premise
stringlengths 923
1.41k
| hypothesis
stringlengths 11
33
| label
stringclasses 4
values |
|---|---|---|
Kerwin is not serious.
Sophie is obedient.
Albern is not uptight.
Lloyd is serious.
Albion is not reliable.
Albion is conscious.
Odessa is serious.
Lloyd is reliable.
Amery is not conscious.
Odessa is not obedient.
Sophie is not purple.
Amery is not purple.If Odessa is obedient or Kerwin is purple, then Odessa is reliable.
Odessa being not serious is equivalent to Odessa being not purple and Odessa being reliable.
If there is at least one people who is reliable, then Lloyd is conscious and Albern is not serious.
Albion being not purple implies that Lloyd is not obedient and Sophie is conscious.
Someone who is serious is always both not reliable and purple.
If someone is not purple or serious, then he is uptight.
If there is someone who is serious, then Albion is uptight.
Lloyd being conscious and Albion being not obedient are equivalent to Albern being not serious and Amery being not reliable.
Albion being serious implies that Odessa is not uptight.
If there is at least one people who is both purple and uptight, then Albion is not obedient.
If someone is not conscious or not purple, then he is obedient.
If someone is not conscious and not obedient, then he is both reliable and serious, and vice versa. | Lloyd is not conscious. | self_contradiction |
Kerwin is not serious.
Sophie is obedient.
Albern is not uptight.
Lloyd is serious.
Albion is not reliable.
Albion is conscious.
Odessa is serious.
Lloyd is reliable.
Amery is not conscious.
Odessa is not obedient.
Sophie is not purple.
Amery is not purple.If Odessa is obedient or Kerwin is purple, then Odessa is reliable.
Odessa being not serious is equivalent to Odessa being not purple and Odessa being reliable.
If there is at least one people who is reliable, then Lloyd is conscious and Albern is not serious.
Albion being not purple implies that Lloyd is not obedient and Sophie is conscious.
Someone who is serious is always both not reliable and purple.
If someone is not purple or serious, then he is uptight.
If there is someone who is serious, then Albion is uptight.
Lloyd being conscious and Albion being not obedient are equivalent to Albern being not serious and Amery being not reliable.
Albion being serious implies that Odessa is not uptight.
If there is at least one people who is both purple and uptight, then Albion is not obedient.
If someone is not conscious or not purple, then he is obedient.
If someone is not conscious and not obedient, then he is both reliable and serious, and vice versa. | Lloyd is not obedient. | self_contradiction |
Kerwin is not serious.
Sophie is obedient.
Albern is not uptight.
Lloyd is serious.
Albion is not reliable.
Albion is conscious.
Odessa is serious.
Lloyd is reliable.
Amery is not conscious.
Odessa is not obedient.
Sophie is not purple.
Amery is not purple.If Odessa is obedient or Kerwin is purple, then Odessa is reliable.
Odessa being not serious is equivalent to Odessa being not purple and Odessa being reliable.
If there is at least one people who is reliable, then Lloyd is conscious and Albern is not serious.
Albion being not purple implies that Lloyd is not obedient and Sophie is conscious.
Someone who is serious is always both not reliable and purple.
If someone is not purple or serious, then he is uptight.
If there is someone who is serious, then Albion is uptight.
Lloyd being conscious and Albion being not obedient are equivalent to Albern being not serious and Amery being not reliable.
Albion being serious implies that Odessa is not uptight.
If there is at least one people who is both purple and uptight, then Albion is not obedient.
If someone is not conscious or not purple, then he is obedient.
If someone is not conscious and not obedient, then he is both reliable and serious, and vice versa. | Sophie is serious. | neutral |
Kerwin is not serious.
Sophie is obedient.
Albern is not uptight.
Lloyd is serious.
Albion is not reliable.
Albion is conscious.
Odessa is serious.
Lloyd is reliable.
Amery is not conscious.
Odessa is not obedient.
Sophie is not purple.
Amery is not purple.If Odessa is obedient or Kerwin is purple, then Odessa is reliable.
Odessa being not serious is equivalent to Odessa being not purple and Odessa being reliable.
If there is at least one people who is reliable, then Lloyd is conscious and Albern is not serious.
Albion being not purple implies that Lloyd is not obedient and Sophie is conscious.
Someone who is serious is always both not reliable and purple.
If someone is not purple or serious, then he is uptight.
If there is someone who is serious, then Albion is uptight.
Lloyd being conscious and Albion being not obedient are equivalent to Albern being not serious and Amery being not reliable.
Albion being serious implies that Odessa is not uptight.
If there is at least one people who is both purple and uptight, then Albion is not obedient.
If someone is not conscious or not purple, then he is obedient.
If someone is not conscious and not obedient, then he is both reliable and serious, and vice versa. | Albion is not serious. | neutral |
Kerwin is not serious.
Sophie is obedient.
Albern is not uptight.
Lloyd is serious.
Albion is not reliable.
Albion is conscious.
Odessa is serious.
Lloyd is reliable.
Amery is not conscious.
Odessa is not obedient.
Sophie is not purple.
Amery is not purple.If Odessa is obedient or Kerwin is purple, then Odessa is reliable.
Odessa being not serious is equivalent to Odessa being not purple and Odessa being reliable.
If there is at least one people who is reliable, then Lloyd is conscious and Albern is not serious.
Albion being not purple implies that Lloyd is not obedient and Sophie is conscious.
Someone who is serious is always both not reliable and purple.
If someone is not purple or serious, then he is uptight.
If there is someone who is serious, then Albion is uptight.
Lloyd being conscious and Albion being not obedient are equivalent to Albern being not serious and Amery being not reliable.
Albion being serious implies that Odessa is not uptight.
If there is at least one people who is both purple and uptight, then Albion is not obedient.
If someone is not conscious or not purple, then he is obedient.
If someone is not conscious and not obedient, then he is both reliable and serious, and vice versa. | Sophie is obedient. | entailment |
Kerwin is not serious.
Sophie is obedient.
Albern is not uptight.
Lloyd is serious.
Albion is not reliable.
Albion is conscious.
Odessa is serious.
Lloyd is reliable.
Amery is not conscious.
Odessa is not obedient.
Sophie is not purple.
Amery is not purple.If Odessa is obedient or Kerwin is purple, then Odessa is reliable.
Odessa being not serious is equivalent to Odessa being not purple and Odessa being reliable.
If there is at least one people who is reliable, then Lloyd is conscious and Albern is not serious.
Albion being not purple implies that Lloyd is not obedient and Sophie is conscious.
Someone who is serious is always both not reliable and purple.
If someone is not purple or serious, then he is uptight.
If there is someone who is serious, then Albion is uptight.
Lloyd being conscious and Albion being not obedient are equivalent to Albern being not serious and Amery being not reliable.
Albion being serious implies that Odessa is not uptight.
If there is at least one people who is both purple and uptight, then Albion is not obedient.
If someone is not conscious or not purple, then he is obedient.
If someone is not conscious and not obedient, then he is both reliable and serious, and vice versa. | Odessa is not obedient. | entailment |
Kerwin is not serious.
Sophie is obedient.
Albern is not uptight.
Lloyd is serious.
Albion is not reliable.
Albion is conscious.
Odessa is serious.
Lloyd is reliable.
Amery is not conscious.
Odessa is not obedient.
Sophie is not purple.
Amery is not purple.If Odessa is obedient or Kerwin is purple, then Odessa is reliable.
Odessa being not serious is equivalent to Odessa being not purple and Odessa being reliable.
If there is at least one people who is reliable, then Lloyd is conscious and Albern is not serious.
Albion being not purple implies that Lloyd is not obedient and Sophie is conscious.
Someone who is serious is always both not reliable and purple.
If someone is not purple or serious, then he is uptight.
If there is someone who is serious, then Albion is uptight.
Lloyd being conscious and Albion being not obedient are equivalent to Albern being not serious and Amery being not reliable.
Albion being serious implies that Odessa is not uptight.
If there is at least one people who is both purple and uptight, then Albion is not obedient.
If someone is not conscious or not purple, then he is obedient.
If someone is not conscious and not obedient, then he is both reliable and serious, and vice versa. | Odessa is not serious. | contradiction |
Kerwin is not serious.
Sophie is obedient.
Albern is not uptight.
Lloyd is serious.
Albion is not reliable.
Albion is conscious.
Odessa is serious.
Lloyd is reliable.
Amery is not conscious.
Odessa is not obedient.
Sophie is not purple.
Amery is not purple.If Odessa is obedient or Kerwin is purple, then Odessa is reliable.
Odessa being not serious is equivalent to Odessa being not purple and Odessa being reliable.
If there is at least one people who is reliable, then Lloyd is conscious and Albern is not serious.
Albion being not purple implies that Lloyd is not obedient and Sophie is conscious.
Someone who is serious is always both not reliable and purple.
If someone is not purple or serious, then he is uptight.
If there is someone who is serious, then Albion is uptight.
Lloyd being conscious and Albion being not obedient are equivalent to Albern being not serious and Amery being not reliable.
Albion being serious implies that Odessa is not uptight.
If there is at least one people who is both purple and uptight, then Albion is not obedient.
If someone is not conscious or not purple, then he is obedient.
If someone is not conscious and not obedient, then he is both reliable and serious, and vice versa. | Kerwin is reliable. | neutral |
Kerwin is not serious.
Sophie is obedient.
Albern is not uptight.
Lloyd is serious.
Albion is not reliable.
Albion is conscious.
Odessa is serious.
Lloyd is reliable.
Amery is not conscious.
Odessa is not obedient.
Sophie is not purple.
Amery is not purple.If Odessa is obedient or Kerwin is purple, then Odessa is reliable.
Odessa being not serious is equivalent to Odessa being not purple and Odessa being reliable.
If there is at least one people who is reliable, then Lloyd is conscious and Albern is not serious.
Albion being not purple implies that Lloyd is not obedient and Sophie is conscious.
Someone who is serious is always both not reliable and purple.
If someone is not purple or serious, then he is uptight.
If there is someone who is serious, then Albion is uptight.
Lloyd being conscious and Albion being not obedient are equivalent to Albern being not serious and Amery being not reliable.
Albion being serious implies that Odessa is not uptight.
If there is at least one people who is both purple and uptight, then Albion is not obedient.
If someone is not conscious or not purple, then he is obedient.
If someone is not conscious and not obedient, then he is both reliable and serious, and vice versa. | Sophie is not reliable. | neutral |
Kerwin is not serious.
Sophie is obedient.
Albern is not uptight.
Lloyd is serious.
Albion is not reliable.
Albion is conscious.
Odessa is serious.
Lloyd is reliable.
Amery is not conscious.
Odessa is not obedient.
Sophie is not purple.
Amery is not purple.If Odessa is obedient or Kerwin is purple, then Odessa is reliable.
Odessa being not serious is equivalent to Odessa being not purple and Odessa being reliable.
If there is at least one people who is reliable, then Lloyd is conscious and Albern is not serious.
Albion being not purple implies that Lloyd is not obedient and Sophie is conscious.
Someone who is serious is always both not reliable and purple.
If someone is not purple or serious, then he is uptight.
If there is someone who is serious, then Albion is uptight.
Lloyd being conscious and Albion being not obedient are equivalent to Albern being not serious and Amery being not reliable.
Albion being serious implies that Odessa is not uptight.
If there is at least one people who is both purple and uptight, then Albion is not obedient.
If someone is not conscious or not purple, then he is obedient.
If someone is not conscious and not obedient, then he is both reliable and serious, and vice versa. | Amery is uptight. | entailment |
Kerwin is not serious.
Sophie is obedient.
Albern is not uptight.
Lloyd is serious.
Albion is not reliable.
Albion is conscious.
Odessa is serious.
Lloyd is reliable.
Amery is not conscious.
Odessa is not obedient.
Sophie is not purple.
Amery is not purple.If Odessa is obedient or Kerwin is purple, then Odessa is reliable.
Odessa being not serious is equivalent to Odessa being not purple and Odessa being reliable.
If there is at least one people who is reliable, then Lloyd is conscious and Albern is not serious.
Albion being not purple implies that Lloyd is not obedient and Sophie is conscious.
Someone who is serious is always both not reliable and purple.
If someone is not purple or serious, then he is uptight.
If there is someone who is serious, then Albion is uptight.
Lloyd being conscious and Albion being not obedient are equivalent to Albern being not serious and Amery being not reliable.
Albion being serious implies that Odessa is not uptight.
If there is at least one people who is both purple and uptight, then Albion is not obedient.
If someone is not conscious or not purple, then he is obedient.
If someone is not conscious and not obedient, then he is both reliable and serious, and vice versa. | Albion is not conscious. | contradiction |
Kerwin is not serious.
Sophie is obedient.
Albern is not uptight.
Lloyd is serious.
Albion is not reliable.
Albion is conscious.
Odessa is serious.
Lloyd is reliable.
Amery is not conscious.
Odessa is not obedient.
Sophie is not purple.
Amery is not purple.If Odessa is obedient or Kerwin is purple, then Odessa is reliable.
Odessa being not serious is equivalent to Odessa being not purple and Odessa being reliable.
If there is at least one people who is reliable, then Lloyd is conscious and Albern is not serious.
Albion being not purple implies that Lloyd is not obedient and Sophie is conscious.
Someone who is serious is always both not reliable and purple.
If someone is not purple or serious, then he is uptight.
If there is someone who is serious, then Albion is uptight.
Lloyd being conscious and Albion being not obedient are equivalent to Albern being not serious and Amery being not reliable.
Albion being serious implies that Odessa is not uptight.
If there is at least one people who is both purple and uptight, then Albion is not obedient.
If someone is not conscious or not purple, then he is obedient.
If someone is not conscious and not obedient, then he is both reliable and serious, and vice versa. | Lloyd is not serious. | contradiction |
Kerwin is not serious.
Sophie is obedient.
Albern is not uptight.
Lloyd is serious.
Albion is not reliable.
Albion is conscious.
Odessa is serious.
Lloyd is reliable.
Amery is not conscious.
Odessa is not obedient.
Sophie is not purple.
