premise
stringlengths 923
1.41k
| hypothesis
stringlengths 11
33
| label
stringclasses 4
values |
|---|---|---|
Burton is white.
Randolph is few.
Baird is not white.
Rex is not swift.
Rex is not good.
Mark is good.
Charles is administrative.
Randolph is not white.
Burton is not swift.
Charles is not swift.
Burton is tough.
Mark is few.If all people are white, then Mark is swift.
If someone is white and administrative, then he is good, and vice versa.
Someone is not swift and good if and only if he is not white and not tough.
Randolph being not administrative and Della being tough are equivalent to Charles being not good and Rex being not few.
If Rex is few and Charles is tough, then Baird is not white.
If Burton is not swift or Della is not good, then Randolph is not tough.
Mark being good or Randolph being swift implies that Randolph is white.
Della being few implies that Rex is white and Della is tough.
Della is not good if and only if Randolph is not tough and Burton is few.
If someone is good, then he is not few.
Randolph being tough and Baird being good imply that Rex is not few.
If there is at least one people who is not swift, then Rex is administrative and Della is not tough. | Randolph is not white. | self_contradiction |
Burton is white.
Randolph is few.
Baird is not white.
Rex is not swift.
Rex is not good.
Mark is good.
Charles is administrative.
Randolph is not white.
Burton is not swift.
Charles is not swift.
Burton is tough.
Mark is few.If all people are white, then Mark is swift.
If someone is white and administrative, then he is good, and vice versa.
Someone is not swift and good if and only if he is not white and not tough.
Randolph being not administrative and Della being tough are equivalent to Charles being not good and Rex being not few.
If Rex is few and Charles is tough, then Baird is not white.
If Burton is not swift or Della is not good, then Randolph is not tough.
Mark being good or Randolph being swift implies that Randolph is white.
Della being few implies that Rex is white and Della is tough.
Della is not good if and only if Randolph is not tough and Burton is few.
If someone is good, then he is not few.
Randolph being tough and Baird being good imply that Rex is not few.
If there is at least one people who is not swift, then Rex is administrative and Della is not tough. | Burton is not swift. | entailment |
Burton is white.
Randolph is few.
Baird is not white.
Rex is not swift.
Rex is not good.
Mark is good.
Charles is administrative.
Randolph is not white.
Burton is not swift.
Charles is not swift.
Burton is tough.
Mark is few.If all people are white, then Mark is swift.
If someone is white and administrative, then he is good, and vice versa.
Someone is not swift and good if and only if he is not white and not tough.
Randolph being not administrative and Della being tough are equivalent to Charles being not good and Rex being not few.
If Rex is few and Charles is tough, then Baird is not white.
If Burton is not swift or Della is not good, then Randolph is not tough.
Mark being good or Randolph being swift implies that Randolph is white.
Della being few implies that Rex is white and Della is tough.
Della is not good if and only if Randolph is not tough and Burton is few.
If someone is good, then he is not few.
Randolph being tough and Baird being good imply that Rex is not few.
If there is at least one people who is not swift, then Rex is administrative and Della is not tough. | Mark is white. | entailment |
Burton is white.
Randolph is few.
Baird is not white.
Rex is not swift.
Rex is not good.
Mark is good.
Charles is administrative.
Randolph is not white.
Burton is not swift.
Charles is not swift.
Burton is tough.
Mark is few.If all people are white, then Mark is swift.
If someone is white and administrative, then he is good, and vice versa.
Someone is not swift and good if and only if he is not white and not tough.
Randolph being not administrative and Della being tough are equivalent to Charles being not good and Rex being not few.
If Rex is few and Charles is tough, then Baird is not white.
If Burton is not swift or Della is not good, then Randolph is not tough.
Mark being good or Randolph being swift implies that Randolph is white.
Della being few implies that Rex is white and Della is tough.
Della is not good if and only if Randolph is not tough and Burton is few.
If someone is good, then he is not few.
Randolph being tough and Baird being good imply that Rex is not few.
If there is at least one people who is not swift, then Rex is administrative and Della is not tough. | Mark is not white. | contradiction |
Burton is white.
Randolph is few.
Baird is not white.
Rex is not swift.
Rex is not good.
Mark is good.
Charles is administrative.
Randolph is not white.
Burton is not swift.
Charles is not swift.
Burton is tough.
Mark is few.If all people are white, then Mark is swift.
If someone is white and administrative, then he is good, and vice versa.
Someone is not swift and good if and only if he is not white and not tough.
Randolph being not administrative and Della being tough are equivalent to Charles being not good and Rex being not few.
If Rex is few and Charles is tough, then Baird is not white.
If Burton is not swift or Della is not good, then Randolph is not tough.
Mark being good or Randolph being swift implies that Randolph is white.
Della being few implies that Rex is white and Della is tough.
Della is not good if and only if Randolph is not tough and Burton is few.
If someone is good, then he is not few.
Randolph being tough and Baird being good imply that Rex is not few.
If there is at least one people who is not swift, then Rex is administrative and Della is not tough. | Burton is not tough. | contradiction |
Burton is white.
Randolph is few.
Baird is not white.
Rex is not swift.
Rex is not good.
Mark is good.
Charles is administrative.
Randolph is not white.
Burton is not swift.
Charles is not swift.
Burton is tough.
Mark is few.If all people are white, then Mark is swift.
If someone is white and administrative, then he is good, and vice versa.
Someone is not swift and good if and only if he is not white and not tough.
Randolph being not administrative and Della being tough are equivalent to Charles being not good and Rex being not few.
If Rex is few and Charles is tough, then Baird is not white.
If Burton is not swift or Della is not good, then Randolph is not tough.
Mark being good or Randolph being swift implies that Randolph is white.
Della being few implies that Rex is white and Della is tough.
Della is not good if and only if Randolph is not tough and Burton is few.
If someone is good, then he is not few.
Randolph being tough and Baird being good imply that Rex is not few.
If there is at least one people who is not swift, then Rex is administrative and Della is not tough. | Mark is not good. | contradiction |
Burton is white.
Randolph is few.
Baird is not white.
Rex is not swift.
Rex is not good.
Mark is good.
Charles is administrative.
Randolph is not white.
Burton is not swift.
Charles is not swift.
Burton is tough.
Mark is few.If all people are white, then Mark is swift.
If someone is white and administrative, then he is good, and vice versa.
Someone is not swift and good if and only if he is not white and not tough.
Randolph being not administrative and Della being tough are equivalent to Charles being not good and Rex being not few.
If Rex is few and Charles is tough, then Baird is not white.
If Burton is not swift or Della is not good, then Randolph is not tough.
Mark being good or Randolph being swift implies that Randolph is white.
Della being few implies that Rex is white and Della is tough.
Della is not good if and only if Randolph is not tough and Burton is few.
If someone is good, then he is not few.
Randolph being tough and Baird being good imply that Rex is not few.
If there is at least one people who is not swift, then Rex is administrative and Della is not tough. | Randolph is few. | self_contradiction |
Burton is white.
Randolph is few.
Baird is not white.
Rex is not swift.
Rex is not good.
Mark is good.
Charles is administrative.
Randolph is not white.
Burton is not swift.
Charles is not swift.
Burton is tough.
Mark is few.If all people are white, then Mark is swift.
If someone is white and administrative, then he is good, and vice versa.
Someone is not swift and good if and only if he is not white and not tough.
Randolph being not administrative and Della being tough are equivalent to Charles being not good and Rex being not few.
If Rex is few and Charles is tough, then Baird is not white.
If Burton is not swift or Della is not good, then Randolph is not tough.
Mark being good or Randolph being swift implies that Randolph is white.
Della being few implies that Rex is white and Della is tough.
Della is not good if and only if Randolph is not tough and Burton is few.
If someone is good, then he is not few.
Randolph being tough and Baird being good imply that Rex is not few.
If there is at least one people who is not swift, then Rex is administrative and Della is not tough. | Mark is not few. | self_contradiction |
Burton is white.
Randolph is few.
Baird is not white.
Rex is not swift.
Rex is not good.
Mark is good.
Charles is administrative.
Randolph is not white.
Burton is not swift.
Charles is not swift.
Burton is tough.
Mark is few.If all people are white, then Mark is swift.
If someone is white and administrative, then he is good, and vice versa.
Someone is not swift and good if and only if he is not white and not tough.
Randolph being not administrative and Della being tough are equivalent to Charles being not good and Rex being not few.
If Rex is few and Charles is tough, then Baird is not white.
If Burton is not swift or Della is not good, then Randolph is not tough.
Mark being good or Randolph being swift implies that Randolph is white.
Della being few implies that Rex is white and Della is tough.
Della is not good if and only if Randolph is not tough and Burton is few.
If someone is good, then he is not few.
Randolph being tough and Baird being good imply that Rex is not few.
If there is at least one people who is not swift, then Rex is administrative and Della is not tough. | Charles is not white. | neutral |
Burton is white.
Randolph is few.
Baird is not white.
Rex is not swift.
Rex is not good.
Mark is good.
Charles is administrative.
Randolph is not white.
Burton is not swift.
Charles is not swift.
Burton is tough.
Mark is few.If all people are white, then Mark is swift.
If someone is white and administrative, then he is good, and vice versa.
Someone is not swift and good if and only if he is not white and not tough.
Randolph being not administrative and Della being tough are equivalent to Charles being not good and Rex being not few.
If Rex is few and Charles is tough, then Baird is not white.
If Burton is not swift or Della is not good, then Randolph is not tough.
Mark being good or Randolph being swift implies that Randolph is white.
Della being few implies that Rex is white and Della is tough.
Della is not good if and only if Randolph is not tough and Burton is few.
If someone is good, then he is not few.
Randolph being tough and Baird being good imply that Rex is not few.
If there is at least one people who is not swift, then Rex is administrative and Della is not tough. | Charles is not administrative. | contradiction |
Burton is white.
Randolph is few.
Baird is not white.
Rex is not swift.
Rex is not good.
Mark is good.
Charles is administrative.
Randolph is not white.
Burton is not swift.
Charles is not swift.
Burton is tough.
Mark is few.If all people are white, then Mark is swift.
If someone is white and administrative, then he is good, and vice versa.
Someone is not swift and good if and only if he is not white and not tough.
Randolph being not administrative and Della being tough are equivalent to Charles being not good and Rex being not few.
If Rex is few and Charles is tough, then Baird is not white.
If Burton is not swift or Della is not good, then Randolph is not tough.
Mark being good or Randolph being swift implies that Randolph is white.
Della being few implies that Rex is white and Della is tough.
Della is not good if and only if Randolph is not tough and Burton is few.
If someone is good, then he is not few.
Randolph being tough and Baird being good imply that Rex is not few.
If there is at least one people who is not swift, then Rex is administrative and Della is not tough. | Della is administrative. | neutral |
Burton is white.
Randolph is few.
Baird is not white.
Rex is not swift.
Rex is not good.
Mark is good.
Charles is administrative.
Randolph is not white.
Burton is not swift.
Charles is not swift.
Burton is tough.
Mark is few.If all people are white, then Mark is swift.
If someone is white and administrative, then he is good, and vice versa.
Someone is not swift and good if and only if he is not white and not tough.
Randolph being not administrative and Della being tough are equivalent to Charles being not good and Rex being not few.
If Rex is few and Charles is tough, then Baird is not white.
If Burton is not swift or Della is not good, then Randolph is not tough.
Mark being good or Randolph being swift implies that Randolph is white.
Della being few implies that Rex is white and Della is tough.
Della is not good if and only if Randolph is not tough and Burton is few.
If someone is good, then he is not few.
Randolph being tough and Baird being good imply that Rex is not few.
If there is at least one people who is not swift, then Rex is administrative and Della is not tough. | Rex is tough. | neutral |
Burton is white.
Randolph is few.
Baird is not white.
Rex is not swift.
Rex is not good.
Mark is good.
Charles is administrative.
Randolph is not white.
Burton is not swift.
Charles is not swift.
Burton is tough.
Mark is few.If all people are white, then Mark is swift.
If someone is white and administrative, then he is good, and vice versa.
Someone is not swift and good if and only if he is not white and not tough.
Randolph being not administrative and Della being tough are equivalent to Charles being not good and Rex being not few.
If Rex is few and Charles is tough, then Baird is not white.
If Burton is not swift or Della is not good, then Randolph is not tough.
Mark being good or Randolph being swift implies that Randolph is white.
Della being few implies that Rex is white and Della is tough.
Della is not good if and only if Randolph is not tough and Burton is few.
If someone is good, then he is not few.
Randolph being tough and Baird being good imply that Rex is not few.
If there is at least one people who is not swift, then Rex is administrative and Della is not tough. | Randolph is white. | self_contradiction |
Burton is white.
Randolph is few.
Baird is not white.
Rex is not swift.
Rex is not good.
Mark is good.
Charles is administrative.
Randolph is not white.
Burton is not swift.
Charles is not swift.
Burton is tough.
Mark is few.If all people are white, then Mark is swift.
If someone is white and administrative, then he is good, and vice versa.
Someone is not swift and good if and only if he is not white and not tough.
Randolph being not administrative and Della being tough are equivalent to Charles being not good and Rex being not few.
If Rex is few and Charles is tough, then Baird is not white.
If Burton is not swift or Della is not good, then Randolph is not tough.
Mark being good or Randolph being swift implies that Randolph is white.
Della being few implies that Rex is white and Della is tough.
Della is not good if and only if Randolph is not tough and Burton is few.
If someone is good, then he is not few.
Randolph being tough and Baird being good imply that Rex is not few.
If there is at least one people who is not swift, then Rex is administrative and Della is not tough. | Rex is not tough. | neutral |
Burton is white.
Randolph is few.
Baird is not white.
Rex is not swift.
Rex is not good.
Mark is good.
Charles is administrative.
Randolph is not white.
Burton is not swift.
Charles is not swift.
Burton is tough.
Mark is few.If all people are white, then Mark is swift.
If someone is white and administrative, then he is good, and vice versa.
Someone is not swift and good if and only if he is not white and not tough.
Randolph being not administrative and Della being tough are equivalent to Charles being not good and Rex being not few.
If Rex is few and Charles is tough, then Baird is not white.
If Burton is not swift or Della is not good, then Randolph is not tough.
Mark being good or Randolph being swift implies that Randolph is white.
