text
stringlengths 0
89.3k
|
|---|
Θj
|
ξΘjPKs
|
i1Θi1jKs
|
0 K s j24
|
We set the shape basis dimension Ksaccording to the as
|
sumption of linear basis combination and truncate the sin
|
gular values We can better measure the importance of dif
|
ferent singular values by adjusting the weights through nor
|
malization
|
Solution for ˆSThe solution model for the optimization
|
variable ˆScan be expressed as follows
|
ˆS arg min
|
ˆSβ
|
2
|
SgˆSΛ
|
2
|
FD
|
Y1SgˆSΛE
|
β
|
2
|
ˆSQS
|
2
|
FD
|
Y2ˆSQSE
|
25
|
where gis an invertible linear operator so we can rewrite
|
the above equation in a more easily solvable form as
|
ˆS arg min
|
ˆSβ
|
2
|
ˆSQS
|
2
|
FD
|
Y2ˆSQSE
|
β
|
2
|
g1SˆSΛ
|
2
|
FD
|
g1Y1 g1SˆSΛE
|
26
|
The closedform solution of ˆScan be computed by taking
|
the derivative of the model 26 and equating it to zero
|
ˆSIPΛΛT
|
QS1
|
βY2g1SΛT1
|
βg1Y1ΛT27
|
Solution for SFirst we define the firstorder smoothing
|
matrix HR3F3Fas in 11
|
Hij
|
1 j i i 1 3F1
|
1 ji 3 i 1 3F1
|
0Otherwise 28Algorithm 2 ADMM Optimization Algorithm
|
1Input Initialize SSˆSSRpQΛ β β max λand
|
ϵ 1e6
|
2repeat
|
3 Update Sby Eq 22 yields S
|
4 Update ˆSby Eq 27 yields ˆS
|
5 Update Sby Eq 31 yields S
|
6 Update Sby Eq 33 yields S
|
7 repeat
|
8 Calculate the gradient by Eq 35 and update Q
|
by LM algorithm yields Q
|
9 until Convergence
|
10 Update Y1byY1β
|
SgˆSΛ
|
11 Update Y2byY2β
|
ˆSQS
|
12 Update Y3byY3β
|
SRpS
|
13 Update βasminβmax λβ
|
14untilSS ϵ
|
Output SQ
|
By introducing the matrix H we can denote the TPA mod
|
ule equivalently as
|
F1X
|
i1
|
QiSiQi1Si1
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.