dataset_id
int64 0
5.47k
| email_body
stringlengths 800
9.73k
|
|---|---|
2,100 |
Subject: standy
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/1813.
=====================================
It may, or may not, be as obvious to you as it is to me, but it seems like
the issue of standy rates/charges for current and new self-generators has
been brought back "on the table", as one of many effects of AB970.? The first
attachment is a copy of ORAs comments (filed yesterday) that focuses on AB970
effects on DG/EE public purpose programs; the other attachments are media
accounts of the effects of summer 2000 interruptions on participants and
non-participants in various ISO/UDC "load management/demand respoisnivesness"
programs, incluidng SCE's intended use of "windfalls" from "penalties" paid
by those customers who were expected to cut loads but didn't.
Basic question--does Enron have a position on standby rates/charges (e.g.,
should these rates/charges be lowered---now?)
? <<ORA Comments on ESRA for 2001 plans_Final.doc>> <<interrupt policy and
practice_SCE windfall DJN 9_00.doc>> <<Interrupt_SCE participant drop outs
DJN 8_00.doc>> <<Interup_Oil refinery drop outs DJN 8_00.doc>>
<<Interupt_SCE_Inglewood dropout LAT 9_00.doc>> <<Interrup_Air Quality
conflicts SJMN 8_00.doc>>
- ORA Comments on ESRA for 2001 plans_Final.doc
- interrupt policy and practice_SCE windfall DJN 9_00.doc
- Interrupt_SCE participant drop outs DJN 8_00.doc
- Interup_Oil refinery drop outs DJN 8_00.doc
- Interupt_SCE_Inglewood dropout LAT 9_00.doc
- Interrup_Air Quality conflicts SJMN 8_00.doc
=====================================
|
2,101 |
Subject: RE: Directions
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/4517.
=====================================
I will send this out. Yes, we can talk tonight. When will you be at the
house?
Cameron Sellers
Vice President, Business Development
PERFECT
1860 Embarcadero Road - Suite 210
Palo Alto, CA 94303
[email protected]
650.798.3366 (direct dial)
650.269.3366 (cell)
650.858.1095 (fax)
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, December 11, 2000 11:02 AM
To: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Directions
Can we do a little planning tonite for this weekend?
Cameron:
Here are the directions to the place in Stinson. Can you email to your
invites? Did you invite John E?
We have the place from 5 PM on Friday evening till 10 AM on Sunday morning.
Address:
11 Sonoma Patio
Stinson Beach
If you're coming from the City and take Panoramic over Mt. Tam, then when
you hit Highway One, make a right and head north toward town. Go through
town and make a left on Calle del Arroyo. If you see the lagoon on your
left, you've gone too far. After making a left on Calle del Arroyo, make a
left on Sonoma.
If you're coming from points North, then you'll be heading south on Highway
One toward Stinson. After you've passed the lagoon on your right, you'll
eventually come to Calle del Arroyo. If you arrive in the town of Stinson
Beach, you've gone too far. Make a right on Calle del Arroyo, then a left
on Sonoma.
=====================================
|
2,102 |
Subject: Enron Image 2000 Video is Here
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/2108.
=====================================
Enron's Image 2000 Video is Now Available
We think you will like Enron's new corporate image video, which can be used
for employees, customers, suppliers, government officials, and other
audiences who want to know about Enron. The video features Ken Lay, Jeff
Skilling and Joe Sutton who discuss four key business initiatives:
broadband; wholesale energy; energy outsourcing services and EnronOnline.
The look and feel represents our people, culture and new branding.
MooreSource has a large supply of standard VHS (also known as NTSC) copies,
which is the format used in the U.S. and some international locations, and
copies in PAL, which is the format used in the U.K. and in most European
locations. There also are special PAL formats (PAL-M and PAL-N) available
for locations in South America.
You may use the order form below or, for those of you who prefer to order
electronically, you may do so from MooreSource using the following item
numbers. If you aren't familiar with MooreSource, please go
tohttp://home.enron.com:84/imgctr/ and click on the MooreSource button.
Instructions for ordering will be provided there. If you have questions
about using MooreSource, contact Michael Shea at 713/853-5418.
Order a copy today.
Item # Description Price
43162 Image Video-VHS $4.25
43163 Image Video-PAL $8.25
43164 Image Video-PAL/M $15.00
43165 Image Video-PAL/N $15.00
=====================================
|
2,103 |
Subject: Re: Draft Comments on DWR Letter
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/4795.
=====================================
Jeanne,
I think you are saying more and going into more detail than we need to. It
was my understanding from the call that you were not going to get into the
statutory interpretation issues at all.
I think modifying the first sentence of the carryover to the top of page 2
(at least as printed on my machine) is fully sufficient if you just say:
"Moreover, EPMI submits that DWR has presented the Commission with a
reasonable [STRIKEOUT interpretation of the STRIKEOUT] approach for
implementing the applicable statutory language."
I do not understand the benefit of the balance of the paragraph. It opens us
up to getting drug into a interpretation argument we do not need to be in.
Similarly, I do not understand why we would want to say "is consistent with
the statutory language" and similar statements in the following paragraph.
I am not sure I agree fully with those statements or that we need to be
limiting our ability to respond to any further proposals which may come out
by taking a firm position of the statutory foundation for CDWR's approach in
this letter.
Am I missing something? Thanks
>>> JBennett <[email protected]> 03/21 11:26 AM >>>
Attached, per our conference call of earlier this morning, are short and
sweet comments on the March 14, 2001 letter of DWR re CPA implementation.
Please provide any comments/questions to me as soon as possible.
<<X22873.DOC>>
Jeanne Bennett
=====================================
|
2,104 |
Subject: RE: Socal Storage Projects
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/deleted_items/297.
=====================================
Thanks Jeff, I am planning a business trip to San Fransisco with Stephanie Miller towrards the end of August... are you around.
I will check on dates but it should be the end of Aug.
BT
-----Original Message-----
From: Dasovich, Jeff
Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2001 2:02 PM
To: Tholt, Jane M.; Tycholiz, Barry; Lawner, Leslie
Subject: RE: Socal Storage Projects
They are selling gas from Montebello.
They have been given authority by the PUC to begin taking steps to sell from the remaining two (Alsio and La Goleta), but the PUC left some issues (principally around ratemaking) open, and have not given them the authority to actually begin selling the gas. SoCal would like to start selling around Oct. 1, so they're expecting (hoping for) a decision in early September. However, the state-run consumer group (ORA) and TURN have asked the Commission to require SoCal to retain two-thirds of the gas and sell it to the core at book value--unclear where the Commission will come out on that.
If there's anything else, let me know.
Best,
Jeff
-----Original Message-----
From: Tholt, Jane M.
Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2001 10:44 AM
To: Dasovich, Jeff
Subject: Socal Storage Projects
Can you provide the West Desk with an update on the Socal Storage projects-Socal Montebello Salvage Project ;Alsio Canyon and Lo goleta Cushion Gas Projects Would like to have something by this afternoon if possible.
=====================================
|
2,105 |
Subject: FW: CA De-DASR's
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/inbox/1018.
=====================================
Customers we will start to de-DASR probably next week. VERY CONFIDENTIAL
-----Original Message-----
From: Hughes, Evan
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 10:33 AM
To: Steffes, James D.; Dietrich, Janet; Delainey, David W.; Schwarz, Angela; Blachman, Jeremy; Leff, Dan; Herndon, Rogers; Gresch, Robert; Apollo, Beth; O'Neil, Murray P.; Huddleson, Diann
Subject: FW: CA De-DASR's
This is the list we had Thursday last week. Please let me know if you need more information.
Thanks,
Evan
-----Original Message-----
From: Hughes, Evan
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 4:58 PM
To: Steffes, James D.; Dietrich, Janet; Delainey, David W.; Schwarz, Angela; Blachman, Jeremy; Leff, Dan; Herndon, Rogers; Gresch, Robert; Apollo, Beth; O'Neil, Murray P.; Huddleson, Diann
Subject: CA De-DASR's
The attached list details the California De-DASR status (by customer) as of this afternoon. This list was prepared using the prior guidance of "...all customers pre-June/August with the exception of PacTel, IBM and UC/CSU".
Please note that there are two tabs to the spreadsheet. fyi -- You need to scroll to the bottom of the EESO List to see those customers that are not "qued".
We are prepared to launch the De-DASR's but want to confirm via this message that everyone agrees with each individual customer status.
Please give me a call if you need additional information -- or have any edits or changes.
Thanks,
Evan
=====================================
|
2,106 |
Subject: Re: Jeff Dasovich
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/26.
=====================================
Thanks very much to all for your assistance. Is it possible to get some idea
of exactly what the amount to be refunded is? Thanks so much again for your
help.
Best,
Jeff
Andrea Williams@ENRON
08/24/2000 04:12 PM
To: Michelle Hargrave/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Shawn Simon/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES@ECT
Subject: Re: Jeff Dasovich
Michelle,
We have corrected Mr. Dasovich's tuition reimbursement to non-taxable. Due
to SAP configuration, the system will not deduct any taxes from his pay until
the total is refunded. Therefore, on his 8/31 paycheck, he will not have a
tax deduction for FICA/SS/MED.
Thanks,
Andrea
Michelle Hargrave@ECT
08/04/2000 04:41 PM
To: Andrea Williams/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Shawn Simon/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES
Subject: Jeff Dasovich
Hi Andrea,
Jeff Dasovich (508152) received his latest tuition reimbursement on 7/31/00,
unfortunately it was not supposed to be taxed. A letter was sent with his
tuition on 4/15/00 that was paid correctly - but I think Gwen forgot to send
it with the July claim. It is being required by his Managing Director, Rick
Shapiro, and should therefore not be subject to income tax. Can you please
process a refund for the the taxes that were taken? I will insure that we
send the letter with all future claims.
Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me on ext 36023.
Regards,
Michelle
=====================================
|
2,107 |
Subject: Worldwide regulatory conference call on 23rd Jan
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/8370.
=====================================
These calls with our European and Asian counterparts take place every two
weeks. They generally focus on international issues and coordination.
You're welcome to participate if you are interested.
----- Forwarded by Sue Nord/NA/Enron on 01/19/2001 03:47 PM -----
June Fernandes@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
01/19/2001 04:32 AM
To: Jane Wilson/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Ban
Sharma/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Amr
Ibrahim/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Michael Grimes/AP/Enron@Enron,
[email protected], Sue Nord@Enron, Scott Bolton@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS,
Jan Haizmann@ECT, Mark Schroeder@ECT, K
Seethayya/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Beverley Ashcroft/LON/ECT@ECT, Ginger Dernehl@EES, Ritu
Kalia/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
Subject: Worldwide regulatory conference call on 23rd Jan
The next worldwide regulatory conference call has been scheduled for Tuesday,
January 23rd 2001. The details are as under.
Time : 8 pm India time
Dial-in nos.:
If dialling in the U.S. - 1 800 991 9019
If dialling from countries other than the U.S. - 1 847 619 8039
Passcode - 6158349 #
Host : Jane Wilson
No. of ports - 10
Besides the regular participants, Mr. Seethayya K of Enron India, Delhi will
also join this call. Please refer to the attached file for the different time
zones.
Beverely - Please remind Mark and Jan.
Ginger - Please remind Donald, Sue and Scott
=====================================
|
2,108 |
Subject: Earn Free Gas
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/1809.
=====================================
https://securecards.chase.com/servlet/at?target=shellapp&creative=a507
As a reader of TheStreet.com, you've been invited to receive this
special offer from Chase Manhattan Bank. Chase is bringing you
another great deal - this time for the Shell Platinum MasterCardc from
Chase. You'll earn unlimited free FormulaShellc gasoline:
A 5% rebate on Shell gasoline purchases made in the U.S.
A 1% rebate on all other purchases made with your Shell Platinum
MasterCard
A low 5.99% APR* on purchases and balance transfers
And all with no annual fee*. That's a super value from a card with two
great names. Apply today and start saving with every gallon you pump.
https://securecards.chase.com/servlet/at?target=shellapp&creative=a507
Sincerely,
Michael J. Barrett
President
Chase Manhattan Bank USA, NA
*See Important Notices for details.
Chase, The Right Relationship Is Everything.
-------------------------------------------------
This special promotion was a result of a partnership between
TheStreet.com and Chase Manhattan Bank. The email you have
received was sent to you by TheStreet.com. Please be assured
that we respect the privacy of our readers. To view our
privacy policy, click here:
http://www.thestreet.com/tsc/about/privacy.html
If you would like to be excluded from receiving these types of
offers in the future, please send an email to [email protected]
with the subject line "No Exclusive Offers."
=====================================
|
2,109 |
Subject: Practice Exam Problems + Clarifications on Take-Home Exam
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/mba__quant/1.
=====================================
Dear E204-1, E204-2 Students,
I am attaching a set of problems for your review. They are only sample
problems for discussion during the review session and should not to be
deemed to have special significance for the in-class final exam. Of course,
the general concepts will have to be somewhat relevant/helpful. I have not
covered every aspect of the course in the questions and the exam questions
may well deal with other topics/models. I have also included solutions,
but you should think about the problems first -- the value is in your working
on the problems as much as it is seeing the answer.
As for the take-home exam, one student inquired whether parts (b), (c), and
(d)
were separate or cumulative questions in Problem 1-- They are separate such
that each change is a change to the original model without other changes.
In Problem 2, I refer to "secondary" unit, and by this I meant the Backup
instrument.
When I ask you to estimate the probabilities (in Problem 2) from
"the simulation results only," I intend that you will not derive the
theoretical result
from probability concepts.
--Tom McCullough
- E204_Sample Exam Probs.doc
- E204_Sample Exam Probs+Solutions.doc
=======================================================================
Tom McCullough
Senior Lecturer
Haas School of Business
University of California at Berkeley
==========================================================================
=====================================
|
2,110 |
Subject: FW: SCE-QF Update
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent_items/2139.
=====================================
Yesterday, we discussed that Edison is likely going to try to jerk around ESPs, QFs and generators on past due amounts under its settlement with the PUC. Here's the latest on what they're doing to the QFs.
Best,
Jeff
-----Original Message-----
From: Comnes, Alan
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 5:14 PM
To: Etringer, Michael; Calger, Christopher F.; Parquet, David; Fillinger, Mark; Dasovich, Jeff; Mara, Susan
Subject: SCE-QF Update
I listed in on this afternoon's IEP call re: SCE's MOU.
According to Smutney-Jones (who was more than average mad), SCE has reneged on the "pay 10% up front" portion of the deal they struck with SCE. According to IEP, SCE says that the banks, who are spooked by TURN's success in getting a 14-day temporary suspension of the CPUC-SCE settlement, is not interested in allowing SCE to pay any creditors like QFs preferentially. SCE said the 5.37 c/kWh commitment is still there, however. IEP's was also unsuccessful in getting the effective date of 5.37 c/kWh changed in return for the loss of the 10% up front.
CCC/Jerry Bloom, who represents gas-fired QFs is seperately negotiating with SCE and may be willing to give up 10% in return for commiting to 5.37c/kwh outside of the CPUC. (They are concerned with CPUC overturning the IEP-SCE "deal.")
Several parties on the call, including CalEnergy, indicated they may sue SCE outside the CPUC over reneging on this deal.
Alan Comnes
=====================================
|
2,111 |
Subject: FW: HTC presents NTT DoCoMo on Thursday 11/15
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent_items/2242.
=====================================
-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Nuttall [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 6:45 PM
To: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: HTC presents NTT DoCoMo on Thursday 11/15
The wireless industry is growing rapidly with more than 1.6BN people expected to have a wireless/mobile device by 2005. NTT DoCoMo is the world's leading wireless services provider. Come and hear about NTT DoCoMo's critical success factors and how it is building on it's success, both inside and outside Japan.
Haas Technology Club Fall Lecture Series
presents
"Building a Next Generation Wireless Services Business"
by
Norihiko Hirose
Vice President, Business Development & Investment
NTT DoCoMo USA
Date: Thursday, November 15th, 2001
Time: 6:00 to 7:00 p.m. with refreshments from 5:30 p.m.
Location: Wells Fargo Room
Topics to be covered include:
- what were the business issues associated with the deployment of iMode and FOMA services in Japan?
- how did NTT DoCoMo overcome those issues?
- what led NTT DoCoMo to invest in AT&T, what were the risks and how were the risks managed?
- why did NTT DoCoMo seek a deal with KPN and how did NTT DoCoMo overcome the barriers to complete the deal?
Mark your diary today!
=====================================
|
2,112 |
Subject: Silence of the lambs?
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/5334.
=====================================
FYI. Some potential allies in keeping DA alive.
---------------------- Forwarded by Dennis Benevides/HOU/EES on 02/14/2001
01:37 PM ---------------------------
Richard Kohl <[email protected]> on 02/14/2001 12:14:27 PM
To: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected]
cc:
Subject: Silence of the lambs?
Dear fellow green marketer;
Has "green marketing" become a conflict of terms in California? It would
appear so. I can only speak for myself when I say that the past few
years of work, money and time should not be so easily written off.
