premise
stringlengths 923
1.41k
| hypothesis
stringlengths 11
33
| label
stringclasses 4
values |
|---|---|---|
Justin is selfish.
Albert is available.
Albert is charming.
Justin is polite.
Albert is not selfish.
Arvel is selfish.
Todd is polite.
Todd is charming.
Arvel is annoyed.
Alfred is not charming.
Justin is not available.
Albert is annoyed.Justin being charming or Marshall being not polite implies that Todd is hard-working.
If there is at least one people who is not available, then Marshall is selfish and Alfred is not annoyed.
If someone is selfish, then he is both hard-working and not charming.
All annoyed people are not selfish.
If Justin is not annoyed and Arvel is not available, then Marshall is polite.
Someone is not charming if and only if he is selfish.
If there is at least one people who is not available or not selfish, then Alfred is annoyed.
If someone is not annoyed and not charming, then he is both not hard-working and not available, and vice versa.
If Arvel is selfish, then Albert is annoyed and Arvel is not polite, and vice versa.
If someone is not charming, then he is both not polite and annoyed.
If there is at least one people who is not hard-working or not annoyed, then Todd is charming.
If there is someone who is both available and not selfish, then Marshall is hard-working. | Alfred is not polite. | entailment |
Justin is selfish.
Albert is available.
Albert is charming.
Justin is polite.
Albert is not selfish.
Arvel is selfish.
Todd is polite.
Todd is charming.
Arvel is annoyed.
Alfred is not charming.
Justin is not available.
Albert is annoyed.Justin being charming or Marshall being not polite implies that Todd is hard-working.
If there is at least one people who is not available, then Marshall is selfish and Alfred is not annoyed.
If someone is selfish, then he is both hard-working and not charming.
All annoyed people are not selfish.
If Justin is not annoyed and Arvel is not available, then Marshall is polite.
Someone is not charming if and only if he is selfish.
If there is at least one people who is not available or not selfish, then Alfred is annoyed.
If someone is not annoyed and not charming, then he is both not hard-working and not available, and vice versa.
If Arvel is selfish, then Albert is annoyed and Arvel is not polite, and vice versa.
If someone is not charming, then he is both not polite and annoyed.
If there is at least one people who is not hard-working or not annoyed, then Todd is charming.
If there is someone who is both available and not selfish, then Marshall is hard-working. | Alfred is not selfish. | self_contradiction |
Justin is selfish.
Albert is available.
Albert is charming.
Justin is polite.
Albert is not selfish.
Arvel is selfish.
Todd is polite.
Todd is charming.
Arvel is annoyed.
Alfred is not charming.
Justin is not available.
Albert is annoyed.Justin being charming or Marshall being not polite implies that Todd is hard-working.
If there is at least one people who is not available, then Marshall is selfish and Alfred is not annoyed.
If someone is selfish, then he is both hard-working and not charming.
All annoyed people are not selfish.
If Justin is not annoyed and Arvel is not available, then Marshall is polite.
Someone is not charming if and only if he is selfish.
If there is at least one people who is not available or not selfish, then Alfred is annoyed.
If someone is not annoyed and not charming, then he is both not hard-working and not available, and vice versa.
If Arvel is selfish, then Albert is annoyed and Arvel is not polite, and vice versa.
If someone is not charming, then he is both not polite and annoyed.
If there is at least one people who is not hard-working or not annoyed, then Todd is charming.
If there is someone who is both available and not selfish, then Marshall is hard-working. | Justin is hard-working. | entailment |
Justin is selfish.
Albert is available.
Albert is charming.
Justin is polite.
Albert is not selfish.
Arvel is selfish.
Todd is polite.
Todd is charming.
Arvel is annoyed.
Alfred is not charming.
Justin is not available.
Albert is annoyed.Justin being charming or Marshall being not polite implies that Todd is hard-working.
If there is at least one people who is not available, then Marshall is selfish and Alfred is not annoyed.
If someone is selfish, then he is both hard-working and not charming.
All annoyed people are not selfish.
If Justin is not annoyed and Arvel is not available, then Marshall is polite.
Someone is not charming if and only if he is selfish.
If there is at least one people who is not available or not selfish, then Alfred is annoyed.
If someone is not annoyed and not charming, then he is both not hard-working and not available, and vice versa.
If Arvel is selfish, then Albert is annoyed and Arvel is not polite, and vice versa.
If someone is not charming, then he is both not polite and annoyed.
If there is at least one people who is not hard-working or not annoyed, then Todd is charming.
If there is someone who is both available and not selfish, then Marshall is hard-working. | Todd is hard-working. | entailment |
Justin is selfish.
Albert is available.
Albert is charming.
Justin is polite.
Albert is not selfish.
Arvel is selfish.
Todd is polite.
Todd is charming.
Arvel is annoyed.
Alfred is not charming.
Justin is not available.
Albert is annoyed.Justin being charming or Marshall being not polite implies that Todd is hard-working.
If there is at least one people who is not available, then Marshall is selfish and Alfred is not annoyed.
If someone is selfish, then he is both hard-working and not charming.
All annoyed people are not selfish.
If Justin is not annoyed and Arvel is not available, then Marshall is polite.
Someone is not charming if and only if he is selfish.
If there is at least one people who is not available or not selfish, then Alfred is annoyed.
If someone is not annoyed and not charming, then he is both not hard-working and not available, and vice versa.
If Arvel is selfish, then Albert is annoyed and Arvel is not polite, and vice versa.
If someone is not charming, then he is both not polite and annoyed.
If there is at least one people who is not hard-working or not annoyed, then Todd is charming.
If there is someone who is both available and not selfish, then Marshall is hard-working. | Alfred is not available. | entailment |
Justin is selfish.
Albert is available.
Albert is charming.
Justin is polite.
Albert is not selfish.
Arvel is selfish.
Todd is polite.
Todd is charming.
Arvel is annoyed.
Alfred is not charming.
Justin is not available.
Albert is annoyed.Justin being charming or Marshall being not polite implies that Todd is hard-working.
If there is at least one people who is not available, then Marshall is selfish and Alfred is not annoyed.
If someone is selfish, then he is both hard-working and not charming.
All annoyed people are not selfish.
If Justin is not annoyed and Arvel is not available, then Marshall is polite.
Someone is not charming if and only if he is selfish.
If there is at least one people who is not available or not selfish, then Alfred is annoyed.
If someone is not annoyed and not charming, then he is both not hard-working and not available, and vice versa.
If Arvel is selfish, then Albert is annoyed and Arvel is not polite, and vice versa.
If someone is not charming, then he is both not polite and annoyed.
If there is at least one people who is not hard-working or not annoyed, then Todd is charming.
If there is someone who is both available and not selfish, then Marshall is hard-working. | Arvel is charming. | contradiction |
Justin is selfish.
Albert is available.
Albert is charming.
Justin is polite.
Albert is not selfish.
Arvel is selfish.
Todd is polite.
Todd is charming.
Arvel is annoyed.
Alfred is not charming.
Justin is not available.
Albert is annoyed.Justin being charming or Marshall being not polite implies that Todd is hard-working.
If there is at least one people who is not available, then Marshall is selfish and Alfred is not annoyed.
If someone is selfish, then he is both hard-working and not charming.
All annoyed people are not selfish.
If Justin is not annoyed and Arvel is not available, then Marshall is polite.
Someone is not charming if and only if he is selfish.
If there is at least one people who is not available or not selfish, then Alfred is annoyed.
If someone is not annoyed and not charming, then he is both not hard-working and not available, and vice versa.
If Arvel is selfish, then Albert is annoyed and Arvel is not polite, and vice versa.
If someone is not charming, then he is both not polite and annoyed.
If there is at least one people who is not hard-working or not annoyed, then Todd is charming.
If there is someone who is both available and not selfish, then Marshall is hard-working. | Justin is available. | contradiction |
Justin is selfish.
Albert is available.
Albert is charming.
Justin is polite.
Albert is not selfish.
Arvel is selfish.
Todd is polite.
Todd is charming.
Arvel is annoyed.
Alfred is not charming.
Justin is not available.
Albert is annoyed.Justin being charming or Marshall being not polite implies that Todd is hard-working.
If there is at least one people who is not available, then Marshall is selfish and Alfred is not annoyed.
If someone is selfish, then he is both hard-working and not charming.
All annoyed people are not selfish.
If Justin is not annoyed and Arvel is not available, then Marshall is polite.
Someone is not charming if and only if he is selfish.
If there is at least one people who is not available or not selfish, then Alfred is annoyed.
If someone is not annoyed and not charming, then he is both not hard-working and not available, and vice versa.
If Arvel is selfish, then Albert is annoyed and Arvel is not polite, and vice versa.
If someone is not charming, then he is both not polite and annoyed.
If there is at least one people who is not hard-working or not annoyed, then Todd is charming.
If there is someone who is both available and not selfish, then Marshall is hard-working. | Scott is not polite. | neutral |
Justin is selfish.
Albert is available.
Albert is charming.
Justin is polite.
Albert is not selfish.
Arvel is selfish.
Todd is polite.
Todd is charming.
Arvel is annoyed.
Alfred is not charming.
Justin is not available.
Albert is annoyed.Justin being charming or Marshall being not polite implies that Todd is hard-working.
If there is at least one people who is not available, then Marshall is selfish and Alfred is not annoyed.
If someone is selfish, then he is both hard-working and not charming.
All annoyed people are not selfish.
If Justin is not annoyed and Arvel is not available, then Marshall is polite.
Someone is not charming if and only if he is selfish.
If there is at least one people who is not available or not selfish, then Alfred is annoyed.
If someone is not annoyed and not charming, then he is both not hard-working and not available, and vice versa.
If Arvel is selfish, then Albert is annoyed and Arvel is not polite, and vice versa.
If someone is not charming, then he is both not polite and annoyed.
If there is at least one people who is not hard-working or not annoyed, then Todd is charming.
If there is someone who is both available and not selfish, then Marshall is hard-working. | Alfred is charming. | contradiction |
Justin is selfish.
Albert is available.
Albert is charming.
Justin is polite.
Albert is not selfish.
Arvel is selfish.
Todd is polite.
Todd is charming.
Arvel is annoyed.
Alfred is not charming.
Justin is not available.
Albert is annoyed.Justin being charming or Marshall being not polite implies that Todd is hard-working.
If there is at least one people who is not available, then Marshall is selfish and Alfred is not annoyed.
If someone is selfish, then he is both hard-working and not charming.
All annoyed people are not selfish.
If Justin is not annoyed and Arvel is not available, then Marshall is polite.
Someone is not charming if and only if he is selfish.
If there is at least one people who is not available or not selfish, then Alfred is annoyed.
If someone is not annoyed and not charming, then he is both not hard-working and not available, and vice versa.
If Arvel is selfish, then Albert is annoyed and Arvel is not polite, and vice versa.
If someone is not charming, then he is both not polite and annoyed.
If there is at least one people who is not hard-working or not annoyed, then Todd is charming.
If there is someone who is both available and not selfish, then Marshall is hard-working. | Marshall is not polite. | entailment |
Justin is selfish.
Albert is available.
Albert is charming.
Justin is polite.
Albert is not selfish.
Arvel is selfish.
Todd is polite.
Todd is charming.
Arvel is annoyed.
Alfred is not charming.
Justin is not available.
Albert is annoyed.Justin being charming or Marshall being not polite implies that Todd is hard-working.
If there is at least one people who is not available, then Marshall is selfish and Alfred is not annoyed.
If someone is selfish, then he is both hard-working and not charming.
All annoyed people are not selfish.
If Justin is not annoyed and Arvel is not available, then Marshall is polite.
Someone is not charming if and only if he is selfish.
If there is at least one people who is not available or not selfish, then Alfred is annoyed.
If someone is not annoyed and not charming, then he is both not hard-working and not available, and vice versa.
If Arvel is selfish, then Albert is annoyed and Arvel is not polite, and vice versa.
If someone is not charming, then he is both not polite and annoyed.
If there is at least one people who is not hard-working or not annoyed, then Todd is charming.
If there is someone who is both available and not selfish, then Marshall is hard-working. | Alfred is annoyed. | self_contradiction |
Justin is selfish.
Albert is available.
Albert is charming.
Justin is polite.
Albert is not selfish.
Arvel is selfish.
Todd is polite.
Todd is charming.
Arvel is annoyed.
Alfred is not charming.
Justin is not available.
Albert is annoyed.Justin being charming or Marshall being not polite implies that Todd is hard-working.
If there is at least one people who is not available, then Marshall is selfish and Alfred is not annoyed.
If someone is selfish, then he is both hard-working and not charming.
All annoyed people are not selfish.
If Justin is not annoyed and Arvel is not available, then Marshall is polite.
Someone is not charming if and only if he is selfish.
If there is at least one people who is not available or not selfish, then Alfred is annoyed.
If someone is not annoyed and not charming, then he is both not hard-working and not available, and vice versa.
If Arvel is selfish, then Albert is annoyed and Arvel is not polite, and vice versa.
If someone is not charming, then he is both not polite and annoyed.
If there is at least one people who is not hard-working or not annoyed, then Todd is charming.
If there is someone who is both available and not selfish, then Marshall is hard-working. | Arvel is selfish. | self_contradiction |
Justin is selfish.
Albert is available.
Albert is charming.
Justin is polite.
Albert is not selfish.
Arvel is selfish.
Todd is polite.
Todd is charming.
Arvel is annoyed.
