premise
stringlengths 923
1.41k
| hypothesis
stringlengths 11
33
| label
stringclasses 4
values |
|---|---|---|
Rick is rational.
Jessie is not cute.
Jessie is not humble.
Leona is not humble.
Harlan is cute.
Leona is cute.
Leona is not comprehensive.
Barclay is rational.
Rick is not tense.
Jessie is horrible.
Barclay is not horrible.
Justin is horrible.If Harlan is tense, then Barclay is not cute, and vice versa.
If someone is comprehensive, then he is not horrible.
If there is at least one people who is both not rational and not humble, then Leona is horrible.
Someone who is eithor not horrible or comprehensive is always humble.
If there is at least one people who is tense, then Jessie is not horrible.
If there is someone who is either not humble or not comprehensive, then Rick is cute.
Someone being both cute and not rational is equivalent to being not horrible.
If someone is both horrible and not comprehensive, then he is rational.
If there is someone who is comprehensive, then Justin is not cute and Leona is rational.
Someone being both cute and not humble is equivalent to being rational and not tense.
As long as someone is not comprehensive, he is horrible and not humble.
Someone who is not cute or not comprehensive is always not tense and not rational. | Barclay is not comprehensive. | neutral |
Rick is rational.
Jessie is not cute.
Jessie is not humble.
Leona is not humble.
Harlan is cute.
Leona is cute.
Leona is not comprehensive.
Barclay is rational.
Rick is not tense.
Jessie is horrible.
Barclay is not horrible.
Justin is horrible.If Harlan is tense, then Barclay is not cute, and vice versa.
If someone is comprehensive, then he is not horrible.
If there is at least one people who is both not rational and not humble, then Leona is horrible.
Someone who is eithor not horrible or comprehensive is always humble.
If there is at least one people who is tense, then Jessie is not horrible.
If there is someone who is either not humble or not comprehensive, then Rick is cute.
Someone being both cute and not rational is equivalent to being not horrible.
If someone is both horrible and not comprehensive, then he is rational.
If there is someone who is comprehensive, then Justin is not cute and Leona is rational.
Someone being both cute and not humble is equivalent to being rational and not tense.
As long as someone is not comprehensive, he is horrible and not humble.
Someone who is not cute or not comprehensive is always not tense and not rational. | Leona is comprehensive. | contradiction |
Rick is rational.
Jessie is not cute.
Jessie is not humble.
Leona is not humble.
Harlan is cute.
Leona is cute.
Leona is not comprehensive.
Barclay is rational.
Rick is not tense.
Jessie is horrible.
Barclay is not horrible.
Justin is horrible.If Harlan is tense, then Barclay is not cute, and vice versa.
If someone is comprehensive, then he is not horrible.
If there is at least one people who is both not rational and not humble, then Leona is horrible.
Someone who is eithor not horrible or comprehensive is always humble.
If there is at least one people who is tense, then Jessie is not horrible.
If there is someone who is either not humble or not comprehensive, then Rick is cute.
Someone being both cute and not rational is equivalent to being not horrible.
If someone is both horrible and not comprehensive, then he is rational.
If there is someone who is comprehensive, then Justin is not cute and Leona is rational.
Someone being both cute and not humble is equivalent to being rational and not tense.
As long as someone is not comprehensive, he is horrible and not humble.
Someone who is not cute or not comprehensive is always not tense and not rational. | Ross is tense. | neutral |
Rick is rational.
Jessie is not cute.
Jessie is not humble.
Leona is not humble.
Harlan is cute.
Leona is cute.
Leona is not comprehensive.
Barclay is rational.
Rick is not tense.
Jessie is horrible.
Barclay is not horrible.
Justin is horrible.If Harlan is tense, then Barclay is not cute, and vice versa.
If someone is comprehensive, then he is not horrible.
If there is at least one people who is both not rational and not humble, then Leona is horrible.
Someone who is eithor not horrible or comprehensive is always humble.
If there is at least one people who is tense, then Jessie is not horrible.
If there is someone who is either not humble or not comprehensive, then Rick is cute.
Someone being both cute and not rational is equivalent to being not horrible.
If someone is both horrible and not comprehensive, then he is rational.
If there is someone who is comprehensive, then Justin is not cute and Leona is rational.
Someone being both cute and not humble is equivalent to being rational and not tense.
As long as someone is not comprehensive, he is horrible and not humble.
Someone who is not cute or not comprehensive is always not tense and not rational. | Justin is rational. | neutral |
Rick is rational.
Jessie is not cute.
Jessie is not humble.
Leona is not humble.
Harlan is cute.
Leona is cute.
Leona is not comprehensive.
Barclay is rational.
Rick is not tense.
Jessie is horrible.
Barclay is not horrible.
Justin is horrible.If Harlan is tense, then Barclay is not cute, and vice versa.
If someone is comprehensive, then he is not horrible.
If there is at least one people who is both not rational and not humble, then Leona is horrible.
Someone who is eithor not horrible or comprehensive is always humble.
If there is at least one people who is tense, then Jessie is not horrible.
If there is someone who is either not humble or not comprehensive, then Rick is cute.
Someone being both cute and not rational is equivalent to being not horrible.
If someone is both horrible and not comprehensive, then he is rational.
If there is someone who is comprehensive, then Justin is not cute and Leona is rational.
Someone being both cute and not humble is equivalent to being rational and not tense.
As long as someone is not comprehensive, he is horrible and not humble.
Someone who is not cute or not comprehensive is always not tense and not rational. | Justin is horrible. | entailment |
Rick is rational.
Jessie is not cute.
Jessie is not humble.
Leona is not humble.
Harlan is cute.
Leona is cute.
Leona is not comprehensive.
Barclay is rational.
Rick is not tense.
Jessie is horrible.
Barclay is not horrible.
Justin is horrible.If Harlan is tense, then Barclay is not cute, and vice versa.
If someone is comprehensive, then he is not horrible.
If there is at least one people who is both not rational and not humble, then Leona is horrible.
Someone who is eithor not horrible or comprehensive is always humble.
If there is at least one people who is tense, then Jessie is not horrible.
If there is someone who is either not humble or not comprehensive, then Rick is cute.
Someone being both cute and not rational is equivalent to being not horrible.
If someone is both horrible and not comprehensive, then he is rational.
If there is someone who is comprehensive, then Justin is not cute and Leona is rational.
Someone being both cute and not humble is equivalent to being rational and not tense.
As long as someone is not comprehensive, he is horrible and not humble.
Someone who is not cute or not comprehensive is always not tense and not rational. | Leona is not horrible. | self_contradiction |
Rick is rational.
Jessie is not cute.
Jessie is not humble.
Leona is not humble.
Harlan is cute.
Leona is cute.
Leona is not comprehensive.
Barclay is rational.
Rick is not tense.
Jessie is horrible.
Barclay is not horrible.
Justin is horrible.If Harlan is tense, then Barclay is not cute, and vice versa.
If someone is comprehensive, then he is not horrible.
If there is at least one people who is both not rational and not humble, then Leona is horrible.
Someone who is eithor not horrible or comprehensive is always humble.
If there is at least one people who is tense, then Jessie is not horrible.
If there is someone who is either not humble or not comprehensive, then Rick is cute.
Someone being both cute and not rational is equivalent to being not horrible.
If someone is both horrible and not comprehensive, then he is rational.
If there is someone who is comprehensive, then Justin is not cute and Leona is rational.
Someone being both cute and not humble is equivalent to being rational and not tense.
As long as someone is not comprehensive, he is horrible and not humble.
Someone who is not cute or not comprehensive is always not tense and not rational. | Barclay is rational. | self_contradiction |
Rick is rational.
Jessie is not cute.
Jessie is not humble.
Leona is not humble.
Harlan is cute.
Leona is cute.
Leona is not comprehensive.
Barclay is rational.
Rick is not tense.
Jessie is horrible.
Barclay is not horrible.
Justin is horrible.If Harlan is tense, then Barclay is not cute, and vice versa.
If someone is comprehensive, then he is not horrible.
If there is at least one people who is both not rational and not humble, then Leona is horrible.
Someone who is eithor not horrible or comprehensive is always humble.
If there is at least one people who is tense, then Jessie is not horrible.
If there is someone who is either not humble or not comprehensive, then Rick is cute.
Someone being both cute and not rational is equivalent to being not horrible.
If someone is both horrible and not comprehensive, then he is rational.
If there is someone who is comprehensive, then Justin is not cute and Leona is rational.
Someone being both cute and not humble is equivalent to being rational and not tense.
As long as someone is not comprehensive, he is horrible and not humble.
Someone who is not cute or not comprehensive is always not tense and not rational. | Harlan is tense. | neutral |
Rick is rational.
Jessie is not cute.
Jessie is not humble.
Leona is not humble.
Harlan is cute.
Leona is cute.
Leona is not comprehensive.
Barclay is rational.
Rick is not tense.
Jessie is horrible.
Barclay is not horrible.
Justin is horrible.If Harlan is tense, then Barclay is not cute, and vice versa.
If someone is comprehensive, then he is not horrible.
If there is at least one people who is both not rational and not humble, then Leona is horrible.
Someone who is eithor not horrible or comprehensive is always humble.
If there is at least one people who is tense, then Jessie is not horrible.
If there is someone who is either not humble or not comprehensive, then Rick is cute.
Someone being both cute and not rational is equivalent to being not horrible.
If someone is both horrible and not comprehensive, then he is rational.
If there is someone who is comprehensive, then Justin is not cute and Leona is rational.
Someone being both cute and not humble is equivalent to being rational and not tense.
As long as someone is not comprehensive, he is horrible and not humble.
Someone who is not cute or not comprehensive is always not tense and not rational. | Jessie is not humble. | entailment |
Rick is rational.
Jessie is not cute.
Jessie is not humble.
Leona is not humble.
Harlan is cute.
Leona is cute.
Leona is not comprehensive.
Barclay is rational.
Rick is not tense.
Jessie is horrible.
Barclay is not horrible.
Justin is horrible.If Harlan is tense, then Barclay is not cute, and vice versa.
If someone is comprehensive, then he is not horrible.
If there is at least one people who is both not rational and not humble, then Leona is horrible.
Someone who is eithor not horrible or comprehensive is always humble.
If there is at least one people who is tense, then Jessie is not horrible.
If there is someone who is either not humble or not comprehensive, then Rick is cute.
Someone being both cute and not rational is equivalent to being not horrible.
If someone is both horrible and not comprehensive, then he is rational.
If there is someone who is comprehensive, then Justin is not cute and Leona is rational.
Someone being both cute and not humble is equivalent to being rational and not tense.
As long as someone is not comprehensive, he is horrible and not humble.
Someone who is not cute or not comprehensive is always not tense and not rational. | Leona is tense. | contradiction |
Rick is rational.
Jessie is not cute.
Jessie is not humble.
Leona is not humble.
Harlan is cute.
Leona is cute.
Leona is not comprehensive.
Barclay is rational.
Rick is not tense.
Jessie is horrible.
Barclay is not horrible.
Justin is horrible.If Harlan is tense, then Barclay is not cute, and vice versa.
If someone is comprehensive, then he is not horrible.
If there is at least one people who is both not rational and not humble, then Leona is horrible.
Someone who is eithor not horrible or comprehensive is always humble.
If there is at least one people who is tense, then Jessie is not horrible.
If there is someone who is either not humble or not comprehensive, then Rick is cute.
Someone being both cute and not rational is equivalent to being not horrible.
If someone is both horrible and not comprehensive, then he is rational.
If there is someone who is comprehensive, then Justin is not cute and Leona is rational.
Someone being both cute and not humble is equivalent to being rational and not tense.
As long as someone is not comprehensive, he is horrible and not humble.
Someone who is not cute or not comprehensive is always not tense and not rational. | Barclay is not rational. | self_contradiction |
Rick is rational.
Jessie is not cute.
Jessie is not humble.
Leona is not humble.
Harlan is cute.
Leona is cute.
Leona is not comprehensive.
Barclay is rational.
Rick is not tense.
Jessie is horrible.
Barclay is not horrible.
Justin is horrible.If Harlan is tense, then Barclay is not cute, and vice versa.
If someone is comprehensive, then he is not horrible.
If there is at least one people who is both not rational and not humble, then Leona is horrible.
Someone who is eithor not horrible or comprehensive is always humble.
If there is at least one people who is tense, then Jessie is not horrible.
If there is someone who is either not humble or not comprehensive, then Rick is cute.
Someone being both cute and not rational is equivalent to being not horrible.
If someone is both horrible and not comprehensive, then he is rational.
If there is someone who is comprehensive, then Justin is not cute and Leona is rational.
Someone being both cute and not humble is equivalent to being rational and not tense.
As long as someone is not comprehensive, he is horrible and not humble.
Someone who is not cute or not comprehensive is always not tense and not rational. | Leona is cute. | entailment |
Rick is rational.
Jessie is not cute.
Jessie is not humble.
Leona is not humble.
Harlan is cute.
Leona is cute.
Leona is not comprehensive.
Barclay is rational.
Rick is not tense.
Jessie is horrible.
Barclay is not horrible.
Justin is horrible.If Harlan is tense, then Barclay is not cute, and vice versa.
If someone is comprehensive, then he is not horrible.
If there is at least one people who is both not rational and not humble, then Leona is horrible.
Someone who is eithor not horrible or comprehensive is always humble.