Della being few implies that Rex is white and Della is tough.
Della is not good if and only if Randolph is not tough and Burton is few.
If someone is good, then he is not few.
Randolph being tough and Baird being good imply that Rex is not few.
If there is at least one people who is not swift, then Rex is administrative and Della is not tough. | Mark is few. | self_contradiction |
Burton is white.
Randolph is few.
Baird is not white.
Rex is not swift.
Rex is not good.
Mark is good.
Charles is administrative.
Randolph is not white.
Burton is not swift.
Charles is not swift.
Burton is tough.
Mark is few.If all people are white, then Mark is swift.
If someone is white and administrative, then he is good, and vice versa.
Someone is not swift and good if and only if he is not white and not tough.
Randolph being not administrative and Della being tough are equivalent to Charles being not good and Rex being not few.
If Rex is few and Charles is tough, then Baird is not white.
If Burton is not swift or Della is not good, then Randolph is not tough.
Mark being good or Randolph being swift implies that Randolph is white.
Della being few implies that Rex is white and Della is tough.
Della is not good if and only if Randolph is not tough and Burton is few.
If someone is good, then he is not few.
Randolph being tough and Baird being good imply that Rex is not few.
If there is at least one people who is not swift, then Rex is administrative and Della is not tough. | Charles is administrative. | entailment |
Burton is white.
Randolph is few.
Baird is not white.
Rex is not swift.
Rex is not good.
Mark is good.
Charles is administrative.
Randolph is not white.
Burton is not swift.
Charles is not swift.
Burton is tough.
Mark is few.If all people are white, then Mark is swift.
If someone is white and administrative, then he is good, and vice versa.
Someone is not swift and good if and only if he is not white and not tough.
Randolph being not administrative and Della being tough are equivalent to Charles being not good and Rex being not few.
If Rex is few and Charles is tough, then Baird is not white.
If Burton is not swift or Della is not good, then Randolph is not tough.
Mark being good or Randolph being swift implies that Randolph is white.
Della being few implies that Rex is white and Della is tough.
Della is not good if and only if Randolph is not tough and Burton is few.
If someone is good, then he is not few.
Randolph being tough and Baird being good imply that Rex is not few.
If there is at least one people who is not swift, then Rex is administrative and Della is not tough. | Charles is not swift. | entailment |
Burton is white.
Randolph is few.
Baird is not white.
Rex is not swift.
Rex is not good.
Mark is good.
Charles is administrative.
Randolph is not white.
Burton is not swift.
Charles is not swift.
Burton is tough.
Mark is few.If all people are white, then Mark is swift.
If someone is white and administrative, then he is good, and vice versa.
Someone is not swift and good if and only if he is not white and not tough.
Randolph being not administrative and Della being tough are equivalent to Charles being not good and Rex being not few.
If Rex is few and Charles is tough, then Baird is not white.
If Burton is not swift or Della is not good, then Randolph is not tough.
Mark being good or Randolph being swift implies that Randolph is white.
Della being few implies that Rex is white and Della is tough.
Della is not good if and only if Randolph is not tough and Burton is few.
If someone is good, then he is not few.
Randolph being tough and Baird being good imply that Rex is not few.
If there is at least one people who is not swift, then Rex is administrative and Della is not tough. | Burton is administrative. | neutral |
Burton is white.
Randolph is few.
Baird is not white.
Rex is not swift.
Rex is not good.
Mark is good.
Charles is administrative.
Randolph is not white.
Burton is not swift.
Charles is not swift.
Burton is tough.
Mark is few.If all people are white, then Mark is swift.
If someone is white and administrative, then he is good, and vice versa.
Someone is not swift and good if and only if he is not white and not tough.
Randolph being not administrative and Della being tough are equivalent to Charles being not good and Rex being not few.
If Rex is few and Charles is tough, then Baird is not white.
If Burton is not swift or Della is not good, then Randolph is not tough.
Mark being good or Randolph being swift implies that Randolph is white.
Della being few implies that Rex is white and Della is tough.
Della is not good if and only if Randolph is not tough and Burton is few.
If someone is good, then he is not few.
Randolph being tough and Baird being good imply that Rex is not few.
If there is at least one people who is not swift, then Rex is administrative and Della is not tough. | Mark is administrative. | entailment |
Burton is white.
Randolph is few.
Baird is not white.
Rex is not swift.
Rex is not good.
Mark is good.
Charles is administrative.
Randolph is not white.
Burton is not swift.
Charles is not swift.
Burton is tough.
Mark is few.If all people are white, then Mark is swift.
If someone is white and administrative, then he is good, and vice versa.
Someone is not swift and good if and only if he is not white and not tough.
Randolph being not administrative and Della being tough are equivalent to Charles being not good and Rex being not few.
If Rex is few and Charles is tough, then Baird is not white.
If Burton is not swift or Della is not good, then Randolph is not tough.
Mark being good or Randolph being swift implies that Randolph is white.
Della being few implies that Rex is white and Della is tough.
Della is not good if and only if Randolph is not tough and Burton is few.
If someone is good, then he is not few.
Randolph being tough and Baird being good imply that Rex is not few.
If there is at least one people who is not swift, then Rex is administrative and Della is not tough. | Burton is swift. | contradiction |
Leonard is not agreeable.
Alisa is nice.
Alisa is agreeable.
Lauren is not fuzzy.
Luisa is nice.
Alisa is not careful.
Luisa is not careful.
Leonard is mellow.
Lincoln is nice.
Lincoln is not lucky.
Lauren is mellow.
Melody is lucky.Leonard being not mellow and Alisa being not agreeable imply that Lincoln is lucky.
Someone who is both lucky and not fuzzy is always mellow.
Lincoln being nice implies that Phineas is not agreeable.
If there is someone who is fuzzy, then Melody is not careful.
If Lauren is not nice, then Alisa is not lucky and Phineas is not agreeable.
As long as someone is careful, he is not mellow and not nice.
If someone is lucky and mellow, then he is both agreeable and not careful, and vice versa.
Someone is not agreeable and lucky if and only if he is nice.
If there is at least one people who is lucky or not nice, then Leonard is not careful.
If there is at least one people who is agreeable, then Phineas is not lucky and Luisa is fuzzy.
Someone who is nice is always both agreeable and not mellow.
Someone who is eithor careful or mellow is always not lucky. | Leonard is not fuzzy. | neutral |
Leonard is not agreeable.
Alisa is nice.
Alisa is agreeable.
Lauren is not fuzzy.
Luisa is nice.
Alisa is not careful.
Luisa is not careful.
Leonard is mellow.
Lincoln is nice.
Lincoln is not lucky.
Lauren is mellow.
Melody is lucky.Leonard being not mellow and Alisa being not agreeable imply that Lincoln is lucky.
Someone who is both lucky and not fuzzy is always mellow.
Lincoln being nice implies that Phineas is not agreeable.
If there is someone who is fuzzy, then Melody is not careful.
If Lauren is not nice, then Alisa is not lucky and Phineas is not agreeable.
As long as someone is careful, he is not mellow and not nice.
If someone is lucky and mellow, then he is both agreeable and not careful, and vice versa.
Someone is not agreeable and lucky if and only if he is nice.
If there is at least one people who is lucky or not nice, then Leonard is not careful.
If there is at least one people who is agreeable, then Phineas is not lucky and Luisa is fuzzy.
Someone who is nice is always both agreeable and not mellow.
Someone who is eithor careful or mellow is always not lucky. | Lauren is agreeable. | neutral |
Leonard is not agreeable.
Alisa is nice.
Alisa is agreeable.
Lauren is not fuzzy.
Luisa is nice.
Alisa is not careful.
Luisa is not careful.
Leonard is mellow.
Lincoln is nice.
Lincoln is not lucky.
Lauren is mellow.
Melody is lucky.Leonard being not mellow and Alisa being not agreeable imply that Lincoln is lucky.
Someone who is both lucky and not fuzzy is always mellow.
Lincoln being nice implies that Phineas is not agreeable.
If there is someone who is fuzzy, then Melody is not careful.
If Lauren is not nice, then Alisa is not lucky and Phineas is not agreeable.
As long as someone is careful, he is not mellow and not nice.
If someone is lucky and mellow, then he is both agreeable and not careful, and vice versa.
Someone is not agreeable and lucky if and only if he is nice.
If there is at least one people who is lucky or not nice, then Leonard is not careful.
If there is at least one people who is agreeable, then Phineas is not lucky and Luisa is fuzzy.
Someone who is nice is always both agreeable and not mellow.
Someone who is eithor careful or mellow is always not lucky. | Lincoln is mellow. | contradiction |
Leonard is not agreeable.
Alisa is nice.
Alisa is agreeable.
Lauren is not fuzzy.
Luisa is nice.
Alisa is not careful.
Luisa is not careful.
Leonard is mellow.
Lincoln is nice.
Lincoln is not lucky.
Lauren is mellow.
Melody is lucky.Leonard being not mellow and Alisa being not agreeable imply that Lincoln is lucky.
Someone who is both lucky and not fuzzy is always mellow.
Lincoln being nice implies that Phineas is not agreeable.
If there is someone who is fuzzy, then Melody is not careful.
If Lauren is not nice, then Alisa is not lucky and Phineas is not agreeable.
As long as someone is careful, he is not mellow and not nice.
If someone is lucky and mellow, then he is both agreeable and not careful, and vice versa.
Someone is not agreeable and lucky if and only if he is nice.
If there is at least one people who is lucky or not nice, then Leonard is not careful.
If there is at least one people who is agreeable, then Phineas is not lucky and Luisa is fuzzy.
Someone who is nice is always both agreeable and not mellow.
Someone who is eithor careful or mellow is always not lucky. | Lincoln is not lucky. | self_contradiction |
Leonard is not agreeable.
Alisa is nice.
Alisa is agreeable.
Lauren is not fuzzy.
Luisa is nice.
Alisa is not careful.
Luisa is not careful.
Leonard is mellow.
Lincoln is nice.
Lincoln is not lucky.
Lauren is mellow.
Melody is lucky.Leonard being not mellow and Alisa being not agreeable imply that Lincoln is lucky.
Someone who is both lucky and not fuzzy is always mellow.
Lincoln being nice implies that Phineas is not agreeable.
If there is someone who is fuzzy, then Melody is not careful.
If Lauren is not nice, then Alisa is not lucky and Phineas is not agreeable.
As long as someone is careful, he is not mellow and not nice.
If someone is lucky and mellow, then he is both agreeable and not careful, and vice versa.
Someone is not agreeable and lucky if and only if he is nice.
If there is at least one people who is lucky or not nice, then Leonard is not careful.
If there is at least one people who is agreeable, then Phineas is not lucky and Luisa is fuzzy.
Someone who is nice is always both agreeable and not mellow.
Someone who is eithor careful or mellow is always not lucky. | Alisa is not lucky. | self_contradiction |
Leonard is not agreeable.
Alisa is nice.
Alisa is agreeable.
Lauren is not fuzzy.
Luisa is nice.
Alisa is not careful.
Luisa is not careful.
Leonard is mellow.
Lincoln is nice.
Lincoln is not lucky.
Lauren is mellow.
Melody is lucky.Leonard being not mellow and Alisa being not agreeable imply that Lincoln is lucky.
Someone who is both lucky and not fuzzy is always mellow.
Lincoln being nice implies that Phineas is not agreeable.
If there is someone who is fuzzy, then Melody is not careful.
If Lauren is not nice, then Alisa is not lucky and Phineas is not agreeable.
As long as someone is careful, he is not mellow and not nice.
If someone is lucky and mellow, then he is both agreeable and not careful, and vice versa.
Someone is not agreeable and lucky if and only if he is nice.
If there is at least one people who is lucky or not nice, then Leonard is not careful.
If there is at least one people who is agreeable, then Phineas is not lucky and Luisa is fuzzy.
Someone who is nice is always both agreeable and not mellow.
Someone who is eithor careful or mellow is always not lucky. | Leonard is not nice. | neutral |
Leonard is not agreeable.
Alisa is nice.
Alisa is agreeable.
Lauren is not fuzzy.
Luisa is nice.
Alisa is not careful.
Luisa is not careful.
Leonard is mellow.
Lincoln is nice.
Lincoln is not lucky.
Lauren is mellow.
Melody is lucky.Leonard being not mellow and Alisa being not agreeable imply that Lincoln is lucky.
Someone who is both lucky and not fuzzy is always mellow.
Lincoln being nice implies that Phineas is not agreeable.
If there is someone who is fuzzy, then Melody is not careful.
If Lauren is not nice, then Alisa is not lucky and Phineas is not agreeable.
As long as someone is careful, he is not mellow and not nice.
If someone is lucky and mellow, then he is both agreeable and not careful, and vice versa.
Someone is not agreeable and lucky if and only if he is nice.
If there is at least one people who is lucky or not nice, then Leonard is not careful.
If there is at least one people who is agreeable, then Phineas is not lucky and Luisa is fuzzy.
Someone who is nice is always both agreeable and not mellow.
Someone who is eithor careful or mellow is always not lucky. | Alisa is fuzzy. | neutral |
Leonard is not agreeable.
Alisa is nice.
Alisa is agreeable.
Lauren is not fuzzy.
Luisa is nice.
Alisa is not careful.
Luisa is not careful.
Leonard is mellow.
Lincoln is nice.
Lincoln is not lucky.
Lauren is mellow.
Melody is lucky.Leonard being not mellow and Alisa being not agreeable imply that Lincoln is lucky.
Someone who is both lucky and not fuzzy is always mellow.
Lincoln being nice implies that Phineas is not agreeable.
If there is someone who is fuzzy, then Melody is not careful.
If Lauren is not nice, then Alisa is not lucky and Phineas is not agreeable.
As long as someone is careful, he is not mellow and not nice.
If someone is lucky and mellow, then he is both agreeable and not careful, and vice versa.
Someone is not agreeable and lucky if and only if he is nice.
If there is at least one people who is lucky or not nice, then Leonard is not careful.
If there is at least one people who is agreeable, then Phineas is not lucky and Luisa is fuzzy.
Someone who is nice is always both agreeable and not mellow.
Someone who is eithor careful or mellow is always not lucky. | Phineas is not lucky. | entailment |
Leonard is not agreeable.
Alisa is nice.
Alisa is agreeable.
Lauren is not fuzzy.