Alfred is not charming.
Justin is not available.
Albert is annoyed.Justin being charming or Marshall being not polite implies that Todd is hard-working.
If there is at least one people who is not available, then Marshall is selfish and Alfred is not annoyed.
If someone is selfish, then he is both hard-working and not charming.
All annoyed people are not selfish.
If Justin is not annoyed and Arvel is not available, then Marshall is polite.
Someone is not charming if and only if he is selfish.
If there is at least one people who is not available or not selfish, then Alfred is annoyed.
If someone is not annoyed and not charming, then he is both not hard-working and not available, and vice versa.
If Arvel is selfish, then Albert is annoyed and Arvel is not polite, and vice versa.
If someone is not charming, then he is both not polite and annoyed.
If there is at least one people who is not hard-working or not annoyed, then Todd is charming.
If there is someone who is both available and not selfish, then Marshall is hard-working. | Scott is not hard-working. | neutral |
Justin is selfish.
Albert is available.
Albert is charming.
Justin is polite.
Albert is not selfish.
Arvel is selfish.
Todd is polite.
Todd is charming.
Arvel is annoyed.
Alfred is not charming.
Justin is not available.
Albert is annoyed.Justin being charming or Marshall being not polite implies that Todd is hard-working.
If there is at least one people who is not available, then Marshall is selfish and Alfred is not annoyed.
If someone is selfish, then he is both hard-working and not charming.
All annoyed people are not selfish.
If Justin is not annoyed and Arvel is not available, then Marshall is polite.
Someone is not charming if and only if he is selfish.
If there is at least one people who is not available or not selfish, then Alfred is annoyed.
If someone is not annoyed and not charming, then he is both not hard-working and not available, and vice versa.
If Arvel is selfish, then Albert is annoyed and Arvel is not polite, and vice versa.
If someone is not charming, then he is both not polite and annoyed.
If there is at least one people who is not hard-working or not annoyed, then Todd is charming.
If there is someone who is both available and not selfish, then Marshall is hard-working. | Albert is not polite. | neutral |
Justin is selfish.
Albert is available.
Albert is charming.
Justin is polite.
Albert is not selfish.
Arvel is selfish.
Todd is polite.
Todd is charming.
Arvel is annoyed.
Alfred is not charming.
Justin is not available.
Albert is annoyed.Justin being charming or Marshall being not polite implies that Todd is hard-working.
If there is at least one people who is not available, then Marshall is selfish and Alfred is not annoyed.
If someone is selfish, then he is both hard-working and not charming.
All annoyed people are not selfish.
If Justin is not annoyed and Arvel is not available, then Marshall is polite.
Someone is not charming if and only if he is selfish.
If there is at least one people who is not available or not selfish, then Alfred is annoyed.
If someone is not annoyed and not charming, then he is both not hard-working and not available, and vice versa.
If Arvel is selfish, then Albert is annoyed and Arvel is not polite, and vice versa.
If someone is not charming, then he is both not polite and annoyed.
If there is at least one people who is not hard-working or not annoyed, then Todd is charming.
If there is someone who is both available and not selfish, then Marshall is hard-working. | Marshall is available. | neutral |
Justin is selfish.
Albert is available.
Albert is charming.
Justin is polite.
Albert is not selfish.
Arvel is selfish.
Todd is polite.
Todd is charming.
Arvel is annoyed.
Alfred is not charming.
Justin is not available.
Albert is annoyed.Justin being charming or Marshall being not polite implies that Todd is hard-working.
If there is at least one people who is not available, then Marshall is selfish and Alfred is not annoyed.
If someone is selfish, then he is both hard-working and not charming.
All annoyed people are not selfish.
If Justin is not annoyed and Arvel is not available, then Marshall is polite.
Someone is not charming if and only if he is selfish.
If there is at least one people who is not available or not selfish, then Alfred is annoyed.
If someone is not annoyed and not charming, then he is both not hard-working and not available, and vice versa.
If Arvel is selfish, then Albert is annoyed and Arvel is not polite, and vice versa.
If someone is not charming, then he is both not polite and annoyed.
If there is at least one people who is not hard-working or not annoyed, then Todd is charming.
If there is someone who is both available and not selfish, then Marshall is hard-working. | Scott is charming. | neutral |
Justin is selfish.
Albert is available.
Albert is charming.
Justin is polite.
Albert is not selfish.
Arvel is selfish.
Todd is polite.
Todd is charming.
Arvel is annoyed.
Alfred is not charming.
Justin is not available.
Albert is annoyed.Justin being charming or Marshall being not polite implies that Todd is hard-working.
If there is at least one people who is not available, then Marshall is selfish and Alfred is not annoyed.
If someone is selfish, then he is both hard-working and not charming.
All annoyed people are not selfish.
If Justin is not annoyed and Arvel is not available, then Marshall is polite.
Someone is not charming if and only if he is selfish.
If there is at least one people who is not available or not selfish, then Alfred is annoyed.
If someone is not annoyed and not charming, then he is both not hard-working and not available, and vice versa.
If Arvel is selfish, then Albert is annoyed and Arvel is not polite, and vice versa.
If someone is not charming, then he is both not polite and annoyed.
If there is at least one people who is not hard-working or not annoyed, then Todd is charming.
If there is someone who is both available and not selfish, then Marshall is hard-working. | Justin is not annoyed. | contradiction |
Justin is selfish.
Albert is available.
Albert is charming.
Justin is polite.
Albert is not selfish.
Arvel is selfish.
Todd is polite.
Todd is charming.
Arvel is annoyed.
Alfred is not charming.
Justin is not available.
Albert is annoyed.Justin being charming or Marshall being not polite implies that Todd is hard-working.
If there is at least one people who is not available, then Marshall is selfish and Alfred is not annoyed.
If someone is selfish, then he is both hard-working and not charming.
All annoyed people are not selfish.
If Justin is not annoyed and Arvel is not available, then Marshall is polite.
Someone is not charming if and only if he is selfish.
If there is at least one people who is not available or not selfish, then Alfred is annoyed.
If someone is not annoyed and not charming, then he is both not hard-working and not available, and vice versa.
If Arvel is selfish, then Albert is annoyed and Arvel is not polite, and vice versa.
If someone is not charming, then he is both not polite and annoyed.
If there is at least one people who is not hard-working or not annoyed, then Todd is charming.
If there is someone who is both available and not selfish, then Marshall is hard-working. | Justin is charming. | contradiction |
Justin is selfish.
Albert is available.
Albert is charming.
Justin is polite.
Albert is not selfish.
Arvel is selfish.
Todd is polite.
Todd is charming.
Arvel is annoyed.
Alfred is not charming.
Justin is not available.
Albert is annoyed.Justin being charming or Marshall being not polite implies that Todd is hard-working.
If there is at least one people who is not available, then Marshall is selfish and Alfred is not annoyed.
If someone is selfish, then he is both hard-working and not charming.
All annoyed people are not selfish.
If Justin is not annoyed and Arvel is not available, then Marshall is polite.
Someone is not charming if and only if he is selfish.
If there is at least one people who is not available or not selfish, then Alfred is annoyed.
If someone is not annoyed and not charming, then he is both not hard-working and not available, and vice versa.
If Arvel is selfish, then Albert is annoyed and Arvel is not polite, and vice versa.
If someone is not charming, then he is both not polite and annoyed.
If there is at least one people who is not hard-working or not annoyed, then Todd is charming.
If there is someone who is both available and not selfish, then Marshall is hard-working. | Alfred is selfish. | self_contradiction |
Justin is selfish.
Albert is available.
Albert is charming.
Justin is polite.
Albert is not selfish.
Arvel is selfish.
Todd is polite.
Todd is charming.
Arvel is annoyed.
Alfred is not charming.
Justin is not available.
Albert is annoyed.Justin being charming or Marshall being not polite implies that Todd is hard-working.
If there is at least one people who is not available, then Marshall is selfish and Alfred is not annoyed.
If someone is selfish, then he is both hard-working and not charming.
All annoyed people are not selfish.
If Justin is not annoyed and Arvel is not available, then Marshall is polite.
Someone is not charming if and only if he is selfish.
If there is at least one people who is not available or not selfish, then Alfred is annoyed.
If someone is not annoyed and not charming, then he is both not hard-working and not available, and vice versa.
If Arvel is selfish, then Albert is annoyed and Arvel is not polite, and vice versa.
If someone is not charming, then he is both not polite and annoyed.
If there is at least one people who is not hard-working or not annoyed, then Todd is charming.
If there is someone who is both available and not selfish, then Marshall is hard-working. | Marshall is selfish. | self_contradiction |
Kathryn is famous.
Gale is cute.
Gemma is cute.
Gale is not frantic.
Kathryn is good.
Avery is not self-disciplined.
Rosie is good.
Gale is self-disciplined.
Hubert is not famous.
Culbert is frantic.
Hubert is not good.
Rosie is famous.Avery being not cute and Hubert being frantic are equivalent to Gemma being good and Rosie being not obedient.
If Gemma is not cute, then Rosie is not obedient, and vice versa.
If someone is not frantic, then he is both famous and obedient.
If Hubert is obedient and Hubert is not frantic, then Rosie is self-disciplined and Hubert is not cute.
All not obedient people are famous.
If there is someone who is not cute, then Gemma is self-disciplined.
If there is someone who is either not famous or not obedient, then Hubert is frantic.
Gemma being not obedient and Gemma being not famous imply that Gemma is not self-disciplined.
If there is someone who is both frantic and self-disciplined, then Gale is not good.
If there is someone who is famous, then Culbert is not self-disciplined.
Someone being both not frantic and not self-disciplined is equivalent to being not good.
It can be concluded that Gale is obedient and Culbert is good once knowing that Culbert is self-disciplined. | Hubert is obedient. | entailment |
Kathryn is famous.
Gale is cute.
Gemma is cute.
Gale is not frantic.
Kathryn is good.
Avery is not self-disciplined.
Rosie is good.
Gale is self-disciplined.
Hubert is not famous.
Culbert is frantic.
Hubert is not good.
Rosie is famous.Avery being not cute and Hubert being frantic are equivalent to Gemma being good and Rosie being not obedient.
If Gemma is not cute, then Rosie is not obedient, and vice versa.
If someone is not frantic, then he is both famous and obedient.
If Hubert is obedient and Hubert is not frantic, then Rosie is self-disciplined and Hubert is not cute.
All not obedient people are famous.
If there is someone who is not cute, then Gemma is self-disciplined.
If there is someone who is either not famous or not obedient, then Hubert is frantic.
Gemma being not obedient and Gemma being not famous imply that Gemma is not self-disciplined.
If there is someone who is both frantic and self-disciplined, then Gale is not good.
If there is someone who is famous, then Culbert is not self-disciplined.
Someone being both not frantic and not self-disciplined is equivalent to being not good.
It can be concluded that Gale is obedient and Culbert is good once knowing that Culbert is self-disciplined. | Hubert is not famous. | self_contradiction |
Kathryn is famous.
Gale is cute.
Gemma is cute.
Gale is not frantic.
Kathryn is good.
Avery is not self-disciplined.
Rosie is good.
Gale is self-disciplined.
Hubert is not famous.
Culbert is frantic.
Hubert is not good.
Rosie is famous.Avery being not cute and Hubert being frantic are equivalent to Gemma being good and Rosie being not obedient.
If Gemma is not cute, then Rosie is not obedient, and vice versa.
If someone is not frantic, then he is both famous and obedient.
If Hubert is obedient and Hubert is not frantic, then Rosie is self-disciplined and Hubert is not cute.
All not obedient people are famous.
If there is someone who is not cute, then Gemma is self-disciplined.
If there is someone who is either not famous or not obedient, then Hubert is frantic.
Gemma being not obedient and Gemma being not famous imply that Gemma is not self-disciplined.
If there is someone who is both frantic and self-disciplined, then Gale is not good.
If there is someone who is famous, then Culbert is not self-disciplined.
Someone being both not frantic and not self-disciplined is equivalent to being not good.
It can be concluded that Gale is obedient and Culbert is good once knowing that Culbert is self-disciplined. | Gale is not self-disciplined. | self_contradiction |
Kathryn is famous.
Gale is cute.
Gemma is cute.
Gale is not frantic.
Kathryn is good.
Avery is not self-disciplined.
Rosie is good.
Gale is self-disciplined.
Hubert is not famous.
Culbert is frantic.
Hubert is not good.
Rosie is famous.Avery being not cute and Hubert being frantic are equivalent to Gemma being good and Rosie being not obedient.
If Gemma is not cute, then Rosie is not obedient, and vice versa.
If someone is not frantic, then he is both famous and obedient.
If Hubert is obedient and Hubert is not frantic, then Rosie is self-disciplined and Hubert is not cute.
All not obedient people are famous.
If there is someone who is not cute, then Gemma is self-disciplined.
If there is someone who is either not famous or not obedient, then Hubert is frantic.
Gemma being not obedient and Gemma being not famous imply that Gemma is not self-disciplined.
If there is someone who is both frantic and self-disciplined, then Gale is not good.
If there is someone who is famous, then Culbert is not self-disciplined.
Someone being both not frantic and not self-disciplined is equivalent to being not good.
It can be concluded that Gale is obedient and Culbert is good once knowing that Culbert is self-disciplined. | Culbert is not famous. | neutral |
Kathryn is famous.
Gale is cute.
Gemma is cute.
Gale is not frantic.
Kathryn is good.
Avery is not self-disciplined.
