premise
stringlengths 923
1.41k
| hypothesis
stringlengths 11
33
| label
stringclasses 4
values |
|---|---|---|
Trent is misty.
Herbert is misty.
Nathalie is not delightful.
Tobias is sufficient.
Chapman is sufficient.
Tobias is delightful.
Eunice is misty.
Nathalie is foolish.
Ives is not foolish.
Eunice is delightful.
Trent is clear.
Ives is sufficient.Someone who is eithor not foolish or sufficient is always inner.
If someone is not delightful, then he is clear.
If Ives is not sufficient, then Tobias is not clear and Trent is not inner, and vice versa.
Someone is not misty if and only if he is inner.
Trent being not delightful implies that Ives is not clear and Tobias is sufficient.
If Chapman is sufficient and Nathalie is foolish, then Chapman is inner and Trent is misty.
Herbert is not inner if and only if Eunice is not delightful and Trent is not sufficient.
Someone who is sufficient is always both not foolish and inner.
It can be concluded that Herbert is sufficient once knowing that Chapman is not delightful or Eunice is clear.
Tobias being inner or Chapman being clear implies that Chapman is misty.
Ives being not foolish is equivalent to Eunice being not sufficient and Herbert being not clear.
If there is someone who is either not misty or sufficient, then Herbert is inner and Nathalie is not foolish. | Trent is foolish. | neutral |
Trent is misty.
Herbert is misty.
Nathalie is not delightful.
Tobias is sufficient.
Chapman is sufficient.
Tobias is delightful.
Eunice is misty.
Nathalie is foolish.
Ives is not foolish.
Eunice is delightful.
Trent is clear.
Ives is sufficient.Someone who is eithor not foolish or sufficient is always inner.
If someone is not delightful, then he is clear.
If Ives is not sufficient, then Tobias is not clear and Trent is not inner, and vice versa.
Someone is not misty if and only if he is inner.
Trent being not delightful implies that Ives is not clear and Tobias is sufficient.
If Chapman is sufficient and Nathalie is foolish, then Chapman is inner and Trent is misty.
Herbert is not inner if and only if Eunice is not delightful and Trent is not sufficient.
Someone who is sufficient is always both not foolish and inner.
It can be concluded that Herbert is sufficient once knowing that Chapman is not delightful or Eunice is clear.
Tobias being inner or Chapman being clear implies that Chapman is misty.
Ives being not foolish is equivalent to Eunice being not sufficient and Herbert being not clear.
If there is someone who is either not misty or sufficient, then Herbert is inner and Nathalie is not foolish. | Trent is sufficient. | neutral |
Trent is misty.
Herbert is misty.
Nathalie is not delightful.
Tobias is sufficient.
Chapman is sufficient.
Tobias is delightful.
Eunice is misty.
Nathalie is foolish.
Ives is not foolish.
Eunice is delightful.
Trent is clear.
Ives is sufficient.Someone who is eithor not foolish or sufficient is always inner.
If someone is not delightful, then he is clear.
If Ives is not sufficient, then Tobias is not clear and Trent is not inner, and vice versa.
Someone is not misty if and only if he is inner.
Trent being not delightful implies that Ives is not clear and Tobias is sufficient.
If Chapman is sufficient and Nathalie is foolish, then Chapman is inner and Trent is misty.
Herbert is not inner if and only if Eunice is not delightful and Trent is not sufficient.
Someone who is sufficient is always both not foolish and inner.
It can be concluded that Herbert is sufficient once knowing that Chapman is not delightful or Eunice is clear.
Tobias being inner or Chapman being clear implies that Chapman is misty.
Ives being not foolish is equivalent to Eunice being not sufficient and Herbert being not clear.
If there is someone who is either not misty or sufficient, then Herbert is inner and Nathalie is not foolish. | Tobias is not foolish. | entailment |
Trent is misty.
Herbert is misty.
Nathalie is not delightful.
Tobias is sufficient.
Chapman is sufficient.
Tobias is delightful.
Eunice is misty.
Nathalie is foolish.
Ives is not foolish.
Eunice is delightful.
Trent is clear.
Ives is sufficient.Someone who is eithor not foolish or sufficient is always inner.
If someone is not delightful, then he is clear.
If Ives is not sufficient, then Tobias is not clear and Trent is not inner, and vice versa.
Someone is not misty if and only if he is inner.
Trent being not delightful implies that Ives is not clear and Tobias is sufficient.
If Chapman is sufficient and Nathalie is foolish, then Chapman is inner and Trent is misty.
Herbert is not inner if and only if Eunice is not delightful and Trent is not sufficient.
Someone who is sufficient is always both not foolish and inner.
It can be concluded that Herbert is sufficient once knowing that Chapman is not delightful or Eunice is clear.
Tobias being inner or Chapman being clear implies that Chapman is misty.
Ives being not foolish is equivalent to Eunice being not sufficient and Herbert being not clear.
If there is someone who is either not misty or sufficient, then Herbert is inner and Nathalie is not foolish. | Tobias is foolish. | contradiction |
Trent is misty.
Herbert is misty.
Nathalie is not delightful.
Tobias is sufficient.
Chapman is sufficient.
Tobias is delightful.
Eunice is misty.
Nathalie is foolish.
Ives is not foolish.
Eunice is delightful.
Trent is clear.
Ives is sufficient.Someone who is eithor not foolish or sufficient is always inner.
If someone is not delightful, then he is clear.
If Ives is not sufficient, then Tobias is not clear and Trent is not inner, and vice versa.
Someone is not misty if and only if he is inner.
Trent being not delightful implies that Ives is not clear and Tobias is sufficient.
If Chapman is sufficient and Nathalie is foolish, then Chapman is inner and Trent is misty.
Herbert is not inner if and only if Eunice is not delightful and Trent is not sufficient.
Someone who is sufficient is always both not foolish and inner.
It can be concluded that Herbert is sufficient once knowing that Chapman is not delightful or Eunice is clear.
Tobias being inner or Chapman being clear implies that Chapman is misty.
Ives being not foolish is equivalent to Eunice being not sufficient and Herbert being not clear.
If there is someone who is either not misty or sufficient, then Herbert is inner and Nathalie is not foolish. | Nathalie is not clear. | contradiction |
Trent is misty.
Herbert is misty.
Nathalie is not delightful.
Tobias is sufficient.
Chapman is sufficient.
Tobias is delightful.
Eunice is misty.
Nathalie is foolish.
Ives is not foolish.
Eunice is delightful.
Trent is clear.
Ives is sufficient.Someone who is eithor not foolish or sufficient is always inner.
If someone is not delightful, then he is clear.
If Ives is not sufficient, then Tobias is not clear and Trent is not inner, and vice versa.
Someone is not misty if and only if he is inner.
Trent being not delightful implies that Ives is not clear and Tobias is sufficient.
If Chapman is sufficient and Nathalie is foolish, then Chapman is inner and Trent is misty.
Herbert is not inner if and only if Eunice is not delightful and Trent is not sufficient.
Someone who is sufficient is always both not foolish and inner.
It can be concluded that Herbert is sufficient once knowing that Chapman is not delightful or Eunice is clear.
Tobias being inner or Chapman being clear implies that Chapman is misty.
Ives being not foolish is equivalent to Eunice being not sufficient and Herbert being not clear.
If there is someone who is either not misty or sufficient, then Herbert is inner and Nathalie is not foolish. | Herbert is clear. | contradiction |
Trent is misty.
Herbert is misty.
Nathalie is not delightful.
Tobias is sufficient.
Chapman is sufficient.
Tobias is delightful.
Eunice is misty.
Nathalie is foolish.
Ives is not foolish.
Eunice is delightful.
Trent is clear.
Ives is sufficient.Someone who is eithor not foolish or sufficient is always inner.
If someone is not delightful, then he is clear.
If Ives is not sufficient, then Tobias is not clear and Trent is not inner, and vice versa.
Someone is not misty if and only if he is inner.
Trent being not delightful implies that Ives is not clear and Tobias is sufficient.
If Chapman is sufficient and Nathalie is foolish, then Chapman is inner and Trent is misty.
Herbert is not inner if and only if Eunice is not delightful and Trent is not sufficient.
Someone who is sufficient is always both not foolish and inner.
It can be concluded that Herbert is sufficient once knowing that Chapman is not delightful or Eunice is clear.
Tobias being inner or Chapman being clear implies that Chapman is misty.
Ives being not foolish is equivalent to Eunice being not sufficient and Herbert being not clear.
If there is someone who is either not misty or sufficient, then Herbert is inner and Nathalie is not foolish. | Nathalie is not foolish. | self_contradiction |
Trent is misty.
Herbert is misty.
Nathalie is not delightful.
Tobias is sufficient.
Chapman is sufficient.
Tobias is delightful.
Eunice is misty.
Nathalie is foolish.
Ives is not foolish.
Eunice is delightful.
Trent is clear.
Ives is sufficient.Someone who is eithor not foolish or sufficient is always inner.
If someone is not delightful, then he is clear.
If Ives is not sufficient, then Tobias is not clear and Trent is not inner, and vice versa.
Someone is not misty if and only if he is inner.
Trent being not delightful implies that Ives is not clear and Tobias is sufficient.
If Chapman is sufficient and Nathalie is foolish, then Chapman is inner and Trent is misty.
Herbert is not inner if and only if Eunice is not delightful and Trent is not sufficient.
Someone who is sufficient is always both not foolish and inner.
It can be concluded that Herbert is sufficient once knowing that Chapman is not delightful or Eunice is clear.
Tobias being inner or Chapman being clear implies that Chapman is misty.
Ives being not foolish is equivalent to Eunice being not sufficient and Herbert being not clear.
If there is someone who is either not misty or sufficient, then Herbert is inner and Nathalie is not foolish. | Nathalie is not inner. | contradiction |
Trent is misty.
Herbert is misty.
Nathalie is not delightful.
Tobias is sufficient.
Chapman is sufficient.
Tobias is delightful.
Eunice is misty.
Nathalie is foolish.
Ives is not foolish.
Eunice is delightful.
Trent is clear.
Ives is sufficient.Someone who is eithor not foolish or sufficient is always inner.
If someone is not delightful, then he is clear.
If Ives is not sufficient, then Tobias is not clear and Trent is not inner, and vice versa.
Someone is not misty if and only if he is inner.
Trent being not delightful implies that Ives is not clear and Tobias is sufficient.
If Chapman is sufficient and Nathalie is foolish, then Chapman is inner and Trent is misty.
Herbert is not inner if and only if Eunice is not delightful and Trent is not sufficient.
Someone who is sufficient is always both not foolish and inner.
It can be concluded that Herbert is sufficient once knowing that Chapman is not delightful or Eunice is clear.
Tobias being inner or Chapman being clear implies that Chapman is misty.
Ives being not foolish is equivalent to Eunice being not sufficient and Herbert being not clear.
If there is someone who is either not misty or sufficient, then Herbert is inner and Nathalie is not foolish. | Tobias is not clear. | neutral |
Trent is misty.
Herbert is misty.
Nathalie is not delightful.
Tobias is sufficient.
Chapman is sufficient.
Tobias is delightful.
Eunice is misty.
Nathalie is foolish.
Ives is not foolish.
Eunice is delightful.
Trent is clear.
Ives is sufficient.Someone who is eithor not foolish or sufficient is always inner.
If someone is not delightful, then he is clear.
If Ives is not sufficient, then Tobias is not clear and Trent is not inner, and vice versa.
Someone is not misty if and only if he is inner.
Trent being not delightful implies that Ives is not clear and Tobias is sufficient.
If Chapman is sufficient and Nathalie is foolish, then Chapman is inner and Trent is misty.
Herbert is not inner if and only if Eunice is not delightful and Trent is not sufficient.
Someone who is sufficient is always both not foolish and inner.
It can be concluded that Herbert is sufficient once knowing that Chapman is not delightful or Eunice is clear.
Tobias being inner or Chapman being clear implies that Chapman is misty.
Ives being not foolish is equivalent to Eunice being not sufficient and Herbert being not clear.
If there is someone who is either not misty or sufficient, then Herbert is inner and Nathalie is not foolish. | Eunice is not sufficient. | entailment |
Trent is misty.
Herbert is misty.
Nathalie is not delightful.
Tobias is sufficient.
Chapman is sufficient.
Tobias is delightful.
Eunice is misty.
Nathalie is foolish.
Ives is not foolish.
Eunice is delightful.
Trent is clear.
Ives is sufficient.Someone who is eithor not foolish or sufficient is always inner.
If someone is not delightful, then he is clear.
If Ives is not sufficient, then Tobias is not clear and Trent is not inner, and vice versa.
Someone is not misty if and only if he is inner.
Trent being not delightful implies that Ives is not clear and Tobias is sufficient.
If Chapman is sufficient and Nathalie is foolish, then Chapman is inner and Trent is misty.
Herbert is not inner if and only if Eunice is not delightful and Trent is not sufficient.
Someone who is sufficient is always both not foolish and inner.
It can be concluded that Herbert is sufficient once knowing that Chapman is not delightful or Eunice is clear.
Tobias being inner or Chapman being clear implies that Chapman is misty.
Ives being not foolish is equivalent to Eunice being not sufficient and Herbert being not clear.
If there is someone who is either not misty or sufficient, then Herbert is inner and Nathalie is not foolish. | Herbert is misty. | self_contradiction |
Trent is misty.
Herbert is misty.
Nathalie is not delightful.
Tobias is sufficient.
Chapman is sufficient.
Tobias is delightful.
Eunice is misty.
Nathalie is foolish.
Ives is not foolish.
Eunice is delightful.
Trent is clear.
Ives is sufficient.Someone who is eithor not foolish or sufficient is always inner.
If someone is not delightful, then he is clear.
If Ives is not sufficient, then Tobias is not clear and Trent is not inner, and vice versa.
Someone is not misty if and only if he is inner.
Trent being not delightful implies that Ives is not clear and Tobias is sufficient.
If Chapman is sufficient and Nathalie is foolish, then Chapman is inner and Trent is misty.
Herbert is not inner if and only if Eunice is not delightful and Trent is not sufficient.