Amery is not purple.If Odessa is obedient or Kerwin is purple, then Odessa is reliable.
Odessa being not serious is equivalent to Odessa being not purple and Odessa being reliable.
If there is at least one people who is reliable, then Lloyd is conscious and Albern is not serious.
Albion being not purple implies that Lloyd is not obedient and Sophie is conscious.
Someone who is serious is always both not reliable and purple.
If someone is not purple or serious, then he is uptight.
If there is someone who is serious, then Albion is uptight.
Lloyd being conscious and Albion being not obedient are equivalent to Albern being not serious and Amery being not reliable.
Albion being serious implies that Odessa is not uptight.
If there is at least one people who is both purple and uptight, then Albion is not obedient.
If someone is not conscious or not purple, then he is obedient.
If someone is not conscious and not obedient, then he is both reliable and serious, and vice versa. | Sophie is not obedient. | contradiction |
Kerwin is not serious.
Sophie is obedient.
Albern is not uptight.
Lloyd is serious.
Albion is not reliable.
Albion is conscious.
Odessa is serious.
Lloyd is reliable.
Amery is not conscious.
Odessa is not obedient.
Sophie is not purple.
Amery is not purple.If Odessa is obedient or Kerwin is purple, then Odessa is reliable.
Odessa being not serious is equivalent to Odessa being not purple and Odessa being reliable.
If there is at least one people who is reliable, then Lloyd is conscious and Albern is not serious.
Albion being not purple implies that Lloyd is not obedient and Sophie is conscious.
Someone who is serious is always both not reliable and purple.
If someone is not purple or serious, then he is uptight.
If there is someone who is serious, then Albion is uptight.
Lloyd being conscious and Albion being not obedient are equivalent to Albern being not serious and Amery being not reliable.
Albion being serious implies that Odessa is not uptight.
If there is at least one people who is both purple and uptight, then Albion is not obedient.
If someone is not conscious or not purple, then he is obedient.
If someone is not conscious and not obedient, then he is both reliable and serious, and vice versa. | Lloyd is reliable. | self_contradiction |
Kerwin is not serious.
Sophie is obedient.
Albern is not uptight.
Lloyd is serious.
Albion is not reliable.
Albion is conscious.
Odessa is serious.
Lloyd is reliable.
Amery is not conscious.
Odessa is not obedient.
Sophie is not purple.
Amery is not purple.If Odessa is obedient or Kerwin is purple, then Odessa is reliable.
Odessa being not serious is equivalent to Odessa being not purple and Odessa being reliable.
If there is at least one people who is reliable, then Lloyd is conscious and Albern is not serious.
Albion being not purple implies that Lloyd is not obedient and Sophie is conscious.
Someone who is serious is always both not reliable and purple.
If someone is not purple or serious, then he is uptight.
If there is someone who is serious, then Albion is uptight.
Lloyd being conscious and Albion being not obedient are equivalent to Albern being not serious and Amery being not reliable.
Albion being serious implies that Odessa is not uptight.
If there is at least one people who is both purple and uptight, then Albion is not obedient.
If someone is not conscious or not purple, then he is obedient.
If someone is not conscious and not obedient, then he is both reliable and serious, and vice versa. | Albern is purple. | neutral |
Kerwin is not serious.
Sophie is obedient.
Albern is not uptight.
Lloyd is serious.
Albion is not reliable.
Albion is conscious.
Odessa is serious.
Lloyd is reliable.
Amery is not conscious.
Odessa is not obedient.
Sophie is not purple.
Amery is not purple.If Odessa is obedient or Kerwin is purple, then Odessa is reliable.
Odessa being not serious is equivalent to Odessa being not purple and Odessa being reliable.
If there is at least one people who is reliable, then Lloyd is conscious and Albern is not serious.
Albion being not purple implies that Lloyd is not obedient and Sophie is conscious.
Someone who is serious is always both not reliable and purple.
If someone is not purple or serious, then he is uptight.
If there is someone who is serious, then Albion is uptight.
Lloyd being conscious and Albion being not obedient are equivalent to Albern being not serious and Amery being not reliable.
Albion being serious implies that Odessa is not uptight.
If there is at least one people who is both purple and uptight, then Albion is not obedient.
If someone is not conscious or not purple, then he is obedient.
If someone is not conscious and not obedient, then he is both reliable and serious, and vice versa. | Lloyd is not reliable. | self_contradiction |
Kerwin is not serious.
Sophie is obedient.
Albern is not uptight.
Lloyd is serious.
Albion is not reliable.
Albion is conscious.
Odessa is serious.
Lloyd is reliable.
Amery is not conscious.
Odessa is not obedient.
Sophie is not purple.
Amery is not purple.If Odessa is obedient or Kerwin is purple, then Odessa is reliable.
Odessa being not serious is equivalent to Odessa being not purple and Odessa being reliable.
If there is at least one people who is reliable, then Lloyd is conscious and Albern is not serious.
Albion being not purple implies that Lloyd is not obedient and Sophie is conscious.
Someone who is serious is always both not reliable and purple.
If someone is not purple or serious, then he is uptight.
If there is someone who is serious, then Albion is uptight.
Lloyd being conscious and Albion being not obedient are equivalent to Albern being not serious and Amery being not reliable.
Albion being serious implies that Odessa is not uptight.
If there is at least one people who is both purple and uptight, then Albion is not obedient.
If someone is not conscious or not purple, then he is obedient.
If someone is not conscious and not obedient, then he is both reliable and serious, and vice versa. | Odessa is purple. | entailment |
Kerwin is not serious.
Sophie is obedient.
Albern is not uptight.
Lloyd is serious.
Albion is not reliable.
Albion is conscious.
Odessa is serious.
Lloyd is reliable.
Amery is not conscious.
Odessa is not obedient.
Sophie is not purple.
Amery is not purple.If Odessa is obedient or Kerwin is purple, then Odessa is reliable.
Odessa being not serious is equivalent to Odessa being not purple and Odessa being reliable.
If there is at least one people who is reliable, then Lloyd is conscious and Albern is not serious.
Albion being not purple implies that Lloyd is not obedient and Sophie is conscious.
Someone who is serious is always both not reliable and purple.
If someone is not purple or serious, then he is uptight.
If there is someone who is serious, then Albion is uptight.
Lloyd being conscious and Albion being not obedient are equivalent to Albern being not serious and Amery being not reliable.
Albion being serious implies that Odessa is not uptight.
If there is at least one people who is both purple and uptight, then Albion is not obedient.
If someone is not conscious or not purple, then he is obedient.
If someone is not conscious and not obedient, then he is both reliable and serious, and vice versa. | Sophie is not uptight. | contradiction |
Kerwin is not serious.
Sophie is obedient.
Albern is not uptight.
Lloyd is serious.
Albion is not reliable.
Albion is conscious.
Odessa is serious.
Lloyd is reliable.
Amery is not conscious.
Odessa is not obedient.
Sophie is not purple.
Amery is not purple.If Odessa is obedient or Kerwin is purple, then Odessa is reliable.
Odessa being not serious is equivalent to Odessa being not purple and Odessa being reliable.
If there is at least one people who is reliable, then Lloyd is conscious and Albern is not serious.
Albion being not purple implies that Lloyd is not obedient and Sophie is conscious.
Someone who is serious is always both not reliable and purple.
If someone is not purple or serious, then he is uptight.
If there is someone who is serious, then Albion is uptight.
Lloyd being conscious and Albion being not obedient are equivalent to Albern being not serious and Amery being not reliable.
Albion being serious implies that Odessa is not uptight.
If there is at least one people who is both purple and uptight, then Albion is not obedient.
If someone is not conscious or not purple, then he is obedient.
If someone is not conscious and not obedient, then he is both reliable and serious, and vice versa. | Albion is not reliable. | entailment |
Kerwin is not serious.
Sophie is obedient.
Albern is not uptight.
Lloyd is serious.
Albion is not reliable.
Albion is conscious.
Odessa is serious.
Lloyd is reliable.
Amery is not conscious.
Odessa is not obedient.
Sophie is not purple.
Amery is not purple.If Odessa is obedient or Kerwin is purple, then Odessa is reliable.
Odessa being not serious is equivalent to Odessa being not purple and Odessa being reliable.
If there is at least one people who is reliable, then Lloyd is conscious and Albern is not serious.
Albion being not purple implies that Lloyd is not obedient and Sophie is conscious.
Someone who is serious is always both not reliable and purple.
If someone is not purple or serious, then he is uptight.
If there is someone who is serious, then Albion is uptight.
Lloyd being conscious and Albion being not obedient are equivalent to Albern being not serious and Amery being not reliable.
Albion being serious implies that Odessa is not uptight.
If there is at least one people who is both purple and uptight, then Albion is not obedient.
If someone is not conscious or not purple, then he is obedient.
If someone is not conscious and not obedient, then he is both reliable and serious, and vice versa. | Lloyd is conscious. | self_contradiction |
Leona is not dishonest.
Lombard is not good-tempered.
Harvey is not good-tempered.
Gemma is hypocritical.
Arvel is tough.
Orlando is tough.
Lombard is hypocritical.
Arvel is not selfish.
Leona is good-tempered.
Harvey is not dishonest.
Harvey is tough.
Orlando is alive.As long as someone is hypocritical, he is not dishonest and not tough.
If there is someone who is tough, then Gemma is not dishonest and Morris is not hypocritical.
If there is at least one people who is dishonest or tough, then Leona is hypocritical.
Someone is alive and hypocritical if and only if he is not good-tempered and tough.
If there is someone who is not tough, then Gemma is not dishonest.
It can be concluded that Gemma is not tough and Harvey is not dishonest once knowing that Gemma is not selfish.
If Arvel is not hypocritical or Gemma is alive, then Gemma is good-tempered.
If someone is both not selfish and not tough, then he is dishonest.
If Leona is good-tempered, then Gemma is not hypocritical and Harvey is not dishonest.
If there is someone who is either not good-tempered or dishonest, then Leona is alive.
Lombard being not alive implies that Leona is not tough.
If there is at least one people who is both not tough and dishonest, then Orlando is not alive. | Morris is not dishonest. | neutral |
Leona is not dishonest.
Lombard is not good-tempered.
Harvey is not good-tempered.
Gemma is hypocritical.
Arvel is tough.
Orlando is tough.
Lombard is hypocritical.
Arvel is not selfish.
Leona is good-tempered.
Harvey is not dishonest.
Harvey is tough.
Orlando is alive.As long as someone is hypocritical, he is not dishonest and not tough.
If there is someone who is tough, then Gemma is not dishonest and Morris is not hypocritical.
If there is at least one people who is dishonest or tough, then Leona is hypocritical.
Someone is alive and hypocritical if and only if he is not good-tempered and tough.
If there is someone who is not tough, then Gemma is not dishonest.
It can be concluded that Gemma is not tough and Harvey is not dishonest once knowing that Gemma is not selfish.
If Arvel is not hypocritical or Gemma is alive, then Gemma is good-tempered.
If someone is both not selfish and not tough, then he is dishonest.
If Leona is good-tempered, then Gemma is not hypocritical and Harvey is not dishonest.
If there is someone who is either not good-tempered or dishonest, then Leona is alive.
Lombard being not alive implies that Leona is not tough.
If there is at least one people who is both not tough and dishonest, then Orlando is not alive. | Arvel is selfish. | contradiction |
Leona is not dishonest.
Lombard is not good-tempered.
Harvey is not good-tempered.
Gemma is hypocritical.
Arvel is tough.
Orlando is tough.
Lombard is hypocritical.
Arvel is not selfish.
Leona is good-tempered.
Harvey is not dishonest.
Harvey is tough.
Orlando is alive.As long as someone is hypocritical, he is not dishonest and not tough.
If there is someone who is tough, then Gemma is not dishonest and Morris is not hypocritical.
If there is at least one people who is dishonest or tough, then Leona is hypocritical.
Someone is alive and hypocritical if and only if he is not good-tempered and tough.
If there is someone who is not tough, then Gemma is not dishonest.
It can be concluded that Gemma is not tough and Harvey is not dishonest once knowing that Gemma is not selfish.
If Arvel is not hypocritical or Gemma is alive, then Gemma is good-tempered.
If someone is both not selfish and not tough, then he is dishonest.
If Leona is good-tempered, then Gemma is not hypocritical and Harvey is not dishonest.
If there is someone who is either not good-tempered or dishonest, then Leona is alive.
Lombard being not alive implies that Leona is not tough.
If there is at least one people who is both not tough and dishonest, then Orlando is not alive. | Arvel is good-tempered. | neutral |
Leona is not dishonest.
Lombard is not good-tempered.
Harvey is not good-tempered.
Gemma is hypocritical.
Arvel is tough.
Orlando is tough.
Lombard is hypocritical.
Arvel is not selfish.
Leona is good-tempered.
Harvey is not dishonest.
Harvey is tough.
Orlando is alive.As long as someone is hypocritical, he is not dishonest and not tough.
If there is someone who is tough, then Gemma is not dishonest and Morris is not hypocritical.
If there is at least one people who is dishonest or tough, then Leona is hypocritical.
Someone is alive and hypocritical if and only if he is not good-tempered and tough.
If there is someone who is not tough, then Gemma is not dishonest.
It can be concluded that Gemma is not tough and Harvey is not dishonest once knowing that Gemma is not selfish.
If Arvel is not hypocritical or Gemma is alive, then Gemma is good-tempered.
If someone is both not selfish and not tough, then he is dishonest.
If Leona is good-tempered, then Gemma is not hypocritical and Harvey is not dishonest.
If there is someone who is either not good-tempered or dishonest, then Leona is alive.
Lombard being not alive implies that Leona is not tough.
If there is at least one people who is both not tough and dishonest, then Orlando is not alive. | Leona is tough. | self_contradiction |
Leona is not dishonest.
Lombard is not good-tempered.
Harvey is not good-tempered.
Gemma is hypocritical.
Arvel is tough.
Orlando is tough.
Lombard is hypocritical.
Arvel is not selfish.
Leona is good-tempered.
Harvey is not dishonest.
Harvey is tough.
Orlando is alive.As long as someone is hypocritical, he is not dishonest and not tough.
