text
stringlengths 0
89.3k
|
---|
subject to constraints 3and in closedloop with 33 |
is inputtostate stable ISS in Xfeasfor any admissible |
sequence of combined disturbances η where Xfeasis the |
set of all initial states xkfor which 32is feasible |
PROOF Due to Theorem 3 we know that 32 is re |
cursively feasible for all xk Xfeas Therefore we can |
prove ISS by showing that the optimal value function |
of 32 is an ISSLyapunov function in Xfeasaccord |
ing to Definition 5 3 Lemma B44 Denote 32a as |
VNxkzv and the optimal value function of 32 |
asV |
Nxk ie VN evaluated at the optimal solu |
tionzv Using the candidate sequences ˆzˆvdefined |
in 37 it follows that |
V |
Nxk1V |
NxkVNxk1 ˆzˆvV |
Nxk |
lfˆzNlfz |
N |
N1X |
i0lˆziˆvilz |
i v |
i |
10We then use the candidate sequences 37 and uniform |
continuity of lf with corresponding Kfunction βf |
to obtain the upper bound |
lfˆzNlfz |
N lfAKfz |
N Γwklfz |
N |
lfAKfz |
NlfAKfz |
N |
lfAKfz |
Nlfz |
N |
lfAKfz |
NΓwklfAKfz |
N |
lfAKfz |
Nlfz |
NβfΓwk |
We rewrite the sum of the cost differences as |
N1X |
i0lˆziˆvilz |
i v |
i lz |
0 v |
0 lˆzN1ˆvN1 |
N1X |
i1lˆzi1ˆvi1lz |
i v |
i |
and use the candidate sequences 37 and uniform conti |
nuity of l with βx βu the respective Kfunctions |
to obtain |
lˆzi1ˆvi1lz |
i v |
ilz |
iΦe |
i0wk v |
iΦν |
i0wk |
lz |
i v |
i |
lz |
iΦe |
i0wk v |
iΦν |
i0wk |
lz |
i v |
iΦν |
i0wk |
lz |
i v |
iΦν |
i0wklz |
i v |
i |
βxΦe |
i0wkβuΦν |
i0wk |
Additionally we rewrite |
lˆzN1ˆvN1 lz |
NΦe |
N0wk Kfz |
NΦν |
N0wk |
lz |
NΦe |
N0wk Kfz |
NΦν |
N0wk |
lz |
N Kfz |
NΦν |
N0wk |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.