premise
stringlengths 923
1.41k
| hypothesis
stringlengths 11
33
| label
stringclasses 4
values |
|---|---|---|
Culver is practical.
Brice is not agreeable.
Baird is agreeable.
Bruno is practical.
Jimmy is not practical.
Brice is not funny.
Brice is not elated.
Casper is not agreeable.
Brice is cooperative.
Baird is cooperative.
Culver is not cooperative.
Alastair is not cooperative.Someone being both cooperative and not elated is equivalent to being not sticky and not funny.
Culver being not agreeable is equivalent to Casper being not practical.
if there is at least one people who is cooperative and elated, then Culver is not agreeable and Jimmy is practical.
It can be concluded that Brice is not practical once knowing that Jimmy is elated or Brice is agreeable.
Someone who is cooperative is always not agreeable.
Someone being both not practical and not elated is equivalent to being cooperative.
Someone who is eithor cooperative or not elated is always not funny.
If everyone is not practical, then Brice is not funny and Alastair is agreeable.
If Baird is not agreeable, then Bruno is not funny, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either not elated or practical, then Brice is not funny.
It can be concluded that Jimmy is practical and Alastair is not cooperative once knowing that Brice is not funny.
It can be concluded that Baird is sticky once knowing that Jimmy is not cooperative or Baird is not funny. | Baird is elated. | contradiction |
Culver is practical.
Brice is not agreeable.
Baird is agreeable.
Bruno is practical.
Jimmy is not practical.
Brice is not funny.
Brice is not elated.
Casper is not agreeable.
Brice is cooperative.
Baird is cooperative.
Culver is not cooperative.
Alastair is not cooperative.Someone being both cooperative and not elated is equivalent to being not sticky and not funny.
Culver being not agreeable is equivalent to Casper being not practical.
if there is at least one people who is cooperative and elated, then Culver is not agreeable and Jimmy is practical.
It can be concluded that Brice is not practical once knowing that Jimmy is elated or Brice is agreeable.
Someone who is cooperative is always not agreeable.
Someone being both not practical and not elated is equivalent to being cooperative.
Someone who is eithor cooperative or not elated is always not funny.
If everyone is not practical, then Brice is not funny and Alastair is agreeable.
If Baird is not agreeable, then Bruno is not funny, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either not elated or practical, then Brice is not funny.
It can be concluded that Jimmy is practical and Alastair is not cooperative once knowing that Brice is not funny.
It can be concluded that Baird is sticky once knowing that Jimmy is not cooperative or Baird is not funny. | Bruno is sticky. | neutral |
Culver is practical.
Brice is not agreeable.
Baird is agreeable.
Bruno is practical.
Jimmy is not practical.
Brice is not funny.
Brice is not elated.
Casper is not agreeable.
Brice is cooperative.
Baird is cooperative.
Culver is not cooperative.
Alastair is not cooperative.Someone being both cooperative and not elated is equivalent to being not sticky and not funny.
Culver being not agreeable is equivalent to Casper being not practical.
if there is at least one people who is cooperative and elated, then Culver is not agreeable and Jimmy is practical.
It can be concluded that Brice is not practical once knowing that Jimmy is elated or Brice is agreeable.
Someone who is cooperative is always not agreeable.
Someone being both not practical and not elated is equivalent to being cooperative.
Someone who is eithor cooperative or not elated is always not funny.
If everyone is not practical, then Brice is not funny and Alastair is agreeable.
If Baird is not agreeable, then Bruno is not funny, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either not elated or practical, then Brice is not funny.
It can be concluded that Jimmy is practical and Alastair is not cooperative once knowing that Brice is not funny.
It can be concluded that Baird is sticky once knowing that Jimmy is not cooperative or Baird is not funny. | Culver is not cooperative. | entailment |
Culver is practical.
Brice is not agreeable.
Baird is agreeable.
Bruno is practical.
Jimmy is not practical.
Brice is not funny.
Brice is not elated.
Casper is not agreeable.
Brice is cooperative.
Baird is cooperative.
Culver is not cooperative.
Alastair is not cooperative.Someone being both cooperative and not elated is equivalent to being not sticky and not funny.
Culver being not agreeable is equivalent to Casper being not practical.
if there is at least one people who is cooperative and elated, then Culver is not agreeable and Jimmy is practical.
It can be concluded that Brice is not practical once knowing that Jimmy is elated or Brice is agreeable.
Someone who is cooperative is always not agreeable.
Someone being both not practical and not elated is equivalent to being cooperative.
Someone who is eithor cooperative or not elated is always not funny.
If everyone is not practical, then Brice is not funny and Alastair is agreeable.
If Baird is not agreeable, then Bruno is not funny, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either not elated or practical, then Brice is not funny.
It can be concluded that Jimmy is practical and Alastair is not cooperative once knowing that Brice is not funny.
It can be concluded that Baird is sticky once knowing that Jimmy is not cooperative or Baird is not funny. | Jimmy is not practical. | self_contradiction |
Culver is practical.
Brice is not agreeable.
Baird is agreeable.
Bruno is practical.
Jimmy is not practical.
Brice is not funny.
Brice is not elated.
Casper is not agreeable.
Brice is cooperative.
Baird is cooperative.
Culver is not cooperative.
Alastair is not cooperative.Someone being both cooperative and not elated is equivalent to being not sticky and not funny.
Culver being not agreeable is equivalent to Casper being not practical.
if there is at least one people who is cooperative and elated, then Culver is not agreeable and Jimmy is practical.
It can be concluded that Brice is not practical once knowing that Jimmy is elated or Brice is agreeable.
Someone who is cooperative is always not agreeable.
Someone being both not practical and not elated is equivalent to being cooperative.
Someone who is eithor cooperative or not elated is always not funny.
If everyone is not practical, then Brice is not funny and Alastair is agreeable.
If Baird is not agreeable, then Bruno is not funny, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either not elated or practical, then Brice is not funny.
It can be concluded that Jimmy is practical and Alastair is not cooperative once knowing that Brice is not funny.
It can be concluded that Baird is sticky once knowing that Jimmy is not cooperative or Baird is not funny. | Brice is not elated. | entailment |
Culver is practical.
Brice is not agreeable.
Baird is agreeable.
Bruno is practical.
Jimmy is not practical.
Brice is not funny.
Brice is not elated.
Casper is not agreeable.
Brice is cooperative.
Baird is cooperative.
Culver is not cooperative.
Alastair is not cooperative.Someone being both cooperative and not elated is equivalent to being not sticky and not funny.
Culver being not agreeable is equivalent to Casper being not practical.
if there is at least one people who is cooperative and elated, then Culver is not agreeable and Jimmy is practical.
It can be concluded that Brice is not practical once knowing that Jimmy is elated or Brice is agreeable.
Someone who is cooperative is always not agreeable.
Someone being both not practical and not elated is equivalent to being cooperative.
Someone who is eithor cooperative or not elated is always not funny.
If everyone is not practical, then Brice is not funny and Alastair is agreeable.
If Baird is not agreeable, then Bruno is not funny, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either not elated or practical, then Brice is not funny.
It can be concluded that Jimmy is practical and Alastair is not cooperative once knowing that Brice is not funny.
It can be concluded that Baird is sticky once knowing that Jimmy is not cooperative or Baird is not funny. | Bruno is not agreeable. | neutral |
Culver is practical.
Brice is not agreeable.
Baird is agreeable.
Bruno is practical.
Jimmy is not practical.
Brice is not funny.
Brice is not elated.
Casper is not agreeable.
Brice is cooperative.
Baird is cooperative.
Culver is not cooperative.
Alastair is not cooperative.Someone being both cooperative and not elated is equivalent to being not sticky and not funny.
Culver being not agreeable is equivalent to Casper being not practical.
if there is at least one people who is cooperative and elated, then Culver is not agreeable and Jimmy is practical.
It can be concluded that Brice is not practical once knowing that Jimmy is elated or Brice is agreeable.
Someone who is cooperative is always not agreeable.
Someone being both not practical and not elated is equivalent to being cooperative.
Someone who is eithor cooperative or not elated is always not funny.
If everyone is not practical, then Brice is not funny and Alastair is agreeable.
If Baird is not agreeable, then Bruno is not funny, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either not elated or practical, then Brice is not funny.
It can be concluded that Jimmy is practical and Alastair is not cooperative once knowing that Brice is not funny.
It can be concluded that Baird is sticky once knowing that Jimmy is not cooperative or Baird is not funny. | Brice is not cooperative. | contradiction |
Culver is practical.
Brice is not agreeable.
Baird is agreeable.
Bruno is practical.
Jimmy is not practical.
Brice is not funny.
Brice is not elated.
Casper is not agreeable.
Brice is cooperative.
Baird is cooperative.
Culver is not cooperative.
Alastair is not cooperative.Someone being both cooperative and not elated is equivalent to being not sticky and not funny.
Culver being not agreeable is equivalent to Casper being not practical.
if there is at least one people who is cooperative and elated, then Culver is not agreeable and Jimmy is practical.
It can be concluded that Brice is not practical once knowing that Jimmy is elated or Brice is agreeable.
Someone who is cooperative is always not agreeable.
Someone being both not practical and not elated is equivalent to being cooperative.
Someone who is eithor cooperative or not elated is always not funny.
If everyone is not practical, then Brice is not funny and Alastair is agreeable.
If Baird is not agreeable, then Bruno is not funny, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either not elated or practical, then Brice is not funny.
It can be concluded that Jimmy is practical and Alastair is not cooperative once knowing that Brice is not funny.
It can be concluded that Baird is sticky once knowing that Jimmy is not cooperative or Baird is not funny. | Casper is practical. | contradiction |
Culver is practical.
Brice is not agreeable.
Baird is agreeable.
Bruno is practical.
Jimmy is not practical.
Brice is not funny.
Brice is not elated.
Casper is not agreeable.
Brice is cooperative.
Baird is cooperative.
Culver is not cooperative.
Alastair is not cooperative.Someone being both cooperative and not elated is equivalent to being not sticky and not funny.
Culver being not agreeable is equivalent to Casper being not practical.
if there is at least one people who is cooperative and elated, then Culver is not agreeable and Jimmy is practical.
It can be concluded that Brice is not practical once knowing that Jimmy is elated or Brice is agreeable.
Someone who is cooperative is always not agreeable.
Someone being both not practical and not elated is equivalent to being cooperative.
Someone who is eithor cooperative or not elated is always not funny.
If everyone is not practical, then Brice is not funny and Alastair is agreeable.
If Baird is not agreeable, then Bruno is not funny, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either not elated or practical, then Brice is not funny.
It can be concluded that Jimmy is practical and Alastair is not cooperative once knowing that Brice is not funny.
It can be concluded that Baird is sticky once knowing that Jimmy is not cooperative or Baird is not funny. | Baird is sticky. | self_contradiction |
Culver is practical.
Brice is not agreeable.
Baird is agreeable.
Bruno is practical.
Jimmy is not practical.
Brice is not funny.
Brice is not elated.
Casper is not agreeable.
Brice is cooperative.
Baird is cooperative.
Culver is not cooperative.
Alastair is not cooperative.Someone being both cooperative and not elated is equivalent to being not sticky and not funny.
Culver being not agreeable is equivalent to Casper being not practical.
if there is at least one people who is cooperative and elated, then Culver is not agreeable and Jimmy is practical.
It can be concluded that Brice is not practical once knowing that Jimmy is elated or Brice is agreeable.
Someone who is cooperative is always not agreeable.
Someone being both not practical and not elated is equivalent to being cooperative.
Someone who is eithor cooperative or not elated is always not funny.
If everyone is not practical, then Brice is not funny and Alastair is agreeable.
If Baird is not agreeable, then Bruno is not funny, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either not elated or practical, then Brice is not funny.
It can be concluded that Jimmy is practical and Alastair is not cooperative once knowing that Brice is not funny.
It can be concluded that Baird is sticky once knowing that Jimmy is not cooperative or Baird is not funny. | Bruno is not cooperative. | neutral |
Culver is practical.
Brice is not agreeable.
Baird is agreeable.
Bruno is practical.
Jimmy is not practical.
Brice is not funny.
Brice is not elated.
Casper is not agreeable.
Brice is cooperative.
Baird is cooperative.
Culver is not cooperative.
Alastair is not cooperative.Someone being both cooperative and not elated is equivalent to being not sticky and not funny.
Culver being not agreeable is equivalent to Casper being not practical.
if there is at least one people who is cooperative and elated, then Culver is not agreeable and Jimmy is practical.
It can be concluded that Brice is not practical once knowing that Jimmy is elated or Brice is agreeable.
Someone who is cooperative is always not agreeable.
Someone being both not practical and not elated is equivalent to being cooperative.
Someone who is eithor cooperative or not elated is always not funny.
If everyone is not practical, then Brice is not funny and Alastair is agreeable.
If Baird is not agreeable, then Bruno is not funny, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either not elated or practical, then Brice is not funny.
It can be concluded that Jimmy is practical and Alastair is not cooperative once knowing that Brice is not funny.
It can be concluded that Baird is sticky once knowing that Jimmy is not cooperative or Baird is not funny. | Casper is not sticky. | neutral |
Culver is practical.
Brice is not agreeable.
Baird is agreeable.
Bruno is practical.
Jimmy is not practical.
Brice is not funny.
Brice is not elated.
Casper is not agreeable.
Brice is cooperative.
Baird is cooperative.
Culver is not cooperative.
Alastair is not cooperative.Someone being both cooperative and not elated is equivalent to being not sticky and not funny.
Culver being not agreeable is equivalent to Casper being not practical.
if there is at least one people who is cooperative and elated, then Culver is not agreeable and Jimmy is practical.
It can be concluded that Brice is not practical once knowing that Jimmy is elated or Brice is agreeable.
Someone who is cooperative is always not agreeable.
Someone being both not practical and not elated is equivalent to being cooperative.
Someone who is eithor cooperative or not elated is always not funny.
If everyone is not practical, then Brice is not funny and Alastair is agreeable.
If Baird is not agreeable, then Bruno is not funny, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either not elated or practical, then Brice is not funny.
It can be concluded that Jimmy is practical and Alastair is not cooperative once knowing that Brice is not funny.
