premise
stringlengths 923
1.41k
| hypothesis
stringlengths 11
33
| label
stringclasses 4
values |
|---|---|---|
Quade is impossible.
Nathalie is not loyal.
Quade is weak.
Alexis is smoggy.
Alexis is loyal.
Brooke is smoggy.
Brooke is oak.
Marcus is oak.
Nathalie is weak.
Nathalie is oak.
Brooke is not ugliest.
Alexis is impossible.John being ugliest implies that Greyson is not smoggy.
Someone who is impossible is always not weak.
Nathalie being not smoggy implies that Nathalie is loyal and Greyson is weak.
If Quade is not ugliest, then Brooke is loyal and Quade is oak.
Marcus is oak if and only if Marcus is not weak.
If there is nobody who is not oak, then John is smoggy and Marcus is not ugliest.
If there is at least one people who is not ugliest, then Greyson is weak and Brooke is loyal.
Someone who is not smoggy and not oak is always not weak and ugliest.
If there is someone who is not loyal, then Brooke is oak and Quade is smoggy.
If someone is not loyal and weak, then he is both not oak and not smoggy, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is loyal or not impossible, then Brooke is ugliest.
Someone who is not impossible is always both oak and weak. | Brooke is not impossible. | neutral |
Quade is impossible.
Nathalie is not loyal.
Quade is weak.
Alexis is smoggy.
Alexis is loyal.
Brooke is smoggy.
Brooke is oak.
Marcus is oak.
Nathalie is weak.
Nathalie is oak.
Brooke is not ugliest.
Alexis is impossible.John being ugliest implies that Greyson is not smoggy.
Someone who is impossible is always not weak.
Nathalie being not smoggy implies that Nathalie is loyal and Greyson is weak.
If Quade is not ugliest, then Brooke is loyal and Quade is oak.
Marcus is oak if and only if Marcus is not weak.
If there is nobody who is not oak, then John is smoggy and Marcus is not ugliest.
If there is at least one people who is not ugliest, then Greyson is weak and Brooke is loyal.
Someone who is not smoggy and not oak is always not weak and ugliest.
If there is someone who is not loyal, then Brooke is oak and Quade is smoggy.
If someone is not loyal and weak, then he is both not oak and not smoggy, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is loyal or not impossible, then Brooke is ugliest.
Someone who is not impossible is always both oak and weak. | Nathalie is loyal. | self_contradiction |
Quade is impossible.
Nathalie is not loyal.
Quade is weak.
Alexis is smoggy.
Alexis is loyal.
Brooke is smoggy.
Brooke is oak.
Marcus is oak.
Nathalie is weak.
Nathalie is oak.
Brooke is not ugliest.
Alexis is impossible.John being ugliest implies that Greyson is not smoggy.
Someone who is impossible is always not weak.
Nathalie being not smoggy implies that Nathalie is loyal and Greyson is weak.
If Quade is not ugliest, then Brooke is loyal and Quade is oak.
Marcus is oak if and only if Marcus is not weak.
If there is nobody who is not oak, then John is smoggy and Marcus is not ugliest.
If there is at least one people who is not ugliest, then Greyson is weak and Brooke is loyal.
Someone who is not smoggy and not oak is always not weak and ugliest.
If there is someone who is not loyal, then Brooke is oak and Quade is smoggy.
If someone is not loyal and weak, then he is both not oak and not smoggy, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is loyal or not impossible, then Brooke is ugliest.
Someone who is not impossible is always both oak and weak. | Nathalie is not oak. | self_contradiction |
Quade is impossible.
Nathalie is not loyal.
Quade is weak.
Alexis is smoggy.
Alexis is loyal.
Brooke is smoggy.
Brooke is oak.
Marcus is oak.
Nathalie is weak.
Nathalie is oak.
Brooke is not ugliest.
Alexis is impossible.John being ugliest implies that Greyson is not smoggy.
Someone who is impossible is always not weak.
Nathalie being not smoggy implies that Nathalie is loyal and Greyson is weak.
If Quade is not ugliest, then Brooke is loyal and Quade is oak.
Marcus is oak if and only if Marcus is not weak.
If there is nobody who is not oak, then John is smoggy and Marcus is not ugliest.
If there is at least one people who is not ugliest, then Greyson is weak and Brooke is loyal.
Someone who is not smoggy and not oak is always not weak and ugliest.
If there is someone who is not loyal, then Brooke is oak and Quade is smoggy.
If someone is not loyal and weak, then he is both not oak and not smoggy, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is loyal or not impossible, then Brooke is ugliest.
Someone who is not impossible is always both oak and weak. | Marcus is not oak. | contradiction |
Quade is impossible.
Nathalie is not loyal.
Quade is weak.
Alexis is smoggy.
Alexis is loyal.
Brooke is smoggy.
Brooke is oak.
Marcus is oak.
Nathalie is weak.
Nathalie is oak.
Brooke is not ugliest.
Alexis is impossible.John being ugliest implies that Greyson is not smoggy.
Someone who is impossible is always not weak.
Nathalie being not smoggy implies that Nathalie is loyal and Greyson is weak.
If Quade is not ugliest, then Brooke is loyal and Quade is oak.
Marcus is oak if and only if Marcus is not weak.
If there is nobody who is not oak, then John is smoggy and Marcus is not ugliest.
If there is at least one people who is not ugliest, then Greyson is weak and Brooke is loyal.
Someone who is not smoggy and not oak is always not weak and ugliest.
If there is someone who is not loyal, then Brooke is oak and Quade is smoggy.
If someone is not loyal and weak, then he is both not oak and not smoggy, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is loyal or not impossible, then Brooke is ugliest.
Someone who is not impossible is always both oak and weak. | Quade is not oak. | neutral |
Quade is impossible.
Nathalie is not loyal.
Quade is weak.
Alexis is smoggy.
Alexis is loyal.
Brooke is smoggy.
Brooke is oak.
Marcus is oak.
Nathalie is weak.
Nathalie is oak.
Brooke is not ugliest.
Alexis is impossible.John being ugliest implies that Greyson is not smoggy.
Someone who is impossible is always not weak.
Nathalie being not smoggy implies that Nathalie is loyal and Greyson is weak.
If Quade is not ugliest, then Brooke is loyal and Quade is oak.
Marcus is oak if and only if Marcus is not weak.
If there is nobody who is not oak, then John is smoggy and Marcus is not ugliest.
If there is at least one people who is not ugliest, then Greyson is weak and Brooke is loyal.
Someone who is not smoggy and not oak is always not weak and ugliest.
If there is someone who is not loyal, then Brooke is oak and Quade is smoggy.
If someone is not loyal and weak, then he is both not oak and not smoggy, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is loyal or not impossible, then Brooke is ugliest.
Someone who is not impossible is always both oak and weak. | Alexis is not weak. | entailment |
Quade is impossible.
Nathalie is not loyal.
Quade is weak.
Alexis is smoggy.
Alexis is loyal.
Brooke is smoggy.
Brooke is oak.
Marcus is oak.
Nathalie is weak.
Nathalie is oak.
Brooke is not ugliest.
Alexis is impossible.John being ugliest implies that Greyson is not smoggy.
Someone who is impossible is always not weak.
Nathalie being not smoggy implies that Nathalie is loyal and Greyson is weak.
If Quade is not ugliest, then Brooke is loyal and Quade is oak.
Marcus is oak if and only if Marcus is not weak.
If there is nobody who is not oak, then John is smoggy and Marcus is not ugliest.
If there is at least one people who is not ugliest, then Greyson is weak and Brooke is loyal.
Someone who is not smoggy and not oak is always not weak and ugliest.
If there is someone who is not loyal, then Brooke is oak and Quade is smoggy.
If someone is not loyal and weak, then he is both not oak and not smoggy, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is loyal or not impossible, then Brooke is ugliest.
Someone who is not impossible is always both oak and weak. | Alexis is not loyal. | contradiction |
Quade is impossible.
Nathalie is not loyal.
Quade is weak.
Alexis is smoggy.
Alexis is loyal.
Brooke is smoggy.
Brooke is oak.
Marcus is oak.
Nathalie is weak.
Nathalie is oak.
Brooke is not ugliest.
Alexis is impossible.John being ugliest implies that Greyson is not smoggy.
Someone who is impossible is always not weak.
Nathalie being not smoggy implies that Nathalie is loyal and Greyson is weak.
If Quade is not ugliest, then Brooke is loyal and Quade is oak.
Marcus is oak if and only if Marcus is not weak.
If there is nobody who is not oak, then John is smoggy and Marcus is not ugliest.
If there is at least one people who is not ugliest, then Greyson is weak and Brooke is loyal.
Someone who is not smoggy and not oak is always not weak and ugliest.
If there is someone who is not loyal, then Brooke is oak and Quade is smoggy.
If someone is not loyal and weak, then he is both not oak and not smoggy, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is loyal or not impossible, then Brooke is ugliest.
Someone who is not impossible is always both oak and weak. | Nathalie is oak. | self_contradiction |
Quade is impossible.
Nathalie is not loyal.
Quade is weak.
Alexis is smoggy.
Alexis is loyal.
Brooke is smoggy.
Brooke is oak.
Marcus is oak.
Nathalie is weak.
Nathalie is oak.
Brooke is not ugliest.
Alexis is impossible.John being ugliest implies that Greyson is not smoggy.
Someone who is impossible is always not weak.
Nathalie being not smoggy implies that Nathalie is loyal and Greyson is weak.
If Quade is not ugliest, then Brooke is loyal and Quade is oak.
Marcus is oak if and only if Marcus is not weak.
If there is nobody who is not oak, then John is smoggy and Marcus is not ugliest.
If there is at least one people who is not ugliest, then Greyson is weak and Brooke is loyal.
Someone who is not smoggy and not oak is always not weak and ugliest.
If there is someone who is not loyal, then Brooke is oak and Quade is smoggy.
If someone is not loyal and weak, then he is both not oak and not smoggy, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is loyal or not impossible, then Brooke is ugliest.
Someone who is not impossible is always both oak and weak. | Nathalie is not ugliest. | contradiction |
Quade is impossible.
Nathalie is not loyal.
Quade is weak.
Alexis is smoggy.
Alexis is loyal.
Brooke is smoggy.
Brooke is oak.
Marcus is oak.
Nathalie is weak.
Nathalie is oak.
Brooke is not ugliest.
Alexis is impossible.John being ugliest implies that Greyson is not smoggy.
Someone who is impossible is always not weak.
Nathalie being not smoggy implies that Nathalie is loyal and Greyson is weak.
If Quade is not ugliest, then Brooke is loyal and Quade is oak.
Marcus is oak if and only if Marcus is not weak.
If there is nobody who is not oak, then John is smoggy and Marcus is not ugliest.
If there is at least one people who is not ugliest, then Greyson is weak and Brooke is loyal.
Someone who is not smoggy and not oak is always not weak and ugliest.
If there is someone who is not loyal, then Brooke is oak and Quade is smoggy.
If someone is not loyal and weak, then he is both not oak and not smoggy, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is loyal or not impossible, then Brooke is ugliest.
Someone who is not impossible is always both oak and weak. | Alexis is impossible. | entailment |
Quade is impossible.
Nathalie is not loyal.
Quade is weak.
Alexis is smoggy.
Alexis is loyal.
Brooke is smoggy.
Brooke is oak.
Marcus is oak.
Nathalie is weak.
Nathalie is oak.
Brooke is not ugliest.
Alexis is impossible.John being ugliest implies that Greyson is not smoggy.
Someone who is impossible is always not weak.
Nathalie being not smoggy implies that Nathalie is loyal and Greyson is weak.
If Quade is not ugliest, then Brooke is loyal and Quade is oak.
Marcus is oak if and only if Marcus is not weak.
If there is nobody who is not oak, then John is smoggy and Marcus is not ugliest.
If there is at least one people who is not ugliest, then Greyson is weak and Brooke is loyal.
Someone who is not smoggy and not oak is always not weak and ugliest.
If there is someone who is not loyal, then Brooke is oak and Quade is smoggy.
If someone is not loyal and weak, then he is both not oak and not smoggy, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is loyal or not impossible, then Brooke is ugliest.
Someone who is not impossible is always both oak and weak. | Greyson is ugliest. | neutral |
Quade is impossible.
Nathalie is not loyal.
Quade is weak.
Alexis is smoggy.
Alexis is loyal.
Brooke is smoggy.
Brooke is oak.
Marcus is oak.
Nathalie is weak.
Nathalie is oak.
Brooke is not ugliest.
Alexis is impossible.John being ugliest implies that Greyson is not smoggy.
Someone who is impossible is always not weak.
Nathalie being not smoggy implies that Nathalie is loyal and Greyson is weak.
If Quade is not ugliest, then Brooke is loyal and Quade is oak.
Marcus is oak if and only if Marcus is not weak.
If there is nobody who is not oak, then John is smoggy and Marcus is not ugliest.
If there is at least one people who is not ugliest, then Greyson is weak and Brooke is loyal.
Someone who is not smoggy and not oak is always not weak and ugliest.
If there is someone who is not loyal, then Brooke is oak and Quade is smoggy.
If someone is not loyal and weak, then he is both not oak and not smoggy, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is loyal or not impossible, then Brooke is ugliest.
Someone who is not impossible is always both oak and weak. | Brooke is not oak. | contradiction |
Quade is impossible.
Nathalie is not loyal.
Quade is weak.
Alexis is smoggy.
Alexis is loyal.
Brooke is smoggy.
Brooke is oak.
Marcus is oak.
Nathalie is weak.
Nathalie is oak.
Brooke is not ugliest.
Alexis is impossible.John being ugliest implies that Greyson is not smoggy.
Someone who is impossible is always not weak.
