harvey is lively.
Kane is not clever.
Mila is not clever.
Kane is tender.
Kingston is unpleasant.If there is at least one people who is both not lively and not clever, then Andrew is unpleasant.
If there is at least one people who is tender, then Andrew is lively.
If Kane is not unpleasant and Raymond is not lively, then Raymond is clever.
If Mila is not tender, then Harvey is not clever, and vice versa.
Someone being messy is equivalent to being unpleasant.
If there is at least one people who is tender, then Kane is not unpleasant and Harvey is every.
It can be concluded that Kingston is clever and Andrew is tender once knowing that Kingston is not unpleasant and Kane is every.
If there is someone who is both unpleasant and clever, then Kingston is not every.
If someone is messy, then he is not unpleasant, and vice versa.
If Kane is every, then Kingston is messy and Sherman is unpleasant.
If there is at least one people who is lively or not tender, then Kane is every.
If Mila is messy or Andrew is clever, then Raymond is not every. | Mila is clever. | contradiction |
Raymond is not tender.
Andrew is messy.
Raymond is not lively.
Raymond is not unpleasant.
Kane is every.
Kane is not unpleasant.
Kane is not lively.
Harvey is lively.
Kane is not clever.
Mila is not clever.
Kane is tender.
Kingston is unpleasant.If there is at least one people who is both not lively and not clever, then Andrew is unpleasant.
If there is at least one people who is tender, then Andrew is lively.
If Kane is not unpleasant and Raymond is not lively, then Raymond is clever.
If Mila is not tender, then Harvey is not clever, and vice versa.
Someone being messy is equivalent to being unpleasant.
If there is at least one people who is tender, then Kane is not unpleasant and Harvey is every.
It can be concluded that Kingston is clever and Andrew is tender once knowing that Kingston is not unpleasant and Kane is every.
If there is someone who is both unpleasant and clever, then Kingston is not every.
If someone is messy, then he is not unpleasant, and vice versa.
If Kane is every, then Kingston is messy and Sherman is unpleasant.
If there is at least one people who is lively or not tender, then Kane is every.
If Mila is messy or Andrew is clever, then Raymond is not every. | Sherman is not clever. | neutral |
Raymond is not tender.
Andrew is messy.
Raymond is not lively.
Raymond is not unpleasant.
Kane is every.
Kane is not unpleasant.
Kane is not lively.
Harvey is lively.
Kane is not clever.
Mila is not clever.
Kane is tender.
Kingston is unpleasant.If there is at least one people who is both not lively and not clever, then Andrew is unpleasant.
If there is at least one people who is tender, then Andrew is lively.
If Kane is not unpleasant and Raymond is not lively, then Raymond is clever.
If Mila is not tender, then Harvey is not clever, and vice versa.
Someone being messy is equivalent to being unpleasant.
If there is at least one people who is tender, then Kane is not unpleasant and Harvey is every.
It can be concluded that Kingston is clever and Andrew is tender once knowing that Kingston is not unpleasant and Kane is every.
If there is someone who is both unpleasant and clever, then Kingston is not every.
If someone is messy, then he is not unpleasant, and vice versa.
If Kane is every, then Kingston is messy and Sherman is unpleasant.
If there is at least one people who is lively or not tender, then Kane is every.
If Mila is messy or Andrew is clever, then Raymond is not every. | Mila is lively. | neutral |
Raymond is not tender.
Andrew is messy.
Raymond is not lively.
Raymond is not unpleasant.
Kane is every.
Kane is not unpleasant.
Kane is not lively.
Harvey is lively.
Kane is not clever.
Mila is not clever.
Kane is tender.
Kingston is unpleasant.If there is at least one people who is both not lively and not clever, then Andrew is unpleasant.
If there is at least one people who is tender, then Andrew is lively.
If Kane is not unpleasant and Raymond is not lively, then Raymond is clever.
If Mila is not tender, then Harvey is not clever, and vice versa.
Someone being messy is equivalent to being unpleasant.
If there is at least one people who is tender, then Kane is not unpleasant and Harvey is every.
It can be concluded that Kingston is clever and Andrew is tender once knowing that Kingston is not unpleasant and Kane is every.
If there is someone who is both unpleasant and clever, then Kingston is not every.
If someone is messy, then he is not unpleasant, and vice versa.
If Kane is every, then Kingston is messy and Sherman is unpleasant.
If there is at least one people who is lively or not tender, then Kane is every.
If Mila is messy or Andrew is clever, then Raymond is not every. | Sherman is not unpleasant. | self_contradiction |
Raymond is not tender.
Andrew is messy.
Raymond is not lively.
Raymond is not unpleasant.
Kane is every.
Kane is not unpleasant.
Kane is not lively.
Harvey is lively.
Kane is not clever.
Mila is not clever.
Kane is tender.
Kingston is unpleasant.If there is at least one people who is both not lively and not clever, then Andrew is unpleasant.
If there is at least one people who is tender, then Andrew is lively.
If Kane is not unpleasant and Raymond is not lively, then Raymond is clever.
If Mila is not tender, then Harvey is not clever, and vice versa.
Someone being messy is equivalent to being unpleasant.
If there is at least one people who is tender, then Kane is not unpleasant and Harvey is every.
It can be concluded that Kingston is clever and Andrew is tender once knowing that Kingston is not unpleasant and Kane is every.
If there is someone who is both unpleasant and clever, then Kingston is not every.
If someone is messy, then he is not unpleasant, and vice versa.
If Kane is every, then Kingston is messy and Sherman is unpleasant.
If there is at least one people who is lively or not tender, then Kane is every.
If Mila is messy or Andrew is clever, then Raymond is not every. | Kingston is messy. | entailment |
Raymond is not tender.
Andrew is messy.
Raymond is not lively.
Raymond is not unpleasant.
Kane is every.
Kane is not unpleasant.
Kane is not lively.
Harvey is lively.
Kane is not clever.
Mila is not clever.
Kane is tender.
Kingston is unpleasant.If there is at least one people who is both not lively and not clever, then Andrew is unpleasant.
If there is at least one people who is tender, then Andrew is lively.
If Kane is not unpleasant and Raymond is not lively, then Raymond is clever.
If Mila is not tender, then Harvey is not clever, and vice versa.
Someone being messy is equivalent to being unpleasant.
If there is at least one people who is tender, then Kane is not unpleasant and Harvey is every.
It can be concluded that Kingston is clever and Andrew is tender once knowing that Kingston is not unpleasant and Kane is every.
If there is someone who is both unpleasant and clever, then Kingston is not every.
If someone is messy, then he is not unpleasant, and vice versa.
If Kane is every, then Kingston is messy and Sherman is unpleasant.
If there is at least one people who is lively or not tender, then Kane is every.
If Mila is messy or Andrew is clever, then Raymond is not every. | Andrew is lively. | entailment |
Raymond is not tender.
Andrew is messy.
Raymond is not lively.
Raymond is not unpleasant.
Kane is every.
Kane is not unpleasant.
Kane is not lively.
Harvey is lively.
Kane is not clever.
Mila is not clever.
Kane is tender.
Kingston is unpleasant.If there is at least one people who is both not lively and not clever, then Andrew is unpleasant.
If there is at least one people who is tender, then Andrew is lively.
If Kane is not unpleasant and Raymond is not lively, then Raymond is clever.
If Mila is not tender, then Harvey is not clever, and vice versa.
Someone being messy is equivalent to being unpleasant.
If there is at least one people who is tender, then Kane is not unpleasant and Harvey is every.
It can be concluded that Kingston is clever and Andrew is tender once knowing that Kingston is not unpleasant and Kane is every.
If there is someone who is both unpleasant and clever, then Kingston is not every.
If someone is messy, then he is not unpleasant, and vice versa.
If Kane is every, then Kingston is messy and Sherman is unpleasant.
If there is at least one people who is lively or not tender, then Kane is every.
If Mila is messy or Andrew is clever, then Raymond is not every. | Kingston is not tender. | neutral |
Raymond is not tender.
Andrew is messy.
Raymond is not lively.
Raymond is not unpleasant.
Kane is every.
Kane is not unpleasant.
Kane is not lively.
Harvey is lively.
Kane is not clever.
Mila is not clever.
Kane is tender.
Kingston is unpleasant.If there is at least one people who is both not lively and not clever, then Andrew is unpleasant.
If there is at least one people who is tender, then Andrew is lively.
If Kane is not unpleasant and Raymond is not lively, then Raymond is clever.
If Mila is not tender, then Harvey is not clever, and vice versa.
Someone being messy is equivalent to being unpleasant.
If there is at least one people who is tender, then Kane is not unpleasant and Harvey is every.
It can be concluded that Kingston is clever and Andrew is tender once knowing that Kingston is not unpleasant and Kane is every.
If there is someone who is both unpleasant and clever, then Kingston is not every.
If someone is messy, then he is not unpleasant, and vice versa.
If Kane is every, then Kingston is messy and Sherman is unpleasant.
If there is at least one people who is lively or not tender, then Kane is every.
If Mila is messy or Andrew is clever, then Raymond is not every. | Mila is not clever. | entailment |
Raymond is not tender.
Andrew is messy.
Raymond is not lively.
Raymond is not unpleasant.
Kane is every.
Kane is not unpleasant.
Kane is not lively.
Harvey is lively.
Kane is not clever.
Mila is not clever.
Kane is tender.
Kingston is unpleasant.If there is at least one people who is both not lively and not clever, then Andrew is unpleasant.
If there is at least one people who is tender, then Andrew is lively.
If Kane is not unpleasant and Raymond is not lively, then Raymond is clever.
If Mila is not tender, then Harvey is not clever, and vice versa.
Someone being messy is equivalent to being unpleasant.
If there is at least one people who is tender, then Kane is not unpleasant and Harvey is every.
It can be concluded that Kingston is clever and Andrew is tender once knowing that Kingston is not unpleasant and Kane is every.
If there is someone who is both unpleasant and clever, then Kingston is not every.
If someone is messy, then he is not unpleasant, and vice versa.
If Kane is every, then Kingston is messy and Sherman is unpleasant.
If there is at least one people who is lively or not tender, then Kane is every.
If Mila is messy or Andrew is clever, then Raymond is not every. | Raymond is not messy. | contradiction |
Raymond is not tender.
Andrew is messy.
Raymond is not lively.
Raymond is not unpleasant.
Kane is every.
Kane is not unpleasant.
Kane is not lively.
Harvey is lively.
Kane is not clever.
Mila is not clever.
Kane is tender.
Kingston is unpleasant.If there is at least one people who is both not lively and not clever, then Andrew is unpleasant.
If there is at least one people who is tender, then Andrew is lively.
If Kane is not unpleasant and Raymond is not lively, then Raymond is clever.
If Mila is not tender, then Harvey is not clever, and vice versa.
Someone being messy is equivalent to being unpleasant.
If there is at least one people who is tender, then Kane is not unpleasant and Harvey is every.
It can be concluded that Kingston is clever and Andrew is tender once knowing that Kingston is not unpleasant and Kane is every.
If there is someone who is both unpleasant and clever, then Kingston is not every.
If someone is messy, then he is not unpleasant, and vice versa.
If Kane is every, then Kingston is messy and Sherman is unpleasant.
If there is at least one people who is lively or not tender, then Kane is every.
If Mila is messy or Andrew is clever, then Raymond is not every. | Andrew is not lively. | contradiction |
Raymond is not tender.
Andrew is messy.
Raymond is not lively.
Raymond is not unpleasant.
Kane is every.
Kane is not unpleasant.
Kane is not lively.
Harvey is lively.
Kane is not clever.
Mila is not clever.
Kane is tender.
Kingston is unpleasant.If there is at least one people who is both not lively and not clever, then Andrew is unpleasant.
If there is at least one people who is tender, then Andrew is lively.
If Kane is not unpleasant and Raymond is not lively, then Raymond is clever.
If Mila is not tender, then Harvey is not clever, and vice versa.
Someone being messy is equivalent to being unpleasant.
If there is at least one people who is tender, then Kane is not unpleasant and Harvey is every.
It can be concluded that Kingston is clever and Andrew is tender once knowing that Kingston is not unpleasant and Kane is every.
If there is someone who is both unpleasant and clever, then Kingston is not every.
If someone is messy, then he is not unpleasant, and vice versa.
If Kane is every, then Kingston is messy and Sherman is unpleasant.
If there is at least one people who is lively or not tender, then Kane is every.
If Mila is messy or Andrew is clever, then Raymond is not every. | Andrew is not unpleasant. | self_contradiction |
Raymond is not tender.
Andrew is messy.
Raymond is not lively.
Raymond is not unpleasant.
Kane is every.
Kane is not unpleasant.
Kane is not lively.
Harvey is lively.
Kane is not clever.
Mila is not clever.
Kane is tender.
Kingston is unpleasant.If there is at least one people who is both not lively and not clever, then Andrew is unpleasant.
If there is at least one people who is tender, then Andrew is lively.
If Kane is not unpleasant and Raymond is not lively, then Raymond is clever.
If Mila is not tender, then Harvey is not clever, and vice versa.
Someone being messy is equivalent to being unpleasant.
If there is at least one people who is tender, then Kane is not unpleasant and Harvey is every.
It can be concluded that Kingston is clever and Andrew is tender once knowing that Kingston is not unpleasant and Kane is every.
If there is someone who is both unpleasant and clever, then Kingston is not every.