It can be concluded that Baird is sticky once knowing that Jimmy is not cooperative or Baird is not funny. | Baird is funny. | contradiction |
Culver is practical.
Brice is not agreeable.
Baird is agreeable.
Bruno is practical.
Jimmy is not practical.
Brice is not funny.
Brice is not elated.
Casper is not agreeable.
Brice is cooperative.
Baird is cooperative.
Culver is not cooperative.
Alastair is not cooperative.Someone being both cooperative and not elated is equivalent to being not sticky and not funny.
Culver being not agreeable is equivalent to Casper being not practical.
if there is at least one people who is cooperative and elated, then Culver is not agreeable and Jimmy is practical.
It can be concluded that Brice is not practical once knowing that Jimmy is elated or Brice is agreeable.
Someone who is cooperative is always not agreeable.
Someone being both not practical and not elated is equivalent to being cooperative.
Someone who is eithor cooperative or not elated is always not funny.
If everyone is not practical, then Brice is not funny and Alastair is agreeable.
If Baird is not agreeable, then Bruno is not funny, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either not elated or practical, then Brice is not funny.
It can be concluded that Jimmy is practical and Alastair is not cooperative once knowing that Brice is not funny.
It can be concluded that Baird is sticky once knowing that Jimmy is not cooperative or Baird is not funny. | Bruno is not funny. | entailment |
Culver is practical.
Brice is not agreeable.
Baird is agreeable.
Bruno is practical.
Jimmy is not practical.
Brice is not funny.
Brice is not elated.
Casper is not agreeable.
Brice is cooperative.
Baird is cooperative.
Culver is not cooperative.
Alastair is not cooperative.Someone being both cooperative and not elated is equivalent to being not sticky and not funny.
Culver being not agreeable is equivalent to Casper being not practical.
if there is at least one people who is cooperative and elated, then Culver is not agreeable and Jimmy is practical.
It can be concluded that Brice is not practical once knowing that Jimmy is elated or Brice is agreeable.
Someone who is cooperative is always not agreeable.
Someone being both not practical and not elated is equivalent to being cooperative.
Someone who is eithor cooperative or not elated is always not funny.
If everyone is not practical, then Brice is not funny and Alastair is agreeable.
If Baird is not agreeable, then Bruno is not funny, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either not elated or practical, then Brice is not funny.
It can be concluded that Jimmy is practical and Alastair is not cooperative once knowing that Brice is not funny.
It can be concluded that Baird is sticky once knowing that Jimmy is not cooperative or Baird is not funny. | Baird is agreeable. | self_contradiction |
Culver is practical.
Brice is not agreeable.
Baird is agreeable.
Bruno is practical.
Jimmy is not practical.
Brice is not funny.
Brice is not elated.
Casper is not agreeable.
Brice is cooperative.
Baird is cooperative.
Culver is not cooperative.
Alastair is not cooperative.Someone being both cooperative and not elated is equivalent to being not sticky and not funny.
Culver being not agreeable is equivalent to Casper being not practical.
if there is at least one people who is cooperative and elated, then Culver is not agreeable and Jimmy is practical.
It can be concluded that Brice is not practical once knowing that Jimmy is elated or Brice is agreeable.
Someone who is cooperative is always not agreeable.
Someone being both not practical and not elated is equivalent to being cooperative.
Someone who is eithor cooperative or not elated is always not funny.
If everyone is not practical, then Brice is not funny and Alastair is agreeable.
If Baird is not agreeable, then Bruno is not funny, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either not elated or practical, then Brice is not funny.
It can be concluded that Jimmy is practical and Alastair is not cooperative once knowing that Brice is not funny.
It can be concluded that Baird is sticky once knowing that Jimmy is not cooperative or Baird is not funny. | Bruno is elated. | neutral |
Culver is practical.
Brice is not agreeable.
Baird is agreeable.
Bruno is practical.
Jimmy is not practical.
Brice is not funny.
Brice is not elated.
Casper is not agreeable.
Brice is cooperative.
Baird is cooperative.
Culver is not cooperative.
Alastair is not cooperative.Someone being both cooperative and not elated is equivalent to being not sticky and not funny.
Culver being not agreeable is equivalent to Casper being not practical.
if there is at least one people who is cooperative and elated, then Culver is not agreeable and Jimmy is practical.
It can be concluded that Brice is not practical once knowing that Jimmy is elated or Brice is agreeable.
Someone who is cooperative is always not agreeable.
Someone being both not practical and not elated is equivalent to being cooperative.
Someone who is eithor cooperative or not elated is always not funny.
If everyone is not practical, then Brice is not funny and Alastair is agreeable.
If Baird is not agreeable, then Bruno is not funny, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either not elated or practical, then Brice is not funny.
It can be concluded that Jimmy is practical and Alastair is not cooperative once knowing that Brice is not funny.
It can be concluded that Baird is sticky once knowing that Jimmy is not cooperative or Baird is not funny. | Culver is not agreeable. | entailment |
Culver is practical.
Brice is not agreeable.
Baird is agreeable.
Bruno is practical.
Jimmy is not practical.
Brice is not funny.
Brice is not elated.
Casper is not agreeable.
Brice is cooperative.
Baird is cooperative.
Culver is not cooperative.
Alastair is not cooperative.Someone being both cooperative and not elated is equivalent to being not sticky and not funny.
Culver being not agreeable is equivalent to Casper being not practical.
if there is at least one people who is cooperative and elated, then Culver is not agreeable and Jimmy is practical.
It can be concluded that Brice is not practical once knowing that Jimmy is elated or Brice is agreeable.
Someone who is cooperative is always not agreeable.
Someone being both not practical and not elated is equivalent to being cooperative.
Someone who is eithor cooperative or not elated is always not funny.
If everyone is not practical, then Brice is not funny and Alastair is agreeable.
If Baird is not agreeable, then Bruno is not funny, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either not elated or practical, then Brice is not funny.
It can be concluded that Jimmy is practical and Alastair is not cooperative once knowing that Brice is not funny.
It can be concluded that Baird is sticky once knowing that Jimmy is not cooperative or Baird is not funny. | Baird is not sticky. | self_contradiction |
Culver is practical.
Brice is not agreeable.
Baird is agreeable.
Bruno is practical.
Jimmy is not practical.
Brice is not funny.
Brice is not elated.
Casper is not agreeable.
Brice is cooperative.
Baird is cooperative.
Culver is not cooperative.
Alastair is not cooperative.Someone being both cooperative and not elated is equivalent to being not sticky and not funny.
Culver being not agreeable is equivalent to Casper being not practical.
if there is at least one people who is cooperative and elated, then Culver is not agreeable and Jimmy is practical.
It can be concluded that Brice is not practical once knowing that Jimmy is elated or Brice is agreeable.
Someone who is cooperative is always not agreeable.
Someone being both not practical and not elated is equivalent to being cooperative.
Someone who is eithor cooperative or not elated is always not funny.
If everyone is not practical, then Brice is not funny and Alastair is agreeable.
If Baird is not agreeable, then Bruno is not funny, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either not elated or practical, then Brice is not funny.
It can be concluded that Jimmy is practical and Alastair is not cooperative once knowing that Brice is not funny.
It can be concluded that Baird is sticky once knowing that Jimmy is not cooperative or Baird is not funny. | Baird is practical. | contradiction |
Culver is practical.
Brice is not agreeable.
Baird is agreeable.
Bruno is practical.
Jimmy is not practical.
Brice is not funny.
Brice is not elated.
Casper is not agreeable.
Brice is cooperative.
Baird is cooperative.
Culver is not cooperative.
Alastair is not cooperative.Someone being both cooperative and not elated is equivalent to being not sticky and not funny.
Culver being not agreeable is equivalent to Casper being not practical.
if there is at least one people who is cooperative and elated, then Culver is not agreeable and Jimmy is practical.
It can be concluded that Brice is not practical once knowing that Jimmy is elated or Brice is agreeable.
Someone who is cooperative is always not agreeable.
Someone being both not practical and not elated is equivalent to being cooperative.
Someone who is eithor cooperative or not elated is always not funny.
If everyone is not practical, then Brice is not funny and Alastair is agreeable.
If Baird is not agreeable, then Bruno is not funny, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either not elated or practical, then Brice is not funny.
It can be concluded that Jimmy is practical and Alastair is not cooperative once knowing that Brice is not funny.
It can be concluded that Baird is sticky once knowing that Jimmy is not cooperative or Baird is not funny. | Baird is not agreeable. | self_contradiction |
Culver is practical.
Brice is not agreeable.
Baird is agreeable.
Bruno is practical.
Jimmy is not practical.
Brice is not funny.
Brice is not elated.
Casper is not agreeable.
Brice is cooperative.
Baird is cooperative.
Culver is not cooperative.
Alastair is not cooperative.Someone being both cooperative and not elated is equivalent to being not sticky and not funny.
Culver being not agreeable is equivalent to Casper being not practical.
if there is at least one people who is cooperative and elated, then Culver is not agreeable and Jimmy is practical.
It can be concluded that Brice is not practical once knowing that Jimmy is elated or Brice is agreeable.
Someone who is cooperative is always not agreeable.
Someone being both not practical and not elated is equivalent to being cooperative.
Someone who is eithor cooperative or not elated is always not funny.
If everyone is not practical, then Brice is not funny and Alastair is agreeable.
If Baird is not agreeable, then Bruno is not funny, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is either not elated or practical, then Brice is not funny.
It can be concluded that Jimmy is practical and Alastair is not cooperative once knowing that Brice is not funny.
It can be concluded that Baird is sticky once knowing that Jimmy is not cooperative or Baird is not funny. | Alastair is not cooperative. | entailment |
Ridley is not quiet.
Beverly is puzzled.
Joshua is quiet.
Blanche is not exciting.
Joshua is polite.
Aiken is not polite.
Joshua is exciting.
Beverly is exciting.
Beverly is not quiet.
Joshua is not puzzled.
Blanche is confident.
Blanche is not puzzled.Aiken being not confident implies that Luisa is not polite and Ridley is suitable.
If Blanche is confident, then Blanche is not exciting, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not polite or not puzzled is always not exciting.
Beverly being confident implies that Blanche is polite.
If there is at least one people who is both quiet and puzzled, then Joshua is not polite.
If someone is exciting or not quiet, then he is not puzzled.
All not puzzled people are not exciting.
If Ridley is not confident, then Luisa is puzzled and Ridley is polite, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is quiet, then Philbert is not suitable.
If there is someone who is either not confident or quiet, then Philbert is suitable.
If there is someone who is polite, then Aiken is not confident.
If Joshua is puzzled, then Blanche is suitable, and vice versa. | Philbert is suitable. | self_contradiction |
Ridley is not quiet.
Beverly is puzzled.
Joshua is quiet.
Blanche is not exciting.
Joshua is polite.
Aiken is not polite.
Joshua is exciting.
Beverly is exciting.
Beverly is not quiet.
Joshua is not puzzled.
Blanche is confident.
Blanche is not puzzled.Aiken being not confident implies that Luisa is not polite and Ridley is suitable.
If Blanche is confident, then Blanche is not exciting, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not polite or not puzzled is always not exciting.
Beverly being confident implies that Blanche is polite.
If there is at least one people who is both quiet and puzzled, then Joshua is not polite.
If someone is exciting or not quiet, then he is not puzzled.
All not puzzled people are not exciting.
If Ridley is not confident, then Luisa is puzzled and Ridley is polite, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is quiet, then Philbert is not suitable.
If there is someone who is either not confident or quiet, then Philbert is suitable.
If there is someone who is polite, then Aiken is not confident.
If Joshua is puzzled, then Blanche is suitable, and vice versa. | Beverly is not polite. | neutral |
Ridley is not quiet.
Beverly is puzzled.
Joshua is quiet.
Blanche is not exciting.
Joshua is polite.
Aiken is not polite.
Joshua is exciting.
Beverly is exciting.
Beverly is not quiet.
Joshua is not puzzled.
Blanche is confident.
Blanche is not puzzled.Aiken being not confident implies that Luisa is not polite and Ridley is suitable.
If Blanche is confident, then Blanche is not exciting, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not polite or not puzzled is always not exciting.
Beverly being confident implies that Blanche is polite.
If there is at least one people who is both quiet and puzzled, then Joshua is not polite.
If someone is exciting or not quiet, then he is not puzzled.
All not puzzled people are not exciting.
If Ridley is not confident, then Luisa is puzzled and Ridley is polite, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is quiet, then Philbert is not suitable.
If there is someone who is either not confident or quiet, then Philbert is suitable.
If there is someone who is polite, then Aiken is not confident.
If Joshua is puzzled, then Blanche is suitable, and vice versa. | Luisa is not polite. | entailment |
Ridley is not quiet.
Beverly is puzzled.
Joshua is quiet.
Blanche is not exciting.
Joshua is polite.
Aiken is not polite.
Joshua is exciting.
Beverly is exciting.
Beverly is not quiet.
Joshua is not puzzled.
Blanche is confident.
Blanche is not puzzled.Aiken being not confident implies that Luisa is not polite and Ridley is suitable.
If Blanche is confident, then Blanche is not exciting, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not polite or not puzzled is always not exciting.
Beverly being confident implies that Blanche is polite.
If there is at least one people who is both quiet and puzzled, then Joshua is not polite.
If someone is exciting or not quiet, then he is not puzzled.
All not puzzled people are not exciting.
If Ridley is not confident, then Luisa is puzzled and Ridley is polite, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is quiet, then Philbert is not suitable.
If there is someone who is either not confident or quiet, then Philbert is suitable.
If there is someone who is polite, then Aiken is not confident.
If Joshua is puzzled, then Blanche is suitable, and vice versa. | Philbert is not suitable. | self_contradiction |
Ridley is not quiet.
Beverly is puzzled.
Joshua is quiet.
Blanche is not exciting.
Joshua is polite.
Aiken is not polite.
Joshua is exciting.
Beverly is exciting.
Beverly is not quiet.
Joshua is not puzzled.
Blanche is confident.
Blanche is not puzzled.Aiken being not confident implies that Luisa is not polite and Ridley is suitable.
If Blanche is confident, then Blanche is not exciting, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not polite or not puzzled is always not exciting.
Beverly being confident implies that Blanche is polite.
If there is at least one people who is both quiet and puzzled, then Joshua is not polite.
