premise
stringlengths 923
1.41k
| hypothesis
stringlengths 11
33
| label
stringclasses 4
values |
|---|---|---|
Isaac is critical.
Jimmy is remarkable.
Roy is critical.
Isabel is shy.
Jimmy is not whispering.
Guy is critical.
Stefan is not whispering.
Jimmy is not shy.
Jimmy is not critical.
Guy is popular.
Roy is popular.
Isaac is remarkable.It can be concluded that Jimmy is not critical once knowing that Stefan is remarkable.
It can be concluded that Isaac is not popular once knowing that Odessa is not critical.
If there is at least one people who is not popular, then Odessa is remarkable.
If there is at least one people who is both not popular and not shy, then Odessa is not adventurous.
If someone is not whispering or he is not remarkable, then he is not shy.
As long as someone is not whispering and adventurous, he is popular and not remarkable.
Someone who is whispering is always not popular.
Someone who is not remarkable is always both not shy and popular.
Someone is not critical and not whispering if and only if he is remarkable.
If Isabel is not popular or Guy is remarkable, then Odessa is shy.
As long as someone is not critical, he is not adventurous and not whispering.
Someone being critical is equivalent to being not popular. | Guy is not popular. | self_contradiction |
Isaac is critical.
Jimmy is remarkable.
Roy is critical.
Isabel is shy.
Jimmy is not whispering.
Guy is critical.
Stefan is not whispering.
Jimmy is not shy.
Jimmy is not critical.
Guy is popular.
Roy is popular.
Isaac is remarkable.It can be concluded that Jimmy is not critical once knowing that Stefan is remarkable.
It can be concluded that Isaac is not popular once knowing that Odessa is not critical.
If there is at least one people who is not popular, then Odessa is remarkable.
If there is at least one people who is both not popular and not shy, then Odessa is not adventurous.
If someone is not whispering or he is not remarkable, then he is not shy.
As long as someone is not whispering and adventurous, he is popular and not remarkable.
Someone who is whispering is always not popular.
Someone who is not remarkable is always both not shy and popular.
Someone is not critical and not whispering if and only if he is remarkable.
If Isabel is not popular or Guy is remarkable, then Odessa is shy.
As long as someone is not critical, he is not adventurous and not whispering.
Someone being critical is equivalent to being not popular. | Isaac is popular. | contradiction |
Isaac is critical.
Jimmy is remarkable.
Roy is critical.
Isabel is shy.
Jimmy is not whispering.
Guy is critical.
Stefan is not whispering.
Jimmy is not shy.
Jimmy is not critical.
Guy is popular.
Roy is popular.
Isaac is remarkable.It can be concluded that Jimmy is not critical once knowing that Stefan is remarkable.
It can be concluded that Isaac is not popular once knowing that Odessa is not critical.
If there is at least one people who is not popular, then Odessa is remarkable.
If there is at least one people who is both not popular and not shy, then Odessa is not adventurous.
If someone is not whispering or he is not remarkable, then he is not shy.
As long as someone is not whispering and adventurous, he is popular and not remarkable.
Someone who is whispering is always not popular.
Someone who is not remarkable is always both not shy and popular.
Someone is not critical and not whispering if and only if he is remarkable.
If Isabel is not popular or Guy is remarkable, then Odessa is shy.
As long as someone is not critical, he is not adventurous and not whispering.
Someone being critical is equivalent to being not popular. | Roy is critical. | entailment |
Isaac is critical.
Jimmy is remarkable.
Roy is critical.
Isabel is shy.
Jimmy is not whispering.
Guy is critical.
Stefan is not whispering.
Jimmy is not shy.
Jimmy is not critical.
Guy is popular.
Roy is popular.
Isaac is remarkable.It can be concluded that Jimmy is not critical once knowing that Stefan is remarkable.
It can be concluded that Isaac is not popular once knowing that Odessa is not critical.
If there is at least one people who is not popular, then Odessa is remarkable.
If there is at least one people who is both not popular and not shy, then Odessa is not adventurous.
If someone is not whispering or he is not remarkable, then he is not shy.
As long as someone is not whispering and adventurous, he is popular and not remarkable.
Someone who is whispering is always not popular.
Someone who is not remarkable is always both not shy and popular.
Someone is not critical and not whispering if and only if he is remarkable.
If Isabel is not popular or Guy is remarkable, then Odessa is shy.
As long as someone is not critical, he is not adventurous and not whispering.
Someone being critical is equivalent to being not popular. | Guy is adventurous. | neutral |
Isaac is critical.
Jimmy is remarkable.
Roy is critical.
Isabel is shy.
Jimmy is not whispering.
Guy is critical.
Stefan is not whispering.
Jimmy is not shy.
Jimmy is not critical.
Guy is popular.
Roy is popular.
Isaac is remarkable.It can be concluded that Jimmy is not critical once knowing that Stefan is remarkable.
It can be concluded that Isaac is not popular once knowing that Odessa is not critical.
If there is at least one people who is not popular, then Odessa is remarkable.
If there is at least one people who is both not popular and not shy, then Odessa is not adventurous.
If someone is not whispering or he is not remarkable, then he is not shy.
As long as someone is not whispering and adventurous, he is popular and not remarkable.
Someone who is whispering is always not popular.
Someone who is not remarkable is always both not shy and popular.
Someone is not critical and not whispering if and only if he is remarkable.
If Isabel is not popular or Guy is remarkable, then Odessa is shy.
As long as someone is not critical, he is not adventurous and not whispering.
Someone being critical is equivalent to being not popular. | Jimmy is remarkable. | entailment |
Isaac is critical.
Jimmy is remarkable.
Roy is critical.
Isabel is shy.
Jimmy is not whispering.
Guy is critical.
Stefan is not whispering.
Jimmy is not shy.
Jimmy is not critical.
Guy is popular.
Roy is popular.
Isaac is remarkable.It can be concluded that Jimmy is not critical once knowing that Stefan is remarkable.
It can be concluded that Isaac is not popular once knowing that Odessa is not critical.
If there is at least one people who is not popular, then Odessa is remarkable.
If there is at least one people who is both not popular and not shy, then Odessa is not adventurous.
If someone is not whispering or he is not remarkable, then he is not shy.
As long as someone is not whispering and adventurous, he is popular and not remarkable.
Someone who is whispering is always not popular.
Someone who is not remarkable is always both not shy and popular.
Someone is not critical and not whispering if and only if he is remarkable.
If Isabel is not popular or Guy is remarkable, then Odessa is shy.
As long as someone is not critical, he is not adventurous and not whispering.
Someone being critical is equivalent to being not popular. | Roy is not popular. | self_contradiction |
Isaac is critical.
Jimmy is remarkable.
Roy is critical.
Isabel is shy.
Jimmy is not whispering.
Guy is critical.
Stefan is not whispering.
Jimmy is not shy.
Jimmy is not critical.
Guy is popular.
Roy is popular.
Isaac is remarkable.It can be concluded that Jimmy is not critical once knowing that Stefan is remarkable.
It can be concluded that Isaac is not popular once knowing that Odessa is not critical.
If there is at least one people who is not popular, then Odessa is remarkable.
If there is at least one people who is both not popular and not shy, then Odessa is not adventurous.
If someone is not whispering or he is not remarkable, then he is not shy.
As long as someone is not whispering and adventurous, he is popular and not remarkable.
Someone who is whispering is always not popular.
Someone who is not remarkable is always both not shy and popular.
Someone is not critical and not whispering if and only if he is remarkable.
If Isabel is not popular or Guy is remarkable, then Odessa is shy.
As long as someone is not critical, he is not adventurous and not whispering.
Someone being critical is equivalent to being not popular. | Stefan is not remarkable. | neutral |
Isaac is critical.
Jimmy is remarkable.
Roy is critical.
Isabel is shy.
Jimmy is not whispering.
Guy is critical.
Stefan is not whispering.
Jimmy is not shy.
Jimmy is not critical.
Guy is popular.
Roy is popular.
Isaac is remarkable.It can be concluded that Jimmy is not critical once knowing that Stefan is remarkable.
It can be concluded that Isaac is not popular once knowing that Odessa is not critical.
If there is at least one people who is not popular, then Odessa is remarkable.
If there is at least one people who is both not popular and not shy, then Odessa is not adventurous.
If someone is not whispering or he is not remarkable, then he is not shy.
As long as someone is not whispering and adventurous, he is popular and not remarkable.
Someone who is whispering is always not popular.
Someone who is not remarkable is always both not shy and popular.
Someone is not critical and not whispering if and only if he is remarkable.
If Isabel is not popular or Guy is remarkable, then Odessa is shy.
As long as someone is not critical, he is not adventurous and not whispering.
Someone being critical is equivalent to being not popular. | Odessa is not shy. | entailment |
Isaac is critical.
Jimmy is remarkable.
Roy is critical.
Isabel is shy.
Jimmy is not whispering.
Guy is critical.
Stefan is not whispering.
Jimmy is not shy.
Jimmy is not critical.
Guy is popular.
Roy is popular.
Isaac is remarkable.It can be concluded that Jimmy is not critical once knowing that Stefan is remarkable.
It can be concluded that Isaac is not popular once knowing that Odessa is not critical.
If there is at least one people who is not popular, then Odessa is remarkable.
If there is at least one people who is both not popular and not shy, then Odessa is not adventurous.
If someone is not whispering or he is not remarkable, then he is not shy.
As long as someone is not whispering and adventurous, he is popular and not remarkable.
Someone who is whispering is always not popular.
Someone who is not remarkable is always both not shy and popular.
Someone is not critical and not whispering if and only if he is remarkable.
If Isabel is not popular or Guy is remarkable, then Odessa is shy.
As long as someone is not critical, he is not adventurous and not whispering.
Someone being critical is equivalent to being not popular. | Guy is critical. | entailment |
Isaac is critical.
Jimmy is remarkable.
Roy is critical.
Isabel is shy.
Jimmy is not whispering.
Guy is critical.
Stefan is not whispering.
Jimmy is not shy.
Jimmy is not critical.
Guy is popular.
Roy is popular.
Isaac is remarkable.It can be concluded that Jimmy is not critical once knowing that Stefan is remarkable.
It can be concluded that Isaac is not popular once knowing that Odessa is not critical.
If there is at least one people who is not popular, then Odessa is remarkable.
If there is at least one people who is both not popular and not shy, then Odessa is not adventurous.
If someone is not whispering or he is not remarkable, then he is not shy.
As long as someone is not whispering and adventurous, he is popular and not remarkable.
Someone who is whispering is always not popular.
Someone who is not remarkable is always both not shy and popular.
Someone is not critical and not whispering if and only if he is remarkable.
If Isabel is not popular or Guy is remarkable, then Odessa is shy.
As long as someone is not critical, he is not adventurous and not whispering.
Someone being critical is equivalent to being not popular. | Stefan is shy. | contradiction |
Isaac is critical.
Jimmy is remarkable.
Roy is critical.
Isabel is shy.
Jimmy is not whispering.
Guy is critical.
Stefan is not whispering.
Jimmy is not shy.
Jimmy is not critical.
Guy is popular.
Roy is popular.
Isaac is remarkable.It can be concluded that Jimmy is not critical once knowing that Stefan is remarkable.
It can be concluded that Isaac is not popular once knowing that Odessa is not critical.
If there is at least one people who is not popular, then Odessa is remarkable.
If there is at least one people who is both not popular and not shy, then Odessa is not adventurous.
If someone is not whispering or he is not remarkable, then he is not shy.
As long as someone is not whispering and adventurous, he is popular and not remarkable.
Someone who is whispering is always not popular.
Someone who is not remarkable is always both not shy and popular.
Someone is not critical and not whispering if and only if he is remarkable.
If Isabel is not popular or Guy is remarkable, then Odessa is shy.
As long as someone is not critical, he is not adventurous and not whispering.
Someone being critical is equivalent to being not popular. | Isaac is not critical. | self_contradiction |
Isaac is critical.
Jimmy is remarkable.
Roy is critical.
Isabel is shy.
Jimmy is not whispering.
Guy is critical.
Stefan is not whispering.
Jimmy is not shy.
Jimmy is not critical.
Guy is popular.
Roy is popular.
Isaac is remarkable.It can be concluded that Jimmy is not critical once knowing that Stefan is remarkable.
It can be concluded that Isaac is not popular once knowing that Odessa is not critical.
If there is at least one people who is not popular, then Odessa is remarkable.
If there is at least one people who is both not popular and not shy, then Odessa is not adventurous.
If someone is not whispering or he is not remarkable, then he is not shy.
As long as someone is not whispering and adventurous, he is popular and not remarkable.
Someone who is whispering is always not popular.
Someone who is not remarkable is always both not shy and popular.
Someone is not critical and not whispering if and only if he is remarkable.
If Isabel is not popular or Guy is remarkable, then Odessa is shy.
As long as someone is not critical, he is not adventurous and not whispering.
Someone being critical is equivalent to being not popular. | Odessa is remarkable. | entailment |
Isaac is critical.
Jimmy is remarkable.
Roy is critical.
Isabel is shy.
Jimmy is not whispering.
Guy is critical.
Stefan is not whispering.
Jimmy is not shy.
Jimmy is not critical.
Guy is popular.
Roy is popular.
Isaac is remarkable.It can be concluded that Jimmy is not critical once knowing that Stefan is remarkable.
It can be concluded that Isaac is not popular once knowing that Odessa is not critical.
If there is at least one people who is not popular, then Odessa is remarkable.
If there is at least one people who is both not popular and not shy, then Odessa is not adventurous.
If someone is not whispering or he is not remarkable, then he is not shy.
As long as someone is not whispering and adventurous, he is popular and not remarkable.
Someone who is whispering is always not popular.
Someone who is not remarkable is always both not shy and popular.
Someone is not critical and not whispering if and only if he is remarkable.
If Isabel is not popular or Guy is remarkable, then Odessa is shy.
As long as someone is not critical, he is not adventurous and not whispering.
Someone being critical is equivalent to being not popular. | Stefan is whispering. | contradiction |
Isaac is critical.