Someone who is sufficient is always both not foolish and inner.
It can be concluded that Herbert is sufficient once knowing that Chapman is not delightful or Eunice is clear.
Tobias being inner or Chapman being clear implies that Chapman is misty.
Ives being not foolish is equivalent to Eunice being not sufficient and Herbert being not clear.
If there is someone who is either not misty or sufficient, then Herbert is inner and Nathalie is not foolish. | Chapman is misty. | self_contradiction |
Trent is misty.
Herbert is misty.
Nathalie is not delightful.
Tobias is sufficient.
Chapman is sufficient.
Tobias is delightful.
Eunice is misty.
Nathalie is foolish.
Ives is not foolish.
Eunice is delightful.
Trent is clear.
Ives is sufficient.Someone who is eithor not foolish or sufficient is always inner.
If someone is not delightful, then he is clear.
If Ives is not sufficient, then Tobias is not clear and Trent is not inner, and vice versa.
Someone is not misty if and only if he is inner.
Trent being not delightful implies that Ives is not clear and Tobias is sufficient.
If Chapman is sufficient and Nathalie is foolish, then Chapman is inner and Trent is misty.
Herbert is not inner if and only if Eunice is not delightful and Trent is not sufficient.
Someone who is sufficient is always both not foolish and inner.
It can be concluded that Herbert is sufficient once knowing that Chapman is not delightful or Eunice is clear.
Tobias being inner or Chapman being clear implies that Chapman is misty.
Ives being not foolish is equivalent to Eunice being not sufficient and Herbert being not clear.
If there is someone who is either not misty or sufficient, then Herbert is inner and Nathalie is not foolish. | Trent is not sufficient. | neutral |
Trent is misty.
Herbert is misty.
Nathalie is not delightful.
Tobias is sufficient.
Chapman is sufficient.
Tobias is delightful.
Eunice is misty.
Nathalie is foolish.
Ives is not foolish.
Eunice is delightful.
Trent is clear.
Ives is sufficient.Someone who is eithor not foolish or sufficient is always inner.
If someone is not delightful, then he is clear.
If Ives is not sufficient, then Tobias is not clear and Trent is not inner, and vice versa.
Someone is not misty if and only if he is inner.
Trent being not delightful implies that Ives is not clear and Tobias is sufficient.
If Chapman is sufficient and Nathalie is foolish, then Chapman is inner and Trent is misty.
Herbert is not inner if and only if Eunice is not delightful and Trent is not sufficient.
Someone who is sufficient is always both not foolish and inner.
It can be concluded that Herbert is sufficient once knowing that Chapman is not delightful or Eunice is clear.
Tobias being inner or Chapman being clear implies that Chapman is misty.
Ives being not foolish is equivalent to Eunice being not sufficient and Herbert being not clear.
If there is someone who is either not misty or sufficient, then Herbert is inner and Nathalie is not foolish. | Ives is delightful. | neutral |
Trent is misty.
Herbert is misty.
Nathalie is not delightful.
Tobias is sufficient.
Chapman is sufficient.
Tobias is delightful.
Eunice is misty.
Nathalie is foolish.
Ives is not foolish.
Eunice is delightful.
Trent is clear.
Ives is sufficient.Someone who is eithor not foolish or sufficient is always inner.
If someone is not delightful, then he is clear.
If Ives is not sufficient, then Tobias is not clear and Trent is not inner, and vice versa.
Someone is not misty if and only if he is inner.
Trent being not delightful implies that Ives is not clear and Tobias is sufficient.
If Chapman is sufficient and Nathalie is foolish, then Chapman is inner and Trent is misty.
Herbert is not inner if and only if Eunice is not delightful and Trent is not sufficient.
Someone who is sufficient is always both not foolish and inner.
It can be concluded that Herbert is sufficient once knowing that Chapman is not delightful or Eunice is clear.
Tobias being inner or Chapman being clear implies that Chapman is misty.
Ives being not foolish is equivalent to Eunice being not sufficient and Herbert being not clear.
If there is someone who is either not misty or sufficient, then Herbert is inner and Nathalie is not foolish. | Eunice is misty. | entailment |
Trent is misty.
Herbert is misty.
Nathalie is not delightful.
Tobias is sufficient.
Chapman is sufficient.
Tobias is delightful.
Eunice is misty.
Nathalie is foolish.
Ives is not foolish.
Eunice is delightful.
Trent is clear.
Ives is sufficient.Someone who is eithor not foolish or sufficient is always inner.
If someone is not delightful, then he is clear.
If Ives is not sufficient, then Tobias is not clear and Trent is not inner, and vice versa.
Someone is not misty if and only if he is inner.
Trent being not delightful implies that Ives is not clear and Tobias is sufficient.
If Chapman is sufficient and Nathalie is foolish, then Chapman is inner and Trent is misty.
Herbert is not inner if and only if Eunice is not delightful and Trent is not sufficient.
Someone who is sufficient is always both not foolish and inner.
It can be concluded that Herbert is sufficient once knowing that Chapman is not delightful or Eunice is clear.
Tobias being inner or Chapman being clear implies that Chapman is misty.
Ives being not foolish is equivalent to Eunice being not sufficient and Herbert being not clear.
If there is someone who is either not misty or sufficient, then Herbert is inner and Nathalie is not foolish. | Tobias is misty. | contradiction |
Trent is misty.
Herbert is misty.
Nathalie is not delightful.
Tobias is sufficient.
Chapman is sufficient.
Tobias is delightful.
Eunice is misty.
Nathalie is foolish.
Ives is not foolish.
Eunice is delightful.
Trent is clear.
Ives is sufficient.Someone who is eithor not foolish or sufficient is always inner.
If someone is not delightful, then he is clear.
If Ives is not sufficient, then Tobias is not clear and Trent is not inner, and vice versa.
Someone is not misty if and only if he is inner.
Trent being not delightful implies that Ives is not clear and Tobias is sufficient.
If Chapman is sufficient and Nathalie is foolish, then Chapman is inner and Trent is misty.
Herbert is not inner if and only if Eunice is not delightful and Trent is not sufficient.
Someone who is sufficient is always both not foolish and inner.
It can be concluded that Herbert is sufficient once knowing that Chapman is not delightful or Eunice is clear.
Tobias being inner or Chapman being clear implies that Chapman is misty.
Ives being not foolish is equivalent to Eunice being not sufficient and Herbert being not clear.
If there is someone who is either not misty or sufficient, then Herbert is inner and Nathalie is not foolish. | Nathalie is foolish. | self_contradiction |
Trent is misty.
Herbert is misty.
Nathalie is not delightful.
Tobias is sufficient.
Chapman is sufficient.
Tobias is delightful.
Eunice is misty.
Nathalie is foolish.
Ives is not foolish.
Eunice is delightful.
Trent is clear.
Ives is sufficient.Someone who is eithor not foolish or sufficient is always inner.
If someone is not delightful, then he is clear.
If Ives is not sufficient, then Tobias is not clear and Trent is not inner, and vice versa.
Someone is not misty if and only if he is inner.
Trent being not delightful implies that Ives is not clear and Tobias is sufficient.
If Chapman is sufficient and Nathalie is foolish, then Chapman is inner and Trent is misty.
Herbert is not inner if and only if Eunice is not delightful and Trent is not sufficient.
Someone who is sufficient is always both not foolish and inner.
It can be concluded that Herbert is sufficient once knowing that Chapman is not delightful or Eunice is clear.
Tobias being inner or Chapman being clear implies that Chapman is misty.
Ives being not foolish is equivalent to Eunice being not sufficient and Herbert being not clear.
If there is someone who is either not misty or sufficient, then Herbert is inner and Nathalie is not foolish. | Nathalie is inner. | entailment |
Trent is misty.
Herbert is misty.
Nathalie is not delightful.
Tobias is sufficient.
Chapman is sufficient.
Tobias is delightful.
Eunice is misty.
Nathalie is foolish.
Ives is not foolish.
Eunice is delightful.
Trent is clear.
Ives is sufficient.Someone who is eithor not foolish or sufficient is always inner.
If someone is not delightful, then he is clear.
If Ives is not sufficient, then Tobias is not clear and Trent is not inner, and vice versa.
Someone is not misty if and only if he is inner.
Trent being not delightful implies that Ives is not clear and Tobias is sufficient.
If Chapman is sufficient and Nathalie is foolish, then Chapman is inner and Trent is misty.
Herbert is not inner if and only if Eunice is not delightful and Trent is not sufficient.
Someone who is sufficient is always both not foolish and inner.
It can be concluded that Herbert is sufficient once knowing that Chapman is not delightful or Eunice is clear.
Tobias being inner or Chapman being clear implies that Chapman is misty.
Ives being not foolish is equivalent to Eunice being not sufficient and Herbert being not clear.
If there is someone who is either not misty or sufficient, then Herbert is inner and Nathalie is not foolish. | Chapman is sufficient. | entailment |
Trent is misty.
Herbert is misty.
Nathalie is not delightful.
Tobias is sufficient.
Chapman is sufficient.
Tobias is delightful.
Eunice is misty.
Nathalie is foolish.
Ives is not foolish.
Eunice is delightful.
Trent is clear.
Ives is sufficient.Someone who is eithor not foolish or sufficient is always inner.
If someone is not delightful, then he is clear.
If Ives is not sufficient, then Tobias is not clear and Trent is not inner, and vice versa.
Someone is not misty if and only if he is inner.
Trent being not delightful implies that Ives is not clear and Tobias is sufficient.
If Chapman is sufficient and Nathalie is foolish, then Chapman is inner and Trent is misty.
Herbert is not inner if and only if Eunice is not delightful and Trent is not sufficient.
Someone who is sufficient is always both not foolish and inner.
It can be concluded that Herbert is sufficient once knowing that Chapman is not delightful or Eunice is clear.
Tobias being inner or Chapman being clear implies that Chapman is misty.
Ives being not foolish is equivalent to Eunice being not sufficient and Herbert being not clear.
If there is someone who is either not misty or sufficient, then Herbert is inner and Nathalie is not foolish. | Chapman is not misty. | self_contradiction |
Leonard is shallow.
Glen is not aware.
Scott is not aware.
Chester is not aware.
Alvin is sexual.
Chester is not sexual.
Glen is chestnut.
Chester is reserved.
Alvin is shallow.
Laurence is not shallow.
Glen is not reserved.
Alvin is not perfect.Someone who is eithor not reserved or not chestnut is always not sexual.
If there is someone who is chestnut, then Laurence is perfect.
As long as someone is sexual, he is reserved and not perfect.
If there is nobody who is not not shallow, then Leonard is sexual.
All chestnut people are not perfect.
If Laurence is shallow, then Laurence is not sexual, and vice versa.
Someone who is not sexual is always both shallow and not perfect.
If there is at least one people who is aware, then Glen is not shallow and Alvin is not sexual.
if there is at least one people who is sexual and shallow, then Leonard is chestnut and Alvin is not reserved.
Chester being not reserved implies that Scott is perfect and Chester is not sexual.
Glen being not perfect and Scott being chestnut imply that Chester is sexual.
If someone is not sexual, then he is both not chestnut and not perfect. | Glen is sexual. | contradiction |
Leonard is shallow.
Glen is not aware.
Scott is not aware.
Chester is not aware.
Alvin is sexual.
Chester is not sexual.
Glen is chestnut.
Chester is reserved.
Alvin is shallow.
Laurence is not shallow.
Glen is not reserved.
Alvin is not perfect.Someone who is eithor not reserved or not chestnut is always not sexual.
If there is someone who is chestnut, then Laurence is perfect.
As long as someone is sexual, he is reserved and not perfect.
If there is nobody who is not not shallow, then Leonard is sexual.
All chestnut people are not perfect.
If Laurence is shallow, then Laurence is not sexual, and vice versa.
Someone who is not sexual is always both shallow and not perfect.
If there is at least one people who is aware, then Glen is not shallow and Alvin is not sexual.
if there is at least one people who is sexual and shallow, then Leonard is chestnut and Alvin is not reserved.
Chester being not reserved implies that Scott is perfect and Chester is not sexual.
Glen being not perfect and Scott being chestnut imply that Chester is sexual.
If someone is not sexual, then he is both not chestnut and not perfect. | Scott is chestnut. | neutral |
Leonard is shallow.
Glen is not aware.
Scott is not aware.
Chester is not aware.
Alvin is sexual.
Chester is not sexual.
Glen is chestnut.
Chester is reserved.
Alvin is shallow.
Laurence is not shallow.
Glen is not reserved.
Alvin is not perfect.Someone who is eithor not reserved or not chestnut is always not sexual.
If there is someone who is chestnut, then Laurence is perfect.
As long as someone is sexual, he is reserved and not perfect.
If there is nobody who is not not shallow, then Leonard is sexual.
All chestnut people are not perfect.
If Laurence is shallow, then Laurence is not sexual, and vice versa.
Someone who is not sexual is always both shallow and not perfect.
If there is at least one people who is aware, then Glen is not shallow and Alvin is not sexual.
if there is at least one people who is sexual and shallow, then Leonard is chestnut and Alvin is not reserved.
Chester being not reserved implies that Scott is perfect and Chester is not sexual.
Glen being not perfect and Scott being chestnut imply that Chester is sexual.
If someone is not sexual, then he is both not chestnut and not perfect. | Leonard is chestnut. | entailment |
Leonard is shallow.
Glen is not aware.
Scott is not aware.
Chester is not aware.
Alvin is sexual.
Chester is not sexual.
Glen is chestnut.
Chester is reserved.
Alvin is shallow.
Laurence is not shallow.
Glen is not reserved.
Alvin is not perfect.Someone who is eithor not reserved or not chestnut is always not sexual.
If there is someone who is chestnut, then Laurence is perfect.
As long as someone is sexual, he is reserved and not perfect.
If there is nobody who is not not shallow, then Leonard is sexual.
All chestnut people are not perfect.
If Laurence is shallow, then Laurence is not sexual, and vice versa.
Someone who is not sexual is always both shallow and not perfect.