Luisa is nice.
Alisa is not careful.
Luisa is not careful.
Leonard is mellow.
Lincoln is nice.
Lincoln is not lucky.
Lauren is mellow.
Melody is lucky.Leonard being not mellow and Alisa being not agreeable imply that Lincoln is lucky.
Someone who is both lucky and not fuzzy is always mellow.
Lincoln being nice implies that Phineas is not agreeable.
If there is someone who is fuzzy, then Melody is not careful.
If Lauren is not nice, then Alisa is not lucky and Phineas is not agreeable.
As long as someone is careful, he is not mellow and not nice.
If someone is lucky and mellow, then he is both agreeable and not careful, and vice versa.
Someone is not agreeable and lucky if and only if he is nice.
If there is at least one people who is lucky or not nice, then Leonard is not careful.
If there is at least one people who is agreeable, then Phineas is not lucky and Luisa is fuzzy.
Someone who is nice is always both agreeable and not mellow.
Someone who is eithor careful or mellow is always not lucky. | Melody is nice. | neutral |
Leonard is not agreeable.
Alisa is nice.
Alisa is agreeable.
Lauren is not fuzzy.
Luisa is nice.
Alisa is not careful.
Luisa is not careful.
Leonard is mellow.
Lincoln is nice.
Lincoln is not lucky.
Lauren is mellow.
Melody is lucky.Leonard being not mellow and Alisa being not agreeable imply that Lincoln is lucky.
Someone who is both lucky and not fuzzy is always mellow.
Lincoln being nice implies that Phineas is not agreeable.
If there is someone who is fuzzy, then Melody is not careful.
If Lauren is not nice, then Alisa is not lucky and Phineas is not agreeable.
As long as someone is careful, he is not mellow and not nice.
If someone is lucky and mellow, then he is both agreeable and not careful, and vice versa.
Someone is not agreeable and lucky if and only if he is nice.
If there is at least one people who is lucky or not nice, then Leonard is not careful.
If there is at least one people who is agreeable, then Phineas is not lucky and Luisa is fuzzy.
Someone who is nice is always both agreeable and not mellow.
Someone who is eithor careful or mellow is always not lucky. | Melody is not careful. | entailment |
Leonard is not agreeable.
Alisa is nice.
Alisa is agreeable.
Lauren is not fuzzy.
Luisa is nice.
Alisa is not careful.
Luisa is not careful.
Leonard is mellow.
Lincoln is nice.
Lincoln is not lucky.
Lauren is mellow.
Melody is lucky.Leonard being not mellow and Alisa being not agreeable imply that Lincoln is lucky.
Someone who is both lucky and not fuzzy is always mellow.
Lincoln being nice implies that Phineas is not agreeable.
If there is someone who is fuzzy, then Melody is not careful.
If Lauren is not nice, then Alisa is not lucky and Phineas is not agreeable.
As long as someone is careful, he is not mellow and not nice.
If someone is lucky and mellow, then he is both agreeable and not careful, and vice versa.
Someone is not agreeable and lucky if and only if he is nice.
If there is at least one people who is lucky or not nice, then Leonard is not careful.
If there is at least one people who is agreeable, then Phineas is not lucky and Luisa is fuzzy.
Someone who is nice is always both agreeable and not mellow.
Someone who is eithor careful or mellow is always not lucky. | Lauren is mellow. | entailment |
Leonard is not agreeable.
Alisa is nice.
Alisa is agreeable.
Lauren is not fuzzy.
Luisa is nice.
Alisa is not careful.
Luisa is not careful.
Leonard is mellow.
Lincoln is nice.
Lincoln is not lucky.
Lauren is mellow.
Melody is lucky.Leonard being not mellow and Alisa being not agreeable imply that Lincoln is lucky.
Someone who is both lucky and not fuzzy is always mellow.
Lincoln being nice implies that Phineas is not agreeable.
If there is someone who is fuzzy, then Melody is not careful.
If Lauren is not nice, then Alisa is not lucky and Phineas is not agreeable.
As long as someone is careful, he is not mellow and not nice.
If someone is lucky and mellow, then he is both agreeable and not careful, and vice versa.
Someone is not agreeable and lucky if and only if he is nice.
If there is at least one people who is lucky or not nice, then Leonard is not careful.
If there is at least one people who is agreeable, then Phineas is not lucky and Luisa is fuzzy.
Someone who is nice is always both agreeable and not mellow.
Someone who is eithor careful or mellow is always not lucky. | Phineas is agreeable. | contradiction |
Leonard is not agreeable.
Alisa is nice.
Alisa is agreeable.
Lauren is not fuzzy.
Luisa is nice.
Alisa is not careful.
Luisa is not careful.
Leonard is mellow.
Lincoln is nice.
Lincoln is not lucky.
Lauren is mellow.
Melody is lucky.Leonard being not mellow and Alisa being not agreeable imply that Lincoln is lucky.
Someone who is both lucky and not fuzzy is always mellow.
Lincoln being nice implies that Phineas is not agreeable.
If there is someone who is fuzzy, then Melody is not careful.
If Lauren is not nice, then Alisa is not lucky and Phineas is not agreeable.
As long as someone is careful, he is not mellow and not nice.
If someone is lucky and mellow, then he is both agreeable and not careful, and vice versa.
Someone is not agreeable and lucky if and only if he is nice.
If there is at least one people who is lucky or not nice, then Leonard is not careful.
If there is at least one people who is agreeable, then Phineas is not lucky and Luisa is fuzzy.
Someone who is nice is always both agreeable and not mellow.
Someone who is eithor careful or mellow is always not lucky. | Phineas is lucky. | contradiction |
Leonard is not agreeable.
Alisa is nice.
Alisa is agreeable.
Lauren is not fuzzy.
Luisa is nice.
Alisa is not careful.
Luisa is not careful.
Leonard is mellow.
Lincoln is nice.
Lincoln is not lucky.
Lauren is mellow.
Melody is lucky.Leonard being not mellow and Alisa being not agreeable imply that Lincoln is lucky.
Someone who is both lucky and not fuzzy is always mellow.
Lincoln being nice implies that Phineas is not agreeable.
If there is someone who is fuzzy, then Melody is not careful.
If Lauren is not nice, then Alisa is not lucky and Phineas is not agreeable.
As long as someone is careful, he is not mellow and not nice.
If someone is lucky and mellow, then he is both agreeable and not careful, and vice versa.
Someone is not agreeable and lucky if and only if he is nice.
If there is at least one people who is lucky or not nice, then Leonard is not careful.
If there is at least one people who is agreeable, then Phineas is not lucky and Luisa is fuzzy.
Someone who is nice is always both agreeable and not mellow.
Someone who is eithor careful or mellow is always not lucky. | Lincoln is nice. | entailment |
Leonard is not agreeable.
Alisa is nice.
Alisa is agreeable.
Lauren is not fuzzy.
Luisa is nice.
Alisa is not careful.
Luisa is not careful.
Leonard is mellow.
Lincoln is nice.
Lincoln is not lucky.
Lauren is mellow.
Melody is lucky.Leonard being not mellow and Alisa being not agreeable imply that Lincoln is lucky.
Someone who is both lucky and not fuzzy is always mellow.
Lincoln being nice implies that Phineas is not agreeable.
If there is someone who is fuzzy, then Melody is not careful.
If Lauren is not nice, then Alisa is not lucky and Phineas is not agreeable.
As long as someone is careful, he is not mellow and not nice.
If someone is lucky and mellow, then he is both agreeable and not careful, and vice versa.
Someone is not agreeable and lucky if and only if he is nice.
If there is at least one people who is lucky or not nice, then Leonard is not careful.
If there is at least one people who is agreeable, then Phineas is not lucky and Luisa is fuzzy.
Someone who is nice is always both agreeable and not mellow.
Someone who is eithor careful or mellow is always not lucky. | Alisa is agreeable. | self_contradiction |
Leonard is not agreeable.
Alisa is nice.
Alisa is agreeable.
Lauren is not fuzzy.
Luisa is nice.
Alisa is not careful.
Luisa is not careful.
Leonard is mellow.
Lincoln is nice.
Lincoln is not lucky.
Lauren is mellow.
Melody is lucky.Leonard being not mellow and Alisa being not agreeable imply that Lincoln is lucky.
Someone who is both lucky and not fuzzy is always mellow.
Lincoln being nice implies that Phineas is not agreeable.
If there is someone who is fuzzy, then Melody is not careful.
If Lauren is not nice, then Alisa is not lucky and Phineas is not agreeable.
As long as someone is careful, he is not mellow and not nice.
If someone is lucky and mellow, then he is both agreeable and not careful, and vice versa.
Someone is not agreeable and lucky if and only if he is nice.
If there is at least one people who is lucky or not nice, then Leonard is not careful.
If there is at least one people who is agreeable, then Phineas is not lucky and Luisa is fuzzy.
Someone who is nice is always both agreeable and not mellow.
Someone who is eithor careful or mellow is always not lucky. | Luisa is lucky. | self_contradiction |
Leonard is not agreeable.
Alisa is nice.
Alisa is agreeable.
Lauren is not fuzzy.
Luisa is nice.
Alisa is not careful.
Luisa is not careful.
Leonard is mellow.
Lincoln is nice.
Lincoln is not lucky.
Lauren is mellow.
Melody is lucky.Leonard being not mellow and Alisa being not agreeable imply that Lincoln is lucky.
Someone who is both lucky and not fuzzy is always mellow.
Lincoln being nice implies that Phineas is not agreeable.
If there is someone who is fuzzy, then Melody is not careful.
If Lauren is not nice, then Alisa is not lucky and Phineas is not agreeable.
As long as someone is careful, he is not mellow and not nice.
If someone is lucky and mellow, then he is both agreeable and not careful, and vice versa.
Someone is not agreeable and lucky if and only if he is nice.
If there is at least one people who is lucky or not nice, then Leonard is not careful.
If there is at least one people who is agreeable, then Phineas is not lucky and Luisa is fuzzy.
Someone who is nice is always both agreeable and not mellow.
Someone who is eithor careful or mellow is always not lucky. | Alisa is not nice. | contradiction |
Leonard is not agreeable.
Alisa is nice.
Alisa is agreeable.
Lauren is not fuzzy.
Luisa is nice.
Alisa is not careful.
Luisa is not careful.
Leonard is mellow.
Lincoln is nice.
Lincoln is not lucky.
Lauren is mellow.
Melody is lucky.Leonard being not mellow and Alisa being not agreeable imply that Lincoln is lucky.
Someone who is both lucky and not fuzzy is always mellow.
Lincoln being nice implies that Phineas is not agreeable.
If there is someone who is fuzzy, then Melody is not careful.
If Lauren is not nice, then Alisa is not lucky and Phineas is not agreeable.
As long as someone is careful, he is not mellow and not nice.
If someone is lucky and mellow, then he is both agreeable and not careful, and vice versa.
Someone is not agreeable and lucky if and only if he is nice.
If there is at least one people who is lucky or not nice, then Leonard is not careful.
If there is at least one people who is agreeable, then Phineas is not lucky and Luisa is fuzzy.
Someone who is nice is always both agreeable and not mellow.
Someone who is eithor careful or mellow is always not lucky. | Leonard is not careful. | entailment |
Leonard is not agreeable.
Alisa is nice.
Alisa is agreeable.
Lauren is not fuzzy.
Luisa is nice.
Alisa is not careful.
Luisa is not careful.
Leonard is mellow.
Lincoln is nice.
Lincoln is not lucky.
Lauren is mellow.
Melody is lucky.Leonard being not mellow and Alisa being not agreeable imply that Lincoln is lucky.
Someone who is both lucky and not fuzzy is always mellow.
Lincoln being nice implies that Phineas is not agreeable.
If there is someone who is fuzzy, then Melody is not careful.
If Lauren is not nice, then Alisa is not lucky and Phineas is not agreeable.
As long as someone is careful, he is not mellow and not nice.
If someone is lucky and mellow, then he is both agreeable and not careful, and vice versa.
Someone is not agreeable and lucky if and only if he is nice.
If there is at least one people who is lucky or not nice, then Leonard is not careful.
If there is at least one people who is agreeable, then Phineas is not lucky and Luisa is fuzzy.
Someone who is nice is always both agreeable and not mellow.
Someone who is eithor careful or mellow is always not lucky. | Luisa is agreeable. | self_contradiction |
Leonard is not agreeable.
Alisa is nice.
Alisa is agreeable.
Lauren is not fuzzy.
Luisa is nice.
Alisa is not careful.
Luisa is not careful.
Leonard is mellow.
Lincoln is nice.
Lincoln is not lucky.
Lauren is mellow.
Melody is lucky.Leonard being not mellow and Alisa being not agreeable imply that Lincoln is lucky.
Someone who is both lucky and not fuzzy is always mellow.
Lincoln being nice implies that Phineas is not agreeable.
If there is someone who is fuzzy, then Melody is not careful.
If Lauren is not nice, then Alisa is not lucky and Phineas is not agreeable.
As long as someone is careful, he is not mellow and not nice.
If someone is lucky and mellow, then he is both agreeable and not careful, and vice versa.
Someone is not agreeable and lucky if and only if he is nice.
If there is at least one people who is lucky or not nice, then Leonard is not careful.
If there is at least one people who is agreeable, then Phineas is not lucky and Luisa is fuzzy.
Someone who is nice is always both agreeable and not mellow.
Someone who is eithor careful or mellow is always not lucky. | Leonard is lucky. | contradiction |
Konrad is not unusual.
Garth is fuzzy.
Konrad is lucky.
Hardy is hungry.
Kathie is panicky.
Odessa is not desperate.
Olaf is unusual.
Hardy is desperate.
Albion is not fuzzy.
Albion is hungry.
Odessa is not fuzzy.
Hardy is not lucky.If Olaf is not unusual, then Odessa is not desperate, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not desperate, then Odessa is not panicky.
Someone who is fuzzy is always not lucky.
If Konrad is desperate and Odessa is not fuzzy, then Kathie is not unusual and Konrad is not hungry, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not unusual, then Kathie is not hungry and Albion is fuzzy.
It can be concluded that Garth is not fuzzy once knowing that Garth is not panicky or Albion is not hungry.
If there is someone who is either not fuzzy or hungry, then Kathie is not unusual and Olaf is not panicky.