Jimmy is remarkable.
Roy is critical.
Isabel is shy.
Jimmy is not whispering.
Guy is critical.
Stefan is not whispering.
Jimmy is not shy.
Jimmy is not critical.
Guy is popular.
Roy is popular.
Isaac is remarkable.It can be concluded that Jimmy is not critical once knowing that Stefan is remarkable.
It can be concluded that Isaac is not popular once knowing that Odessa is not critical.
If there is at least one people who is not popular, then Odessa is remarkable.
If there is at least one people who is both not popular and not shy, then Odessa is not adventurous.
If someone is not whispering or he is not remarkable, then he is not shy.
As long as someone is not whispering and adventurous, he is popular and not remarkable.
Someone who is whispering is always not popular.
Someone who is not remarkable is always both not shy and popular.
Someone is not critical and not whispering if and only if he is remarkable.
If Isabel is not popular or Guy is remarkable, then Odessa is shy.
As long as someone is not critical, he is not adventurous and not whispering.
Someone being critical is equivalent to being not popular. | Guy is remarkable. | neutral |
Isaac is critical.
Jimmy is remarkable.
Roy is critical.
Isabel is shy.
Jimmy is not whispering.
Guy is critical.
Stefan is not whispering.
Jimmy is not shy.
Jimmy is not critical.
Guy is popular.
Roy is popular.
Isaac is remarkable.It can be concluded that Jimmy is not critical once knowing that Stefan is remarkable.
It can be concluded that Isaac is not popular once knowing that Odessa is not critical.
If there is at least one people who is not popular, then Odessa is remarkable.
If there is at least one people who is both not popular and not shy, then Odessa is not adventurous.
If someone is not whispering or he is not remarkable, then he is not shy.
As long as someone is not whispering and adventurous, he is popular and not remarkable.
Someone who is whispering is always not popular.
Someone who is not remarkable is always both not shy and popular.
Someone is not critical and not whispering if and only if he is remarkable.
If Isabel is not popular or Guy is remarkable, then Odessa is shy.
As long as someone is not critical, he is not adventurous and not whispering.
Someone being critical is equivalent to being not popular. | Odessa is adventurous. | contradiction |
Isaac is critical.
Jimmy is remarkable.
Roy is critical.
Isabel is shy.
Jimmy is not whispering.
Guy is critical.
Stefan is not whispering.
Jimmy is not shy.
Jimmy is not critical.
Guy is popular.
Roy is popular.
Isaac is remarkable.It can be concluded that Jimmy is not critical once knowing that Stefan is remarkable.
It can be concluded that Isaac is not popular once knowing that Odessa is not critical.
If there is at least one people who is not popular, then Odessa is remarkable.
If there is at least one people who is both not popular and not shy, then Odessa is not adventurous.
If someone is not whispering or he is not remarkable, then he is not shy.
As long as someone is not whispering and adventurous, he is popular and not remarkable.
Someone who is whispering is always not popular.
Someone who is not remarkable is always both not shy and popular.
Someone is not critical and not whispering if and only if he is remarkable.
If Isabel is not popular or Guy is remarkable, then Odessa is shy.
As long as someone is not critical, he is not adventurous and not whispering.
Someone being critical is equivalent to being not popular. | Guy is popular. | self_contradiction |
Isaac is critical.
Jimmy is remarkable.
Roy is critical.
Isabel is shy.
Jimmy is not whispering.
Guy is critical.
Stefan is not whispering.
Jimmy is not shy.
Jimmy is not critical.
Guy is popular.
Roy is popular.
Isaac is remarkable.It can be concluded that Jimmy is not critical once knowing that Stefan is remarkable.
It can be concluded that Isaac is not popular once knowing that Odessa is not critical.
If there is at least one people who is not popular, then Odessa is remarkable.
If there is at least one people who is both not popular and not shy, then Odessa is not adventurous.
If someone is not whispering or he is not remarkable, then he is not shy.
As long as someone is not whispering and adventurous, he is popular and not remarkable.
Someone who is whispering is always not popular.
Someone who is not remarkable is always both not shy and popular.
Someone is not critical and not whispering if and only if he is remarkable.
If Isabel is not popular or Guy is remarkable, then Odessa is shy.
As long as someone is not critical, he is not adventurous and not whispering.
Someone being critical is equivalent to being not popular. | Roy is popular. | self_contradiction |
Isaac is critical.
Jimmy is remarkable.
Roy is critical.
Isabel is shy.
Jimmy is not whispering.
Guy is critical.
Stefan is not whispering.
Jimmy is not shy.
Jimmy is not critical.
Guy is popular.
Roy is popular.
Isaac is remarkable.It can be concluded that Jimmy is not critical once knowing that Stefan is remarkable.
It can be concluded that Isaac is not popular once knowing that Odessa is not critical.
If there is at least one people who is not popular, then Odessa is remarkable.
If there is at least one people who is both not popular and not shy, then Odessa is not adventurous.
If someone is not whispering or he is not remarkable, then he is not shy.
As long as someone is not whispering and adventurous, he is popular and not remarkable.
Someone who is whispering is always not popular.
Someone who is not remarkable is always both not shy and popular.
Someone is not critical and not whispering if and only if he is remarkable.
If Isabel is not popular or Guy is remarkable, then Odessa is shy.
As long as someone is not critical, he is not adventurous and not whispering.
Someone being critical is equivalent to being not popular. | Isabel is popular. | neutral |
Isaac is critical.
Jimmy is remarkable.
Roy is critical.
Isabel is shy.
Jimmy is not whispering.
Guy is critical.
Stefan is not whispering.
Jimmy is not shy.
Jimmy is not critical.
Guy is popular.
Roy is popular.
Isaac is remarkable.It can be concluded that Jimmy is not critical once knowing that Stefan is remarkable.
It can be concluded that Isaac is not popular once knowing that Odessa is not critical.
If there is at least one people who is not popular, then Odessa is remarkable.
If there is at least one people who is both not popular and not shy, then Odessa is not adventurous.
If someone is not whispering or he is not remarkable, then he is not shy.
As long as someone is not whispering and adventurous, he is popular and not remarkable.
Someone who is whispering is always not popular.
Someone who is not remarkable is always both not shy and popular.
Someone is not critical and not whispering if and only if he is remarkable.
If Isabel is not popular or Guy is remarkable, then Odessa is shy.
As long as someone is not critical, he is not adventurous and not whispering.
Someone being critical is equivalent to being not popular. | Roy is whispering. | neutral |
Isaac is critical.
Jimmy is remarkable.
Roy is critical.
Isabel is shy.
Jimmy is not whispering.
Guy is critical.
Stefan is not whispering.
Jimmy is not shy.
Jimmy is not critical.
Guy is popular.
Roy is popular.
Isaac is remarkable.It can be concluded that Jimmy is not critical once knowing that Stefan is remarkable.
It can be concluded that Isaac is not popular once knowing that Odessa is not critical.
If there is at least one people who is not popular, then Odessa is remarkable.
If there is at least one people who is both not popular and not shy, then Odessa is not adventurous.
If someone is not whispering or he is not remarkable, then he is not shy.
As long as someone is not whispering and adventurous, he is popular and not remarkable.
Someone who is whispering is always not popular.
Someone who is not remarkable is always both not shy and popular.
Someone is not critical and not whispering if and only if he is remarkable.
If Isabel is not popular or Guy is remarkable, then Odessa is shy.
As long as someone is not critical, he is not adventurous and not whispering.
Someone being critical is equivalent to being not popular. | Odessa is shy. | contradiction |
Kelvin is not few.
Roswell is not fine.
Clifford is not few.
Clifford is not medical.
Raymond is fine.
Hardy is not small.
Roswell is not small.
Hardy is exuberant.
Hardy is not fine.
Raymond is not concerned.
Hardy is not medical.
Scott is not medical.Kelvin being fine implies that Scott is exuberant.
If Scott is not small, then Clifford is concerned and Kelvin is fine, and vice versa.
If someone is not exuberant and not few, then he is not small, and vice versa.
Hardy being not exuberant implies that Roswell is concerned and Roswell is not medical.
Someone is not few and not concerned if and only if he is not exuberant.
If there is someone who is not concerned, then Raymond is few and Kelvin is exuberant.
Scott being not concerned and Roswell being fine imply that Lucille is not few and Roswell is small.
If there is at least one people who is not few or not exuberant, then Scott is concerned.
Someone being both fine and not small is equivalent to being not exuberant.
If there is nobody who is not not few, then Hardy is not fine and Clifford is not concerned.
If there is at least one people who is both not fine and small, then Raymond is not few.
All few people are not exuberant. | Lucille is medical. | neutral |
Kelvin is not few.
Roswell is not fine.
Clifford is not few.
Clifford is not medical.
Raymond is fine.
Hardy is not small.
Roswell is not small.
Hardy is exuberant.
Hardy is not fine.
Raymond is not concerned.
Hardy is not medical.
Scott is not medical.Kelvin being fine implies that Scott is exuberant.
If Scott is not small, then Clifford is concerned and Kelvin is fine, and vice versa.
If someone is not exuberant and not few, then he is not small, and vice versa.
Hardy being not exuberant implies that Roswell is concerned and Roswell is not medical.
Someone is not few and not concerned if and only if he is not exuberant.
If there is someone who is not concerned, then Raymond is few and Kelvin is exuberant.
Scott being not concerned and Roswell being fine imply that Lucille is not few and Roswell is small.
If there is at least one people who is not few or not exuberant, then Scott is concerned.
Someone being both fine and not small is equivalent to being not exuberant.
If there is nobody who is not not few, then Hardy is not fine and Clifford is not concerned.
If there is at least one people who is both not fine and small, then Raymond is not few.
All few people are not exuberant. | Roswell is small. | contradiction |
Kelvin is not few.
Roswell is not fine.
Clifford is not few.
Clifford is not medical.
Raymond is fine.
Hardy is not small.
Roswell is not small.
Hardy is exuberant.
Hardy is not fine.
Raymond is not concerned.
Hardy is not medical.
Scott is not medical.Kelvin being fine implies that Scott is exuberant.
If Scott is not small, then Clifford is concerned and Kelvin is fine, and vice versa.
If someone is not exuberant and not few, then he is not small, and vice versa.
Hardy being not exuberant implies that Roswell is concerned and Roswell is not medical.
Someone is not few and not concerned if and only if he is not exuberant.
If there is someone who is not concerned, then Raymond is few and Kelvin is exuberant.
Scott being not concerned and Roswell being fine imply that Lucille is not few and Roswell is small.
If there is at least one people who is not few or not exuberant, then Scott is concerned.
Someone being both fine and not small is equivalent to being not exuberant.
If there is nobody who is not not few, then Hardy is not fine and Clifford is not concerned.
If there is at least one people who is both not fine and small, then Raymond is not few.
All few people are not exuberant. | Clifford is concerned. | neutral |
Kelvin is not few.
Roswell is not fine.
Clifford is not few.
Clifford is not medical.
Raymond is fine.
Hardy is not small.
Roswell is not small.
Hardy is exuberant.
Hardy is not fine.
Raymond is not concerned.
Hardy is not medical.
Scott is not medical.Kelvin being fine implies that Scott is exuberant.
If Scott is not small, then Clifford is concerned and Kelvin is fine, and vice versa.
If someone is not exuberant and not few, then he is not small, and vice versa.
Hardy being not exuberant implies that Roswell is concerned and Roswell is not medical.
Someone is not few and not concerned if and only if he is not exuberant.
If there is someone who is not concerned, then Raymond is few and Kelvin is exuberant.
Scott being not concerned and Roswell being fine imply that Lucille is not few and Roswell is small.
If there is at least one people who is not few or not exuberant, then Scott is concerned.
Someone being both fine and not small is equivalent to being not exuberant.
If there is nobody who is not not few, then Hardy is not fine and Clifford is not concerned.
If there is at least one people who is both not fine and small, then Raymond is not few.
All few people are not exuberant. | Kelvin is few. | contradiction |
Kelvin is not few.
Roswell is not fine.
Clifford is not few.
Clifford is not medical.
Raymond is fine.
Hardy is not small.
Roswell is not small.
Hardy is exuberant.
Hardy is not fine.
Raymond is not concerned.
Hardy is not medical.
Scott is not medical.Kelvin being fine implies that Scott is exuberant.
If Scott is not small, then Clifford is concerned and Kelvin is fine, and vice versa.
If someone is not exuberant and not few, then he is not small, and vice versa.
Hardy being not exuberant implies that Roswell is concerned and Roswell is not medical.
Someone is not few and not concerned if and only if he is not exuberant.
If there is someone who is not concerned, then Raymond is few and Kelvin is exuberant.
Scott being not concerned and Roswell being fine imply that Lucille is not few and Roswell is small.
If there is at least one people who is not few or not exuberant, then Scott is concerned.
Someone being both fine and not small is equivalent to being not exuberant.
If there is nobody who is not not few, then Hardy is not fine and Clifford is not concerned.
If there is at least one people who is both not fine and small, then Raymond is not few.
All few people are not exuberant. | Raymond is concerned. | contradiction |
Kelvin is not few.
Roswell is not fine.
Clifford is not few.
Clifford is not medical.
Raymond is fine.
Hardy is not small.
Roswell is not small.
Hardy is exuberant.
Hardy is not fine.
Raymond is not concerned.
Hardy is not medical.
Scott is not medical.Kelvin being fine implies that Scott is exuberant.
If Scott is not small, then Clifford is concerned and Kelvin is fine, and vice versa.
If someone is not exuberant and not few, then he is not small, and vice versa.
Hardy being not exuberant implies that Roswell is concerned and Roswell is not medical.
Someone is not few and not concerned if and only if he is not exuberant.
If there is someone who is not concerned, then Raymond is few and Kelvin is exuberant.
Scott being not concerned and Roswell being fine imply that Lucille is not few and Roswell is small.
If there is at least one people who is not few or not exuberant, then Scott is concerned.
