dataset_id
int64 0
5.47k
| email_body
stringlengths 800
9.73k
|
|---|---|
2,300 |
Subject: RE: Friday is the last day for purchasing Discount Ski Tickets!!!
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/1152.
=====================================
Hi Will,
Thanks for e-mail!!
Is there anyway I can tell you how many tickets I need and leave a check in
your box on Monday or mail it to you today. I had a mid-term last night and
forgot to bring my check book and won't be back on campus until Monday.
Let me know what would be easier for you!
thanks,
Jackie
Eve99
-----Original Message-----
From: Will C Birdsey [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2000 11:08 AM
To: [email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Friday is the last day for purchasing Discount Ski Tickets!!!!!
Just a quick reminder, Friday is the last day to purchase your discount ski
tickets. We need to buy 50 to make this thing happen. Please get your
checks in ASAP. Thanks
Redwoods@Haas is organizing discounted ski tickets at Squaw Valley and
Alpine Meadows.
This is a great way to save some money if you plan on skiing this year.
Both Squaw and Alpine are PREMIERE North Lake Tahoe ski resorts.
Squaw Valley Tickets cost $45 each and include night skiing. (Regular Price
$54)
Make checks payable to Will Birdsey and leave them in my MBA02 mailbox.
Deadline Friday, October 27th!
Alpine Meadows Tickets cost $42 each. (Regular Price $52)
Make checks payable to Matt Hawe and leave them in his MBA02 mailbox.
Deadline Friday, October 27th!
* Tickets are good all ski season (including holidays and weekends)
* Tickets are transferrable
* Buy as many (or as few) tickets as you want
See you on the slopes!
=====================================
|
2,301 |
Subject: RE: Order Instituting Rulemaking to Establish Policies and Cost
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['MDay', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent_items/2275.
=====================================
Jeanne: Do you have a copy of the procurement OIR? Could you email it to me if you do? Thanks very much.
Best,
Jeff
-----Original Message-----
From: JBennett [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2001 7:35 PM
To: Jeff Dasovich (E-mail); Jim Steffes (E-mail); Sue Mara (E-mail)
Cc: MDay
Subject: Order Instituting Rulemaking to Establish Policies and Cost
Recovery Mechanisms for Generation Procurement
On October 29, 2001, the commission issues an order instituting a rulemaking
to establish ratemaking mechanisms to enable SCE, PG&E and SDG&E to resume
purchasing electric energy, capacity ,ancillary services and related hedging
instrument to full their obligation to serve their customers once DWR's
authority to purchase on their behalf ends (December 31, 2001). At that
point, the UDCs, not DWR, will have to pick up anything not covered by
retained generation and the DWR contracts. The Commission will also address
proposals on how renewable resources should be included in the mix of
generation serving the state. The OIR will have a significant impact on
procurement practices in the state on a going forward basis. The ruling
states that if you are interested in being on the service list for this
proceeding, a letter must be sent to the docket office stating that fact
within 15 days (by next Monday).
Bottom line is do you want me to continue to monitor (and perhaps get
active) in this proceeding. Please let me know by the end of the week so
that I can send in the required letter.
Jeanne Bennett
=====================================
|
2,302 |
Subject: Picks of the Week--Final Results & PLAYOFF POOL
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/5993.
=====================================
Congratulations, Brady, for a great finish. He edged out Cameron by just
thirteen points. The Commish kept his third-place position with a nine point
margin over JAM and Narvco who tied for fourth. Only three points back were
Cindy and Helmet.
The week was won by Growney, followed by JAM, Cindy, Helmet and Prentice
(tied for 4th place).
I attempted to send out the results when we were in San Diego for the
Christmas holiday, but even if you received them, I made the mistake of
stating that the points used in the Playoff Pool ranked from 15 to 5. I
should have said 11 down to 1. If you will acknowledge this via e-mail, I
would appreciate it so I won't have to call a lot of people to make sure
there's no misunderstanding. Here are the rules again:
PLAYOFF POOL
The rules will be similar to the Weekly Pool, but the whole playoff series
will be treated as one week. You will decide how many points to give each
potential game winner, and since there are eleven games you have from 1-11
points available for each game, but you cannot use the same number more than
once. Each week you turn in your picks for the teams playing that particular
week. That means you have only one number left for the Super Bowl. Please
note in the schedule of Payouts below that there is a payout of $50.00 for
last place. This could make it interesting for someone who hasn't done too
well toward the end of the playoffs.
The payout for the Playoff Pool is:
1st $130.00; 2nd $90.00; 3rd $70.00; Last $50.00
- 2000WK17final.xls
- Pick Sheet - playoff2000 #1.xls
=====================================
|
2,303 |
Subject: Re: Cameron's b-day
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/2968.
=====================================
Dude,
Next Wednesday, May 30. Let's see, the 12: the four of us, Nancy, Eldon,
then Molly, Sean, Chris, Kristina, Kent, Allison, and maybe scanky HO, and
her friend Stacey, or Riddles and his "girlfriend."
