premise
stringlengths 923
1.41k
| hypothesis
stringlengths 11
33
| label
stringclasses 4
values |
|---|---|---|
Heath is not willing.
Heath is smoggy.
Richard is not self-confident.
Lombard is not willing.
Murray is smoggy.
Heath is not medical.
Della is not psychological.
Gale is not smoggy.
Lombard is not medical.
Richard is willing.
Hubert is psychological.
Lombard is self-confident.If all people are self-confident or not psychological, then Lombard is not willing.
If there is someone who is not brave, then Murray is willing.
Someone is self-confident and not brave if and only if he is not psychological and willing.
Gale being not smoggy and Richard being medical imply that Della is not willing.
Lombard is not willing if and only if Della is not medical and Della is not brave.
If someone is willing, then he is medical.
Someone is self-confident and brave if and only if he is not smoggy.
If someone is both not self-confident and not willing, then he is smoggy.
If someone is not psychological or not self-confident, then he is brave.
If there is someone who is both psychological and not medical, then Heath is not willing.
It can be concluded that Murray is not psychological once knowing that Hubert is smoggy or Gale is self-confident.
If Della is not self-confident and Murray is willing, then Heath is not psychological. | Heath is not self-confident. | neutral |
Heath is not willing.
Heath is smoggy.
Richard is not self-confident.
Lombard is not willing.
Murray is smoggy.
Heath is not medical.
Della is not psychological.
Gale is not smoggy.
Lombard is not medical.
Richard is willing.
Hubert is psychological.
Lombard is self-confident.If all people are self-confident or not psychological, then Lombard is not willing.
If there is someone who is not brave, then Murray is willing.
Someone is self-confident and not brave if and only if he is not psychological and willing.
Gale being not smoggy and Richard being medical imply that Della is not willing.
Lombard is not willing if and only if Della is not medical and Della is not brave.
If someone is willing, then he is medical.
Someone is self-confident and brave if and only if he is not smoggy.
If someone is both not self-confident and not willing, then he is smoggy.
If someone is not psychological or not self-confident, then he is brave.
If there is someone who is both psychological and not medical, then Heath is not willing.
It can be concluded that Murray is not psychological once knowing that Hubert is smoggy or Gale is self-confident.
If Della is not self-confident and Murray is willing, then Heath is not psychological. | Lombard is willing. | contradiction |
Heath is not willing.
Heath is smoggy.
Richard is not self-confident.
Lombard is not willing.
Murray is smoggy.
Heath is not medical.
Della is not psychological.
Gale is not smoggy.
Lombard is not medical.
Richard is willing.
Hubert is psychological.
Lombard is self-confident.If all people are self-confident or not psychological, then Lombard is not willing.
If there is someone who is not brave, then Murray is willing.
Someone is self-confident and not brave if and only if he is not psychological and willing.
Gale being not smoggy and Richard being medical imply that Della is not willing.
Lombard is not willing if and only if Della is not medical and Della is not brave.
If someone is willing, then he is medical.
Someone is self-confident and brave if and only if he is not smoggy.
If someone is both not self-confident and not willing, then he is smoggy.
If someone is not psychological or not self-confident, then he is brave.
If there is someone who is both psychological and not medical, then Heath is not willing.
It can be concluded that Murray is not psychological once knowing that Hubert is smoggy or Gale is self-confident.
If Della is not self-confident and Murray is willing, then Heath is not psychological. | Gale is smoggy. | contradiction |
Heath is not willing.
Heath is smoggy.
Richard is not self-confident.
Lombard is not willing.
Murray is smoggy.
Heath is not medical.
Della is not psychological.
Gale is not smoggy.
Lombard is not medical.
Richard is willing.
Hubert is psychological.
Lombard is self-confident.If all people are self-confident or not psychological, then Lombard is not willing.
If there is someone who is not brave, then Murray is willing.
Someone is self-confident and not brave if and only if he is not psychological and willing.
Gale being not smoggy and Richard being medical imply that Della is not willing.
Lombard is not willing if and only if Della is not medical and Della is not brave.
If someone is willing, then he is medical.
Someone is self-confident and brave if and only if he is not smoggy.
If someone is both not self-confident and not willing, then he is smoggy.
If someone is not psychological or not self-confident, then he is brave.
If there is someone who is both psychological and not medical, then Heath is not willing.
It can be concluded that Murray is not psychological once knowing that Hubert is smoggy or Gale is self-confident.
If Della is not self-confident and Murray is willing, then Heath is not psychological. | Heath is medical. | contradiction |
Heath is not willing.
Heath is smoggy.
Richard is not self-confident.
Lombard is not willing.
Murray is smoggy.
Heath is not medical.
Della is not psychological.
Gale is not smoggy.
Lombard is not medical.
Richard is willing.
Hubert is psychological.
Lombard is self-confident.If all people are self-confident or not psychological, then Lombard is not willing.
If there is someone who is not brave, then Murray is willing.
Someone is self-confident and not brave if and only if he is not psychological and willing.
Gale being not smoggy and Richard being medical imply that Della is not willing.
Lombard is not willing if and only if Della is not medical and Della is not brave.
If someone is willing, then he is medical.
Someone is self-confident and brave if and only if he is not smoggy.
If someone is both not self-confident and not willing, then he is smoggy.
If someone is not psychological or not self-confident, then he is brave.
If there is someone who is both psychological and not medical, then Heath is not willing.
It can be concluded that Murray is not psychological once knowing that Hubert is smoggy or Gale is self-confident.
If Della is not self-confident and Murray is willing, then Heath is not psychological. | Della is brave. | self_contradiction |
Heath is not willing.
Heath is smoggy.
Richard is not self-confident.
Lombard is not willing.
Murray is smoggy.
Heath is not medical.
Della is not psychological.
Gale is not smoggy.
Lombard is not medical.
Richard is willing.
Hubert is psychological.
Lombard is self-confident.If all people are self-confident or not psychological, then Lombard is not willing.
If there is someone who is not brave, then Murray is willing.
Someone is self-confident and not brave if and only if he is not psychological and willing.
Gale being not smoggy and Richard being medical imply that Della is not willing.
Lombard is not willing if and only if Della is not medical and Della is not brave.
If someone is willing, then he is medical.
Someone is self-confident and brave if and only if he is not smoggy.
If someone is both not self-confident and not willing, then he is smoggy.
If someone is not psychological or not self-confident, then he is brave.
If there is someone who is both psychological and not medical, then Heath is not willing.
It can be concluded that Murray is not psychological once knowing that Hubert is smoggy or Gale is self-confident.
If Della is not self-confident and Murray is willing, then Heath is not psychological. | Lombard is not willing. | entailment |
Heath is not willing.
Heath is smoggy.
Richard is not self-confident.
Lombard is not willing.
Murray is smoggy.
Heath is not medical.
Della is not psychological.
Gale is not smoggy.
Lombard is not medical.
Richard is willing.
Hubert is psychological.
Lombard is self-confident.If all people are self-confident or not psychological, then Lombard is not willing.
If there is someone who is not brave, then Murray is willing.
Someone is self-confident and not brave if and only if he is not psychological and willing.
Gale being not smoggy and Richard being medical imply that Della is not willing.
Lombard is not willing if and only if Della is not medical and Della is not brave.
If someone is willing, then he is medical.
Someone is self-confident and brave if and only if he is not smoggy.
If someone is both not self-confident and not willing, then he is smoggy.
If someone is not psychological or not self-confident, then he is brave.
If there is someone who is both psychological and not medical, then Heath is not willing.
It can be concluded that Murray is not psychological once knowing that Hubert is smoggy or Gale is self-confident.
If Della is not self-confident and Murray is willing, then Heath is not psychological. | Gale is willing. | neutral |
Heath is not willing.
Heath is smoggy.
Richard is not self-confident.
Lombard is not willing.
Murray is smoggy.
Heath is not medical.
Della is not psychological.
Gale is not smoggy.
Lombard is not medical.
Richard is willing.
Hubert is psychological.
Lombard is self-confident.If all people are self-confident or not psychological, then Lombard is not willing.
If there is someone who is not brave, then Murray is willing.
Someone is self-confident and not brave if and only if he is not psychological and willing.
Gale being not smoggy and Richard being medical imply that Della is not willing.
Lombard is not willing if and only if Della is not medical and Della is not brave.
If someone is willing, then he is medical.
Someone is self-confident and brave if and only if he is not smoggy.
If someone is both not self-confident and not willing, then he is smoggy.
If someone is not psychological or not self-confident, then he is brave.
If there is someone who is both psychological and not medical, then Heath is not willing.
It can be concluded that Murray is not psychological once knowing that Hubert is smoggy or Gale is self-confident.
If Della is not self-confident and Murray is willing, then Heath is not psychological. | Heath is not willing. | entailment |
Heath is not willing.
Heath is smoggy.
Richard is not self-confident.
Lombard is not willing.
Murray is smoggy.
Heath is not medical.
Della is not psychological.
Gale is not smoggy.
Lombard is not medical.
Richard is willing.
Hubert is psychological.
Lombard is self-confident.If all people are self-confident or not psychological, then Lombard is not willing.
If there is someone who is not brave, then Murray is willing.
Someone is self-confident and not brave if and only if he is not psychological and willing.
Gale being not smoggy and Richard being medical imply that Della is not willing.
Lombard is not willing if and only if Della is not medical and Della is not brave.
If someone is willing, then he is medical.
Someone is self-confident and brave if and only if he is not smoggy.
If someone is both not self-confident and not willing, then he is smoggy.
If someone is not psychological or not self-confident, then he is brave.
If there is someone who is both psychological and not medical, then Heath is not willing.
It can be concluded that Murray is not psychological once knowing that Hubert is smoggy or Gale is self-confident.
If Della is not self-confident and Murray is willing, then Heath is not psychological. | Della is not brave. | self_contradiction |
Heath is not willing.
Heath is smoggy.
Richard is not self-confident.
Lombard is not willing.
Murray is smoggy.
Heath is not medical.
Della is not psychological.
Gale is not smoggy.
Lombard is not medical.
Richard is willing.
Hubert is psychological.
Lombard is self-confident.If all people are self-confident or not psychological, then Lombard is not willing.
If there is someone who is not brave, then Murray is willing.
Someone is self-confident and not brave if and only if he is not psychological and willing.
Gale being not smoggy and Richard being medical imply that Della is not willing.
Lombard is not willing if and only if Della is not medical and Della is not brave.
If someone is willing, then he is medical.
Someone is self-confident and brave if and only if he is not smoggy.
If someone is both not self-confident and not willing, then he is smoggy.
If someone is not psychological or not self-confident, then he is brave.
If there is someone who is both psychological and not medical, then Heath is not willing.
It can be concluded that Murray is not psychological once knowing that Hubert is smoggy or Gale is self-confident.
If Della is not self-confident and Murray is willing, then Heath is not psychological. | Della is not medical. | entailment |
Heath is not willing.
Heath is smoggy.
Richard is not self-confident.
Lombard is not willing.
Murray is smoggy.
Heath is not medical.
Della is not psychological.
Gale is not smoggy.
Lombard is not medical.
Richard is willing.
Hubert is psychological.
Lombard is self-confident.If all people are self-confident or not psychological, then Lombard is not willing.
If there is someone who is not brave, then Murray is willing.
Someone is self-confident and not brave if and only if he is not psychological and willing.
Gale being not smoggy and Richard being medical imply that Della is not willing.
Lombard is not willing if and only if Della is not medical and Della is not brave.
If someone is willing, then he is medical.
Someone is self-confident and brave if and only if he is not smoggy.
If someone is both not self-confident and not willing, then he is smoggy.
If someone is not psychological or not self-confident, then he is brave.
If there is someone who is both psychological and not medical, then Heath is not willing.
It can be concluded that Murray is not psychological once knowing that Hubert is smoggy or Gale is self-confident.
If Della is not self-confident and Murray is willing, then Heath is not psychological. | Gale is not brave. | contradiction |
Heath is not willing.
Heath is smoggy.
Richard is not self-confident.
Lombard is not willing.
Murray is smoggy.
Heath is not medical.
Della is not psychological.
Gale is not smoggy.
Lombard is not medical.
Richard is willing.
Hubert is psychological.
Lombard is self-confident.If all people are self-confident or not psychological, then Lombard is not willing.
If there is someone who is not brave, then Murray is willing.
Someone is self-confident and not brave if and only if he is not psychological and willing.
Gale being not smoggy and Richard being medical imply that Della is not willing.
Lombard is not willing if and only if Della is not medical and Della is not brave.
If someone is willing, then he is medical.
Someone is self-confident and brave if and only if he is not smoggy.
If someone is both not self-confident and not willing, then he is smoggy.
If someone is not psychological or not self-confident, then he is brave.
If there is someone who is both psychological and not medical, then Heath is not willing.
It can be concluded that Murray is not psychological once knowing that Hubert is smoggy or Gale is self-confident.
If Della is not self-confident and Murray is willing, then Heath is not psychological. | Richard is willing. | entailment |
Heath is not willing.
Heath is smoggy.
Richard is not self-confident.
Lombard is not willing.
Murray is smoggy.
Heath is not medical.
Della is not psychological.
Gale is not smoggy.
Lombard is not medical.
Richard is willing.
Hubert is psychological.
Lombard is self-confident.If all people are self-confident or not psychological, then Lombard is not willing.
If there is someone who is not brave, then Murray is willing.
Someone is self-confident and not brave if and only if he is not psychological and willing.
Gale being not smoggy and Richard being medical imply that Della is not willing.
Lombard is not willing if and only if Della is not medical and Della is not brave.
If someone is willing, then he is medical.
Someone is self-confident and brave if and only if he is not smoggy.
If someone is both not self-confident and not willing, then he is smoggy.
If someone is not psychological or not self-confident, then he is brave.
If there is someone who is both psychological and not medical, then Heath is not willing.
It can be concluded that Murray is not psychological once knowing that Hubert is smoggy or Gale is self-confident.