Someone being both fine and not small is equivalent to being not exuberant.
If there is nobody who is not not few, then Hardy is not fine and Clifford is not concerned.
If there is at least one people who is both not fine and small, then Raymond is not few.
All few people are not exuberant. | Hardy is exuberant. | self_contradiction |
Kelvin is not few.
Roswell is not fine.
Clifford is not few.
Clifford is not medical.
Raymond is fine.
Hardy is not small.
Roswell is not small.
Hardy is exuberant.
Hardy is not fine.
Raymond is not concerned.
Hardy is not medical.
Scott is not medical.Kelvin being fine implies that Scott is exuberant.
If Scott is not small, then Clifford is concerned and Kelvin is fine, and vice versa.
If someone is not exuberant and not few, then he is not small, and vice versa.
Hardy being not exuberant implies that Roswell is concerned and Roswell is not medical.
Someone is not few and not concerned if and only if he is not exuberant.
If there is someone who is not concerned, then Raymond is few and Kelvin is exuberant.
Scott being not concerned and Roswell being fine imply that Lucille is not few and Roswell is small.
If there is at least one people who is not few or not exuberant, then Scott is concerned.
Someone being both fine and not small is equivalent to being not exuberant.
If there is nobody who is not not few, then Hardy is not fine and Clifford is not concerned.
If there is at least one people who is both not fine and small, then Raymond is not few.
All few people are not exuberant. | Roswell is exuberant. | contradiction |
Kelvin is not few.
Roswell is not fine.
Clifford is not few.
Clifford is not medical.
Raymond is fine.
Hardy is not small.
Roswell is not small.
Hardy is exuberant.
Hardy is not fine.
Raymond is not concerned.
Hardy is not medical.
Scott is not medical.Kelvin being fine implies that Scott is exuberant.
If Scott is not small, then Clifford is concerned and Kelvin is fine, and vice versa.
If someone is not exuberant and not few, then he is not small, and vice versa.
Hardy being not exuberant implies that Roswell is concerned and Roswell is not medical.
Someone is not few and not concerned if and only if he is not exuberant.
If there is someone who is not concerned, then Raymond is few and Kelvin is exuberant.
Scott being not concerned and Roswell being fine imply that Lucille is not few and Roswell is small.
If there is at least one people who is not few or not exuberant, then Scott is concerned.
Someone being both fine and not small is equivalent to being not exuberant.
If there is nobody who is not not few, then Hardy is not fine and Clifford is not concerned.
If there is at least one people who is both not fine and small, then Raymond is not few.
All few people are not exuberant. | Roswell is concerned. | self_contradiction |
Kelvin is not few.
Roswell is not fine.
Clifford is not few.
Clifford is not medical.
Raymond is fine.
Hardy is not small.
Roswell is not small.
Hardy is exuberant.
Hardy is not fine.
Raymond is not concerned.
Hardy is not medical.
Scott is not medical.Kelvin being fine implies that Scott is exuberant.
If Scott is not small, then Clifford is concerned and Kelvin is fine, and vice versa.
If someone is not exuberant and not few, then he is not small, and vice versa.
Hardy being not exuberant implies that Roswell is concerned and Roswell is not medical.
Someone is not few and not concerned if and only if he is not exuberant.
If there is someone who is not concerned, then Raymond is few and Kelvin is exuberant.
Scott being not concerned and Roswell being fine imply that Lucille is not few and Roswell is small.
If there is at least one people who is not few or not exuberant, then Scott is concerned.
Someone being both fine and not small is equivalent to being not exuberant.
If there is nobody who is not not few, then Hardy is not fine and Clifford is not concerned.
If there is at least one people who is both not fine and small, then Raymond is not few.
All few people are not exuberant. | Kelvin is exuberant. | entailment |
Kelvin is not few.
Roswell is not fine.
Clifford is not few.
Clifford is not medical.
Raymond is fine.
Hardy is not small.
Roswell is not small.
Hardy is exuberant.
Hardy is not fine.
Raymond is not concerned.
Hardy is not medical.
Scott is not medical.Kelvin being fine implies that Scott is exuberant.
If Scott is not small, then Clifford is concerned and Kelvin is fine, and vice versa.
If someone is not exuberant and not few, then he is not small, and vice versa.
Hardy being not exuberant implies that Roswell is concerned and Roswell is not medical.
Someone is not few and not concerned if and only if he is not exuberant.
If there is someone who is not concerned, then Raymond is few and Kelvin is exuberant.
Scott being not concerned and Roswell being fine imply that Lucille is not few and Roswell is small.
If there is at least one people who is not few or not exuberant, then Scott is concerned.
Someone being both fine and not small is equivalent to being not exuberant.
If there is nobody who is not not few, then Hardy is not fine and Clifford is not concerned.
If there is at least one people who is both not fine and small, then Raymond is not few.
All few people are not exuberant. | Lucille is not concerned. | neutral |
Kelvin is not few.
Roswell is not fine.
Clifford is not few.
Clifford is not medical.
Raymond is fine.
Hardy is not small.
Roswell is not small.
Hardy is exuberant.
Hardy is not fine.
Raymond is not concerned.
Hardy is not medical.
Scott is not medical.Kelvin being fine implies that Scott is exuberant.
If Scott is not small, then Clifford is concerned and Kelvin is fine, and vice versa.
If someone is not exuberant and not few, then he is not small, and vice versa.
Hardy being not exuberant implies that Roswell is concerned and Roswell is not medical.
Someone is not few and not concerned if and only if he is not exuberant.
If there is someone who is not concerned, then Raymond is few and Kelvin is exuberant.
Scott being not concerned and Roswell being fine imply that Lucille is not few and Roswell is small.
If there is at least one people who is not few or not exuberant, then Scott is concerned.
Someone being both fine and not small is equivalent to being not exuberant.
If there is nobody who is not not few, then Hardy is not fine and Clifford is not concerned.
If there is at least one people who is both not fine and small, then Raymond is not few.
All few people are not exuberant. | Hardy is not medical. | entailment |
Kelvin is not few.
Roswell is not fine.
Clifford is not few.
Clifford is not medical.
Raymond is fine.
Hardy is not small.
Roswell is not small.
Hardy is exuberant.
Hardy is not fine.
Raymond is not concerned.
Hardy is not medical.
Scott is not medical.Kelvin being fine implies that Scott is exuberant.
If Scott is not small, then Clifford is concerned and Kelvin is fine, and vice versa.
If someone is not exuberant and not few, then he is not small, and vice versa.
Hardy being not exuberant implies that Roswell is concerned and Roswell is not medical.
Someone is not few and not concerned if and only if he is not exuberant.
If there is someone who is not concerned, then Raymond is few and Kelvin is exuberant.
Scott being not concerned and Roswell being fine imply that Lucille is not few and Roswell is small.
If there is at least one people who is not few or not exuberant, then Scott is concerned.
Someone being both fine and not small is equivalent to being not exuberant.
If there is nobody who is not not few, then Hardy is not fine and Clifford is not concerned.
If there is at least one people who is both not fine and small, then Raymond is not few.
All few people are not exuberant. | Hardy is fine. | self_contradiction |
Kelvin is not few.
Roswell is not fine.
Clifford is not few.
Clifford is not medical.
Raymond is fine.
Hardy is not small.
Roswell is not small.
Hardy is exuberant.
Hardy is not fine.
Raymond is not concerned.
Hardy is not medical.
Scott is not medical.Kelvin being fine implies that Scott is exuberant.
If Scott is not small, then Clifford is concerned and Kelvin is fine, and vice versa.
If someone is not exuberant and not few, then he is not small, and vice versa.
Hardy being not exuberant implies that Roswell is concerned and Roswell is not medical.
Someone is not few and not concerned if and only if he is not exuberant.
If there is someone who is not concerned, then Raymond is few and Kelvin is exuberant.
Scott being not concerned and Roswell being fine imply that Lucille is not few and Roswell is small.
If there is at least one people who is not few or not exuberant, then Scott is concerned.
Someone being both fine and not small is equivalent to being not exuberant.
If there is nobody who is not not few, then Hardy is not fine and Clifford is not concerned.
If there is at least one people who is both not fine and small, then Raymond is not few.
All few people are not exuberant. | Raymond is few. | self_contradiction |
Kelvin is not few.
Roswell is not fine.
Clifford is not few.
Clifford is not medical.
Raymond is fine.
Hardy is not small.
Roswell is not small.
Hardy is exuberant.
Hardy is not fine.
Raymond is not concerned.
Hardy is not medical.
Scott is not medical.Kelvin being fine implies that Scott is exuberant.
If Scott is not small, then Clifford is concerned and Kelvin is fine, and vice versa.
If someone is not exuberant and not few, then he is not small, and vice versa.
Hardy being not exuberant implies that Roswell is concerned and Roswell is not medical.
Someone is not few and not concerned if and only if he is not exuberant.
If there is someone who is not concerned, then Raymond is few and Kelvin is exuberant.
Scott being not concerned and Roswell being fine imply that Lucille is not few and Roswell is small.
If there is at least one people who is not few or not exuberant, then Scott is concerned.
Someone being both fine and not small is equivalent to being not exuberant.
If there is nobody who is not not few, then Hardy is not fine and Clifford is not concerned.
If there is at least one people who is both not fine and small, then Raymond is not few.
All few people are not exuberant. | Lucille is small. | neutral |
Kelvin is not few.
Roswell is not fine.
Clifford is not few.
Clifford is not medical.
Raymond is fine.
Hardy is not small.
Roswell is not small.
Hardy is exuberant.
Hardy is not fine.
Raymond is not concerned.
Hardy is not medical.
Scott is not medical.Kelvin being fine implies that Scott is exuberant.
If Scott is not small, then Clifford is concerned and Kelvin is fine, and vice versa.
If someone is not exuberant and not few, then he is not small, and vice versa.
Hardy being not exuberant implies that Roswell is concerned and Roswell is not medical.
Someone is not few and not concerned if and only if he is not exuberant.
If there is someone who is not concerned, then Raymond is few and Kelvin is exuberant.
Scott being not concerned and Roswell being fine imply that Lucille is not few and Roswell is small.
If there is at least one people who is not few or not exuberant, then Scott is concerned.
Someone being both fine and not small is equivalent to being not exuberant.
If there is nobody who is not not few, then Hardy is not fine and Clifford is not concerned.
If there is at least one people who is both not fine and small, then Raymond is not few.
All few people are not exuberant. | Hardy is not few. | entailment |
Kelvin is not few.
Roswell is not fine.
Clifford is not few.
Clifford is not medical.
Raymond is fine.
Hardy is not small.
Roswell is not small.
Hardy is exuberant.
Hardy is not fine.
Raymond is not concerned.
Hardy is not medical.
Scott is not medical.Kelvin being fine implies that Scott is exuberant.
If Scott is not small, then Clifford is concerned and Kelvin is fine, and vice versa.
If someone is not exuberant and not few, then he is not small, and vice versa.
Hardy being not exuberant implies that Roswell is concerned and Roswell is not medical.
Someone is not few and not concerned if and only if he is not exuberant.
If there is someone who is not concerned, then Raymond is few and Kelvin is exuberant.
Scott being not concerned and Roswell being fine imply that Lucille is not few and Roswell is small.
If there is at least one people who is not few or not exuberant, then Scott is concerned.
Someone being both fine and not small is equivalent to being not exuberant.
If there is nobody who is not not few, then Hardy is not fine and Clifford is not concerned.
If there is at least one people who is both not fine and small, then Raymond is not few.
All few people are not exuberant. | Raymond is not concerned. | entailment |
Kelvin is not few.
Roswell is not fine.
Clifford is not few.
Clifford is not medical.
Raymond is fine.
Hardy is not small.
Roswell is not small.
Hardy is exuberant.
Hardy is not fine.
Raymond is not concerned.
Hardy is not medical.
Scott is not medical.Kelvin being fine implies that Scott is exuberant.
If Scott is not small, then Clifford is concerned and Kelvin is fine, and vice versa.
If someone is not exuberant and not few, then he is not small, and vice versa.
Hardy being not exuberant implies that Roswell is concerned and Roswell is not medical.
Someone is not few and not concerned if and only if he is not exuberant.
If there is someone who is not concerned, then Raymond is few and Kelvin is exuberant.
Scott being not concerned and Roswell being fine imply that Lucille is not few and Roswell is small.
If there is at least one people who is not few or not exuberant, then Scott is concerned.
Someone being both fine and not small is equivalent to being not exuberant.
If there is nobody who is not not few, then Hardy is not fine and Clifford is not concerned.
If there is at least one people who is both not fine and small, then Raymond is not few.
All few people are not exuberant. | Roswell is not concerned. | self_contradiction |
Kelvin is not few.
Roswell is not fine.
Clifford is not few.
Clifford is not medical.
Raymond is fine.
Hardy is not small.
Roswell is not small.
Hardy is exuberant.
Hardy is not fine.
Raymond is not concerned.
Hardy is not medical.
Scott is not medical.Kelvin being fine implies that Scott is exuberant.
If Scott is not small, then Clifford is concerned and Kelvin is fine, and vice versa.
If someone is not exuberant and not few, then he is not small, and vice versa.
Hardy being not exuberant implies that Roswell is concerned and Roswell is not medical.
Someone is not few and not concerned if and only if he is not exuberant.
If there is someone who is not concerned, then Raymond is few and Kelvin is exuberant.
Scott being not concerned and Roswell being fine imply that Lucille is not few and Roswell is small.
If there is at least one people who is not few or not exuberant, then Scott is concerned.
Someone being both fine and not small is equivalent to being not exuberant.
If there is nobody who is not not few, then Hardy is not fine and Clifford is not concerned.
If there is at least one people who is both not fine and small, then Raymond is not few.
All few people are not exuberant. | Scott is concerned. | entailment |
Kelvin is not few.
Roswell is not fine.
Clifford is not few.
Clifford is not medical.
Raymond is fine.
Hardy is not small.
Roswell is not small.
Hardy is exuberant.
Hardy is not fine.
Raymond is not concerned.