If there is someone who is tough, then Gemma is not dishonest and Morris is not hypocritical.
If there is at least one people who is dishonest or tough, then Leona is hypocritical.
Someone is alive and hypocritical if and only if he is not good-tempered and tough.
If there is someone who is not tough, then Gemma is not dishonest.
It can be concluded that Gemma is not tough and Harvey is not dishonest once knowing that Gemma is not selfish.
If Arvel is not hypocritical or Gemma is alive, then Gemma is good-tempered.
If someone is both not selfish and not tough, then he is dishonest.
If Leona is good-tempered, then Gemma is not hypocritical and Harvey is not dishonest.
If there is someone who is either not good-tempered or dishonest, then Leona is alive.
Lombard being not alive implies that Leona is not tough.
If there is at least one people who is both not tough and dishonest, then Orlando is not alive. | Gemma is hypocritical. | self_contradiction |
Leona is not dishonest.
Lombard is not good-tempered.
Harvey is not good-tempered.
Gemma is hypocritical.
Arvel is tough.
Orlando is tough.
Lombard is hypocritical.
Arvel is not selfish.
Leona is good-tempered.
Harvey is not dishonest.
Harvey is tough.
Orlando is alive.As long as someone is hypocritical, he is not dishonest and not tough.
If there is someone who is tough, then Gemma is not dishonest and Morris is not hypocritical.
If there is at least one people who is dishonest or tough, then Leona is hypocritical.
Someone is alive and hypocritical if and only if he is not good-tempered and tough.
If there is someone who is not tough, then Gemma is not dishonest.
It can be concluded that Gemma is not tough and Harvey is not dishonest once knowing that Gemma is not selfish.
If Arvel is not hypocritical or Gemma is alive, then Gemma is good-tempered.
If someone is both not selfish and not tough, then he is dishonest.
If Leona is good-tempered, then Gemma is not hypocritical and Harvey is not dishonest.
If there is someone who is either not good-tempered or dishonest, then Leona is alive.
Lombard being not alive implies that Leona is not tough.
If there is at least one people who is both not tough and dishonest, then Orlando is not alive. | Leona is not alive. | contradiction |
Leona is not dishonest.
Lombard is not good-tempered.
Harvey is not good-tempered.
Gemma is hypocritical.
Arvel is tough.
Orlando is tough.
Lombard is hypocritical.
Arvel is not selfish.
Leona is good-tempered.
Harvey is not dishonest.
Harvey is tough.
Orlando is alive.As long as someone is hypocritical, he is not dishonest and not tough.
If there is someone who is tough, then Gemma is not dishonest and Morris is not hypocritical.
If there is at least one people who is dishonest or tough, then Leona is hypocritical.
Someone is alive and hypocritical if and only if he is not good-tempered and tough.
If there is someone who is not tough, then Gemma is not dishonest.
It can be concluded that Gemma is not tough and Harvey is not dishonest once knowing that Gemma is not selfish.
If Arvel is not hypocritical or Gemma is alive, then Gemma is good-tempered.
If someone is both not selfish and not tough, then he is dishonest.
If Leona is good-tempered, then Gemma is not hypocritical and Harvey is not dishonest.
If there is someone who is either not good-tempered or dishonest, then Leona is alive.
Lombard being not alive implies that Leona is not tough.
If there is at least one people who is both not tough and dishonest, then Orlando is not alive. | Harvey is dishonest. | contradiction |
Leona is not dishonest.
Lombard is not good-tempered.
Harvey is not good-tempered.
Gemma is hypocritical.
Arvel is tough.
Orlando is tough.
Lombard is hypocritical.
Arvel is not selfish.
Leona is good-tempered.
Harvey is not dishonest.
Harvey is tough.
Orlando is alive.As long as someone is hypocritical, he is not dishonest and not tough.
If there is someone who is tough, then Gemma is not dishonest and Morris is not hypocritical.
If there is at least one people who is dishonest or tough, then Leona is hypocritical.
Someone is alive and hypocritical if and only if he is not good-tempered and tough.
If there is someone who is not tough, then Gemma is not dishonest.
It can be concluded that Gemma is not tough and Harvey is not dishonest once knowing that Gemma is not selfish.
If Arvel is not hypocritical or Gemma is alive, then Gemma is good-tempered.
If someone is both not selfish and not tough, then he is dishonest.
If Leona is good-tempered, then Gemma is not hypocritical and Harvey is not dishonest.
If there is someone who is either not good-tempered or dishonest, then Leona is alive.
Lombard being not alive implies that Leona is not tough.
If there is at least one people who is both not tough and dishonest, then Orlando is not alive. | Orlando is selfish. | neutral |
Leona is not dishonest.
Lombard is not good-tempered.
Harvey is not good-tempered.
Gemma is hypocritical.
Arvel is tough.
Orlando is tough.
Lombard is hypocritical.
Arvel is not selfish.
Leona is good-tempered.
Harvey is not dishonest.
Harvey is tough.
Orlando is alive.As long as someone is hypocritical, he is not dishonest and not tough.
If there is someone who is tough, then Gemma is not dishonest and Morris is not hypocritical.
If there is at least one people who is dishonest or tough, then Leona is hypocritical.
Someone is alive and hypocritical if and only if he is not good-tempered and tough.
If there is someone who is not tough, then Gemma is not dishonest.
It can be concluded that Gemma is not tough and Harvey is not dishonest once knowing that Gemma is not selfish.
If Arvel is not hypocritical or Gemma is alive, then Gemma is good-tempered.
If someone is both not selfish and not tough, then he is dishonest.
If Leona is good-tempered, then Gemma is not hypocritical and Harvey is not dishonest.
If there is someone who is either not good-tempered or dishonest, then Leona is alive.
Lombard being not alive implies that Leona is not tough.
If there is at least one people who is both not tough and dishonest, then Orlando is not alive. | Harvey is tough. | self_contradiction |
Leona is not dishonest.
Lombard is not good-tempered.
Harvey is not good-tempered.
Gemma is hypocritical.
Arvel is tough.
Orlando is tough.
Lombard is hypocritical.
Arvel is not selfish.
Leona is good-tempered.
Harvey is not dishonest.
Harvey is tough.
Orlando is alive.As long as someone is hypocritical, he is not dishonest and not tough.
If there is someone who is tough, then Gemma is not dishonest and Morris is not hypocritical.
If there is at least one people who is dishonest or tough, then Leona is hypocritical.
Someone is alive and hypocritical if and only if he is not good-tempered and tough.
If there is someone who is not tough, then Gemma is not dishonest.
It can be concluded that Gemma is not tough and Harvey is not dishonest once knowing that Gemma is not selfish.
If Arvel is not hypocritical or Gemma is alive, then Gemma is good-tempered.
If someone is both not selfish and not tough, then he is dishonest.
If Leona is good-tempered, then Gemma is not hypocritical and Harvey is not dishonest.
If there is someone who is either not good-tempered or dishonest, then Leona is alive.
Lombard being not alive implies that Leona is not tough.
If there is at least one people who is both not tough and dishonest, then Orlando is not alive. | Leona is not good-tempered. | self_contradiction |
Leona is not dishonest.
Lombard is not good-tempered.
Harvey is not good-tempered.
Gemma is hypocritical.
Arvel is tough.
Orlando is tough.
Lombard is hypocritical.
Arvel is not selfish.
Leona is good-tempered.
Harvey is not dishonest.
Harvey is tough.
Orlando is alive.As long as someone is hypocritical, he is not dishonest and not tough.
If there is someone who is tough, then Gemma is not dishonest and Morris is not hypocritical.
If there is at least one people who is dishonest or tough, then Leona is hypocritical.
Someone is alive and hypocritical if and only if he is not good-tempered and tough.
If there is someone who is not tough, then Gemma is not dishonest.
It can be concluded that Gemma is not tough and Harvey is not dishonest once knowing that Gemma is not selfish.
If Arvel is not hypocritical or Gemma is alive, then Gemma is good-tempered.
If someone is both not selfish and not tough, then he is dishonest.
If Leona is good-tempered, then Gemma is not hypocritical and Harvey is not dishonest.
If there is someone who is either not good-tempered or dishonest, then Leona is alive.
Lombard being not alive implies that Leona is not tough.
If there is at least one people who is both not tough and dishonest, then Orlando is not alive. | Morris is not hypocritical. | entailment |
Leona is not dishonest.
Lombard is not good-tempered.
Harvey is not good-tempered.
Gemma is hypocritical.
Arvel is tough.
Orlando is tough.
Lombard is hypocritical.
Arvel is not selfish.
Leona is good-tempered.
Harvey is not dishonest.
Harvey is tough.
Orlando is alive.As long as someone is hypocritical, he is not dishonest and not tough.
If there is someone who is tough, then Gemma is not dishonest and Morris is not hypocritical.
If there is at least one people who is dishonest or tough, then Leona is hypocritical.
Someone is alive and hypocritical if and only if he is not good-tempered and tough.
If there is someone who is not tough, then Gemma is not dishonest.
It can be concluded that Gemma is not tough and Harvey is not dishonest once knowing that Gemma is not selfish.
If Arvel is not hypocritical or Gemma is alive, then Gemma is good-tempered.
If someone is both not selfish and not tough, then he is dishonest.
If Leona is good-tempered, then Gemma is not hypocritical and Harvey is not dishonest.
If there is someone who is either not good-tempered or dishonest, then Leona is alive.
Lombard being not alive implies that Leona is not tough.
If there is at least one people who is both not tough and dishonest, then Orlando is not alive. | Harvey is alive. | entailment |
Leona is not dishonest.
Lombard is not good-tempered.
Harvey is not good-tempered.
Gemma is hypocritical.
Arvel is tough.
Orlando is tough.
Lombard is hypocritical.
Arvel is not selfish.
Leona is good-tempered.
Harvey is not dishonest.
Harvey is tough.
Orlando is alive.As long as someone is hypocritical, he is not dishonest and not tough.
If there is someone who is tough, then Gemma is not dishonest and Morris is not hypocritical.
If there is at least one people who is dishonest or tough, then Leona is hypocritical.
Someone is alive and hypocritical if and only if he is not good-tempered and tough.
If there is someone who is not tough, then Gemma is not dishonest.
It can be concluded that Gemma is not tough and Harvey is not dishonest once knowing that Gemma is not selfish.
If Arvel is not hypocritical or Gemma is alive, then Gemma is good-tempered.
If someone is both not selfish and not tough, then he is dishonest.
If Leona is good-tempered, then Gemma is not hypocritical and Harvey is not dishonest.
If there is someone who is either not good-tempered or dishonest, then Leona is alive.
Lombard being not alive implies that Leona is not tough.
If there is at least one people who is both not tough and dishonest, then Orlando is not alive. | Leona is dishonest. | contradiction |
Leona is not dishonest.
Lombard is not good-tempered.
Harvey is not good-tempered.
Gemma is hypocritical.
Arvel is tough.
Orlando is tough.
Lombard is hypocritical.
Arvel is not selfish.
Leona is good-tempered.
Harvey is not dishonest.
Harvey is tough.
Orlando is alive.As long as someone is hypocritical, he is not dishonest and not tough.
If there is someone who is tough, then Gemma is not dishonest and Morris is not hypocritical.
If there is at least one people who is dishonest or tough, then Leona is hypocritical.
Someone is alive and hypocritical if and only if he is not good-tempered and tough.
If there is someone who is not tough, then Gemma is not dishonest.
It can be concluded that Gemma is not tough and Harvey is not dishonest once knowing that Gemma is not selfish.
If Arvel is not hypocritical or Gemma is alive, then Gemma is good-tempered.
If someone is both not selfish and not tough, then he is dishonest.
If Leona is good-tempered, then Gemma is not hypocritical and Harvey is not dishonest.
If there is someone who is either not good-tempered or dishonest, then Leona is alive.
Lombard being not alive implies that Leona is not tough.
If there is at least one people who is both not tough and dishonest, then Orlando is not alive. | Gemma is not selfish. | neutral |
Leona is not dishonest.
Lombard is not good-tempered.
Harvey is not good-tempered.
Gemma is hypocritical.
Arvel is tough.
Orlando is tough.
Lombard is hypocritical.
Arvel is not selfish.
Leona is good-tempered.
Harvey is not dishonest.
Harvey is tough.
Orlando is alive.As long as someone is hypocritical, he is not dishonest and not tough.
If there is someone who is tough, then Gemma is not dishonest and Morris is not hypocritical.
If there is at least one people who is dishonest or tough, then Leona is hypocritical.
Someone is alive and hypocritical if and only if he is not good-tempered and tough.
If there is someone who is not tough, then Gemma is not dishonest.
It can be concluded that Gemma is not tough and Harvey is not dishonest once knowing that Gemma is not selfish.
If Arvel is not hypocritical or Gemma is alive, then Gemma is good-tempered.
If someone is both not selfish and not tough, then he is dishonest.
If Leona is good-tempered, then Gemma is not hypocritical and Harvey is not dishonest.
If there is someone who is either not good-tempered or dishonest, then Leona is alive.
Lombard being not alive implies that Leona is not tough.
If there is at least one people who is both not tough and dishonest, then Orlando is not alive. | Leona is not dishonest. | entailment |
Leona is not dishonest.
Lombard is not good-tempered.
Harvey is not good-tempered.
Gemma is hypocritical.
Arvel is tough.
Orlando is tough.
Lombard is hypocritical.
Arvel is not selfish.
Leona is good-tempered.
Harvey is not dishonest.
Harvey is tough.
Orlando is alive.As long as someone is hypocritical, he is not dishonest and not tough.
If there is someone who is tough, then Gemma is not dishonest and Morris is not hypocritical.
If there is at least one people who is dishonest or tough, then Leona is hypocritical.
Someone is alive and hypocritical if and only if he is not good-tempered and tough.
If there is someone who is not tough, then Gemma is not dishonest.
It can be concluded that Gemma is not tough and Harvey is not dishonest once knowing that Gemma is not selfish.
If Arvel is not hypocritical or Gemma is alive, then Gemma is good-tempered.
If someone is both not selfish and not tough, then he is dishonest.