If there is at least one people who is tense, then Jessie is not horrible.
If there is someone who is either not humble or not comprehensive, then Rick is cute.
Someone being both cute and not rational is equivalent to being not horrible.
If someone is both horrible and not comprehensive, then he is rational.
If there is someone who is comprehensive, then Justin is not cute and Leona is rational.
Someone being both cute and not humble is equivalent to being rational and not tense.
As long as someone is not comprehensive, he is horrible and not humble.
Someone who is not cute or not comprehensive is always not tense and not rational. | Jessie is cute. | contradiction |
Rick is rational.
Jessie is not cute.
Jessie is not humble.
Leona is not humble.
Harlan is cute.
Leona is cute.
Leona is not comprehensive.
Barclay is rational.
Rick is not tense.
Jessie is horrible.
Barclay is not horrible.
Justin is horrible.If Harlan is tense, then Barclay is not cute, and vice versa.
If someone is comprehensive, then he is not horrible.
If there is at least one people who is both not rational and not humble, then Leona is horrible.
Someone who is eithor not horrible or comprehensive is always humble.
If there is at least one people who is tense, then Jessie is not horrible.
If there is someone who is either not humble or not comprehensive, then Rick is cute.
Someone being both cute and not rational is equivalent to being not horrible.
If someone is both horrible and not comprehensive, then he is rational.
If there is someone who is comprehensive, then Justin is not cute and Leona is rational.
Someone being both cute and not humble is equivalent to being rational and not tense.
As long as someone is not comprehensive, he is horrible and not humble.
Someone who is not cute or not comprehensive is always not tense and not rational. | Leona is humble. | self_contradiction |
Rick is rational.
Jessie is not cute.
Jessie is not humble.
Leona is not humble.
Harlan is cute.
Leona is cute.
Leona is not comprehensive.
Barclay is rational.
Rick is not tense.
Jessie is horrible.
Barclay is not horrible.
Justin is horrible.If Harlan is tense, then Barclay is not cute, and vice versa.
If someone is comprehensive, then he is not horrible.
If there is at least one people who is both not rational and not humble, then Leona is horrible.
Someone who is eithor not horrible or comprehensive is always humble.
If there is at least one people who is tense, then Jessie is not horrible.
If there is someone who is either not humble or not comprehensive, then Rick is cute.
Someone being both cute and not rational is equivalent to being not horrible.
If someone is both horrible and not comprehensive, then he is rational.
If there is someone who is comprehensive, then Justin is not cute and Leona is rational.
Someone being both cute and not humble is equivalent to being rational and not tense.
As long as someone is not comprehensive, he is horrible and not humble.
Someone who is not cute or not comprehensive is always not tense and not rational. | Jessie is rational. | contradiction |
Rick is rational.
Jessie is not cute.
Jessie is not humble.
Leona is not humble.
Harlan is cute.
Leona is cute.
Leona is not comprehensive.
Barclay is rational.
Rick is not tense.
Jessie is horrible.
Barclay is not horrible.
Justin is horrible.If Harlan is tense, then Barclay is not cute, and vice versa.
If someone is comprehensive, then he is not horrible.
If there is at least one people who is both not rational and not humble, then Leona is horrible.
Someone who is eithor not horrible or comprehensive is always humble.
If there is at least one people who is tense, then Jessie is not horrible.
If there is someone who is either not humble or not comprehensive, then Rick is cute.
Someone being both cute and not rational is equivalent to being not horrible.
If someone is both horrible and not comprehensive, then he is rational.
If there is someone who is comprehensive, then Justin is not cute and Leona is rational.
Someone being both cute and not humble is equivalent to being rational and not tense.
As long as someone is not comprehensive, he is horrible and not humble.
Someone who is not cute or not comprehensive is always not tense and not rational. | Rick is rational. | entailment |
Rick is rational.
Jessie is not cute.
Jessie is not humble.
Leona is not humble.
Harlan is cute.
Leona is cute.
Leona is not comprehensive.
Barclay is rational.
Rick is not tense.
Jessie is horrible.
Barclay is not horrible.
Justin is horrible.If Harlan is tense, then Barclay is not cute, and vice versa.
If someone is comprehensive, then he is not horrible.
If there is at least one people who is both not rational and not humble, then Leona is horrible.
Someone who is eithor not horrible or comprehensive is always humble.
If there is at least one people who is tense, then Jessie is not horrible.
If there is someone who is either not humble or not comprehensive, then Rick is cute.
Someone being both cute and not rational is equivalent to being not horrible.
If someone is both horrible and not comprehensive, then he is rational.
If there is someone who is comprehensive, then Justin is not cute and Leona is rational.
Someone being both cute and not humble is equivalent to being rational and not tense.
As long as someone is not comprehensive, he is horrible and not humble.
Someone who is not cute or not comprehensive is always not tense and not rational. | Barclay is not horrible. | entailment |
Rick is rational.
Jessie is not cute.
Jessie is not humble.
Leona is not humble.
Harlan is cute.
Leona is cute.
Leona is not comprehensive.
Barclay is rational.
Rick is not tense.
Jessie is horrible.
Barclay is not horrible.
Justin is horrible.If Harlan is tense, then Barclay is not cute, and vice versa.
If someone is comprehensive, then he is not horrible.
If there is at least one people who is both not rational and not humble, then Leona is horrible.
Someone who is eithor not horrible or comprehensive is always humble.
If there is at least one people who is tense, then Jessie is not horrible.
If there is someone who is either not humble or not comprehensive, then Rick is cute.
Someone being both cute and not rational is equivalent to being not horrible.
If someone is both horrible and not comprehensive, then he is rational.
If there is someone who is comprehensive, then Justin is not cute and Leona is rational.
Someone being both cute and not humble is equivalent to being rational and not tense.
As long as someone is not comprehensive, he is horrible and not humble.
Someone who is not cute or not comprehensive is always not tense and not rational. | Leona is horrible. | self_contradiction |
Rick is rational.
Jessie is not cute.
Jessie is not humble.
Leona is not humble.
Harlan is cute.
Leona is cute.
Leona is not comprehensive.
Barclay is rational.
Rick is not tense.
Jessie is horrible.
Barclay is not horrible.
Justin is horrible.If Harlan is tense, then Barclay is not cute, and vice versa.
If someone is comprehensive, then he is not horrible.
If there is at least one people who is both not rational and not humble, then Leona is horrible.
Someone who is eithor not horrible or comprehensive is always humble.
If there is at least one people who is tense, then Jessie is not horrible.
If there is someone who is either not humble or not comprehensive, then Rick is cute.
Someone being both cute and not rational is equivalent to being not horrible.
If someone is both horrible and not comprehensive, then he is rational.
If there is someone who is comprehensive, then Justin is not cute and Leona is rational.
Someone being both cute and not humble is equivalent to being rational and not tense.
As long as someone is not comprehensive, he is horrible and not humble.
Someone who is not cute or not comprehensive is always not tense and not rational. | Justin is not horrible. | contradiction |
Rick is rational.
Jessie is not cute.
Jessie is not humble.
Leona is not humble.
Harlan is cute.
Leona is cute.
Leona is not comprehensive.
Barclay is rational.
Rick is not tense.
Jessie is horrible.
Barclay is not horrible.
Justin is horrible.If Harlan is tense, then Barclay is not cute, and vice versa.
If someone is comprehensive, then he is not horrible.
If there is at least one people who is both not rational and not humble, then Leona is horrible.
Someone who is eithor not horrible or comprehensive is always humble.
If there is at least one people who is tense, then Jessie is not horrible.
If there is someone who is either not humble or not comprehensive, then Rick is cute.
Someone being both cute and not rational is equivalent to being not horrible.
If someone is both horrible and not comprehensive, then he is rational.
If there is someone who is comprehensive, then Justin is not cute and Leona is rational.
Someone being both cute and not humble is equivalent to being rational and not tense.
As long as someone is not comprehensive, he is horrible and not humble.
Someone who is not cute or not comprehensive is always not tense and not rational. | Rick is not horrible. | neutral |
Humphrey is not medical.
Phoebe is not wild.
Marshall is not medical.
Hector is not aggressive.
Monique is not wild.
Rick is wild.
Phoebe is not funny.
Hector is not medical.
Hector is wild.
Rick is aggressive.
Hector is lucky.
Phoebe is aggressive.If Humphrey is lucky, then Rick is aggressive.
Someone is not wild if and only if he is not lucky.
Someone who is both wild and tan is always not lucky.
It can be concluded that Marshall is wild once knowing that Monique is lucky.
If someone is both not aggressive and not wild, then he is not tan.
If someone is both not aggressive and wild, then he is not medical.
All not aggressive people are not lucky.
If someone is funny, then he is not wild.
Someone being both not tan and not aggressive is equivalent to being not lucky.
As long as someone is funny, he is not aggressive and not wild.
Someone who is tan or not wild is always not funny and aggressive.
If someone is not funny or not aggressive, then he is lucky. | Hector is not lucky. | self_contradiction |
Humphrey is not medical.
Phoebe is not wild.
Marshall is not medical.
Hector is not aggressive.
Monique is not wild.
Rick is wild.
Phoebe is not funny.
Hector is not medical.
Hector is wild.
Rick is aggressive.
Hector is lucky.
Phoebe is aggressive.If Humphrey is lucky, then Rick is aggressive.
Someone is not wild if and only if he is not lucky.
Someone who is both wild and tan is always not lucky.
It can be concluded that Marshall is wild once knowing that Monique is lucky.
If someone is both not aggressive and not wild, then he is not tan.
If someone is both not aggressive and wild, then he is not medical.
All not aggressive people are not lucky.
If someone is funny, then he is not wild.
Someone being both not tan and not aggressive is equivalent to being not lucky.
As long as someone is funny, he is not aggressive and not wild.
Someone who is tan or not wild is always not funny and aggressive.
If someone is not funny or not aggressive, then he is lucky. | Hector is lucky. | self_contradiction |
Humphrey is not medical.
Phoebe is not wild.
Marshall is not medical.
Hector is not aggressive.
Monique is not wild.
Rick is wild.
Phoebe is not funny.
Hector is not medical.
Hector is wild.
Rick is aggressive.
Hector is lucky.
Phoebe is aggressive.If Humphrey is lucky, then Rick is aggressive.
Someone is not wild if and only if he is not lucky.
Someone who is both wild and tan is always not lucky.
It can be concluded that Marshall is wild once knowing that Monique is lucky.
If someone is both not aggressive and not wild, then he is not tan.
If someone is both not aggressive and wild, then he is not medical.
All not aggressive people are not lucky.
If someone is funny, then he is not wild.
Someone being both not tan and not aggressive is equivalent to being not lucky.
As long as someone is funny, he is not aggressive and not wild.
Someone who is tan or not wild is always not funny and aggressive.
If someone is not funny or not aggressive, then he is lucky. | Humphrey is not medical. | entailment |
Humphrey is not medical.
Phoebe is not wild.
Marshall is not medical.
Hector is not aggressive.
Monique is not wild.
Rick is wild.
Phoebe is not funny.
Hector is not medical.
Hector is wild.
Rick is aggressive.
Hector is lucky.
Phoebe is aggressive.If Humphrey is lucky, then Rick is aggressive.
Someone is not wild if and only if he is not lucky.
Someone who is both wild and tan is always not lucky.
It can be concluded that Marshall is wild once knowing that Monique is lucky.
If someone is both not aggressive and not wild, then he is not tan.
If someone is both not aggressive and wild, then he is not medical.
All not aggressive people are not lucky.
If someone is funny, then he is not wild.
Someone being both not tan and not aggressive is equivalent to being not lucky.
As long as someone is funny, he is not aggressive and not wild.
Someone who is tan or not wild is always not funny and aggressive.
If someone is not funny or not aggressive, then he is lucky. | Rick is wild. | entailment |
Humphrey is not medical.
Phoebe is not wild.
Marshall is not medical.
Hector is not aggressive.
Monique is not wild.
Rick is wild.
Phoebe is not funny.
Hector is not medical.
Hector is wild.
Rick is aggressive.
Hector is lucky.
Phoebe is aggressive.If Humphrey is lucky, then Rick is aggressive.
Someone is not wild if and only if he is not lucky.
Someone who is both wild and tan is always not lucky.
It can be concluded that Marshall is wild once knowing that Monique is lucky.
If someone is both not aggressive and not wild, then he is not tan.
If someone is both not aggressive and wild, then he is not medical.
All not aggressive people are not lucky.
If someone is funny, then he is not wild.
Someone being both not tan and not aggressive is equivalent to being not lucky.
As long as someone is funny, he is not aggressive and not wild.
Someone who is tan or not wild is always not funny and aggressive.
If someone is not funny or not aggressive, then he is lucky. | Monique is not aggressive. | self_contradiction |
Humphrey is not medical.
Phoebe is not wild.
Marshall is not medical.
Hector is not aggressive.
Monique is not wild.
Rick is wild.
Phoebe is not funny.
Hector is not medical.
Hector is wild.
Rick is aggressive.
Hector is lucky.
Phoebe is aggressive.If Humphrey is lucky, then Rick is aggressive.
Someone is not wild if and only if he is not lucky.
Someone who is both wild and tan is always not lucky.
It can be concluded that Marshall is wild once knowing that Monique is lucky.
If someone is both not aggressive and not wild, then he is not tan.