If Della is not self-confident and Murray is willing, then Heath is not psychological. | Murray is willing. | entailment |
Heath is not willing.
Heath is smoggy.
Richard is not self-confident.
Lombard is not willing.
Murray is smoggy.
Heath is not medical.
Della is not psychological.
Gale is not smoggy.
Lombard is not medical.
Richard is willing.
Hubert is psychological.
Lombard is self-confident.If all people are self-confident or not psychological, then Lombard is not willing.
If there is someone who is not brave, then Murray is willing.
Someone is self-confident and not brave if and only if he is not psychological and willing.
Gale being not smoggy and Richard being medical imply that Della is not willing.
Lombard is not willing if and only if Della is not medical and Della is not brave.
If someone is willing, then he is medical.
Someone is self-confident and brave if and only if he is not smoggy.
If someone is both not self-confident and not willing, then he is smoggy.
If someone is not psychological or not self-confident, then he is brave.
If there is someone who is both psychological and not medical, then Heath is not willing.
It can be concluded that Murray is not psychological once knowing that Hubert is smoggy or Gale is self-confident.
If Della is not self-confident and Murray is willing, then Heath is not psychological. | Lombard is smoggy. | neutral |
Heath is not willing.
Heath is smoggy.
Richard is not self-confident.
Lombard is not willing.
Murray is smoggy.
Heath is not medical.
Della is not psychological.
Gale is not smoggy.
Lombard is not medical.
Richard is willing.
Hubert is psychological.
Lombard is self-confident.If all people are self-confident or not psychological, then Lombard is not willing.
If there is someone who is not brave, then Murray is willing.
Someone is self-confident and not brave if and only if he is not psychological and willing.
Gale being not smoggy and Richard being medical imply that Della is not willing.
Lombard is not willing if and only if Della is not medical and Della is not brave.
If someone is willing, then he is medical.
Someone is self-confident and brave if and only if he is not smoggy.
If someone is both not self-confident and not willing, then he is smoggy.
If someone is not psychological or not self-confident, then he is brave.
If there is someone who is both psychological and not medical, then Heath is not willing.
It can be concluded that Murray is not psychological once knowing that Hubert is smoggy or Gale is self-confident.
If Della is not self-confident and Murray is willing, then Heath is not psychological. | Hubert is willing. | neutral |
Heath is not willing.
Heath is smoggy.
Richard is not self-confident.
Lombard is not willing.
Murray is smoggy.
Heath is not medical.
Della is not psychological.
Gale is not smoggy.
Lombard is not medical.
Richard is willing.
Hubert is psychological.
Lombard is self-confident.If all people are self-confident or not psychological, then Lombard is not willing.
If there is someone who is not brave, then Murray is willing.
Someone is self-confident and not brave if and only if he is not psychological and willing.
Gale being not smoggy and Richard being medical imply that Della is not willing.
Lombard is not willing if and only if Della is not medical and Della is not brave.
If someone is willing, then he is medical.
Someone is self-confident and brave if and only if he is not smoggy.
If someone is both not self-confident and not willing, then he is smoggy.
If someone is not psychological or not self-confident, then he is brave.
If there is someone who is both psychological and not medical, then Heath is not willing.
It can be concluded that Murray is not psychological once knowing that Hubert is smoggy or Gale is self-confident.
If Della is not self-confident and Murray is willing, then Heath is not psychological. | Richard is self-confident. | contradiction |
Heath is not willing.
Heath is smoggy.
Richard is not self-confident.
Lombard is not willing.
Murray is smoggy.
Heath is not medical.
Della is not psychological.
Gale is not smoggy.
Lombard is not medical.
Richard is willing.
Hubert is psychological.
Lombard is self-confident.If all people are self-confident or not psychological, then Lombard is not willing.
If there is someone who is not brave, then Murray is willing.
Someone is self-confident and not brave if and only if he is not psychological and willing.
Gale being not smoggy and Richard being medical imply that Della is not willing.
Lombard is not willing if and only if Della is not medical and Della is not brave.
If someone is willing, then he is medical.
Someone is self-confident and brave if and only if he is not smoggy.
If someone is both not self-confident and not willing, then he is smoggy.
If someone is not psychological or not self-confident, then he is brave.
If there is someone who is both psychological and not medical, then Heath is not willing.
It can be concluded that Murray is not psychological once knowing that Hubert is smoggy or Gale is self-confident.
If Della is not self-confident and Murray is willing, then Heath is not psychological. | Murray is not smoggy. | self_contradiction |
Heath is not willing.
Heath is smoggy.
Richard is not self-confident.
Lombard is not willing.
Murray is smoggy.
Heath is not medical.
Della is not psychological.
Gale is not smoggy.
Lombard is not medical.
Richard is willing.
Hubert is psychological.
Lombard is self-confident.If all people are self-confident or not psychological, then Lombard is not willing.
If there is someone who is not brave, then Murray is willing.
Someone is self-confident and not brave if and only if he is not psychological and willing.
Gale being not smoggy and Richard being medical imply that Della is not willing.
Lombard is not willing if and only if Della is not medical and Della is not brave.
If someone is willing, then he is medical.
Someone is self-confident and brave if and only if he is not smoggy.
If someone is both not self-confident and not willing, then he is smoggy.
If someone is not psychological or not self-confident, then he is brave.
If there is someone who is both psychological and not medical, then Heath is not willing.
It can be concluded that Murray is not psychological once knowing that Hubert is smoggy or Gale is self-confident.
If Della is not self-confident and Murray is willing, then Heath is not psychological. | Murray is not brave. | self_contradiction |
Heath is not willing.
Heath is smoggy.
Richard is not self-confident.
Lombard is not willing.
Murray is smoggy.
Heath is not medical.
Della is not psychological.
Gale is not smoggy.
Lombard is not medical.
Richard is willing.
Hubert is psychological.
Lombard is self-confident.If all people are self-confident or not psychological, then Lombard is not willing.
If there is someone who is not brave, then Murray is willing.
Someone is self-confident and not brave if and only if he is not psychological and willing.
Gale being not smoggy and Richard being medical imply that Della is not willing.
Lombard is not willing if and only if Della is not medical and Della is not brave.
If someone is willing, then he is medical.
Someone is self-confident and brave if and only if he is not smoggy.
If someone is both not self-confident and not willing, then he is smoggy.
If someone is not psychological or not self-confident, then he is brave.
If there is someone who is both psychological and not medical, then Heath is not willing.
It can be concluded that Murray is not psychological once knowing that Hubert is smoggy or Gale is self-confident.
If Della is not self-confident and Murray is willing, then Heath is not psychological. | Murray is smoggy. | self_contradiction |
Heath is not willing.
Heath is smoggy.
Richard is not self-confident.
Lombard is not willing.
Murray is smoggy.
Heath is not medical.
Della is not psychological.
Gale is not smoggy.
Lombard is not medical.
Richard is willing.
Hubert is psychological.
Lombard is self-confident.If all people are self-confident or not psychological, then Lombard is not willing.
If there is someone who is not brave, then Murray is willing.
Someone is self-confident and not brave if and only if he is not psychological and willing.
Gale being not smoggy and Richard being medical imply that Della is not willing.
Lombard is not willing if and only if Della is not medical and Della is not brave.
If someone is willing, then he is medical.
Someone is self-confident and brave if and only if he is not smoggy.
If someone is both not self-confident and not willing, then he is smoggy.
If someone is not psychological or not self-confident, then he is brave.
If there is someone who is both psychological and not medical, then Heath is not willing.
It can be concluded that Murray is not psychological once knowing that Hubert is smoggy or Gale is self-confident.
If Della is not self-confident and Murray is willing, then Heath is not psychological. | Hubert is brave. | neutral |
Caleb is not quaint.
Ron is quaint.
Ron is angry.
Aiken is yellow.
Bud is polite.
Aiken is quaint.
Clive is jealous.
Hope is angry.
Aiken is not plucky.
Basil is not jealous.
Ron is plucky.
Aiken is angry.Someone is not plucky and polite if and only if he is not quaint.
Someone is not quaint and not yellow if and only if he is plucky and not jealous.
If Caleb is not plucky, then Clive is not jealous and Aiken is not angry, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both yellow and polite, then Ron is not angry.
If there is at least one people who is both plucky and not angry, then Ron is quaint.
If there is someone who is both not yellow and plucky, then Clive is not angry and Clive is quaint.
If there is someone who is yellow, then Hope is angry.
If Ron is plucky, then Ron is not yellow, and vice versa.
If someone is both not jealous and quaint, then he is plucky.
It can be concluded that Hope is not yellow and Aiken is not quaint once knowing that Aiken is not polite.
If Ron is not plucky or Hope is yellow, then Aiken is not angry.
If there is at least one people who is plucky, then Ron is not quaint. | Clive is not jealous. | self_contradiction |
Caleb is not quaint.
Ron is quaint.
Ron is angry.
Aiken is yellow.
Bud is polite.
Aiken is quaint.
Clive is jealous.
Hope is angry.
Aiken is not plucky.
Basil is not jealous.
Ron is plucky.
Aiken is angry.Someone is not plucky and polite if and only if he is not quaint.
Someone is not quaint and not yellow if and only if he is plucky and not jealous.
If Caleb is not plucky, then Clive is not jealous and Aiken is not angry, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both yellow and polite, then Ron is not angry.
If there is at least one people who is both plucky and not angry, then Ron is quaint.
If there is someone who is both not yellow and plucky, then Clive is not angry and Clive is quaint.
If there is someone who is yellow, then Hope is angry.
If Ron is plucky, then Ron is not yellow, and vice versa.
If someone is both not jealous and quaint, then he is plucky.
It can be concluded that Hope is not yellow and Aiken is not quaint once knowing that Aiken is not polite.
If Ron is not plucky or Hope is yellow, then Aiken is not angry.
If there is at least one people who is plucky, then Ron is not quaint. | Ron is polite. | entailment |
Caleb is not quaint.
Ron is quaint.
Ron is angry.
Aiken is yellow.
Bud is polite.
Aiken is quaint.
Clive is jealous.
Hope is angry.
Aiken is not plucky.
Basil is not jealous.
Ron is plucky.
Aiken is angry.Someone is not plucky and polite if and only if he is not quaint.
Someone is not quaint and not yellow if and only if he is plucky and not jealous.
If Caleb is not plucky, then Clive is not jealous and Aiken is not angry, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both yellow and polite, then Ron is not angry.
If there is at least one people who is both plucky and not angry, then Ron is quaint.
If there is someone who is both not yellow and plucky, then Clive is not angry and Clive is quaint.
If there is someone who is yellow, then Hope is angry.
If Ron is plucky, then Ron is not yellow, and vice versa.
If someone is both not jealous and quaint, then he is plucky.
It can be concluded that Hope is not yellow and Aiken is not quaint once knowing that Aiken is not polite.
If Ron is not plucky or Hope is yellow, then Aiken is not angry.
If there is at least one people who is plucky, then Ron is not quaint. | Bud is plucky. | neutral |
Caleb is not quaint.
Ron is quaint.
Ron is angry.
Aiken is yellow.
Bud is polite.
Aiken is quaint.
Clive is jealous.
Hope is angry.
Aiken is not plucky.
Basil is not jealous.
Ron is plucky.
Aiken is angry.Someone is not plucky and polite if and only if he is not quaint.
Someone is not quaint and not yellow if and only if he is plucky and not jealous.
If Caleb is not plucky, then Clive is not jealous and Aiken is not angry, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both yellow and polite, then Ron is not angry.
If there is at least one people who is both plucky and not angry, then Ron is quaint.
If there is someone who is both not yellow and plucky, then Clive is not angry and Clive is quaint.
If there is someone who is yellow, then Hope is angry.
If Ron is plucky, then Ron is not yellow, and vice versa.
If someone is both not jealous and quaint, then he is plucky.
It can be concluded that Hope is not yellow and Aiken is not quaint once knowing that Aiken is not polite.
If Ron is not plucky or Hope is yellow, then Aiken is not angry.
If there is at least one people who is plucky, then Ron is not quaint. | Clive is not angry. | neutral |
Caleb is not quaint.
Ron is quaint.
Ron is angry.
Aiken is yellow.
Bud is polite.
Aiken is quaint.
Clive is jealous.
Hope is angry.
Aiken is not plucky.
Basil is not jealous.
Ron is plucky.
Aiken is angry.Someone is not plucky and polite if and only if he is not quaint.
Someone is not quaint and not yellow if and only if he is plucky and not jealous.
If Caleb is not plucky, then Clive is not jealous and Aiken is not angry, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both yellow and polite, then Ron is not angry.
If there is at least one people who is both plucky and not angry, then Ron is quaint.
If there is someone who is both not yellow and plucky, then Clive is not angry and Clive is quaint.
If there is someone who is yellow, then Hope is angry.
If Ron is plucky, then Ron is not yellow, and vice versa.
If someone is both not jealous and quaint, then he is plucky.
It can be concluded that Hope is not yellow and Aiken is not quaint once knowing that Aiken is not polite.
If Ron is not plucky or Hope is yellow, then Aiken is not angry.
If there is at least one people who is plucky, then Ron is not quaint. | Aiken is not angry. | self_contradiction |
Caleb is not quaint.
Ron is quaint.
Ron is angry.
Aiken is yellow.
Bud is polite.
Aiken is quaint.
Clive is jealous.
Hope is angry.
Aiken is not plucky.
Basil is not jealous.
Ron is plucky.
Aiken is angry.Someone is not plucky and polite if and only if he is not quaint.
Someone is not quaint and not yellow if and only if he is plucky and not jealous.
If Caleb is not plucky, then Clive is not jealous and Aiken is not angry, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both yellow and polite, then Ron is not angry.
If there is at least one people who is both plucky and not angry, then Ron is quaint.
If there is someone who is both not yellow and plucky, then Clive is not angry and Clive is quaint.
If there is someone who is yellow, then Hope is angry.
If Ron is plucky, then Ron is not yellow, and vice versa.