If someone is exciting or not quiet, then he is not puzzled.
All not puzzled people are not exciting.
If Ridley is not confident, then Luisa is puzzled and Ridley is polite, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is quiet, then Philbert is not suitable.
If there is someone who is either not confident or quiet, then Philbert is suitable.
If there is someone who is polite, then Aiken is not confident.
If Joshua is puzzled, then Blanche is suitable, and vice versa. | Luisa is exciting. | contradiction |
Ridley is not quiet.
Beverly is puzzled.
Joshua is quiet.
Blanche is not exciting.
Joshua is polite.
Aiken is not polite.
Joshua is exciting.
Beverly is exciting.
Beverly is not quiet.
Joshua is not puzzled.
Blanche is confident.
Blanche is not puzzled.Aiken being not confident implies that Luisa is not polite and Ridley is suitable.
If Blanche is confident, then Blanche is not exciting, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not polite or not puzzled is always not exciting.
Beverly being confident implies that Blanche is polite.
If there is at least one people who is both quiet and puzzled, then Joshua is not polite.
If someone is exciting or not quiet, then he is not puzzled.
All not puzzled people are not exciting.
If Ridley is not confident, then Luisa is puzzled and Ridley is polite, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is quiet, then Philbert is not suitable.
If there is someone who is either not confident or quiet, then Philbert is suitable.
If there is someone who is polite, then Aiken is not confident.
If Joshua is puzzled, then Blanche is suitable, and vice versa. | Beverly is not exciting. | self_contradiction |
Ridley is not quiet.
Beverly is puzzled.
Joshua is quiet.
Blanche is not exciting.
Joshua is polite.
Aiken is not polite.
Joshua is exciting.
Beverly is exciting.
Beverly is not quiet.
Joshua is not puzzled.
Blanche is confident.
Blanche is not puzzled.Aiken being not confident implies that Luisa is not polite and Ridley is suitable.
If Blanche is confident, then Blanche is not exciting, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not polite or not puzzled is always not exciting.
Beverly being confident implies that Blanche is polite.
If there is at least one people who is both quiet and puzzled, then Joshua is not polite.
If someone is exciting or not quiet, then he is not puzzled.
All not puzzled people are not exciting.
If Ridley is not confident, then Luisa is puzzled and Ridley is polite, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is quiet, then Philbert is not suitable.
If there is someone who is either not confident or quiet, then Philbert is suitable.
If there is someone who is polite, then Aiken is not confident.
If Joshua is puzzled, then Blanche is suitable, and vice versa. | Beverly is quiet. | contradiction |
Ridley is not quiet.
Beverly is puzzled.
Joshua is quiet.
Blanche is not exciting.
Joshua is polite.
Aiken is not polite.
Joshua is exciting.
Beverly is exciting.
Beverly is not quiet.
Joshua is not puzzled.
Blanche is confident.
Blanche is not puzzled.Aiken being not confident implies that Luisa is not polite and Ridley is suitable.
If Blanche is confident, then Blanche is not exciting, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not polite or not puzzled is always not exciting.
Beverly being confident implies that Blanche is polite.
If there is at least one people who is both quiet and puzzled, then Joshua is not polite.
If someone is exciting or not quiet, then he is not puzzled.
All not puzzled people are not exciting.
If Ridley is not confident, then Luisa is puzzled and Ridley is polite, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is quiet, then Philbert is not suitable.
If there is someone who is either not confident or quiet, then Philbert is suitable.
If there is someone who is polite, then Aiken is not confident.
If Joshua is puzzled, then Blanche is suitable, and vice versa. | Blanche is not exciting. | entailment |
Ridley is not quiet.
Beverly is puzzled.
Joshua is quiet.
Blanche is not exciting.
Joshua is polite.
Aiken is not polite.
Joshua is exciting.
Beverly is exciting.
Beverly is not quiet.
Joshua is not puzzled.
Blanche is confident.
Blanche is not puzzled.Aiken being not confident implies that Luisa is not polite and Ridley is suitable.
If Blanche is confident, then Blanche is not exciting, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not polite or not puzzled is always not exciting.
Beverly being confident implies that Blanche is polite.
If there is at least one people who is both quiet and puzzled, then Joshua is not polite.
If someone is exciting or not quiet, then he is not puzzled.
All not puzzled people are not exciting.
If Ridley is not confident, then Luisa is puzzled and Ridley is polite, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is quiet, then Philbert is not suitable.
If there is someone who is either not confident or quiet, then Philbert is suitable.
If there is someone who is polite, then Aiken is not confident.
If Joshua is puzzled, then Blanche is suitable, and vice versa. | Blanche is not confident. | contradiction |
Ridley is not quiet.
Beverly is puzzled.
Joshua is quiet.
Blanche is not exciting.
Joshua is polite.
Aiken is not polite.
Joshua is exciting.
Beverly is exciting.
Beverly is not quiet.
Joshua is not puzzled.
Blanche is confident.
Blanche is not puzzled.Aiken being not confident implies that Luisa is not polite and Ridley is suitable.
If Blanche is confident, then Blanche is not exciting, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not polite or not puzzled is always not exciting.
Beverly being confident implies that Blanche is polite.
If there is at least one people who is both quiet and puzzled, then Joshua is not polite.
If someone is exciting or not quiet, then he is not puzzled.
All not puzzled people are not exciting.
If Ridley is not confident, then Luisa is puzzled and Ridley is polite, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is quiet, then Philbert is not suitable.
If there is someone who is either not confident or quiet, then Philbert is suitable.
If there is someone who is polite, then Aiken is not confident.
If Joshua is puzzled, then Blanche is suitable, and vice versa. | Blanche is confident. | entailment |
Ridley is not quiet.
Beverly is puzzled.
Joshua is quiet.
Blanche is not exciting.
Joshua is polite.
Aiken is not polite.
Joshua is exciting.
Beverly is exciting.
Beverly is not quiet.
Joshua is not puzzled.
Blanche is confident.
Blanche is not puzzled.Aiken being not confident implies that Luisa is not polite and Ridley is suitable.
If Blanche is confident, then Blanche is not exciting, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not polite or not puzzled is always not exciting.
Beverly being confident implies that Blanche is polite.
If there is at least one people who is both quiet and puzzled, then Joshua is not polite.
If someone is exciting or not quiet, then he is not puzzled.
All not puzzled people are not exciting.
If Ridley is not confident, then Luisa is puzzled and Ridley is polite, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is quiet, then Philbert is not suitable.
If there is someone who is either not confident or quiet, then Philbert is suitable.
If there is someone who is polite, then Aiken is not confident.
If Joshua is puzzled, then Blanche is suitable, and vice versa. | Beverly is not puzzled. | self_contradiction |
Ridley is not quiet.
Beverly is puzzled.
Joshua is quiet.
Blanche is not exciting.
Joshua is polite.
Aiken is not polite.
Joshua is exciting.
Beverly is exciting.
Beverly is not quiet.
Joshua is not puzzled.
Blanche is confident.
Blanche is not puzzled.Aiken being not confident implies that Luisa is not polite and Ridley is suitable.
If Blanche is confident, then Blanche is not exciting, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not polite or not puzzled is always not exciting.
Beverly being confident implies that Blanche is polite.
If there is at least one people who is both quiet and puzzled, then Joshua is not polite.
If someone is exciting or not quiet, then he is not puzzled.
All not puzzled people are not exciting.
If Ridley is not confident, then Luisa is puzzled and Ridley is polite, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is quiet, then Philbert is not suitable.
If there is someone who is either not confident or quiet, then Philbert is suitable.
If there is someone who is polite, then Aiken is not confident.
If Joshua is puzzled, then Blanche is suitable, and vice versa. | Blanche is exciting. | contradiction |
Ridley is not quiet.
Beverly is puzzled.
Joshua is quiet.
Blanche is not exciting.
Joshua is polite.
Aiken is not polite.
Joshua is exciting.
Beverly is exciting.
Beverly is not quiet.
Joshua is not puzzled.
Blanche is confident.
Blanche is not puzzled.Aiken being not confident implies that Luisa is not polite and Ridley is suitable.
If Blanche is confident, then Blanche is not exciting, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not polite or not puzzled is always not exciting.
Beverly being confident implies that Blanche is polite.
If there is at least one people who is both quiet and puzzled, then Joshua is not polite.
If someone is exciting or not quiet, then he is not puzzled.
All not puzzled people are not exciting.
If Ridley is not confident, then Luisa is puzzled and Ridley is polite, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is quiet, then Philbert is not suitable.
If there is someone who is either not confident or quiet, then Philbert is suitable.
If there is someone who is polite, then Aiken is not confident.
If Joshua is puzzled, then Blanche is suitable, and vice versa. | Aiken is not polite. | entailment |
Ridley is not quiet.
Beverly is puzzled.
Joshua is quiet.
Blanche is not exciting.
Joshua is polite.
Aiken is not polite.
Joshua is exciting.
Beverly is exciting.
Beverly is not quiet.
Joshua is not puzzled.
Blanche is confident.
Blanche is not puzzled.Aiken being not confident implies that Luisa is not polite and Ridley is suitable.
If Blanche is confident, then Blanche is not exciting, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not polite or not puzzled is always not exciting.
Beverly being confident implies that Blanche is polite.
If there is at least one people who is both quiet and puzzled, then Joshua is not polite.
If someone is exciting or not quiet, then he is not puzzled.
All not puzzled people are not exciting.
If Ridley is not confident, then Luisa is puzzled and Ridley is polite, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is quiet, then Philbert is not suitable.
If there is someone who is either not confident or quiet, then Philbert is suitable.
If there is someone who is polite, then Aiken is not confident.
If Joshua is puzzled, then Blanche is suitable, and vice versa. | Joshua is not polite. | self_contradiction |
Ridley is not quiet.
Beverly is puzzled.
Joshua is quiet.
Blanche is not exciting.
Joshua is polite.
Aiken is not polite.
Joshua is exciting.
Beverly is exciting.
Beverly is not quiet.
Joshua is not puzzled.
Blanche is confident.
Blanche is not puzzled.Aiken being not confident implies that Luisa is not polite and Ridley is suitable.
If Blanche is confident, then Blanche is not exciting, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not polite or not puzzled is always not exciting.
Beverly being confident implies that Blanche is polite.
If there is at least one people who is both quiet and puzzled, then Joshua is not polite.
If someone is exciting or not quiet, then he is not puzzled.
All not puzzled people are not exciting.
If Ridley is not confident, then Luisa is puzzled and Ridley is polite, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is quiet, then Philbert is not suitable.
If there is someone who is either not confident or quiet, then Philbert is suitable.
If there is someone who is polite, then Aiken is not confident.
If Joshua is puzzled, then Blanche is suitable, and vice versa. | Aiken is not exciting. | entailment |
Ridley is not quiet.
Beverly is puzzled.
Joshua is quiet.
Blanche is not exciting.
Joshua is polite.
Aiken is not polite.
Joshua is exciting.
Beverly is exciting.
Beverly is not quiet.
Joshua is not puzzled.
Blanche is confident.
Blanche is not puzzled.Aiken being not confident implies that Luisa is not polite and Ridley is suitable.
If Blanche is confident, then Blanche is not exciting, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not polite or not puzzled is always not exciting.
Beverly being confident implies that Blanche is polite.
If there is at least one people who is both quiet and puzzled, then Joshua is not polite.
If someone is exciting or not quiet, then he is not puzzled.
All not puzzled people are not exciting.
If Ridley is not confident, then Luisa is puzzled and Ridley is polite, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is quiet, then Philbert is not suitable.
If there is someone who is either not confident or quiet, then Philbert is suitable.
If there is someone who is polite, then Aiken is not confident.
If Joshua is puzzled, then Blanche is suitable, and vice versa. | Joshua is not quiet. | contradiction |
Ridley is not quiet.
Beverly is puzzled.
Joshua is quiet.
Blanche is not exciting.
Joshua is polite.
Aiken is not polite.
Joshua is exciting.
Beverly is exciting.
Beverly is not quiet.
Joshua is not puzzled.
Blanche is confident.
Blanche is not puzzled.Aiken being not confident implies that Luisa is not polite and Ridley is suitable.
If Blanche is confident, then Blanche is not exciting, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not polite or not puzzled is always not exciting.
Beverly being confident implies that Blanche is polite.
If there is at least one people who is both quiet and puzzled, then Joshua is not polite.
If someone is exciting or not quiet, then he is not puzzled.
All not puzzled people are not exciting.
If Ridley is not confident, then Luisa is puzzled and Ridley is polite, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is quiet, then Philbert is not suitable.
If there is someone who is either not confident or quiet, then Philbert is suitable.
If there is someone who is polite, then Aiken is not confident.
If Joshua is puzzled, then Blanche is suitable, and vice versa. | Philbert is confident. | neutral |
Ridley is not quiet.
Beverly is puzzled.
Joshua is quiet.
Blanche is not exciting.
Joshua is polite.
Aiken is not polite.
Joshua is exciting.
Beverly is exciting.
Beverly is not quiet.
Joshua is not puzzled.
Blanche is confident.
Blanche is not puzzled.Aiken being not confident implies that Luisa is not polite and Ridley is suitable.
If Blanche is confident, then Blanche is not exciting, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not polite or not puzzled is always not exciting.
Beverly being confident implies that Blanche is polite.
If there is at least one people who is both quiet and puzzled, then Joshua is not polite.
If someone is exciting or not quiet, then he is not puzzled.
All not puzzled people are not exciting.
If Ridley is not confident, then Luisa is puzzled and Ridley is polite, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is quiet, then Philbert is not suitable.
If there is someone who is either not confident or quiet, then Philbert is suitable.
If there is someone who is polite, then Aiken is not confident.
If Joshua is puzzled, then Blanche is suitable, and vice versa. | Aiken is suitable. | neutral |
Ridley is not quiet.
Beverly is puzzled.
Joshua is quiet.
Blanche is not exciting.
Joshua is polite.
Aiken is not polite.
Joshua is exciting.
Beverly is exciting.
Beverly is not quiet.
Joshua is not puzzled.
Blanche is confident.
Blanche is not puzzled.Aiken being not confident implies that Luisa is not polite and Ridley is suitable.
If Blanche is confident, then Blanche is not exciting, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not polite or not puzzled is always not exciting.