Nathalie being not smoggy implies that Nathalie is loyal and Greyson is weak.
If Quade is not ugliest, then Brooke is loyal and Quade is oak.
Marcus is oak if and only if Marcus is not weak.
If there is nobody who is not oak, then John is smoggy and Marcus is not ugliest.
If there is at least one people who is not ugliest, then Greyson is weak and Brooke is loyal.
Someone who is not smoggy and not oak is always not weak and ugliest.
If there is someone who is not loyal, then Brooke is oak and Quade is smoggy.
If someone is not loyal and weak, then he is both not oak and not smoggy, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is loyal or not impossible, then Brooke is ugliest.
Someone who is not impossible is always both oak and weak. | Greyson is not impossible. | neutral |
Quade is impossible.
Nathalie is not loyal.
Quade is weak.
Alexis is smoggy.
Alexis is loyal.
Brooke is smoggy.
Brooke is oak.
Marcus is oak.
Nathalie is weak.
Nathalie is oak.
Brooke is not ugliest.
Alexis is impossible.John being ugliest implies that Greyson is not smoggy.
Someone who is impossible is always not weak.
Nathalie being not smoggy implies that Nathalie is loyal and Greyson is weak.
If Quade is not ugliest, then Brooke is loyal and Quade is oak.
Marcus is oak if and only if Marcus is not weak.
If there is nobody who is not oak, then John is smoggy and Marcus is not ugliest.
If there is at least one people who is not ugliest, then Greyson is weak and Brooke is loyal.
Someone who is not smoggy and not oak is always not weak and ugliest.
If there is someone who is not loyal, then Brooke is oak and Quade is smoggy.
If someone is not loyal and weak, then he is both not oak and not smoggy, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is loyal or not impossible, then Brooke is ugliest.
Someone who is not impossible is always both oak and weak. | Greyson is not ugliest. | neutral |
Quade is impossible.
Nathalie is not loyal.
Quade is weak.
Alexis is smoggy.
Alexis is loyal.
Brooke is smoggy.
Brooke is oak.
Marcus is oak.
Nathalie is weak.
Nathalie is oak.
Brooke is not ugliest.
Alexis is impossible.John being ugliest implies that Greyson is not smoggy.
Someone who is impossible is always not weak.
Nathalie being not smoggy implies that Nathalie is loyal and Greyson is weak.
If Quade is not ugliest, then Brooke is loyal and Quade is oak.
Marcus is oak if and only if Marcus is not weak.
If there is nobody who is not oak, then John is smoggy and Marcus is not ugliest.
If there is at least one people who is not ugliest, then Greyson is weak and Brooke is loyal.
Someone who is not smoggy and not oak is always not weak and ugliest.
If there is someone who is not loyal, then Brooke is oak and Quade is smoggy.
If someone is not loyal and weak, then he is both not oak and not smoggy, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is loyal or not impossible, then Brooke is ugliest.
Someone who is not impossible is always both oak and weak. | Quade is not weak. | self_contradiction |
Quade is impossible.
Nathalie is not loyal.
Quade is weak.
Alexis is smoggy.
Alexis is loyal.
Brooke is smoggy.
Brooke is oak.
Marcus is oak.
Nathalie is weak.
Nathalie is oak.
Brooke is not ugliest.
Alexis is impossible.John being ugliest implies that Greyson is not smoggy.
Someone who is impossible is always not weak.
Nathalie being not smoggy implies that Nathalie is loyal and Greyson is weak.
If Quade is not ugliest, then Brooke is loyal and Quade is oak.
Marcus is oak if and only if Marcus is not weak.
If there is nobody who is not oak, then John is smoggy and Marcus is not ugliest.
If there is at least one people who is not ugliest, then Greyson is weak and Brooke is loyal.
Someone who is not smoggy and not oak is always not weak and ugliest.
If there is someone who is not loyal, then Brooke is oak and Quade is smoggy.
If someone is not loyal and weak, then he is both not oak and not smoggy, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is loyal or not impossible, then Brooke is ugliest.
Someone who is not impossible is always both oak and weak. | Marcus is not weak. | entailment |
Quade is impossible.
Nathalie is not loyal.
Quade is weak.
Alexis is smoggy.
Alexis is loyal.
Brooke is smoggy.
Brooke is oak.
Marcus is oak.
Nathalie is weak.
Nathalie is oak.
Brooke is not ugliest.
Alexis is impossible.John being ugliest implies that Greyson is not smoggy.
Someone who is impossible is always not weak.
Nathalie being not smoggy implies that Nathalie is loyal and Greyson is weak.
If Quade is not ugliest, then Brooke is loyal and Quade is oak.
Marcus is oak if and only if Marcus is not weak.
If there is nobody who is not oak, then John is smoggy and Marcus is not ugliest.
If there is at least one people who is not ugliest, then Greyson is weak and Brooke is loyal.
Someone who is not smoggy and not oak is always not weak and ugliest.
If there is someone who is not loyal, then Brooke is oak and Quade is smoggy.
If someone is not loyal and weak, then he is both not oak and not smoggy, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is loyal or not impossible, then Brooke is ugliest.
Someone who is not impossible is always both oak and weak. | Alexis is smoggy. | entailment |
Quade is impossible.
Nathalie is not loyal.
Quade is weak.
Alexis is smoggy.
Alexis is loyal.
Brooke is smoggy.
Brooke is oak.
Marcus is oak.
Nathalie is weak.
Nathalie is oak.
Brooke is not ugliest.
Alexis is impossible.John being ugliest implies that Greyson is not smoggy.
Someone who is impossible is always not weak.
Nathalie being not smoggy implies that Nathalie is loyal and Greyson is weak.
If Quade is not ugliest, then Brooke is loyal and Quade is oak.
Marcus is oak if and only if Marcus is not weak.
If there is nobody who is not oak, then John is smoggy and Marcus is not ugliest.
If there is at least one people who is not ugliest, then Greyson is weak and Brooke is loyal.
Someone who is not smoggy and not oak is always not weak and ugliest.
If there is someone who is not loyal, then Brooke is oak and Quade is smoggy.
If someone is not loyal and weak, then he is both not oak and not smoggy, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is loyal or not impossible, then Brooke is ugliest.
Someone who is not impossible is always both oak and weak. | Quade is impossible. | entailment |
Quade is impossible.
Nathalie is not loyal.
Quade is weak.
Alexis is smoggy.
Alexis is loyal.
Brooke is smoggy.
Brooke is oak.
Marcus is oak.
Nathalie is weak.
Nathalie is oak.
Brooke is not ugliest.
Alexis is impossible.John being ugliest implies that Greyson is not smoggy.
Someone who is impossible is always not weak.
Nathalie being not smoggy implies that Nathalie is loyal and Greyson is weak.
If Quade is not ugliest, then Brooke is loyal and Quade is oak.
Marcus is oak if and only if Marcus is not weak.
If there is nobody who is not oak, then John is smoggy and Marcus is not ugliest.
If there is at least one people who is not ugliest, then Greyson is weak and Brooke is loyal.
Someone who is not smoggy and not oak is always not weak and ugliest.
If there is someone who is not loyal, then Brooke is oak and Quade is smoggy.
If someone is not loyal and weak, then he is both not oak and not smoggy, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is loyal or not impossible, then Brooke is ugliest.
Someone who is not impossible is always both oak and weak. | Nathalie is smoggy. | contradiction |
Quade is impossible.
Nathalie is not loyal.
Quade is weak.
Alexis is smoggy.
Alexis is loyal.
Brooke is smoggy.
Brooke is oak.
Marcus is oak.
Nathalie is weak.
Nathalie is oak.
Brooke is not ugliest.
Alexis is impossible.John being ugliest implies that Greyson is not smoggy.
Someone who is impossible is always not weak.
Nathalie being not smoggy implies that Nathalie is loyal and Greyson is weak.
If Quade is not ugliest, then Brooke is loyal and Quade is oak.
Marcus is oak if and only if Marcus is not weak.
If there is nobody who is not oak, then John is smoggy and Marcus is not ugliest.
If there is at least one people who is not ugliest, then Greyson is weak and Brooke is loyal.
Someone who is not smoggy and not oak is always not weak and ugliest.
If there is someone who is not loyal, then Brooke is oak and Quade is smoggy.
If someone is not loyal and weak, then he is both not oak and not smoggy, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is loyal or not impossible, then Brooke is ugliest.
Someone who is not impossible is always both oak and weak. | Brooke is ugliest. | self_contradiction |
Tony is rational.
Igor is successful.
Aedan is rational.
Chad is unable.
Calvert is successful.
Aedan is tremendous.
Calvert is nice.
Tony is successful.
Igor is not nutty.
Marlon is nice.
Marlon is not successful.
Clifford is not tremendous.If all people are not rational, then Clifford is unable.
Calvert is not successful and Aedan is rational if and only if Marlon is nice and Aedan is tremendous.
If everyone is successful, then Tony is not rational and Clifford is tremendous.
If someone is not unable or he is successful, then he is not nice.
If Marlon is nutty, then Tony is not successful and Aedan is not nice, and vice versa.
If Calvert is successful or Calvert is not rational, then Tony is not unable.
If Marlon is not nutty, then Calvert is not successful.
If Marlon is not rational and Clifford is successful, then Calvert is not tremendous.
It can be concluded that Tony is successful once knowing that Marlon is not rational or Igor is not nice.
As long as someone is rational, he is not unable and not nutty.
If someone is either nutty or not successful, then he is rational and not nice.
If Marlon is nutty, then Calvert is unable and Igor is not nice. | Aedan is tremendous. | entailment |
Tony is rational.
Igor is successful.
Aedan is rational.
Chad is unable.
Calvert is successful.
Aedan is tremendous.
Calvert is nice.
Tony is successful.
Igor is not nutty.
Marlon is nice.
Marlon is not successful.
Clifford is not tremendous.If all people are not rational, then Clifford is unable.
Calvert is not successful and Aedan is rational if and only if Marlon is nice and Aedan is tremendous.
If everyone is successful, then Tony is not rational and Clifford is tremendous.
If someone is not unable or he is successful, then he is not nice.
If Marlon is nutty, then Tony is not successful and Aedan is not nice, and vice versa.
If Calvert is successful or Calvert is not rational, then Tony is not unable.
If Marlon is not nutty, then Calvert is not successful.
If Marlon is not rational and Clifford is successful, then Calvert is not tremendous.
It can be concluded that Tony is successful once knowing that Marlon is not rational or Igor is not nice.
As long as someone is rational, he is not unable and not nutty.
If someone is either nutty or not successful, then he is rational and not nice.
If Marlon is nutty, then Calvert is unable and Igor is not nice. | Marlon is not rational. | contradiction |
Tony is rational.
Igor is successful.
Aedan is rational.
Chad is unable.
Calvert is successful.
Aedan is tremendous.
Calvert is nice.
Tony is successful.
Igor is not nutty.
Marlon is nice.
Marlon is not successful.
Clifford is not tremendous.If all people are not rational, then Clifford is unable.
Calvert is not successful and Aedan is rational if and only if Marlon is nice and Aedan is tremendous.
If everyone is successful, then Tony is not rational and Clifford is tremendous.
If someone is not unable or he is successful, then he is not nice.
If Marlon is nutty, then Tony is not successful and Aedan is not nice, and vice versa.
If Calvert is successful or Calvert is not rational, then Tony is not unable.
If Marlon is not nutty, then Calvert is not successful.
If Marlon is not rational and Clifford is successful, then Calvert is not tremendous.
It can be concluded that Tony is successful once knowing that Marlon is not rational or Igor is not nice.
As long as someone is rational, he is not unable and not nutty.
If someone is either nutty or not successful, then he is rational and not nice.
If Marlon is nutty, then Calvert is unable and Igor is not nice. | Calvert is successful. | self_contradiction |
Tony is rational.
Igor is successful.
Aedan is rational.
Chad is unable.
Calvert is successful.
Aedan is tremendous.
Calvert is nice.
Tony is successful.
Igor is not nutty.
Marlon is nice.
Marlon is not successful.
Clifford is not tremendous.If all people are not rational, then Clifford is unable.
Calvert is not successful and Aedan is rational if and only if Marlon is nice and Aedan is tremendous.
If everyone is successful, then Tony is not rational and Clifford is tremendous.
If someone is not unable or he is successful, then he is not nice.
If Marlon is nutty, then Tony is not successful and Aedan is not nice, and vice versa.
If Calvert is successful or Calvert is not rational, then Tony is not unable.
If Marlon is not nutty, then Calvert is not successful.
If Marlon is not rational and Clifford is successful, then Calvert is not tremendous.
It can be concluded that Tony is successful once knowing that Marlon is not rational or Igor is not nice.
As long as someone is rational, he is not unable and not nutty.
If someone is either nutty or not successful, then he is rational and not nice.
If Marlon is nutty, then Calvert is unable and Igor is not nice. | Igor is nice. | contradiction |
Tony is rational.
Igor is successful.
Aedan is rational.
Chad is unable.
Calvert is successful.
Aedan is tremendous.
Calvert is nice.
Tony is successful.
Igor is not nutty.
Marlon is nice.
Marlon is not successful.
Clifford is not tremendous.If all people are not rational, then Clifford is unable.
Calvert is not successful and Aedan is rational if and only if Marlon is nice and Aedan is tremendous.
If everyone is successful, then Tony is not rational and Clifford is tremendous.
If someone is not unable or he is successful, then he is not nice.
If Marlon is nutty, then Tony is not successful and Aedan is not nice, and vice versa.
If Calvert is successful or Calvert is not rational, then Tony is not unable.
If Marlon is not nutty, then Calvert is not successful.
If Marlon is not rational and Clifford is successful, then Calvert is not tremendous.