It can be concluded that Odessa is panicky once knowing that Odessa is not hungry or Kathie is unusual.
If Konrad is not panicky or Hardy is not unusual, then Konrad is not hungry.
If Konrad is not fuzzy, then Konrad is hungry and Garth is not desperate, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Konrad is hungry and Hardy is not desperate once knowing that Hardy is fuzzy and Albion is not unusual.
If someone is not panicky and not unusual, then he is not hungry, and vice versa. | Odessa is panicky. | contradiction |
Konrad is not unusual.
Garth is fuzzy.
Konrad is lucky.
Hardy is hungry.
Kathie is panicky.
Odessa is not desperate.
Olaf is unusual.
Hardy is desperate.
Albion is not fuzzy.
Albion is hungry.
Odessa is not fuzzy.
Hardy is not lucky.If Olaf is not unusual, then Odessa is not desperate, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not desperate, then Odessa is not panicky.
Someone who is fuzzy is always not lucky.
If Konrad is desperate and Odessa is not fuzzy, then Kathie is not unusual and Konrad is not hungry, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not unusual, then Kathie is not hungry and Albion is fuzzy.
It can be concluded that Garth is not fuzzy once knowing that Garth is not panicky or Albion is not hungry.
If there is someone who is either not fuzzy or hungry, then Kathie is not unusual and Olaf is not panicky.
It can be concluded that Odessa is panicky once knowing that Odessa is not hungry or Kathie is unusual.
If Konrad is not panicky or Hardy is not unusual, then Konrad is not hungry.
If Konrad is not fuzzy, then Konrad is hungry and Garth is not desperate, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Konrad is hungry and Hardy is not desperate once knowing that Hardy is fuzzy and Albion is not unusual.
If someone is not panicky and not unusual, then he is not hungry, and vice versa. | Albion is not fuzzy. | self_contradiction |
Konrad is not unusual.
Garth is fuzzy.
Konrad is lucky.
Hardy is hungry.
Kathie is panicky.
Odessa is not desperate.
Olaf is unusual.
Hardy is desperate.
Albion is not fuzzy.
Albion is hungry.
Odessa is not fuzzy.
Hardy is not lucky.If Olaf is not unusual, then Odessa is not desperate, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not desperate, then Odessa is not panicky.
Someone who is fuzzy is always not lucky.
If Konrad is desperate and Odessa is not fuzzy, then Kathie is not unusual and Konrad is not hungry, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not unusual, then Kathie is not hungry and Albion is fuzzy.
It can be concluded that Garth is not fuzzy once knowing that Garth is not panicky or Albion is not hungry.
If there is someone who is either not fuzzy or hungry, then Kathie is not unusual and Olaf is not panicky.
It can be concluded that Odessa is panicky once knowing that Odessa is not hungry or Kathie is unusual.
If Konrad is not panicky or Hardy is not unusual, then Konrad is not hungry.
If Konrad is not fuzzy, then Konrad is hungry and Garth is not desperate, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Konrad is hungry and Hardy is not desperate once knowing that Hardy is fuzzy and Albion is not unusual.
If someone is not panicky and not unusual, then he is not hungry, and vice versa. | Garth is not panicky. | neutral |
Konrad is not unusual.
Garth is fuzzy.
Konrad is lucky.
Hardy is hungry.
Kathie is panicky.
Odessa is not desperate.
Olaf is unusual.
Hardy is desperate.
Albion is not fuzzy.
Albion is hungry.
Odessa is not fuzzy.
Hardy is not lucky.If Olaf is not unusual, then Odessa is not desperate, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not desperate, then Odessa is not panicky.
Someone who is fuzzy is always not lucky.
If Konrad is desperate and Odessa is not fuzzy, then Kathie is not unusual and Konrad is not hungry, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not unusual, then Kathie is not hungry and Albion is fuzzy.
It can be concluded that Garth is not fuzzy once knowing that Garth is not panicky or Albion is not hungry.
If there is someone who is either not fuzzy or hungry, then Kathie is not unusual and Olaf is not panicky.
It can be concluded that Odessa is panicky once knowing that Odessa is not hungry or Kathie is unusual.
If Konrad is not panicky or Hardy is not unusual, then Konrad is not hungry.
If Konrad is not fuzzy, then Konrad is hungry and Garth is not desperate, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Konrad is hungry and Hardy is not desperate once knowing that Hardy is fuzzy and Albion is not unusual.
If someone is not panicky and not unusual, then he is not hungry, and vice versa. | Odessa is desperate. | contradiction |
Konrad is not unusual.
Garth is fuzzy.
Konrad is lucky.
Hardy is hungry.
Kathie is panicky.
Odessa is not desperate.
Olaf is unusual.
Hardy is desperate.
Albion is not fuzzy.
Albion is hungry.
Odessa is not fuzzy.
Hardy is not lucky.If Olaf is not unusual, then Odessa is not desperate, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not desperate, then Odessa is not panicky.
Someone who is fuzzy is always not lucky.
If Konrad is desperate and Odessa is not fuzzy, then Kathie is not unusual and Konrad is not hungry, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not unusual, then Kathie is not hungry and Albion is fuzzy.
It can be concluded that Garth is not fuzzy once knowing that Garth is not panicky or Albion is not hungry.
If there is someone who is either not fuzzy or hungry, then Kathie is not unusual and Olaf is not panicky.
It can be concluded that Odessa is panicky once knowing that Odessa is not hungry or Kathie is unusual.
If Konrad is not panicky or Hardy is not unusual, then Konrad is not hungry.
If Konrad is not fuzzy, then Konrad is hungry and Garth is not desperate, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Konrad is hungry and Hardy is not desperate once knowing that Hardy is fuzzy and Albion is not unusual.
If someone is not panicky and not unusual, then he is not hungry, and vice versa. | Hardy is not panicky. | neutral |
Konrad is not unusual.
Garth is fuzzy.
Konrad is lucky.
Hardy is hungry.
Kathie is panicky.
Odessa is not desperate.
Olaf is unusual.
Hardy is desperate.
Albion is not fuzzy.
Albion is hungry.
Odessa is not fuzzy.
Hardy is not lucky.If Olaf is not unusual, then Odessa is not desperate, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not desperate, then Odessa is not panicky.
Someone who is fuzzy is always not lucky.
If Konrad is desperate and Odessa is not fuzzy, then Kathie is not unusual and Konrad is not hungry, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not unusual, then Kathie is not hungry and Albion is fuzzy.
It can be concluded that Garth is not fuzzy once knowing that Garth is not panicky or Albion is not hungry.
If there is someone who is either not fuzzy or hungry, then Kathie is not unusual and Olaf is not panicky.
It can be concluded that Odessa is panicky once knowing that Odessa is not hungry or Kathie is unusual.
If Konrad is not panicky or Hardy is not unusual, then Konrad is not hungry.
If Konrad is not fuzzy, then Konrad is hungry and Garth is not desperate, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Konrad is hungry and Hardy is not desperate once knowing that Hardy is fuzzy and Albion is not unusual.
If someone is not panicky and not unusual, then he is not hungry, and vice versa. | Konrad is unusual. | contradiction |
Konrad is not unusual.
Garth is fuzzy.
Konrad is lucky.
Hardy is hungry.
Kathie is panicky.
Odessa is not desperate.
Olaf is unusual.
Hardy is desperate.
Albion is not fuzzy.
Albion is hungry.
Odessa is not fuzzy.
Hardy is not lucky.If Olaf is not unusual, then Odessa is not desperate, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not desperate, then Odessa is not panicky.
Someone who is fuzzy is always not lucky.
If Konrad is desperate and Odessa is not fuzzy, then Kathie is not unusual and Konrad is not hungry, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not unusual, then Kathie is not hungry and Albion is fuzzy.
It can be concluded that Garth is not fuzzy once knowing that Garth is not panicky or Albion is not hungry.
If there is someone who is either not fuzzy or hungry, then Kathie is not unusual and Olaf is not panicky.
It can be concluded that Odessa is panicky once knowing that Odessa is not hungry or Kathie is unusual.
If Konrad is not panicky or Hardy is not unusual, then Konrad is not hungry.
If Konrad is not fuzzy, then Konrad is hungry and Garth is not desperate, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Konrad is hungry and Hardy is not desperate once knowing that Hardy is fuzzy and Albion is not unusual.
If someone is not panicky and not unusual, then he is not hungry, and vice versa. | Hardy is fuzzy. | neutral |
Konrad is not unusual.
Garth is fuzzy.
Konrad is lucky.
Hardy is hungry.
Kathie is panicky.
Odessa is not desperate.
Olaf is unusual.
Hardy is desperate.
Albion is not fuzzy.
Albion is hungry.
Odessa is not fuzzy.
Hardy is not lucky.If Olaf is not unusual, then Odessa is not desperate, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not desperate, then Odessa is not panicky.
Someone who is fuzzy is always not lucky.
If Konrad is desperate and Odessa is not fuzzy, then Kathie is not unusual and Konrad is not hungry, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not unusual, then Kathie is not hungry and Albion is fuzzy.
It can be concluded that Garth is not fuzzy once knowing that Garth is not panicky or Albion is not hungry.
If there is someone who is either not fuzzy or hungry, then Kathie is not unusual and Olaf is not panicky.
It can be concluded that Odessa is panicky once knowing that Odessa is not hungry or Kathie is unusual.
If Konrad is not panicky or Hardy is not unusual, then Konrad is not hungry.
If Konrad is not fuzzy, then Konrad is hungry and Garth is not desperate, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Konrad is hungry and Hardy is not desperate once knowing that Hardy is fuzzy and Albion is not unusual.
If someone is not panicky and not unusual, then he is not hungry, and vice versa. | Garth is not lucky. | entailment |
Konrad is not unusual.
Garth is fuzzy.
Konrad is lucky.
Hardy is hungry.
Kathie is panicky.
Odessa is not desperate.
Olaf is unusual.
Hardy is desperate.
Albion is not fuzzy.
Albion is hungry.
Odessa is not fuzzy.
Hardy is not lucky.If Olaf is not unusual, then Odessa is not desperate, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not desperate, then Odessa is not panicky.
Someone who is fuzzy is always not lucky.
If Konrad is desperate and Odessa is not fuzzy, then Kathie is not unusual and Konrad is not hungry, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not unusual, then Kathie is not hungry and Albion is fuzzy.
It can be concluded that Garth is not fuzzy once knowing that Garth is not panicky or Albion is not hungry.
If there is someone who is either not fuzzy or hungry, then Kathie is not unusual and Olaf is not panicky.
It can be concluded that Odessa is panicky once knowing that Odessa is not hungry or Kathie is unusual.
If Konrad is not panicky or Hardy is not unusual, then Konrad is not hungry.
If Konrad is not fuzzy, then Konrad is hungry and Garth is not desperate, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Konrad is hungry and Hardy is not desperate once knowing that Hardy is fuzzy and Albion is not unusual.
If someone is not panicky and not unusual, then he is not hungry, and vice versa. | Kathie is not panicky. | self_contradiction |
Konrad is not unusual.
Garth is fuzzy.
Konrad is lucky.
Hardy is hungry.
Kathie is panicky.
Odessa is not desperate.
Olaf is unusual.
Hardy is desperate.
Albion is not fuzzy.
Albion is hungry.
Odessa is not fuzzy.
Hardy is not lucky.If Olaf is not unusual, then Odessa is not desperate, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not desperate, then Odessa is not panicky.
Someone who is fuzzy is always not lucky.
If Konrad is desperate and Odessa is not fuzzy, then Kathie is not unusual and Konrad is not hungry, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not unusual, then Kathie is not hungry and Albion is fuzzy.
It can be concluded that Garth is not fuzzy once knowing that Garth is not panicky or Albion is not hungry.
If there is someone who is either not fuzzy or hungry, then Kathie is not unusual and Olaf is not panicky.
It can be concluded that Odessa is panicky once knowing that Odessa is not hungry or Kathie is unusual.
If Konrad is not panicky or Hardy is not unusual, then Konrad is not hungry.
If Konrad is not fuzzy, then Konrad is hungry and Garth is not desperate, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Konrad is hungry and Hardy is not desperate once knowing that Hardy is fuzzy and Albion is not unusual.
If someone is not panicky and not unusual, then he is not hungry, and vice versa. | Hardy is unusual. | neutral |
Konrad is not unusual.
Garth is fuzzy.
Konrad is lucky.
Hardy is hungry.
Kathie is panicky.
Odessa is not desperate.
Olaf is unusual.
Hardy is desperate.
Albion is not fuzzy.
Albion is hungry.
Odessa is not fuzzy.
Hardy is not lucky.If Olaf is not unusual, then Odessa is not desperate, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not desperate, then Odessa is not panicky.
Someone who is fuzzy is always not lucky.
If Konrad is desperate and Odessa is not fuzzy, then Kathie is not unusual and Konrad is not hungry, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not unusual, then Kathie is not hungry and Albion is fuzzy.
It can be concluded that Garth is not fuzzy once knowing that Garth is not panicky or Albion is not hungry.
If there is someone who is either not fuzzy or hungry, then Kathie is not unusual and Olaf is not panicky.
It can be concluded that Odessa is panicky once knowing that Odessa is not hungry or Kathie is unusual.
If Konrad is not panicky or Hardy is not unusual, then Konrad is not hungry.
If Konrad is not fuzzy, then Konrad is hungry and Garth is not desperate, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Konrad is hungry and Hardy is not desperate once knowing that Hardy is fuzzy and Albion is not unusual.
If someone is not panicky and not unusual, then he is not hungry, and vice versa. | Hardy is lucky. | contradiction |
Konrad is not unusual.
Garth is fuzzy.
Konrad is lucky.
Hardy is hungry.
Kathie is panicky.
Odessa is not desperate.
Olaf is unusual.
Hardy is desperate.
Albion is not fuzzy.
Albion is hungry.
Odessa is not fuzzy.
Hardy is not lucky.If Olaf is not unusual, then Odessa is not desperate, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not desperate, then Odessa is not panicky.
Someone who is fuzzy is always not lucky.
If Konrad is desperate and Odessa is not fuzzy, then Kathie is not unusual and Konrad is not hungry, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not unusual, then Kathie is not hungry and Albion is fuzzy.
It can be concluded that Garth is not fuzzy once knowing that Garth is not panicky or Albion is not hungry.