Beverly being confident implies that Blanche is polite.
If there is at least one people who is both quiet and puzzled, then Joshua is not polite.
If someone is exciting or not quiet, then he is not puzzled.
All not puzzled people are not exciting.
If Ridley is not confident, then Luisa is puzzled and Ridley is polite, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is quiet, then Philbert is not suitable.
If there is someone who is either not confident or quiet, then Philbert is suitable.
If there is someone who is polite, then Aiken is not confident.
If Joshua is puzzled, then Blanche is suitable, and vice versa. | Philbert is not confident. | neutral |
Ridley is not quiet.
Beverly is puzzled.
Joshua is quiet.
Blanche is not exciting.
Joshua is polite.
Aiken is not polite.
Joshua is exciting.
Beverly is exciting.
Beverly is not quiet.
Joshua is not puzzled.
Blanche is confident.
Blanche is not puzzled.Aiken being not confident implies that Luisa is not polite and Ridley is suitable.
If Blanche is confident, then Blanche is not exciting, and vice versa.
Someone who is eithor not polite or not puzzled is always not exciting.
Beverly being confident implies that Blanche is polite.
If there is at least one people who is both quiet and puzzled, then Joshua is not polite.
If someone is exciting or not quiet, then he is not puzzled.
All not puzzled people are not exciting.
If Ridley is not confident, then Luisa is puzzled and Ridley is polite, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is quiet, then Philbert is not suitable.
If there is someone who is either not confident or quiet, then Philbert is suitable.
If there is someone who is polite, then Aiken is not confident.
If Joshua is puzzled, then Blanche is suitable, and vice versa. | Luisa is confident. | neutral |
Sloane is not mental.
Bruce is not popular.
Sloane is not popular.
Glenn is not bumpy.
Sloane is helpful.
Roswell is bumpy.
Sloane is wrong.
Truman is emotional.
Roswell is helpful.
Leith is not mental.
Leith is helpful.
Conroy is not popular.Someone is not wrong and mental if and only if he is helpful.
Someone who is mental and wrong is always popular and emotional.
If someone who is not wrong is also bumpy, then he is not helpful.
If there is at least one people who is not helpful, then Truman is not mental and Conroy is not wrong.
If there is at least one people who is both not wrong and mental, then Bruce is not emotional.
If there is at least one people who is both not popular and mental, then Truman is not bumpy.
Someone who is not wrong is always popular.
If Bruce is not wrong and Truman is not mental, then Sloane is popular.
If there is someone who is either emotional or mental, then Bruce is not wrong.
If Roswell is mental and Glenn is not popular, then Leith is not bumpy.
If there is someone who is either not popular or helpful, then Sloane is emotional.
Sloane is not bumpy if and only if Bruce is mental and Sloane is wrong. | Conroy is not popular. | self_contradiction |
Sloane is not mental.
Bruce is not popular.
Sloane is not popular.
Glenn is not bumpy.
Sloane is helpful.
Roswell is bumpy.
Sloane is wrong.
Truman is emotional.
Roswell is helpful.
Leith is not mental.
Leith is helpful.
Conroy is not popular.Someone is not wrong and mental if and only if he is helpful.
Someone who is mental and wrong is always popular and emotional.
If someone who is not wrong is also bumpy, then he is not helpful.
If there is at least one people who is not helpful, then Truman is not mental and Conroy is not wrong.
If there is at least one people who is both not wrong and mental, then Bruce is not emotional.
If there is at least one people who is both not popular and mental, then Truman is not bumpy.
Someone who is not wrong is always popular.
If Bruce is not wrong and Truman is not mental, then Sloane is popular.
If there is someone who is either emotional or mental, then Bruce is not wrong.
If Roswell is mental and Glenn is not popular, then Leith is not bumpy.
If there is someone who is either not popular or helpful, then Sloane is emotional.
Sloane is not bumpy if and only if Bruce is mental and Sloane is wrong. | Bruce is mental. | neutral |
Sloane is not mental.
Bruce is not popular.
Sloane is not popular.
Glenn is not bumpy.
Sloane is helpful.
Roswell is bumpy.
Sloane is wrong.
Truman is emotional.
Roswell is helpful.
Leith is not mental.
Leith is helpful.
Conroy is not popular.Someone is not wrong and mental if and only if he is helpful.
Someone who is mental and wrong is always popular and emotional.
If someone who is not wrong is also bumpy, then he is not helpful.
If there is at least one people who is not helpful, then Truman is not mental and Conroy is not wrong.
If there is at least one people who is both not wrong and mental, then Bruce is not emotional.
If there is at least one people who is both not popular and mental, then Truman is not bumpy.
Someone who is not wrong is always popular.
If Bruce is not wrong and Truman is not mental, then Sloane is popular.
If there is someone who is either emotional or mental, then Bruce is not wrong.
If Roswell is mental and Glenn is not popular, then Leith is not bumpy.
If there is someone who is either not popular or helpful, then Sloane is emotional.
Sloane is not bumpy if and only if Bruce is mental and Sloane is wrong. | Glenn is not mental. | neutral |
Sloane is not mental.
Bruce is not popular.
Sloane is not popular.
Glenn is not bumpy.
Sloane is helpful.
Roswell is bumpy.
Sloane is wrong.
Truman is emotional.
Roswell is helpful.
Leith is not mental.
Leith is helpful.
Conroy is not popular.Someone is not wrong and mental if and only if he is helpful.
Someone who is mental and wrong is always popular and emotional.
If someone who is not wrong is also bumpy, then he is not helpful.
If there is at least one people who is not helpful, then Truman is not mental and Conroy is not wrong.
If there is at least one people who is both not wrong and mental, then Bruce is not emotional.
If there is at least one people who is both not popular and mental, then Truman is not bumpy.
Someone who is not wrong is always popular.
If Bruce is not wrong and Truman is not mental, then Sloane is popular.
If there is someone who is either emotional or mental, then Bruce is not wrong.
If Roswell is mental and Glenn is not popular, then Leith is not bumpy.
If there is someone who is either not popular or helpful, then Sloane is emotional.
Sloane is not bumpy if and only if Bruce is mental and Sloane is wrong. | Bruce is not mental. | neutral |
Sloane is not mental.
Bruce is not popular.
Sloane is not popular.
Glenn is not bumpy.
Sloane is helpful.
Roswell is bumpy.
Sloane is wrong.
Truman is emotional.
Roswell is helpful.
Leith is not mental.
Leith is helpful.
Conroy is not popular.Someone is not wrong and mental if and only if he is helpful.
Someone who is mental and wrong is always popular and emotional.
If someone who is not wrong is also bumpy, then he is not helpful.
If there is at least one people who is not helpful, then Truman is not mental and Conroy is not wrong.
If there is at least one people who is both not wrong and mental, then Bruce is not emotional.
If there is at least one people who is both not popular and mental, then Truman is not bumpy.
Someone who is not wrong is always popular.
If Bruce is not wrong and Truman is not mental, then Sloane is popular.
If there is someone who is either emotional or mental, then Bruce is not wrong.
If Roswell is mental and Glenn is not popular, then Leith is not bumpy.
If there is someone who is either not popular or helpful, then Sloane is emotional.
Sloane is not bumpy if and only if Bruce is mental and Sloane is wrong. | Leith is not wrong. | entailment |
Sloane is not mental.
Bruce is not popular.
Sloane is not popular.
Glenn is not bumpy.
Sloane is helpful.
Roswell is bumpy.
Sloane is wrong.
Truman is emotional.
Roswell is helpful.
Leith is not mental.
Leith is helpful.
Conroy is not popular.Someone is not wrong and mental if and only if he is helpful.
Someone who is mental and wrong is always popular and emotional.
If someone who is not wrong is also bumpy, then he is not helpful.
If there is at least one people who is not helpful, then Truman is not mental and Conroy is not wrong.
If there is at least one people who is both not wrong and mental, then Bruce is not emotional.
If there is at least one people who is both not popular and mental, then Truman is not bumpy.
Someone who is not wrong is always popular.
If Bruce is not wrong and Truman is not mental, then Sloane is popular.
If there is someone who is either emotional or mental, then Bruce is not wrong.
If Roswell is mental and Glenn is not popular, then Leith is not bumpy.
If there is someone who is either not popular or helpful, then Sloane is emotional.
Sloane is not bumpy if and only if Bruce is mental and Sloane is wrong. | Bruce is not wrong. | entailment |
Sloane is not mental.
Bruce is not popular.
Sloane is not popular.
Glenn is not bumpy.
Sloane is helpful.
Roswell is bumpy.
Sloane is wrong.
Truman is emotional.
Roswell is helpful.
Leith is not mental.
Leith is helpful.
Conroy is not popular.Someone is not wrong and mental if and only if he is helpful.
Someone who is mental and wrong is always popular and emotional.
If someone who is not wrong is also bumpy, then he is not helpful.
If there is at least one people who is not helpful, then Truman is not mental and Conroy is not wrong.
If there is at least one people who is both not wrong and mental, then Bruce is not emotional.
If there is at least one people who is both not popular and mental, then Truman is not bumpy.
Someone who is not wrong is always popular.
If Bruce is not wrong and Truman is not mental, then Sloane is popular.
If there is someone who is either emotional or mental, then Bruce is not wrong.
If Roswell is mental and Glenn is not popular, then Leith is not bumpy.
If there is someone who is either not popular or helpful, then Sloane is emotional.
Sloane is not bumpy if and only if Bruce is mental and Sloane is wrong. | Roswell is bumpy. | entailment |
Sloane is not mental.
Bruce is not popular.
Sloane is not popular.
Glenn is not bumpy.
Sloane is helpful.
Roswell is bumpy.
Sloane is wrong.
Truman is emotional.
Roswell is helpful.
Leith is not mental.
Leith is helpful.
Conroy is not popular.Someone is not wrong and mental if and only if he is helpful.
Someone who is mental and wrong is always popular and emotional.
If someone who is not wrong is also bumpy, then he is not helpful.
If there is at least one people who is not helpful, then Truman is not mental and Conroy is not wrong.
If there is at least one people who is both not wrong and mental, then Bruce is not emotional.
If there is at least one people who is both not popular and mental, then Truman is not bumpy.
Someone who is not wrong is always popular.
If Bruce is not wrong and Truman is not mental, then Sloane is popular.
If there is someone who is either emotional or mental, then Bruce is not wrong.
If Roswell is mental and Glenn is not popular, then Leith is not bumpy.
If there is someone who is either not popular or helpful, then Sloane is emotional.
Sloane is not bumpy if and only if Bruce is mental and Sloane is wrong. | Bruce is popular. | self_contradiction |
Sloane is not mental.
Bruce is not popular.
Sloane is not popular.
Glenn is not bumpy.
Sloane is helpful.
Roswell is bumpy.
Sloane is wrong.
Truman is emotional.
Roswell is helpful.
Leith is not mental.
Leith is helpful.
Conroy is not popular.Someone is not wrong and mental if and only if he is helpful.
Someone who is mental and wrong is always popular and emotional.
If someone who is not wrong is also bumpy, then he is not helpful.
If there is at least one people who is not helpful, then Truman is not mental and Conroy is not wrong.
If there is at least one people who is both not wrong and mental, then Bruce is not emotional.
If there is at least one people who is both not popular and mental, then Truman is not bumpy.
Someone who is not wrong is always popular.
If Bruce is not wrong and Truman is not mental, then Sloane is popular.
If there is someone who is either emotional or mental, then Bruce is not wrong.
If Roswell is mental and Glenn is not popular, then Leith is not bumpy.
If there is someone who is either not popular or helpful, then Sloane is emotional.
Sloane is not bumpy if and only if Bruce is mental and Sloane is wrong. | Sloane is mental. | self_contradiction |
Sloane is not mental.
Bruce is not popular.
Sloane is not popular.
Glenn is not bumpy.
Sloane is helpful.
Roswell is bumpy.
Sloane is wrong.
Truman is emotional.
Roswell is helpful.
Leith is not mental.
Leith is helpful.
Conroy is not popular.Someone is not wrong and mental if and only if he is helpful.
Someone who is mental and wrong is always popular and emotional.
If someone who is not wrong is also bumpy, then he is not helpful.
If there is at least one people who is not helpful, then Truman is not mental and Conroy is not wrong.
If there is at least one people who is both not wrong and mental, then Bruce is not emotional.
If there is at least one people who is both not popular and mental, then Truman is not bumpy.
Someone who is not wrong is always popular.
If Bruce is not wrong and Truman is not mental, then Sloane is popular.
If there is someone who is either emotional or mental, then Bruce is not wrong.
If Roswell is mental and Glenn is not popular, then Leith is not bumpy.
If there is someone who is either not popular or helpful, then Sloane is emotional.
Sloane is not bumpy if and only if Bruce is mental and Sloane is wrong. | Truman is not emotional. | contradiction |
Sloane is not mental.
Bruce is not popular.
Sloane is not popular.
Glenn is not bumpy.
Sloane is helpful.
Roswell is bumpy.
Sloane is wrong.
Truman is emotional.
Roswell is helpful.
Leith is not mental.
Leith is helpful.
Conroy is not popular.Someone is not wrong and mental if and only if he is helpful.
Someone who is mental and wrong is always popular and emotional.
If someone who is not wrong is also bumpy, then he is not helpful.
If there is at least one people who is not helpful, then Truman is not mental and Conroy is not wrong.
If there is at least one people who is both not wrong and mental, then Bruce is not emotional.
If there is at least one people who is both not popular and mental, then Truman is not bumpy.
Someone who is not wrong is always popular.
If Bruce is not wrong and Truman is not mental, then Sloane is popular.
If there is someone who is either emotional or mental, then Bruce is not wrong.
If Roswell is mental and Glenn is not popular, then Leith is not bumpy.
If there is someone who is either not popular or helpful, then Sloane is emotional.
Sloane is not bumpy if and only if Bruce is mental and Sloane is wrong. | Conroy is popular. | self_contradiction |
Sloane is not mental.
Bruce is not popular.
Sloane is not popular.
Glenn is not bumpy.
Sloane is helpful.
Roswell is bumpy.
Sloane is wrong.
Truman is emotional.
Roswell is helpful.
Leith is not mental.
Leith is helpful.