It can be concluded that Tony is successful once knowing that Marlon is not rational or Igor is not nice.
As long as someone is rational, he is not unable and not nutty.
If someone is either nutty or not successful, then he is rational and not nice.
If Marlon is nutty, then Calvert is unable and Igor is not nice. | Aedan is not unable. | entailment |
Tony is rational.
Igor is successful.
Aedan is rational.
Chad is unable.
Calvert is successful.
Aedan is tremendous.
Calvert is nice.
Tony is successful.
Igor is not nutty.
Marlon is nice.
Marlon is not successful.
Clifford is not tremendous.If all people are not rational, then Clifford is unable.
Calvert is not successful and Aedan is rational if and only if Marlon is nice and Aedan is tremendous.
If everyone is successful, then Tony is not rational and Clifford is tremendous.
If someone is not unable or he is successful, then he is not nice.
If Marlon is nutty, then Tony is not successful and Aedan is not nice, and vice versa.
If Calvert is successful or Calvert is not rational, then Tony is not unable.
If Marlon is not nutty, then Calvert is not successful.
If Marlon is not rational and Clifford is successful, then Calvert is not tremendous.
It can be concluded that Tony is successful once knowing that Marlon is not rational or Igor is not nice.
As long as someone is rational, he is not unable and not nutty.
If someone is either nutty or not successful, then he is rational and not nice.
If Marlon is nutty, then Calvert is unable and Igor is not nice. | Chad is unable. | entailment |
Tony is rational.
Igor is successful.
Aedan is rational.
Chad is unable.
Calvert is successful.
Aedan is tremendous.
Calvert is nice.
Tony is successful.
Igor is not nutty.
Marlon is nice.
Marlon is not successful.
Clifford is not tremendous.If all people are not rational, then Clifford is unable.
Calvert is not successful and Aedan is rational if and only if Marlon is nice and Aedan is tremendous.
If everyone is successful, then Tony is not rational and Clifford is tremendous.
If someone is not unable or he is successful, then he is not nice.
If Marlon is nutty, then Tony is not successful and Aedan is not nice, and vice versa.
If Calvert is successful or Calvert is not rational, then Tony is not unable.
If Marlon is not nutty, then Calvert is not successful.
If Marlon is not rational and Clifford is successful, then Calvert is not tremendous.
It can be concluded that Tony is successful once knowing that Marlon is not rational or Igor is not nice.
As long as someone is rational, he is not unable and not nutty.
If someone is either nutty or not successful, then he is rational and not nice.
If Marlon is nutty, then Calvert is unable and Igor is not nice. | Calvert is nice. | self_contradiction |
Tony is rational.
Igor is successful.
Aedan is rational.
Chad is unable.
Calvert is successful.
Aedan is tremendous.
Calvert is nice.
Tony is successful.
Igor is not nutty.
Marlon is nice.
Marlon is not successful.
Clifford is not tremendous.If all people are not rational, then Clifford is unable.
Calvert is not successful and Aedan is rational if and only if Marlon is nice and Aedan is tremendous.
If everyone is successful, then Tony is not rational and Clifford is tremendous.
If someone is not unable or he is successful, then he is not nice.
If Marlon is nutty, then Tony is not successful and Aedan is not nice, and vice versa.
If Calvert is successful or Calvert is not rational, then Tony is not unable.
If Marlon is not nutty, then Calvert is not successful.
If Marlon is not rational and Clifford is successful, then Calvert is not tremendous.
It can be concluded that Tony is successful once knowing that Marlon is not rational or Igor is not nice.
As long as someone is rational, he is not unable and not nutty.
If someone is either nutty or not successful, then he is rational and not nice.
If Marlon is nutty, then Calvert is unable and Igor is not nice. | Chad is nutty. | neutral |
Tony is rational.
Igor is successful.
Aedan is rational.
Chad is unable.
Calvert is successful.
Aedan is tremendous.
Calvert is nice.
Tony is successful.
Igor is not nutty.
Marlon is nice.
Marlon is not successful.
Clifford is not tremendous.If all people are not rational, then Clifford is unable.
Calvert is not successful and Aedan is rational if and only if Marlon is nice and Aedan is tremendous.
If everyone is successful, then Tony is not rational and Clifford is tremendous.
If someone is not unable or he is successful, then he is not nice.
If Marlon is nutty, then Tony is not successful and Aedan is not nice, and vice versa.
If Calvert is successful or Calvert is not rational, then Tony is not unable.
If Marlon is not nutty, then Calvert is not successful.
If Marlon is not rational and Clifford is successful, then Calvert is not tremendous.
It can be concluded that Tony is successful once knowing that Marlon is not rational or Igor is not nice.
As long as someone is rational, he is not unable and not nutty.
If someone is either nutty or not successful, then he is rational and not nice.
If Marlon is nutty, then Calvert is unable and Igor is not nice. | Clifford is not unable. | neutral |
Tony is rational.
Igor is successful.
Aedan is rational.
Chad is unable.
Calvert is successful.
Aedan is tremendous.
Calvert is nice.
Tony is successful.
Igor is not nutty.
Marlon is nice.
Marlon is not successful.
Clifford is not tremendous.If all people are not rational, then Clifford is unable.
Calvert is not successful and Aedan is rational if and only if Marlon is nice and Aedan is tremendous.
If everyone is successful, then Tony is not rational and Clifford is tremendous.
If someone is not unable or he is successful, then he is not nice.
If Marlon is nutty, then Tony is not successful and Aedan is not nice, and vice versa.
If Calvert is successful or Calvert is not rational, then Tony is not unable.
If Marlon is not nutty, then Calvert is not successful.
If Marlon is not rational and Clifford is successful, then Calvert is not tremendous.
It can be concluded that Tony is successful once knowing that Marlon is not rational or Igor is not nice.
As long as someone is rational, he is not unable and not nutty.
If someone is either nutty or not successful, then he is rational and not nice.
If Marlon is nutty, then Calvert is unable and Igor is not nice. | Calvert is nutty. | contradiction |
Tony is rational.
Igor is successful.
Aedan is rational.
Chad is unable.
Calvert is successful.
Aedan is tremendous.
Calvert is nice.
Tony is successful.
Igor is not nutty.
Marlon is nice.
Marlon is not successful.
Clifford is not tremendous.If all people are not rational, then Clifford is unable.
Calvert is not successful and Aedan is rational if and only if Marlon is nice and Aedan is tremendous.
If everyone is successful, then Tony is not rational and Clifford is tremendous.
If someone is not unable or he is successful, then he is not nice.
If Marlon is nutty, then Tony is not successful and Aedan is not nice, and vice versa.
If Calvert is successful or Calvert is not rational, then Tony is not unable.
If Marlon is not nutty, then Calvert is not successful.
If Marlon is not rational and Clifford is successful, then Calvert is not tremendous.
It can be concluded that Tony is successful once knowing that Marlon is not rational or Igor is not nice.
As long as someone is rational, he is not unable and not nutty.
If someone is either nutty or not successful, then he is rational and not nice.
If Marlon is nutty, then Calvert is unable and Igor is not nice. | Calvert is not successful. | self_contradiction |
Tony is rational.
Igor is successful.
Aedan is rational.
Chad is unable.
Calvert is successful.
Aedan is tremendous.
Calvert is nice.
Tony is successful.
Igor is not nutty.
Marlon is nice.
Marlon is not successful.
Clifford is not tremendous.If all people are not rational, then Clifford is unable.
Calvert is not successful and Aedan is rational if and only if Marlon is nice and Aedan is tremendous.
If everyone is successful, then Tony is not rational and Clifford is tremendous.
If someone is not unable or he is successful, then he is not nice.
If Marlon is nutty, then Tony is not successful and Aedan is not nice, and vice versa.
If Calvert is successful or Calvert is not rational, then Tony is not unable.
If Marlon is not nutty, then Calvert is not successful.
If Marlon is not rational and Clifford is successful, then Calvert is not tremendous.
It can be concluded that Tony is successful once knowing that Marlon is not rational or Igor is not nice.
As long as someone is rational, he is not unable and not nutty.
If someone is either nutty or not successful, then he is rational and not nice.
If Marlon is nutty, then Calvert is unable and Igor is not nice. | Chad is not unable. | contradiction |
Tony is rational.
Igor is successful.
Aedan is rational.
Chad is unable.
Calvert is successful.
Aedan is tremendous.
Calvert is nice.
Tony is successful.
Igor is not nutty.
Marlon is nice.
Marlon is not successful.
Clifford is not tremendous.If all people are not rational, then Clifford is unable.
Calvert is not successful and Aedan is rational if and only if Marlon is nice and Aedan is tremendous.
If everyone is successful, then Tony is not rational and Clifford is tremendous.
If someone is not unable or he is successful, then he is not nice.
If Marlon is nutty, then Tony is not successful and Aedan is not nice, and vice versa.
If Calvert is successful or Calvert is not rational, then Tony is not unable.
If Marlon is not nutty, then Calvert is not successful.
If Marlon is not rational and Clifford is successful, then Calvert is not tremendous.
It can be concluded that Tony is successful once knowing that Marlon is not rational or Igor is not nice.
As long as someone is rational, he is not unable and not nutty.
If someone is either nutty or not successful, then he is rational and not nice.
If Marlon is nutty, then Calvert is unable and Igor is not nice. | Marlon is not nice. | self_contradiction |
Tony is rational.
Igor is successful.
Aedan is rational.
Chad is unable.
Calvert is successful.
Aedan is tremendous.
Calvert is nice.
Tony is successful.
Igor is not nutty.
Marlon is nice.
Marlon is not successful.
Clifford is not tremendous.If all people are not rational, then Clifford is unable.
Calvert is not successful and Aedan is rational if and only if Marlon is nice and Aedan is tremendous.
If everyone is successful, then Tony is not rational and Clifford is tremendous.
If someone is not unable or he is successful, then he is not nice.
If Marlon is nutty, then Tony is not successful and Aedan is not nice, and vice versa.
If Calvert is successful or Calvert is not rational, then Tony is not unable.
If Marlon is not nutty, then Calvert is not successful.
If Marlon is not rational and Clifford is successful, then Calvert is not tremendous.
It can be concluded that Tony is successful once knowing that Marlon is not rational or Igor is not nice.
As long as someone is rational, he is not unable and not nutty.
If someone is either nutty or not successful, then he is rational and not nice.
If Marlon is nutty, then Calvert is unable and Igor is not nice. | Calvert is not nice. | self_contradiction |
Tony is rational.
Igor is successful.
Aedan is rational.
Chad is unable.
Calvert is successful.
Aedan is tremendous.
Calvert is nice.
Tony is successful.
Igor is not nutty.
Marlon is nice.
Marlon is not successful.
Clifford is not tremendous.If all people are not rational, then Clifford is unable.
Calvert is not successful and Aedan is rational if and only if Marlon is nice and Aedan is tremendous.
If everyone is successful, then Tony is not rational and Clifford is tremendous.
If someone is not unable or he is successful, then he is not nice.
If Marlon is nutty, then Tony is not successful and Aedan is not nice, and vice versa.
If Calvert is successful or Calvert is not rational, then Tony is not unable.
If Marlon is not nutty, then Calvert is not successful.
If Marlon is not rational and Clifford is successful, then Calvert is not tremendous.
It can be concluded that Tony is successful once knowing that Marlon is not rational or Igor is not nice.
As long as someone is rational, he is not unable and not nutty.
If someone is either nutty or not successful, then he is rational and not nice.
If Marlon is nutty, then Calvert is unable and Igor is not nice. | Clifford is rational. | neutral |
Tony is rational.
Igor is successful.
Aedan is rational.
Chad is unable.
Calvert is successful.
Aedan is tremendous.
Calvert is nice.
Tony is successful.
Igor is not nutty.
Marlon is nice.
Marlon is not successful.
Clifford is not tremendous.If all people are not rational, then Clifford is unable.
Calvert is not successful and Aedan is rational if and only if Marlon is nice and Aedan is tremendous.
If everyone is successful, then Tony is not rational and Clifford is tremendous.
If someone is not unable or he is successful, then he is not nice.
If Marlon is nutty, then Tony is not successful and Aedan is not nice, and vice versa.
If Calvert is successful or Calvert is not rational, then Tony is not unable.
If Marlon is not nutty, then Calvert is not successful.
If Marlon is not rational and Clifford is successful, then Calvert is not tremendous.
It can be concluded that Tony is successful once knowing that Marlon is not rational or Igor is not nice.
As long as someone is rational, he is not unable and not nutty.
If someone is either nutty or not successful, then he is rational and not nice.
If Marlon is nutty, then Calvert is unable and Igor is not nice. | Chad is not nice. | neutral |
Tony is rational.
Igor is successful.
Aedan is rational.
Chad is unable.
Calvert is successful.
Aedan is tremendous.
Calvert is nice.
Tony is successful.
Igor is not nutty.
Marlon is nice.
Marlon is not successful.
Clifford is not tremendous.If all people are not rational, then Clifford is unable.
Calvert is not successful and Aedan is rational if and only if Marlon is nice and Aedan is tremendous.
If everyone is successful, then Tony is not rational and Clifford is tremendous.
If someone is not unable or he is successful, then he is not nice.
If Marlon is nutty, then Tony is not successful and Aedan is not nice, and vice versa.
If Calvert is successful or Calvert is not rational, then Tony is not unable.
If Marlon is not nutty, then Calvert is not successful.
If Marlon is not rational and Clifford is successful, then Calvert is not tremendous.
It can be concluded that Tony is successful once knowing that Marlon is not rational or Igor is not nice.
As long as someone is rational, he is not unable and not nutty.
If someone is either nutty or not successful, then he is rational and not nice.