Listen, I just got back from ZYZZYVA and they want me to edit 3/4 of the new
issue--by Saturday, Tuesday AM at latest. I told them I'd get it to them by
Friday afternoon, so you know what that means. It's just that there are only
two people there, and you need fresh eyes to catch the small, but very
important, errors. I think they have someone else like me who does stuff,
but can't come through right now. Also, the deadline for application to the
Napa Valley Writer's Workshop is Friday, Nancy just told me. Then, my
Guardian article's due next week. I've never been this busy since I moved
here!! Pretty funny. But I'm sorry I can't make it. I do, however, pledge my
time to blue collar labor any and all days. Like, save the wood piles or
anything else 'til Saturday AM. Anyway, I guess because of that and
Prentice's strep, you can leave early.
Cheers, dude, and I'm bummed I'm not going early myself, playing golf, maybe
diving, and just chilling up there.
See you Friday!
LATE!
>From: [email protected]
>To: "Scott Laughlin" <[email protected]>
>Subject: Re: Cameron's b-day
>Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 14:46:17 -0500
>
>
>woodward is great! damned good choice. who's the 12? and what day?
>
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
=====================================
|
2,304 |
Subject: Re:
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/9521.
=====================================
Thanks. It would of course be easiest to make the calls and say "pass it out
now, as is," but if more is needed to fix the credit issue, want to be
prepared to tell them how the decision needs to be modified. If it's fine as
is, all the better.
Best,
Jeff
Christian Yoder@ECT
02/28/2001 12:59 PM
To: Jeff Dasovich/Na/Enron@ENRON
cc: [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re:
We like the Alternate Order. It is a big step in the right direction. Jean
Bennett is preparing a draft letter in support which we were going to file by
no later than Friday. Pat Boylston and I will go over the letter and discuss
it with Jean. I'm not really sure we are going to want to do any surgery on
the wording or not. I invite Jean and Pat to give you a quick comment on
this. ----cgy
From: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON on 02/28/2001 12:58 PM CST
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON
To: Christian Yoder/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Calger
cc:
Subject:
Christian:
Could you let me know as soon as possible if 1) the proposed decision that I
faxed you yesterday is go to go, i.e., adequately addresses our concerns
regarding creditworthiness or if 2) we want to recommend some additional
provisions? If we want to recommend additional provisions, could you let me
know what those are? I want to make a run at getting this deal done at the
CPUC ASAP,and would like to push Peevey to get Davis to have the PUC pass it
out at their next meeting. But need to know if it's good as is or needs some
tweeking. Thanks very much.
Best,
Jeff
=====================================
|
2,305 |
Subject: Suggestions on life/work/school balance
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/inbox/589.
=====================================
Subject: Please read if you have suggestions on how to maintain life/work
balance while attending the EveMBA program.
Have you ever said "I wish I knew what I know now when I started the
Evening MBA program"?
If you have ever had a great mentor or coach in your life you can
appreciate the value of a little information at the right time. Or maybe
you did not have a mentor/coach, but wished you had.
Well...now is the time to give back to your fellow MBA colleagues and
strengthen our collective community by sharing your experience with them.
Specifically we are interested in gathering any:
Lessons learned
Advice
Strategies
Tricks
Great ideas
anecdotes
Any nuggets of wisdom that have helped you to deal with the life/family,
work, school-balancing act! These can be ones you came up with, an article
or book you read or suggestions given to you by a mentor or coach.
Some possible topic areas are:
Managing visibility at work,
Dealing with competing demands
Friday night date/night--how to make sure your loved ones recognize you
How to strategically say NO!
Minimizing crisis and maintaining some quality of life while being in the
EveMBA program.
Please share any and all tips or suggestions. Your help and insight will
be greatly appreciated. The results will be used in an evening break
seminar on Life Work Balance while in B-school.
To contribute your pearls of wisdom just hit reply and start typing. On
behalf of your peers--thanks for sharing.
This is a joint effort by Jon Bain (current EveMBA student) and John Morel.
=====================================
|
2,306 |
Subject: ADV: Energy Restructuring in the SW Conference
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/12638.
=====================================
Note:If you do not want to receive notice of any upcoming programs, please
reply to this email with "remove" in the subject line. You also can limit
notices to specific topics by replying and specifying the topics. Thank
you.
Dear Mr. Dasovich,
Energy Restructuring in the Southwest conference, co-sponsored by Energy
Newsdata Corporation
When/Where: July 19 and 20, 2001 at the Alexis Park in Las Vegas
While California=01,s electric system stumbles from crisis to crisis during=
a
continuing state of emergency, states and municipalities throughout the
Western region are reexamining and, in some cases, reversing their policies
regarding restructuring of the electric services industry. This has
resulted in ever-changing and confusing laws and policies affecting
utilities, energy service providers and consumers in Arizona, Nevada and
New Mexico.
This conference will help lay the groundwork for a better understanding of
current market and regulatory conditions in the Southwest, and the faculty
of expert speakers will provide insight as to how evolving policies will
shape markets of the future.
Program Co-chairs: Arthur O'Donnell of California Energy Markets and Fred
Schmidt of Hale Lane Peek Dennison Howard & Anderson.
Information or registration: reply to this announcement; call us at (800)
854-8009; or visit our web site:
http://www.lawseminars.com/htmls/seminars/01resnv.
--------------------------------------------
Copyright 2001 by Law Seminars International
All Rights Reserved
--------------------------------------------
=====================================
|
2,307 |
Subject: Haas Alumni Network & Online Community presentations
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/deleted_items/2071.
