premise
stringlengths 923
1.41k
| hypothesis
stringlengths 11
33
| label
stringclasses 4
values |
|---|---|---|
Glen is existing.
Ethan is not eastern.
Hannah is healthy.
Boris is not healthy.
Glen is reliable.
Ethan is not rude.
Boris is not reliable.
Boris is electronic.
Alberto is existing.
Joe is not existing.
Alberto is not healthy.
Hall is not existing.If there is at least one people who is rude or eastern, then Glen is not healthy.
If there is at least one people who is healthy or not eastern, then Hannah is reliable.
If someone is either electronic or not existing, then he is healthy and reliable.
If someone is both eastern and healthy, then he is reliable.
Someone is not reliable if and only if he is not healthy.
If there is someone who is both healthy and not eastern, then Ethan is existing.
Hannah being not electronic and Alberto being not existing imply that Boris is not healthy.
Hall being not eastern implies that Alberto is not electronic and Hannah is existing.
If Ethan is reliable, then Boris is rude and Ethan is not existing, and vice versa.
Someone being both not healthy and not eastern is equivalent to being not rude and not existing.
If someone is healthy and reliable, then he is both existing and not electronic, and vice versa.
Boris is not eastern if and only if Joe is healthy. | Hall is electronic. | contradiction |
Glen is existing.
Ethan is not eastern.
Hannah is healthy.
Boris is not healthy.
Glen is reliable.
Ethan is not rude.
Boris is not reliable.
Boris is electronic.
Alberto is existing.
Joe is not existing.
Alberto is not healthy.
Hall is not existing.If there is at least one people who is rude or eastern, then Glen is not healthy.
If there is at least one people who is healthy or not eastern, then Hannah is reliable.
If someone is either electronic or not existing, then he is healthy and reliable.
If someone is both eastern and healthy, then he is reliable.
Someone is not reliable if and only if he is not healthy.
If there is someone who is both healthy and not eastern, then Ethan is existing.
Hannah being not electronic and Alberto being not existing imply that Boris is not healthy.
Hall being not eastern implies that Alberto is not electronic and Hannah is existing.
If Ethan is reliable, then Boris is rude and Ethan is not existing, and vice versa.
Someone being both not healthy and not eastern is equivalent to being not rude and not existing.
If someone is healthy and reliable, then he is both existing and not electronic, and vice versa.
Boris is not eastern if and only if Joe is healthy. | Boris is not healthy. | self_contradiction |
Glen is existing.
Ethan is not eastern.
Hannah is healthy.
Boris is not healthy.
Glen is reliable.
Ethan is not rude.
Boris is not reliable.
Boris is electronic.
Alberto is existing.
Joe is not existing.
Alberto is not healthy.
Hall is not existing.If there is at least one people who is rude or eastern, then Glen is not healthy.
If there is at least one people who is healthy or not eastern, then Hannah is reliable.
If someone is either electronic or not existing, then he is healthy and reliable.
If someone is both eastern and healthy, then he is reliable.
Someone is not reliable if and only if he is not healthy.
If there is someone who is both healthy and not eastern, then Ethan is existing.
Hannah being not electronic and Alberto being not existing imply that Boris is not healthy.
Hall being not eastern implies that Alberto is not electronic and Hannah is existing.
If Ethan is reliable, then Boris is rude and Ethan is not existing, and vice versa.
Someone being both not healthy and not eastern is equivalent to being not rude and not existing.
If someone is healthy and reliable, then he is both existing and not electronic, and vice versa.
Boris is not eastern if and only if Joe is healthy. | Boris is healthy. | self_contradiction |
Glen is existing.
Ethan is not eastern.
Hannah is healthy.
Boris is not healthy.
Glen is reliable.
Ethan is not rude.
Boris is not reliable.
Boris is electronic.
Alberto is existing.
Joe is not existing.
Alberto is not healthy.
Hall is not existing.If there is at least one people who is rude or eastern, then Glen is not healthy.
If there is at least one people who is healthy or not eastern, then Hannah is reliable.
If someone is either electronic or not existing, then he is healthy and reliable.
If someone is both eastern and healthy, then he is reliable.
Someone is not reliable if and only if he is not healthy.
If there is someone who is both healthy and not eastern, then Ethan is existing.
Hannah being not electronic and Alberto being not existing imply that Boris is not healthy.
Hall being not eastern implies that Alberto is not electronic and Hannah is existing.
If Ethan is reliable, then Boris is rude and Ethan is not existing, and vice versa.
Someone being both not healthy and not eastern is equivalent to being not rude and not existing.
If someone is healthy and reliable, then he is both existing and not electronic, and vice versa.
Boris is not eastern if and only if Joe is healthy. | Joe is healthy. | entailment |
Glen is existing.
Ethan is not eastern.
Hannah is healthy.
Boris is not healthy.
Glen is reliable.
Ethan is not rude.
Boris is not reliable.
Boris is electronic.
Alberto is existing.
Joe is not existing.
Alberto is not healthy.
Hall is not existing.If there is at least one people who is rude or eastern, then Glen is not healthy.
If there is at least one people who is healthy or not eastern, then Hannah is reliable.
If someone is either electronic or not existing, then he is healthy and reliable.
If someone is both eastern and healthy, then he is reliable.
Someone is not reliable if and only if he is not healthy.
If there is someone who is both healthy and not eastern, then Ethan is existing.
Hannah being not electronic and Alberto being not existing imply that Boris is not healthy.
Hall being not eastern implies that Alberto is not electronic and Hannah is existing.
If Ethan is reliable, then Boris is rude and Ethan is not existing, and vice versa.
Someone being both not healthy and not eastern is equivalent to being not rude and not existing.
If someone is healthy and reliable, then he is both existing and not electronic, and vice versa.
Boris is not eastern if and only if Joe is healthy. | Hall is eastern. | neutral |
Glen is existing.
Ethan is not eastern.
Hannah is healthy.
Boris is not healthy.
Glen is reliable.
Ethan is not rude.
Boris is not reliable.
Boris is electronic.
Alberto is existing.
Joe is not existing.
Alberto is not healthy.
Hall is not existing.If there is at least one people who is rude or eastern, then Glen is not healthy.
If there is at least one people who is healthy or not eastern, then Hannah is reliable.
If someone is either electronic or not existing, then he is healthy and reliable.
If someone is both eastern and healthy, then he is reliable.
Someone is not reliable if and only if he is not healthy.
If there is someone who is both healthy and not eastern, then Ethan is existing.
Hannah being not electronic and Alberto being not existing imply that Boris is not healthy.
Hall being not eastern implies that Alberto is not electronic and Hannah is existing.
If Ethan is reliable, then Boris is rude and Ethan is not existing, and vice versa.
Someone being both not healthy and not eastern is equivalent to being not rude and not existing.
If someone is healthy and reliable, then he is both existing and not electronic, and vice versa.
Boris is not eastern if and only if Joe is healthy. | Hall is not healthy. | contradiction |
Glen is existing.
Ethan is not eastern.
Hannah is healthy.
Boris is not healthy.
Glen is reliable.
Ethan is not rude.
Boris is not reliable.
Boris is electronic.
Alberto is existing.
Joe is not existing.
Alberto is not healthy.
Hall is not existing.If there is at least one people who is rude or eastern, then Glen is not healthy.
If there is at least one people who is healthy or not eastern, then Hannah is reliable.
If someone is either electronic or not existing, then he is healthy and reliable.
If someone is both eastern and healthy, then he is reliable.
Someone is not reliable if and only if he is not healthy.
If there is someone who is both healthy and not eastern, then Ethan is existing.
Hannah being not electronic and Alberto being not existing imply that Boris is not healthy.
Hall being not eastern implies that Alberto is not electronic and Hannah is existing.
If Ethan is reliable, then Boris is rude and Ethan is not existing, and vice versa.
Someone being both not healthy and not eastern is equivalent to being not rude and not existing.
If someone is healthy and reliable, then he is both existing and not electronic, and vice versa.
Boris is not eastern if and only if Joe is healthy. | Joe is rude. | neutral |
Glen is existing.
Ethan is not eastern.
Hannah is healthy.
Boris is not healthy.
Glen is reliable.
Ethan is not rude.
Boris is not reliable.
Boris is electronic.
Alberto is existing.
Joe is not existing.
Alberto is not healthy.
Hall is not existing.If there is at least one people who is rude or eastern, then Glen is not healthy.
If there is at least one people who is healthy or not eastern, then Hannah is reliable.
If someone is either electronic or not existing, then he is healthy and reliable.
If someone is both eastern and healthy, then he is reliable.
Someone is not reliable if and only if he is not healthy.
If there is someone who is both healthy and not eastern, then Ethan is existing.
Hannah being not electronic and Alberto being not existing imply that Boris is not healthy.
Hall being not eastern implies that Alberto is not electronic and Hannah is existing.
If Ethan is reliable, then Boris is rude and Ethan is not existing, and vice versa.
Someone being both not healthy and not eastern is equivalent to being not rude and not existing.
If someone is healthy and reliable, then he is both existing and not electronic, and vice versa.
Boris is not eastern if and only if Joe is healthy. | Hannah is healthy. | entailment |
Glen is existing.
Ethan is not eastern.
Hannah is healthy.
Boris is not healthy.
Glen is reliable.
Ethan is not rude.
Boris is not reliable.
Boris is electronic.
Alberto is existing.
Joe is not existing.
Alberto is not healthy.
Hall is not existing.If there is at least one people who is rude or eastern, then Glen is not healthy.
If there is at least one people who is healthy or not eastern, then Hannah is reliable.
If someone is either electronic or not existing, then he is healthy and reliable.
If someone is both eastern and healthy, then he is reliable.
Someone is not reliable if and only if he is not healthy.
If there is someone who is both healthy and not eastern, then Ethan is existing.
Hannah being not electronic and Alberto being not existing imply that Boris is not healthy.
Hall being not eastern implies that Alberto is not electronic and Hannah is existing.
If Ethan is reliable, then Boris is rude and Ethan is not existing, and vice versa.
Someone being both not healthy and not eastern is equivalent to being not rude and not existing.
If someone is healthy and reliable, then he is both existing and not electronic, and vice versa.
Boris is not eastern if and only if Joe is healthy. | Boris is not electronic. | self_contradiction |
Glen is existing.
Ethan is not eastern.
Hannah is healthy.
Boris is not healthy.
Glen is reliable.
Ethan is not rude.
Boris is not reliable.
Boris is electronic.
Alberto is existing.
Joe is not existing.
Alberto is not healthy.
Hall is not existing.If there is at least one people who is rude or eastern, then Glen is not healthy.
If there is at least one people who is healthy or not eastern, then Hannah is reliable.
If someone is either electronic or not existing, then he is healthy and reliable.
If someone is both eastern and healthy, then he is reliable.
Someone is not reliable if and only if he is not healthy.
If there is someone who is both healthy and not eastern, then Ethan is existing.
Hannah being not electronic and Alberto being not existing imply that Boris is not healthy.
Hall being not eastern implies that Alberto is not electronic and Hannah is existing.
If Ethan is reliable, then Boris is rude and Ethan is not existing, and vice versa.
Someone being both not healthy and not eastern is equivalent to being not rude and not existing.
If someone is healthy and reliable, then he is both existing and not electronic, and vice versa.
Boris is not eastern if and only if Joe is healthy. | Joe is eastern. | neutral |
Glen is existing.
Ethan is not eastern.
Hannah is healthy.
Boris is not healthy.
Glen is reliable.
Ethan is not rude.
Boris is not reliable.
Boris is electronic.
Alberto is existing.
Joe is not existing.
Alberto is not healthy.
Hall is not existing.If there is at least one people who is rude or eastern, then Glen is not healthy.
If there is at least one people who is healthy or not eastern, then Hannah is reliable.
If someone is either electronic or not existing, then he is healthy and reliable.
If someone is both eastern and healthy, then he is reliable.
Someone is not reliable if and only if he is not healthy.
If there is someone who is both healthy and not eastern, then Ethan is existing.
Hannah being not electronic and Alberto being not existing imply that Boris is not healthy.
Hall being not eastern implies that Alberto is not electronic and Hannah is existing.
If Ethan is reliable, then Boris is rude and Ethan is not existing, and vice versa.
Someone being both not healthy and not eastern is equivalent to being not rude and not existing.
If someone is healthy and reliable, then he is both existing and not electronic, and vice versa.
Boris is not eastern if and only if Joe is healthy. | Joe is not healthy. | contradiction |
Glen is existing.
Ethan is not eastern.
Hannah is healthy.
Boris is not healthy.
Glen is reliable.
Ethan is not rude.
Boris is not reliable.
Boris is electronic.
Alberto is existing.
Joe is not existing.
Alberto is not healthy.
Hall is not existing.If there is at least one people who is rude or eastern, then Glen is not healthy.
If there is at least one people who is healthy or not eastern, then Hannah is reliable.
If someone is either electronic or not existing, then he is healthy and reliable.
If someone is both eastern and healthy, then he is reliable.
Someone is not reliable if and only if he is not healthy.
If there is someone who is both healthy and not eastern, then Ethan is existing.
Hannah being not electronic and Alberto being not existing imply that Boris is not healthy.
Hall being not eastern implies that Alberto is not electronic and Hannah is existing.
If Ethan is reliable, then Boris is rude and Ethan is not existing, and vice versa.
Someone being both not healthy and not eastern is equivalent to being not rude and not existing.
If someone is healthy and reliable, then he is both existing and not electronic, and vice versa.
Boris is not eastern if and only if Joe is healthy. | Boris is reliable. | self_contradiction |
Glen is existing.
Ethan is not eastern.
Hannah is healthy.
Boris is not healthy.
Glen is reliable.
Ethan is not rude.
Boris is not reliable.
Boris is electronic.
Alberto is existing.
Joe is not existing.
Alberto is not healthy.