If someone is messy, then he is not unpleasant, and vice versa.
If Kane is every, then Kingston is messy and Sherman is unpleasant.
If there is at least one people who is lively or not tender, then Kane is every.
If Mila is messy or Andrew is clever, then Raymond is not every. | Kingston is not messy. | contradiction |
Raymond is not tender.
Andrew is messy.
Raymond is not lively.
Raymond is not unpleasant.
Kane is every.
Kane is not unpleasant.
Kane is not lively.
Harvey is lively.
Kane is not clever.
Mila is not clever.
Kane is tender.
Kingston is unpleasant.If there is at least one people who is both not lively and not clever, then Andrew is unpleasant.
If there is at least one people who is tender, then Andrew is lively.
If Kane is not unpleasant and Raymond is not lively, then Raymond is clever.
If Mila is not tender, then Harvey is not clever, and vice versa.
Someone being messy is equivalent to being unpleasant.
If there is at least one people who is tender, then Kane is not unpleasant and Harvey is every.
It can be concluded that Kingston is clever and Andrew is tender once knowing that Kingston is not unpleasant and Kane is every.
If there is someone who is both unpleasant and clever, then Kingston is not every.
If someone is messy, then he is not unpleasant, and vice versa.
If Kane is every, then Kingston is messy and Sherman is unpleasant.
If there is at least one people who is lively or not tender, then Kane is every.
If Mila is messy or Andrew is clever, then Raymond is not every. | Harvey is unpleasant. | neutral |
Raymond is not tender.
Andrew is messy.
Raymond is not lively.
Raymond is not unpleasant.
Kane is every.
Kane is not unpleasant.
Kane is not lively.
Harvey is lively.
Kane is not clever.
Mila is not clever.
Kane is tender.
Kingston is unpleasant.If there is at least one people who is both not lively and not clever, then Andrew is unpleasant.
If there is at least one people who is tender, then Andrew is lively.
If Kane is not unpleasant and Raymond is not lively, then Raymond is clever.
If Mila is not tender, then Harvey is not clever, and vice versa.
Someone being messy is equivalent to being unpleasant.
If there is at least one people who is tender, then Kane is not unpleasant and Harvey is every.
It can be concluded that Kingston is clever and Andrew is tender once knowing that Kingston is not unpleasant and Kane is every.
If there is someone who is both unpleasant and clever, then Kingston is not every.
If someone is messy, then he is not unpleasant, and vice versa.
If Kane is every, then Kingston is messy and Sherman is unpleasant.
If there is at least one people who is lively or not tender, then Kane is every.
If Mila is messy or Andrew is clever, then Raymond is not every. | Kane is not every. | contradiction |
Raymond is not tender.
Andrew is messy.
Raymond is not lively.
Raymond is not unpleasant.
Kane is every.
Kane is not unpleasant.
Kane is not lively.
Harvey is lively.
Kane is not clever.
Mila is not clever.
Kane is tender.
Kingston is unpleasant.If there is at least one people who is both not lively and not clever, then Andrew is unpleasant.
If there is at least one people who is tender, then Andrew is lively.
If Kane is not unpleasant and Raymond is not lively, then Raymond is clever.
If Mila is not tender, then Harvey is not clever, and vice versa.
Someone being messy is equivalent to being unpleasant.
If there is at least one people who is tender, then Kane is not unpleasant and Harvey is every.
It can be concluded that Kingston is clever and Andrew is tender once knowing that Kingston is not unpleasant and Kane is every.
If there is someone who is both unpleasant and clever, then Kingston is not every.
If someone is messy, then he is not unpleasant, and vice versa.
If Kane is every, then Kingston is messy and Sherman is unpleasant.
If there is at least one people who is lively or not tender, then Kane is every.
If Mila is messy or Andrew is clever, then Raymond is not every. | Andrew is unpleasant. | self_contradiction |
Raymond is not tender.
Andrew is messy.
Raymond is not lively.
Raymond is not unpleasant.
Kane is every.
Kane is not unpleasant.
Kane is not lively.
Harvey is lively.
Kane is not clever.
Mila is not clever.
Kane is tender.
Kingston is unpleasant.If there is at least one people who is both not lively and not clever, then Andrew is unpleasant.
If there is at least one people who is tender, then Andrew is lively.
If Kane is not unpleasant and Raymond is not lively, then Raymond is clever.
If Mila is not tender, then Harvey is not clever, and vice versa.
Someone being messy is equivalent to being unpleasant.
If there is at least one people who is tender, then Kane is not unpleasant and Harvey is every.
It can be concluded that Kingston is clever and Andrew is tender once knowing that Kingston is not unpleasant and Kane is every.
If there is someone who is both unpleasant and clever, then Kingston is not every.
If someone is messy, then he is not unpleasant, and vice versa.
If Kane is every, then Kingston is messy and Sherman is unpleasant.
If there is at least one people who is lively or not tender, then Kane is every.
If Mila is messy or Andrew is clever, then Raymond is not every. | Kane is unpleasant. | self_contradiction |
Boris is not additional.
Brent is not courteous.
Carter is not cooperative.
Lauren is not global.
Lauren is obedient.
Alexis is courteous.
Carter is global.
Carter is ugly.
Chapman is global.
Lauren is cooperative.
Boris is not ugly.
Hardy is cooperative.If everyone is ugly or additional, then Chapman is not obedient.
If there is someone who is not courteous, then Lauren is additional and Chapman is ugly.
Someone who is additional is always both courteous and global.
Lauren being obedient or Boris being courteous implies that Chapman is cooperative.
If there is someone who is either not ugly or courteous, then Alexis is cooperative.
If there is someone who is courteous, then Brent is not ugly and Brent is not cooperative.
If there is someone who is either ugly or not global, then Alexis is courteous.
If Lauren is not global, then Hardy is cooperative.
If Lauren is obedient and Brent is global, then Alexis is courteous.
Someone is not obedient if and only if he is cooperative.
If Boris is not global or Alexis is ugly, then Alexis is not courteous.
Someone is not additional if and only if he is global. | Hardy is courteous. | neutral |
Boris is not additional.
Brent is not courteous.
Carter is not cooperative.
Lauren is not global.
Lauren is obedient.
Alexis is courteous.
Carter is global.
Carter is ugly.
Chapman is global.
Lauren is cooperative.
Boris is not ugly.
Hardy is cooperative.If everyone is ugly or additional, then Chapman is not obedient.
If there is someone who is not courteous, then Lauren is additional and Chapman is ugly.
Someone who is additional is always both courteous and global.
Lauren being obedient or Boris being courteous implies that Chapman is cooperative.
If there is someone who is either not ugly or courteous, then Alexis is cooperative.
If there is someone who is courteous, then Brent is not ugly and Brent is not cooperative.
If there is someone who is either ugly or not global, then Alexis is courteous.
If Lauren is not global, then Hardy is cooperative.
If Lauren is obedient and Brent is global, then Alexis is courteous.
Someone is not obedient if and only if he is cooperative.
If Boris is not global or Alexis is ugly, then Alexis is not courteous.
Someone is not additional if and only if he is global. | Carter is not ugly. | contradiction |
Boris is not additional.
Brent is not courteous.
Carter is not cooperative.
Lauren is not global.
Lauren is obedient.
Alexis is courteous.
Carter is global.
Carter is ugly.
Chapman is global.
Lauren is cooperative.
Boris is not ugly.
Hardy is cooperative.If everyone is ugly or additional, then Chapman is not obedient.
If there is someone who is not courteous, then Lauren is additional and Chapman is ugly.
Someone who is additional is always both courteous and global.
Lauren being obedient or Boris being courteous implies that Chapman is cooperative.
If there is someone who is either not ugly or courteous, then Alexis is cooperative.
If there is someone who is courteous, then Brent is not ugly and Brent is not cooperative.
If there is someone who is either ugly or not global, then Alexis is courteous.
If Lauren is not global, then Hardy is cooperative.
If Lauren is obedient and Brent is global, then Alexis is courteous.
Someone is not obedient if and only if he is cooperative.
If Boris is not global or Alexis is ugly, then Alexis is not courteous.
Someone is not additional if and only if he is global. | Lauren is not additional. | self_contradiction |
Boris is not additional.
Brent is not courteous.
Carter is not cooperative.
Lauren is not global.
Lauren is obedient.
Alexis is courteous.
Carter is global.
Carter is ugly.
Chapman is global.
Lauren is cooperative.
Boris is not ugly.
Hardy is cooperative.If everyone is ugly or additional, then Chapman is not obedient.
If there is someone who is not courteous, then Lauren is additional and Chapman is ugly.
Someone who is additional is always both courteous and global.
Lauren being obedient or Boris being courteous implies that Chapman is cooperative.
If there is someone who is either not ugly or courteous, then Alexis is cooperative.
If there is someone who is courteous, then Brent is not ugly and Brent is not cooperative.
If there is someone who is either ugly or not global, then Alexis is courteous.
If Lauren is not global, then Hardy is cooperative.
If Lauren is obedient and Brent is global, then Alexis is courteous.
Someone is not obedient if and only if he is cooperative.
If Boris is not global or Alexis is ugly, then Alexis is not courteous.
Someone is not additional if and only if he is global. | Alexis is not cooperative. | contradiction |
Boris is not additional.
Brent is not courteous.
Carter is not cooperative.
Lauren is not global.
Lauren is obedient.
Alexis is courteous.
Carter is global.
Carter is ugly.
Chapman is global.
Lauren is cooperative.
Boris is not ugly.
Hardy is cooperative.If everyone is ugly or additional, then Chapman is not obedient.
If there is someone who is not courteous, then Lauren is additional and Chapman is ugly.
Someone who is additional is always both courteous and global.
Lauren being obedient or Boris being courteous implies that Chapman is cooperative.
If there is someone who is either not ugly or courteous, then Alexis is cooperative.
If there is someone who is courteous, then Brent is not ugly and Brent is not cooperative.
If there is someone who is either ugly or not global, then Alexis is courteous.
If Lauren is not global, then Hardy is cooperative.
If Lauren is obedient and Brent is global, then Alexis is courteous.
Someone is not obedient if and only if he is cooperative.
If Boris is not global or Alexis is ugly, then Alexis is not courteous.
Someone is not additional if and only if he is global. | Lauren is global. | self_contradiction |
Boris is not additional.
Brent is not courteous.
Carter is not cooperative.
Lauren is not global.
Lauren is obedient.
Alexis is courteous.
Carter is global.
Carter is ugly.
Chapman is global.
Lauren is cooperative.
Boris is not ugly.
Hardy is cooperative.If everyone is ugly or additional, then Chapman is not obedient.
If there is someone who is not courteous, then Lauren is additional and Chapman is ugly.
Someone who is additional is always both courteous and global.
Lauren being obedient or Boris being courteous implies that Chapman is cooperative.
If there is someone who is either not ugly or courteous, then Alexis is cooperative.
If there is someone who is courteous, then Brent is not ugly and Brent is not cooperative.
If there is someone who is either ugly or not global, then Alexis is courteous.
If Lauren is not global, then Hardy is cooperative.
If Lauren is obedient and Brent is global, then Alexis is courteous.
Someone is not obedient if and only if he is cooperative.
If Boris is not global or Alexis is ugly, then Alexis is not courteous.
Someone is not additional if and only if he is global. | Lauren is additional. | self_contradiction |
Boris is not additional.
Brent is not courteous.
Carter is not cooperative.
Lauren is not global.
Lauren is obedient.
Alexis is courteous.
Carter is global.
Carter is ugly.
Chapman is global.
Lauren is cooperative.
Boris is not ugly.
Hardy is cooperative.If everyone is ugly or additional, then Chapman is not obedient.
If there is someone who is not courteous, then Lauren is additional and Chapman is ugly.
Someone who is additional is always both courteous and global.
Lauren being obedient or Boris being courteous implies that Chapman is cooperative.
If there is someone who is either not ugly or courteous, then Alexis is cooperative.
If there is someone who is courteous, then Brent is not ugly and Brent is not cooperative.
If there is someone who is either ugly or not global, then Alexis is courteous.
If Lauren is not global, then Hardy is cooperative.
If Lauren is obedient and Brent is global, then Alexis is courteous.
Someone is not obedient if and only if he is cooperative.
If Boris is not global or Alexis is ugly, then Alexis is not courteous.
Someone is not additional if and only if he is global. | Hardy is not courteous. | neutral |
Boris is not additional.
Brent is not courteous.
Carter is not cooperative.
Lauren is not global.
Lauren is obedient.
Alexis is courteous.
Carter is global.
Carter is ugly.
Chapman is global.
Lauren is cooperative.
Boris is not ugly.
Hardy is cooperative.If everyone is ugly or additional, then Chapman is not obedient.
If there is someone who is not courteous, then Lauren is additional and Chapman is ugly.
Someone who is additional is always both courteous and global.
Lauren being obedient or Boris being courteous implies that Chapman is cooperative.
If there is someone who is either not ugly or courteous, then Alexis is cooperative.
If there is someone who is courteous, then Brent is not ugly and Brent is not cooperative.
If there is someone who is either ugly or not global, then Alexis is courteous.
If Lauren is not global, then Hardy is cooperative.
If Lauren is obedient and Brent is global, then Alexis is courteous.
Someone is not obedient if and only if he is cooperative.
If Boris is not global or Alexis is ugly, then Alexis is not courteous.