=====================================
>Dear Evening MBA students,
>
>We enjoyed providing you with an overview of the Haas Alumni Network and
>our online services at our pizza presentations in mid-November. Some of
>you were unable to attend our session because your class was not held on
>that Thursday night and we tried to find a suitable classroom/presentation
>space for a session this week, but there is nothing available during your
>7:30 p.m. break. So, we have decided that we will hold more information
>sessions about the Haas Alumni Network next semester in order to
>accommodate your needs.
>
>In the meantime, if you have any questions, please consult the Haas Alumni
>Network brochure you received in your mailbox earlier this semester, visit
>our website (http://www.haas.berkeley.edu) for detailed overviews and
>updates, or contact my office at 510-642-7790 for assistance with
>registration to the Online Community.
>
>Good luck with your final projects and exams.
>
>Tenny Frost
>Director, Alumni Relations
>
>
>
>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>Be in CalBusiness: submit an update on your career and personal life
>http://www.haas.berkeley.edu/alumninotes
>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>Tenny H. Frost
>Director of Alumni Relations | Haas School of Business | University of
>California, Berkeley
>S520 Student Services Building, #1904 | Berkeley, CA | USA 94720-1904
>510/642.7790 (Alumni Relations Office) | 510/643.5340 (direct line)
>510/643.0531 (fax) | [email protected]
>http://haas.berkeley.edu/alumni
>
=====================================
|
2,308 |
Subject: Re: Senate Bill tracking
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/3691.
=====================================
FYI. There is a great catalogue of the legislation currently pending
attached as an appendix to the leg analyst report that I distributed
yesterday.
Best,
Jeff
Janel Guerrero
03/15/2001 11:19 AM
To: Miyung Buster/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, John
Neslage/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, [email protected],
Leslie Lawner/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Re: Senate Bill tracking
Everyone,
Just to clarify Miyung's message, I want Houston to be kept abreast of the
key pieces of legislation that Sacto is working on, offering amendements etc.
John Neslage provided us with a list but I want to be sure that it hasn't
changed at all. Please review what Miyung sent you and foward to her any
comments/updates.
thanks
Miyung Buster@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
03/15/2001 11:10 AM
To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, [email protected]
cc: Janel Guerrero/Corp/Enron@Enron, John
Neslage/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
Subject: Senate Bill tracking
Janel has asked me to monitor Assembly/Senate bill activities, and I need to
confirm that I have a complete list of all of the bills that Enron is
involved with.
Below is the a list of the bills that I am aware of. Could you review the
following list and confirm that my list is complete. Please respond by
Friday, March 16th. I would like to begin working on this project as soon as
possible.
Thank you for your assistance.
ABx1 1
SBx6
SBx33
SBx39
ABx1 60
SBx1 5
Abx1 7
AB 18
SB33
SB6
SB27X
AB33X
=====================================
|
2,309 |
Subject: Re: brazil contact
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/27953.
=====================================
Glad to hear it. Let me know, once you've met, if there's any there there.
Best,
Jeff
Joe Kishkill
06/19/2001 06:36 PM
To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Re: brazil contact
...have received the e-mail, made contact, and scheduled a Thursday meeting...
life is good.
Kish
From: Jeff Dasovich on 06/19/2001 05:49 PM CDT
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
To: [email protected], [email protected]
cc:
Subject: Re: brazil contact
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 06/19/2001 05:49 PM -----
Jeff Dasovich
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
06/18/2001 05:09 PM
To: [email protected], [email protected]
cc:
Subject: Re: brazil contact
Joe, meet Joe. My apologies. I've had trouble getting contact information
for Joe (Kaishkill). Joe K. could you confirm that you've received this
note. Also, I left you Joe A.'s phone contact numbers on your Houston
voicemail last week. Joe A. could you please send Joe K. your contact
numbers again? Thanks very much.
If there's anything else either of you need, please don't hesitate to let me
know.
All the best,
Jeff
[email protected]
06/18/2001 09:20 AM
To: [email protected], [email protected]
cc:
Subject: brazil contact
Hello Jeff:
I am back from my Asia trip and will be leaving for Brazil tomorrow. I would
like to contact Joe Kaischkill in anticipation of my trip to schedule time
with him. Could I get a contact # or email to intitiate contact?
Thanks for your help once again.
Best regards,
Joe Alcantara
=====================================
|
2,310 |
Subject: RE: Supplemental PHC Stmt of New West
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent_items/2222.
=====================================
Well, that's not helpful. Won't make things any easier. Are they an ARM member?
I'll let the large customer groups know.
Best,
Jeff
-----Original Message-----
From: Mara, Susan
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 1:10 PM
To: Dasovich, Jeff; Tribolet, Michael; Curry, Wanda; Mellencamp, Lisa;
'[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; Huddleson, Diann
Subject: FW: Supplemental PHC Stmt of New West
New West has indeed adopted SCE's position hook-line-and-sinker. I left Janie a very pointed e-mail on this topic. They have no customers receiving commodity from them, so, I guess, in the short term, they are not harmed. It is, noehteless, an unprincipled position. A key quote from the filing:
"It is the position of New West Energy that all customers, both bundled service customers and direct access customers, are equally responsible for payment of the net undercollections. Fairness dictates that bundled customers and direct access customers are both assessed their fair share of the responsibility for repaying the amount of the net undercollections as may be determined by the Commission."