Hall is not existing.If there is at least one people who is rude or eastern, then Glen is not healthy.
If there is at least one people who is healthy or not eastern, then Hannah is reliable.
If someone is either electronic or not existing, then he is healthy and reliable.
If someone is both eastern and healthy, then he is reliable.
Someone is not reliable if and only if he is not healthy.
If there is someone who is both healthy and not eastern, then Ethan is existing.
Hannah being not electronic and Alberto being not existing imply that Boris is not healthy.
Hall being not eastern implies that Alberto is not electronic and Hannah is existing.
If Ethan is reliable, then Boris is rude and Ethan is not existing, and vice versa.
Someone being both not healthy and not eastern is equivalent to being not rude and not existing.
If someone is healthy and reliable, then he is both existing and not electronic, and vice versa.
Boris is not eastern if and only if Joe is healthy. | Glen is healthy. | neutral |
Glen is existing.
Ethan is not eastern.
Hannah is healthy.
Boris is not healthy.
Glen is reliable.
Ethan is not rude.
Boris is not reliable.
Boris is electronic.
Alberto is existing.
Joe is not existing.
Alberto is not healthy.
Hall is not existing.If there is at least one people who is rude or eastern, then Glen is not healthy.
If there is at least one people who is healthy or not eastern, then Hannah is reliable.
If someone is either electronic or not existing, then he is healthy and reliable.
If someone is both eastern and healthy, then he is reliable.
Someone is not reliable if and only if he is not healthy.
If there is someone who is both healthy and not eastern, then Ethan is existing.
Hannah being not electronic and Alberto being not existing imply that Boris is not healthy.
Hall being not eastern implies that Alberto is not electronic and Hannah is existing.
If Ethan is reliable, then Boris is rude and Ethan is not existing, and vice versa.
Someone being both not healthy and not eastern is equivalent to being not rude and not existing.
If someone is healthy and reliable, then he is both existing and not electronic, and vice versa.
Boris is not eastern if and only if Joe is healthy. | Ethan is not existing. | neutral |
Glen is existing.
Ethan is not eastern.
Hannah is healthy.
Boris is not healthy.
Glen is reliable.
Ethan is not rude.
Boris is not reliable.
Boris is electronic.
Alberto is existing.
Joe is not existing.
Alberto is not healthy.
Hall is not existing.If there is at least one people who is rude or eastern, then Glen is not healthy.
If there is at least one people who is healthy or not eastern, then Hannah is reliable.
If someone is either electronic or not existing, then he is healthy and reliable.
If someone is both eastern and healthy, then he is reliable.
Someone is not reliable if and only if he is not healthy.
If there is someone who is both healthy and not eastern, then Ethan is existing.
Hannah being not electronic and Alberto being not existing imply that Boris is not healthy.
Hall being not eastern implies that Alberto is not electronic and Hannah is existing.
If Ethan is reliable, then Boris is rude and Ethan is not existing, and vice versa.
Someone being both not healthy and not eastern is equivalent to being not rude and not existing.
If someone is healthy and reliable, then he is both existing and not electronic, and vice versa.
Boris is not eastern if and only if Joe is healthy. | Hannah is existing. | entailment |
Glen is existing.
Ethan is not eastern.
Hannah is healthy.
Boris is not healthy.
Glen is reliable.
Ethan is not rude.
Boris is not reliable.
Boris is electronic.
Alberto is existing.
Joe is not existing.
Alberto is not healthy.
Hall is not existing.If there is at least one people who is rude or eastern, then Glen is not healthy.
If there is at least one people who is healthy or not eastern, then Hannah is reliable.
If someone is either electronic or not existing, then he is healthy and reliable.
If someone is both eastern and healthy, then he is reliable.
Someone is not reliable if and only if he is not healthy.
If there is someone who is both healthy and not eastern, then Ethan is existing.
Hannah being not electronic and Alberto being not existing imply that Boris is not healthy.
Hall being not eastern implies that Alberto is not electronic and Hannah is existing.
If Ethan is reliable, then Boris is rude and Ethan is not existing, and vice versa.
Someone being both not healthy and not eastern is equivalent to being not rude and not existing.
If someone is healthy and reliable, then he is both existing and not electronic, and vice versa.
Boris is not eastern if and only if Joe is healthy. | Hannah is electronic. | contradiction |
Glen is existing.
Ethan is not eastern.
Hannah is healthy.
Boris is not healthy.
Glen is reliable.
Ethan is not rude.
Boris is not reliable.
Boris is electronic.
Alberto is existing.
Joe is not existing.
Alberto is not healthy.
Hall is not existing.If there is at least one people who is rude or eastern, then Glen is not healthy.
If there is at least one people who is healthy or not eastern, then Hannah is reliable.
If someone is either electronic or not existing, then he is healthy and reliable.
If someone is both eastern and healthy, then he is reliable.
Someone is not reliable if and only if he is not healthy.
If there is someone who is both healthy and not eastern, then Ethan is existing.
Hannah being not electronic and Alberto being not existing imply that Boris is not healthy.
Hall being not eastern implies that Alberto is not electronic and Hannah is existing.
If Ethan is reliable, then Boris is rude and Ethan is not existing, and vice versa.
Someone being both not healthy and not eastern is equivalent to being not rude and not existing.
If someone is healthy and reliable, then he is both existing and not electronic, and vice versa.
Boris is not eastern if and only if Joe is healthy. | Glen is not reliable. | contradiction |
Glen is existing.
Ethan is not eastern.
Hannah is healthy.
Boris is not healthy.
Glen is reliable.
Ethan is not rude.
Boris is not reliable.
Boris is electronic.
Alberto is existing.
Joe is not existing.
Alberto is not healthy.
Hall is not existing.If there is at least one people who is rude or eastern, then Glen is not healthy.
If there is at least one people who is healthy or not eastern, then Hannah is reliable.
If someone is either electronic or not existing, then he is healthy and reliable.
If someone is both eastern and healthy, then he is reliable.
Someone is not reliable if and only if he is not healthy.
If there is someone who is both healthy and not eastern, then Ethan is existing.
Hannah being not electronic and Alberto being not existing imply that Boris is not healthy.
Hall being not eastern implies that Alberto is not electronic and Hannah is existing.
If Ethan is reliable, then Boris is rude and Ethan is not existing, and vice versa.
Someone being both not healthy and not eastern is equivalent to being not rude and not existing.
If someone is healthy and reliable, then he is both existing and not electronic, and vice versa.
Boris is not eastern if and only if Joe is healthy. | Boris is not reliable. | self_contradiction |
Glen is existing.
Ethan is not eastern.
Hannah is healthy.
Boris is not healthy.
Glen is reliable.
Ethan is not rude.
Boris is not reliable.
Boris is electronic.
Alberto is existing.
Joe is not existing.
Alberto is not healthy.
Hall is not existing.If there is at least one people who is rude or eastern, then Glen is not healthy.
If there is at least one people who is healthy or not eastern, then Hannah is reliable.
If someone is either electronic or not existing, then he is healthy and reliable.
If someone is both eastern and healthy, then he is reliable.
Someone is not reliable if and only if he is not healthy.
If there is someone who is both healthy and not eastern, then Ethan is existing.
Hannah being not electronic and Alberto being not existing imply that Boris is not healthy.
Hall being not eastern implies that Alberto is not electronic and Hannah is existing.
If Ethan is reliable, then Boris is rude and Ethan is not existing, and vice versa.
Someone being both not healthy and not eastern is equivalent to being not rude and not existing.
If someone is healthy and reliable, then he is both existing and not electronic, and vice versa.
Boris is not eastern if and only if Joe is healthy. | Joe is reliable. | entailment |
Glen is existing.
Ethan is not eastern.
Hannah is healthy.
Boris is not healthy.
Glen is reliable.
Ethan is not rude.
Boris is not reliable.
Boris is electronic.
Alberto is existing.
Joe is not existing.
Alberto is not healthy.
Hall is not existing.If there is at least one people who is rude or eastern, then Glen is not healthy.
If there is at least one people who is healthy or not eastern, then Hannah is reliable.
If someone is either electronic or not existing, then he is healthy and reliable.
If someone is both eastern and healthy, then he is reliable.
Someone is not reliable if and only if he is not healthy.
If there is someone who is both healthy and not eastern, then Ethan is existing.
Hannah being not electronic and Alberto being not existing imply that Boris is not healthy.
Hall being not eastern implies that Alberto is not electronic and Hannah is existing.
If Ethan is reliable, then Boris is rude and Ethan is not existing, and vice versa.
Someone being both not healthy and not eastern is equivalent to being not rude and not existing.
If someone is healthy and reliable, then he is both existing and not electronic, and vice versa.
Boris is not eastern if and only if Joe is healthy. | Glen is reliable. | entailment |
Glenn is not historical.
Rupert is historical.
Rupert is not defeated.
Amanda is not panicky.
Glenn is defeated.
Hunter is not agreeable.
Hunter is not panicky.
Amanda is not silly.
Louis is not silly.
Aldis is historical.
Amanda is defeated.
Curt is agreeable.Louis being not silly is equivalent to Hunter being panicky.
Louis being good and Curt being not silly imply that Rupert is not defeated.
If there is someone who is either not historical or not silly, then Hunter is panicky.
Someone who is defeated is always both silly and not historical.
If there is someone who is both not defeated and panicky, then Hunter is not historical.
Louis being defeated implies that Rupert is not agreeable and Louis is panicky.
If someone is not silly and not good, then he is historical, and vice versa.
If Amanda is not good, then Aldis is defeated and Hunter is not agreeable, and vice versa.
Hunter being panicky and Hunter being not silly imply that Amanda is agreeable and Louis is not good.
If someone is agreeable, then he is both panicky and not historical.
Someone is not silly and defeated if and only if he is good and historical.
If someone is agreeable, then he is both defeated and not panicky. | Amanda is not panicky. | entailment |
Glenn is not historical.
Rupert is historical.
Rupert is not defeated.
Amanda is not panicky.
Glenn is defeated.
Hunter is not agreeable.
Hunter is not panicky.
Amanda is not silly.
Louis is not silly.
Aldis is historical.
Amanda is defeated.
Curt is agreeable.Louis being not silly is equivalent to Hunter being panicky.
Louis being good and Curt being not silly imply that Rupert is not defeated.
If there is someone who is either not historical or not silly, then Hunter is panicky.
Someone who is defeated is always both silly and not historical.
If there is someone who is both not defeated and panicky, then Hunter is not historical.
Louis being defeated implies that Rupert is not agreeable and Louis is panicky.
If someone is not silly and not good, then he is historical, and vice versa.
If Amanda is not good, then Aldis is defeated and Hunter is not agreeable, and vice versa.
Hunter being panicky and Hunter being not silly imply that Amanda is agreeable and Louis is not good.
If someone is agreeable, then he is both panicky and not historical.
Someone is not silly and defeated if and only if he is good and historical.
If someone is agreeable, then he is both defeated and not panicky. | Aldis is not silly. | self_contradiction |
Glenn is not historical.
Rupert is historical.
Rupert is not defeated.
Amanda is not panicky.
Glenn is defeated.
Hunter is not agreeable.
Hunter is not panicky.
Amanda is not silly.
Louis is not silly.
Aldis is historical.
Amanda is defeated.
Curt is agreeable.Louis being not silly is equivalent to Hunter being panicky.
Louis being good and Curt being not silly imply that Rupert is not defeated.
If there is someone who is either not historical or not silly, then Hunter is panicky.
Someone who is defeated is always both silly and not historical.
If there is someone who is both not defeated and panicky, then Hunter is not historical.
Louis being defeated implies that Rupert is not agreeable and Louis is panicky.
If someone is not silly and not good, then he is historical, and vice versa.
If Amanda is not good, then Aldis is defeated and Hunter is not agreeable, and vice versa.
Hunter being panicky and Hunter being not silly imply that Amanda is agreeable and Louis is not good.
If someone is agreeable, then he is both panicky and not historical.
Someone is not silly and defeated if and only if he is good and historical.
If someone is agreeable, then he is both defeated and not panicky. | Glenn is not agreeable. | neutral |
Glenn is not historical.
Rupert is historical.
Rupert is not defeated.
Amanda is not panicky.
Glenn is defeated.
Hunter is not agreeable.
Hunter is not panicky.
Amanda is not silly.
Louis is not silly.
Aldis is historical.
Amanda is defeated.
Curt is agreeable.Louis being not silly is equivalent to Hunter being panicky.
Louis being good and Curt being not silly imply that Rupert is not defeated.
If there is someone who is either not historical or not silly, then Hunter is panicky.
Someone who is defeated is always both silly and not historical.
If there is someone who is both not defeated and panicky, then Hunter is not historical.
Louis being defeated implies that Rupert is not agreeable and Louis is panicky.
If someone is not silly and not good, then he is historical, and vice versa.
If Amanda is not good, then Aldis is defeated and Hunter is not agreeable, and vice versa.
Hunter being panicky and Hunter being not silly imply that Amanda is agreeable and Louis is not good.
If someone is agreeable, then he is both panicky and not historical.
Someone is not silly and defeated if and only if he is good and historical.
If someone is agreeable, then he is both defeated and not panicky. | Aldis is good. | self_contradiction |
Glenn is not historical.
Rupert is historical.
Rupert is not defeated.
Amanda is not panicky.
Glenn is defeated.
Hunter is not agreeable.
Hunter is not panicky.
Amanda is not silly.
Louis is not silly.
Aldis is historical.
Amanda is defeated.
Curt is agreeable.Louis being not silly is equivalent to Hunter being panicky.
Louis being good and Curt being not silly imply that Rupert is not defeated.
If there is someone who is either not historical or not silly, then Hunter is panicky.
Someone who is defeated is always both silly and not historical.
If there is someone who is both not defeated and panicky, then Hunter is not historical.
Louis being defeated implies that Rupert is not agreeable and Louis is panicky.
