text
stringlengths 0
89.3k
|
---|
2 |
F |
HQS |
2 |
F 29 |
Then the optimization model for the variable Scan be ex |
pressed as follows |
S arg min |
Sµ3 |
2 |
HQS |
2 |
F |
β |
2 |
ˆSQS |
2 |
FD |
Y2ˆSQSE |
β |
2 |
SRpS |
2 |
FD |
Y3SRpSE |
30 |
Calculating the derivative of model 30 and equating it to |
zero yields the closedform solution of Sas follows |
µ3 |
βQTHTHQ 2I3FS |
QTˆS1 |
βQTY2RpS1 |
βY331 |
Solution for SThe optimization model for the variable S |
can be expressed as follows |
S arg min |
Sµ1 |
2WΠS2 |
F |
β |
2 |
SRpS |
2 |
FD |
Y3SRpSE |
32 |
Calculating the derivative of model 32 and equating it tozero yields the closedform solution of Sas follows |
µ1 |
βΠTΠI3FS |
µ1 |
βΠTWRT |
pS1 |
βRT |
pY333 |
Solution for QWe have already discussed how to solve the |
TPA module in Sec 61 But in model 20 the variables in |
Ωare coupled and need to be optimized alternatively so |
the updating formula for Qneeds adjustments The opti |
mization terms in model 20 containing the optimization |
variable Qi i 1 Fare |
Qi arg min |
Qiµ3 |
2F1X |
i1 |
QiSiQi1Si1 |
2 |
F |
β |
2 |
ˆSQS |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.