If someone is both not aggressive and wild, then he is not medical.
All not aggressive people are not lucky.
If someone is funny, then he is not wild.
Someone being both not tan and not aggressive is equivalent to being not lucky.
As long as someone is funny, he is not aggressive and not wild.
Someone who is tan or not wild is always not funny and aggressive.
If someone is not funny or not aggressive, then he is lucky. | Monique is funny. | contradiction |
Humphrey is not medical.
Phoebe is not wild.
Marshall is not medical.
Hector is not aggressive.
Monique is not wild.
Rick is wild.
Phoebe is not funny.
Hector is not medical.
Hector is wild.
Rick is aggressive.
Hector is lucky.
Phoebe is aggressive.If Humphrey is lucky, then Rick is aggressive.
Someone is not wild if and only if he is not lucky.
Someone who is both wild and tan is always not lucky.
It can be concluded that Marshall is wild once knowing that Monique is lucky.
If someone is both not aggressive and not wild, then he is not tan.
If someone is both not aggressive and wild, then he is not medical.
All not aggressive people are not lucky.
If someone is funny, then he is not wild.
Someone being both not tan and not aggressive is equivalent to being not lucky.
As long as someone is funny, he is not aggressive and not wild.
Someone who is tan or not wild is always not funny and aggressive.
If someone is not funny or not aggressive, then he is lucky. | Rick is aggressive. | entailment |
Humphrey is not medical.
Phoebe is not wild.
Marshall is not medical.
Hector is not aggressive.
Monique is not wild.
Rick is wild.
Phoebe is not funny.
Hector is not medical.
Hector is wild.
Rick is aggressive.
Hector is lucky.
Phoebe is aggressive.If Humphrey is lucky, then Rick is aggressive.
Someone is not wild if and only if he is not lucky.
Someone who is both wild and tan is always not lucky.
It can be concluded that Marshall is wild once knowing that Monique is lucky.
If someone is both not aggressive and not wild, then he is not tan.
If someone is both not aggressive and wild, then he is not medical.
All not aggressive people are not lucky.
If someone is funny, then he is not wild.
Someone being both not tan and not aggressive is equivalent to being not lucky.
As long as someone is funny, he is not aggressive and not wild.
Someone who is tan or not wild is always not funny and aggressive.
If someone is not funny or not aggressive, then he is lucky. | Humphrey is aggressive. | neutral |
Humphrey is not medical.
Phoebe is not wild.
Marshall is not medical.
Hector is not aggressive.
Monique is not wild.
Rick is wild.
Phoebe is not funny.
Hector is not medical.
Hector is wild.
Rick is aggressive.
Hector is lucky.
Phoebe is aggressive.If Humphrey is lucky, then Rick is aggressive.
Someone is not wild if and only if he is not lucky.
Someone who is both wild and tan is always not lucky.
It can be concluded that Marshall is wild once knowing that Monique is lucky.
If someone is both not aggressive and not wild, then he is not tan.
If someone is both not aggressive and wild, then he is not medical.
All not aggressive people are not lucky.
If someone is funny, then he is not wild.
Someone being both not tan and not aggressive is equivalent to being not lucky.
As long as someone is funny, he is not aggressive and not wild.
Someone who is tan or not wild is always not funny and aggressive.
If someone is not funny or not aggressive, then he is lucky. | Monique is not wild. | entailment |
Humphrey is not medical.
Phoebe is not wild.
Marshall is not medical.
Hector is not aggressive.
Monique is not wild.
Rick is wild.
Phoebe is not funny.
Hector is not medical.
Hector is wild.
Rick is aggressive.
Hector is lucky.
Phoebe is aggressive.If Humphrey is lucky, then Rick is aggressive.
Someone is not wild if and only if he is not lucky.
Someone who is both wild and tan is always not lucky.
It can be concluded that Marshall is wild once knowing that Monique is lucky.
If someone is both not aggressive and not wild, then he is not tan.
If someone is both not aggressive and wild, then he is not medical.
All not aggressive people are not lucky.
If someone is funny, then he is not wild.
Someone being both not tan and not aggressive is equivalent to being not lucky.
As long as someone is funny, he is not aggressive and not wild.
Someone who is tan or not wild is always not funny and aggressive.
If someone is not funny or not aggressive, then he is lucky. | Kingsley is not funny. | neutral |
Humphrey is not medical.
Phoebe is not wild.
Marshall is not medical.
Hector is not aggressive.
Monique is not wild.
Rick is wild.
Phoebe is not funny.
Hector is not medical.
Hector is wild.
Rick is aggressive.
Hector is lucky.
Phoebe is aggressive.If Humphrey is lucky, then Rick is aggressive.
Someone is not wild if and only if he is not lucky.
Someone who is both wild and tan is always not lucky.
It can be concluded that Marshall is wild once knowing that Monique is lucky.
If someone is both not aggressive and not wild, then he is not tan.
If someone is both not aggressive and wild, then he is not medical.
All not aggressive people are not lucky.
If someone is funny, then he is not wild.
Someone being both not tan and not aggressive is equivalent to being not lucky.
As long as someone is funny, he is not aggressive and not wild.
Someone who is tan or not wild is always not funny and aggressive.
If someone is not funny or not aggressive, then he is lucky. | Humphrey is medical. | contradiction |
Humphrey is not medical.
Phoebe is not wild.
Marshall is not medical.
Hector is not aggressive.
Monique is not wild.
Rick is wild.
Phoebe is not funny.
Hector is not medical.
Hector is wild.
Rick is aggressive.
Hector is lucky.
Phoebe is aggressive.If Humphrey is lucky, then Rick is aggressive.
Someone is not wild if and only if he is not lucky.
Someone who is both wild and tan is always not lucky.
It can be concluded that Marshall is wild once knowing that Monique is lucky.
If someone is both not aggressive and not wild, then he is not tan.
If someone is both not aggressive and wild, then he is not medical.
All not aggressive people are not lucky.
If someone is funny, then he is not wild.
Someone being both not tan and not aggressive is equivalent to being not lucky.
As long as someone is funny, he is not aggressive and not wild.
Someone who is tan or not wild is always not funny and aggressive.
If someone is not funny or not aggressive, then he is lucky. | Hector is not wild. | self_contradiction |
Humphrey is not medical.
Phoebe is not wild.
Marshall is not medical.
Hector is not aggressive.
Monique is not wild.
Rick is wild.
Phoebe is not funny.
Hector is not medical.
Hector is wild.
Rick is aggressive.
Hector is lucky.
Phoebe is aggressive.If Humphrey is lucky, then Rick is aggressive.
Someone is not wild if and only if he is not lucky.
Someone who is both wild and tan is always not lucky.
It can be concluded that Marshall is wild once knowing that Monique is lucky.
If someone is both not aggressive and not wild, then he is not tan.
If someone is both not aggressive and wild, then he is not medical.
All not aggressive people are not lucky.
If someone is funny, then he is not wild.
Someone being both not tan and not aggressive is equivalent to being not lucky.
As long as someone is funny, he is not aggressive and not wild.
Someone who is tan or not wild is always not funny and aggressive.
If someone is not funny or not aggressive, then he is lucky. | Kingsley is not tan. | neutral |
Humphrey is not medical.
Phoebe is not wild.
Marshall is not medical.
Hector is not aggressive.
Monique is not wild.
Rick is wild.
Phoebe is not funny.
Hector is not medical.
Hector is wild.
Rick is aggressive.
Hector is lucky.
Phoebe is aggressive.If Humphrey is lucky, then Rick is aggressive.
Someone is not wild if and only if he is not lucky.
Someone who is both wild and tan is always not lucky.
It can be concluded that Marshall is wild once knowing that Monique is lucky.
If someone is both not aggressive and not wild, then he is not tan.
If someone is both not aggressive and wild, then he is not medical.
All not aggressive people are not lucky.
If someone is funny, then he is not wild.
Someone being both not tan and not aggressive is equivalent to being not lucky.
As long as someone is funny, he is not aggressive and not wild.
Someone who is tan or not wild is always not funny and aggressive.
If someone is not funny or not aggressive, then he is lucky. | Marshall is tan. | neutral |
Humphrey is not medical.
Phoebe is not wild.
Marshall is not medical.
Hector is not aggressive.
Monique is not wild.
Rick is wild.
Phoebe is not funny.
Hector is not medical.
Hector is wild.
Rick is aggressive.
Hector is lucky.
Phoebe is aggressive.If Humphrey is lucky, then Rick is aggressive.
Someone is not wild if and only if he is not lucky.
Someone who is both wild and tan is always not lucky.
It can be concluded that Marshall is wild once knowing that Monique is lucky.
If someone is both not aggressive and not wild, then he is not tan.
If someone is both not aggressive and wild, then he is not medical.
All not aggressive people are not lucky.
If someone is funny, then he is not wild.
Someone being both not tan and not aggressive is equivalent to being not lucky.
As long as someone is funny, he is not aggressive and not wild.
Someone who is tan or not wild is always not funny and aggressive.
If someone is not funny or not aggressive, then he is lucky. | Phoebe is funny. | contradiction |
Humphrey is not medical.
Phoebe is not wild.
Marshall is not medical.
Hector is not aggressive.
Monique is not wild.
Rick is wild.
Phoebe is not funny.
Hector is not medical.
Hector is wild.
Rick is aggressive.
Hector is lucky.
Phoebe is aggressive.If Humphrey is lucky, then Rick is aggressive.
Someone is not wild if and only if he is not lucky.
Someone who is both wild and tan is always not lucky.
It can be concluded that Marshall is wild once knowing that Monique is lucky.
If someone is both not aggressive and not wild, then he is not tan.
If someone is both not aggressive and wild, then he is not medical.
All not aggressive people are not lucky.
If someone is funny, then he is not wild.
Someone being both not tan and not aggressive is equivalent to being not lucky.
As long as someone is funny, he is not aggressive and not wild.
Someone who is tan or not wild is always not funny and aggressive.
If someone is not funny or not aggressive, then he is lucky. | Marshall is wild. | entailment |
Humphrey is not medical.
Phoebe is not wild.
Marshall is not medical.
Hector is not aggressive.
Monique is not wild.
Rick is wild.
Phoebe is not funny.
Hector is not medical.
Hector is wild.
Rick is aggressive.
Hector is lucky.
Phoebe is aggressive.If Humphrey is lucky, then Rick is aggressive.
Someone is not wild if and only if he is not lucky.
Someone who is both wild and tan is always not lucky.
It can be concluded that Marshall is wild once knowing that Monique is lucky.
If someone is both not aggressive and not wild, then he is not tan.
If someone is both not aggressive and wild, then he is not medical.
All not aggressive people are not lucky.
If someone is funny, then he is not wild.
Someone being both not tan and not aggressive is equivalent to being not lucky.
As long as someone is funny, he is not aggressive and not wild.
Someone who is tan or not wild is always not funny and aggressive.
If someone is not funny or not aggressive, then he is lucky. | Rick is not wild. | contradiction |
Humphrey is not medical.
Phoebe is not wild.
Marshall is not medical.
Hector is not aggressive.
Monique is not wild.
Rick is wild.
Phoebe is not funny.
Hector is not medical.
Hector is wild.
Rick is aggressive.
Hector is lucky.
Phoebe is aggressive.If Humphrey is lucky, then Rick is aggressive.
Someone is not wild if and only if he is not lucky.
Someone who is both wild and tan is always not lucky.
It can be concluded that Marshall is wild once knowing that Monique is lucky.
If someone is both not aggressive and not wild, then he is not tan.
If someone is both not aggressive and wild, then he is not medical.
All not aggressive people are not lucky.
If someone is funny, then he is not wild.
Someone being both not tan and not aggressive is equivalent to being not lucky.
As long as someone is funny, he is not aggressive and not wild.
Someone who is tan or not wild is always not funny and aggressive.
If someone is not funny or not aggressive, then he is lucky. | Monique is wild. | contradiction |
Humphrey is not medical.
Phoebe is not wild.
Marshall is not medical.
Hector is not aggressive.
Monique is not wild.
Rick is wild.
Phoebe is not funny.
Hector is not medical.
Hector is wild.
Rick is aggressive.
Hector is lucky.
Phoebe is aggressive.If Humphrey is lucky, then Rick is aggressive.
Someone is not wild if and only if he is not lucky.
Someone who is both wild and tan is always not lucky.
It can be concluded that Marshall is wild once knowing that Monique is lucky.
If someone is both not aggressive and not wild, then he is not tan.
If someone is both not aggressive and wild, then he is not medical.
All not aggressive people are not lucky.
If someone is funny, then he is not wild.
Someone being both not tan and not aggressive is equivalent to being not lucky.
As long as someone is funny, he is not aggressive and not wild.
Someone who is tan or not wild is always not funny and aggressive.
If someone is not funny or not aggressive, then he is lucky. | Rick is not lucky. | neutral |
Humphrey is not medical.
Phoebe is not wild.
Marshall is not medical.
Hector is not aggressive.
Monique is not wild.
Rick is wild.
Phoebe is not funny.
Hector is not medical.
Hector is wild.
Rick is aggressive.
Hector is lucky.
Phoebe is aggressive.If Humphrey is lucky, then Rick is aggressive.
Someone is not wild if and only if he is not lucky.
Someone who is both wild and tan is always not lucky.
It can be concluded that Marshall is wild once knowing that Monique is lucky.