If someone is not silly and not good, then he is historical, and vice versa.
If Amanda is not good, then Aldis is defeated and Hunter is not agreeable, and vice versa.
Hunter being panicky and Hunter being not silly imply that Amanda is agreeable and Louis is not good.
If someone is agreeable, then he is both panicky and not historical.
Someone is not silly and defeated if and only if he is good and historical.
If someone is agreeable, then he is both defeated and not panicky. | Glenn is agreeable. | neutral |
Glenn is not historical.
Rupert is historical.
Rupert is not defeated.
Amanda is not panicky.
Glenn is defeated.
Hunter is not agreeable.
Hunter is not panicky.
Amanda is not silly.
Louis is not silly.
Aldis is historical.
Amanda is defeated.
Curt is agreeable.Louis being not silly is equivalent to Hunter being panicky.
Louis being good and Curt being not silly imply that Rupert is not defeated.
If there is someone who is either not historical or not silly, then Hunter is panicky.
Someone who is defeated is always both silly and not historical.
If there is someone who is both not defeated and panicky, then Hunter is not historical.
Louis being defeated implies that Rupert is not agreeable and Louis is panicky.
If someone is not silly and not good, then he is historical, and vice versa.
If Amanda is not good, then Aldis is defeated and Hunter is not agreeable, and vice versa.
Hunter being panicky and Hunter being not silly imply that Amanda is agreeable and Louis is not good.
If someone is agreeable, then he is both panicky and not historical.
Someone is not silly and defeated if and only if he is good and historical.
If someone is agreeable, then he is both defeated and not panicky. | Glenn is not panicky. | neutral |
Glenn is not historical.
Rupert is historical.
Rupert is not defeated.
Amanda is not panicky.
Glenn is defeated.
Hunter is not agreeable.
Hunter is not panicky.
Amanda is not silly.
Louis is not silly.
Aldis is historical.
Amanda is defeated.
Curt is agreeable.Louis being not silly is equivalent to Hunter being panicky.
Louis being good and Curt being not silly imply that Rupert is not defeated.
If there is someone who is either not historical or not silly, then Hunter is panicky.
Someone who is defeated is always both silly and not historical.
If there is someone who is both not defeated and panicky, then Hunter is not historical.
Louis being defeated implies that Rupert is not agreeable and Louis is panicky.
If someone is not silly and not good, then he is historical, and vice versa.
If Amanda is not good, then Aldis is defeated and Hunter is not agreeable, and vice versa.
Hunter being panicky and Hunter being not silly imply that Amanda is agreeable and Louis is not good.
If someone is agreeable, then he is both panicky and not historical.
Someone is not silly and defeated if and only if he is good and historical.
If someone is agreeable, then he is both defeated and not panicky. | Hunter is not silly. | neutral |
Glenn is not historical.
Rupert is historical.
Rupert is not defeated.
Amanda is not panicky.
Glenn is defeated.
Hunter is not agreeable.
Hunter is not panicky.
Amanda is not silly.
Louis is not silly.
Aldis is historical.
Amanda is defeated.
Curt is agreeable.Louis being not silly is equivalent to Hunter being panicky.
Louis being good and Curt being not silly imply that Rupert is not defeated.
If there is someone who is either not historical or not silly, then Hunter is panicky.
Someone who is defeated is always both silly and not historical.
If there is someone who is both not defeated and panicky, then Hunter is not historical.
Louis being defeated implies that Rupert is not agreeable and Louis is panicky.
If someone is not silly and not good, then he is historical, and vice versa.
If Amanda is not good, then Aldis is defeated and Hunter is not agreeable, and vice versa.
Hunter being panicky and Hunter being not silly imply that Amanda is agreeable and Louis is not good.
If someone is agreeable, then he is both panicky and not historical.
Someone is not silly and defeated if and only if he is good and historical.
If someone is agreeable, then he is both defeated and not panicky. | Glenn is historical. | contradiction |
Glenn is not historical.
Rupert is historical.
Rupert is not defeated.
Amanda is not panicky.
Glenn is defeated.
Hunter is not agreeable.
Hunter is not panicky.
Amanda is not silly.
Louis is not silly.
Aldis is historical.
Amanda is defeated.
Curt is agreeable.Louis being not silly is equivalent to Hunter being panicky.
Louis being good and Curt being not silly imply that Rupert is not defeated.
If there is someone who is either not historical or not silly, then Hunter is panicky.
Someone who is defeated is always both silly and not historical.
If there is someone who is both not defeated and panicky, then Hunter is not historical.
Louis being defeated implies that Rupert is not agreeable and Louis is panicky.
If someone is not silly and not good, then he is historical, and vice versa.
If Amanda is not good, then Aldis is defeated and Hunter is not agreeable, and vice versa.
Hunter being panicky and Hunter being not silly imply that Amanda is agreeable and Louis is not good.
If someone is agreeable, then he is both panicky and not historical.
Someone is not silly and defeated if and only if he is good and historical.
If someone is agreeable, then he is both defeated and not panicky. | Aldis is historical. | self_contradiction |
Glenn is not historical.
Rupert is historical.
Rupert is not defeated.
Amanda is not panicky.
Glenn is defeated.
Hunter is not agreeable.
Hunter is not panicky.
Amanda is not silly.
Louis is not silly.
Aldis is historical.
Amanda is defeated.
Curt is agreeable.Louis being not silly is equivalent to Hunter being panicky.
Louis being good and Curt being not silly imply that Rupert is not defeated.
If there is someone who is either not historical or not silly, then Hunter is panicky.
Someone who is defeated is always both silly and not historical.
If there is someone who is both not defeated and panicky, then Hunter is not historical.
Louis being defeated implies that Rupert is not agreeable and Louis is panicky.
If someone is not silly and not good, then he is historical, and vice versa.
If Amanda is not good, then Aldis is defeated and Hunter is not agreeable, and vice versa.
Hunter being panicky and Hunter being not silly imply that Amanda is agreeable and Louis is not good.
If someone is agreeable, then he is both panicky and not historical.
Someone is not silly and defeated if and only if he is good and historical.
If someone is agreeable, then he is both defeated and not panicky. | Rupert is historical. | entailment |
Glenn is not historical.
Rupert is historical.
Rupert is not defeated.
Amanda is not panicky.
Glenn is defeated.
Hunter is not agreeable.
Hunter is not panicky.
Amanda is not silly.
Louis is not silly.
Aldis is historical.
Amanda is defeated.
Curt is agreeable.Louis being not silly is equivalent to Hunter being panicky.
Louis being good and Curt being not silly imply that Rupert is not defeated.
If there is someone who is either not historical or not silly, then Hunter is panicky.
Someone who is defeated is always both silly and not historical.
If there is someone who is both not defeated and panicky, then Hunter is not historical.
Louis being defeated implies that Rupert is not agreeable and Louis is panicky.
If someone is not silly and not good, then he is historical, and vice versa.
If Amanda is not good, then Aldis is defeated and Hunter is not agreeable, and vice versa.
Hunter being panicky and Hunter being not silly imply that Amanda is agreeable and Louis is not good.
If someone is agreeable, then he is both panicky and not historical.
Someone is not silly and defeated if and only if he is good and historical.
If someone is agreeable, then he is both defeated and not panicky. | Amanda is not defeated. | contradiction |
Glenn is not historical.
Rupert is historical.
Rupert is not defeated.
Amanda is not panicky.
Glenn is defeated.
Hunter is not agreeable.
Hunter is not panicky.
Amanda is not silly.
Louis is not silly.
Aldis is historical.
Amanda is defeated.
Curt is agreeable.Louis being not silly is equivalent to Hunter being panicky.
Louis being good and Curt being not silly imply that Rupert is not defeated.
If there is someone who is either not historical or not silly, then Hunter is panicky.
Someone who is defeated is always both silly and not historical.
If there is someone who is both not defeated and panicky, then Hunter is not historical.
Louis being defeated implies that Rupert is not agreeable and Louis is panicky.
If someone is not silly and not good, then he is historical, and vice versa.
If Amanda is not good, then Aldis is defeated and Hunter is not agreeable, and vice versa.
Hunter being panicky and Hunter being not silly imply that Amanda is agreeable and Louis is not good.
If someone is agreeable, then he is both panicky and not historical.
Someone is not silly and defeated if and only if he is good and historical.
If someone is agreeable, then he is both defeated and not panicky. | Louis is not silly. | entailment |
Glenn is not historical.
Rupert is historical.
Rupert is not defeated.
Amanda is not panicky.
Glenn is defeated.
Hunter is not agreeable.
Hunter is not panicky.
Amanda is not silly.
Louis is not silly.
Aldis is historical.
Amanda is defeated.
Curt is agreeable.Louis being not silly is equivalent to Hunter being panicky.
Louis being good and Curt being not silly imply that Rupert is not defeated.
If there is someone who is either not historical or not silly, then Hunter is panicky.
Someone who is defeated is always both silly and not historical.
If there is someone who is both not defeated and panicky, then Hunter is not historical.
Louis being defeated implies that Rupert is not agreeable and Louis is panicky.
If someone is not silly and not good, then he is historical, and vice versa.
If Amanda is not good, then Aldis is defeated and Hunter is not agreeable, and vice versa.
Hunter being panicky and Hunter being not silly imply that Amanda is agreeable and Louis is not good.
If someone is agreeable, then he is both panicky and not historical.
Someone is not silly and defeated if and only if he is good and historical.
If someone is agreeable, then he is both defeated and not panicky. | Amanda is historical. | self_contradiction |
Glenn is not historical.
Rupert is historical.
Rupert is not defeated.
Amanda is not panicky.
Glenn is defeated.
Hunter is not agreeable.
Hunter is not panicky.
Amanda is not silly.
Louis is not silly.
Aldis is historical.
Amanda is defeated.
Curt is agreeable.Louis being not silly is equivalent to Hunter being panicky.
Louis being good and Curt being not silly imply that Rupert is not defeated.
If there is someone who is either not historical or not silly, then Hunter is panicky.
Someone who is defeated is always both silly and not historical.
If there is someone who is both not defeated and panicky, then Hunter is not historical.
Louis being defeated implies that Rupert is not agreeable and Louis is panicky.
If someone is not silly and not good, then he is historical, and vice versa.
If Amanda is not good, then Aldis is defeated and Hunter is not agreeable, and vice versa.
Hunter being panicky and Hunter being not silly imply that Amanda is agreeable and Louis is not good.
If someone is agreeable, then he is both panicky and not historical.
Someone is not silly and defeated if and only if he is good and historical.
If someone is agreeable, then he is both defeated and not panicky. | Glenn is not historical. | entailment |
Glenn is not historical.
Rupert is historical.
Rupert is not defeated.
Amanda is not panicky.
Glenn is defeated.
Hunter is not agreeable.
Hunter is not panicky.
Amanda is not silly.
Louis is not silly.
Aldis is historical.
Amanda is defeated.
Curt is agreeable.Louis being not silly is equivalent to Hunter being panicky.
Louis being good and Curt being not silly imply that Rupert is not defeated.
If there is someone who is either not historical or not silly, then Hunter is panicky.
Someone who is defeated is always both silly and not historical.
If there is someone who is both not defeated and panicky, then Hunter is not historical.
Louis being defeated implies that Rupert is not agreeable and Louis is panicky.
If someone is not silly and not good, then he is historical, and vice versa.
If Amanda is not good, then Aldis is defeated and Hunter is not agreeable, and vice versa.
Hunter being panicky and Hunter being not silly imply that Amanda is agreeable and Louis is not good.
If someone is agreeable, then he is both panicky and not historical.
Someone is not silly and defeated if and only if he is good and historical.
If someone is agreeable, then he is both defeated and not panicky. | Hunter is not panicky. | self_contradiction |
Glenn is not historical.
Rupert is historical.
Rupert is not defeated.
Amanda is not panicky.
Glenn is defeated.
Hunter is not agreeable.
Hunter is not panicky.
Amanda is not silly.
Louis is not silly.
Aldis is historical.
Amanda is defeated.
Curt is agreeable.Louis being not silly is equivalent to Hunter being panicky.
Louis being good and Curt being not silly imply that Rupert is not defeated.
If there is someone who is either not historical or not silly, then Hunter is panicky.
Someone who is defeated is always both silly and not historical.
If there is someone who is both not defeated and panicky, then Hunter is not historical.
Louis being defeated implies that Rupert is not agreeable and Louis is panicky.
If someone is not silly and not good, then he is historical, and vice versa.
If Amanda is not good, then Aldis is defeated and Hunter is not agreeable, and vice versa.
Hunter being panicky and Hunter being not silly imply that Amanda is agreeable and Louis is not good.
If someone is agreeable, then he is both panicky and not historical.
Someone is not silly and defeated if and only if he is good and historical.
If someone is agreeable, then he is both defeated and not panicky. | Curt is historical. | contradiction |
Glenn is not historical.
Rupert is historical.
Rupert is not defeated.
Amanda is not panicky.
Glenn is defeated.
Hunter is not agreeable.
Hunter is not panicky.
Amanda is not silly.
Louis is not silly.
Aldis is historical.
Amanda is defeated.
Curt is agreeable.Louis being not silly is equivalent to Hunter being panicky.
Louis being good and Curt being not silly imply that Rupert is not defeated.
If there is someone who is either not historical or not silly, then Hunter is panicky.
Someone who is defeated is always both silly and not historical.
If there is someone who is both not defeated and panicky, then Hunter is not historical.
Louis being defeated implies that Rupert is not agreeable and Louis is panicky.
If someone is not silly and not good, then he is historical, and vice versa.
If Amanda is not good, then Aldis is defeated and Hunter is not agreeable, and vice versa.
Hunter being panicky and Hunter being not silly imply that Amanda is agreeable and Louis is not good.
If someone is agreeable, then he is both panicky and not historical.
Someone is not silly and defeated if and only if he is good and historical.