Rosie is good.
Gale is self-disciplined.
Hubert is not famous.
Culbert is frantic.
Hubert is not good.
Rosie is famous.Avery being not cute and Hubert being frantic are equivalent to Gemma being good and Rosie being not obedient.
If Gemma is not cute, then Rosie is not obedient, and vice versa.
If someone is not frantic, then he is both famous and obedient.
If Hubert is obedient and Hubert is not frantic, then Rosie is self-disciplined and Hubert is not cute.
All not obedient people are famous.
If there is someone who is not cute, then Gemma is self-disciplined.
If there is someone who is either not famous or not obedient, then Hubert is frantic.
Gemma being not obedient and Gemma being not famous imply that Gemma is not self-disciplined.
If there is someone who is both frantic and self-disciplined, then Gale is not good.
If there is someone who is famous, then Culbert is not self-disciplined.
Someone being both not frantic and not self-disciplined is equivalent to being not good.
It can be concluded that Gale is obedient and Culbert is good once knowing that Culbert is self-disciplined. | Hubert is not frantic. | self_contradiction |
Kathryn is famous.
Gale is cute.
Gemma is cute.
Gale is not frantic.
Kathryn is good.
Avery is not self-disciplined.
Rosie is good.
Gale is self-disciplined.
Hubert is not famous.
Culbert is frantic.
Hubert is not good.
Rosie is famous.Avery being not cute and Hubert being frantic are equivalent to Gemma being good and Rosie being not obedient.
If Gemma is not cute, then Rosie is not obedient, and vice versa.
If someone is not frantic, then he is both famous and obedient.
If Hubert is obedient and Hubert is not frantic, then Rosie is self-disciplined and Hubert is not cute.
All not obedient people are famous.
If there is someone who is not cute, then Gemma is self-disciplined.
If there is someone who is either not famous or not obedient, then Hubert is frantic.
Gemma being not obedient and Gemma being not famous imply that Gemma is not self-disciplined.
If there is someone who is both frantic and self-disciplined, then Gale is not good.
If there is someone who is famous, then Culbert is not self-disciplined.
Someone being both not frantic and not self-disciplined is equivalent to being not good.
It can be concluded that Gale is obedient and Culbert is good once knowing that Culbert is self-disciplined. | Rosie is not famous. | contradiction |
Kathryn is famous.
Gale is cute.
Gemma is cute.
Gale is not frantic.
Kathryn is good.
Avery is not self-disciplined.
Rosie is good.
Gale is self-disciplined.
Hubert is not famous.
Culbert is frantic.
Hubert is not good.
Rosie is famous.Avery being not cute and Hubert being frantic are equivalent to Gemma being good and Rosie being not obedient.
If Gemma is not cute, then Rosie is not obedient, and vice versa.
If someone is not frantic, then he is both famous and obedient.
If Hubert is obedient and Hubert is not frantic, then Rosie is self-disciplined and Hubert is not cute.
All not obedient people are famous.
If there is someone who is not cute, then Gemma is self-disciplined.
If there is someone who is either not famous or not obedient, then Hubert is frantic.
Gemma being not obedient and Gemma being not famous imply that Gemma is not self-disciplined.
If there is someone who is both frantic and self-disciplined, then Gale is not good.
If there is someone who is famous, then Culbert is not self-disciplined.
Someone being both not frantic and not self-disciplined is equivalent to being not good.
It can be concluded that Gale is obedient and Culbert is good once knowing that Culbert is self-disciplined. | Kathryn is famous. | entailment |
Kathryn is famous.
Gale is cute.
Gemma is cute.
Gale is not frantic.
Kathryn is good.
Avery is not self-disciplined.
Rosie is good.
Gale is self-disciplined.
Hubert is not famous.
Culbert is frantic.
Hubert is not good.
Rosie is famous.Avery being not cute and Hubert being frantic are equivalent to Gemma being good and Rosie being not obedient.
If Gemma is not cute, then Rosie is not obedient, and vice versa.
If someone is not frantic, then he is both famous and obedient.
If Hubert is obedient and Hubert is not frantic, then Rosie is self-disciplined and Hubert is not cute.
All not obedient people are famous.
If there is someone who is not cute, then Gemma is self-disciplined.
If there is someone who is either not famous or not obedient, then Hubert is frantic.
Gemma being not obedient and Gemma being not famous imply that Gemma is not self-disciplined.
If there is someone who is both frantic and self-disciplined, then Gale is not good.
If there is someone who is famous, then Culbert is not self-disciplined.
Someone being both not frantic and not self-disciplined is equivalent to being not good.
It can be concluded that Gale is obedient and Culbert is good once knowing that Culbert is self-disciplined. | Gale is self-disciplined. | self_contradiction |
Kathryn is famous.
Gale is cute.
Gemma is cute.
Gale is not frantic.
Kathryn is good.
Avery is not self-disciplined.
Rosie is good.
Gale is self-disciplined.
Hubert is not famous.
Culbert is frantic.
Hubert is not good.
Rosie is famous.Avery being not cute and Hubert being frantic are equivalent to Gemma being good and Rosie being not obedient.
If Gemma is not cute, then Rosie is not obedient, and vice versa.
If someone is not frantic, then he is both famous and obedient.
If Hubert is obedient and Hubert is not frantic, then Rosie is self-disciplined and Hubert is not cute.
All not obedient people are famous.
If there is someone who is not cute, then Gemma is self-disciplined.
If there is someone who is either not famous or not obedient, then Hubert is frantic.
Gemma being not obedient and Gemma being not famous imply that Gemma is not self-disciplined.
If there is someone who is both frantic and self-disciplined, then Gale is not good.
If there is someone who is famous, then Culbert is not self-disciplined.
Someone being both not frantic and not self-disciplined is equivalent to being not good.
It can be concluded that Gale is obedient and Culbert is good once knowing that Culbert is self-disciplined. | Rosie is not obedient. | neutral |
Kathryn is famous.
Gale is cute.
Gemma is cute.
Gale is not frantic.
Kathryn is good.
Avery is not self-disciplined.
Rosie is good.
Gale is self-disciplined.
Hubert is not famous.
Culbert is frantic.
Hubert is not good.
Rosie is famous.Avery being not cute and Hubert being frantic are equivalent to Gemma being good and Rosie being not obedient.
If Gemma is not cute, then Rosie is not obedient, and vice versa.
If someone is not frantic, then he is both famous and obedient.
If Hubert is obedient and Hubert is not frantic, then Rosie is self-disciplined and Hubert is not cute.
All not obedient people are famous.
If there is someone who is not cute, then Gemma is self-disciplined.
If there is someone who is either not famous or not obedient, then Hubert is frantic.
Gemma being not obedient and Gemma being not famous imply that Gemma is not self-disciplined.
If there is someone who is both frantic and self-disciplined, then Gale is not good.
If there is someone who is famous, then Culbert is not self-disciplined.
Someone being both not frantic and not self-disciplined is equivalent to being not good.
It can be concluded that Gale is obedient and Culbert is good once knowing that Culbert is self-disciplined. | Gale is not frantic. | entailment |
Kathryn is famous.
Gale is cute.
Gemma is cute.
Gale is not frantic.
Kathryn is good.
Avery is not self-disciplined.
Rosie is good.
Gale is self-disciplined.
Hubert is not famous.
Culbert is frantic.
Hubert is not good.
Rosie is famous.Avery being not cute and Hubert being frantic are equivalent to Gemma being good and Rosie being not obedient.
If Gemma is not cute, then Rosie is not obedient, and vice versa.
If someone is not frantic, then he is both famous and obedient.
If Hubert is obedient and Hubert is not frantic, then Rosie is self-disciplined and Hubert is not cute.
All not obedient people are famous.
If there is someone who is not cute, then Gemma is self-disciplined.
If there is someone who is either not famous or not obedient, then Hubert is frantic.
Gemma being not obedient and Gemma being not famous imply that Gemma is not self-disciplined.
If there is someone who is both frantic and self-disciplined, then Gale is not good.
If there is someone who is famous, then Culbert is not self-disciplined.
Someone being both not frantic and not self-disciplined is equivalent to being not good.
It can be concluded that Gale is obedient and Culbert is good once knowing that Culbert is self-disciplined. | Gale is good. | contradiction |
Kathryn is famous.
Gale is cute.
Gemma is cute.
Gale is not frantic.
Kathryn is good.
Avery is not self-disciplined.
Rosie is good.
Gale is self-disciplined.
Hubert is not famous.
Culbert is frantic.
Hubert is not good.
Rosie is famous.Avery being not cute and Hubert being frantic are equivalent to Gemma being good and Rosie being not obedient.
If Gemma is not cute, then Rosie is not obedient, and vice versa.
If someone is not frantic, then he is both famous and obedient.
If Hubert is obedient and Hubert is not frantic, then Rosie is self-disciplined and Hubert is not cute.
All not obedient people are famous.
If there is someone who is not cute, then Gemma is self-disciplined.
If there is someone who is either not famous or not obedient, then Hubert is frantic.
Gemma being not obedient and Gemma being not famous imply that Gemma is not self-disciplined.
If there is someone who is both frantic and self-disciplined, then Gale is not good.
If there is someone who is famous, then Culbert is not self-disciplined.
Someone being both not frantic and not self-disciplined is equivalent to being not good.
It can be concluded that Gale is obedient and Culbert is good once knowing that Culbert is self-disciplined. | Gale is cute. | entailment |
Kathryn is famous.
Gale is cute.
Gemma is cute.
Gale is not frantic.
Kathryn is good.
Avery is not self-disciplined.
Rosie is good.
Gale is self-disciplined.
Hubert is not famous.
Culbert is frantic.
Hubert is not good.
Rosie is famous.Avery being not cute and Hubert being frantic are equivalent to Gemma being good and Rosie being not obedient.
If Gemma is not cute, then Rosie is not obedient, and vice versa.
If someone is not frantic, then he is both famous and obedient.
If Hubert is obedient and Hubert is not frantic, then Rosie is self-disciplined and Hubert is not cute.
All not obedient people are famous.
If there is someone who is not cute, then Gemma is self-disciplined.
If there is someone who is either not famous or not obedient, then Hubert is frantic.
Gemma being not obedient and Gemma being not famous imply that Gemma is not self-disciplined.
If there is someone who is both frantic and self-disciplined, then Gale is not good.
If there is someone who is famous, then Culbert is not self-disciplined.
Someone being both not frantic and not self-disciplined is equivalent to being not good.
It can be concluded that Gale is obedient and Culbert is good once knowing that Culbert is self-disciplined. | Culbert is not cute. | neutral |
Kathryn is famous.
Gale is cute.
Gemma is cute.
Gale is not frantic.
Kathryn is good.
Avery is not self-disciplined.
Rosie is good.
Gale is self-disciplined.
Hubert is not famous.
Culbert is frantic.
Hubert is not good.
Rosie is famous.Avery being not cute and Hubert being frantic are equivalent to Gemma being good and Rosie being not obedient.
If Gemma is not cute, then Rosie is not obedient, and vice versa.
If someone is not frantic, then he is both famous and obedient.
If Hubert is obedient and Hubert is not frantic, then Rosie is self-disciplined and Hubert is not cute.
All not obedient people are famous.
If there is someone who is not cute, then Gemma is self-disciplined.
If there is someone who is either not famous or not obedient, then Hubert is frantic.
Gemma being not obedient and Gemma being not famous imply that Gemma is not self-disciplined.
If there is someone who is both frantic and self-disciplined, then Gale is not good.
If there is someone who is famous, then Culbert is not self-disciplined.
Someone being both not frantic and not self-disciplined is equivalent to being not good.
It can be concluded that Gale is obedient and Culbert is good once knowing that Culbert is self-disciplined. | Avery is not self-disciplined. | entailment |
Kathryn is famous.
Gale is cute.
Gemma is cute.
Gale is not frantic.
Kathryn is good.
Avery is not self-disciplined.
Rosie is good.
Gale is self-disciplined.
Hubert is not famous.
Culbert is frantic.
Hubert is not good.
Rosie is famous.Avery being not cute and Hubert being frantic are equivalent to Gemma being good and Rosie being not obedient.
If Gemma is not cute, then Rosie is not obedient, and vice versa.
If someone is not frantic, then he is both famous and obedient.
If Hubert is obedient and Hubert is not frantic, then Rosie is self-disciplined and Hubert is not cute.
All not obedient people are famous.
If there is someone who is not cute, then Gemma is self-disciplined.
If there is someone who is either not famous or not obedient, then Hubert is frantic.
Gemma being not obedient and Gemma being not famous imply that Gemma is not self-disciplined.
If there is someone who is both frantic and self-disciplined, then Gale is not good.
If there is someone who is famous, then Culbert is not self-disciplined.
Someone being both not frantic and not self-disciplined is equivalent to being not good.
It can be concluded that Gale is obedient and Culbert is good once knowing that Culbert is self-disciplined. | Gemma is famous. | neutral |
Kathryn is famous.
Gale is cute.
Gemma is cute.
Gale is not frantic.
Kathryn is good.
Avery is not self-disciplined.
Rosie is good.
Gale is self-disciplined.
Hubert is not famous.
Culbert is frantic.
Hubert is not good.
Rosie is famous.Avery being not cute and Hubert being frantic are equivalent to Gemma being good and Rosie being not obedient.
If Gemma is not cute, then Rosie is not obedient, and vice versa.
If someone is not frantic, then he is both famous and obedient.