If there is at least one people who is aware, then Glen is not shallow and Alvin is not sexual.
if there is at least one people who is sexual and shallow, then Leonard is chestnut and Alvin is not reserved.
Chester being not reserved implies that Scott is perfect and Chester is not sexual.
Glen being not perfect and Scott being chestnut imply that Chester is sexual.
If someone is not sexual, then he is both not chestnut and not perfect. | Hadley is chestnut. | neutral |
Leonard is shallow.
Glen is not aware.
Scott is not aware.
Chester is not aware.
Alvin is sexual.
Chester is not sexual.
Glen is chestnut.
Chester is reserved.
Alvin is shallow.
Laurence is not shallow.
Glen is not reserved.
Alvin is not perfect.Someone who is eithor not reserved or not chestnut is always not sexual.
If there is someone who is chestnut, then Laurence is perfect.
As long as someone is sexual, he is reserved and not perfect.
If there is nobody who is not not shallow, then Leonard is sexual.
All chestnut people are not perfect.
If Laurence is shallow, then Laurence is not sexual, and vice versa.
Someone who is not sexual is always both shallow and not perfect.
If there is at least one people who is aware, then Glen is not shallow and Alvin is not sexual.
if there is at least one people who is sexual and shallow, then Leonard is chestnut and Alvin is not reserved.
Chester being not reserved implies that Scott is perfect and Chester is not sexual.
Glen being not perfect and Scott being chestnut imply that Chester is sexual.
If someone is not sexual, then he is both not chestnut and not perfect. | Scott is not aware. | entailment |
Leonard is shallow.
Glen is not aware.
Scott is not aware.
Chester is not aware.
Alvin is sexual.
Chester is not sexual.
Glen is chestnut.
Chester is reserved.
Alvin is shallow.
Laurence is not shallow.
Glen is not reserved.
Alvin is not perfect.Someone who is eithor not reserved or not chestnut is always not sexual.
If there is someone who is chestnut, then Laurence is perfect.
As long as someone is sexual, he is reserved and not perfect.
If there is nobody who is not not shallow, then Leonard is sexual.
All chestnut people are not perfect.
If Laurence is shallow, then Laurence is not sexual, and vice versa.
Someone who is not sexual is always both shallow and not perfect.
If there is at least one people who is aware, then Glen is not shallow and Alvin is not sexual.
if there is at least one people who is sexual and shallow, then Leonard is chestnut and Alvin is not reserved.
Chester being not reserved implies that Scott is perfect and Chester is not sexual.
Glen being not perfect and Scott being chestnut imply that Chester is sexual.
If someone is not sexual, then he is both not chestnut and not perfect. | Alvin is not sexual. | self_contradiction |
Leonard is shallow.
Glen is not aware.
Scott is not aware.
Chester is not aware.
Alvin is sexual.
Chester is not sexual.
Glen is chestnut.
Chester is reserved.
Alvin is shallow.
Laurence is not shallow.
Glen is not reserved.
Alvin is not perfect.Someone who is eithor not reserved or not chestnut is always not sexual.
If there is someone who is chestnut, then Laurence is perfect.
As long as someone is sexual, he is reserved and not perfect.
If there is nobody who is not not shallow, then Leonard is sexual.
All chestnut people are not perfect.
If Laurence is shallow, then Laurence is not sexual, and vice versa.
Someone who is not sexual is always both shallow and not perfect.
If there is at least one people who is aware, then Glen is not shallow and Alvin is not sexual.
if there is at least one people who is sexual and shallow, then Leonard is chestnut and Alvin is not reserved.
Chester being not reserved implies that Scott is perfect and Chester is not sexual.
Glen being not perfect and Scott being chestnut imply that Chester is sexual.
If someone is not sexual, then he is both not chestnut and not perfect. | Hadley is not reserved. | neutral |
Leonard is shallow.
Glen is not aware.
Scott is not aware.
Chester is not aware.
Alvin is sexual.
Chester is not sexual.
Glen is chestnut.
Chester is reserved.
Alvin is shallow.
Laurence is not shallow.
Glen is not reserved.
Alvin is not perfect.Someone who is eithor not reserved or not chestnut is always not sexual.
If there is someone who is chestnut, then Laurence is perfect.
As long as someone is sexual, he is reserved and not perfect.
If there is nobody who is not not shallow, then Leonard is sexual.
All chestnut people are not perfect.
If Laurence is shallow, then Laurence is not sexual, and vice versa.
Someone who is not sexual is always both shallow and not perfect.
If there is at least one people who is aware, then Glen is not shallow and Alvin is not sexual.
if there is at least one people who is sexual and shallow, then Leonard is chestnut and Alvin is not reserved.
Chester being not reserved implies that Scott is perfect and Chester is not sexual.
Glen being not perfect and Scott being chestnut imply that Chester is sexual.
If someone is not sexual, then he is both not chestnut and not perfect. | Glen is not chestnut. | self_contradiction |
Leonard is shallow.
Glen is not aware.
Scott is not aware.
Chester is not aware.
Alvin is sexual.
Chester is not sexual.
Glen is chestnut.
Chester is reserved.
Alvin is shallow.
Laurence is not shallow.
Glen is not reserved.
Alvin is not perfect.Someone who is eithor not reserved or not chestnut is always not sexual.
If there is someone who is chestnut, then Laurence is perfect.
As long as someone is sexual, he is reserved and not perfect.
If there is nobody who is not not shallow, then Leonard is sexual.
All chestnut people are not perfect.
If Laurence is shallow, then Laurence is not sexual, and vice versa.
Someone who is not sexual is always both shallow and not perfect.
If there is at least one people who is aware, then Glen is not shallow and Alvin is not sexual.
if there is at least one people who is sexual and shallow, then Leonard is chestnut and Alvin is not reserved.
Chester being not reserved implies that Scott is perfect and Chester is not sexual.
Glen being not perfect and Scott being chestnut imply that Chester is sexual.
If someone is not sexual, then he is both not chestnut and not perfect. | Alvin is sexual. | self_contradiction |
Leonard is shallow.
Glen is not aware.
Scott is not aware.
Chester is not aware.
Alvin is sexual.
Chester is not sexual.
Glen is chestnut.
Chester is reserved.
Alvin is shallow.
Laurence is not shallow.
Glen is not reserved.
Alvin is not perfect.Someone who is eithor not reserved or not chestnut is always not sexual.
If there is someone who is chestnut, then Laurence is perfect.
As long as someone is sexual, he is reserved and not perfect.
If there is nobody who is not not shallow, then Leonard is sexual.
All chestnut people are not perfect.
If Laurence is shallow, then Laurence is not sexual, and vice versa.
Someone who is not sexual is always both shallow and not perfect.
If there is at least one people who is aware, then Glen is not shallow and Alvin is not sexual.
if there is at least one people who is sexual and shallow, then Leonard is chestnut and Alvin is not reserved.
Chester being not reserved implies that Scott is perfect and Chester is not sexual.
Glen being not perfect and Scott being chestnut imply that Chester is sexual.
If someone is not sexual, then he is both not chestnut and not perfect. | Alvin is reserved. | self_contradiction |
Leonard is shallow.
Glen is not aware.
Scott is not aware.
Chester is not aware.
Alvin is sexual.
Chester is not sexual.
Glen is chestnut.
Chester is reserved.
Alvin is shallow.
Laurence is not shallow.
Glen is not reserved.
Alvin is not perfect.Someone who is eithor not reserved or not chestnut is always not sexual.
If there is someone who is chestnut, then Laurence is perfect.
As long as someone is sexual, he is reserved and not perfect.
If there is nobody who is not not shallow, then Leonard is sexual.
All chestnut people are not perfect.
If Laurence is shallow, then Laurence is not sexual, and vice versa.
Someone who is not sexual is always both shallow and not perfect.
If there is at least one people who is aware, then Glen is not shallow and Alvin is not sexual.
if there is at least one people who is sexual and shallow, then Leonard is chestnut and Alvin is not reserved.
Chester being not reserved implies that Scott is perfect and Chester is not sexual.
Glen being not perfect and Scott being chestnut imply that Chester is sexual.
If someone is not sexual, then he is both not chestnut and not perfect. | Chester is not chestnut. | entailment |
Leonard is shallow.
Glen is not aware.
Scott is not aware.
Chester is not aware.
Alvin is sexual.
Chester is not sexual.
Glen is chestnut.
Chester is reserved.
Alvin is shallow.
Laurence is not shallow.
Glen is not reserved.
Alvin is not perfect.Someone who is eithor not reserved or not chestnut is always not sexual.
If there is someone who is chestnut, then Laurence is perfect.
As long as someone is sexual, he is reserved and not perfect.
If there is nobody who is not not shallow, then Leonard is sexual.
All chestnut people are not perfect.
If Laurence is shallow, then Laurence is not sexual, and vice versa.
Someone who is not sexual is always both shallow and not perfect.
If there is at least one people who is aware, then Glen is not shallow and Alvin is not sexual.
if there is at least one people who is sexual and shallow, then Leonard is chestnut and Alvin is not reserved.
Chester being not reserved implies that Scott is perfect and Chester is not sexual.
Glen being not perfect and Scott being chestnut imply that Chester is sexual.
If someone is not sexual, then he is both not chestnut and not perfect. | Scott is not shallow. | neutral |
Leonard is shallow.
Glen is not aware.
Scott is not aware.
Chester is not aware.
Alvin is sexual.
Chester is not sexual.
Glen is chestnut.
Chester is reserved.
Alvin is shallow.
Laurence is not shallow.
Glen is not reserved.
Alvin is not perfect.Someone who is eithor not reserved or not chestnut is always not sexual.
If there is someone who is chestnut, then Laurence is perfect.
As long as someone is sexual, he is reserved and not perfect.
If there is nobody who is not not shallow, then Leonard is sexual.
All chestnut people are not perfect.
If Laurence is shallow, then Laurence is not sexual, and vice versa.
Someone who is not sexual is always both shallow and not perfect.
If there is at least one people who is aware, then Glen is not shallow and Alvin is not sexual.
if there is at least one people who is sexual and shallow, then Leonard is chestnut and Alvin is not reserved.
Chester being not reserved implies that Scott is perfect and Chester is not sexual.
Glen being not perfect and Scott being chestnut imply that Chester is sexual.
If someone is not sexual, then he is both not chestnut and not perfect. | Leonard is perfect. | contradiction |
Leonard is shallow.
Glen is not aware.
Scott is not aware.
Chester is not aware.
Alvin is sexual.
Chester is not sexual.
Glen is chestnut.
Chester is reserved.
Alvin is shallow.
Laurence is not shallow.
Glen is not reserved.
Alvin is not perfect.Someone who is eithor not reserved or not chestnut is always not sexual.
If there is someone who is chestnut, then Laurence is perfect.
As long as someone is sexual, he is reserved and not perfect.
If there is nobody who is not not shallow, then Leonard is sexual.
All chestnut people are not perfect.
If Laurence is shallow, then Laurence is not sexual, and vice versa.
Someone who is not sexual is always both shallow and not perfect.
If there is at least one people who is aware, then Glen is not shallow and Alvin is not sexual.
if there is at least one people who is sexual and shallow, then Leonard is chestnut and Alvin is not reserved.
Chester being not reserved implies that Scott is perfect and Chester is not sexual.
Glen being not perfect and Scott being chestnut imply that Chester is sexual.
If someone is not sexual, then he is both not chestnut and not perfect. | Alvin is perfect. | contradiction |
Leonard is shallow.
Glen is not aware.
Scott is not aware.
Chester is not aware.
Alvin is sexual.
Chester is not sexual.
Glen is chestnut.
Chester is reserved.
Alvin is shallow.
Laurence is not shallow.
Glen is not reserved.
Alvin is not perfect.Someone who is eithor not reserved or not chestnut is always not sexual.
If there is someone who is chestnut, then Laurence is perfect.
As long as someone is sexual, he is reserved and not perfect.
If there is nobody who is not not shallow, then Leonard is sexual.
All chestnut people are not perfect.
If Laurence is shallow, then Laurence is not sexual, and vice versa.
Someone who is not sexual is always both shallow and not perfect.
If there is at least one people who is aware, then Glen is not shallow and Alvin is not sexual.
if there is at least one people who is sexual and shallow, then Leonard is chestnut and Alvin is not reserved.
Chester being not reserved implies that Scott is perfect and Chester is not sexual.
Glen being not perfect and Scott being chestnut imply that Chester is sexual.
If someone is not sexual, then he is both not chestnut and not perfect. | Alvin is not chestnut. | entailment |
Leonard is shallow.
Glen is not aware.
Scott is not aware.
Chester is not aware.
Alvin is sexual.
Chester is not sexual.
Glen is chestnut.
Chester is reserved.
Alvin is shallow.
Laurence is not shallow.
Glen is not reserved.
Alvin is not perfect.Someone who is eithor not reserved or not chestnut is always not sexual.
If there is someone who is chestnut, then Laurence is perfect.
As long as someone is sexual, he is reserved and not perfect.
If there is nobody who is not not shallow, then Leonard is sexual.
All chestnut people are not perfect.
If Laurence is shallow, then Laurence is not sexual, and vice versa.
Someone who is not sexual is always both shallow and not perfect.
If there is at least one people who is aware, then Glen is not shallow and Alvin is not sexual.
if there is at least one people who is sexual and shallow, then Leonard is chestnut and Alvin is not reserved.
Chester being not reserved implies that Scott is perfect and Chester is not sexual.
Glen being not perfect and Scott being chestnut imply that Chester is sexual.
If someone is not sexual, then he is both not chestnut and not perfect. | Laurence is not shallow. | entailment |
Leonard is shallow.
Glen is not aware.
Scott is not aware.
Chester is not aware.
Alvin is sexual.
Chester is not sexual.
Glen is chestnut.
Chester is reserved.
Alvin is shallow.
Laurence is not shallow.
Glen is not reserved.
Alvin is not perfect.Someone who is eithor not reserved or not chestnut is always not sexual.
If there is someone who is chestnut, then Laurence is perfect.
As long as someone is sexual, he is reserved and not perfect.
If there is nobody who is not not shallow, then Leonard is sexual.