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 10:25 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: FW: Supplemental PHC Stmt of New West
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 4:46 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Supplemental PHC Stmt of New West
(See attached file: Document1.doc)
=====================================
|
2,311 |
Subject: RE: Booked PX Credits
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent_items/341.
=====================================
thanks very much.
-----Original Message-----
From: Curry, Wanda
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2001 4:42 PM
To: Dasovich, Jeff
Cc: Tribolet, Michael
Subject: Booked PX Credits
<< File: PX Summary 091401.xls >>
Jeff,
I have attached a file showing the SCE receivable amount of ($109,292,004.75) Due Enron. This amount is net of the payments made by SCE. A few cautions, these amounts are reported more by Enron accounting month vs. utility bill cycle month. But at least it highlights the rapid fall off starting in the March, when most of the customers had been returned to Bundled Utility Service.
To obtain a more accurate projection of the receivable as of January 18, 2001 or at any point would require this information be sorted differently and require allocation assumptions to handle the bill cycle vs. accounting vs. PX end date.
Hopefully this will be enough to get you ready for Monday's meeting. Call me if you would like to discuss. FYI, I have also included information re PG&E. If you are asked, these amounts are directly from the utility bills, not an Enron's calculation.
We have not really tried to "tie" these numbers with the utility, but in all cases these amounts were pulled directly from the utility bills. Any errors would be due to omissions or query compilation errors. EES could be prepared to actually reconcile these with SCE, if you give the go-ahead to do so.
Let me know what you think, or if you need anything else. If you follow Rick's suggestion, it might be a short meeting anyway.
Wanda
=====================================
|
2,312 |
Subject: DG Phase 2 Scoping Memo
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/distributed_generation/20.
=====================================
Phase 2 testimony is due May 26, 2000 and addresses rate design issues
Rate design and ratemaking proposals submitted in testimony should follow the
principles:
1. provide for fair cost allocation among customers;
2. allow the utility distribution companies (UDCs) adequate cost recovery
while minimizing costs to consumers;
3. facilitate customer-side distributed generation deployment; and send
proper price signals to prospective purchasers of distributed generation.
Testimony should identify how current rate structures and those proposed in
other Commission proceedings may prevent or hinder deployment of distributed
generation, and how rate structures could be modified to facilitate
distributed generation deployment. Parties should discuss the
interrelationship among rate design issues: stranded costs, bypass, demand,
customer and grid charges, standby rates, and PBR and flexible pricing
mechanisms.
Additionally, rate design issues related to interconnection costs should be
addressed. Issues include cost recovery and allocation, such as who should
pay for costs to interconnect to the distribution system and for
interconnection studies, or if costs incurred by the first distributed
generation customers on a specific circuit or feeder should be shared by
subsequent distributed generation customers connecting to the same facilities.
The attachment (Attachment A) provides 36 questions and a framework for the
issues the Commission will consider in Phase 2 of this proceeding.
See attached ruling for details.
=====================================
|
2,313 |
Subject: Get FREE Annual Reports For Over 3000 Companies!
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/deleted_items/660.
=====================================
Please respond to ******GET FREE ANNUAL REPORTS FOR OVER 3000 COMPANIES**********
Dear Former Subscriber:
Whether you work for an investment firm or you're an individual
investor, you need an unbiased opinion before making an
investment decision. That's how TheStreet.com can help.
In association with World Investor, TheStreet.com is pleased
to provide you access to thousands of annual reports on publicly
traded companies - FREE! Search for a report by either company
name or industry and get it mailed to you or download it when
available. Click here to find a report:
http://thestreet.ar.wilink.com?mkt_code=StreetARS1
Get the information you need to succeed when you are making
your investment decisions - FREE!
Sharon Bogan
Marketing
TheStreet.com
===============================================================
This email has been sent to you by TheStreet.com because you are
a current or former subscriber (either free-trial or paid)
to one of our web sites, http://www.thestreet.com/or
http://www.realmoney.com/. If you would prefer not to receive
these types of emails from us in the future, please click here:
http://www.thestreet.com/z/unsubscribe.jhtml?Type=M If you are
not a current or former subscriber, and you believe you received
this message in error, please forward this message to
[email protected], or call our customer service department
at 1-800-562-9571.
Please be assured that we respect the privacy of our subscribers.
To view our privacy policy, please click here:
http://www.thestreet.com/tsc/about/privacy.html
=====================================
|
2,314 |
Subject: RE: Western Wholesale Activities - Gas & Power Conf. Call
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/inbox/236.
=====================================
FYI, Attached is memo I prepared for Jim and Rick on the PNW refund case.