If Marlon is nutty, then Calvert is unable and Igor is not nice. | Aedan is not successful. | neutral |
Tony is rational.
Igor is successful.
Aedan is rational.
Chad is unable.
Calvert is successful.
Aedan is tremendous.
Calvert is nice.
Tony is successful.
Igor is not nutty.
Marlon is nice.
Marlon is not successful.
Clifford is not tremendous.If all people are not rational, then Clifford is unable.
Calvert is not successful and Aedan is rational if and only if Marlon is nice and Aedan is tremendous.
If everyone is successful, then Tony is not rational and Clifford is tremendous.
If someone is not unable or he is successful, then he is not nice.
If Marlon is nutty, then Tony is not successful and Aedan is not nice, and vice versa.
If Calvert is successful or Calvert is not rational, then Tony is not unable.
If Marlon is not nutty, then Calvert is not successful.
If Marlon is not rational and Clifford is successful, then Calvert is not tremendous.
It can be concluded that Tony is successful once knowing that Marlon is not rational or Igor is not nice.
As long as someone is rational, he is not unable and not nutty.
If someone is either nutty or not successful, then he is rational and not nice.
If Marlon is nutty, then Calvert is unable and Igor is not nice. | Tony is successful. | entailment |
Tony is rational.
Igor is successful.
Aedan is rational.
Chad is unable.
Calvert is successful.
Aedan is tremendous.
Calvert is nice.
Tony is successful.
Igor is not nutty.
Marlon is nice.
Marlon is not successful.
Clifford is not tremendous.If all people are not rational, then Clifford is unable.
Calvert is not successful and Aedan is rational if and only if Marlon is nice and Aedan is tremendous.
If everyone is successful, then Tony is not rational and Clifford is tremendous.
If someone is not unable or he is successful, then he is not nice.
If Marlon is nutty, then Tony is not successful and Aedan is not nice, and vice versa.
If Calvert is successful or Calvert is not rational, then Tony is not unable.
If Marlon is not nutty, then Calvert is not successful.
If Marlon is not rational and Clifford is successful, then Calvert is not tremendous.
It can be concluded that Tony is successful once knowing that Marlon is not rational or Igor is not nice.
As long as someone is rational, he is not unable and not nutty.
If someone is either nutty or not successful, then he is rational and not nice.
If Marlon is nutty, then Calvert is unable and Igor is not nice. | Marlon is unable. | contradiction |
Tony is rational.
Igor is successful.
Aedan is rational.
Chad is unable.
Calvert is successful.
Aedan is tremendous.
Calvert is nice.
Tony is successful.
Igor is not nutty.
Marlon is nice.
Marlon is not successful.
Clifford is not tremendous.If all people are not rational, then Clifford is unable.
Calvert is not successful and Aedan is rational if and only if Marlon is nice and Aedan is tremendous.
If everyone is successful, then Tony is not rational and Clifford is tremendous.
If someone is not unable or he is successful, then he is not nice.
If Marlon is nutty, then Tony is not successful and Aedan is not nice, and vice versa.
If Calvert is successful or Calvert is not rational, then Tony is not unable.
If Marlon is not nutty, then Calvert is not successful.
If Marlon is not rational and Clifford is successful, then Calvert is not tremendous.
It can be concluded that Tony is successful once knowing that Marlon is not rational or Igor is not nice.
As long as someone is rational, he is not unable and not nutty.
If someone is either nutty or not successful, then he is rational and not nice.
If Marlon is nutty, then Calvert is unable and Igor is not nice. | Marlon is rational. | entailment |
Humphrey is foolish.
Maddox is not lonely.
Boris is gifted.
Jason is not funny.
Culver is not tidy.
Boris is not tidy.
Boris is not foolish.
Maddox is adventurous.
Colin is not adventurous.
Culver is funny.
Colin is foolish.
Jason is tidy.It can be concluded that Culver is not gifted once knowing that Colin is funny and Culver is not tidy.
Colin being not tidy and Boris being not adventurous imply that Humphrey is not gifted.
Maddox is funny if and only if Maddox is not foolish and Maddox is not adventurous.
Someone being funny is equivalent to being not foolish.
As long as someone is not tidy, he is not funny and not foolish.
Kirby being funny implies that Jason is not tidy.
If Maddox is not tidy, then Culver is lonely, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is either lonely or not funny, then Boris is tidy and Kirby is adventurous.
Someone who is not foolish or not adventurous is always not lonely and not funny.
Someone being both funny and not lonely is equivalent to being not tidy.
If someone is gifted and not funny, then he is both not tidy and lonely, and vice versa.
Someone is not foolish and gifted if and only if he is tidy. | Culver is not funny. | self_contradiction |
Humphrey is foolish.
Maddox is not lonely.
Boris is gifted.
Jason is not funny.
Culver is not tidy.
Boris is not tidy.
Boris is not foolish.
Maddox is adventurous.
Colin is not adventurous.
Culver is funny.
Colin is foolish.
Jason is tidy.It can be concluded that Culver is not gifted once knowing that Colin is funny and Culver is not tidy.
Colin being not tidy and Boris being not adventurous imply that Humphrey is not gifted.
Maddox is funny if and only if Maddox is not foolish and Maddox is not adventurous.
Someone being funny is equivalent to being not foolish.
As long as someone is not tidy, he is not funny and not foolish.
Kirby being funny implies that Jason is not tidy.
If Maddox is not tidy, then Culver is lonely, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is either lonely or not funny, then Boris is tidy and Kirby is adventurous.
Someone who is not foolish or not adventurous is always not lonely and not funny.
Someone being both funny and not lonely is equivalent to being not tidy.
If someone is gifted and not funny, then he is both not tidy and lonely, and vice versa.
Someone is not foolish and gifted if and only if he is tidy. | Colin is not lonely. | entailment |
Humphrey is foolish.
Maddox is not lonely.
Boris is gifted.
Jason is not funny.
Culver is not tidy.
Boris is not tidy.
Boris is not foolish.
Maddox is adventurous.
Colin is not adventurous.
Culver is funny.
Colin is foolish.
Jason is tidy.It can be concluded that Culver is not gifted once knowing that Colin is funny and Culver is not tidy.
Colin being not tidy and Boris being not adventurous imply that Humphrey is not gifted.
Maddox is funny if and only if Maddox is not foolish and Maddox is not adventurous.
Someone being funny is equivalent to being not foolish.
As long as someone is not tidy, he is not funny and not foolish.
Kirby being funny implies that Jason is not tidy.
If Maddox is not tidy, then Culver is lonely, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is either lonely or not funny, then Boris is tidy and Kirby is adventurous.
Someone who is not foolish or not adventurous is always not lonely and not funny.
Someone being both funny and not lonely is equivalent to being not tidy.
If someone is gifted and not funny, then he is both not tidy and lonely, and vice versa.
Someone is not foolish and gifted if and only if he is tidy. | Humphrey is not tidy. | neutral |
Humphrey is foolish.
Maddox is not lonely.
Boris is gifted.
Jason is not funny.
Culver is not tidy.
Boris is not tidy.
Boris is not foolish.
Maddox is adventurous.
Colin is not adventurous.
Culver is funny.
Colin is foolish.
Jason is tidy.It can be concluded that Culver is not gifted once knowing that Colin is funny and Culver is not tidy.
Colin being not tidy and Boris being not adventurous imply that Humphrey is not gifted.
Maddox is funny if and only if Maddox is not foolish and Maddox is not adventurous.
Someone being funny is equivalent to being not foolish.
As long as someone is not tidy, he is not funny and not foolish.
Kirby being funny implies that Jason is not tidy.
If Maddox is not tidy, then Culver is lonely, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is either lonely or not funny, then Boris is tidy and Kirby is adventurous.
Someone who is not foolish or not adventurous is always not lonely and not funny.
Someone being both funny and not lonely is equivalent to being not tidy.
If someone is gifted and not funny, then he is both not tidy and lonely, and vice versa.
Someone is not foolish and gifted if and only if he is tidy. | Colin is funny. | contradiction |
Humphrey is foolish.
Maddox is not lonely.
Boris is gifted.
Jason is not funny.
Culver is not tidy.
Boris is not tidy.
Boris is not foolish.
Maddox is adventurous.
Colin is not adventurous.
Culver is funny.
Colin is foolish.
Jason is tidy.It can be concluded that Culver is not gifted once knowing that Colin is funny and Culver is not tidy.
Colin being not tidy and Boris being not adventurous imply that Humphrey is not gifted.
Maddox is funny if and only if Maddox is not foolish and Maddox is not adventurous.
Someone being funny is equivalent to being not foolish.
As long as someone is not tidy, he is not funny and not foolish.
Kirby being funny implies that Jason is not tidy.
If Maddox is not tidy, then Culver is lonely, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is either lonely or not funny, then Boris is tidy and Kirby is adventurous.
Someone who is not foolish or not adventurous is always not lonely and not funny.
Someone being both funny and not lonely is equivalent to being not tidy.
If someone is gifted and not funny, then he is both not tidy and lonely, and vice versa.
Someone is not foolish and gifted if and only if he is tidy. | Jason is lonely. | self_contradiction |
Humphrey is foolish.
Maddox is not lonely.
Boris is gifted.
Jason is not funny.
Culver is not tidy.
Boris is not tidy.
Boris is not foolish.
Maddox is adventurous.
Colin is not adventurous.
Culver is funny.
Colin is foolish.
Jason is tidy.It can be concluded that Culver is not gifted once knowing that Colin is funny and Culver is not tidy.
Colin being not tidy and Boris being not adventurous imply that Humphrey is not gifted.
Maddox is funny if and only if Maddox is not foolish and Maddox is not adventurous.
Someone being funny is equivalent to being not foolish.
As long as someone is not tidy, he is not funny and not foolish.
Kirby being funny implies that Jason is not tidy.
If Maddox is not tidy, then Culver is lonely, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is either lonely or not funny, then Boris is tidy and Kirby is adventurous.
Someone who is not foolish or not adventurous is always not lonely and not funny.
Someone being both funny and not lonely is equivalent to being not tidy.
If someone is gifted and not funny, then he is both not tidy and lonely, and vice versa.
Someone is not foolish and gifted if and only if he is tidy. | Culver is not adventurous. | neutral |
Humphrey is foolish.
Maddox is not lonely.
Boris is gifted.
Jason is not funny.
Culver is not tidy.
Boris is not tidy.
Boris is not foolish.
Maddox is adventurous.
Colin is not adventurous.
Culver is funny.
Colin is foolish.
Jason is tidy.It can be concluded that Culver is not gifted once knowing that Colin is funny and Culver is not tidy.
Colin being not tidy and Boris being not adventurous imply that Humphrey is not gifted.
Maddox is funny if and only if Maddox is not foolish and Maddox is not adventurous.
Someone being funny is equivalent to being not foolish.
As long as someone is not tidy, he is not funny and not foolish.
Kirby being funny implies that Jason is not tidy.
If Maddox is not tidy, then Culver is lonely, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is either lonely or not funny, then Boris is tidy and Kirby is adventurous.
Someone who is not foolish or not adventurous is always not lonely and not funny.
Someone being both funny and not lonely is equivalent to being not tidy.
If someone is gifted and not funny, then he is both not tidy and lonely, and vice versa.
Someone is not foolish and gifted if and only if he is tidy. | Culver is lonely. | contradiction |
Humphrey is foolish.
Maddox is not lonely.
Boris is gifted.
Jason is not funny.
Culver is not tidy.
Boris is not tidy.
Boris is not foolish.
Maddox is adventurous.
Colin is not adventurous.
Culver is funny.
Colin is foolish.
Jason is tidy.It can be concluded that Culver is not gifted once knowing that Colin is funny and Culver is not tidy.
Colin being not tidy and Boris being not adventurous imply that Humphrey is not gifted.
Maddox is funny if and only if Maddox is not foolish and Maddox is not adventurous.
Someone being funny is equivalent to being not foolish.
As long as someone is not tidy, he is not funny and not foolish.
Kirby being funny implies that Jason is not tidy.
If Maddox is not tidy, then Culver is lonely, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is either lonely or not funny, then Boris is tidy and Kirby is adventurous.
Someone who is not foolish or not adventurous is always not lonely and not funny.
Someone being both funny and not lonely is equivalent to being not tidy.
If someone is gifted and not funny, then he is both not tidy and lonely, and vice versa.
Someone is not foolish and gifted if and only if he is tidy. | Maddox is not lonely. | entailment |
Humphrey is foolish.
Maddox is not lonely.
Boris is gifted.
Jason is not funny.
Culver is not tidy.
Boris is not tidy.
Boris is not foolish.
Maddox is adventurous.
Colin is not adventurous.
Culver is funny.
Colin is foolish.
Jason is tidy.It can be concluded that Culver is not gifted once knowing that Colin is funny and Culver is not tidy.
Colin being not tidy and Boris being not adventurous imply that Humphrey is not gifted.
Maddox is funny if and only if Maddox is not foolish and Maddox is not adventurous.
Someone being funny is equivalent to being not foolish.
As long as someone is not tidy, he is not funny and not foolish.
Kirby being funny implies that Jason is not tidy.
If Maddox is not tidy, then Culver is lonely, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is either lonely or not funny, then Boris is tidy and Kirby is adventurous.
Someone who is not foolish or not adventurous is always not lonely and not funny.
Someone being both funny and not lonely is equivalent to being not tidy.
If someone is gifted and not funny, then he is both not tidy and lonely, and vice versa.
Someone is not foolish and gifted if and only if he is tidy. | Jason is foolish. | contradiction |
Humphrey is foolish.
Maddox is not lonely.
Boris is gifted.
Jason is not funny.
Culver is not tidy.
Boris is not tidy.
Boris is not foolish.