Conroy is not popular.Someone is not wrong and mental if and only if he is helpful.
Someone who is mental and wrong is always popular and emotional.
If someone who is not wrong is also bumpy, then he is not helpful.
If there is at least one people who is not helpful, then Truman is not mental and Conroy is not wrong.
If there is at least one people who is both not wrong and mental, then Bruce is not emotional.
If there is at least one people who is both not popular and mental, then Truman is not bumpy.
Someone who is not wrong is always popular.
If Bruce is not wrong and Truman is not mental, then Sloane is popular.
If there is someone who is either emotional or mental, then Bruce is not wrong.
If Roswell is mental and Glenn is not popular, then Leith is not bumpy.
If there is someone who is either not popular or helpful, then Sloane is emotional.
Sloane is not bumpy if and only if Bruce is mental and Sloane is wrong. | Leith is wrong. | contradiction |
Sloane is not mental.
Bruce is not popular.
Sloane is not popular.
Glenn is not bumpy.
Sloane is helpful.
Roswell is bumpy.
Sloane is wrong.
Truman is emotional.
Roswell is helpful.
Leith is not mental.
Leith is helpful.
Conroy is not popular.Someone is not wrong and mental if and only if he is helpful.
Someone who is mental and wrong is always popular and emotional.
If someone who is not wrong is also bumpy, then he is not helpful.
If there is at least one people who is not helpful, then Truman is not mental and Conroy is not wrong.
If there is at least one people who is both not wrong and mental, then Bruce is not emotional.
If there is at least one people who is both not popular and mental, then Truman is not bumpy.
Someone who is not wrong is always popular.
If Bruce is not wrong and Truman is not mental, then Sloane is popular.
If there is someone who is either emotional or mental, then Bruce is not wrong.
If Roswell is mental and Glenn is not popular, then Leith is not bumpy.
If there is someone who is either not popular or helpful, then Sloane is emotional.
Sloane is not bumpy if and only if Bruce is mental and Sloane is wrong. | Sloane is bumpy. | neutral |
Sloane is not mental.
Bruce is not popular.
Sloane is not popular.
Glenn is not bumpy.
Sloane is helpful.
Roswell is bumpy.
Sloane is wrong.
Truman is emotional.
Roswell is helpful.
Leith is not mental.
Leith is helpful.
Conroy is not popular.Someone is not wrong and mental if and only if he is helpful.
Someone who is mental and wrong is always popular and emotional.
If someone who is not wrong is also bumpy, then he is not helpful.
If there is at least one people who is not helpful, then Truman is not mental and Conroy is not wrong.
If there is at least one people who is both not wrong and mental, then Bruce is not emotional.
If there is at least one people who is both not popular and mental, then Truman is not bumpy.
Someone who is not wrong is always popular.
If Bruce is not wrong and Truman is not mental, then Sloane is popular.
If there is someone who is either emotional or mental, then Bruce is not wrong.
If Roswell is mental and Glenn is not popular, then Leith is not bumpy.
If there is someone who is either not popular or helpful, then Sloane is emotional.
Sloane is not bumpy if and only if Bruce is mental and Sloane is wrong. | Roswell is wrong. | contradiction |
Sloane is not mental.
Bruce is not popular.
Sloane is not popular.
Glenn is not bumpy.
Sloane is helpful.
Roswell is bumpy.
Sloane is wrong.
Truman is emotional.
Roswell is helpful.
Leith is not mental.
Leith is helpful.
Conroy is not popular.Someone is not wrong and mental if and only if he is helpful.
Someone who is mental and wrong is always popular and emotional.
If someone who is not wrong is also bumpy, then he is not helpful.
If there is at least one people who is not helpful, then Truman is not mental and Conroy is not wrong.
If there is at least one people who is both not wrong and mental, then Bruce is not emotional.
If there is at least one people who is both not popular and mental, then Truman is not bumpy.
Someone who is not wrong is always popular.
If Bruce is not wrong and Truman is not mental, then Sloane is popular.
If there is someone who is either emotional or mental, then Bruce is not wrong.
If Roswell is mental and Glenn is not popular, then Leith is not bumpy.
If there is someone who is either not popular or helpful, then Sloane is emotional.
Sloane is not bumpy if and only if Bruce is mental and Sloane is wrong. | Sloane is emotional. | entailment |
Sloane is not mental.
Bruce is not popular.
Sloane is not popular.
Glenn is not bumpy.
Sloane is helpful.
Roswell is bumpy.
Sloane is wrong.
Truman is emotional.
Roswell is helpful.
Leith is not mental.
Leith is helpful.
Conroy is not popular.Someone is not wrong and mental if and only if he is helpful.
Someone who is mental and wrong is always popular and emotional.
If someone who is not wrong is also bumpy, then he is not helpful.
If there is at least one people who is not helpful, then Truman is not mental and Conroy is not wrong.
If there is at least one people who is both not wrong and mental, then Bruce is not emotional.
If there is at least one people who is both not popular and mental, then Truman is not bumpy.
Someone who is not wrong is always popular.
If Bruce is not wrong and Truman is not mental, then Sloane is popular.
If there is someone who is either emotional or mental, then Bruce is not wrong.
If Roswell is mental and Glenn is not popular, then Leith is not bumpy.
If there is someone who is either not popular or helpful, then Sloane is emotional.
Sloane is not bumpy if and only if Bruce is mental and Sloane is wrong. | Bruce is not bumpy. | neutral |
Sloane is not mental.
Bruce is not popular.
Sloane is not popular.
Glenn is not bumpy.
Sloane is helpful.
Roswell is bumpy.
Sloane is wrong.
Truman is emotional.
Roswell is helpful.
Leith is not mental.
Leith is helpful.
Conroy is not popular.Someone is not wrong and mental if and only if he is helpful.
Someone who is mental and wrong is always popular and emotional.
If someone who is not wrong is also bumpy, then he is not helpful.
If there is at least one people who is not helpful, then Truman is not mental and Conroy is not wrong.
If there is at least one people who is both not wrong and mental, then Bruce is not emotional.
If there is at least one people who is both not popular and mental, then Truman is not bumpy.
Someone who is not wrong is always popular.
If Bruce is not wrong and Truman is not mental, then Sloane is popular.
If there is someone who is either emotional or mental, then Bruce is not wrong.
If Roswell is mental and Glenn is not popular, then Leith is not bumpy.
If there is someone who is either not popular or helpful, then Sloane is emotional.
Sloane is not bumpy if and only if Bruce is mental and Sloane is wrong. | Conroy is wrong. | contradiction |
Sloane is not mental.
Bruce is not popular.
Sloane is not popular.
Glenn is not bumpy.
Sloane is helpful.
Roswell is bumpy.
Sloane is wrong.
Truman is emotional.
Roswell is helpful.
Leith is not mental.
Leith is helpful.
Conroy is not popular.Someone is not wrong and mental if and only if he is helpful.
Someone who is mental and wrong is always popular and emotional.
If someone who is not wrong is also bumpy, then he is not helpful.
If there is at least one people who is not helpful, then Truman is not mental and Conroy is not wrong.
If there is at least one people who is both not wrong and mental, then Bruce is not emotional.
If there is at least one people who is both not popular and mental, then Truman is not bumpy.
Someone who is not wrong is always popular.
If Bruce is not wrong and Truman is not mental, then Sloane is popular.
If there is someone who is either emotional or mental, then Bruce is not wrong.
If Roswell is mental and Glenn is not popular, then Leith is not bumpy.
If there is someone who is either not popular or helpful, then Sloane is emotional.
Sloane is not bumpy if and only if Bruce is mental and Sloane is wrong. | Leith is popular. | entailment |
Sloane is not mental.
Bruce is not popular.
Sloane is not popular.
Glenn is not bumpy.
Sloane is helpful.
Roswell is bumpy.
Sloane is wrong.
Truman is emotional.
Roswell is helpful.
Leith is not mental.
Leith is helpful.
Conroy is not popular.Someone is not wrong and mental if and only if he is helpful.
Someone who is mental and wrong is always popular and emotional.
If someone who is not wrong is also bumpy, then he is not helpful.
If there is at least one people who is not helpful, then Truman is not mental and Conroy is not wrong.
If there is at least one people who is both not wrong and mental, then Bruce is not emotional.
If there is at least one people who is both not popular and mental, then Truman is not bumpy.
Someone who is not wrong is always popular.
If Bruce is not wrong and Truman is not mental, then Sloane is popular.
If there is someone who is either emotional or mental, then Bruce is not wrong.
If Roswell is mental and Glenn is not popular, then Leith is not bumpy.
If there is someone who is either not popular or helpful, then Sloane is emotional.
Sloane is not bumpy if and only if Bruce is mental and Sloane is wrong. | Sloane is wrong. | self_contradiction |
Sloane is not mental.
Bruce is not popular.
Sloane is not popular.
Glenn is not bumpy.
Sloane is helpful.
Roswell is bumpy.
Sloane is wrong.
Truman is emotional.
Roswell is helpful.
Leith is not mental.
Leith is helpful.
Conroy is not popular.Someone is not wrong and mental if and only if he is helpful.
Someone who is mental and wrong is always popular and emotional.
If someone who is not wrong is also bumpy, then he is not helpful.
If there is at least one people who is not helpful, then Truman is not mental and Conroy is not wrong.
If there is at least one people who is both not wrong and mental, then Bruce is not emotional.
If there is at least one people who is both not popular and mental, then Truman is not bumpy.
Someone who is not wrong is always popular.
If Bruce is not wrong and Truman is not mental, then Sloane is popular.
If there is someone who is either emotional or mental, then Bruce is not wrong.
If Roswell is mental and Glenn is not popular, then Leith is not bumpy.
If there is someone who is either not popular or helpful, then Sloane is emotional.
Sloane is not bumpy if and only if Bruce is mental and Sloane is wrong. | Roswell is not mental. | contradiction |
Kent is intellectual.
Kurt is not desperate.
Crispin is not imaginative.
Kurt is not popular.
Boris is not shiny.
Kurt is not shiny.
Boris is not intellectual.
Albert is not silly.
Boris is desperate.
Tracey is not intellectual.
Kent is not popular.
Crispin is not intellectual.Kent being desperate implies that Maddox is intellectual and Tracey is not shiny.
If there is at least one people who is either intellectual or not shiny, then Kurt is popular and Kent is desperate.
If Kent is desperate or Boris is shiny, then Kent is intellectual.
Albert is not imaginative if and only if Albert is not shiny.
If there is at least one people who is silly or not popular, then Kurt is intellectual.
Someone is popular and intellectual if and only if he is imaginative.
Someone being both intellectual and silly is equivalent to being not desperate.
If there is someone who is shiny, then Maddox is not imaginative and Tracey is popular.
If there is at least one people who is not desperate or not popular, then Crispin is not intellectual.
If someone is either popular or desperate, then he is not imaginative and intellectual.
Someone who is intellectual and not popular is always silly and imaginative.
Kurt being not popular or Tracey being imaginative implies that Boris is not silly. | Kent is not desperate. | self_contradiction |
Kent is intellectual.
Kurt is not desperate.
Crispin is not imaginative.
Kurt is not popular.
Boris is not shiny.
Kurt is not shiny.
Boris is not intellectual.
Albert is not silly.
Boris is desperate.
Tracey is not intellectual.
Kent is not popular.
Crispin is not intellectual.Kent being desperate implies that Maddox is intellectual and Tracey is not shiny.
If there is at least one people who is either intellectual or not shiny, then Kurt is popular and Kent is desperate.
If Kent is desperate or Boris is shiny, then Kent is intellectual.
Albert is not imaginative if and only if Albert is not shiny.
If there is at least one people who is silly or not popular, then Kurt is intellectual.
Someone is popular and intellectual if and only if he is imaginative.
Someone being both intellectual and silly is equivalent to being not desperate.
If there is someone who is shiny, then Maddox is not imaginative and Tracey is popular.
If there is at least one people who is not desperate or not popular, then Crispin is not intellectual.
If someone is either popular or desperate, then he is not imaginative and intellectual.
Someone who is intellectual and not popular is always silly and imaginative.
Kurt being not popular or Tracey being imaginative implies that Boris is not silly. | Maddox is not intellectual. | contradiction |
Kent is intellectual.
Kurt is not desperate.
Crispin is not imaginative.
Kurt is not popular.
Boris is not shiny.
Kurt is not shiny.
Boris is not intellectual.
Albert is not silly.
Boris is desperate.
Tracey is not intellectual.
Kent is not popular.
Crispin is not intellectual.Kent being desperate implies that Maddox is intellectual and Tracey is not shiny.
If there is at least one people who is either intellectual or not shiny, then Kurt is popular and Kent is desperate.
If Kent is desperate or Boris is shiny, then Kent is intellectual.
Albert is not imaginative if and only if Albert is not shiny.
If there is at least one people who is silly or not popular, then Kurt is intellectual.
Someone is popular and intellectual if and only if he is imaginative.
Someone being both intellectual and silly is equivalent to being not desperate.
If there is someone who is shiny, then Maddox is not imaginative and Tracey is popular.
If there is at least one people who is not desperate or not popular, then Crispin is not intellectual.
If someone is either popular or desperate, then he is not imaginative and intellectual.
Someone who is intellectual and not popular is always silly and imaginative.
Kurt being not popular or Tracey being imaginative implies that Boris is not silly. | Kurt is silly. | entailment |
Kent is intellectual.
Kurt is not desperate.
Crispin is not imaginative.
Kurt is not popular.
Boris is not shiny.
Kurt is not shiny.
Boris is not intellectual.
Albert is not silly.
Boris is desperate.
Tracey is not intellectual.
Kent is not popular.
Crispin is not intellectual.Kent being desperate implies that Maddox is intellectual and Tracey is not shiny.
If there is at least one people who is either intellectual or not shiny, then Kurt is popular and Kent is desperate.
If Kent is desperate or Boris is shiny, then Kent is intellectual.
Albert is not imaginative if and only if Albert is not shiny.
If there is at least one people who is silly or not popular, then Kurt is intellectual.
Someone is popular and intellectual if and only if he is imaginative.
Someone being both intellectual and silly is equivalent to being not desperate.
If there is someone who is shiny, then Maddox is not imaginative and Tracey is popular.