-----Original Message-----
From: Alvarez, Ray
Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 7:22 AM
To: Comnes, Alan; Walton, Steve; Mara, Susan; Lawner, Leslie; Cantrell, Rebecca W.; Fulton, Donna; Dasovich, Jeff; Nicolay, Christi L.; Steffes, James D.; '[email protected]'; Allen, Phillip K.; Noske, Linda J.; Perrino, Dave; Black, Don; Frank, Robert; Miller, Stephanie; Tycholiz, Barry; Novosel, Sarah; Thome, Jennifer; Hall, Steve C. (Legal); Lindberg, Susan
Subject: RE: Western Wholesale Activities - Gas & Power Conf. Call Privileged & Confidential Communication Attorney-Client Communication and Attorney Work Product Privileges Asserted
[Alvarez, Ray] I will be unable to host the call this morning since I must attend a hearing in the CA refund proceeding. Please proceed with the call in my absence. Thanks! Ray
PLEASE MARK YOUR CALENDAR
Date: Every Thursday
Time: 7:30 am Pacific, 9:30 am Central, and 10:30 am Eastern time
Number: 1-888-271-0949
Host Code: 661877 (for Ray only)
Participant Code: 936022 (for everyone else)
The table of the on-going FERC issues and proceedings is available to all team members on the O drive. Please feel free to revise/add to/ update this table as appropriate.
Proposed agenda for today :
ISO settlement redesign and imbalance energy agreement
FERC sponsored reliability meeting at CAISO offices
CA and PAC NW refund proceeding status
Please feel free to communicate any additional agenda items to the group .
=====================================
|
2,315 |
Subject: FW: CAISO Notice - June Preliminary Market Invoice Cash
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/deleted_items/65.
=====================================
I donlt thin the ISO has the right to do this unilaterally. They must have some cash flow problems. We could tell FERC -- but then FERC wouldn;t do anything anyway
-----Original Message-----
From: CRCommunications [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 3:19 PM
To: ISO Market Participants; SC Settlements Contacts
Subject: CAISO Notice - June Preliminary Market Invoice Cash
Distribution Deferral
ISO Market Participants
SC Settlement Contacts
As you know, the ISO Payments Calendar currently provides for cash
distributions twice monthly, based on both the preliminary and final
invoices. However, due to the ongoing market reruns and the recent large
adjustments between preliminary and final invoices, the ISO will suspend
until further notice making cash distributions based on preliminary
invoices. This practice will be effective for the June, 2001 and subsequent
preliminary invoices and will remain in effect until the ISO issues a
further Market Notice addressing cash distributions based on preliminary
invoices.
The ISO will hold and invest the proceeds received from the preliminary
invoices and will include those proceeds, including interest, with the cash
distributions for the final monthly settlement. The ISO will distribute the
funds within five business days from the final payment date. We expect to
distribute the payment for June during the week of September 20th.
The ISO will be filing Tariff revisions with FERC to reflect these changes.
Client Relations Communications
[email protected]
=====================================
|
2,316 |
Subject: Free Food and Booze during 2/13 Break
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/8934.
=====================================
OK, perhaps not the booze, unless you're up for a keg of O'Doul's, but
definitely the pizza and soft drinks. Just a reminder that I am facilitating
an Evening MBA Career Services Planning Session next Tuesday, 2/13 in the
Career Center Conference Room (S420) during class break.
Last week John Morel received some good feedback regarding how the Career
Center can cater to the needs of EvMBA students. I would like to continue on
that path with those of you who weren't able to attend on 1/31. Input from
both sessions will assist John and the account managers structure and
prioritize programs to meet our career-related needs (e.g., EvMBA Resume
Book, on-campus company visits during class breaks, networking events at a
student's company, internships, etc.). Since John will not be attending,
please direct any questions specifically for him using the contact info
below.
Of course, if you cannot attend, feel free to send me your comments and
recommendations. Following is a link to the Career Center in case you're
not familiar with its offerings:
http://www.haas.berkeley.edu/careercenter/mba.html
See you next Tues.,
Albert Demery
EvMBA Class of 2003
415.277.4007 direct
415.217.8668 fax
415.505.5948 mobile
Mailto:[email protected]
John Morel
Associate Director of Career Services
Evening MBA's and MBA Alumni
Haas School of Business
University of California, Berkeley
420 Student Services Building # 1900
Berkeley, California 94720
Ph (510) 642-7731
Fax (510) 642-9387
[email protected]
http://www.haas.berkeley.edu/careercenter/mba.html
=====================================
|
2,317 |
Subject: November Entrepreneurs Forum
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/mba_program/23.
=====================================
=>=>=>UC Berkeley Entrepreneurs Forum<=<=<=
******Thursday, November 18, 1999********
6:30 - 8:30 PM - Haas School of Business - Andersen Auditorium
Topic: Angels in the Infield: Start-up Financing for Entrepreneurs
Panel: Bob Bozeman, Nat Goldhaber, Bob Leppo, Erickson Shirley
This panel of currently investing angels will discuss what types of
ventures they are backing and how they choose their deals.
There are special rates for faculty and staff and a reduced fee of $5 for
students currently enrolled at any Cal school or college. Pre-registration
is encouraged. You may sign up in room F449 weekdays 9-12 AM and 1-4 PM or
by e-mail to [email protected]. Remember to include your school or
department and -for students- your year of graduation.
Preregistration for students closes at 5PM on Tuesday, November 16, or
earlier if it is sold out. NOTE: THIS IS A DAY EARLIER THAN USUAL. WE
EXPECT THIS PROGRAM TO SELL OUT.
REMEMBER TO PRE-REGISTER.
Faculty and staff are encouraged to register by e-mail. Students can
register by e-mail and then either pay at the door or at Room F449. IF
THIS PROGRAM SELLS OUT, STUDENTS WILL BE ASKED TO CONFIRM THEIR ATTENDANCE
BY PREPAYING AT ROOM F449.