All chestnut people are not perfect.
If Laurence is shallow, then Laurence is not sexual, and vice versa.
Someone who is not sexual is always both shallow and not perfect.
If there is at least one people who is aware, then Glen is not shallow and Alvin is not sexual.
if there is at least one people who is sexual and shallow, then Leonard is chestnut and Alvin is not reserved.
Chester being not reserved implies that Scott is perfect and Chester is not sexual.
Glen being not perfect and Scott being chestnut imply that Chester is sexual.
If someone is not sexual, then he is both not chestnut and not perfect. | Glen is chestnut. | self_contradiction |
Leonard is shallow.
Glen is not aware.
Scott is not aware.
Chester is not aware.
Alvin is sexual.
Chester is not sexual.
Glen is chestnut.
Chester is reserved.
Alvin is shallow.
Laurence is not shallow.
Glen is not reserved.
Alvin is not perfect.Someone who is eithor not reserved or not chestnut is always not sexual.
If there is someone who is chestnut, then Laurence is perfect.
As long as someone is sexual, he is reserved and not perfect.
If there is nobody who is not not shallow, then Leonard is sexual.
All chestnut people are not perfect.
If Laurence is shallow, then Laurence is not sexual, and vice versa.
Someone who is not sexual is always both shallow and not perfect.
If there is at least one people who is aware, then Glen is not shallow and Alvin is not sexual.
if there is at least one people who is sexual and shallow, then Leonard is chestnut and Alvin is not reserved.
Chester being not reserved implies that Scott is perfect and Chester is not sexual.
Glen being not perfect and Scott being chestnut imply that Chester is sexual.
If someone is not sexual, then he is both not chestnut and not perfect. | Laurence is shallow. | contradiction |
Leonard is shallow.
Glen is not aware.
Scott is not aware.
Chester is not aware.
Alvin is sexual.
Chester is not sexual.
Glen is chestnut.
Chester is reserved.
Alvin is shallow.
Laurence is not shallow.
Glen is not reserved.
Alvin is not perfect.Someone who is eithor not reserved or not chestnut is always not sexual.
If there is someone who is chestnut, then Laurence is perfect.
As long as someone is sexual, he is reserved and not perfect.
If there is nobody who is not not shallow, then Leonard is sexual.
All chestnut people are not perfect.
If Laurence is shallow, then Laurence is not sexual, and vice versa.
Someone who is not sexual is always both shallow and not perfect.
If there is at least one people who is aware, then Glen is not shallow and Alvin is not sexual.
if there is at least one people who is sexual and shallow, then Leonard is chestnut and Alvin is not reserved.
Chester being not reserved implies that Scott is perfect and Chester is not sexual.
Glen being not perfect and Scott being chestnut imply that Chester is sexual.
If someone is not sexual, then he is both not chestnut and not perfect. | Hadley is perfect. | neutral |
Leonard is shallow.
Glen is not aware.
Scott is not aware.
Chester is not aware.
Alvin is sexual.
Chester is not sexual.
Glen is chestnut.
Chester is reserved.
Alvin is shallow.
Laurence is not shallow.
Glen is not reserved.
Alvin is not perfect.Someone who is eithor not reserved or not chestnut is always not sexual.
If there is someone who is chestnut, then Laurence is perfect.
As long as someone is sexual, he is reserved and not perfect.
If there is nobody who is not not shallow, then Leonard is sexual.
All chestnut people are not perfect.
If Laurence is shallow, then Laurence is not sexual, and vice versa.
Someone who is not sexual is always both shallow and not perfect.
If there is at least one people who is aware, then Glen is not shallow and Alvin is not sexual.
if there is at least one people who is sexual and shallow, then Leonard is chestnut and Alvin is not reserved.
Chester being not reserved implies that Scott is perfect and Chester is not sexual.
Glen being not perfect and Scott being chestnut imply that Chester is sexual.
If someone is not sexual, then he is both not chestnut and not perfect. | Glen is aware. | contradiction |
Hunter is not united.
Lars is not impressive.
Lars is not tired.
Kent is not impressive.
Claudia is not tense.
Hunter is puzzled.
Norman is puzzled.
Kent is not united.
Kent is puzzled.
Marion is not impressive.
Hunter is not helpless.
Marion is not tense.Someone being both helpless and not puzzled is equivalent to being not tense.
Hunter being tense implies that Norman is united and Hunter is impressive.
If there is nobody who is not not tense, then Alfred is not puzzled and Claudia is impressive.
Lars being united and Claudia being tense imply that Marion is not impressive.
It can be concluded that Norman is not tense and Marion is tired once knowing that Claudia is united.
Lars being impressive is equivalent to Lars being not tired.
If there is at least one people who is not impressive, then Marion is not helpless.
If Hunter is not tired, then Alfred is not tense and Hunter is not united.
If there is at least one people who is united or not impressive, then Hunter is not tense.
Someone is helpless and not puzzled if and only if he is tired and not impressive.
If someone is not tired, then he is both not puzzled and helpless.
If Claudia is not united or Claudia is not tired, then Marion is not impressive. | Norman is united. | neutral |
Hunter is not united.
Lars is not impressive.
Lars is not tired.
Kent is not impressive.
Claudia is not tense.
Hunter is puzzled.
Norman is puzzled.
Kent is not united.
Kent is puzzled.
Marion is not impressive.
Hunter is not helpless.
Marion is not tense.Someone being both helpless and not puzzled is equivalent to being not tense.
Hunter being tense implies that Norman is united and Hunter is impressive.
If there is nobody who is not not tense, then Alfred is not puzzled and Claudia is impressive.
Lars being united and Claudia being tense imply that Marion is not impressive.
It can be concluded that Norman is not tense and Marion is tired once knowing that Claudia is united.
Lars being impressive is equivalent to Lars being not tired.
If there is at least one people who is not impressive, then Marion is not helpless.
If Hunter is not tired, then Alfred is not tense and Hunter is not united.
If there is at least one people who is united or not impressive, then Hunter is not tense.
Someone is helpless and not puzzled if and only if he is tired and not impressive.
If someone is not tired, then he is both not puzzled and helpless.
If Claudia is not united or Claudia is not tired, then Marion is not impressive. | Claudia is not tired. | contradiction |
Hunter is not united.
Lars is not impressive.
Lars is not tired.
Kent is not impressive.
Claudia is not tense.
Hunter is puzzled.
Norman is puzzled.
Kent is not united.
Kent is puzzled.
Marion is not impressive.
Hunter is not helpless.
Marion is not tense.Someone being both helpless and not puzzled is equivalent to being not tense.
Hunter being tense implies that Norman is united and Hunter is impressive.
If there is nobody who is not not tense, then Alfred is not puzzled and Claudia is impressive.
Lars being united and Claudia being tense imply that Marion is not impressive.
It can be concluded that Norman is not tense and Marion is tired once knowing that Claudia is united.
Lars being impressive is equivalent to Lars being not tired.
If there is at least one people who is not impressive, then Marion is not helpless.
If Hunter is not tired, then Alfred is not tense and Hunter is not united.
If there is at least one people who is united or not impressive, then Hunter is not tense.
Someone is helpless and not puzzled if and only if he is tired and not impressive.
If someone is not tired, then he is both not puzzled and helpless.
If Claudia is not united or Claudia is not tired, then Marion is not impressive. | Hunter is not tense. | entailment |
Hunter is not united.
Lars is not impressive.
Lars is not tired.
Kent is not impressive.
Claudia is not tense.
Hunter is puzzled.
Norman is puzzled.
Kent is not united.
Kent is puzzled.
Marion is not impressive.
Hunter is not helpless.
Marion is not tense.Someone being both helpless and not puzzled is equivalent to being not tense.
Hunter being tense implies that Norman is united and Hunter is impressive.
If there is nobody who is not not tense, then Alfred is not puzzled and Claudia is impressive.
Lars being united and Claudia being tense imply that Marion is not impressive.
It can be concluded that Norman is not tense and Marion is tired once knowing that Claudia is united.
Lars being impressive is equivalent to Lars being not tired.
If there is at least one people who is not impressive, then Marion is not helpless.
If Hunter is not tired, then Alfred is not tense and Hunter is not united.
If there is at least one people who is united or not impressive, then Hunter is not tense.
Someone is helpless and not puzzled if and only if he is tired and not impressive.
If someone is not tired, then he is both not puzzled and helpless.
If Claudia is not united or Claudia is not tired, then Marion is not impressive. | Claudia is not tense. | entailment |
Hunter is not united.
Lars is not impressive.
Lars is not tired.
Kent is not impressive.
Claudia is not tense.
Hunter is puzzled.
Norman is puzzled.
Kent is not united.
Kent is puzzled.
Marion is not impressive.
Hunter is not helpless.
Marion is not tense.Someone being both helpless and not puzzled is equivalent to being not tense.
Hunter being tense implies that Norman is united and Hunter is impressive.
If there is nobody who is not not tense, then Alfred is not puzzled and Claudia is impressive.
Lars being united and Claudia being tense imply that Marion is not impressive.
It can be concluded that Norman is not tense and Marion is tired once knowing that Claudia is united.
Lars being impressive is equivalent to Lars being not tired.
If there is at least one people who is not impressive, then Marion is not helpless.
If Hunter is not tired, then Alfred is not tense and Hunter is not united.
If there is at least one people who is united or not impressive, then Hunter is not tense.
Someone is helpless and not puzzled if and only if he is tired and not impressive.
If someone is not tired, then he is both not puzzled and helpless.
If Claudia is not united or Claudia is not tired, then Marion is not impressive. | Lars is united. | neutral |
Hunter is not united.
Lars is not impressive.
Lars is not tired.
Kent is not impressive.
Claudia is not tense.
Hunter is puzzled.
Norman is puzzled.
Kent is not united.
Kent is puzzled.
Marion is not impressive.
Hunter is not helpless.
Marion is not tense.Someone being both helpless and not puzzled is equivalent to being not tense.
Hunter being tense implies that Norman is united and Hunter is impressive.
If there is nobody who is not not tense, then Alfred is not puzzled and Claudia is impressive.
Lars being united and Claudia being tense imply that Marion is not impressive.
It can be concluded that Norman is not tense and Marion is tired once knowing that Claudia is united.
Lars being impressive is equivalent to Lars being not tired.
If there is at least one people who is not impressive, then Marion is not helpless.
If Hunter is not tired, then Alfred is not tense and Hunter is not united.
If there is at least one people who is united or not impressive, then Hunter is not tense.
Someone is helpless and not puzzled if and only if he is tired and not impressive.
If someone is not tired, then he is both not puzzled and helpless.
If Claudia is not united or Claudia is not tired, then Marion is not impressive. | Hunter is not tired. | contradiction |
Hunter is not united.
Lars is not impressive.
Lars is not tired.
Kent is not impressive.
Claudia is not tense.
Hunter is puzzled.
Norman is puzzled.
Kent is not united.
Kent is puzzled.
Marion is not impressive.
Hunter is not helpless.
Marion is not tense.Someone being both helpless and not puzzled is equivalent to being not tense.
Hunter being tense implies that Norman is united and Hunter is impressive.
If there is nobody who is not not tense, then Alfred is not puzzled and Claudia is impressive.
Lars being united and Claudia being tense imply that Marion is not impressive.
It can be concluded that Norman is not tense and Marion is tired once knowing that Claudia is united.
Lars being impressive is equivalent to Lars being not tired.
If there is at least one people who is not impressive, then Marion is not helpless.
If Hunter is not tired, then Alfred is not tense and Hunter is not united.
If there is at least one people who is united or not impressive, then Hunter is not tense.
Someone is helpless and not puzzled if and only if he is tired and not impressive.
If someone is not tired, then he is both not puzzled and helpless.
If Claudia is not united or Claudia is not tired, then Marion is not impressive. | Lars is not puzzled. | entailment |
Hunter is not united.
Lars is not impressive.
Lars is not tired.
Kent is not impressive.
Claudia is not tense.
Hunter is puzzled.
Norman is puzzled.
Kent is not united.
Kent is puzzled.
Marion is not impressive.
Hunter is not helpless.
Marion is not tense.Someone being both helpless and not puzzled is equivalent to being not tense.
Hunter being tense implies that Norman is united and Hunter is impressive.
If there is nobody who is not not tense, then Alfred is not puzzled and Claudia is impressive.
Lars being united and Claudia being tense imply that Marion is not impressive.
It can be concluded that Norman is not tense and Marion is tired once knowing that Claudia is united.
Lars being impressive is equivalent to Lars being not tired.
If there is at least one people who is not impressive, then Marion is not helpless.
If Hunter is not tired, then Alfred is not tense and Hunter is not united.
If there is at least one people who is united or not impressive, then Hunter is not tense.
Someone is helpless and not puzzled if and only if he is tired and not impressive.
If someone is not tired, then he is both not puzzled and helpless.
If Claudia is not united or Claudia is not tired, then Marion is not impressive. | Lars is not tired. | self_contradiction |
Hunter is not united.
Lars is not impressive.
Lars is not tired.
Kent is not impressive.
Claudia is not tense.
Hunter is puzzled.
Norman is puzzled.
Kent is not united.
Kent is puzzled.
Marion is not impressive.
Hunter is not helpless.
Marion is not tense.Someone being both helpless and not puzzled is equivalent to being not tense.
Hunter being tense implies that Norman is united and Hunter is impressive.
If there is nobody who is not not tense, then Alfred is not puzzled and Claudia is impressive.
Lars being united and Claudia being tense imply that Marion is not impressive.
It can be concluded that Norman is not tense and Marion is tired once knowing that Claudia is united.
Lars being impressive is equivalent to Lars being not tired.
If there is at least one people who is not impressive, then Marion is not helpless.
If Hunter is not tired, then Alfred is not tense and Hunter is not united.
If there is at least one people who is united or not impressive, then Hunter is not tense.
Someone is helpless and not puzzled if and only if he is tired and not impressive.
If someone is not tired, then he is both not puzzled and helpless.
If Claudia is not united or Claudia is not tired, then Marion is not impressive. | Hunter is impressive. | contradiction |
Hunter is not united.