If there is at least one people who is not desperate or not popular, then Crispin is not intellectual.
If someone is either popular or desperate, then he is not imaginative and intellectual.
Someone who is intellectual and not popular is always silly and imaginative.
Kurt being not popular or Tracey being imaginative implies that Boris is not silly. | Kent is intellectual. | entailment |
Kent is intellectual.
Kurt is not desperate.
Crispin is not imaginative.
Kurt is not popular.
Boris is not shiny.
Kurt is not shiny.
Boris is not intellectual.
Albert is not silly.
Boris is desperate.
Tracey is not intellectual.
Kent is not popular.
Crispin is not intellectual.Kent being desperate implies that Maddox is intellectual and Tracey is not shiny.
If there is at least one people who is either intellectual or not shiny, then Kurt is popular and Kent is desperate.
If Kent is desperate or Boris is shiny, then Kent is intellectual.
Albert is not imaginative if and only if Albert is not shiny.
If there is at least one people who is silly or not popular, then Kurt is intellectual.
Someone is popular and intellectual if and only if he is imaginative.
Someone being both intellectual and silly is equivalent to being not desperate.
If there is someone who is shiny, then Maddox is not imaginative and Tracey is popular.
If there is at least one people who is not desperate or not popular, then Crispin is not intellectual.
If someone is either popular or desperate, then he is not imaginative and intellectual.
Someone who is intellectual and not popular is always silly and imaginative.
Kurt being not popular or Tracey being imaginative implies that Boris is not silly. | Boris is not intellectual. | self_contradiction |
Kent is intellectual.
Kurt is not desperate.
Crispin is not imaginative.
Kurt is not popular.
Boris is not shiny.
Kurt is not shiny.
Boris is not intellectual.
Albert is not silly.
Boris is desperate.
Tracey is not intellectual.
Kent is not popular.
Crispin is not intellectual.Kent being desperate implies that Maddox is intellectual and Tracey is not shiny.
If there is at least one people who is either intellectual or not shiny, then Kurt is popular and Kent is desperate.
If Kent is desperate or Boris is shiny, then Kent is intellectual.
Albert is not imaginative if and only if Albert is not shiny.
If there is at least one people who is silly or not popular, then Kurt is intellectual.
Someone is popular and intellectual if and only if he is imaginative.
Someone being both intellectual and silly is equivalent to being not desperate.
If there is someone who is shiny, then Maddox is not imaginative and Tracey is popular.
If there is at least one people who is not desperate or not popular, then Crispin is not intellectual.
If someone is either popular or desperate, then he is not imaginative and intellectual.
Someone who is intellectual and not popular is always silly and imaginative.
Kurt being not popular or Tracey being imaginative implies that Boris is not silly. | Albert is not shiny. | neutral |
Kent is intellectual.
Kurt is not desperate.
Crispin is not imaginative.
Kurt is not popular.
Boris is not shiny.
Kurt is not shiny.
Boris is not intellectual.
Albert is not silly.
Boris is desperate.
Tracey is not intellectual.
Kent is not popular.
Crispin is not intellectual.Kent being desperate implies that Maddox is intellectual and Tracey is not shiny.
If there is at least one people who is either intellectual or not shiny, then Kurt is popular and Kent is desperate.
If Kent is desperate or Boris is shiny, then Kent is intellectual.
Albert is not imaginative if and only if Albert is not shiny.
If there is at least one people who is silly or not popular, then Kurt is intellectual.
Someone is popular and intellectual if and only if he is imaginative.
Someone being both intellectual and silly is equivalent to being not desperate.
If there is someone who is shiny, then Maddox is not imaginative and Tracey is popular.
If there is at least one people who is not desperate or not popular, then Crispin is not intellectual.
If someone is either popular or desperate, then he is not imaginative and intellectual.
Someone who is intellectual and not popular is always silly and imaginative.
Kurt being not popular or Tracey being imaginative implies that Boris is not silly. | Kurt is not popular. | self_contradiction |
Kent is intellectual.
Kurt is not desperate.
Crispin is not imaginative.
Kurt is not popular.
Boris is not shiny.
Kurt is not shiny.
Boris is not intellectual.
Albert is not silly.
Boris is desperate.
Tracey is not intellectual.
Kent is not popular.
Crispin is not intellectual.Kent being desperate implies that Maddox is intellectual and Tracey is not shiny.
If there is at least one people who is either intellectual or not shiny, then Kurt is popular and Kent is desperate.
If Kent is desperate or Boris is shiny, then Kent is intellectual.
Albert is not imaginative if and only if Albert is not shiny.
If there is at least one people who is silly or not popular, then Kurt is intellectual.
Someone is popular and intellectual if and only if he is imaginative.
Someone being both intellectual and silly is equivalent to being not desperate.
If there is someone who is shiny, then Maddox is not imaginative and Tracey is popular.
If there is at least one people who is not desperate or not popular, then Crispin is not intellectual.
If someone is either popular or desperate, then he is not imaginative and intellectual.
Someone who is intellectual and not popular is always silly and imaginative.
Kurt being not popular or Tracey being imaginative implies that Boris is not silly. | Tracey is not desperate. | neutral |
Kent is intellectual.
Kurt is not desperate.
Crispin is not imaginative.
Kurt is not popular.
Boris is not shiny.
Kurt is not shiny.
Boris is not intellectual.
Albert is not silly.
Boris is desperate.
Tracey is not intellectual.
Kent is not popular.
Crispin is not intellectual.Kent being desperate implies that Maddox is intellectual and Tracey is not shiny.
If there is at least one people who is either intellectual or not shiny, then Kurt is popular and Kent is desperate.
If Kent is desperate or Boris is shiny, then Kent is intellectual.
Albert is not imaginative if and only if Albert is not shiny.
If there is at least one people who is silly or not popular, then Kurt is intellectual.
Someone is popular and intellectual if and only if he is imaginative.
Someone being both intellectual and silly is equivalent to being not desperate.
If there is someone who is shiny, then Maddox is not imaginative and Tracey is popular.
If there is at least one people who is not desperate or not popular, then Crispin is not intellectual.
If someone is either popular or desperate, then he is not imaginative and intellectual.
Someone who is intellectual and not popular is always silly and imaginative.
Kurt being not popular or Tracey being imaginative implies that Boris is not silly. | Kent is not intellectual. | contradiction |
Kent is intellectual.
Kurt is not desperate.
Crispin is not imaginative.
Kurt is not popular.
Boris is not shiny.
Kurt is not shiny.
Boris is not intellectual.
Albert is not silly.
Boris is desperate.
Tracey is not intellectual.
Kent is not popular.
Crispin is not intellectual.Kent being desperate implies that Maddox is intellectual and Tracey is not shiny.
If there is at least one people who is either intellectual or not shiny, then Kurt is popular and Kent is desperate.
If Kent is desperate or Boris is shiny, then Kent is intellectual.
Albert is not imaginative if and only if Albert is not shiny.
If there is at least one people who is silly or not popular, then Kurt is intellectual.
Someone is popular and intellectual if and only if he is imaginative.
Someone being both intellectual and silly is equivalent to being not desperate.
If there is someone who is shiny, then Maddox is not imaginative and Tracey is popular.
If there is at least one people who is not desperate or not popular, then Crispin is not intellectual.
If someone is either popular or desperate, then he is not imaginative and intellectual.
Someone who is intellectual and not popular is always silly and imaginative.
Kurt being not popular or Tracey being imaginative implies that Boris is not silly. | Kurt is not silly. | contradiction |
Kent is intellectual.
Kurt is not desperate.
Crispin is not imaginative.
Kurt is not popular.
Boris is not shiny.
Kurt is not shiny.
Boris is not intellectual.
Albert is not silly.
Boris is desperate.
Tracey is not intellectual.
Kent is not popular.
Crispin is not intellectual.Kent being desperate implies that Maddox is intellectual and Tracey is not shiny.
If there is at least one people who is either intellectual or not shiny, then Kurt is popular and Kent is desperate.
If Kent is desperate or Boris is shiny, then Kent is intellectual.
Albert is not imaginative if and only if Albert is not shiny.
If there is at least one people who is silly or not popular, then Kurt is intellectual.
Someone is popular and intellectual if and only if he is imaginative.
Someone being both intellectual and silly is equivalent to being not desperate.
If there is someone who is shiny, then Maddox is not imaginative and Tracey is popular.
If there is at least one people who is not desperate or not popular, then Crispin is not intellectual.
If someone is either popular or desperate, then he is not imaginative and intellectual.
Someone who is intellectual and not popular is always silly and imaginative.
Kurt being not popular or Tracey being imaginative implies that Boris is not silly. | Kurt is not shiny. | entailment |
Kent is intellectual.
Kurt is not desperate.
Crispin is not imaginative.
Kurt is not popular.
Boris is not shiny.
Kurt is not shiny.
Boris is not intellectual.
Albert is not silly.
Boris is desperate.
Tracey is not intellectual.
Kent is not popular.
Crispin is not intellectual.Kent being desperate implies that Maddox is intellectual and Tracey is not shiny.
If there is at least one people who is either intellectual or not shiny, then Kurt is popular and Kent is desperate.
If Kent is desperate or Boris is shiny, then Kent is intellectual.
Albert is not imaginative if and only if Albert is not shiny.
If there is at least one people who is silly or not popular, then Kurt is intellectual.
Someone is popular and intellectual if and only if he is imaginative.
Someone being both intellectual and silly is equivalent to being not desperate.
If there is someone who is shiny, then Maddox is not imaginative and Tracey is popular.
If there is at least one people who is not desperate or not popular, then Crispin is not intellectual.
If someone is either popular or desperate, then he is not imaginative and intellectual.
Someone who is intellectual and not popular is always silly and imaginative.
Kurt being not popular or Tracey being imaginative implies that Boris is not silly. | Kent is not silly. | contradiction |
Kent is intellectual.
Kurt is not desperate.
Crispin is not imaginative.
Kurt is not popular.
Boris is not shiny.
Kurt is not shiny.
Boris is not intellectual.
Albert is not silly.
Boris is desperate.
Tracey is not intellectual.
Kent is not popular.
Crispin is not intellectual.Kent being desperate implies that Maddox is intellectual and Tracey is not shiny.
If there is at least one people who is either intellectual or not shiny, then Kurt is popular and Kent is desperate.
If Kent is desperate or Boris is shiny, then Kent is intellectual.
Albert is not imaginative if and only if Albert is not shiny.
If there is at least one people who is silly or not popular, then Kurt is intellectual.
Someone is popular and intellectual if and only if he is imaginative.
Someone being both intellectual and silly is equivalent to being not desperate.
If there is someone who is shiny, then Maddox is not imaginative and Tracey is popular.
If there is at least one people who is not desperate or not popular, then Crispin is not intellectual.
If someone is either popular or desperate, then he is not imaginative and intellectual.
Someone who is intellectual and not popular is always silly and imaginative.
Kurt being not popular or Tracey being imaginative implies that Boris is not silly. | Kurt is desperate. | contradiction |
Kent is intellectual.
Kurt is not desperate.
Crispin is not imaginative.
Kurt is not popular.
Boris is not shiny.
Kurt is not shiny.
Boris is not intellectual.
Albert is not silly.
Boris is desperate.
Tracey is not intellectual.
Kent is not popular.
Crispin is not intellectual.Kent being desperate implies that Maddox is intellectual and Tracey is not shiny.
If there is at least one people who is either intellectual or not shiny, then Kurt is popular and Kent is desperate.
If Kent is desperate or Boris is shiny, then Kent is intellectual.
Albert is not imaginative if and only if Albert is not shiny.
If there is at least one people who is silly or not popular, then Kurt is intellectual.
Someone is popular and intellectual if and only if he is imaginative.
Someone being both intellectual and silly is equivalent to being not desperate.
If there is someone who is shiny, then Maddox is not imaginative and Tracey is popular.
If there is at least one people who is not desperate or not popular, then Crispin is not intellectual.
If someone is either popular or desperate, then he is not imaginative and intellectual.
Someone who is intellectual and not popular is always silly and imaginative.
Kurt being not popular or Tracey being imaginative implies that Boris is not silly. | Maddox is not popular. | neutral |
Kent is intellectual.
Kurt is not desperate.
Crispin is not imaginative.
Kurt is not popular.
Boris is not shiny.
Kurt is not shiny.
Boris is not intellectual.
Albert is not silly.
Boris is desperate.
Tracey is not intellectual.
Kent is not popular.
Crispin is not intellectual.Kent being desperate implies that Maddox is intellectual and Tracey is not shiny.
If there is at least one people who is either intellectual or not shiny, then Kurt is popular and Kent is desperate.
If Kent is desperate or Boris is shiny, then Kent is intellectual.
Albert is not imaginative if and only if Albert is not shiny.
If there is at least one people who is silly or not popular, then Kurt is intellectual.
Someone is popular and intellectual if and only if he is imaginative.
Someone being both intellectual and silly is equivalent to being not desperate.
If there is someone who is shiny, then Maddox is not imaginative and Tracey is popular.
If there is at least one people who is not desperate or not popular, then Crispin is not intellectual.
If someone is either popular or desperate, then he is not imaginative and intellectual.
Someone who is intellectual and not popular is always silly and imaginative.
Kurt being not popular or Tracey being imaginative implies that Boris is not silly. | Tracey is not imaginative. | neutral |
Kent is intellectual.
Kurt is not desperate.
Crispin is not imaginative.
Kurt is not popular.
Boris is not shiny.
Kurt is not shiny.
Boris is not intellectual.
Albert is not silly.
Boris is desperate.
Tracey is not intellectual.
Kent is not popular.
Crispin is not intellectual.Kent being desperate implies that Maddox is intellectual and Tracey is not shiny.
If there is at least one people who is either intellectual or not shiny, then Kurt is popular and Kent is desperate.
If Kent is desperate or Boris is shiny, then Kent is intellectual.
Albert is not imaginative if and only if Albert is not shiny.
If there is at least one people who is silly or not popular, then Kurt is intellectual.
Someone is popular and intellectual if and only if he is imaginative.
Someone being both intellectual and silly is equivalent to being not desperate.
If there is someone who is shiny, then Maddox is not imaginative and Tracey is popular.
If there is at least one people who is not desperate or not popular, then Crispin is not intellectual.