Maddox is adventurous.
Colin is not adventurous.
Culver is funny.
Colin is foolish.
Jason is tidy.It can be concluded that Culver is not gifted once knowing that Colin is funny and Culver is not tidy.
Colin being not tidy and Boris being not adventurous imply that Humphrey is not gifted.
Maddox is funny if and only if Maddox is not foolish and Maddox is not adventurous.
Someone being funny is equivalent to being not foolish.
As long as someone is not tidy, he is not funny and not foolish.
Kirby being funny implies that Jason is not tidy.
If Maddox is not tidy, then Culver is lonely, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is either lonely or not funny, then Boris is tidy and Kirby is adventurous.
Someone who is not foolish or not adventurous is always not lonely and not funny.
Someone being both funny and not lonely is equivalent to being not tidy.
If someone is gifted and not funny, then he is both not tidy and lonely, and vice versa.
Someone is not foolish and gifted if and only if he is tidy. | Colin is not foolish. | contradiction |
Humphrey is foolish.
Maddox is not lonely.
Boris is gifted.
Jason is not funny.
Culver is not tidy.
Boris is not tidy.
Boris is not foolish.
Maddox is adventurous.
Colin is not adventurous.
Culver is funny.
Colin is foolish.
Jason is tidy.It can be concluded that Culver is not gifted once knowing that Colin is funny and Culver is not tidy.
Colin being not tidy and Boris being not adventurous imply that Humphrey is not gifted.
Maddox is funny if and only if Maddox is not foolish and Maddox is not adventurous.
Someone being funny is equivalent to being not foolish.
As long as someone is not tidy, he is not funny and not foolish.
Kirby being funny implies that Jason is not tidy.
If Maddox is not tidy, then Culver is lonely, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is either lonely or not funny, then Boris is tidy and Kirby is adventurous.
Someone who is not foolish or not adventurous is always not lonely and not funny.
Someone being both funny and not lonely is equivalent to being not tidy.
If someone is gifted and not funny, then he is both not tidy and lonely, and vice versa.
Someone is not foolish and gifted if and only if he is tidy. | Kirby is foolish. | neutral |
Humphrey is foolish.
Maddox is not lonely.
Boris is gifted.
Jason is not funny.
Culver is not tidy.
Boris is not tidy.
Boris is not foolish.
Maddox is adventurous.
Colin is not adventurous.
Culver is funny.
Colin is foolish.
Jason is tidy.It can be concluded that Culver is not gifted once knowing that Colin is funny and Culver is not tidy.
Colin being not tidy and Boris being not adventurous imply that Humphrey is not gifted.
Maddox is funny if and only if Maddox is not foolish and Maddox is not adventurous.
Someone being funny is equivalent to being not foolish.
As long as someone is not tidy, he is not funny and not foolish.
Kirby being funny implies that Jason is not tidy.
If Maddox is not tidy, then Culver is lonely, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is either lonely or not funny, then Boris is tidy and Kirby is adventurous.
Someone who is not foolish or not adventurous is always not lonely and not funny.
Someone being both funny and not lonely is equivalent to being not tidy.
If someone is gifted and not funny, then he is both not tidy and lonely, and vice versa.
Someone is not foolish and gifted if and only if he is tidy. | Colin is lonely. | contradiction |
Humphrey is foolish.
Maddox is not lonely.
Boris is gifted.
Jason is not funny.
Culver is not tidy.
Boris is not tidy.
Boris is not foolish.
Maddox is adventurous.
Colin is not adventurous.
Culver is funny.
Colin is foolish.
Jason is tidy.It can be concluded that Culver is not gifted once knowing that Colin is funny and Culver is not tidy.
Colin being not tidy and Boris being not adventurous imply that Humphrey is not gifted.
Maddox is funny if and only if Maddox is not foolish and Maddox is not adventurous.
Someone being funny is equivalent to being not foolish.
As long as someone is not tidy, he is not funny and not foolish.
Kirby being funny implies that Jason is not tidy.
If Maddox is not tidy, then Culver is lonely, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is either lonely or not funny, then Boris is tidy and Kirby is adventurous.
Someone who is not foolish or not adventurous is always not lonely and not funny.
Someone being both funny and not lonely is equivalent to being not tidy.
If someone is gifted and not funny, then he is both not tidy and lonely, and vice versa.
Someone is not foolish and gifted if and only if he is tidy. | Colin is not funny. | entailment |
Humphrey is foolish.
Maddox is not lonely.
Boris is gifted.
Jason is not funny.
Culver is not tidy.
Boris is not tidy.
Boris is not foolish.
Maddox is adventurous.
Colin is not adventurous.
Culver is funny.
Colin is foolish.
Jason is tidy.It can be concluded that Culver is not gifted once knowing that Colin is funny and Culver is not tidy.
Colin being not tidy and Boris being not adventurous imply that Humphrey is not gifted.
Maddox is funny if and only if Maddox is not foolish and Maddox is not adventurous.
Someone being funny is equivalent to being not foolish.
As long as someone is not tidy, he is not funny and not foolish.
Kirby being funny implies that Jason is not tidy.
If Maddox is not tidy, then Culver is lonely, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is either lonely or not funny, then Boris is tidy and Kirby is adventurous.
Someone who is not foolish or not adventurous is always not lonely and not funny.
Someone being both funny and not lonely is equivalent to being not tidy.
If someone is gifted and not funny, then he is both not tidy and lonely, and vice versa.
Someone is not foolish and gifted if and only if he is tidy. | Culver is not lonely. | entailment |
Humphrey is foolish.
Maddox is not lonely.
Boris is gifted.
Jason is not funny.
Culver is not tidy.
Boris is not tidy.
Boris is not foolish.
Maddox is adventurous.
Colin is not adventurous.
Culver is funny.
Colin is foolish.
Jason is tidy.It can be concluded that Culver is not gifted once knowing that Colin is funny and Culver is not tidy.
Colin being not tidy and Boris being not adventurous imply that Humphrey is not gifted.
Maddox is funny if and only if Maddox is not foolish and Maddox is not adventurous.
Someone being funny is equivalent to being not foolish.
As long as someone is not tidy, he is not funny and not foolish.
Kirby being funny implies that Jason is not tidy.
If Maddox is not tidy, then Culver is lonely, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is either lonely or not funny, then Boris is tidy and Kirby is adventurous.
Someone who is not foolish or not adventurous is always not lonely and not funny.
Someone being both funny and not lonely is equivalent to being not tidy.
If someone is gifted and not funny, then he is both not tidy and lonely, and vice versa.
Someone is not foolish and gifted if and only if he is tidy. | Humphrey is foolish. | entailment |
Humphrey is foolish.
Maddox is not lonely.
Boris is gifted.
Jason is not funny.
Culver is not tidy.
Boris is not tidy.
Boris is not foolish.
Maddox is adventurous.
Colin is not adventurous.
Culver is funny.
Colin is foolish.
Jason is tidy.It can be concluded that Culver is not gifted once knowing that Colin is funny and Culver is not tidy.
Colin being not tidy and Boris being not adventurous imply that Humphrey is not gifted.
Maddox is funny if and only if Maddox is not foolish and Maddox is not adventurous.
Someone being funny is equivalent to being not foolish.
As long as someone is not tidy, he is not funny and not foolish.
Kirby being funny implies that Jason is not tidy.
If Maddox is not tidy, then Culver is lonely, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is either lonely or not funny, then Boris is tidy and Kirby is adventurous.
Someone who is not foolish or not adventurous is always not lonely and not funny.
Someone being both funny and not lonely is equivalent to being not tidy.
If someone is gifted and not funny, then he is both not tidy and lonely, and vice versa.
Someone is not foolish and gifted if and only if he is tidy. | Jason is not tidy. | self_contradiction |
Humphrey is foolish.
Maddox is not lonely.
Boris is gifted.
Jason is not funny.
Culver is not tidy.
Boris is not tidy.
Boris is not foolish.
Maddox is adventurous.
Colin is not adventurous.
Culver is funny.
Colin is foolish.
Jason is tidy.It can be concluded that Culver is not gifted once knowing that Colin is funny and Culver is not tidy.
Colin being not tidy and Boris being not adventurous imply that Humphrey is not gifted.
Maddox is funny if and only if Maddox is not foolish and Maddox is not adventurous.
Someone being funny is equivalent to being not foolish.
As long as someone is not tidy, he is not funny and not foolish.
Kirby being funny implies that Jason is not tidy.
If Maddox is not tidy, then Culver is lonely, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is either lonely or not funny, then Boris is tidy and Kirby is adventurous.
Someone who is not foolish or not adventurous is always not lonely and not funny.
Someone being both funny and not lonely is equivalent to being not tidy.
If someone is gifted and not funny, then he is both not tidy and lonely, and vice versa.
Someone is not foolish and gifted if and only if he is tidy. | Humphrey is tidy. | neutral |
Humphrey is foolish.
Maddox is not lonely.
Boris is gifted.
Jason is not funny.
Culver is not tidy.
Boris is not tidy.
Boris is not foolish.
Maddox is adventurous.
Colin is not adventurous.
Culver is funny.
Colin is foolish.
Jason is tidy.It can be concluded that Culver is not gifted once knowing that Colin is funny and Culver is not tidy.
Colin being not tidy and Boris being not adventurous imply that Humphrey is not gifted.
Maddox is funny if and only if Maddox is not foolish and Maddox is not adventurous.
Someone being funny is equivalent to being not foolish.
As long as someone is not tidy, he is not funny and not foolish.
Kirby being funny implies that Jason is not tidy.
If Maddox is not tidy, then Culver is lonely, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is either lonely or not funny, then Boris is tidy and Kirby is adventurous.
Someone who is not foolish or not adventurous is always not lonely and not funny.
Someone being both funny and not lonely is equivalent to being not tidy.
If someone is gifted and not funny, then he is both not tidy and lonely, and vice versa.
Someone is not foolish and gifted if and only if he is tidy. | Boris is not tidy. | self_contradiction |
Humphrey is foolish.
Maddox is not lonely.
Boris is gifted.
Jason is not funny.
Culver is not tidy.
Boris is not tidy.
Boris is not foolish.
Maddox is adventurous.
Colin is not adventurous.
Culver is funny.
Colin is foolish.
Jason is tidy.It can be concluded that Culver is not gifted once knowing that Colin is funny and Culver is not tidy.
Colin being not tidy and Boris being not adventurous imply that Humphrey is not gifted.
Maddox is funny if and only if Maddox is not foolish and Maddox is not adventurous.
Someone being funny is equivalent to being not foolish.
As long as someone is not tidy, he is not funny and not foolish.
Kirby being funny implies that Jason is not tidy.
If Maddox is not tidy, then Culver is lonely, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is either lonely or not funny, then Boris is tidy and Kirby is adventurous.
Someone who is not foolish or not adventurous is always not lonely and not funny.
Someone being both funny and not lonely is equivalent to being not tidy.
If someone is gifted and not funny, then he is both not tidy and lonely, and vice versa.
Someone is not foolish and gifted if and only if he is tidy. | Jason is not lonely. | self_contradiction |
Humphrey is foolish.
Maddox is not lonely.
Boris is gifted.
Jason is not funny.
Culver is not tidy.
Boris is not tidy.
Boris is not foolish.
Maddox is adventurous.
Colin is not adventurous.
Culver is funny.
Colin is foolish.
Jason is tidy.It can be concluded that Culver is not gifted once knowing that Colin is funny and Culver is not tidy.
Colin being not tidy and Boris being not adventurous imply that Humphrey is not gifted.
Maddox is funny if and only if Maddox is not foolish and Maddox is not adventurous.
Someone being funny is equivalent to being not foolish.
As long as someone is not tidy, he is not funny and not foolish.
Kirby being funny implies that Jason is not tidy.
If Maddox is not tidy, then Culver is lonely, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is either lonely or not funny, then Boris is tidy and Kirby is adventurous.
Someone who is not foolish or not adventurous is always not lonely and not funny.
Someone being both funny and not lonely is equivalent to being not tidy.
If someone is gifted and not funny, then he is both not tidy and lonely, and vice versa.
Someone is not foolish and gifted if and only if he is tidy. | Kirby is gifted. | neutral |
Ashley is splendid.
Ashley is upset.
Charlie is not splendid.
Lauren is not foolish.
Heath is not upset.
Heath is not beautiful.
Travis is oak.
Quimby is upset.
Lauren is not splendid.
Travis is not foolish.
Charlie is not oak.
Ashley is beautiful.Someone who is eithor not foolish or upset is always not splendid.
If someone who is not splendid is also foolish, then he is tame.
Someone is upset and oak if and only if he is foolish and tame.
If Charlie is not splendid, then Charlie is not foolish.
If there is someone who is not foolish, then Quimby is tame and Charlie is upset.
If there is at least one people who is not splendid or not foolish, then Quimby is not upset.
If there is at least one people who is not foolish, then Ashley is not tame.
If Charlie is tame or Travis is splendid, then Charlie is beautiful.
Someone who is both not upset and foolish is always beautiful.
if there is at least one people who is upset and not beautiful, then Blanche is foolish and Charlie is not oak.
If Travis is not splendid, then Heath is not foolish.
As long as someone is not tame, he is upset and not beautiful. | Ashley is splendid. | self_contradiction |
Ashley is splendid.
Ashley is upset.
Charlie is not splendid.
Lauren is not foolish.
Heath is not upset.
Heath is not beautiful.
Travis is oak.
Quimby is upset.
Lauren is not splendid.
Travis is not foolish.
Charlie is not oak.
Ashley is beautiful.Someone who is eithor not foolish or upset is always not splendid.
If someone who is not splendid is also foolish, then he is tame.
Someone is upset and oak if and only if he is foolish and tame.