If Hubert is obedient and Hubert is not frantic, then Rosie is self-disciplined and Hubert is not cute.
All not obedient people are famous.
If there is someone who is not cute, then Gemma is self-disciplined.
If there is someone who is either not famous or not obedient, then Hubert is frantic.
Gemma being not obedient and Gemma being not famous imply that Gemma is not self-disciplined.
If there is someone who is both frantic and self-disciplined, then Gale is not good.
If there is someone who is famous, then Culbert is not self-disciplined.
Someone being both not frantic and not self-disciplined is equivalent to being not good.
It can be concluded that Gale is obedient and Culbert is good once knowing that Culbert is self-disciplined. | Gemma is not self-disciplined. | contradiction |
Kathryn is famous.
Gale is cute.
Gemma is cute.
Gale is not frantic.
Kathryn is good.
Avery is not self-disciplined.
Rosie is good.
Gale is self-disciplined.
Hubert is not famous.
Culbert is frantic.
Hubert is not good.
Rosie is famous.Avery being not cute and Hubert being frantic are equivalent to Gemma being good and Rosie being not obedient.
If Gemma is not cute, then Rosie is not obedient, and vice versa.
If someone is not frantic, then he is both famous and obedient.
If Hubert is obedient and Hubert is not frantic, then Rosie is self-disciplined and Hubert is not cute.
All not obedient people are famous.
If there is someone who is not cute, then Gemma is self-disciplined.
If there is someone who is either not famous or not obedient, then Hubert is frantic.
Gemma being not obedient and Gemma being not famous imply that Gemma is not self-disciplined.
If there is someone who is both frantic and self-disciplined, then Gale is not good.
If there is someone who is famous, then Culbert is not self-disciplined.
Someone being both not frantic and not self-disciplined is equivalent to being not good.
It can be concluded that Gale is obedient and Culbert is good once knowing that Culbert is self-disciplined. | Gemma is not cute. | contradiction |
Kathryn is famous.
Gale is cute.
Gemma is cute.
Gale is not frantic.
Kathryn is good.
Avery is not self-disciplined.
Rosie is good.
Gale is self-disciplined.
Hubert is not famous.
Culbert is frantic.
Hubert is not good.
Rosie is famous.Avery being not cute and Hubert being frantic are equivalent to Gemma being good and Rosie being not obedient.
If Gemma is not cute, then Rosie is not obedient, and vice versa.
If someone is not frantic, then he is both famous and obedient.
If Hubert is obedient and Hubert is not frantic, then Rosie is self-disciplined and Hubert is not cute.
All not obedient people are famous.
If there is someone who is not cute, then Gemma is self-disciplined.
If there is someone who is either not famous or not obedient, then Hubert is frantic.
Gemma being not obedient and Gemma being not famous imply that Gemma is not self-disciplined.
If there is someone who is both frantic and self-disciplined, then Gale is not good.
If there is someone who is famous, then Culbert is not self-disciplined.
Someone being both not frantic and not self-disciplined is equivalent to being not good.
It can be concluded that Gale is obedient and Culbert is good once knowing that Culbert is self-disciplined. | Hubert is famous. | self_contradiction |
Kathryn is famous.
Gale is cute.
Gemma is cute.
Gale is not frantic.
Kathryn is good.
Avery is not self-disciplined.
Rosie is good.
Gale is self-disciplined.
Hubert is not famous.
Culbert is frantic.
Hubert is not good.
Rosie is famous.Avery being not cute and Hubert being frantic are equivalent to Gemma being good and Rosie being not obedient.
If Gemma is not cute, then Rosie is not obedient, and vice versa.
If someone is not frantic, then he is both famous and obedient.
If Hubert is obedient and Hubert is not frantic, then Rosie is self-disciplined and Hubert is not cute.
All not obedient people are famous.
If there is someone who is not cute, then Gemma is self-disciplined.
If there is someone who is either not famous or not obedient, then Hubert is frantic.
Gemma being not obedient and Gemma being not famous imply that Gemma is not self-disciplined.
If there is someone who is both frantic and self-disciplined, then Gale is not good.
If there is someone who is famous, then Culbert is not self-disciplined.
Someone being both not frantic and not self-disciplined is equivalent to being not good.
It can be concluded that Gale is obedient and Culbert is good once knowing that Culbert is self-disciplined. | Culbert is cute. | neutral |
Kathryn is famous.
Gale is cute.
Gemma is cute.
Gale is not frantic.
Kathryn is good.
Avery is not self-disciplined.
Rosie is good.
Gale is self-disciplined.
Hubert is not famous.
Culbert is frantic.
Hubert is not good.
Rosie is famous.Avery being not cute and Hubert being frantic are equivalent to Gemma being good and Rosie being not obedient.
If Gemma is not cute, then Rosie is not obedient, and vice versa.
If someone is not frantic, then he is both famous and obedient.
If Hubert is obedient and Hubert is not frantic, then Rosie is self-disciplined and Hubert is not cute.
All not obedient people are famous.
If there is someone who is not cute, then Gemma is self-disciplined.
If there is someone who is either not famous or not obedient, then Hubert is frantic.
Gemma being not obedient and Gemma being not famous imply that Gemma is not self-disciplined.
If there is someone who is both frantic and self-disciplined, then Gale is not good.
If there is someone who is famous, then Culbert is not self-disciplined.
Someone being both not frantic and not self-disciplined is equivalent to being not good.
It can be concluded that Gale is obedient and Culbert is good once knowing that Culbert is self-disciplined. | Kathryn is not good. | contradiction |
Gale is good.
Alfie is good.
Alfie is nice.
Gale is dangerous.
Gale is not homely.
Alfie is not white.
Sherard is dangerous.
Randolph is good.
Sherard is good.
Bryant is homely.
Mark is not dangerous.
Alfie is homely.All not nice people are not happy.
Someone being both nice and not white is equivalent to being not dangerous.
If there is someone who is homely, then Sherard is happy.
If Sherard is not good or Alfie is happy, then Gale is not nice.
If someone is good, then he is not dangerous.
If someone is good or happy, then he is white.
Mark being not nice is equivalent to Alfie being good.
If someone who is happy is also not homely, then he is not dangerous.
Someone is not white if and only if he is not happy.
If there is at least one people who is nice or not white, then Randolph is not dangerous.
Mark being not happy is equivalent to Randolph being not homely.
If Mark is not homely, then Randolph is white. | Gale is not homely. | entailment |
Gale is good.
Alfie is good.
Alfie is nice.
Gale is dangerous.
Gale is not homely.
Alfie is not white.
Sherard is dangerous.
Randolph is good.
Sherard is good.
Bryant is homely.
Mark is not dangerous.
Alfie is homely.All not nice people are not happy.
Someone being both nice and not white is equivalent to being not dangerous.
If there is someone who is homely, then Sherard is happy.
If Sherard is not good or Alfie is happy, then Gale is not nice.
If someone is good, then he is not dangerous.
If someone is good or happy, then he is white.
Mark being not nice is equivalent to Alfie being good.
If someone who is happy is also not homely, then he is not dangerous.
Someone is not white if and only if he is not happy.
If there is at least one people who is nice or not white, then Randolph is not dangerous.
Mark being not happy is equivalent to Randolph being not homely.
If Mark is not homely, then Randolph is white. | Gale is not nice. | contradiction |
Gale is good.
Alfie is good.
Alfie is nice.
Gale is dangerous.
Gale is not homely.
Alfie is not white.
Sherard is dangerous.
Randolph is good.
Sherard is good.
Bryant is homely.
Mark is not dangerous.
Alfie is homely.All not nice people are not happy.
Someone being both nice and not white is equivalent to being not dangerous.
If there is someone who is homely, then Sherard is happy.
If Sherard is not good or Alfie is happy, then Gale is not nice.
If someone is good, then he is not dangerous.
If someone is good or happy, then he is white.
Mark being not nice is equivalent to Alfie being good.
If someone who is happy is also not homely, then he is not dangerous.
Someone is not white if and only if he is not happy.
If there is at least one people who is nice or not white, then Randolph is not dangerous.
Mark being not happy is equivalent to Randolph being not homely.
If Mark is not homely, then Randolph is white. | Mark is dangerous. | contradiction |
Gale is good.
Alfie is good.
Alfie is nice.
Gale is dangerous.
Gale is not homely.
Alfie is not white.
Sherard is dangerous.
Randolph is good.
Sherard is good.
Bryant is homely.
Mark is not dangerous.
Alfie is homely.All not nice people are not happy.
Someone being both nice and not white is equivalent to being not dangerous.
If there is someone who is homely, then Sherard is happy.
If Sherard is not good or Alfie is happy, then Gale is not nice.
If someone is good, then he is not dangerous.
If someone is good or happy, then he is white.
Mark being not nice is equivalent to Alfie being good.
If someone who is happy is also not homely, then he is not dangerous.
Someone is not white if and only if he is not happy.
If there is at least one people who is nice or not white, then Randolph is not dangerous.
Mark being not happy is equivalent to Randolph being not homely.
If Mark is not homely, then Randolph is white. | Alfie is not happy. | entailment |
Gale is good.
Alfie is good.
Alfie is nice.
Gale is dangerous.
Gale is not homely.
Alfie is not white.
Sherard is dangerous.
Randolph is good.
Sherard is good.
Bryant is homely.
Mark is not dangerous.
Alfie is homely.All not nice people are not happy.
Someone being both nice and not white is equivalent to being not dangerous.
If there is someone who is homely, then Sherard is happy.
If Sherard is not good or Alfie is happy, then Gale is not nice.
If someone is good, then he is not dangerous.
If someone is good or happy, then he is white.
Mark being not nice is equivalent to Alfie being good.
If someone who is happy is also not homely, then he is not dangerous.
Someone is not white if and only if he is not happy.
If there is at least one people who is nice or not white, then Randolph is not dangerous.
Mark being not happy is equivalent to Randolph being not homely.
If Mark is not homely, then Randolph is white. | Gale is white. | self_contradiction |
Gale is good.
Alfie is good.
Alfie is nice.
Gale is dangerous.
Gale is not homely.
Alfie is not white.
Sherard is dangerous.
Randolph is good.
Sherard is good.
Bryant is homely.
Mark is not dangerous.
Alfie is homely.All not nice people are not happy.
Someone being both nice and not white is equivalent to being not dangerous.
If there is someone who is homely, then Sherard is happy.
If Sherard is not good or Alfie is happy, then Gale is not nice.
If someone is good, then he is not dangerous.
If someone is good or happy, then he is white.
Mark being not nice is equivalent to Alfie being good.
If someone who is happy is also not homely, then he is not dangerous.
Someone is not white if and only if he is not happy.
If there is at least one people who is nice or not white, then Randolph is not dangerous.
Mark being not happy is equivalent to Randolph being not homely.
If Mark is not homely, then Randolph is white. | Bryant is white. | neutral |
Gale is good.
Alfie is good.
Alfie is nice.
Gale is dangerous.
Gale is not homely.
Alfie is not white.
Sherard is dangerous.
Randolph is good.
Sherard is good.
Bryant is homely.
Mark is not dangerous.
Alfie is homely.All not nice people are not happy.
Someone being both nice and not white is equivalent to being not dangerous.
If there is someone who is homely, then Sherard is happy.
If Sherard is not good or Alfie is happy, then Gale is not nice.
If someone is good, then he is not dangerous.
If someone is good or happy, then he is white.
Mark being not nice is equivalent to Alfie being good.
If someone who is happy is also not homely, then he is not dangerous.
Someone is not white if and only if he is not happy.
If there is at least one people who is nice or not white, then Randolph is not dangerous.
Mark being not happy is equivalent to Randolph being not homely.
If Mark is not homely, then Randolph is white. | Gale is not white. | self_contradiction |
Gale is good.
Alfie is good.
Alfie is nice.
Gale is dangerous.
Gale is not homely.
Alfie is not white.
Sherard is dangerous.
Randolph is good.
Sherard is good.
Bryant is homely.
Mark is not dangerous.
Alfie is homely.All not nice people are not happy.
Someone being both nice and not white is equivalent to being not dangerous.
If there is someone who is homely, then Sherard is happy.
If Sherard is not good or Alfie is happy, then Gale is not nice.
If someone is good, then he is not dangerous.
If someone is good or happy, then he is white.
Mark being not nice is equivalent to Alfie being good.
If someone who is happy is also not homely, then he is not dangerous.
Someone is not white if and only if he is not happy.
If there is at least one people who is nice or not white, then Randolph is not dangerous.
Mark being not happy is equivalent to Randolph being not homely.
If Mark is not homely, then Randolph is white. | Alfie is homely. | entailment |
Gale is good.
Alfie is good.
Alfie is nice.
Gale is dangerous.
Gale is not homely.
Alfie is not white.
Sherard is dangerous.
Randolph is good.
Sherard is good.
Bryant is homely.
Mark is not dangerous.
Alfie is homely.All not nice people are not happy.
Someone being both nice and not white is equivalent to being not dangerous.
If there is someone who is homely, then Sherard is happy.
If Sherard is not good or Alfie is happy, then Gale is not nice.
If someone is good, then he is not dangerous.
If someone is good or happy, then he is white.
Mark being not nice is equivalent to Alfie being good.
If someone who is happy is also not homely, then he is not dangerous.
Someone is not white if and only if he is not happy.
If there is at least one people who is nice or not white, then Randolph is not dangerous.
Mark being not happy is equivalent to Randolph being not homely.