If someone is agreeable, then he is both defeated and not panicky. | Rupert is panicky. | neutral |
Glenn is not historical.
Rupert is historical.
Rupert is not defeated.
Amanda is not panicky.
Glenn is defeated.
Hunter is not agreeable.
Hunter is not panicky.
Amanda is not silly.
Louis is not silly.
Aldis is historical.
Amanda is defeated.
Curt is agreeable.Louis being not silly is equivalent to Hunter being panicky.
Louis being good and Curt being not silly imply that Rupert is not defeated.
If there is someone who is either not historical or not silly, then Hunter is panicky.
Someone who is defeated is always both silly and not historical.
If there is someone who is both not defeated and panicky, then Hunter is not historical.
Louis being defeated implies that Rupert is not agreeable and Louis is panicky.
If someone is not silly and not good, then he is historical, and vice versa.
If Amanda is not good, then Aldis is defeated and Hunter is not agreeable, and vice versa.
Hunter being panicky and Hunter being not silly imply that Amanda is agreeable and Louis is not good.
If someone is agreeable, then he is both panicky and not historical.
Someone is not silly and defeated if and only if he is good and historical.
If someone is agreeable, then he is both defeated and not panicky. | Curt is not agreeable. | contradiction |
Glenn is not historical.
Rupert is historical.
Rupert is not defeated.
Amanda is not panicky.
Glenn is defeated.
Hunter is not agreeable.
Hunter is not panicky.
Amanda is not silly.
Louis is not silly.
Aldis is historical.
Amanda is defeated.
Curt is agreeable.Louis being not silly is equivalent to Hunter being panicky.
Louis being good and Curt being not silly imply that Rupert is not defeated.
If there is someone who is either not historical or not silly, then Hunter is panicky.
Someone who is defeated is always both silly and not historical.
If there is someone who is both not defeated and panicky, then Hunter is not historical.
Louis being defeated implies that Rupert is not agreeable and Louis is panicky.
If someone is not silly and not good, then he is historical, and vice versa.
If Amanda is not good, then Aldis is defeated and Hunter is not agreeable, and vice versa.
Hunter being panicky and Hunter being not silly imply that Amanda is agreeable and Louis is not good.
If someone is agreeable, then he is both panicky and not historical.
Someone is not silly and defeated if and only if he is good and historical.
If someone is agreeable, then he is both defeated and not panicky. | Rupert is not silly. | entailment |
Glenn is not historical.
Rupert is historical.
Rupert is not defeated.
Amanda is not panicky.
Glenn is defeated.
Hunter is not agreeable.
Hunter is not panicky.
Amanda is not silly.
Louis is not silly.
Aldis is historical.
Amanda is defeated.
Curt is agreeable.Louis being not silly is equivalent to Hunter being panicky.
Louis being good and Curt being not silly imply that Rupert is not defeated.
If there is someone who is either not historical or not silly, then Hunter is panicky.
Someone who is defeated is always both silly and not historical.
If there is someone who is both not defeated and panicky, then Hunter is not historical.
Louis being defeated implies that Rupert is not agreeable and Louis is panicky.
If someone is not silly and not good, then he is historical, and vice versa.
If Amanda is not good, then Aldis is defeated and Hunter is not agreeable, and vice versa.
Hunter being panicky and Hunter being not silly imply that Amanda is agreeable and Louis is not good.
If someone is agreeable, then he is both panicky and not historical.
Someone is not silly and defeated if and only if he is good and historical.
If someone is agreeable, then he is both defeated and not panicky. | Rupert is good. | contradiction |
Claudia is not encouraging.
Ashley is bad.
Claudia is bad.
Hector is not bad.
Roswell is determined.
Hadley is not encouraging.
Quillan is red.
Ashley is not encouraging.
Hartley is neat.
Hadley is brave.
Hartley is not brave.
Quillan is not brave.If Hector is not encouraging, then Hector is not neat.
If there is at least one people who is neat, then Roswell is not brave.
If someone is neat, then he is both brave and not bad.
If Claudia is brave and Roswell is not red, then Ashley is not determined.
If there is at least one people who is not brave, then Roswell is not bad.
If there is at least one people who is both not determined and not bad, then Roswell is brave.
Someone who is red is always both bad and neat.
Ashley is not bad if and only if Quillan is red.
If everyone is encouraging, then Hadley is neat.
It can be concluded that Roswell is bad once knowing that Roswell is not encouraging or Quillan is not neat.
if there is at least one people who is bad and red, then Hadley is not determined and Hartley is not neat.
Claudia is not neat if and only if Roswell is determined. | Hadley is not bad. | neutral |
Claudia is not encouraging.
Ashley is bad.
Claudia is bad.
Hector is not bad.
Roswell is determined.
Hadley is not encouraging.
Quillan is red.
Ashley is not encouraging.
Hartley is neat.
Hadley is brave.
Hartley is not brave.
Quillan is not brave.If Hector is not encouraging, then Hector is not neat.
If there is at least one people who is neat, then Roswell is not brave.
If someone is neat, then he is both brave and not bad.
If Claudia is brave and Roswell is not red, then Ashley is not determined.
If there is at least one people who is not brave, then Roswell is not bad.
If there is at least one people who is both not determined and not bad, then Roswell is brave.
Someone who is red is always both bad and neat.
Ashley is not bad if and only if Quillan is red.
If everyone is encouraging, then Hadley is neat.
It can be concluded that Roswell is bad once knowing that Roswell is not encouraging or Quillan is not neat.
if there is at least one people who is bad and red, then Hadley is not determined and Hartley is not neat.
Claudia is not neat if and only if Roswell is determined. | Claudia is encouraging. | contradiction |
Claudia is not encouraging.
Ashley is bad.
Claudia is bad.
Hector is not bad.
Roswell is determined.
Hadley is not encouraging.
Quillan is red.
Ashley is not encouraging.
Hartley is neat.
Hadley is brave.
Hartley is not brave.
Quillan is not brave.If Hector is not encouraging, then Hector is not neat.
If there is at least one people who is neat, then Roswell is not brave.
If someone is neat, then he is both brave and not bad.
If Claudia is brave and Roswell is not red, then Ashley is not determined.
If there is at least one people who is not brave, then Roswell is not bad.
If there is at least one people who is both not determined and not bad, then Roswell is brave.
Someone who is red is always both bad and neat.
Ashley is not bad if and only if Quillan is red.
If everyone is encouraging, then Hadley is neat.
It can be concluded that Roswell is bad once knowing that Roswell is not encouraging or Quillan is not neat.
if there is at least one people who is bad and red, then Hadley is not determined and Hartley is not neat.
Claudia is not neat if and only if Roswell is determined. | Hadley is determined. | contradiction |
Claudia is not encouraging.
Ashley is bad.
Claudia is bad.
Hector is not bad.
Roswell is determined.
Hadley is not encouraging.
Quillan is red.
Ashley is not encouraging.
Hartley is neat.
Hadley is brave.
Hartley is not brave.
Quillan is not brave.If Hector is not encouraging, then Hector is not neat.
If there is at least one people who is neat, then Roswell is not brave.
If someone is neat, then he is both brave and not bad.
If Claudia is brave and Roswell is not red, then Ashley is not determined.
If there is at least one people who is not brave, then Roswell is not bad.
If there is at least one people who is both not determined and not bad, then Roswell is brave.
Someone who is red is always both bad and neat.
Ashley is not bad if and only if Quillan is red.
If everyone is encouraging, then Hadley is neat.
It can be concluded that Roswell is bad once knowing that Roswell is not encouraging or Quillan is not neat.
if there is at least one people who is bad and red, then Hadley is not determined and Hartley is not neat.
Claudia is not neat if and only if Roswell is determined. | Roswell is bad. | contradiction |
Claudia is not encouraging.
Ashley is bad.
Claudia is bad.
Hector is not bad.
Roswell is determined.
Hadley is not encouraging.
Quillan is red.
Ashley is not encouraging.
Hartley is neat.
Hadley is brave.
Hartley is not brave.
Quillan is not brave.If Hector is not encouraging, then Hector is not neat.
If there is at least one people who is neat, then Roswell is not brave.
If someone is neat, then he is both brave and not bad.
If Claudia is brave and Roswell is not red, then Ashley is not determined.
If there is at least one people who is not brave, then Roswell is not bad.
If there is at least one people who is both not determined and not bad, then Roswell is brave.
Someone who is red is always both bad and neat.
Ashley is not bad if and only if Quillan is red.
If everyone is encouraging, then Hadley is neat.
It can be concluded that Roswell is bad once knowing that Roswell is not encouraging or Quillan is not neat.
if there is at least one people who is bad and red, then Hadley is not determined and Hartley is not neat.
Claudia is not neat if and only if Roswell is determined. | Quillan is not brave. | self_contradiction |
Claudia is not encouraging.
Ashley is bad.
Claudia is bad.
Hector is not bad.
Roswell is determined.
Hadley is not encouraging.
Quillan is red.
Ashley is not encouraging.
Hartley is neat.
Hadley is brave.
Hartley is not brave.
Quillan is not brave.If Hector is not encouraging, then Hector is not neat.
If there is at least one people who is neat, then Roswell is not brave.
If someone is neat, then he is both brave and not bad.
If Claudia is brave and Roswell is not red, then Ashley is not determined.
If there is at least one people who is not brave, then Roswell is not bad.
If there is at least one people who is both not determined and not bad, then Roswell is brave.
Someone who is red is always both bad and neat.
Ashley is not bad if and only if Quillan is red.
If everyone is encouraging, then Hadley is neat.
It can be concluded that Roswell is bad once knowing that Roswell is not encouraging or Quillan is not neat.
if there is at least one people who is bad and red, then Hadley is not determined and Hartley is not neat.
Claudia is not neat if and only if Roswell is determined. | Hadley is red. | neutral |
Claudia is not encouraging.
Ashley is bad.
Claudia is bad.
Hector is not bad.
Roswell is determined.
Hadley is not encouraging.
Quillan is red.
Ashley is not encouraging.
Hartley is neat.
Hadley is brave.
Hartley is not brave.
Quillan is not brave.If Hector is not encouraging, then Hector is not neat.
If there is at least one people who is neat, then Roswell is not brave.
If someone is neat, then he is both brave and not bad.
If Claudia is brave and Roswell is not red, then Ashley is not determined.
If there is at least one people who is not brave, then Roswell is not bad.
If there is at least one people who is both not determined and not bad, then Roswell is brave.
Someone who is red is always both bad and neat.
Ashley is not bad if and only if Quillan is red.
If everyone is encouraging, then Hadley is neat.
It can be concluded that Roswell is bad once knowing that Roswell is not encouraging or Quillan is not neat.
if there is at least one people who is bad and red, then Hadley is not determined and Hartley is not neat.
Claudia is not neat if and only if Roswell is determined. | Quillan is not encouraging. | neutral |
Claudia is not encouraging.
Ashley is bad.
Claudia is bad.
Hector is not bad.
Roswell is determined.
Hadley is not encouraging.
Quillan is red.
Ashley is not encouraging.
Hartley is neat.
Hadley is brave.
Hartley is not brave.
Quillan is not brave.If Hector is not encouraging, then Hector is not neat.
If there is at least one people who is neat, then Roswell is not brave.
If someone is neat, then he is both brave and not bad.
If Claudia is brave and Roswell is not red, then Ashley is not determined.
If there is at least one people who is not brave, then Roswell is not bad.
If there is at least one people who is both not determined and not bad, then Roswell is brave.
Someone who is red is always both bad and neat.
Ashley is not bad if and only if Quillan is red.
If everyone is encouraging, then Hadley is neat.
It can be concluded that Roswell is bad once knowing that Roswell is not encouraging or Quillan is not neat.
if there is at least one people who is bad and red, then Hadley is not determined and Hartley is not neat.
Claudia is not neat if and only if Roswell is determined. | Roswell is determined. | entailment |
Claudia is not encouraging.
Ashley is bad.
Claudia is bad.
Hector is not bad.
Roswell is determined.
Hadley is not encouraging.
Quillan is red.
Ashley is not encouraging.
Hartley is neat.
Hadley is brave.
Hartley is not brave.
Quillan is not brave.If Hector is not encouraging, then Hector is not neat.
If there is at least one people who is neat, then Roswell is not brave.
If someone is neat, then he is both brave and not bad.
If Claudia is brave and Roswell is not red, then Ashley is not determined.
If there is at least one people who is not brave, then Roswell is not bad.
If there is at least one people who is both not determined and not bad, then Roswell is brave.
Someone who is red is always both bad and neat.
Ashley is not bad if and only if Quillan is red.
If everyone is encouraging, then Hadley is neat.
It can be concluded that Roswell is bad once knowing that Roswell is not encouraging or Quillan is not neat.
if there is at least one people who is bad and red, then Hadley is not determined and Hartley is not neat.
Claudia is not neat if and only if Roswell is determined. | Roswell is not bad. | entailment |
Claudia is not encouraging.
Ashley is bad.
Claudia is bad.
Hector is not bad.
Roswell is determined.
Hadley is not encouraging.
Quillan is red.
Ashley is not encouraging.
Hartley is neat.
Hadley is brave.
Hartley is not brave.
Quillan is not brave.If Hector is not encouraging, then Hector is not neat.
If there is at least one people who is neat, then Roswell is not brave.
If someone is neat, then he is both brave and not bad.
If Claudia is brave and Roswell is not red, then Ashley is not determined.
If there is at least one people who is not brave, then Roswell is not bad.
If there is at least one people who is both not determined and not bad, then Roswell is brave.
Someone who is red is always both bad and neat.
Ashley is not bad if and only if Quillan is red.
If everyone is encouraging, then Hadley is neat.
It can be concluded that Roswell is bad once knowing that Roswell is not encouraging or Quillan is not neat.
if there is at least one people who is bad and red, then Hadley is not determined and Hartley is not neat.