If Charlie is not splendid, then Charlie is not foolish.
If there is someone who is not foolish, then Quimby is tame and Charlie is upset.
If there is at least one people who is not splendid or not foolish, then Quimby is not upset.
If there is at least one people who is not foolish, then Ashley is not tame.
If Charlie is tame or Travis is splendid, then Charlie is beautiful.
Someone who is both not upset and foolish is always beautiful.
if there is at least one people who is upset and not beautiful, then Blanche is foolish and Charlie is not oak.
If Travis is not splendid, then Heath is not foolish.
As long as someone is not tame, he is upset and not beautiful. | Quimby is foolish. | neutral |
Ashley is splendid.
Ashley is upset.
Charlie is not splendid.
Lauren is not foolish.
Heath is not upset.
Heath is not beautiful.
Travis is oak.
Quimby is upset.
Lauren is not splendid.
Travis is not foolish.
Charlie is not oak.
Ashley is beautiful.Someone who is eithor not foolish or upset is always not splendid.
If someone who is not splendid is also foolish, then he is tame.
Someone is upset and oak if and only if he is foolish and tame.
If Charlie is not splendid, then Charlie is not foolish.
If there is someone who is not foolish, then Quimby is tame and Charlie is upset.
If there is at least one people who is not splendid or not foolish, then Quimby is not upset.
If there is at least one people who is not foolish, then Ashley is not tame.
If Charlie is tame or Travis is splendid, then Charlie is beautiful.
Someone who is both not upset and foolish is always beautiful.
if there is at least one people who is upset and not beautiful, then Blanche is foolish and Charlie is not oak.
If Travis is not splendid, then Heath is not foolish.
As long as someone is not tame, he is upset and not beautiful. | Quimby is upset. | self_contradiction |
Ashley is splendid.
Ashley is upset.
Charlie is not splendid.
Lauren is not foolish.
Heath is not upset.
Heath is not beautiful.
Travis is oak.
Quimby is upset.
Lauren is not splendid.
Travis is not foolish.
Charlie is not oak.
Ashley is beautiful.Someone who is eithor not foolish or upset is always not splendid.
If someone who is not splendid is also foolish, then he is tame.
Someone is upset and oak if and only if he is foolish and tame.
If Charlie is not splendid, then Charlie is not foolish.
If there is someone who is not foolish, then Quimby is tame and Charlie is upset.
If there is at least one people who is not splendid or not foolish, then Quimby is not upset.
If there is at least one people who is not foolish, then Ashley is not tame.
If Charlie is tame or Travis is splendid, then Charlie is beautiful.
Someone who is both not upset and foolish is always beautiful.
if there is at least one people who is upset and not beautiful, then Blanche is foolish and Charlie is not oak.
If Travis is not splendid, then Heath is not foolish.
As long as someone is not tame, he is upset and not beautiful. | Heath is beautiful. | contradiction |
Ashley is splendid.
Ashley is upset.
Charlie is not splendid.
Lauren is not foolish.
Heath is not upset.
Heath is not beautiful.
Travis is oak.
Quimby is upset.
Lauren is not splendid.
Travis is not foolish.
Charlie is not oak.
Ashley is beautiful.Someone who is eithor not foolish or upset is always not splendid.
If someone who is not splendid is also foolish, then he is tame.
Someone is upset and oak if and only if he is foolish and tame.
If Charlie is not splendid, then Charlie is not foolish.
If there is someone who is not foolish, then Quimby is tame and Charlie is upset.
If there is at least one people who is not splendid or not foolish, then Quimby is not upset.
If there is at least one people who is not foolish, then Ashley is not tame.
If Charlie is tame or Travis is splendid, then Charlie is beautiful.
Someone who is both not upset and foolish is always beautiful.
if there is at least one people who is upset and not beautiful, then Blanche is foolish and Charlie is not oak.
If Travis is not splendid, then Heath is not foolish.
As long as someone is not tame, he is upset and not beautiful. | Lauren is not foolish. | entailment |
Ashley is splendid.
Ashley is upset.
Charlie is not splendid.
Lauren is not foolish.
Heath is not upset.
Heath is not beautiful.
Travis is oak.
Quimby is upset.
Lauren is not splendid.
Travis is not foolish.
Charlie is not oak.
Ashley is beautiful.Someone who is eithor not foolish or upset is always not splendid.
If someone who is not splendid is also foolish, then he is tame.
Someone is upset and oak if and only if he is foolish and tame.
If Charlie is not splendid, then Charlie is not foolish.
If there is someone who is not foolish, then Quimby is tame and Charlie is upset.
If there is at least one people who is not splendid or not foolish, then Quimby is not upset.
If there is at least one people who is not foolish, then Ashley is not tame.
If Charlie is tame or Travis is splendid, then Charlie is beautiful.
Someone who is both not upset and foolish is always beautiful.
if there is at least one people who is upset and not beautiful, then Blanche is foolish and Charlie is not oak.
If Travis is not splendid, then Heath is not foolish.
As long as someone is not tame, he is upset and not beautiful. | Quimby is not tame. | contradiction |
Ashley is splendid.
Ashley is upset.
Charlie is not splendid.
Lauren is not foolish.
Heath is not upset.
Heath is not beautiful.
Travis is oak.
Quimby is upset.
Lauren is not splendid.
Travis is not foolish.
Charlie is not oak.
Ashley is beautiful.Someone who is eithor not foolish or upset is always not splendid.
If someone who is not splendid is also foolish, then he is tame.
Someone is upset and oak if and only if he is foolish and tame.
If Charlie is not splendid, then Charlie is not foolish.
If there is someone who is not foolish, then Quimby is tame and Charlie is upset.
If there is at least one people who is not splendid or not foolish, then Quimby is not upset.
If there is at least one people who is not foolish, then Ashley is not tame.
If Charlie is tame or Travis is splendid, then Charlie is beautiful.
Someone who is both not upset and foolish is always beautiful.
if there is at least one people who is upset and not beautiful, then Blanche is foolish and Charlie is not oak.
If Travis is not splendid, then Heath is not foolish.
As long as someone is not tame, he is upset and not beautiful. | Quimby is not upset. | self_contradiction |
Ashley is splendid.
Ashley is upset.
Charlie is not splendid.
Lauren is not foolish.
Heath is not upset.
Heath is not beautiful.
Travis is oak.
Quimby is upset.
Lauren is not splendid.
Travis is not foolish.
Charlie is not oak.
Ashley is beautiful.Someone who is eithor not foolish or upset is always not splendid.
If someone who is not splendid is also foolish, then he is tame.
Someone is upset and oak if and only if he is foolish and tame.
If Charlie is not splendid, then Charlie is not foolish.
If there is someone who is not foolish, then Quimby is tame and Charlie is upset.
If there is at least one people who is not splendid or not foolish, then Quimby is not upset.
If there is at least one people who is not foolish, then Ashley is not tame.
If Charlie is tame or Travis is splendid, then Charlie is beautiful.
Someone who is both not upset and foolish is always beautiful.
if there is at least one people who is upset and not beautiful, then Blanche is foolish and Charlie is not oak.
If Travis is not splendid, then Heath is not foolish.
As long as someone is not tame, he is upset and not beautiful. | Lauren is splendid. | contradiction |
Ashley is splendid.
Ashley is upset.
Charlie is not splendid.
Lauren is not foolish.
Heath is not upset.
Heath is not beautiful.
Travis is oak.
Quimby is upset.
Lauren is not splendid.
Travis is not foolish.
Charlie is not oak.
Ashley is beautiful.Someone who is eithor not foolish or upset is always not splendid.
If someone who is not splendid is also foolish, then he is tame.
Someone is upset and oak if and only if he is foolish and tame.
If Charlie is not splendid, then Charlie is not foolish.
If there is someone who is not foolish, then Quimby is tame and Charlie is upset.
If there is at least one people who is not splendid or not foolish, then Quimby is not upset.
If there is at least one people who is not foolish, then Ashley is not tame.
If Charlie is tame or Travis is splendid, then Charlie is beautiful.
Someone who is both not upset and foolish is always beautiful.
if there is at least one people who is upset and not beautiful, then Blanche is foolish and Charlie is not oak.
If Travis is not splendid, then Heath is not foolish.
As long as someone is not tame, he is upset and not beautiful. | Heath is upset. | contradiction |
Ashley is splendid.
Ashley is upset.
Charlie is not splendid.
Lauren is not foolish.
Heath is not upset.
Heath is not beautiful.
Travis is oak.
Quimby is upset.
Lauren is not splendid.
Travis is not foolish.
Charlie is not oak.
Ashley is beautiful.Someone who is eithor not foolish or upset is always not splendid.
If someone who is not splendid is also foolish, then he is tame.
Someone is upset and oak if and only if he is foolish and tame.
If Charlie is not splendid, then Charlie is not foolish.
If there is someone who is not foolish, then Quimby is tame and Charlie is upset.
If there is at least one people who is not splendid or not foolish, then Quimby is not upset.
If there is at least one people who is not foolish, then Ashley is not tame.
If Charlie is tame or Travis is splendid, then Charlie is beautiful.
Someone who is both not upset and foolish is always beautiful.
if there is at least one people who is upset and not beautiful, then Blanche is foolish and Charlie is not oak.
If Travis is not splendid, then Heath is not foolish.
As long as someone is not tame, he is upset and not beautiful. | Quimby is beautiful. | neutral |
Ashley is splendid.
Ashley is upset.
Charlie is not splendid.
Lauren is not foolish.
Heath is not upset.
Heath is not beautiful.
Travis is oak.
Quimby is upset.
Lauren is not splendid.
Travis is not foolish.
Charlie is not oak.
Ashley is beautiful.Someone who is eithor not foolish or upset is always not splendid.
If someone who is not splendid is also foolish, then he is tame.
Someone is upset and oak if and only if he is foolish and tame.
If Charlie is not splendid, then Charlie is not foolish.
If there is someone who is not foolish, then Quimby is tame and Charlie is upset.
If there is at least one people who is not splendid or not foolish, then Quimby is not upset.
If there is at least one people who is not foolish, then Ashley is not tame.
If Charlie is tame or Travis is splendid, then Charlie is beautiful.
Someone who is both not upset and foolish is always beautiful.
if there is at least one people who is upset and not beautiful, then Blanche is foolish and Charlie is not oak.
If Travis is not splendid, then Heath is not foolish.
As long as someone is not tame, he is upset and not beautiful. | Heath is splendid. | contradiction |
Ashley is splendid.
Ashley is upset.
Charlie is not splendid.
Lauren is not foolish.
Heath is not upset.
Heath is not beautiful.
Travis is oak.
Quimby is upset.
Lauren is not splendid.
Travis is not foolish.
Charlie is not oak.
Ashley is beautiful.Someone who is eithor not foolish or upset is always not splendid.
If someone who is not splendid is also foolish, then he is tame.
Someone is upset and oak if and only if he is foolish and tame.
If Charlie is not splendid, then Charlie is not foolish.
If there is someone who is not foolish, then Quimby is tame and Charlie is upset.
If there is at least one people who is not splendid or not foolish, then Quimby is not upset.
If there is at least one people who is not foolish, then Ashley is not tame.
If Charlie is tame or Travis is splendid, then Charlie is beautiful.
Someone who is both not upset and foolish is always beautiful.
if there is at least one people who is upset and not beautiful, then Blanche is foolish and Charlie is not oak.
If Travis is not splendid, then Heath is not foolish.
As long as someone is not tame, he is upset and not beautiful. | Travis is not splendid. | entailment |
Ashley is splendid.
Ashley is upset.
Charlie is not splendid.
Lauren is not foolish.
Heath is not upset.
Heath is not beautiful.
Travis is oak.
Quimby is upset.
Lauren is not splendid.
Travis is not foolish.
Charlie is not oak.
Ashley is beautiful.Someone who is eithor not foolish or upset is always not splendid.
If someone who is not splendid is also foolish, then he is tame.
Someone is upset and oak if and only if he is foolish and tame.
If Charlie is not splendid, then Charlie is not foolish.
If there is someone who is not foolish, then Quimby is tame and Charlie is upset.
If there is at least one people who is not splendid or not foolish, then Quimby is not upset.
If there is at least one people who is not foolish, then Ashley is not tame.
If Charlie is tame or Travis is splendid, then Charlie is beautiful.
Someone who is both not upset and foolish is always beautiful.
if there is at least one people who is upset and not beautiful, then Blanche is foolish and Charlie is not oak.
If Travis is not splendid, then Heath is not foolish.
As long as someone is not tame, he is upset and not beautiful. | Heath is not upset. | entailment |
Ashley is splendid.
Ashley is upset.
Charlie is not splendid.
Lauren is not foolish.
Heath is not upset.
Heath is not beautiful.
Travis is oak.
Quimby is upset.
Lauren is not splendid.
Travis is not foolish.
Charlie is not oak.
Ashley is beautiful.Someone who is eithor not foolish or upset is always not splendid.
If someone who is not splendid is also foolish, then he is tame.
Someone is upset and oak if and only if he is foolish and tame.
If Charlie is not splendid, then Charlie is not foolish.
If there is someone who is not foolish, then Quimby is tame and Charlie is upset.
If there is at least one people who is not splendid or not foolish, then Quimby is not upset.
If there is at least one people who is not foolish, then Ashley is not tame.
If Charlie is tame or Travis is splendid, then Charlie is beautiful.
Someone who is both not upset and foolish is always beautiful.
if there is at least one people who is upset and not beautiful, then Blanche is foolish and Charlie is not oak.
If Travis is not splendid, then Heath is not foolish.
As long as someone is not tame, he is upset and not beautiful. | Ashley is beautiful. | self_contradiction |
Ashley is splendid.