Hardy is not medical.
Scott is not medical.Kelvin being fine implies that Scott is exuberant.
If Scott is not small, then Clifford is concerned and Kelvin is fine, and vice versa.
If someone is not exuberant and not few, then he is not small, and vice versa.
Hardy being not exuberant implies that Roswell is concerned and Roswell is not medical.
Someone is not few and not concerned if and only if he is not exuberant.
If there is someone who is not concerned, then Raymond is few and Kelvin is exuberant.
Scott being not concerned and Roswell being fine imply that Lucille is not few and Roswell is small.
If there is at least one people who is not few or not exuberant, then Scott is concerned.
Someone being both fine and not small is equivalent to being not exuberant.
If there is nobody who is not not few, then Hardy is not fine and Clifford is not concerned.
If there is at least one people who is both not fine and small, then Raymond is not few.
All few people are not exuberant. | Raymond is exuberant. | contradiction |
Kelvin is not few.
Roswell is not fine.
Clifford is not few.
Clifford is not medical.
Raymond is fine.
Hardy is not small.
Roswell is not small.
Hardy is exuberant.
Hardy is not fine.
Raymond is not concerned.
Hardy is not medical.
Scott is not medical.Kelvin being fine implies that Scott is exuberant.
If Scott is not small, then Clifford is concerned and Kelvin is fine, and vice versa.
If someone is not exuberant and not few, then he is not small, and vice versa.
Hardy being not exuberant implies that Roswell is concerned and Roswell is not medical.
Someone is not few and not concerned if and only if he is not exuberant.
If there is someone who is not concerned, then Raymond is few and Kelvin is exuberant.
Scott being not concerned and Roswell being fine imply that Lucille is not few and Roswell is small.
If there is at least one people who is not few or not exuberant, then Scott is concerned.
Someone being both fine and not small is equivalent to being not exuberant.
If there is nobody who is not not few, then Hardy is not fine and Clifford is not concerned.
If there is at least one people who is both not fine and small, then Raymond is not few.
All few people are not exuberant. | Scott is few. | neutral |
Adrian is not informal.
Scott is not friendly.
Chandler is not dangerous.
Adrian is not dangerous.
Hunter is not dangerous.
Leonard is not lively.
Hunter is lively.
Hunter is not sad.
Leonard is not friendly.
Chalmers is not dangerous.
Adrian is not friendly.
Chandler is not informal.if there is at least one people who is informal and not dangerous, then Chalmers is sad and Chalmers is not friendly.
Someone being both not handsome and informal is equivalent to being not sad and lively.
Someone being both sad and not handsome is equivalent to being dangerous.
Leonard is friendly if and only if Scott is not lively.
Someone who is both not informal and lively is always not handsome.
It can be concluded that Leonard is handsome and Adrian is sad once knowing that Scott is informal.
If there is at least one people who is not lively or friendly, then Scott is not dangerous.
If there is someone who is both not sad and not informal, then Scott is not friendly.
Someone who is not dangerous is always both sad and not handsome.
If there is someone who is handsome, then Scott is not dangerous and Brian is not lively.
If there is someone who is either friendly or dangerous, then Leonard is not sad.
If all people are not sad, then Adrian is informal and Adrian is lively. | Hunter is sad. | self_contradiction |
Adrian is not informal.
Scott is not friendly.
Chandler is not dangerous.
Adrian is not dangerous.
Hunter is not dangerous.
Leonard is not lively.
Hunter is lively.
Hunter is not sad.
Leonard is not friendly.
Chalmers is not dangerous.
Adrian is not friendly.
Chandler is not informal.if there is at least one people who is informal and not dangerous, then Chalmers is sad and Chalmers is not friendly.
Someone being both not handsome and informal is equivalent to being not sad and lively.
Someone being both sad and not handsome is equivalent to being dangerous.
Leonard is friendly if and only if Scott is not lively.
Someone who is both not informal and lively is always not handsome.
It can be concluded that Leonard is handsome and Adrian is sad once knowing that Scott is informal.
If there is at least one people who is not lively or friendly, then Scott is not dangerous.
If there is someone who is both not sad and not informal, then Scott is not friendly.
Someone who is not dangerous is always both sad and not handsome.
If there is someone who is handsome, then Scott is not dangerous and Brian is not lively.
If there is someone who is either friendly or dangerous, then Leonard is not sad.
If all people are not sad, then Adrian is informal and Adrian is lively. | Leonard is not handsome. | neutral |
Adrian is not informal.
Scott is not friendly.
Chandler is not dangerous.
Adrian is not dangerous.
Hunter is not dangerous.
Leonard is not lively.
Hunter is lively.
Hunter is not sad.
Leonard is not friendly.
Chalmers is not dangerous.
Adrian is not friendly.
Chandler is not informal.if there is at least one people who is informal and not dangerous, then Chalmers is sad and Chalmers is not friendly.
Someone being both not handsome and informal is equivalent to being not sad and lively.
Someone being both sad and not handsome is equivalent to being dangerous.
Leonard is friendly if and only if Scott is not lively.
Someone who is both not informal and lively is always not handsome.
It can be concluded that Leonard is handsome and Adrian is sad once knowing that Scott is informal.
If there is at least one people who is not lively or friendly, then Scott is not dangerous.
If there is someone who is both not sad and not informal, then Scott is not friendly.
Someone who is not dangerous is always both sad and not handsome.
If there is someone who is handsome, then Scott is not dangerous and Brian is not lively.
If there is someone who is either friendly or dangerous, then Leonard is not sad.
If all people are not sad, then Adrian is informal and Adrian is lively. | Chandler is dangerous. | self_contradiction |
Adrian is not informal.
Scott is not friendly.
Chandler is not dangerous.
Adrian is not dangerous.
Hunter is not dangerous.
Leonard is not lively.
Hunter is lively.
Hunter is not sad.
Leonard is not friendly.
Chalmers is not dangerous.
Adrian is not friendly.
Chandler is not informal.if there is at least one people who is informal and not dangerous, then Chalmers is sad and Chalmers is not friendly.
Someone being both not handsome and informal is equivalent to being not sad and lively.
Someone being both sad and not handsome is equivalent to being dangerous.
Leonard is friendly if and only if Scott is not lively.
Someone who is both not informal and lively is always not handsome.
It can be concluded that Leonard is handsome and Adrian is sad once knowing that Scott is informal.
If there is at least one people who is not lively or friendly, then Scott is not dangerous.
If there is someone who is both not sad and not informal, then Scott is not friendly.
Someone who is not dangerous is always both sad and not handsome.
If there is someone who is handsome, then Scott is not dangerous and Brian is not lively.
If there is someone who is either friendly or dangerous, then Leonard is not sad.
If all people are not sad, then Adrian is informal and Adrian is lively. | Adrian is friendly. | contradiction |
Adrian is not informal.
Scott is not friendly.
Chandler is not dangerous.
Adrian is not dangerous.
Hunter is not dangerous.
Leonard is not lively.
Hunter is lively.
Hunter is not sad.
Leonard is not friendly.
Chalmers is not dangerous.
Adrian is not friendly.
Chandler is not informal.if there is at least one people who is informal and not dangerous, then Chalmers is sad and Chalmers is not friendly.
Someone being both not handsome and informal is equivalent to being not sad and lively.
Someone being both sad and not handsome is equivalent to being dangerous.
Leonard is friendly if and only if Scott is not lively.
Someone who is both not informal and lively is always not handsome.
It can be concluded that Leonard is handsome and Adrian is sad once knowing that Scott is informal.
If there is at least one people who is not lively or friendly, then Scott is not dangerous.
If there is someone who is both not sad and not informal, then Scott is not friendly.
Someone who is not dangerous is always both sad and not handsome.
If there is someone who is handsome, then Scott is not dangerous and Brian is not lively.
If there is someone who is either friendly or dangerous, then Leonard is not sad.
If all people are not sad, then Adrian is informal and Adrian is lively. | Adrian is lively. | neutral |
Adrian is not informal.
Scott is not friendly.
Chandler is not dangerous.
Adrian is not dangerous.
Hunter is not dangerous.
Leonard is not lively.
Hunter is lively.
Hunter is not sad.
Leonard is not friendly.
Chalmers is not dangerous.
Adrian is not friendly.
Chandler is not informal.if there is at least one people who is informal and not dangerous, then Chalmers is sad and Chalmers is not friendly.
Someone being both not handsome and informal is equivalent to being not sad and lively.
Someone being both sad and not handsome is equivalent to being dangerous.
Leonard is friendly if and only if Scott is not lively.
Someone who is both not informal and lively is always not handsome.
It can be concluded that Leonard is handsome and Adrian is sad once knowing that Scott is informal.
If there is at least one people who is not lively or friendly, then Scott is not dangerous.
If there is someone who is both not sad and not informal, then Scott is not friendly.
Someone who is not dangerous is always both sad and not handsome.
If there is someone who is handsome, then Scott is not dangerous and Brian is not lively.
If there is someone who is either friendly or dangerous, then Leonard is not sad.
If all people are not sad, then Adrian is informal and Adrian is lively. | Adrian is informal. | contradiction |
Adrian is not informal.
Scott is not friendly.
Chandler is not dangerous.
Adrian is not dangerous.
Hunter is not dangerous.
Leonard is not lively.
Hunter is lively.
Hunter is not sad.
Leonard is not friendly.
Chalmers is not dangerous.
Adrian is not friendly.
Chandler is not informal.if there is at least one people who is informal and not dangerous, then Chalmers is sad and Chalmers is not friendly.
Someone being both not handsome and informal is equivalent to being not sad and lively.
Someone being both sad and not handsome is equivalent to being dangerous.
Leonard is friendly if and only if Scott is not lively.
Someone who is both not informal and lively is always not handsome.
It can be concluded that Leonard is handsome and Adrian is sad once knowing that Scott is informal.
If there is at least one people who is not lively or friendly, then Scott is not dangerous.
If there is someone who is both not sad and not informal, then Scott is not friendly.
Someone who is not dangerous is always both sad and not handsome.
If there is someone who is handsome, then Scott is not dangerous and Brian is not lively.
If there is someone who is either friendly or dangerous, then Leonard is not sad.
If all people are not sad, then Adrian is informal and Adrian is lively. | Adrian is dangerous. | self_contradiction |
Adrian is not informal.
Scott is not friendly.
Chandler is not dangerous.
Adrian is not dangerous.
Hunter is not dangerous.
Leonard is not lively.
Hunter is lively.
Hunter is not sad.
Leonard is not friendly.
Chalmers is not dangerous.
Adrian is not friendly.
Chandler is not informal.if there is at least one people who is informal and not dangerous, then Chalmers is sad and Chalmers is not friendly.
Someone being both not handsome and informal is equivalent to being not sad and lively.
Someone being both sad and not handsome is equivalent to being dangerous.
Leonard is friendly if and only if Scott is not lively.
Someone who is both not informal and lively is always not handsome.
It can be concluded that Leonard is handsome and Adrian is sad once knowing that Scott is informal.
If there is at least one people who is not lively or friendly, then Scott is not dangerous.
If there is someone who is both not sad and not informal, then Scott is not friendly.
Someone who is not dangerous is always both sad and not handsome.
If there is someone who is handsome, then Scott is not dangerous and Brian is not lively.
If there is someone who is either friendly or dangerous, then Leonard is not sad.
If all people are not sad, then Adrian is informal and Adrian is lively. | Brian is lively. | neutral |
Adrian is not informal.
Scott is not friendly.
Chandler is not dangerous.
Adrian is not dangerous.
Hunter is not dangerous.
Leonard is not lively.
Hunter is lively.
Hunter is not sad.
Leonard is not friendly.
Chalmers is not dangerous.
Adrian is not friendly.
Chandler is not informal.if there is at least one people who is informal and not dangerous, then Chalmers is sad and Chalmers is not friendly.
Someone being both not handsome and informal is equivalent to being not sad and lively.
Someone being both sad and not handsome is equivalent to being dangerous.
Leonard is friendly if and only if Scott is not lively.
Someone who is both not informal and lively is always not handsome.
It can be concluded that Leonard is handsome and Adrian is sad once knowing that Scott is informal.
If there is at least one people who is not lively or friendly, then Scott is not dangerous.
If there is someone who is both not sad and not informal, then Scott is not friendly.
Someone who is not dangerous is always both sad and not handsome.
If there is someone who is handsome, then Scott is not dangerous and Brian is not lively.
If there is someone who is either friendly or dangerous, then Leonard is not sad.
If all people are not sad, then Adrian is informal and Adrian is lively. | Chandler is friendly. | neutral |
Adrian is not informal.
Scott is not friendly.
Chandler is not dangerous.
Adrian is not dangerous.
Hunter is not dangerous.
Leonard is not lively.
Hunter is lively.
Hunter is not sad.
Leonard is not friendly.
Chalmers is not dangerous.
Adrian is not friendly.
Chandler is not informal.if there is at least one people who is informal and not dangerous, then Chalmers is sad and Chalmers is not friendly.
Someone being both not handsome and informal is equivalent to being not sad and lively.
Someone being both sad and not handsome is equivalent to being dangerous.
Leonard is friendly if and only if Scott is not lively.
Someone who is both not informal and lively is always not handsome.
It can be concluded that Leonard is handsome and Adrian is sad once knowing that Scott is informal.
If there is at least one people who is not lively or friendly, then Scott is not dangerous.
If there is someone who is both not sad and not informal, then Scott is not friendly.
Someone who is not dangerous is always both sad and not handsome.
If there is someone who is handsome, then Scott is not dangerous and Brian is not lively.
If there is someone who is either friendly or dangerous, then Leonard is not sad.
If all people are not sad, then Adrian is informal and Adrian is lively. | Leonard is not friendly. | entailment |
Adrian is not informal.
Scott is not friendly.
Chandler is not dangerous.
Adrian is not dangerous.
Hunter is not dangerous.
Leonard is not lively.
Hunter is lively.
Hunter is not sad.
Leonard is not friendly.
Chalmers is not dangerous.