I have been sensing the feelings on Capital Hill and there are a number
of legislators very sympathetic to us. If we can start speaking to one
another, there may exist an opportunity for support from the state for
a) our past efforts, and b) new legislation to keep retail
deregulatrion alive (or resuscitate). While we never a very cohesive,
unified group during deregulation, it would make sense to present
ourselves as a unified group at this juncture.
Please contact me and let me know if you have an interest in discussing
measures that we would wish the legislature to take on our behalf.
There's strength in numbers.
Rick Kohl
Go-Green
- rkohl.vcf
=====================================
|
2,113 |
Subject: Request for Assistance in Updating California RED Index
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/13455.
=====================================
Dear Rick and Jeff:
I'm the Project Director for the CAEM RED Index and Ken Malloy suggested I
send this request to you. We have contacted the CPUC for their response to
our survey update, but their press of business results in no response from
them to us. The dramatic changes in California from December 2000 to June
2001 makes it imperative that we have some intelligence on updating the
individual attributes. Based on the attached PDF file description of the
attributes and the Word document table of characterizations which shows year
end 2000 and a blank for May 2001, could you help me by filling in those
blanks based on your knowledge of state legislation, CPUC orders or anything
else official that has changed the way they implement their electric
restructuring plan? I don't expect an answer to the seven survey questions,
but feel free to provide your response just for my education.
I've sent this request to Commissioner Bilas, who works with Ken, but he
couldn't offer any assistance, so I'm relying on the industry to fill in the
blanks. If you have any other suggestions of who might be able to respond
to this information, it would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks for your help.
Nancy Etkin
RED Index Project Director
Center for the Advancement of Energy Markets
E-mail [email protected]
Voice (703) 532-6887
Fax (208) 361-0785
- Attributes for 2001 RED Index1.PDF
- California survey response.doc
=====================================
|
2,114 |
Subject: Save $5 on Business & Investing e-Book Downloads
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/deleted_items/791.
=====================================
<http://images.amazon.com/images/G/01/marketing/html-mailings/microsoft/top_banner.gif>
<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/feature/-/223353/ref=mk_prt_eb11>
As someone who's purchased Business & Investing books at Amazon.com, you're invited to save $5 <http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/feature/-/223353/ref=mk_prt_eb12> the first time you download any e-book--including hundreds of insightful Business & Investing titles--using Microsoft Reader 2.0. It's quick. It's easy. And best of all, you can be reading in minutes. Get started now <http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/feature/-/223353/ref=mk_prt_eb13>.
Download and activate Microsoft Reader 2.0 for free. And get $5 off <http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/feature/-/223353/ref=mk_prt_eb14> your first e-book.
<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/feature/-/223353/ref=mk_prt_eb15>
<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/feature/-/223353/ref=mk_prt_eb16> <http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/feature/-/223353/ref=mk_prt_eb17>
We hope you enjoyed receiving this message. However, if you'd rather not receive future e-mails of this sort from Amazon.com, please visit your Amazon.com account page <http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/account-access-login/ref=mk_prt_eb18>. Under the Your Account Settings heading, click the "Update your communication preferences" link.
Please note this e-mail was sent to the following address: [email protected]
=====================================
|
2,115 |
Subject: Conference Discount for Evening MBAs
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/deleted_items/308.
=====================================
>Dear Evening MBA Students:
>
>The Center for Financial Reporting and Management in the Haas School is
>hosting a conference: Business Combinations and Goodwill--What the New
>FASB Rulings Mean to You on Friday, Sept. 7, 2001 at the San Francisco
>Airport Marriott Hotel.
>
>As a special offer to Evening MBA Program students, we are offering one
>seat to each student at the discounted price of $100 per seat. This can
>be used by you or by a person in your firm whom you wish to designate.
>
>A copy of the program is attached. If you or an associate wish to attend,
>please register on-line
>at: http://www.haas.berkeley.edu/accounting/cfrm/registration.htm . When
>filling out the registration form, please write: "EVENING PROGRAM" in the
>"additional registrants" space on the form. Dayna will contact you
>regarding payment after August 23 when she returns from vacation. If you
>prefer to pay by check, you may print the registration form and mail it or
>leave it in Dayna Haugh's mailbox in the student services building
>mailroom with a check.
>
>If you have questions, you can contact Dayna Haugh at 642-6334.
>
>Dayna Haugh
>Assistant Director
>Center for Financial Reporting and Management
>Haas School of Business
>University of California
>502D Faculty Building, #1900
>Berkeley, CA 94720-1900
>
>510-642-6334 (Phone)
>510-643-7218 (Fax)
>http://www.haas.berkeley.edu/accounting/cfrm/cfrm.htm
>
=====================================
|
2,116 |
Subject: XMS Upgrade Transition Plan - All XMS Users Please Read!!
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/13499.
=====================================
Concur Expense (XMS) Upgrade!
On July 2, 2001, Enron=01,s Corporate Expense Management Solution will unde=
rgo=20
an upgrade to version 6.0.2. =20
The Integrated Solution Center (ISC) has developed a transition plan=20
containing several important deadlines affecting=20
all XMS users.
Transition Schedule
Important Date #1 - Monday, June 18th
? American Express transactions will no longer be loaded into the current X=
MS=20
system starting June 18th. Beginning June 18th, all AMEX transactions will=
=20
be loaded into the new Concur Expense (XMS) system.
? Beginning June 18th, the ISC will be solely responsible for adding new=
=20
users to the current XMS system. On July 2nd, new users created in SAP HR=
=20
will be automatically loaded into the new Concur Expense (XMS) system.
=20
Important Date #2 - Wednesday, June 27th
? This marks the deadline for entering new expense reports into the current=
=20
XMS system. All open expense reports in XMS must be submitted and approved=
=20
by June 27th. All users will be locked out of XMS after this date!!
Important Date #3 - Monday, July 2nd
? The new version of Concur Expense (XMS ver. 6.0.2) goes LIVE!!!
For a list of frequently asked questions (FAQ), please click on the followi=
ng=20
link: http://isc.enron.com/site/xmsfaqs.htm
If you have any other questions on any of the above items, please contact t=
he=20
ISC Call Center at 713-345-4727.
=====================================
|
2,117 |
Subject: FW: Great job!
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', "[email protected]'; Elizabeth Sloan", '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/1826.
=====================================
I will be in print for the first time =01) the October 9th issues of eWeek =
and=20
Internet Week.? I have been officially launched as a spokesperson.? It was =
a=20
little scary on the first one, but now its actually fun.? You just have to =
be=20
so aware of what you are saying, but still sound enthusiastic and lively.?=
=20
The first part doesn=01,t come naturally for me.
?
Cameron Sellers
Vice President, Business Development
PERFECT.COM
1860 Embarcadero Road - Suite 210
Palo Alto, CA 94303
[email protected]
650.798.3366 (direct dial)
650.269.3366 (cell)
650.858.1095 (fax)
?
-----Original Message-----
From: Sarah Bracken [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2000 12:44 PM
To: '[email protected]'
Cc: '[email protected]'; Elizabeth Sloan
Subject: Great job!
?
Cameron,
?
Great job on the calls today. I thought the InternetWeek call was especiall=
y=20
good in that Chuck
was so interested and interactive! I am thrilled as well that we have two=
=20
confirmed hits in eWeek
and InternetWeek for their Oct. 9th issues.
?
I sent both customer and analyst contact information along to both Jeff and=
=20
Chuck, along with the UI
screen shots that Jane sent over, so we should be all set.
?
Talk to you soon -
Sarah
?
Sarah Bracken
The Horn Group, Inc.=20
E-Public Relations for E-Business=20
415/905-4020=20
[email protected]=20
?
?
- image001.jpg
=====================================
|
2,118 |
Subject: PROOF - ENRON'S POLICIES EXPAND SUPPLY AND FIX THE POWER CRISIS
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/4322.
=====================================
Here are the arguments / material that I am trying to round up by mid-day
Friday. Please add anything else to this to prove our point.
Enron's Agenda - Making the System More Reliable / Ending the Crisis
1. Supply - really four key pieces to the puzzle (1) Streamline Generation
Interconnection, (2) Mandatory Electricity Reliability Organization, (3)
Public Power Transmission Facilities Fully Under FERC, (4) Complete Open
Access - End the Native Load Exception
The key theme: Open Access "expands" the available generation and reduces
the overall need to build.
2. Demand - Industrial & Commercial Demand Buydown
The key theme: Sometimes the cheapest watt is the watt that isn't used.
I want to add that I still think that the right message is reliability AND
cost savings. In California, the electricity bill could go from $7
billion/year (1999) to $70 billion/year (2001). No matter how big your
economy is, there is no way that a price shock of that magnitude won't kill
your future growth.
KEY PROOF
1. HEPG Presentation Shapiro
2. Natural Gas Analysis Carson
3. Balkanization Analysis Walton/Comnes/Neustaedter
4. AEP Transmission Abuses Novosel
5. FERC Staff Report Anecdotes Novosel
6. TCA Analysis - Price Impact Pickel/Tabors
7. TCA Analysis - Expanding Supply Pickel/Tabors
8. Western Power Market Abuses Dasovich/Comnes
I will try and call everyone in the am to discuss.
Jim
=====================================
|
2,119 |
Subject: Re: Meeting Invitation for 4/18/1
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/4163.
=====================================
Greetings Dorothy:
Hope all is well. I can participate in your meeting tomorrow. Is it
possible to participate by conference call, or would you prefer that folks
attend in person? Just let me know.
Best,
Jeff
Loretta Macktal <[email protected]>
04/16/2001 03:27 PM
To: "Allen, Tom" <[email protected]>, "Baker, Carolyn"
<[email protected]>, "Gough, Kassandra" <[email protected]>, "Parquet,
David" <[email protected]>, "Stout, John"
<[email protected]>
cc: "Rothrock, Dorothy" <[email protected]>, "Stewart, Jack"
<[email protected]>, "McCrea, Keith" <[email protected]>
Subject: Meeting Invitation for 4/18/1
To: Tom Allen, Mirant
Kasssandra Gough, CalPine
David Parquet, Enron
John Stout, Reliant
Carolyn Baker, Duke Energy
From: Dorothy Rothrock, CMTA
CMTA is reviewing it's policy position on wholesale market reforms and
price caps going into the summer 2001. We would welcome and value your
input and expertise at a meeting this week.
Date: April 18, 2001
Time: 1:00 to 2:00 pm
Place: CMTA Exec Conference Room, 980 Ninth Street, Sacramento
You are invited to attend or send a representative. If you can do
neither, I would like to talk to you at a convenient time before the
meeting.
Call or email Loretta at 916-441-5420 or [email protected] to RSVP or
set up a time for a phone call.
Thanks,
Dorothy Rothrock
=====================================
|
2,120 |
Subject: RE: Concept Slides Reacting to Latest Push for Price Caps
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/13332.
=====================================
I think that the slides are quite good. However, there has been a lot of
press recently in certain areas (such as Arizona and Nevada) still predicting
shortages for this summer. Thus, one of the slides addressing the net short
issue may be somewhat confusing to those that are familiar with the shortage
issue from reading press reports.
-----Original Message-----
From: Comnes, Alan
Sent: Friday, June 01, 2001 10:41 AM
To: Steffes, James; Dasovich, Jeff; Thome, Jennifer; Guerrero, Janel;
Perrino, Dave; Kaufman, Paul; Alvarez, Ray; Shelk, John; Mara, Susan
Subject: Concept Slides Reacting to Latest Push for Price Caps CONFIDENTIAL
Yesterday (5/31) Jim Steffes, John Shelk, and I met with Jeff Duncan, a
staffer for Congressman Markey (D-MA). Unfortunately, Markey's 80% forward
contracting requirement seems to be alive and well. He seems commited to the
belief that forcing more 18-month deals will help customers in the current
"sellers" market. He specifically asked for information on the amount of
forward contracting currently in place.
Please review attached slides (the word slides are very rough) and give me
feedback as to whether the current market information would effective in
either our DC or Califronia legislative.
Note that the forward price information is confidential and we need to get
clearance before we release.
GAC
<< File: Western Electricity and Gas Markets Update.ppt >>
=====================================
|
2,121 |
Subject: Direct Access Petition
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/inbox/270.
=====================================
Susan,
I am pleased that the PUC demonstrated some level of propriety and common sense by not acting in a retroactive manner on direct access. Accordingly, we are placing our work in abeyance pending further instruction.
If any party is interested in litigating further the direct access decision from September 20, it will be necessary to petition for rehearing at the PUC. An aggrieved party will only be able to go to court if the PUC denies the petition for rehearing or upholds its original decision following rehearing. The grounds for judicial review now appear to be limited to (1) denial of procedural due process and (2) PUC conduct contrary to law. This latter argument is based on a statutory duty to hold hearings when deciding whether to change a policy originally decided following hearings. Unlike the problems caused by a retroactive decision, there is probably no basis for a stay pending final decision.
The attached petition is the most recent generation and has fairly accurate tables of authorities and content. It does not have the two most recent developments (the statement by the Department of Finance indicating that bonds may not be necessary and the argument that there was a statutory duty to conduct hearings). If this petition is revived, those arguments can be quickly inserted.
I have also retained all comments so those will be available if the petition is revived.
Best regards,
Ed Duncan
=====================================
|
2,122 |
Subject: Re: DRAFT talking points on gas in CA
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/12736.
=====================================
Leslie, thank you for your comments.
From my understanding, we have a need for the following:
1. Talking points directed to a CA audience (similar to the number of
"one-pagers" we have already done for CA)
2. Talking points to circulate on the Hill
3. Points to include in a presentation to FERC on the 24th
It is not clear to me whether we should produce one document that fills all
of these needs or if we need more than one document. Perhaps, as Leslie
mentioned in her message below, we should add some FERC-level solutions to
this document and use it for several purposes.
**If someone has some suggestions about FERC language, please send them to me
or call me and I will incorporate them and recirculate the document.**
I am re-attaching the draft talking points again, for your reference.
Thanks,
Jennifer
Leslie Lawner
05/17/2001 05:00 PM
To: Jennifer Thome/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Re: DRAFT talking points on gas in CA
I guess my only thought is focused on the presentation to FERC on the 24th.
The solutions you have identified are all at the state level. Can we put in
something to address what the FERC can do? I am not sure what it is, but
maybe it would include expeditious approval of projects to and WITHIN
California that have been filed with FERC, as opposed to PG&E and SoCalGas
projects, which would be within the province of the CPUC. Something to think
about.
=====================================
|
2,123 |
Subject: Reporting on CPUC Ability to Change Direct Access Rules
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/deleted_items/405.
=====================================
As we discussed in our special call last week, I asked Brian Cragg from Goodin McBride to look into the issue of what, if anything, the CPUC can do in lieu of suspending direct access.
ABX 1 says the CPUC "shall suspend" DA, but does not give any time line for doing so, nor any criterita to use in making the determination to suspend it. This gives the CPUC ample ability to delay suspending DA, especially while bills affecting DA are in play in Sacramento. The President could have her own investigation or propose her own solutions -- all the while delaying the suspension. Brian also thought she could possibly put her own DA plan in place -- although he said it was a "stretch." Brian said she could, for example, argue that limiting DA to the net short position was a way of implementing ABX 1. He felt that adding an exit fee as well was , however, stretching the concept a bit too far. Nonethless, limiting DA to a net short position could be argued to be within her existing authority under the law. She could also institute an "open season" through some defined date, such as Jan 1, 2002, and suspend DA thereafter.
She could take this action subject to the passage of superceding legislation -- which, of course, could either kill DA altogether or implement some combination of exit fee/DAopen season/DA limitation.
Let's discuss strategy on our next call.
Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854
=====================================
|
2,124 |
Subject: Peaker Facility We Discussed Last Week
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent_items/2257.
=====================================
Dan: I wanted to follow up on our discussion last week regarding the peaker we're helping Lodi to develop.
The project is a peaker plant inside Lodi's territory, with the power sold to DWR.
The deal is both price and time sensitive (no surprise there). Needs to be on line Q3/Q4, 2002, at a price that's in line with price negotiated with DWR.
For the gas interconnect, your folks tell us that the project requires $8-$11 MM in system upgrades that will take 14-16 months to complete.
By contrast, the project could connect directly to Lodi's gas storage facility for about $2.6 MM and could be completed in about 4-6 months.
In short, PG&E's offers blows through both the time and price constraints; the Lodi option accommodates both very well.
We are very senstive to the tariff revenues you would forgo via a direct connect to Lodi and potential concerns regarding precedent over connecting directly to the storage facility.
Therefore, 1) we'd be willing to pay the local distribution tariff price, irrespective of being connected directly to the Lodi facility, 2) we'd be willing to switch over and connect with PG&E once the upgrades in the Lodi/Stockton area are done, and 3) we'd agree that the direct connection with Lodi should be viewed as a "special case" (and not precendent) with the goal of avoiding exacerbating California's problems with supply shortages.
Thanks for listening. Let me know what you think.
Best,
Jeff
=====================================
|
2,125 |
Subject: Faculty Evaluations
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/3798.