Ashley is upset.
Charlie is not splendid.
Lauren is not foolish.
Heath is not upset.
Heath is not beautiful.
Travis is oak.
Quimby is upset.
Lauren is not splendid.
Travis is not foolish.
Charlie is not oak.
Ashley is beautiful.Someone who is eithor not foolish or upset is always not splendid.
If someone who is not splendid is also foolish, then he is tame.
Someone is upset and oak if and only if he is foolish and tame.
If Charlie is not splendid, then Charlie is not foolish.
If there is someone who is not foolish, then Quimby is tame and Charlie is upset.
If there is at least one people who is not splendid or not foolish, then Quimby is not upset.
If there is at least one people who is not foolish, then Ashley is not tame.
If Charlie is tame or Travis is splendid, then Charlie is beautiful.
Someone who is both not upset and foolish is always beautiful.
if there is at least one people who is upset and not beautiful, then Blanche is foolish and Charlie is not oak.
If Travis is not splendid, then Heath is not foolish.
As long as someone is not tame, he is upset and not beautiful. | Ashley is not beautiful. | self_contradiction |
Ashley is splendid.
Ashley is upset.
Charlie is not splendid.
Lauren is not foolish.
Heath is not upset.
Heath is not beautiful.
Travis is oak.
Quimby is upset.
Lauren is not splendid.
Travis is not foolish.
Charlie is not oak.
Ashley is beautiful.Someone who is eithor not foolish or upset is always not splendid.
If someone who is not splendid is also foolish, then he is tame.
Someone is upset and oak if and only if he is foolish and tame.
If Charlie is not splendid, then Charlie is not foolish.
If there is someone who is not foolish, then Quimby is tame and Charlie is upset.
If there is at least one people who is not splendid or not foolish, then Quimby is not upset.
If there is at least one people who is not foolish, then Ashley is not tame.
If Charlie is tame or Travis is splendid, then Charlie is beautiful.
Someone who is both not upset and foolish is always beautiful.
if there is at least one people who is upset and not beautiful, then Blanche is foolish and Charlie is not oak.
If Travis is not splendid, then Heath is not foolish.
As long as someone is not tame, he is upset and not beautiful. | Lauren is not upset. | neutral |
Ashley is splendid.
Ashley is upset.
Charlie is not splendid.
Lauren is not foolish.
Heath is not upset.
Heath is not beautiful.
Travis is oak.
Quimby is upset.
Lauren is not splendid.
Travis is not foolish.
Charlie is not oak.
Ashley is beautiful.Someone who is eithor not foolish or upset is always not splendid.
If someone who is not splendid is also foolish, then he is tame.
Someone is upset and oak if and only if he is foolish and tame.
If Charlie is not splendid, then Charlie is not foolish.
If there is someone who is not foolish, then Quimby is tame and Charlie is upset.
If there is at least one people who is not splendid or not foolish, then Quimby is not upset.
If there is at least one people who is not foolish, then Ashley is not tame.
If Charlie is tame or Travis is splendid, then Charlie is beautiful.
Someone who is both not upset and foolish is always beautiful.
if there is at least one people who is upset and not beautiful, then Blanche is foolish and Charlie is not oak.
If Travis is not splendid, then Heath is not foolish.
As long as someone is not tame, he is upset and not beautiful. | Quimby is oak. | neutral |
Ashley is splendid.
Ashley is upset.
Charlie is not splendid.
Lauren is not foolish.
Heath is not upset.
Heath is not beautiful.
Travis is oak.
Quimby is upset.
Lauren is not splendid.
Travis is not foolish.
Charlie is not oak.
Ashley is beautiful.Someone who is eithor not foolish or upset is always not splendid.
If someone who is not splendid is also foolish, then he is tame.
Someone is upset and oak if and only if he is foolish and tame.
If Charlie is not splendid, then Charlie is not foolish.
If there is someone who is not foolish, then Quimby is tame and Charlie is upset.
If there is at least one people who is not splendid or not foolish, then Quimby is not upset.
If there is at least one people who is not foolish, then Ashley is not tame.
If Charlie is tame or Travis is splendid, then Charlie is beautiful.
Someone who is both not upset and foolish is always beautiful.
if there is at least one people who is upset and not beautiful, then Blanche is foolish and Charlie is not oak.
If Travis is not splendid, then Heath is not foolish.
As long as someone is not tame, he is upset and not beautiful. | Quimby is tame. | entailment |
Ashley is splendid.
Ashley is upset.
Charlie is not splendid.
Lauren is not foolish.
Heath is not upset.
Heath is not beautiful.
Travis is oak.
Quimby is upset.
Lauren is not splendid.
Travis is not foolish.
Charlie is not oak.
Ashley is beautiful.Someone who is eithor not foolish or upset is always not splendid.
If someone who is not splendid is also foolish, then he is tame.
Someone is upset and oak if and only if he is foolish and tame.
If Charlie is not splendid, then Charlie is not foolish.
If there is someone who is not foolish, then Quimby is tame and Charlie is upset.
If there is at least one people who is not splendid or not foolish, then Quimby is not upset.
If there is at least one people who is not foolish, then Ashley is not tame.
If Charlie is tame or Travis is splendid, then Charlie is beautiful.
Someone who is both not upset and foolish is always beautiful.
if there is at least one people who is upset and not beautiful, then Blanche is foolish and Charlie is not oak.
If Travis is not splendid, then Heath is not foolish.
As long as someone is not tame, he is upset and not beautiful. | Travis is not foolish. | entailment |
Ashley is splendid.
Ashley is upset.
Charlie is not splendid.
Lauren is not foolish.
Heath is not upset.
Heath is not beautiful.
Travis is oak.
Quimby is upset.
Lauren is not splendid.
Travis is not foolish.
Charlie is not oak.
Ashley is beautiful.Someone who is eithor not foolish or upset is always not splendid.
If someone who is not splendid is also foolish, then he is tame.
Someone is upset and oak if and only if he is foolish and tame.
If Charlie is not splendid, then Charlie is not foolish.
If there is someone who is not foolish, then Quimby is tame and Charlie is upset.
If there is at least one people who is not splendid or not foolish, then Quimby is not upset.
If there is at least one people who is not foolish, then Ashley is not tame.
If Charlie is tame or Travis is splendid, then Charlie is beautiful.
Someone who is both not upset and foolish is always beautiful.
if there is at least one people who is upset and not beautiful, then Blanche is foolish and Charlie is not oak.
If Travis is not splendid, then Heath is not foolish.
As long as someone is not tame, he is upset and not beautiful. | Blanche is upset. | neutral |
Hartley is not smart.
Boris is not bad.
Lucia is romantic.
Alice is not swift.
Hartley is swift.
Titus is not realistic.
Alice is not whispering.
Adrian is realistic.
Alice is romantic.
Titus is whispering.
Titus is romantic.
Boris is not smart.If there is someone who is both romantic and smart, then Lucia is whispering.
It can be concluded that Alice is not realistic and Alice is whispering once knowing that Hartley is smart and Adrian is swift.
As long as someone is either smart or not bad, he is realistic and not swift.
Hartley being not bad implies that Jeremiah is whispering.
Someone who is not swift is always not smart.
If Lucia is not realistic or Titus is smart, then Boris is not whispering.
If there is at least one people who is realistic or smart, then Titus is romantic.
Someone who is romantic is always both not bad and not swift.
If there is someone who is either realistic or smart, then Lucia is not whispering.
If Adrian is swift, then Adrian is not realistic, and vice versa.
All not smart people are not romantic.
If someone is both swift and not whispering, then he is not romantic. | Boris is not bad. | entailment |
Hartley is not smart.
Boris is not bad.
Lucia is romantic.
Alice is not swift.
Hartley is swift.
Titus is not realistic.
Alice is not whispering.
Adrian is realistic.
Alice is romantic.
Titus is whispering.
Titus is romantic.
Boris is not smart.If there is someone who is both romantic and smart, then Lucia is whispering.
It can be concluded that Alice is not realistic and Alice is whispering once knowing that Hartley is smart and Adrian is swift.
As long as someone is either smart or not bad, he is realistic and not swift.
Hartley being not bad implies that Jeremiah is whispering.
Someone who is not swift is always not smart.
If Lucia is not realistic or Titus is smart, then Boris is not whispering.
If there is at least one people who is realistic or smart, then Titus is romantic.
Someone who is romantic is always both not bad and not swift.
If there is someone who is either realistic or smart, then Lucia is not whispering.
If Adrian is swift, then Adrian is not realistic, and vice versa.
All not smart people are not romantic.
If someone is both swift and not whispering, then he is not romantic. | Boris is romantic. | contradiction |
Hartley is not smart.
Boris is not bad.
Lucia is romantic.
Alice is not swift.
Hartley is swift.
Titus is not realistic.
Alice is not whispering.
Adrian is realistic.
Alice is romantic.
Titus is whispering.
Titus is romantic.
Boris is not smart.If there is someone who is both romantic and smart, then Lucia is whispering.
It can be concluded that Alice is not realistic and Alice is whispering once knowing that Hartley is smart and Adrian is swift.
As long as someone is either smart or not bad, he is realistic and not swift.
Hartley being not bad implies that Jeremiah is whispering.
Someone who is not swift is always not smart.
If Lucia is not realistic or Titus is smart, then Boris is not whispering.
If there is at least one people who is realistic or smart, then Titus is romantic.
Someone who is romantic is always both not bad and not swift.
If there is someone who is either realistic or smart, then Lucia is not whispering.
If Adrian is swift, then Adrian is not realistic, and vice versa.
All not smart people are not romantic.
If someone is both swift and not whispering, then he is not romantic. | Titus is romantic. | self_contradiction |
Hartley is not smart.
Boris is not bad.
Lucia is romantic.
Alice is not swift.
Hartley is swift.
Titus is not realistic.
Alice is not whispering.
Adrian is realistic.
Alice is romantic.
Titus is whispering.
Titus is romantic.
Boris is not smart.If there is someone who is both romantic and smart, then Lucia is whispering.
It can be concluded that Alice is not realistic and Alice is whispering once knowing that Hartley is smart and Adrian is swift.
As long as someone is either smart or not bad, he is realistic and not swift.
Hartley being not bad implies that Jeremiah is whispering.
Someone who is not swift is always not smart.
If Lucia is not realistic or Titus is smart, then Boris is not whispering.
If there is at least one people who is realistic or smart, then Titus is romantic.
Someone who is romantic is always both not bad and not swift.
If there is someone who is either realistic or smart, then Lucia is not whispering.
If Adrian is swift, then Adrian is not realistic, and vice versa.
All not smart people are not romantic.
If someone is both swift and not whispering, then he is not romantic. | Lucia is not smart. | entailment |
Hartley is not smart.
Boris is not bad.
Lucia is romantic.
Alice is not swift.
Hartley is swift.
Titus is not realistic.
Alice is not whispering.
Adrian is realistic.
Alice is romantic.
Titus is whispering.
Titus is romantic.
Boris is not smart.If there is someone who is both romantic and smart, then Lucia is whispering.
It can be concluded that Alice is not realistic and Alice is whispering once knowing that Hartley is smart and Adrian is swift.
As long as someone is either smart or not bad, he is realistic and not swift.
Hartley being not bad implies that Jeremiah is whispering.
Someone who is not swift is always not smart.
If Lucia is not realistic or Titus is smart, then Boris is not whispering.
If there is at least one people who is realistic or smart, then Titus is romantic.
Someone who is romantic is always both not bad and not swift.
If there is someone who is either realistic or smart, then Lucia is not whispering.
If Adrian is swift, then Adrian is not realistic, and vice versa.
All not smart people are not romantic.
If someone is both swift and not whispering, then he is not romantic. | Jeremiah is smart. | neutral |
Hartley is not smart.
Boris is not bad.
Lucia is romantic.
Alice is not swift.
Hartley is swift.
Titus is not realistic.
Alice is not whispering.
Adrian is realistic.
Alice is romantic.
Titus is whispering.
Titus is romantic.
Boris is not smart.If there is someone who is both romantic and smart, then Lucia is whispering.
It can be concluded that Alice is not realistic and Alice is whispering once knowing that Hartley is smart and Adrian is swift.
As long as someone is either smart or not bad, he is realistic and not swift.
Hartley being not bad implies that Jeremiah is whispering.
Someone who is not swift is always not smart.
If Lucia is not realistic or Titus is smart, then Boris is not whispering.
If there is at least one people who is realistic or smart, then Titus is romantic.
Someone who is romantic is always both not bad and not swift.
If there is someone who is either realistic or smart, then Lucia is not whispering.
If Adrian is swift, then Adrian is not realistic, and vice versa.
All not smart people are not romantic.
If someone is both swift and not whispering, then he is not romantic. | Lucia is not realistic. | contradiction |
Hartley is not smart.
Boris is not bad.
Lucia is romantic.
Alice is not swift.
Hartley is swift.
Titus is not realistic.
Alice is not whispering.
Adrian is realistic.
Alice is romantic.
Titus is whispering.
Titus is romantic.
Boris is not smart.If there is someone who is both romantic and smart, then Lucia is whispering.
It can be concluded that Alice is not realistic and Alice is whispering once knowing that Hartley is smart and Adrian is swift.
As long as someone is either smart or not bad, he is realistic and not swift.
Hartley being not bad implies that Jeremiah is whispering.
Someone who is not swift is always not smart.
If Lucia is not realistic or Titus is smart, then Boris is not whispering.
If there is at least one people who is realistic or smart, then Titus is romantic.
Someone who is romantic is always both not bad and not swift.
If there is someone who is either realistic or smart, then Lucia is not whispering.
If Adrian is swift, then Adrian is not realistic, and vice versa.
All not smart people are not romantic.