Adrian is not friendly.
Chandler is not informal.if there is at least one people who is informal and not dangerous, then Chalmers is sad and Chalmers is not friendly.
Someone being both not handsome and informal is equivalent to being not sad and lively.
Someone being both sad and not handsome is equivalent to being dangerous.
Leonard is friendly if and only if Scott is not lively.
Someone who is both not informal and lively is always not handsome.
It can be concluded that Leonard is handsome and Adrian is sad once knowing that Scott is informal.
If there is at least one people who is not lively or friendly, then Scott is not dangerous.
If there is someone who is both not sad and not informal, then Scott is not friendly.
Someone who is not dangerous is always both sad and not handsome.
If there is someone who is handsome, then Scott is not dangerous and Brian is not lively.
If there is someone who is either friendly or dangerous, then Leonard is not sad.
If all people are not sad, then Adrian is informal and Adrian is lively. | Hunter is not sad. | self_contradiction |
Adrian is not informal.
Scott is not friendly.
Chandler is not dangerous.
Adrian is not dangerous.
Hunter is not dangerous.
Leonard is not lively.
Hunter is lively.
Hunter is not sad.
Leonard is not friendly.
Chalmers is not dangerous.
Adrian is not friendly.
Chandler is not informal.if there is at least one people who is informal and not dangerous, then Chalmers is sad and Chalmers is not friendly.
Someone being both not handsome and informal is equivalent to being not sad and lively.
Someone being both sad and not handsome is equivalent to being dangerous.
Leonard is friendly if and only if Scott is not lively.
Someone who is both not informal and lively is always not handsome.
It can be concluded that Leonard is handsome and Adrian is sad once knowing that Scott is informal.
If there is at least one people who is not lively or friendly, then Scott is not dangerous.
If there is someone who is both not sad and not informal, then Scott is not friendly.
Someone who is not dangerous is always both sad and not handsome.
If there is someone who is handsome, then Scott is not dangerous and Brian is not lively.
If there is someone who is either friendly or dangerous, then Leonard is not sad.
If all people are not sad, then Adrian is informal and Adrian is lively. | Chandler is not sad. | contradiction |
Adrian is not informal.
Scott is not friendly.
Chandler is not dangerous.
Adrian is not dangerous.
Hunter is not dangerous.
Leonard is not lively.
Hunter is lively.
Hunter is not sad.
Leonard is not friendly.
Chalmers is not dangerous.
Adrian is not friendly.
Chandler is not informal.if there is at least one people who is informal and not dangerous, then Chalmers is sad and Chalmers is not friendly.
Someone being both not handsome and informal is equivalent to being not sad and lively.
Someone being both sad and not handsome is equivalent to being dangerous.
Leonard is friendly if and only if Scott is not lively.
Someone who is both not informal and lively is always not handsome.
It can be concluded that Leonard is handsome and Adrian is sad once knowing that Scott is informal.
If there is at least one people who is not lively or friendly, then Scott is not dangerous.
If there is someone who is both not sad and not informal, then Scott is not friendly.
Someone who is not dangerous is always both sad and not handsome.
If there is someone who is handsome, then Scott is not dangerous and Brian is not lively.
If there is someone who is either friendly or dangerous, then Leonard is not sad.
If all people are not sad, then Adrian is informal and Adrian is lively. | Hunter is handsome. | contradiction |
Adrian is not informal.
Scott is not friendly.
Chandler is not dangerous.
Adrian is not dangerous.
Hunter is not dangerous.
Leonard is not lively.
Hunter is lively.
Hunter is not sad.
Leonard is not friendly.
Chalmers is not dangerous.
Adrian is not friendly.
Chandler is not informal.if there is at least one people who is informal and not dangerous, then Chalmers is sad and Chalmers is not friendly.
Someone being both not handsome and informal is equivalent to being not sad and lively.
Someone being both sad and not handsome is equivalent to being dangerous.
Leonard is friendly if and only if Scott is not lively.
Someone who is both not informal and lively is always not handsome.
It can be concluded that Leonard is handsome and Adrian is sad once knowing that Scott is informal.
If there is at least one people who is not lively or friendly, then Scott is not dangerous.
If there is someone who is both not sad and not informal, then Scott is not friendly.
Someone who is not dangerous is always both sad and not handsome.
If there is someone who is handsome, then Scott is not dangerous and Brian is not lively.
If there is someone who is either friendly or dangerous, then Leonard is not sad.
If all people are not sad, then Adrian is informal and Adrian is lively. | Hunter is informal. | entailment |
Adrian is not informal.
Scott is not friendly.
Chandler is not dangerous.
Adrian is not dangerous.
Hunter is not dangerous.
Leonard is not lively.
Hunter is lively.
Hunter is not sad.
Leonard is not friendly.
Chalmers is not dangerous.
Adrian is not friendly.
Chandler is not informal.if there is at least one people who is informal and not dangerous, then Chalmers is sad and Chalmers is not friendly.
Someone being both not handsome and informal is equivalent to being not sad and lively.
Someone being both sad and not handsome is equivalent to being dangerous.
Leonard is friendly if and only if Scott is not lively.
Someone who is both not informal and lively is always not handsome.
It can be concluded that Leonard is handsome and Adrian is sad once knowing that Scott is informal.
If there is at least one people who is not lively or friendly, then Scott is not dangerous.
If there is someone who is both not sad and not informal, then Scott is not friendly.
Someone who is not dangerous is always both sad and not handsome.
If there is someone who is handsome, then Scott is not dangerous and Brian is not lively.
If there is someone who is either friendly or dangerous, then Leonard is not sad.
If all people are not sad, then Adrian is informal and Adrian is lively. | Chandler is sad. | entailment |
Adrian is not informal.
Scott is not friendly.
Chandler is not dangerous.
Adrian is not dangerous.
Hunter is not dangerous.
Leonard is not lively.
Hunter is lively.
Hunter is not sad.
Leonard is not friendly.
Chalmers is not dangerous.
Adrian is not friendly.
Chandler is not informal.if there is at least one people who is informal and not dangerous, then Chalmers is sad and Chalmers is not friendly.
Someone being both not handsome and informal is equivalent to being not sad and lively.
Someone being both sad and not handsome is equivalent to being dangerous.
Leonard is friendly if and only if Scott is not lively.
Someone who is both not informal and lively is always not handsome.
It can be concluded that Leonard is handsome and Adrian is sad once knowing that Scott is informal.
If there is at least one people who is not lively or friendly, then Scott is not dangerous.
If there is someone who is both not sad and not informal, then Scott is not friendly.
Someone who is not dangerous is always both sad and not handsome.
If there is someone who is handsome, then Scott is not dangerous and Brian is not lively.
If there is someone who is either friendly or dangerous, then Leonard is not sad.
If all people are not sad, then Adrian is informal and Adrian is lively. | Hunter is not handsome. | entailment |
Adrian is not informal.
Scott is not friendly.
Chandler is not dangerous.
Adrian is not dangerous.
Hunter is not dangerous.
Leonard is not lively.
Hunter is lively.
Hunter is not sad.
Leonard is not friendly.
Chalmers is not dangerous.
Adrian is not friendly.
Chandler is not informal.if there is at least one people who is informal and not dangerous, then Chalmers is sad and Chalmers is not friendly.
Someone being both not handsome and informal is equivalent to being not sad and lively.
Someone being both sad and not handsome is equivalent to being dangerous.
Leonard is friendly if and only if Scott is not lively.
Someone who is both not informal and lively is always not handsome.
It can be concluded that Leonard is handsome and Adrian is sad once knowing that Scott is informal.
If there is at least one people who is not lively or friendly, then Scott is not dangerous.
If there is someone who is both not sad and not informal, then Scott is not friendly.
Someone who is not dangerous is always both sad and not handsome.
If there is someone who is handsome, then Scott is not dangerous and Brian is not lively.
If there is someone who is either friendly or dangerous, then Leonard is not sad.
If all people are not sad, then Adrian is informal and Adrian is lively. | Scott is dangerous. | self_contradiction |
Adrian is not informal.
Scott is not friendly.
Chandler is not dangerous.
Adrian is not dangerous.
Hunter is not dangerous.
Leonard is not lively.
Hunter is lively.
Hunter is not sad.
Leonard is not friendly.
Chalmers is not dangerous.
Adrian is not friendly.
Chandler is not informal.if there is at least one people who is informal and not dangerous, then Chalmers is sad and Chalmers is not friendly.
Someone being both not handsome and informal is equivalent to being not sad and lively.
Someone being both sad and not handsome is equivalent to being dangerous.
Leonard is friendly if and only if Scott is not lively.
Someone who is both not informal and lively is always not handsome.
It can be concluded that Leonard is handsome and Adrian is sad once knowing that Scott is informal.
If there is at least one people who is not lively or friendly, then Scott is not dangerous.
If there is someone who is both not sad and not informal, then Scott is not friendly.
Someone who is not dangerous is always both sad and not handsome.
If there is someone who is handsome, then Scott is not dangerous and Brian is not lively.
If there is someone who is either friendly or dangerous, then Leonard is not sad.
If all people are not sad, then Adrian is informal and Adrian is lively. | Adrian is sad. | entailment |
Adrian is not informal.
Scott is not friendly.
Chandler is not dangerous.
Adrian is not dangerous.
Hunter is not dangerous.
Leonard is not lively.
Hunter is lively.
Hunter is not sad.
Leonard is not friendly.
Chalmers is not dangerous.
Adrian is not friendly.
Chandler is not informal.if there is at least one people who is informal and not dangerous, then Chalmers is sad and Chalmers is not friendly.
Someone being both not handsome and informal is equivalent to being not sad and lively.
Someone being both sad and not handsome is equivalent to being dangerous.
Leonard is friendly if and only if Scott is not lively.
Someone who is both not informal and lively is always not handsome.
It can be concluded that Leonard is handsome and Adrian is sad once knowing that Scott is informal.
If there is at least one people who is not lively or friendly, then Scott is not dangerous.
If there is someone who is both not sad and not informal, then Scott is not friendly.
Someone who is not dangerous is always both sad and not handsome.
If there is someone who is handsome, then Scott is not dangerous and Brian is not lively.
If there is someone who is either friendly or dangerous, then Leonard is not sad.
If all people are not sad, then Adrian is informal and Adrian is lively. | Leonard is friendly. | contradiction |
Adrian is not informal.
Scott is not friendly.
Chandler is not dangerous.
Adrian is not dangerous.
Hunter is not dangerous.
Leonard is not lively.
Hunter is lively.
Hunter is not sad.
Leonard is not friendly.
Chalmers is not dangerous.
Adrian is not friendly.
Chandler is not informal.if there is at least one people who is informal and not dangerous, then Chalmers is sad and Chalmers is not friendly.
Someone being both not handsome and informal is equivalent to being not sad and lively.
Someone being both sad and not handsome is equivalent to being dangerous.
Leonard is friendly if and only if Scott is not lively.
Someone who is both not informal and lively is always not handsome.
It can be concluded that Leonard is handsome and Adrian is sad once knowing that Scott is informal.
If there is at least one people who is not lively or friendly, then Scott is not dangerous.
If there is someone who is both not sad and not informal, then Scott is not friendly.
Someone who is not dangerous is always both sad and not handsome.
If there is someone who is handsome, then Scott is not dangerous and Brian is not lively.
If there is someone who is either friendly or dangerous, then Leonard is not sad.
If all people are not sad, then Adrian is informal and Adrian is lively. | Brian is dangerous. | neutral |
Nathalie is not foolish.
Tony is not ugly.
Johnny is foolish.
Nathalie is outrageous.
Chester is not ugly.
Tony is foolish.
Johnny is not outrageous.
Coleman is guilty.
Abraham is reliable.
Abraham is not ugly.
Chester is reliable.
Coleman is ugly.If Travis is not ugly, then Tony is not reliable, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is guilty or foolish, then Chester is not ugly.
If someone is both reliable and guilty, then he is not foolish.
if there is at least one people who is foolish and outrageous, then Nathalie is guilty and Chester is not ugly.
Someone is ugly if and only if he is not reliable.
If everyone is not reliable, then Abraham is guilty.
If Chester is not reliable, then Coleman is not ugly and Chester is guilty.
Someone who is both ugly and foolish is always reliable.
If someone is not ugly, then he is both not outrageous and not reliable.
If there is someone who is either not ugly or not outrageous, then Johnny is foolish.
If there is someone who is either ugly or guilty, then Johnny is not reliable.
Travis being not reliable and Nathalie being not ugly imply that Chester is foolish and Nathalie is not ugly. | Johnny is outrageous. | contradiction |
Nathalie is not foolish.
Tony is not ugly.
Johnny is foolish.
Nathalie is outrageous.
Chester is not ugly.
Tony is foolish.
Johnny is not outrageous.
Coleman is guilty.
Abraham is reliable.
Abraham is not ugly.
Chester is reliable.
Coleman is ugly.If Travis is not ugly, then Tony is not reliable, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is guilty or foolish, then Chester is not ugly.
If someone is both reliable and guilty, then he is not foolish.
if there is at least one people who is foolish and outrageous, then Nathalie is guilty and Chester is not ugly.
Someone is ugly if and only if he is not reliable.
If everyone is not reliable, then Abraham is guilty.
If Chester is not reliable, then Coleman is not ugly and Chester is guilty.
Someone who is both ugly and foolish is always reliable.
If someone is not ugly, then he is both not outrageous and not reliable.
If there is someone who is either not ugly or not outrageous, then Johnny is foolish.
If there is someone who is either ugly or guilty, then Johnny is not reliable.
Travis being not reliable and Nathalie being not ugly imply that Chester is foolish and Nathalie is not ugly. | Travis is reliable. | contradiction |
Nathalie is not foolish.
Tony is not ugly.
Johnny is foolish.
Nathalie is outrageous.
Chester is not ugly.
Tony is foolish.
Johnny is not outrageous.
Coleman is guilty.
Abraham is reliable.
Abraham is not ugly.
Chester is reliable.