Lars is not impressive.
Lars is not tired.
Kent is not impressive.
Claudia is not tense.
Hunter is puzzled.
Norman is puzzled.
Kent is not united.
Kent is puzzled.
Marion is not impressive.
Hunter is not helpless.
Marion is not tense.Someone being both helpless and not puzzled is equivalent to being not tense.
Hunter being tense implies that Norman is united and Hunter is impressive.
If there is nobody who is not not tense, then Alfred is not puzzled and Claudia is impressive.
Lars being united and Claudia being tense imply that Marion is not impressive.
It can be concluded that Norman is not tense and Marion is tired once knowing that Claudia is united.
Lars being impressive is equivalent to Lars being not tired.
If there is at least one people who is not impressive, then Marion is not helpless.
If Hunter is not tired, then Alfred is not tense and Hunter is not united.
If there is at least one people who is united or not impressive, then Hunter is not tense.
Someone is helpless and not puzzled if and only if he is tired and not impressive.
If someone is not tired, then he is both not puzzled and helpless.
If Claudia is not united or Claudia is not tired, then Marion is not impressive. | Kent is helpless. | neutral |
Hunter is not united.
Lars is not impressive.
Lars is not tired.
Kent is not impressive.
Claudia is not tense.
Hunter is puzzled.
Norman is puzzled.
Kent is not united.
Kent is puzzled.
Marion is not impressive.
Hunter is not helpless.
Marion is not tense.Someone being both helpless and not puzzled is equivalent to being not tense.
Hunter being tense implies that Norman is united and Hunter is impressive.
If there is nobody who is not not tense, then Alfred is not puzzled and Claudia is impressive.
Lars being united and Claudia being tense imply that Marion is not impressive.
It can be concluded that Norman is not tense and Marion is tired once knowing that Claudia is united.
Lars being impressive is equivalent to Lars being not tired.
If there is at least one people who is not impressive, then Marion is not helpless.
If Hunter is not tired, then Alfred is not tense and Hunter is not united.
If there is at least one people who is united or not impressive, then Hunter is not tense.
Someone is helpless and not puzzled if and only if he is tired and not impressive.
If someone is not tired, then he is both not puzzled and helpless.
If Claudia is not united or Claudia is not tired, then Marion is not impressive. | Kent is not puzzled. | contradiction |
Hunter is not united.
Lars is not impressive.
Lars is not tired.
Kent is not impressive.
Claudia is not tense.
Hunter is puzzled.
Norman is puzzled.
Kent is not united.
Kent is puzzled.
Marion is not impressive.
Hunter is not helpless.
Marion is not tense.Someone being both helpless and not puzzled is equivalent to being not tense.
Hunter being tense implies that Norman is united and Hunter is impressive.
If there is nobody who is not not tense, then Alfred is not puzzled and Claudia is impressive.
Lars being united and Claudia being tense imply that Marion is not impressive.
It can be concluded that Norman is not tense and Marion is tired once knowing that Claudia is united.
Lars being impressive is equivalent to Lars being not tired.
If there is at least one people who is not impressive, then Marion is not helpless.
If Hunter is not tired, then Alfred is not tense and Hunter is not united.
If there is at least one people who is united or not impressive, then Hunter is not tense.
Someone is helpless and not puzzled if and only if he is tired and not impressive.
If someone is not tired, then he is both not puzzled and helpless.
If Claudia is not united or Claudia is not tired, then Marion is not impressive. | Kent is puzzled. | entailment |
Hunter is not united.
Lars is not impressive.
Lars is not tired.
Kent is not impressive.
Claudia is not tense.
Hunter is puzzled.
Norman is puzzled.
Kent is not united.
Kent is puzzled.
Marion is not impressive.
Hunter is not helpless.
Marion is not tense.Someone being both helpless and not puzzled is equivalent to being not tense.
Hunter being tense implies that Norman is united and Hunter is impressive.
If there is nobody who is not not tense, then Alfred is not puzzled and Claudia is impressive.
Lars being united and Claudia being tense imply that Marion is not impressive.
It can be concluded that Norman is not tense and Marion is tired once knowing that Claudia is united.
Lars being impressive is equivalent to Lars being not tired.
If there is at least one people who is not impressive, then Marion is not helpless.
If Hunter is not tired, then Alfred is not tense and Hunter is not united.
If there is at least one people who is united or not impressive, then Hunter is not tense.
Someone is helpless and not puzzled if and only if he is tired and not impressive.
If someone is not tired, then he is both not puzzled and helpless.
If Claudia is not united or Claudia is not tired, then Marion is not impressive. | Kent is united. | contradiction |
Hunter is not united.
Lars is not impressive.
Lars is not tired.
Kent is not impressive.
Claudia is not tense.
Hunter is puzzled.
Norman is puzzled.
Kent is not united.
Kent is puzzled.
Marion is not impressive.
Hunter is not helpless.
Marion is not tense.Someone being both helpless and not puzzled is equivalent to being not tense.
Hunter being tense implies that Norman is united and Hunter is impressive.
If there is nobody who is not not tense, then Alfred is not puzzled and Claudia is impressive.
Lars being united and Claudia being tense imply that Marion is not impressive.
It can be concluded that Norman is not tense and Marion is tired once knowing that Claudia is united.
Lars being impressive is equivalent to Lars being not tired.
If there is at least one people who is not impressive, then Marion is not helpless.
If Hunter is not tired, then Alfred is not tense and Hunter is not united.
If there is at least one people who is united or not impressive, then Hunter is not tense.
Someone is helpless and not puzzled if and only if he is tired and not impressive.
If someone is not tired, then he is both not puzzled and helpless.
If Claudia is not united or Claudia is not tired, then Marion is not impressive. | Hunter is puzzled. | self_contradiction |
Hunter is not united.
Lars is not impressive.
Lars is not tired.
Kent is not impressive.
Claudia is not tense.
Hunter is puzzled.
Norman is puzzled.
Kent is not united.
Kent is puzzled.
Marion is not impressive.
Hunter is not helpless.
Marion is not tense.Someone being both helpless and not puzzled is equivalent to being not tense.
Hunter being tense implies that Norman is united and Hunter is impressive.
If there is nobody who is not not tense, then Alfred is not puzzled and Claudia is impressive.
Lars being united and Claudia being tense imply that Marion is not impressive.
It can be concluded that Norman is not tense and Marion is tired once knowing that Claudia is united.
Lars being impressive is equivalent to Lars being not tired.
If there is at least one people who is not impressive, then Marion is not helpless.
If Hunter is not tired, then Alfred is not tense and Hunter is not united.
If there is at least one people who is united or not impressive, then Hunter is not tense.
Someone is helpless and not puzzled if and only if he is tired and not impressive.
If someone is not tired, then he is both not puzzled and helpless.
If Claudia is not united or Claudia is not tired, then Marion is not impressive. | Alfred is impressive. | neutral |
Hunter is not united.
Lars is not impressive.
Lars is not tired.
Kent is not impressive.
Claudia is not tense.
Hunter is puzzled.
Norman is puzzled.
Kent is not united.
Kent is puzzled.
Marion is not impressive.
Hunter is not helpless.
Marion is not tense.Someone being both helpless and not puzzled is equivalent to being not tense.
Hunter being tense implies that Norman is united and Hunter is impressive.
If there is nobody who is not not tense, then Alfred is not puzzled and Claudia is impressive.
Lars being united and Claudia being tense imply that Marion is not impressive.
It can be concluded that Norman is not tense and Marion is tired once knowing that Claudia is united.
Lars being impressive is equivalent to Lars being not tired.
If there is at least one people who is not impressive, then Marion is not helpless.
If Hunter is not tired, then Alfred is not tense and Hunter is not united.
If there is at least one people who is united or not impressive, then Hunter is not tense.
Someone is helpless and not puzzled if and only if he is tired and not impressive.
If someone is not tired, then he is both not puzzled and helpless.
If Claudia is not united or Claudia is not tired, then Marion is not impressive. | Marion is helpless. | self_contradiction |
Hunter is not united.
Lars is not impressive.
Lars is not tired.
Kent is not impressive.
Claudia is not tense.
Hunter is puzzled.
Norman is puzzled.
Kent is not united.
Kent is puzzled.
Marion is not impressive.
Hunter is not helpless.
Marion is not tense.Someone being both helpless and not puzzled is equivalent to being not tense.
Hunter being tense implies that Norman is united and Hunter is impressive.
If there is nobody who is not not tense, then Alfred is not puzzled and Claudia is impressive.
Lars being united and Claudia being tense imply that Marion is not impressive.
It can be concluded that Norman is not tense and Marion is tired once knowing that Claudia is united.
Lars being impressive is equivalent to Lars being not tired.
If there is at least one people who is not impressive, then Marion is not helpless.
If Hunter is not tired, then Alfred is not tense and Hunter is not united.
If there is at least one people who is united or not impressive, then Hunter is not tense.
Someone is helpless and not puzzled if and only if he is tired and not impressive.
If someone is not tired, then he is both not puzzled and helpless.
If Claudia is not united or Claudia is not tired, then Marion is not impressive. | Marion is not tense. | entailment |
Hunter is not united.
Lars is not impressive.
Lars is not tired.
Kent is not impressive.
Claudia is not tense.
Hunter is puzzled.
Norman is puzzled.
Kent is not united.
Kent is puzzled.
Marion is not impressive.
Hunter is not helpless.
Marion is not tense.Someone being both helpless and not puzzled is equivalent to being not tense.
Hunter being tense implies that Norman is united and Hunter is impressive.
If there is nobody who is not not tense, then Alfred is not puzzled and Claudia is impressive.
Lars being united and Claudia being tense imply that Marion is not impressive.
It can be concluded that Norman is not tense and Marion is tired once knowing that Claudia is united.
Lars being impressive is equivalent to Lars being not tired.
If there is at least one people who is not impressive, then Marion is not helpless.
If Hunter is not tired, then Alfred is not tense and Hunter is not united.
If there is at least one people who is united or not impressive, then Hunter is not tense.
Someone is helpless and not puzzled if and only if he is tired and not impressive.
If someone is not tired, then he is both not puzzled and helpless.
If Claudia is not united or Claudia is not tired, then Marion is not impressive. | Kent is not helpless. | neutral |
Hunter is not united.
Lars is not impressive.
Lars is not tired.
Kent is not impressive.
Claudia is not tense.
Hunter is puzzled.
Norman is puzzled.
Kent is not united.
Kent is puzzled.
Marion is not impressive.
Hunter is not helpless.
Marion is not tense.Someone being both helpless and not puzzled is equivalent to being not tense.
Hunter being tense implies that Norman is united and Hunter is impressive.
If there is nobody who is not not tense, then Alfred is not puzzled and Claudia is impressive.
Lars being united and Claudia being tense imply that Marion is not impressive.
It can be concluded that Norman is not tense and Marion is tired once knowing that Claudia is united.
Lars being impressive is equivalent to Lars being not tired.
If there is at least one people who is not impressive, then Marion is not helpless.
If Hunter is not tired, then Alfred is not tense and Hunter is not united.
If there is at least one people who is united or not impressive, then Hunter is not tense.
Someone is helpless and not puzzled if and only if he is tired and not impressive.
If someone is not tired, then he is both not puzzled and helpless.
If Claudia is not united or Claudia is not tired, then Marion is not impressive. | Hunter is not puzzled. | self_contradiction |
Hunter is not united.
Lars is not impressive.
Lars is not tired.
Kent is not impressive.
Claudia is not tense.
Hunter is puzzled.
Norman is puzzled.
Kent is not united.
Kent is puzzled.
Marion is not impressive.
Hunter is not helpless.
Marion is not tense.Someone being both helpless and not puzzled is equivalent to being not tense.
Hunter being tense implies that Norman is united and Hunter is impressive.
If there is nobody who is not not tense, then Alfred is not puzzled and Claudia is impressive.
Lars being united and Claudia being tense imply that Marion is not impressive.
It can be concluded that Norman is not tense and Marion is tired once knowing that Claudia is united.
Lars being impressive is equivalent to Lars being not tired.
If there is at least one people who is not impressive, then Marion is not helpless.
If Hunter is not tired, then Alfred is not tense and Hunter is not united.
If there is at least one people who is united or not impressive, then Hunter is not tense.
Someone is helpless and not puzzled if and only if he is tired and not impressive.
If someone is not tired, then he is both not puzzled and helpless.
If Claudia is not united or Claudia is not tired, then Marion is not impressive. | Hunter is not helpless. | self_contradiction |
Humphrey is green.
Silvia is not steep.
Marshall is not messy.
Crispin is not messy.
Marshall is fantastic.
Leith is not similar.
Crispin is brown.
Melody is messy.
Hannah is green.
Leith is not steep.
Leith is messy.
Silvia is not green.If there is someone who is either brown or not green, then Marshall is steep and Humphrey is not fantastic.
Marshall is not green if and only if Leith is not similar.
Someone is not messy if and only if he is not brown.
All brown people are not steep.
Someone is not green if and only if he is similar.
If there is at least one people who is fantastic, then Humphrey is brown.
Someone who is both green and not brown is always messy.
Someone being both not steep and not green is equivalent to being not fantastic and messy.
It can be concluded that Marshall is green and Humphrey is similar once knowing that Melody is fantastic.
If there is someone who is steep, then Marshall is not messy.
Hannah being not green implies that Marshall is not similar.
Someone is not steep and not similar if and only if he is not green. | Marshall is not steep. | self_contradiction |
Humphrey is green.
Silvia is not steep.
Marshall is not messy.
Crispin is not messy.
Marshall is fantastic.
Leith is not similar.
Crispin is brown.
Melody is messy.
Hannah is green.
Leith is not steep.
Leith is messy.
Silvia is not green.If there is someone who is either brown or not green, then Marshall is steep and Humphrey is not fantastic.
Marshall is not green if and only if Leith is not similar.
Someone is not messy if and only if he is not brown.
All brown people are not steep.
Someone is not green if and only if he is similar.
If there is at least one people who is fantastic, then Humphrey is brown.
Someone who is both green and not brown is always messy.