Claudia is not neat if and only if Roswell is determined. | Quillan is not neat. | contradiction |
Claudia is not encouraging.
Ashley is bad.
Claudia is bad.
Hector is not bad.
Roswell is determined.
Hadley is not encouraging.
Quillan is red.
Ashley is not encouraging.
Hartley is neat.
Hadley is brave.
Hartley is not brave.
Quillan is not brave.If Hector is not encouraging, then Hector is not neat.
If there is at least one people who is neat, then Roswell is not brave.
If someone is neat, then he is both brave and not bad.
If Claudia is brave and Roswell is not red, then Ashley is not determined.
If there is at least one people who is not brave, then Roswell is not bad.
If there is at least one people who is both not determined and not bad, then Roswell is brave.
Someone who is red is always both bad and neat.
Ashley is not bad if and only if Quillan is red.
If everyone is encouraging, then Hadley is neat.
It can be concluded that Roswell is bad once knowing that Roswell is not encouraging or Quillan is not neat.
if there is at least one people who is bad and red, then Hadley is not determined and Hartley is not neat.
Claudia is not neat if and only if Roswell is determined. | Quillan is neat. | entailment |
Claudia is not encouraging.
Ashley is bad.
Claudia is bad.
Hector is not bad.
Roswell is determined.
Hadley is not encouraging.
Quillan is red.
Ashley is not encouraging.
Hartley is neat.
Hadley is brave.
Hartley is not brave.
Quillan is not brave.If Hector is not encouraging, then Hector is not neat.
If there is at least one people who is neat, then Roswell is not brave.
If someone is neat, then he is both brave and not bad.
If Claudia is brave and Roswell is not red, then Ashley is not determined.
If there is at least one people who is not brave, then Roswell is not bad.
If there is at least one people who is both not determined and not bad, then Roswell is brave.
Someone who is red is always both bad and neat.
Ashley is not bad if and only if Quillan is red.
If everyone is encouraging, then Hadley is neat.
It can be concluded that Roswell is bad once knowing that Roswell is not encouraging or Quillan is not neat.
if there is at least one people who is bad and red, then Hadley is not determined and Hartley is not neat.
Claudia is not neat if and only if Roswell is determined. | Hector is not brave. | neutral |
Claudia is not encouraging.
Ashley is bad.
Claudia is bad.
Hector is not bad.
Roswell is determined.
Hadley is not encouraging.
Quillan is red.
Ashley is not encouraging.
Hartley is neat.
Hadley is brave.
Hartley is not brave.
Quillan is not brave.If Hector is not encouraging, then Hector is not neat.
If there is at least one people who is neat, then Roswell is not brave.
If someone is neat, then he is both brave and not bad.
If Claudia is brave and Roswell is not red, then Ashley is not determined.
If there is at least one people who is not brave, then Roswell is not bad.
If there is at least one people who is both not determined and not bad, then Roswell is brave.
Someone who is red is always both bad and neat.
Ashley is not bad if and only if Quillan is red.
If everyone is encouraging, then Hadley is neat.
It can be concluded that Roswell is bad once knowing that Roswell is not encouraging or Quillan is not neat.
if there is at least one people who is bad and red, then Hadley is not determined and Hartley is not neat.
Claudia is not neat if and only if Roswell is determined. | Quillan is brave. | self_contradiction |
Claudia is not encouraging.
Ashley is bad.
Claudia is bad.
Hector is not bad.
Roswell is determined.
Hadley is not encouraging.
Quillan is red.
Ashley is not encouraging.
Hartley is neat.
Hadley is brave.
Hartley is not brave.
Quillan is not brave.If Hector is not encouraging, then Hector is not neat.
If there is at least one people who is neat, then Roswell is not brave.
If someone is neat, then he is both brave and not bad.
If Claudia is brave and Roswell is not red, then Ashley is not determined.
If there is at least one people who is not brave, then Roswell is not bad.
If there is at least one people who is both not determined and not bad, then Roswell is brave.
Someone who is red is always both bad and neat.
Ashley is not bad if and only if Quillan is red.
If everyone is encouraging, then Hadley is neat.
It can be concluded that Roswell is bad once knowing that Roswell is not encouraging or Quillan is not neat.
if there is at least one people who is bad and red, then Hadley is not determined and Hartley is not neat.
Claudia is not neat if and only if Roswell is determined. | Ashley is bad. | self_contradiction |
Claudia is not encouraging.
Ashley is bad.
Claudia is bad.
Hector is not bad.
Roswell is determined.
Hadley is not encouraging.
Quillan is red.
Ashley is not encouraging.
Hartley is neat.
Hadley is brave.
Hartley is not brave.
Quillan is not brave.If Hector is not encouraging, then Hector is not neat.
If there is at least one people who is neat, then Roswell is not brave.
If someone is neat, then he is both brave and not bad.
If Claudia is brave and Roswell is not red, then Ashley is not determined.
If there is at least one people who is not brave, then Roswell is not bad.
If there is at least one people who is both not determined and not bad, then Roswell is brave.
Someone who is red is always both bad and neat.
Ashley is not bad if and only if Quillan is red.
If everyone is encouraging, then Hadley is neat.
It can be concluded that Roswell is bad once knowing that Roswell is not encouraging or Quillan is not neat.
if there is at least one people who is bad and red, then Hadley is not determined and Hartley is not neat.
Claudia is not neat if and only if Roswell is determined. | Hector is bad. | contradiction |
Claudia is not encouraging.
Ashley is bad.
Claudia is bad.
Hector is not bad.
Roswell is determined.
Hadley is not encouraging.
Quillan is red.
Ashley is not encouraging.
Hartley is neat.
Hadley is brave.
Hartley is not brave.
Quillan is not brave.If Hector is not encouraging, then Hector is not neat.
If there is at least one people who is neat, then Roswell is not brave.
If someone is neat, then he is both brave and not bad.
If Claudia is brave and Roswell is not red, then Ashley is not determined.
If there is at least one people who is not brave, then Roswell is not bad.
If there is at least one people who is both not determined and not bad, then Roswell is brave.
Someone who is red is always both bad and neat.
Ashley is not bad if and only if Quillan is red.
If everyone is encouraging, then Hadley is neat.
It can be concluded that Roswell is bad once knowing that Roswell is not encouraging or Quillan is not neat.
if there is at least one people who is bad and red, then Hadley is not determined and Hartley is not neat.
Claudia is not neat if and only if Roswell is determined. | Ashley is not bad. | self_contradiction |
Claudia is not encouraging.
Ashley is bad.
Claudia is bad.
Hector is not bad.
Roswell is determined.
Hadley is not encouraging.
Quillan is red.
Ashley is not encouraging.
Hartley is neat.
Hadley is brave.
Hartley is not brave.
Quillan is not brave.If Hector is not encouraging, then Hector is not neat.
If there is at least one people who is neat, then Roswell is not brave.
If someone is neat, then he is both brave and not bad.
If Claudia is brave and Roswell is not red, then Ashley is not determined.
If there is at least one people who is not brave, then Roswell is not bad.
If there is at least one people who is both not determined and not bad, then Roswell is brave.
Someone who is red is always both bad and neat.
Ashley is not bad if and only if Quillan is red.
If everyone is encouraging, then Hadley is neat.
It can be concluded that Roswell is bad once knowing that Roswell is not encouraging or Quillan is not neat.
if there is at least one people who is bad and red, then Hadley is not determined and Hartley is not neat.
Claudia is not neat if and only if Roswell is determined. | Hector is not bad. | entailment |
Claudia is not encouraging.
Ashley is bad.
Claudia is bad.
Hector is not bad.
Roswell is determined.
Hadley is not encouraging.
Quillan is red.
Ashley is not encouraging.
Hartley is neat.
Hadley is brave.
Hartley is not brave.
Quillan is not brave.If Hector is not encouraging, then Hector is not neat.
If there is at least one people who is neat, then Roswell is not brave.
If someone is neat, then he is both brave and not bad.
If Claudia is brave and Roswell is not red, then Ashley is not determined.
If there is at least one people who is not brave, then Roswell is not bad.
If there is at least one people who is both not determined and not bad, then Roswell is brave.
Someone who is red is always both bad and neat.
Ashley is not bad if and only if Quillan is red.
If everyone is encouraging, then Hadley is neat.
It can be concluded that Roswell is bad once knowing that Roswell is not encouraging or Quillan is not neat.
if there is at least one people who is bad and red, then Hadley is not determined and Hartley is not neat.
Claudia is not neat if and only if Roswell is determined. | Hartley is not brave. | self_contradiction |
Claudia is not encouraging.
Ashley is bad.
Claudia is bad.
Hector is not bad.
Roswell is determined.
Hadley is not encouraging.
Quillan is red.
Ashley is not encouraging.
Hartley is neat.
Hadley is brave.
Hartley is not brave.
Quillan is not brave.If Hector is not encouraging, then Hector is not neat.
If there is at least one people who is neat, then Roswell is not brave.
If someone is neat, then he is both brave and not bad.
If Claudia is brave and Roswell is not red, then Ashley is not determined.
If there is at least one people who is not brave, then Roswell is not bad.
If there is at least one people who is both not determined and not bad, then Roswell is brave.
Someone who is red is always both bad and neat.
Ashley is not bad if and only if Quillan is red.
If everyone is encouraging, then Hadley is neat.
It can be concluded that Roswell is bad once knowing that Roswell is not encouraging or Quillan is not neat.
if there is at least one people who is bad and red, then Hadley is not determined and Hartley is not neat.
Claudia is not neat if and only if Roswell is determined. | Hartley is red. | neutral |
Claudia is not encouraging.
Ashley is bad.
Claudia is bad.
Hector is not bad.
Roswell is determined.
Hadley is not encouraging.
Quillan is red.
Ashley is not encouraging.
Hartley is neat.
Hadley is brave.
Hartley is not brave.
Quillan is not brave.If Hector is not encouraging, then Hector is not neat.
If there is at least one people who is neat, then Roswell is not brave.
If someone is neat, then he is both brave and not bad.
If Claudia is brave and Roswell is not red, then Ashley is not determined.
If there is at least one people who is not brave, then Roswell is not bad.
If there is at least one people who is both not determined and not bad, then Roswell is brave.
Someone who is red is always both bad and neat.
Ashley is not bad if and only if Quillan is red.
If everyone is encouraging, then Hadley is neat.
It can be concluded that Roswell is bad once knowing that Roswell is not encouraging or Quillan is not neat.
if there is at least one people who is bad and red, then Hadley is not determined and Hartley is not neat.
Claudia is not neat if and only if Roswell is determined. | Hartley is not bad. | entailment |
Silvia is cheeky.
Alastair is not dangerous.
Ron is not victorious.
Ron is automatic.
Amanda is dangerous.
Chandler is not nice.
Alastair is cheeky.
Amanda is cheeky.
Ron is cheeky.
Ron is not plucky.
Chandler is not cheeky.
Hope is dangerous.If someone is both not automatic and not dangerous, then he is not cheeky.
Someone who is automatic or nice is always not victorious and plucky.
Chandler being victorious is equivalent to Chandler being not dangerous and Chandler being not cheeky.
Silvia being nice or Hope being not victorious implies that Ron is not plucky.
If someone who is plucky is also dangerous, then he is victorious.
If there is at least one people who is victorious or not dangerous, then Alastair is automatic.
Someone is automatic if and only if he is nice.
Someone who is nice is always both not automatic and not plucky.
Chandler is automatic if and only if Silvia is not cheeky.
If there is at least one people who is cheeky, then Ron is not victorious.
If someone is dangerous or he is victorious, then he is not automatic.
If someone is both dangerous and automatic, then he is victorious. | Alastair is victorious. | contradiction |
Silvia is cheeky.
Alastair is not dangerous.
Ron is not victorious.
Ron is automatic.
Amanda is dangerous.
Chandler is not nice.
Alastair is cheeky.
Amanda is cheeky.
Ron is cheeky.
Ron is not plucky.
Chandler is not cheeky.
Hope is dangerous.If someone is both not automatic and not dangerous, then he is not cheeky.
Someone who is automatic or nice is always not victorious and plucky.
Chandler being victorious is equivalent to Chandler being not dangerous and Chandler being not cheeky.
Silvia being nice or Hope being not victorious implies that Ron is not plucky.
If someone who is plucky is also dangerous, then he is victorious.
If there is at least one people who is victorious or not dangerous, then Alastair is automatic.
Someone is automatic if and only if he is nice.
Someone who is nice is always both not automatic and not plucky.
Chandler is automatic if and only if Silvia is not cheeky.
If there is at least one people who is cheeky, then Ron is not victorious.
If someone is dangerous or he is victorious, then he is not automatic.
If someone is both dangerous and automatic, then he is victorious. | Alastair is not dangerous. | entailment |
Silvia is cheeky.
Alastair is not dangerous.
Ron is not victorious.
Ron is automatic.
Amanda is dangerous.
Chandler is not nice.
Alastair is cheeky.
Amanda is cheeky.
Ron is cheeky.
Ron is not plucky.
Chandler is not cheeky.
Hope is dangerous.If someone is both not automatic and not dangerous, then he is not cheeky.
Someone who is automatic or nice is always not victorious and plucky.
Chandler being victorious is equivalent to Chandler being not dangerous and Chandler being not cheeky.
Silvia being nice or Hope being not victorious implies that Ron is not plucky.
If someone who is plucky is also dangerous, then he is victorious.
If there is at least one people who is victorious or not dangerous, then Alastair is automatic.
Someone is automatic if and only if he is nice.
Someone who is nice is always both not automatic and not plucky.
Chandler is automatic if and only if Silvia is not cheeky.
If there is at least one people who is cheeky, then Ron is not victorious.
If someone is dangerous or he is victorious, then he is not automatic.
If someone is both dangerous and automatic, then he is victorious. | Alastair is plucky. | self_contradiction |
Silvia is cheeky.