Coleman is ugly.If Travis is not ugly, then Tony is not reliable, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is guilty or foolish, then Chester is not ugly.
If someone is both reliable and guilty, then he is not foolish.
if there is at least one people who is foolish and outrageous, then Nathalie is guilty and Chester is not ugly.
Someone is ugly if and only if he is not reliable.
If everyone is not reliable, then Abraham is guilty.
If Chester is not reliable, then Coleman is not ugly and Chester is guilty.
Someone who is both ugly and foolish is always reliable.
If someone is not ugly, then he is both not outrageous and not reliable.
If there is someone who is either not ugly or not outrageous, then Johnny is foolish.
If there is someone who is either ugly or guilty, then Johnny is not reliable.
Travis being not reliable and Nathalie being not ugly imply that Chester is foolish and Nathalie is not ugly. | Nathalie is reliable. | neutral |
Nathalie is not foolish.
Tony is not ugly.
Johnny is foolish.
Nathalie is outrageous.
Chester is not ugly.
Tony is foolish.
Johnny is not outrageous.
Coleman is guilty.
Abraham is reliable.
Abraham is not ugly.
Chester is reliable.
Coleman is ugly.If Travis is not ugly, then Tony is not reliable, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is guilty or foolish, then Chester is not ugly.
If someone is both reliable and guilty, then he is not foolish.
if there is at least one people who is foolish and outrageous, then Nathalie is guilty and Chester is not ugly.
Someone is ugly if and only if he is not reliable.
If everyone is not reliable, then Abraham is guilty.
If Chester is not reliable, then Coleman is not ugly and Chester is guilty.
Someone who is both ugly and foolish is always reliable.
If someone is not ugly, then he is both not outrageous and not reliable.
If there is someone who is either not ugly or not outrageous, then Johnny is foolish.
If there is someone who is either ugly or guilty, then Johnny is not reliable.
Travis being not reliable and Nathalie being not ugly imply that Chester is foolish and Nathalie is not ugly. | Travis is not ugly. | self_contradiction |
Nathalie is not foolish.
Tony is not ugly.
Johnny is foolish.
Nathalie is outrageous.
Chester is not ugly.
Tony is foolish.
Johnny is not outrageous.
Coleman is guilty.
Abraham is reliable.
Abraham is not ugly.
Chester is reliable.
Coleman is ugly.If Travis is not ugly, then Tony is not reliable, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is guilty or foolish, then Chester is not ugly.
If someone is both reliable and guilty, then he is not foolish.
if there is at least one people who is foolish and outrageous, then Nathalie is guilty and Chester is not ugly.
Someone is ugly if and only if he is not reliable.
If everyone is not reliable, then Abraham is guilty.
If Chester is not reliable, then Coleman is not ugly and Chester is guilty.
Someone who is both ugly and foolish is always reliable.
If someone is not ugly, then he is both not outrageous and not reliable.
If there is someone who is either not ugly or not outrageous, then Johnny is foolish.
If there is someone who is either ugly or guilty, then Johnny is not reliable.
Travis being not reliable and Nathalie being not ugly imply that Chester is foolish and Nathalie is not ugly. | Travis is ugly. | self_contradiction |
Nathalie is not foolish.
Tony is not ugly.
Johnny is foolish.
Nathalie is outrageous.
Chester is not ugly.
Tony is foolish.
Johnny is not outrageous.
Coleman is guilty.
Abraham is reliable.
Abraham is not ugly.
Chester is reliable.
Coleman is ugly.If Travis is not ugly, then Tony is not reliable, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is guilty or foolish, then Chester is not ugly.
If someone is both reliable and guilty, then he is not foolish.
if there is at least one people who is foolish and outrageous, then Nathalie is guilty and Chester is not ugly.
Someone is ugly if and only if he is not reliable.
If everyone is not reliable, then Abraham is guilty.
If Chester is not reliable, then Coleman is not ugly and Chester is guilty.
Someone who is both ugly and foolish is always reliable.
If someone is not ugly, then he is both not outrageous and not reliable.
If there is someone who is either not ugly or not outrageous, then Johnny is foolish.
If there is someone who is either ugly or guilty, then Johnny is not reliable.
Travis being not reliable and Nathalie being not ugly imply that Chester is foolish and Nathalie is not ugly. | Tony is foolish. | entailment |
Nathalie is not foolish.
Tony is not ugly.
Johnny is foolish.
Nathalie is outrageous.
Chester is not ugly.
Tony is foolish.
Johnny is not outrageous.
Coleman is guilty.
Abraham is reliable.
Abraham is not ugly.
Chester is reliable.
Coleman is ugly.If Travis is not ugly, then Tony is not reliable, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is guilty or foolish, then Chester is not ugly.
If someone is both reliable and guilty, then he is not foolish.
if there is at least one people who is foolish and outrageous, then Nathalie is guilty and Chester is not ugly.
Someone is ugly if and only if he is not reliable.
If everyone is not reliable, then Abraham is guilty.
If Chester is not reliable, then Coleman is not ugly and Chester is guilty.
Someone who is both ugly and foolish is always reliable.
If someone is not ugly, then he is both not outrageous and not reliable.
If there is someone who is either not ugly or not outrageous, then Johnny is foolish.
If there is someone who is either ugly or guilty, then Johnny is not reliable.
Travis being not reliable and Nathalie being not ugly imply that Chester is foolish and Nathalie is not ugly. | Coleman is not ugly. | self_contradiction |
Nathalie is not foolish.
Tony is not ugly.
Johnny is foolish.
Nathalie is outrageous.
Chester is not ugly.
Tony is foolish.
Johnny is not outrageous.
Coleman is guilty.
Abraham is reliable.
Abraham is not ugly.
Chester is reliable.
Coleman is ugly.If Travis is not ugly, then Tony is not reliable, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is guilty or foolish, then Chester is not ugly.
If someone is both reliable and guilty, then he is not foolish.
if there is at least one people who is foolish and outrageous, then Nathalie is guilty and Chester is not ugly.
Someone is ugly if and only if he is not reliable.
If everyone is not reliable, then Abraham is guilty.
If Chester is not reliable, then Coleman is not ugly and Chester is guilty.
Someone who is both ugly and foolish is always reliable.
If someone is not ugly, then he is both not outrageous and not reliable.
If there is someone who is either not ugly or not outrageous, then Johnny is foolish.
If there is someone who is either ugly or guilty, then Johnny is not reliable.
Travis being not reliable and Nathalie being not ugly imply that Chester is foolish and Nathalie is not ugly. | Abraham is reliable. | self_contradiction |
Nathalie is not foolish.
Tony is not ugly.
Johnny is foolish.
Nathalie is outrageous.
Chester is not ugly.
Tony is foolish.
Johnny is not outrageous.
Coleman is guilty.
Abraham is reliable.
Abraham is not ugly.
Chester is reliable.
Coleman is ugly.If Travis is not ugly, then Tony is not reliable, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is guilty or foolish, then Chester is not ugly.
If someone is both reliable and guilty, then he is not foolish.
if there is at least one people who is foolish and outrageous, then Nathalie is guilty and Chester is not ugly.
Someone is ugly if and only if he is not reliable.
If everyone is not reliable, then Abraham is guilty.
If Chester is not reliable, then Coleman is not ugly and Chester is guilty.
Someone who is both ugly and foolish is always reliable.
If someone is not ugly, then he is both not outrageous and not reliable.
If there is someone who is either not ugly or not outrageous, then Johnny is foolish.
If there is someone who is either ugly or guilty, then Johnny is not reliable.
Travis being not reliable and Nathalie being not ugly imply that Chester is foolish and Nathalie is not ugly. | Abraham is not outrageous. | entailment |
Nathalie is not foolish.
Tony is not ugly.
Johnny is foolish.
Nathalie is outrageous.
Chester is not ugly.
Tony is foolish.
Johnny is not outrageous.
Coleman is guilty.
Abraham is reliable.
Abraham is not ugly.
Chester is reliable.
Coleman is ugly.If Travis is not ugly, then Tony is not reliable, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is guilty or foolish, then Chester is not ugly.
If someone is both reliable and guilty, then he is not foolish.
if there is at least one people who is foolish and outrageous, then Nathalie is guilty and Chester is not ugly.
Someone is ugly if and only if he is not reliable.
If everyone is not reliable, then Abraham is guilty.
If Chester is not reliable, then Coleman is not ugly and Chester is guilty.
Someone who is both ugly and foolish is always reliable.
If someone is not ugly, then he is both not outrageous and not reliable.
If there is someone who is either not ugly or not outrageous, then Johnny is foolish.
If there is someone who is either ugly or guilty, then Johnny is not reliable.
Travis being not reliable and Nathalie being not ugly imply that Chester is foolish and Nathalie is not ugly. | Travis is outrageous. | contradiction |
Nathalie is not foolish.
Tony is not ugly.
Johnny is foolish.
Nathalie is outrageous.
Chester is not ugly.
Tony is foolish.
Johnny is not outrageous.
Coleman is guilty.
Abraham is reliable.
Abraham is not ugly.
Chester is reliable.
Coleman is ugly.If Travis is not ugly, then Tony is not reliable, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is guilty or foolish, then Chester is not ugly.
If someone is both reliable and guilty, then he is not foolish.
if there is at least one people who is foolish and outrageous, then Nathalie is guilty and Chester is not ugly.
Someone is ugly if and only if he is not reliable.
If everyone is not reliable, then Abraham is guilty.
If Chester is not reliable, then Coleman is not ugly and Chester is guilty.
Someone who is both ugly and foolish is always reliable.
If someone is not ugly, then he is both not outrageous and not reliable.
If there is someone who is either not ugly or not outrageous, then Johnny is foolish.
If there is someone who is either ugly or guilty, then Johnny is not reliable.
Travis being not reliable and Nathalie being not ugly imply that Chester is foolish and Nathalie is not ugly. | Nathalie is guilty. | entailment |
Nathalie is not foolish.
Tony is not ugly.
Johnny is foolish.
Nathalie is outrageous.
Chester is not ugly.
Tony is foolish.
Johnny is not outrageous.
Coleman is guilty.
Abraham is reliable.
Abraham is not ugly.
Chester is reliable.
Coleman is ugly.If Travis is not ugly, then Tony is not reliable, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is guilty or foolish, then Chester is not ugly.
If someone is both reliable and guilty, then he is not foolish.
if there is at least one people who is foolish and outrageous, then Nathalie is guilty and Chester is not ugly.
Someone is ugly if and only if he is not reliable.
If everyone is not reliable, then Abraham is guilty.
If Chester is not reliable, then Coleman is not ugly and Chester is guilty.
Someone who is both ugly and foolish is always reliable.
If someone is not ugly, then he is both not outrageous and not reliable.
If there is someone who is either not ugly or not outrageous, then Johnny is foolish.
If there is someone who is either ugly or guilty, then Johnny is not reliable.
Travis being not reliable and Nathalie being not ugly imply that Chester is foolish and Nathalie is not ugly. | Travis is not guilty. | neutral |
Nathalie is not foolish.
Tony is not ugly.
Johnny is foolish.
Nathalie is outrageous.
Chester is not ugly.
Tony is foolish.
Johnny is not outrageous.
Coleman is guilty.
Abraham is reliable.
Abraham is not ugly.
Chester is reliable.
Coleman is ugly.If Travis is not ugly, then Tony is not reliable, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is guilty or foolish, then Chester is not ugly.
If someone is both reliable and guilty, then he is not foolish.
if there is at least one people who is foolish and outrageous, then Nathalie is guilty and Chester is not ugly.
Someone is ugly if and only if he is not reliable.
If everyone is not reliable, then Abraham is guilty.
If Chester is not reliable, then Coleman is not ugly and Chester is guilty.
Someone who is both ugly and foolish is always reliable.
If someone is not ugly, then he is both not outrageous and not reliable.
If there is someone who is either not ugly or not outrageous, then Johnny is foolish.
If there is someone who is either ugly or guilty, then Johnny is not reliable.
Travis being not reliable and Nathalie being not ugly imply that Chester is foolish and Nathalie is not ugly. | Nathalie is ugly. | neutral |
Nathalie is not foolish.
Tony is not ugly.
Johnny is foolish.
Nathalie is outrageous.
Chester is not ugly.
Tony is foolish.
Johnny is not outrageous.
Coleman is guilty.
Abraham is reliable.
Abraham is not ugly.
Chester is reliable.
Coleman is ugly.If Travis is not ugly, then Tony is not reliable, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is guilty or foolish, then Chester is not ugly.
If someone is both reliable and guilty, then he is not foolish.
if there is at least one people who is foolish and outrageous, then Nathalie is guilty and Chester is not ugly.
Someone is ugly if and only if he is not reliable.
If everyone is not reliable, then Abraham is guilty.
If Chester is not reliable, then Coleman is not ugly and Chester is guilty.
Someone who is both ugly and foolish is always reliable.
If someone is not ugly, then he is both not outrageous and not reliable.
If there is someone who is either not ugly or not outrageous, then Johnny is foolish.
If there is someone who is either ugly or guilty, then Johnny is not reliable.
Travis being not reliable and Nathalie being not ugly imply that Chester is foolish and Nathalie is not ugly. | Travis is foolish. | neutral |
Nathalie is not foolish.
Tony is not ugly.
Johnny is foolish.
Nathalie is outrageous.
Chester is not ugly.
Tony is foolish.
Johnny is not outrageous.
Coleman is guilty.
Abraham is reliable.
Abraham is not ugly.
Chester is reliable.
Coleman is ugly.If Travis is not ugly, then Tony is not reliable, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is guilty or foolish, then Chester is not ugly.
If someone is both reliable and guilty, then he is not foolish.
if there is at least one people who is foolish and outrageous, then Nathalie is guilty and Chester is not ugly.
Someone is ugly if and only if he is not reliable.
If everyone is not reliable, then Abraham is guilty.
If Chester is not reliable, then Coleman is not ugly and Chester is guilty.
Someone who is both ugly and foolish is always reliable.