If Leona is good-tempered, then Gemma is not hypocritical and Harvey is not dishonest.
If there is someone who is either not good-tempered or dishonest, then Leona is alive.
Lombard being not alive implies that Leona is not tough.
If there is at least one people who is both not tough and dishonest, then Orlando is not alive. | Arvel is tough. | entailment |
Leona is not dishonest.
Lombard is not good-tempered.
Harvey is not good-tempered.
Gemma is hypocritical.
Arvel is tough.
Orlando is tough.
Lombard is hypocritical.
Arvel is not selfish.
Leona is good-tempered.
Harvey is not dishonest.
Harvey is tough.
Orlando is alive.As long as someone is hypocritical, he is not dishonest and not tough.
If there is someone who is tough, then Gemma is not dishonest and Morris is not hypocritical.
If there is at least one people who is dishonest or tough, then Leona is hypocritical.
Someone is alive and hypocritical if and only if he is not good-tempered and tough.
If there is someone who is not tough, then Gemma is not dishonest.
It can be concluded that Gemma is not tough and Harvey is not dishonest once knowing that Gemma is not selfish.
If Arvel is not hypocritical or Gemma is alive, then Gemma is good-tempered.
If someone is both not selfish and not tough, then he is dishonest.
If Leona is good-tempered, then Gemma is not hypocritical and Harvey is not dishonest.
If there is someone who is either not good-tempered or dishonest, then Leona is alive.
Lombard being not alive implies that Leona is not tough.
If there is at least one people who is both not tough and dishonest, then Orlando is not alive. | Orlando is not tough. | contradiction |
Leona is not dishonest.
Lombard is not good-tempered.
Harvey is not good-tempered.
Gemma is hypocritical.
Arvel is tough.
Orlando is tough.
Lombard is hypocritical.
Arvel is not selfish.
Leona is good-tempered.
Harvey is not dishonest.
Harvey is tough.
Orlando is alive.As long as someone is hypocritical, he is not dishonest and not tough.
If there is someone who is tough, then Gemma is not dishonest and Morris is not hypocritical.
If there is at least one people who is dishonest or tough, then Leona is hypocritical.
Someone is alive and hypocritical if and only if he is not good-tempered and tough.
If there is someone who is not tough, then Gemma is not dishonest.
It can be concluded that Gemma is not tough and Harvey is not dishonest once knowing that Gemma is not selfish.
If Arvel is not hypocritical or Gemma is alive, then Gemma is good-tempered.
If someone is both not selfish and not tough, then he is dishonest.
If Leona is good-tempered, then Gemma is not hypocritical and Harvey is not dishonest.
If there is someone who is either not good-tempered or dishonest, then Leona is alive.
Lombard being not alive implies that Leona is not tough.
If there is at least one people who is both not tough and dishonest, then Orlando is not alive. | Orlando is not selfish. | neutral |
Leona is not dishonest.
Lombard is not good-tempered.
Harvey is not good-tempered.
Gemma is hypocritical.
Arvel is tough.
Orlando is tough.
Lombard is hypocritical.
Arvel is not selfish.
Leona is good-tempered.
Harvey is not dishonest.
Harvey is tough.
Orlando is alive.As long as someone is hypocritical, he is not dishonest and not tough.
If there is someone who is tough, then Gemma is not dishonest and Morris is not hypocritical.
If there is at least one people who is dishonest or tough, then Leona is hypocritical.
Someone is alive and hypocritical if and only if he is not good-tempered and tough.
If there is someone who is not tough, then Gemma is not dishonest.
It can be concluded that Gemma is not tough and Harvey is not dishonest once knowing that Gemma is not selfish.
If Arvel is not hypocritical or Gemma is alive, then Gemma is good-tempered.
If someone is both not selfish and not tough, then he is dishonest.
If Leona is good-tempered, then Gemma is not hypocritical and Harvey is not dishonest.
If there is someone who is either not good-tempered or dishonest, then Leona is alive.
Lombard being not alive implies that Leona is not tough.
If there is at least one people who is both not tough and dishonest, then Orlando is not alive. | Orlando is alive. | entailment |
Leona is not dishonest.
Lombard is not good-tempered.
Harvey is not good-tempered.
Gemma is hypocritical.
Arvel is tough.
Orlando is tough.
Lombard is hypocritical.
Arvel is not selfish.
Leona is good-tempered.
Harvey is not dishonest.
Harvey is tough.
Orlando is alive.As long as someone is hypocritical, he is not dishonest and not tough.
If there is someone who is tough, then Gemma is not dishonest and Morris is not hypocritical.
If there is at least one people who is dishonest or tough, then Leona is hypocritical.
Someone is alive and hypocritical if and only if he is not good-tempered and tough.
If there is someone who is not tough, then Gemma is not dishonest.
It can be concluded that Gemma is not tough and Harvey is not dishonest once knowing that Gemma is not selfish.
If Arvel is not hypocritical or Gemma is alive, then Gemma is good-tempered.
If someone is both not selfish and not tough, then he is dishonest.
If Leona is good-tempered, then Gemma is not hypocritical and Harvey is not dishonest.
If there is someone who is either not good-tempered or dishonest, then Leona is alive.
Lombard being not alive implies that Leona is not tough.
If there is at least one people who is both not tough and dishonest, then Orlando is not alive. | Leona is good-tempered. | self_contradiction |
Abraham is not loyal.
Abraham is not crazy.
Hunter is loyal.
Hanna is not powerful.
Hector is not powerful.
Hector is not shy.
Robert is not shy.
Hector is not tall.
Robert is not selfish.
Hadwin is powerful.
Robert is crazy.
Hanna is not tall.If someone is either loyal or not selfish, then he is crazy and shy.
If someone who is not powerful is also not crazy, then he is tall.
If Kelsey is selfish, then Hanna is not powerful and Kelsey is not shy.
Someone is powerful and shy if and only if he is not tall.
If there is at least one people who is not tall or not shy, then Hadwin is selfish.
As long as someone is not powerful, he is not crazy and not shy.
It can be concluded that Hadwin is powerful and Abraham is loyal once knowing that Hunter is tall.
If there is someone who is either not loyal or selfish, then Hadwin is not shy.
If someone is both shy and crazy, then he is loyal.
If someone is loyal or he is powerful, then he is not shy.
Hanna being crazy and Hunter being not shy are equivalent to Hadwin being tall and Hector being loyal.
If there is someone who is not shy, then Robert is not tall and Robert is not crazy. | Hanna is not crazy. | entailment |
Abraham is not loyal.
Abraham is not crazy.
Hunter is loyal.
Hanna is not powerful.
Hector is not powerful.
Hector is not shy.
Robert is not shy.
Hector is not tall.
Robert is not selfish.
Hadwin is powerful.
Robert is crazy.
Hanna is not tall.If someone is either loyal or not selfish, then he is crazy and shy.
If someone who is not powerful is also not crazy, then he is tall.
If Kelsey is selfish, then Hanna is not powerful and Kelsey is not shy.
Someone is powerful and shy if and only if he is not tall.
If there is at least one people who is not tall or not shy, then Hadwin is selfish.
As long as someone is not powerful, he is not crazy and not shy.
It can be concluded that Hadwin is powerful and Abraham is loyal once knowing that Hunter is tall.
If there is someone who is either not loyal or selfish, then Hadwin is not shy.
If someone is both shy and crazy, then he is loyal.
If someone is loyal or he is powerful, then he is not shy.
Hanna being crazy and Hunter being not shy are equivalent to Hadwin being tall and Hector being loyal.
If there is someone who is not shy, then Robert is not tall and Robert is not crazy. | Robert is powerful. | entailment |
Abraham is not loyal.
Abraham is not crazy.
Hunter is loyal.
Hanna is not powerful.
Hector is not powerful.
Hector is not shy.
Robert is not shy.
Hector is not tall.
Robert is not selfish.
Hadwin is powerful.
Robert is crazy.
Hanna is not tall.If someone is either loyal or not selfish, then he is crazy and shy.
If someone who is not powerful is also not crazy, then he is tall.
If Kelsey is selfish, then Hanna is not powerful and Kelsey is not shy.
Someone is powerful and shy if and only if he is not tall.
If there is at least one people who is not tall or not shy, then Hadwin is selfish.
As long as someone is not powerful, he is not crazy and not shy.
It can be concluded that Hadwin is powerful and Abraham is loyal once knowing that Hunter is tall.
If there is someone who is either not loyal or selfish, then Hadwin is not shy.
If someone is both shy and crazy, then he is loyal.
If someone is loyal or he is powerful, then he is not shy.
Hanna being crazy and Hunter being not shy are equivalent to Hadwin being tall and Hector being loyal.
If there is someone who is not shy, then Robert is not tall and Robert is not crazy. | Hector is not powerful. | self_contradiction |
Abraham is not loyal.
Abraham is not crazy.
Hunter is loyal.
Hanna is not powerful.
Hector is not powerful.
Hector is not shy.
Robert is not shy.
Hector is not tall.
Robert is not selfish.
Hadwin is powerful.
Robert is crazy.
Hanna is not tall.If someone is either loyal or not selfish, then he is crazy and shy.
If someone who is not powerful is also not crazy, then he is tall.
If Kelsey is selfish, then Hanna is not powerful and Kelsey is not shy.
Someone is powerful and shy if and only if he is not tall.
If there is at least one people who is not tall or not shy, then Hadwin is selfish.
As long as someone is not powerful, he is not crazy and not shy.
It can be concluded that Hadwin is powerful and Abraham is loyal once knowing that Hunter is tall.
If there is someone who is either not loyal or selfish, then Hadwin is not shy.
If someone is both shy and crazy, then he is loyal.
If someone is loyal or he is powerful, then he is not shy.
Hanna being crazy and Hunter being not shy are equivalent to Hadwin being tall and Hector being loyal.
If there is someone who is not shy, then Robert is not tall and Robert is not crazy. | Hunter is shy. | self_contradiction |
Abraham is not loyal.
Abraham is not crazy.
Hunter is loyal.
Hanna is not powerful.
Hector is not powerful.
Hector is not shy.
Robert is not shy.
Hector is not tall.
Robert is not selfish.
Hadwin is powerful.
Robert is crazy.
Hanna is not tall.If someone is either loyal or not selfish, then he is crazy and shy.
If someone who is not powerful is also not crazy, then he is tall.
If Kelsey is selfish, then Hanna is not powerful and Kelsey is not shy.
Someone is powerful and shy if and only if he is not tall.
If there is at least one people who is not tall or not shy, then Hadwin is selfish.
As long as someone is not powerful, he is not crazy and not shy.
It can be concluded that Hadwin is powerful and Abraham is loyal once knowing that Hunter is tall.
If there is someone who is either not loyal or selfish, then Hadwin is not shy.
If someone is both shy and crazy, then he is loyal.
If someone is loyal or he is powerful, then he is not shy.
Hanna being crazy and Hunter being not shy are equivalent to Hadwin being tall and Hector being loyal.
If there is someone who is not shy, then Robert is not tall and Robert is not crazy. | Hunter is not loyal. | contradiction |
Abraham is not loyal.
Abraham is not crazy.
Hunter is loyal.
Hanna is not powerful.
Hector is not powerful.
Hector is not shy.
Robert is not shy.
Hector is not tall.
Robert is not selfish.
Hadwin is powerful.
Robert is crazy.
Hanna is not tall.If someone is either loyal or not selfish, then he is crazy and shy.
If someone who is not powerful is also not crazy, then he is tall.
If Kelsey is selfish, then Hanna is not powerful and Kelsey is not shy.
Someone is powerful and shy if and only if he is not tall.
If there is at least one people who is not tall or not shy, then Hadwin is selfish.
As long as someone is not powerful, he is not crazy and not shy.
It can be concluded that Hadwin is powerful and Abraham is loyal once knowing that Hunter is tall.
If there is someone who is either not loyal or selfish, then Hadwin is not shy.
If someone is both shy and crazy, then he is loyal.
If someone is loyal or he is powerful, then he is not shy.
Hanna being crazy and Hunter being not shy are equivalent to Hadwin being tall and Hector being loyal.
If there is someone who is not shy, then Robert is not tall and Robert is not crazy. | Hadwin is not powerful. | contradiction |
Abraham is not loyal.
Abraham is not crazy.
Hunter is loyal.
Hanna is not powerful.
Hector is not powerful.
Hector is not shy.
Robert is not shy.
Hector is not tall.
Robert is not selfish.
Hadwin is powerful.
Robert is crazy.
Hanna is not tall.If someone is either loyal or not selfish, then he is crazy and shy.
If someone who is not powerful is also not crazy, then he is tall.
If Kelsey is selfish, then Hanna is not powerful and Kelsey is not shy.
Someone is powerful and shy if and only if he is not tall.
If there is at least one people who is not tall or not shy, then Hadwin is selfish.
As long as someone is not powerful, he is not crazy and not shy.
It can be concluded that Hadwin is powerful and Abraham is loyal once knowing that Hunter is tall.
If there is someone who is either not loyal or selfish, then Hadwin is not shy.
If someone is both shy and crazy, then he is loyal.
If someone is loyal or he is powerful, then he is not shy.
Hanna being crazy and Hunter being not shy are equivalent to Hadwin being tall and Hector being loyal.
If there is someone who is not shy, then Robert is not tall and Robert is not crazy. | Hunter is loyal. | entailment |
Abraham is not loyal.
Abraham is not crazy.
Hunter is loyal.
Hanna is not powerful.
Hector is not powerful.
Hector is not shy.
Robert is not shy.
Hector is not tall.
Robert is not selfish.
Hadwin is powerful.
Robert is crazy.
Hanna is not tall.If someone is either loyal or not selfish, then he is crazy and shy.
If someone who is not powerful is also not crazy, then he is tall.
If Kelsey is selfish, then Hanna is not powerful and Kelsey is not shy.
Someone is powerful and shy if and only if he is not tall.
If there is at least one people who is not tall or not shy, then Hadwin is selfish.
As long as someone is not powerful, he is not crazy and not shy.
It can be concluded that Hadwin is powerful and Abraham is loyal once knowing that Hunter is tall.
If there is someone who is either not loyal or selfish, then Hadwin is not shy.