If Mark is not homely, then Randolph is white. | Mark is not homely. | neutral |
Gale is good.
Alfie is good.
Alfie is nice.
Gale is dangerous.
Gale is not homely.
Alfie is not white.
Sherard is dangerous.
Randolph is good.
Sherard is good.
Bryant is homely.
Mark is not dangerous.
Alfie is homely.All not nice people are not happy.
Someone being both nice and not white is equivalent to being not dangerous.
If there is someone who is homely, then Sherard is happy.
If Sherard is not good or Alfie is happy, then Gale is not nice.
If someone is good, then he is not dangerous.
If someone is good or happy, then he is white.
Mark being not nice is equivalent to Alfie being good.
If someone who is happy is also not homely, then he is not dangerous.
Someone is not white if and only if he is not happy.
If there is at least one people who is nice or not white, then Randolph is not dangerous.
Mark being not happy is equivalent to Randolph being not homely.
If Mark is not homely, then Randolph is white. | Sherard is happy. | self_contradiction |
Gale is good.
Alfie is good.
Alfie is nice.
Gale is dangerous.
Gale is not homely.
Alfie is not white.
Sherard is dangerous.
Randolph is good.
Sherard is good.
Bryant is homely.
Mark is not dangerous.
Alfie is homely.All not nice people are not happy.
Someone being both nice and not white is equivalent to being not dangerous.
If there is someone who is homely, then Sherard is happy.
If Sherard is not good or Alfie is happy, then Gale is not nice.
If someone is good, then he is not dangerous.
If someone is good or happy, then he is white.
Mark being not nice is equivalent to Alfie being good.
If someone who is happy is also not homely, then he is not dangerous.
Someone is not white if and only if he is not happy.
If there is at least one people who is nice or not white, then Randolph is not dangerous.
Mark being not happy is equivalent to Randolph being not homely.
If Mark is not homely, then Randolph is white. | Mark is not white. | entailment |
Gale is good.
Alfie is good.
Alfie is nice.
Gale is dangerous.
Gale is not homely.
Alfie is not white.
Sherard is dangerous.
Randolph is good.
Sherard is good.
Bryant is homely.
Mark is not dangerous.
Alfie is homely.All not nice people are not happy.
Someone being both nice and not white is equivalent to being not dangerous.
If there is someone who is homely, then Sherard is happy.
If Sherard is not good or Alfie is happy, then Gale is not nice.
If someone is good, then he is not dangerous.
If someone is good or happy, then he is white.
Mark being not nice is equivalent to Alfie being good.
If someone who is happy is also not homely, then he is not dangerous.
Someone is not white if and only if he is not happy.
If there is at least one people who is nice or not white, then Randolph is not dangerous.
Mark being not happy is equivalent to Randolph being not homely.
If Mark is not homely, then Randolph is white. | Randolph is not nice. | contradiction |
Gale is good.
Alfie is good.
Alfie is nice.
Gale is dangerous.
Gale is not homely.
Alfie is not white.
Sherard is dangerous.
Randolph is good.
Sherard is good.
Bryant is homely.
Mark is not dangerous.
Alfie is homely.All not nice people are not happy.
Someone being both nice and not white is equivalent to being not dangerous.
If there is someone who is homely, then Sherard is happy.
If Sherard is not good or Alfie is happy, then Gale is not nice.
If someone is good, then he is not dangerous.
If someone is good or happy, then he is white.
Mark being not nice is equivalent to Alfie being good.
If someone who is happy is also not homely, then he is not dangerous.
Someone is not white if and only if he is not happy.
If there is at least one people who is nice or not white, then Randolph is not dangerous.
Mark being not happy is equivalent to Randolph being not homely.
If Mark is not homely, then Randolph is white. | Gale is not good. | contradiction |
Gale is good.
Alfie is good.
Alfie is nice.
Gale is dangerous.
Gale is not homely.
Alfie is not white.
Sherard is dangerous.
Randolph is good.
Sherard is good.
Bryant is homely.
Mark is not dangerous.
Alfie is homely.All not nice people are not happy.
Someone being both nice and not white is equivalent to being not dangerous.
If there is someone who is homely, then Sherard is happy.
If Sherard is not good or Alfie is happy, then Gale is not nice.
If someone is good, then he is not dangerous.
If someone is good or happy, then he is white.
Mark being not nice is equivalent to Alfie being good.
If someone who is happy is also not homely, then he is not dangerous.
Someone is not white if and only if he is not happy.
If there is at least one people who is nice or not white, then Randolph is not dangerous.
Mark being not happy is equivalent to Randolph being not homely.
If Mark is not homely, then Randolph is white. | Gale is good. | entailment |
Gale is good.
Alfie is good.
Alfie is nice.
Gale is dangerous.
Gale is not homely.
Alfie is not white.
Sherard is dangerous.
Randolph is good.
Sherard is good.
Bryant is homely.
Mark is not dangerous.
Alfie is homely.All not nice people are not happy.
Someone being both nice and not white is equivalent to being not dangerous.
If there is someone who is homely, then Sherard is happy.
If Sherard is not good or Alfie is happy, then Gale is not nice.
If someone is good, then he is not dangerous.
If someone is good or happy, then he is white.
Mark being not nice is equivalent to Alfie being good.
If someone who is happy is also not homely, then he is not dangerous.
Someone is not white if and only if he is not happy.
If there is at least one people who is nice or not white, then Randolph is not dangerous.
Mark being not happy is equivalent to Randolph being not homely.
If Mark is not homely, then Randolph is white. | Randolph is not good. | contradiction |
Gale is good.
Alfie is good.
Alfie is nice.
Gale is dangerous.
Gale is not homely.
Alfie is not white.
Sherard is dangerous.
Randolph is good.
Sherard is good.
Bryant is homely.
Mark is not dangerous.
Alfie is homely.All not nice people are not happy.
Someone being both nice and not white is equivalent to being not dangerous.
If there is someone who is homely, then Sherard is happy.
If Sherard is not good or Alfie is happy, then Gale is not nice.
If someone is good, then he is not dangerous.
If someone is good or happy, then he is white.
Mark being not nice is equivalent to Alfie being good.
If someone who is happy is also not homely, then he is not dangerous.
Someone is not white if and only if he is not happy.
If there is at least one people who is nice or not white, then Randolph is not dangerous.
Mark being not happy is equivalent to Randolph being not homely.
If Mark is not homely, then Randolph is white. | Sherard is dangerous. | self_contradiction |
Gale is good.
Alfie is good.
Alfie is nice.
Gale is dangerous.
Gale is not homely.
Alfie is not white.
Sherard is dangerous.
Randolph is good.
Sherard is good.
Bryant is homely.
Mark is not dangerous.
Alfie is homely.All not nice people are not happy.
Someone being both nice and not white is equivalent to being not dangerous.
If there is someone who is homely, then Sherard is happy.
If Sherard is not good or Alfie is happy, then Gale is not nice.
If someone is good, then he is not dangerous.
If someone is good or happy, then he is white.
Mark being not nice is equivalent to Alfie being good.
If someone who is happy is also not homely, then he is not dangerous.
Someone is not white if and only if he is not happy.
If there is at least one people who is nice or not white, then Randolph is not dangerous.
Mark being not happy is equivalent to Randolph being not homely.
If Mark is not homely, then Randolph is white. | Caldwell is good. | neutral |
Gale is good.
Alfie is good.
Alfie is nice.
Gale is dangerous.
Gale is not homely.
Alfie is not white.
Sherard is dangerous.
Randolph is good.
Sherard is good.
Bryant is homely.
Mark is not dangerous.
Alfie is homely.All not nice people are not happy.
Someone being both nice and not white is equivalent to being not dangerous.
If there is someone who is homely, then Sherard is happy.
If Sherard is not good or Alfie is happy, then Gale is not nice.
If someone is good, then he is not dangerous.
If someone is good or happy, then he is white.
Mark being not nice is equivalent to Alfie being good.
If someone who is happy is also not homely, then he is not dangerous.
Someone is not white if and only if he is not happy.
If there is at least one people who is nice or not white, then Randolph is not dangerous.
Mark being not happy is equivalent to Randolph being not homely.
If Mark is not homely, then Randolph is white. | Alfie is white. | self_contradiction |
Gale is good.
Alfie is good.
Alfie is nice.
Gale is dangerous.
Gale is not homely.
Alfie is not white.
Sherard is dangerous.
Randolph is good.
Sherard is good.
Bryant is homely.
Mark is not dangerous.
Alfie is homely.All not nice people are not happy.
Someone being both nice and not white is equivalent to being not dangerous.
If there is someone who is homely, then Sherard is happy.
If Sherard is not good or Alfie is happy, then Gale is not nice.
If someone is good, then he is not dangerous.
If someone is good or happy, then he is white.
Mark being not nice is equivalent to Alfie being good.
If someone who is happy is also not homely, then he is not dangerous.
Someone is not white if and only if he is not happy.
If there is at least one people who is nice or not white, then Randolph is not dangerous.
Mark being not happy is equivalent to Randolph being not homely.
If Mark is not homely, then Randolph is white. | Caldwell is not good. | neutral |
Gale is good.
Alfie is good.
Alfie is nice.
Gale is dangerous.
Gale is not homely.
Alfie is not white.
Sherard is dangerous.
Randolph is good.
Sherard is good.
Bryant is homely.
Mark is not dangerous.
Alfie is homely.All not nice people are not happy.
Someone being both nice and not white is equivalent to being not dangerous.
If there is someone who is homely, then Sherard is happy.
If Sherard is not good or Alfie is happy, then Gale is not nice.
If someone is good, then he is not dangerous.
If someone is good or happy, then he is white.
Mark being not nice is equivalent to Alfie being good.
If someone who is happy is also not homely, then he is not dangerous.
Someone is not white if and only if he is not happy.
If there is at least one people who is nice or not white, then Randolph is not dangerous.
Mark being not happy is equivalent to Randolph being not homely.
If Mark is not homely, then Randolph is white. | Caldwell is not happy. | neutral |
Vicki is helpful.
Aldis is not loyal.
Kirby is odd.
Kirby is humble.
Aldis is not sharp.
Todd is not humble.
Clifford is sharp.
Kirby is misty.
Clifford is misty.
Neil is sharp.
Aldis is not helpful.
Neil is misty.Someone who is not humble is always not helpful.
All not loyal people are odd.
If all people are not helpful, then Neil is sharp.
If someone who is not helpful is also not loyal, then he is sharp.
Someone is not loyal and not odd if and only if he is not helpful and sharp.
If there is at least one people who is both not misty and helpful, then Avery is humble.
If there is someone who is humble, then Todd is not misty.
If there is at least one people who is helpful or odd, then Aldis is humble.
Someone being odd is equivalent to being loyal.
If Aldis is not humble, then Avery is not loyal, and vice versa.
If Avery is not misty and Todd is not humble, then Neil is not sharp and Aldis is helpful, and vice versa.
If Kirby is not humble and Avery is sharp, then Aldis is not misty. | Clifford is not misty. | contradiction |
Vicki is helpful.
Aldis is not loyal.
Kirby is odd.
Kirby is humble.
Aldis is not sharp.
Todd is not humble.
Clifford is sharp.
Kirby is misty.
Clifford is misty.
Neil is sharp.
Aldis is not helpful.
Neil is misty.Someone who is not humble is always not helpful.
All not loyal people are odd.
If all people are not helpful, then Neil is sharp.
If someone who is not helpful is also not loyal, then he is sharp.
Someone is not loyal and not odd if and only if he is not helpful and sharp.
If there is at least one people who is both not misty and helpful, then Avery is humble.
If there is someone who is humble, then Todd is not misty.
If there is at least one people who is helpful or odd, then Aldis is humble.
Someone being odd is equivalent to being loyal.
If Aldis is not humble, then Avery is not loyal, and vice versa.
If Avery is not misty and Todd is not humble, then Neil is not sharp and Aldis is helpful, and vice versa.
If Kirby is not humble and Avery is sharp, then Aldis is not misty. | Avery is odd. | neutral |
Vicki is helpful.
Aldis is not loyal.
Kirby is odd.
Kirby is humble.
Aldis is not sharp.
Todd is not humble.
Clifford is sharp.
Kirby is misty.
Clifford is misty.
Neil is sharp.
Aldis is not helpful.
Neil is misty.Someone who is not humble is always not helpful.
All not loyal people are odd.
If all people are not helpful, then Neil is sharp.
If someone who is not helpful is also not loyal, then he is sharp.
Someone is not loyal and not odd if and only if he is not helpful and sharp.
If there is at least one people who is both not misty and helpful, then Avery is humble.
If there is someone who is humble, then Todd is not misty.
If there is at least one people who is helpful or odd, then Aldis is humble.
Someone being odd is equivalent to being loyal.
If Aldis is not humble, then Avery is not loyal, and vice versa.
If Avery is not misty and Todd is not humble, then Neil is not sharp and Aldis is helpful, and vice versa.
If Kirby is not humble and Avery is sharp, then Aldis is not misty. | Clifford is not sharp. | contradiction |
Vicki is helpful.
Aldis is not loyal.
Kirby is odd.
Kirby is humble.
Aldis is not sharp.
Todd is not humble.
Clifford is sharp.
Kirby is misty.
Clifford is misty.
Neil is sharp.
Aldis is not helpful.
Neil is misty.Someone who is not humble is always not helpful.
All not loyal people are odd.
If all people are not helpful, then Neil is sharp.