For more information on the series, see
<<http://www.haas.berkeley.edu/~lester/bef.html>>
On this program, see
<<http://www.haas.berkeley.edu/~lester/nov99.html>>
--
Stephanie J. Tibbetts
Program Coordinator
Lester Center for Entrepreneurship & Innovation
Haas School of Business #1930
Berkeley CA 94720-1930
510-642-4255 Fax 510-642-2826
=====================================
|
2,318 |
Subject: News for 2002 from VentureWire Professional
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/inbox/1066.
=====================================
Dear Jeffrey:
Start the year off right -- at a great price -- with
a subscription to VentureWire Professional and an
invaluable piece of research from us.
As a subscriber to VentureWire Alert, you know the value
of being up to date about private companies and private
capital. For the rest of this year you can subscribe to
the broader, deeper, and searchable version of our daily
news service, VentureWire Professional at the special
rate of only $445, a savings of 28% off our regular price.
As a bonus, you'll get a free copy of the brand-new $295
study from VentureWire Research: New Venture Funds 2001.
This report, which is being published this week,
identifies the dozens of funds that raised a total of more
than $50 billion in capital this year. It provides complete
information about focus and contacts.
To take advantage of our holiday offer (for products worth
$915 together) follow this link:
http://professional.venturewire.com/doublesub.asp
You already rely on VentureWire for private company news;
now's the time to make sure that next year you'll have all
the tools and information you need to continue building
your company.
Sincerely,
Brian O'Connell
Publisher
VentureWire
[email protected]
More about The 2001 Report on Expansion Capital:
http://research.venturewire.com/research.asp?pID=57
More about VentureWire Professional:
http://professional.venturewire.com/m2_professional.asp
P.S.: If you'd prefer not to receive such notes from us,
follow this link:
http://venturewire.com/[email protected]
=====================================
|
2,319 |
Subject: Draft Outline of JSJ Comments for FERC Meeting on Thursday, Nov 9;
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/1508.
=====================================
Attached is a draft outline of Jan Smutny Jone's Statement/Comments for the
FERC Hearing on Thursday, November 9 to address the California
Report/Order.?
?
A conference call is scheduled for 9:30 a.m. (PST) on Wed., Nov 8 to discuss
the draft outline.
?
??? ??? Call-In Number??? ??? ??? 888/476-6127
??????? Participant #???????????????111756
?
?
Note, as the Hearing is Thursday, we are working in real time to finalize
this Statement.? This is a work in progress.? IEP will be translating the
draft outline into prose continually between now and Wed noon, when we hope
to finalize the Statement.
?
As a point of reference, building off the IEP Workshop we held last Friday,
IEP is moving forward to develop detailed comments for the FERC proceeding
on California market structure matters? These comments are due Nov. 22.? We
anticipate these Comments to be detailed (e.g. 20-50 pages).
?
This Statement for the FERC Hearing on Thursday is building off of the
discussion during the IEP workshop.? The Statement is expected to be 5-10
pages, therefore by necessity it will be less substantive and exhaustive as
the Nov 22 filing.? We are attempting to hit the 'high points" and provide a
framework for FERC to (1) consider the specific details of their proposal,
and (2) address certain FERC/state matters regarding roles and
responsibilities.
?
We will be developing "talking points" as well, but these will be driven by
the overall Statement.
?
Talk to you tomorrow.
- 001109_Statement of Jan Smutny.v3 SKK mark up.doc
=====================================
|
2,320 |
Subject: "Perfect Pitch" Seminar
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/mba_program/7.
=====================================
Hi Everyone,
Last month I announced a new seminar we're offering called "Show Me the
Money...The Perfect Pitch", taught by Peggy Klaus. We will have signups
available in the office from Wednesday, March 15 through Friday March 24.
THIS IS NOT FIRST-COME, FIRST-SERVED. Seats will be assigned according to
seniority in the program.
I've copied, below, the description of the seminar. It should be great!
*****************
"You may have an incredible idea, the best product, or the most dynamic
company in the world. But if you can't talk about your assets in ways that
make your audience as excited as you are, you've struck out. Whether
asking for seed money for a start-up, taking the company public, or just
debriefing investors at a quarterly meeting, you will need compelling
presentation techniques that ensure a winning delivery. This interactive
workshop is designed to keep you out of the bull-pen and on the mound,
pitching a perfect game with no walks and no errors."
This workshop will include assessments and enhancements of personal style
including creating a positive first impression; effective use of voice,
body language, and humor; and managing stage fright.
"The Perfect Pitch" will be taught by Ms. Peggy Klaus of Klaus &
Associates. Peggy is an executive coach who trains executives, managers,
celebrities, professionals, media personalities, and political candidates
to project a more dynamic presence. I'm really pleased that she has agreed
to join us, and I hope that you consider attending this workshop.
Cheers,
Diane
=====================================
|
2,321 |
Subject: FW: SCE Advice Filings
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/11989.