Someone being both not steep and not green is equivalent to being not fantastic and messy.
It can be concluded that Marshall is green and Humphrey is similar once knowing that Melody is fantastic.
If there is someone who is steep, then Marshall is not messy.
Hannah being not green implies that Marshall is not similar.
Someone is not steep and not similar if and only if he is not green. | Humphrey is not steep. | entailment |
Humphrey is green.
Silvia is not steep.
Marshall is not messy.
Crispin is not messy.
Marshall is fantastic.
Leith is not similar.
Crispin is brown.
Melody is messy.
Hannah is green.
Leith is not steep.
Leith is messy.
Silvia is not green.If there is someone who is either brown or not green, then Marshall is steep and Humphrey is not fantastic.
Marshall is not green if and only if Leith is not similar.
Someone is not messy if and only if he is not brown.
All brown people are not steep.
Someone is not green if and only if he is similar.
If there is at least one people who is fantastic, then Humphrey is brown.
Someone who is both green and not brown is always messy.
Someone being both not steep and not green is equivalent to being not fantastic and messy.
It can be concluded that Marshall is green and Humphrey is similar once knowing that Melody is fantastic.
If there is someone who is steep, then Marshall is not messy.
Hannah being not green implies that Marshall is not similar.
Someone is not steep and not similar if and only if he is not green. | Marshall is not green. | entailment |
Humphrey is green.
Silvia is not steep.
Marshall is not messy.
Crispin is not messy.
Marshall is fantastic.
Leith is not similar.
Crispin is brown.
Melody is messy.
Hannah is green.
Leith is not steep.
Leith is messy.
Silvia is not green.If there is someone who is either brown or not green, then Marshall is steep and Humphrey is not fantastic.
Marshall is not green if and only if Leith is not similar.
Someone is not messy if and only if he is not brown.
All brown people are not steep.
Someone is not green if and only if he is similar.
If there is at least one people who is fantastic, then Humphrey is brown.
Someone who is both green and not brown is always messy.
Someone being both not steep and not green is equivalent to being not fantastic and messy.
It can be concluded that Marshall is green and Humphrey is similar once knowing that Melody is fantastic.
If there is someone who is steep, then Marshall is not messy.
Hannah being not green implies that Marshall is not similar.
Someone is not steep and not similar if and only if he is not green. | Marshall is fantastic. | self_contradiction |
Humphrey is green.
Silvia is not steep.
Marshall is not messy.
Crispin is not messy.
Marshall is fantastic.
Leith is not similar.
Crispin is brown.
Melody is messy.
Hannah is green.
Leith is not steep.
Leith is messy.
Silvia is not green.If there is someone who is either brown or not green, then Marshall is steep and Humphrey is not fantastic.
Marshall is not green if and only if Leith is not similar.
Someone is not messy if and only if he is not brown.
All brown people are not steep.
Someone is not green if and only if he is similar.
If there is at least one people who is fantastic, then Humphrey is brown.
Someone who is both green and not brown is always messy.
Someone being both not steep and not green is equivalent to being not fantastic and messy.
It can be concluded that Marshall is green and Humphrey is similar once knowing that Melody is fantastic.
If there is someone who is steep, then Marshall is not messy.
Hannah being not green implies that Marshall is not similar.
Someone is not steep and not similar if and only if he is not green. | Humphrey is brown. | entailment |
Humphrey is green.
Silvia is not steep.
Marshall is not messy.
Crispin is not messy.
Marshall is fantastic.
Leith is not similar.
Crispin is brown.
Melody is messy.
Hannah is green.
Leith is not steep.
Leith is messy.
Silvia is not green.If there is someone who is either brown or not green, then Marshall is steep and Humphrey is not fantastic.
Marshall is not green if and only if Leith is not similar.
Someone is not messy if and only if he is not brown.
All brown people are not steep.
Someone is not green if and only if he is similar.
If there is at least one people who is fantastic, then Humphrey is brown.
Someone who is both green and not brown is always messy.
Someone being both not steep and not green is equivalent to being not fantastic and messy.
It can be concluded that Marshall is green and Humphrey is similar once knowing that Melody is fantastic.
If there is someone who is steep, then Marshall is not messy.
Hannah being not green implies that Marshall is not similar.
Someone is not steep and not similar if and only if he is not green. | Humphrey is similar. | neutral |
Humphrey is green.
Silvia is not steep.
Marshall is not messy.
Crispin is not messy.
Marshall is fantastic.
Leith is not similar.
Crispin is brown.
Melody is messy.
Hannah is green.
Leith is not steep.
Leith is messy.
Silvia is not green.If there is someone who is either brown or not green, then Marshall is steep and Humphrey is not fantastic.
Marshall is not green if and only if Leith is not similar.
Someone is not messy if and only if he is not brown.
All brown people are not steep.
Someone is not green if and only if he is similar.
If there is at least one people who is fantastic, then Humphrey is brown.
Someone who is both green and not brown is always messy.
Someone being both not steep and not green is equivalent to being not fantastic and messy.
It can be concluded that Marshall is green and Humphrey is similar once knowing that Melody is fantastic.
If there is someone who is steep, then Marshall is not messy.
Hannah being not green implies that Marshall is not similar.
Someone is not steep and not similar if and only if he is not green. | Melody is not similar. | neutral |
Humphrey is green.
Silvia is not steep.
Marshall is not messy.
Crispin is not messy.
Marshall is fantastic.
Leith is not similar.
Crispin is brown.
Melody is messy.
Hannah is green.
Leith is not steep.
Leith is messy.
Silvia is not green.If there is someone who is either brown or not green, then Marshall is steep and Humphrey is not fantastic.
Marshall is not green if and only if Leith is not similar.
Someone is not messy if and only if he is not brown.
All brown people are not steep.
Someone is not green if and only if he is similar.
If there is at least one people who is fantastic, then Humphrey is brown.
Someone who is both green and not brown is always messy.
Someone being both not steep and not green is equivalent to being not fantastic and messy.
It can be concluded that Marshall is green and Humphrey is similar once knowing that Melody is fantastic.
If there is someone who is steep, then Marshall is not messy.
Hannah being not green implies that Marshall is not similar.
Someone is not steep and not similar if and only if he is not green. | Silvia is not green. | entailment |
Humphrey is green.
Silvia is not steep.
Marshall is not messy.
Crispin is not messy.
Marshall is fantastic.
Leith is not similar.
Crispin is brown.
Melody is messy.
Hannah is green.
Leith is not steep.
Leith is messy.
Silvia is not green.If there is someone who is either brown or not green, then Marshall is steep and Humphrey is not fantastic.
Marshall is not green if and only if Leith is not similar.
Someone is not messy if and only if he is not brown.
All brown people are not steep.
Someone is not green if and only if he is similar.
If there is at least one people who is fantastic, then Humphrey is brown.
Someone who is both green and not brown is always messy.
Someone being both not steep and not green is equivalent to being not fantastic and messy.
It can be concluded that Marshall is green and Humphrey is similar once knowing that Melody is fantastic.
If there is someone who is steep, then Marshall is not messy.
Hannah being not green implies that Marshall is not similar.
Someone is not steep and not similar if and only if he is not green. | Crispin is brown. | self_contradiction |
Humphrey is green.
Silvia is not steep.
Marshall is not messy.
Crispin is not messy.
Marshall is fantastic.
Leith is not similar.
Crispin is brown.
Melody is messy.
Hannah is green.
Leith is not steep.
Leith is messy.
Silvia is not green.If there is someone who is either brown or not green, then Marshall is steep and Humphrey is not fantastic.
Marshall is not green if and only if Leith is not similar.
Someone is not messy if and only if he is not brown.
All brown people are not steep.
Someone is not green if and only if he is similar.
If there is at least one people who is fantastic, then Humphrey is brown.
Someone who is both green and not brown is always messy.
Someone being both not steep and not green is equivalent to being not fantastic and messy.
It can be concluded that Marshall is green and Humphrey is similar once knowing that Melody is fantastic.
If there is someone who is steep, then Marshall is not messy.
Hannah being not green implies that Marshall is not similar.
Someone is not steep and not similar if and only if he is not green. | Marshall is green. | contradiction |
Humphrey is green.
Silvia is not steep.
Marshall is not messy.
Crispin is not messy.
Marshall is fantastic.
Leith is not similar.
Crispin is brown.
Melody is messy.
Hannah is green.
Leith is not steep.
Leith is messy.
Silvia is not green.If there is someone who is either brown or not green, then Marshall is steep and Humphrey is not fantastic.
Marshall is not green if and only if Leith is not similar.
Someone is not messy if and only if he is not brown.
All brown people are not steep.
Someone is not green if and only if he is similar.
If there is at least one people who is fantastic, then Humphrey is brown.
Someone who is both green and not brown is always messy.
Someone being both not steep and not green is equivalent to being not fantastic and messy.
It can be concluded that Marshall is green and Humphrey is similar once knowing that Melody is fantastic.
If there is someone who is steep, then Marshall is not messy.
Hannah being not green implies that Marshall is not similar.
Someone is not steep and not similar if and only if he is not green. | Humphrey is messy. | neutral |
Humphrey is green.
Silvia is not steep.
Marshall is not messy.
Crispin is not messy.
Marshall is fantastic.
Leith is not similar.
Crispin is brown.
Melody is messy.
Hannah is green.
Leith is not steep.
Leith is messy.
Silvia is not green.If there is someone who is either brown or not green, then Marshall is steep and Humphrey is not fantastic.
Marshall is not green if and only if Leith is not similar.
Someone is not messy if and only if he is not brown.
All brown people are not steep.
Someone is not green if and only if he is similar.
If there is at least one people who is fantastic, then Humphrey is brown.
Someone who is both green and not brown is always messy.
Someone being both not steep and not green is equivalent to being not fantastic and messy.
It can be concluded that Marshall is green and Humphrey is similar once knowing that Melody is fantastic.
If there is someone who is steep, then Marshall is not messy.
Hannah being not green implies that Marshall is not similar.
Someone is not steep and not similar if and only if he is not green. | Melody is messy. | entailment |
Humphrey is green.
Silvia is not steep.
Marshall is not messy.
Crispin is not messy.
Marshall is fantastic.
Leith is not similar.
Crispin is brown.
Melody is messy.
Hannah is green.
Leith is not steep.
Leith is messy.
Silvia is not green.If there is someone who is either brown or not green, then Marshall is steep and Humphrey is not fantastic.
Marshall is not green if and only if Leith is not similar.
Someone is not messy if and only if he is not brown.
All brown people are not steep.
Someone is not green if and only if he is similar.
If there is at least one people who is fantastic, then Humphrey is brown.
Someone who is both green and not brown is always messy.
Someone being both not steep and not green is equivalent to being not fantastic and messy.
It can be concluded that Marshall is green and Humphrey is similar once knowing that Melody is fantastic.
If there is someone who is steep, then Marshall is not messy.
Hannah being not green implies that Marshall is not similar.
Someone is not steep and not similar if and only if he is not green. | Marshall is messy. | self_contradiction |
Humphrey is green.
Silvia is not steep.
Marshall is not messy.
Crispin is not messy.
Marshall is fantastic.
Leith is not similar.
Crispin is brown.
Melody is messy.
Hannah is green.
Leith is not steep.
Leith is messy.
Silvia is not green.If there is someone who is either brown or not green, then Marshall is steep and Humphrey is not fantastic.
Marshall is not green if and only if Leith is not similar.
Someone is not messy if and only if he is not brown.
All brown people are not steep.
Someone is not green if and only if he is similar.
If there is at least one people who is fantastic, then Humphrey is brown.
Someone who is both green and not brown is always messy.
Someone being both not steep and not green is equivalent to being not fantastic and messy.
It can be concluded that Marshall is green and Humphrey is similar once knowing that Melody is fantastic.
If there is someone who is steep, then Marshall is not messy.
Hannah being not green implies that Marshall is not similar.
Someone is not steep and not similar if and only if he is not green. | Crispin is messy. | contradiction |
Humphrey is green.
Silvia is not steep.
Marshall is not messy.
Crispin is not messy.
Marshall is fantastic.
Leith is not similar.
Crispin is brown.
Melody is messy.
Hannah is green.
Leith is not steep.
Leith is messy.
Silvia is not green.If there is someone who is either brown or not green, then Marshall is steep and Humphrey is not fantastic.
Marshall is not green if and only if Leith is not similar.
Someone is not messy if and only if he is not brown.
All brown people are not steep.
Someone is not green if and only if he is similar.
If there is at least one people who is fantastic, then Humphrey is brown.
Someone who is both green and not brown is always messy.
Someone being both not steep and not green is equivalent to being not fantastic and messy.
It can be concluded that Marshall is green and Humphrey is similar once knowing that Melody is fantastic.
If there is someone who is steep, then Marshall is not messy.
Hannah being not green implies that Marshall is not similar.
Someone is not steep and not similar if and only if he is not green. | Crispin is green. | neutral |
Humphrey is green.
Silvia is not steep.
Marshall is not messy.
Crispin is not messy.
Marshall is fantastic.
Leith is not similar.
Crispin is brown.
Melody is messy.
Hannah is green.
Leith is not steep.
Leith is messy.
Silvia is not green.If there is someone who is either brown or not green, then Marshall is steep and Humphrey is not fantastic.
Marshall is not green if and only if Leith is not similar.
Someone is not messy if and only if he is not brown.
All brown people are not steep.
Someone is not green if and only if he is similar.
If there is at least one people who is fantastic, then Humphrey is brown.
Someone who is both green and not brown is always messy.
Someone being both not steep and not green is equivalent to being not fantastic and messy.
It can be concluded that Marshall is green and Humphrey is similar once knowing that Melody is fantastic.
If there is someone who is steep, then Marshall is not messy.
Hannah being not green implies that Marshall is not similar.
Someone is not steep and not similar if and only if he is not green. | Silvia is steep. | contradiction |
Humphrey is green.
Silvia is not steep.
Marshall is not messy.
Crispin is not messy.
Marshall is fantastic.
Leith is not similar.
Crispin is brown.
Melody is messy.
Hannah is green.