If someone who is not helpful is also not loyal, then he is sharp.
Someone is not loyal and not odd if and only if he is not helpful and sharp.
If there is at least one people who is both not misty and helpful, then Avery is humble.
If there is someone who is humble, then Todd is not misty.
If there is at least one people who is helpful or odd, then Aldis is humble.
Someone being odd is equivalent to being loyal.
If Aldis is not humble, then Avery is not loyal, and vice versa.
If Avery is not misty and Todd is not humble, then Neil is not sharp and Aldis is helpful, and vice versa.
If Kirby is not humble and Avery is sharp, then Aldis is not misty. | Vicki is helpful. | entailment |
Vicki is helpful.
Aldis is not loyal.
Kirby is odd.
Kirby is humble.
Aldis is not sharp.
Todd is not humble.
Clifford is sharp.
Kirby is misty.
Clifford is misty.
Neil is sharp.
Aldis is not helpful.
Neil is misty.Someone who is not humble is always not helpful.
All not loyal people are odd.
If all people are not helpful, then Neil is sharp.
If someone who is not helpful is also not loyal, then he is sharp.
Someone is not loyal and not odd if and only if he is not helpful and sharp.
If there is at least one people who is both not misty and helpful, then Avery is humble.
If there is someone who is humble, then Todd is not misty.
If there is at least one people who is helpful or odd, then Aldis is humble.
Someone being odd is equivalent to being loyal.
If Aldis is not humble, then Avery is not loyal, and vice versa.
If Avery is not misty and Todd is not humble, then Neil is not sharp and Aldis is helpful, and vice versa.
If Kirby is not humble and Avery is sharp, then Aldis is not misty. | Neil is loyal. | neutral |
Vicki is helpful.
Aldis is not loyal.
Kirby is odd.
Kirby is humble.
Aldis is not sharp.
Todd is not humble.
Clifford is sharp.
Kirby is misty.
Clifford is misty.
Neil is sharp.
Aldis is not helpful.
Neil is misty.Someone who is not humble is always not helpful.
All not loyal people are odd.
If all people are not helpful, then Neil is sharp.
If someone who is not helpful is also not loyal, then he is sharp.
Someone is not loyal and not odd if and only if he is not helpful and sharp.
If there is at least one people who is both not misty and helpful, then Avery is humble.
If there is someone who is humble, then Todd is not misty.
If there is at least one people who is helpful or odd, then Aldis is humble.
Someone being odd is equivalent to being loyal.
If Aldis is not humble, then Avery is not loyal, and vice versa.
If Avery is not misty and Todd is not humble, then Neil is not sharp and Aldis is helpful, and vice versa.
If Kirby is not humble and Avery is sharp, then Aldis is not misty. | Clifford is odd. | neutral |
Vicki is helpful.
Aldis is not loyal.
Kirby is odd.
Kirby is humble.
Aldis is not sharp.
Todd is not humble.
Clifford is sharp.
Kirby is misty.
Clifford is misty.
Neil is sharp.
Aldis is not helpful.
Neil is misty.Someone who is not humble is always not helpful.
All not loyal people are odd.
If all people are not helpful, then Neil is sharp.
If someone who is not helpful is also not loyal, then he is sharp.
Someone is not loyal and not odd if and only if he is not helpful and sharp.
If there is at least one people who is both not misty and helpful, then Avery is humble.
If there is someone who is humble, then Todd is not misty.
If there is at least one people who is helpful or odd, then Aldis is humble.
Someone being odd is equivalent to being loyal.
If Aldis is not humble, then Avery is not loyal, and vice versa.
If Avery is not misty and Todd is not humble, then Neil is not sharp and Aldis is helpful, and vice versa.
If Kirby is not humble and Avery is sharp, then Aldis is not misty. | Aldis is not helpful. | entailment |
Vicki is helpful.
Aldis is not loyal.
Kirby is odd.
Kirby is humble.
Aldis is not sharp.
Todd is not humble.
Clifford is sharp.
Kirby is misty.
Clifford is misty.
Neil is sharp.
Aldis is not helpful.
Neil is misty.Someone who is not humble is always not helpful.
All not loyal people are odd.
If all people are not helpful, then Neil is sharp.
If someone who is not helpful is also not loyal, then he is sharp.
Someone is not loyal and not odd if and only if he is not helpful and sharp.
If there is at least one people who is both not misty and helpful, then Avery is humble.
If there is someone who is humble, then Todd is not misty.
If there is at least one people who is helpful or odd, then Aldis is humble.
Someone being odd is equivalent to being loyal.
If Aldis is not humble, then Avery is not loyal, and vice versa.
If Avery is not misty and Todd is not humble, then Neil is not sharp and Aldis is helpful, and vice versa.
If Kirby is not humble and Avery is sharp, then Aldis is not misty. | Neil is misty. | entailment |
Vicki is helpful.
Aldis is not loyal.
Kirby is odd.
Kirby is humble.
Aldis is not sharp.
Todd is not humble.
Clifford is sharp.
Kirby is misty.
Clifford is misty.
Neil is sharp.
Aldis is not helpful.
Neil is misty.Someone who is not humble is always not helpful.
All not loyal people are odd.
If all people are not helpful, then Neil is sharp.
If someone who is not helpful is also not loyal, then he is sharp.
Someone is not loyal and not odd if and only if he is not helpful and sharp.
If there is at least one people who is both not misty and helpful, then Avery is humble.
If there is someone who is humble, then Todd is not misty.
If there is at least one people who is helpful or odd, then Aldis is humble.
Someone being odd is equivalent to being loyal.
If Aldis is not humble, then Avery is not loyal, and vice versa.
If Avery is not misty and Todd is not humble, then Neil is not sharp and Aldis is helpful, and vice versa.
If Kirby is not humble and Avery is sharp, then Aldis is not misty. | Kirby is misty. | entailment |
Vicki is helpful.
Aldis is not loyal.
Kirby is odd.
Kirby is humble.
Aldis is not sharp.
Todd is not humble.
Clifford is sharp.
Kirby is misty.
Clifford is misty.
Neil is sharp.
Aldis is not helpful.
Neil is misty.Someone who is not humble is always not helpful.
All not loyal people are odd.
If all people are not helpful, then Neil is sharp.
If someone who is not helpful is also not loyal, then he is sharp.
Someone is not loyal and not odd if and only if he is not helpful and sharp.
If there is at least one people who is both not misty and helpful, then Avery is humble.
If there is someone who is humble, then Todd is not misty.
If there is at least one people who is helpful or odd, then Aldis is humble.
Someone being odd is equivalent to being loyal.
If Aldis is not humble, then Avery is not loyal, and vice versa.
If Avery is not misty and Todd is not humble, then Neil is not sharp and Aldis is helpful, and vice versa.
If Kirby is not humble and Avery is sharp, then Aldis is not misty. | Aldis is not loyal. | self_contradiction |
Vicki is helpful.
Aldis is not loyal.
Kirby is odd.
Kirby is humble.
Aldis is not sharp.
Todd is not humble.
Clifford is sharp.
Kirby is misty.
Clifford is misty.
Neil is sharp.
Aldis is not helpful.
Neil is misty.Someone who is not humble is always not helpful.
All not loyal people are odd.
If all people are not helpful, then Neil is sharp.
If someone who is not helpful is also not loyal, then he is sharp.
Someone is not loyal and not odd if and only if he is not helpful and sharp.
If there is at least one people who is both not misty and helpful, then Avery is humble.
If there is someone who is humble, then Todd is not misty.
If there is at least one people who is helpful or odd, then Aldis is humble.
Someone being odd is equivalent to being loyal.
If Aldis is not humble, then Avery is not loyal, and vice versa.
If Avery is not misty and Todd is not humble, then Neil is not sharp and Aldis is helpful, and vice versa.
If Kirby is not humble and Avery is sharp, then Aldis is not misty. | Todd is helpful. | contradiction |
Vicki is helpful.
Aldis is not loyal.
Kirby is odd.
Kirby is humble.
Aldis is not sharp.
Todd is not humble.
Clifford is sharp.
Kirby is misty.
Clifford is misty.
Neil is sharp.
Aldis is not helpful.
Neil is misty.Someone who is not humble is always not helpful.
All not loyal people are odd.
If all people are not helpful, then Neil is sharp.
If someone who is not helpful is also not loyal, then he is sharp.
Someone is not loyal and not odd if and only if he is not helpful and sharp.
If there is at least one people who is both not misty and helpful, then Avery is humble.
If there is someone who is humble, then Todd is not misty.
If there is at least one people who is helpful or odd, then Aldis is humble.
Someone being odd is equivalent to being loyal.
If Aldis is not humble, then Avery is not loyal, and vice versa.
If Avery is not misty and Todd is not humble, then Neil is not sharp and Aldis is helpful, and vice versa.
If Kirby is not humble and Avery is sharp, then Aldis is not misty. | Aldis is sharp. | self_contradiction |
Vicki is helpful.
Aldis is not loyal.
Kirby is odd.
Kirby is humble.
Aldis is not sharp.
Todd is not humble.
Clifford is sharp.
Kirby is misty.
Clifford is misty.
Neil is sharp.
Aldis is not helpful.
Neil is misty.Someone who is not humble is always not helpful.
All not loyal people are odd.
If all people are not helpful, then Neil is sharp.
If someone who is not helpful is also not loyal, then he is sharp.
Someone is not loyal and not odd if and only if he is not helpful and sharp.
If there is at least one people who is both not misty and helpful, then Avery is humble.
If there is someone who is humble, then Todd is not misty.
If there is at least one people who is helpful or odd, then Aldis is humble.
Someone being odd is equivalent to being loyal.
If Aldis is not humble, then Avery is not loyal, and vice versa.
If Avery is not misty and Todd is not humble, then Neil is not sharp and Aldis is helpful, and vice versa.
If Kirby is not humble and Avery is sharp, then Aldis is not misty. | Aldis is odd. | self_contradiction |
Vicki is helpful.
Aldis is not loyal.
Kirby is odd.
Kirby is humble.
Aldis is not sharp.
Todd is not humble.
Clifford is sharp.
Kirby is misty.
Clifford is misty.
Neil is sharp.
Aldis is not helpful.
Neil is misty.Someone who is not humble is always not helpful.
All not loyal people are odd.
If all people are not helpful, then Neil is sharp.
If someone who is not helpful is also not loyal, then he is sharp.
Someone is not loyal and not odd if and only if he is not helpful and sharp.
If there is at least one people who is both not misty and helpful, then Avery is humble.
If there is someone who is humble, then Todd is not misty.
If there is at least one people who is helpful or odd, then Aldis is humble.
Someone being odd is equivalent to being loyal.
If Aldis is not humble, then Avery is not loyal, and vice versa.
If Avery is not misty and Todd is not humble, then Neil is not sharp and Aldis is helpful, and vice versa.
If Kirby is not humble and Avery is sharp, then Aldis is not misty. | Aldis is helpful. | contradiction |
Vicki is helpful.
Aldis is not loyal.
Kirby is odd.
Kirby is humble.
Aldis is not sharp.
Todd is not humble.
Clifford is sharp.
Kirby is misty.
Clifford is misty.
Neil is sharp.
Aldis is not helpful.
Neil is misty.Someone who is not humble is always not helpful.
All not loyal people are odd.
If all people are not helpful, then Neil is sharp.
If someone who is not helpful is also not loyal, then he is sharp.
Someone is not loyal and not odd if and only if he is not helpful and sharp.
If there is at least one people who is both not misty and helpful, then Avery is humble.
If there is someone who is humble, then Todd is not misty.
If there is at least one people who is helpful or odd, then Aldis is humble.
Someone being odd is equivalent to being loyal.
If Aldis is not humble, then Avery is not loyal, and vice versa.
If Avery is not misty and Todd is not humble, then Neil is not sharp and Aldis is helpful, and vice versa.
If Kirby is not humble and Avery is sharp, then Aldis is not misty. | Kirby is not loyal. | contradiction |
Vicki is helpful.
Aldis is not loyal.
Kirby is odd.
Kirby is humble.
Aldis is not sharp.
Todd is not humble.
Clifford is sharp.
Kirby is misty.
Clifford is misty.
Neil is sharp.
Aldis is not helpful.
Neil is misty.Someone who is not humble is always not helpful.
All not loyal people are odd.
If all people are not helpful, then Neil is sharp.
If someone who is not helpful is also not loyal, then he is sharp.
Someone is not loyal and not odd if and only if he is not helpful and sharp.
If there is at least one people who is both not misty and helpful, then Avery is humble.
If there is someone who is humble, then Todd is not misty.
If there is at least one people who is helpful or odd, then Aldis is humble.
Someone being odd is equivalent to being loyal.
If Aldis is not humble, then Avery is not loyal, and vice versa.
If Avery is not misty and Todd is not humble, then Neil is not sharp and Aldis is helpful, and vice versa.
If Kirby is not humble and Avery is sharp, then Aldis is not misty. | Aldis is not sharp. | self_contradiction |
Vicki is helpful.
Aldis is not loyal.
Kirby is odd.
Kirby is humble.
Aldis is not sharp.
Todd is not humble.
Clifford is sharp.
Kirby is misty.
Clifford is misty.
Neil is sharp.
Aldis is not helpful.
Neil is misty.Someone who is not humble is always not helpful.
All not loyal people are odd.
If all people are not helpful, then Neil is sharp.
If someone who is not helpful is also not loyal, then he is sharp.