=====================================
Hi Everyone,
I thought it would be helpful to you, in filling out the faculty
evaluations that are quickly coming up, if I explained a bit further how
the administration views the
quantitative rankings you give to instructors. Specifically, there are two
questions at the end of the evaluation form that ask you about the teaching
effectiveness of the instructor and whether you would recommend the
instructor to a friend. You are asked to answer these two questions on a
scale from 1 - 7, with 1 being "Not at all effective" and 7 being
"Extremely effective."
As viewed by the administration, a median score of 5 or above is considered
acceptable. While we would love to have everyone earning a 6, this is
quite difficult to accomplish! Scores below 5 are taken very seriously.
In the case of a visitor earning below a 5.0, he or she is given one more
semester to improve their teaching. If in the next semester the instructor
does not improve
(earn a 5.0 or above), it is unlikely he or she will be rehired.
In the case of a regular faculty member earning below a 5.0, the
administration works with him or her on a plan to improve his or her
teaching. In some cases, the
instructor may not be allowed to teach the course again.
Please be sure to utilize the full range of the evaluation scale so that we
can continue to reward those faculty members who are doing a great job and
work with those who need improvement.
Cheers,
Diane
=====================================
|
2,126 |
Subject: Re: Documents for your review
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/deleted_items/674.
=====================================
Only couple brief comments on the version that includes Edison's comments:
Under the definition of "Spot Market Service" it now reads:
This service is available for Large Customers and Medium Customers whose service from a Direct Access provider has been interrupted, or who have failed to elect or be deemed to elect either Direct Access, Core Service or Term Service.
I don't understand the meaning of the phrase "or be deemed to elect." If inserting the phrase serves an important purpose, then perhaps it's appropriate to leave it in. But we haven't discussed any reason for needing it. As such, given the last-minute nature of the change, it should be deleted.
There is one heckuvalot of detail in the rate-related language that Edison provided that we didn't have a chance to discuss in our negotiations. It may turn out that it's all fine, but I frankly haven't haven't had the chance to adequately wrap my meager mind around the language, so I just want to let folks know that many more comments on those pieces may pop up from my end in the near term.
Finally, I just want to raise a flag on section 25465 (a) (6) regarding the green portfolio standard. We never discussed/analyzed those additional percentages and consequently we never established a "zone of comfort" around including those numbers. That may become an issue (and may not, just wanted to briefly flag it).
Thanks again for all the effort.
Best,
Jeff
=====================================
|
2,127 |
Subject: FERC Order Granting Emergency Waiver of QF Regulations until
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/2367.
=====================================
In response to the FERC Order on the California marketplace, Ridgeway Power
filed comments argueing for a waiver of QF regulations in order to incent
more power into the California marketplace. IEP discussed this concept with
FERC Commissioners today and the Commission issued late today an Order
Granting Emergency Waiver of QF Regulations for the remainder of this year.
This order is attached as part of an additional order by FERC granting the
CAISO request for implementation of a $250 "soft cap" plus penalities for
failue to respond to CAISO dispatch orders during an emergency.
For QFs positioned to take advantage of the FERC Order, IEP suggests (1)
procure legal advice because in essense you have an existing contract with
the utility, (2) contact your utility/contract holder, and as appropriate
move to implement the FERC Order. Your existing bilateral contract with the
utility provides for a SRAC based payment mechanism which appears to apply
under the FERC Order. Note, however, that the waiver at this time only
applies through the end of this year. You may have other options as well.
----- Original Message -----
From: Katie Kaplan <[email protected]>
To: Steven Kelly <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, December 08, 2000 4:47 PM
>
>
> Katie Kaplan
> Manager of State Policy Affairs
> Independent Energy Producers Association
> (916) 448-9499
>
>
- 12-8-00.wpd
- 12-08-00-2.pdf
- 12-08-00-3.wpd
- ca-relief.pdf
=====================================
|
2,128 |
Subject: RE: abx2_82_bill_20010712_introduced
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/28722.
=====================================
It is my understanding that Hertzberg and Keeley would like to bring this up
in the Assembly Energy Committee tomorrow, and perhaps Appropriations and
the floor on Sunday. The Assembly will be in this weekend under the guise
of working on the budget, however the MOU is a more likely topic. I do not
know where the Senate stands on this proposal. Byron Sher had circulated a
Senate alternate MOU earlier this week which was supposedly far less SCE
friendly then the Assembly version.
-----Original Message-----
From: MDay [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, July 13, 2001 11:11 AM
To: 'Bev Hansen, Enron lobbyist'; 'Harry Kingerski'; 'Jeff Dasovich
Enron SF'; 'Jim Steffes, Enron'; 'Leslie Lawner, Enron'; 'Scott Govenar,
Enron lobbyist'; 'Sue Mara at Enron SF'; 'Rick Shapiro, Enron Houston'
Subject: abx2_82_bill_20010712_introduced
(http://info.sen.ca.gov/pub/bill/asm/ab_0051-0
I just saw this monster bill on the Senate website. It is a
Keeley-Hertzberg bill that looks like it is intended to be the Hertzberg
version of the MOU. It was just introduced yesterday. Does anyone have
info on what the story is with this bill? I have not finished reviewing it
but it does prohibit additional direct access until January 2003. It
clearly does not have our recommended DA language in it. Mike Day
http://info.sen.ca.gov/pub/bill/asm/ab_0051-0100/abx2_82_bill_20010712_intro
duced.pdf
<<abx2_82_bill_20010712_introduced.url>>
=====================================
|
2,129 |
Subject: Funding for Energy Expert
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: []
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/28840.
=====================================
Dear Colleagues,
Much of our strategy of success on Energy issues in Sacramento over the last
several months has been due to the expert help of Dr. Barbara Barkovich.
(see attached documenting the scope of her work with SVMG). Many of you
have met her either through her work with the Energy Committee or at Working
Council. We are now reaching a critical phase of our legislative efforts
with bills that will affect California employers, workers and their families
for years to come and we rely on Barbara for the depth of her analysis,
insight and connections. She is assisting on an every day basis to craft
our responses to extremely complex rate chane legislation that will create a
fair scheme for our businesses. We are down to the wire here and need your
financial support. Please help us continue this excellent partnership with
Barbara. We have been working with her on a special contract for the
past 6 months at a rate of $5000 per month and need to retain her for
another 6 months for a total of $30,000. If you can help with this matter
to please let me know right away. Please send any pledges to
[email protected]
Thank you, your help is greatly appreciated.
Dr. James Woody
President Roche Bioscience
Chairman of the Board
Carl Guardino
President and CEO
SVMG
<<Activities Return on Investment of Dr Barkovich 1st half of 2001.doc>>
- Activities Return on Investment of Dr Barkovich 1st half of 2001.doc
=====================================
|
2,130 |
Subject: FW: PUC Votes to Suspend Direct Access Effective September 20th,
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent_items/184.
=====================================
The Commission also delayed a decision on whether contract renewal will be included under the suspension.
Jeff
-----Original Message-----
From: Dasovich, Jeff
Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 2:46 PM
To: Kean, Steven J.; Belden, Tim; Sharp, Vicki; Blachman, Jeremy; Comnes, Alan; Tribolet, Michael; Walsh, Kristin; Delainey, David; Leff, Dan; Frazier, Lamar; Keeney, Kevin; Gahn, Scott; Swain, Steve; Lavorato, John; Kaufman, Paul; Steffes, James D.; Calger, Christopher F.; Mara, Susan; Black, Don; Richter, Jeff; Kitchen, Louise; Dietrich, Janet; Mara, Susan; Robertson, Linda; Kingerski, Harry; Denne, Karen; Palmer, Mark A. (PR); Shapiro, Richard; Curry, Wanda; Mellencamp, Lisa; Higgason, Kelly; Whalley, Greg
Subject: PUC Votes to Suspend Direct Access Effective September 20th, But Continues to Hold Out Threat of Retroactivity
The commission suspended Direct Access effective September 20th.
The decision orders the utilities to stop accepting DASRs for contracts executed after 9.20.01.
But astonishingly, the language in the proposed decision states that the Commission will take more time to consider whether the effective date should be pushed back to July 1. In short, that battle continues.
How the Commission will proceed in continuing to consider retroactivity is uncertain at this time.
The Commission held over until its next meeting the decision regarding the rate agreement between DWR and the PUC.
Best,
Jeff
=====================================
|
2,131 |
Subject: RE: Info Reqest
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]; [email protected]; Anil Sama', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/mba__e_commerce/3.
=====================================
Jeff,
Sorry for the delay in responding.
As for initiatives. I have a VERY tentative product roadmap that plots the
Perfect course for the next 12-18 months. Here's what I've come up with so
far.
Keep in mind that anything past V2.0 is a pure WAG. Also, if you have any
questions about any of the specific features, just let me know and I'll try
to explain.
Also keep in mind that the name so companies mentioned for the integration
pieces is only tentative. These are companies we are working with but have
NOT finalized any formal agreements as yet.
Regards,
Mike D.
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, May 05, 2000 3:49 PM
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; Anil Sama
Subject: Info Reqest
Hi Mike:
Hope all is well. The PDR you sent us several weeks ago is very
informative, but a tad unwieldy. Do you have anything that focuses in on
1) what the 3-5 major products/initiatives are that you're currently
working on (e.g., "develop capability to integrate ERP and supply chain
management software")
2) what the 3-5 major products/initiatvies are that you'd like to make
happen a little further down the road (e.g., 6-12 months from now)?
3) a description of those products/initiatives
4) the plan to execute on those products/initiatives?
Thanks alot. And have a great weekend.
Best,
Jeff
- ProdRoadmap.doc
=====================================
|
2,132 |
Subject: California
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/542.
=====================================
Do any of the sets of message points on which you worked suit this purpose?
---------------------- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/SFO/EES on 09/21/2000 09:04
AM ---------------------------
Jane Wilson@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
09/21/2000 08:17 AM
To: Susan Mara@EES
cc:
Subject: California
Doesn't go through as "Sue"
---------------------- Forwarded by Jane Wilson/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
09/21/2000 06:47 PM ---------------------------
Jane Wilson
09/21/2000 06:20 PM
To: Richard Shapiro@EES
cc: John Ambler/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Jimmy
Mogal/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Wade
Cline/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Mark Schroeder@ECT, Sue Mara
Subject: California
I have heard twice now in two conferences that California is the perfect
example of why restructuring/deregulation is undesirable and should not be
instituted in India. I typically speak up and state that the regulatory
structure is mostly to blame for the operational difficulties (brown-outs,
etc.) stating that the wires business remains regulated always. I don't
really have an answer for the soaring spot market prices in California. Do
we have any written explanation of the situation in California or could we
write one? It would be very helpful to us here. As restructuring becomes
more and more hotly debated, especially once the Electricity Bill is debated
in Parliament, we will need this kind of support. Thanks in advance.
=====================================
|
2,133 |
Subject: Design of long-term contractual mechanism for California
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/5821.
=====================================
Is there any detail available about how this long-term contractual mechanism
being neogotiated might work? I ask because we have heard about interest in
a similar mechanism that was adopted in Australia, in New South Wales. My
colleagues in Australia are the main restructuring advisors to the NSW
government. Details of this mechanism are in the public domain, i documents
available from the NSW Treasury.
If they design it properly it is possible that you could still have some
form of retail competition, if the hedge moves with the customer. This was a
big design issue in Australia. Otherwise, it looks like a political fudge
that will stymie the development of the market for years to come.
Seab
This e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the
addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or
confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this
e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify me at
(617) 354-0060 and permanently delete the original and any copy of any
e-mail and any printout thereof.
Seabron Adamson
Frontier Economics Inc
Two Brattle Square
Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
Ph: (617) 354-0060
Fax: (617) 354-0640
[email protected]
www.frontier-economics.com
=====================================
|
2,134 |
Subject: Re: California Update--07.24.01
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/deleted_items/491.
=====================================
Unbelievable.
From: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON on 07/24/2001 11:02 AM
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON
To: David W Delainey/HOU/EES@EES, Janet R Dietrich/HOU/EES@EES, Marty Sunde/HOU/EES@EES, Dan Leff/HOU/EES@EES, Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES, Jeremy Blachman/HOU/EES@EES, Scott Gahn/HOU/EES@EES, Evan Hughes/HOU/EES@EES, Tim Belden/ENRON@enronXgate, Jeff Richter/ENRON@enronXgate, Stephen Swain/ENRON@enronXgate, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, [email protected], Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Paul Kaufman/Enron@EnronXGate, Linda Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Susan M Landwehr/Enron@EnronXGate, Harry Kingerski/Enron@EnronXGate, Michael Tribolet/ENRON@enronXgate, Kristin Walsh/Enron@EnronXGate, Richard Shapiro/Enron@EnronXGate, [email protected], Louise Kitchen/Enron@EnronXGate, John J Lavorato/Enron@EnronXGate, Christopher F Calger/Enron@EnronXGate, Lisa Mellencamp/Enron@EnronXGate
cc:
Subject: California Update--07.24.01
The Assembly passed the budget late last night.
The Assembly recessed without passing out any energy bill.
There is some talk of a working group being convened beginning next week comprised of Legislative staff and industry to continue to try to work out a deal.
For now, however, the free world is safe from the CA Assembly and the Senate--they've left and all Legislative activity is on hold until the 20th of August, unless leadership, or the Governor tries to bring them back early.
The activity now moves to the PUC.
Best,
Jeff
=====================================
|
2,135 |
Subject: Pay Dispute at National Grid
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', "nicholas.o'[email protected]", '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/604.
=====================================
Home News: Pay dispute at National Grid ? 09/23/2000 Irish Times 5 Copyright
(C) 2000 Irish Times; Source: World Reporter (TM)
A pay dispute has arisen between staff and management at the National Grid,
the electricity transmission system operator formerly owned by the ESB, which
was 'ring-fenced' as a State-owned body in February, following deregulation
proposals.
Staff at the National Grid have been working an interim agreement since the
industry was liberalised. They now say the agreement has expired and they are
demanding extra payment to continue working the new system. Earlier this week
they reverted to pre-February work duties. Most of the approximately 100
staff are represented by MSF and the ESB Officers' Association.
In a separate development, the ESBOA has issued notice of industrial action
in mid-October unless a 16.5 per cent pay claim is granted. Folder Name:
Utilities, Electric: Deregulation Relevance Score on Scale of 100:
97______________________________________________________________________ To
review or revise your folder, visit Dow Jones CustomClipsor contact Dow Jones
Customer Service by e-mail at [email protected] by phone at
800-369-7466. (Outside the U.S. and Canada, call 609-452-1511 or contact
your local sales representative.)
______________________________________________________________________
Copyright (c) 2000 Dow Jones &Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved
=====================================
|
2,136 |
Subject: C4C Trivia Bowl Clarification
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/4385.
=====================================
I apologize that the earlier note from our MBA Social chair didn't reach
you earlier. I want to clarify a couple of questions and reach out to you
to participate in tonight's competition.
Evening MBA's are eligible to compete. Tonight will be the only night to
try out. I understand that all of you have class until around 9:30 pm. I
will not start the competition until 9:45 pm to give you a chance to
attend. In addition, if you miss the first set of category competitions
there will be two more throughout the night that you can jump in and tryout
for. The following is the breakdown of how the competition will run:
1st set - Science & Art/Literature (Starts at 9:45 pm)
2nd set - Sports & Entertainment (Starts 5 minutes after the end of set #1)
3rd set - History & Geography (Starts 5 minutes after the end of set #2)
4th set - All Categories for top 2 runnerups in first 3 sets (Starts 5
minutes after the end of set #3)
I will ask 15 questions for each set and take the top person who answers
the most questions in the set. The second and 3rd place finishers of each
set will then be paired in a 4th set of competition where I will ask 15
questions from all the categories. The winner of that set will be the 4th
member of the team.
PS - Beckett's is giving us $1 off on pints of Guiness and Caffrey's.
Address again is:
Beckett's
2271 Shattuck Ave. (Between Bancroft and Kittredge)
Berkeley, CA 94704
510-647-1790
Juan
=====================================
|
2,137 |
Subject: Re: California Regulatory Strategy
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/1357.
=====================================
The inequities that you are referring to in #4 is that the cap be applied
both to bundled service and d/a customers, right?
Roger Yang@EES
11/01/2000 04:44 PM
To: Mona L Petrochko/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J
Mara/NA/Enron@Enron, Dennis Benevides/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Dennis Benevides/HOU/EES@EES, Scott Stoness/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: California Regulatory Strategy
The purpose of this e-mail is to discuss the regulatory strategy in
California. As we have discussed, I believe the regulatory strategy can be
summarized as follows:
Support the TURN proposal in order to maintain leverage against PG&E and
SCE. We will have to do this strategically to avoid negative consequences.
Provide comments on mitigation measures at the CPUC's disposal to mitigate
PG&E's and SCE's undercollections on December 31, 2001 in order to make the
CPUC comfortable with their decisions.
Work with PG&E and SCE on developing a post-freeze solution at the
legislature to recover undercollections over a 5 year period in order to
facilitate an acceptable solution.
Expose the inequities of the rate caps implemented in SDG&E's service
territory for small customers in order to avoid a similar transition
mechanism in PG&E's and SCE's service territories that might facilitate an
end to the rate freeze for all customers prior to December 31, 2001.