If someone is both not jealous and quaint, then he is plucky.
It can be concluded that Hope is not yellow and Aiken is not quaint once knowing that Aiken is not polite.
If Ron is not plucky or Hope is yellow, then Aiken is not angry.
If there is at least one people who is plucky, then Ron is not quaint. | Caleb is not plucky. | entailment |
Caleb is not quaint.
Ron is quaint.
Ron is angry.
Aiken is yellow.
Bud is polite.
Aiken is quaint.
Clive is jealous.
Hope is angry.
Aiken is not plucky.
Basil is not jealous.
Ron is plucky.
Aiken is angry.Someone is not plucky and polite if and only if he is not quaint.
Someone is not quaint and not yellow if and only if he is plucky and not jealous.
If Caleb is not plucky, then Clive is not jealous and Aiken is not angry, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both yellow and polite, then Ron is not angry.
If there is at least one people who is both plucky and not angry, then Ron is quaint.
If there is someone who is both not yellow and plucky, then Clive is not angry and Clive is quaint.
If there is someone who is yellow, then Hope is angry.
If Ron is plucky, then Ron is not yellow, and vice versa.
If someone is both not jealous and quaint, then he is plucky.
It can be concluded that Hope is not yellow and Aiken is not quaint once knowing that Aiken is not polite.
If Ron is not plucky or Hope is yellow, then Aiken is not angry.
If there is at least one people who is plucky, then Ron is not quaint. | Aiken is not quaint. | contradiction |
Caleb is not quaint.
Ron is quaint.
Ron is angry.
Aiken is yellow.
Bud is polite.
Aiken is quaint.
Clive is jealous.
Hope is angry.
Aiken is not plucky.
Basil is not jealous.
Ron is plucky.
Aiken is angry.Someone is not plucky and polite if and only if he is not quaint.
Someone is not quaint and not yellow if and only if he is plucky and not jealous.
If Caleb is not plucky, then Clive is not jealous and Aiken is not angry, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both yellow and polite, then Ron is not angry.
If there is at least one people who is both plucky and not angry, then Ron is quaint.
If there is someone who is both not yellow and plucky, then Clive is not angry and Clive is quaint.
If there is someone who is yellow, then Hope is angry.
If Ron is plucky, then Ron is not yellow, and vice versa.
If someone is both not jealous and quaint, then he is plucky.
It can be concluded that Hope is not yellow and Aiken is not quaint once knowing that Aiken is not polite.
If Ron is not plucky or Hope is yellow, then Aiken is not angry.
If there is at least one people who is plucky, then Ron is not quaint. | Aiken is quaint. | entailment |
Caleb is not quaint.
Ron is quaint.
Ron is angry.
Aiken is yellow.
Bud is polite.
Aiken is quaint.
Clive is jealous.
Hope is angry.
Aiken is not plucky.
Basil is not jealous.
Ron is plucky.
Aiken is angry.Someone is not plucky and polite if and only if he is not quaint.
Someone is not quaint and not yellow if and only if he is plucky and not jealous.
If Caleb is not plucky, then Clive is not jealous and Aiken is not angry, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both yellow and polite, then Ron is not angry.
If there is at least one people who is both plucky and not angry, then Ron is quaint.
If there is someone who is both not yellow and plucky, then Clive is not angry and Clive is quaint.
If there is someone who is yellow, then Hope is angry.
If Ron is plucky, then Ron is not yellow, and vice versa.
If someone is both not jealous and quaint, then he is plucky.
It can be concluded that Hope is not yellow and Aiken is not quaint once knowing that Aiken is not polite.
If Ron is not plucky or Hope is yellow, then Aiken is not angry.
If there is at least one people who is plucky, then Ron is not quaint. | Ron is quaint. | self_contradiction |
Caleb is not quaint.
Ron is quaint.
Ron is angry.
Aiken is yellow.
Bud is polite.
Aiken is quaint.
Clive is jealous.
Hope is angry.
Aiken is not plucky.
Basil is not jealous.
Ron is plucky.
Aiken is angry.Someone is not plucky and polite if and only if he is not quaint.
Someone is not quaint and not yellow if and only if he is plucky and not jealous.
If Caleb is not plucky, then Clive is not jealous and Aiken is not angry, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both yellow and polite, then Ron is not angry.
If there is at least one people who is both plucky and not angry, then Ron is quaint.
If there is someone who is both not yellow and plucky, then Clive is not angry and Clive is quaint.
If there is someone who is yellow, then Hope is angry.
If Ron is plucky, then Ron is not yellow, and vice versa.
If someone is both not jealous and quaint, then he is plucky.
It can be concluded that Hope is not yellow and Aiken is not quaint once knowing that Aiken is not polite.
If Ron is not plucky or Hope is yellow, then Aiken is not angry.
If there is at least one people who is plucky, then Ron is not quaint. | Caleb is not polite. | contradiction |
Caleb is not quaint.
Ron is quaint.
Ron is angry.
Aiken is yellow.
Bud is polite.
Aiken is quaint.
Clive is jealous.
Hope is angry.
Aiken is not plucky.
Basil is not jealous.
Ron is plucky.
Aiken is angry.Someone is not plucky and polite if and only if he is not quaint.
Someone is not quaint and not yellow if and only if he is plucky and not jealous.
If Caleb is not plucky, then Clive is not jealous and Aiken is not angry, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both yellow and polite, then Ron is not angry.
If there is at least one people who is both plucky and not angry, then Ron is quaint.
If there is someone who is both not yellow and plucky, then Clive is not angry and Clive is quaint.
If there is someone who is yellow, then Hope is angry.
If Ron is plucky, then Ron is not yellow, and vice versa.
If someone is both not jealous and quaint, then he is plucky.
It can be concluded that Hope is not yellow and Aiken is not quaint once knowing that Aiken is not polite.
If Ron is not plucky or Hope is yellow, then Aiken is not angry.
If there is at least one people who is plucky, then Ron is not quaint. | Hope is not angry. | contradiction |
Caleb is not quaint.
Ron is quaint.
Ron is angry.
Aiken is yellow.
Bud is polite.
Aiken is quaint.
Clive is jealous.
Hope is angry.
Aiken is not plucky.
Basil is not jealous.
Ron is plucky.
Aiken is angry.Someone is not plucky and polite if and only if he is not quaint.
Someone is not quaint and not yellow if and only if he is plucky and not jealous.
If Caleb is not plucky, then Clive is not jealous and Aiken is not angry, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both yellow and polite, then Ron is not angry.
If there is at least one people who is both plucky and not angry, then Ron is quaint.
If there is someone who is both not yellow and plucky, then Clive is not angry and Clive is quaint.
If there is someone who is yellow, then Hope is angry.
If Ron is plucky, then Ron is not yellow, and vice versa.
If someone is both not jealous and quaint, then he is plucky.
It can be concluded that Hope is not yellow and Aiken is not quaint once knowing that Aiken is not polite.
If Ron is not plucky or Hope is yellow, then Aiken is not angry.
If there is at least one people who is plucky, then Ron is not quaint. | Hope is polite. | neutral |
Caleb is not quaint.
Ron is quaint.
Ron is angry.
Aiken is yellow.
Bud is polite.
Aiken is quaint.
Clive is jealous.
Hope is angry.
Aiken is not plucky.
Basil is not jealous.
Ron is plucky.
Aiken is angry.Someone is not plucky and polite if and only if he is not quaint.
Someone is not quaint and not yellow if and only if he is plucky and not jealous.
If Caleb is not plucky, then Clive is not jealous and Aiken is not angry, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both yellow and polite, then Ron is not angry.
If there is at least one people who is both plucky and not angry, then Ron is quaint.
If there is someone who is both not yellow and plucky, then Clive is not angry and Clive is quaint.
If there is someone who is yellow, then Hope is angry.
If Ron is plucky, then Ron is not yellow, and vice versa.
If someone is both not jealous and quaint, then he is plucky.
It can be concluded that Hope is not yellow and Aiken is not quaint once knowing that Aiken is not polite.
If Ron is not plucky or Hope is yellow, then Aiken is not angry.
If there is at least one people who is plucky, then Ron is not quaint. | Aiken is angry. | self_contradiction |
Caleb is not quaint.
Ron is quaint.
Ron is angry.
Aiken is yellow.
Bud is polite.
Aiken is quaint.
Clive is jealous.
Hope is angry.
Aiken is not plucky.
Basil is not jealous.
Ron is plucky.
Aiken is angry.Someone is not plucky and polite if and only if he is not quaint.
Someone is not quaint and not yellow if and only if he is plucky and not jealous.
If Caleb is not plucky, then Clive is not jealous and Aiken is not angry, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both yellow and polite, then Ron is not angry.
If there is at least one people who is both plucky and not angry, then Ron is quaint.
If there is someone who is both not yellow and plucky, then Clive is not angry and Clive is quaint.
If there is someone who is yellow, then Hope is angry.
If Ron is plucky, then Ron is not yellow, and vice versa.
If someone is both not jealous and quaint, then he is plucky.
It can be concluded that Hope is not yellow and Aiken is not quaint once knowing that Aiken is not polite.
If Ron is not plucky or Hope is yellow, then Aiken is not angry.
If there is at least one people who is plucky, then Ron is not quaint. | Aiken is not yellow. | contradiction |
Caleb is not quaint.
Ron is quaint.
Ron is angry.
Aiken is yellow.
Bud is polite.
Aiken is quaint.
Clive is jealous.
Hope is angry.
Aiken is not plucky.
Basil is not jealous.
Ron is plucky.
Aiken is angry.Someone is not plucky and polite if and only if he is not quaint.
Someone is not quaint and not yellow if and only if he is plucky and not jealous.
If Caleb is not plucky, then Clive is not jealous and Aiken is not angry, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both yellow and polite, then Ron is not angry.
If there is at least one people who is both plucky and not angry, then Ron is quaint.
If there is someone who is both not yellow and plucky, then Clive is not angry and Clive is quaint.
If there is someone who is yellow, then Hope is angry.
If Ron is plucky, then Ron is not yellow, and vice versa.
If someone is both not jealous and quaint, then he is plucky.
It can be concluded that Hope is not yellow and Aiken is not quaint once knowing that Aiken is not polite.
If Ron is not plucky or Hope is yellow, then Aiken is not angry.
If there is at least one people who is plucky, then Ron is not quaint. | Basil is plucky. | neutral |
Caleb is not quaint.
Ron is quaint.
Ron is angry.
Aiken is yellow.
Bud is polite.
Aiken is quaint.
Clive is jealous.
Hope is angry.
Aiken is not plucky.
Basil is not jealous.
Ron is plucky.
Aiken is angry.Someone is not plucky and polite if and only if he is not quaint.
Someone is not quaint and not yellow if and only if he is plucky and not jealous.
If Caleb is not plucky, then Clive is not jealous and Aiken is not angry, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both yellow and polite, then Ron is not angry.
If there is at least one people who is both plucky and not angry, then Ron is quaint.
If there is someone who is both not yellow and plucky, then Clive is not angry and Clive is quaint.
If there is someone who is yellow, then Hope is angry.
If Ron is plucky, then Ron is not yellow, and vice versa.
If someone is both not jealous and quaint, then he is plucky.
It can be concluded that Hope is not yellow and Aiken is not quaint once knowing that Aiken is not polite.
If Ron is not plucky or Hope is yellow, then Aiken is not angry.
If there is at least one people who is plucky, then Ron is not quaint. | Ron is not quaint. | self_contradiction |
Caleb is not quaint.
Ron is quaint.
Ron is angry.
Aiken is yellow.
Bud is polite.
Aiken is quaint.
Clive is jealous.
Hope is angry.
Aiken is not plucky.
Basil is not jealous.
Ron is plucky.
Aiken is angry.Someone is not plucky and polite if and only if he is not quaint.
Someone is not quaint and not yellow if and only if he is plucky and not jealous.
If Caleb is not plucky, then Clive is not jealous and Aiken is not angry, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both yellow and polite, then Ron is not angry.
If there is at least one people who is both plucky and not angry, then Ron is quaint.
If there is someone who is both not yellow and plucky, then Clive is not angry and Clive is quaint.
If there is someone who is yellow, then Hope is angry.
If Ron is plucky, then Ron is not yellow, and vice versa.
If someone is both not jealous and quaint, then he is plucky.
It can be concluded that Hope is not yellow and Aiken is not quaint once knowing that Aiken is not polite.
If Ron is not plucky or Hope is yellow, then Aiken is not angry.
If there is at least one people who is plucky, then Ron is not quaint. | Aiken is plucky. | contradiction |
Caleb is not quaint.
Ron is quaint.
Ron is angry.
Aiken is yellow.
Bud is polite.
Aiken is quaint.
Clive is jealous.
Hope is angry.
Aiken is not plucky.
Basil is not jealous.
Ron is plucky.
Aiken is angry.Someone is not plucky and polite if and only if he is not quaint.
Someone is not quaint and not yellow if and only if he is plucky and not jealous.
If Caleb is not plucky, then Clive is not jealous and Aiken is not angry, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both yellow and polite, then Ron is not angry.
If there is at least one people who is both plucky and not angry, then Ron is quaint.
If there is someone who is both not yellow and plucky, then Clive is not angry and Clive is quaint.
If there is someone who is yellow, then Hope is angry.
If Ron is plucky, then Ron is not yellow, and vice versa.
If someone is both not jealous and quaint, then he is plucky.
It can be concluded that Hope is not yellow and Aiken is not quaint once knowing that Aiken is not polite.
If Ron is not plucky or Hope is yellow, then Aiken is not angry.
If there is at least one people who is plucky, then Ron is not quaint. | Caleb is polite. | entailment |
Caleb is not quaint.
Ron is quaint.
Ron is angry.
Aiken is yellow.
Bud is polite.
Aiken is quaint.
Clive is jealous.
Hope is angry.
Aiken is not plucky.
Basil is not jealous.
Ron is plucky.
Aiken is angry.Someone is not plucky and polite if and only if he is not quaint.