=====================================
> --
> On April 15th, I sent the following e-mail about a series of SCE advice
> filings. The one which I highlighted for potential concern was 1534-E
> which starts the process of implementing the MOU with the governor and
> DWR. On April 20th, SCE filed a supplement to 1534-E which it states
> replaces 1534-E in its entirety. Accordingly the clock for protests was
> reset and protests on the advice filing are now due on May 11th. The
> changes made by SCE are not of a nature to drastically impact the summary
> of the advice letter sent to you on April 15th. I will forward the
> amended advice letter under separate cover. Please let me know as soon as
> possible if we want to protest.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: JBennett
> Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2001 12:32 PM
> To: '[email protected]'; '[email protected]';
> '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]';
> '[email protected]'; '[email protected]';
> '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; 'Harry Kingerski
> (E-mail)'
> Subject: SCE Advice Filings
>
> On Thursday, April 12th, I forwarded to you a series of Advice filings
> which SCE made on April 11. The attached document summarizes those
> filings. While two the three appear to be fairly innocuous, one (1534-E)
> apparently starts the process of implementing the MOU with the governor.
> Please pay careful attention to your review of that advice. If we are to
> protest, such protest would be due on May 1.
>
> <<X23609.DOC>>
>
> Jeanne Bennett
- X23609.DOC
=====================================
|
2,322 |
Subject: Outstanding Teacher Nominations
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/10564.
=====================================
Hello Everyone,
Each year, we have an opportunity to recognize a faculty member who has
distinguished him/herself among his/her peers. Faculty who receive the
Outstanding Teacher Award are recognized for this important accomplishment
by both the UC Berkeley Campus and the Haas School of Business. The award
really does mean a lot to the faculty members, so if you feel strongly about
a teacher's performance, I urge you to reward them with a nomination. Last
year's award went to David Levine (Core: Macroeconomics) with honorable
mentions to Michael Katz (Elective: Competitive Strategy) and Jonathan Berk
(Core: Finance). All teachers that receive nominations will be recognized
in the SAC Newsletter.
Thanks to those of you that submitted nominations from your Fall 2000
classes. We are currently soliciting nominations for Spring 2001 courses.
Just submit a written recommendation to me via e-mail based on the
guidelines listed below. Alternatively, you may submit a hard copy to the
Evening MBA office. Only nominations with a written explanation will be
considered. The more compelling your recommendation, the greater the weight
it will carry. The Spring 2001 nominations will be considered with the Fall
2000 nominations to determine the winner. Please try to have your
nominations in by April 9th.
Thanks, in advance, for your support of this important and prestigious
award.
Michael Plumb
Chair, Student Advisory Committee (SAC)
Michael Plumb
Director, Health Services Actuarial - Northern California
PacifiCare of California
925-602-1660
=====================================
|
2,323 |
Subject: The Pie
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/28043.
=====================================
FYI. Hit the wires almost immediately. He handled it with great aplomb and
delivered a very good speech. He had the crowd (but for the pie throwin'
types) squarely on his side.
Best,
Jeff
Enron CEO gets pie in the face from a protester
?
06/21/2001
Associated Press Newswires
Copyright 2001. The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved.
?
?
SAN FRANCISCO (AP) - A Texas energy executive got more than boos and jeers
before starting a speech on California's energy crisis, he got a pie in the
face.
Jeffrey Skilling, chief executive of Houston-based Enron Corp., was nailed
with a pie by a protester at the beginning of his speech at the Commonwealth
Club of California.
?
Enron has come under fire after accusations from Gov. Gray Davis and state
officials that it and other energy companies forced electricity prices
skyward by holding back supply.
Enron has denied such claims, and joined other power producers in arguing
that the state and utilities owes them billions in unpaid bills.
Davis acknowledged that Pacific Gas & Electric Co., which has declared
bankruptcy, and Southern California Edison together still owe generators such
as Enron, Duke Energy, Mirant and Reliant Energy about $2.5 billion for past
electricity sales.
State officials countered that wholesalers charged as much as $9 billion in
illegal overcharges dating back to May 2000. The feuding groups are to meet
in a single room next week under a federal order to try and work out
agreements that could determine how billions of dollars will be divided.
=====================================
|
2,324 |
Subject: EvMBA Writing Workshop announcement
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/5544.
=====================================
ANNOUNCING THE SPRING EVMBA WRITING WORKSHOP -- March 3, 2001 -- 10:00 - 5:00
_________________________
Are you an adequate writer? In today's competitive business world, that's
not good enough! On Saturday, March 3 I'll lead a not-for-credit workshop
to help you write more effectively and pass the writing requirement with
ease.
(Passed the requirement but still want more writing tips? This workshop is
designed for ALL Evening MBA students interested in improving their
business writing skills.)
Through lecture and hands-on activities, you will learn techniques for
getting your messages across clearly, persuasively, and swiftly.
Topics include:
* Moving from ideas to final draft without getting "blocked"
* Writing effective introductions and solid arguments
* Revising for concise, concrete, and active language
* Avoiding problems with tense and time
* Common punctuation problems and solutions
...and, if we have time and enough interest...
* Writing effective email
The workshop will be held from 10 a.m. to 5 p.m. Sign-up in the Evening MBA
Program office. We will let you know the room number for the workshop in
an e-mail reminder. If you have additional questions, please feel free to
contact me. I look forward to seeing you there!