Alastair is not dangerous.
Ron is not victorious.
Ron is automatic.
Amanda is dangerous.
Chandler is not nice.
Alastair is cheeky.
Amanda is cheeky.
Ron is cheeky.
Ron is not plucky.
Chandler is not cheeky.
Hope is dangerous.If someone is both not automatic and not dangerous, then he is not cheeky.
Someone who is automatic or nice is always not victorious and plucky.
Chandler being victorious is equivalent to Chandler being not dangerous and Chandler being not cheeky.
Silvia being nice or Hope being not victorious implies that Ron is not plucky.
If someone who is plucky is also dangerous, then he is victorious.
If there is at least one people who is victorious or not dangerous, then Alastair is automatic.
Someone is automatic if and only if he is nice.
Someone who is nice is always both not automatic and not plucky.
Chandler is automatic if and only if Silvia is not cheeky.
If there is at least one people who is cheeky, then Ron is not victorious.
If someone is dangerous or he is victorious, then he is not automatic.
If someone is both dangerous and automatic, then he is victorious. | Alastair is not cheeky. | self_contradiction |
Silvia is cheeky.
Alastair is not dangerous.
Ron is not victorious.
Ron is automatic.
Amanda is dangerous.
Chandler is not nice.
Alastair is cheeky.
Amanda is cheeky.
Ron is cheeky.
Ron is not plucky.
Chandler is not cheeky.
Hope is dangerous.If someone is both not automatic and not dangerous, then he is not cheeky.
Someone who is automatic or nice is always not victorious and plucky.
Chandler being victorious is equivalent to Chandler being not dangerous and Chandler being not cheeky.
Silvia being nice or Hope being not victorious implies that Ron is not plucky.
If someone who is plucky is also dangerous, then he is victorious.
If there is at least one people who is victorious or not dangerous, then Alastair is automatic.
Someone is automatic if and only if he is nice.
Someone who is nice is always both not automatic and not plucky.
Chandler is automatic if and only if Silvia is not cheeky.
If there is at least one people who is cheeky, then Ron is not victorious.
If someone is dangerous or he is victorious, then he is not automatic.
If someone is both dangerous and automatic, then he is victorious. | Hope is not cheeky. | neutral |
Silvia is cheeky.
Alastair is not dangerous.
Ron is not victorious.
Ron is automatic.
Amanda is dangerous.
Chandler is not nice.
Alastair is cheeky.
Amanda is cheeky.
Ron is cheeky.
Ron is not plucky.
Chandler is not cheeky.
Hope is dangerous.If someone is both not automatic and not dangerous, then he is not cheeky.
Someone who is automatic or nice is always not victorious and plucky.
Chandler being victorious is equivalent to Chandler being not dangerous and Chandler being not cheeky.
Silvia being nice or Hope being not victorious implies that Ron is not plucky.
If someone who is plucky is also dangerous, then he is victorious.
If there is at least one people who is victorious or not dangerous, then Alastair is automatic.
Someone is automatic if and only if he is nice.
Someone who is nice is always both not automatic and not plucky.
Chandler is automatic if and only if Silvia is not cheeky.
If there is at least one people who is cheeky, then Ron is not victorious.
If someone is dangerous or he is victorious, then he is not automatic.
If someone is both dangerous and automatic, then he is victorious. | Bruce is not automatic. | neutral |
Silvia is cheeky.
Alastair is not dangerous.
Ron is not victorious.
Ron is automatic.
Amanda is dangerous.
Chandler is not nice.
Alastair is cheeky.
Amanda is cheeky.
Ron is cheeky.
Ron is not plucky.
Chandler is not cheeky.
Hope is dangerous.If someone is both not automatic and not dangerous, then he is not cheeky.
Someone who is automatic or nice is always not victorious and plucky.
Chandler being victorious is equivalent to Chandler being not dangerous and Chandler being not cheeky.
Silvia being nice or Hope being not victorious implies that Ron is not plucky.
If someone who is plucky is also dangerous, then he is victorious.
If there is at least one people who is victorious or not dangerous, then Alastair is automatic.
Someone is automatic if and only if he is nice.
Someone who is nice is always both not automatic and not plucky.
Chandler is automatic if and only if Silvia is not cheeky.
If there is at least one people who is cheeky, then Ron is not victorious.
If someone is dangerous or he is victorious, then he is not automatic.
If someone is both dangerous and automatic, then he is victorious. | Silvia is cheeky. | entailment |
Silvia is cheeky.
Alastair is not dangerous.
Ron is not victorious.
Ron is automatic.
Amanda is dangerous.
Chandler is not nice.
Alastair is cheeky.
Amanda is cheeky.
Ron is cheeky.
Ron is not plucky.
Chandler is not cheeky.
Hope is dangerous.If someone is both not automatic and not dangerous, then he is not cheeky.
Someone who is automatic or nice is always not victorious and plucky.
Chandler being victorious is equivalent to Chandler being not dangerous and Chandler being not cheeky.
Silvia being nice or Hope being not victorious implies that Ron is not plucky.
If someone who is plucky is also dangerous, then he is victorious.
If there is at least one people who is victorious or not dangerous, then Alastair is automatic.
Someone is automatic if and only if he is nice.
Someone who is nice is always both not automatic and not plucky.
Chandler is automatic if and only if Silvia is not cheeky.
If there is at least one people who is cheeky, then Ron is not victorious.
If someone is dangerous or he is victorious, then he is not automatic.
If someone is both dangerous and automatic, then he is victorious. | Amanda is cheeky. | entailment |
Silvia is cheeky.
Alastair is not dangerous.
Ron is not victorious.
Ron is automatic.
Amanda is dangerous.
Chandler is not nice.
Alastair is cheeky.
Amanda is cheeky.
Ron is cheeky.
Ron is not plucky.
Chandler is not cheeky.
Hope is dangerous.If someone is both not automatic and not dangerous, then he is not cheeky.
Someone who is automatic or nice is always not victorious and plucky.
Chandler being victorious is equivalent to Chandler being not dangerous and Chandler being not cheeky.
Silvia being nice or Hope being not victorious implies that Ron is not plucky.
If someone who is plucky is also dangerous, then he is victorious.
If there is at least one people who is victorious or not dangerous, then Alastair is automatic.
Someone is automatic if and only if he is nice.
Someone who is nice is always both not automatic and not plucky.
Chandler is automatic if and only if Silvia is not cheeky.
If there is at least one people who is cheeky, then Ron is not victorious.
If someone is dangerous or he is victorious, then he is not automatic.
If someone is both dangerous and automatic, then he is victorious. | Silvia is not dangerous. | neutral |
Silvia is cheeky.
Alastair is not dangerous.
Ron is not victorious.
Ron is automatic.
Amanda is dangerous.
Chandler is not nice.
Alastair is cheeky.
Amanda is cheeky.
Ron is cheeky.
Ron is not plucky.
Chandler is not cheeky.
Hope is dangerous.If someone is both not automatic and not dangerous, then he is not cheeky.
Someone who is automatic or nice is always not victorious and plucky.
Chandler being victorious is equivalent to Chandler being not dangerous and Chandler being not cheeky.
Silvia being nice or Hope being not victorious implies that Ron is not plucky.
If someone who is plucky is also dangerous, then he is victorious.
If there is at least one people who is victorious or not dangerous, then Alastair is automatic.
Someone is automatic if and only if he is nice.
Someone who is nice is always both not automatic and not plucky.
Chandler is automatic if and only if Silvia is not cheeky.
If there is at least one people who is cheeky, then Ron is not victorious.
If someone is dangerous or he is victorious, then he is not automatic.
If someone is both dangerous and automatic, then he is victorious. | Chandler is not automatic. | neutral |
Silvia is cheeky.
Alastair is not dangerous.
Ron is not victorious.
Ron is automatic.
Amanda is dangerous.
Chandler is not nice.
Alastair is cheeky.
Amanda is cheeky.
Ron is cheeky.
Ron is not plucky.
Chandler is not cheeky.
Hope is dangerous.If someone is both not automatic and not dangerous, then he is not cheeky.
Someone who is automatic or nice is always not victorious and plucky.
Chandler being victorious is equivalent to Chandler being not dangerous and Chandler being not cheeky.
Silvia being nice or Hope being not victorious implies that Ron is not plucky.
If someone who is plucky is also dangerous, then he is victorious.
If there is at least one people who is victorious or not dangerous, then Alastair is automatic.
Someone is automatic if and only if he is nice.
Someone who is nice is always both not automatic and not plucky.
Chandler is automatic if and only if Silvia is not cheeky.
If there is at least one people who is cheeky, then Ron is not victorious.
If someone is dangerous or he is victorious, then he is not automatic.
If someone is both dangerous and automatic, then he is victorious. | Ron is not automatic. | self_contradiction |
Silvia is cheeky.
Alastair is not dangerous.
Ron is not victorious.
Ron is automatic.
Amanda is dangerous.
Chandler is not nice.
Alastair is cheeky.
Amanda is cheeky.
Ron is cheeky.
Ron is not plucky.
Chandler is not cheeky.
Hope is dangerous.If someone is both not automatic and not dangerous, then he is not cheeky.
Someone who is automatic or nice is always not victorious and plucky.
Chandler being victorious is equivalent to Chandler being not dangerous and Chandler being not cheeky.
Silvia being nice or Hope being not victorious implies that Ron is not plucky.
If someone who is plucky is also dangerous, then he is victorious.
If there is at least one people who is victorious or not dangerous, then Alastair is automatic.
Someone is automatic if and only if he is nice.
Someone who is nice is always both not automatic and not plucky.
Chandler is automatic if and only if Silvia is not cheeky.
If there is at least one people who is cheeky, then Ron is not victorious.
If someone is dangerous or he is victorious, then he is not automatic.
If someone is both dangerous and automatic, then he is victorious. | Ron is victorious. | contradiction |
Silvia is cheeky.
Alastair is not dangerous.
Ron is not victorious.
Ron is automatic.
Amanda is dangerous.
Chandler is not nice.
Alastair is cheeky.
Amanda is cheeky.
Ron is cheeky.
Ron is not plucky.
Chandler is not cheeky.
Hope is dangerous.If someone is both not automatic and not dangerous, then he is not cheeky.
Someone who is automatic or nice is always not victorious and plucky.
Chandler being victorious is equivalent to Chandler being not dangerous and Chandler being not cheeky.
Silvia being nice or Hope being not victorious implies that Ron is not plucky.
If someone who is plucky is also dangerous, then he is victorious.
If there is at least one people who is victorious or not dangerous, then Alastair is automatic.
Someone is automatic if and only if he is nice.
Someone who is nice is always both not automatic and not plucky.
Chandler is automatic if and only if Silvia is not cheeky.
If there is at least one people who is cheeky, then Ron is not victorious.
If someone is dangerous or he is victorious, then he is not automatic.
If someone is both dangerous and automatic, then he is victorious. | Alastair is nice. | entailment |
Silvia is cheeky.
Alastair is not dangerous.
Ron is not victorious.
Ron is automatic.
Amanda is dangerous.
Chandler is not nice.
Alastair is cheeky.
Amanda is cheeky.
Ron is cheeky.
Ron is not plucky.
Chandler is not cheeky.
Hope is dangerous.If someone is both not automatic and not dangerous, then he is not cheeky.
Someone who is automatic or nice is always not victorious and plucky.
Chandler being victorious is equivalent to Chandler being not dangerous and Chandler being not cheeky.
Silvia being nice or Hope being not victorious implies that Ron is not plucky.
If someone who is plucky is also dangerous, then he is victorious.
If there is at least one people who is victorious or not dangerous, then Alastair is automatic.
Someone is automatic if and only if he is nice.
Someone who is nice is always both not automatic and not plucky.
Chandler is automatic if and only if Silvia is not cheeky.
If there is at least one people who is cheeky, then Ron is not victorious.
If someone is dangerous or he is victorious, then he is not automatic.
If someone is both dangerous and automatic, then he is victorious. | Amanda is automatic. | contradiction |
Silvia is cheeky.
Alastair is not dangerous.
Ron is not victorious.
Ron is automatic.
Amanda is dangerous.
Chandler is not nice.
Alastair is cheeky.
Amanda is cheeky.
Ron is cheeky.
Ron is not plucky.
Chandler is not cheeky.
Hope is dangerous.If someone is both not automatic and not dangerous, then he is not cheeky.
Someone who is automatic or nice is always not victorious and plucky.
Chandler being victorious is equivalent to Chandler being not dangerous and Chandler being not cheeky.
Silvia being nice or Hope being not victorious implies that Ron is not plucky.
If someone who is plucky is also dangerous, then he is victorious.
If there is at least one people who is victorious or not dangerous, then Alastair is automatic.
Someone is automatic if and only if he is nice.
Someone who is nice is always both not automatic and not plucky.
Chandler is automatic if and only if Silvia is not cheeky.
If there is at least one people who is cheeky, then Ron is not victorious.
If someone is dangerous or he is victorious, then he is not automatic.
If someone is both dangerous and automatic, then he is victorious. | Alastair is automatic. | self_contradiction |
Silvia is cheeky.
Alastair is not dangerous.
Ron is not victorious.
Ron is automatic.
Amanda is dangerous.
Chandler is not nice.
Alastair is cheeky.
Amanda is cheeky.
Ron is cheeky.
Ron is not plucky.
Chandler is not cheeky.
Hope is dangerous.If someone is both not automatic and not dangerous, then he is not cheeky.
Someone who is automatic or nice is always not victorious and plucky.
Chandler being victorious is equivalent to Chandler being not dangerous and Chandler being not cheeky.
Silvia being nice or Hope being not victorious implies that Ron is not plucky.
If someone who is plucky is also dangerous, then he is victorious.
If there is at least one people who is victorious or not dangerous, then Alastair is automatic.
Someone is automatic if and only if he is nice.