Leith is not steep.
Leith is messy.
Silvia is not green.If there is someone who is either brown or not green, then Marshall is steep and Humphrey is not fantastic.
Marshall is not green if and only if Leith is not similar.
Someone is not messy if and only if he is not brown.
All brown people are not steep.
Someone is not green if and only if he is similar.
If there is at least one people who is fantastic, then Humphrey is brown.
Someone who is both green and not brown is always messy.
Someone being both not steep and not green is equivalent to being not fantastic and messy.
It can be concluded that Marshall is green and Humphrey is similar once knowing that Melody is fantastic.
If there is someone who is steep, then Marshall is not messy.
Hannah being not green implies that Marshall is not similar.
Someone is not steep and not similar if and only if he is not green. | Crispin is not brown. | self_contradiction |
Humphrey is green.
Silvia is not steep.
Marshall is not messy.
Crispin is not messy.
Marshall is fantastic.
Leith is not similar.
Crispin is brown.
Melody is messy.
Hannah is green.
Leith is not steep.
Leith is messy.
Silvia is not green.If there is someone who is either brown or not green, then Marshall is steep and Humphrey is not fantastic.
Marshall is not green if and only if Leith is not similar.
Someone is not messy if and only if he is not brown.
All brown people are not steep.
Someone is not green if and only if he is similar.
If there is at least one people who is fantastic, then Humphrey is brown.
Someone who is both green and not brown is always messy.
Someone being both not steep and not green is equivalent to being not fantastic and messy.
It can be concluded that Marshall is green and Humphrey is similar once knowing that Melody is fantastic.
If there is someone who is steep, then Marshall is not messy.
Hannah being not green implies that Marshall is not similar.
Someone is not steep and not similar if and only if he is not green. | Leith is not messy. | contradiction |
Humphrey is green.
Silvia is not steep.
Marshall is not messy.
Crispin is not messy.
Marshall is fantastic.
Leith is not similar.
Crispin is brown.
Melody is messy.
Hannah is green.
Leith is not steep.
Leith is messy.
Silvia is not green.If there is someone who is either brown or not green, then Marshall is steep and Humphrey is not fantastic.
Marshall is not green if and only if Leith is not similar.
Someone is not messy if and only if he is not brown.
All brown people are not steep.
Someone is not green if and only if he is similar.
If there is at least one people who is fantastic, then Humphrey is brown.
Someone who is both green and not brown is always messy.
Someone being both not steep and not green is equivalent to being not fantastic and messy.
It can be concluded that Marshall is green and Humphrey is similar once knowing that Melody is fantastic.
If there is someone who is steep, then Marshall is not messy.
Hannah being not green implies that Marshall is not similar.
Someone is not steep and not similar if and only if he is not green. | Crispin is fantastic. | neutral |
Humphrey is green.
Silvia is not steep.
Marshall is not messy.
Crispin is not messy.
Marshall is fantastic.
Leith is not similar.
Crispin is brown.
Melody is messy.
Hannah is green.
Leith is not steep.
Leith is messy.
Silvia is not green.If there is someone who is either brown or not green, then Marshall is steep and Humphrey is not fantastic.
Marshall is not green if and only if Leith is not similar.
Someone is not messy if and only if he is not brown.
All brown people are not steep.
Someone is not green if and only if he is similar.
If there is at least one people who is fantastic, then Humphrey is brown.
Someone who is both green and not brown is always messy.
Someone being both not steep and not green is equivalent to being not fantastic and messy.
It can be concluded that Marshall is green and Humphrey is similar once knowing that Melody is fantastic.
If there is someone who is steep, then Marshall is not messy.
Hannah being not green implies that Marshall is not similar.
Someone is not steep and not similar if and only if he is not green. | Humphrey is not brown. | contradiction |
Laurence is not embarrassed.
Bethany is concerned.
Bethany is itchy.
Hadden is not embarrassed.
Silas is latter.
Bethany is latter.
Brian is not itchy.
Vera is not latter.
Aedan is embarrassed.
Laurence is latter.
Aedan is orange.
Vera is not concerned.If everyone is orange or not guilty, then Brian is embarrassed.
If someone is not orange and guilty, then he is both concerned and itchy, and vice versa.
If Silas is not latter and Laurence is orange, then Silas is not guilty.
Laurence is not orange if and only if Bethany is not guilty and Laurence is latter.
If there is someone who is either latter or guilty, then Aedan is orange.
If there is at least one people who is concerned or orange, then Bethany is not guilty.
It can be concluded that Aedan is embarrassed once knowing that Laurence is not concerned and Aedan is orange.
If everyone is orange, then Bethany is not embarrassed.
It can be concluded that Bethany is not itchy and Silas is latter once knowing that Hadden is not concerned.
If Aedan is orange, then Bethany is not itchy and Bethany is not concerned.
Hadden being not orange is equivalent to Vera being embarrassed and Brian being itchy.
If there is someone who is either latter or not concerned, then Laurence is not orange. | Vera is concerned. | contradiction |
Laurence is not embarrassed.
Bethany is concerned.
Bethany is itchy.
Hadden is not embarrassed.
Silas is latter.
Bethany is latter.
Brian is not itchy.
Vera is not latter.
Aedan is embarrassed.
Laurence is latter.
Aedan is orange.
Vera is not concerned.If everyone is orange or not guilty, then Brian is embarrassed.
If someone is not orange and guilty, then he is both concerned and itchy, and vice versa.
If Silas is not latter and Laurence is orange, then Silas is not guilty.
Laurence is not orange if and only if Bethany is not guilty and Laurence is latter.
If there is someone who is either latter or guilty, then Aedan is orange.
If there is at least one people who is concerned or orange, then Bethany is not guilty.
It can be concluded that Aedan is embarrassed once knowing that Laurence is not concerned and Aedan is orange.
If everyone is orange, then Bethany is not embarrassed.
It can be concluded that Bethany is not itchy and Silas is latter once knowing that Hadden is not concerned.
If Aedan is orange, then Bethany is not itchy and Bethany is not concerned.
Hadden being not orange is equivalent to Vera being embarrassed and Brian being itchy.
If there is someone who is either latter or not concerned, then Laurence is not orange. | Aedan is embarrassed. | entailment |
Laurence is not embarrassed.
Bethany is concerned.
Bethany is itchy.
Hadden is not embarrassed.
Silas is latter.
Bethany is latter.
Brian is not itchy.
Vera is not latter.
Aedan is embarrassed.
Laurence is latter.
Aedan is orange.
Vera is not concerned.If everyone is orange or not guilty, then Brian is embarrassed.
If someone is not orange and guilty, then he is both concerned and itchy, and vice versa.
If Silas is not latter and Laurence is orange, then Silas is not guilty.
Laurence is not orange if and only if Bethany is not guilty and Laurence is latter.
If there is someone who is either latter or guilty, then Aedan is orange.
If there is at least one people who is concerned or orange, then Bethany is not guilty.
It can be concluded that Aedan is embarrassed once knowing that Laurence is not concerned and Aedan is orange.
If everyone is orange, then Bethany is not embarrassed.
It can be concluded that Bethany is not itchy and Silas is latter once knowing that Hadden is not concerned.
If Aedan is orange, then Bethany is not itchy and Bethany is not concerned.
Hadden being not orange is equivalent to Vera being embarrassed and Brian being itchy.
If there is someone who is either latter or not concerned, then Laurence is not orange. | Bethany is itchy. | self_contradiction |
Laurence is not embarrassed.
Bethany is concerned.
Bethany is itchy.
Hadden is not embarrassed.
Silas is latter.
Bethany is latter.
Brian is not itchy.
Vera is not latter.
Aedan is embarrassed.
Laurence is latter.
Aedan is orange.
Vera is not concerned.If everyone is orange or not guilty, then Brian is embarrassed.
If someone is not orange and guilty, then he is both concerned and itchy, and vice versa.
If Silas is not latter and Laurence is orange, then Silas is not guilty.
Laurence is not orange if and only if Bethany is not guilty and Laurence is latter.
If there is someone who is either latter or guilty, then Aedan is orange.
If there is at least one people who is concerned or orange, then Bethany is not guilty.
It can be concluded that Aedan is embarrassed once knowing that Laurence is not concerned and Aedan is orange.
If everyone is orange, then Bethany is not embarrassed.
It can be concluded that Bethany is not itchy and Silas is latter once knowing that Hadden is not concerned.
If Aedan is orange, then Bethany is not itchy and Bethany is not concerned.
Hadden being not orange is equivalent to Vera being embarrassed and Brian being itchy.
If there is someone who is either latter or not concerned, then Laurence is not orange. | Aedan is latter. | neutral |
Laurence is not embarrassed.
Bethany is concerned.
Bethany is itchy.
Hadden is not embarrassed.
Silas is latter.
Bethany is latter.
Brian is not itchy.
Vera is not latter.
Aedan is embarrassed.
Laurence is latter.
Aedan is orange.
Vera is not concerned.If everyone is orange or not guilty, then Brian is embarrassed.
If someone is not orange and guilty, then he is both concerned and itchy, and vice versa.
If Silas is not latter and Laurence is orange, then Silas is not guilty.
Laurence is not orange if and only if Bethany is not guilty and Laurence is latter.
If there is someone who is either latter or guilty, then Aedan is orange.
If there is at least one people who is concerned or orange, then Bethany is not guilty.
It can be concluded that Aedan is embarrassed once knowing that Laurence is not concerned and Aedan is orange.
If everyone is orange, then Bethany is not embarrassed.
It can be concluded that Bethany is not itchy and Silas is latter once knowing that Hadden is not concerned.
If Aedan is orange, then Bethany is not itchy and Bethany is not concerned.
Hadden being not orange is equivalent to Vera being embarrassed and Brian being itchy.
If there is someone who is either latter or not concerned, then Laurence is not orange. | Bethany is guilty. | self_contradiction |
Laurence is not embarrassed.
Bethany is concerned.
Bethany is itchy.
Hadden is not embarrassed.
Silas is latter.
Bethany is latter.
Brian is not itchy.
Vera is not latter.
Aedan is embarrassed.
Laurence is latter.
Aedan is orange.
Vera is not concerned.If everyone is orange or not guilty, then Brian is embarrassed.
If someone is not orange and guilty, then he is both concerned and itchy, and vice versa.
If Silas is not latter and Laurence is orange, then Silas is not guilty.
Laurence is not orange if and only if Bethany is not guilty and Laurence is latter.
If there is someone who is either latter or guilty, then Aedan is orange.
If there is at least one people who is concerned or orange, then Bethany is not guilty.
It can be concluded that Aedan is embarrassed once knowing that Laurence is not concerned and Aedan is orange.
If everyone is orange, then Bethany is not embarrassed.
It can be concluded that Bethany is not itchy and Silas is latter once knowing that Hadden is not concerned.
If Aedan is orange, then Bethany is not itchy and Bethany is not concerned.
Hadden being not orange is equivalent to Vera being embarrassed and Brian being itchy.
If there is someone who is either latter or not concerned, then Laurence is not orange. | Aedan is itchy. | neutral |
Laurence is not embarrassed.
Bethany is concerned.
Bethany is itchy.
Hadden is not embarrassed.
Silas is latter.
Bethany is latter.
Brian is not itchy.
Vera is not latter.
Aedan is embarrassed.
Laurence is latter.
Aedan is orange.
Vera is not concerned.If everyone is orange or not guilty, then Brian is embarrassed.
If someone is not orange and guilty, then he is both concerned and itchy, and vice versa.
If Silas is not latter and Laurence is orange, then Silas is not guilty.
Laurence is not orange if and only if Bethany is not guilty and Laurence is latter.
If there is someone who is either latter or guilty, then Aedan is orange.
If there is at least one people who is concerned or orange, then Bethany is not guilty.
It can be concluded that Aedan is embarrassed once knowing that Laurence is not concerned and Aedan is orange.
If everyone is orange, then Bethany is not embarrassed.
It can be concluded that Bethany is not itchy and Silas is latter once knowing that Hadden is not concerned.
If Aedan is orange, then Bethany is not itchy and Bethany is not concerned.
Hadden being not orange is equivalent to Vera being embarrassed and Brian being itchy.
If there is someone who is either latter or not concerned, then Laurence is not orange. | Brian is itchy. | contradiction |
Laurence is not embarrassed.
Bethany is concerned.
Bethany is itchy.
Hadden is not embarrassed.
Silas is latter.
Bethany is latter.
Brian is not itchy.
Vera is not latter.
Aedan is embarrassed.
Laurence is latter.
Aedan is orange.
Vera is not concerned.If everyone is orange or not guilty, then Brian is embarrassed.
If someone is not orange and guilty, then he is both concerned and itchy, and vice versa.
If Silas is not latter and Laurence is orange, then Silas is not guilty.
Laurence is not orange if and only if Bethany is not guilty and Laurence is latter.
If there is someone who is either latter or guilty, then Aedan is orange.
If there is at least one people who is concerned or orange, then Bethany is not guilty.
It can be concluded that Aedan is embarrassed once knowing that Laurence is not concerned and Aedan is orange.
If everyone is orange, then Bethany is not embarrassed.
It can be concluded that Bethany is not itchy and Silas is latter once knowing that Hadden is not concerned.
If Aedan is orange, then Bethany is not itchy and Bethany is not concerned.
Hadden being not orange is equivalent to Vera being embarrassed and Brian being itchy.
If there is someone who is either latter or not concerned, then Laurence is not orange. | Laurence is not orange. | entailment |
Laurence is not embarrassed.
Bethany is concerned.
Bethany is itchy.
Hadden is not embarrassed.
Silas is latter.
Bethany is latter.
Brian is not itchy.
Vera is not latter.
Aedan is embarrassed.
Laurence is latter.
Aedan is orange.
Vera is not concerned.If everyone is orange or not guilty, then Brian is embarrassed.
If someone is not orange and guilty, then he is both concerned and itchy, and vice versa.
If Silas is not latter and Laurence is orange, then Silas is not guilty.
Laurence is not orange if and only if Bethany is not guilty and Laurence is latter.
If there is someone who is either latter or guilty, then Aedan is orange.