If there is someone who is either not fuzzy or hungry, then Kathie is not unusual and Olaf is not panicky.
It can be concluded that Odessa is panicky once knowing that Odessa is not hungry or Kathie is unusual.
If Konrad is not panicky or Hardy is not unusual, then Konrad is not hungry.
If Konrad is not fuzzy, then Konrad is hungry and Garth is not desperate, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Konrad is hungry and Hardy is not desperate once knowing that Hardy is fuzzy and Albion is not unusual.
If someone is not panicky and not unusual, then he is not hungry, and vice versa. | Olaf is not unusual. | self_contradiction |
Konrad is not unusual.
Garth is fuzzy.
Konrad is lucky.
Hardy is hungry.
Kathie is panicky.
Odessa is not desperate.
Olaf is unusual.
Hardy is desperate.
Albion is not fuzzy.
Albion is hungry.
Odessa is not fuzzy.
Hardy is not lucky.If Olaf is not unusual, then Odessa is not desperate, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not desperate, then Odessa is not panicky.
Someone who is fuzzy is always not lucky.
If Konrad is desperate and Odessa is not fuzzy, then Kathie is not unusual and Konrad is not hungry, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not unusual, then Kathie is not hungry and Albion is fuzzy.
It can be concluded that Garth is not fuzzy once knowing that Garth is not panicky or Albion is not hungry.
If there is someone who is either not fuzzy or hungry, then Kathie is not unusual and Olaf is not panicky.
It can be concluded that Odessa is panicky once knowing that Odessa is not hungry or Kathie is unusual.
If Konrad is not panicky or Hardy is not unusual, then Konrad is not hungry.
If Konrad is not fuzzy, then Konrad is hungry and Garth is not desperate, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Konrad is hungry and Hardy is not desperate once knowing that Hardy is fuzzy and Albion is not unusual.
If someone is not panicky and not unusual, then he is not hungry, and vice versa. | Garth is hungry. | neutral |
Konrad is not unusual.
Garth is fuzzy.
Konrad is lucky.
Hardy is hungry.
Kathie is panicky.
Odessa is not desperate.
Olaf is unusual.
Hardy is desperate.
Albion is not fuzzy.
Albion is hungry.
Odessa is not fuzzy.
Hardy is not lucky.If Olaf is not unusual, then Odessa is not desperate, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not desperate, then Odessa is not panicky.
Someone who is fuzzy is always not lucky.
If Konrad is desperate and Odessa is not fuzzy, then Kathie is not unusual and Konrad is not hungry, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not unusual, then Kathie is not hungry and Albion is fuzzy.
It can be concluded that Garth is not fuzzy once knowing that Garth is not panicky or Albion is not hungry.
If there is someone who is either not fuzzy or hungry, then Kathie is not unusual and Olaf is not panicky.
It can be concluded that Odessa is panicky once knowing that Odessa is not hungry or Kathie is unusual.
If Konrad is not panicky or Hardy is not unusual, then Konrad is not hungry.
If Konrad is not fuzzy, then Konrad is hungry and Garth is not desperate, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Konrad is hungry and Hardy is not desperate once knowing that Hardy is fuzzy and Albion is not unusual.
If someone is not panicky and not unusual, then he is not hungry, and vice versa. | Odessa is not desperate. | entailment |
Konrad is not unusual.
Garth is fuzzy.
Konrad is lucky.
Hardy is hungry.
Kathie is panicky.
Odessa is not desperate.
Olaf is unusual.
Hardy is desperate.
Albion is not fuzzy.
Albion is hungry.
Odessa is not fuzzy.
Hardy is not lucky.If Olaf is not unusual, then Odessa is not desperate, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not desperate, then Odessa is not panicky.
Someone who is fuzzy is always not lucky.
If Konrad is desperate and Odessa is not fuzzy, then Kathie is not unusual and Konrad is not hungry, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not unusual, then Kathie is not hungry and Albion is fuzzy.
It can be concluded that Garth is not fuzzy once knowing that Garth is not panicky or Albion is not hungry.
If there is someone who is either not fuzzy or hungry, then Kathie is not unusual and Olaf is not panicky.
It can be concluded that Odessa is panicky once knowing that Odessa is not hungry or Kathie is unusual.
If Konrad is not panicky or Hardy is not unusual, then Konrad is not hungry.
If Konrad is not fuzzy, then Konrad is hungry and Garth is not desperate, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Konrad is hungry and Hardy is not desperate once knowing that Hardy is fuzzy and Albion is not unusual.
If someone is not panicky and not unusual, then he is not hungry, and vice versa. | Hardy is not hungry. | contradiction |
Konrad is not unusual.
Garth is fuzzy.
Konrad is lucky.
Hardy is hungry.
Kathie is panicky.
Odessa is not desperate.
Olaf is unusual.
Hardy is desperate.
Albion is not fuzzy.
Albion is hungry.
Odessa is not fuzzy.
Hardy is not lucky.If Olaf is not unusual, then Odessa is not desperate, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not desperate, then Odessa is not panicky.
Someone who is fuzzy is always not lucky.
If Konrad is desperate and Odessa is not fuzzy, then Kathie is not unusual and Konrad is not hungry, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not unusual, then Kathie is not hungry and Albion is fuzzy.
It can be concluded that Garth is not fuzzy once knowing that Garth is not panicky or Albion is not hungry.
If there is someone who is either not fuzzy or hungry, then Kathie is not unusual and Olaf is not panicky.
It can be concluded that Odessa is panicky once knowing that Odessa is not hungry or Kathie is unusual.
If Konrad is not panicky or Hardy is not unusual, then Konrad is not hungry.
If Konrad is not fuzzy, then Konrad is hungry and Garth is not desperate, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Konrad is hungry and Hardy is not desperate once knowing that Hardy is fuzzy and Albion is not unusual.
If someone is not panicky and not unusual, then he is not hungry, and vice versa. | Olaf is not panicky. | entailment |
Konrad is not unusual.
Garth is fuzzy.
Konrad is lucky.
Hardy is hungry.
Kathie is panicky.
Odessa is not desperate.
Olaf is unusual.
Hardy is desperate.
Albion is not fuzzy.
Albion is hungry.
Odessa is not fuzzy.
Hardy is not lucky.If Olaf is not unusual, then Odessa is not desperate, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not desperate, then Odessa is not panicky.
Someone who is fuzzy is always not lucky.
If Konrad is desperate and Odessa is not fuzzy, then Kathie is not unusual and Konrad is not hungry, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not unusual, then Kathie is not hungry and Albion is fuzzy.
It can be concluded that Garth is not fuzzy once knowing that Garth is not panicky or Albion is not hungry.
If there is someone who is either not fuzzy or hungry, then Kathie is not unusual and Olaf is not panicky.
It can be concluded that Odessa is panicky once knowing that Odessa is not hungry or Kathie is unusual.
If Konrad is not panicky or Hardy is not unusual, then Konrad is not hungry.
If Konrad is not fuzzy, then Konrad is hungry and Garth is not desperate, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Konrad is hungry and Hardy is not desperate once knowing that Hardy is fuzzy and Albion is not unusual.
If someone is not panicky and not unusual, then he is not hungry, and vice versa. | Kathie is panicky. | self_contradiction |
Konrad is not unusual.
Garth is fuzzy.
Konrad is lucky.
Hardy is hungry.
Kathie is panicky.
Odessa is not desperate.
Olaf is unusual.
Hardy is desperate.
Albion is not fuzzy.
Albion is hungry.
Odessa is not fuzzy.
Hardy is not lucky.If Olaf is not unusual, then Odessa is not desperate, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not desperate, then Odessa is not panicky.
Someone who is fuzzy is always not lucky.
If Konrad is desperate and Odessa is not fuzzy, then Kathie is not unusual and Konrad is not hungry, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not unusual, then Kathie is not hungry and Albion is fuzzy.
It can be concluded that Garth is not fuzzy once knowing that Garth is not panicky or Albion is not hungry.
If there is someone who is either not fuzzy or hungry, then Kathie is not unusual and Olaf is not panicky.
It can be concluded that Odessa is panicky once knowing that Odessa is not hungry or Kathie is unusual.
If Konrad is not panicky or Hardy is not unusual, then Konrad is not hungry.
If Konrad is not fuzzy, then Konrad is hungry and Garth is not desperate, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Konrad is hungry and Hardy is not desperate once knowing that Hardy is fuzzy and Albion is not unusual.
If someone is not panicky and not unusual, then he is not hungry, and vice versa. | Albion is fuzzy. | self_contradiction |
Konrad is not unusual.
Garth is fuzzy.
Konrad is lucky.
Hardy is hungry.
Kathie is panicky.
Odessa is not desperate.
Olaf is unusual.
Hardy is desperate.
Albion is not fuzzy.
Albion is hungry.
Odessa is not fuzzy.
Hardy is not lucky.If Olaf is not unusual, then Odessa is not desperate, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not desperate, then Odessa is not panicky.
Someone who is fuzzy is always not lucky.
If Konrad is desperate and Odessa is not fuzzy, then Kathie is not unusual and Konrad is not hungry, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not unusual, then Kathie is not hungry and Albion is fuzzy.
It can be concluded that Garth is not fuzzy once knowing that Garth is not panicky or Albion is not hungry.
If there is someone who is either not fuzzy or hungry, then Kathie is not unusual and Olaf is not panicky.
It can be concluded that Odessa is panicky once knowing that Odessa is not hungry or Kathie is unusual.
If Konrad is not panicky or Hardy is not unusual, then Konrad is not hungry.
If Konrad is not fuzzy, then Konrad is hungry and Garth is not desperate, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Konrad is hungry and Hardy is not desperate once knowing that Hardy is fuzzy and Albion is not unusual.
If someone is not panicky and not unusual, then he is not hungry, and vice versa. | Odessa is not panicky. | entailment |
Konrad is not unusual.
Garth is fuzzy.
Konrad is lucky.
Hardy is hungry.
Kathie is panicky.
Odessa is not desperate.
Olaf is unusual.
Hardy is desperate.
Albion is not fuzzy.
Albion is hungry.
Odessa is not fuzzy.
Hardy is not lucky.If Olaf is not unusual, then Odessa is not desperate, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is not desperate, then Odessa is not panicky.
Someone who is fuzzy is always not lucky.
If Konrad is desperate and Odessa is not fuzzy, then Kathie is not unusual and Konrad is not hungry, and vice versa.
If there is someone who is not unusual, then Kathie is not hungry and Albion is fuzzy.
It can be concluded that Garth is not fuzzy once knowing that Garth is not panicky or Albion is not hungry.
If there is someone who is either not fuzzy or hungry, then Kathie is not unusual and Olaf is not panicky.
It can be concluded that Odessa is panicky once knowing that Odessa is not hungry or Kathie is unusual.
If Konrad is not panicky or Hardy is not unusual, then Konrad is not hungry.
If Konrad is not fuzzy, then Konrad is hungry and Garth is not desperate, and vice versa.
It can be concluded that Konrad is hungry and Hardy is not desperate once knowing that Hardy is fuzzy and Albion is not unusual.
If someone is not panicky and not unusual, then he is not hungry, and vice versa. | Garth is fuzzy. | entailment |
Sabrina is cheeky.
Quimby is not willing.
Bryant is jealous.
Garrick is not willing.
Andrew is cheeky.
Quimby is jealous.
Stephen is not cheeky.
Bryant is not cheeky.
Guy is not jealous.
Stephen is sincere.
Bryant is not horrible.
Quimby is horrible.Someone who is eithor weary or not willing is always not sincere.
Quimby being horrible and Stephen being not willing imply that Andrew is sincere.
Bryant being weary implies that Quimby is not jealous.
As long as someone is not sincere, he is not horrible and cheeky.
Someone is sincere if and only if he is not weary.
If Andrew is not willing, then Stephen is not sincere and Sabrina is weary, and vice versa.
If Sabrina is not jealous and Andrew is not willing, then Garrick is not cheeky and Garrick is not horrible.
If someone is not sincere or he is not horrible, then he is willing.
If someone is jealous and sincere, then he is not horrible and not willing.
If Sabrina is not sincere or Quimby is jealous, then Andrew is weary.
If there is someone who is either sincere or willing, then Quimby is horrible and Stephen is weary.
It can be concluded that Garrick is not jealous once knowing that Andrew is not willing and Stephen is not horrible. | Bryant is cheeky. | contradiction |
Sabrina is cheeky.
Quimby is not willing.
Bryant is jealous.
Garrick is not willing.
Andrew is cheeky.
Quimby is jealous.
Stephen is not cheeky.
Bryant is not cheeky.
Guy is not jealous.
Stephen is sincere.
Bryant is not horrible.
Quimby is horrible.Someone who is eithor weary or not willing is always not sincere.
Quimby being horrible and Stephen being not willing imply that Andrew is sincere.
Bryant being weary implies that Quimby is not jealous.
As long as someone is not sincere, he is not horrible and cheeky.
Someone is sincere if and only if he is not weary.
If Andrew is not willing, then Stephen is not sincere and Sabrina is weary, and vice versa.
If Sabrina is not jealous and Andrew is not willing, then Garrick is not cheeky and Garrick is not horrible.
If someone is not sincere or he is not horrible, then he is willing.
If someone is jealous and sincere, then he is not horrible and not willing.
If Sabrina is not sincere or Quimby is jealous, then Andrew is weary.
If there is someone who is either sincere or willing, then Quimby is horrible and Stephen is weary.
It can be concluded that Garrick is not jealous once knowing that Andrew is not willing and Stephen is not horrible. | Stephen is not cheeky. | self_contradiction |
Sabrina is cheeky.
Quimby is not willing.
Bryant is jealous.
Garrick is not willing.
Andrew is cheeky.
Quimby is jealous.
Stephen is not cheeky.
Bryant is not cheeky.
Guy is not jealous.
Stephen is sincere.
Bryant is not horrible.
Quimby is horrible.Someone who is eithor weary or not willing is always not sincere.
Quimby being horrible and Stephen being not willing imply that Andrew is sincere.
Bryant being weary implies that Quimby is not jealous.
As long as someone is not sincere, he is not horrible and cheeky.
Someone is sincere if and only if he is not weary.
If Andrew is not willing, then Stephen is not sincere and Sabrina is weary, and vice versa.
If Sabrina is not jealous and Andrew is not willing, then Garrick is not cheeky and Garrick is not horrible.