Someone who is nice is always both not automatic and not plucky.
Chandler is automatic if and only if Silvia is not cheeky.
If there is at least one people who is cheeky, then Ron is not victorious.
If someone is dangerous or he is victorious, then he is not automatic.
If someone is both dangerous and automatic, then he is victorious. | Ron is not nice. | contradiction |
Silvia is cheeky.
Alastair is not dangerous.
Ron is not victorious.
Ron is automatic.
Amanda is dangerous.
Chandler is not nice.
Alastair is cheeky.
Amanda is cheeky.
Ron is cheeky.
Ron is not plucky.
Chandler is not cheeky.
Hope is dangerous.If someone is both not automatic and not dangerous, then he is not cheeky.
Someone who is automatic or nice is always not victorious and plucky.
Chandler being victorious is equivalent to Chandler being not dangerous and Chandler being not cheeky.
Silvia being nice or Hope being not victorious implies that Ron is not plucky.
If someone who is plucky is also dangerous, then he is victorious.
If there is at least one people who is victorious or not dangerous, then Alastair is automatic.
Someone is automatic if and only if he is nice.
Someone who is nice is always both not automatic and not plucky.
Chandler is automatic if and only if Silvia is not cheeky.
If there is at least one people who is cheeky, then Ron is not victorious.
If someone is dangerous or he is victorious, then he is not automatic.
If someone is both dangerous and automatic, then he is victorious. | Amanda is not dangerous. | contradiction |
Silvia is cheeky.
Alastair is not dangerous.
Ron is not victorious.
Ron is automatic.
Amanda is dangerous.
Chandler is not nice.
Alastair is cheeky.
Amanda is cheeky.
Ron is cheeky.
Ron is not plucky.
Chandler is not cheeky.
Hope is dangerous.If someone is both not automatic and not dangerous, then he is not cheeky.
Someone who is automatic or nice is always not victorious and plucky.
Chandler being victorious is equivalent to Chandler being not dangerous and Chandler being not cheeky.
Silvia being nice or Hope being not victorious implies that Ron is not plucky.
If someone who is plucky is also dangerous, then he is victorious.
If there is at least one people who is victorious or not dangerous, then Alastair is automatic.
Someone is automatic if and only if he is nice.
Someone who is nice is always both not automatic and not plucky.
Chandler is automatic if and only if Silvia is not cheeky.
If there is at least one people who is cheeky, then Ron is not victorious.
If someone is dangerous or he is victorious, then he is not automatic.
If someone is both dangerous and automatic, then he is victorious. | Amanda is not automatic. | entailment |
Silvia is cheeky.
Alastair is not dangerous.
Ron is not victorious.
Ron is automatic.
Amanda is dangerous.
Chandler is not nice.
Alastair is cheeky.
Amanda is cheeky.
Ron is cheeky.
Ron is not plucky.
Chandler is not cheeky.
Hope is dangerous.If someone is both not automatic and not dangerous, then he is not cheeky.
Someone who is automatic or nice is always not victorious and plucky.
Chandler being victorious is equivalent to Chandler being not dangerous and Chandler being not cheeky.
Silvia being nice or Hope being not victorious implies that Ron is not plucky.
If someone who is plucky is also dangerous, then he is victorious.
If there is at least one people who is victorious or not dangerous, then Alastair is automatic.
Someone is automatic if and only if he is nice.
Someone who is nice is always both not automatic and not plucky.
Chandler is automatic if and only if Silvia is not cheeky.
If there is at least one people who is cheeky, then Ron is not victorious.
If someone is dangerous or he is victorious, then he is not automatic.
If someone is both dangerous and automatic, then he is victorious. | Alastair is cheeky. | self_contradiction |
Silvia is cheeky.
Alastair is not dangerous.
Ron is not victorious.
Ron is automatic.
Amanda is dangerous.
Chandler is not nice.
Alastair is cheeky.
Amanda is cheeky.
Ron is cheeky.
Ron is not plucky.
Chandler is not cheeky.
Hope is dangerous.If someone is both not automatic and not dangerous, then he is not cheeky.
Someone who is automatic or nice is always not victorious and plucky.
Chandler being victorious is equivalent to Chandler being not dangerous and Chandler being not cheeky.
Silvia being nice or Hope being not victorious implies that Ron is not plucky.
If someone who is plucky is also dangerous, then he is victorious.
If there is at least one people who is victorious or not dangerous, then Alastair is automatic.
Someone is automatic if and only if he is nice.
Someone who is nice is always both not automatic and not plucky.
Chandler is automatic if and only if Silvia is not cheeky.
If there is at least one people who is cheeky, then Ron is not victorious.
If someone is dangerous or he is victorious, then he is not automatic.
If someone is both dangerous and automatic, then he is victorious. | Bruce is automatic. | neutral |
Andrew is innocent.
Leith is not salty.
Alexis is upset.
Quimby is not innocent.
Curt is not innocent.
Quimby is not upset.
Quimby is blue.
Cuthbert is warm-hearted.
Gardner is salty.
Andrew is upset.
Gardner is not blue.
Cuthbert is salty.If there is at least one people who is not plastic, then Leith is upset and Quimby is innocent.
If there is at least one people who is both not warm-hearted and plastic, then Alexis is not blue.
If everyone is salty, then Curt is not plastic.
It can be concluded that Alexis is not blue and Leith is not upset once knowing that Andrew is not salty.
Someone is warm-hearted if and only if he is innocent.
All innocent people are not warm-hearted.
If there is at least one people who is not plastic or not innocent, then Cuthbert is not upset.
Someone who is both upset and warm-hearted is always blue.
Quimby is upset if and only if Cuthbert is warm-hearted and Andrew is not innocent.
All not upset people are warm-hearted.
If Gardner is plastic, then Leith is salty and Curt is innocent.
Andrew being not innocent and Gardner being not blue are equivalent to Gardner being plastic and Andrew being upset. | Alexis is innocent. | neutral |
Andrew is innocent.
Leith is not salty.
Alexis is upset.
Quimby is not innocent.
Curt is not innocent.
Quimby is not upset.
Quimby is blue.
Cuthbert is warm-hearted.
Gardner is salty.
Andrew is upset.
Gardner is not blue.
Cuthbert is salty.If there is at least one people who is not plastic, then Leith is upset and Quimby is innocent.
If there is at least one people who is both not warm-hearted and plastic, then Alexis is not blue.
If everyone is salty, then Curt is not plastic.
It can be concluded that Alexis is not blue and Leith is not upset once knowing that Andrew is not salty.
Someone is warm-hearted if and only if he is innocent.
All innocent people are not warm-hearted.
If there is at least one people who is not plastic or not innocent, then Cuthbert is not upset.
Someone who is both upset and warm-hearted is always blue.
Quimby is upset if and only if Cuthbert is warm-hearted and Andrew is not innocent.
All not upset people are warm-hearted.
If Gardner is plastic, then Leith is salty and Curt is innocent.
Andrew being not innocent and Gardner being not blue are equivalent to Gardner being plastic and Andrew being upset. | Quimby is not blue. | contradiction |
Andrew is innocent.
Leith is not salty.
Alexis is upset.
Quimby is not innocent.
Curt is not innocent.
Quimby is not upset.
Quimby is blue.
Cuthbert is warm-hearted.
Gardner is salty.
Andrew is upset.
Gardner is not blue.
Cuthbert is salty.If there is at least one people who is not plastic, then Leith is upset and Quimby is innocent.
If there is at least one people who is both not warm-hearted and plastic, then Alexis is not blue.
If everyone is salty, then Curt is not plastic.
It can be concluded that Alexis is not blue and Leith is not upset once knowing that Andrew is not salty.
Someone is warm-hearted if and only if he is innocent.
All innocent people are not warm-hearted.
If there is at least one people who is not plastic or not innocent, then Cuthbert is not upset.
Someone who is both upset and warm-hearted is always blue.
Quimby is upset if and only if Cuthbert is warm-hearted and Andrew is not innocent.
All not upset people are warm-hearted.
If Gardner is plastic, then Leith is salty and Curt is innocent.
Andrew being not innocent and Gardner being not blue are equivalent to Gardner being plastic and Andrew being upset. | Curt is innocent. | contradiction |
Andrew is innocent.
Leith is not salty.
Alexis is upset.
Quimby is not innocent.
Curt is not innocent.
Quimby is not upset.
Quimby is blue.
Cuthbert is warm-hearted.
Gardner is salty.
Andrew is upset.
Gardner is not blue.
Cuthbert is salty.If there is at least one people who is not plastic, then Leith is upset and Quimby is innocent.
If there is at least one people who is both not warm-hearted and plastic, then Alexis is not blue.
If everyone is salty, then Curt is not plastic.
It can be concluded that Alexis is not blue and Leith is not upset once knowing that Andrew is not salty.
Someone is warm-hearted if and only if he is innocent.
All innocent people are not warm-hearted.
If there is at least one people who is not plastic or not innocent, then Cuthbert is not upset.
Someone who is both upset and warm-hearted is always blue.
Quimby is upset if and only if Cuthbert is warm-hearted and Andrew is not innocent.
All not upset people are warm-hearted.
If Gardner is plastic, then Leith is salty and Curt is innocent.
Andrew being not innocent and Gardner being not blue are equivalent to Gardner being plastic and Andrew being upset. | Alexis is upset. | entailment |
Andrew is innocent.
Leith is not salty.
Alexis is upset.
Quimby is not innocent.
Curt is not innocent.
Quimby is not upset.
Quimby is blue.
Cuthbert is warm-hearted.
Gardner is salty.
Andrew is upset.
Gardner is not blue.
Cuthbert is salty.If there is at least one people who is not plastic, then Leith is upset and Quimby is innocent.
If there is at least one people who is both not warm-hearted and plastic, then Alexis is not blue.
If everyone is salty, then Curt is not plastic.
It can be concluded that Alexis is not blue and Leith is not upset once knowing that Andrew is not salty.
Someone is warm-hearted if and only if he is innocent.
All innocent people are not warm-hearted.
If there is at least one people who is not plastic or not innocent, then Cuthbert is not upset.
Someone who is both upset and warm-hearted is always blue.
Quimby is upset if and only if Cuthbert is warm-hearted and Andrew is not innocent.
All not upset people are warm-hearted.
If Gardner is plastic, then Leith is salty and Curt is innocent.
Andrew being not innocent and Gardner being not blue are equivalent to Gardner being plastic and Andrew being upset. | Cuthbert is not upset. | entailment |
Andrew is innocent.
Leith is not salty.
Alexis is upset.
Quimby is not innocent.
Curt is not innocent.
Quimby is not upset.
Quimby is blue.
Cuthbert is warm-hearted.
Gardner is salty.
Andrew is upset.
Gardner is not blue.
Cuthbert is salty.If there is at least one people who is not plastic, then Leith is upset and Quimby is innocent.
If there is at least one people who is both not warm-hearted and plastic, then Alexis is not blue.
If everyone is salty, then Curt is not plastic.
It can be concluded that Alexis is not blue and Leith is not upset once knowing that Andrew is not salty.
Someone is warm-hearted if and only if he is innocent.
All innocent people are not warm-hearted.
If there is at least one people who is not plastic or not innocent, then Cuthbert is not upset.
Someone who is both upset and warm-hearted is always blue.
Quimby is upset if and only if Cuthbert is warm-hearted and Andrew is not innocent.
All not upset people are warm-hearted.
If Gardner is plastic, then Leith is salty and Curt is innocent.
Andrew being not innocent and Gardner being not blue are equivalent to Gardner being plastic and Andrew being upset. | Curt is not blue. | neutral |
Andrew is innocent.
Leith is not salty.
Alexis is upset.
Quimby is not innocent.
Curt is not innocent.
Quimby is not upset.
Quimby is blue.
Cuthbert is warm-hearted.
Gardner is salty.
Andrew is upset.
Gardner is not blue.
Cuthbert is salty.If there is at least one people who is not plastic, then Leith is upset and Quimby is innocent.
If there is at least one people who is both not warm-hearted and plastic, then Alexis is not blue.
If everyone is salty, then Curt is not plastic.
It can be concluded that Alexis is not blue and Leith is not upset once knowing that Andrew is not salty.
Someone is warm-hearted if and only if he is innocent.
All innocent people are not warm-hearted.
If there is at least one people who is not plastic or not innocent, then Cuthbert is not upset.
Someone who is both upset and warm-hearted is always blue.
Quimby is upset if and only if Cuthbert is warm-hearted and Andrew is not innocent.
All not upset people are warm-hearted.
If Gardner is plastic, then Leith is salty and Curt is innocent.
Andrew being not innocent and Gardner being not blue are equivalent to Gardner being plastic and Andrew being upset. | Gardner is not warm-hearted. | neutral |
Andrew is innocent.
Leith is not salty.
Alexis is upset.
Quimby is not innocent.
Curt is not innocent.
Quimby is not upset.
Quimby is blue.
Cuthbert is warm-hearted.
Gardner is salty.
Andrew is upset.
Gardner is not blue.
Cuthbert is salty.If there is at least one people who is not plastic, then Leith is upset and Quimby is innocent.
If there is at least one people who is both not warm-hearted and plastic, then Alexis is not blue.
If everyone is salty, then Curt is not plastic.
It can be concluded that Alexis is not blue and Leith is not upset once knowing that Andrew is not salty.
Someone is warm-hearted if and only if he is innocent.
All innocent people are not warm-hearted.
If there is at least one people who is not plastic or not innocent, then Cuthbert is not upset.
Someone who is both upset and warm-hearted is always blue.
Quimby is upset if and only if Cuthbert is warm-hearted and Andrew is not innocent.
All not upset people are warm-hearted.
If Gardner is plastic, then Leith is salty and Curt is innocent.
Andrew being not innocent and Gardner being not blue are equivalent to Gardner being plastic and Andrew being upset. | Cuthbert is not warm-hearted. | self_contradiction |
Andrew is innocent.