Someone is not quaint and not yellow if and only if he is plucky and not jealous.
If Caleb is not plucky, then Clive is not jealous and Aiken is not angry, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both yellow and polite, then Ron is not angry.
If there is at least one people who is both plucky and not angry, then Ron is quaint.
If there is someone who is both not yellow and plucky, then Clive is not angry and Clive is quaint.
If there is someone who is yellow, then Hope is angry.
If Ron is plucky, then Ron is not yellow, and vice versa.
If someone is both not jealous and quaint, then he is plucky.
It can be concluded that Hope is not yellow and Aiken is not quaint once knowing that Aiken is not polite.
If Ron is not plucky or Hope is yellow, then Aiken is not angry.
If there is at least one people who is plucky, then Ron is not quaint. | Ron is not jealous. | entailment |
Caleb is not quaint.
Ron is quaint.
Ron is angry.
Aiken is yellow.
Bud is polite.
Aiken is quaint.
Clive is jealous.
Hope is angry.
Aiken is not plucky.
Basil is not jealous.
Ron is plucky.
Aiken is angry.Someone is not plucky and polite if and only if he is not quaint.
Someone is not quaint and not yellow if and only if he is plucky and not jealous.
If Caleb is not plucky, then Clive is not jealous and Aiken is not angry, and vice versa.
If there is at least one people who is both yellow and polite, then Ron is not angry.
If there is at least one people who is both plucky and not angry, then Ron is quaint.
If there is someone who is both not yellow and plucky, then Clive is not angry and Clive is quaint.
If there is someone who is yellow, then Hope is angry.
If Ron is plucky, then Ron is not yellow, and vice versa.
If someone is both not jealous and quaint, then he is plucky.
It can be concluded that Hope is not yellow and Aiken is not quaint once knowing that Aiken is not polite.
If Ron is not plucky or Hope is yellow, then Aiken is not angry.
If there is at least one people who is plucky, then Ron is not quaint. | Caleb is not yellow. | neutral |
Hubert is not salty.
Alvin is not arrow.
Charles is not arrow.
Hubert is gentle.
Hubert is plain.
Hubert is not panicky.
Beverly is gentle.
Alvin is not gentle.
Sterling is not gentle.
Beverly is salty.
Douglas is salty.
Alvin is not plain.If Charles is not panicky, then Douglas is talented.
If someone is both salty and talented, then he is arrow.
If someone is not gentle, then he is both not panicky and arrow.
Douglas being arrow or Douglas being not salty implies that Hubert is not gentle.
Shelley being not salty implies that Sterling is talented and Shelley is not gentle.
Shelley is panicky and Shelley is arrow if and only if Beverly is not salty and Sterling is not plain.
If Sterling is not arrow, then Alvin is not talented, and vice versa.
Someone who is gentle or arrow is always not panicky and plain.
As long as someone is salty, he is plain and arrow.
If there is at least one people who is panicky, then Sterling is not arrow.
If all people are talented, then Beverly is plain and Alvin is not salty.
Someone is arrow and not talented if and only if he is plain and salty. | Sterling is plain. | entailment |
Hubert is not salty.
Alvin is not arrow.
Charles is not arrow.
Hubert is gentle.
Hubert is plain.
Hubert is not panicky.
Beverly is gentle.
Alvin is not gentle.
Sterling is not gentle.
Beverly is salty.
Douglas is salty.
Alvin is not plain.If Charles is not panicky, then Douglas is talented.
If someone is both salty and talented, then he is arrow.
If someone is not gentle, then he is both not panicky and arrow.
Douglas being arrow or Douglas being not salty implies that Hubert is not gentle.
Shelley being not salty implies that Sterling is talented and Shelley is not gentle.
Shelley is panicky and Shelley is arrow if and only if Beverly is not salty and Sterling is not plain.
If Sterling is not arrow, then Alvin is not talented, and vice versa.
Someone who is gentle or arrow is always not panicky and plain.
As long as someone is salty, he is plain and arrow.
If there is at least one people who is panicky, then Sterling is not arrow.
If all people are talented, then Beverly is plain and Alvin is not salty.
Someone is arrow and not talented if and only if he is plain and salty. | Beverly is panicky. | contradiction |
Hubert is not salty.
Alvin is not arrow.
Charles is not arrow.
Hubert is gentle.
Hubert is plain.
Hubert is not panicky.
Beverly is gentle.
Alvin is not gentle.
Sterling is not gentle.
Beverly is salty.
Douglas is salty.
Alvin is not plain.If Charles is not panicky, then Douglas is talented.
If someone is both salty and talented, then he is arrow.
If someone is not gentle, then he is both not panicky and arrow.
Douglas being arrow or Douglas being not salty implies that Hubert is not gentle.
Shelley being not salty implies that Sterling is talented and Shelley is not gentle.
Shelley is panicky and Shelley is arrow if and only if Beverly is not salty and Sterling is not plain.
If Sterling is not arrow, then Alvin is not talented, and vice versa.
Someone who is gentle or arrow is always not panicky and plain.
As long as someone is salty, he is plain and arrow.
If there is at least one people who is panicky, then Sterling is not arrow.
If all people are talented, then Beverly is plain and Alvin is not salty.
Someone is arrow and not talented if and only if he is plain and salty. | Alvin is arrow. | self_contradiction |
Hubert is not salty.
Alvin is not arrow.
Charles is not arrow.
Hubert is gentle.
Hubert is plain.
Hubert is not panicky.
Beverly is gentle.
Alvin is not gentle.
Sterling is not gentle.
Beverly is salty.
Douglas is salty.
Alvin is not plain.If Charles is not panicky, then Douglas is talented.
If someone is both salty and talented, then he is arrow.
If someone is not gentle, then he is both not panicky and arrow.
Douglas being arrow or Douglas being not salty implies that Hubert is not gentle.
Shelley being not salty implies that Sterling is talented and Shelley is not gentle.
Shelley is panicky and Shelley is arrow if and only if Beverly is not salty and Sterling is not plain.
If Sterling is not arrow, then Alvin is not talented, and vice versa.
Someone who is gentle or arrow is always not panicky and plain.
As long as someone is salty, he is plain and arrow.
If there is at least one people who is panicky, then Sterling is not arrow.
If all people are talented, then Beverly is plain and Alvin is not salty.
Someone is arrow and not talented if and only if he is plain and salty. | Charles is salty. | neutral |
Hubert is not salty.
Alvin is not arrow.
Charles is not arrow.
Hubert is gentle.
Hubert is plain.
Hubert is not panicky.
Beverly is gentle.
Alvin is not gentle.
Sterling is not gentle.
Beverly is salty.
Douglas is salty.
Alvin is not plain.If Charles is not panicky, then Douglas is talented.
If someone is both salty and talented, then he is arrow.
If someone is not gentle, then he is both not panicky and arrow.
Douglas being arrow or Douglas being not salty implies that Hubert is not gentle.
Shelley being not salty implies that Sterling is talented and Shelley is not gentle.
Shelley is panicky and Shelley is arrow if and only if Beverly is not salty and Sterling is not plain.
If Sterling is not arrow, then Alvin is not talented, and vice versa.
Someone who is gentle or arrow is always not panicky and plain.
As long as someone is salty, he is plain and arrow.
If there is at least one people who is panicky, then Sterling is not arrow.
If all people are talented, then Beverly is plain and Alvin is not salty.
Someone is arrow and not talented if and only if he is plain and salty. | Hubert is gentle. | self_contradiction |
Hubert is not salty.
Alvin is not arrow.
Charles is not arrow.
Hubert is gentle.
Hubert is plain.
Hubert is not panicky.
Beverly is gentle.
Alvin is not gentle.
Sterling is not gentle.
Beverly is salty.
Douglas is salty.
Alvin is not plain.If Charles is not panicky, then Douglas is talented.
If someone is both salty and talented, then he is arrow.
If someone is not gentle, then he is both not panicky and arrow.
Douglas being arrow or Douglas being not salty implies that Hubert is not gentle.
Shelley being not salty implies that Sterling is talented and Shelley is not gentle.
Shelley is panicky and Shelley is arrow if and only if Beverly is not salty and Sterling is not plain.
If Sterling is not arrow, then Alvin is not talented, and vice versa.
Someone who is gentle or arrow is always not panicky and plain.
As long as someone is salty, he is plain and arrow.
If there is at least one people who is panicky, then Sterling is not arrow.
If all people are talented, then Beverly is plain and Alvin is not salty.
Someone is arrow and not talented if and only if he is plain and salty. | Hubert is not gentle. | self_contradiction |
Hubert is not salty.
Alvin is not arrow.
Charles is not arrow.
Hubert is gentle.
Hubert is plain.
Hubert is not panicky.
Beverly is gentle.
Alvin is not gentle.
Sterling is not gentle.
Beverly is salty.
Douglas is salty.
Alvin is not plain.If Charles is not panicky, then Douglas is talented.
If someone is both salty and talented, then he is arrow.
If someone is not gentle, then he is both not panicky and arrow.
Douglas being arrow or Douglas being not salty implies that Hubert is not gentle.
Shelley being not salty implies that Sterling is talented and Shelley is not gentle.
Shelley is panicky and Shelley is arrow if and only if Beverly is not salty and Sterling is not plain.
If Sterling is not arrow, then Alvin is not talented, and vice versa.
Someone who is gentle or arrow is always not panicky and plain.
As long as someone is salty, he is plain and arrow.
If there is at least one people who is panicky, then Sterling is not arrow.
If all people are talented, then Beverly is plain and Alvin is not salty.
Someone is arrow and not talented if and only if he is plain and salty. | Alvin is talented. | neutral |
Hubert is not salty.
Alvin is not arrow.
Charles is not arrow.
Hubert is gentle.
Hubert is plain.
Hubert is not panicky.
Beverly is gentle.
Alvin is not gentle.
Sterling is not gentle.
Beverly is salty.
Douglas is salty.
Alvin is not plain.If Charles is not panicky, then Douglas is talented.
If someone is both salty and talented, then he is arrow.
If someone is not gentle, then he is both not panicky and arrow.
Douglas being arrow or Douglas being not salty implies that Hubert is not gentle.
Shelley being not salty implies that Sterling is talented and Shelley is not gentle.
Shelley is panicky and Shelley is arrow if and only if Beverly is not salty and Sterling is not plain.
If Sterling is not arrow, then Alvin is not talented, and vice versa.
Someone who is gentle or arrow is always not panicky and plain.
As long as someone is salty, he is plain and arrow.
If there is at least one people who is panicky, then Sterling is not arrow.
If all people are talented, then Beverly is plain and Alvin is not salty.
Someone is arrow and not talented if and only if he is plain and salty. | Charles is not arrow. | entailment |
Hubert is not salty.
Alvin is not arrow.
Charles is not arrow.
Hubert is gentle.
Hubert is plain.
Hubert is not panicky.
Beverly is gentle.
Alvin is not gentle.
Sterling is not gentle.
Beverly is salty.
Douglas is salty.
Alvin is not plain.If Charles is not panicky, then Douglas is talented.
If someone is both salty and talented, then he is arrow.
If someone is not gentle, then he is both not panicky and arrow.
Douglas being arrow or Douglas being not salty implies that Hubert is not gentle.
Shelley being not salty implies that Sterling is talented and Shelley is not gentle.
Shelley is panicky and Shelley is arrow if and only if Beverly is not salty and Sterling is not plain.
If Sterling is not arrow, then Alvin is not talented, and vice versa.
Someone who is gentle or arrow is always not panicky and plain.
As long as someone is salty, he is plain and arrow.
If there is at least one people who is panicky, then Sterling is not arrow.
If all people are talented, then Beverly is plain and Alvin is not salty.
Someone is arrow and not talented if and only if he is plain and salty. | Beverly is not plain. | contradiction |
Hubert is not salty.
Alvin is not arrow.
Charles is not arrow.
Hubert is gentle.
Hubert is plain.
Hubert is not panicky.
Beverly is gentle.
Alvin is not gentle.
Sterling is not gentle.
Beverly is salty.
Douglas is salty.
Alvin is not plain.If Charles is not panicky, then Douglas is talented.
If someone is both salty and talented, then he is arrow.
If someone is not gentle, then he is both not panicky and arrow.
Douglas being arrow or Douglas being not salty implies that Hubert is not gentle.
Shelley being not salty implies that Sterling is talented and Shelley is not gentle.
Shelley is panicky and Shelley is arrow if and only if Beverly is not salty and Sterling is not plain.
If Sterling is not arrow, then Alvin is not talented, and vice versa.
Someone who is gentle or arrow is always not panicky and plain.
As long as someone is salty, he is plain and arrow.
If there is at least one people who is panicky, then Sterling is not arrow.
If all people are talented, then Beverly is plain and Alvin is not salty.
Someone is arrow and not talented if and only if he is plain and salty. | Alvin is not plain. | self_contradiction |
Hubert is not salty.
Alvin is not arrow.
Charles is not arrow.
Hubert is gentle.
Hubert is plain.
Hubert is not panicky.
Beverly is gentle.
Alvin is not gentle.
Sterling is not gentle.
Beverly is salty.
Douglas is salty.
Alvin is not plain.If Charles is not panicky, then Douglas is talented.
If someone is both salty and talented, then he is arrow.
If someone is not gentle, then he is both not panicky and arrow.
Douglas being arrow or Douglas being not salty implies that Hubert is not gentle.
Shelley being not salty implies that Sterling is talented and Shelley is not gentle.
Shelley is panicky and Shelley is arrow if and only if Beverly is not salty and Sterling is not plain.
If Sterling is not arrow, then Alvin is not talented, and vice versa.
Someone who is gentle or arrow is always not panicky and plain.
As long as someone is salty, he is plain and arrow.
If there is at least one people who is panicky, then Sterling is not arrow.
If all people are talented, then Beverly is plain and Alvin is not salty.
Someone is arrow and not talented if and only if he is plain and salty. | Beverly is not panicky. | entailment |
Hubert is not salty.