Watch and prevent adverse changes to how the PX credit is calculated.
Roger
=====================================
|
2,138 |
Subject: Re: San Diego Tribune Story
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/9993.
=====================================
That's the right story. Only thing I'd be prepared for is the following,
"OK, Mr. Belden, California's stupid, they did it wrong, and your company
told them so right at the outset. Does that give you the right to rob
California's consumers and businesses blind?"
Regarding the story with Peace quoted saying "we exported our stranded costs
out of state." I recall seeing that story on several occasions. Karen, do
we have someone who can do a search (lexis/nexis) and find those articles?
Shouldn't be too tough.
Best,
Jeff
Tim Belden@ECT
03/14/2001 07:47 PM
To: Robert Badeer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Karen
Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: San Diego Tribune Story
I am giving a speech in Santa Fe in a couple of weeks. One of the points
that I want to make is that California set up the rules, made a strategic bet
to go short, decided to buy all of their power on the spot market, and is now
crying that their massive bet didn't work. I remember reading an article in
the San Diego Tribune from sometime in 1998 or 1999 with a quote from Steve
Peace. Peace talked about how the state of California ripped off a bunch of
dumb out of state generators and wisely solved their stranded cost problem.
Does anybody remember this article? Does anybody have this article? Is
there a service that we can use to find it if we don't have it? Let me know.
=====================================
|
2,139 |
Subject: RE: Draft program
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/gspp_conference/4.
=====================================
Hey! Everyone seems to miss a point I tried to make clear. The collaboration
I suggested is not with Haas. Don't mention that name! The collaboration is
with IBER and UEI, two research organizations that are not formally
connected with any school. Shapiro suggested that they could offer some
modest help with resources, and we have to figure out if it's worth asking
for any. Maybe if we are planning to keep the "conference fees" for GSPP
then it is better not to ask them for any money (and thus keep clear our
claim to any fees). Reactions?
Monday is Labor Day by the way.
Cheers,
Lee
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2000 3:44 AM
To: [email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Draft program
Shall we try to talk again Monday? I think I will talk to Borenstein to see
what the Haas folks have in mind.
I tried to capture everyone's comments. Allen, you might want to explain
more
about your panel suggestions since I didn't do them justice. As you'll see
I
took the liberty of offering a new characterization of the panels that I
didn't
bring up on the call. Everything on there is offered as a strawman to be
criticized and changed.
Rob <<Draft program.doc>>
Rob Gramlich
PJM Market Monitoring Unit
(610) 666-4291
[email protected]
=====================================
|
2,140 |
Subject: TURN's Rate Stabilizaton Proposal
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/1272.
=====================================
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 12/07/2000 12:38 PM -----
Roger Yang@EES
12/07/2000 12:36 PM
To: Gordon Savage/HOU/EES@EES, Scott Stoness/HOU/EES@EES, James W
Lewis/HOU/EES@EES, Dennis Benevides/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Mona Petrochko, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J
Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: TURN's Rate Stabilizaton Proposal
In a non-descriptive article in today's SF Chronicle, an article reports on
some TURN plan to basically take the assets retained by the utilities and use
the assets to deliver 5 cent energy to customers. I imagine that TURN's plan
only covers small customers because there is obviously not enough capacity
for all customers. Whereas, we have seen the utility's attempts to get the
assets at below market prices in the past, it looks like TURN may be trying
to maneuver to get the assets below market for its customers. This leaves
either the C&I or utility shareholders holding the bag for undercollections.
I am sure that this is just some posturing, but CLECA/CMTA needs to be on top
of this issue so that they don't get stuck. It would be a double whammy for
CLECA/CMTA customers, because not only would they see the higher market
prices, but would have to bear a burden of undercollections that are not
offset by an appropriate valuation of retained assets.
We will need Government Affairs to stay on top of this issue for us.
Roger
=====================================
|
2,141 |
Subject: Conversation with Fielder of Edison
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent_items/2107.
=====================================
The call was pretty tough.
Quick side bar: Edison is very concerned about TURN getting a stay from the court on the EIX/PUC settlement .
At the start of the call, Fielder said that he'd fax me the judge's ruling in the TURN appeal, but based on how the call went, I'm not sure if he'll send it.
As we conjectured sometime back, Edison is indeed talking about charging us (through a reduced PX credit) for our "share" of the undercollection.
Our "share" would be paid down through a reduction in the PX credit over the life of the settlement (presumably about 2-3 years).
In short, with one hand Edison would pay us what they owe us; with the other hand, Edison would take it back.
Edison intends (as we conjectured) to base the amount of the undercollection owed by DA customers on the percentage of load they represent (e.g., if DA is (was) 10% of the load, they would pay for 10% of the undercollection).
We had a very "animated" discussion that went back and forth for some time.
I told him that there's been some gross misunderstanding since his proposal simply doesn't track.
Fielder said that they believe their argument is solid.
Here's how we left it--he's going to get back to us by COB today or tomorrow and tell us what Edison's calculation is of our "share" of the undercollection.
We can discuss further on the call that Wanda's setting up for tomorrow.
If you have any questions between now and then, give a holler.
Best,
Jeff
=====================================
|
2,142 |
Subject: FW: CADER'S DG 2001 CONFERENCE
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent_items/731.
=====================================
Greetings. In case Martin's interested...
Best,
Jeff
-----Original Message-----
From: Jairam Gopal [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 12:15 PM
To: undisclosed-recipients
Subject: CADER'S DG 2001 CONFERENCE
!! CADER'S DG 2001 CONFERENCE !!
CADER's 3rd Annual International Symposium "Distributed Generation: Opportunities and Obstacles" will be held as scheduled on November 1-2, 2001 at the Catamaran Resort Hotel in San Diego.
Registration at the regular rates is still available. If you haven't registered yet, do so now. You should be there to network and mingle with some 250 fellow dg enthusiasts.
Twenty-three sponsors will be showing you the latest in distributed energy resource technologies. Over fifty speakers will provide you the latest and greatest in recent developments in fiancing, DG initiatives, deployment and comercialization issues, control & communication, standards and codes and more..... with a focus on case studies.
For the latest information on the Agenda, and registration details, please see www.cader.org <http://www.cader.org/>
To facilitate your planning, San Diego's gorgeous Catamaran Resort Hotel has graciously extended the special rate deadline. Contact the hotel at 800-422-8386 or <http://www.catamaranresort.com/cad1030.html>
Call Jairam Gopal (916) 654-4880 or Michael Theroux (530) 823-7300 ext. 203 or Betsie Brown (858) 794-7355 if you have any questions.
>
=====================================
|
2,143 |
Subject: RE: Hansen
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent_items/2380.
=====================================
Thanks.
-----Original Message-----
From: Schwarz, Angela
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 4:58 PM
To: Dasovich, Jeff
Subject: RE: Hansen
could be, not necessarily the bidders have the option on all or partial
-----Original Message-----
From: Dasovich, Jeff
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 2:29 PM
To: Schwarz, Angela
Subject: RE: Hansen
Thanks very much? Does that mean that the Hansen contract would be sold as a stand-alone asset?
-----Original Message-----
From: Schwarz, Angela
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 2:07 PM
To: Dasovich, Jeff; Frazier, Lamar; Angela Schwarz/HOU/EES@ENRON
Subject: RE: Hansen
They are included in the CAL book but not in the 24 as they were added after the count was 24. as of 12 noon, we were still waiting data from ENA but had the contract and had included in the iniitail due diligence.
-----Original Message-----
From: Dasovich, Jeff
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 1:36 PM
To: Frazier, Lamar; Angela Schwarz/HOU/EES@ENRON
Subject: Hansen
Please forgive me for continuing with this, but ENA just told me that they talked to Jeremy about 90 minutes ago and they had the view that there was still some uncertainty regarding whether Hansen had been included in the 24 contracts. I told them that I'd already spoken with you folks and that Hansen was on the list. Let me know if I'm missing something here. Again, apologize for keeping on about it.
Best,
Jeff
=====================================
|
2,144 |
Subject: Protecting Our Claim from the PUC' Clutches
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent_items/2172.
=====================================
Couple thoughts. Understanding that we're really trying to get this thing done and that there's a million different ornaments one could hang on the tree (and bring the thing toppling down), I'll just throw this out for consideration.
Seems that as a first-order issue, the judge is either going to approve the settlement or cede to arguments the PUC could make regarding its exclusive ratemaking authority--that is what it is.
Assuming that the judge sides in our favor, there remains the chance that the PUC could take the Edison view and charge DA customers for the undercollection, thereby taking back what we achieved in the settlement based on the way our deals are structured with our customers.
It would help alot if PG&E took the position at the PUC that (for a variety of reasons) the PUC should NOT tack on DA customers' bills any charges designed to pay down the utilities' undercollection.
In a proceeding where Edison and PG&E are on different sides, our chances of prevailing are of course much better.
But it likely won't do much good if we have any such deal written explicitly in the settlement document (i.e., PG&E agrees to take our side at the PUC).
But if there's any way to do some sort of side deal, outside of the settlement agreement, and if PG&E were amenable, there might be some real value.
Again, I know we want to get this thing wrapped up, but thought I'd toss it out there. We can take it or leave it.
Best,
Jeff
=====================================
|
2,145 |
Subject: Minnesota telecom ruling
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/232.
=====================================
Scott--give me some guidance on how important or relevent this issue is for
us so that I can get a better understanding of what I should/should not being
spending time on.
The Minnesota PUC ruled yesterday the US West must open/share it's lines with
competitors offering digital subscriber line (DSL) high speed interent
access. Apparently the order is the first for a state, but I understand that
the FCC passed a similiar rule in the last month or so. The Commission also
ruled that USWest could charge an additional $6.00 for this access to their
lines (in addition to the current rate of $18 that the customer pays) and
that the DSL provider had the right to pass that charge on to the customer.
The COmmission took a "soft" position on the $6.00, saying that they would
review the amount of the charge over the next six months before making a
final ruling on that specific issue. I believe that this ruling came about
due to an initial complaint by a provider from Colorado.
I did not follow this case at all other than occassionally reading something
about it. The major reason I did not was that I saw it as a "retail" access
issue and I see our video streaming and bandwidth businesses as "wholesale"
access/opportunity issues. Certainly we always want to see open access and
we want to see competitive parity, but I didn't see that our involvment
and/or tracking of this proceeding was of great value. Am I correct?
=====================================
|
2,146 |
Subject: Re: survey
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/mba_program/289.
=====================================
Possible follow up questions or additions
(2a) If you feel you were evaluated unfairly, do you feel comfortable
voicing your concern?
(1) If there is a significant age difference between you and your
manager, was the issue ever openly discussed?
______________________________ Reply Separator
_________________________________
Subject: survey
Author: [email protected] at Internet-USA
Date: 9/20/99 10:27 PM
Getting close to a real draft- please review and send comments
(1) Your manager is
much younger younger same older much older
(2) If managed, did/do you feel fairly evaluated in your
perfromance/abitlities?
Positvely <---> Negatively
(3) Did you make any active attempt to alter the performance evaluation
system. ?Reword?
(4) Do you feel that your perfromance was influenced by the age difference
between you and your supervisor?
A lot somewhat not at all
positively negatively
(5) Would you say that you are willing to shift your job schedule (work
through lunch or nont the weekend) in order to help solve a problem?
All the time sometimes rarely
(6) Leaving/turnover: If you were to or did leave your job, how much would
you attribute to the age difference between you and your supervisor?
much <---> little
(7) To what extent would you say your manager encourages your career growth
through educational and new work opportunities?
Little <--> Much
(8)
=====================================
|
2,147 |
Subject: Reporting on CPUC Ability to Change Direct Access Rules
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/11555.
=====================================
As we discussed in our special call last week, I asked Brian Cragg from
Goodin McBride to look into the issue of what, if anything, the CPUC can do
in lieu of suspending direct access.
ABX 1 says the CPUC "shall suspend" DA, but does not give any time line for
doing so, nor any criterita to use in making the determination to suspend
it. This gives the CPUC ample ability to delay suspending DA, especially
while bills affecting DA are in play in Sacramento. The President could have
her own investigation or propose her own solutions -- all the while delaying
the suspension. Brian also thought she could possibly put her own DA plan in
place -- although he said it was a "stretch." Brian said she could, for
example, argue that limiting DA to the net short position was a way of
implementing ABX 1. He felt that adding an exit fee as well was , however,
stretching the concept a bit too far. Nonethless, limiting DA to a net short
position could be argued to be within her existing authority under the law.
She could also institute an "open season" through some defined date, such as
Jan 1, 2002, and suspend DA thereafter.
She could take this action subject to the passage of superceding legislation
-- which, of course, could either kill DA altogether or implement some
combination of exit fee/DAopen season/DA limitation.
Let's discuss strategy on our next call.
Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854
=====================================
|
2,148 |
Subject: TELEBEARS Thursday 4:30 p.m .- Midnight
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/4188.
=====================================
To: Continuing Evening MBA Students
TELEBEARS Thursday, April 19
LATER THURSDAY HOURS
1) Please register for Fall 2001 courses through TELEBEARS at:
(510) 642-3400 or http://bearlink.berkeley.edu/
during the "open hours" for Evening MBA students:
Thursday, April 19 (4:30 p.m. - 12:00 midnight) NEW LATER HOURS
and
Friday, April 20 (7:00 a.m. - 9:00 a.m.) early morning hours
After 9:00 a.m. Friday, April 20, we will extract from TeleBEARS the
courses in which you have enrolled. TELEBEARS is necessary for the
first round. After 9:00 a.m. Friday, April 20, all correspondence
regarding registration should be sent to [email protected].
People who registered via TELEBEARS (phone or web) by 9:00 a.m. Friday,
April 20 will have first priority, regardless of seniority in the program.
2) Be sure to have your student identification number (SID) along with
your personal identification code (PIN) ready.
3) Course Descriptions: As faculty submit their Fall 2001 course
descriptions, they will be available at: http://www.haas.berkeley.edu/EvMBA/
and click on "Fall 2001 Course Information".
4) Course Control Numbers: The course control numbers (CCNs) for your
elective courses are listed on the Evening MBA Program Fall 2001 Course
Information sheet you received in the mail and are posted at:
http://www.haas.berkeley.edu/EvMBA/
and click on "Fall 2001 Course Information".
GRADUATING STUDENTS:
Congratulations to you!
See you!
TJ
=====================================
|
2,149 |
Subject: RE: Monday 5th Committee Meeting
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/9549.
=====================================
Yes, I would like to attend if that would be possible. Thanks very much for
the info. I assume that the folks on the committe are the energy managers of
the companies (like K.C. Mares, who I met when I met with Justin a few weeks
ago)?
Jeff
"Laura Goldseth" <[email protected]>
02/28/2001 07:30 PM
To: <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: RE: Monday 5th Committee Meeting
Jeff - this is the Energy Committee Meeting. I have invited well over 100
people, all who are on the Committee...not everyone is able to attend
however. I am working on the agenda and expect to get that out to everyone
tomorrow. Unfortunately, I have to get an estimated count to Cisco, who is
hosting the meeting, so that they can prepare for Monday. We will be
discussing legislation that is of interest to us and our member company's
and we will be attempting to assemble a coalition of companies and
organizations to stand with us in regards to the legislation being
considered. A lot of info will be passed around. Do you think you may
attend? Laura
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2001 5:11 PM
To: Laura Goldseth
Subject: Re: Monday 5th Committee Meeting
Laura:
Thanks so much for including me on the list. Quick question: Which
committe is this and who's on the committe? Is there an agenda for the
meeting on the 5th? Thanks again.
Best,
Jeff
=====================================
|
2,150 |
Subject: Re: Documents for your review
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/12061.
=====================================
Only couple brief comments on the version that includes Edison's comments:
Under the definition of "Spot Market Service" it now reads:
This service is available for Large Customers and Medium Customers whose
service from a Direct Access provider has been interrupted, or who have
failed to elect or be deemed to elect either Direct Access, Core Service or
Term Service.
I don't understand the meaning of the phrase "or be deemed to elect." If
inserting the phrase serves an important purpose, then perhaps it's
appropriate to leave it in. But we haven't discussed any reason for needing
it. As such, given the last-minute nature of the change, it should be
deleted.
There is one heckuvalot of detail in the rate-related language that Edison
provided that we didn't have a chance to discuss in our negotiations. It may
turn out that it's all fine, but I frankly haven't haven't had the chance to
adequately wrap my meager mind around the language, so I just want to let
folks know that many more comments on those pieces may pop up from my end in
the near term.
Finally, I just want to raise a flag on section 25465 (a) (6) regarding the
green portfolio standard. We never discussed/analyzed those additional
percentages and consequently we never established a "zone of comfort" around
including those numbers. That may become an issue (and may not, just wanted
to briefly flag it).
Thanks again for all the effort.
Best,
Jeff
=====================================
|
2,151 |
Subject: RE: Budget Spreadsheet
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent_items/1426.
=====================================
That's helpful. Thanks. Needed a time frame. Today's going to be very interesting. Should be able to get you something before 10; before noon, max.
