Datasets:
tensorkelechi
/
arxiv-cstext

Dataset card Data Studio Files Community
1
text
stringlengths
0
89.3k
Claim
Assessment Think step by step Use the
following chain of thought
Step 1 Remember the claim
Step 2 Remember the summary
Step 3 Break down all the lines in the claim
and remember them Pay close attention
to numbers associated with the events and
store them separately
Step 4 Follow the given chain of thought
After following these steps decide if
the claim is SUPPORTED or NOT SUP
PORTED If you are not sure output NOT
SUPPORTED Only output SUPPORTED
if you are 100 percent confident that the
claim is fully supported by the summary
But regardless be sure that you output your
answer
Prompt 2
Assess the factual consistency of the fol
lowing claim based solely on the informa
tion provided in the summary Do not make
inferences or assumptions beyond the pro
vided information
Summary
Claim
Assessment Think step by step Use the
following chain of thought
Step 1 Remember the claim
Step 2 Remember the summary
Step 3 Break down all the lines in the
claim and remember them Pay close
attention to numbers associated with the
events and store them separately
Step 4 Use multiple factuality metrics eg
ChatGPTbased metrics FEQA QAGS
to evaluate the factuality of every line
Compare and contrast the results from each
metric discussing any variations in their
effectiveness in detecting factual errorsExplain which metric appears to be most
effective and why based on the specific
characteristics of the summary
Step 5 Summarize results
Step 6 Be strict Even if one line is
factually inconsistent mark as UNSUP
PORTED else mark as SUPPORTED
Prompt 3
In this task you are required to analyze the
factual consistency of a summary against
the original article by directly comparing
key points
Procedure
1 Identify Key Points List the key points
and claims made in the summary and the
corresponding points in the article
2 Comparative Analysis Create a side
byside comparison for each key point be
tween the summary and the article Note
any discrepancies no matter how minor in
each comparison
3 Detailed Discrepancy Evaluation For
each noted discrepancy determine whether
it falls under any specific error type eg
Negation Adjective Coreference etc
Evaluate the impact of each discrepancy
on the overall factual consistency For
each noted discrepancy determine whether
it falls under any specific error type eg
Adjective Error Coreference Error Num
ber Error Entity Error Attribute Error Pro
noun Error Commonsense Error Temporal
Error Predicate Error Discourse Link Er
ror Relation Error Quantity Error Event
Error Noun Phrase Error Circumstance
Error Hallucination Error ENSURE
THAT YOU THOROUGHLY AND COM
PREHENSIVELY CHECK FOR ANY Ad
jective Error Coreference Error Number
Error Entity Error Attribute Error Pronoun
Error Commonsense Error Temporal Er
ror Predicate Error Discourse Link Error
Relation Error Quantity Error Event Er
ror Noun Phrase Error Circumstance Error
Hallucination Error If any of the follow
ing discrepancies fall under the listed error
types output NOT SUPPORTED4 Strict Criteria for Comparative Support
Classify the summary as SUPPORTED
only if there are no discrepancies in the com
parative analysis If any discrepancy is
found classify the summary as NOT SUP
PORTED
Article
Summary
Answer SUPPORTED or NOT SUP
PORTED
B Existing Prompts
Li et al 2023 Prompt For Identifying Fac
tual Consistencies
Follow the instructions Instruction
Determine if the text is consistent or incon