If someone is either popular or desperate, then he is not imaginative and intellectual.
Someone who is intellectual and not popular is always silly and imaginative.
Kurt being not popular or Tracey being imaginative implies that Boris is not silly. | Maddox is intellectual. | entailment |
Kent is intellectual.
Kurt is not desperate.
Crispin is not imaginative.
Kurt is not popular.
Boris is not shiny.
Kurt is not shiny.
Boris is not intellectual.
Albert is not silly.
Boris is desperate.
Tracey is not intellectual.
Kent is not popular.
Crispin is not intellectual.Kent being desperate implies that Maddox is intellectual and Tracey is not shiny.
If there is at least one people who is either intellectual or not shiny, then Kurt is popular and Kent is desperate.
If Kent is desperate or Boris is shiny, then Kent is intellectual.
Albert is not imaginative if and only if Albert is not shiny.
If there is at least one people who is silly or not popular, then Kurt is intellectual.
Someone is popular and intellectual if and only if he is imaginative.
Someone being both intellectual and silly is equivalent to being not desperate.
If there is someone who is shiny, then Maddox is not imaginative and Tracey is popular.
If there is at least one people who is not desperate or not popular, then Crispin is not intellectual.
If someone is either popular or desperate, then he is not imaginative and intellectual.
Someone who is intellectual and not popular is always silly and imaginative.
Kurt being not popular or Tracey being imaginative implies that Boris is not silly. | Kent is not popular. | self_contradiction |
Kent is intellectual.
Kurt is not desperate.
Crispin is not imaginative.
Kurt is not popular.
Boris is not shiny.
Kurt is not shiny.
Boris is not intellectual.
Albert is not silly.
Boris is desperate.
Tracey is not intellectual.
Kent is not popular.
Crispin is not intellectual.Kent being desperate implies that Maddox is intellectual and Tracey is not shiny.
If there is at least one people who is either intellectual or not shiny, then Kurt is popular and Kent is desperate.
If Kent is desperate or Boris is shiny, then Kent is intellectual.
Albert is not imaginative if and only if Albert is not shiny.
If there is at least one people who is silly or not popular, then Kurt is intellectual.
Someone is popular and intellectual if and only if he is imaginative.
Someone being both intellectual and silly is equivalent to being not desperate.
If there is someone who is shiny, then Maddox is not imaginative and Tracey is popular.
If there is at least one people who is not desperate or not popular, then Crispin is not intellectual.
If someone is either popular or desperate, then he is not imaginative and intellectual.
Someone who is intellectual and not popular is always silly and imaginative.
Kurt being not popular or Tracey being imaginative implies that Boris is not silly. | Kurt is imaginative. | self_contradiction |
Kent is intellectual.
Kurt is not desperate.
Crispin is not imaginative.
Kurt is not popular.
Boris is not shiny.
Kurt is not shiny.
Boris is not intellectual.
Albert is not silly.
Boris is desperate.
Tracey is not intellectual.
Kent is not popular.
Crispin is not intellectual.Kent being desperate implies that Maddox is intellectual and Tracey is not shiny.
If there is at least one people who is either intellectual or not shiny, then Kurt is popular and Kent is desperate.
If Kent is desperate or Boris is shiny, then Kent is intellectual.
Albert is not imaginative if and only if Albert is not shiny.
If there is at least one people who is silly or not popular, then Kurt is intellectual.
Someone is popular and intellectual if and only if he is imaginative.
Someone being both intellectual and silly is equivalent to being not desperate.
If there is someone who is shiny, then Maddox is not imaginative and Tracey is popular.
If there is at least one people who is not desperate or not popular, then Crispin is not intellectual.
If someone is either popular or desperate, then he is not imaginative and intellectual.
Someone who is intellectual and not popular is always silly and imaginative.
Kurt being not popular or Tracey being imaginative implies that Boris is not silly. | Boris is not silly. | entailment |
Kent is intellectual.
Kurt is not desperate.
Crispin is not imaginative.
Kurt is not popular.
Boris is not shiny.
Kurt is not shiny.
Boris is not intellectual.
Albert is not silly.
Boris is desperate.
Tracey is not intellectual.
Kent is not popular.
Crispin is not intellectual.Kent being desperate implies that Maddox is intellectual and Tracey is not shiny.
If there is at least one people who is either intellectual or not shiny, then Kurt is popular and Kent is desperate.
If Kent is desperate or Boris is shiny, then Kent is intellectual.
Albert is not imaginative if and only if Albert is not shiny.
If there is at least one people who is silly or not popular, then Kurt is intellectual.
Someone is popular and intellectual if and only if he is imaginative.
Someone being both intellectual and silly is equivalent to being not desperate.
If there is someone who is shiny, then Maddox is not imaginative and Tracey is popular.
If there is at least one people who is not desperate or not popular, then Crispin is not intellectual.
If someone is either popular or desperate, then he is not imaginative and intellectual.
Someone who is intellectual and not popular is always silly and imaginative.
Kurt being not popular or Tracey being imaginative implies that Boris is not silly. | Albert is desperate. | neutral |
Walter is not expensive.
Conroy is wandering.
Walter is not brown.
Joshua is not wandering.
Kayla is serious.
Scott is not adventurous.
Abner is wandering.
Abner is not serious.
Joshua is not brown.
Conroy is not magnificent.
Walter is wandering.
Joshua is adventurous.If someone who is magnificent is also serious, then he is brown.
Someone who is both expensive and not wandering is always brown.
If someone is wandering or adventurous, then he is not magnificent.
It can be concluded that Scott is brown once knowing that Scott is not expensive or Kayla is not wandering.
Scott being not serious implies that Joshua is magnificent and Jerry is not adventurous.
If there is at least one people who is not serious, then Walter is expensive and Abner is adventurous.
If someone is not serious and adventurous, then he is not expensive, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Abner is not expensive once knowing that Walter is wandering or Joshua is not serious.
Someone being serious is equivalent to being not magnificent.
If there is nobody who is not not magnificent, then Jerry is not expensive and Jerry is not wandering.
It can be concluded that Kayla is adventurous once knowing that Abner is serious.
It can be concluded that Scott is not serious once knowing that Conroy is not expensive and Walter is adventurous. | Abner is not adventurous. | contradiction |
Walter is not expensive.
Conroy is wandering.
Walter is not brown.
Joshua is not wandering.
Kayla is serious.
Scott is not adventurous.
Abner is wandering.
Abner is not serious.
Joshua is not brown.
Conroy is not magnificent.
Walter is wandering.
Joshua is adventurous.If someone who is magnificent is also serious, then he is brown.
Someone who is both expensive and not wandering is always brown.
If someone is wandering or adventurous, then he is not magnificent.
It can be concluded that Scott is brown once knowing that Scott is not expensive or Kayla is not wandering.
Scott being not serious implies that Joshua is magnificent and Jerry is not adventurous.
If there is at least one people who is not serious, then Walter is expensive and Abner is adventurous.
If someone is not serious and adventurous, then he is not expensive, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Abner is not expensive once knowing that Walter is wandering or Joshua is not serious.
Someone being serious is equivalent to being not magnificent.
If there is nobody who is not not magnificent, then Jerry is not expensive and Jerry is not wandering.
It can be concluded that Kayla is adventurous once knowing that Abner is serious.
It can be concluded that Scott is not serious once knowing that Conroy is not expensive and Walter is adventurous. | Conroy is wandering. | entailment |
Walter is not expensive.
Conroy is wandering.
Walter is not brown.
Joshua is not wandering.
Kayla is serious.
Scott is not adventurous.
Abner is wandering.
Abner is not serious.
Joshua is not brown.
Conroy is not magnificent.
Walter is wandering.
Joshua is adventurous.If someone who is magnificent is also serious, then he is brown.
Someone who is both expensive and not wandering is always brown.
If someone is wandering or adventurous, then he is not magnificent.
It can be concluded that Scott is brown once knowing that Scott is not expensive or Kayla is not wandering.
Scott being not serious implies that Joshua is magnificent and Jerry is not adventurous.
If there is at least one people who is not serious, then Walter is expensive and Abner is adventurous.
If someone is not serious and adventurous, then he is not expensive, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Abner is not expensive once knowing that Walter is wandering or Joshua is not serious.
Someone being serious is equivalent to being not magnificent.
If there is nobody who is not not magnificent, then Jerry is not expensive and Jerry is not wandering.
It can be concluded that Kayla is adventurous once knowing that Abner is serious.
It can be concluded that Scott is not serious once knowing that Conroy is not expensive and Walter is adventurous. | Walter is expensive. | self_contradiction |
Walter is not expensive.
Conroy is wandering.
Walter is not brown.
Joshua is not wandering.
Kayla is serious.
Scott is not adventurous.
Abner is wandering.
Abner is not serious.
Joshua is not brown.
Conroy is not magnificent.
Walter is wandering.
Joshua is adventurous.If someone who is magnificent is also serious, then he is brown.
Someone who is both expensive and not wandering is always brown.
If someone is wandering or adventurous, then he is not magnificent.
It can be concluded that Scott is brown once knowing that Scott is not expensive or Kayla is not wandering.
Scott being not serious implies that Joshua is magnificent and Jerry is not adventurous.
If there is at least one people who is not serious, then Walter is expensive and Abner is adventurous.
If someone is not serious and adventurous, then he is not expensive, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Abner is not expensive once knowing that Walter is wandering or Joshua is not serious.
Someone being serious is equivalent to being not magnificent.
If there is nobody who is not not magnificent, then Jerry is not expensive and Jerry is not wandering.
It can be concluded that Kayla is adventurous once knowing that Abner is serious.
It can be concluded that Scott is not serious once knowing that Conroy is not expensive and Walter is adventurous. | Walter is not serious. | self_contradiction |
Walter is not expensive.
Conroy is wandering.
Walter is not brown.
Joshua is not wandering.
Kayla is serious.
Scott is not adventurous.
Abner is wandering.
Abner is not serious.
Joshua is not brown.
Conroy is not magnificent.
Walter is wandering.
Joshua is adventurous.If someone who is magnificent is also serious, then he is brown.
Someone who is both expensive and not wandering is always brown.
If someone is wandering or adventurous, then he is not magnificent.
It can be concluded that Scott is brown once knowing that Scott is not expensive or Kayla is not wandering.
Scott being not serious implies that Joshua is magnificent and Jerry is not adventurous.
If there is at least one people who is not serious, then Walter is expensive and Abner is adventurous.
If someone is not serious and adventurous, then he is not expensive, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Abner is not expensive once knowing that Walter is wandering or Joshua is not serious.
Someone being serious is equivalent to being not magnificent.
If there is nobody who is not not magnificent, then Jerry is not expensive and Jerry is not wandering.
It can be concluded that Kayla is adventurous once knowing that Abner is serious.
It can be concluded that Scott is not serious once knowing that Conroy is not expensive and Walter is adventurous. | Walter is serious. | self_contradiction |
Walter is not expensive.
Conroy is wandering.
Walter is not brown.
Joshua is not wandering.
Kayla is serious.
Scott is not adventurous.
Abner is wandering.
Abner is not serious.
Joshua is not brown.
Conroy is not magnificent.
Walter is wandering.
Joshua is adventurous.If someone who is magnificent is also serious, then he is brown.
Someone who is both expensive and not wandering is always brown.
If someone is wandering or adventurous, then he is not magnificent.
It can be concluded that Scott is brown once knowing that Scott is not expensive or Kayla is not wandering.
Scott being not serious implies that Joshua is magnificent and Jerry is not adventurous.
If there is at least one people who is not serious, then Walter is expensive and Abner is adventurous.
If someone is not serious and adventurous, then he is not expensive, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Abner is not expensive once knowing that Walter is wandering or Joshua is not serious.
Someone being serious is equivalent to being not magnificent.
If there is nobody who is not not magnificent, then Jerry is not expensive and Jerry is not wandering.
It can be concluded that Kayla is adventurous once knowing that Abner is serious.
It can be concluded that Scott is not serious once knowing that Conroy is not expensive and Walter is adventurous. | Abner is not serious. | self_contradiction |
Walter is not expensive.
Conroy is wandering.
Walter is not brown.
Joshua is not wandering.
Kayla is serious.
Scott is not adventurous.
Abner is wandering.
Abner is not serious.
Joshua is not brown.
Conroy is not magnificent.
Walter is wandering.
Joshua is adventurous.If someone who is magnificent is also serious, then he is brown.
Someone who is both expensive and not wandering is always brown.
If someone is wandering or adventurous, then he is not magnificent.
It can be concluded that Scott is brown once knowing that Scott is not expensive or Kayla is not wandering.
Scott being not serious implies that Joshua is magnificent and Jerry is not adventurous.
If there is at least one people who is not serious, then Walter is expensive and Abner is adventurous.
If someone is not serious and adventurous, then he is not expensive, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Abner is not expensive once knowing that Walter is wandering or Joshua is not serious.
Someone being serious is equivalent to being not magnificent.
If there is nobody who is not not magnificent, then Jerry is not expensive and Jerry is not wandering.
It can be concluded that Kayla is adventurous once knowing that Abner is serious.
It can be concluded that Scott is not serious once knowing that Conroy is not expensive and Walter is adventurous. | Abner is expensive. | contradiction |
Walter is not expensive.
Conroy is wandering.
Walter is not brown.
Joshua is not wandering.
Kayla is serious.
Scott is not adventurous.
Abner is wandering.
Abner is not serious.
Joshua is not brown.
Conroy is not magnificent.
Walter is wandering.
Joshua is adventurous.If someone who is magnificent is also serious, then he is brown.
Someone who is both expensive and not wandering is always brown.
If someone is wandering or adventurous, then he is not magnificent.
It can be concluded that Scott is brown once knowing that Scott is not expensive or Kayla is not wandering.
Scott being not serious implies that Joshua is magnificent and Jerry is not adventurous.
If there is at least one people who is not serious, then Walter is expensive and Abner is adventurous.
If someone is not serious and adventurous, then he is not expensive, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Abner is not expensive once knowing that Walter is wandering or Joshua is not serious.
Someone being serious is equivalent to being not magnificent.
If there is nobody who is not not magnificent, then Jerry is not expensive and Jerry is not wandering.
It can be concluded that Kayla is adventurous once knowing that Abner is serious.