Best,
Jeff
-----Original Message-----
From: Kaufman, Paul
Sent: Mon 10/1/2001 7:50 PM
To: Dasovich, Jeff
Cc:
Subject: RE: Budget Spreadsheet
I need to have the document into Rick by COB on Wednesday (i.e., 4:00 our time). Don't yank my chain.
-----Original Message-----
From: Dasovich, Jeff
Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 5:48 PM
To: Kaufman, Paul
Subject: RE: Budget Spreadsheet
What time on Wednesday?
-----Original Message-----
From: Kaufman, Paul
Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 7:44 PM
To: Dasovich, Jeff; Comnes, Alan; Mara, Susan
Subject: Budget Spreadsheet
Attached is the strawman. Note that the Sheet 2--drops participation to bare essentials. Sheet 3 assumes a 40% budget cut from Sheet 1. The deleted actions are different in Sheet 2 and Sheet 3.
Jeff: Please review ASAP, add the gas matters to Sheet 1, delete gas matters that are not essential in Sheet 2, and take a 40% haircut in Sheet 3. Also add back any other matters that I have deleted that you disagree with, but make sure that Sheet 3 continues to meet the 40% haircut target. Then send to Sue Mara for review.
Sue: Please review ASAP after Jeff. I need to get this into Rick by Wednesday.
Alan: Please take a look and pass any comments along to me.
=====================================
|
2,152 |
Subject: Re: 98 Answers
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/mba_program/59.
=====================================
Jeff,
Thanks for your comments. I guess that explains why you're at
Enron rather than PG&E. By the way, if you have not already met, I am
sure you would enjoy talking about energy markets with Professor Severin
Borenstein, the Director of UC's Energy Institute.
At 03:23 PM 9/28/99 +0000, you wrote:
>furthering our discussion from the break yesterday evening, and for what it's
>worth to add another data point, i'd like to pass along my view that 1) the
>course is extremely challenging, 2) the course is extremely interesting,
>informative, pertinent and useful, 3) the course is extremely well organized,
>and 4) the course's level of difficulty and demands are consistent with the
>requirements of a top-notch graduate professional program. in addition, it
is
>my view that the "amount" of questions given in the problem sets, and the
>level
>of difficulty of the problems, while quite significant, is appropriate and
>offers individuals the opportunity to choose to do some or all of the
>problems.
>finally, i am indifferent to the frequency with which any particular
>individual
>speaks during class, as long as the questions, comments, discussion, etc.
>do not
>detract from accomplishing the objectives during any given lecture.
>
>
Jonathan Leonard
Professor
tel: 510-642-7048 545 Student Services Building, #1900
fax: 510-642-4700 Haas School of Business
University of California
Berkeley, CA. 94720-1900
=====================================
|
2,153 |
Subject: RE: Comments on Proposed and Alternate Decisions
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/28005.
=====================================
Some initial comments:
Will Barnett/Wood/CPUC really care if we can't "work off" the credit? I
suspect they will be delighted. Therefore shouldn't we delete section I(C)
and rely on the arguments that (1) the Proposed Decision misconstrues the
Stipulation (can we flesh this out some? can we submit an affidavit by those
who negotiated it?); (2) that it is contrary to the parties' own course of
performance (I think we need to use this legal terminology); and (3) that it
goes beyond what SCE requested in its filing and so violates fundamental
principles of due process (notice and an opportunity to be heard) and perhaps
CPUC procedures or practices (Jeanne?). Are there any CPUC precedents we
could cite relating to arguments (2) and (3)?
-----Original Message-----
From: JBennett <[email protected]>@ENRON
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-JBennett+20+3CJBennett+40GMSSR+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2001 6:57 PM
To: Mara, Susan; Dasovich, Jeff; Smith, Martin; Kean, Steven; Williams,
Robert C.; [email protected]; [email protected]; Kingerski, Harry; Steffes,
James
Cc: MDay
Subject: Comments on Proposed and Alternate Decisions
Importance: High
Attached are drafts of the comments on the Proposed and Alternate Decisions
pertaining to the PX credit and the suspension of Direct Access.
<<X25517.DOC>> <<X25496.DOC>>
Jeanne Bennett
- X25517.DOC << File: X25517.DOC >>
- X25496.DOC << File: X25496.DOC >>
=====================================
|
2,154 |
Subject: FW: Total DA Load at 5.7% as of 8/31
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/inbox/423.
=====================================
-----Original Message-----
From: Curry, Wanda
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 8:53 AM
To: Tribolet, Michael; Steffes, James D.; Mara, Susan
Subject: FW: Total DA Load at 5.7% as of 8/31
FYI
I asked Steve to compare the information from Sue's email re the CPUC estimate of DA load to Enron's forecast of retail load. His response is below.
-----Original Message-----
From: Swain, Steve
Sent: Tuesday, October 2, 2001 10:21 AM
To: Curry, Wanda
Cc: Lewchuk, Ken
Subject: Total DA Load at 5.7% as of 8/31
Wanda,
Given the current state of our systems, it is not possible to tell with precision which of the categories below all of our customers fall into. For example, in the current position report the largest volumes by far in Calif appear in the rate class labelled "?".
Still, we have a total volume for 2002 of 8,331,762 MWH, or about 83% of the total reported. Not bad. Also, it appears from my quick review of the categorical breakout that our volumes are weighted towards the Commercial and Industrial customers, which indicates that we likely own > 90% of those volumes. Let me know if you have any other questions.
Activities Residential Commercial Commercial Industrial
<20kW <500kW >500kW >500 kW Agricultural Unknown Total
4) Total Direct Access Load (KWH) 488,246,354 160,111,329 3,707,713,770 5,576,608,164 78,690,129 0 10,011,369,746
=====================================
|
2,155 |
Subject: another question
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/12080.
=====================================
Hi Jeff,
?
Did you get my email last week?
?
I really hate the fact that questions of fact are so hard to get answered,
because nobody seems to be able to answer energy issue questions that aren't
tinged with political implications. It seems to me that certain questions
ought to be answerable purely on the basis of simple empirical fact.
?
For example, in the paper today it says "San Diego Gas & Electric was the
first utility to sell its power plants, and under the deregulation law was
then freed from the state-imposed rate caps."
?
Thus, is the problem with PG&E that it never sold ALL its plants? I know it
sold some (the one near us, Moss Landing, is owned by Duke, for example.) So
was the sole reason PG&E was unable to raise their rates to meet their costs
of buying energy the fact that it hadn't sold all its plants? If so, does
that mean, say, if PG&E had kept 1% of its plants, and the other 99% of the
power it sold it had to buy on the unregulated wholesale market, it would
have been prevented from raising its rates for 100% of the power it sold (or
resold)?to its customers? If so, what WAS the percentage of power plants
PG&E DIDN'T sell? Did they try to sell these? Were they just unable to find
any buyers? You'd think, with the amount of money they claimed to be losing
everyday, they could have GIVEN those plants away and made money off the
deal. What is wrong with my understanding here?
?
Rory
?
=====================================
|
2,156 |
Subject: Kern River Expansion
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/10087.
=====================================
The order that FERC issued last Wednesday regarding the western electric
markets1 contains some provisions that would seem to indicate a favorable
response at FERC to Kern River's open season last week. Specifically, the
order asks for industry comments on proposals (1) offering blanket
certificates for construction or acquisition and operation of portable
compressor stations to enhance pipeline capacity to California and (2)
offering rate incentives to expedite construction of projects that will make
additional capacity available this summer on constrained pipeline systems.
As to the in-state problems, FERC also recognized that "actions the
Commission takes to expedite new capacity for gas to serve California and the
West may only be effective to the extent there is available local
distribution capacity to deliver gas downstream of the interstate pipeline.
The availability of sufficient local take-away capacity, however, is a matter
that is within the control fo the states rather than of this Commission."
FERC asks that the pipelines coordinate their efforts with LDCs, utilities
and state officials so that any additional gas would get to all entities that
need the gas supply.
1 Order Removing Obstacles to Increased Electric Generation and Natural Gas
Supply in the Western United States and Requesting Comments on Further
Actions to Increase Energy Supply and Decrease Energy Consumption, Docket No.
EL01-47-000.
=====================================
|
2,157 |
Subject: Re: 2nd Request: Updates for September Internal Resource Table
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/151.
=====================================
Joseph Alamo
08/30/2000 06:08 PM
To: California Government Affairs, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc: Lysa Akin/PDX/ECT@ECT, Ginger Dernehl/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: 2nd Request: Updates for September Internal Resource Table
Please note *Second Request* for attached. Thanks, Joseph
---------------------- Forwarded by Joseph Alamo/SFO/EES on 08/30/2000 06:07
PM ---------------------------
Joseph Alamo
08/25/2000 11:16 AM
To: California Government Affairs, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Marcie
Milner/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Lysa Akin/PDX/ECT@ECT
Subject: Updates for September Internal Resource Table
Please consider this a reminder that your "IRT" updates are soon due to Rick
& Sue Nord.
In order to facilitate processing this report in a timely manner, please
utilize the
attached Excel file (see below), which contains two worksheets, one "blank"
for your usage for new entries (see the tab labeled "INPUT for SEPTEMBER").
The other worksheet contains the August Report in its entirety (tab labeled
"AUGUST REPORT"), for reference as well as "cut & paste" purposes (if
simpler!).
Please complete and return to me by COB Wednesday, August 30th......
(and don't forget your priority "rankings" for each entry!)
Note: if you'd prefer a hard copy of the above, please let me know.
Thanks in advance for your assistance.
Joseph Alamo
Sr. Administrative Assistant
Government Affairs - The Americas
San Francisco CA
=====================================
|
2,158 |
Subject: Fwd: [UCB-NET-ANNOUNCE] Electrical Outage, Evans Hall, 10/15/2000
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/2412.
=====================================
The following email from IST provides information concerning the extensive
outage of network services on campus Sunday evening between about 7:00 and
9:30 PM.
Should you experience any continuing problems with computing services
please contact the information desk in the Computer Center, or helpdesk
at http://helpdesk.haas.berkeley.edu, phone 510/642-0434.
Thank you,
Haas Computing Services
>To: [email protected]
>Organization: Communication & Network Services
>Subject: [UCB-NET-ANNOUNCE] Electrical Outage, Evans Hall, 10/15/2000
>
>hi,
>
>at ~6:45PM PDT this evening, Sunday 10/15/2000, Evans Hall lost all
>electrical power. PPCS was dispatched and determined the breaker on the
>12KV building feed had been tripped. Power was restored at ~9:35PM;
>but as yet PPCS has not identified the cause of the outage and will
>continue their investigation tomorrow.
>
>the electrical outage caused a disruption in campus Internet/I2/calren2
>network connectivity as well as connectivity to hosts and resources
>within the Evans data center. external network connectivity has since
>been restored and we understand that the data center is also in the
>process of bringing hosts affected by the outage back into service.
>the outage also disrupted Internet/I2/calren2 connectivity from UCDavis as
>their primary path transits equipment in Evans affected by the outage.
>
>...
>
>john hess
>ist-cns-oir, nocman
>[email protected]
=====================================
|
2,159 |
Subject: Messaging for Jeff Skilling
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/115.
=====================================
If there is going to be a play come the first of the year to meld
California's PX and ISO, Skilling may want to consider pre-empting that
agenda (and most of this is not new; already included in previous messaging
points we've developed internally):
It's the gas industry, stupid---for profit transcos is the answer.
California's big mistake was replacing one monopoly--the utility---with
another--the PX. PX's are not necessarily bad things. But PXs with a
monopoly is a very bad thing.
Forcing the IOUS to buy everything from the PX was irresponsible.
"Put everyone on a variable rate mortgage" story.
Decision makers openly admitted that they put in place a strucuture designed
NOT to encourage retail choice and competition.
Decision makers actively urged families and businesses NOT to switch to
providers offering an "insurance policy" (i.e., fixed price deals) against
the volatile and risky power exchange price.
When you combine the supply shortage, the PX monopoly, the nonexistant retail
market and decision makers' attempts to discourage choice, you get a
debacle--that's what California set itself up for, and that's what it got.
Putting the PX inside the ISO will only infect the wound that's already been
inflicted.
The real answer is....(we've developed these points already).
This is quick and dirty and can be made much more punchy and articulate, but
wanted to get the notion out there given our time constraints.
Best,
Jeff
=====================================
|
2,160 |
Subject: Re: Conf Call Follow Up
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/2861.
=====================================
Strange that it took this email 48 hours to reach me!
Let me know if there are other immediate issues for this week.
We can be reached as well in the DC office 202 955-6300 Weds.
jeremy
[email protected] wrote:
> Thanks. I'm glad they want to follow-up with Steve (I've been pushing it)
> and I've got some follow-up as well based on chats I had in the afternoon
> on Friday with folks post-call. Let's regroup on Monday. I'll be in
> Portland but can call you.
>
> Best,
> Jeff
>
>
> Jeremy Meier
> <jermeier@eart To: [email protected]
> hlink.net> cc:
> Subject: Conf Call Follow Up
> 10/29/2000
> 11:48 AM
>
>
>
> Jeff:
>
> FYI, we had an instructive rest of the conference call on Friday with
> Sue and Robbie et al.
> They indicated they could use Steve's help face to face at some point.
>
> We are following up with Sue and Robbie on a couple legal issues, case
> law and MSA self-certification language, and let me know if you have
> additional items.
>
> We await approval on the final tariff language and can then file at the
> CPUC. Let me know what schedule works for you.
> Also, can you confirm the correct names, email addresses, titles for
> those new folks on Friday's call: Robbie Rossi, Michelle, Melissa Lloyd?
>
> Thanks.
>
> Jeremy Meier
> Blumenfeld & Cohen
=====================================
|
2,161 |
Subject: RE: Analysis of Prices Charged for Power Sold to DWR
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/deleted_items/348.
=====================================
Jeff we talked about developing messages around PGE's pricing, etc. I'll check with the PGE folks to get a good set of facts to address this issue. Messaging is tough, but I'd suggest we focus on: (1) the total dollars at issue--$318,071 isn't a big deal; (2) PGE is 61 out of 74 in terns of total sales; and (3) PGE's took a position in the market and is selling power purchased at high prices (PGE is a net short position).
The additional facts we need are how the dollars flow to Enron Corp. given PGE's power cost adjustment stipulation.
-----Original Message-----
From: Dasovich, Jeff
Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2001 11:13 AM
To: Shapiro, Richard; Kean, Steven J.; Denne, Karen; Robertson, Linda; Mara, Susan; Kingerski, Harry; Steffes, James D.; Tribolet, Michael; Kaufman, Paul; Palmer, Mark A. (PR)
Subject: Analysis of Prices Charged for Power Sold to DWR
FYI.
In case you haven't seen it. According to MRW's analysis for IEP, Portland General sold the highest-price power to DWR in 1Q01. But at $318,071, PGE is 61 out of 74 in terms of total sales dollars. The highest is Mirant at $706 million.
Enron Power Marketing is #60 out of 74 in terms of prices charged, and #26 in terms of totals sales to DWR (about $45MM), according to the analysis.
Best,
Jeff
-----Original Message-----
From: Kaufman, Paul
Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2001 12:07 PM
To: Dasovich, Jeff
Subject: Analysis
<< File: dwr purchases analysis MEF3.xls >>
=====================================
|
2,162 |
Subject: GSPP on the forefront
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/625.
=====================================
> Jeff,
> How are you? Wild prices and politics out there I gather. I have a
> question/proposal for you. A major goal that is shared by the GSPP alumni
> board
> and the school is to host policy forums that attract top academics, policy
> makers, and public attention as not only a good public service, but at good
PR
> for the school and its mission. Since electricity deregulation in CA is on
> the
> front page of all major newspapers this summer, the Dean and I are
interested
> in
> putting together an electricity policy forum. I would need your contacts,
> political sense, and perhaps some financial support from Enron to make this
> work. Do you like the idea and would you be willing to help in some of
these
> ways? I think it is in the interest of Enron to advance reasoned debate
with
> the backing of the independent/objective GSPP against what is already a
major
> emotional/political backlash.
>
> On a totally unrelated issue, I spoke with Tim Belden about a position in
the
> Enron govt affairs group working with the trading desk. I guess the VP for
> the
> West, Kaufman, is supposed to call me. If the job is really to understand
and
> follow RTO developments and their interaction with energy prices it seems a
> perfect fit with what I've been doing. I told Tim I'm happy where I am but
> the
> opportunity sounds interesting.
> Cheers,
> Rob
>
> Rob Gramlich
> PJM Market Monitoring Unit
> (610) 666-4291
> [email protected]
=====================================
|
2,163 |
Subject: Re:
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/710.
=====================================
Thanks. Remind me to tell you the story of the time that I was on a panel
with him. Yours is the most succint description of him that I've heard to
date. Was curious whether his rant was getting any traction with people that
matter. Sounds like it isn't.