Alvin is not arrow.
Charles is not arrow.
Hubert is gentle.
Hubert is plain.
Hubert is not panicky.
Beverly is gentle.
Alvin is not gentle.
Sterling is not gentle.
Beverly is salty.
Douglas is salty.
Alvin is not plain.If Charles is not panicky, then Douglas is talented.
If someone is both salty and talented, then he is arrow.
If someone is not gentle, then he is both not panicky and arrow.
Douglas being arrow or Douglas being not salty implies that Hubert is not gentle.
Shelley being not salty implies that Sterling is talented and Shelley is not gentle.
Shelley is panicky and Shelley is arrow if and only if Beverly is not salty and Sterling is not plain.
If Sterling is not arrow, then Alvin is not talented, and vice versa.
Someone who is gentle or arrow is always not panicky and plain.
As long as someone is salty, he is plain and arrow.
If there is at least one people who is panicky, then Sterling is not arrow.
If all people are talented, then Beverly is plain and Alvin is not salty.
Someone is arrow and not talented if and only if he is plain and salty. | Charles is plain. | neutral |
Hubert is not salty.
Alvin is not arrow.
Charles is not arrow.
Hubert is gentle.
Hubert is plain.
Hubert is not panicky.
Beverly is gentle.
Alvin is not gentle.
Sterling is not gentle.
Beverly is salty.
Douglas is salty.
Alvin is not plain.If Charles is not panicky, then Douglas is talented.
If someone is both salty and talented, then he is arrow.
If someone is not gentle, then he is both not panicky and arrow.
Douglas being arrow or Douglas being not salty implies that Hubert is not gentle.
Shelley being not salty implies that Sterling is talented and Shelley is not gentle.
Shelley is panicky and Shelley is arrow if and only if Beverly is not salty and Sterling is not plain.
If Sterling is not arrow, then Alvin is not talented, and vice versa.
Someone who is gentle or arrow is always not panicky and plain.
As long as someone is salty, he is plain and arrow.
If there is at least one people who is panicky, then Sterling is not arrow.
If all people are talented, then Beverly is plain and Alvin is not salty.
Someone is arrow and not talented if and only if he is plain and salty. | Douglas is not talented. | entailment |
Hubert is not salty.
Alvin is not arrow.
Charles is not arrow.
Hubert is gentle.
Hubert is plain.
Hubert is not panicky.
Beverly is gentle.
Alvin is not gentle.
Sterling is not gentle.
Beverly is salty.
Douglas is salty.
Alvin is not plain.If Charles is not panicky, then Douglas is talented.
If someone is both salty and talented, then he is arrow.
If someone is not gentle, then he is both not panicky and arrow.
Douglas being arrow or Douglas being not salty implies that Hubert is not gentle.
Shelley being not salty implies that Sterling is talented and Shelley is not gentle.
Shelley is panicky and Shelley is arrow if and only if Beverly is not salty and Sterling is not plain.
If Sterling is not arrow, then Alvin is not talented, and vice versa.
Someone who is gentle or arrow is always not panicky and plain.
As long as someone is salty, he is plain and arrow.
If there is at least one people who is panicky, then Sterling is not arrow.
If all people are talented, then Beverly is plain and Alvin is not salty.
Someone is arrow and not talented if and only if he is plain and salty. | Sterling is not panicky. | entailment |
Hubert is not salty.
Alvin is not arrow.
Charles is not arrow.
Hubert is gentle.
Hubert is plain.
Hubert is not panicky.
Beverly is gentle.
Alvin is not gentle.
Sterling is not gentle.
Beverly is salty.
Douglas is salty.
Alvin is not plain.If Charles is not panicky, then Douglas is talented.
If someone is both salty and talented, then he is arrow.
If someone is not gentle, then he is both not panicky and arrow.
Douglas being arrow or Douglas being not salty implies that Hubert is not gentle.
Shelley being not salty implies that Sterling is talented and Shelley is not gentle.
Shelley is panicky and Shelley is arrow if and only if Beverly is not salty and Sterling is not plain.
If Sterling is not arrow, then Alvin is not talented, and vice versa.
Someone who is gentle or arrow is always not panicky and plain.
As long as someone is salty, he is plain and arrow.
If there is at least one people who is panicky, then Sterling is not arrow.
If all people are talented, then Beverly is plain and Alvin is not salty.
Someone is arrow and not talented if and only if he is plain and salty. | Alvin is not talented. | neutral |
Hubert is not salty.
Alvin is not arrow.
Charles is not arrow.
Hubert is gentle.
Hubert is plain.
Hubert is not panicky.
Beverly is gentle.
Alvin is not gentle.
Sterling is not gentle.
Beverly is salty.
Douglas is salty.
Alvin is not plain.If Charles is not panicky, then Douglas is talented.
If someone is both salty and talented, then he is arrow.
If someone is not gentle, then he is both not panicky and arrow.
Douglas being arrow or Douglas being not salty implies that Hubert is not gentle.
Shelley being not salty implies that Sterling is talented and Shelley is not gentle.
Shelley is panicky and Shelley is arrow if and only if Beverly is not salty and Sterling is not plain.
If Sterling is not arrow, then Alvin is not talented, and vice versa.
Someone who is gentle or arrow is always not panicky and plain.
As long as someone is salty, he is plain and arrow.
If there is at least one people who is panicky, then Sterling is not arrow.
If all people are talented, then Beverly is plain and Alvin is not salty.
Someone is arrow and not talented if and only if he is plain and salty. | Shelley is gentle. | neutral |
Hubert is not salty.
Alvin is not arrow.
Charles is not arrow.
Hubert is gentle.
Hubert is plain.
Hubert is not panicky.
Beverly is gentle.
Alvin is not gentle.
Sterling is not gentle.
Beverly is salty.
Douglas is salty.
Alvin is not plain.If Charles is not panicky, then Douglas is talented.
If someone is both salty and talented, then he is arrow.
If someone is not gentle, then he is both not panicky and arrow.
Douglas being arrow or Douglas being not salty implies that Hubert is not gentle.
Shelley being not salty implies that Sterling is talented and Shelley is not gentle.
Shelley is panicky and Shelley is arrow if and only if Beverly is not salty and Sterling is not plain.
If Sterling is not arrow, then Alvin is not talented, and vice versa.
Someone who is gentle or arrow is always not panicky and plain.
As long as someone is salty, he is plain and arrow.
If there is at least one people who is panicky, then Sterling is not arrow.
If all people are talented, then Beverly is plain and Alvin is not salty.
Someone is arrow and not talented if and only if he is plain and salty. | Douglas is talented. | contradiction |
Hubert is not salty.
Alvin is not arrow.
Charles is not arrow.
Hubert is gentle.
Hubert is plain.
Hubert is not panicky.
Beverly is gentle.
Alvin is not gentle.
Sterling is not gentle.
Beverly is salty.
Douglas is salty.
Alvin is not plain.If Charles is not panicky, then Douglas is talented.
If someone is both salty and talented, then he is arrow.
If someone is not gentle, then he is both not panicky and arrow.
Douglas being arrow or Douglas being not salty implies that Hubert is not gentle.
Shelley being not salty implies that Sterling is talented and Shelley is not gentle.
Shelley is panicky and Shelley is arrow if and only if Beverly is not salty and Sterling is not plain.
If Sterling is not arrow, then Alvin is not talented, and vice versa.
Someone who is gentle or arrow is always not panicky and plain.
As long as someone is salty, he is plain and arrow.
If there is at least one people who is panicky, then Sterling is not arrow.
If all people are talented, then Beverly is plain and Alvin is not salty.
Someone is arrow and not talented if and only if he is plain and salty. | Douglas is not plain. | contradiction |
Hubert is not salty.
Alvin is not arrow.
Charles is not arrow.
Hubert is gentle.
Hubert is plain.
Hubert is not panicky.
Beverly is gentle.
Alvin is not gentle.
Sterling is not gentle.
Beverly is salty.
Douglas is salty.
Alvin is not plain.If Charles is not panicky, then Douglas is talented.
If someone is both salty and talented, then he is arrow.
If someone is not gentle, then he is both not panicky and arrow.
Douglas being arrow or Douglas being not salty implies that Hubert is not gentle.
Shelley being not salty implies that Sterling is talented and Shelley is not gentle.
Shelley is panicky and Shelley is arrow if and only if Beverly is not salty and Sterling is not plain.
If Sterling is not arrow, then Alvin is not talented, and vice versa.
Someone who is gentle or arrow is always not panicky and plain.
As long as someone is salty, he is plain and arrow.
If there is at least one people who is panicky, then Sterling is not arrow.
If all people are talented, then Beverly is plain and Alvin is not salty.
Someone is arrow and not talented if and only if he is plain and salty. | Alvin is not arrow. | self_contradiction |
Hubert is not salty.
Alvin is not arrow.
Charles is not arrow.
Hubert is gentle.
Hubert is plain.
Hubert is not panicky.
Beverly is gentle.
Alvin is not gentle.
Sterling is not gentle.
Beverly is salty.
Douglas is salty.
Alvin is not plain.If Charles is not panicky, then Douglas is talented.
If someone is both salty and talented, then he is arrow.
If someone is not gentle, then he is both not panicky and arrow.
Douglas being arrow or Douglas being not salty implies that Hubert is not gentle.
Shelley being not salty implies that Sterling is talented and Shelley is not gentle.
Shelley is panicky and Shelley is arrow if and only if Beverly is not salty and Sterling is not plain.
If Sterling is not arrow, then Alvin is not talented, and vice versa.
Someone who is gentle or arrow is always not panicky and plain.
As long as someone is salty, he is plain and arrow.
If there is at least one people who is panicky, then Sterling is not arrow.
If all people are talented, then Beverly is plain and Alvin is not salty.
Someone is arrow and not talented if and only if he is plain and salty. | Beverly is talented. | contradiction |
Claude is innocent.
Silas is not angry.
Silas is not dynamic.
Claude is wrong.
Leith is dynamic.
Silas is not innocent.
Claude is not creepy.
Kayla is not creepy.
Claude is angry.
Kayla is not wrong.
Leith is not horrible.
Culver is not angry.Someone is not creepy if and only if he is angry.
If there is someone who is either creepy or angry, then Claude is innocent.
It can be concluded that Silas is not dynamic and Silas is not wrong once knowing that Leith is not angry.
If there is someone who is not horrible, then Culver is not innocent.
As long as someone is not creepy, he is not angry and innocent.
If there is at least one people who is not creepy, then Bruce is not horrible and Claude is angry.
Silas is not dynamic if and only if Rick is not wrong.
Rick being innocent or Claude being creepy implies that Kayla is not dynamic.
Leith being not innocent and Kayla being creepy imply that Claude is not wrong and Silas is not dynamic.
Culver being not innocent and Culver being creepy imply that Claude is angry.
It can be concluded that Claude is not wrong once knowing that Claude is not horrible.
If there is at least one people who is not horrible, then Rick is innocent and Rick is angry. | Leith is not innocent. | neutral |
Claude is innocent.
Silas is not angry.
Silas is not dynamic.
Claude is wrong.
Leith is dynamic.
Silas is not innocent.
Claude is not creepy.
Kayla is not creepy.
Claude is angry.
Kayla is not wrong.
Leith is not horrible.
Culver is not angry.Someone is not creepy if and only if he is angry.
If there is someone who is either creepy or angry, then Claude is innocent.
It can be concluded that Silas is not dynamic and Silas is not wrong once knowing that Leith is not angry.
If there is someone who is not horrible, then Culver is not innocent.
As long as someone is not creepy, he is not angry and innocent.
If there is at least one people who is not creepy, then Bruce is not horrible and Claude is angry.
Silas is not dynamic if and only if Rick is not wrong.
Rick being innocent or Claude being creepy implies that Kayla is not dynamic.
Leith being not innocent and Kayla being creepy imply that Claude is not wrong and Silas is not dynamic.
Culver being not innocent and Culver being creepy imply that Claude is angry.
It can be concluded that Claude is not wrong once knowing that Claude is not horrible.
If there is at least one people who is not horrible, then Rick is innocent and Rick is angry. | Culver is angry. | contradiction |
Claude is innocent.
Silas is not angry.
Silas is not dynamic.
Claude is wrong.
Leith is dynamic.
Silas is not innocent.
Claude is not creepy.
Kayla is not creepy.
Claude is angry.
Kayla is not wrong.
Leith is not horrible.
Culver is not angry.Someone is not creepy if and only if he is angry.
If there is someone who is either creepy or angry, then Claude is innocent.
It can be concluded that Silas is not dynamic and Silas is not wrong once knowing that Leith is not angry.
If there is someone who is not horrible, then Culver is not innocent.
As long as someone is not creepy, he is not angry and innocent.
If there is at least one people who is not creepy, then Bruce is not horrible and Claude is angry.
Silas is not dynamic if and only if Rick is not wrong.
Rick being innocent or Claude being creepy implies that Kayla is not dynamic.
Leith being not innocent and Kayla being creepy imply that Claude is not wrong and Silas is not dynamic.
Culver being not innocent and Culver being creepy imply that Claude is angry.
It can be concluded that Claude is not wrong once knowing that Claude is not horrible.
If there is at least one people who is not horrible, then Rick is innocent and Rick is angry. | Leith is not angry. | neutral |
Claude is innocent.
Silas is not angry.
Silas is not dynamic.
Claude is wrong.
Leith is dynamic.
Silas is not innocent.
Claude is not creepy.
Kayla is not creepy.
Claude is angry.
Kayla is not wrong.
Leith is not horrible.
Culver is not angry.Someone is not creepy if and only if he is angry.
If there is someone who is either creepy or angry, then Claude is innocent.
It can be concluded that Silas is not dynamic and Silas is not wrong once knowing that Leith is not angry.
If there is someone who is not horrible, then Culver is not innocent.
As long as someone is not creepy, he is not angry and innocent.
If there is at least one people who is not creepy, then Bruce is not horrible and Claude is angry.
