text
stringlengths 0
89.3k
|
---|
2 |
F |
β |
2 |
SgˆSΛ |
2 |
FD |
Y1SgˆSΛE |
β |
2 |
ˆSQS |
2 |
FD |
Y2ˆSQSE |
β |
2 |
SRpS |
2 |
FD |
Y3SRpSE |
20 |
where Ω SSˆSSQdenotes the variables to be up |
datedYn3 |
n1are the Lagrange multipliers We then give |
the update formula for each optimization variable in Ω |
Solution for SSelecting all the optimization terms in |
model 20 that are related to S the optimization model |
forSis obtained as |
S arg min |
Sµ2 |
S |
β |
2 |
SgˆSΛ |
2 |
F |
D |
Y1SgˆSΛE |
arg min |
Sβ |
2 |
S |
gˆSΛ1 |
βY1 |
2 |
Fµ2 |
S |
21 |
We use the method in 26 to obtain the closedform solu |
tion We first define the softthresholding function Sτσ signσ max σ τ0 Then the closedform solution S |
can be given by |
SUSΘµ2 |
βΣVT |
UΣV SVD |
gˆSΛ1 |
βY1 |
22 |
where Θis the weight set for different singular values The |
larger the singular value tends to be the more significant |
and it should correspond to a smaller weight The weight Θ |
in 26 is set as |
Θjξ |
σjX γ 23 |
where σjXis the singular value of Xξis a positive num |
ber and γ 1e6 Here we use the relative magnitude of |
the singular values to adjust the weight setting ie |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.