Leith is not salty.
Alexis is upset.
Quimby is not innocent.
Curt is not innocent.
Quimby is not upset.
Quimby is blue.
Cuthbert is warm-hearted.
Gardner is salty.
Andrew is upset.
Gardner is not blue.
Cuthbert is salty.If there is at least one people who is not plastic, then Leith is upset and Quimby is innocent.
If there is at least one people who is both not warm-hearted and plastic, then Alexis is not blue.
If everyone is salty, then Curt is not plastic.
It can be concluded that Alexis is not blue and Leith is not upset once knowing that Andrew is not salty.
Someone is warm-hearted if and only if he is innocent.
All innocent people are not warm-hearted.
If there is at least one people who is not plastic or not innocent, then Cuthbert is not upset.
Someone who is both upset and warm-hearted is always blue.
Quimby is upset if and only if Cuthbert is warm-hearted and Andrew is not innocent.
All not upset people are warm-hearted.
If Gardner is plastic, then Leith is salty and Curt is innocent.
Andrew being not innocent and Gardner being not blue are equivalent to Gardner being plastic and Andrew being upset. | Andrew is not warm-hearted. | self_contradiction |
Andrew is innocent.
Leith is not salty.
Alexis is upset.
Quimby is not innocent.
Curt is not innocent.
Quimby is not upset.
Quimby is blue.
Cuthbert is warm-hearted.
Gardner is salty.
Andrew is upset.
Gardner is not blue.
Cuthbert is salty.If there is at least one people who is not plastic, then Leith is upset and Quimby is innocent.
If there is at least one people who is both not warm-hearted and plastic, then Alexis is not blue.
If everyone is salty, then Curt is not plastic.
It can be concluded that Alexis is not blue and Leith is not upset once knowing that Andrew is not salty.
Someone is warm-hearted if and only if he is innocent.
All innocent people are not warm-hearted.
If there is at least one people who is not plastic or not innocent, then Cuthbert is not upset.
Someone who is both upset and warm-hearted is always blue.
Quimby is upset if and only if Cuthbert is warm-hearted and Andrew is not innocent.
All not upset people are warm-hearted.
If Gardner is plastic, then Leith is salty and Curt is innocent.
Andrew being not innocent and Gardner being not blue are equivalent to Gardner being plastic and Andrew being upset. | Andrew is not blue. | contradiction |
Andrew is innocent.
Leith is not salty.
Alexis is upset.
Quimby is not innocent.
Curt is not innocent.
Quimby is not upset.
Quimby is blue.
Cuthbert is warm-hearted.
Gardner is salty.
Andrew is upset.
Gardner is not blue.
Cuthbert is salty.If there is at least one people who is not plastic, then Leith is upset and Quimby is innocent.
If there is at least one people who is both not warm-hearted and plastic, then Alexis is not blue.
If everyone is salty, then Curt is not plastic.
It can be concluded that Alexis is not blue and Leith is not upset once knowing that Andrew is not salty.
Someone is warm-hearted if and only if he is innocent.
All innocent people are not warm-hearted.
If there is at least one people who is not plastic or not innocent, then Cuthbert is not upset.
Someone who is both upset and warm-hearted is always blue.
Quimby is upset if and only if Cuthbert is warm-hearted and Andrew is not innocent.
All not upset people are warm-hearted.
If Gardner is plastic, then Leith is salty and Curt is innocent.
Andrew being not innocent and Gardner being not blue are equivalent to Gardner being plastic and Andrew being upset. | Andrew is upset. | entailment |
Andrew is innocent.
Leith is not salty.
Alexis is upset.
Quimby is not innocent.
Curt is not innocent.
Quimby is not upset.
Quimby is blue.
Cuthbert is warm-hearted.
Gardner is salty.
Andrew is upset.
Gardner is not blue.
Cuthbert is salty.If there is at least one people who is not plastic, then Leith is upset and Quimby is innocent.
If there is at least one people who is both not warm-hearted and plastic, then Alexis is not blue.
If everyone is salty, then Curt is not plastic.
It can be concluded that Alexis is not blue and Leith is not upset once knowing that Andrew is not salty.
Someone is warm-hearted if and only if he is innocent.
All innocent people are not warm-hearted.
If there is at least one people who is not plastic or not innocent, then Cuthbert is not upset.
Someone who is both upset and warm-hearted is always blue.
Quimby is upset if and only if Cuthbert is warm-hearted and Andrew is not innocent.
All not upset people are warm-hearted.
If Gardner is plastic, then Leith is salty and Curt is innocent.
Andrew being not innocent and Gardner being not blue are equivalent to Gardner being plastic and Andrew being upset. | Leith is salty. | contradiction |
Andrew is innocent.
Leith is not salty.
Alexis is upset.
Quimby is not innocent.
Curt is not innocent.
Quimby is not upset.
Quimby is blue.
Cuthbert is warm-hearted.
Gardner is salty.
Andrew is upset.
Gardner is not blue.
Cuthbert is salty.If there is at least one people who is not plastic, then Leith is upset and Quimby is innocent.
If there is at least one people who is both not warm-hearted and plastic, then Alexis is not blue.
If everyone is salty, then Curt is not plastic.
It can be concluded that Alexis is not blue and Leith is not upset once knowing that Andrew is not salty.
Someone is warm-hearted if and only if he is innocent.
All innocent people are not warm-hearted.
If there is at least one people who is not plastic or not innocent, then Cuthbert is not upset.
Someone who is both upset and warm-hearted is always blue.
Quimby is upset if and only if Cuthbert is warm-hearted and Andrew is not innocent.
All not upset people are warm-hearted.
If Gardner is plastic, then Leith is salty and Curt is innocent.
Andrew being not innocent and Gardner being not blue are equivalent to Gardner being plastic and Andrew being upset. | Cuthbert is warm-hearted. | self_contradiction |
Andrew is innocent.
Leith is not salty.
Alexis is upset.
Quimby is not innocent.
Curt is not innocent.
Quimby is not upset.
Quimby is blue.
Cuthbert is warm-hearted.
Gardner is salty.
Andrew is upset.
Gardner is not blue.
Cuthbert is salty.If there is at least one people who is not plastic, then Leith is upset and Quimby is innocent.
If there is at least one people who is both not warm-hearted and plastic, then Alexis is not blue.
If everyone is salty, then Curt is not plastic.
It can be concluded that Alexis is not blue and Leith is not upset once knowing that Andrew is not salty.
Someone is warm-hearted if and only if he is innocent.
All innocent people are not warm-hearted.
If there is at least one people who is not plastic or not innocent, then Cuthbert is not upset.
Someone who is both upset and warm-hearted is always blue.
Quimby is upset if and only if Cuthbert is warm-hearted and Andrew is not innocent.
All not upset people are warm-hearted.
If Gardner is plastic, then Leith is salty and Curt is innocent.
Andrew being not innocent and Gardner being not blue are equivalent to Gardner being plastic and Andrew being upset. | Quimby is not warm-hearted. | self_contradiction |
Andrew is innocent.
Leith is not salty.
Alexis is upset.
Quimby is not innocent.
Curt is not innocent.
Quimby is not upset.
Quimby is blue.
Cuthbert is warm-hearted.
Gardner is salty.
Andrew is upset.
Gardner is not blue.
Cuthbert is salty.If there is at least one people who is not plastic, then Leith is upset and Quimby is innocent.
If there is at least one people who is both not warm-hearted and plastic, then Alexis is not blue.
If everyone is salty, then Curt is not plastic.
It can be concluded that Alexis is not blue and Leith is not upset once knowing that Andrew is not salty.
Someone is warm-hearted if and only if he is innocent.
All innocent people are not warm-hearted.
If there is at least one people who is not plastic or not innocent, then Cuthbert is not upset.
Someone who is both upset and warm-hearted is always blue.
Quimby is upset if and only if Cuthbert is warm-hearted and Andrew is not innocent.
All not upset people are warm-hearted.
If Gardner is plastic, then Leith is salty and Curt is innocent.
Andrew being not innocent and Gardner being not blue are equivalent to Gardner being plastic and Andrew being upset. | Andrew is innocent. | entailment |
Andrew is innocent.
Leith is not salty.
Alexis is upset.
Quimby is not innocent.
Curt is not innocent.
Quimby is not upset.
Quimby is blue.
Cuthbert is warm-hearted.
Gardner is salty.
Andrew is upset.
Gardner is not blue.
Cuthbert is salty.If there is at least one people who is not plastic, then Leith is upset and Quimby is innocent.
If there is at least one people who is both not warm-hearted and plastic, then Alexis is not blue.
If everyone is salty, then Curt is not plastic.
It can be concluded that Alexis is not blue and Leith is not upset once knowing that Andrew is not salty.
Someone is warm-hearted if and only if he is innocent.
All innocent people are not warm-hearted.
If there is at least one people who is not plastic or not innocent, then Cuthbert is not upset.
Someone who is both upset and warm-hearted is always blue.
Quimby is upset if and only if Cuthbert is warm-hearted and Andrew is not innocent.
All not upset people are warm-hearted.
If Gardner is plastic, then Leith is salty and Curt is innocent.
Andrew being not innocent and Gardner being not blue are equivalent to Gardner being plastic and Andrew being upset. | Quimby is not plastic. | neutral |
Andrew is innocent.
Leith is not salty.
Alexis is upset.
Quimby is not innocent.
Curt is not innocent.
Quimby is not upset.
Quimby is blue.
Cuthbert is warm-hearted.
Gardner is salty.
Andrew is upset.
Gardner is not blue.
Cuthbert is salty.If there is at least one people who is not plastic, then Leith is upset and Quimby is innocent.
If there is at least one people who is both not warm-hearted and plastic, then Alexis is not blue.
If everyone is salty, then Curt is not plastic.
It can be concluded that Alexis is not blue and Leith is not upset once knowing that Andrew is not salty.
Someone is warm-hearted if and only if he is innocent.
All innocent people are not warm-hearted.
If there is at least one people who is not plastic or not innocent, then Cuthbert is not upset.
Someone who is both upset and warm-hearted is always blue.
Quimby is upset if and only if Cuthbert is warm-hearted and Andrew is not innocent.
All not upset people are warm-hearted.
If Gardner is plastic, then Leith is salty and Curt is innocent.
Andrew being not innocent and Gardner being not blue are equivalent to Gardner being plastic and Andrew being upset. | Cuthbert is innocent. | entailment |
Andrew is innocent.
Leith is not salty.
Alexis is upset.
Quimby is not innocent.
Curt is not innocent.
Quimby is not upset.
Quimby is blue.
Cuthbert is warm-hearted.
Gardner is salty.
Andrew is upset.
Gardner is not blue.
Cuthbert is salty.If there is at least one people who is not plastic, then Leith is upset and Quimby is innocent.
If there is at least one people who is both not warm-hearted and plastic, then Alexis is not blue.
If everyone is salty, then Curt is not plastic.
It can be concluded that Alexis is not blue and Leith is not upset once knowing that Andrew is not salty.
Someone is warm-hearted if and only if he is innocent.
All innocent people are not warm-hearted.
If there is at least one people who is not plastic or not innocent, then Cuthbert is not upset.
Someone who is both upset and warm-hearted is always blue.
Quimby is upset if and only if Cuthbert is warm-hearted and Andrew is not innocent.
All not upset people are warm-hearted.
If Gardner is plastic, then Leith is salty and Curt is innocent.
Andrew being not innocent and Gardner being not blue are equivalent to Gardner being plastic and Andrew being upset. | Cuthbert is not salty. | contradiction |
Andrew is innocent.
Leith is not salty.
Alexis is upset.
Quimby is not innocent.
Curt is not innocent.
Quimby is not upset.
Quimby is blue.
Cuthbert is warm-hearted.
Gardner is salty.
Andrew is upset.
Gardner is not blue.
Cuthbert is salty.If there is at least one people who is not plastic, then Leith is upset and Quimby is innocent.
If there is at least one people who is both not warm-hearted and plastic, then Alexis is not blue.
If everyone is salty, then Curt is not plastic.
It can be concluded that Alexis is not blue and Leith is not upset once knowing that Andrew is not salty.
Someone is warm-hearted if and only if he is innocent.
All innocent people are not warm-hearted.
If there is at least one people who is not plastic or not innocent, then Cuthbert is not upset.
Someone who is both upset and warm-hearted is always blue.
Quimby is upset if and only if Cuthbert is warm-hearted and Andrew is not innocent.
All not upset people are warm-hearted.
If Gardner is plastic, then Leith is salty and Curt is innocent.
Andrew being not innocent and Gardner being not blue are equivalent to Gardner being plastic and Andrew being upset. | Quimby is warm-hearted. | self_contradiction |
Andrew is innocent.
Leith is not salty.
Alexis is upset.
Quimby is not innocent.
Curt is not innocent.
Quimby is not upset.
Quimby is blue.
Cuthbert is warm-hearted.
Gardner is salty.
Andrew is upset.
Gardner is not blue.
Cuthbert is salty.If there is at least one people who is not plastic, then Leith is upset and Quimby is innocent.
If there is at least one people who is both not warm-hearted and plastic, then Alexis is not blue.
If everyone is salty, then Curt is not plastic.
It can be concluded that Alexis is not blue and Leith is not upset once knowing that Andrew is not salty.
Someone is warm-hearted if and only if he is innocent.
All innocent people are not warm-hearted.
If there is at least one people who is not plastic or not innocent, then Cuthbert is not upset.
Someone who is both upset and warm-hearted is always blue.
Quimby is upset if and only if Cuthbert is warm-hearted and Andrew is not innocent.
All not upset people are warm-hearted.
If Gardner is plastic, then Leith is salty and Curt is innocent.
Andrew being not innocent and Gardner being not blue are equivalent to Gardner being plastic and Andrew being upset. | Leith is not warm-hearted. | neutral |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.