If someone is not sincere or he is not horrible, then he is willing.
If someone is jealous and sincere, then he is not horrible and not willing.
If Sabrina is not sincere or Quimby is jealous, then Andrew is weary.
If there is someone who is either sincere or willing, then Quimby is horrible and Stephen is weary.
It can be concluded that Garrick is not jealous once knowing that Andrew is not willing and Stephen is not horrible. | Garrick is not willing. | self_contradiction |
Sabrina is cheeky.
Quimby is not willing.
Bryant is jealous.
Garrick is not willing.
Andrew is cheeky.
Quimby is jealous.
Stephen is not cheeky.
Bryant is not cheeky.
Guy is not jealous.
Stephen is sincere.
Bryant is not horrible.
Quimby is horrible.Someone who is eithor weary or not willing is always not sincere.
Quimby being horrible and Stephen being not willing imply that Andrew is sincere.
Bryant being weary implies that Quimby is not jealous.
As long as someone is not sincere, he is not horrible and cheeky.
Someone is sincere if and only if he is not weary.
If Andrew is not willing, then Stephen is not sincere and Sabrina is weary, and vice versa.
If Sabrina is not jealous and Andrew is not willing, then Garrick is not cheeky and Garrick is not horrible.
If someone is not sincere or he is not horrible, then he is willing.
If someone is jealous and sincere, then he is not horrible and not willing.
If Sabrina is not sincere or Quimby is jealous, then Andrew is weary.
If there is someone who is either sincere or willing, then Quimby is horrible and Stephen is weary.
It can be concluded that Garrick is not jealous once knowing that Andrew is not willing and Stephen is not horrible. | Bryant is willing. | entailment |
Sabrina is cheeky.
Quimby is not willing.
Bryant is jealous.
Garrick is not willing.
Andrew is cheeky.
Quimby is jealous.
Stephen is not cheeky.
Bryant is not cheeky.
Guy is not jealous.
Stephen is sincere.
Bryant is not horrible.
Quimby is horrible.Someone who is eithor weary or not willing is always not sincere.
Quimby being horrible and Stephen being not willing imply that Andrew is sincere.
Bryant being weary implies that Quimby is not jealous.
As long as someone is not sincere, he is not horrible and cheeky.
Someone is sincere if and only if he is not weary.
If Andrew is not willing, then Stephen is not sincere and Sabrina is weary, and vice versa.
If Sabrina is not jealous and Andrew is not willing, then Garrick is not cheeky and Garrick is not horrible.
If someone is not sincere or he is not horrible, then he is willing.
If someone is jealous and sincere, then he is not horrible and not willing.
If Sabrina is not sincere or Quimby is jealous, then Andrew is weary.
If there is someone who is either sincere or willing, then Quimby is horrible and Stephen is weary.
It can be concluded that Garrick is not jealous once knowing that Andrew is not willing and Stephen is not horrible. | Stephen is cheeky. | self_contradiction |
Sabrina is cheeky.
Quimby is not willing.
Bryant is jealous.
Garrick is not willing.
Andrew is cheeky.
Quimby is jealous.
Stephen is not cheeky.
Bryant is not cheeky.
Guy is not jealous.
Stephen is sincere.
Bryant is not horrible.
Quimby is horrible.Someone who is eithor weary or not willing is always not sincere.
Quimby being horrible and Stephen being not willing imply that Andrew is sincere.
Bryant being weary implies that Quimby is not jealous.
As long as someone is not sincere, he is not horrible and cheeky.
Someone is sincere if and only if he is not weary.
If Andrew is not willing, then Stephen is not sincere and Sabrina is weary, and vice versa.
If Sabrina is not jealous and Andrew is not willing, then Garrick is not cheeky and Garrick is not horrible.
If someone is not sincere or he is not horrible, then he is willing.
If someone is jealous and sincere, then he is not horrible and not willing.
If Sabrina is not sincere or Quimby is jealous, then Andrew is weary.
If there is someone who is either sincere or willing, then Quimby is horrible and Stephen is weary.
It can be concluded that Garrick is not jealous once knowing that Andrew is not willing and Stephen is not horrible. | Garrick is not weary. | neutral |
Sabrina is cheeky.
Quimby is not willing.
Bryant is jealous.
Garrick is not willing.
Andrew is cheeky.
Quimby is jealous.
Stephen is not cheeky.
Bryant is not cheeky.
Guy is not jealous.
Stephen is sincere.
Bryant is not horrible.
Quimby is horrible.Someone who is eithor weary or not willing is always not sincere.
Quimby being horrible and Stephen being not willing imply that Andrew is sincere.
Bryant being weary implies that Quimby is not jealous.
As long as someone is not sincere, he is not horrible and cheeky.
Someone is sincere if and only if he is not weary.
If Andrew is not willing, then Stephen is not sincere and Sabrina is weary, and vice versa.
If Sabrina is not jealous and Andrew is not willing, then Garrick is not cheeky and Garrick is not horrible.
If someone is not sincere or he is not horrible, then he is willing.
If someone is jealous and sincere, then he is not horrible and not willing.
If Sabrina is not sincere or Quimby is jealous, then Andrew is weary.
If there is someone who is either sincere or willing, then Quimby is horrible and Stephen is weary.
It can be concluded that Garrick is not jealous once knowing that Andrew is not willing and Stephen is not horrible. | Bryant is horrible. | contradiction |
Sabrina is cheeky.
Quimby is not willing.
Bryant is jealous.
Garrick is not willing.
Andrew is cheeky.
Quimby is jealous.
Stephen is not cheeky.
Bryant is not cheeky.
Guy is not jealous.
Stephen is sincere.
Bryant is not horrible.
Quimby is horrible.Someone who is eithor weary or not willing is always not sincere.
Quimby being horrible and Stephen being not willing imply that Andrew is sincere.
Bryant being weary implies that Quimby is not jealous.
As long as someone is not sincere, he is not horrible and cheeky.
Someone is sincere if and only if he is not weary.
If Andrew is not willing, then Stephen is not sincere and Sabrina is weary, and vice versa.
If Sabrina is not jealous and Andrew is not willing, then Garrick is not cheeky and Garrick is not horrible.
If someone is not sincere or he is not horrible, then he is willing.
If someone is jealous and sincere, then he is not horrible and not willing.
If Sabrina is not sincere or Quimby is jealous, then Andrew is weary.
If there is someone who is either sincere or willing, then Quimby is horrible and Stephen is weary.
It can be concluded that Garrick is not jealous once knowing that Andrew is not willing and Stephen is not horrible. | Andrew is cheeky. | entailment |
Sabrina is cheeky.
Quimby is not willing.
Bryant is jealous.
Garrick is not willing.
Andrew is cheeky.
Quimby is jealous.
Stephen is not cheeky.
Bryant is not cheeky.
Guy is not jealous.
Stephen is sincere.
Bryant is not horrible.
Quimby is horrible.Someone who is eithor weary or not willing is always not sincere.
Quimby being horrible and Stephen being not willing imply that Andrew is sincere.
Bryant being weary implies that Quimby is not jealous.
As long as someone is not sincere, he is not horrible and cheeky.
Someone is sincere if and only if he is not weary.
If Andrew is not willing, then Stephen is not sincere and Sabrina is weary, and vice versa.
If Sabrina is not jealous and Andrew is not willing, then Garrick is not cheeky and Garrick is not horrible.
If someone is not sincere or he is not horrible, then he is willing.
If someone is jealous and sincere, then he is not horrible and not willing.
If Sabrina is not sincere or Quimby is jealous, then Andrew is weary.
If there is someone who is either sincere or willing, then Quimby is horrible and Stephen is weary.
It can be concluded that Garrick is not jealous once knowing that Andrew is not willing and Stephen is not horrible. | Garrick is cheeky. | entailment |
Sabrina is cheeky.
Quimby is not willing.
Bryant is jealous.
Garrick is not willing.
Andrew is cheeky.
Quimby is jealous.
Stephen is not cheeky.
Bryant is not cheeky.
Guy is not jealous.
Stephen is sincere.
Bryant is not horrible.
Quimby is horrible.Someone who is eithor weary or not willing is always not sincere.
Quimby being horrible and Stephen being not willing imply that Andrew is sincere.
Bryant being weary implies that Quimby is not jealous.
As long as someone is not sincere, he is not horrible and cheeky.
Someone is sincere if and only if he is not weary.
If Andrew is not willing, then Stephen is not sincere and Sabrina is weary, and vice versa.
If Sabrina is not jealous and Andrew is not willing, then Garrick is not cheeky and Garrick is not horrible.
If someone is not sincere or he is not horrible, then he is willing.
If someone is jealous and sincere, then he is not horrible and not willing.
If Sabrina is not sincere or Quimby is jealous, then Andrew is weary.
If there is someone who is either sincere or willing, then Quimby is horrible and Stephen is weary.
It can be concluded that Garrick is not jealous once knowing that Andrew is not willing and Stephen is not horrible. | Quimby is not sincere. | entailment |
Sabrina is cheeky.
Quimby is not willing.
Bryant is jealous.
Garrick is not willing.
Andrew is cheeky.
Quimby is jealous.
Stephen is not cheeky.
Bryant is not cheeky.
Guy is not jealous.
Stephen is sincere.
Bryant is not horrible.
Quimby is horrible.Someone who is eithor weary or not willing is always not sincere.
Quimby being horrible and Stephen being not willing imply that Andrew is sincere.
Bryant being weary implies that Quimby is not jealous.
As long as someone is not sincere, he is not horrible and cheeky.
Someone is sincere if and only if he is not weary.
If Andrew is not willing, then Stephen is not sincere and Sabrina is weary, and vice versa.
If Sabrina is not jealous and Andrew is not willing, then Garrick is not cheeky and Garrick is not horrible.
If someone is not sincere or he is not horrible, then he is willing.
If someone is jealous and sincere, then he is not horrible and not willing.
If Sabrina is not sincere or Quimby is jealous, then Andrew is weary.
If there is someone who is either sincere or willing, then Quimby is horrible and Stephen is weary.
It can be concluded that Garrick is not jealous once knowing that Andrew is not willing and Stephen is not horrible. | Quimby is sincere. | contradiction |
Sabrina is cheeky.
Quimby is not willing.
Bryant is jealous.
Garrick is not willing.
Andrew is cheeky.
Quimby is jealous.
Stephen is not cheeky.
Bryant is not cheeky.
Guy is not jealous.
Stephen is sincere.
Bryant is not horrible.
Quimby is horrible.Someone who is eithor weary or not willing is always not sincere.
Quimby being horrible and Stephen being not willing imply that Andrew is sincere.
Bryant being weary implies that Quimby is not jealous.
As long as someone is not sincere, he is not horrible and cheeky.
Someone is sincere if and only if he is not weary.
If Andrew is not willing, then Stephen is not sincere and Sabrina is weary, and vice versa.
If Sabrina is not jealous and Andrew is not willing, then Garrick is not cheeky and Garrick is not horrible.
If someone is not sincere or he is not horrible, then he is willing.
If someone is jealous and sincere, then he is not horrible and not willing.
If Sabrina is not sincere or Quimby is jealous, then Andrew is weary.
If there is someone who is either sincere or willing, then Quimby is horrible and Stephen is weary.
It can be concluded that Garrick is not jealous once knowing that Andrew is not willing and Stephen is not horrible. | Quimby is not willing. | self_contradiction |
Sabrina is cheeky.
Quimby is not willing.
Bryant is jealous.
Garrick is not willing.
Andrew is cheeky.
Quimby is jealous.
Stephen is not cheeky.
Bryant is not cheeky.
Guy is not jealous.
Stephen is sincere.
Bryant is not horrible.
Quimby is horrible.Someone who is eithor weary or not willing is always not sincere.
Quimby being horrible and Stephen being not willing imply that Andrew is sincere.
Bryant being weary implies that Quimby is not jealous.
As long as someone is not sincere, he is not horrible and cheeky.
Someone is sincere if and only if he is not weary.
If Andrew is not willing, then Stephen is not sincere and Sabrina is weary, and vice versa.
If Sabrina is not jealous and Andrew is not willing, then Garrick is not cheeky and Garrick is not horrible.
If someone is not sincere or he is not horrible, then he is willing.
If someone is jealous and sincere, then he is not horrible and not willing.
If Sabrina is not sincere or Quimby is jealous, then Andrew is weary.
If there is someone who is either sincere or willing, then Quimby is horrible and Stephen is weary.
It can be concluded that Garrick is not jealous once knowing that Andrew is not willing and Stephen is not horrible. | Quimby is not weary. | neutral |
Sabrina is cheeky.
Quimby is not willing.
Bryant is jealous.
Garrick is not willing.
Andrew is cheeky.
Quimby is jealous.
Stephen is not cheeky.
Bryant is not cheeky.
Guy is not jealous.
Stephen is sincere.
Bryant is not horrible.
Quimby is horrible.Someone who is eithor weary or not willing is always not sincere.
Quimby being horrible and Stephen being not willing imply that Andrew is sincere.
Bryant being weary implies that Quimby is not jealous.
As long as someone is not sincere, he is not horrible and cheeky.
Someone is sincere if and only if he is not weary.
If Andrew is not willing, then Stephen is not sincere and Sabrina is weary, and vice versa.
If Sabrina is not jealous and Andrew is not willing, then Garrick is not cheeky and Garrick is not horrible.
If someone is not sincere or he is not horrible, then he is willing.
If someone is jealous and sincere, then he is not horrible and not willing.
If Sabrina is not sincere or Quimby is jealous, then Andrew is weary.
If there is someone who is either sincere or willing, then Quimby is horrible and Stephen is weary.
It can be concluded that Garrick is not jealous once knowing that Andrew is not willing and Stephen is not horrible. | Stephen is not sincere. | self_contradiction |
Sabrina is cheeky.
Quimby is not willing.
Bryant is jealous.
Garrick is not willing.
Andrew is cheeky.
Quimby is jealous.
Stephen is not cheeky.
Bryant is not cheeky.
Guy is not jealous.
Stephen is sincere.
Bryant is not horrible.
Quimby is horrible.Someone who is eithor weary or not willing is always not sincere.
Quimby being horrible and Stephen being not willing imply that Andrew is sincere.
Bryant being weary implies that Quimby is not jealous.