Silas is not dynamic if and only if Rick is not wrong.
Rick being innocent or Claude being creepy implies that Kayla is not dynamic.
Leith being not innocent and Kayla being creepy imply that Claude is not wrong and Silas is not dynamic.
Culver being not innocent and Culver being creepy imply that Claude is angry.
It can be concluded that Claude is not wrong once knowing that Claude is not horrible.
If there is at least one people who is not horrible, then Rick is innocent and Rick is angry. | Bruce is not innocent. | neutral |
Claude is innocent.
Silas is not angry.
Silas is not dynamic.
Claude is wrong.
Leith is dynamic.
Silas is not innocent.
Claude is not creepy.
Kayla is not creepy.
Claude is angry.
Kayla is not wrong.
Leith is not horrible.
Culver is not angry.Someone is not creepy if and only if he is angry.
If there is someone who is either creepy or angry, then Claude is innocent.
It can be concluded that Silas is not dynamic and Silas is not wrong once knowing that Leith is not angry.
If there is someone who is not horrible, then Culver is not innocent.
As long as someone is not creepy, he is not angry and innocent.
If there is at least one people who is not creepy, then Bruce is not horrible and Claude is angry.
Silas is not dynamic if and only if Rick is not wrong.
Rick being innocent or Claude being creepy implies that Kayla is not dynamic.
Leith being not innocent and Kayla being creepy imply that Claude is not wrong and Silas is not dynamic.
Culver being not innocent and Culver being creepy imply that Claude is angry.
It can be concluded that Claude is not wrong once knowing that Claude is not horrible.
If there is at least one people who is not horrible, then Rick is innocent and Rick is angry. | Kayla is not wrong. | entailment |
Claude is innocent.
Silas is not angry.
Silas is not dynamic.
Claude is wrong.
Leith is dynamic.
Silas is not innocent.
Claude is not creepy.
Kayla is not creepy.
Claude is angry.
Kayla is not wrong.
Leith is not horrible.
Culver is not angry.Someone is not creepy if and only if he is angry.
If there is someone who is either creepy or angry, then Claude is innocent.
It can be concluded that Silas is not dynamic and Silas is not wrong once knowing that Leith is not angry.
If there is someone who is not horrible, then Culver is not innocent.
As long as someone is not creepy, he is not angry and innocent.
If there is at least one people who is not creepy, then Bruce is not horrible and Claude is angry.
Silas is not dynamic if and only if Rick is not wrong.
Rick being innocent or Claude being creepy implies that Kayla is not dynamic.
Leith being not innocent and Kayla being creepy imply that Claude is not wrong and Silas is not dynamic.
Culver being not innocent and Culver being creepy imply that Claude is angry.
It can be concluded that Claude is not wrong once knowing that Claude is not horrible.
If there is at least one people who is not horrible, then Rick is innocent and Rick is angry. | Rick is not angry. | self_contradiction |
Claude is innocent.
Silas is not angry.
Silas is not dynamic.
Claude is wrong.
Leith is dynamic.
Silas is not innocent.
Claude is not creepy.
Kayla is not creepy.
Claude is angry.
Kayla is not wrong.
Leith is not horrible.
Culver is not angry.Someone is not creepy if and only if he is angry.
If there is someone who is either creepy or angry, then Claude is innocent.
It can be concluded that Silas is not dynamic and Silas is not wrong once knowing that Leith is not angry.
If there is someone who is not horrible, then Culver is not innocent.
As long as someone is not creepy, he is not angry and innocent.
If there is at least one people who is not creepy, then Bruce is not horrible and Claude is angry.
Silas is not dynamic if and only if Rick is not wrong.
Rick being innocent or Claude being creepy implies that Kayla is not dynamic.
Leith being not innocent and Kayla being creepy imply that Claude is not wrong and Silas is not dynamic.
Culver being not innocent and Culver being creepy imply that Claude is angry.
It can be concluded that Claude is not wrong once knowing that Claude is not horrible.
If there is at least one people who is not horrible, then Rick is innocent and Rick is angry. | Kayla is not creepy. | entailment |
Claude is innocent.
Silas is not angry.
Silas is not dynamic.
Claude is wrong.
Leith is dynamic.
Silas is not innocent.
Claude is not creepy.
Kayla is not creepy.
Claude is angry.
Kayla is not wrong.
Leith is not horrible.
Culver is not angry.Someone is not creepy if and only if he is angry.
If there is someone who is either creepy or angry, then Claude is innocent.
It can be concluded that Silas is not dynamic and Silas is not wrong once knowing that Leith is not angry.
If there is someone who is not horrible, then Culver is not innocent.
As long as someone is not creepy, he is not angry and innocent.
If there is at least one people who is not creepy, then Bruce is not horrible and Claude is angry.
Silas is not dynamic if and only if Rick is not wrong.
Rick being innocent or Claude being creepy implies that Kayla is not dynamic.
Leith being not innocent and Kayla being creepy imply that Claude is not wrong and Silas is not dynamic.
Culver being not innocent and Culver being creepy imply that Claude is angry.
It can be concluded that Claude is not wrong once knowing that Claude is not horrible.
If there is at least one people who is not horrible, then Rick is innocent and Rick is angry. | Claude is wrong. | entailment |
Claude is innocent.
Silas is not angry.
Silas is not dynamic.
Claude is wrong.
Leith is dynamic.
Silas is not innocent.
Claude is not creepy.
Kayla is not creepy.
Claude is angry.
Kayla is not wrong.
Leith is not horrible.
Culver is not angry.Someone is not creepy if and only if he is angry.
If there is someone who is either creepy or angry, then Claude is innocent.
It can be concluded that Silas is not dynamic and Silas is not wrong once knowing that Leith is not angry.
If there is someone who is not horrible, then Culver is not innocent.
As long as someone is not creepy, he is not angry and innocent.
If there is at least one people who is not creepy, then Bruce is not horrible and Claude is angry.
Silas is not dynamic if and only if Rick is not wrong.
Rick being innocent or Claude being creepy implies that Kayla is not dynamic.
Leith being not innocent and Kayla being creepy imply that Claude is not wrong and Silas is not dynamic.
Culver being not innocent and Culver being creepy imply that Claude is angry.
It can be concluded that Claude is not wrong once knowing that Claude is not horrible.
If there is at least one people who is not horrible, then Rick is innocent and Rick is angry. | Rick is angry. | self_contradiction |
Claude is innocent.
Silas is not angry.
Silas is not dynamic.
Claude is wrong.
Leith is dynamic.
Silas is not innocent.
Claude is not creepy.
Kayla is not creepy.
Claude is angry.
Kayla is not wrong.
Leith is not horrible.
Culver is not angry.Someone is not creepy if and only if he is angry.
If there is someone who is either creepy or angry, then Claude is innocent.
It can be concluded that Silas is not dynamic and Silas is not wrong once knowing that Leith is not angry.
If there is someone who is not horrible, then Culver is not innocent.
As long as someone is not creepy, he is not angry and innocent.
If there is at least one people who is not creepy, then Bruce is not horrible and Claude is angry.
Silas is not dynamic if and only if Rick is not wrong.
Rick being innocent or Claude being creepy implies that Kayla is not dynamic.
Leith being not innocent and Kayla being creepy imply that Claude is not wrong and Silas is not dynamic.
Culver being not innocent and Culver being creepy imply that Claude is angry.
It can be concluded that Claude is not wrong once knowing that Claude is not horrible.
If there is at least one people who is not horrible, then Rick is innocent and Rick is angry. | Claude is not wrong. | contradiction |
Claude is innocent.
Silas is not angry.
Silas is not dynamic.
Claude is wrong.
Leith is dynamic.
Silas is not innocent.
Claude is not creepy.
Kayla is not creepy.
Claude is angry.
Kayla is not wrong.
Leith is not horrible.
Culver is not angry.Someone is not creepy if and only if he is angry.
If there is someone who is either creepy or angry, then Claude is innocent.
It can be concluded that Silas is not dynamic and Silas is not wrong once knowing that Leith is not angry.
If there is someone who is not horrible, then Culver is not innocent.
As long as someone is not creepy, he is not angry and innocent.
If there is at least one people who is not creepy, then Bruce is not horrible and Claude is angry.
Silas is not dynamic if and only if Rick is not wrong.
Rick being innocent or Claude being creepy implies that Kayla is not dynamic.
Leith being not innocent and Kayla being creepy imply that Claude is not wrong and Silas is not dynamic.
Culver being not innocent and Culver being creepy imply that Claude is angry.
It can be concluded that Claude is not wrong once knowing that Claude is not horrible.
If there is at least one people who is not horrible, then Rick is innocent and Rick is angry. | Kayla is angry. | self_contradiction |
Claude is innocent.
Silas is not angry.
Silas is not dynamic.
Claude is wrong.
Leith is dynamic.
Silas is not innocent.
Claude is not creepy.
Kayla is not creepy.
Claude is angry.
Kayla is not wrong.
Leith is not horrible.
Culver is not angry.Someone is not creepy if and only if he is angry.
If there is someone who is either creepy or angry, then Claude is innocent.
It can be concluded that Silas is not dynamic and Silas is not wrong once knowing that Leith is not angry.
If there is someone who is not horrible, then Culver is not innocent.
As long as someone is not creepy, he is not angry and innocent.
If there is at least one people who is not creepy, then Bruce is not horrible and Claude is angry.
Silas is not dynamic if and only if Rick is not wrong.
Rick being innocent or Claude being creepy implies that Kayla is not dynamic.
Leith being not innocent and Kayla being creepy imply that Claude is not wrong and Silas is not dynamic.
Culver being not innocent and Culver being creepy imply that Claude is angry.
It can be concluded that Claude is not wrong once knowing that Claude is not horrible.
If there is at least one people who is not horrible, then Rick is innocent and Rick is angry. | Claude is angry. | self_contradiction |
Claude is innocent.
Silas is not angry.
Silas is not dynamic.
Claude is wrong.
Leith is dynamic.
Silas is not innocent.
Claude is not creepy.
Kayla is not creepy.
Claude is angry.
Kayla is not wrong.
Leith is not horrible.
Culver is not angry.Someone is not creepy if and only if he is angry.
If there is someone who is either creepy or angry, then Claude is innocent.
It can be concluded that Silas is not dynamic and Silas is not wrong once knowing that Leith is not angry.
If there is someone who is not horrible, then Culver is not innocent.
As long as someone is not creepy, he is not angry and innocent.
If there is at least one people who is not creepy, then Bruce is not horrible and Claude is angry.
Silas is not dynamic if and only if Rick is not wrong.
Rick being innocent or Claude being creepy implies that Kayla is not dynamic.
Leith being not innocent and Kayla being creepy imply that Claude is not wrong and Silas is not dynamic.
Culver being not innocent and Culver being creepy imply that Claude is angry.
It can be concluded that Claude is not wrong once knowing that Claude is not horrible.
If there is at least one people who is not horrible, then Rick is innocent and Rick is angry. | Kayla is wrong. | contradiction |
Claude is innocent.
Silas is not angry.
Silas is not dynamic.
Claude is wrong.
Leith is dynamic.
Silas is not innocent.
Claude is not creepy.
Kayla is not creepy.
Claude is angry.
Kayla is not wrong.
Leith is not horrible.
Culver is not angry.Someone is not creepy if and only if he is angry.
If there is someone who is either creepy or angry, then Claude is innocent.
It can be concluded that Silas is not dynamic and Silas is not wrong once knowing that Leith is not angry.
If there is someone who is not horrible, then Culver is not innocent.
As long as someone is not creepy, he is not angry and innocent.
If there is at least one people who is not creepy, then Bruce is not horrible and Claude is angry.
Silas is not dynamic if and only if Rick is not wrong.
Rick being innocent or Claude being creepy implies that Kayla is not dynamic.
Leith being not innocent and Kayla being creepy imply that Claude is not wrong and Silas is not dynamic.
Culver being not innocent and Culver being creepy imply that Claude is angry.
It can be concluded that Claude is not wrong once knowing that Claude is not horrible.
If there is at least one people who is not horrible, then Rick is innocent and Rick is angry. | Culver is not angry. | entailment |
Claude is innocent.
Silas is not angry.
Silas is not dynamic.
Claude is wrong.
Leith is dynamic.
Silas is not innocent.
Claude is not creepy.
Kayla is not creepy.
Claude is angry.
Kayla is not wrong.
Leith is not horrible.
Culver is not angry.Someone is not creepy if and only if he is angry.
If there is someone who is either creepy or angry, then Claude is innocent.
It can be concluded that Silas is not dynamic and Silas is not wrong once knowing that Leith is not angry.
If there is someone who is not horrible, then Culver is not innocent.
As long as someone is not creepy, he is not angry and innocent.
If there is at least one people who is not creepy, then Bruce is not horrible and Claude is angry.
Silas is not dynamic if and only if Rick is not wrong.
Rick being innocent or Claude being creepy implies that Kayla is not dynamic.
Leith being not innocent and Kayla being creepy imply that Claude is not wrong and Silas is not dynamic.
Culver being not innocent and Culver being creepy imply that Claude is angry.
It can be concluded that Claude is not wrong once knowing that Claude is not horrible.
If there is at least one people who is not horrible, then Rick is innocent and Rick is angry. | Silas is angry. | contradiction |
Claude is innocent.
Silas is not angry.
Silas is not dynamic.
Claude is wrong.
Leith is dynamic.
Silas is not innocent.
Claude is not creepy.
Kayla is not creepy.
Claude is angry.
Kayla is not wrong.
Leith is not horrible.
Culver is not angry.Someone is not creepy if and only if he is angry.
If there is someone who is either creepy or angry, then Claude is innocent.
It can be concluded that Silas is not dynamic and Silas is not wrong once knowing that Leith is not angry.
If there is someone who is not horrible, then Culver is not innocent.
As long as someone is not creepy, he is not angry and innocent.
If there is at least one people who is not creepy, then Bruce is not horrible and Claude is angry.