It can be concluded that Scott is not serious once knowing that Conroy is not expensive and Walter is adventurous. | Jerry is brown. | neutral |
Walter is not expensive.
Conroy is wandering.
Walter is not brown.
Joshua is not wandering.
Kayla is serious.
Scott is not adventurous.
Abner is wandering.
Abner is not serious.
Joshua is not brown.
Conroy is not magnificent.
Walter is wandering.
Joshua is adventurous.If someone who is magnificent is also serious, then he is brown.
Someone who is both expensive and not wandering is always brown.
If someone is wandering or adventurous, then he is not magnificent.
It can be concluded that Scott is brown once knowing that Scott is not expensive or Kayla is not wandering.
Scott being not serious implies that Joshua is magnificent and Jerry is not adventurous.
If there is at least one people who is not serious, then Walter is expensive and Abner is adventurous.
If someone is not serious and adventurous, then he is not expensive, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Abner is not expensive once knowing that Walter is wandering or Joshua is not serious.
Someone being serious is equivalent to being not magnificent.
If there is nobody who is not not magnificent, then Jerry is not expensive and Jerry is not wandering.
It can be concluded that Kayla is adventurous once knowing that Abner is serious.
It can be concluded that Scott is not serious once knowing that Conroy is not expensive and Walter is adventurous. | Walter is wandering. | entailment |
Walter is not expensive.
Conroy is wandering.
Walter is not brown.
Joshua is not wandering.
Kayla is serious.
Scott is not adventurous.
Abner is wandering.
Abner is not serious.
Joshua is not brown.
Conroy is not magnificent.
Walter is wandering.
Joshua is adventurous.If someone who is magnificent is also serious, then he is brown.
Someone who is both expensive and not wandering is always brown.
If someone is wandering or adventurous, then he is not magnificent.
It can be concluded that Scott is brown once knowing that Scott is not expensive or Kayla is not wandering.
Scott being not serious implies that Joshua is magnificent and Jerry is not adventurous.
If there is at least one people who is not serious, then Walter is expensive and Abner is adventurous.
If someone is not serious and adventurous, then he is not expensive, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Abner is not expensive once knowing that Walter is wandering or Joshua is not serious.
Someone being serious is equivalent to being not magnificent.
If there is nobody who is not not magnificent, then Jerry is not expensive and Jerry is not wandering.
It can be concluded that Kayla is adventurous once knowing that Abner is serious.
It can be concluded that Scott is not serious once knowing that Conroy is not expensive and Walter is adventurous. | Walter is not expensive. | self_contradiction |
Walter is not expensive.
Conroy is wandering.
Walter is not brown.
Joshua is not wandering.
Kayla is serious.
Scott is not adventurous.
Abner is wandering.
Abner is not serious.
Joshua is not brown.
Conroy is not magnificent.
Walter is wandering.
Joshua is adventurous.If someone who is magnificent is also serious, then he is brown.
Someone who is both expensive and not wandering is always brown.
If someone is wandering or adventurous, then he is not magnificent.
It can be concluded that Scott is brown once knowing that Scott is not expensive or Kayla is not wandering.
Scott being not serious implies that Joshua is magnificent and Jerry is not adventurous.
If there is at least one people who is not serious, then Walter is expensive and Abner is adventurous.
If someone is not serious and adventurous, then he is not expensive, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Abner is not expensive once knowing that Walter is wandering or Joshua is not serious.
Someone being serious is equivalent to being not magnificent.
If there is nobody who is not not magnificent, then Jerry is not expensive and Jerry is not wandering.
It can be concluded that Kayla is adventurous once knowing that Abner is serious.
It can be concluded that Scott is not serious once knowing that Conroy is not expensive and Walter is adventurous. | Conroy is not wandering. | contradiction |
Walter is not expensive.
Conroy is wandering.
Walter is not brown.
Joshua is not wandering.
Kayla is serious.
Scott is not adventurous.
Abner is wandering.
Abner is not serious.
Joshua is not brown.
Conroy is not magnificent.
Walter is wandering.
Joshua is adventurous.If someone who is magnificent is also serious, then he is brown.
Someone who is both expensive and not wandering is always brown.
If someone is wandering or adventurous, then he is not magnificent.
It can be concluded that Scott is brown once knowing that Scott is not expensive or Kayla is not wandering.
Scott being not serious implies that Joshua is magnificent and Jerry is not adventurous.
If there is at least one people who is not serious, then Walter is expensive and Abner is adventurous.
If someone is not serious and adventurous, then he is not expensive, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Abner is not expensive once knowing that Walter is wandering or Joshua is not serious.
Someone being serious is equivalent to being not magnificent.
If there is nobody who is not not magnificent, then Jerry is not expensive and Jerry is not wandering.
It can be concluded that Kayla is adventurous once knowing that Abner is serious.
It can be concluded that Scott is not serious once knowing that Conroy is not expensive and Walter is adventurous. | Kayla is not magnificent. | entailment |
Walter is not expensive.
Conroy is wandering.
Walter is not brown.
Joshua is not wandering.
Kayla is serious.
Scott is not adventurous.
Abner is wandering.
Abner is not serious.
Joshua is not brown.
Conroy is not magnificent.
Walter is wandering.
Joshua is adventurous.If someone who is magnificent is also serious, then he is brown.
Someone who is both expensive and not wandering is always brown.
If someone is wandering or adventurous, then he is not magnificent.
It can be concluded that Scott is brown once knowing that Scott is not expensive or Kayla is not wandering.
Scott being not serious implies that Joshua is magnificent and Jerry is not adventurous.
If there is at least one people who is not serious, then Walter is expensive and Abner is adventurous.
If someone is not serious and adventurous, then he is not expensive, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Abner is not expensive once knowing that Walter is wandering or Joshua is not serious.
Someone being serious is equivalent to being not magnificent.
If there is nobody who is not not magnificent, then Jerry is not expensive and Jerry is not wandering.
It can be concluded that Kayla is adventurous once knowing that Abner is serious.
It can be concluded that Scott is not serious once knowing that Conroy is not expensive and Walter is adventurous. | Kayla is expensive. | neutral |
Walter is not expensive.
Conroy is wandering.
Walter is not brown.
Joshua is not wandering.
Kayla is serious.
Scott is not adventurous.
Abner is wandering.
Abner is not serious.
Joshua is not brown.
Conroy is not magnificent.
Walter is wandering.
Joshua is adventurous.If someone who is magnificent is also serious, then he is brown.
Someone who is both expensive and not wandering is always brown.
If someone is wandering or adventurous, then he is not magnificent.
It can be concluded that Scott is brown once knowing that Scott is not expensive or Kayla is not wandering.
Scott being not serious implies that Joshua is magnificent and Jerry is not adventurous.
If there is at least one people who is not serious, then Walter is expensive and Abner is adventurous.
If someone is not serious and adventurous, then he is not expensive, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Abner is not expensive once knowing that Walter is wandering or Joshua is not serious.
Someone being serious is equivalent to being not magnificent.
If there is nobody who is not not magnificent, then Jerry is not expensive and Jerry is not wandering.
It can be concluded that Kayla is adventurous once knowing that Abner is serious.
It can be concluded that Scott is not serious once knowing that Conroy is not expensive and Walter is adventurous. | Walter is adventurous. | entailment |
Walter is not expensive.
Conroy is wandering.
Walter is not brown.
Joshua is not wandering.
Kayla is serious.
Scott is not adventurous.
Abner is wandering.
Abner is not serious.
Joshua is not brown.
Conroy is not magnificent.
Walter is wandering.
Joshua is adventurous.If someone who is magnificent is also serious, then he is brown.
Someone who is both expensive and not wandering is always brown.
If someone is wandering or adventurous, then he is not magnificent.
It can be concluded that Scott is brown once knowing that Scott is not expensive or Kayla is not wandering.
Scott being not serious implies that Joshua is magnificent and Jerry is not adventurous.
If there is at least one people who is not serious, then Walter is expensive and Abner is adventurous.
If someone is not serious and adventurous, then he is not expensive, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Abner is not expensive once knowing that Walter is wandering or Joshua is not serious.
Someone being serious is equivalent to being not magnificent.
If there is nobody who is not not magnificent, then Jerry is not expensive and Jerry is not wandering.
It can be concluded that Kayla is adventurous once knowing that Abner is serious.
It can be concluded that Scott is not serious once knowing that Conroy is not expensive and Walter is adventurous. | Walter is not brown. | entailment |
Walter is not expensive.
Conroy is wandering.
Walter is not brown.
Joshua is not wandering.
Kayla is serious.
Scott is not adventurous.
Abner is wandering.
Abner is not serious.
Joshua is not brown.
Conroy is not magnificent.
Walter is wandering.
Joshua is adventurous.If someone who is magnificent is also serious, then he is brown.
Someone who is both expensive and not wandering is always brown.
If someone is wandering or adventurous, then he is not magnificent.
It can be concluded that Scott is brown once knowing that Scott is not expensive or Kayla is not wandering.
Scott being not serious implies that Joshua is magnificent and Jerry is not adventurous.
If there is at least one people who is not serious, then Walter is expensive and Abner is adventurous.
If someone is not serious and adventurous, then he is not expensive, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Abner is not expensive once knowing that Walter is wandering or Joshua is not serious.
Someone being serious is equivalent to being not magnificent.
If there is nobody who is not not magnificent, then Jerry is not expensive and Jerry is not wandering.
It can be concluded that Kayla is adventurous once knowing that Abner is serious.
It can be concluded that Scott is not serious once knowing that Conroy is not expensive and Walter is adventurous. | Abner is brown. | neutral |
Walter is not expensive.
Conroy is wandering.
Walter is not brown.
Joshua is not wandering.
Kayla is serious.
Scott is not adventurous.
Abner is wandering.
Abner is not serious.
Joshua is not brown.
Conroy is not magnificent.
Walter is wandering.
Joshua is adventurous.If someone who is magnificent is also serious, then he is brown.
Someone who is both expensive and not wandering is always brown.
If someone is wandering or adventurous, then he is not magnificent.
It can be concluded that Scott is brown once knowing that Scott is not expensive or Kayla is not wandering.
Scott being not serious implies that Joshua is magnificent and Jerry is not adventurous.
If there is at least one people who is not serious, then Walter is expensive and Abner is adventurous.
If someone is not serious and adventurous, then he is not expensive, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Abner is not expensive once knowing that Walter is wandering or Joshua is not serious.
Someone being serious is equivalent to being not magnificent.
If there is nobody who is not not magnificent, then Jerry is not expensive and Jerry is not wandering.
It can be concluded that Kayla is adventurous once knowing that Abner is serious.
It can be concluded that Scott is not serious once knowing that Conroy is not expensive and Walter is adventurous. | Jerry is wandering. | neutral |
Walter is not expensive.
Conroy is wandering.
Walter is not brown.
Joshua is not wandering.
Kayla is serious.
Scott is not adventurous.
Abner is wandering.
Abner is not serious.
Joshua is not brown.
Conroy is not magnificent.
Walter is wandering.
Joshua is adventurous.If someone who is magnificent is also serious, then he is brown.
Someone who is both expensive and not wandering is always brown.
If someone is wandering or adventurous, then he is not magnificent.
It can be concluded that Scott is brown once knowing that Scott is not expensive or Kayla is not wandering.
Scott being not serious implies that Joshua is magnificent and Jerry is not adventurous.
If there is at least one people who is not serious, then Walter is expensive and Abner is adventurous.
If someone is not serious and adventurous, then he is not expensive, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Abner is not expensive once knowing that Walter is wandering or Joshua is not serious.
Someone being serious is equivalent to being not magnificent.
If there is nobody who is not not magnificent, then Jerry is not expensive and Jerry is not wandering.
It can be concluded that Kayla is adventurous once knowing that Abner is serious.
It can be concluded that Scott is not serious once knowing that Conroy is not expensive and Walter is adventurous. | Joshua is not expensive. | neutral |
Walter is not expensive.
Conroy is wandering.
Walter is not brown.
Joshua is not wandering.
Kayla is serious.
Scott is not adventurous.
Abner is wandering.
Abner is not serious.
Joshua is not brown.
Conroy is not magnificent.
Walter is wandering.
Joshua is adventurous.If someone who is magnificent is also serious, then he is brown.
Someone who is both expensive and not wandering is always brown.
If someone is wandering or adventurous, then he is not magnificent.
It can be concluded that Scott is brown once knowing that Scott is not expensive or Kayla is not wandering.
Scott being not serious implies that Joshua is magnificent and Jerry is not adventurous.
If there is at least one people who is not serious, then Walter is expensive and Abner is adventurous.
If someone is not serious and adventurous, then he is not expensive, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Abner is not expensive once knowing that Walter is wandering or Joshua is not serious.
Someone being serious is equivalent to being not magnificent.
If there is nobody who is not not magnificent, then Jerry is not expensive and Jerry is not wandering.
It can be concluded that Kayla is adventurous once knowing that Abner is serious.
It can be concluded that Scott is not serious once knowing that Conroy is not expensive and Walter is adventurous. | Abner is magnificent. | contradiction |
Walter is not expensive.
Conroy is wandering.
Walter is not brown.
Joshua is not wandering.
Kayla is serious.
Scott is not adventurous.
Abner is wandering.
Abner is not serious.
Joshua is not brown.
Conroy is not magnificent.
Walter is wandering.
Joshua is adventurous.If someone who is magnificent is also serious, then he is brown.
Someone who is both expensive and not wandering is always brown.
If someone is wandering or adventurous, then he is not magnificent.
It can be concluded that Scott is brown once knowing that Scott is not expensive or Kayla is not wandering.
Scott being not serious implies that Joshua is magnificent and Jerry is not adventurous.
If there is at least one people who is not serious, then Walter is expensive and Abner is adventurous.
If someone is not serious and adventurous, then he is not expensive, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Abner is not expensive once knowing that Walter is wandering or Joshua is not serious.
Someone being serious is equivalent to being not magnificent.
If there is nobody who is not not magnificent, then Jerry is not expensive and Jerry is not wandering.
It can be concluded that Kayla is adventurous once knowing that Abner is serious.
It can be concluded that Scott is not serious once knowing that Conroy is not expensive and Walter is adventurous. | Kayla is not adventurous. | contradiction |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.