Someone is not additional if and only if he is global. | Lauren is not cooperative. | contradiction |
Boris is not additional.
Brent is not courteous.
Carter is not cooperative.
Lauren is not global.
Lauren is obedient.
Alexis is courteous.
Carter is global.
Carter is ugly.
Chapman is global.
Lauren is cooperative.
Boris is not ugly.
Hardy is cooperative.If everyone is ugly or additional, then Chapman is not obedient.
If there is someone who is not courteous, then Lauren is additional and Chapman is ugly.
Someone who is additional is always both courteous and global.
Lauren being obedient or Boris being courteous implies that Chapman is cooperative.
If there is someone who is either not ugly or courteous, then Alexis is cooperative.
If there is someone who is courteous, then Brent is not ugly and Brent is not cooperative.
If there is someone who is either ugly or not global, then Alexis is courteous.
If Lauren is not global, then Hardy is cooperative.
If Lauren is obedient and Brent is global, then Alexis is courteous.
Someone is not obedient if and only if he is cooperative.
If Boris is not global or Alexis is ugly, then Alexis is not courteous.
Someone is not additional if and only if he is global. | Brent is not ugly. | entailment |
Boris is not additional.
Brent is not courteous.
Carter is not cooperative.
Lauren is not global.
Lauren is obedient.
Alexis is courteous.
Carter is global.
Carter is ugly.
Chapman is global.
Lauren is cooperative.
Boris is not ugly.
Hardy is cooperative.If everyone is ugly or additional, then Chapman is not obedient.
If there is someone who is not courteous, then Lauren is additional and Chapman is ugly.
Someone who is additional is always both courteous and global.
Lauren being obedient or Boris being courteous implies that Chapman is cooperative.
If there is someone who is either not ugly or courteous, then Alexis is cooperative.
If there is someone who is courteous, then Brent is not ugly and Brent is not cooperative.
If there is someone who is either ugly or not global, then Alexis is courteous.
If Lauren is not global, then Hardy is cooperative.
If Lauren is obedient and Brent is global, then Alexis is courteous.
Someone is not obedient if and only if he is cooperative.
If Boris is not global or Alexis is ugly, then Alexis is not courteous.
Someone is not additional if and only if he is global. | Boris is not cooperative. | neutral |
Boris is not additional.
Brent is not courteous.
Carter is not cooperative.
Lauren is not global.
Lauren is obedient.
Alexis is courteous.
Carter is global.
Carter is ugly.
Chapman is global.
Lauren is cooperative.
Boris is not ugly.
Hardy is cooperative.If everyone is ugly or additional, then Chapman is not obedient.
If there is someone who is not courteous, then Lauren is additional and Chapman is ugly.
Someone who is additional is always both courteous and global.
Lauren being obedient or Boris being courteous implies that Chapman is cooperative.
If there is someone who is either not ugly or courteous, then Alexis is cooperative.
If there is someone who is courteous, then Brent is not ugly and Brent is not cooperative.
If there is someone who is either ugly or not global, then Alexis is courteous.
If Lauren is not global, then Hardy is cooperative.
If Lauren is obedient and Brent is global, then Alexis is courteous.
Someone is not obedient if and only if he is cooperative.
If Boris is not global or Alexis is ugly, then Alexis is not courteous.
Someone is not additional if and only if he is global. | Lauren is not obedient. | self_contradiction |
Boris is not additional.
Brent is not courteous.
Carter is not cooperative.
Lauren is not global.
Lauren is obedient.
Alexis is courteous.
Carter is global.
Carter is ugly.
Chapman is global.
Lauren is cooperative.
Boris is not ugly.
Hardy is cooperative.If everyone is ugly or additional, then Chapman is not obedient.
If there is someone who is not courteous, then Lauren is additional and Chapman is ugly.
Someone who is additional is always both courteous and global.
Lauren being obedient or Boris being courteous implies that Chapman is cooperative.
If there is someone who is either not ugly or courteous, then Alexis is cooperative.
If there is someone who is courteous, then Brent is not ugly and Brent is not cooperative.
If there is someone who is either ugly or not global, then Alexis is courteous.
If Lauren is not global, then Hardy is cooperative.
If Lauren is obedient and Brent is global, then Alexis is courteous.
Someone is not obedient if and only if he is cooperative.
If Boris is not global or Alexis is ugly, then Alexis is not courteous.
Someone is not additional if and only if he is global. | Lauren is not ugly. | neutral |
Boris is not additional.
Brent is not courteous.
Carter is not cooperative.
Lauren is not global.
Lauren is obedient.
Alexis is courteous.
Carter is global.
Carter is ugly.
Chapman is global.
Lauren is cooperative.
Boris is not ugly.
Hardy is cooperative.If everyone is ugly or additional, then Chapman is not obedient.
If there is someone who is not courteous, then Lauren is additional and Chapman is ugly.
Someone who is additional is always both courteous and global.
Lauren being obedient or Boris being courteous implies that Chapman is cooperative.
If there is someone who is either not ugly or courteous, then Alexis is cooperative.
If there is someone who is courteous, then Brent is not ugly and Brent is not cooperative.
If there is someone who is either ugly or not global, then Alexis is courteous.
If Lauren is not global, then Hardy is cooperative.
If Lauren is obedient and Brent is global, then Alexis is courteous.
Someone is not obedient if and only if he is cooperative.
If Boris is not global or Alexis is ugly, then Alexis is not courteous.
Someone is not additional if and only if he is global. | Lauren is courteous. | entailment |
Boris is not additional.
Brent is not courteous.
Carter is not cooperative.
Lauren is not global.
Lauren is obedient.
Alexis is courteous.
Carter is global.
Carter is ugly.
Chapman is global.
Lauren is cooperative.
Boris is not ugly.
Hardy is cooperative.If everyone is ugly or additional, then Chapman is not obedient.
If there is someone who is not courteous, then Lauren is additional and Chapman is ugly.
Someone who is additional is always both courteous and global.
Lauren being obedient or Boris being courteous implies that Chapman is cooperative.
If there is someone who is either not ugly or courteous, then Alexis is cooperative.
If there is someone who is courteous, then Brent is not ugly and Brent is not cooperative.
If there is someone who is either ugly or not global, then Alexis is courteous.
If Lauren is not global, then Hardy is cooperative.
If Lauren is obedient and Brent is global, then Alexis is courteous.
Someone is not obedient if and only if he is cooperative.
If Boris is not global or Alexis is ugly, then Alexis is not courteous.
Someone is not additional if and only if he is global. | Lauren is not courteous. | contradiction |
Boris is not additional.
Brent is not courteous.
Carter is not cooperative.
Lauren is not global.
Lauren is obedient.
Alexis is courteous.
Carter is global.
Carter is ugly.
Chapman is global.
Lauren is cooperative.
Boris is not ugly.
Hardy is cooperative.If everyone is ugly or additional, then Chapman is not obedient.
If there is someone who is not courteous, then Lauren is additional and Chapman is ugly.
Someone who is additional is always both courteous and global.
Lauren being obedient or Boris being courteous implies that Chapman is cooperative.
If there is someone who is either not ugly or courteous, then Alexis is cooperative.
If there is someone who is courteous, then Brent is not ugly and Brent is not cooperative.
If there is someone who is either ugly or not global, then Alexis is courteous.
If Lauren is not global, then Hardy is cooperative.
If Lauren is obedient and Brent is global, then Alexis is courteous.
Someone is not obedient if and only if he is cooperative.
If Boris is not global or Alexis is ugly, then Alexis is not courteous.
Someone is not additional if and only if he is global. | Lauren is obedient. | self_contradiction |
Boris is not additional.
Brent is not courteous.
Carter is not cooperative.
Lauren is not global.
Lauren is obedient.
Alexis is courteous.
Carter is global.
Carter is ugly.
Chapman is global.
Lauren is cooperative.
Boris is not ugly.
Hardy is cooperative.If everyone is ugly or additional, then Chapman is not obedient.
If there is someone who is not courteous, then Lauren is additional and Chapman is ugly.
Someone who is additional is always both courteous and global.
Lauren being obedient or Boris being courteous implies that Chapman is cooperative.
If there is someone who is either not ugly or courteous, then Alexis is cooperative.
If there is someone who is courteous, then Brent is not ugly and Brent is not cooperative.
If there is someone who is either ugly or not global, then Alexis is courteous.
If Lauren is not global, then Hardy is cooperative.
If Lauren is obedient and Brent is global, then Alexis is courteous.
Someone is not obedient if and only if he is cooperative.
If Boris is not global or Alexis is ugly, then Alexis is not courteous.
Someone is not additional if and only if he is global. | Carter is ugly. | entailment |
Boris is not additional.
Brent is not courteous.
Carter is not cooperative.
Lauren is not global.
Lauren is obedient.
Alexis is courteous.
Carter is global.
Carter is ugly.
Chapman is global.
Lauren is cooperative.
Boris is not ugly.
Hardy is cooperative.If everyone is ugly or additional, then Chapman is not obedient.
If there is someone who is not courteous, then Lauren is additional and Chapman is ugly.
Someone who is additional is always both courteous and global.
Lauren being obedient or Boris being courteous implies that Chapman is cooperative.
If there is someone who is either not ugly or courteous, then Alexis is cooperative.
If there is someone who is courteous, then Brent is not ugly and Brent is not cooperative.
If there is someone who is either ugly or not global, then Alexis is courteous.
If Lauren is not global, then Hardy is cooperative.
If Lauren is obedient and Brent is global, then Alexis is courteous.
Someone is not obedient if and only if he is cooperative.
If Boris is not global or Alexis is ugly, then Alexis is not courteous.
Someone is not additional if and only if he is global. | Brent is global. | neutral |
Boris is not additional.
Brent is not courteous.
Carter is not cooperative.
Lauren is not global.
Lauren is obedient.
Alexis is courteous.
Carter is global.
Carter is ugly.
Chapman is global.
Lauren is cooperative.
Boris is not ugly.
Hardy is cooperative.If everyone is ugly or additional, then Chapman is not obedient.
If there is someone who is not courteous, then Lauren is additional and Chapman is ugly.
Someone who is additional is always both courteous and global.
Lauren being obedient or Boris being courteous implies that Chapman is cooperative.
If there is someone who is either not ugly or courteous, then Alexis is cooperative.
If there is someone who is courteous, then Brent is not ugly and Brent is not cooperative.
If there is someone who is either ugly or not global, then Alexis is courteous.
If Lauren is not global, then Hardy is cooperative.
If Lauren is obedient and Brent is global, then Alexis is courteous.
Someone is not obedient if and only if he is cooperative.
If Boris is not global or Alexis is ugly, then Alexis is not courteous.
Someone is not additional if and only if he is global. | Boris is ugly. | contradiction |
Boris is not additional.
Brent is not courteous.
Carter is not cooperative.
Lauren is not global.
Lauren is obedient.
Alexis is courteous.
Carter is global.
Carter is ugly.
Chapman is global.
Lauren is cooperative.
Boris is not ugly.
Hardy is cooperative.If everyone is ugly or additional, then Chapman is not obedient.
If there is someone who is not courteous, then Lauren is additional and Chapman is ugly.
Someone who is additional is always both courteous and global.
Lauren being obedient or Boris being courteous implies that Chapman is cooperative.
If there is someone who is either not ugly or courteous, then Alexis is cooperative.
If there is someone who is courteous, then Brent is not ugly and Brent is not cooperative.
If there is someone who is either ugly or not global, then Alexis is courteous.
If Lauren is not global, then Hardy is cooperative.
If Lauren is obedient and Brent is global, then Alexis is courteous.
Someone is not obedient if and only if he is cooperative.
If Boris is not global or Alexis is ugly, then Alexis is not courteous.
Someone is not additional if and only if he is global. | Hardy is not obedient. | entailment |
Boris is not additional.
Brent is not courteous.
Carter is not cooperative.
Lauren is not global.
Lauren is obedient.
Alexis is courteous.
Carter is global.
Carter is ugly.
Chapman is global.
Lauren is cooperative.
Boris is not ugly.
Hardy is cooperative.If everyone is ugly or additional, then Chapman is not obedient.
If there is someone who is not courteous, then Lauren is additional and Chapman is ugly.
Someone who is additional is always both courteous and global.
Lauren being obedient or Boris being courteous implies that Chapman is cooperative.
If there is someone who is either not ugly or courteous, then Alexis is cooperative.
If there is someone who is courteous, then Brent is not ugly and Brent is not cooperative.
If there is someone who is either ugly or not global, then Alexis is courteous.
If Lauren is not global, then Hardy is cooperative.
If Lauren is obedient and Brent is global, then Alexis is courteous.
Someone is not obedient if and only if he is cooperative.
If Boris is not global or Alexis is ugly, then Alexis is not courteous.
Someone is not additional if and only if he is global. | Chapman is ugly. | entailment |
Bruce is careless.
Stuart is not ugly.
Baird is not reserved.
Cedric is not weak.
Dave is not weak.
Dave is ugly.
Baird is concerned.
Baird is not annoying.
Cedric is not annoying.
Baird is not weak.
Stuart is careless.
Dave is not annoying.Someone being not reserved is equivalent to being weak.
Someone being ugly is equivalent to being annoying.
Baird is concerned if and only if Dave is reserved.
It can be concluded that Alastair is concerned and Cedric is not reserved once knowing that Jed is not ugly.
If there is at least one people who is not annoying, then Cedric is not reserved.
