tensorkelechi/arxiv-cstext · Datasets at Hugging Face

text stringlengths 0 89.3k
Medical Large
Language Model
Evaluations Sec IV
Machine Evaluation
Human Centric Evaluation
Medical
Datasets
Public
Corpus
Synthetic
Data
Organization
Corpus
Data
Cleaning
Data
Augmentation
Data
Formatting
Translation
Standardized
Training Sets
IFT
CPIFT
IFTHA
CPIFTHA
Accuracy Matching Degree
Rating
Win tie and loss rate
Fig 1 Training Pipeline from General LLMs to Medical LLMs Firstly the medical corpus is collected and processed to form a standardized training set
Next an appropriate training paradigm is selected to train General LLMs to become Medical LLMs with medical knowledge The training paradigms consist
of three optional training phases Continued Pretraining CP Instruction Finetuning IFT and Human Alignment HA Finally Medical LLMs are evaluated
from both machine and human perspectives
effectiveness and efficiency of training domain LLMs from
general LLMs this paper systematically surveys medical
LLMs derived from further training of general LLMs from
the perspectives of dataset methodology and evaluation
The main content is depicted in Fig 1 Firstly we focus
on the construction of training datasets for medical LLMs
as the quality of these datasets directly impacts the models
medical capabilities Thus we analyze the training datasets
for existing medical LLMs from two perspectives the source
of the training corpus and data processing methods Training
corpus sources can assist developers in collecting the expected
data while data processing methods facilitate the cleansing
of data to form a standardized training set Furthermore
considering the differing capabilities injected to medical LLMs
by the three training stages of CP IFT and HA as well
as the variations in required computational resources and
data scale we have summarized the combinations of training
stages adopted by existing medical LLMs and classified them
into four paradigms IFT CPIFT IFTHA and CPIFT
HA These paradigms can guide institutions in choosing the
appropriate training methods based on their computational
capabilities data scale and specific needs Subsequently
given the professional nature of content generated by medical
LLMs and the potential harm that erroneous content can
cause to patients we systematically review existing evaluation
benchmarks and protocols from two perspectives machine
evaluation and humancentric evaluation In particular we
standardize the dimensions of the humancentric evaluationFinally we analyze the shortcomings of existing medical
LLMs and propose future research directions with the potential
to address these issues
Here we compare several recent similar studies The study
20 systematically summarizes the training data methods
optimization strategies and evaluation techniques for LLMs
in healthcare However our work retrieved updated literature
on medical LLMs and summarized the training data and
methods from a more nuanced perspective Specifically we
analyzed the data sources and processing techniques in detail
for training data For training methods we identified four
training paradigms and examined their respective advantages
and disadvantages Another study similar to ours is 21
which systematically overviews the methods datasets and
applications details of language foundation models vision
foundation models bioinformatics foundation models and
multimodal foundation models in healthcare Our work specif
ically focuses on language foundation models summarizing
datasets training methods and evaluation benchmarks using
new classifications and perspectives Finally some studies
19 22 have concentrated on the applications and challenges
of LLMs in medicine In contrast our research specifically
emphasizes methods and technologies
The contributions of this review are summarized below
1 We systematically review medical LLMs emerged since
ChatGPT Detailed guidelines and tutorials are provided
for healthcare organizations in training customized med
ical LLMs in terms of dataset construction trainingJOURNAL OF L ATEX CLASS FILES VOL 14 NO 8 AUGUST 2021 3
technologies and evaluation benchmarks
2 Data Acquisition and Processing Section II Summa
rizing and classifying existing training corpus sources
and data processing methods for medical LLMs offers
robust recommendations and guidance for constructing
customized medical datasets
3 Training Paradigms Section III Systematically sum
marizes the existing training methods for medical LLMs
and proposes four distinct training paradigms This fa
cilitates medical organizations in selecting appropriate
training methods based on their available computational
resources

Medical Large

Language Model

Evaluations Sec IV

Machine Evaluation

Human Centric Evaluation

Medical

Datasets

Public

Corpus

Synthetic

Data

Organization

Corpus

Data

Cleaning

Data

Augmentation

Data

Formatting

Translation

Standardized

Training Sets

IFT

CPIFT

IFTHA

CPIFTHA

Accuracy Matching Degree

Rating

Win tie and loss rate

Fig 1 Training Pipeline from General LLMs to Medical LLMs Firstly the medical corpus is collected and processed to form a standardized training set

Next an appropriate training paradigm is selected to train General LLMs to become Medical LLMs with medical knowledge The training paradigms consist

of three optional training phases Continued Pretraining CP Instruction Finetuning IFT and Human Alignment HA Finally Medical LLMs are evaluated

from both machine and human perspectives

effectiveness and efficiency of training domain LLMs from

general LLMs this paper systematically surveys medical

LLMs derived from further training of general LLMs from

the perspectives of dataset methodology and evaluation

The main content is depicted in Fig 1 Firstly we focus

on the construction of training datasets for medical LLMs

as the quality of these datasets directly impacts the models

medical capabilities Thus we analyze the training datasets

for existing medical LLMs from two perspectives the source

of the training corpus and data processing methods Training

corpus sources can assist developers in collecting the expected

data while data processing methods facilitate the cleansing

of data to form a standardized training set Furthermore

considering the differing capabilities injected to medical LLMs

by the three training stages of CP IFT and HA as well

as the variations in required computational resources and

data scale we have summarized the combinations of training

stages adopted by existing medical LLMs and classified them

into four paradigms IFT CPIFT IFTHA and CPIFT

HA These paradigms can guide institutions in choosing the

appropriate training methods based on their computational

capabilities data scale and specific needs Subsequently

given the professional nature of content generated by medical

LLMs and the potential harm that erroneous content can

cause to patients we systematically review existing evaluation

benchmarks and protocols from two perspectives machine

evaluation and humancentric evaluation In particular we

standardize the dimensions of the humancentric evaluationFinally we analyze the shortcomings of existing medical

LLMs and propose future research directions with the potential

to address these issues

Here we compare several recent similar studies The study

20 systematically summarizes the training data methods

optimization strategies and evaluation techniques for LLMs

in healthcare However our work retrieved updated literature

on medical LLMs and summarized the training data and

methods from a more nuanced perspective Specifically we

analyzed the data sources and processing techniques in detail

for training data For training methods we identified four

training paradigms and examined their respective advantages

and disadvantages Another study similar to ours is 21

which systematically overviews the methods datasets and

applications details of language foundation models vision

foundation models bioinformatics foundation models and

multimodal foundation models in healthcare Our work specif

ically focuses on language foundation models summarizing

datasets training methods and evaluation benchmarks using

new classifications and perspectives Finally some studies

19 22 have concentrated on the applications and challenges

of LLMs in medicine In contrast our research specifically

emphasizes methods and technologies

The contributions of this review are summarized below

1 We systematically review medical LLMs emerged since

ChatGPT Detailed guidelines and tutorials are provided

for healthcare organizations in training customized med

ical LLMs in terms of dataset construction trainingJOURNAL OF L ATEX CLASS FILES VOL 14 NO 8 AUGUST 2021 3

technologies and evaluation benchmarks

2 Data Acquisition and Processing Section II Summa

rizing and classifying existing training corpus sources

and data processing methods for medical LLMs offers

robust recommendations and guidance for constructing

customized medical datasets

3 Training Paradigms Section III Systematically sum

marizes the existing training methods for medical LLMs

and proposes four distinct training paradigms This fa

cilitates medical organizations in selecting appropriate

training methods based on their available computational

resources