Someone is not loyal and not odd if and only if he is not helpful and sharp.
If there is at least one people who is both not misty and helpful, then Avery is humble.
If there is someone who is humble, then Todd is not misty.
If there is at least one people who is helpful or odd, then Aldis is humble.
Someone being odd is equivalent to being loyal.
If Aldis is not humble, then Avery is not loyal, and vice versa.
If Avery is not misty and Todd is not humble, then Neil is not sharp and Aldis is helpful, and vice versa.
If Kirby is not humble and Avery is sharp, then Aldis is not misty. | Todd is not humble. | entailment |
Vicki is helpful.
Aldis is not loyal.
Kirby is odd.
Kirby is humble.
Aldis is not sharp.
Todd is not humble.
Clifford is sharp.
Kirby is misty.
Clifford is misty.
Neil is sharp.
Aldis is not helpful.
Neil is misty.Someone who is not humble is always not helpful.
All not loyal people are odd.
If all people are not helpful, then Neil is sharp.
If someone who is not helpful is also not loyal, then he is sharp.
Someone is not loyal and not odd if and only if he is not helpful and sharp.
If there is at least one people who is both not misty and helpful, then Avery is humble.
If there is someone who is humble, then Todd is not misty.
If there is at least one people who is helpful or odd, then Aldis is humble.
Someone being odd is equivalent to being loyal.
If Aldis is not humble, then Avery is not loyal, and vice versa.
If Avery is not misty and Todd is not humble, then Neil is not sharp and Aldis is helpful, and vice versa.
If Kirby is not humble and Avery is sharp, then Aldis is not misty. | Aldis is not odd. | self_contradiction |
Vicki is helpful.
Aldis is not loyal.
Kirby is odd.
Kirby is humble.
Aldis is not sharp.
Todd is not humble.
Clifford is sharp.
Kirby is misty.
Clifford is misty.
Neil is sharp.
Aldis is not helpful.
Neil is misty.Someone who is not humble is always not helpful.
All not loyal people are odd.
If all people are not helpful, then Neil is sharp.
If someone who is not helpful is also not loyal, then he is sharp.
Someone is not loyal and not odd if and only if he is not helpful and sharp.
If there is at least one people who is both not misty and helpful, then Avery is humble.
If there is someone who is humble, then Todd is not misty.
If there is at least one people who is helpful or odd, then Aldis is humble.
Someone being odd is equivalent to being loyal.
If Aldis is not humble, then Avery is not loyal, and vice versa.
If Avery is not misty and Todd is not humble, then Neil is not sharp and Aldis is helpful, and vice versa.
If Kirby is not humble and Avery is sharp, then Aldis is not misty. | Avery is not loyal. | neutral |
Vicki is helpful.
Aldis is not loyal.
Kirby is odd.
Kirby is humble.
Aldis is not sharp.
Todd is not humble.
Clifford is sharp.
Kirby is misty.
Clifford is misty.
Neil is sharp.
Aldis is not helpful.
Neil is misty.Someone who is not humble is always not helpful.
All not loyal people are odd.
If all people are not helpful, then Neil is sharp.
If someone who is not helpful is also not loyal, then he is sharp.
Someone is not loyal and not odd if and only if he is not helpful and sharp.
If there is at least one people who is both not misty and helpful, then Avery is humble.
If there is someone who is humble, then Todd is not misty.
If there is at least one people who is helpful or odd, then Aldis is humble.
Someone being odd is equivalent to being loyal.
If Aldis is not humble, then Avery is not loyal, and vice versa.
If Avery is not misty and Todd is not humble, then Neil is not sharp and Aldis is helpful, and vice versa.
If Kirby is not humble and Avery is sharp, then Aldis is not misty. | Kirby is not helpful. | neutral |
Hanna is worried.
Kingsley is not frail.
Carlton is worried.
Cedric is not worried.
Claude is not frail.
Blanca is frail.
Blanca is not intellectual.
Kingsley is not worried.
Hanna is frail.
Melody is intellectual.
Carlton is frail.
Hanna is not similar.If someone is not remarkable, then he is not intellectual.
If someone who is frail is also intellectual, then he is joyous.
If there is at least one people who is either not remarkable or worried, then Kingsley is similar and Carlton is joyous.
Someone being similar is equivalent to being remarkable.
Someone being both joyous and not intellectual is equivalent to being not frail.
As long as someone is frail, he is worried and not joyous.
Someone who is eithor not intellectual or worried is always not frail.
If someone is intellectual and frail, then he is both not remarkable and not similar, and vice versa.
Claude is intellectual if and only if Carlton is remarkable and Kingsley is joyous.
Carlton being not intellectual is equivalent to Cedric being not worried and Blanca being remarkable.
Someone being both not worried and not intellectual is equivalent to being joyous.
It can be concluded that Carlton is worried and Carlton is not joyous once knowing that Hanna is not remarkable. | Kingsley is not intellectual. | entailment |
Hanna is worried.
Kingsley is not frail.
Carlton is worried.
Cedric is not worried.
Claude is not frail.
Blanca is frail.
Blanca is not intellectual.
Kingsley is not worried.
Hanna is frail.
Melody is intellectual.
Carlton is frail.
Hanna is not similar.If someone is not remarkable, then he is not intellectual.
If someone who is frail is also intellectual, then he is joyous.
If there is at least one people who is either not remarkable or worried, then Kingsley is similar and Carlton is joyous.
Someone being similar is equivalent to being remarkable.
Someone being both joyous and not intellectual is equivalent to being not frail.
As long as someone is frail, he is worried and not joyous.
Someone who is eithor not intellectual or worried is always not frail.
If someone is intellectual and frail, then he is both not remarkable and not similar, and vice versa.
Claude is intellectual if and only if Carlton is remarkable and Kingsley is joyous.
Carlton being not intellectual is equivalent to Cedric being not worried and Blanca being remarkable.
Someone being both not worried and not intellectual is equivalent to being joyous.
It can be concluded that Carlton is worried and Carlton is not joyous once knowing that Hanna is not remarkable. | Hanna is frail. | self_contradiction |
Hanna is worried.
Kingsley is not frail.
Carlton is worried.
Cedric is not worried.
Claude is not frail.
Blanca is frail.
Blanca is not intellectual.
Kingsley is not worried.
Hanna is frail.
Melody is intellectual.
Carlton is frail.
Hanna is not similar.If someone is not remarkable, then he is not intellectual.
If someone who is frail is also intellectual, then he is joyous.
If there is at least one people who is either not remarkable or worried, then Kingsley is similar and Carlton is joyous.
Someone being similar is equivalent to being remarkable.
Someone being both joyous and not intellectual is equivalent to being not frail.
As long as someone is frail, he is worried and not joyous.
Someone who is eithor not intellectual or worried is always not frail.
If someone is intellectual and frail, then he is both not remarkable and not similar, and vice versa.
Claude is intellectual if and only if Carlton is remarkable and Kingsley is joyous.
Carlton being not intellectual is equivalent to Cedric being not worried and Blanca being remarkable.
Someone being both not worried and not intellectual is equivalent to being joyous.
It can be concluded that Carlton is worried and Carlton is not joyous once knowing that Hanna is not remarkable. | Blanca is not worried. | self_contradiction |
Hanna is worried.
Kingsley is not frail.
Carlton is worried.
Cedric is not worried.
Claude is not frail.
Blanca is frail.
Blanca is not intellectual.
Kingsley is not worried.
Hanna is frail.
Melody is intellectual.
Carlton is frail.
Hanna is not similar.If someone is not remarkable, then he is not intellectual.
If someone who is frail is also intellectual, then he is joyous.
If there is at least one people who is either not remarkable or worried, then Kingsley is similar and Carlton is joyous.
Someone being similar is equivalent to being remarkable.
Someone being both joyous and not intellectual is equivalent to being not frail.
As long as someone is frail, he is worried and not joyous.
Someone who is eithor not intellectual or worried is always not frail.
If someone is intellectual and frail, then he is both not remarkable and not similar, and vice versa.
Claude is intellectual if and only if Carlton is remarkable and Kingsley is joyous.
Carlton being not intellectual is equivalent to Cedric being not worried and Blanca being remarkable.
Someone being both not worried and not intellectual is equivalent to being joyous.
It can be concluded that Carlton is worried and Carlton is not joyous once knowing that Hanna is not remarkable. | Cedric is not worried. | entailment |
Hanna is worried.
Kingsley is not frail.
Carlton is worried.
Cedric is not worried.
Claude is not frail.
Blanca is frail.
Blanca is not intellectual.
Kingsley is not worried.
Hanna is frail.
Melody is intellectual.
Carlton is frail.
Hanna is not similar.If someone is not remarkable, then he is not intellectual.
If someone who is frail is also intellectual, then he is joyous.
If there is at least one people who is either not remarkable or worried, then Kingsley is similar and Carlton is joyous.
Someone being similar is equivalent to being remarkable.
Someone being both joyous and not intellectual is equivalent to being not frail.
As long as someone is frail, he is worried and not joyous.
Someone who is eithor not intellectual or worried is always not frail.
If someone is intellectual and frail, then he is both not remarkable and not similar, and vice versa.
Claude is intellectual if and only if Carlton is remarkable and Kingsley is joyous.
Carlton being not intellectual is equivalent to Cedric being not worried and Blanca being remarkable.
Someone being both not worried and not intellectual is equivalent to being joyous.
It can be concluded that Carlton is worried and Carlton is not joyous once knowing that Hanna is not remarkable. | Kingsley is not joyous. | contradiction |
Hanna is worried.
Kingsley is not frail.
Carlton is worried.
Cedric is not worried.
Claude is not frail.
Blanca is frail.
Blanca is not intellectual.
Kingsley is not worried.
Hanna is frail.
Melody is intellectual.
Carlton is frail.
Hanna is not similar.If someone is not remarkable, then he is not intellectual.
If someone who is frail is also intellectual, then he is joyous.
If there is at least one people who is either not remarkable or worried, then Kingsley is similar and Carlton is joyous.
Someone being similar is equivalent to being remarkable.
Someone being both joyous and not intellectual is equivalent to being not frail.
As long as someone is frail, he is worried and not joyous.
Someone who is eithor not intellectual or worried is always not frail.
If someone is intellectual and frail, then he is both not remarkable and not similar, and vice versa.
Claude is intellectual if and only if Carlton is remarkable and Kingsley is joyous.
Carlton being not intellectual is equivalent to Cedric being not worried and Blanca being remarkable.
Someone being both not worried and not intellectual is equivalent to being joyous.
It can be concluded that Carlton is worried and Carlton is not joyous once knowing that Hanna is not remarkable. | Cedric is remarkable. | neutral |
Hanna is worried.
Kingsley is not frail.
Carlton is worried.
Cedric is not worried.
Claude is not frail.
Blanca is frail.
Blanca is not intellectual.
Kingsley is not worried.
Hanna is frail.
Melody is intellectual.
Carlton is frail.
Hanna is not similar.If someone is not remarkable, then he is not intellectual.
If someone who is frail is also intellectual, then he is joyous.
If there is at least one people who is either not remarkable or worried, then Kingsley is similar and Carlton is joyous.
Someone being similar is equivalent to being remarkable.
Someone being both joyous and not intellectual is equivalent to being not frail.
As long as someone is frail, he is worried and not joyous.
Someone who is eithor not intellectual or worried is always not frail.
If someone is intellectual and frail, then he is both not remarkable and not similar, and vice versa.
Claude is intellectual if and only if Carlton is remarkable and Kingsley is joyous.
Carlton being not intellectual is equivalent to Cedric being not worried and Blanca being remarkable.
Someone being both not worried and not intellectual is equivalent to being joyous.
It can be concluded that Carlton is worried and Carlton is not joyous once knowing that Hanna is not remarkable. | Hanna is not similar. | entailment |
Hanna is worried.
Kingsley is not frail.
Carlton is worried.
Cedric is not worried.
Claude is not frail.
Blanca is frail.
Blanca is not intellectual.
Kingsley is not worried.
Hanna is frail.
Melody is intellectual.
Carlton is frail.
Hanna is not similar.If someone is not remarkable, then he is not intellectual.
If someone who is frail is also intellectual, then he is joyous.
If there is at least one people who is either not remarkable or worried, then Kingsley is similar and Carlton is joyous.
Someone being similar is equivalent to being remarkable.
Someone being both joyous and not intellectual is equivalent to being not frail.
As long as someone is frail, he is worried and not joyous.
Someone who is eithor not intellectual or worried is always not frail.
If someone is intellectual and frail, then he is both not remarkable and not similar, and vice versa.
Claude is intellectual if and only if Carlton is remarkable and Kingsley is joyous.
Carlton being not intellectual is equivalent to Cedric being not worried and Blanca being remarkable.
Someone being both not worried and not intellectual is equivalent to being joyous.
It can be concluded that Carlton is worried and Carlton is not joyous once knowing that Hanna is not remarkable. | Melody is remarkable. | neutral |
Hanna is worried.
Kingsley is not frail.
Carlton is worried.
Cedric is not worried.
Claude is not frail.
Blanca is frail.
Blanca is not intellectual.
Kingsley is not worried.
Hanna is frail.
Melody is intellectual.
Carlton is frail.
Hanna is not similar.If someone is not remarkable, then he is not intellectual.
If someone who is frail is also intellectual, then he is joyous.
If there is at least one people who is either not remarkable or worried, then Kingsley is similar and Carlton is joyous.