If someone is both not aggressive and not wild, then he is not tan.
If someone is both not aggressive and wild, then he is not medical.
All not aggressive people are not lucky.
If someone is funny, then he is not wild.
Someone being both not tan and not aggressive is equivalent to being not lucky.
As long as someone is funny, he is not aggressive and not wild.
Someone who is tan or not wild is always not funny and aggressive.
If someone is not funny or not aggressive, then he is lucky. | Phoebe is not aggressive. | self_contradiction |
Murray is not psychological.
Hall is not psychological.
Sidney is repulsive.
Sidney is not cute.
Barclay is repulsive.
Clark is thoughtful.
Hall is bright.
Isaiah is repulsive.
Hall is not thoughtful.
Murray is bright.
Murray is right.
Isaiah is not thoughtful.If Barclay is not bright, then Isaiah is repulsive and Murray is not psychological.
Murray is thoughtful if and only if Hall is not bright and Sidney is not cute.
It can be concluded that Sidney is cute once knowing that Sidney is not right and Irvin is repulsive.
It can be concluded that Murray is right and Clark is bright once knowing that Barclay is not psychological.
If someone is not psychological or he is cute, then he is right.
Hall being not repulsive implies that Irvin is thoughtful and Murray is cute.
If there is at least one people who is right, then Clark is not thoughtful.
Someone who is repulsive is always both not cute and not bright.
if there is at least one people who is psychological and not right, then Murray is not thoughtful and Murray is not repulsive.
Someone being not right is equivalent to being not psychological.
As long as someone is either not cute or repulsive, he is not psychological and thoughtful.
All psychological people are right. | Murray is not right. | self_contradiction |
Murray is not psychological.
Hall is not psychological.
Sidney is repulsive.
Sidney is not cute.
Barclay is repulsive.
Clark is thoughtful.
Hall is bright.
Isaiah is repulsive.
Hall is not thoughtful.
Murray is bright.
Murray is right.
Isaiah is not thoughtful.If Barclay is not bright, then Isaiah is repulsive and Murray is not psychological.
Murray is thoughtful if and only if Hall is not bright and Sidney is not cute.
It can be concluded that Sidney is cute once knowing that Sidney is not right and Irvin is repulsive.
It can be concluded that Murray is right and Clark is bright once knowing that Barclay is not psychological.
If someone is not psychological or he is cute, then he is right.
Hall being not repulsive implies that Irvin is thoughtful and Murray is cute.
If there is at least one people who is right, then Clark is not thoughtful.
Someone who is repulsive is always both not cute and not bright.
if there is at least one people who is psychological and not right, then Murray is not thoughtful and Murray is not repulsive.
Someone being not right is equivalent to being not psychological.
As long as someone is either not cute or repulsive, he is not psychological and thoughtful.
All psychological people are right. | Sidney is not psychological. | entailment |
Murray is not psychological.
Hall is not psychological.
Sidney is repulsive.
Sidney is not cute.
Barclay is repulsive.
Clark is thoughtful.
Hall is bright.
Isaiah is repulsive.
Hall is not thoughtful.
Murray is bright.
Murray is right.
Isaiah is not thoughtful.If Barclay is not bright, then Isaiah is repulsive and Murray is not psychological.
Murray is thoughtful if and only if Hall is not bright and Sidney is not cute.
It can be concluded that Sidney is cute once knowing that Sidney is not right and Irvin is repulsive.
It can be concluded that Murray is right and Clark is bright once knowing that Barclay is not psychological.
If someone is not psychological or he is cute, then he is right.
Hall being not repulsive implies that Irvin is thoughtful and Murray is cute.
If there is at least one people who is right, then Clark is not thoughtful.
Someone who is repulsive is always both not cute and not bright.
if there is at least one people who is psychological and not right, then Murray is not thoughtful and Murray is not repulsive.
Someone being not right is equivalent to being not psychological.
As long as someone is either not cute or repulsive, he is not psychological and thoughtful.
All psychological people are right. | Barclay is not right. | self_contradiction |
Murray is not psychological.
Hall is not psychological.
Sidney is repulsive.
Sidney is not cute.
Barclay is repulsive.
Clark is thoughtful.
Hall is bright.
Isaiah is repulsive.
Hall is not thoughtful.
Murray is bright.
Murray is right.
Isaiah is not thoughtful.If Barclay is not bright, then Isaiah is repulsive and Murray is not psychological.
Murray is thoughtful if and only if Hall is not bright and Sidney is not cute.
It can be concluded that Sidney is cute once knowing that Sidney is not right and Irvin is repulsive.
It can be concluded that Murray is right and Clark is bright once knowing that Barclay is not psychological.
If someone is not psychological or he is cute, then he is right.
Hall being not repulsive implies that Irvin is thoughtful and Murray is cute.
If there is at least one people who is right, then Clark is not thoughtful.
Someone who is repulsive is always both not cute and not bright.
if there is at least one people who is psychological and not right, then Murray is not thoughtful and Murray is not repulsive.
Someone being not right is equivalent to being not psychological.
As long as someone is either not cute or repulsive, he is not psychological and thoughtful.
All psychological people are right. | Isaiah is right. | self_contradiction |
Murray is not psychological.
Hall is not psychological.
Sidney is repulsive.
Sidney is not cute.
Barclay is repulsive.
Clark is thoughtful.
Hall is bright.
Isaiah is repulsive.
Hall is not thoughtful.
Murray is bright.
Murray is right.
Isaiah is not thoughtful.If Barclay is not bright, then Isaiah is repulsive and Murray is not psychological.
Murray is thoughtful if and only if Hall is not bright and Sidney is not cute.
It can be concluded that Sidney is cute once knowing that Sidney is not right and Irvin is repulsive.
It can be concluded that Murray is right and Clark is bright once knowing that Barclay is not psychological.
If someone is not psychological or he is cute, then he is right.
Hall being not repulsive implies that Irvin is thoughtful and Murray is cute.
If there is at least one people who is right, then Clark is not thoughtful.
Someone who is repulsive is always both not cute and not bright.
if there is at least one people who is psychological and not right, then Murray is not thoughtful and Murray is not repulsive.
Someone being not right is equivalent to being not psychological.
As long as someone is either not cute or repulsive, he is not psychological and thoughtful.
All psychological people are right. | Murray is not psychological. | entailment |
Murray is not psychological.
Hall is not psychological.
Sidney is repulsive.
Sidney is not cute.
Barclay is repulsive.
Clark is thoughtful.
Hall is bright.
Isaiah is repulsive.
Hall is not thoughtful.
Murray is bright.
Murray is right.
Isaiah is not thoughtful.If Barclay is not bright, then Isaiah is repulsive and Murray is not psychological.
Murray is thoughtful if and only if Hall is not bright and Sidney is not cute.
It can be concluded that Sidney is cute once knowing that Sidney is not right and Irvin is repulsive.
It can be concluded that Murray is right and Clark is bright once knowing that Barclay is not psychological.
If someone is not psychological or he is cute, then he is right.
Hall being not repulsive implies that Irvin is thoughtful and Murray is cute.
If there is at least one people who is right, then Clark is not thoughtful.
Someone who is repulsive is always both not cute and not bright.
if there is at least one people who is psychological and not right, then Murray is not thoughtful and Murray is not repulsive.
Someone being not right is equivalent to being not psychological.
As long as someone is either not cute or repulsive, he is not psychological and thoughtful.
All psychological people are right. | Barclay is bright. | contradiction |
Murray is not psychological.
Hall is not psychological.
Sidney is repulsive.
Sidney is not cute.
Barclay is repulsive.
Clark is thoughtful.
Hall is bright.
Isaiah is repulsive.
Hall is not thoughtful.
Murray is bright.
Murray is right.
Isaiah is not thoughtful.If Barclay is not bright, then Isaiah is repulsive and Murray is not psychological.
Murray is thoughtful if and only if Hall is not bright and Sidney is not cute.
It can be concluded that Sidney is cute once knowing that Sidney is not right and Irvin is repulsive.
It can be concluded that Murray is right and Clark is bright once knowing that Barclay is not psychological.
If someone is not psychological or he is cute, then he is right.
Hall being not repulsive implies that Irvin is thoughtful and Murray is cute.
If there is at least one people who is right, then Clark is not thoughtful.
Someone who is repulsive is always both not cute and not bright.
if there is at least one people who is psychological and not right, then Murray is not thoughtful and Murray is not repulsive.
Someone being not right is equivalent to being not psychological.
As long as someone is either not cute or repulsive, he is not psychological and thoughtful.
All psychological people are right. | Clark is psychological. | neutral |
Murray is not psychological.
Hall is not psychological.
Sidney is repulsive.
Sidney is not cute.
Barclay is repulsive.
Clark is thoughtful.
Hall is bright.
Isaiah is repulsive.
Hall is not thoughtful.
Murray is bright.
Murray is right.
Isaiah is not thoughtful.If Barclay is not bright, then Isaiah is repulsive and Murray is not psychological.
Murray is thoughtful if and only if Hall is not bright and Sidney is not cute.
It can be concluded that Sidney is cute once knowing that Sidney is not right and Irvin is repulsive.
It can be concluded that Murray is right and Clark is bright once knowing that Barclay is not psychological.
If someone is not psychological or he is cute, then he is right.
Hall being not repulsive implies that Irvin is thoughtful and Murray is cute.
If there is at least one people who is right, then Clark is not thoughtful.
Someone who is repulsive is always both not cute and not bright.
if there is at least one people who is psychological and not right, then Murray is not thoughtful and Murray is not repulsive.
Someone being not right is equivalent to being not psychological.
As long as someone is either not cute or repulsive, he is not psychological and thoughtful.
All psychological people are right. | Sidney is not cute. | entailment |
Murray is not psychological.
Hall is not psychological.
Sidney is repulsive.
Sidney is not cute.
Barclay is repulsive.
Clark is thoughtful.
Hall is bright.
Isaiah is repulsive.
Hall is not thoughtful.
Murray is bright.
Murray is right.
Isaiah is not thoughtful.If Barclay is not bright, then Isaiah is repulsive and Murray is not psychological.
Murray is thoughtful if and only if Hall is not bright and Sidney is not cute.
It can be concluded that Sidney is cute once knowing that Sidney is not right and Irvin is repulsive.
It can be concluded that Murray is right and Clark is bright once knowing that Barclay is not psychological.
If someone is not psychological or he is cute, then he is right.
Hall being not repulsive implies that Irvin is thoughtful and Murray is cute.
If there is at least one people who is right, then Clark is not thoughtful.
Someone who is repulsive is always both not cute and not bright.
if there is at least one people who is psychological and not right, then Murray is not thoughtful and Murray is not repulsive.
Someone being not right is equivalent to being not psychological.
As long as someone is either not cute or repulsive, he is not psychological and thoughtful.
All psychological people are right. | Sidney is not right. | self_contradiction |
Murray is not psychological.
Hall is not psychological.
Sidney is repulsive.
Sidney is not cute.
Barclay is repulsive.
Clark is thoughtful.
Hall is bright.
Isaiah is repulsive.
Hall is not thoughtful.
Murray is bright.
Murray is right.
Isaiah is not thoughtful.If Barclay is not bright, then Isaiah is repulsive and Murray is not psychological.
Murray is thoughtful if and only if Hall is not bright and Sidney is not cute.
It can be concluded that Sidney is cute once knowing that Sidney is not right and Irvin is repulsive.
It can be concluded that Murray is right and Clark is bright once knowing that Barclay is not psychological.
If someone is not psychological or he is cute, then he is right.
Hall being not repulsive implies that Irvin is thoughtful and Murray is cute.
If there is at least one people who is right, then Clark is not thoughtful.
Someone who is repulsive is always both not cute and not bright.
if there is at least one people who is psychological and not right, then Murray is not thoughtful and Murray is not repulsive.
Someone being not right is equivalent to being not psychological.
As long as someone is either not cute or repulsive, he is not psychological and thoughtful.
All psychological people are right. | Sidney is not thoughtful. | contradiction |
Murray is not psychological.
Hall is not psychological.
Sidney is repulsive.
Sidney is not cute.
Barclay is repulsive.
Clark is thoughtful.
Hall is bright.
Isaiah is repulsive.
Hall is not thoughtful.
Murray is bright.
Murray is right.
Isaiah is not thoughtful.If Barclay is not bright, then Isaiah is repulsive and Murray is not psychological.
Murray is thoughtful if and only if Hall is not bright and Sidney is not cute.
It can be concluded that Sidney is cute once knowing that Sidney is not right and Irvin is repulsive.
It can be concluded that Murray is right and Clark is bright once knowing that Barclay is not psychological.
If someone is not psychological or he is cute, then he is right.
Hall being not repulsive implies that Irvin is thoughtful and Murray is cute.
If there is at least one people who is right, then Clark is not thoughtful.
Someone who is repulsive is always both not cute and not bright.
if there is at least one people who is psychological and not right, then Murray is not thoughtful and Murray is not repulsive.
Someone being not right is equivalent to being not psychological.
As long as someone is either not cute or repulsive, he is not psychological and thoughtful.
All psychological people are right. | Murray is not repulsive. | neutral |
Murray is not psychological.
Hall is not psychological.
Sidney is repulsive.
Sidney is not cute.
Barclay is repulsive.
Clark is thoughtful.
Hall is bright.
Isaiah is repulsive.