Tim Belden@ECT
10/19/2000 05:36 PM
To: Jeff Dasovich/Na/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Re:
I don't know if you know the history behind McCullough. He is a consultant
who primarily advises industrial loads. He advised his customers that prices
were going down and that they should go on index based tariffs rather than
fixed-price tariffs. Needless to say, his advise cost his customers a great
deal of money. Notable examples are Bellingham Cold Storage and Georgia
Pacific in Puget Sound Energy's service territory. Rather than acknowledge
that he was wrong, Robert is on a witch hunt. His data is bad, his analysis
is horrible, he lies with numbers but does a good job being pompous and
putting together flashy power point presentations. I have not heard of
anybody agreeing with him, including the NWPPC, CEC, CAISO, CAPX. He is a
loud entertaining speaker, so I am sure that he will continue to get coverage.
From: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON on 10/19/2000 05:24 PM CDT
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON
To: Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:
Have there been any more reactions to the presentation that McCullough made
at the "volatility conference" in Portland last week?
=====================================
|
2,164 |
Subject: Re: Still nothing on the gas meeting?
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/4745.
=====================================
Greetings. Forgive the delays. The meeting can largely be summarized by the
CEC presentation. I'll have Joseph email it to you. In a nut shell, there's
more interstate pipeline coming to the California border than there is
INTRAstate capacity to take it from the California border to the
consumer/business. The CEC's forecasts show that things will be tight in
California. The thrust of the workshop is that, just like power plants,
intrastate pipeline capapcity is lagging demand in California and California
needs to make a concerted effort at revitalizing the in-state gas
infrastructure and do it quickly. Hope this is helpful, and again, sorry
for the delay.
Best,
Jeff
Joseph Alamo
05/29/2001 12:01 PM
To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron
cc:
Subject: Still nothing on the gas meeting?
Jeffrey.......?????
---------------------- Forwarded by Joseph Alamo/NA/Enron on 05/29/2001 10:00
AM ---------------------------
From: Scott Sullivan/Western Region/The Bentley Company@Exchange on
05/29/2001 11:54 AM CDT
To: Joseph Alamo/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Still nothing on the gas meeting?
R. Scott Sullivan
Account Manager
Enron Energy Services
12467 Alcosta Blvd. Suite 500
San Ramon, CA 94583
direct: (925) 543-3870
cell: (707) 631-5668
fax: (925) 543-0050
pager: (877) 348-8934
pager e-mail: [email protected]
[email protected]
"Failure is the opportunity to begin again, more intelligently." - Henry
Ford
=====================================
|
2,165 |
Subject: nan
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/mba__quant/12.
=====================================
Dear E204-1 and E204-2 students,
Regarding the Team Assignment #2, I neglected to put the point-count in the
Points Scoreboard on page 1.? The points assigned should be:
Problem 1:??? 8 pts
Problem 2:? 12 pts
On Personal Problem Set 5 (due May 3/4), the note says NOT to use Linear
Programming to
determine the EST, EFT, LST, and LFT times for each activity but instead
determine them
manually as in lecture.? This direction should have referred to 15.9 (b) and
(d), so Linear
Programming should not be an issue for the homework.? Creating a spreadsheet
in part (e)
can be done from the text examples and the spreadsheet example that you have
in your
Project Management handout (p11).
Elizabeth Joy will hold the Review on Saturday for those looking for
additonal
insights on simulation and the initial topics of project management --
defining the
network diagram (activity on node), deriving the Early Start Times,
Early Finish Times (+EST + duration), Late Finish Times, Late Start Times
(=LFT - duration),
Total Slack (=LST-EST), Free Slack, Safety Slack, Unshared Slack (=Min{Free
S, Safety S}),
Critical Path, Project Duration, Linear Programming formulation to Min
Project Time, etc.
--Tom McCullough
=======================================================================
Tom McCullough
Senior Lecturer
Haas School of Business
University of California at Berkeley
==========================================================================
=====================================
|
2,166 |
Subject: Re: Tyson Update
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/2957.
=====================================
Thanks. FYI: Tyson will also be at Davos. Suggested list of business
leaders to try to bring on board to follow.
Linda Robertson
01/23/2001 03:16 PM
To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@ENRON, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@ENRON, [email protected]
Subject: Re: Tyson Update
Good. Rick Shapiro and I have an appointment to see Larry Summers Thursday
morning to update him on CA events. Larry leaves later that day for Davos
(Steve, note that Ken will also be in Davos. Greenspan almost always goes to
Davos as well.) As for new Administration, they are publicly saying that
this mess is CA's mess. We'll see how long they can sustain this position.
Rick and I will be meeting with Ed Gillespie Wednesday a.m. We should know
more then.
Jeff Dasovich
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
01/23/2001 03:04 PM
To: [email protected], Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Linda Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Tyson Update
Tyson has gotten a call-back from the governor's office. She's going to call
him back shortly to try to sell him on the plan (i.e., private sector to the
rescue) and ensure that he'll come to the party. She'll call me back as soon
as she talks to him.
Curious--do we have any sense of whether there's much activity within the
adminstration on this, or can we expect the wait and see approach to continue?
Best,
Jeff
=====================================
|
2,167 |
Subject: Bad Bill in LA
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/10102.
=====================================
FYI - check out this rotten legislation in LA. I think this is a good one
for our state coalition. Regards.
INTERNET
LOUISIANA
ISPs would need permits under bill
Rep. Matthew (Pete) Schneider III (R., District 90) has prefiled a bill
to require the Public Service Commission to issue permits to Internet
service providers (ISPs). HB 355 also would prohibit ISPs from issuing
preprinted solicitation checks to entice customers to enter into an
agreement with the ISP unless that ISP had a permit.
HB 355 would prohibit local exchange carriers (LECs) and interexchange
carriers (IXCs) from allowing an ISP without a permit to provide
Internet access to a telephone subscriber in the state. The bill also
would bar banks from cashing any preprinted solicitation checks issued
by an ISP without a permit.
The bill would fine the LECs, IXCs, and banks $500 if they violated the
measure. Those entities would have to keep track of permitted ISPs
through a list compiled by the commission.
HB 355 would require out-of-state ISPs to maintain a $10,000 surety bond
in the state to be permitted to provide Internet access to Louisiana
residents. The PSC would be able to waive the bond requirement for any
provider demonstrating financial responsibility by submitting a letter
of credit from an accredited financial institution.
The bill would authorize the commission to set a fee for obtaining and
renewing the permit. The permit would need to be renewed annually.
=====================================
|
2,168 |
Subject: Fwd: DJ - US Richardson To Unveil Calif Pwr Supply Initiatives Wed
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/1314.
=====================================
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2000 10:34:29 -0600
From: "Tracey Bradley" <[email protected]>
To: "Deanna King" <[email protected]>, "Jeffrey Watkiss"
<[email protected]>, "Paul Fox" <[email protected]>, "Ronald Carroll"
<[email protected]>
Subject: DJ - US Richardson To Unveil Calif Pwr Supply Initiatives Wed
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
DJ US Richardson To Unveil Calif Pwr Supply Initiatives Wed
Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.
WASHINGTON (Dow Jones)--U.S. Energy Secretary Bill Richardson will announce
Wednesday a series of initiatives the Clinton administration will undertake
to help alleviate California's power supply crisis, the U.S. Department Of
Energy said in a press release Tuesday.
Richardson will announce the initiatives at a press event in Sacramento. He
will be joined by California Gov. Gray Davis and California congressional and
state lawmakers.
The initiatives will "help California reduce the strain on its electricity
system and increase electric grid reliability," the DOE said in the release.
The event is scheduled for 11 a.m. PST (1900 GMT) at the Sacramento Municipal
Utility District's Hedge Photovoltaic Facility.
A DOE spokesman declined to provide further information Tuesday.
-By Bryan Lee, Dow Jones Newswires; 202-862-6647,
mailto:[email protected]
(END) Dow Jones Newswires 31-10-00
=====================================
|
2,169 |
Subject: Potential Opportunity for ECI
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/eci/98.
=====================================
Fellas, please read below. Do we have a need for extra capacity in
California? Mitch, could this be a re-sell opportunity? Let me know if this
is at all attractive. Thanks.
----- Forwarded by Scott Bolton/Enron Communications on 01/17/00 01:49 PM
-----
[email protected]
01/17/00 11:46 AM
To: Scott Bolton/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
cc:
Subject: Potential Opportunity for ECI
Greetings Scott:
As we discussed, an acquaintance of mine is a lawyer whose client is the
California Independent System Operator (ISO). The ISO contracted with MCI (a
couple of years ago) to build a broad band network ( OC-48) to support
electricity deregulation in California. (Friends of mine at MCI worked on the
deal.) Since that time, the ISO has discovered that it has capacity
substantially in excess of what it needs to operate the grid (and certain
markets for power, e.g., ancillary services). The ISO is none to happy about
having been sold an "overbuild" network by MCI.
But given MCI's reputation, the ISO is looking at marketing the capacity
rather
than trying to re-negotiate the contract with MCI. Sounds like the capacity
runs between Sacramento (Folsom?) and Southern California (Alhambra?).
Could
be an opportunity for ECI to get some quality capacity at a substantial
discount. I've let Tom Gros know about it, too (bandwidth trading
opportunity?). Please pass along to ECI folks for their assessment.
Best,
Jeff
=====================================
|
2,170 |
Subject: Re: thanks
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/2662.
=====================================
Sorry. Been a bit crazy around here. Thanks for the note, and thank you for
doing such a good job at driving this process. My thoughts on your proposal
(and these are very preliminary): 1) politicians may not be willing to go as
high as 25% for fear of being accused of a "utility bailout"--maybe 10-15%?
though utility solvency may force their hands. 2) TURN will go ape-#%#$ if
we make the "roll off" retroactive to October. 3) I'm willing to allow
utilities to collect TRA undercollections, but feel that customers and
utilities (not me) need to figure out precisely what that number is.
Look forward to getting closure tomorrow, though I'm very concerned that
we've lost Edison, given Bryson's public calls to return to 1950.
Best,
Jeff
Evelyn Kahl Elsesser <[email protected]>
12/12/2000 06:57 PM
To: "Jeff Dasovich (E-mail)" <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: thanks
I really appreciated your participation today...very substantive and
constructive. I particularly liked the idea of a migration "trigger",
which I included in the outline. I personally think that the big ticket
items are rate level, rate freeze end and TRA allocation. I wish we
could start facing that dance. I'd play with (a) 25% immediate increase
in commodity price (explicit, rather than residual); (b) rate freeze end
on October 2, 2000 (c) pre EOF TRA undercollections to utilities,
everything after is allocated forward to procurement customers.
Thoughts?
=====================================
|
2,171 |
Subject: Secured Access to the CA Issues Intranet Site.
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: []
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/237.
=====================================
Subject: Secured Access to the CA Issues Intranet Site.
As you probably already know the California Deregulation/Power Issue Intranet
site is now available at home.enron.com. However, there have been
difficulties in accessing the secured document part of the site because of
Windows 2000 migration issues.
To access the secured documents there are two things you can do.
1. To access the secured documents, click on secured documents and type in
your user name, which is the same as if you are logging onto the network,
and then type in your password, which is the same as if you are logging
onto the network.
2. However, if you have difficulties entering this site, you
will need to change your Lotus internet password. Which is very simple to
do and which you will need to do regardless if you decide to use this site
or not, it is all part of the current computer migration. To change your
internet password, go to this link Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES
and then hit the edit person key. Go to the last field that says "internet
password" and type in whatever password you would like, preferably your
current network login password. (In the internet password section you will
see a bunch of numbers and letters, delete those and enter your new network
password.) Then go to the save and close button. You should then have access
to the secured documents on the site.
Please let me know if you have any problems accessing this information. My
number is 713-853-4382.
=====================================
|
2,172 |
Subject: Re: UC/CSU issue - SB - 27X
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/5264.
=====================================
I talked to Mike Smith and he agrees this is a commercial problem. Really
nothing for us to do directly other than minimize exit fees, etc.
Jeff Dasovich
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
02/16/2001 09:20 PM
To: Tom Riley/Western Region/The Bentley Company@Exchange@EES
cc: Douglas Huth/HOU/EES@EES, Mike D Smith/HOU/EES@EES, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul
Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Re: UC/CSU issue - SB - 27X
We'll need to discuss further internally, but they may be correct in their
assessment.
Best,
Jeff
Tom Riley/Western Region/The Bentley Company@Exchange
02/16/2001 07:03 PM
To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Mike D Smith/HOU/EES@EES, Douglas Huth/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: UC/CSU issue - SB - 27X
From further discussions with UC/CSU, it appears their primary concern
relative to Enron's decision to De-DASR their accounts is that they have lost
their "direct access" status, and are again a bundled utility customer.
Jeff - what impacts does this status have with respect to the ban language of
AB-1X? And with SB-27X, will they now encumber costs to become a direct
access customer that they would not have been liable for had Enron not made
the decision to return them to utility supply?
Your input is appreciated. Please shed some light here as soon as possible.
Regards - Tom Riley
=====================================
|
2,173 |
Subject: An Invitation to Attend Financial Reporting Conference
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/inbox/237.
=====================================
Dear Evening MBA Students:
The Center for Financial Reporting and Management in the Haas School is hosting it Twelfth Annual Conference on Financial Reporting on Monday, November 5, 2001 at the San Francisco Marriott Hotel, 55 Fourth Street.
As a special offer to Evening MBA Program students, we are offering one seat to each student at the discounted price of $145 per seat. This can be used by you or by a person in your firm whom you wish to designate.
A copy of the program is attached. If you or an associate wish to attend, please register on-line at: <http://www.haas.berkeley.edu/accounting/cfrm/registration.htm> . When filling out the registration form, please write: "EVENING PROGRAM" in the "additional registrants" space on the form. I will contact you regarding payment. If you prefer to pay by check, you may print the registration form and mail it or leave it in Dayna Haugh's mailbox in the student services building mailroom with a check.
If you have questions, feel free to contact me at 642-6334. We hope you or one of your colleagues will be able to attend.
Dayna Haugh
Assistant Director
Center for Financial Reporting and Management
Haas School of Business
University of California
502D Faculty Building, #1900
Berkeley, CA 94720-1900
510-642-6334 (Phone)
510-643-7218 (Fax)
<http://www.haas.berkeley.edu/accounting/cfrm/cfrm.htm>://www.haas.berkeley.edu/accounting/cfrm/cfrm.
<http://www.haas.berkeley.edu/accounting/cfrm/cfrm.htm>
=====================================
|
2,174 |
Subject: FW: You can still join the Marketing Club!
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/inbox/120.
=====================================
Alice S. Eagleson
MBA Candidate, May 2002
Walter A. Haas School of Business
[email protected]
415-567-5796
-----Original Message-----
From: Alice Eagleson [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 5:55 PM
To: [email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]
Subject: You can still join the Marketing Club!
Welcome new members of the Marketing Club!
To learn more about the Marketing Club at Haas, check out our fabulous
re-designed website, courtesy of webmaster Kevin Petrie:
http://groups.haas.berkeley.edu/mktclub/index.htm
The following is a list of everyone who paid dues at Club Night:
Akerkar Anita
Barthold Kerry
Brown Monica
Christy Nicholas
Daniel Jason
Gaylord John
Harris Kristin
Johnson Michael
Lacayo Roger
Mesa Monica
Phillips (Sales) Fermina
Plotner Ryan
Schnauffer Meagan
Stein Brent
Zhang Michael
Chao Will
Co Laura
Lynch Ann Marie
Pearson John
Rangarajan Bharath
Yang Sharon
Zhukovskaya Tanya
If your name is not on this list and you would still like to join, it's not
too late. (Second-years, you know you want to join too!)
Dues are: $30 for lifetime membership, $20 for one year
Checks should be made out to: MBA Marketing Club and can be put in my
mailbox.
Our first meeting is Tuesday, Oct. 9 from 12:30 to 2:00pm in room C110.
Hope to see you then!!
ali
Alice S. Eagleson
MBA Candidate, May 2002
Walter A. Haas School of Business
[email protected]
415-567-5796
=====================================
|
2,175 |
Subject: IEP Info on Industry Meeting with Rod Wright
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/826.
=====================================
Sandi and Dave and Mike will dicuss further on the call on Monday but wanted
to disseminate info regarding the meeting that Joe Ronan of Calpine offered
on an IEP call today:
The meeting was attended by a lot of folks of all stripes.
Wright was very critical of how the Governor is handling the issue and wants
to craft a solution with the industry and then invite the Governor to get on
board.
Wright threw a whole laundry list of options on the table for folks to
consider (Dave's typing up his notes from the meeting for distribution later
today)
One of Wright's key concern is forward contracting.
The utilities said that Loretta Lynch is the problem with the onerous
"prudence" criteria she's imposing on utility forward contracts.
Those onerous criteria keep the utility from contracting.
Much discussion of what California does on the gas side, i.e., set an
objective benchmark price; if the utility beats it, they profit; if they do
worse, they take the hit. The utility, under this framework, has broad
flexibility to contract forward, i.e., PUC gets out of the way. (FYI:
Coincidentally, I suggested this approach in very broad terms--pointing to
the fact that it's already successfully in use on the gas side--during a
panel discussion that I participated in yesterday at the California Energy
Markets conference.)