Someone being similar is equivalent to being remarkable.
Someone being both joyous and not intellectual is equivalent to being not frail.
As long as someone is frail, he is worried and not joyous.
Someone who is eithor not intellectual or worried is always not frail.
If someone is intellectual and frail, then he is both not remarkable and not similar, and vice versa.
Claude is intellectual if and only if Carlton is remarkable and Kingsley is joyous.
Carlton being not intellectual is equivalent to Cedric being not worried and Blanca being remarkable.
Someone being both not worried and not intellectual is equivalent to being joyous.
It can be concluded that Carlton is worried and Carlton is not joyous once knowing that Hanna is not remarkable. | Claude is worried. | contradiction |
Hanna is worried.
Kingsley is not frail.
Carlton is worried.
Cedric is not worried.
Claude is not frail.
Blanca is frail.
Blanca is not intellectual.
Kingsley is not worried.
Hanna is frail.
Melody is intellectual.
Carlton is frail.
Hanna is not similar.If someone is not remarkable, then he is not intellectual.
If someone who is frail is also intellectual, then he is joyous.
If there is at least one people who is either not remarkable or worried, then Kingsley is similar and Carlton is joyous.
Someone being similar is equivalent to being remarkable.
Someone being both joyous and not intellectual is equivalent to being not frail.
As long as someone is frail, he is worried and not joyous.
Someone who is eithor not intellectual or worried is always not frail.
If someone is intellectual and frail, then he is both not remarkable and not similar, and vice versa.
Claude is intellectual if and only if Carlton is remarkable and Kingsley is joyous.
Carlton being not intellectual is equivalent to Cedric being not worried and Blanca being remarkable.
Someone being both not worried and not intellectual is equivalent to being joyous.
It can be concluded that Carlton is worried and Carlton is not joyous once knowing that Hanna is not remarkable. | Cedric is worried. | contradiction |
Hanna is worried.
Kingsley is not frail.
Carlton is worried.
Cedric is not worried.
Claude is not frail.
Blanca is frail.
Blanca is not intellectual.
Kingsley is not worried.
Hanna is frail.
Melody is intellectual.
Carlton is frail.
Hanna is not similar.If someone is not remarkable, then he is not intellectual.
If someone who is frail is also intellectual, then he is joyous.
If there is at least one people who is either not remarkable or worried, then Kingsley is similar and Carlton is joyous.
Someone being similar is equivalent to being remarkable.
Someone being both joyous and not intellectual is equivalent to being not frail.
As long as someone is frail, he is worried and not joyous.
Someone who is eithor not intellectual or worried is always not frail.
If someone is intellectual and frail, then he is both not remarkable and not similar, and vice versa.
Claude is intellectual if and only if Carlton is remarkable and Kingsley is joyous.
Carlton being not intellectual is equivalent to Cedric being not worried and Blanca being remarkable.
Someone being both not worried and not intellectual is equivalent to being joyous.
It can be concluded that Carlton is worried and Carlton is not joyous once knowing that Hanna is not remarkable. | Carlton is not joyous. | self_contradiction |
Hanna is worried.
Kingsley is not frail.
Carlton is worried.
Cedric is not worried.
Claude is not frail.
Blanca is frail.
Blanca is not intellectual.
Kingsley is not worried.
Hanna is frail.
Melody is intellectual.
Carlton is frail.
Hanna is not similar.If someone is not remarkable, then he is not intellectual.
If someone who is frail is also intellectual, then he is joyous.
If there is at least one people who is either not remarkable or worried, then Kingsley is similar and Carlton is joyous.
Someone being similar is equivalent to being remarkable.
Someone being both joyous and not intellectual is equivalent to being not frail.
As long as someone is frail, he is worried and not joyous.
Someone who is eithor not intellectual or worried is always not frail.
If someone is intellectual and frail, then he is both not remarkable and not similar, and vice versa.
Claude is intellectual if and only if Carlton is remarkable and Kingsley is joyous.
Carlton being not intellectual is equivalent to Cedric being not worried and Blanca being remarkable.
Someone being both not worried and not intellectual is equivalent to being joyous.
It can be concluded that Carlton is worried and Carlton is not joyous once knowing that Hanna is not remarkable. | Kingsley is frail. | contradiction |
Hanna is worried.
Kingsley is not frail.
Carlton is worried.
Cedric is not worried.
Claude is not frail.
Blanca is frail.
Blanca is not intellectual.
Kingsley is not worried.
Hanna is frail.
Melody is intellectual.
Carlton is frail.
Hanna is not similar.If someone is not remarkable, then he is not intellectual.
If someone who is frail is also intellectual, then he is joyous.
If there is at least one people who is either not remarkable or worried, then Kingsley is similar and Carlton is joyous.
Someone being similar is equivalent to being remarkable.
Someone being both joyous and not intellectual is equivalent to being not frail.
As long as someone is frail, he is worried and not joyous.
Someone who is eithor not intellectual or worried is always not frail.
If someone is intellectual and frail, then he is both not remarkable and not similar, and vice versa.
Claude is intellectual if and only if Carlton is remarkable and Kingsley is joyous.
Carlton being not intellectual is equivalent to Cedric being not worried and Blanca being remarkable.
Someone being both not worried and not intellectual is equivalent to being joyous.
It can be concluded that Carlton is worried and Carlton is not joyous once knowing that Hanna is not remarkable. | Kingsley is not frail. | entailment |
Hanna is worried.
Kingsley is not frail.
Carlton is worried.
Cedric is not worried.
Claude is not frail.
Blanca is frail.
Blanca is not intellectual.
Kingsley is not worried.
Hanna is frail.
Melody is intellectual.
Carlton is frail.
Hanna is not similar.If someone is not remarkable, then he is not intellectual.
If someone who is frail is also intellectual, then he is joyous.
If there is at least one people who is either not remarkable or worried, then Kingsley is similar and Carlton is joyous.
Someone being similar is equivalent to being remarkable.
Someone being both joyous and not intellectual is equivalent to being not frail.
As long as someone is frail, he is worried and not joyous.
Someone who is eithor not intellectual or worried is always not frail.
If someone is intellectual and frail, then he is both not remarkable and not similar, and vice versa.
Claude is intellectual if and only if Carlton is remarkable and Kingsley is joyous.
Carlton being not intellectual is equivalent to Cedric being not worried and Blanca being remarkable.
Someone being both not worried and not intellectual is equivalent to being joyous.
It can be concluded that Carlton is worried and Carlton is not joyous once knowing that Hanna is not remarkable. | Hanna is not worried. | self_contradiction |
Hanna is worried.
Kingsley is not frail.
Carlton is worried.
Cedric is not worried.
Claude is not frail.
Blanca is frail.
Blanca is not intellectual.
Kingsley is not worried.
Hanna is frail.
Melody is intellectual.
Carlton is frail.
Hanna is not similar.If someone is not remarkable, then he is not intellectual.
If someone who is frail is also intellectual, then he is joyous.
If there is at least one people who is either not remarkable or worried, then Kingsley is similar and Carlton is joyous.
Someone being similar is equivalent to being remarkable.
Someone being both joyous and not intellectual is equivalent to being not frail.
As long as someone is frail, he is worried and not joyous.
Someone who is eithor not intellectual or worried is always not frail.
If someone is intellectual and frail, then he is both not remarkable and not similar, and vice versa.
Claude is intellectual if and only if Carlton is remarkable and Kingsley is joyous.
Carlton being not intellectual is equivalent to Cedric being not worried and Blanca being remarkable.
Someone being both not worried and not intellectual is equivalent to being joyous.
It can be concluded that Carlton is worried and Carlton is not joyous once knowing that Hanna is not remarkable. | Claude is similar. | neutral |
Hanna is worried.
Kingsley is not frail.
Carlton is worried.
Cedric is not worried.
Claude is not frail.
Blanca is frail.
Blanca is not intellectual.
Kingsley is not worried.
Hanna is frail.
Melody is intellectual.
Carlton is frail.
Hanna is not similar.If someone is not remarkable, then he is not intellectual.
If someone who is frail is also intellectual, then he is joyous.
If there is at least one people who is either not remarkable or worried, then Kingsley is similar and Carlton is joyous.
Someone being similar is equivalent to being remarkable.
Someone being both joyous and not intellectual is equivalent to being not frail.
As long as someone is frail, he is worried and not joyous.
Someone who is eithor not intellectual or worried is always not frail.
If someone is intellectual and frail, then he is both not remarkable and not similar, and vice versa.
Claude is intellectual if and only if Carlton is remarkable and Kingsley is joyous.
Carlton being not intellectual is equivalent to Cedric being not worried and Blanca being remarkable.
Someone being both not worried and not intellectual is equivalent to being joyous.
It can be concluded that Carlton is worried and Carlton is not joyous once knowing that Hanna is not remarkable. | Hanna is not frail. | self_contradiction |
Hanna is worried.
Kingsley is not frail.
Carlton is worried.
Cedric is not worried.
Claude is not frail.
Blanca is frail.
Blanca is not intellectual.
Kingsley is not worried.
Hanna is frail.
Melody is intellectual.
Carlton is frail.
Hanna is not similar.If someone is not remarkable, then he is not intellectual.
If someone who is frail is also intellectual, then he is joyous.
If there is at least one people who is either not remarkable or worried, then Kingsley is similar and Carlton is joyous.
Someone being similar is equivalent to being remarkable.
Someone being both joyous and not intellectual is equivalent to being not frail.
As long as someone is frail, he is worried and not joyous.
Someone who is eithor not intellectual or worried is always not frail.
If someone is intellectual and frail, then he is both not remarkable and not similar, and vice versa.
Claude is intellectual if and only if Carlton is remarkable and Kingsley is joyous.
Carlton being not intellectual is equivalent to Cedric being not worried and Blanca being remarkable.
Someone being both not worried and not intellectual is equivalent to being joyous.
It can be concluded that Carlton is worried and Carlton is not joyous once knowing that Hanna is not remarkable. | Cedric is similar. | neutral |
Hanna is worried.
Kingsley is not frail.
Carlton is worried.
Cedric is not worried.
Claude is not frail.
Blanca is frail.
Blanca is not intellectual.
Kingsley is not worried.
Hanna is frail.
Melody is intellectual.
Carlton is frail.
Hanna is not similar.If someone is not remarkable, then he is not intellectual.
If someone who is frail is also intellectual, then he is joyous.
If there is at least one people who is either not remarkable or worried, then Kingsley is similar and Carlton is joyous.
Someone being similar is equivalent to being remarkable.
Someone being both joyous and not intellectual is equivalent to being not frail.
As long as someone is frail, he is worried and not joyous.
Someone who is eithor not intellectual or worried is always not frail.
If someone is intellectual and frail, then he is both not remarkable and not similar, and vice versa.
Claude is intellectual if and only if Carlton is remarkable and Kingsley is joyous.
Carlton being not intellectual is equivalent to Cedric being not worried and Blanca being remarkable.
Someone being both not worried and not intellectual is equivalent to being joyous.
It can be concluded that Carlton is worried and Carlton is not joyous once knowing that Hanna is not remarkable. | Cedric is not similar. | neutral |
Hanna is worried.
Kingsley is not frail.
Carlton is worried.
Cedric is not worried.
Claude is not frail.
Blanca is frail.
Blanca is not intellectual.
Kingsley is not worried.
Hanna is frail.
Melody is intellectual.
Carlton is frail.
Hanna is not similar.If someone is not remarkable, then he is not intellectual.
If someone who is frail is also intellectual, then he is joyous.
If there is at least one people who is either not remarkable or worried, then Kingsley is similar and Carlton is joyous.
Someone being similar is equivalent to being remarkable.
Someone being both joyous and not intellectual is equivalent to being not frail.
As long as someone is frail, he is worried and not joyous.
Someone who is eithor not intellectual or worried is always not frail.
If someone is intellectual and frail, then he is both not remarkable and not similar, and vice versa.
Claude is intellectual if and only if Carlton is remarkable and Kingsley is joyous.
Carlton being not intellectual is equivalent to Cedric being not worried and Blanca being remarkable.
Someone being both not worried and not intellectual is equivalent to being joyous.
It can be concluded that Carlton is worried and Carlton is not joyous once knowing that Hanna is not remarkable. | Carlton is intellectual. | contradiction |
Hanna is worried.
Kingsley is not frail.
Carlton is worried.
Cedric is not worried.
Claude is not frail.
Blanca is frail.
Blanca is not intellectual.
Kingsley is not worried.
Hanna is frail.
Melody is intellectual.
Carlton is frail.
Hanna is not similar.If someone is not remarkable, then he is not intellectual.
If someone who is frail is also intellectual, then he is joyous.
If there is at least one people who is either not remarkable or worried, then Kingsley is similar and Carlton is joyous.
Someone being similar is equivalent to being remarkable.
Someone being both joyous and not intellectual is equivalent to being not frail.
As long as someone is frail, he is worried and not joyous.
Someone who is eithor not intellectual or worried is always not frail.
If someone is intellectual and frail, then he is both not remarkable and not similar, and vice versa.
Claude is intellectual if and only if Carlton is remarkable and Kingsley is joyous.
Carlton being not intellectual is equivalent to Cedric being not worried and Blanca being remarkable.
Someone being both not worried and not intellectual is equivalent to being joyous.
It can be concluded that Carlton is worried and Carlton is not joyous once knowing that Hanna is not remarkable. | Melody is intellectual. | entailment |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.