If someone is not ugly, then he is both not outrageous and not reliable.
If there is someone who is either not ugly or not outrageous, then Johnny is foolish.
If there is someone who is either ugly or guilty, then Johnny is not reliable.
Travis being not reliable and Nathalie being not ugly imply that Chester is foolish and Nathalie is not ugly. | Travis is not foolish. | neutral |
Nathalie is not foolish.
Tony is not ugly.
Johnny is foolish.
Nathalie is outrageous.
Chester is not ugly.
Tony is foolish.
Johnny is not outrageous.
Coleman is guilty.
Abraham is reliable.
Abraham is not ugly.
Chester is reliable.
Coleman is ugly.If Travis is not ugly, then Tony is not reliable, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is guilty or foolish, then Chester is not ugly.
If someone is both reliable and guilty, then he is not foolish.
if there is at least one people who is foolish and outrageous, then Nathalie is guilty and Chester is not ugly.
Someone is ugly if and only if he is not reliable.
If everyone is not reliable, then Abraham is guilty.
If Chester is not reliable, then Coleman is not ugly and Chester is guilty.
Someone who is both ugly and foolish is always reliable.
If someone is not ugly, then he is both not outrageous and not reliable.
If there is someone who is either not ugly or not outrageous, then Johnny is foolish.
If there is someone who is either ugly or guilty, then Johnny is not reliable.
Travis being not reliable and Nathalie being not ugly imply that Chester is foolish and Nathalie is not ugly. | Chester is not foolish. | entailment |
Nathalie is not foolish.
Tony is not ugly.
Johnny is foolish.
Nathalie is outrageous.
Chester is not ugly.
Tony is foolish.
Johnny is not outrageous.
Coleman is guilty.
Abraham is reliable.
Abraham is not ugly.
Chester is reliable.
Coleman is ugly.If Travis is not ugly, then Tony is not reliable, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is guilty or foolish, then Chester is not ugly.
If someone is both reliable and guilty, then he is not foolish.
if there is at least one people who is foolish and outrageous, then Nathalie is guilty and Chester is not ugly.
Someone is ugly if and only if he is not reliable.
If everyone is not reliable, then Abraham is guilty.
If Chester is not reliable, then Coleman is not ugly and Chester is guilty.
Someone who is both ugly and foolish is always reliable.
If someone is not ugly, then he is both not outrageous and not reliable.
If there is someone who is either not ugly or not outrageous, then Johnny is foolish.
If there is someone who is either ugly or guilty, then Johnny is not reliable.
Travis being not reliable and Nathalie being not ugly imply that Chester is foolish and Nathalie is not ugly. | Chester is reliable. | self_contradiction |
Nathalie is not foolish.
Tony is not ugly.
Johnny is foolish.
Nathalie is outrageous.
Chester is not ugly.
Tony is foolish.
Johnny is not outrageous.
Coleman is guilty.
Abraham is reliable.
Abraham is not ugly.
Chester is reliable.
Coleman is ugly.If Travis is not ugly, then Tony is not reliable, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is guilty or foolish, then Chester is not ugly.
If someone is both reliable and guilty, then he is not foolish.
if there is at least one people who is foolish and outrageous, then Nathalie is guilty and Chester is not ugly.
Someone is ugly if and only if he is not reliable.
If everyone is not reliable, then Abraham is guilty.
If Chester is not reliable, then Coleman is not ugly and Chester is guilty.
Someone who is both ugly and foolish is always reliable.
If someone is not ugly, then he is both not outrageous and not reliable.
If there is someone who is either not ugly or not outrageous, then Johnny is foolish.
If there is someone who is either ugly or guilty, then Johnny is not reliable.
Travis being not reliable and Nathalie being not ugly imply that Chester is foolish and Nathalie is not ugly. | Johnny is not ugly. | contradiction |
Nathalie is not foolish.
Tony is not ugly.
Johnny is foolish.
Nathalie is outrageous.
Chester is not ugly.
Tony is foolish.
Johnny is not outrageous.
Coleman is guilty.
Abraham is reliable.
Abraham is not ugly.
Chester is reliable.
Coleman is ugly.If Travis is not ugly, then Tony is not reliable, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is guilty or foolish, then Chester is not ugly.
If someone is both reliable and guilty, then he is not foolish.
if there is at least one people who is foolish and outrageous, then Nathalie is guilty and Chester is not ugly.
Someone is ugly if and only if he is not reliable.
If everyone is not reliable, then Abraham is guilty.
If Chester is not reliable, then Coleman is not ugly and Chester is guilty.
Someone who is both ugly and foolish is always reliable.
If someone is not ugly, then he is both not outrageous and not reliable.
If there is someone who is either not ugly or not outrageous, then Johnny is foolish.
If there is someone who is either ugly or guilty, then Johnny is not reliable.
Travis being not reliable and Nathalie being not ugly imply that Chester is foolish and Nathalie is not ugly. | Johnny is foolish. | entailment |
Nathalie is not foolish.
Tony is not ugly.
Johnny is foolish.
Nathalie is outrageous.
Chester is not ugly.
Tony is foolish.
Johnny is not outrageous.
Coleman is guilty.
Abraham is reliable.
Abraham is not ugly.
Chester is reliable.
Coleman is ugly.If Travis is not ugly, then Tony is not reliable, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is guilty or foolish, then Chester is not ugly.
If someone is both reliable and guilty, then he is not foolish.
if there is at least one people who is foolish and outrageous, then Nathalie is guilty and Chester is not ugly.
Someone is ugly if and only if he is not reliable.
If everyone is not reliable, then Abraham is guilty.
If Chester is not reliable, then Coleman is not ugly and Chester is guilty.
Someone who is both ugly and foolish is always reliable.
If someone is not ugly, then he is both not outrageous and not reliable.
If there is someone who is either not ugly or not outrageous, then Johnny is foolish.
If there is someone who is either ugly or guilty, then Johnny is not reliable.
Travis being not reliable and Nathalie being not ugly imply that Chester is foolish and Nathalie is not ugly. | Chester is foolish. | contradiction |
Sloane is not unsightly.
Sloane is handsome.
Isaac is nice.
Sloane is not nice.
Debra is not courageous.
Isaac is cold.
Collier is unsightly.
Sloane is not wrong.
Isaac is courageous.
Shamus is wrong.
Marion is not courageous.
Collier is nice.Marion is nice if and only if Debra is not handsome.
It can be concluded that Collier is not handsome and Sloane is not courageous once knowing that Shamus is cold.
If someone is not wrong, then he is unsightly, and vice versa.
If someone is cold or wrong, then he is courageous.
If someone is nice and not wrong, then he is handsome, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is unsightly, then Sloane is not courageous and Isaac is cold.
Joshua being not courageous is equivalent to Joshua being wrong and Sloane being unsightly.
If Isaac is not cold, then Isaac is unsightly, and vice versa.
If Isaac is cold, then Shamus is not courageous.
Shamus is not courageous if and only if Collier is nice.
It can be concluded that Debra is not cold once knowing that Debra is unsightly or Joshua is courageous.
If someone is handsome or he is not courageous, then he is not wrong. | Debra is nice. | neutral |
Sloane is not unsightly.
Sloane is handsome.
Isaac is nice.
Sloane is not nice.
Debra is not courageous.
Isaac is cold.
Collier is unsightly.
Sloane is not wrong.
Isaac is courageous.
Shamus is wrong.
Marion is not courageous.
Collier is nice.Marion is nice if and only if Debra is not handsome.
It can be concluded that Collier is not handsome and Sloane is not courageous once knowing that Shamus is cold.
If someone is not wrong, then he is unsightly, and vice versa.
If someone is cold or wrong, then he is courageous.
If someone is nice and not wrong, then he is handsome, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is unsightly, then Sloane is not courageous and Isaac is cold.
Joshua being not courageous is equivalent to Joshua being wrong and Sloane being unsightly.
If Isaac is not cold, then Isaac is unsightly, and vice versa.
If Isaac is cold, then Shamus is not courageous.
Shamus is not courageous if and only if Collier is nice.
It can be concluded that Debra is not cold once knowing that Debra is unsightly or Joshua is courageous.
If someone is handsome or he is not courageous, then he is not wrong. | Shamus is courageous. | self_contradiction |
Sloane is not unsightly.
Sloane is handsome.
Isaac is nice.
Sloane is not nice.
Debra is not courageous.
Isaac is cold.
Collier is unsightly.
Sloane is not wrong.
Isaac is courageous.
Shamus is wrong.
Marion is not courageous.
Collier is nice.Marion is nice if and only if Debra is not handsome.
It can be concluded that Collier is not handsome and Sloane is not courageous once knowing that Shamus is cold.
If someone is not wrong, then he is unsightly, and vice versa.
If someone is cold or wrong, then he is courageous.
If someone is nice and not wrong, then he is handsome, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is unsightly, then Sloane is not courageous and Isaac is cold.
Joshua being not courageous is equivalent to Joshua being wrong and Sloane being unsightly.
If Isaac is not cold, then Isaac is unsightly, and vice versa.
If Isaac is cold, then Shamus is not courageous.
Shamus is not courageous if and only if Collier is nice.
It can be concluded that Debra is not cold once knowing that Debra is unsightly or Joshua is courageous.
If someone is handsome or he is not courageous, then he is not wrong. | Collier is nice. | entailment |
Sloane is not unsightly.
Sloane is handsome.
Isaac is nice.
Sloane is not nice.
Debra is not courageous.
Isaac is cold.
Collier is unsightly.
Sloane is not wrong.
Isaac is courageous.
Shamus is wrong.
Marion is not courageous.
Collier is nice.Marion is nice if and only if Debra is not handsome.
It can be concluded that Collier is not handsome and Sloane is not courageous once knowing that Shamus is cold.
If someone is not wrong, then he is unsightly, and vice versa.
If someone is cold or wrong, then he is courageous.
If someone is nice and not wrong, then he is handsome, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is unsightly, then Sloane is not courageous and Isaac is cold.
Joshua being not courageous is equivalent to Joshua being wrong and Sloane being unsightly.
If Isaac is not cold, then Isaac is unsightly, and vice versa.
If Isaac is cold, then Shamus is not courageous.
Shamus is not courageous if and only if Collier is nice.
It can be concluded that Debra is not cold once knowing that Debra is unsightly or Joshua is courageous.
If someone is handsome or he is not courageous, then he is not wrong. | Sloane is not nice. | self_contradiction |
Sloane is not unsightly.
Sloane is handsome.
Isaac is nice.
Sloane is not nice.
Debra is not courageous.
Isaac is cold.
Collier is unsightly.
Sloane is not wrong.
Isaac is courageous.
Shamus is wrong.
Marion is not courageous.
Collier is nice.Marion is nice if and only if Debra is not handsome.
It can be concluded that Collier is not handsome and Sloane is not courageous once knowing that Shamus is cold.
If someone is not wrong, then he is unsightly, and vice versa.
If someone is cold or wrong, then he is courageous.
If someone is nice and not wrong, then he is handsome, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is unsightly, then Sloane is not courageous and Isaac is cold.
Joshua being not courageous is equivalent to Joshua being wrong and Sloane being unsightly.
If Isaac is not cold, then Isaac is unsightly, and vice versa.
If Isaac is cold, then Shamus is not courageous.
Shamus is not courageous if and only if Collier is nice.
It can be concluded that Debra is not cold once knowing that Debra is unsightly or Joshua is courageous.
If someone is handsome or he is not courageous, then he is not wrong. | Joshua is not courageous. | neutral |
Sloane is not unsightly.
Sloane is handsome.
Isaac is nice.
Sloane is not nice.
Debra is not courageous.
Isaac is cold.
Collier is unsightly.
Sloane is not wrong.
Isaac is courageous.
Shamus is wrong.
Marion is not courageous.
Collier is nice.Marion is nice if and only if Debra is not handsome.
It can be concluded that Collier is not handsome and Sloane is not courageous once knowing that Shamus is cold.
If someone is not wrong, then he is unsightly, and vice versa.
If someone is cold or wrong, then he is courageous.
If someone is nice and not wrong, then he is handsome, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is unsightly, then Sloane is not courageous and Isaac is cold.
Joshua being not courageous is equivalent to Joshua being wrong and Sloane being unsightly.
If Isaac is not cold, then Isaac is unsightly, and vice versa.
If Isaac is cold, then Shamus is not courageous.
Shamus is not courageous if and only if Collier is nice.
It can be concluded that Debra is not cold once knowing that Debra is unsightly or Joshua is courageous.
If someone is handsome or he is not courageous, then he is not wrong. | Collier is wrong. | contradiction |
Sloane is not unsightly.
Sloane is handsome.
Isaac is nice.
Sloane is not nice.
Debra is not courageous.
Isaac is cold.
Collier is unsightly.
Sloane is not wrong.
Isaac is courageous.
Shamus is wrong.
Marion is not courageous.
Collier is nice.Marion is nice if and only if Debra is not handsome.
It can be concluded that Collier is not handsome and Sloane is not courageous once knowing that Shamus is cold.
If someone is not wrong, then he is unsightly, and vice versa.
If someone is cold or wrong, then he is courageous.
If someone is nice and not wrong, then he is handsome, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is unsightly, then Sloane is not courageous and Isaac is cold.
Joshua being not courageous is equivalent to Joshua being wrong and Sloane being unsightly.
If Isaac is not cold, then Isaac is unsightly, and vice versa.
If Isaac is cold, then Shamus is not courageous.
Shamus is not courageous if and only if Collier is nice.
It can be concluded that Debra is not cold once knowing that Debra is unsightly or Joshua is courageous.
If someone is handsome or he is not courageous, then he is not wrong. | Collier is not handsome. | contradiction |
Sloane is not unsightly.
Sloane is handsome.
Isaac is nice.
Sloane is not nice.
Debra is not courageous.
Isaac is cold.
Collier is unsightly.
Sloane is not wrong.
Isaac is courageous.
Shamus is wrong.
Marion is not courageous.
Collier is nice.Marion is nice if and only if Debra is not handsome.