Silas is not dynamic if and only if Rick is not wrong.
Rick being innocent or Claude being creepy implies that Kayla is not dynamic.
Leith being not innocent and Kayla being creepy imply that Claude is not wrong and Silas is not dynamic.
Culver being not innocent and Culver being creepy imply that Claude is angry.
It can be concluded that Claude is not wrong once knowing that Claude is not horrible.
If there is at least one people who is not horrible, then Rick is innocent and Rick is angry. | Claude is not angry. | self_contradiction |
Claude is innocent.
Silas is not angry.
Silas is not dynamic.
Claude is wrong.
Leith is dynamic.
Silas is not innocent.
Claude is not creepy.
Kayla is not creepy.
Claude is angry.
Kayla is not wrong.
Leith is not horrible.
Culver is not angry.Someone is not creepy if and only if he is angry.
If there is someone who is either creepy or angry, then Claude is innocent.
It can be concluded that Silas is not dynamic and Silas is not wrong once knowing that Leith is not angry.
If there is someone who is not horrible, then Culver is not innocent.
As long as someone is not creepy, he is not angry and innocent.
If there is at least one people who is not creepy, then Bruce is not horrible and Claude is angry.
Silas is not dynamic if and only if Rick is not wrong.
Rick being innocent or Claude being creepy implies that Kayla is not dynamic.
Leith being not innocent and Kayla being creepy imply that Claude is not wrong and Silas is not dynamic.
Culver being not innocent and Culver being creepy imply that Claude is angry.
It can be concluded that Claude is not wrong once knowing that Claude is not horrible.
If there is at least one people who is not horrible, then Rick is innocent and Rick is angry. | Leith is angry. | neutral |
Claude is innocent.
Silas is not angry.
Silas is not dynamic.
Claude is wrong.
Leith is dynamic.
Silas is not innocent.
Claude is not creepy.
Kayla is not creepy.
Claude is angry.
Kayla is not wrong.
Leith is not horrible.
Culver is not angry.Someone is not creepy if and only if he is angry.
If there is someone who is either creepy or angry, then Claude is innocent.
It can be concluded that Silas is not dynamic and Silas is not wrong once knowing that Leith is not angry.
If there is someone who is not horrible, then Culver is not innocent.
As long as someone is not creepy, he is not angry and innocent.
If there is at least one people who is not creepy, then Bruce is not horrible and Claude is angry.
Silas is not dynamic if and only if Rick is not wrong.
Rick being innocent or Claude being creepy implies that Kayla is not dynamic.
Leith being not innocent and Kayla being creepy imply that Claude is not wrong and Silas is not dynamic.
Culver being not innocent and Culver being creepy imply that Claude is angry.
It can be concluded that Claude is not wrong once knowing that Claude is not horrible.
If there is at least one people who is not horrible, then Rick is innocent and Rick is angry. | Leith is not wrong. | neutral |
Claude is innocent.
Silas is not angry.
Silas is not dynamic.
Claude is wrong.
Leith is dynamic.
Silas is not innocent.
Claude is not creepy.
Kayla is not creepy.
Claude is angry.
Kayla is not wrong.
Leith is not horrible.
Culver is not angry.Someone is not creepy if and only if he is angry.
If there is someone who is either creepy or angry, then Claude is innocent.
It can be concluded that Silas is not dynamic and Silas is not wrong once knowing that Leith is not angry.
If there is someone who is not horrible, then Culver is not innocent.
As long as someone is not creepy, he is not angry and innocent.
If there is at least one people who is not creepy, then Bruce is not horrible and Claude is angry.
Silas is not dynamic if and only if Rick is not wrong.
Rick being innocent or Claude being creepy implies that Kayla is not dynamic.
Leith being not innocent and Kayla being creepy imply that Claude is not wrong and Silas is not dynamic.
Culver being not innocent and Culver being creepy imply that Claude is angry.
It can be concluded that Claude is not wrong once knowing that Claude is not horrible.
If there is at least one people who is not horrible, then Rick is innocent and Rick is angry. | Silas is not angry. | entailment |
Claude is innocent.
Silas is not angry.
Silas is not dynamic.
Claude is wrong.
Leith is dynamic.
Silas is not innocent.
Claude is not creepy.
Kayla is not creepy.
Claude is angry.
Kayla is not wrong.
Leith is not horrible.
Culver is not angry.Someone is not creepy if and only if he is angry.
If there is someone who is either creepy or angry, then Claude is innocent.
It can be concluded that Silas is not dynamic and Silas is not wrong once knowing that Leith is not angry.
If there is someone who is not horrible, then Culver is not innocent.
As long as someone is not creepy, he is not angry and innocent.
If there is at least one people who is not creepy, then Bruce is not horrible and Claude is angry.
Silas is not dynamic if and only if Rick is not wrong.
Rick being innocent or Claude being creepy implies that Kayla is not dynamic.
Leith being not innocent and Kayla being creepy imply that Claude is not wrong and Silas is not dynamic.
Culver being not innocent and Culver being creepy imply that Claude is angry.
It can be concluded that Claude is not wrong once knowing that Claude is not horrible.
If there is at least one people who is not horrible, then Rick is innocent and Rick is angry. | Claude is not innocent. | contradiction |
Leonard is clear.
Leonard is healthy.
Stella is healthy.
Corwin is not brave.
Marcus is brave.
Alexander is miniscule.
Adrian is imaginative.
Stella is not imaginative.
Gifford is not clear.
Alexander is imaginative.
Alexander is brave.
Marcus is imaginative.If there is someone who is miniscule, then Gifford is brave and Leonard is healthy.
If Adrian is not brave, then Stella is not miniscule.
If someone is not miniscule and not brave, then he is both brave and clear, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not brave and imaginative, he is healthy and brave.
Someone who is brave is always not imaginative.
If there is someone who is both brave and imaginative, then Marcus is not brave and Marcus is not miniscule.
Leonard being healthy and Alexander being brave imply that Adrian is brave.
If there is at least one people who is both miniscule and clear, then Alexander is not brave.
Corwin being not imaginative implies that Adrian is miniscule and Adrian is not healthy.
It can be concluded that Adrian is not brave once knowing that Marcus is imaginative and Adrian is not clear.
Someone is brave if and only if he is not miniscule.
If there is someone who is either clear or brave, then Marcus is not healthy. | Gifford is miniscule. | contradiction |
Leonard is clear.
Leonard is healthy.
Stella is healthy.
Corwin is not brave.
Marcus is brave.
Alexander is miniscule.
Adrian is imaginative.
Stella is not imaginative.
Gifford is not clear.
Alexander is imaginative.
Alexander is brave.
Marcus is imaginative.If there is someone who is miniscule, then Gifford is brave and Leonard is healthy.
If Adrian is not brave, then Stella is not miniscule.
If someone is not miniscule and not brave, then he is both brave and clear, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not brave and imaginative, he is healthy and brave.
Someone who is brave is always not imaginative.
If there is someone who is both brave and imaginative, then Marcus is not brave and Marcus is not miniscule.
Leonard being healthy and Alexander being brave imply that Adrian is brave.
If there is at least one people who is both miniscule and clear, then Alexander is not brave.
Corwin being not imaginative implies that Adrian is miniscule and Adrian is not healthy.
It can be concluded that Adrian is not brave once knowing that Marcus is imaginative and Adrian is not clear.
Someone is brave if and only if he is not miniscule.
If there is someone who is either clear or brave, then Marcus is not healthy. | Alexander is clear. | neutral |
Leonard is clear.
Leonard is healthy.
Stella is healthy.
Corwin is not brave.
Marcus is brave.
Alexander is miniscule.
Adrian is imaginative.
Stella is not imaginative.
Gifford is not clear.
Alexander is imaginative.
Alexander is brave.
Marcus is imaginative.If there is someone who is miniscule, then Gifford is brave and Leonard is healthy.
If Adrian is not brave, then Stella is not miniscule.
If someone is not miniscule and not brave, then he is both brave and clear, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not brave and imaginative, he is healthy and brave.
Someone who is brave is always not imaginative.
If there is someone who is both brave and imaginative, then Marcus is not brave and Marcus is not miniscule.
Leonard being healthy and Alexander being brave imply that Adrian is brave.
If there is at least one people who is both miniscule and clear, then Alexander is not brave.
Corwin being not imaginative implies that Adrian is miniscule and Adrian is not healthy.
It can be concluded that Adrian is not brave once knowing that Marcus is imaginative and Adrian is not clear.
Someone is brave if and only if he is not miniscule.
If there is someone who is either clear or brave, then Marcus is not healthy. | Stella is imaginative. | contradiction |
Leonard is clear.
Leonard is healthy.
Stella is healthy.
Corwin is not brave.
Marcus is brave.
Alexander is miniscule.
Adrian is imaginative.
Stella is not imaginative.
Gifford is not clear.
Alexander is imaginative.
Alexander is brave.
Marcus is imaginative.If there is someone who is miniscule, then Gifford is brave and Leonard is healthy.
If Adrian is not brave, then Stella is not miniscule.
If someone is not miniscule and not brave, then he is both brave and clear, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not brave and imaginative, he is healthy and brave.
Someone who is brave is always not imaginative.
If there is someone who is both brave and imaginative, then Marcus is not brave and Marcus is not miniscule.
Leonard being healthy and Alexander being brave imply that Adrian is brave.
If there is at least one people who is both miniscule and clear, then Alexander is not brave.
Corwin being not imaginative implies that Adrian is miniscule and Adrian is not healthy.
It can be concluded that Adrian is not brave once knowing that Marcus is imaginative and Adrian is not clear.
Someone is brave if and only if he is not miniscule.
If there is someone who is either clear or brave, then Marcus is not healthy. | Marcus is healthy. | self_contradiction |
Leonard is clear.
Leonard is healthy.
Stella is healthy.
Corwin is not brave.
Marcus is brave.
Alexander is miniscule.
Adrian is imaginative.
Stella is not imaginative.
Gifford is not clear.
Alexander is imaginative.
Alexander is brave.
Marcus is imaginative.If there is someone who is miniscule, then Gifford is brave and Leonard is healthy.
If Adrian is not brave, then Stella is not miniscule.
If someone is not miniscule and not brave, then he is both brave and clear, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not brave and imaginative, he is healthy and brave.
Someone who is brave is always not imaginative.
If there is someone who is both brave and imaginative, then Marcus is not brave and Marcus is not miniscule.
Leonard being healthy and Alexander being brave imply that Adrian is brave.
If there is at least one people who is both miniscule and clear, then Alexander is not brave.
Corwin being not imaginative implies that Adrian is miniscule and Adrian is not healthy.
It can be concluded that Adrian is not brave once knowing that Marcus is imaginative and Adrian is not clear.
Someone is brave if and only if he is not miniscule.
If there is someone who is either clear or brave, then Marcus is not healthy. | Corwin is not healthy. | neutral |
Leonard is clear.
Leonard is healthy.
Stella is healthy.
Corwin is not brave.
Marcus is brave.
Alexander is miniscule.
Adrian is imaginative.
Stella is not imaginative.
Gifford is not clear.
Alexander is imaginative.
Alexander is brave.
Marcus is imaginative.If there is someone who is miniscule, then Gifford is brave and Leonard is healthy.
If Adrian is not brave, then Stella is not miniscule.
If someone is not miniscule and not brave, then he is both brave and clear, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not brave and imaginative, he is healthy and brave.
Someone who is brave is always not imaginative.
If there is someone who is both brave and imaginative, then Marcus is not brave and Marcus is not miniscule.
Leonard being healthy and Alexander being brave imply that Adrian is brave.
If there is at least one people who is both miniscule and clear, then Alexander is not brave.
Corwin being not imaginative implies that Adrian is miniscule and Adrian is not healthy.
It can be concluded that Adrian is not brave once knowing that Marcus is imaginative and Adrian is not clear.
Someone is brave if and only if he is not miniscule.
If there is someone who is either clear or brave, then Marcus is not healthy. | Gifford is not healthy. | neutral |
Leonard is clear.
Leonard is healthy.
Stella is healthy.
Corwin is not brave.
Marcus is brave.
Alexander is miniscule.
Adrian is imaginative.
Stella is not imaginative.
Gifford is not clear.
Alexander is imaginative.
Alexander is brave.
Marcus is imaginative.If there is someone who is miniscule, then Gifford is brave and Leonard is healthy.
If Adrian is not brave, then Stella is not miniscule.
If someone is not miniscule and not brave, then he is both brave and clear, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not brave and imaginative, he is healthy and brave.
Someone who is brave is always not imaginative.
If there is someone who is both brave and imaginative, then Marcus is not brave and Marcus is not miniscule.
Leonard being healthy and Alexander being brave imply that Adrian is brave.
If there is at least one people who is both miniscule and clear, then Alexander is not brave.
Corwin being not imaginative implies that Adrian is miniscule and Adrian is not healthy.
It can be concluded that Adrian is not brave once knowing that Marcus is imaginative and Adrian is not clear.
Someone is brave if and only if he is not miniscule.
If there is someone who is either clear or brave, then Marcus is not healthy. | Alexander is not imaginative. | self_contradiction |
Leonard is clear.
Leonard is healthy.
Stella is healthy.
Corwin is not brave.
Marcus is brave.
Alexander is miniscule.
Adrian is imaginative.
Stella is not imaginative.
Gifford is not clear.
Alexander is imaginative.
Alexander is brave.
Marcus is imaginative.If there is someone who is miniscule, then Gifford is brave and Leonard is healthy.
If Adrian is not brave, then Stella is not miniscule.
If someone is not miniscule and not brave, then he is both brave and clear, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not brave and imaginative, he is healthy and brave.
Someone who is brave is always not imaginative.
If there is someone who is both brave and imaginative, then Marcus is not brave and Marcus is not miniscule.
Leonard being healthy and Alexander being brave imply that Adrian is brave.
If there is at least one people who is both miniscule and clear, then Alexander is not brave.
Corwin being not imaginative implies that Adrian is miniscule and Adrian is not healthy.
