text
stringlengths 0
89.3k
|
---|
occlusion is different for each frame centralization for the |
observation matrix Wdoes not guarantee that the transla |
tion between shapes is eliminated Therefore recentering |
of the shapes is required before alignment using the TPA |
module which only requires modification of S |
SiRpiSiT i 1 F 37 |
where the definition of TI1 |
P11Tis translation re |
moval matrix The completed model after adding occlusion |
is as followsmin |
SQµ1 |
2OWΠS2 |
Fµ2 |
S |
µ3 |
2F1X |
i1 |
QiSiQi1Si1 |
2 |
F |
st |
SgˆSΛ |
ˆSiQiSi i 1 F |
SiRpiSiT i 1 F38 |
The update formulas for variables Ωcan be obtained by im |
itating the above solution procedure Since the improve |
ment of the model is only related to the optimization vari |
ableSS we only need to adjust their update formulas |
Solution for Sunder occlusion Sin model 38 needs to |
be centralized and then transformed by rotation Rpito get |
S Thus we only need to replace Sin Eq 31 with STie |
µ3 |
βQTHTHQ 2I3FS |
QTˆS1 |
βQTY2RpST1 |
βY339 |
Solution for Sunder occlusion We solve the 3D shape Si |
framebyframe and the optimization model is as follows |
Si arg min |
Siµ1 |
2OiWiΠiSi2 |
F |
β |
2 |
SiRpiSiT |
2 |
FD |
Yi |
3SiRpiSiTE |
40 |
where Oi12oi We define MidiagoiRPP |
then model 40 can be rewritten as |
Si arg min |
Siµ1 |
2WiΠiSiMi2 |
F |
β |
2 |
SiRpiSiT |
2 |
FD |
Yi |
3SiRpiSiTE |
41 |
Calculating the derivative of model 41 and equating it to |
zero yields the solution of Sias follows |
µ1 |
βΠT |
iΠiSiM2 |
iSiT2 |
µ1 |
βΠT |
iWiM2 |
iRT |
piSiT1 |
βRT |
piYi |
3T42 |
In order to calculate the closedform solution of Si we use |
the property vecAXB BTAvecXto equiva |
lently represent Eq 42 as |
µ1 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.