The utilities told Rod Wright that they did not want, nor did they have the
expertise, to get back into the generation business.
=====================================
|
2,176 |
Subject: Re: San Diego witnesses
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/1254.
=====================================
Thanks, Cynthia. Extreme rhetoric likely from Ms Lynch, CPUC Prez, UCAN and
Sempra chief (Steve Baum). Rest of panel looking pretty good. Might be
useful to let Smutney do at least the lion's share of the "responding" to Ms
Lynch's and Mr. Baum's rabid attacks on generators. Smutney's had a lot of
practice in the last couple of months and he's close to the issue. But, of
course, a few well placed jabs, couldn't hurt....
Cynthia Sandherr@ENRON
09/08/2000 12:23 PM
To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, Joe Hillings/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Maureen
McVicker/NA/Enron@Enron, Elizabeth Linnell/NA/Enron@Enron, Allison
Navin/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES
Subject: San Diego witnesses
Steve: here's the witness list as discussed for Monday, September 11th's San
Diego hearing.
---------------------- Forwarded by Cynthia Sandherr/Corp/Enron on 09/08/2000
01:30 PM ---------------------------
"Black, Andy" <[email protected]> on 09/08/2000 12:33:54 PM
To: Cynthia Sandherr <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: San Diego witnesses
We have not finalized who is on what panels. Following are the 16
witnesses:
4 FERC Commissioners
Cal PUC Chair
Cal Energy Commission Chair
Cal ISO CEO
Cal PX
SDG&E
Reliant
Enron
Solar Turbines
Oracle
Jan Smutny-Jones as head of Cal Independent Energy Producers
restauranter Roy Tyler of Tyler's Taste of Texas (no, we didn't plan that)
Utility Consumers Action Network
=====================================
|
2,177 |
Subject: Re: Lone Mountain Gig
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/4103.
=====================================
did they charge your credit card, too? if they double-booked us, we better
get a free weekend out of it (in addition to getting the money back).
"Scott Laughlin" <[email protected]>
04/11/2001 05:07 PM
To: [email protected], [email protected]
cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Lone Mountain Gig
Because Jeff told us that he wasn't going to play, I assumed we all weren't
going to play. So I went ahead and made plans for us to go see my mom (and
my uncle and his family) this weekend in San Diego... Sorry about that. I
leave at 12:30 on Friday, and Cameron comes down at 6:30.
P.S. I'd think about staying if the gig paid for that spurious $740.00 bill
from Squaw.
>From: Prentice Sellers <[email protected]>
>To: [email protected], Cameron Sellers <[email protected]>
>CC: [email protected]
>Subject: Lone Mountain Gig
>Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 13:56:09 -0700
>
>Cameron and Scott - are you still up for playing at Haas on Friday? Jeff
>won't do it. BUt the guy who arranged it sent out an email to everyone
>saying we were playing and will be really bummed if we don't. If you guys
>are still up for it, I can try to find a guitar player to play with
>us. Obviously I would ask Steve and see if he could or if he had any other
>suggestions. Let me know how y'all feel about it.
>
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
=====================================
|
2,178 |
Subject: Draft #2 the Letter
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/2680.
=====================================
Attached is a letter that we worked on today and that will be sent to the
Governor, CA's US Senators (Boxer/Feinstein), congressional folks, and key
Cal state legislators. It's going out first thing tomorrow AM. It builds on
many of the things we've discussed over the past several months, so there
shouldn't be any surprises. If you've got any concerns please give Paul a
call at home or page me at 888.916.7184.
Jeff
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 12/14/2000 08:24 PM -----
Paul Kaufman@ECT
12/14/2000 06:57 PM
To: Cindy Derecskey/Corp/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul
Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Joe
Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Tom
Briggs/NA/Enron@Enron, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT,
Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Maureen
McVicker/NA/Enron@Enron, Ginger Dernehl/NA/Enron@Enron, Bernadette
Hawkins/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Marcia A Linton/NA/Enron@Enron, Joseph
Alamo/NA/Enron@Enron, Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mark
Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Draft #2 the Letter
Attached is a revised draft of the letter reflecting the comments recevied on
today's call. I toned down references to the Secretary's action yesterday,
reduced the discussion of caps, and eliminated our response to the "when did
you stop beating your dog" question.
=====================================
|
2,179 |
Subject: RE: Socalgas
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent_items/764.
=====================================
You know what is more recently? Reason I ask is that in the past, when volumes have been low, SoCal's had to "prop up" flows, i.e., keep a minimum at Blythe for "operational reasons" to serve San Diego (they said). So (just to give them the benefit of the doubt), I was wondering if there might be something to that recently. Pure speculation, but wondering if you had any info. Because I certainly can't think of ANY other reason for their behavior. I'm calling another PUC staffer today to discuss. In the meantime, are we continuing to make the request to SoCal for service? Might be a good idea to keep doing that.
Best,
Jeff
-----Original Message-----
From: Lindberg, Lorraine
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 8:31 AM
To: Dasovich, Jeff
Subject: RE: Socalgas
Hi Jeff - Throughput to Blythe has been averaging about 84% this year with peak flows of 99% in Jan and March. In your sentence below, do you mean to ensure max vols through Blythe? Typically, Topock averages higher throughput than Blythe. Thanks for your help.
Lorraine
-----Original Message-----
From: Dasovich, Jeff
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 6:02 PM
To: Lindberg, Lorraine
Subject: Socalgas
Talked to someone at the PUC (and I'll be talking to additional folks over there). Question: Do we know what volumes through Blythe have been? One thing that might be happening is that SoCal's restricting flows at Topock in order to ensure minimum volumes through Blythe.
Best,
Jeff
=====================================
|
2,180 |
Subject: New Procedure for Projects/RCR's
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['Ginger Dernehl/HOU/EES@EES', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/administrative/22.
=====================================
Please see the note from Elizabeth below.
RCR's are now on-line and should be submitted via this on-line format.
Please refrain from using the old form.
Thank you,
gngr
---------------------- Forwarded by Ginger Dernehl/HOU/EES on 10/19/99 04:35
PM ---------------------------
Elizabeth Linnell
10/18/99 05:01 PM
To: Joseph Alamo/SFO/EES@EES, Bruno Gaillard/SFO/EES@EES, Judy
Pearson/HOU/EES@EES, Laurie Knight/DUB/EES@EES, Lysa Akin/PDX/ECT@ECT, Marcia
A Linton/HOU/EES@EES, Margo Reyna/HOU/EES@EES, Marcie
Milner/Corp/Enron@Enron, Bernadette Hawkins/Corp/Enron@Enron, Chauncy
Hood/DUB/EES@EES, Terri Miller/HOU/EES@EES, Gloria Solis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Geriann
Warner/Corp/Enron@Enron, Earlene O'Connell/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jean R
Dressler/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Ginger Dernehl/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: New Procedure for Projects/RCR's
Please see the attached Word document for directions on a new on-line
procedure for RCR's. All RCR requests must now be submitted on-line through
the Project Tracking system. To access the system, click on the first link
below, and a new icon will be added to your Lotus Notes desktop (it has a
picture of a globe). (Don't click on the other two links, they'll be added
automatically.) If you have any problems accessing the system, please call
me. If you have any questions on entering the information, please call me or
Ginger. Thanks!!
Click on this link --> > Gov Affairs
> Projects
> Contacts
Instructions: -->
=====================================
|
2,181 |
Subject: WA and OR EBS Certificates
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/2960.
=====================================
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 01/23/2001 03:47 PM -----
Jeremy Meier <[email protected]>
01/23/2001 02:15 PM
To: [email protected]
cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: WA and OR EBS Certificates
Jeff:
As discussed last week, we distributed the ICA Memo's to Sue and Donald and
sent the CA tariffs to Mona in SF. Please let me know if these documents
need to go to anyone else at Enron.
You had also indicated you wanted more information on "costs" for the next
EBS (or ETI) states of Washington and Oregon (and Utah). The state filing
fees should not be overly significant, and we can provide specific numbers -
though if by "costs" you refer to legal fees, perhaps Steve can best address
that area.
You can expect, fortunately or unfortunately, somewhat similar paper
processes for Wa, Or, and Ut as was done in CA. There will necessarily be
issues that Enron will want to first discuss internally, such as disclosure
of requested financial info. for Wa, before any filing.
We can send you the forms for each state so you get a feel for what is
required, or we can capsulize them in a Memo, and/or schedule a call with
Steve and Anita to go over specific EBS concerns. Let me know your
preference. To also confirm, you indicated WA as the first priority state,
with Scott overseeing.
We are otherwise proceeding as planned. Thanks,
Jeremy Meier
Blumenfeld & Cohen
SF
=====================================
|
2,182 |
Subject: Re: Brazil opportunity-completed one-pager
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/12643.
=====================================
Jeff:
Thanks for your attention on this matter. I am leaving for China tomorrow
(Saturday 6/9) and will return on Saturday 6/16. I am confirmed to depart for
Sao Paulo on 6/19. Is there a phone # I can reach Joe Kaischkill on? If so, I
would contact him when I get settled in in Shanghai. On the contrary, I can
be reached on Monday 6/18 in my office in Miami at 305-443-6665 or on my
mobile 305-773-0319.
Thanks again for your help.
Best regards,
Joe Alcantara
On Fri, 08 June 2001, [email protected] wrote:
>
>
> Joe:
>
> You can expect a call from Joe Kaischkill about setting up a meeting in Sao
> Paolo to discuss your proposal. Let me know if there's anything else that
> I can do to help.
>
> All the best,
> Jeff
>
>
>
> mail@joesdesk
> .com To: [email protected],
> [email protected]
> 06/04/2001 cc:
> 03:30 PM Subject: Brazil
opportunity-completed
> one-pager
>
>
>
>
>
> Jeff:
>
> I did a final draft of the one-pager I sent you earlier. I am attaching it
> here as it communicates the idea better. Please send along to whomever you
> feel should recieve it and let me know when I can contact who & when. I
> will be traveling on Friday am for 1 week.
> Thank you.
> Joe Alcantara
>
>
>
> (See attached file: DearJeffreyIII.doc)
=====================================
|
2,183 |
Subject: Venture Capitalist's talk on Fiber Optical Communication and
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/10086.
=====================================
Want to know?a Venture Capitalist's insights in the Technology and Market
trends on Semiconductor and Fiber Optical Communication in Asia and USA?
?
?
?
Global Management and Asia class
hosted by Haas Pacific Rim Club
invites you?to a lecture by
?
Dr. Stephen Chiao
Partner of Sycamore Venture
Director of Broadband Optical Networking Lab, San Jose State University
?
on
?
Recent Development, Market Trend and Opportunity on Semiconductor and Fiber
Optical Communication Industries in China, Taiwan, Japan and USA
?
Tuesday, March 20
18:00-19:50
C250
?
Dr. Chiao is a partner of Sycamore Venture. Dr. Chiao is also a professor
at Electrical Engineering Department and Director of the Broadband Optical
Networking Lab. at San Jose State University. Dr. Chiao has a distinguished
record of applying academic research to meet technology and business
requirements. With more than 85 technical articles published worldwide and 5
U.S. patents, Dr. Chiao is also an active consultant to many high-tech firms.
He is on the board of directors of several high-tech companies in Silicon
Valley. Dr. Chiao is also a partner of several VC funds. Prior to his
professorship, Dr. Chiao held senior management and R&D positions at
Mosel/Vitelic, Gould/AMI, Hewlett-Packard and Varian Associates. Dr. Chiao
received his B.S. from National Cheng-Kung University in Taiwan, M.S. from
University of Southern California and Ph.D. from Stanford University.?
?
=====================================
|
2,184 |
Subject: Re: Clarkson
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/3048.
=====================================
OK. Jimmie and I duplicated effort just a bit. Attached is the memo and the
spreadsheet. Note that in the memo, we have a dispute about whether $750k is
adequate. Therefore, I've left questions 4 and 5 attached to the memo for
you folks to reconcile (if they take advantage of discounts and get A/R and
inventory rates back in line with '93 rates, is $750 enough?).
Also, I've included a common-size income statement in exhibit 1, a cash flow
statement in exhibit 2, and I, too, completed exhibit 3. We may want to
clean up some of the calculations in the spreadsheet, given that we'll likely
need to turn them in as attachments.
Hope this helps. I'd do more, but I'm off for the airport and New
York--won't be in class tomorrow.
Best,
Jeff
[email protected]
01/28/2001 01:01 AM
To: [email protected], [email protected]
cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected]
Subject: Re: Clarkson
To simplify the analysis, I completed Exhibit 3 for 1993, 94, 95 for clarkson
in the attached spreadsheet. Whoever calculated ROA forgot to add interest
expense and used year end assets instead of average. For ROCE again, average
instead of ending should be used. The level of current liabilities jumps out
when you compare it to the rest of the industry. Dylan is right the growth
in inventory is also alarming. I will look at the data some more tomorrow.
Jimmy
- CLARKS~1.XLS
=====================================
|
2,185 |
Subject: E-Biz Executive Seminar Series
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/3056.
=====================================
FISHER CENTER FOR THE STRATEGIC USE OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
Haas School of Business
is pleased to present in its
E-Biz Executive Seminar Series
Stuck in the Bozo Filter
Reputation management -- How startups can escape fuzzy
branding and bad media relations
Tom Gable
Chairman and CEO, The Gable Group
Friday, November 17, 2000, 5:00 p.m.
Wells Fargo Room, Haas School of Business
ABSTRACT
Startups can't cross the chasm or ride the tornado weighted down with fuzzy
branding and bad media relations. There is no denying the power of good
public relations to launch a company from the ground up, build the brand
and support a company's business and marketing plans over time. But in
today's fast-moving economy, clutter abounds. News about a company is often
ignored if it doesn't have a big number attached to it, tell a bigger story
or have a unique twist. Editors and writers filter out pitches and releases
that sound alike. How to break through the clutter? In this talk, we will
review the nine easy ways to kill a startup with PR, see "worst of PR"
examples the media hate and learn a few secrets of proper positioning --
methods companies have used to make a difference with intelligence and
personality.
*******************************************************************
Serena Joe, Program Assistant
Institute of Management, Innovation and Organization
Room 402 Haas School of Business #1930
Berkeley, CA 94720-1930
Tel #: (510) 643-4096
Fax #: (510) 642-2826
=====================================
|
2,186 |
Subject: Weekend of November 11 & 12
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/2439.
=====================================
Do you know that Friday November 10 is a UC Berkeley holiday? Can you take
off work so we can have a 3 day weekend? Also, there is a mushroom & wine
festival in Mendocino that weekend. Are you interested in any of the
following?
Friday November 10
8 am - 6 pm
Wine & Mushroom Symposium
Camp Mendocino via the Skunk Train -- Includes talks, chefs panel, lunch,
foray, wine & mushroom tasting & train ride
$135
Friday November 10
1 pm
Guided Mushroom Walk
With Gardens Nursery Manager Allen Palacios Mendocino Coast Botanical
Gardens, South Highway 1, Fort Bragg
$6
Friday November 10
5 pm - 7 pm
Wine & Mushroom Reception
With Wine Country Gourmands and Navarro wines at the Lodge at Noyo River,
Fort Bragg
$10
Saturday November 11
11 am
Guided Mushroom Walk
With Vince Viverito & Henry Young Van Damme State Park
$10
Saturday November 11
1 pm - 2:30 pm
Cooking Demo
Taming the Wild Mushroom with chef Silver Canul and Husch wine tasting at
the Little River Inn
Saturday November 11
2:00 pm
Wild Mushroom Exhibit Reception at the Ford House in Mendocino
Saturday November 11
5 - 7 pm
Wine & Mushroom Reception
With Wine Country Gourmands and Navarro wines at the Lodge at Noyo River,
Fort Bragg
$10
Saturday November 11
5 pm
Price Fixed Mushroom Menu
With Lolonis wines at The Ravens, Stanford Inn by the Sea
Saturday November 11
5:30 - 7 pm
The Wines of Anderson Valley
Wine tasting and mushroom appetizers at Inn at Schoolhouse Creek & Dennen's
Victorian Farmhouse
$10
=====================================
|
2,187 |
Subject: FW: POWER: California Department of Water Resources -- Fitch
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/deleted_items/137.
=====================================
Chris Calger
503-464-3735
FYI
-----Original Message-----
From: Jon Cartwright [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 1:23 PM
To: 'RJF Energy-Gram (E-mail)'
Subject: POWER: California Department of Water Resources -- Fitch
Teleconference: 24 Aug 2001 8:29 AM
Fitch-NY-August 24, 2001:
On Wednesday, August 29 at 3 p.m. (EDT), Fitch will host a teleconference to
address frequently asked questions about the legal structure and
creditworthiness of the California Department of Water Resource's (DWR)
Power Fund.
In addition, the teleconference will address any issues related to pending
matters at the California Public Utilities Commission that could affect the
ability of the DWR Power Fund to issue bonds. Fitch analysts Donna DiDonato
and Steven Fetter will host the call.
Participants in the U.S. and Canada should call 1-888-542-8839 five minutes
prior to the 3 p.m. (EDT) start time. International participants should call
1-706-634-1731. The identification number for the call is 1673543
(California Department of Water Resources).
