text
stringlengths 0
89.3k
|
---|
of the information foraging process For instance if a user is |
interested in information about health it would be unneces |
sary to search posts talking about sport |
Consequently and given the above observations we propose |
to introduce a new step in the Elephant Herding Optimization |
algorithm consisting of dividing the search space into multi |
ple regions in order to explore them more efficiently In addi |
tion to modeling the concept of territories in nature this will |
improve the performance of the algorithm especially when |
dealing with large scale problems |
There are numerous methods for grouping similar objects |
together they can be either supervised or unsupervised de |
pending on whether classes of objects already exist or not |
Supervised classification considers classes to insert the ob |
jects whereas unsupervised classification generates clusters |
as outcome Clustering is the process of organizing objects |
into groups whose members are similar A cluster is a col |
lection of objects which are consistent internally but clearly |
dissimilar to the objects belonging to other clusters One of |
the main advantages of clustering over supervised classifica |
tion is the fact that it doesnt require predefined classes and It |
can therefore be performed with data of different sizes with |
out the need of a taxonomy or a training set |
In this paper we perform the clustering phase using k |
means algorithm which is known for its efficiency with |
large datasets and its capacity of working with textual data |
32 33 It intends to automatically group a set of nobjects |
intokclusters so that objects in a same cluster are similar |
to one another while objects from different clusters are dis |
similar 34 The grouping decision is based on the distance |
between the object and each cluster centroid mean in a way |
that each object belongs to the cluster with the nearest cen |
troid A centeroid serves as a prototype of its corresponding |
cluster and is defined as the average of all the objects in that |
cluster The number of clusters kcan be either predefined or |
userdefined depending on the problem the number of ob |
jects and the goal behind clustering |
When it comes to textual data clustering the idea consists in |
grouping texts or documents in clusters based on their con |
tent similarity In order to achieve this goal a proper doc |
ument representation method is necessary We use the vec |
tor space model VSM to represent each social post eias a |
weighted vector of terms ei wi1 wi2 w iTwhere |
Tis the set of terms or features that occur at least once in |
the social graph G The detailed clustering process using k |
means is presented in the following subsectionsEnhanced Elephant Herding Optimization for Large Scale Information Access on Social Media 34 |
A Text preprocessing |
This preprocessing phase refers to the set of actions that are |
applied to the social posts in order to achieve a good sta |
tistical representation of the whole collection This phase |
is performed before defining the weights of the words using |
TFIDF and includes the following actions |
Tokenization which consists in dividing the text into |
individual words |
Removing special characters related to social media |
platforms links usernames etc |
Deleting common words that dont bring any semantic |
meaning to the text using a stop words list |
Reducing each word to its root using adequate algo |
rithms such as Porter Stemming As a result inflected |
words will be grouped under their word stem which is |
referred to as a term |
The result of the textual preprocessing is a collection of posts |
that are each represented by a set of significant terms The |
following subsection explain how each post is afterwards |
converted into a weighted vector of terms |
B Feature extraction with TFIDF |
The goal of the feature extraction using TFIDF is to create |
a mapping of the textual data into vectors of terms This |
vector representation of the social posts is grounded on the |
term relevance concept The weight associated to each term |
should be proportional to its importance so that terms with |
high weight values are considered as relevant This method |
consists in increasing the weight of a term when it appears |
many times in a post and lowering it when it is common in |
many posts We can summarize the TFIDF calculation with |
the two following steps |
1 Term Frequency TF |
The term frequency TFtiejestimates the importance of |
a term tiin a post ejbased on how often tiappears in ej |
The more frequent a term is in a post the more important it |
is in its description We use Formula 8 to compute the term |
frequency |
TFtiej freq ijP |
tlejfreq lj8 |
With freq ijbeing the number of occurrences of term tiin |
postej |
2 Inverse Document Frequency IDF |
Inverse Document Frequency indicates how commonly a |
word is used in a collection of documents A term has an |
important characterizing power if its frequency is high in a |
particular social post and low in the rest of the posts We |
estimate the inverse document frequency using Formula 9 |
IDF ti logE |
ni 9 |
WhereEis the total number of posts in the social graph |
niis the number of posts containing the term ti |
3 TFIDF |
We compute the weigh of a term tiin a post ejusing the |
TFIDscore which is obtained by Formula 10 The |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.