Ericka Lutz
EMBA Writing Consultant
=============================================================
Ericka Lutz
MBA Writing Faculty
Haas School of Business
University of California, Berkeley
Campus office: 510-643-8005
Home office: 510-336-1239
=============================================================
=====================================
|
2,325 |
Subject: Farewell
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/inbox/932.
=====================================
All -
It is with no surprise (I've only known I was leaving for 6 months now!) and yet still with a heavy heart that I wish you all farewell and the best for the future. I am in my last week here at the Lazy E and I am getting around the part that I dreaded the most - goodbyes. I have and will be sending notes to most of the people I have worked with over the past 3 1/2 years (whether they like it or not), but you are the folks I have learned the most from and will miss the most painfully. It's hard to believe the roller coaster we have been on - both the ups and downs - and I don't think it would have been as manageable, tolerable, or fun without you. I really have had more fun in this job than I could ever have imagined coming in. Everyone has been a great friend and mentor, and I will always appreciate the time you have spent with me, indulged my questions, put up with my wandering attentions, and made sure I got home safely in a clean cab...
Unfortunately I am sure there will probably be more "good bye" emails to come your way over the next few weeks, so I'll keep this brief and close for now. But I hope for the absolute best for all of you and your families, and do not underestimate the impact you have had on me or the high esteem I hold you in. Best regards, Scott
Our home info (in case anyone wants to play "six degrees of Kevin Bacon," debate the witticisms of Dorothy Parker and Redd Foxx, or just keep in touch)
Scott Bolton and Trudi Traister
6212 N. Commercial Ave
Portland, OR 97217
(503) 285-0408
[email protected]
=====================================
|
2,326 |
Subject: Special Meeting this afternoon
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/4411.
=====================================
Blackout Busters meeting on Tuesday, April 10,
3:00-5:00pm at EPRI Auditorium
This is not to be confused with the Business
Continuity meeting, which will continue to meet at its
regular meeting time of Mondays prior to the full
committee meeting.
At the Energy Committee meeting on Monday, April 09,
2001, Jerry Meek of Roche pointed out the urgent need
for sharing and exchanging information on how to
actually curtail demand.
Some of the Energy Committee members decided to meet
and discuss these technical issues, and possibly
conduct 'pilot' drills similar to the ones that were
conducted last year. There is, of course, more need
to be prepared this year, and any voluntary load
reduction from any end user is going to help us all by
reducing the frequency and length of rolling
blackouts. Therefore, it is time to resurrect Blackout
Busters.
We will begin with sharing how our companies are
preparing to curtail demand, from lighting to HVAC to
other miscellaneous loads (e.g., water heaters,
elevators, etc). And in the HVAC area, where systems
configurations can be very different, how some of us
are addressing energy management.
Those of you who have interest in sharing and
exchanging experiences are welcome to this meeting. I
apologize for the short notice. If you can not attend
the meeting for any reason but have suggestions for
the group, please forward it to me for sharing, or go
to the www.blackoutbusters.com website and post it
there.
Thank you.
Mukesh Khattar
Energy Director
Oracle Corporation
[email protected]
(650) 506-6980
=====================================
|
2,327 |
Subject: Global Management in Asia
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/5464.
=====================================
Michael Yang, Chairman of the Board & Co-Founder of NetGeo, will talk about=
=20
technology and entrepreneurship=20
in Silicon Valley from the global perspective.??=20
????????Date/Time: February 6th(Tue) 6:00 PM to 7:30 PM=20
????????Place: C250 ????
Class is open for any students subject to availability.=20
Michael Yang,Chairman of the Board & Co-Founder
Michael is Chairman of the Board and Co-Founder of NetGeo=01v. Prior to Net=
Geo??
Michael cofounded mySimon Inc. in April 1998 and served as its President &=
=20
CEO from April 1998 to January 1999, and as Chairman of the Board from=20
January 1999 to February 2000. mySimon was selected by Time Digital as one =
of=20
Top 25 e-Commerce sites in 1999, raised $30M in venture capital and was=20
successfully acquired by CNET for $700M in January 2000 to become the=20
world-leader in online comparison shopping. From 1984 to 1998, Michael held=
=20
technical and executive positions with several Silicon Valley high-tech=20
companies including the Xerox Palo Alto Research Center, Intergraph Corp.,=
=20
Samsung Electronics Corp., and Jazz Multimedia Inc. Michael holds a BS degr=
ee=20
in Electrical Engineering and Computer Science from UC Berkeley, an MBA fro=
m=20
the Haas School of Business, and an MS in computer science from Columbia=20
University. Michael is a member of President George W. Bush's IT Advisory=
=20
Council. Michael also serves on the Board of Trustees of Handong University=
=20
in Korea and on the board of eJigsaw Inc., a high-technology start-up ventu=
re=20
in Silicon Valley.
=====================================
|
2,328 |
Subject: ECI Support Strategy Meeting, Jan 20 and 21 in New Orleans
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/292.
=====================================
Greetings all,
Scott Bolton and I wanted to give you the "low-down" on the strategy meeting
taking place next week in New Orleans.
The meeting will be held at the Hilton New Orleans Riverside. The hotel
address is: Poydras at the Mississippi River, New Orleans, 70140.
We have reserved a block of sleeping rooms (16 total) at a rate of $189.00
per night. The room reservations are for the nights of January 19 and 20,
checking out January 21. