text
stringlengths 0
89.3k
|
---|
tween the present post being visited at time twith the users |
interests vector and the considered post to be accessed in time |
t 1 with the users interests vector Formula 1 shows |
how the information scent is calculated when considering to |
move from the current post located on the edge eito one of |
its neighbors located on the edge ej |
InfoScent ej Simej ISimei I 1 |
Where |
Iis the users interests vector |
eiis the current post |
ejNi with Nibeing the set of adjacent edges to ei |
ieeis neighborhood |
Simrepresents the cosine similarity between two |
vectors |
The main role of the information scent is to guide the for |
aging a positive value indicates that we are approaching a |
relevant post in the social graph whereas a negative value |
indicates the oppositeD Trail surfing path |
While foraging food animals follow a certain path that al |
lows them to reach food sources in an optimal way according |
to the OFT Web users have a similar behavior as they visit |
Web pages one at a time until reaching a relevant page that |
satisfies their information needs constructing there a surfing |
path composed of one or more Web pages |
The information foraging process starts from an initial post |
and progresses through each step attempting to reach a post |
with more relevant information than its predecessor A surf |
ing path is built for this purpose starting with an initial |
contentsharing edge and then being enriched by adding fur |
ther edges to create a chain of related posts This means |
that at each step of the foraging process the system should |
choose one contentsharing edge to visit from the neighbor |
hood of the current post This choice is made based on For |
mula 2 |
Peiej |
0 ifInfoScent ej0 |
InfoScent ejP |
elNpiInfoScent elotherwise |
2 |
where |
Peiejis the likelihood of selecting the edge ej |
among the reachable edges from the current edge ei |
Npiis the set of adjacent contentsharing edges of the |
edge eiwith a positive information scent value ie |
elNpiInfoScent el0 |
IV Adapted elephant herding optimization to |
information foraging |
The social structure of elephants is complex varying by gen |
der and population dynamics Adult females form a matriar |
chal societies while adult males are usually solitary 29 30 |
A herd structure is similar to concentric rings with the in |
nermost circle comprising a family unit of related female |
adults A family unit is formed by the eldest most domi |
nant female called the matriarch as well as her adult daugh |
ters their calves and a number of juveniles The male calves |
leave the herd when reaching adulthood generally between |
the age of 12 and 15 From this stable core the groupings |
widen to include less familiar individuals A clan is formed |
when elephants gather in large groups consisting of different |
herds The functioning of the elephants society is illustrated |
by Figure 4 |
We decided to combine the information foraging theory with |
EHO in order to efficiently identify useful information in |
large social graphs Each elephant will look for relevant so |
cial posts by browsing a section of the graph in this manner |
constructing surfing paths that lead to relevant information |
The elephants perform the foraging while taking advantage |
of the hierarchy and organization of their society This will |
allow them to collaborate and find relevant information in a |
more effective and efficient way |
In this section we adapt the basic Elephant Herding Opti |
mization algorithm to information foraging Note that the |
original EHO was developed to address continuous prob |
lems whereas information foraging is a discrete combinaEnhanced Elephant Herding Optimization for Large Scale Information Access on Social Media 32 |
Figure 4 Elephants society structure |
torial problem Further improvements to basic EHO will be |
introduced in sections V and VI |
A Generating the elephant population and assigning the po |
sitions |
To create an elephant population with pclans we first gener |
atepdifferent elephants with respect to distClan which rep |
resents the shortest minimal distance between clans The rest |
of the elephants in each clan are then formed using the posi |
tions of the pelephants with respect to distElephant which |
represents the maximum distance between elephants in the |
same clan Figure 5 depicts a population of three clans scat |
tered throughout a social graph |
Figure 5 A population of elephants distributed over a social |
graph |
We assign mdifferent positions to a social graph with m |
contentsharing edges one for each edge These positions |
are represented by integer values in the interval 1 m Each |
elephant jbelonging to clan ciis identified by a unique po |
sition denoted by the xcij An elephants position at time t |
is the position of the edge it is visiting at that timeB Surfing paths construction |
Each elephant is assigned the duty of building a surfing path |
leading to relevant information during one iteration of the |
EHO algorithm This is accomplished using Algorithm 1 |
Algorithm 1 Building a surfing path |
Input xcij elephants position I users interests G so |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.