As long as someone is not sincere, he is not horrible and cheeky.
Someone is sincere if and only if he is not weary.
If Andrew is not willing, then Stephen is not sincere and Sabrina is weary, and vice versa.
If Sabrina is not jealous and Andrew is not willing, then Garrick is not cheeky and Garrick is not horrible.
If someone is not sincere or he is not horrible, then he is willing.
If someone is jealous and sincere, then he is not horrible and not willing.
If Sabrina is not sincere or Quimby is jealous, then Andrew is weary.
If there is someone who is either sincere or willing, then Quimby is horrible and Stephen is weary.
It can be concluded that Garrick is not jealous once knowing that Andrew is not willing and Stephen is not horrible. | Garrick is not sincere. | entailment |
Sabrina is cheeky.
Quimby is not willing.
Bryant is jealous.
Garrick is not willing.
Andrew is cheeky.
Quimby is jealous.
Stephen is not cheeky.
Bryant is not cheeky.
Guy is not jealous.
Stephen is sincere.
Bryant is not horrible.
Quimby is horrible.Someone who is eithor weary or not willing is always not sincere.
Quimby being horrible and Stephen being not willing imply that Andrew is sincere.
Bryant being weary implies that Quimby is not jealous.
As long as someone is not sincere, he is not horrible and cheeky.
Someone is sincere if and only if he is not weary.
If Andrew is not willing, then Stephen is not sincere and Sabrina is weary, and vice versa.
If Sabrina is not jealous and Andrew is not willing, then Garrick is not cheeky and Garrick is not horrible.
If someone is not sincere or he is not horrible, then he is willing.
If someone is jealous and sincere, then he is not horrible and not willing.
If Sabrina is not sincere or Quimby is jealous, then Andrew is weary.
If there is someone who is either sincere or willing, then Quimby is horrible and Stephen is weary.
It can be concluded that Garrick is not jealous once knowing that Andrew is not willing and Stephen is not horrible. | Guy is weary. | neutral |
Sabrina is cheeky.
Quimby is not willing.
Bryant is jealous.
Garrick is not willing.
Andrew is cheeky.
Quimby is jealous.
Stephen is not cheeky.
Bryant is not cheeky.
Guy is not jealous.
Stephen is sincere.
Bryant is not horrible.
Quimby is horrible.Someone who is eithor weary or not willing is always not sincere.
Quimby being horrible and Stephen being not willing imply that Andrew is sincere.
Bryant being weary implies that Quimby is not jealous.
As long as someone is not sincere, he is not horrible and cheeky.
Someone is sincere if and only if he is not weary.
If Andrew is not willing, then Stephen is not sincere and Sabrina is weary, and vice versa.
If Sabrina is not jealous and Andrew is not willing, then Garrick is not cheeky and Garrick is not horrible.
If someone is not sincere or he is not horrible, then he is willing.
If someone is jealous and sincere, then he is not horrible and not willing.
If Sabrina is not sincere or Quimby is jealous, then Andrew is weary.
If there is someone who is either sincere or willing, then Quimby is horrible and Stephen is weary.
It can be concluded that Garrick is not jealous once knowing that Andrew is not willing and Stephen is not horrible. | Sabrina is willing. | neutral |
Sabrina is cheeky.
Quimby is not willing.
Bryant is jealous.
Garrick is not willing.
Andrew is cheeky.
Quimby is jealous.
Stephen is not cheeky.
Bryant is not cheeky.
Guy is not jealous.
Stephen is sincere.
Bryant is not horrible.
Quimby is horrible.Someone who is eithor weary or not willing is always not sincere.
Quimby being horrible and Stephen being not willing imply that Andrew is sincere.
Bryant being weary implies that Quimby is not jealous.
As long as someone is not sincere, he is not horrible and cheeky.
Someone is sincere if and only if he is not weary.
If Andrew is not willing, then Stephen is not sincere and Sabrina is weary, and vice versa.
If Sabrina is not jealous and Andrew is not willing, then Garrick is not cheeky and Garrick is not horrible.
If someone is not sincere or he is not horrible, then he is willing.
If someone is jealous and sincere, then he is not horrible and not willing.
If Sabrina is not sincere or Quimby is jealous, then Andrew is weary.
If there is someone who is either sincere or willing, then Quimby is horrible and Stephen is weary.
It can be concluded that Garrick is not jealous once knowing that Andrew is not willing and Stephen is not horrible. | Quimby is not jealous. | contradiction |
Sabrina is cheeky.
Quimby is not willing.
Bryant is jealous.
Garrick is not willing.
Andrew is cheeky.
Quimby is jealous.
Stephen is not cheeky.
Bryant is not cheeky.
Guy is not jealous.
Stephen is sincere.
Bryant is not horrible.
Quimby is horrible.Someone who is eithor weary or not willing is always not sincere.
Quimby being horrible and Stephen being not willing imply that Andrew is sincere.
Bryant being weary implies that Quimby is not jealous.
As long as someone is not sincere, he is not horrible and cheeky.
Someone is sincere if and only if he is not weary.
If Andrew is not willing, then Stephen is not sincere and Sabrina is weary, and vice versa.
If Sabrina is not jealous and Andrew is not willing, then Garrick is not cheeky and Garrick is not horrible.
If someone is not sincere or he is not horrible, then he is willing.
If someone is jealous and sincere, then he is not horrible and not willing.
If Sabrina is not sincere or Quimby is jealous, then Andrew is weary.
If there is someone who is either sincere or willing, then Quimby is horrible and Stephen is weary.
It can be concluded that Garrick is not jealous once knowing that Andrew is not willing and Stephen is not horrible. | Garrick is jealous. | neutral |
Sabrina is cheeky.
Quimby is not willing.
Bryant is jealous.
Garrick is not willing.
Andrew is cheeky.
Quimby is jealous.
Stephen is not cheeky.
Bryant is not cheeky.
Guy is not jealous.
Stephen is sincere.
Bryant is not horrible.
Quimby is horrible.Someone who is eithor weary or not willing is always not sincere.
Quimby being horrible and Stephen being not willing imply that Andrew is sincere.
Bryant being weary implies that Quimby is not jealous.
As long as someone is not sincere, he is not horrible and cheeky.
Someone is sincere if and only if he is not weary.
If Andrew is not willing, then Stephen is not sincere and Sabrina is weary, and vice versa.
If Sabrina is not jealous and Andrew is not willing, then Garrick is not cheeky and Garrick is not horrible.
If someone is not sincere or he is not horrible, then he is willing.
If someone is jealous and sincere, then he is not horrible and not willing.
If Sabrina is not sincere or Quimby is jealous, then Andrew is weary.
If there is someone who is either sincere or willing, then Quimby is horrible and Stephen is weary.
It can be concluded that Garrick is not jealous once knowing that Andrew is not willing and Stephen is not horrible. | Stephen is not willing. | contradiction |
Kayla is not nice.
Traci is sexual.
Ethan is not nice.
Traci is not nice.
Halden is annoying.
Kayla is disgusted.
Halden is nice.
Aiken is annoying.
Bruce is not big.
Maribel is nice.
Aiken is not disgusted.
Kayla is not sexual.If there is someone who is both sexual and disgusted, then Ethan is not good.
All not big people are not good.
It can be concluded that Maribel is not big and Halden is disgusted once knowing that Maribel is not annoying.
If someone who is not good is also sexual, then he is not big.
It can be concluded that Maribel is not nice and Kayla is not good once knowing that Traci is not annoying.
Someone who is both not nice and sexual is always not annoying.
If there is someone who is either sexual or big, then Ethan is annoying.
If someone is not sexual, then he is big.
If all people are disgusted, then Aiken is annoying.
If someone is either not big or disgusted, then he is nice and not annoying.
It can be concluded that Ethan is not big once knowing that Bruce is not good or Maribel is nice.
If there is at least one people who is either annoying or good, then Bruce is not disgusted and Maribel is not nice. | Traci is not annoying. | entailment |
Kayla is not nice.
Traci is sexual.
Ethan is not nice.
Traci is not nice.
Halden is annoying.
Kayla is disgusted.
Halden is nice.
Aiken is annoying.
Bruce is not big.
Maribel is nice.
Aiken is not disgusted.
Kayla is not sexual.If there is someone who is both sexual and disgusted, then Ethan is not good.
All not big people are not good.
It can be concluded that Maribel is not big and Halden is disgusted once knowing that Maribel is not annoying.
If someone who is not good is also sexual, then he is not big.
It can be concluded that Maribel is not nice and Kayla is not good once knowing that Traci is not annoying.
Someone who is both not nice and sexual is always not annoying.
If there is someone who is either sexual or big, then Ethan is annoying.
If someone is not sexual, then he is big.
If all people are disgusted, then Aiken is annoying.
If someone is either not big or disgusted, then he is nice and not annoying.
It can be concluded that Ethan is not big once knowing that Bruce is not good or Maribel is nice.
If there is at least one people who is either annoying or good, then Bruce is not disgusted and Maribel is not nice. | Aiken is annoying. | entailment |
Kayla is not nice.
Traci is sexual.
Ethan is not nice.
Traci is not nice.
Halden is annoying.
Kayla is disgusted.
Halden is nice.
Aiken is annoying.
Bruce is not big.
Maribel is nice.
Aiken is not disgusted.
Kayla is not sexual.If there is someone who is both sexual and disgusted, then Ethan is not good.
All not big people are not good.
It can be concluded that Maribel is not big and Halden is disgusted once knowing that Maribel is not annoying.
If someone who is not good is also sexual, then he is not big.
It can be concluded that Maribel is not nice and Kayla is not good once knowing that Traci is not annoying.
Someone who is both not nice and sexual is always not annoying.
If there is someone who is either sexual or big, then Ethan is annoying.
If someone is not sexual, then he is big.
If all people are disgusted, then Aiken is annoying.
If someone is either not big or disgusted, then he is nice and not annoying.
It can be concluded that Ethan is not big once knowing that Bruce is not good or Maribel is nice.
If there is at least one people who is either annoying or good, then Bruce is not disgusted and Maribel is not nice. | Bruce is not good. | entailment |
Kayla is not nice.
Traci is sexual.
Ethan is not nice.
Traci is not nice.
Halden is annoying.
Kayla is disgusted.
Halden is nice.
Aiken is annoying.
Bruce is not big.
Maribel is nice.
Aiken is not disgusted.
Kayla is not sexual.If there is someone who is both sexual and disgusted, then Ethan is not good.
All not big people are not good.
It can be concluded that Maribel is not big and Halden is disgusted once knowing that Maribel is not annoying.
If someone who is not good is also sexual, then he is not big.
It can be concluded that Maribel is not nice and Kayla is not good once knowing that Traci is not annoying.
Someone who is both not nice and sexual is always not annoying.
If there is someone who is either sexual or big, then Ethan is annoying.
If someone is not sexual, then he is big.
If all people are disgusted, then Aiken is annoying.
If someone is either not big or disgusted, then he is nice and not annoying.
It can be concluded that Ethan is not big once knowing that Bruce is not good or Maribel is nice.
If there is at least one people who is either annoying or good, then Bruce is not disgusted and Maribel is not nice. | Halden is nice. | entailment |
Kayla is not nice.
Traci is sexual.
Ethan is not nice.
Traci is not nice.
Halden is annoying.
Kayla is disgusted.
Halden is nice.
Aiken is annoying.
Bruce is not big.
Maribel is nice.
Aiken is not disgusted.
Kayla is not sexual.If there is someone who is both sexual and disgusted, then Ethan is not good.
All not big people are not good.
It can be concluded that Maribel is not big and Halden is disgusted once knowing that Maribel is not annoying.
If someone who is not good is also sexual, then he is not big.
It can be concluded that Maribel is not nice and Kayla is not good once knowing that Traci is not annoying.
Someone who is both not nice and sexual is always not annoying.
If there is someone who is either sexual or big, then Ethan is annoying.
If someone is not sexual, then he is big.
If all people are disgusted, then Aiken is annoying.
If someone is either not big or disgusted, then he is nice and not annoying.
It can be concluded that Ethan is not big once knowing that Bruce is not good or Maribel is nice.
If there is at least one people who is either annoying or good, then Bruce is not disgusted and Maribel is not nice. | Kayla is annoying. | contradiction |
Kayla is not nice.
Traci is sexual.
Ethan is not nice.
Traci is not nice.
Halden is annoying.
Kayla is disgusted.
Halden is nice.
Aiken is annoying.
Bruce is not big.
Maribel is nice.
Aiken is not disgusted.
Kayla is not sexual.If there is someone who is both sexual and disgusted, then Ethan is not good.
All not big people are not good.
It can be concluded that Maribel is not big and Halden is disgusted once knowing that Maribel is not annoying.
If someone who is not good is also sexual, then he is not big.
It can be concluded that Maribel is not nice and Kayla is not good once knowing that Traci is not annoying.
Someone who is both not nice and sexual is always not annoying.
If there is someone who is either sexual or big, then Ethan is annoying.
If someone is not sexual, then he is big.
If all people are disgusted, then Aiken is annoying.
If someone is either not big or disgusted, then he is nice and not annoying.
It can be concluded that Ethan is not big once knowing that Bruce is not good or Maribel is nice.
If there is at least one people who is either annoying or good, then Bruce is not disgusted and Maribel is not nice. | Kayla is good. | contradiction |
Kayla is not nice.
Traci is sexual.
Ethan is not nice.
Traci is not nice.
Halden is annoying.
Kayla is disgusted.
Halden is nice.
Aiken is annoying.
Bruce is not big.
Maribel is nice.
Aiken is not disgusted.
Kayla is not sexual.If there is someone who is both sexual and disgusted, then Ethan is not good.
All not big people are not good.
It can be concluded that Maribel is not big and Halden is disgusted once knowing that Maribel is not annoying.
If someone who is not good is also sexual, then he is not big.
It can be concluded that Maribel is not nice and Kayla is not good once knowing that Traci is not annoying.
Someone who is both not nice and sexual is always not annoying.
If there is someone who is either sexual or big, then Ethan is annoying.
If someone is not sexual, then he is big.
If all people are disgusted, then Aiken is annoying.
If someone is either not big or disgusted, then he is nice and not annoying.
It can be concluded that Ethan is not big once knowing that Bruce is not good or Maribel is nice.