If someone is both swift and not whispering, then he is not romantic. | Hartley is smart. | contradiction |
Hartley is not smart.
Boris is not bad.
Lucia is romantic.
Alice is not swift.
Hartley is swift.
Titus is not realistic.
Alice is not whispering.
Adrian is realistic.
Alice is romantic.
Titus is whispering.
Titus is romantic.
Boris is not smart.If there is someone who is both romantic and smart, then Lucia is whispering.
It can be concluded that Alice is not realistic and Alice is whispering once knowing that Hartley is smart and Adrian is swift.
As long as someone is either smart or not bad, he is realistic and not swift.
Hartley being not bad implies that Jeremiah is whispering.
Someone who is not swift is always not smart.
If Lucia is not realistic or Titus is smart, then Boris is not whispering.
If there is at least one people who is realistic or smart, then Titus is romantic.
Someone who is romantic is always both not bad and not swift.
If there is someone who is either realistic or smart, then Lucia is not whispering.
If Adrian is swift, then Adrian is not realistic, and vice versa.
All not smart people are not romantic.
If someone is both swift and not whispering, then he is not romantic. | Adrian is not whispering. | neutral |
Hartley is not smart.
Boris is not bad.
Lucia is romantic.
Alice is not swift.
Hartley is swift.
Titus is not realistic.
Alice is not whispering.
Adrian is realistic.
Alice is romantic.
Titus is whispering.
Titus is romantic.
Boris is not smart.If there is someone who is both romantic and smart, then Lucia is whispering.
It can be concluded that Alice is not realistic and Alice is whispering once knowing that Hartley is smart and Adrian is swift.
As long as someone is either smart or not bad, he is realistic and not swift.
Hartley being not bad implies that Jeremiah is whispering.
Someone who is not swift is always not smart.
If Lucia is not realistic or Titus is smart, then Boris is not whispering.
If there is at least one people who is realistic or smart, then Titus is romantic.
Someone who is romantic is always both not bad and not swift.
If there is someone who is either realistic or smart, then Lucia is not whispering.
If Adrian is swift, then Adrian is not realistic, and vice versa.
All not smart people are not romantic.
If someone is both swift and not whispering, then he is not romantic. | Lucia is not romantic. | self_contradiction |
Hartley is not smart.
Boris is not bad.
Lucia is romantic.
Alice is not swift.
Hartley is swift.
Titus is not realistic.
Alice is not whispering.
Adrian is realistic.
Alice is romantic.
Titus is whispering.
Titus is romantic.
Boris is not smart.If there is someone who is both romantic and smart, then Lucia is whispering.
It can be concluded that Alice is not realistic and Alice is whispering once knowing that Hartley is smart and Adrian is swift.
As long as someone is either smart or not bad, he is realistic and not swift.
Hartley being not bad implies that Jeremiah is whispering.
Someone who is not swift is always not smart.
If Lucia is not realistic or Titus is smart, then Boris is not whispering.
If there is at least one people who is realistic or smart, then Titus is romantic.
Someone who is romantic is always both not bad and not swift.
If there is someone who is either realistic or smart, then Lucia is not whispering.
If Adrian is swift, then Adrian is not realistic, and vice versa.
All not smart people are not romantic.
If someone is both swift and not whispering, then he is not romantic. | Adrian is whispering. | neutral |
Hartley is not smart.
Boris is not bad.
Lucia is romantic.
Alice is not swift.
Hartley is swift.
Titus is not realistic.
Alice is not whispering.
Adrian is realistic.
Alice is romantic.
Titus is whispering.
Titus is romantic.
Boris is not smart.If there is someone who is both romantic and smart, then Lucia is whispering.
It can be concluded that Alice is not realistic and Alice is whispering once knowing that Hartley is smart and Adrian is swift.
As long as someone is either smart or not bad, he is realistic and not swift.
Hartley being not bad implies that Jeremiah is whispering.
Someone who is not swift is always not smart.
If Lucia is not realistic or Titus is smart, then Boris is not whispering.
If there is at least one people who is realistic or smart, then Titus is romantic.
Someone who is romantic is always both not bad and not swift.
If there is someone who is either realistic or smart, then Lucia is not whispering.
If Adrian is swift, then Adrian is not realistic, and vice versa.
All not smart people are not romantic.
If someone is both swift and not whispering, then he is not romantic. | Jeremiah is not realistic. | neutral |
Hartley is not smart.
Boris is not bad.
Lucia is romantic.
Alice is not swift.
Hartley is swift.
Titus is not realistic.
Alice is not whispering.
Adrian is realistic.
Alice is romantic.
Titus is whispering.
Titus is romantic.
Boris is not smart.If there is someone who is both romantic and smart, then Lucia is whispering.
It can be concluded that Alice is not realistic and Alice is whispering once knowing that Hartley is smart and Adrian is swift.
As long as someone is either smart or not bad, he is realistic and not swift.
Hartley being not bad implies that Jeremiah is whispering.
Someone who is not swift is always not smart.
If Lucia is not realistic or Titus is smart, then Boris is not whispering.
If there is at least one people who is realistic or smart, then Titus is romantic.
Someone who is romantic is always both not bad and not swift.
If there is someone who is either realistic or smart, then Lucia is not whispering.
If Adrian is swift, then Adrian is not realistic, and vice versa.
All not smart people are not romantic.
If someone is both swift and not whispering, then he is not romantic. | Alice is realistic. | entailment |
Hartley is not smart.
Boris is not bad.
Lucia is romantic.
Alice is not swift.
Hartley is swift.
Titus is not realistic.
Alice is not whispering.
Adrian is realistic.
Alice is romantic.
Titus is whispering.
Titus is romantic.
Boris is not smart.If there is someone who is both romantic and smart, then Lucia is whispering.
It can be concluded that Alice is not realistic and Alice is whispering once knowing that Hartley is smart and Adrian is swift.
As long as someone is either smart or not bad, he is realistic and not swift.
Hartley being not bad implies that Jeremiah is whispering.
Someone who is not swift is always not smart.
If Lucia is not realistic or Titus is smart, then Boris is not whispering.
If there is at least one people who is realistic or smart, then Titus is romantic.
Someone who is romantic is always both not bad and not swift.
If there is someone who is either realistic or smart, then Lucia is not whispering.
If Adrian is swift, then Adrian is not realistic, and vice versa.
All not smart people are not romantic.
If someone is both swift and not whispering, then he is not romantic. | Boris is smart. | contradiction |
Hartley is not smart.
Boris is not bad.
Lucia is romantic.
Alice is not swift.
Hartley is swift.
Titus is not realistic.
Alice is not whispering.
Adrian is realistic.
Alice is romantic.
Titus is whispering.
Titus is romantic.
Boris is not smart.If there is someone who is both romantic and smart, then Lucia is whispering.
It can be concluded that Alice is not realistic and Alice is whispering once knowing that Hartley is smart and Adrian is swift.
As long as someone is either smart or not bad, he is realistic and not swift.
Hartley being not bad implies that Jeremiah is whispering.
Someone who is not swift is always not smart.
If Lucia is not realistic or Titus is smart, then Boris is not whispering.
If there is at least one people who is realistic or smart, then Titus is romantic.
Someone who is romantic is always both not bad and not swift.
If there is someone who is either realistic or smart, then Lucia is not whispering.
If Adrian is swift, then Adrian is not realistic, and vice versa.
All not smart people are not romantic.
If someone is both swift and not whispering, then he is not romantic. | Titus is not romantic. | self_contradiction |
Hartley is not smart.
Boris is not bad.
Lucia is romantic.
Alice is not swift.
Hartley is swift.
Titus is not realistic.
Alice is not whispering.
Adrian is realistic.
Alice is romantic.
Titus is whispering.
Titus is romantic.
Boris is not smart.If there is someone who is both romantic and smart, then Lucia is whispering.
It can be concluded that Alice is not realistic and Alice is whispering once knowing that Hartley is smart and Adrian is swift.
As long as someone is either smart or not bad, he is realistic and not swift.
Hartley being not bad implies that Jeremiah is whispering.
Someone who is not swift is always not smart.
If Lucia is not realistic or Titus is smart, then Boris is not whispering.
If there is at least one people who is realistic or smart, then Titus is romantic.
Someone who is romantic is always both not bad and not swift.
If there is someone who is either realistic or smart, then Lucia is not whispering.
If Adrian is swift, then Adrian is not realistic, and vice versa.
All not smart people are not romantic.
If someone is both swift and not whispering, then he is not romantic. | Jeremiah is not whispering. | neutral |
Hartley is not smart.
Boris is not bad.
Lucia is romantic.
Alice is not swift.
Hartley is swift.
Titus is not realistic.
Alice is not whispering.
Adrian is realistic.
Alice is romantic.
Titus is whispering.
Titus is romantic.
Boris is not smart.If there is someone who is both romantic and smart, then Lucia is whispering.
It can be concluded that Alice is not realistic and Alice is whispering once knowing that Hartley is smart and Adrian is swift.
As long as someone is either smart or not bad, he is realistic and not swift.
Hartley being not bad implies that Jeremiah is whispering.
Someone who is not swift is always not smart.
If Lucia is not realistic or Titus is smart, then Boris is not whispering.
If there is at least one people who is realistic or smart, then Titus is romantic.
Someone who is romantic is always both not bad and not swift.
If there is someone who is either realistic or smart, then Lucia is not whispering.
If Adrian is swift, then Adrian is not realistic, and vice versa.
All not smart people are not romantic.
If someone is both swift and not whispering, then he is not romantic. | Alice is swift. | contradiction |
Hartley is not smart.
Boris is not bad.
Lucia is romantic.
Alice is not swift.
Hartley is swift.
Titus is not realistic.
Alice is not whispering.
Adrian is realistic.
Alice is romantic.
Titus is whispering.
Titus is romantic.
Boris is not smart.If there is someone who is both romantic and smart, then Lucia is whispering.
It can be concluded that Alice is not realistic and Alice is whispering once knowing that Hartley is smart and Adrian is swift.
As long as someone is either smart or not bad, he is realistic and not swift.
Hartley being not bad implies that Jeremiah is whispering.
Someone who is not swift is always not smart.
If Lucia is not realistic or Titus is smart, then Boris is not whispering.
If there is at least one people who is realistic or smart, then Titus is romantic.
Someone who is romantic is always both not bad and not swift.
If there is someone who is either realistic or smart, then Lucia is not whispering.
If Adrian is swift, then Adrian is not realistic, and vice versa.
All not smart people are not romantic.
If someone is both swift and not whispering, then he is not romantic. | Hartley is not romantic. | entailment |
Hartley is not smart.
Boris is not bad.
Lucia is romantic.
Alice is not swift.
Hartley is swift.
Titus is not realistic.
Alice is not whispering.
Adrian is realistic.
Alice is romantic.
Titus is whispering.
Titus is romantic.
Boris is not smart.If there is someone who is both romantic and smart, then Lucia is whispering.
It can be concluded that Alice is not realistic and Alice is whispering once knowing that Hartley is smart and Adrian is swift.
As long as someone is either smart or not bad, he is realistic and not swift.
Hartley being not bad implies that Jeremiah is whispering.
Someone who is not swift is always not smart.
If Lucia is not realistic or Titus is smart, then Boris is not whispering.
If there is at least one people who is realistic or smart, then Titus is romantic.
Someone who is romantic is always both not bad and not swift.
If there is someone who is either realistic or smart, then Lucia is not whispering.
If Adrian is swift, then Adrian is not realistic, and vice versa.
All not smart people are not romantic.
If someone is both swift and not whispering, then he is not romantic. | Boris is not swift. | entailment |
Hartley is not smart.
Boris is not bad.
Lucia is romantic.
Alice is not swift.
Hartley is swift.
Titus is not realistic.
Alice is not whispering.
Adrian is realistic.
Alice is romantic.
Titus is whispering.
Titus is romantic.
Boris is not smart.If there is someone who is both romantic and smart, then Lucia is whispering.
It can be concluded that Alice is not realistic and Alice is whispering once knowing that Hartley is smart and Adrian is swift.
As long as someone is either smart or not bad, he is realistic and not swift.
Hartley being not bad implies that Jeremiah is whispering.
Someone who is not swift is always not smart.
If Lucia is not realistic or Titus is smart, then Boris is not whispering.
If there is at least one people who is realistic or smart, then Titus is romantic.
Someone who is romantic is always both not bad and not swift.
If there is someone who is either realistic or smart, then Lucia is not whispering.
If Adrian is swift, then Adrian is not realistic, and vice versa.
All not smart people are not romantic.
If someone is both swift and not whispering, then he is not romantic. | Titus is not realistic. | self_contradiction |
Hartley is not smart.
Boris is not bad.
Lucia is romantic.
Alice is not swift.
Hartley is swift.
Titus is not realistic.
Alice is not whispering.
Adrian is realistic.
Alice is romantic.
Titus is whispering.
Titus is romantic.
Boris is not smart.If there is someone who is both romantic and smart, then Lucia is whispering.
It can be concluded that Alice is not realistic and Alice is whispering once knowing that Hartley is smart and Adrian is swift.
As long as someone is either smart or not bad, he is realistic and not swift.
Hartley being not bad implies that Jeremiah is whispering.
Someone who is not swift is always not smart.
If Lucia is not realistic or Titus is smart, then Boris is not whispering.
If there is at least one people who is realistic or smart, then Titus is romantic.
Someone who is romantic is always both not bad and not swift.
If there is someone who is either realistic or smart, then Lucia is not whispering.
If Adrian is swift, then Adrian is not realistic, and vice versa.
All not smart people are not romantic.
If someone is both swift and not whispering, then he is not romantic. | Lucia is not whispering. | self_contradiction |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.