If there is at least one people who is concerned or orange, then Bethany is not guilty.
It can be concluded that Aedan is embarrassed once knowing that Laurence is not concerned and Aedan is orange.
If everyone is orange, then Bethany is not embarrassed.
It can be concluded that Bethany is not itchy and Silas is latter once knowing that Hadden is not concerned.
If Aedan is orange, then Bethany is not itchy and Bethany is not concerned.
Hadden being not orange is equivalent to Vera being embarrassed and Brian being itchy.
If there is someone who is either latter or not concerned, then Laurence is not orange. | Bethany is orange. | contradiction |
Laurence is not embarrassed.
Bethany is concerned.
Bethany is itchy.
Hadden is not embarrassed.
Silas is latter.
Bethany is latter.
Brian is not itchy.
Vera is not latter.
Aedan is embarrassed.
Laurence is latter.
Aedan is orange.
Vera is not concerned.If everyone is orange or not guilty, then Brian is embarrassed.
If someone is not orange and guilty, then he is both concerned and itchy, and vice versa.
If Silas is not latter and Laurence is orange, then Silas is not guilty.
Laurence is not orange if and only if Bethany is not guilty and Laurence is latter.
If there is someone who is either latter or guilty, then Aedan is orange.
If there is at least one people who is concerned or orange, then Bethany is not guilty.
It can be concluded that Aedan is embarrassed once knowing that Laurence is not concerned and Aedan is orange.
If everyone is orange, then Bethany is not embarrassed.
It can be concluded that Bethany is not itchy and Silas is latter once knowing that Hadden is not concerned.
If Aedan is orange, then Bethany is not itchy and Bethany is not concerned.
Hadden being not orange is equivalent to Vera being embarrassed and Brian being itchy.
If there is someone who is either latter or not concerned, then Laurence is not orange. | Hadden is not embarrassed. | entailment |
Laurence is not embarrassed.
Bethany is concerned.
Bethany is itchy.
Hadden is not embarrassed.
Silas is latter.
Bethany is latter.
Brian is not itchy.
Vera is not latter.
Aedan is embarrassed.
Laurence is latter.
Aedan is orange.
Vera is not concerned.If everyone is orange or not guilty, then Brian is embarrassed.
If someone is not orange and guilty, then he is both concerned and itchy, and vice versa.
If Silas is not latter and Laurence is orange, then Silas is not guilty.
Laurence is not orange if and only if Bethany is not guilty and Laurence is latter.
If there is someone who is either latter or guilty, then Aedan is orange.
If there is at least one people who is concerned or orange, then Bethany is not guilty.
It can be concluded that Aedan is embarrassed once knowing that Laurence is not concerned and Aedan is orange.
If everyone is orange, then Bethany is not embarrassed.
It can be concluded that Bethany is not itchy and Silas is latter once knowing that Hadden is not concerned.
If Aedan is orange, then Bethany is not itchy and Bethany is not concerned.
Hadden being not orange is equivalent to Vera being embarrassed and Brian being itchy.
If there is someone who is either latter or not concerned, then Laurence is not orange. | Silas is embarrassed. | neutral |
Laurence is not embarrassed.
Bethany is concerned.
Bethany is itchy.
Hadden is not embarrassed.
Silas is latter.
Bethany is latter.
Brian is not itchy.
Vera is not latter.
Aedan is embarrassed.
Laurence is latter.
Aedan is orange.
Vera is not concerned.If everyone is orange or not guilty, then Brian is embarrassed.
If someone is not orange and guilty, then he is both concerned and itchy, and vice versa.
If Silas is not latter and Laurence is orange, then Silas is not guilty.
Laurence is not orange if and only if Bethany is not guilty and Laurence is latter.
If there is someone who is either latter or guilty, then Aedan is orange.
If there is at least one people who is concerned or orange, then Bethany is not guilty.
It can be concluded that Aedan is embarrassed once knowing that Laurence is not concerned and Aedan is orange.
If everyone is orange, then Bethany is not embarrassed.
It can be concluded that Bethany is not itchy and Silas is latter once knowing that Hadden is not concerned.
If Aedan is orange, then Bethany is not itchy and Bethany is not concerned.
Hadden being not orange is equivalent to Vera being embarrassed and Brian being itchy.
If there is someone who is either latter or not concerned, then Laurence is not orange. | Hadden is embarrassed. | contradiction |
Laurence is not embarrassed.
Bethany is concerned.
Bethany is itchy.
Hadden is not embarrassed.
Silas is latter.
Bethany is latter.
Brian is not itchy.
Vera is not latter.
Aedan is embarrassed.
Laurence is latter.
Aedan is orange.
Vera is not concerned.If everyone is orange or not guilty, then Brian is embarrassed.
If someone is not orange and guilty, then he is both concerned and itchy, and vice versa.
If Silas is not latter and Laurence is orange, then Silas is not guilty.
Laurence is not orange if and only if Bethany is not guilty and Laurence is latter.
If there is someone who is either latter or guilty, then Aedan is orange.
If there is at least one people who is concerned or orange, then Bethany is not guilty.
It can be concluded that Aedan is embarrassed once knowing that Laurence is not concerned and Aedan is orange.
If everyone is orange, then Bethany is not embarrassed.
It can be concluded that Bethany is not itchy and Silas is latter once knowing that Hadden is not concerned.
If Aedan is orange, then Bethany is not itchy and Bethany is not concerned.
Hadden being not orange is equivalent to Vera being embarrassed and Brian being itchy.
If there is someone who is either latter or not concerned, then Laurence is not orange. | Bethany is not guilty. | self_contradiction |
Laurence is not embarrassed.
Bethany is concerned.
Bethany is itchy.
Hadden is not embarrassed.
Silas is latter.
Bethany is latter.
Brian is not itchy.
Vera is not latter.
Aedan is embarrassed.
Laurence is latter.
Aedan is orange.
Vera is not concerned.If everyone is orange or not guilty, then Brian is embarrassed.
If someone is not orange and guilty, then he is both concerned and itchy, and vice versa.
If Silas is not latter and Laurence is orange, then Silas is not guilty.
Laurence is not orange if and only if Bethany is not guilty and Laurence is latter.
If there is someone who is either latter or guilty, then Aedan is orange.
If there is at least one people who is concerned or orange, then Bethany is not guilty.
It can be concluded that Aedan is embarrassed once knowing that Laurence is not concerned and Aedan is orange.
If everyone is orange, then Bethany is not embarrassed.
It can be concluded that Bethany is not itchy and Silas is latter once knowing that Hadden is not concerned.
If Aedan is orange, then Bethany is not itchy and Bethany is not concerned.
Hadden being not orange is equivalent to Vera being embarrassed and Brian being itchy.
If there is someone who is either latter or not concerned, then Laurence is not orange. | Brian is not itchy. | entailment |
Laurence is not embarrassed.
Bethany is concerned.
Bethany is itchy.
Hadden is not embarrassed.
Silas is latter.
Bethany is latter.
Brian is not itchy.
Vera is not latter.
Aedan is embarrassed.
Laurence is latter.
Aedan is orange.
Vera is not concerned.If everyone is orange or not guilty, then Brian is embarrassed.
If someone is not orange and guilty, then he is both concerned and itchy, and vice versa.
If Silas is not latter and Laurence is orange, then Silas is not guilty.
Laurence is not orange if and only if Bethany is not guilty and Laurence is latter.
If there is someone who is either latter or guilty, then Aedan is orange.
If there is at least one people who is concerned or orange, then Bethany is not guilty.
It can be concluded that Aedan is embarrassed once knowing that Laurence is not concerned and Aedan is orange.
If everyone is orange, then Bethany is not embarrassed.
It can be concluded that Bethany is not itchy and Silas is latter once knowing that Hadden is not concerned.
If Aedan is orange, then Bethany is not itchy and Bethany is not concerned.
Hadden being not orange is equivalent to Vera being embarrassed and Brian being itchy.
If there is someone who is either latter or not concerned, then Laurence is not orange. | Vera is not concerned. | entailment |
Laurence is not embarrassed.
Bethany is concerned.
Bethany is itchy.
Hadden is not embarrassed.
Silas is latter.
Bethany is latter.
Brian is not itchy.
Vera is not latter.
Aedan is embarrassed.
Laurence is latter.
Aedan is orange.
Vera is not concerned.If everyone is orange or not guilty, then Brian is embarrassed.
If someone is not orange and guilty, then he is both concerned and itchy, and vice versa.
If Silas is not latter and Laurence is orange, then Silas is not guilty.
Laurence is not orange if and only if Bethany is not guilty and Laurence is latter.
If there is someone who is either latter or guilty, then Aedan is orange.
If there is at least one people who is concerned or orange, then Bethany is not guilty.
It can be concluded that Aedan is embarrassed once knowing that Laurence is not concerned and Aedan is orange.
If everyone is orange, then Bethany is not embarrassed.
It can be concluded that Bethany is not itchy and Silas is latter once knowing that Hadden is not concerned.
If Aedan is orange, then Bethany is not itchy and Bethany is not concerned.
Hadden being not orange is equivalent to Vera being embarrassed and Brian being itchy.
If there is someone who is either latter or not concerned, then Laurence is not orange. | Laurence is not latter. | contradiction |
Laurence is not embarrassed.
Bethany is concerned.
Bethany is itchy.
Hadden is not embarrassed.
Silas is latter.
Bethany is latter.
Brian is not itchy.
Vera is not latter.
Aedan is embarrassed.
Laurence is latter.
Aedan is orange.
Vera is not concerned.If everyone is orange or not guilty, then Brian is embarrassed.
If someone is not orange and guilty, then he is both concerned and itchy, and vice versa.
If Silas is not latter and Laurence is orange, then Silas is not guilty.
Laurence is not orange if and only if Bethany is not guilty and Laurence is latter.
If there is someone who is either latter or guilty, then Aedan is orange.
If there is at least one people who is concerned or orange, then Bethany is not guilty.
It can be concluded that Aedan is embarrassed once knowing that Laurence is not concerned and Aedan is orange.
If everyone is orange, then Bethany is not embarrassed.
It can be concluded that Bethany is not itchy and Silas is latter once knowing that Hadden is not concerned.
If Aedan is orange, then Bethany is not itchy and Bethany is not concerned.
Hadden being not orange is equivalent to Vera being embarrassed and Brian being itchy.
If there is someone who is either latter or not concerned, then Laurence is not orange. | Aedan is not concerned. | neutral |
Laurence is not embarrassed.
Bethany is concerned.
Bethany is itchy.
Hadden is not embarrassed.
Silas is latter.
Bethany is latter.
Brian is not itchy.
Vera is not latter.
Aedan is embarrassed.
Laurence is latter.
Aedan is orange.
Vera is not concerned.If everyone is orange or not guilty, then Brian is embarrassed.
If someone is not orange and guilty, then he is both concerned and itchy, and vice versa.
If Silas is not latter and Laurence is orange, then Silas is not guilty.
Laurence is not orange if and only if Bethany is not guilty and Laurence is latter.
If there is someone who is either latter or guilty, then Aedan is orange.
If there is at least one people who is concerned or orange, then Bethany is not guilty.
It can be concluded that Aedan is embarrassed once knowing that Laurence is not concerned and Aedan is orange.
If everyone is orange, then Bethany is not embarrassed.
It can be concluded that Bethany is not itchy and Silas is latter once knowing that Hadden is not concerned.
If Aedan is orange, then Bethany is not itchy and Bethany is not concerned.
Hadden being not orange is equivalent to Vera being embarrassed and Brian being itchy.
If there is someone who is either latter or not concerned, then Laurence is not orange. | Silas is not guilty. | neutral |
Laurence is not embarrassed.
Bethany is concerned.
Bethany is itchy.
Hadden is not embarrassed.
Silas is latter.
Bethany is latter.
Brian is not itchy.
Vera is not latter.
Aedan is embarrassed.
Laurence is latter.
Aedan is orange.
Vera is not concerned.If everyone is orange or not guilty, then Brian is embarrassed.
If someone is not orange and guilty, then he is both concerned and itchy, and vice versa.
If Silas is not latter and Laurence is orange, then Silas is not guilty.
Laurence is not orange if and only if Bethany is not guilty and Laurence is latter.
If there is someone who is either latter or guilty, then Aedan is orange.
If there is at least one people who is concerned or orange, then Bethany is not guilty.
It can be concluded that Aedan is embarrassed once knowing that Laurence is not concerned and Aedan is orange.
If everyone is orange, then Bethany is not embarrassed.
It can be concluded that Bethany is not itchy and Silas is latter once knowing that Hadden is not concerned.
If Aedan is orange, then Bethany is not itchy and Bethany is not concerned.
Hadden being not orange is equivalent to Vera being embarrassed and Brian being itchy.
If there is someone who is either latter or not concerned, then Laurence is not orange. | Bethany is concerned. | self_contradiction |
Laurence is not embarrassed.
Bethany is concerned.
Bethany is itchy.
Hadden is not embarrassed.
Silas is latter.
Bethany is latter.
Brian is not itchy.
Vera is not latter.
Aedan is embarrassed.
Laurence is latter.
Aedan is orange.
Vera is not concerned.If everyone is orange or not guilty, then Brian is embarrassed.
If someone is not orange and guilty, then he is both concerned and itchy, and vice versa.
If Silas is not latter and Laurence is orange, then Silas is not guilty.
Laurence is not orange if and only if Bethany is not guilty and Laurence is latter.
If there is someone who is either latter or guilty, then Aedan is orange.
If there is at least one people who is concerned or orange, then Bethany is not guilty.
It can be concluded that Aedan is embarrassed once knowing that Laurence is not concerned and Aedan is orange.
If everyone is orange, then Bethany is not embarrassed.
It can be concluded that Bethany is not itchy and Silas is latter once knowing that Hadden is not concerned.
If Aedan is orange, then Bethany is not itchy and Bethany is not concerned.
Hadden being not orange is equivalent to Vera being embarrassed and Brian being itchy.
If there is someone who is either latter or not concerned, then Laurence is not orange. | Bethany is not concerned. | self_contradiction |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.