Stuart is ugly if and only if Bruce is not careless and Stuart is reserved.
If there is someone who is both weak and concerned, then Bruce is not reserved.
If someone is ugly or he is weak, then he is concerned.
If there is someone who is weak, then Jed is ugly and Cedric is not concerned.
If there is someone who is not annoying, then Jed is not concerned and Stuart is weak.
If Alastair is ugly, then Baird is not careless and Cedric is not concerned, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Jed is concerned and Bruce is not annoying once knowing that Cedric is not reserved. | Alastair is not concerned. | neutral |
Bruce is careless.
Stuart is not ugly.
Baird is not reserved.
Cedric is not weak.
Dave is not weak.
Dave is ugly.
Baird is concerned.
Baird is not annoying.
Cedric is not annoying.
Baird is not weak.
Stuart is careless.
Dave is not annoying.Someone being not reserved is equivalent to being weak.
Someone being ugly is equivalent to being annoying.
Baird is concerned if and only if Dave is reserved.
It can be concluded that Alastair is concerned and Cedric is not reserved once knowing that Jed is not ugly.
If there is at least one people who is not annoying, then Cedric is not reserved.
Stuart is ugly if and only if Bruce is not careless and Stuart is reserved.
If there is someone who is both weak and concerned, then Bruce is not reserved.
If someone is ugly or he is weak, then he is concerned.
If there is someone who is weak, then Jed is ugly and Cedric is not concerned.
If there is someone who is not annoying, then Jed is not concerned and Stuart is weak.
If Alastair is ugly, then Baird is not careless and Cedric is not concerned, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Jed is concerned and Bruce is not annoying once knowing that Cedric is not reserved. | Alastair is ugly. | neutral |
Bruce is careless.
Stuart is not ugly.
Baird is not reserved.
Cedric is not weak.
Dave is not weak.
Dave is ugly.
Baird is concerned.
Baird is not annoying.
Cedric is not annoying.
Baird is not weak.
Stuart is careless.
Dave is not annoying.Someone being not reserved is equivalent to being weak.
Someone being ugly is equivalent to being annoying.
Baird is concerned if and only if Dave is reserved.
It can be concluded that Alastair is concerned and Cedric is not reserved once knowing that Jed is not ugly.
If there is at least one people who is not annoying, then Cedric is not reserved.
Stuart is ugly if and only if Bruce is not careless and Stuart is reserved.
If there is someone who is both weak and concerned, then Bruce is not reserved.
If someone is ugly or he is weak, then he is concerned.
If there is someone who is weak, then Jed is ugly and Cedric is not concerned.
If there is someone who is not annoying, then Jed is not concerned and Stuart is weak.
If Alastair is ugly, then Baird is not careless and Cedric is not concerned, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Jed is concerned and Bruce is not annoying once knowing that Cedric is not reserved. | Jed is not annoying. | contradiction |
Bruce is careless.
Stuart is not ugly.
Baird is not reserved.
Cedric is not weak.
Dave is not weak.
Dave is ugly.
Baird is concerned.
Baird is not annoying.
Cedric is not annoying.
Baird is not weak.
Stuart is careless.
Dave is not annoying.Someone being not reserved is equivalent to being weak.
Someone being ugly is equivalent to being annoying.
Baird is concerned if and only if Dave is reserved.
It can be concluded that Alastair is concerned and Cedric is not reserved once knowing that Jed is not ugly.
If there is at least one people who is not annoying, then Cedric is not reserved.
Stuart is ugly if and only if Bruce is not careless and Stuart is reserved.
If there is someone who is both weak and concerned, then Bruce is not reserved.
If someone is ugly or he is weak, then he is concerned.
If there is someone who is weak, then Jed is ugly and Cedric is not concerned.
If there is someone who is not annoying, then Jed is not concerned and Stuart is weak.
If Alastair is ugly, then Baird is not careless and Cedric is not concerned, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Jed is concerned and Bruce is not annoying once knowing that Cedric is not reserved. | Jed is not concerned. | self_contradiction |
Bruce is careless.
Stuart is not ugly.
Baird is not reserved.
Cedric is not weak.
Dave is not weak.
Dave is ugly.
Baird is concerned.
Baird is not annoying.
Cedric is not annoying.
Baird is not weak.
Stuart is careless.
Dave is not annoying.Someone being not reserved is equivalent to being weak.
Someone being ugly is equivalent to being annoying.
Baird is concerned if and only if Dave is reserved.
It can be concluded that Alastair is concerned and Cedric is not reserved once knowing that Jed is not ugly.
If there is at least one people who is not annoying, then Cedric is not reserved.
Stuart is ugly if and only if Bruce is not careless and Stuart is reserved.
If there is someone who is both weak and concerned, then Bruce is not reserved.
If someone is ugly or he is weak, then he is concerned.
If there is someone who is weak, then Jed is ugly and Cedric is not concerned.
If there is someone who is not annoying, then Jed is not concerned and Stuart is weak.
If Alastair is ugly, then Baird is not careless and Cedric is not concerned, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Jed is concerned and Bruce is not annoying once knowing that Cedric is not reserved. | Cedric is not careless. | neutral |
Bruce is careless.
Stuart is not ugly.
Baird is not reserved.
Cedric is not weak.
Dave is not weak.
Dave is ugly.
Baird is concerned.
Baird is not annoying.
Cedric is not annoying.
Baird is not weak.
Stuart is careless.
Dave is not annoying.Someone being not reserved is equivalent to being weak.
Someone being ugly is equivalent to being annoying.
Baird is concerned if and only if Dave is reserved.
It can be concluded that Alastair is concerned and Cedric is not reserved once knowing that Jed is not ugly.
If there is at least one people who is not annoying, then Cedric is not reserved.
Stuart is ugly if and only if Bruce is not careless and Stuart is reserved.
If there is someone who is both weak and concerned, then Bruce is not reserved.
If someone is ugly or he is weak, then he is concerned.
If there is someone who is weak, then Jed is ugly and Cedric is not concerned.
If there is someone who is not annoying, then Jed is not concerned and Stuart is weak.
If Alastair is ugly, then Baird is not careless and Cedric is not concerned, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Jed is concerned and Bruce is not annoying once knowing that Cedric is not reserved. | Stuart is ugly. | contradiction |
Bruce is careless.
Stuart is not ugly.
Baird is not reserved.
Cedric is not weak.
Dave is not weak.
Dave is ugly.
Baird is concerned.
Baird is not annoying.
Cedric is not annoying.
Baird is not weak.
Stuart is careless.
Dave is not annoying.Someone being not reserved is equivalent to being weak.
Someone being ugly is equivalent to being annoying.
Baird is concerned if and only if Dave is reserved.
It can be concluded that Alastair is concerned and Cedric is not reserved once knowing that Jed is not ugly.
If there is at least one people who is not annoying, then Cedric is not reserved.
Stuart is ugly if and only if Bruce is not careless and Stuart is reserved.
If there is someone who is both weak and concerned, then Bruce is not reserved.
If someone is ugly or he is weak, then he is concerned.
If there is someone who is weak, then Jed is ugly and Cedric is not concerned.
If there is someone who is not annoying, then Jed is not concerned and Stuart is weak.
If Alastair is ugly, then Baird is not careless and Cedric is not concerned, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Jed is concerned and Bruce is not annoying once knowing that Cedric is not reserved. | Cedric is not weak. | self_contradiction |
Bruce is careless.
Stuart is not ugly.
Baird is not reserved.
Cedric is not weak.
Dave is not weak.
Dave is ugly.
Baird is concerned.
Baird is not annoying.
Cedric is not annoying.
Baird is not weak.
Stuart is careless.
Dave is not annoying.Someone being not reserved is equivalent to being weak.
Someone being ugly is equivalent to being annoying.
Baird is concerned if and only if Dave is reserved.
It can be concluded that Alastair is concerned and Cedric is not reserved once knowing that Jed is not ugly.
If there is at least one people who is not annoying, then Cedric is not reserved.
Stuart is ugly if and only if Bruce is not careless and Stuart is reserved.
If there is someone who is both weak and concerned, then Bruce is not reserved.
If someone is ugly or he is weak, then he is concerned.
If there is someone who is weak, then Jed is ugly and Cedric is not concerned.
If there is someone who is not annoying, then Jed is not concerned and Stuart is weak.
If Alastair is ugly, then Baird is not careless and Cedric is not concerned, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Jed is concerned and Bruce is not annoying once knowing that Cedric is not reserved. | Stuart is not ugly. | entailment |
Bruce is careless.
Stuart is not ugly.
Baird is not reserved.
Cedric is not weak.
Dave is not weak.
Dave is ugly.
Baird is concerned.
Baird is not annoying.
Cedric is not annoying.
Baird is not weak.
Stuart is careless.
Dave is not annoying.Someone being not reserved is equivalent to being weak.
Someone being ugly is equivalent to being annoying.
Baird is concerned if and only if Dave is reserved.
It can be concluded that Alastair is concerned and Cedric is not reserved once knowing that Jed is not ugly.
If there is at least one people who is not annoying, then Cedric is not reserved.
Stuart is ugly if and only if Bruce is not careless and Stuart is reserved.
If there is someone who is both weak and concerned, then Bruce is not reserved.
If someone is ugly or he is weak, then he is concerned.
If there is someone who is weak, then Jed is ugly and Cedric is not concerned.
If there is someone who is not annoying, then Jed is not concerned and Stuart is weak.
If Alastair is ugly, then Baird is not careless and Cedric is not concerned, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Jed is concerned and Bruce is not annoying once knowing that Cedric is not reserved. | Bruce is annoying. | contradiction |
Bruce is careless.
Stuart is not ugly.
Baird is not reserved.
Cedric is not weak.
Dave is not weak.
Dave is ugly.
Baird is concerned.
Baird is not annoying.
Cedric is not annoying.
Baird is not weak.
Stuart is careless.
Dave is not annoying.Someone being not reserved is equivalent to being weak.
Someone being ugly is equivalent to being annoying.
Baird is concerned if and only if Dave is reserved.
It can be concluded that Alastair is concerned and Cedric is not reserved once knowing that Jed is not ugly.
If there is at least one people who is not annoying, then Cedric is not reserved.
Stuart is ugly if and only if Bruce is not careless and Stuart is reserved.
If there is someone who is both weak and concerned, then Bruce is not reserved.
If someone is ugly or he is weak, then he is concerned.
If there is someone who is weak, then Jed is ugly and Cedric is not concerned.
If there is someone who is not annoying, then Jed is not concerned and Stuart is weak.
If Alastair is ugly, then Baird is not careless and Cedric is not concerned, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Jed is concerned and Bruce is not annoying once knowing that Cedric is not reserved. | Bruce is concerned. | entailment |
Bruce is careless.
Stuart is not ugly.
Baird is not reserved.
Cedric is not weak.
Dave is not weak.
Dave is ugly.
Baird is concerned.
Baird is not annoying.
Cedric is not annoying.
Baird is not weak.
Stuart is careless.
Dave is not annoying.Someone being not reserved is equivalent to being weak.
Someone being ugly is equivalent to being annoying.
Baird is concerned if and only if Dave is reserved.
It can be concluded that Alastair is concerned and Cedric is not reserved once knowing that Jed is not ugly.
If there is at least one people who is not annoying, then Cedric is not reserved.
Stuart is ugly if and only if Bruce is not careless and Stuart is reserved.
If there is someone who is both weak and concerned, then Bruce is not reserved.
If someone is ugly or he is weak, then he is concerned.
If there is someone who is weak, then Jed is ugly and Cedric is not concerned.
If there is someone who is not annoying, then Jed is not concerned and Stuart is weak.
If Alastair is ugly, then Baird is not careless and Cedric is not concerned, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Jed is concerned and Bruce is not annoying once knowing that Cedric is not reserved. | Cedric is reserved. | contradiction |
Bruce is careless.
Stuart is not ugly.
Baird is not reserved.
Cedric is not weak.
Dave is not weak.
Dave is ugly.
Baird is concerned.
Baird is not annoying.
Cedric is not annoying.
Baird is not weak.
Stuart is careless.
Dave is not annoying.Someone being not reserved is equivalent to being weak.
Someone being ugly is equivalent to being annoying.
Baird is concerned if and only if Dave is reserved.
It can be concluded that Alastair is concerned and Cedric is not reserved once knowing that Jed is not ugly.
If there is at least one people who is not annoying, then Cedric is not reserved.
Stuart is ugly if and only if Bruce is not careless and Stuart is reserved.
If there is someone who is both weak and concerned, then Bruce is not reserved.
If someone is ugly or he is weak, then he is concerned.
If there is someone who is weak, then Jed is ugly and Cedric is not concerned.
If there is someone who is not annoying, then Jed is not concerned and Stuart is weak.
If Alastair is ugly, then Baird is not careless and Cedric is not concerned, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Jed is concerned and Bruce is not annoying once knowing that Cedric is not reserved. | Cedric is not reserved. | entailment |
Bruce is careless.
Stuart is not ugly.
Baird is not reserved.
Cedric is not weak.
Dave is not weak.
Dave is ugly.
Baird is concerned.
Baird is not annoying.
Cedric is not annoying.
Baird is not weak.
Stuart is careless.
Dave is not annoying.Someone being not reserved is equivalent to being weak.
Someone being ugly is equivalent to being annoying.
Baird is concerned if and only if Dave is reserved.
It can be concluded that Alastair is concerned and Cedric is not reserved once knowing that Jed is not ugly.
