text
stringlengths 0
89.3k
|
---|
N0Ξ |
0 |
wk |
d |
Kfz |
N Ψd |
N0wk |
ˆΨd |
N1j d |
AˆΦe |
N1j d |
BˆΦν |
N1jˆΣNj |
d |
AΦe |
Nj1 d |
BΦν |
Nj1Ξ |
j1 Ψd |
Nj1 |
ˆΨd |
Nj d |
AˆΦe |
Nj d |
BˆΦν |
NjˆΞj |
d |
AΦe |
Nj d |
BΦν |
NjΞ |
j Ψd |
Nj |
Using these candidates we then check the inclu |
sions 32k and 32l ie for i 0 N2 we get |
ˆψd |
i i1M |
j0ˆΨd |
ijW W |
ψd |
i1 Ψd |
i10wk iM |
j1Ψd |
i1jW W |
ψd |
i1 iM |
j0Ψd |
i1jW W32k |
σ |
i2W ˆσi1W |
and for iN1 we get |
ˆψd |
N1 N2M |
j0ˆΨd |
N1jW W |
d |
Kfz |
N Ψd |
N0wk N1M |
j1Ψd |
NjW W |
αd |
KfZfN1M |
j0Ψd |
NjW W32l |
σ |
NW ˆσNW |
both of which satisfy 32k Finally 32l is trivially fulfilled by the candidate solution ie |
ˆαd |
KfZfN1M |
j0ˆΨd |
NjW W |
αd |
KfZfN1M |
j0Ψd |
NjW W32l |
σ |
NW ˆσNW |
Since we impose 32k and 32l for each vertex Dd |
individually the argument holds for all vertices of D |
Therefore we have shown that the candidate solu |
tions 37 38 satisfy all constraints in 32 which |
proves recursive feasibility 2 |
Next we show that the closedloop system is inputto |
state stable ISS where ISS is formally defined in 3 |
Definition B42 For the ISS proof we rely on an ISS |
Lyapunov function 3 Appendix B6 which we define in |
the following definition Note that due to the equivalence |
of 1 and 35 we only need to check the stability of 35 |
to conclude ISS of the original system |
Definition 5 ISSLyapunov function Consider |
an RPI set S Rnwith the origin in its interior A |
function VS R0is called an ISSLyapunov func |
tion in Sfor system 35withuκMPCxandwW |
if there exist Kfunctions γ1 γ2 γ3 and γ4 such that for |
allx SandwW |
γ1xVxγ2x 40a |
VxVxγ3xγ4w 40b |
where is any vector norm on Rn |
Theorem 4 Given that Assumption 1 holds system 1 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.