If someone is both shy and crazy, then he is loyal.
If someone is loyal or he is powerful, then he is not shy.
Hanna being crazy and Hunter being not shy are equivalent to Hadwin being tall and Hector being loyal.
If there is someone who is not shy, then Robert is not tall and Robert is not crazy. | Kelsey is shy. | neutral |
Abraham is not loyal.
Abraham is not crazy.
Hunter is loyal.
Hanna is not powerful.
Hector is not powerful.
Hector is not shy.
Robert is not shy.
Hector is not tall.
Robert is not selfish.
Hadwin is powerful.
Robert is crazy.
Hanna is not tall.If someone is either loyal or not selfish, then he is crazy and shy.
If someone who is not powerful is also not crazy, then he is tall.
If Kelsey is selfish, then Hanna is not powerful and Kelsey is not shy.
Someone is powerful and shy if and only if he is not tall.
If there is at least one people who is not tall or not shy, then Hadwin is selfish.
As long as someone is not powerful, he is not crazy and not shy.
It can be concluded that Hadwin is powerful and Abraham is loyal once knowing that Hunter is tall.
If there is someone who is either not loyal or selfish, then Hadwin is not shy.
If someone is both shy and crazy, then he is loyal.
If someone is loyal or he is powerful, then he is not shy.
Hanna being crazy and Hunter being not shy are equivalent to Hadwin being tall and Hector being loyal.
If there is someone who is not shy, then Robert is not tall and Robert is not crazy. | Hanna is not powerful. | self_contradiction |
Abraham is not loyal.
Abraham is not crazy.
Hunter is loyal.
Hanna is not powerful.
Hector is not powerful.
Hector is not shy.
Robert is not shy.
Hector is not tall.
Robert is not selfish.
Hadwin is powerful.
Robert is crazy.
Hanna is not tall.If someone is either loyal or not selfish, then he is crazy and shy.
If someone who is not powerful is also not crazy, then he is tall.
If Kelsey is selfish, then Hanna is not powerful and Kelsey is not shy.
Someone is powerful and shy if and only if he is not tall.
If there is at least one people who is not tall or not shy, then Hadwin is selfish.
As long as someone is not powerful, he is not crazy and not shy.
It can be concluded that Hadwin is powerful and Abraham is loyal once knowing that Hunter is tall.
If there is someone who is either not loyal or selfish, then Hadwin is not shy.
If someone is both shy and crazy, then he is loyal.
If someone is loyal or he is powerful, then he is not shy.
Hanna being crazy and Hunter being not shy are equivalent to Hadwin being tall and Hector being loyal.
If there is someone who is not shy, then Robert is not tall and Robert is not crazy. | Hunter is tall. | neutral |
Abraham is not loyal.
Abraham is not crazy.
Hunter is loyal.
Hanna is not powerful.
Hector is not powerful.
Hector is not shy.
Robert is not shy.
Hector is not tall.
Robert is not selfish.
Hadwin is powerful.
Robert is crazy.
Hanna is not tall.If someone is either loyal or not selfish, then he is crazy and shy.
If someone who is not powerful is also not crazy, then he is tall.
If Kelsey is selfish, then Hanna is not powerful and Kelsey is not shy.
Someone is powerful and shy if and only if he is not tall.
If there is at least one people who is not tall or not shy, then Hadwin is selfish.
As long as someone is not powerful, he is not crazy and not shy.
It can be concluded that Hadwin is powerful and Abraham is loyal once knowing that Hunter is tall.
If there is someone who is either not loyal or selfish, then Hadwin is not shy.
If someone is both shy and crazy, then he is loyal.
If someone is loyal or he is powerful, then he is not shy.
Hanna being crazy and Hunter being not shy are equivalent to Hadwin being tall and Hector being loyal.
If there is someone who is not shy, then Robert is not tall and Robert is not crazy. | Hanna is not loyal. | neutral |
Abraham is not loyal.
Abraham is not crazy.
Hunter is loyal.
Hanna is not powerful.
Hector is not powerful.
Hector is not shy.
Robert is not shy.
Hector is not tall.
Robert is not selfish.
Hadwin is powerful.
Robert is crazy.
Hanna is not tall.If someone is either loyal or not selfish, then he is crazy and shy.
If someone who is not powerful is also not crazy, then he is tall.
If Kelsey is selfish, then Hanna is not powerful and Kelsey is not shy.
Someone is powerful and shy if and only if he is not tall.
If there is at least one people who is not tall or not shy, then Hadwin is selfish.
As long as someone is not powerful, he is not crazy and not shy.
It can be concluded that Hadwin is powerful and Abraham is loyal once knowing that Hunter is tall.
If there is someone who is either not loyal or selfish, then Hadwin is not shy.
If someone is both shy and crazy, then he is loyal.
If someone is loyal or he is powerful, then he is not shy.
Hanna being crazy and Hunter being not shy are equivalent to Hadwin being tall and Hector being loyal.
If there is someone who is not shy, then Robert is not tall and Robert is not crazy. | Robert is crazy. | self_contradiction |
Abraham is not loyal.
Abraham is not crazy.
Hunter is loyal.
Hanna is not powerful.
Hector is not powerful.
Hector is not shy.
Robert is not shy.
Hector is not tall.
Robert is not selfish.
Hadwin is powerful.
Robert is crazy.
Hanna is not tall.If someone is either loyal or not selfish, then he is crazy and shy.
If someone who is not powerful is also not crazy, then he is tall.
If Kelsey is selfish, then Hanna is not powerful and Kelsey is not shy.
Someone is powerful and shy if and only if he is not tall.
If there is at least one people who is not tall or not shy, then Hadwin is selfish.
As long as someone is not powerful, he is not crazy and not shy.
It can be concluded that Hadwin is powerful and Abraham is loyal once knowing that Hunter is tall.
If there is someone who is either not loyal or selfish, then Hadwin is not shy.
If someone is both shy and crazy, then he is loyal.
If someone is loyal or he is powerful, then he is not shy.
Hanna being crazy and Hunter being not shy are equivalent to Hadwin being tall and Hector being loyal.
If there is someone who is not shy, then Robert is not tall and Robert is not crazy. | Hanna is not tall. | self_contradiction |
Abraham is not loyal.
Abraham is not crazy.
Hunter is loyal.
Hanna is not powerful.
Hector is not powerful.
Hector is not shy.
Robert is not shy.
Hector is not tall.
Robert is not selfish.
Hadwin is powerful.
Robert is crazy.
Hanna is not tall.If someone is either loyal or not selfish, then he is crazy and shy.
If someone who is not powerful is also not crazy, then he is tall.
If Kelsey is selfish, then Hanna is not powerful and Kelsey is not shy.
Someone is powerful and shy if and only if he is not tall.
If there is at least one people who is not tall or not shy, then Hadwin is selfish.
As long as someone is not powerful, he is not crazy and not shy.
It can be concluded that Hadwin is powerful and Abraham is loyal once knowing that Hunter is tall.
If there is someone who is either not loyal or selfish, then Hadwin is not shy.
If someone is both shy and crazy, then he is loyal.
If someone is loyal or he is powerful, then he is not shy.
Hanna being crazy and Hunter being not shy are equivalent to Hadwin being tall and Hector being loyal.
If there is someone who is not shy, then Robert is not tall and Robert is not crazy. | Kelsey is powerful. | neutral |
Abraham is not loyal.
Abraham is not crazy.
Hunter is loyal.
Hanna is not powerful.
Hector is not powerful.
Hector is not shy.
Robert is not shy.
Hector is not tall.
Robert is not selfish.
Hadwin is powerful.
Robert is crazy.
Hanna is not tall.If someone is either loyal or not selfish, then he is crazy and shy.
If someone who is not powerful is also not crazy, then he is tall.
If Kelsey is selfish, then Hanna is not powerful and Kelsey is not shy.
Someone is powerful and shy if and only if he is not tall.
If there is at least one people who is not tall or not shy, then Hadwin is selfish.
As long as someone is not powerful, he is not crazy and not shy.
It can be concluded that Hadwin is powerful and Abraham is loyal once knowing that Hunter is tall.
If there is someone who is either not loyal or selfish, then Hadwin is not shy.
If someone is both shy and crazy, then he is loyal.
If someone is loyal or he is powerful, then he is not shy.
Hanna being crazy and Hunter being not shy are equivalent to Hadwin being tall and Hector being loyal.
If there is someone who is not shy, then Robert is not tall and Robert is not crazy. | Kelsey is not loyal. | neutral |
Abraham is not loyal.
Abraham is not crazy.
Hunter is loyal.
Hanna is not powerful.
Hector is not powerful.
Hector is not shy.
Robert is not shy.
Hector is not tall.
Robert is not selfish.
Hadwin is powerful.
Robert is crazy.
Hanna is not tall.If someone is either loyal or not selfish, then he is crazy and shy.
If someone who is not powerful is also not crazy, then he is tall.
If Kelsey is selfish, then Hanna is not powerful and Kelsey is not shy.
Someone is powerful and shy if and only if he is not tall.
If there is at least one people who is not tall or not shy, then Hadwin is selfish.
As long as someone is not powerful, he is not crazy and not shy.
It can be concluded that Hadwin is powerful and Abraham is loyal once knowing that Hunter is tall.
If there is someone who is either not loyal or selfish, then Hadwin is not shy.
If someone is both shy and crazy, then he is loyal.
If someone is loyal or he is powerful, then he is not shy.
Hanna being crazy and Hunter being not shy are equivalent to Hadwin being tall and Hector being loyal.
If there is someone who is not shy, then Robert is not tall and Robert is not crazy. | Abraham is crazy. | contradiction |
Abraham is not loyal.
Abraham is not crazy.
Hunter is loyal.
Hanna is not powerful.
Hector is not powerful.
Hector is not shy.
Robert is not shy.
Hector is not tall.
Robert is not selfish.
Hadwin is powerful.
Robert is crazy.
Hanna is not tall.If someone is either loyal or not selfish, then he is crazy and shy.
If someone who is not powerful is also not crazy, then he is tall.
If Kelsey is selfish, then Hanna is not powerful and Kelsey is not shy.
Someone is powerful and shy if and only if he is not tall.
If there is at least one people who is not tall or not shy, then Hadwin is selfish.
As long as someone is not powerful, he is not crazy and not shy.
It can be concluded that Hadwin is powerful and Abraham is loyal once knowing that Hunter is tall.
If there is someone who is either not loyal or selfish, then Hadwin is not shy.
If someone is both shy and crazy, then he is loyal.
If someone is loyal or he is powerful, then he is not shy.
Hanna being crazy and Hunter being not shy are equivalent to Hadwin being tall and Hector being loyal.
If there is someone who is not shy, then Robert is not tall and Robert is not crazy. | Hunter is crazy. | entailment |
Abraham is not loyal.
Abraham is not crazy.
Hunter is loyal.
Hanna is not powerful.
Hector is not powerful.
Hector is not shy.
Robert is not shy.
Hector is not tall.
Robert is not selfish.
Hadwin is powerful.
Robert is crazy.
Hanna is not tall.If someone is either loyal or not selfish, then he is crazy and shy.
If someone who is not powerful is also not crazy, then he is tall.
If Kelsey is selfish, then Hanna is not powerful and Kelsey is not shy.
Someone is powerful and shy if and only if he is not tall.
If there is at least one people who is not tall or not shy, then Hadwin is selfish.
As long as someone is not powerful, he is not crazy and not shy.
It can be concluded that Hadwin is powerful and Abraham is loyal once knowing that Hunter is tall.
If there is someone who is either not loyal or selfish, then Hadwin is not shy.
If someone is both shy and crazy, then he is loyal.
If someone is loyal or he is powerful, then he is not shy.
Hanna being crazy and Hunter being not shy are equivalent to Hadwin being tall and Hector being loyal.
If there is someone who is not shy, then Robert is not tall and Robert is not crazy. | Hector is crazy. | contradiction |
Abraham is not loyal.
Abraham is not crazy.
Hunter is loyal.
Hanna is not powerful.
Hector is not powerful.
Hector is not shy.
Robert is not shy.
Hector is not tall.
Robert is not selfish.
Hadwin is powerful.
Robert is crazy.
Hanna is not tall.If someone is either loyal or not selfish, then he is crazy and shy.
If someone who is not powerful is also not crazy, then he is tall.
If Kelsey is selfish, then Hanna is not powerful and Kelsey is not shy.
Someone is powerful and shy if and only if he is not tall.
If there is at least one people who is not tall or not shy, then Hadwin is selfish.
As long as someone is not powerful, he is not crazy and not shy.
It can be concluded that Hadwin is powerful and Abraham is loyal once knowing that Hunter is tall.
If there is someone who is either not loyal or selfish, then Hadwin is not shy.
If someone is both shy and crazy, then he is loyal.
If someone is loyal or he is powerful, then he is not shy.
Hanna being crazy and Hunter being not shy are equivalent to Hadwin being tall and Hector being loyal.
If there is someone who is not shy, then Robert is not tall and Robert is not crazy. | Abraham is loyal. | contradiction |
Abraham is not loyal.
Abraham is not crazy.
Hunter is loyal.
Hanna is not powerful.
Hector is not powerful.
Hector is not shy.
Robert is not shy.
Hector is not tall.
Robert is not selfish.
Hadwin is powerful.
Robert is crazy.
Hanna is not tall.If someone is either loyal or not selfish, then he is crazy and shy.
If someone who is not powerful is also not crazy, then he is tall.
If Kelsey is selfish, then Hanna is not powerful and Kelsey is not shy.
Someone is powerful and shy if and only if he is not tall.
If there is at least one people who is not tall or not shy, then Hadwin is selfish.
As long as someone is not powerful, he is not crazy and not shy.
It can be concluded that Hadwin is powerful and Abraham is loyal once knowing that Hunter is tall.
If there is someone who is either not loyal or selfish, then Hadwin is not shy.
If someone is both shy and crazy, then he is loyal.
If someone is loyal or he is powerful, then he is not shy.
Hanna being crazy and Hunter being not shy are equivalent to Hadwin being tall and Hector being loyal.
