text
stringlengths 0
89.3k
|
---|
Amazon
|
qzhuamznamazoncomXiang Song
|
Amazon
|
xiangsxamazoncomSoji Adeshina
|
Amazon
|
adesojiaamazoncom
|
Christos Faloutsos
|
Carnegie Mellon University
|
Amazon
|
christoscscmueduGeorge Karypis
|
Amazon
|
gkarypisamazoncomYizhou Sun
|
University of California Los Angeles
|
Amazon
|
yzsuncsuclaedu
|
ABSTRACT
|
Textrich graphs prevalent in data mining contexts like ecommerce
|
and academic graphs consist of nodes with textual features linked
|
by various relations Traditional graph machine learning models
|
such as Graph Neural Networks GNNs excel in encoding the
|
graph structural information but have limited capability in han
|
dling rich text on graph nodes Large Language Models LLMs
|
noted for their superior text understanding abilities offer a solution
|
for processing the text in graphs but face integration challenges
|
due to their limitation for encoding graph structures and their
|
computational complexities when dealing with extensive text in
|
large neighborhoods of interconnected nodes This paper intro
|
duces Hierarchical Compression HiCom a novel method to
|
align the capabilities of LLMs with the structure of textrich graphs
|
HiCom processes text in a nodes neighborhood in a structured
|
manner by organizing the extensive textual information into a
|
more manageable hierarchy and compressing node text step by
|
step Therefore HiCom not only preserves the contextual richness
|
of the text but also addresses the computational challenges of LLMs
|
which presents an advancement in integrating the text processing
|
power of LLMs with the structural complexities of textrich graphs
|
Empirical results show that HiCom can outperform both GNNs and
|
LLM backbones for node classification on ecommerce and citation
|
graphs HiCom is especially effective for nodes from a dense re
|
gion in a graph where it achieves a 348 average performance
|
improvement on five datasets while being more efficient than LLM
|
backbones
|
Work done while being an intern at Amazon Web Services
|
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or
|
classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed
|
for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation
|
on the first page Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the
|
authors must be honored Abstracting with credit is permitted To copy otherwise or
|
republish to post on servers or to redistribute to lists requires prior specific permission
|
andor a fee Request permissions from permissionsacmorg
|
Conference acronym XX June 0305 2018 Woodstock NY
|
2018 Copyright held by the ownerauthors Publication rights licensed to ACM
|
ACM ISBN 97814503XXXXX1806
|
httpsdoiorgXXXXXXXXXXXXXXCCS CONCEPTS
|
Computing methodologies Neural networks Natural
|
language processing Mathematics of computing Graph
|
algorithms
|
KEYWORDS
|
Machine Learning Graphs Compression Language Models
|
ACM Reference Format
|
Shichang Zhang Da Zheng Jiani Zhang Qi Zhu Xiang Song Soji Adeshina
|
Christos Faloutsos George Karypis and Yizhou Sun 2018 Hierarchical
|
Compression of TextRich Graphs via Large Language Models In Proceedings
|
of Make sure to enter the correct conference title from your rights confirmation
|
emai Conference acronym XX ACM New York NY USA 12 pages https
|
doiorgXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
|
1 INTRODUCTION
|
Textrich graphs have become prevalent and increasingly important
|
in data mining These graphs combine textual features with graph
|
structures offering a unique representation that captures complex
|
entity interactions For instance academic graphs represent publi
|
cations as nodes linked by citations with paper titles and abstracts
|
providing rich textual node features 51 Similarly ecommerce
|
graphs represent products as nodes connected by customer viewing
|
and purchasing histories enriched with detailed textual product de
|
scriptions 26 These graphs are characterized by both substantial
|
textual information and complex relations
|
Studies have pointed out that both textual features and graph
|
structures are crucial for data mining tasks associated with these
|
graphs eg node classification 4552 Figure 1 presents two
|
productcoviewing graph snippets demonstrating that product
|
category classifications such as Kitchen Dining orSports
|
Outdoors become clearer by considering the surrounding context
|
of neighboring nodes rather than relying solely on product descrip
|
tions For instance the category of a water bottle leans towards
|
Kitchen Dining when linked with items such as Glass Tum
|
blers and Strawberry Popping Boba suggesting a usage scenario
|
aligned with home and kitchen settings Conversely a water bot
|
tle with a similar description is more likely to be classified underarXiv240611884v1 csSI 13 Jun 2024Conference acronym XX June 0305 2018 Woodstock NY Zhang et al
|
Sports Outdoors if it is often coviewed with other water bot
|
tles for travel outdoors and gym as well as Health and Fitness
|
Trackers Thus integrating textual descriptions with the relational
|
information from a graph structure captures the comprehensive
|
neighborhood context and enhances predictive accuracy
|
To leverage both textual features and graph structures for solving
|
problems on textrich graphs Graph Neural Networks GNNs have
|
recently gained popularity as they can encode both information via
|
message passing 142138 While GNNs are good at capturing
|
structural information and have achieved great results on many
|
benchmarks 162532 they are not inherently equipped to handle
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.