It can be concluded that Adrian is not brave once knowing that Marcus is imaginative and Adrian is not clear.
Someone is brave if and only if he is not miniscule.
If there is someone who is either clear or brave, then Marcus is not healthy. | Marcus is imaginative. | self_contradiction |
Leonard is clear.
Leonard is healthy.
Stella is healthy.
Corwin is not brave.
Marcus is brave.
Alexander is miniscule.
Adrian is imaginative.
Stella is not imaginative.
Gifford is not clear.
Alexander is imaginative.
Alexander is brave.
Marcus is imaginative.If there is someone who is miniscule, then Gifford is brave and Leonard is healthy.
If Adrian is not brave, then Stella is not miniscule.
If someone is not miniscule and not brave, then he is both brave and clear, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not brave and imaginative, he is healthy and brave.
Someone who is brave is always not imaginative.
If there is someone who is both brave and imaginative, then Marcus is not brave and Marcus is not miniscule.
Leonard being healthy and Alexander being brave imply that Adrian is brave.
If there is at least one people who is both miniscule and clear, then Alexander is not brave.
Corwin being not imaginative implies that Adrian is miniscule and Adrian is not healthy.
It can be concluded that Adrian is not brave once knowing that Marcus is imaginative and Adrian is not clear.
Someone is brave if and only if he is not miniscule.
If there is someone who is either clear or brave, then Marcus is not healthy. | Gifford is not clear. | entailment |
Leonard is clear.
Leonard is healthy.
Stella is healthy.
Corwin is not brave.
Marcus is brave.
Alexander is miniscule.
Adrian is imaginative.
Stella is not imaginative.
Gifford is not clear.
Alexander is imaginative.
Alexander is brave.
Marcus is imaginative.If there is someone who is miniscule, then Gifford is brave and Leonard is healthy.
If Adrian is not brave, then Stella is not miniscule.
If someone is not miniscule and not brave, then he is both brave and clear, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not brave and imaginative, he is healthy and brave.
Someone who is brave is always not imaginative.
If there is someone who is both brave and imaginative, then Marcus is not brave and Marcus is not miniscule.
Leonard being healthy and Alexander being brave imply that Adrian is brave.
If there is at least one people who is both miniscule and clear, then Alexander is not brave.
Corwin being not imaginative implies that Adrian is miniscule and Adrian is not healthy.
It can be concluded that Adrian is not brave once knowing that Marcus is imaginative and Adrian is not clear.
Someone is brave if and only if he is not miniscule.
If there is someone who is either clear or brave, then Marcus is not healthy. | Adrian is not imaginative. | self_contradiction |
Leonard is clear.
Leonard is healthy.
Stella is healthy.
Corwin is not brave.
Marcus is brave.
Alexander is miniscule.
Adrian is imaginative.
Stella is not imaginative.
Gifford is not clear.
Alexander is imaginative.
Alexander is brave.
Marcus is imaginative.If there is someone who is miniscule, then Gifford is brave and Leonard is healthy.
If Adrian is not brave, then Stella is not miniscule.
If someone is not miniscule and not brave, then he is both brave and clear, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not brave and imaginative, he is healthy and brave.
Someone who is brave is always not imaginative.
If there is someone who is both brave and imaginative, then Marcus is not brave and Marcus is not miniscule.
Leonard being healthy and Alexander being brave imply that Adrian is brave.
If there is at least one people who is both miniscule and clear, then Alexander is not brave.
Corwin being not imaginative implies that Adrian is miniscule and Adrian is not healthy.
It can be concluded that Adrian is not brave once knowing that Marcus is imaginative and Adrian is not clear.
Someone is brave if and only if he is not miniscule.
If there is someone who is either clear or brave, then Marcus is not healthy. | Leonard is clear. | entailment |
Leonard is clear.
Leonard is healthy.
Stella is healthy.
Corwin is not brave.
Marcus is brave.
Alexander is miniscule.
Adrian is imaginative.
Stella is not imaginative.
Gifford is not clear.
Alexander is imaginative.
Alexander is brave.
Marcus is imaginative.If there is someone who is miniscule, then Gifford is brave and Leonard is healthy.
If Adrian is not brave, then Stella is not miniscule.
If someone is not miniscule and not brave, then he is both brave and clear, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not brave and imaginative, he is healthy and brave.
Someone who is brave is always not imaginative.
If there is someone who is both brave and imaginative, then Marcus is not brave and Marcus is not miniscule.
Leonard being healthy and Alexander being brave imply that Adrian is brave.
If there is at least one people who is both miniscule and clear, then Alexander is not brave.
Corwin being not imaginative implies that Adrian is miniscule and Adrian is not healthy.
It can be concluded that Adrian is not brave once knowing that Marcus is imaginative and Adrian is not clear.
Someone is brave if and only if he is not miniscule.
If there is someone who is either clear or brave, then Marcus is not healthy. | Marcus is miniscule. | contradiction |
Leonard is clear.
Leonard is healthy.
Stella is healthy.
Corwin is not brave.
Marcus is brave.
Alexander is miniscule.
Adrian is imaginative.
Stella is not imaginative.
Gifford is not clear.
Alexander is imaginative.
Alexander is brave.
Marcus is imaginative.If there is someone who is miniscule, then Gifford is brave and Leonard is healthy.
If Adrian is not brave, then Stella is not miniscule.
If someone is not miniscule and not brave, then he is both brave and clear, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not brave and imaginative, he is healthy and brave.
Someone who is brave is always not imaginative.
If there is someone who is both brave and imaginative, then Marcus is not brave and Marcus is not miniscule.
Leonard being healthy and Alexander being brave imply that Adrian is brave.
If there is at least one people who is both miniscule and clear, then Alexander is not brave.
Corwin being not imaginative implies that Adrian is miniscule and Adrian is not healthy.
It can be concluded that Adrian is not brave once knowing that Marcus is imaginative and Adrian is not clear.
Someone is brave if and only if he is not miniscule.
If there is someone who is either clear or brave, then Marcus is not healthy. | Alexander is imaginative. | self_contradiction |
Leonard is clear.
Leonard is healthy.
Stella is healthy.
Corwin is not brave.
Marcus is brave.
Alexander is miniscule.
Adrian is imaginative.
Stella is not imaginative.
Gifford is not clear.
Alexander is imaginative.
Alexander is brave.
Marcus is imaginative.If there is someone who is miniscule, then Gifford is brave and Leonard is healthy.
If Adrian is not brave, then Stella is not miniscule.
If someone is not miniscule and not brave, then he is both brave and clear, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not brave and imaginative, he is healthy and brave.
Someone who is brave is always not imaginative.
If there is someone who is both brave and imaginative, then Marcus is not brave and Marcus is not miniscule.
Leonard being healthy and Alexander being brave imply that Adrian is brave.
If there is at least one people who is both miniscule and clear, then Alexander is not brave.
Corwin being not imaginative implies that Adrian is miniscule and Adrian is not healthy.
It can be concluded that Adrian is not brave once knowing that Marcus is imaginative and Adrian is not clear.
Someone is brave if and only if he is not miniscule.
If there is someone who is either clear or brave, then Marcus is not healthy. | Alexander is not clear. | neutral |
Leonard is clear.
Leonard is healthy.
Stella is healthy.
Corwin is not brave.
Marcus is brave.
Alexander is miniscule.
Adrian is imaginative.
Stella is not imaginative.
Gifford is not clear.
Alexander is imaginative.
Alexander is brave.
Marcus is imaginative.If there is someone who is miniscule, then Gifford is brave and Leonard is healthy.
If Adrian is not brave, then Stella is not miniscule.
If someone is not miniscule and not brave, then he is both brave and clear, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not brave and imaginative, he is healthy and brave.
Someone who is brave is always not imaginative.
If there is someone who is both brave and imaginative, then Marcus is not brave and Marcus is not miniscule.
Leonard being healthy and Alexander being brave imply that Adrian is brave.
If there is at least one people who is both miniscule and clear, then Alexander is not brave.
Corwin being not imaginative implies that Adrian is miniscule and Adrian is not healthy.
It can be concluded that Adrian is not brave once knowing that Marcus is imaginative and Adrian is not clear.
Someone is brave if and only if he is not miniscule.
If there is someone who is either clear or brave, then Marcus is not healthy. | Gifford is imaginative. | contradiction |
Leonard is clear.
Leonard is healthy.
Stella is healthy.
Corwin is not brave.
Marcus is brave.
Alexander is miniscule.
Adrian is imaginative.
Stella is not imaginative.
Gifford is not clear.
Alexander is imaginative.
Alexander is brave.
Marcus is imaginative.If there is someone who is miniscule, then Gifford is brave and Leonard is healthy.
If Adrian is not brave, then Stella is not miniscule.
If someone is not miniscule and not brave, then he is both brave and clear, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not brave and imaginative, he is healthy and brave.
Someone who is brave is always not imaginative.
If there is someone who is both brave and imaginative, then Marcus is not brave and Marcus is not miniscule.
Leonard being healthy and Alexander being brave imply that Adrian is brave.
If there is at least one people who is both miniscule and clear, then Alexander is not brave.
Corwin being not imaginative implies that Adrian is miniscule and Adrian is not healthy.
It can be concluded that Adrian is not brave once knowing that Marcus is imaginative and Adrian is not clear.
Someone is brave if and only if he is not miniscule.
If there is someone who is either clear or brave, then Marcus is not healthy. | Alexander is healthy. | neutral |
Leonard is clear.
Leonard is healthy.
Stella is healthy.
Corwin is not brave.
Marcus is brave.
Alexander is miniscule.
Adrian is imaginative.
Stella is not imaginative.
Gifford is not clear.
Alexander is imaginative.
Alexander is brave.
Marcus is imaginative.If there is someone who is miniscule, then Gifford is brave and Leonard is healthy.
If Adrian is not brave, then Stella is not miniscule.
If someone is not miniscule and not brave, then he is both brave and clear, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not brave and imaginative, he is healthy and brave.
Someone who is brave is always not imaginative.
If there is someone who is both brave and imaginative, then Marcus is not brave and Marcus is not miniscule.
Leonard being healthy and Alexander being brave imply that Adrian is brave.
If there is at least one people who is both miniscule and clear, then Alexander is not brave.
Corwin being not imaginative implies that Adrian is miniscule and Adrian is not healthy.
It can be concluded that Adrian is not brave once knowing that Marcus is imaginative and Adrian is not clear.
Someone is brave if and only if he is not miniscule.
If there is someone who is either clear or brave, then Marcus is not healthy. | Alexander is brave. | entailment |
Leonard is clear.
Leonard is healthy.
Stella is healthy.
Corwin is not brave.
Marcus is brave.
Alexander is miniscule.
Adrian is imaginative.
Stella is not imaginative.
Gifford is not clear.
Alexander is imaginative.
Alexander is brave.
Marcus is imaginative.If there is someone who is miniscule, then Gifford is brave and Leonard is healthy.
If Adrian is not brave, then Stella is not miniscule.
If someone is not miniscule and not brave, then he is both brave and clear, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not brave and imaginative, he is healthy and brave.
Someone who is brave is always not imaginative.
If there is someone who is both brave and imaginative, then Marcus is not brave and Marcus is not miniscule.
Leonard being healthy and Alexander being brave imply that Adrian is brave.
If there is at least one people who is both miniscule and clear, then Alexander is not brave.
Corwin being not imaginative implies that Adrian is miniscule and Adrian is not healthy.
It can be concluded that Adrian is not brave once knowing that Marcus is imaginative and Adrian is not clear.
Someone is brave if and only if he is not miniscule.
If there is someone who is either clear or brave, then Marcus is not healthy. | Adrian is brave. | entailment |
Leonard is clear.
Leonard is healthy.
Stella is healthy.
Corwin is not brave.
Marcus is brave.
Alexander is miniscule.
Adrian is imaginative.
Stella is not imaginative.
Gifford is not clear.
Alexander is imaginative.
Alexander is brave.
Marcus is imaginative.If there is someone who is miniscule, then Gifford is brave and Leonard is healthy.
If Adrian is not brave, then Stella is not miniscule.
If someone is not miniscule and not brave, then he is both brave and clear, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not brave and imaginative, he is healthy and brave.
Someone who is brave is always not imaginative.
If there is someone who is both brave and imaginative, then Marcus is not brave and Marcus is not miniscule.
Leonard being healthy and Alexander being brave imply that Adrian is brave.
If there is at least one people who is both miniscule and clear, then Alexander is not brave.
Corwin being not imaginative implies that Adrian is miniscule and Adrian is not healthy.
It can be concluded that Adrian is not brave once knowing that Marcus is imaginative and Adrian is not clear.
Someone is brave if and only if he is not miniscule.
If there is someone who is either clear or brave, then Marcus is not healthy. | Gifford is not brave. | contradiction |
Leonard is clear.
Leonard is healthy.
Stella is healthy.
Corwin is not brave.
Marcus is brave.
Alexander is miniscule.
Adrian is imaginative.
Stella is not imaginative.
Gifford is not clear.
Alexander is imaginative.
Alexander is brave.
Marcus is imaginative.If there is someone who is miniscule, then Gifford is brave and Leonard is healthy.
If Adrian is not brave, then Stella is not miniscule.
If someone is not miniscule and not brave, then he is both brave and clear, and vice versa.
As long as someone is not brave and imaginative, he is healthy and brave.
Someone who is brave is always not imaginative.
If there is someone who is both brave and imaginative, then Marcus is not brave and Marcus is not miniscule.
Leonard being healthy and Alexander being brave imply that Adrian is brave.
If there is at least one people who is both miniscule and clear, then Alexander is not brave.
Corwin being not imaginative implies that Adrian is miniscule and Adrian is not healthy.
It can be concluded that Adrian is not brave once knowing that Marcus is imaginative and Adrian is not clear.
Someone is brave if and only if he is not miniscule.
If there is someone who is either clear or brave, then Marcus is not healthy. | Leonard is healthy. | entailment |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.