Hall is not thoughtful.
Murray is bright.
Murray is right.
Isaiah is not thoughtful.If Barclay is not bright, then Isaiah is repulsive and Murray is not psychological.
Murray is thoughtful if and only if Hall is not bright and Sidney is not cute.
It can be concluded that Sidney is cute once knowing that Sidney is not right and Irvin is repulsive.
It can be concluded that Murray is right and Clark is bright once knowing that Barclay is not psychological.
If someone is not psychological or he is cute, then he is right.
Hall being not repulsive implies that Irvin is thoughtful and Murray is cute.
If there is at least one people who is right, then Clark is not thoughtful.
Someone who is repulsive is always both not cute and not bright.
if there is at least one people who is psychological and not right, then Murray is not thoughtful and Murray is not repulsive.
Someone being not right is equivalent to being not psychological.
As long as someone is either not cute or repulsive, he is not psychological and thoughtful.
All psychological people are right. | Clark is not psychological. | neutral |
Murray is not psychological.
Hall is not psychological.
Sidney is repulsive.
Sidney is not cute.
Barclay is repulsive.
Clark is thoughtful.
Hall is bright.
Isaiah is repulsive.
Hall is not thoughtful.
Murray is bright.
Murray is right.
Isaiah is not thoughtful.If Barclay is not bright, then Isaiah is repulsive and Murray is not psychological.
Murray is thoughtful if and only if Hall is not bright and Sidney is not cute.
It can be concluded that Sidney is cute once knowing that Sidney is not right and Irvin is repulsive.
It can be concluded that Murray is right and Clark is bright once knowing that Barclay is not psychological.
If someone is not psychological or he is cute, then he is right.
Hall being not repulsive implies that Irvin is thoughtful and Murray is cute.
If there is at least one people who is right, then Clark is not thoughtful.
Someone who is repulsive is always both not cute and not bright.
if there is at least one people who is psychological and not right, then Murray is not thoughtful and Murray is not repulsive.
Someone being not right is equivalent to being not psychological.
As long as someone is either not cute or repulsive, he is not psychological and thoughtful.
All psychological people are right. | Clark is cute. | neutral |
Murray is not psychological.
Hall is not psychological.
Sidney is repulsive.
Sidney is not cute.
Barclay is repulsive.
Clark is thoughtful.
Hall is bright.
Isaiah is repulsive.
Hall is not thoughtful.
Murray is bright.
Murray is right.
Isaiah is not thoughtful.If Barclay is not bright, then Isaiah is repulsive and Murray is not psychological.
Murray is thoughtful if and only if Hall is not bright and Sidney is not cute.
It can be concluded that Sidney is cute once knowing that Sidney is not right and Irvin is repulsive.
It can be concluded that Murray is right and Clark is bright once knowing that Barclay is not psychological.
If someone is not psychological or he is cute, then he is right.
Hall being not repulsive implies that Irvin is thoughtful and Murray is cute.
If there is at least one people who is right, then Clark is not thoughtful.
Someone who is repulsive is always both not cute and not bright.
if there is at least one people who is psychological and not right, then Murray is not thoughtful and Murray is not repulsive.
Someone being not right is equivalent to being not psychological.
As long as someone is either not cute or repulsive, he is not psychological and thoughtful.
All psychological people are right. | Isaiah is not repulsive. | contradiction |
Murray is not psychological.
Hall is not psychological.
Sidney is repulsive.
Sidney is not cute.
Barclay is repulsive.
Clark is thoughtful.
Hall is bright.
Isaiah is repulsive.
Hall is not thoughtful.
Murray is bright.
Murray is right.
Isaiah is not thoughtful.If Barclay is not bright, then Isaiah is repulsive and Murray is not psychological.
Murray is thoughtful if and only if Hall is not bright and Sidney is not cute.
It can be concluded that Sidney is cute once knowing that Sidney is not right and Irvin is repulsive.
It can be concluded that Murray is right and Clark is bright once knowing that Barclay is not psychological.
If someone is not psychological or he is cute, then he is right.
Hall being not repulsive implies that Irvin is thoughtful and Murray is cute.
If there is at least one people who is right, then Clark is not thoughtful.
Someone who is repulsive is always both not cute and not bright.
if there is at least one people who is psychological and not right, then Murray is not thoughtful and Murray is not repulsive.
Someone being not right is equivalent to being not psychological.
As long as someone is either not cute or repulsive, he is not psychological and thoughtful.
All psychological people are right. | Murray is right. | self_contradiction |
Murray is not psychological.
Hall is not psychological.
Sidney is repulsive.
Sidney is not cute.
Barclay is repulsive.
Clark is thoughtful.
Hall is bright.
Isaiah is repulsive.
Hall is not thoughtful.
Murray is bright.
Murray is right.
Isaiah is not thoughtful.If Barclay is not bright, then Isaiah is repulsive and Murray is not psychological.
Murray is thoughtful if and only if Hall is not bright and Sidney is not cute.
It can be concluded that Sidney is cute once knowing that Sidney is not right and Irvin is repulsive.
It can be concluded that Murray is right and Clark is bright once knowing that Barclay is not psychological.
If someone is not psychological or he is cute, then he is right.
Hall being not repulsive implies that Irvin is thoughtful and Murray is cute.
If there is at least one people who is right, then Clark is not thoughtful.
Someone who is repulsive is always both not cute and not bright.
if there is at least one people who is psychological and not right, then Murray is not thoughtful and Murray is not repulsive.
Someone being not right is equivalent to being not psychological.
As long as someone is either not cute or repulsive, he is not psychological and thoughtful.
All psychological people are right. | Barclay is repulsive. | entailment |
Murray is not psychological.
Hall is not psychological.
Sidney is repulsive.
Sidney is not cute.
Barclay is repulsive.
Clark is thoughtful.
Hall is bright.
Isaiah is repulsive.
Hall is not thoughtful.
Murray is bright.
Murray is right.
Isaiah is not thoughtful.If Barclay is not bright, then Isaiah is repulsive and Murray is not psychological.
Murray is thoughtful if and only if Hall is not bright and Sidney is not cute.
It can be concluded that Sidney is cute once knowing that Sidney is not right and Irvin is repulsive.
It can be concluded that Murray is right and Clark is bright once knowing that Barclay is not psychological.
If someone is not psychological or he is cute, then he is right.
Hall being not repulsive implies that Irvin is thoughtful and Murray is cute.
If there is at least one people who is right, then Clark is not thoughtful.
Someone who is repulsive is always both not cute and not bright.
if there is at least one people who is psychological and not right, then Murray is not thoughtful and Murray is not repulsive.
Someone being not right is equivalent to being not psychological.
As long as someone is either not cute or repulsive, he is not psychological and thoughtful.
All psychological people are right. | Irvin is not cute. | neutral |
Murray is not psychological.
Hall is not psychological.
Sidney is repulsive.
Sidney is not cute.
Barclay is repulsive.
Clark is thoughtful.
Hall is bright.
Isaiah is repulsive.
Hall is not thoughtful.
Murray is bright.
Murray is right.
Isaiah is not thoughtful.If Barclay is not bright, then Isaiah is repulsive and Murray is not psychological.
Murray is thoughtful if and only if Hall is not bright and Sidney is not cute.
It can be concluded that Sidney is cute once knowing that Sidney is not right and Irvin is repulsive.
It can be concluded that Murray is right and Clark is bright once knowing that Barclay is not psychological.
If someone is not psychological or he is cute, then he is right.
Hall being not repulsive implies that Irvin is thoughtful and Murray is cute.
If there is at least one people who is right, then Clark is not thoughtful.
Someone who is repulsive is always both not cute and not bright.
if there is at least one people who is psychological and not right, then Murray is not thoughtful and Murray is not repulsive.
Someone being not right is equivalent to being not psychological.
As long as someone is either not cute or repulsive, he is not psychological and thoughtful.
All psychological people are right. | Barclay is thoughtful. | entailment |
Murray is not psychological.
Hall is not psychological.
Sidney is repulsive.
Sidney is not cute.
Barclay is repulsive.
Clark is thoughtful.
Hall is bright.
Isaiah is repulsive.
Hall is not thoughtful.
Murray is bright.
Murray is right.
Isaiah is not thoughtful.If Barclay is not bright, then Isaiah is repulsive and Murray is not psychological.
Murray is thoughtful if and only if Hall is not bright and Sidney is not cute.
It can be concluded that Sidney is cute once knowing that Sidney is not right and Irvin is repulsive.
It can be concluded that Murray is right and Clark is bright once knowing that Barclay is not psychological.
If someone is not psychological or he is cute, then he is right.
Hall being not repulsive implies that Irvin is thoughtful and Murray is cute.
If there is at least one people who is right, then Clark is not thoughtful.
Someone who is repulsive is always both not cute and not bright.
if there is at least one people who is psychological and not right, then Murray is not thoughtful and Murray is not repulsive.
Someone being not right is equivalent to being not psychological.
As long as someone is either not cute or repulsive, he is not psychological and thoughtful.
All psychological people are right. | Hall is not bright. | contradiction |
Murray is not psychological.
Hall is not psychological.
Sidney is repulsive.
Sidney is not cute.
Barclay is repulsive.
Clark is thoughtful.
Hall is bright.
Isaiah is repulsive.
Hall is not thoughtful.
Murray is bright.
Murray is right.
Isaiah is not thoughtful.If Barclay is not bright, then Isaiah is repulsive and Murray is not psychological.
Murray is thoughtful if and only if Hall is not bright and Sidney is not cute.
It can be concluded that Sidney is cute once knowing that Sidney is not right and Irvin is repulsive.
It can be concluded that Murray is right and Clark is bright once knowing that Barclay is not psychological.
If someone is not psychological or he is cute, then he is right.
Hall being not repulsive implies that Irvin is thoughtful and Murray is cute.
If there is at least one people who is right, then Clark is not thoughtful.
Someone who is repulsive is always both not cute and not bright.
if there is at least one people who is psychological and not right, then Murray is not thoughtful and Murray is not repulsive.
Someone being not right is equivalent to being not psychological.
As long as someone is either not cute or repulsive, he is not psychological and thoughtful.
All psychological people are right. | Murray is not bright. | contradiction |
Maggie is fuzzy.
Sean is tan.
Sean is optimistic.
Roland is magnificent.
Maggie is embarrassed.
Percival is not fuzzy.
Roland is embarrassed.
Percival is magnificent.
Bruce is optimistic.
Roland is not optimistic.
Sean is embarrassed.
Phineas is not fuzzy.If there is someone who is not optimistic, then Phineas is fuzzy.
Percival being fuzzy implies that Kirk is tan.
Maggie being not fuzzy and Percival being not magnificent imply that Maggie is not swift and Kirk is not optimistic.
If Maggie is swift, then Kirk is not embarrassed and Bruce is not optimistic, and vice versa.
If someone is not swift or magnificent, then he is not embarrassed.
If there is at least one people who is embarrassed, then Bruce is not optimistic and Roland is fuzzy.
If someone is not tan or he is not magnificent, then he is fuzzy.
Someone who is swift is always not magnificent.
If there is nobody who is not not optimistic, then Bruce is swift.
If someone is not magnificent, then he is not fuzzy.
If someone is magnificent, then he is both not embarrassed and not swift.
If Maggie is fuzzy and Bruce is embarrassed, then Sean is not optimistic. | Sean is not optimistic. | contradiction |
Maggie is fuzzy.
Sean is tan.
Sean is optimistic.
Roland is magnificent.
Maggie is embarrassed.
Percival is not fuzzy.
Roland is embarrassed.
Percival is magnificent.
Bruce is optimistic.
Roland is not optimistic.
Sean is embarrassed.
Phineas is not fuzzy.If there is someone who is not optimistic, then Phineas is fuzzy.
Percival being fuzzy implies that Kirk is tan.
Maggie being not fuzzy and Percival being not magnificent imply that Maggie is not swift and Kirk is not optimistic.
If Maggie is swift, then Kirk is not embarrassed and Bruce is not optimistic, and vice versa.
If someone is not swift or magnificent, then he is not embarrassed.
If there is at least one people who is embarrassed, then Bruce is not optimistic and Roland is fuzzy.
If someone is not tan or he is not magnificent, then he is fuzzy.
Someone who is swift is always not magnificent.
If there is nobody who is not not optimistic, then Bruce is swift.
If someone is not magnificent, then he is not fuzzy.
If someone is magnificent, then he is both not embarrassed and not swift.
If Maggie is fuzzy and Bruce is embarrassed, then Sean is not optimistic. | Sean is optimistic. | entailment |
Maggie is fuzzy.
Sean is tan.
Sean is optimistic.
Roland is magnificent.
Maggie is embarrassed.
Percival is not fuzzy.
Roland is embarrassed.
Percival is magnificent.
Bruce is optimistic.
Roland is not optimistic.
Sean is embarrassed.
Phineas is not fuzzy.If there is someone who is not optimistic, then Phineas is fuzzy.
Percival being fuzzy implies that Kirk is tan.
Maggie being not fuzzy and Percival being not magnificent imply that Maggie is not swift and Kirk is not optimistic.
If Maggie is swift, then Kirk is not embarrassed and Bruce is not optimistic, and vice versa.
If someone is not swift or magnificent, then he is not embarrassed.
If there is at least one people who is embarrassed, then Bruce is not optimistic and Roland is fuzzy.