If there is someone who is not shy, then Robert is not tall and Robert is not crazy. | Hadwin is powerful. | entailment |
James is vivacious.
James is not careless.
Todd is fuzzy.
Samson is careless.
Jesse is vivacious.
Samson is not unpleasant.
Todd is eastern.
Samson is not hypocritical.
Todd is not careless.
Bevis is unpleasant.
Bevis is not eastern.
Bevis is hypocritical.If there is at least one people who is both hypocritical and not careless, then Bevis is not eastern.
Someone who is careless is always not eastern.
If there is someone who is unpleasant, then Paxton is hypocritical and Jesse is careless.
If someone is eastern or not hypocritical, then he is vivacious.
As long as someone is not hypocritical, he is not fuzzy and careless.
If there is at least one people who is hypocritical, then Jesse is not unpleasant.
James being careless implies that Bevis is eastern and Bevis is fuzzy.
If Kimball is eastern, then James is hypocritical.
Someone being both careless and eastern is equivalent to being not vivacious and not hypocritical.
If someone is fuzzy or he is not eastern, then he is careless.
If someone is eastern, then he is unpleasant.
Samson is unpleasant if and only if Jesse is not hypocritical and Todd is fuzzy. | Bevis is fuzzy. | neutral |
James is vivacious.
James is not careless.
Todd is fuzzy.
Samson is careless.
Jesse is vivacious.
Samson is not unpleasant.
Todd is eastern.
Samson is not hypocritical.
Todd is not careless.
Bevis is unpleasant.
Bevis is not eastern.
Bevis is hypocritical.If there is at least one people who is both hypocritical and not careless, then Bevis is not eastern.
Someone who is careless is always not eastern.
If there is someone who is unpleasant, then Paxton is hypocritical and Jesse is careless.
If someone is eastern or not hypocritical, then he is vivacious.
As long as someone is not hypocritical, he is not fuzzy and careless.
If there is at least one people who is hypocritical, then Jesse is not unpleasant.
James being careless implies that Bevis is eastern and Bevis is fuzzy.
If Kimball is eastern, then James is hypocritical.
Someone being both careless and eastern is equivalent to being not vivacious and not hypocritical.
If someone is fuzzy or he is not eastern, then he is careless.
If someone is eastern, then he is unpleasant.
Samson is unpleasant if and only if Jesse is not hypocritical and Todd is fuzzy. | Todd is not careless. | self_contradiction |
James is vivacious.
James is not careless.
Todd is fuzzy.
Samson is careless.
Jesse is vivacious.
Samson is not unpleasant.
Todd is eastern.
Samson is not hypocritical.
Todd is not careless.
Bevis is unpleasant.
Bevis is not eastern.
Bevis is hypocritical.If there is at least one people who is both hypocritical and not careless, then Bevis is not eastern.
Someone who is careless is always not eastern.
If there is someone who is unpleasant, then Paxton is hypocritical and Jesse is careless.
If someone is eastern or not hypocritical, then he is vivacious.
As long as someone is not hypocritical, he is not fuzzy and careless.
If there is at least one people who is hypocritical, then Jesse is not unpleasant.
James being careless implies that Bevis is eastern and Bevis is fuzzy.
If Kimball is eastern, then James is hypocritical.
Someone being both careless and eastern is equivalent to being not vivacious and not hypocritical.
If someone is fuzzy or he is not eastern, then he is careless.
If someone is eastern, then he is unpleasant.
Samson is unpleasant if and only if Jesse is not hypocritical and Todd is fuzzy. | Todd is careless. | self_contradiction |
James is vivacious.
James is not careless.
Todd is fuzzy.
Samson is careless.
Jesse is vivacious.
Samson is not unpleasant.
Todd is eastern.
Samson is not hypocritical.
Todd is not careless.
Bevis is unpleasant.
Bevis is not eastern.
Bevis is hypocritical.If there is at least one people who is both hypocritical and not careless, then Bevis is not eastern.
Someone who is careless is always not eastern.
If there is someone who is unpleasant, then Paxton is hypocritical and Jesse is careless.
If someone is eastern or not hypocritical, then he is vivacious.
As long as someone is not hypocritical, he is not fuzzy and careless.
If there is at least one people who is hypocritical, then Jesse is not unpleasant.
James being careless implies that Bevis is eastern and Bevis is fuzzy.
If Kimball is eastern, then James is hypocritical.
Someone being both careless and eastern is equivalent to being not vivacious and not hypocritical.
If someone is fuzzy or he is not eastern, then he is careless.
If someone is eastern, then he is unpleasant.
Samson is unpleasant if and only if Jesse is not hypocritical and Todd is fuzzy. | Todd is fuzzy. | self_contradiction |
James is vivacious.
James is not careless.
Todd is fuzzy.
Samson is careless.
Jesse is vivacious.
Samson is not unpleasant.
Todd is eastern.
Samson is not hypocritical.
Todd is not careless.
Bevis is unpleasant.
Bevis is not eastern.
Bevis is hypocritical.If there is at least one people who is both hypocritical and not careless, then Bevis is not eastern.
Someone who is careless is always not eastern.
If there is someone who is unpleasant, then Paxton is hypocritical and Jesse is careless.
If someone is eastern or not hypocritical, then he is vivacious.
As long as someone is not hypocritical, he is not fuzzy and careless.
If there is at least one people who is hypocritical, then Jesse is not unpleasant.
James being careless implies that Bevis is eastern and Bevis is fuzzy.
If Kimball is eastern, then James is hypocritical.
Someone being both careless and eastern is equivalent to being not vivacious and not hypocritical.
If someone is fuzzy or he is not eastern, then he is careless.
If someone is eastern, then he is unpleasant.
Samson is unpleasant if and only if Jesse is not hypocritical and Todd is fuzzy. | James is careless. | contradiction |
James is vivacious.
James is not careless.
Todd is fuzzy.
Samson is careless.
Jesse is vivacious.
Samson is not unpleasant.
Todd is eastern.
Samson is not hypocritical.
Todd is not careless.
Bevis is unpleasant.
Bevis is not eastern.
Bevis is hypocritical.If there is at least one people who is both hypocritical and not careless, then Bevis is not eastern.
Someone who is careless is always not eastern.
If there is someone who is unpleasant, then Paxton is hypocritical and Jesse is careless.
If someone is eastern or not hypocritical, then he is vivacious.
As long as someone is not hypocritical, he is not fuzzy and careless.
If there is at least one people who is hypocritical, then Jesse is not unpleasant.
James being careless implies that Bevis is eastern and Bevis is fuzzy.
If Kimball is eastern, then James is hypocritical.
Someone being both careless and eastern is equivalent to being not vivacious and not hypocritical.
If someone is fuzzy or he is not eastern, then he is careless.
If someone is eastern, then he is unpleasant.
Samson is unpleasant if and only if Jesse is not hypocritical and Todd is fuzzy. | Bevis is not hypocritical. | contradiction |
James is vivacious.
James is not careless.
Todd is fuzzy.
Samson is careless.
Jesse is vivacious.
Samson is not unpleasant.
Todd is eastern.
Samson is not hypocritical.
Todd is not careless.
Bevis is unpleasant.
Bevis is not eastern.
Bevis is hypocritical.If there is at least one people who is both hypocritical and not careless, then Bevis is not eastern.
Someone who is careless is always not eastern.
If there is someone who is unpleasant, then Paxton is hypocritical and Jesse is careless.
If someone is eastern or not hypocritical, then he is vivacious.
As long as someone is not hypocritical, he is not fuzzy and careless.
If there is at least one people who is hypocritical, then Jesse is not unpleasant.
James being careless implies that Bevis is eastern and Bevis is fuzzy.
If Kimball is eastern, then James is hypocritical.
Someone being both careless and eastern is equivalent to being not vivacious and not hypocritical.
If someone is fuzzy or he is not eastern, then he is careless.
If someone is eastern, then he is unpleasant.
Samson is unpleasant if and only if Jesse is not hypocritical and Todd is fuzzy. | James is not careless. | entailment |
James is vivacious.
James is not careless.
Todd is fuzzy.
Samson is careless.
Jesse is vivacious.
Samson is not unpleasant.
Todd is eastern.
Samson is not hypocritical.
Todd is not careless.
Bevis is unpleasant.
Bevis is not eastern.
Bevis is hypocritical.If there is at least one people who is both hypocritical and not careless, then Bevis is not eastern.
Someone who is careless is always not eastern.
If there is someone who is unpleasant, then Paxton is hypocritical and Jesse is careless.
If someone is eastern or not hypocritical, then he is vivacious.
As long as someone is not hypocritical, he is not fuzzy and careless.
If there is at least one people who is hypocritical, then Jesse is not unpleasant.
James being careless implies that Bevis is eastern and Bevis is fuzzy.
If Kimball is eastern, then James is hypocritical.
Someone being both careless and eastern is equivalent to being not vivacious and not hypocritical.
If someone is fuzzy or he is not eastern, then he is careless.
If someone is eastern, then he is unpleasant.
Samson is unpleasant if and only if Jesse is not hypocritical and Todd is fuzzy. | Kimball is careless. | neutral |
James is vivacious.
James is not careless.
Todd is fuzzy.
Samson is careless.
Jesse is vivacious.
Samson is not unpleasant.
Todd is eastern.
Samson is not hypocritical.
Todd is not careless.
Bevis is unpleasant.
Bevis is not eastern.
Bevis is hypocritical.If there is at least one people who is both hypocritical and not careless, then Bevis is not eastern.
Someone who is careless is always not eastern.
If there is someone who is unpleasant, then Paxton is hypocritical and Jesse is careless.
If someone is eastern or not hypocritical, then he is vivacious.
As long as someone is not hypocritical, he is not fuzzy and careless.
If there is at least one people who is hypocritical, then Jesse is not unpleasant.
James being careless implies that Bevis is eastern and Bevis is fuzzy.
If Kimball is eastern, then James is hypocritical.
Someone being both careless and eastern is equivalent to being not vivacious and not hypocritical.
If someone is fuzzy or he is not eastern, then he is careless.
If someone is eastern, then he is unpleasant.
Samson is unpleasant if and only if Jesse is not hypocritical and Todd is fuzzy. | Jesse is careless. | entailment |
James is vivacious.
James is not careless.
Todd is fuzzy.
Samson is careless.
Jesse is vivacious.
Samson is not unpleasant.
Todd is eastern.
Samson is not hypocritical.
Todd is not careless.
Bevis is unpleasant.
Bevis is not eastern.
Bevis is hypocritical.If there is at least one people who is both hypocritical and not careless, then Bevis is not eastern.
Someone who is careless is always not eastern.
If there is someone who is unpleasant, then Paxton is hypocritical and Jesse is careless.
If someone is eastern or not hypocritical, then he is vivacious.
As long as someone is not hypocritical, he is not fuzzy and careless.
If there is at least one people who is hypocritical, then Jesse is not unpleasant.
James being careless implies that Bevis is eastern and Bevis is fuzzy.
If Kimball is eastern, then James is hypocritical.
Someone being both careless and eastern is equivalent to being not vivacious and not hypocritical.
If someone is fuzzy or he is not eastern, then he is careless.
If someone is eastern, then he is unpleasant.
Samson is unpleasant if and only if Jesse is not hypocritical and Todd is fuzzy. | Samson is not vivacious. | contradiction |
James is vivacious.
James is not careless.
Todd is fuzzy.
Samson is careless.
Jesse is vivacious.
Samson is not unpleasant.
Todd is eastern.
Samson is not hypocritical.
Todd is not careless.
Bevis is unpleasant.
Bevis is not eastern.
Bevis is hypocritical.If there is at least one people who is both hypocritical and not careless, then Bevis is not eastern.
Someone who is careless is always not eastern.
If there is someone who is unpleasant, then Paxton is hypocritical and Jesse is careless.
If someone is eastern or not hypocritical, then he is vivacious.
As long as someone is not hypocritical, he is not fuzzy and careless.
If there is at least one people who is hypocritical, then Jesse is not unpleasant.
James being careless implies that Bevis is eastern and Bevis is fuzzy.
If Kimball is eastern, then James is hypocritical.
Someone being both careless and eastern is equivalent to being not vivacious and not hypocritical.
If someone is fuzzy or he is not eastern, then he is careless.
If someone is eastern, then he is unpleasant.
Samson is unpleasant if and only if Jesse is not hypocritical and Todd is fuzzy. | James is not unpleasant. | neutral |
James is vivacious.
James is not careless.
Todd is fuzzy.
Samson is careless.
Jesse is vivacious.
Samson is not unpleasant.
Todd is eastern.
Samson is not hypocritical.
Todd is not careless.
Bevis is unpleasant.
Bevis is not eastern.
Bevis is hypocritical.If there is at least one people who is both hypocritical and not careless, then Bevis is not eastern.
Someone who is careless is always not eastern.
If there is someone who is unpleasant, then Paxton is hypocritical and Jesse is careless.
If someone is eastern or not hypocritical, then he is vivacious.
As long as someone is not hypocritical, he is not fuzzy and careless.
If there is at least one people who is hypocritical, then Jesse is not unpleasant.
James being careless implies that Bevis is eastern and Bevis is fuzzy.
If Kimball is eastern, then James is hypocritical.
Someone being both careless and eastern is equivalent to being not vivacious and not hypocritical.
If someone is fuzzy or he is not eastern, then he is careless.
If someone is eastern, then he is unpleasant.
Samson is unpleasant if and only if Jesse is not hypocritical and Todd is fuzzy. | Todd is vivacious. | self_contradiction |
James is vivacious.
James is not careless.
Todd is fuzzy.
Samson is careless.
Jesse is vivacious.
Samson is not unpleasant.
Todd is eastern.
Samson is not hypocritical.
Todd is not careless.
Bevis is unpleasant.
Bevis is not eastern.
Bevis is hypocritical.If there is at least one people who is both hypocritical and not careless, then Bevis is not eastern.
Someone who is careless is always not eastern.
If there is someone who is unpleasant, then Paxton is hypocritical and Jesse is careless.
If someone is eastern or not hypocritical, then he is vivacious.
As long as someone is not hypocritical, he is not fuzzy and careless.