If there is at least one people who is either annoying or good, then Bruce is not disgusted and Maribel is not nice. | Kayla is not nice. | self_contradiction |
Kayla is not nice.
Traci is sexual.
Ethan is not nice.
Traci is not nice.
Halden is annoying.
Kayla is disgusted.
Halden is nice.
Aiken is annoying.
Bruce is not big.
Maribel is nice.
Aiken is not disgusted.
Kayla is not sexual.If there is someone who is both sexual and disgusted, then Ethan is not good.
All not big people are not good.
It can be concluded that Maribel is not big and Halden is disgusted once knowing that Maribel is not annoying.
If someone who is not good is also sexual, then he is not big.
It can be concluded that Maribel is not nice and Kayla is not good once knowing that Traci is not annoying.
Someone who is both not nice and sexual is always not annoying.
If there is someone who is either sexual or big, then Ethan is annoying.
If someone is not sexual, then he is big.
If all people are disgusted, then Aiken is annoying.
If someone is either not big or disgusted, then he is nice and not annoying.
It can be concluded that Ethan is not big once knowing that Bruce is not good or Maribel is nice.
If there is at least one people who is either annoying or good, then Bruce is not disgusted and Maribel is not nice. | Ethan is not annoying. | self_contradiction |
Kayla is not nice.
Traci is sexual.
Ethan is not nice.
Traci is not nice.
Halden is annoying.
Kayla is disgusted.
Halden is nice.
Aiken is annoying.
Bruce is not big.
Maribel is nice.
Aiken is not disgusted.
Kayla is not sexual.If there is someone who is both sexual and disgusted, then Ethan is not good.
All not big people are not good.
It can be concluded that Maribel is not big and Halden is disgusted once knowing that Maribel is not annoying.
If someone who is not good is also sexual, then he is not big.
It can be concluded that Maribel is not nice and Kayla is not good once knowing that Traci is not annoying.
Someone who is both not nice and sexual is always not annoying.
If there is someone who is either sexual or big, then Ethan is annoying.
If someone is not sexual, then he is big.
If all people are disgusted, then Aiken is annoying.
If someone is either not big or disgusted, then he is nice and not annoying.
It can be concluded that Ethan is not big once knowing that Bruce is not good or Maribel is nice.
If there is at least one people who is either annoying or good, then Bruce is not disgusted and Maribel is not nice. | Traci is not big. | neutral |
Kayla is not nice.
Traci is sexual.
Ethan is not nice.
Traci is not nice.
Halden is annoying.
Kayla is disgusted.
Halden is nice.
Aiken is annoying.
Bruce is not big.
Maribel is nice.
Aiken is not disgusted.
Kayla is not sexual.If there is someone who is both sexual and disgusted, then Ethan is not good.
All not big people are not good.
It can be concluded that Maribel is not big and Halden is disgusted once knowing that Maribel is not annoying.
If someone who is not good is also sexual, then he is not big.
It can be concluded that Maribel is not nice and Kayla is not good once knowing that Traci is not annoying.
Someone who is both not nice and sexual is always not annoying.
If there is someone who is either sexual or big, then Ethan is annoying.
If someone is not sexual, then he is big.
If all people are disgusted, then Aiken is annoying.
If someone is either not big or disgusted, then he is nice and not annoying.
It can be concluded that Ethan is not big once knowing that Bruce is not good or Maribel is nice.
If there is at least one people who is either annoying or good, then Bruce is not disgusted and Maribel is not nice. | Traci is annoying. | contradiction |
Kayla is not nice.
Traci is sexual.
Ethan is not nice.
Traci is not nice.
Halden is annoying.
Kayla is disgusted.
Halden is nice.
Aiken is annoying.
Bruce is not big.
Maribel is nice.
Aiken is not disgusted.
Kayla is not sexual.If there is someone who is both sexual and disgusted, then Ethan is not good.
All not big people are not good.
It can be concluded that Maribel is not big and Halden is disgusted once knowing that Maribel is not annoying.
If someone who is not good is also sexual, then he is not big.
It can be concluded that Maribel is not nice and Kayla is not good once knowing that Traci is not annoying.
Someone who is both not nice and sexual is always not annoying.
If there is someone who is either sexual or big, then Ethan is annoying.
If someone is not sexual, then he is big.
If all people are disgusted, then Aiken is annoying.
If someone is either not big or disgusted, then he is nice and not annoying.
It can be concluded that Ethan is not big once knowing that Bruce is not good or Maribel is nice.
If there is at least one people who is either annoying or good, then Bruce is not disgusted and Maribel is not nice. | Bruce is not big. | entailment |
Kayla is not nice.
Traci is sexual.
Ethan is not nice.
Traci is not nice.
Halden is annoying.
Kayla is disgusted.
Halden is nice.
Aiken is annoying.
Bruce is not big.
Maribel is nice.
Aiken is not disgusted.
Kayla is not sexual.If there is someone who is both sexual and disgusted, then Ethan is not good.
All not big people are not good.
It can be concluded that Maribel is not big and Halden is disgusted once knowing that Maribel is not annoying.
If someone who is not good is also sexual, then he is not big.
It can be concluded that Maribel is not nice and Kayla is not good once knowing that Traci is not annoying.
Someone who is both not nice and sexual is always not annoying.
If there is someone who is either sexual or big, then Ethan is annoying.
If someone is not sexual, then he is big.
If all people are disgusted, then Aiken is annoying.
If someone is either not big or disgusted, then he is nice and not annoying.
It can be concluded that Ethan is not big once knowing that Bruce is not good or Maribel is nice.
If there is at least one people who is either annoying or good, then Bruce is not disgusted and Maribel is not nice. | Maribel is nice. | self_contradiction |
Kayla is not nice.
Traci is sexual.
Ethan is not nice.
Traci is not nice.
Halden is annoying.
Kayla is disgusted.
Halden is nice.
Aiken is annoying.
Bruce is not big.
Maribel is nice.
Aiken is not disgusted.
Kayla is not sexual.If there is someone who is both sexual and disgusted, then Ethan is not good.
All not big people are not good.
It can be concluded that Maribel is not big and Halden is disgusted once knowing that Maribel is not annoying.
If someone who is not good is also sexual, then he is not big.
It can be concluded that Maribel is not nice and Kayla is not good once knowing that Traci is not annoying.
Someone who is both not nice and sexual is always not annoying.
If there is someone who is either sexual or big, then Ethan is annoying.
If someone is not sexual, then he is big.
If all people are disgusted, then Aiken is annoying.
If someone is either not big or disgusted, then he is nice and not annoying.
It can be concluded that Ethan is not big once knowing that Bruce is not good or Maribel is nice.
If there is at least one people who is either annoying or good, then Bruce is not disgusted and Maribel is not nice. | Aiken is not nice. | neutral |
Kayla is not nice.
Traci is sexual.
Ethan is not nice.
Traci is not nice.
Halden is annoying.
Kayla is disgusted.
Halden is nice.
Aiken is annoying.
Bruce is not big.
Maribel is nice.
Aiken is not disgusted.
Kayla is not sexual.If there is someone who is both sexual and disgusted, then Ethan is not good.
All not big people are not good.
It can be concluded that Maribel is not big and Halden is disgusted once knowing that Maribel is not annoying.
If someone who is not good is also sexual, then he is not big.
It can be concluded that Maribel is not nice and Kayla is not good once knowing that Traci is not annoying.
Someone who is both not nice and sexual is always not annoying.
If there is someone who is either sexual or big, then Ethan is annoying.
If someone is not sexual, then he is big.
If all people are disgusted, then Aiken is annoying.
If someone is either not big or disgusted, then he is nice and not annoying.
It can be concluded that Ethan is not big once knowing that Bruce is not good or Maribel is nice.
If there is at least one people who is either annoying or good, then Bruce is not disgusted and Maribel is not nice. | Halden is good. | neutral |
Kayla is not nice.
Traci is sexual.
Ethan is not nice.
Traci is not nice.
Halden is annoying.
Kayla is disgusted.
Halden is nice.
Aiken is annoying.
Bruce is not big.
Maribel is nice.
Aiken is not disgusted.
Kayla is not sexual.If there is someone who is both sexual and disgusted, then Ethan is not good.
All not big people are not good.
It can be concluded that Maribel is not big and Halden is disgusted once knowing that Maribel is not annoying.
If someone who is not good is also sexual, then he is not big.
It can be concluded that Maribel is not nice and Kayla is not good once knowing that Traci is not annoying.
Someone who is both not nice and sexual is always not annoying.
If there is someone who is either sexual or big, then Ethan is annoying.
If someone is not sexual, then he is big.
If all people are disgusted, then Aiken is annoying.
If someone is either not big or disgusted, then he is nice and not annoying.
It can be concluded that Ethan is not big once knowing that Bruce is not good or Maribel is nice.
If there is at least one people who is either annoying or good, then Bruce is not disgusted and Maribel is not nice. | Bruce is not nice. | contradiction |
Kayla is not nice.
Traci is sexual.
Ethan is not nice.
Traci is not nice.
Halden is annoying.
Kayla is disgusted.
Halden is nice.
Aiken is annoying.
Bruce is not big.
Maribel is nice.
Aiken is not disgusted.
Kayla is not sexual.If there is someone who is both sexual and disgusted, then Ethan is not good.
All not big people are not good.
It can be concluded that Maribel is not big and Halden is disgusted once knowing that Maribel is not annoying.
If someone who is not good is also sexual, then he is not big.
It can be concluded that Maribel is not nice and Kayla is not good once knowing that Traci is not annoying.
Someone who is both not nice and sexual is always not annoying.
If there is someone who is either sexual or big, then Ethan is annoying.
If someone is not sexual, then he is big.
If all people are disgusted, then Aiken is annoying.
If someone is either not big or disgusted, then he is nice and not annoying.
It can be concluded that Ethan is not big once knowing that Bruce is not good or Maribel is nice.
If there is at least one people who is either annoying or good, then Bruce is not disgusted and Maribel is not nice. | Ethan is nice. | self_contradiction |
Kayla is not nice.
Traci is sexual.
Ethan is not nice.
Traci is not nice.
Halden is annoying.
Kayla is disgusted.
Halden is nice.
Aiken is annoying.
Bruce is not big.
Maribel is nice.
Aiken is not disgusted.
Kayla is not sexual.If there is someone who is both sexual and disgusted, then Ethan is not good.
All not big people are not good.
It can be concluded that Maribel is not big and Halden is disgusted once knowing that Maribel is not annoying.
If someone who is not good is also sexual, then he is not big.
It can be concluded that Maribel is not nice and Kayla is not good once knowing that Traci is not annoying.
Someone who is both not nice and sexual is always not annoying.
If there is someone who is either sexual or big, then Ethan is annoying.
If someone is not sexual, then he is big.
If all people are disgusted, then Aiken is annoying.
If someone is either not big or disgusted, then he is nice and not annoying.
It can be concluded that Ethan is not big once knowing that Bruce is not good or Maribel is nice.
If there is at least one people who is either annoying or good, then Bruce is not disgusted and Maribel is not nice. | Maribel is not nice. | self_contradiction |
Kayla is not nice.
Traci is sexual.
Ethan is not nice.
Traci is not nice.
Halden is annoying.
Kayla is disgusted.
Halden is nice.
Aiken is annoying.
Bruce is not big.
Maribel is nice.
Aiken is not disgusted.
Kayla is not sexual.If there is someone who is both sexual and disgusted, then Ethan is not good.
All not big people are not good.
It can be concluded that Maribel is not big and Halden is disgusted once knowing that Maribel is not annoying.
If someone who is not good is also sexual, then he is not big.
It can be concluded that Maribel is not nice and Kayla is not good once knowing that Traci is not annoying.
Someone who is both not nice and sexual is always not annoying.
If there is someone who is either sexual or big, then Ethan is annoying.
If someone is not sexual, then he is big.
If all people are disgusted, then Aiken is annoying.
If someone is either not big or disgusted, then he is nice and not annoying.
It can be concluded that Ethan is not big once knowing that Bruce is not good or Maribel is nice.
If there is at least one people who is either annoying or good, then Bruce is not disgusted and Maribel is not nice. | Maribel is disgusted. | neutral |
Kayla is not nice.
Traci is sexual.
Ethan is not nice.
Traci is not nice.
Halden is annoying.
Kayla is disgusted.
Halden is nice.
Aiken is annoying.
Bruce is not big.
Maribel is nice.
Aiken is not disgusted.
Kayla is not sexual.If there is someone who is both sexual and disgusted, then Ethan is not good.
All not big people are not good.
It can be concluded that Maribel is not big and Halden is disgusted once knowing that Maribel is not annoying.
If someone who is not good is also sexual, then he is not big.
It can be concluded that Maribel is not nice and Kayla is not good once knowing that Traci is not annoying.
Someone who is both not nice and sexual is always not annoying.
If there is someone who is either sexual or big, then Ethan is annoying.
If someone is not sexual, then he is big.
If all people are disgusted, then Aiken is annoying.
If someone is either not big or disgusted, then he is nice and not annoying.
It can be concluded that Ethan is not big once knowing that Bruce is not good or Maribel is nice.
If there is at least one people who is either annoying or good, then Bruce is not disgusted and Maribel is not nice. | Maribel is sexual. | neutral |
Kayla is not nice.
Traci is sexual.
Ethan is not nice.
Traci is not nice.
Halden is annoying.
Kayla is disgusted.
Halden is nice.
Aiken is annoying.
Bruce is not big.
Maribel is nice.
Aiken is not disgusted.
Kayla is not sexual.If there is someone who is both sexual and disgusted, then Ethan is not good.
All not big people are not good.
It can be concluded that Maribel is not big and Halden is disgusted once knowing that Maribel is not annoying.
If someone who is not good is also sexual, then he is not big.
It can be concluded that Maribel is not nice and Kayla is not good once knowing that Traci is not annoying.
Someone who is both not nice and sexual is always not annoying.
If there is someone who is either sexual or big, then Ethan is annoying.
If someone is not sexual, then he is big.
If all people are disgusted, then Aiken is annoying.
If someone is either not big or disgusted, then he is nice and not annoying.
It can be concluded that Ethan is not big once knowing that Bruce is not good or Maribel is nice.
If there is at least one people who is either annoying or good, then Bruce is not disgusted and Maribel is not nice. | Aiken is not annoying. | contradiction |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.