If someone is not tan or he is not magnificent, then he is fuzzy.
Someone who is swift is always not magnificent.
If there is nobody who is not not optimistic, then Bruce is swift.
If someone is not magnificent, then he is not fuzzy.
If someone is magnificent, then he is both not embarrassed and not swift.
If Maggie is fuzzy and Bruce is embarrassed, then Sean is not optimistic. | Percival is swift. | contradiction |
Maggie is fuzzy.
Sean is tan.
Sean is optimistic.
Roland is magnificent.
Maggie is embarrassed.
Percival is not fuzzy.
Roland is embarrassed.
Percival is magnificent.
Bruce is optimistic.
Roland is not optimistic.
Sean is embarrassed.
Phineas is not fuzzy.If there is someone who is not optimistic, then Phineas is fuzzy.
Percival being fuzzy implies that Kirk is tan.
Maggie being not fuzzy and Percival being not magnificent imply that Maggie is not swift and Kirk is not optimistic.
If Maggie is swift, then Kirk is not embarrassed and Bruce is not optimistic, and vice versa.
If someone is not swift or magnificent, then he is not embarrassed.
If there is at least one people who is embarrassed, then Bruce is not optimistic and Roland is fuzzy.
If someone is not tan or he is not magnificent, then he is fuzzy.
Someone who is swift is always not magnificent.
If there is nobody who is not not optimistic, then Bruce is swift.
If someone is not magnificent, then he is not fuzzy.
If someone is magnificent, then he is both not embarrassed and not swift.
If Maggie is fuzzy and Bruce is embarrassed, then Sean is not optimistic. | Maggie is fuzzy. | entailment |
Maggie is fuzzy.
Sean is tan.
Sean is optimistic.
Roland is magnificent.
Maggie is embarrassed.
Percival is not fuzzy.
Roland is embarrassed.
Percival is magnificent.
Bruce is optimistic.
Roland is not optimistic.
Sean is embarrassed.
Phineas is not fuzzy.If there is someone who is not optimistic, then Phineas is fuzzy.
Percival being fuzzy implies that Kirk is tan.
Maggie being not fuzzy and Percival being not magnificent imply that Maggie is not swift and Kirk is not optimistic.
If Maggie is swift, then Kirk is not embarrassed and Bruce is not optimistic, and vice versa.
If someone is not swift or magnificent, then he is not embarrassed.
If there is at least one people who is embarrassed, then Bruce is not optimistic and Roland is fuzzy.
If someone is not tan or he is not magnificent, then he is fuzzy.
Someone who is swift is always not magnificent.
If there is nobody who is not not optimistic, then Bruce is swift.
If someone is not magnificent, then he is not fuzzy.
If someone is magnificent, then he is both not embarrassed and not swift.
If Maggie is fuzzy and Bruce is embarrassed, then Sean is not optimistic. | Bruce is not optimistic. | self_contradiction |
Maggie is fuzzy.
Sean is tan.
Sean is optimistic.
Roland is magnificent.
Maggie is embarrassed.
Percival is not fuzzy.
Roland is embarrassed.
Percival is magnificent.
Bruce is optimistic.
Roland is not optimistic.
Sean is embarrassed.
Phineas is not fuzzy.If there is someone who is not optimistic, then Phineas is fuzzy.
Percival being fuzzy implies that Kirk is tan.
Maggie being not fuzzy and Percival being not magnificent imply that Maggie is not swift and Kirk is not optimistic.
If Maggie is swift, then Kirk is not embarrassed and Bruce is not optimistic, and vice versa.
If someone is not swift or magnificent, then he is not embarrassed.
If there is at least one people who is embarrassed, then Bruce is not optimistic and Roland is fuzzy.
If someone is not tan or he is not magnificent, then he is fuzzy.
Someone who is swift is always not magnificent.
If there is nobody who is not not optimistic, then Bruce is swift.
If someone is not magnificent, then he is not fuzzy.
If someone is magnificent, then he is both not embarrassed and not swift.
If Maggie is fuzzy and Bruce is embarrassed, then Sean is not optimistic. | Percival is magnificent. | entailment |
Maggie is fuzzy.
Sean is tan.
Sean is optimistic.
Roland is magnificent.
Maggie is embarrassed.
Percival is not fuzzy.
Roland is embarrassed.
Percival is magnificent.
Bruce is optimistic.
Roland is not optimistic.
Sean is embarrassed.
Phineas is not fuzzy.If there is someone who is not optimistic, then Phineas is fuzzy.
Percival being fuzzy implies that Kirk is tan.
Maggie being not fuzzy and Percival being not magnificent imply that Maggie is not swift and Kirk is not optimistic.
If Maggie is swift, then Kirk is not embarrassed and Bruce is not optimistic, and vice versa.
If someone is not swift or magnificent, then he is not embarrassed.
If there is at least one people who is embarrassed, then Bruce is not optimistic and Roland is fuzzy.
If someone is not tan or he is not magnificent, then he is fuzzy.
Someone who is swift is always not magnificent.
If there is nobody who is not not optimistic, then Bruce is swift.
If someone is not magnificent, then he is not fuzzy.
If someone is magnificent, then he is both not embarrassed and not swift.
If Maggie is fuzzy and Bruce is embarrassed, then Sean is not optimistic. | Kirk is optimistic. | neutral |
Maggie is fuzzy.
Sean is tan.
Sean is optimistic.
Roland is magnificent.
Maggie is embarrassed.
Percival is not fuzzy.
Roland is embarrassed.
Percival is magnificent.
Bruce is optimistic.
Roland is not optimistic.
Sean is embarrassed.
Phineas is not fuzzy.If there is someone who is not optimistic, then Phineas is fuzzy.
Percival being fuzzy implies that Kirk is tan.
Maggie being not fuzzy and Percival being not magnificent imply that Maggie is not swift and Kirk is not optimistic.
If Maggie is swift, then Kirk is not embarrassed and Bruce is not optimistic, and vice versa.
If someone is not swift or magnificent, then he is not embarrassed.
If there is at least one people who is embarrassed, then Bruce is not optimistic and Roland is fuzzy.
If someone is not tan or he is not magnificent, then he is fuzzy.
Someone who is swift is always not magnificent.
If there is nobody who is not not optimistic, then Bruce is swift.
If someone is not magnificent, then he is not fuzzy.
If someone is magnificent, then he is both not embarrassed and not swift.
If Maggie is fuzzy and Bruce is embarrassed, then Sean is not optimistic. | Maggie is tan. | neutral |
Maggie is fuzzy.
Sean is tan.
Sean is optimistic.
Roland is magnificent.
Maggie is embarrassed.
Percival is not fuzzy.
Roland is embarrassed.
Percival is magnificent.
Bruce is optimistic.
Roland is not optimistic.
Sean is embarrassed.
Phineas is not fuzzy.If there is someone who is not optimistic, then Phineas is fuzzy.
Percival being fuzzy implies that Kirk is tan.
Maggie being not fuzzy and Percival being not magnificent imply that Maggie is not swift and Kirk is not optimistic.
If Maggie is swift, then Kirk is not embarrassed and Bruce is not optimistic, and vice versa.
If someone is not swift or magnificent, then he is not embarrassed.
If there is at least one people who is embarrassed, then Bruce is not optimistic and Roland is fuzzy.
If someone is not tan or he is not magnificent, then he is fuzzy.
Someone who is swift is always not magnificent.
If there is nobody who is not not optimistic, then Bruce is swift.
If someone is not magnificent, then he is not fuzzy.
If someone is magnificent, then he is both not embarrassed and not swift.
If Maggie is fuzzy and Bruce is embarrassed, then Sean is not optimistic. | Percival is not fuzzy. | entailment |
Maggie is fuzzy.
Sean is tan.
Sean is optimistic.
Roland is magnificent.
Maggie is embarrassed.
Percival is not fuzzy.
Roland is embarrassed.
Percival is magnificent.
Bruce is optimistic.
Roland is not optimistic.
Sean is embarrassed.
Phineas is not fuzzy.If there is someone who is not optimistic, then Phineas is fuzzy.
Percival being fuzzy implies that Kirk is tan.
Maggie being not fuzzy and Percival being not magnificent imply that Maggie is not swift and Kirk is not optimistic.
If Maggie is swift, then Kirk is not embarrassed and Bruce is not optimistic, and vice versa.
If someone is not swift or magnificent, then he is not embarrassed.
If there is at least one people who is embarrassed, then Bruce is not optimistic and Roland is fuzzy.
If someone is not tan or he is not magnificent, then he is fuzzy.
Someone who is swift is always not magnificent.
If there is nobody who is not not optimistic, then Bruce is swift.
If someone is not magnificent, then he is not fuzzy.
If someone is magnificent, then he is both not embarrassed and not swift.
If Maggie is fuzzy and Bruce is embarrassed, then Sean is not optimistic. | Sean is not swift. | neutral |
Maggie is fuzzy.
Sean is tan.
Sean is optimistic.
Roland is magnificent.
Maggie is embarrassed.
Percival is not fuzzy.
Roland is embarrassed.
Percival is magnificent.
Bruce is optimistic.
Roland is not optimistic.
Sean is embarrassed.
Phineas is not fuzzy.If there is someone who is not optimistic, then Phineas is fuzzy.
Percival being fuzzy implies that Kirk is tan.
Maggie being not fuzzy and Percival being not magnificent imply that Maggie is not swift and Kirk is not optimistic.
If Maggie is swift, then Kirk is not embarrassed and Bruce is not optimistic, and vice versa.
If someone is not swift or magnificent, then he is not embarrassed.
If there is at least one people who is embarrassed, then Bruce is not optimistic and Roland is fuzzy.
If someone is not tan or he is not magnificent, then he is fuzzy.
Someone who is swift is always not magnificent.
If there is nobody who is not not optimistic, then Bruce is swift.
If someone is not magnificent, then he is not fuzzy.
If someone is magnificent, then he is both not embarrassed and not swift.
If Maggie is fuzzy and Bruce is embarrassed, then Sean is not optimistic. | Roland is embarrassed. | self_contradiction |
Maggie is fuzzy.
Sean is tan.
Sean is optimistic.
Roland is magnificent.
Maggie is embarrassed.
Percival is not fuzzy.
Roland is embarrassed.
Percival is magnificent.
Bruce is optimistic.
Roland is not optimistic.
Sean is embarrassed.
Phineas is not fuzzy.If there is someone who is not optimistic, then Phineas is fuzzy.
Percival being fuzzy implies that Kirk is tan.
Maggie being not fuzzy and Percival being not magnificent imply that Maggie is not swift and Kirk is not optimistic.
If Maggie is swift, then Kirk is not embarrassed and Bruce is not optimistic, and vice versa.
If someone is not swift or magnificent, then he is not embarrassed.
If there is at least one people who is embarrassed, then Bruce is not optimistic and Roland is fuzzy.
If someone is not tan or he is not magnificent, then he is fuzzy.
Someone who is swift is always not magnificent.
If there is nobody who is not not optimistic, then Bruce is swift.
If someone is not magnificent, then he is not fuzzy.
If someone is magnificent, then he is both not embarrassed and not swift.
If Maggie is fuzzy and Bruce is embarrassed, then Sean is not optimistic. | Roland is not embarrassed. | self_contradiction |
Maggie is fuzzy.
Sean is tan.
Sean is optimistic.
Roland is magnificent.
Maggie is embarrassed.
Percival is not fuzzy.
Roland is embarrassed.
Percival is magnificent.
Bruce is optimistic.
Roland is not optimistic.
Sean is embarrassed.
Phineas is not fuzzy.If there is someone who is not optimistic, then Phineas is fuzzy.
Percival being fuzzy implies that Kirk is tan.
Maggie being not fuzzy and Percival being not magnificent imply that Maggie is not swift and Kirk is not optimistic.
If Maggie is swift, then Kirk is not embarrassed and Bruce is not optimistic, and vice versa.
If someone is not swift or magnificent, then he is not embarrassed.
If there is at least one people who is embarrassed, then Bruce is not optimistic and Roland is fuzzy.
If someone is not tan or he is not magnificent, then he is fuzzy.
Someone who is swift is always not magnificent.
If there is nobody who is not not optimistic, then Bruce is swift.
If someone is not magnificent, then he is not fuzzy.
If someone is magnificent, then he is both not embarrassed and not swift.
If Maggie is fuzzy and Bruce is embarrassed, then Sean is not optimistic. | Roland is not optimistic. | entailment |
Maggie is fuzzy.
Sean is tan.
Sean is optimistic.
Roland is magnificent.
Maggie is embarrassed.
Percival is not fuzzy.
Roland is embarrassed.
Percival is magnificent.
Bruce is optimistic.
Roland is not optimistic.
Sean is embarrassed.
Phineas is not fuzzy.If there is someone who is not optimistic, then Phineas is fuzzy.
Percival being fuzzy implies that Kirk is tan.
Maggie being not fuzzy and Percival being not magnificent imply that Maggie is not swift and Kirk is not optimistic.
If Maggie is swift, then Kirk is not embarrassed and Bruce is not optimistic, and vice versa.
If someone is not swift or magnificent, then he is not embarrassed.
If there is at least one people who is embarrassed, then Bruce is not optimistic and Roland is fuzzy.
If someone is not tan or he is not magnificent, then he is fuzzy.
Someone who is swift is always not magnificent.