If there is at least one people who is hypocritical, then Jesse is not unpleasant.
James being careless implies that Bevis is eastern and Bevis is fuzzy.
If Kimball is eastern, then James is hypocritical.
Someone being both careless and eastern is equivalent to being not vivacious and not hypocritical.
If someone is fuzzy or he is not eastern, then he is careless.
If someone is eastern, then he is unpleasant.
Samson is unpleasant if and only if Jesse is not hypocritical and Todd is fuzzy. | Samson is not unpleasant. | entailment |
James is vivacious.
James is not careless.
Todd is fuzzy.
Samson is careless.
Jesse is vivacious.
Samson is not unpleasant.
Todd is eastern.
Samson is not hypocritical.
Todd is not careless.
Bevis is unpleasant.
Bevis is not eastern.
Bevis is hypocritical.If there is at least one people who is both hypocritical and not careless, then Bevis is not eastern.
Someone who is careless is always not eastern.
If there is someone who is unpleasant, then Paxton is hypocritical and Jesse is careless.
If someone is eastern or not hypocritical, then he is vivacious.
As long as someone is not hypocritical, he is not fuzzy and careless.
If there is at least one people who is hypocritical, then Jesse is not unpleasant.
James being careless implies that Bevis is eastern and Bevis is fuzzy.
If Kimball is eastern, then James is hypocritical.
Someone being both careless and eastern is equivalent to being not vivacious and not hypocritical.
If someone is fuzzy or he is not eastern, then he is careless.
If someone is eastern, then he is unpleasant.
Samson is unpleasant if and only if Jesse is not hypocritical and Todd is fuzzy. | Kimball is unpleasant. | neutral |
James is vivacious.
James is not careless.
Todd is fuzzy.
Samson is careless.
Jesse is vivacious.
Samson is not unpleasant.
Todd is eastern.
Samson is not hypocritical.
Todd is not careless.
Bevis is unpleasant.
Bevis is not eastern.
Bevis is hypocritical.If there is at least one people who is both hypocritical and not careless, then Bevis is not eastern.
Someone who is careless is always not eastern.
If there is someone who is unpleasant, then Paxton is hypocritical and Jesse is careless.
If someone is eastern or not hypocritical, then he is vivacious.
As long as someone is not hypocritical, he is not fuzzy and careless.
If there is at least one people who is hypocritical, then Jesse is not unpleasant.
James being careless implies that Bevis is eastern and Bevis is fuzzy.
If Kimball is eastern, then James is hypocritical.
Someone being both careless and eastern is equivalent to being not vivacious and not hypocritical.
If someone is fuzzy or he is not eastern, then he is careless.
If someone is eastern, then he is unpleasant.
Samson is unpleasant if and only if Jesse is not hypocritical and Todd is fuzzy. | Jesse is unpleasant. | contradiction |
James is vivacious.
James is not careless.
Todd is fuzzy.
Samson is careless.
Jesse is vivacious.
Samson is not unpleasant.
Todd is eastern.
Samson is not hypocritical.
Todd is not careless.
Bevis is unpleasant.
Bevis is not eastern.
Bevis is hypocritical.If there is at least one people who is both hypocritical and not careless, then Bevis is not eastern.
Someone who is careless is always not eastern.
If there is someone who is unpleasant, then Paxton is hypocritical and Jesse is careless.
If someone is eastern or not hypocritical, then he is vivacious.
As long as someone is not hypocritical, he is not fuzzy and careless.
If there is at least one people who is hypocritical, then Jesse is not unpleasant.
James being careless implies that Bevis is eastern and Bevis is fuzzy.
If Kimball is eastern, then James is hypocritical.
Someone being both careless and eastern is equivalent to being not vivacious and not hypocritical.
If someone is fuzzy or he is not eastern, then he is careless.
If someone is eastern, then he is unpleasant.
Samson is unpleasant if and only if Jesse is not hypocritical and Todd is fuzzy. | Jesse is not eastern. | entailment |
James is vivacious.
James is not careless.
Todd is fuzzy.
Samson is careless.
Jesse is vivacious.
Samson is not unpleasant.
Todd is eastern.
Samson is not hypocritical.
Todd is not careless.
Bevis is unpleasant.
Bevis is not eastern.
Bevis is hypocritical.If there is at least one people who is both hypocritical and not careless, then Bevis is not eastern.
Someone who is careless is always not eastern.
If there is someone who is unpleasant, then Paxton is hypocritical and Jesse is careless.
If someone is eastern or not hypocritical, then he is vivacious.
As long as someone is not hypocritical, he is not fuzzy and careless.
If there is at least one people who is hypocritical, then Jesse is not unpleasant.
James being careless implies that Bevis is eastern and Bevis is fuzzy.
If Kimball is eastern, then James is hypocritical.
Someone being both careless and eastern is equivalent to being not vivacious and not hypocritical.
If someone is fuzzy or he is not eastern, then he is careless.
If someone is eastern, then he is unpleasant.
Samson is unpleasant if and only if Jesse is not hypocritical and Todd is fuzzy. | Jesse is not unpleasant. | entailment |
James is vivacious.
James is not careless.
Todd is fuzzy.
Samson is careless.
Jesse is vivacious.
Samson is not unpleasant.
Todd is eastern.
Samson is not hypocritical.
Todd is not careless.
Bevis is unpleasant.
Bevis is not eastern.
Bevis is hypocritical.If there is at least one people who is both hypocritical and not careless, then Bevis is not eastern.
Someone who is careless is always not eastern.
If there is someone who is unpleasant, then Paxton is hypocritical and Jesse is careless.
If someone is eastern or not hypocritical, then he is vivacious.
As long as someone is not hypocritical, he is not fuzzy and careless.
If there is at least one people who is hypocritical, then Jesse is not unpleasant.
James being careless implies that Bevis is eastern and Bevis is fuzzy.
If Kimball is eastern, then James is hypocritical.
Someone being both careless and eastern is equivalent to being not vivacious and not hypocritical.
If someone is fuzzy or he is not eastern, then he is careless.
If someone is eastern, then he is unpleasant.
Samson is unpleasant if and only if Jesse is not hypocritical and Todd is fuzzy. | James is not hypocritical. | neutral |
James is vivacious.
James is not careless.
Todd is fuzzy.
Samson is careless.
Jesse is vivacious.
Samson is not unpleasant.
Todd is eastern.
Samson is not hypocritical.
Todd is not careless.
Bevis is unpleasant.
Bevis is not eastern.
Bevis is hypocritical.If there is at least one people who is both hypocritical and not careless, then Bevis is not eastern.
Someone who is careless is always not eastern.
If there is someone who is unpleasant, then Paxton is hypocritical and Jesse is careless.
If someone is eastern or not hypocritical, then he is vivacious.
As long as someone is not hypocritical, he is not fuzzy and careless.
If there is at least one people who is hypocritical, then Jesse is not unpleasant.
James being careless implies that Bevis is eastern and Bevis is fuzzy.
If Kimball is eastern, then James is hypocritical.
Someone being both careless and eastern is equivalent to being not vivacious and not hypocritical.
If someone is fuzzy or he is not eastern, then he is careless.
If someone is eastern, then he is unpleasant.
Samson is unpleasant if and only if Jesse is not hypocritical and Todd is fuzzy. | Todd is not eastern. | self_contradiction |
James is vivacious.
James is not careless.
Todd is fuzzy.
Samson is careless.
Jesse is vivacious.
Samson is not unpleasant.
Todd is eastern.
Samson is not hypocritical.
Todd is not careless.
Bevis is unpleasant.
Bevis is not eastern.
Bevis is hypocritical.If there is at least one people who is both hypocritical and not careless, then Bevis is not eastern.
Someone who is careless is always not eastern.
If there is someone who is unpleasant, then Paxton is hypocritical and Jesse is careless.
If someone is eastern or not hypocritical, then he is vivacious.
As long as someone is not hypocritical, he is not fuzzy and careless.
If there is at least one people who is hypocritical, then Jesse is not unpleasant.
James being careless implies that Bevis is eastern and Bevis is fuzzy.
If Kimball is eastern, then James is hypocritical.
Someone being both careless and eastern is equivalent to being not vivacious and not hypocritical.
If someone is fuzzy or he is not eastern, then he is careless.
If someone is eastern, then he is unpleasant.
Samson is unpleasant if and only if Jesse is not hypocritical and Todd is fuzzy. | Samson is eastern. | contradiction |
Ron is enchanting.
Gifford is not reserved.
Isabel is not enchanting.
Lee is not encouraging.
Ron is not curious.
Ryan is not reserved.
Lee is not various.
Ron is not various.
Michael is not reserved.
Gifford is not important.
Ryan is important.
Michael is enchanting.If there is at least one people who is both enchanting and not important, then Sophia is reserved.
Someone is not important and not reserved if and only if he is various.
If there is at least one people who is not enchanting, then Lee is not important.
Sophia being enchanting or Lee being important implies that Ron is not reserved.
If there is someone who is not various, then Lee is not important.
Michael is various if and only if Ron is important and Sophia is encouraging.
Someone who is both encouraging and curious is always not enchanting.
Someone who is not various is always curious.
If someone is important, then he is both curious and encouraging.
If there is at least one people who is various, then Isabel is important and Lee is not reserved.
Michael being encouraging is equivalent to Sophia being curious and Michael being reserved.
Someone who is important is always reserved. | Michael is not important. | neutral |
Ron is enchanting.
Gifford is not reserved.
Isabel is not enchanting.
Lee is not encouraging.
Ron is not curious.
Ryan is not reserved.
Lee is not various.
Ron is not various.
Michael is not reserved.
Gifford is not important.
Ryan is important.
Michael is enchanting.If there is at least one people who is both enchanting and not important, then Sophia is reserved.
Someone is not important and not reserved if and only if he is various.
If there is at least one people who is not enchanting, then Lee is not important.
Sophia being enchanting or Lee being important implies that Ron is not reserved.
If there is someone who is not various, then Lee is not important.
Michael is various if and only if Ron is important and Sophia is encouraging.
Someone who is both encouraging and curious is always not enchanting.
Someone who is not various is always curious.
If someone is important, then he is both curious and encouraging.
If there is at least one people who is various, then Isabel is important and Lee is not reserved.
Michael being encouraging is equivalent to Sophia being curious and Michael being reserved.
Someone who is important is always reserved. | Ryan is enchanting. | contradiction |
Ron is enchanting.
Gifford is not reserved.
Isabel is not enchanting.
Lee is not encouraging.
Ron is not curious.
Ryan is not reserved.
Lee is not various.
Ron is not various.
Michael is not reserved.
Gifford is not important.
Ryan is important.
Michael is enchanting.If there is at least one people who is both enchanting and not important, then Sophia is reserved.
Someone is not important and not reserved if and only if he is various.
If there is at least one people who is not enchanting, then Lee is not important.
Sophia being enchanting or Lee being important implies that Ron is not reserved.
If there is someone who is not various, then Lee is not important.
Michael is various if and only if Ron is important and Sophia is encouraging.
Someone who is both encouraging and curious is always not enchanting.
Someone who is not various is always curious.
If someone is important, then he is both curious and encouraging.
If there is at least one people who is various, then Isabel is important and Lee is not reserved.
Michael being encouraging is equivalent to Sophia being curious and Michael being reserved.
Someone who is important is always reserved. | Michael is encouraging. | neutral |
Ron is enchanting.
Gifford is not reserved.
Isabel is not enchanting.
Lee is not encouraging.
Ron is not curious.
Ryan is not reserved.
Lee is not various.
Ron is not various.
Michael is not reserved.
Gifford is not important.
Ryan is important.
Michael is enchanting.If there is at least one people who is both enchanting and not important, then Sophia is reserved.
Someone is not important and not reserved if and only if he is various.
If there is at least one people who is not enchanting, then Lee is not important.
Sophia being enchanting or Lee being important implies that Ron is not reserved.
If there is someone who is not various, then Lee is not important.
Michael is various if and only if Ron is important and Sophia is encouraging.
Someone who is both encouraging and curious is always not enchanting.
Someone who is not various is always curious.
If someone is important, then he is both curious and encouraging.
If there is at least one people who is various, then Isabel is important and Lee is not reserved.
Michael being encouraging is equivalent to Sophia being curious and Michael being reserved.
Someone who is important is always reserved. | Ron is enchanting. | entailment |
Ron is enchanting.
Gifford is not reserved.
Isabel is not enchanting.
Lee is not encouraging.
Ron is not curious.
Ryan is not reserved.
Lee is not various.
Ron is not various.
Michael is not reserved.
Gifford is not important.
Ryan is important.
Michael is enchanting.If there is at least one people who is both enchanting and not important, then Sophia is reserved.
Someone is not important and not reserved if and only if he is various.
If there is at least one people who is not enchanting, then Lee is not important.
Sophia being enchanting or Lee being important implies that Ron is not reserved.
If there is someone who is not various, then Lee is not important.
Michael is various if and only if Ron is important and Sophia is encouraging.
Someone who is both encouraging and curious is always not enchanting.
Someone who is not various is always curious.
If someone is important, then he is both curious and encouraging.
If there is at least one people who is various, then Isabel is important and Lee is not reserved.
Michael being encouraging is equivalent to Sophia being curious and Michael being reserved.
Someone who is important is always reserved. | Ron is not reserved. | neutral |
Ron is enchanting.
Gifford is not reserved.
Isabel is not enchanting.
Lee is not encouraging.
Ron is not curious.
Ryan is not reserved.
Lee is not various.
Ron is not various.
Michael is not reserved.
Gifford is not important.
Ryan is important.
Michael is enchanting.If there is at least one people who is both enchanting and not important, then Sophia is reserved.
Someone is not important and not reserved if and only if he is various.
If there is at least one people who is not enchanting, then Lee is not important.
Sophia being enchanting or Lee being important implies that Ron is not reserved.
If there is someone who is not various, then Lee is not important.
Michael is various if and only if Ron is important and Sophia is encouraging.
Someone who is both encouraging and curious is always not enchanting.
Someone who is not various is always curious.
If someone is important, then he is both curious and encouraging.