If there is at least one people who is not annoying, then Cedric is not reserved.
Stuart is ugly if and only if Bruce is not careless and Stuart is reserved.
If there is someone who is both weak and concerned, then Bruce is not reserved.
If someone is ugly or he is weak, then he is concerned.
If there is someone who is weak, then Jed is ugly and Cedric is not concerned.
If there is someone who is not annoying, then Jed is not concerned and Stuart is weak.
If Alastair is ugly, then Baird is not careless and Cedric is not concerned, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Jed is concerned and Bruce is not annoying once knowing that Cedric is not reserved. | Baird is not weak. | self_contradiction |
Bruce is careless.
Stuart is not ugly.
Baird is not reserved.
Cedric is not weak.
Dave is not weak.
Dave is ugly.
Baird is concerned.
Baird is not annoying.
Cedric is not annoying.
Baird is not weak.
Stuart is careless.
Dave is not annoying.Someone being not reserved is equivalent to being weak.
Someone being ugly is equivalent to being annoying.
Baird is concerned if and only if Dave is reserved.
It can be concluded that Alastair is concerned and Cedric is not reserved once knowing that Jed is not ugly.
If there is at least one people who is not annoying, then Cedric is not reserved.
Stuart is ugly if and only if Bruce is not careless and Stuart is reserved.
If there is someone who is both weak and concerned, then Bruce is not reserved.
If someone is ugly or he is weak, then he is concerned.
If there is someone who is weak, then Jed is ugly and Cedric is not concerned.
If there is someone who is not annoying, then Jed is not concerned and Stuart is weak.
If Alastair is ugly, then Baird is not careless and Cedric is not concerned, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Jed is concerned and Bruce is not annoying once knowing that Cedric is not reserved. | Baird is careless. | neutral |
Bruce is careless.
Stuart is not ugly.
Baird is not reserved.
Cedric is not weak.
Dave is not weak.
Dave is ugly.
Baird is concerned.
Baird is not annoying.
Cedric is not annoying.
Baird is not weak.
Stuart is careless.
Dave is not annoying.Someone being not reserved is equivalent to being weak.
Someone being ugly is equivalent to being annoying.
Baird is concerned if and only if Dave is reserved.
It can be concluded that Alastair is concerned and Cedric is not reserved once knowing that Jed is not ugly.
If there is at least one people who is not annoying, then Cedric is not reserved.
Stuart is ugly if and only if Bruce is not careless and Stuart is reserved.
If there is someone who is both weak and concerned, then Bruce is not reserved.
If someone is ugly or he is weak, then he is concerned.
If there is someone who is weak, then Jed is ugly and Cedric is not concerned.
If there is someone who is not annoying, then Jed is not concerned and Stuart is weak.
If Alastair is ugly, then Baird is not careless and Cedric is not concerned, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Jed is concerned and Bruce is not annoying once knowing that Cedric is not reserved. | Dave is not annoying. | self_contradiction |
Bruce is careless.
Stuart is not ugly.
Baird is not reserved.
Cedric is not weak.
Dave is not weak.
Dave is ugly.
Baird is concerned.
Baird is not annoying.
Cedric is not annoying.
Baird is not weak.
Stuart is careless.
Dave is not annoying.Someone being not reserved is equivalent to being weak.
Someone being ugly is equivalent to being annoying.
Baird is concerned if and only if Dave is reserved.
It can be concluded that Alastair is concerned and Cedric is not reserved once knowing that Jed is not ugly.
If there is at least one people who is not annoying, then Cedric is not reserved.
Stuart is ugly if and only if Bruce is not careless and Stuart is reserved.
If there is someone who is both weak and concerned, then Bruce is not reserved.
If someone is ugly or he is weak, then he is concerned.
If there is someone who is weak, then Jed is ugly and Cedric is not concerned.
If there is someone who is not annoying, then Jed is not concerned and Stuart is weak.
If Alastair is ugly, then Baird is not careless and Cedric is not concerned, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Jed is concerned and Bruce is not annoying once knowing that Cedric is not reserved. | Stuart is reserved. | contradiction |
Bruce is careless.
Stuart is not ugly.
Baird is not reserved.
Cedric is not weak.
Dave is not weak.
Dave is ugly.
Baird is concerned.
Baird is not annoying.
Cedric is not annoying.
Baird is not weak.
Stuart is careless.
Dave is not annoying.Someone being not reserved is equivalent to being weak.
Someone being ugly is equivalent to being annoying.
Baird is concerned if and only if Dave is reserved.
It can be concluded that Alastair is concerned and Cedric is not reserved once knowing that Jed is not ugly.
If there is at least one people who is not annoying, then Cedric is not reserved.
Stuart is ugly if and only if Bruce is not careless and Stuart is reserved.
If there is someone who is both weak and concerned, then Bruce is not reserved.
If someone is ugly or he is weak, then he is concerned.
If there is someone who is weak, then Jed is ugly and Cedric is not concerned.
If there is someone who is not annoying, then Jed is not concerned and Stuart is weak.
If Alastair is ugly, then Baird is not careless and Cedric is not concerned, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Jed is concerned and Bruce is not annoying once knowing that Cedric is not reserved. | Alastair is concerned. | neutral |
Bruce is careless.
Stuart is not ugly.
Baird is not reserved.
Cedric is not weak.
Dave is not weak.
Dave is ugly.
Baird is concerned.
Baird is not annoying.
Cedric is not annoying.
Baird is not weak.
Stuart is careless.
Dave is not annoying.Someone being not reserved is equivalent to being weak.
Someone being ugly is equivalent to being annoying.
Baird is concerned if and only if Dave is reserved.
It can be concluded that Alastair is concerned and Cedric is not reserved once knowing that Jed is not ugly.
If there is at least one people who is not annoying, then Cedric is not reserved.
Stuart is ugly if and only if Bruce is not careless and Stuart is reserved.
If there is someone who is both weak and concerned, then Bruce is not reserved.
If someone is ugly or he is weak, then he is concerned.
If there is someone who is weak, then Jed is ugly and Cedric is not concerned.
If there is someone who is not annoying, then Jed is not concerned and Stuart is weak.
If Alastair is ugly, then Baird is not careless and Cedric is not concerned, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Jed is concerned and Bruce is not annoying once knowing that Cedric is not reserved. | Cedric is concerned. | self_contradiction |
Bruce is careless.
Stuart is not ugly.
Baird is not reserved.
Cedric is not weak.
Dave is not weak.
Dave is ugly.
Baird is concerned.
Baird is not annoying.
Cedric is not annoying.
Baird is not weak.
Stuart is careless.
Dave is not annoying.Someone being not reserved is equivalent to being weak.
Someone being ugly is equivalent to being annoying.
Baird is concerned if and only if Dave is reserved.
It can be concluded that Alastair is concerned and Cedric is not reserved once knowing that Jed is not ugly.
If there is at least one people who is not annoying, then Cedric is not reserved.
Stuart is ugly if and only if Bruce is not careless and Stuart is reserved.
If there is someone who is both weak and concerned, then Bruce is not reserved.
If someone is ugly or he is weak, then he is concerned.
If there is someone who is weak, then Jed is ugly and Cedric is not concerned.
If there is someone who is not annoying, then Jed is not concerned and Stuart is weak.
If Alastair is ugly, then Baird is not careless and Cedric is not concerned, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Jed is concerned and Bruce is not annoying once knowing that Cedric is not reserved. | Jed is ugly. | entailment |
Bruce is careless.
Stuart is not ugly.
Baird is not reserved.
Cedric is not weak.
Dave is not weak.
Dave is ugly.
Baird is concerned.
Baird is not annoying.
Cedric is not annoying.
Baird is not weak.
Stuart is careless.
Dave is not annoying.Someone being not reserved is equivalent to being weak.
Someone being ugly is equivalent to being annoying.
Baird is concerned if and only if Dave is reserved.
It can be concluded that Alastair is concerned and Cedric is not reserved once knowing that Jed is not ugly.
If there is at least one people who is not annoying, then Cedric is not reserved.
Stuart is ugly if and only if Bruce is not careless and Stuart is reserved.
If there is someone who is both weak and concerned, then Bruce is not reserved.
If someone is ugly or he is weak, then he is concerned.
If there is someone who is weak, then Jed is ugly and Cedric is not concerned.
If there is someone who is not annoying, then Jed is not concerned and Stuart is weak.
If Alastair is ugly, then Baird is not careless and Cedric is not concerned, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Jed is concerned and Bruce is not annoying once knowing that Cedric is not reserved. | Bruce is not reserved. | entailment |
Baird is not typical.
Harlan is typical.
Harlan is informal.
Arlen is friendly.
Vicki is not nervous.
Harley is informal.
Vicki is not informal.
Rufus is beautiful.
Arlen is beautiful.
Rufus is nervous.
Lauren is typical.
Harley is friendly.Harley is not typical if and only if Harley is not nervous and Harlan is not basic.
If Harlan is beautiful or Vicki is not friendly, then Rufus is basic.
Harley being friendly and Arlen being not nervous imply that Harley is not typical.
If there is someone who is both beautiful and informal, then Lauren is not basic.
If someone who is friendly is also informal, then he is typical.
It can be concluded that Harlan is not friendly once knowing that Lauren is informal and Lauren is nervous.
If there is someone who is beautiful, then Lauren is not typical and Lauren is basic.
If someone is friendly, then he is not informal, and vice versa.
If someone is not informal, then he is both not typical and beautiful.
If there is at least one people who is not typical, then Harlan is friendly and Arlen is beautiful.
Rufus being beautiful and Harley being friendly imply that Baird is nervous and Arlen is not basic.
Rufus being not friendly is equivalent to Arlen being not beautiful. | Harley is nervous. | contradiction |
Baird is not typical.
Harlan is typical.
Harlan is informal.
Arlen is friendly.
Vicki is not nervous.
Harley is informal.
Vicki is not informal.
Rufus is beautiful.
Arlen is beautiful.
Rufus is nervous.
Lauren is typical.
Harley is friendly.Harley is not typical if and only if Harley is not nervous and Harlan is not basic.
If Harlan is beautiful or Vicki is not friendly, then Rufus is basic.
Harley being friendly and Arlen being not nervous imply that Harley is not typical.
If there is someone who is both beautiful and informal, then Lauren is not basic.
If someone who is friendly is also informal, then he is typical.
It can be concluded that Harlan is not friendly once knowing that Lauren is informal and Lauren is nervous.
If there is someone who is beautiful, then Lauren is not typical and Lauren is basic.
If someone is friendly, then he is not informal, and vice versa.
If someone is not informal, then he is both not typical and beautiful.
If there is at least one people who is not typical, then Harlan is friendly and Arlen is beautiful.
Rufus being beautiful and Harley being friendly imply that Baird is nervous and Arlen is not basic.
Rufus being not friendly is equivalent to Arlen being not beautiful. | Harlan is informal. | self_contradiction |
Baird is not typical.
Harlan is typical.
Harlan is informal.
Arlen is friendly.
Vicki is not nervous.
Harley is informal.
Vicki is not informal.
Rufus is beautiful.
Arlen is beautiful.
Rufus is nervous.
Lauren is typical.
Harley is friendly.Harley is not typical if and only if Harley is not nervous and Harlan is not basic.
If Harlan is beautiful or Vicki is not friendly, then Rufus is basic.
Harley being friendly and Arlen being not nervous imply that Harley is not typical.
If there is someone who is both beautiful and informal, then Lauren is not basic.
If someone who is friendly is also informal, then he is typical.
It can be concluded that Harlan is not friendly once knowing that Lauren is informal and Lauren is nervous.
If there is someone who is beautiful, then Lauren is not typical and Lauren is basic.
If someone is friendly, then he is not informal, and vice versa.
If someone is not informal, then he is both not typical and beautiful.
If there is at least one people who is not typical, then Harlan is friendly and Arlen is beautiful.
Rufus being beautiful and Harley being friendly imply that Baird is nervous and Arlen is not basic.
Rufus being not friendly is equivalent to Arlen being not beautiful. | Harlan is not beautiful. | contradiction |
Baird is not typical.
Harlan is typical.
Harlan is informal.
Arlen is friendly.
Vicki is not nervous.
Harley is informal.
Vicki is not informal.
Rufus is beautiful.
Arlen is beautiful.
Rufus is nervous.
Lauren is typical.
Harley is friendly.Harley is not typical if and only if Harley is not nervous and Harlan is not basic.
If Harlan is beautiful or Vicki is not friendly, then Rufus is basic.
Harley being friendly and Arlen being not nervous imply that Harley is not typical.
If there is someone who is both beautiful and informal, then Lauren is not basic.
If someone who is friendly is also informal, then he is typical.
It can be concluded that Harlan is not friendly once knowing that Lauren is informal and Lauren is nervous.
If there is someone who is beautiful, then Lauren is not typical and Lauren is basic.
If someone is friendly, then he is not informal, and vice versa.
If someone is not informal, then he is both not typical and beautiful.
If there is at least one people who is not typical, then Harlan is friendly and Arlen is beautiful.
Rufus being beautiful and Harley being friendly imply that Baird is nervous and Arlen is not basic.
Rufus being not friendly is equivalent to Arlen being not beautiful. | Arlen is not typical. | entailment |
Baird is not typical.
Harlan is typical.
Harlan is informal.
Arlen is friendly.
Vicki is not nervous.