If there is nobody who is not not optimistic, then Bruce is swift.
If someone is not magnificent, then he is not fuzzy.
If someone is magnificent, then he is both not embarrassed and not swift.
If Maggie is fuzzy and Bruce is embarrassed, then Sean is not optimistic. | Maggie is not magnificent. | neutral |
Maggie is fuzzy.
Sean is tan.
Sean is optimistic.
Roland is magnificent.
Maggie is embarrassed.
Percival is not fuzzy.
Roland is embarrassed.
Percival is magnificent.
Bruce is optimistic.
Roland is not optimistic.
Sean is embarrassed.
Phineas is not fuzzy.If there is someone who is not optimistic, then Phineas is fuzzy.
Percival being fuzzy implies that Kirk is tan.
Maggie being not fuzzy and Percival being not magnificent imply that Maggie is not swift and Kirk is not optimistic.
If Maggie is swift, then Kirk is not embarrassed and Bruce is not optimistic, and vice versa.
If someone is not swift or magnificent, then he is not embarrassed.
If there is at least one people who is embarrassed, then Bruce is not optimistic and Roland is fuzzy.
If someone is not tan or he is not magnificent, then he is fuzzy.
Someone who is swift is always not magnificent.
If there is nobody who is not not optimistic, then Bruce is swift.
If someone is not magnificent, then he is not fuzzy.
If someone is magnificent, then he is both not embarrassed and not swift.
If Maggie is fuzzy and Bruce is embarrassed, then Sean is not optimistic. | Sean is not tan. | contradiction |
Maggie is fuzzy.
Sean is tan.
Sean is optimistic.
Roland is magnificent.
Maggie is embarrassed.
Percival is not fuzzy.
Roland is embarrassed.
Percival is magnificent.
Bruce is optimistic.
Roland is not optimistic.
Sean is embarrassed.
Phineas is not fuzzy.If there is someone who is not optimistic, then Phineas is fuzzy.
Percival being fuzzy implies that Kirk is tan.
Maggie being not fuzzy and Percival being not magnificent imply that Maggie is not swift and Kirk is not optimistic.
If Maggie is swift, then Kirk is not embarrassed and Bruce is not optimistic, and vice versa.
If someone is not swift or magnificent, then he is not embarrassed.
If there is at least one people who is embarrassed, then Bruce is not optimistic and Roland is fuzzy.
If someone is not tan or he is not magnificent, then he is fuzzy.
Someone who is swift is always not magnificent.
If there is nobody who is not not optimistic, then Bruce is swift.
If someone is not magnificent, then he is not fuzzy.
If someone is magnificent, then he is both not embarrassed and not swift.
If Maggie is fuzzy and Bruce is embarrassed, then Sean is not optimistic. | Phineas is not fuzzy. | self_contradiction |
Maggie is fuzzy.
Sean is tan.
Sean is optimistic.
Roland is magnificent.
Maggie is embarrassed.
Percival is not fuzzy.
Roland is embarrassed.
Percival is magnificent.
Bruce is optimistic.
Roland is not optimistic.
Sean is embarrassed.
Phineas is not fuzzy.If there is someone who is not optimistic, then Phineas is fuzzy.
Percival being fuzzy implies that Kirk is tan.
Maggie being not fuzzy and Percival being not magnificent imply that Maggie is not swift and Kirk is not optimistic.
If Maggie is swift, then Kirk is not embarrassed and Bruce is not optimistic, and vice versa.
If someone is not swift or magnificent, then he is not embarrassed.
If there is at least one people who is embarrassed, then Bruce is not optimistic and Roland is fuzzy.
If someone is not tan or he is not magnificent, then he is fuzzy.
Someone who is swift is always not magnificent.
If there is nobody who is not not optimistic, then Bruce is swift.
If someone is not magnificent, then he is not fuzzy.
If someone is magnificent, then he is both not embarrassed and not swift.
If Maggie is fuzzy and Bruce is embarrassed, then Sean is not optimistic. | Kirk is tan. | neutral |
Maggie is fuzzy.
Sean is tan.
Sean is optimistic.
Roland is magnificent.
Maggie is embarrassed.
Percival is not fuzzy.
Roland is embarrassed.
Percival is magnificent.
Bruce is optimistic.
Roland is not optimistic.
Sean is embarrassed.
Phineas is not fuzzy.If there is someone who is not optimistic, then Phineas is fuzzy.
Percival being fuzzy implies that Kirk is tan.
Maggie being not fuzzy and Percival being not magnificent imply that Maggie is not swift and Kirk is not optimistic.
If Maggie is swift, then Kirk is not embarrassed and Bruce is not optimistic, and vice versa.
If someone is not swift or magnificent, then he is not embarrassed.
If there is at least one people who is embarrassed, then Bruce is not optimistic and Roland is fuzzy.
If someone is not tan or he is not magnificent, then he is fuzzy.
Someone who is swift is always not magnificent.
If there is nobody who is not not optimistic, then Bruce is swift.
If someone is not magnificent, then he is not fuzzy.
If someone is magnificent, then he is both not embarrassed and not swift.
If Maggie is fuzzy and Bruce is embarrassed, then Sean is not optimistic. | Phineas is fuzzy. | self_contradiction |
Maggie is fuzzy.
Sean is tan.
Sean is optimistic.
Roland is magnificent.
Maggie is embarrassed.
Percival is not fuzzy.
Roland is embarrassed.
Percival is magnificent.
Bruce is optimistic.
Roland is not optimistic.
Sean is embarrassed.
Phineas is not fuzzy.If there is someone who is not optimistic, then Phineas is fuzzy.
Percival being fuzzy implies that Kirk is tan.
Maggie being not fuzzy and Percival being not magnificent imply that Maggie is not swift and Kirk is not optimistic.
If Maggie is swift, then Kirk is not embarrassed and Bruce is not optimistic, and vice versa.
If someone is not swift or magnificent, then he is not embarrassed.
If there is at least one people who is embarrassed, then Bruce is not optimistic and Roland is fuzzy.
If someone is not tan or he is not magnificent, then he is fuzzy.
Someone who is swift is always not magnificent.
If there is nobody who is not not optimistic, then Bruce is swift.
If someone is not magnificent, then he is not fuzzy.
If someone is magnificent, then he is both not embarrassed and not swift.
If Maggie is fuzzy and Bruce is embarrassed, then Sean is not optimistic. | Roland is not magnificent. | contradiction |
Maggie is fuzzy.
Sean is tan.
Sean is optimistic.
Roland is magnificent.
Maggie is embarrassed.
Percival is not fuzzy.
Roland is embarrassed.
Percival is magnificent.
Bruce is optimistic.
Roland is not optimistic.
Sean is embarrassed.
Phineas is not fuzzy.If there is someone who is not optimistic, then Phineas is fuzzy.
Percival being fuzzy implies that Kirk is tan.
Maggie being not fuzzy and Percival being not magnificent imply that Maggie is not swift and Kirk is not optimistic.
If Maggie is swift, then Kirk is not embarrassed and Bruce is not optimistic, and vice versa.
If someone is not swift or magnificent, then he is not embarrassed.
If there is at least one people who is embarrassed, then Bruce is not optimistic and Roland is fuzzy.
If someone is not tan or he is not magnificent, then he is fuzzy.
Someone who is swift is always not magnificent.
If there is nobody who is not not optimistic, then Bruce is swift.
If someone is not magnificent, then he is not fuzzy.
If someone is magnificent, then he is both not embarrassed and not swift.
If Maggie is fuzzy and Bruce is embarrassed, then Sean is not optimistic. | Maggie is not fuzzy. | contradiction |
Debra is not better.
Della is better.
Marion is not better.
Nicholas is not lively.
Truman is lively.
Marion is not curious.
Chester is nice.
Debra is not nice.
Kendrick is not better.
Chester is not better.
Debra is not light.
Truman is light.Someone who is nice is always not curious.
If everyone is not lively or light, then Della is better.
Someone who is eithor tired or not better is always lively.
If there is at least one people who is both not curious and nice, then Chester is not light.
If someone is not curious, then he is both not lively and not light.
If there is at least one people who is lively, then Della is not tired and Kendrick is not nice.
If someone is not light and better, then he is not tired, and vice versa.
If Nicholas is curious or Della is not tired, then Chester is better.
If Nicholas is light or Della is better, then Nicholas is lively.
Someone who is both not nice and not lively is always not better.
It can be concluded that Truman is tired and Della is lively once knowing that Truman is not curious.
Someone is better and not nice if and only if he is not lively and tired. | Chester is not lively. | self_contradiction |
Debra is not better.
Della is better.
Marion is not better.
Nicholas is not lively.
Truman is lively.
Marion is not curious.
Chester is nice.
Debra is not nice.
Kendrick is not better.
Chester is not better.
Debra is not light.
Truman is light.Someone who is nice is always not curious.
If everyone is not lively or light, then Della is better.
Someone who is eithor tired or not better is always lively.
If there is at least one people who is both not curious and nice, then Chester is not light.
If someone is not curious, then he is both not lively and not light.
If there is at least one people who is lively, then Della is not tired and Kendrick is not nice.
If someone is not light and better, then he is not tired, and vice versa.
If Nicholas is curious or Della is not tired, then Chester is better.
If Nicholas is light or Della is better, then Nicholas is lively.
Someone who is both not nice and not lively is always not better.
It can be concluded that Truman is tired and Della is lively once knowing that Truman is not curious.
Someone is better and not nice if and only if he is not lively and tired. | Nicholas is curious. | neutral |
Debra is not better.
Della is better.
Marion is not better.
Nicholas is not lively.
Truman is lively.
Marion is not curious.
Chester is nice.
Debra is not nice.
Kendrick is not better.
Chester is not better.
Debra is not light.
Truman is light.Someone who is nice is always not curious.
If everyone is not lively or light, then Della is better.
Someone who is eithor tired or not better is always lively.
If there is at least one people who is both not curious and nice, then Chester is not light.
If someone is not curious, then he is both not lively and not light.
If there is at least one people who is lively, then Della is not tired and Kendrick is not nice.
If someone is not light and better, then he is not tired, and vice versa.
If Nicholas is curious or Della is not tired, then Chester is better.
If Nicholas is light or Della is better, then Nicholas is lively.
Someone who is both not nice and not lively is always not better.
It can be concluded that Truman is tired and Della is lively once knowing that Truman is not curious.
Someone is better and not nice if and only if he is not lively and tired. | Debra is not tired. | neutral |
Debra is not better.
Della is better.
Marion is not better.
Nicholas is not lively.
Truman is lively.
Marion is not curious.
Chester is nice.
Debra is not nice.
Kendrick is not better.
Chester is not better.
Debra is not light.
Truman is light.Someone who is nice is always not curious.
If everyone is not lively or light, then Della is better.
Someone who is eithor tired or not better is always lively.
If there is at least one people who is both not curious and nice, then Chester is not light.
If someone is not curious, then he is both not lively and not light.
If there is at least one people who is lively, then Della is not tired and Kendrick is not nice.
If someone is not light and better, then he is not tired, and vice versa.
If Nicholas is curious or Della is not tired, then Chester is better.
If Nicholas is light or Della is better, then Nicholas is lively.
Someone who is both not nice and not lively is always not better.
It can be concluded that Truman is tired and Della is lively once knowing that Truman is not curious.
Someone is better and not nice if and only if he is not lively and tired. | Debra is tired. | neutral |
Debra is not better.
Della is better.
Marion is not better.
Nicholas is not lively.
Truman is lively.
Marion is not curious.
Chester is nice.
Debra is not nice.
Kendrick is not better.
Chester is not better.
Debra is not light.
Truman is light.Someone who is nice is always not curious.
If everyone is not lively or light, then Della is better.
Someone who is eithor tired or not better is always lively.
If there is at least one people who is both not curious and nice, then Chester is not light.
If someone is not curious, then he is both not lively and not light.
If there is at least one people who is lively, then Della is not tired and Kendrick is not nice.
If someone is not light and better, then he is not tired, and vice versa.
If Nicholas is curious or Della is not tired, then Chester is better.
If Nicholas is light or Della is better, then Nicholas is lively.
Someone who is both not nice and not lively is always not better.
It can be concluded that Truman is tired and Della is lively once knowing that Truman is not curious.
Someone is better and not nice if and only if he is not lively and tired. | Della is not light. | entailment |
Debra is not better.
Della is better.
Marion is not better.
Nicholas is not lively.
Truman is lively.
Marion is not curious.
Chester is nice.
Debra is not nice.
Kendrick is not better.
Chester is not better.
Debra is not light.
Truman is light.Someone who is nice is always not curious.
If everyone is not lively or light, then Della is better.
Someone who is eithor tired or not better is always lively.
If there is at least one people who is both not curious and nice, then Chester is not light.
If someone is not curious, then he is both not lively and not light.
If there is at least one people who is lively, then Della is not tired and Kendrick is not nice.
If someone is not light and better, then he is not tired, and vice versa.
If Nicholas is curious or Della is not tired, then Chester is better.
If Nicholas is light or Della is better, then Nicholas is lively.
Someone who is both not nice and not lively is always not better.
It can be concluded that Truman is tired and Della is lively once knowing that Truman is not curious.
Someone is better and not nice if and only if he is not lively and tired. | Debra is lively. | entailment |
Debra is not better.
Della is better.
Marion is not better.
Nicholas is not lively.
