Datasets:
tensorkelechi
/
arxiv-cstext

Dataset card Data Studio Files Community
1
text
stringlengths
0
89.3k
nual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistic s pages 40294039 Online July
2020 Association for Computational Linguistics doi 10 18653v12020aclmain371 URL
httpsaclanthologyorg2020aclmain371
Michael S Bernstein Greg Little Robert C Miller Bj orn Ha rtmann Mark S Ackerman David R
Karger David Crowell and Katrina Panovich Soylent a wor d processor with a crowd inside
InProceedings of the 23nd annual ACM symposium on User interfac e software and technology
pages 313322 2010
Jarossuppress law Bsuppress lasiok Parikshit Gopalan Lunjia Hu Adam Tau man Kalai and Preetum Nakkiran Loss
minimization yields multicalibration for large neural net works In 15th Innovations in Theoretical
Computer Science Conference ITCS 2024 2024
Jaroslaw Blasiok Parikshit Gopalan Lunjia Hu and Preetu m Nakkiran When does optimizing a
proper loss yield calibration Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 36 2024
Benjamin Brooks Alexander Frankel and Emir Kamenica Inf ormation hierarchies Econometrica
90521872214 2022
Yiling Chen and FangYi Yu Optimal scoring rule design arXiv preprint arXiv210707420 2021
Paul Duetting Vahab Mirrokni Renato Paes Leme Haifeng Xu and Song Zuo Mechanism design
for large language models arXiv preprint arXiv231010826 2023
Rujun Gao Naveen Thomas and Arun Srinivasa Work in progre ss Large language model based
automatic grading study In 2023 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference FIE pages 14
IEEE 2023
Tilmann Gneiting Making and evaluating point forecasts Journal of the American Statistical
Association 106494746762 2011
Tilmann Gneiting and Adrian E Raftery Strictly proper scor ing rules prediction and estimation
Journal of the American statistical Association 102477359378 2007
Jason D Hartline Liren Shan Yingkai Li and Yifan Wu Optim al scoring rules for multi
dimensional effort In The Thirty Sixth Annual Conference on Learning Theory pages 26242650
PMLR 2023
Dhamma Kimpara Rafael Frongillo and Bo Waggoner Proper l osses for discrete generative models
InInternational Conference on Machine Learning pages 1701517040 PMLR 2023
Yuqing Kong and Grant Schoenebeck Eliciting expertise wit hout verification In Proceedings of the
2018 ACM Conference on Economics and Computation EC 18 page 195212 New York NY
USA 2018 Association for Computing Machinery ISBN 97814 50358293 doi 1011453219166
3219172 URL httpsdoiorg10114532191663219172
20Tom Kwiatkowski Jennimaria Palomaki Olivia Redfield Mic hael Collins Ankur Parikh Chris Al
berti Danielle Epstein Illia Polosukhin Matthew Kelcey Jacob Devlin Kenton Lee Kristina N
Toutanova Llion Jones MingWei Chang Andrew Dai Jakob U szkoreit Quoc Le and Slav
Petrov Natural questions a benchmark for question answer ing research Transactions of the
Association of Computational Linguistics 2019
Nicolas S Lambert Elicitation and evaluation of statistic al forecasts working paper 2011
Edith Law and Luis Von Ahn Human computation Morgan Claypool Publishers 2011
Yingkai Li Jason D Hartline Liren Shan and Yifan Wu Optim ization of scoring rules In
Proceedings of the 23rd ACM Conference on Economics and Computa tion pages 988989 2022
Yuxuan Lu Shengwei Xu Yichi Zhang Yuqing Kong and Grant S choenebeck Eliciting informative
text evaluations with large language models the 25th ACM Conference on Economics and
Computation 2024
John McCarthy Measures of the value of information Proceedings of the National Academy of
Sciences of the United States of America 429654 1956
Robert C Miller Greg Little Michael Bernstein Jeffrey P Big ham Lydia B Chilton Max Goldman
John J Horton and Rajeev Nayak Heads in the cloud XRDS Crossroads The ACM Magazine
for Students 1722731 2010
OpenAI Six strategies for getting better results httpsplatformopenaicomdocsguidespromptengi neer
2023 Accessed 20240211
Long Ouyang Jeffrey Wu Xu Jiang Diogo Almeida Carroll Wain wright Pamela Mishkin Chong
Zhang Sandhini Agarwal Katarina Slama Alex Ray et al Tr aining language models to follow
instructions with human feedback Advances in neural information processing systems 3527730
27744 2022
Maneesha Papireddygari and Bo Waggoner Contracts with inf ormation acquisition via scoring
rules In Proceedings of the 23rd ACM Conference on Economics and Computa tion pages 703
704 2022
Ethan Perez Sam Ringer Kamil e Lukoˇ si ut e Karina Nguy en Edwin Chen Scott Heiner Craig
Pettit Catherine Olsson Sandipan Kundu Saurav Kadavath et al Discovering language model
behaviors with modelwritten evaluations In 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Com
putational Linguistics ACL 2023 pages 1338713434 Association for Computational Lingui stics
ACL 2023
Pranav Rajpurkar Jian Zhang Konstantin Lopyrev and Perc y Liang SQuAD 100000 ques
tions for machine comprehension of text In Jian Su Kevin Du h and Xavier Carreras edi
torsProceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Na tural Language Processing
pages 23832392 Austin Texas November 2016 Associatio n for Computational Linguistics doi
1018653v1D161264 URL httpsaclanthologyorgD161264
Johannes Schneider Bernd Schenk Christina Niklaus and M ichaelis Vlachos Towards llmbased
autograding for short textual answers arXiv preprint arXiv230911508 2023
21Alexander Wei Nika Haghtalab and Jacob Steinhardt Jailb roken How does llm safety training
failAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems 36 2024
22Textual ElicitationGPT
AFMV AFV
Algorithm Class 1
GPT4 057 065
GPT35turbo16k 029 018
Algorithm Class 2
GPT4 042 065
GPT35turbo16k 006 011
Table 5 The Spearmans correlation between the instructor score for textual review and
ElicitationGPTscores
MV AQ
Algorithm Class 1 044 084
Algorithm Class 2 049 072
Table 6 The Spearmans correlation between the instructor score for numerical review and
scoring rules for numerical review
A More Empirical Evaluations
A1 How does the power of language model affect scoring GPT4 vs GPT35
We implement ElicitationGPTwith the same scoring rules via queries to different versions o f Chat
GPT Querying GPT35 significantly reduces the correlatio n between the instructor score and the
ElicitationGPT score We find the bottleneck to the performa nce of GPT is the performance on
the summarization task We observe a low correlation of GPT 35 output with the instructor re
view when GPT35 tends to split indicator states into differ ent categories Bad summarization
of topics induces the filtering of kmost important topics to fail However since we use the sam e
prompt to query GPT4 and GPT35 it is possible that there a re better approaches to implement
ElicitationGPTwith GPT35
A2 Which numerical score is better AQ vs MV
In our paper we test two scoring rules for numerical grade el icitation