Harley is informal.
Vicki is not informal.
Rufus is beautiful.
Arlen is beautiful.
Rufus is nervous.
Lauren is typical.
Harley is friendly.Harley is not typical if and only if Harley is not nervous and Harlan is not basic.
If Harlan is beautiful or Vicki is not friendly, then Rufus is basic.
Harley being friendly and Arlen being not nervous imply that Harley is not typical.
If there is someone who is both beautiful and informal, then Lauren is not basic.
If someone who is friendly is also informal, then he is typical.
It can be concluded that Harlan is not friendly once knowing that Lauren is informal and Lauren is nervous.
If there is someone who is beautiful, then Lauren is not typical and Lauren is basic.
If someone is friendly, then he is not informal, and vice versa.
If someone is not informal, then he is both not typical and beautiful.
If there is at least one people who is not typical, then Harlan is friendly and Arlen is beautiful.
Rufus being beautiful and Harley being friendly imply that Baird is nervous and Arlen is not basic.
Rufus being not friendly is equivalent to Arlen being not beautiful. | Baird is not beautiful. | neutral |
Baird is not typical.
Harlan is typical.
Harlan is informal.
Arlen is friendly.
Vicki is not nervous.
Harley is informal.
Vicki is not informal.
Rufus is beautiful.
Arlen is beautiful.
Rufus is nervous.
Lauren is typical.
Harley is friendly.Harley is not typical if and only if Harley is not nervous and Harlan is not basic.
If Harlan is beautiful or Vicki is not friendly, then Rufus is basic.
Harley being friendly and Arlen being not nervous imply that Harley is not typical.
If there is someone who is both beautiful and informal, then Lauren is not basic.
If someone who is friendly is also informal, then he is typical.
It can be concluded that Harlan is not friendly once knowing that Lauren is informal and Lauren is nervous.
If there is someone who is beautiful, then Lauren is not typical and Lauren is basic.
If someone is friendly, then he is not informal, and vice versa.
If someone is not informal, then he is both not typical and beautiful.
If there is at least one people who is not typical, then Harlan is friendly and Arlen is beautiful.
Rufus being beautiful and Harley being friendly imply that Baird is nervous and Arlen is not basic.
Rufus being not friendly is equivalent to Arlen being not beautiful. | Vicki is informal. | contradiction |
Baird is not typical.
Harlan is typical.
Harlan is informal.
Arlen is friendly.
Vicki is not nervous.
Harley is informal.
Vicki is not informal.
Rufus is beautiful.
Arlen is beautiful.
Rufus is nervous.
Lauren is typical.
Harley is friendly.Harley is not typical if and only if Harley is not nervous and Harlan is not basic.
If Harlan is beautiful or Vicki is not friendly, then Rufus is basic.
Harley being friendly and Arlen being not nervous imply that Harley is not typical.
If there is someone who is both beautiful and informal, then Lauren is not basic.
If someone who is friendly is also informal, then he is typical.
It can be concluded that Harlan is not friendly once knowing that Lauren is informal and Lauren is nervous.
If there is someone who is beautiful, then Lauren is not typical and Lauren is basic.
If someone is friendly, then he is not informal, and vice versa.
If someone is not informal, then he is both not typical and beautiful.
If there is at least one people who is not typical, then Harlan is friendly and Arlen is beautiful.
Rufus being beautiful and Harley being friendly imply that Baird is nervous and Arlen is not basic.
Rufus being not friendly is equivalent to Arlen being not beautiful. | Vicki is not basic. | neutral |
Baird is not typical.
Harlan is typical.
Harlan is informal.
Arlen is friendly.
Vicki is not nervous.
Harley is informal.
Vicki is not informal.
Rufus is beautiful.
Arlen is beautiful.
Rufus is nervous.
Lauren is typical.
Harley is friendly.Harley is not typical if and only if Harley is not nervous and Harlan is not basic.
If Harlan is beautiful or Vicki is not friendly, then Rufus is basic.
Harley being friendly and Arlen being not nervous imply that Harley is not typical.
If there is someone who is both beautiful and informal, then Lauren is not basic.
If someone who is friendly is also informal, then he is typical.
It can be concluded that Harlan is not friendly once knowing that Lauren is informal and Lauren is nervous.
If there is someone who is beautiful, then Lauren is not typical and Lauren is basic.
If someone is friendly, then he is not informal, and vice versa.
If someone is not informal, then he is both not typical and beautiful.
If there is at least one people who is not typical, then Harlan is friendly and Arlen is beautiful.
Rufus being beautiful and Harley being friendly imply that Baird is nervous and Arlen is not basic.
Rufus being not friendly is equivalent to Arlen being not beautiful. | Lauren is typical. | self_contradiction |
Baird is not typical.
Harlan is typical.
Harlan is informal.
Arlen is friendly.
Vicki is not nervous.
Harley is informal.
Vicki is not informal.
Rufus is beautiful.
Arlen is beautiful.
Rufus is nervous.
Lauren is typical.
Harley is friendly.Harley is not typical if and only if Harley is not nervous and Harlan is not basic.
If Harlan is beautiful or Vicki is not friendly, then Rufus is basic.
Harley being friendly and Arlen being not nervous imply that Harley is not typical.
If there is someone who is both beautiful and informal, then Lauren is not basic.
If someone who is friendly is also informal, then he is typical.
It can be concluded that Harlan is not friendly once knowing that Lauren is informal and Lauren is nervous.
If there is someone who is beautiful, then Lauren is not typical and Lauren is basic.
If someone is friendly, then he is not informal, and vice versa.
If someone is not informal, then he is both not typical and beautiful.
If there is at least one people who is not typical, then Harlan is friendly and Arlen is beautiful.
Rufus being beautiful and Harley being friendly imply that Baird is nervous and Arlen is not basic.
Rufus being not friendly is equivalent to Arlen being not beautiful. | Lauren is informal. | neutral |
Baird is not typical.
Harlan is typical.
Harlan is informal.
Arlen is friendly.
Vicki is not nervous.
Harley is informal.
Vicki is not informal.
Rufus is beautiful.
Arlen is beautiful.
Rufus is nervous.
Lauren is typical.
Harley is friendly.Harley is not typical if and only if Harley is not nervous and Harlan is not basic.
If Harlan is beautiful or Vicki is not friendly, then Rufus is basic.
Harley being friendly and Arlen being not nervous imply that Harley is not typical.
If there is someone who is both beautiful and informal, then Lauren is not basic.
If someone who is friendly is also informal, then he is typical.
It can be concluded that Harlan is not friendly once knowing that Lauren is informal and Lauren is nervous.
If there is someone who is beautiful, then Lauren is not typical and Lauren is basic.
If someone is friendly, then he is not informal, and vice versa.
If someone is not informal, then he is both not typical and beautiful.
If there is at least one people who is not typical, then Harlan is friendly and Arlen is beautiful.
Rufus being beautiful and Harley being friendly imply that Baird is nervous and Arlen is not basic.
Rufus being not friendly is equivalent to Arlen being not beautiful. | Baird is nervous. | entailment |
Baird is not typical.
Harlan is typical.
Harlan is informal.
Arlen is friendly.
Vicki is not nervous.
Harley is informal.
Vicki is not informal.
Rufus is beautiful.
Arlen is beautiful.
Rufus is nervous.
Lauren is typical.
Harley is friendly.Harley is not typical if and only if Harley is not nervous and Harlan is not basic.
If Harlan is beautiful or Vicki is not friendly, then Rufus is basic.
Harley being friendly and Arlen being not nervous imply that Harley is not typical.
If there is someone who is both beautiful and informal, then Lauren is not basic.
If someone who is friendly is also informal, then he is typical.
It can be concluded that Harlan is not friendly once knowing that Lauren is informal and Lauren is nervous.
If there is someone who is beautiful, then Lauren is not typical and Lauren is basic.
If someone is friendly, then he is not informal, and vice versa.
If someone is not informal, then he is both not typical and beautiful.
If there is at least one people who is not typical, then Harlan is friendly and Arlen is beautiful.
Rufus being beautiful and Harley being friendly imply that Baird is nervous and Arlen is not basic.
Rufus being not friendly is equivalent to Arlen being not beautiful. | Baird is not friendly. | neutral |
Baird is not typical.
Harlan is typical.
Harlan is informal.
Arlen is friendly.
Vicki is not nervous.
Harley is informal.
Vicki is not informal.
Rufus is beautiful.
Arlen is beautiful.
Rufus is nervous.
Lauren is typical.
Harley is friendly.Harley is not typical if and only if Harley is not nervous and Harlan is not basic.
If Harlan is beautiful or Vicki is not friendly, then Rufus is basic.
Harley being friendly and Arlen being not nervous imply that Harley is not typical.
If there is someone who is both beautiful and informal, then Lauren is not basic.
If someone who is friendly is also informal, then he is typical.
It can be concluded that Harlan is not friendly once knowing that Lauren is informal and Lauren is nervous.
If there is someone who is beautiful, then Lauren is not typical and Lauren is basic.
If someone is friendly, then he is not informal, and vice versa.
If someone is not informal, then he is both not typical and beautiful.
If there is at least one people who is not typical, then Harlan is friendly and Arlen is beautiful.
Rufus being beautiful and Harley being friendly imply that Baird is nervous and Arlen is not basic.
Rufus being not friendly is equivalent to Arlen being not beautiful. | Arlen is not basic. | entailment |
Baird is not typical.
Harlan is typical.
Harlan is informal.
Arlen is friendly.
Vicki is not nervous.
Harley is informal.
Vicki is not informal.
Rufus is beautiful.
Arlen is beautiful.
Rufus is nervous.
Lauren is typical.
Harley is friendly.Harley is not typical if and only if Harley is not nervous and Harlan is not basic.
If Harlan is beautiful or Vicki is not friendly, then Rufus is basic.
Harley being friendly and Arlen being not nervous imply that Harley is not typical.
If there is someone who is both beautiful and informal, then Lauren is not basic.
If someone who is friendly is also informal, then he is typical.
It can be concluded that Harlan is not friendly once knowing that Lauren is informal and Lauren is nervous.
If there is someone who is beautiful, then Lauren is not typical and Lauren is basic.
If someone is friendly, then he is not informal, and vice versa.
If someone is not informal, then he is both not typical and beautiful.
If there is at least one people who is not typical, then Harlan is friendly and Arlen is beautiful.
Rufus being beautiful and Harley being friendly imply that Baird is nervous and Arlen is not basic.
Rufus being not friendly is equivalent to Arlen being not beautiful. | Arlen is not nervous. | neutral |
Baird is not typical.
Harlan is typical.
Harlan is informal.
Arlen is friendly.
Vicki is not nervous.
Harley is informal.
Vicki is not informal.
Rufus is beautiful.
Arlen is beautiful.
Rufus is nervous.
Lauren is typical.
Harley is friendly.Harley is not typical if and only if Harley is not nervous and Harlan is not basic.
If Harlan is beautiful or Vicki is not friendly, then Rufus is basic.
Harley being friendly and Arlen being not nervous imply that Harley is not typical.
If there is someone who is both beautiful and informal, then Lauren is not basic.
If someone who is friendly is also informal, then he is typical.
It can be concluded that Harlan is not friendly once knowing that Lauren is informal and Lauren is nervous.
If there is someone who is beautiful, then Lauren is not typical and Lauren is basic.
If someone is friendly, then he is not informal, and vice versa.
If someone is not informal, then he is both not typical and beautiful.
If there is at least one people who is not typical, then Harlan is friendly and Arlen is beautiful.
Rufus being beautiful and Harley being friendly imply that Baird is nervous and Arlen is not basic.
Rufus being not friendly is equivalent to Arlen being not beautiful. | Harlan is typical. | self_contradiction |
Baird is not typical.
Harlan is typical.
Harlan is informal.
Arlen is friendly.
Vicki is not nervous.
Harley is informal.
Vicki is not informal.
Rufus is beautiful.
Arlen is beautiful.
Rufus is nervous.
Lauren is typical.
Harley is friendly.Harley is not typical if and only if Harley is not nervous and Harlan is not basic.
If Harlan is beautiful or Vicki is not friendly, then Rufus is basic.
Harley being friendly and Arlen being not nervous imply that Harley is not typical.
If there is someone who is both beautiful and informal, then Lauren is not basic.
If someone who is friendly is also informal, then he is typical.
It can be concluded that Harlan is not friendly once knowing that Lauren is informal and Lauren is nervous.
If there is someone who is beautiful, then Lauren is not typical and Lauren is basic.
If someone is friendly, then he is not informal, and vice versa.
If someone is not informal, then he is both not typical and beautiful.
If there is at least one people who is not typical, then Harlan is friendly and Arlen is beautiful.
Rufus being beautiful and Harley being friendly imply that Baird is nervous and Arlen is not basic.
Rufus being not friendly is equivalent to Arlen being not beautiful. | Harley is typical. | self_contradiction |
Baird is not typical.
Harlan is typical.
Harlan is informal.
Arlen is friendly.
Vicki is not nervous.
Harley is informal.
Vicki is not informal.
Rufus is beautiful.
Arlen is beautiful.
Rufus is nervous.
Lauren is typical.
Harley is friendly.Harley is not typical if and only if Harley is not nervous and Harlan is not basic.
If Harlan is beautiful or Vicki is not friendly, then Rufus is basic.
Harley being friendly and Arlen being not nervous imply that Harley is not typical.