Truman is lively.
Marion is not curious.
Chester is nice.
Debra is not nice.
Kendrick is not better.
Chester is not better.
Debra is not light.
Truman is light.Someone who is nice is always not curious.
If everyone is not lively or light, then Della is better.
Someone who is eithor tired or not better is always lively.
If there is at least one people who is both not curious and nice, then Chester is not light.
If someone is not curious, then he is both not lively and not light.
If there is at least one people who is lively, then Della is not tired and Kendrick is not nice.
If someone is not light and better, then he is not tired, and vice versa.
If Nicholas is curious or Della is not tired, then Chester is better.
If Nicholas is light or Della is better, then Nicholas is lively.
Someone who is both not nice and not lively is always not better.
It can be concluded that Truman is tired and Della is lively once knowing that Truman is not curious.
Someone is better and not nice if and only if he is not lively and tired. | Nicholas is lively. | self_contradiction |
Debra is not better.
Della is better.
Marion is not better.
Nicholas is not lively.
Truman is lively.
Marion is not curious.
Chester is nice.
Debra is not nice.
Kendrick is not better.
Chester is not better.
Debra is not light.
Truman is light.Someone who is nice is always not curious.
If everyone is not lively or light, then Della is better.
Someone who is eithor tired or not better is always lively.
If there is at least one people who is both not curious and nice, then Chester is not light.
If someone is not curious, then he is both not lively and not light.
If there is at least one people who is lively, then Della is not tired and Kendrick is not nice.
If someone is not light and better, then he is not tired, and vice versa.
If Nicholas is curious or Della is not tired, then Chester is better.
If Nicholas is light or Della is better, then Nicholas is lively.
Someone who is both not nice and not lively is always not better.
It can be concluded that Truman is tired and Della is lively once knowing that Truman is not curious.
Someone is better and not nice if and only if he is not lively and tired. | Kendrick is nice. | contradiction |
Debra is not better.
Della is better.
Marion is not better.
Nicholas is not lively.
Truman is lively.
Marion is not curious.
Chester is nice.
Debra is not nice.
Kendrick is not better.
Chester is not better.
Debra is not light.
Truman is light.Someone who is nice is always not curious.
If everyone is not lively or light, then Della is better.
Someone who is eithor tired or not better is always lively.
If there is at least one people who is both not curious and nice, then Chester is not light.
If someone is not curious, then he is both not lively and not light.
If there is at least one people who is lively, then Della is not tired and Kendrick is not nice.
If someone is not light and better, then he is not tired, and vice versa.
If Nicholas is curious or Della is not tired, then Chester is better.
If Nicholas is light or Della is better, then Nicholas is lively.
Someone who is both not nice and not lively is always not better.
It can be concluded that Truman is tired and Della is lively once knowing that Truman is not curious.
Someone is better and not nice if and only if he is not lively and tired. | Truman is light. | entailment |
Debra is not better.
Della is better.
Marion is not better.
Nicholas is not lively.
Truman is lively.
Marion is not curious.
Chester is nice.
Debra is not nice.
Kendrick is not better.
Chester is not better.
Debra is not light.
Truman is light.Someone who is nice is always not curious.
If everyone is not lively or light, then Della is better.
Someone who is eithor tired or not better is always lively.
If there is at least one people who is both not curious and nice, then Chester is not light.
If someone is not curious, then he is both not lively and not light.
If there is at least one people who is lively, then Della is not tired and Kendrick is not nice.
If someone is not light and better, then he is not tired, and vice versa.
If Nicholas is curious or Della is not tired, then Chester is better.
If Nicholas is light or Della is better, then Nicholas is lively.
Someone who is both not nice and not lively is always not better.
It can be concluded that Truman is tired and Della is lively once knowing that Truman is not curious.
Someone is better and not nice if and only if he is not lively and tired. | Marion is lively. | self_contradiction |
Debra is not better.
Della is better.
Marion is not better.
Nicholas is not lively.
Truman is lively.
Marion is not curious.
Chester is nice.
Debra is not nice.
Kendrick is not better.
Chester is not better.
Debra is not light.
Truman is light.Someone who is nice is always not curious.
If everyone is not lively or light, then Della is better.
Someone who is eithor tired or not better is always lively.
If there is at least one people who is both not curious and nice, then Chester is not light.
If someone is not curious, then he is both not lively and not light.
If there is at least one people who is lively, then Della is not tired and Kendrick is not nice.
If someone is not light and better, then he is not tired, and vice versa.
If Nicholas is curious or Della is not tired, then Chester is better.
If Nicholas is light or Della is better, then Nicholas is lively.
Someone who is both not nice and not lively is always not better.
It can be concluded that Truman is tired and Della is lively once knowing that Truman is not curious.
Someone is better and not nice if and only if he is not lively and tired. | Marion is light. | contradiction |
Debra is not better.
Della is better.
Marion is not better.
Nicholas is not lively.
Truman is lively.
Marion is not curious.
Chester is nice.
Debra is not nice.
Kendrick is not better.
Chester is not better.
Debra is not light.
Truman is light.Someone who is nice is always not curious.
If everyone is not lively or light, then Della is better.
Someone who is eithor tired or not better is always lively.
If there is at least one people who is both not curious and nice, then Chester is not light.
If someone is not curious, then he is both not lively and not light.
If there is at least one people who is lively, then Della is not tired and Kendrick is not nice.
If someone is not light and better, then he is not tired, and vice versa.
If Nicholas is curious or Della is not tired, then Chester is better.
If Nicholas is light or Della is better, then Nicholas is lively.
Someone who is both not nice and not lively is always not better.
It can be concluded that Truman is tired and Della is lively once knowing that Truman is not curious.
Someone is better and not nice if and only if he is not lively and tired. | Marion is tired. | neutral |
Debra is not better.
Della is better.
Marion is not better.
Nicholas is not lively.
Truman is lively.
Marion is not curious.
Chester is nice.
Debra is not nice.
Kendrick is not better.
Chester is not better.
Debra is not light.
Truman is light.Someone who is nice is always not curious.
If everyone is not lively or light, then Della is better.
Someone who is eithor tired or not better is always lively.
If there is at least one people who is both not curious and nice, then Chester is not light.
If someone is not curious, then he is both not lively and not light.
If there is at least one people who is lively, then Della is not tired and Kendrick is not nice.
If someone is not light and better, then he is not tired, and vice versa.
If Nicholas is curious or Della is not tired, then Chester is better.
If Nicholas is light or Della is better, then Nicholas is lively.
Someone who is both not nice and not lively is always not better.
It can be concluded that Truman is tired and Della is lively once knowing that Truman is not curious.
Someone is better and not nice if and only if he is not lively and tired. | Chester is tired. | contradiction |
Debra is not better.
Della is better.
Marion is not better.
Nicholas is not lively.
Truman is lively.
Marion is not curious.
Chester is nice.
Debra is not nice.
Kendrick is not better.
Chester is not better.
Debra is not light.
Truman is light.Someone who is nice is always not curious.
If everyone is not lively or light, then Della is better.
Someone who is eithor tired or not better is always lively.
If there is at least one people who is both not curious and nice, then Chester is not light.
If someone is not curious, then he is both not lively and not light.
If there is at least one people who is lively, then Della is not tired and Kendrick is not nice.
If someone is not light and better, then he is not tired, and vice versa.
If Nicholas is curious or Della is not tired, then Chester is better.
If Nicholas is light or Della is better, then Nicholas is lively.
Someone who is both not nice and not lively is always not better.
It can be concluded that Truman is tired and Della is lively once knowing that Truman is not curious.
Someone is better and not nice if and only if he is not lively and tired. | Chester is not better. | self_contradiction |
Debra is not better.
Della is better.
Marion is not better.
Nicholas is not lively.
Truman is lively.
Marion is not curious.
Chester is nice.
Debra is not nice.
Kendrick is not better.
Chester is not better.
Debra is not light.
Truman is light.Someone who is nice is always not curious.
If everyone is not lively or light, then Della is better.
Someone who is eithor tired or not better is always lively.
If there is at least one people who is both not curious and nice, then Chester is not light.
If someone is not curious, then he is both not lively and not light.
If there is at least one people who is lively, then Della is not tired and Kendrick is not nice.
If someone is not light and better, then he is not tired, and vice versa.
If Nicholas is curious or Della is not tired, then Chester is better.
If Nicholas is light or Della is better, then Nicholas is lively.
Someone who is both not nice and not lively is always not better.
It can be concluded that Truman is tired and Della is lively once knowing that Truman is not curious.
Someone is better and not nice if and only if he is not lively and tired. | Chester is nice. | entailment |
Debra is not better.
Della is better.
Marion is not better.
Nicholas is not lively.
Truman is lively.
Marion is not curious.
Chester is nice.
Debra is not nice.
Kendrick is not better.
Chester is not better.
Debra is not light.
Truman is light.Someone who is nice is always not curious.
If everyone is not lively or light, then Della is better.
Someone who is eithor tired or not better is always lively.
If there is at least one people who is both not curious and nice, then Chester is not light.
If someone is not curious, then he is both not lively and not light.
If there is at least one people who is lively, then Della is not tired and Kendrick is not nice.
If someone is not light and better, then he is not tired, and vice versa.
If Nicholas is curious or Della is not tired, then Chester is better.
If Nicholas is light or Della is better, then Nicholas is lively.
Someone who is both not nice and not lively is always not better.
It can be concluded that Truman is tired and Della is lively once knowing that Truman is not curious.
Someone is better and not nice if and only if he is not lively and tired. | Nicholas is not curious. | neutral |
Debra is not better.
Della is better.
Marion is not better.
Nicholas is not lively.
Truman is lively.
Marion is not curious.
Chester is nice.
Debra is not nice.
Kendrick is not better.
Chester is not better.
Debra is not light.
Truman is light.Someone who is nice is always not curious.
If everyone is not lively or light, then Della is better.
Someone who is eithor tired or not better is always lively.
If there is at least one people who is both not curious and nice, then Chester is not light.
If someone is not curious, then he is both not lively and not light.
If there is at least one people who is lively, then Della is not tired and Kendrick is not nice.
If someone is not light and better, then he is not tired, and vice versa.
If Nicholas is curious or Della is not tired, then Chester is better.
If Nicholas is light or Della is better, then Nicholas is lively.
Someone who is both not nice and not lively is always not better.
It can be concluded that Truman is tired and Della is lively once knowing that Truman is not curious.
Someone is better and not nice if and only if he is not lively and tired. | Chester is lively. | self_contradiction |
Debra is not better.
Della is better.
Marion is not better.
Nicholas is not lively.
Truman is lively.
Marion is not curious.
Chester is nice.
Debra is not nice.
Kendrick is not better.
Chester is not better.
Debra is not light.
Truman is light.Someone who is nice is always not curious.
If everyone is not lively or light, then Della is better.
Someone who is eithor tired or not better is always lively.
If there is at least one people who is both not curious and nice, then Chester is not light.
If someone is not curious, then he is both not lively and not light.
If there is at least one people who is lively, then Della is not tired and Kendrick is not nice.
If someone is not light and better, then he is not tired, and vice versa.
If Nicholas is curious or Della is not tired, then Chester is better.
If Nicholas is light or Della is better, then Nicholas is lively.
Someone who is both not nice and not lively is always not better.
It can be concluded that Truman is tired and Della is lively once knowing that Truman is not curious.
Someone is better and not nice if and only if he is not lively and tired. | Truman is not light. | contradiction |
Debra is not better.
Della is better.
Marion is not better.
Nicholas is not lively.
Truman is lively.
Marion is not curious.
Chester is nice.
Debra is not nice.
Kendrick is not better.
Chester is not better.
Debra is not light.
Truman is light.Someone who is nice is always not curious.
If everyone is not lively or light, then Della is better.
Someone who is eithor tired or not better is always lively.
If there is at least one people who is both not curious and nice, then Chester is not light.
If someone is not curious, then he is both not lively and not light.
If there is at least one people who is lively, then Della is not tired and Kendrick is not nice.
If someone is not light and better, then he is not tired, and vice versa.
If Nicholas is curious or Della is not tired, then Chester is better.
If Nicholas is light or Della is better, then Nicholas is lively.
Someone who is both not nice and not lively is always not better.
It can be concluded that Truman is tired and Della is lively once knowing that Truman is not curious.
Someone is better and not nice if and only if he is not lively and tired. | Marion is better. | contradiction |
Debra is not better.
Della is better.
Marion is not better.
Nicholas is not lively.
Truman is lively.
Marion is not curious.
Chester is nice.
Debra is not nice.
Kendrick is not better.
Chester is not better.
Debra is not light.
Truman is light.Someone who is nice is always not curious.
If everyone is not lively or light, then Della is better.
Someone who is eithor tired or not better is always lively.
If there is at least one people who is both not curious and nice, then Chester is not light.
If someone is not curious, then he is both not lively and not light.
If there is at least one people who is lively, then Della is not tired and Kendrick is not nice.
If someone is not light and better, then he is not tired, and vice versa.
If Nicholas is curious or Della is not tired, then Chester is better.
If Nicholas is light or Della is better, then Nicholas is lively.
Someone who is both not nice and not lively is always not better.
It can be concluded that Truman is tired and Della is lively once knowing that Truman is not curious.
Someone is better and not nice if and only if he is not lively and tired. | Della is better. | entailment |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.