It can be concluded that Collier is not handsome and Sloane is not courageous once knowing that Shamus is cold.
If someone is not wrong, then he is unsightly, and vice versa.
If someone is cold or wrong, then he is courageous.
If someone is nice and not wrong, then he is handsome, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is unsightly, then Sloane is not courageous and Isaac is cold.
Joshua being not courageous is equivalent to Joshua being wrong and Sloane being unsightly.
If Isaac is not cold, then Isaac is unsightly, and vice versa.
If Isaac is cold, then Shamus is not courageous.
Shamus is not courageous if and only if Collier is nice.
It can be concluded that Debra is not cold once knowing that Debra is unsightly or Joshua is courageous.
If someone is handsome or he is not courageous, then he is not wrong. | Shamus is wrong. | self_contradiction |
Sloane is not unsightly.
Sloane is handsome.
Isaac is nice.
Sloane is not nice.
Debra is not courageous.
Isaac is cold.
Collier is unsightly.
Sloane is not wrong.
Isaac is courageous.
Shamus is wrong.
Marion is not courageous.
Collier is nice.Marion is nice if and only if Debra is not handsome.
It can be concluded that Collier is not handsome and Sloane is not courageous once knowing that Shamus is cold.
If someone is not wrong, then he is unsightly, and vice versa.
If someone is cold or wrong, then he is courageous.
If someone is nice and not wrong, then he is handsome, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is unsightly, then Sloane is not courageous and Isaac is cold.
Joshua being not courageous is equivalent to Joshua being wrong and Sloane being unsightly.
If Isaac is not cold, then Isaac is unsightly, and vice versa.
If Isaac is cold, then Shamus is not courageous.
Shamus is not courageous if and only if Collier is nice.
It can be concluded that Debra is not cold once knowing that Debra is unsightly or Joshua is courageous.
If someone is handsome or he is not courageous, then he is not wrong. | Marion is not nice. | neutral |
Sloane is not unsightly.
Sloane is handsome.
Isaac is nice.
Sloane is not nice.
Debra is not courageous.
Isaac is cold.
Collier is unsightly.
Sloane is not wrong.
Isaac is courageous.
Shamus is wrong.
Marion is not courageous.
Collier is nice.Marion is nice if and only if Debra is not handsome.
It can be concluded that Collier is not handsome and Sloane is not courageous once knowing that Shamus is cold.
If someone is not wrong, then he is unsightly, and vice versa.
If someone is cold or wrong, then he is courageous.
If someone is nice and not wrong, then he is handsome, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is unsightly, then Sloane is not courageous and Isaac is cold.
Joshua being not courageous is equivalent to Joshua being wrong and Sloane being unsightly.
If Isaac is not cold, then Isaac is unsightly, and vice versa.
If Isaac is cold, then Shamus is not courageous.
Shamus is not courageous if and only if Collier is nice.
It can be concluded that Debra is not cold once knowing that Debra is unsightly or Joshua is courageous.
If someone is handsome or he is not courageous, then he is not wrong. | Collier is not wrong. | entailment |
Sloane is not unsightly.
Sloane is handsome.
Isaac is nice.
Sloane is not nice.
Debra is not courageous.
Isaac is cold.
Collier is unsightly.
Sloane is not wrong.
Isaac is courageous.
Shamus is wrong.
Marion is not courageous.
Collier is nice.Marion is nice if and only if Debra is not handsome.
It can be concluded that Collier is not handsome and Sloane is not courageous once knowing that Shamus is cold.
If someone is not wrong, then he is unsightly, and vice versa.
If someone is cold or wrong, then he is courageous.
If someone is nice and not wrong, then he is handsome, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is unsightly, then Sloane is not courageous and Isaac is cold.
Joshua being not courageous is equivalent to Joshua being wrong and Sloane being unsightly.
If Isaac is not cold, then Isaac is unsightly, and vice versa.
If Isaac is cold, then Shamus is not courageous.
Shamus is not courageous if and only if Collier is nice.
It can be concluded that Debra is not cold once knowing that Debra is unsightly or Joshua is courageous.
If someone is handsome or he is not courageous, then he is not wrong. | Debra is cold. | contradiction |
Sloane is not unsightly.
Sloane is handsome.
Isaac is nice.
Sloane is not nice.
Debra is not courageous.
Isaac is cold.
Collier is unsightly.
Sloane is not wrong.
Isaac is courageous.
Shamus is wrong.
Marion is not courageous.
Collier is nice.Marion is nice if and only if Debra is not handsome.
It can be concluded that Collier is not handsome and Sloane is not courageous once knowing that Shamus is cold.
If someone is not wrong, then he is unsightly, and vice versa.
If someone is cold or wrong, then he is courageous.
If someone is nice and not wrong, then he is handsome, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is unsightly, then Sloane is not courageous and Isaac is cold.
Joshua being not courageous is equivalent to Joshua being wrong and Sloane being unsightly.
If Isaac is not cold, then Isaac is unsightly, and vice versa.
If Isaac is cold, then Shamus is not courageous.
Shamus is not courageous if and only if Collier is nice.
It can be concluded that Debra is not cold once knowing that Debra is unsightly or Joshua is courageous.
If someone is handsome or he is not courageous, then he is not wrong. | Debra is unsightly. | entailment |
Sloane is not unsightly.
Sloane is handsome.
Isaac is nice.
Sloane is not nice.
Debra is not courageous.
Isaac is cold.
Collier is unsightly.
Sloane is not wrong.
Isaac is courageous.
Shamus is wrong.
Marion is not courageous.
Collier is nice.Marion is nice if and only if Debra is not handsome.
It can be concluded that Collier is not handsome and Sloane is not courageous once knowing that Shamus is cold.
If someone is not wrong, then he is unsightly, and vice versa.
If someone is cold or wrong, then he is courageous.
If someone is nice and not wrong, then he is handsome, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is unsightly, then Sloane is not courageous and Isaac is cold.
Joshua being not courageous is equivalent to Joshua being wrong and Sloane being unsightly.
If Isaac is not cold, then Isaac is unsightly, and vice versa.
If Isaac is cold, then Shamus is not courageous.
Shamus is not courageous if and only if Collier is nice.
It can be concluded that Debra is not cold once knowing that Debra is unsightly or Joshua is courageous.
If someone is handsome or he is not courageous, then he is not wrong. | Marion is wrong. | contradiction |
Sloane is not unsightly.
Sloane is handsome.
Isaac is nice.
Sloane is not nice.
Debra is not courageous.
Isaac is cold.
Collier is unsightly.
Sloane is not wrong.
Isaac is courageous.
Shamus is wrong.
Marion is not courageous.
Collier is nice.Marion is nice if and only if Debra is not handsome.
It can be concluded that Collier is not handsome and Sloane is not courageous once knowing that Shamus is cold.
If someone is not wrong, then he is unsightly, and vice versa.
If someone is cold or wrong, then he is courageous.
If someone is nice and not wrong, then he is handsome, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is unsightly, then Sloane is not courageous and Isaac is cold.
Joshua being not courageous is equivalent to Joshua being wrong and Sloane being unsightly.
If Isaac is not cold, then Isaac is unsightly, and vice versa.
If Isaac is cold, then Shamus is not courageous.
Shamus is not courageous if and only if Collier is nice.
It can be concluded that Debra is not cold once knowing that Debra is unsightly or Joshua is courageous.
If someone is handsome or he is not courageous, then he is not wrong. | Collier is unsightly. | entailment |
Sloane is not unsightly.
Sloane is handsome.
Isaac is nice.
Sloane is not nice.
Debra is not courageous.
Isaac is cold.
Collier is unsightly.
Sloane is not wrong.
Isaac is courageous.
Shamus is wrong.
Marion is not courageous.
Collier is nice.Marion is nice if and only if Debra is not handsome.
It can be concluded that Collier is not handsome and Sloane is not courageous once knowing that Shamus is cold.
If someone is not wrong, then he is unsightly, and vice versa.
If someone is cold or wrong, then he is courageous.
If someone is nice and not wrong, then he is handsome, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is unsightly, then Sloane is not courageous and Isaac is cold.
Joshua being not courageous is equivalent to Joshua being wrong and Sloane being unsightly.
If Isaac is not cold, then Isaac is unsightly, and vice versa.
If Isaac is cold, then Shamus is not courageous.
Shamus is not courageous if and only if Collier is nice.
It can be concluded that Debra is not cold once knowing that Debra is unsightly or Joshua is courageous.
If someone is handsome or he is not courageous, then he is not wrong. | Shamus is not wrong. | self_contradiction |
Sloane is not unsightly.
Sloane is handsome.
Isaac is nice.
Sloane is not nice.
Debra is not courageous.
Isaac is cold.
Collier is unsightly.
Sloane is not wrong.
Isaac is courageous.
Shamus is wrong.
Marion is not courageous.
Collier is nice.Marion is nice if and only if Debra is not handsome.
It can be concluded that Collier is not handsome and Sloane is not courageous once knowing that Shamus is cold.
If someone is not wrong, then he is unsightly, and vice versa.
If someone is cold or wrong, then he is courageous.
If someone is nice and not wrong, then he is handsome, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is unsightly, then Sloane is not courageous and Isaac is cold.
Joshua being not courageous is equivalent to Joshua being wrong and Sloane being unsightly.
If Isaac is not cold, then Isaac is unsightly, and vice versa.
If Isaac is cold, then Shamus is not courageous.
Shamus is not courageous if and only if Collier is nice.
It can be concluded that Debra is not cold once knowing that Debra is unsightly or Joshua is courageous.
If someone is handsome or he is not courageous, then he is not wrong. | Shamus is not handsome. | neutral |
Sloane is not unsightly.
Sloane is handsome.
Isaac is nice.
Sloane is not nice.
Debra is not courageous.
Isaac is cold.
Collier is unsightly.
Sloane is not wrong.
Isaac is courageous.
Shamus is wrong.
Marion is not courageous.
Collier is nice.Marion is nice if and only if Debra is not handsome.
It can be concluded that Collier is not handsome and Sloane is not courageous once knowing that Shamus is cold.
If someone is not wrong, then he is unsightly, and vice versa.
If someone is cold or wrong, then he is courageous.
If someone is nice and not wrong, then he is handsome, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is unsightly, then Sloane is not courageous and Isaac is cold.
Joshua being not courageous is equivalent to Joshua being wrong and Sloane being unsightly.
If Isaac is not cold, then Isaac is unsightly, and vice versa.
If Isaac is cold, then Shamus is not courageous.
Shamus is not courageous if and only if Collier is nice.
It can be concluded that Debra is not cold once knowing that Debra is unsightly or Joshua is courageous.
If someone is handsome or he is not courageous, then he is not wrong. | Shamus is nice. | neutral |
Sloane is not unsightly.
Sloane is handsome.
Isaac is nice.
Sloane is not nice.
Debra is not courageous.
Isaac is cold.
Collier is unsightly.
Sloane is not wrong.
Isaac is courageous.
Shamus is wrong.
Marion is not courageous.
Collier is nice.Marion is nice if and only if Debra is not handsome.
It can be concluded that Collier is not handsome and Sloane is not courageous once knowing that Shamus is cold.
If someone is not wrong, then he is unsightly, and vice versa.
If someone is cold or wrong, then he is courageous.
If someone is nice and not wrong, then he is handsome, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is unsightly, then Sloane is not courageous and Isaac is cold.
Joshua being not courageous is equivalent to Joshua being wrong and Sloane being unsightly.
If Isaac is not cold, then Isaac is unsightly, and vice versa.
If Isaac is cold, then Shamus is not courageous.
Shamus is not courageous if and only if Collier is nice.
It can be concluded that Debra is not cold once knowing that Debra is unsightly or Joshua is courageous.
If someone is handsome or he is not courageous, then he is not wrong. | Collier is not nice. | contradiction |
Sloane is not unsightly.
Sloane is handsome.
Isaac is nice.
Sloane is not nice.
Debra is not courageous.
Isaac is cold.
Collier is unsightly.
Sloane is not wrong.
Isaac is courageous.
Shamus is wrong.
Marion is not courageous.
Collier is nice.Marion is nice if and only if Debra is not handsome.
It can be concluded that Collier is not handsome and Sloane is not courageous once knowing that Shamus is cold.
If someone is not wrong, then he is unsightly, and vice versa.
If someone is cold or wrong, then he is courageous.
If someone is nice and not wrong, then he is handsome, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is unsightly, then Sloane is not courageous and Isaac is cold.
Joshua being not courageous is equivalent to Joshua being wrong and Sloane being unsightly.
If Isaac is not cold, then Isaac is unsightly, and vice versa.
If Isaac is cold, then Shamus is not courageous.
Shamus is not courageous if and only if Collier is nice.
It can be concluded that Debra is not cold once knowing that Debra is unsightly or Joshua is courageous.
If someone is handsome or he is not courageous, then he is not wrong. | Sloane is nice. | self_contradiction |
Sloane is not unsightly.
Sloane is handsome.
Isaac is nice.
Sloane is not nice.
Debra is not courageous.
Isaac is cold.
Collier is unsightly.
Sloane is not wrong.
Isaac is courageous.
Shamus is wrong.
Marion is not courageous.
Collier is nice.Marion is nice if and only if Debra is not handsome.
It can be concluded that Collier is not handsome and Sloane is not courageous once knowing that Shamus is cold.
If someone is not wrong, then he is unsightly, and vice versa.
If someone is cold or wrong, then he is courageous.
If someone is nice and not wrong, then he is handsome, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is unsightly, then Sloane is not courageous and Isaac is cold.
Joshua being not courageous is equivalent to Joshua being wrong and Sloane being unsightly.
If Isaac is not cold, then Isaac is unsightly, and vice versa.
If Isaac is cold, then Shamus is not courageous.
Shamus is not courageous if and only if Collier is nice.
It can be concluded that Debra is not cold once knowing that Debra is unsightly or Joshua is courageous.
If someone is handsome or he is not courageous, then he is not wrong. | Debra is not cold. | entailment |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.