If there is someone who is both beautiful and informal, then Lauren is not basic.
If someone who is friendly is also informal, then he is typical.
It can be concluded that Harlan is not friendly once knowing that Lauren is informal and Lauren is nervous.
If there is someone who is beautiful, then Lauren is not typical and Lauren is basic.
If someone is friendly, then he is not informal, and vice versa.
If someone is not informal, then he is both not typical and beautiful.
If there is at least one people who is not typical, then Harlan is friendly and Arlen is beautiful.
Rufus being beautiful and Harley being friendly imply that Baird is nervous and Arlen is not basic.
Rufus being not friendly is equivalent to Arlen being not beautiful. | Rufus is not basic. | contradiction |
Baird is not typical.
Harlan is typical.
Harlan is informal.
Arlen is friendly.
Vicki is not nervous.
Harley is informal.
Vicki is not informal.
Rufus is beautiful.
Arlen is beautiful.
Rufus is nervous.
Lauren is typical.
Harley is friendly.Harley is not typical if and only if Harley is not nervous and Harlan is not basic.
If Harlan is beautiful or Vicki is not friendly, then Rufus is basic.
Harley being friendly and Arlen being not nervous imply that Harley is not typical.
If there is someone who is both beautiful and informal, then Lauren is not basic.
If someone who is friendly is also informal, then he is typical.
It can be concluded that Harlan is not friendly once knowing that Lauren is informal and Lauren is nervous.
If there is someone who is beautiful, then Lauren is not typical and Lauren is basic.
If someone is friendly, then he is not informal, and vice versa.
If someone is not informal, then he is both not typical and beautiful.
If there is at least one people who is not typical, then Harlan is friendly and Arlen is beautiful.
Rufus being beautiful and Harley being friendly imply that Baird is nervous and Arlen is not basic.
Rufus being not friendly is equivalent to Arlen being not beautiful. | Arlen is friendly. | entailment |
Baird is not typical.
Harlan is typical.
Harlan is informal.
Arlen is friendly.
Vicki is not nervous.
Harley is informal.
Vicki is not informal.
Rufus is beautiful.
Arlen is beautiful.
Rufus is nervous.
Lauren is typical.
Harley is friendly.Harley is not typical if and only if Harley is not nervous and Harlan is not basic.
If Harlan is beautiful or Vicki is not friendly, then Rufus is basic.
Harley being friendly and Arlen being not nervous imply that Harley is not typical.
If there is someone who is both beautiful and informal, then Lauren is not basic.
If someone who is friendly is also informal, then he is typical.
It can be concluded that Harlan is not friendly once knowing that Lauren is informal and Lauren is nervous.
If there is someone who is beautiful, then Lauren is not typical and Lauren is basic.
If someone is friendly, then he is not informal, and vice versa.
If someone is not informal, then he is both not typical and beautiful.
If there is at least one people who is not typical, then Harlan is friendly and Arlen is beautiful.
Rufus being beautiful and Harley being friendly imply that Baird is nervous and Arlen is not basic.
Rufus being not friendly is equivalent to Arlen being not beautiful. | Baird is not typical. | entailment |
Baird is not typical.
Harlan is typical.
Harlan is informal.
Arlen is friendly.
Vicki is not nervous.
Harley is informal.
Vicki is not informal.
Rufus is beautiful.
Arlen is beautiful.
Rufus is nervous.
Lauren is typical.
Harley is friendly.Harley is not typical if and only if Harley is not nervous and Harlan is not basic.
If Harlan is beautiful or Vicki is not friendly, then Rufus is basic.
Harley being friendly and Arlen being not nervous imply that Harley is not typical.
If there is someone who is both beautiful and informal, then Lauren is not basic.
If someone who is friendly is also informal, then he is typical.
It can be concluded that Harlan is not friendly once knowing that Lauren is informal and Lauren is nervous.
If there is someone who is beautiful, then Lauren is not typical and Lauren is basic.
If someone is friendly, then he is not informal, and vice versa.
If someone is not informal, then he is both not typical and beautiful.
If there is at least one people who is not typical, then Harlan is friendly and Arlen is beautiful.
Rufus being beautiful and Harley being friendly imply that Baird is nervous and Arlen is not basic.
Rufus being not friendly is equivalent to Arlen being not beautiful. | Lauren is not basic. | self_contradiction |
Baird is not typical.
Harlan is typical.
Harlan is informal.
Arlen is friendly.
Vicki is not nervous.
Harley is informal.
Vicki is not informal.
Rufus is beautiful.
Arlen is beautiful.
Rufus is nervous.
Lauren is typical.
Harley is friendly.Harley is not typical if and only if Harley is not nervous and Harlan is not basic.
If Harlan is beautiful or Vicki is not friendly, then Rufus is basic.
Harley being friendly and Arlen being not nervous imply that Harley is not typical.
If there is someone who is both beautiful and informal, then Lauren is not basic.
If someone who is friendly is also informal, then he is typical.
It can be concluded that Harlan is not friendly once knowing that Lauren is informal and Lauren is nervous.
If there is someone who is beautiful, then Lauren is not typical and Lauren is basic.
If someone is friendly, then he is not informal, and vice versa.
If someone is not informal, then he is both not typical and beautiful.
If there is at least one people who is not typical, then Harlan is friendly and Arlen is beautiful.
Rufus being beautiful and Harley being friendly imply that Baird is nervous and Arlen is not basic.
Rufus being not friendly is equivalent to Arlen being not beautiful. | Harlan is not friendly. | contradiction |
Clark is available.
Morris is not adorable.
Lane is shallow.
Alvin is not helpful.
Lane is not disobedient.
Alvin is shallow.
Brian is shallow.
Brian is available.
Neville is adorable.
Neville is available.
Harley is not orange.
Morris is not helpful.Brian being orange is equivalent to Clark being helpful.
If there is at least one people who is disobedient or not adorable, then Clark is not helpful.
Someone being not orange is equivalent to being not helpful.
Someone is not orange if and only if he is not disobedient.
If someone is not orange and not helpful, then he is both disobedient and adorable, and vice versa.
If someone is not adorable or he is not shallow, then he is not available.
If someone is not orange or he is adorable, then he is disobedient.
Brian is orange and Harley is not disobedient if and only if Neville is helpful and Neville is available.
If there is at least one people who is orange, then Morris is not adorable and Clark is helpful.
Lane being orange and Clark being not helpful imply that Brian is shallow.
If someone is orange or helpful, then he is not disobedient.
If there is someone who is either orange or disobedient, then Lane is not adorable. | Brian is not helpful. | neutral |
Clark is available.
Morris is not adorable.
Lane is shallow.
Alvin is not helpful.
Lane is not disobedient.
Alvin is shallow.
Brian is shallow.
Brian is available.
Neville is adorable.
Neville is available.
Harley is not orange.
Morris is not helpful.Brian being orange is equivalent to Clark being helpful.
If there is at least one people who is disobedient or not adorable, then Clark is not helpful.
Someone being not orange is equivalent to being not helpful.
Someone is not orange if and only if he is not disobedient.
If someone is not orange and not helpful, then he is both disobedient and adorable, and vice versa.
If someone is not adorable or he is not shallow, then he is not available.
If someone is not orange or he is adorable, then he is disobedient.
Brian is orange and Harley is not disobedient if and only if Neville is helpful and Neville is available.
If there is at least one people who is orange, then Morris is not adorable and Clark is helpful.
Lane being orange and Clark being not helpful imply that Brian is shallow.
If someone is orange or helpful, then he is not disobedient.
If there is someone who is either orange or disobedient, then Lane is not adorable. | Clark is adorable. | entailment |
Clark is available.
Morris is not adorable.
Lane is shallow.
Alvin is not helpful.
Lane is not disobedient.
Alvin is shallow.
Brian is shallow.
Brian is available.
Neville is adorable.
Neville is available.
Harley is not orange.
Morris is not helpful.Brian being orange is equivalent to Clark being helpful.
If there is at least one people who is disobedient or not adorable, then Clark is not helpful.
Someone being not orange is equivalent to being not helpful.
Someone is not orange if and only if he is not disobedient.
If someone is not orange and not helpful, then he is both disobedient and adorable, and vice versa.
If someone is not adorable or he is not shallow, then he is not available.
If someone is not orange or he is adorable, then he is disobedient.
Brian is orange and Harley is not disobedient if and only if Neville is helpful and Neville is available.
If there is at least one people who is orange, then Morris is not adorable and Clark is helpful.
Lane being orange and Clark being not helpful imply that Brian is shallow.
If someone is orange or helpful, then he is not disobedient.
If there is someone who is either orange or disobedient, then Lane is not adorable. | Clark is disobedient. | self_contradiction |
Clark is available.
Morris is not adorable.
Lane is shallow.
Alvin is not helpful.
Lane is not disobedient.
Alvin is shallow.
Brian is shallow.
Brian is available.
Neville is adorable.
Neville is available.
Harley is not orange.
Morris is not helpful.Brian being orange is equivalent to Clark being helpful.
If there is at least one people who is disobedient or not adorable, then Clark is not helpful.
Someone being not orange is equivalent to being not helpful.
Someone is not orange if and only if he is not disobedient.
If someone is not orange and not helpful, then he is both disobedient and adorable, and vice versa.
If someone is not adorable or he is not shallow, then he is not available.
If someone is not orange or he is adorable, then he is disobedient.
Brian is orange and Harley is not disobedient if and only if Neville is helpful and Neville is available.
If there is at least one people who is orange, then Morris is not adorable and Clark is helpful.
Lane being orange and Clark being not helpful imply that Brian is shallow.
If someone is orange or helpful, then he is not disobedient.
If there is someone who is either orange or disobedient, then Lane is not adorable. | Harley is helpful. | contradiction |
Clark is available.
Morris is not adorable.
Lane is shallow.
Alvin is not helpful.
Lane is not disobedient.
Alvin is shallow.
Brian is shallow.
Brian is available.
Neville is adorable.
Neville is available.
Harley is not orange.
Morris is not helpful.Brian being orange is equivalent to Clark being helpful.
If there is at least one people who is disobedient or not adorable, then Clark is not helpful.
Someone being not orange is equivalent to being not helpful.
Someone is not orange if and only if he is not disobedient.
If someone is not orange and not helpful, then he is both disobedient and adorable, and vice versa.
If someone is not adorable or he is not shallow, then he is not available.
If someone is not orange or he is adorable, then he is disobedient.
Brian is orange and Harley is not disobedient if and only if Neville is helpful and Neville is available.
If there is at least one people who is orange, then Morris is not adorable and Clark is helpful.
Lane being orange and Clark being not helpful imply that Brian is shallow.
If someone is orange or helpful, then he is not disobedient.
If there is someone who is either orange or disobedient, then Lane is not adorable. | Clark is not adorable. | contradiction |
Clark is available.
Morris is not adorable.
Lane is shallow.
Alvin is not helpful.
Lane is not disobedient.
Alvin is shallow.
Brian is shallow.
Brian is available.
Neville is adorable.
Neville is available.
Harley is not orange.
Morris is not helpful.Brian being orange is equivalent to Clark being helpful.
If there is at least one people who is disobedient or not adorable, then Clark is not helpful.
Someone being not orange is equivalent to being not helpful.
Someone is not orange if and only if he is not disobedient.
If someone is not orange and not helpful, then he is both disobedient and adorable, and vice versa.
If someone is not adorable or he is not shallow, then he is not available.
If someone is not orange or he is adorable, then he is disobedient.
Brian is orange and Harley is not disobedient if and only if Neville is helpful and Neville is available.
If there is at least one people who is orange, then Morris is not adorable and Clark is helpful.
Lane being orange and Clark being not helpful imply that Brian is shallow.
If someone is orange or helpful, then he is not disobedient.
If there is someone who is either orange or disobedient, then Lane is not adorable. | Harley is shallow. | neutral |
Clark is available.
Morris is not adorable.
Lane is shallow.
Alvin is not helpful.
Lane is not disobedient.
Alvin is shallow.
Brian is shallow.
Brian is available.
Neville is adorable.
Neville is available.
Harley is not orange.
Morris is not helpful.Brian being orange is equivalent to Clark being helpful.
If there is at least one people who is disobedient or not adorable, then Clark is not helpful.
Someone being not orange is equivalent to being not helpful.
Someone is not orange if and only if he is not disobedient.
If someone is not orange and not helpful, then he is both disobedient and adorable, and vice versa.
If someone is not adorable or he is not shallow, then he is not available.
If someone is not orange or he is adorable, then he is disobedient.
Brian is orange and Harley is not disobedient if and only if Neville is helpful and Neville is available.
If there is at least one people who is orange, then Morris is not adorable and Clark is helpful.
Lane being orange and Clark being not helpful imply that Brian is shallow.
If someone is orange or helpful, then he is not disobedient.
If there is someone who is either orange or disobedient, then Lane is not adorable. | Morris is adorable. | self_contradiction |
Clark is available.
Morris is not adorable.
Lane is shallow.
Alvin is not helpful.
Lane is not disobedient.
Alvin is shallow.
Brian is shallow.
Brian is available.
Neville is adorable.
Neville is available.
Harley is not orange.
Morris is not helpful.Brian being orange is equivalent to Clark being helpful.
If there is at least one people who is disobedient or not adorable, then Clark is not helpful.
Someone being not orange is equivalent to being not helpful.
Someone is not orange if and only if he is not disobedient.