If there is at least one people who is various, then Isabel is important and Lee is not reserved.
Michael being encouraging is equivalent to Sophia being curious and Michael being reserved.
Someone who is important is always reserved. | Lee is various. | self_contradiction |
Ron is enchanting.
Gifford is not reserved.
Isabel is not enchanting.
Lee is not encouraging.
Ron is not curious.
Ryan is not reserved.
Lee is not various.
Ron is not various.
Michael is not reserved.
Gifford is not important.
Ryan is important.
Michael is enchanting.If there is at least one people who is both enchanting and not important, then Sophia is reserved.
Someone is not important and not reserved if and only if he is various.
If there is at least one people who is not enchanting, then Lee is not important.
Sophia being enchanting or Lee being important implies that Ron is not reserved.
If there is someone who is not various, then Lee is not important.
Michael is various if and only if Ron is important and Sophia is encouraging.
Someone who is both encouraging and curious is always not enchanting.
Someone who is not various is always curious.
If someone is important, then he is both curious and encouraging.
If there is at least one people who is various, then Isabel is important and Lee is not reserved.
Michael being encouraging is equivalent to Sophia being curious and Michael being reserved.
Someone who is important is always reserved. | Michael is not enchanting. | contradiction |
Ron is enchanting.
Gifford is not reserved.
Isabel is not enchanting.
Lee is not encouraging.
Ron is not curious.
Ryan is not reserved.
Lee is not various.
Ron is not various.
Michael is not reserved.
Gifford is not important.
Ryan is important.
Michael is enchanting.If there is at least one people who is both enchanting and not important, then Sophia is reserved.
Someone is not important and not reserved if and only if he is various.
If there is at least one people who is not enchanting, then Lee is not important.
Sophia being enchanting or Lee being important implies that Ron is not reserved.
If there is someone who is not various, then Lee is not important.
Michael is various if and only if Ron is important and Sophia is encouraging.
Someone who is both encouraging and curious is always not enchanting.
Someone who is not various is always curious.
If someone is important, then he is both curious and encouraging.
If there is at least one people who is various, then Isabel is important and Lee is not reserved.
Michael being encouraging is equivalent to Sophia being curious and Michael being reserved.
Someone who is important is always reserved. | Gifford is not various. | contradiction |
Ron is enchanting.
Gifford is not reserved.
Isabel is not enchanting.
Lee is not encouraging.
Ron is not curious.
Ryan is not reserved.
Lee is not various.
Ron is not various.
Michael is not reserved.
Gifford is not important.
Ryan is important.
Michael is enchanting.If there is at least one people who is both enchanting and not important, then Sophia is reserved.
Someone is not important and not reserved if and only if he is various.
If there is at least one people who is not enchanting, then Lee is not important.
Sophia being enchanting or Lee being important implies that Ron is not reserved.
If there is someone who is not various, then Lee is not important.
Michael is various if and only if Ron is important and Sophia is encouraging.
Someone who is both encouraging and curious is always not enchanting.
Someone who is not various is always curious.
If someone is important, then he is both curious and encouraging.
If there is at least one people who is various, then Isabel is important and Lee is not reserved.
Michael being encouraging is equivalent to Sophia being curious and Michael being reserved.
Someone who is important is always reserved. | Lee is important. | contradiction |
Ron is enchanting.
Gifford is not reserved.
Isabel is not enchanting.
Lee is not encouraging.
Ron is not curious.
Ryan is not reserved.
Lee is not various.
Ron is not various.
Michael is not reserved.
Gifford is not important.
Ryan is important.
Michael is enchanting.If there is at least one people who is both enchanting and not important, then Sophia is reserved.
Someone is not important and not reserved if and only if he is various.
If there is at least one people who is not enchanting, then Lee is not important.
Sophia being enchanting or Lee being important implies that Ron is not reserved.
If there is someone who is not various, then Lee is not important.
Michael is various if and only if Ron is important and Sophia is encouraging.
Someone who is both encouraging and curious is always not enchanting.
Someone who is not various is always curious.
If someone is important, then he is both curious and encouraging.
If there is at least one people who is various, then Isabel is important and Lee is not reserved.
Michael being encouraging is equivalent to Sophia being curious and Michael being reserved.
Someone who is important is always reserved. | Ron is important. | neutral |
Ron is enchanting.
Gifford is not reserved.
Isabel is not enchanting.
Lee is not encouraging.
Ron is not curious.
Ryan is not reserved.
Lee is not various.
Ron is not various.
Michael is not reserved.
Gifford is not important.
Ryan is important.
Michael is enchanting.If there is at least one people who is both enchanting and not important, then Sophia is reserved.
Someone is not important and not reserved if and only if he is various.
If there is at least one people who is not enchanting, then Lee is not important.
Sophia being enchanting or Lee being important implies that Ron is not reserved.
If there is someone who is not various, then Lee is not important.
Michael is various if and only if Ron is important and Sophia is encouraging.
Someone who is both encouraging and curious is always not enchanting.
Someone who is not various is always curious.
If someone is important, then he is both curious and encouraging.
If there is at least one people who is various, then Isabel is important and Lee is not reserved.
Michael being encouraging is equivalent to Sophia being curious and Michael being reserved.
Someone who is important is always reserved. | Ryan is not reserved. | self_contradiction |
Ron is enchanting.
Gifford is not reserved.
Isabel is not enchanting.
Lee is not encouraging.
Ron is not curious.
Ryan is not reserved.
Lee is not various.
Ron is not various.
Michael is not reserved.
Gifford is not important.
Ryan is important.
Michael is enchanting.If there is at least one people who is both enchanting and not important, then Sophia is reserved.
Someone is not important and not reserved if and only if he is various.
If there is at least one people who is not enchanting, then Lee is not important.
Sophia being enchanting or Lee being important implies that Ron is not reserved.
If there is someone who is not various, then Lee is not important.
Michael is various if and only if Ron is important and Sophia is encouraging.
Someone who is both encouraging and curious is always not enchanting.
Someone who is not various is always curious.
If someone is important, then he is both curious and encouraging.
If there is at least one people who is various, then Isabel is important and Lee is not reserved.
Michael being encouraging is equivalent to Sophia being curious and Michael being reserved.
Someone who is important is always reserved. | Sophia is encouraging. | neutral |
Ron is enchanting.
Gifford is not reserved.
Isabel is not enchanting.
Lee is not encouraging.
Ron is not curious.
Ryan is not reserved.
Lee is not various.
Ron is not various.
Michael is not reserved.
Gifford is not important.
Ryan is important.
Michael is enchanting.If there is at least one people who is both enchanting and not important, then Sophia is reserved.
Someone is not important and not reserved if and only if he is various.
If there is at least one people who is not enchanting, then Lee is not important.
Sophia being enchanting or Lee being important implies that Ron is not reserved.
If there is someone who is not various, then Lee is not important.
Michael is various if and only if Ron is important and Sophia is encouraging.
Someone who is both encouraging and curious is always not enchanting.
Someone who is not various is always curious.
If someone is important, then he is both curious and encouraging.
If there is at least one people who is various, then Isabel is important and Lee is not reserved.
Michael being encouraging is equivalent to Sophia being curious and Michael being reserved.
Someone who is important is always reserved. | Ron is not curious. | self_contradiction |
Ron is enchanting.
Gifford is not reserved.
Isabel is not enchanting.
Lee is not encouraging.
Ron is not curious.
Ryan is not reserved.
Lee is not various.
Ron is not various.
Michael is not reserved.
Gifford is not important.
Ryan is important.
Michael is enchanting.If there is at least one people who is both enchanting and not important, then Sophia is reserved.
Someone is not important and not reserved if and only if he is various.
If there is at least one people who is not enchanting, then Lee is not important.
Sophia being enchanting or Lee being important implies that Ron is not reserved.
If there is someone who is not various, then Lee is not important.
Michael is various if and only if Ron is important and Sophia is encouraging.
Someone who is both encouraging and curious is always not enchanting.
Someone who is not various is always curious.
If someone is important, then he is both curious and encouraging.
If there is at least one people who is various, then Isabel is important and Lee is not reserved.
Michael being encouraging is equivalent to Sophia being curious and Michael being reserved.
Someone who is important is always reserved. | Michael is not reserved. | entailment |
Ron is enchanting.
Gifford is not reserved.
Isabel is not enchanting.
Lee is not encouraging.
Ron is not curious.
Ryan is not reserved.
Lee is not various.
Ron is not various.
Michael is not reserved.
Gifford is not important.
Ryan is important.
Michael is enchanting.If there is at least one people who is both enchanting and not important, then Sophia is reserved.
Someone is not important and not reserved if and only if he is various.
If there is at least one people who is not enchanting, then Lee is not important.
Sophia being enchanting or Lee being important implies that Ron is not reserved.
If there is someone who is not various, then Lee is not important.
Michael is various if and only if Ron is important and Sophia is encouraging.
Someone who is both encouraging and curious is always not enchanting.
Someone who is not various is always curious.
If someone is important, then he is both curious and encouraging.
If there is at least one people who is various, then Isabel is important and Lee is not reserved.
Michael being encouraging is equivalent to Sophia being curious and Michael being reserved.
Someone who is important is always reserved. | Isabel is important. | entailment |
Ron is enchanting.
Gifford is not reserved.
Isabel is not enchanting.
Lee is not encouraging.
Ron is not curious.
Ryan is not reserved.
Lee is not various.
Ron is not various.
Michael is not reserved.
Gifford is not important.
Ryan is important.
Michael is enchanting.If there is at least one people who is both enchanting and not important, then Sophia is reserved.
Someone is not important and not reserved if and only if he is various.
If there is at least one people who is not enchanting, then Lee is not important.
Sophia being enchanting or Lee being important implies that Ron is not reserved.
If there is someone who is not various, then Lee is not important.
Michael is various if and only if Ron is important and Sophia is encouraging.
Someone who is both encouraging and curious is always not enchanting.
Someone who is not various is always curious.
If someone is important, then he is both curious and encouraging.
If there is at least one people who is various, then Isabel is important and Lee is not reserved.
Michael being encouraging is equivalent to Sophia being curious and Michael being reserved.
Someone who is important is always reserved. | Ryan is reserved. | self_contradiction |
Ron is enchanting.
Gifford is not reserved.
Isabel is not enchanting.
Lee is not encouraging.
Ron is not curious.
Ryan is not reserved.
Lee is not various.
Ron is not various.
Michael is not reserved.
Gifford is not important.
Ryan is important.
Michael is enchanting.If there is at least one people who is both enchanting and not important, then Sophia is reserved.
Someone is not important and not reserved if and only if he is various.
If there is at least one people who is not enchanting, then Lee is not important.
Sophia being enchanting or Lee being important implies that Ron is not reserved.
If there is someone who is not various, then Lee is not important.
Michael is various if and only if Ron is important and Sophia is encouraging.
Someone who is both encouraging and curious is always not enchanting.
Someone who is not various is always curious.
If someone is important, then he is both curious and encouraging.
If there is at least one people who is various, then Isabel is important and Lee is not reserved.
Michael being encouraging is equivalent to Sophia being curious and Michael being reserved.
Someone who is important is always reserved. | Ryan is not important. | contradiction |
Ron is enchanting.
Gifford is not reserved.
Isabel is not enchanting.
Lee is not encouraging.
Ron is not curious.
Ryan is not reserved.
Lee is not various.
Ron is not various.
Michael is not reserved.
Gifford is not important.
Ryan is important.
Michael is enchanting.If there is at least one people who is both enchanting and not important, then Sophia is reserved.
Someone is not important and not reserved if and only if he is various.
If there is at least one people who is not enchanting, then Lee is not important.
Sophia being enchanting or Lee being important implies that Ron is not reserved.
If there is someone who is not various, then Lee is not important.
Michael is various if and only if Ron is important and Sophia is encouraging.
Someone who is both encouraging and curious is always not enchanting.
Someone who is not various is always curious.
If someone is important, then he is both curious and encouraging.
If there is at least one people who is various, then Isabel is important and Lee is not reserved.
Michael being encouraging is equivalent to Sophia being curious and Michael being reserved.
Someone who is important is always reserved. | Ron is curious. | self_contradiction |
Ron is enchanting.
Gifford is not reserved.
Isabel is not enchanting.
Lee is not encouraging.
Ron is not curious.
Ryan is not reserved.
Lee is not various.
Ron is not various.
Michael is not reserved.
Gifford is not important.
Ryan is important.
Michael is enchanting.If there is at least one people who is both enchanting and not important, then Sophia is reserved.
Someone is not important and not reserved if and only if he is various.
If there is at least one people who is not enchanting, then Lee is not important.
Sophia being enchanting or Lee being important implies that Ron is not reserved.
If there is someone who is not various, then Lee is not important.
Michael is various if and only if Ron is important and Sophia is encouraging.
Someone who is both encouraging and curious is always not enchanting.
Someone who is not various is always curious.
If someone is important, then he is both curious and encouraging.
If there is at least one people who is various, then Isabel is important and Lee is not reserved.
Michael being encouraging is equivalent to Sophia being curious and Michael being reserved.
Someone who is important is always reserved. | Ron is not various. | entailment |
Ron is enchanting.
Gifford is not reserved.
Isabel is not enchanting.
Lee is not encouraging.
Ron is not curious.
Ryan is not reserved.
Lee is not various.
Ron is not various.
Michael is not reserved.
Gifford is not important.
Ryan is important.
Michael is enchanting.If there is at least one people who is both enchanting and not important, then Sophia is reserved.
Someone is not important and not reserved if and only if he is various.
If there is at least one people who is not enchanting, then Lee is not important.
Sophia being enchanting or Lee being important implies that Ron is not reserved.
If there is someone who is not various, then Lee is not important.
Michael is various if and only if Ron is important and Sophia is encouraging.
Someone who is both encouraging and curious is always not enchanting.
Someone who is not various is always curious.
If someone is important, then he is both curious and encouraging.
If there is at least one people who is various, then Isabel is important and Lee is not reserved.
Michael being encouraging is equivalent to Sophia being curious and Michael being reserved.
Someone who is important is always reserved. | Ryan is important. | entailment |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.