text
stringlengths
0
89.3k
occlusion is different for each frame centralization for the
observation matrix Wdoes not guarantee that the transla
tion between shapes is eliminated Therefore recentering
of the shapes is required before alignment using the TPA
module which only requires modification of S
SiRpiSiT i 1 F 37
where the definition of TI1
P11Tis translation re
moval matrix The completed model after adding occlusion
is as followsmin
SQµ1
2OWΠS2
Fµ2
S
µ3
2F1X
i1
QiSiQi1Si1
2
F
st
SgˆSΛ
ˆSiQiSi i 1 F
SiRpiSiT i 1 F38
The update formulas for variables Ωcan be obtained by im
itating the above solution procedure Since the improve
ment of the model is only related to the optimization vari
ableSS we only need to adjust their update formulas
Solution for Sunder occlusion Sin model 38 needs to
be centralized and then transformed by rotation Rpito get
S Thus we only need to replace Sin Eq 31 with STie
µ3
βQTHTHQ 2I3FS
QTˆS1
βQTY2RpST1
βY339
Solution for Sunder occlusion We solve the 3D shape Si
framebyframe and the optimization model is as follows
Si arg min
Siµ1
2OiWiΠiSi2
F
β
2
SiRpiSiT
2
FD
Yi
3SiRpiSiTE
40
where Oi12oi We define MidiagoiRPP
then model 40 can be rewritten as
Si arg min
Siµ1
2WiΠiSiMi2
F
β
2
SiRpiSiT
2
FD
Yi
3SiRpiSiTE
41
Calculating the derivative of model 41 and equating it to
zero yields the solution of Sias follows
µ1
βΠT
iΠiSiM2
iSiT2
µ1
βΠT
iWiM2
iRT
piSiT1
βRT
piYi
3T42
In order to calculate the closedform solution of Si we use
the property vecAXB BTAvecXto equiva
lently represent Eq 42 as
µ1