If someone is not orange and not helpful, then he is both disobedient and adorable, and vice versa.
If someone is not adorable or he is not shallow, then he is not available.
If someone is not orange or he is adorable, then he is disobedient.
Brian is orange and Harley is not disobedient if and only if Neville is helpful and Neville is available.
If there is at least one people who is orange, then Morris is not adorable and Clark is helpful.
Lane being orange and Clark being not helpful imply that Brian is shallow.
If someone is orange or helpful, then he is not disobedient.
If there is someone who is either orange or disobedient, then Lane is not adorable. | Neville is shallow. | neutral |
Clark is available.
Morris is not adorable.
Lane is shallow.
Alvin is not helpful.
Lane is not disobedient.
Alvin is shallow.
Brian is shallow.
Brian is available.
Neville is adorable.
Neville is available.
Harley is not orange.
Morris is not helpful.Brian being orange is equivalent to Clark being helpful.
If there is at least one people who is disobedient or not adorable, then Clark is not helpful.
Someone being not orange is equivalent to being not helpful.
Someone is not orange if and only if he is not disobedient.
If someone is not orange and not helpful, then he is both disobedient and adorable, and vice versa.
If someone is not adorable or he is not shallow, then he is not available.
If someone is not orange or he is adorable, then he is disobedient.
Brian is orange and Harley is not disobedient if and only if Neville is helpful and Neville is available.
If there is at least one people who is orange, then Morris is not adorable and Clark is helpful.
Lane being orange and Clark being not helpful imply that Brian is shallow.
If someone is orange or helpful, then he is not disobedient.
If there is someone who is either orange or disobedient, then Lane is not adorable. | Morris is not available. | entailment |
Clark is available.
Morris is not adorable.
Lane is shallow.
Alvin is not helpful.
Lane is not disobedient.
Alvin is shallow.
Brian is shallow.
Brian is available.
Neville is adorable.
Neville is available.
Harley is not orange.
Morris is not helpful.Brian being orange is equivalent to Clark being helpful.
If there is at least one people who is disobedient or not adorable, then Clark is not helpful.
Someone being not orange is equivalent to being not helpful.
Someone is not orange if and only if he is not disobedient.
If someone is not orange and not helpful, then he is both disobedient and adorable, and vice versa.
If someone is not adorable or he is not shallow, then he is not available.
If someone is not orange or he is adorable, then he is disobedient.
Brian is orange and Harley is not disobedient if and only if Neville is helpful and Neville is available.
If there is at least one people who is orange, then Morris is not adorable and Clark is helpful.
Lane being orange and Clark being not helpful imply that Brian is shallow.
If someone is orange or helpful, then he is not disobedient.
If there is someone who is either orange or disobedient, then Lane is not adorable. | Clark is not orange. | entailment |
Clark is available.
Morris is not adorable.
Lane is shallow.
Alvin is not helpful.
Lane is not disobedient.
Alvin is shallow.
Brian is shallow.
Brian is available.
Neville is adorable.
Neville is available.
Harley is not orange.
Morris is not helpful.Brian being orange is equivalent to Clark being helpful.
If there is at least one people who is disobedient or not adorable, then Clark is not helpful.
Someone being not orange is equivalent to being not helpful.
Someone is not orange if and only if he is not disobedient.
If someone is not orange and not helpful, then he is both disobedient and adorable, and vice versa.
If someone is not adorable or he is not shallow, then he is not available.
If someone is not orange or he is adorable, then he is disobedient.
Brian is orange and Harley is not disobedient if and only if Neville is helpful and Neville is available.
If there is at least one people who is orange, then Morris is not adorable and Clark is helpful.
Lane being orange and Clark being not helpful imply that Brian is shallow.
If someone is orange or helpful, then he is not disobedient.
If there is someone who is either orange or disobedient, then Lane is not adorable. | Clark is shallow. | neutral |
Clark is available.
Morris is not adorable.
Lane is shallow.
Alvin is not helpful.
Lane is not disobedient.
Alvin is shallow.
Brian is shallow.
Brian is available.
Neville is adorable.
Neville is available.
Harley is not orange.
Morris is not helpful.Brian being orange is equivalent to Clark being helpful.
If there is at least one people who is disobedient or not adorable, then Clark is not helpful.
Someone being not orange is equivalent to being not helpful.
Someone is not orange if and only if he is not disobedient.
If someone is not orange and not helpful, then he is both disobedient and adorable, and vice versa.
If someone is not adorable or he is not shallow, then he is not available.
If someone is not orange or he is adorable, then he is disobedient.
Brian is orange and Harley is not disobedient if and only if Neville is helpful and Neville is available.
If there is at least one people who is orange, then Morris is not adorable and Clark is helpful.
Lane being orange and Clark being not helpful imply that Brian is shallow.
If someone is orange or helpful, then he is not disobedient.
If there is someone who is either orange or disobedient, then Lane is not adorable. | Neville is not disobedient. | self_contradiction |
Clark is available.
Morris is not adorable.
Lane is shallow.
Alvin is not helpful.
Lane is not disobedient.
Alvin is shallow.
Brian is shallow.
Brian is available.
Neville is adorable.
Neville is available.
Harley is not orange.
Morris is not helpful.Brian being orange is equivalent to Clark being helpful.
If there is at least one people who is disobedient or not adorable, then Clark is not helpful.
Someone being not orange is equivalent to being not helpful.
Someone is not orange if and only if he is not disobedient.
If someone is not orange and not helpful, then he is both disobedient and adorable, and vice versa.
If someone is not adorable or he is not shallow, then he is not available.
If someone is not orange or he is adorable, then he is disobedient.
Brian is orange and Harley is not disobedient if and only if Neville is helpful and Neville is available.
If there is at least one people who is orange, then Morris is not adorable and Clark is helpful.
Lane being orange and Clark being not helpful imply that Brian is shallow.
If someone is orange or helpful, then he is not disobedient.
If there is someone who is either orange or disobedient, then Lane is not adorable. | Brian is not available. | contradiction |
Clark is available.
Morris is not adorable.
Lane is shallow.
Alvin is not helpful.
Lane is not disobedient.
Alvin is shallow.
Brian is shallow.
Brian is available.
Neville is adorable.
Neville is available.
Harley is not orange.
Morris is not helpful.Brian being orange is equivalent to Clark being helpful.
If there is at least one people who is disobedient or not adorable, then Clark is not helpful.
Someone being not orange is equivalent to being not helpful.
Someone is not orange if and only if he is not disobedient.
If someone is not orange and not helpful, then he is both disobedient and adorable, and vice versa.
If someone is not adorable or he is not shallow, then he is not available.
If someone is not orange or he is adorable, then he is disobedient.
Brian is orange and Harley is not disobedient if and only if Neville is helpful and Neville is available.
If there is at least one people who is orange, then Morris is not adorable and Clark is helpful.
Lane being orange and Clark being not helpful imply that Brian is shallow.
If someone is orange or helpful, then he is not disobedient.
If there is someone who is either orange or disobedient, then Lane is not adorable. | Alvin is disobedient. | self_contradiction |
Clark is available.
Morris is not adorable.
Lane is shallow.
Alvin is not helpful.
Lane is not disobedient.
Alvin is shallow.
Brian is shallow.
Brian is available.
Neville is adorable.
Neville is available.
Harley is not orange.
Morris is not helpful.Brian being orange is equivalent to Clark being helpful.
If there is at least one people who is disobedient or not adorable, then Clark is not helpful.
Someone being not orange is equivalent to being not helpful.
Someone is not orange if and only if he is not disobedient.
If someone is not orange and not helpful, then he is both disobedient and adorable, and vice versa.
If someone is not adorable or he is not shallow, then he is not available.
If someone is not orange or he is adorable, then he is disobedient.
Brian is orange and Harley is not disobedient if and only if Neville is helpful and Neville is available.
If there is at least one people who is orange, then Morris is not adorable and Clark is helpful.
Lane being orange and Clark being not helpful imply that Brian is shallow.
If someone is orange or helpful, then he is not disobedient.
If there is someone who is either orange or disobedient, then Lane is not adorable. | Harley is not available. | neutral |
Clark is available.
Morris is not adorable.
Lane is shallow.
Alvin is not helpful.
Lane is not disobedient.
Alvin is shallow.
Brian is shallow.
Brian is available.
Neville is adorable.
Neville is available.
Harley is not orange.
Morris is not helpful.Brian being orange is equivalent to Clark being helpful.
If there is at least one people who is disobedient or not adorable, then Clark is not helpful.
Someone being not orange is equivalent to being not helpful.
Someone is not orange if and only if he is not disobedient.
If someone is not orange and not helpful, then he is both disobedient and adorable, and vice versa.
If someone is not adorable or he is not shallow, then he is not available.
If someone is not orange or he is adorable, then he is disobedient.
Brian is orange and Harley is not disobedient if and only if Neville is helpful and Neville is available.
If there is at least one people who is orange, then Morris is not adorable and Clark is helpful.
Lane being orange and Clark being not helpful imply that Brian is shallow.
If someone is orange or helpful, then he is not disobedient.
If there is someone who is either orange or disobedient, then Lane is not adorable. | Clark is not helpful. | entailment |
Clark is available.
Morris is not adorable.
Lane is shallow.
Alvin is not helpful.
Lane is not disobedient.
Alvin is shallow.
Brian is shallow.
Brian is available.
Neville is adorable.
Neville is available.
Harley is not orange.
Morris is not helpful.Brian being orange is equivalent to Clark being helpful.
If there is at least one people who is disobedient or not adorable, then Clark is not helpful.
Someone being not orange is equivalent to being not helpful.
Someone is not orange if and only if he is not disobedient.
If someone is not orange and not helpful, then he is both disobedient and adorable, and vice versa.
If someone is not adorable or he is not shallow, then he is not available.
If someone is not orange or he is adorable, then he is disobedient.
Brian is orange and Harley is not disobedient if and only if Neville is helpful and Neville is available.
If there is at least one people who is orange, then Morris is not adorable and Clark is helpful.
Lane being orange and Clark being not helpful imply that Brian is shallow.
If someone is orange or helpful, then he is not disobedient.
If there is someone who is either orange or disobedient, then Lane is not adorable. | Neville is not helpful. | entailment |
Clark is available.
Morris is not adorable.
Lane is shallow.
Alvin is not helpful.
Lane is not disobedient.
Alvin is shallow.
Brian is shallow.
Brian is available.
Neville is adorable.
Neville is available.
Harley is not orange.
Morris is not helpful.Brian being orange is equivalent to Clark being helpful.
If there is at least one people who is disobedient or not adorable, then Clark is not helpful.
Someone being not orange is equivalent to being not helpful.
Someone is not orange if and only if he is not disobedient.
If someone is not orange and not helpful, then he is both disobedient and adorable, and vice versa.
If someone is not adorable or he is not shallow, then he is not available.
If someone is not orange or he is adorable, then he is disobedient.
Brian is orange and Harley is not disobedient if and only if Neville is helpful and Neville is available.
If there is at least one people who is orange, then Morris is not adorable and Clark is helpful.
Lane being orange and Clark being not helpful imply that Brian is shallow.
If someone is orange or helpful, then he is not disobedient.
If there is someone who is either orange or disobedient, then Lane is not adorable. | Lane is helpful. | contradiction |
Clark is available.
Morris is not adorable.
Lane is shallow.
Alvin is not helpful.
Lane is not disobedient.
Alvin is shallow.
Brian is shallow.
Brian is available.
Neville is adorable.
Neville is available.
Harley is not orange.
Morris is not helpful.Brian being orange is equivalent to Clark being helpful.
If there is at least one people who is disobedient or not adorable, then Clark is not helpful.
Someone being not orange is equivalent to being not helpful.
Someone is not orange if and only if he is not disobedient.
If someone is not orange and not helpful, then he is both disobedient and adorable, and vice versa.
If someone is not adorable or he is not shallow, then he is not available.
If someone is not orange or he is adorable, then he is disobedient.
Brian is orange and Harley is not disobedient if and only if Neville is helpful and Neville is available.
If there is at least one people who is orange, then Morris is not adorable and Clark is helpful.
Lane being orange and Clark being not helpful imply that Brian is shallow.
If someone is orange or helpful, then he is not disobedient.
If there is someone who is either orange or disobedient, then Lane is not adorable. | Lane is adorable. | self_contradiction |
Clark is available.
Morris is not adorable.
Lane is shallow.
Alvin is not helpful.
Lane is not disobedient.
Alvin is shallow.
Brian is shallow.
Brian is available.
Neville is adorable.
Neville is available.
Harley is not orange.
Morris is not helpful.Brian being orange is equivalent to Clark being helpful.
If there is at least one people who is disobedient or not adorable, then Clark is not helpful.
Someone being not orange is equivalent to being not helpful.
Someone is not orange if and only if he is not disobedient.
If someone is not orange and not helpful, then he is both disobedient and adorable, and vice versa.
If someone is not adorable or he is not shallow, then he is not available.
If someone is not orange or he is adorable, then he is disobedient.
Brian is orange and Harley is not disobedient if and only if Neville is helpful and Neville is available.
If there is at least one people who is orange, then Morris is not adorable and Clark is helpful.
Lane being orange and Clark being not helpful imply that Brian is shallow.
If someone is orange or helpful, then he is not disobedient.
If there is someone who is either orange or disobedient, then Lane is not adorable. | Brian is not shallow. | contradiction |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.