A replay of the teleconference will be available two hours after the
conclusion of the call until 5 p.m. on Sept. 5, 2001. To access the replay,
participants in the U.S. or Canada should call 1-800-642-1687 while
international participants should call 1-706-645-9291.
Contact: Donna DiDonato 1-212-908-0637 or Steven Fetter 1-212- 908-0555, New
York.
Media Relations: James Jockle-212-908-0547, New York.
=====================================
|
2,188 |
Subject: RE: Holiday Party - Early Warning System
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent_items/950.
=====================================
I'm only coming if Molly comes as Martha.
-----Original Message-----
From: Sean Maloney
Sent: Mon 10/29/2001 7:22 PM
To: Press Curtiswork; Press Mary & Curtis; Anderluh Brian; Lee Zimmerman; marc sondheimer; Chris Erlin; Cameron Sellers; Prentice Sellers; Scott Laughlin; Jeff Dasovich; Blair Matt; Andy Morrison; Dave Barsotti; Dehm Mike; Brady Brook; Jennifer Peerless; Pete Woodring; Tracy_Brown
Cc:
Subject: Holiday Party - Early Warning System
Hey Guys,
Just wanted to let you know that the Holiday Party at my Parents house will
December 8th. As always it will start at about 10:30am.
I will send out invites in a week or two. Please do not mention the party
to anyone not on this list as my mom will only let me have a limited number
of friends over to play.
Sean
P.S. One more thing. It will be highly encouraged that people come in
holiday costumes. Possible outfits include but are not limited to:
Santa, Chanukah Monkey, Reindeer, Winter Warlock, Elf, Rabbi, Jesus,
Kwanzameister Meister Kwanza, Hermy, Dradle, Christmas Tree, Tooth Fairy
Family Christmas, Yamika Man/Woman, Elvis, Grinch, Max, Heat Mizer, Freeze
Mizer, The Mailman played by Bing Crosby, Jimmy Stewart, Ebeneezer Scrooge,
Tiny Tim, Present, Candy Cane, Boxing Day, 12 Days of Christmas, Batteries
Not Included, Ghost of Christmas Past/Present/Future, World's Tallest Man,
Fat Twins on Mini-Bikes, Sugar Plumbs, Hava Nagila, Neil Diamond, Band-Aid,
Eat Papa, Frosty the Yellow Snowman
=====================================
|
2,189 |
Subject: Transmission OII - PG&E Filing
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/12164.
=====================================
Attached is the prehearing conference statement issued by PG&E in the =20
Transmission OII proceeding.? The utility suggests that there are no =20
projects which should be considered.? Their direct quote is:
?
"...it does not appear that PG&E has any transmission projects appropriate=
=20
for inclusion in this fall=01,s hearings.? While the Los Banos-Gates 500 =
kV=20
Transmission Project (the =01&Path 15 Project=018) raises issues of statew=
ide=20
importance and has progressed to the point where a preferred route has bee=
n=20
identified and a detailed cost estimate prepared, that project is the=20
subject of a pending conditional CPCN application (A.01-04-012).? There is=
=20
no need for the Commission to conduct a duplicative analysis of the Path 1=
5=20
project as part of the instant investigation.? The only other transmissio=
n=20
projects PG&E currently plans that may require a CPCN =01) the Vaca-Lakevi=
lle=20
230 kV Project in Sonoma and Napa Counties, the Jefferson-Martin 230 kV=20
project in San Francisco, the Fresno Long-Term project, and the Bay Area 5=
00=20
kV substation project =01) are all longer-term, locally- or regionally-foc=
used=20
projects not planned to be operational until 2004, 2005, 2006, and 2007,=
=20
respectively."
?
Dan
Law Offices of Daniel W. Douglass
5959 Topanga Canyon Blvd.? Suite 244
Woodland Hills, CA 91367
Tel:?? (818) 596-2201
Fax:? (818) 346-6502
[email protected]
- PHC Stmt_07_03_01.doc
=====================================
|
2,190 |
Subject: CLEC Licensing Status
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/4392.
=====================================
Enron Telecommunications, Inc. ("ETI") is the state jurisdictional entity
that will be providing service. ETI is a wholly-owned subsidiary of EBS.
This memo is to alert you that we have received a license (CPCN) in your
states and there is a potential that ETI may soon be operational. We will
keep you apprised of developments.
PA- We have provisional authority. We can operate while the Commission is
reviewing our tariff.
FL- We have received approval of our license transfer from EBS to ETI.
CA- We had our license approved. We now have our tariffs adopted.
LA- We have received approval of a transfer of the existing license from EBS
to ETI. Our tariffs will be filed shortly for Commission approval.
TX- We have received approval of our license application for ETI.
---------------------- Forwarded by Mona L Petrochko/NA/Enron on 04/11/2001
10:07 AM ---------------------------
Margo Reyna
04/10/2001 02:12 PM
To: Fred Enochs/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Gunnar Frey/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Nicole La/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Neil Carpino/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Mona
L Petrochko/NA/Enron@Enron, Sue Nord/NA/Enron@Enron, Lara Leibman/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, John
Neslage/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Eric Benson/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: CLEC Licensing Status
Margo Reyna
Regulatory Analyst
Enron Corp., Government Affairs
Phone: 713-853-9191
=====================================
|
2,191 |
Subject: herve pierre at the sf ballet!
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/4581.
=====================================
hi-
just wanted to let you know that herve pierre (my friend who is the designer
at vera wang in NY), whom some of you met at the vera wang show last year,
designed the costumes for a gorgeous ballet at the paris opera a few years
ago (when i was still in paris) and that this ballet is coming to san
francisco in the beginning of may!
the name of the choreographer is angelin preljocaj and the name of the
ballet is "LE PARC", and it's really really beautiful and if you like the
ballet you should go see it.... his style is a combination of classical
ballet technique with a very contemporary edge to it, and herve's costumes
are gorgeous....
http://www.sfballet.org/2001season/programs.php
it will be at the sfballet on may 4 and may 5, and most tickets are already
gone, but there are still a few spots left.... just call 865-2000...
MOST IMPORTANTLY: i can't go to this ballet because i will be in las vegas
(spending the weekend with herve pierre... of all coincidences) so if any
one of you go (and why not film it for me?), or even just went and told me
about it, i would be thrilled to death and would forever be grateful....
just thought you might be interested...
colleen
mark---> will you please pass this on to maria because she came to the
fashion show, and what is her email anyways?
-------------------------------------------------------------++
colleen silva
producer
RED SKY >san francisco
v 415-633-2023
c 415-336-2219
<http://www.redsky.com>
=====================================
|
2,192 |
Subject: Re: damn boat
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/4734.
=====================================
There's no way that thing is fitting in the closet... Maybe out back, or
downstairs? We'll figure it out tonight. But we just have to be aware of
Wayne, who might slice the thing up.
>From: [email protected]
>To: "Scott Laughlin" <[email protected]>
>CC: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
>Subject: Re: damn boat
>Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 13:01:17 -0600
>
>
>dear arse:
>i can move it to the guest room closet for the weekend and plan to take it
>to mendocino soon as we return from mexico.
>
>
>
> "Scott
> Laughlin" To: [email protected],
>[email protected],
> <scottwl@hotm [email protected]
> ail.com> cc:
> Subject: damn boat
> 03/23/2001
> 12:39 PM
>
>
>
>
>
>At risk of sounding like a pain in the arse, we do need to get that damn
>boat out of here for this weekend's festivities. It's fine to have a Zodiac
>
>in the living room, if you live in a place like Medecino, but in a city as
>sophisticated as SF, it really does look declasse.
>
>LATE!
>_________________________________________________________________
>Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
>
>
>
>
>
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
=====================================
|
2,193 |
Subject: Re: Solution for SDG&E
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/229.
=====================================
I think that we could put together a pretty close estimation. When you say
tenor, do you also want to try to estimate the balancing account as well or
use the SDG&E estimates? Also, what is your time frame?
TTT
James D Steffes@EES
09/06/2000 08:01 AM
To: thane twiggs, jeff dasovich, harry kingerski
cc:
Subject: Solution for SDG&E
Thane --
We now have enough information for the wholesale deal into SDG&E. What I
want is to mimic the legislation for R, Small C, and Street Lighting. Can
you put together the tenor and rates so we can match?
Jim
---------------------- Forwarded by James D Steffes/HOU/EES on 09/06/2000
07:58 AM ---------------------------
From: Chris H Foster@ECT on 09/05/2000 11:58 AM PDT
To: James D Steffes/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES
Subject: Price Update for SDG&E
Jeff
I found it
---------------------- Forwarded by Chris H Foster/HOU/ECT on 09/05/2000
11:59 AM ---------------------------
From: Chris H Foster on 09/05/2000 11:53 AM
To: Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES, David Parquet/SF/ECT@ECT
cc: Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Price Update for SDG&E
The RFP provided for our updating prices by noon today. Here is what I sent
out just a few minutes ago. We don't know if they are going to disqualify us
because we are not keeping our prices open, but we are trying to stay in the
game. (Jeff: please forward tthis to Jim Steffes with a copy to me. I
can't find him in the Enron Corp. e-mail.)
C
=====================================
|
2,194 |
Subject: RE: John Campbell
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent_items/651.
=====================================
I'll take care of it and if there's anything we need to do, I'll let you know.
Best,
Jeff
-----Original Message-----
From: Kaufman, Paul
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 3:43 PM
To: Dasovich, Jeff; McVicker, Maureen
Subject: RE: John Campbell
Let's get Bev or Hedy to deliver the message. Great idea.
-----Original Message-----
From: Dasovich, Jeff
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 12:08 PM
To: Kaufman, Paul; McVicker, Maureen
Subject: RE: John Campbell
We might be able to communicate this less formally through our lobbyists. If it's OK, let me check with them first, and then I'll get back to you. Sound good?
Best,
Jeff
-----Original Message-----
From: Kaufman, Paul
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 12:53 PM
To: McVicker, Maureen
Cc: Dasovich, Jeff
Subject: John Campbell
We are not giving any more money in California. To that end we just sent a letter to the D's saying, essentially, "we're giving the money we thought we were going to give you to the N.Y. Disaster Relief fund." Prior to the "no more money" decision, we also concluded that it made no sense to give individual donations. So ... the following should a letter similar to the following should work:
"Thank you for your kind invitation to participate in your October 24 reception. Earlier this year, we made a corporate decision to direct our campaign dollars in California to the California Republican Party and not participate in individual races."
Jeff: your thoughts??
=====================================
|
2,195 |
Subject: Re: Greetings from San Diego
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/1641.
=====================================
Hi Dana:
Please accept my apologies for not having responded sooner. Things, as you
know, are, well, a little nuts. It was great to meet you and I would be
happy to discuss opportunities. I need to be in S.D. in the next few weeks.
Perhaps we could have lunch, or something, and you could fill me in on what
you folks do.
Best,
Jeff
Dana Perino <[email protected]>
09/14/2000 06:40 PM
To: [email protected]
cc:
Subject: Greetings from San Diego
Hi, Jeff --
It was great to meet you this week while you were in San Diego for the
hearings. Cathy Van Way and I had a blast catching up on old times and
trying to think of every pun possible that led directly back to electricity.
I know Enron has extensive communications support, but in the future if you
have need on a project or public relations campaign, I hope you'll keep me
in mind. Although it took me a while to understand the difference between
a megawatt and a megaphone before Rep. Schaefer introduced the first bill,
once I finally "got it" I developed an ability to help the media understand
the issue -- so that misinformation, as experienced in San Diego -- can be
avoided. I've also maintained excellent contacts with the media covering
electricity and can help with corporate pr as well as issue communications.
As you're well aware, the light won't go out on this issue for a long time
(pun practice).
Best regards,
Dana
Dana Perino
[email protected]
619-234-1300 ext. 238
=====================================
|
2,196 |
Subject: FCC Video Martkets Report
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/5512.
=====================================
----- Forwarded by Sue Nord/NA/Enron on 02/02/2001 10:30 AM -----
"Pisciotta, Aileen" <[email protected]>
02/02/2001 10:03 AM
To: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'"
<[email protected]>
cc: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>
Subject: FCC Video Martkets Report
Dear Sue and Scott -- I'm sorry for the delay. Here are the News Release
and Text (in .doc and .pdf formats respectively) of the FCC's Video Markets
Report, Released January 8, 2001.
We are aiming to get a first cut of an issues matrix to you by early next
week.
Best regards, Aileen.
<<FCC-01-01A1.doc>> <<FCC-01-01A1.pdf>>
The information contained in this E-mail message is privileged, confidential,
and may be protected from disclosure; please be aware that any other use,
printing, copying, disclosure or dissemination of this communication may be
subject to legal restriction or sanction. If you think that you have received
this E-mail message in error, please reply to the sender.
This E-mail message and any attachments have been scanned for viruses and are
believed to be free of any virus or other defect that might affect any
computer system into which it is received and opened. However, it is the
responsibility of the recipient to ensure that it is virus free and no
responsibility is accepted by Kelley Drye & Warren LLP for any loss or damage
arising in any way from its use.
- FCC-01-01A1.doc
- FCC-01-01A1.pdf
=====================================
|
2,197 |
Subject: California Regulators Delay Vote on Power Revenue Requirements
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/deleted_items/221.
=====================================
FYI
California Regulators Delay Vote on Power Revenue Requirements
By Daniel Taub
San Francisco, Aug. 21 (Bloomberg) -- California regulators will delay voting on a plan to carve out a portion of utility rates for state power purchases, a spokesman for Governor Gray Davis said. The vote is a necessary step in the state's plan to sell as much as $13.4 billion in bonds.
The California Public Utilities Commission was scheduled to vote on the plan on Thursday. The commission will postpone the decision until its next meeting on Sept. 6 for ``largely procedural reasons,'' Davis spokesman Steve Maviglio said.
California has spent more than $9.6 billion buying power on behalf of its three investor-owned utilities. The state entered the power-buying business in January after the two largest utilities, owned by PG&E Corp. and Edison International, became insolvent buying power for more than they were allowed to charge customers.
The state is preparing to sell the bonds in the largest U.S. municipal offering to repay California's general fund for the power purchases. The bonds will be repaid through the rates utility customers pay. The Public Utilities Commission must approve a plan for allocating a portion of rates to the state before the bonds can be sold.
Public Utilities Commission President Loretta Lynch wasn't immediately available for comment on the delay, said commission spokeswoman Carol Robinson. Lynch was appointed to the commission by Governor Davis.
=====================================
|
2,198 |
Subject: Computing Services OUTAGE for Sunday, November 18th
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/inbox/864.
=====================================
Dear Haas Community,
Sunday, November 18th, between 8:00 AM and noon, several servers will be
shut down for a variety of maintenance actions, including installation of
new anti virus software. The servers affected will include the NT web
server WEB, the file servers HCS-DATA and HCS-DATA2, the logon profile
server HCS-MASTER, the personal web site servers FACULTY and STUDENTS, and
several other non critical servers. Most of the outages will be of short
(30 minutes or less) duration.
When WEB is down, web access to all NT based Web sites, including the
EDULINK Career Services, Registration, and Admissions modules, Reserve,
Event Center, group sites, course sites, and Helpdesk will be
interrupted. While FACULTY and STUDENTS are being rebooted, personal
web sites will not be available. While HCS-DATA , HCS-DATA2, and
HCS-MASTER, are down, logon to the Haas NT domain will be very slow, and
roaming profiles and home directories will not be available.
Email should not be affected.
As always, should you experience any problems with computing services
following the maintenance, please contact the information desk in the
Computer Center, or Helpdesk at http://helpdesk.haas.berkeley.edu, phone
510/642-0434. Please note that Helpdesk is not manned on
weekends. Requests for help logged during the weekend will be responded to
Monday morning.
Your patience is greatly appreciated.
Thank you.
-----------------------
Haas Computing Services
=====================================
|
2,199 |
Subject: RE: Quick Update
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/6115.
=====================================
Thanks, Jeff, for your quick update. Haven't had a chance to totally absorb
it (yes, it is crazy), but will do so this afternoon. Keeping my fingers
crossed. Best!
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2000 12:14 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Quick Update
Hi Kari:
I know that you and I are both swamped, so I'm writing very briefly to give
you a brief update. But first, thank you very much again for meeting last
week. Greatly appreciated, and look forward to working together to help in
any way I can to find solution that is acceptable to all. Here's the
update:
Our "subcommitte" is meeting tomorrow to try to close the deal on a
proposed solution. It focuses on 3 key areas:
Using the utilities retained assets to moderate prices.
Designing a framework for forward contracting that strikes a much more
appropriate balance in CA between state oversight and the need for
utility flexibility.
Rate stabilization/Undercollections (utility solvency)
I will update you tomorrow on the group's progress. If thing's go
according to plan, we may be in a position to submit something to you a
early as Monday. If there's a deadline from your end that I ought to be
aware of, let me know and I'll incorporate it into the subcommittee's work
plan.
In the meantime, if there is anything at all that I can do to help, please
don't hesitiate to contact me.
Thanks again and all the best,
Jeff
=====================================
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.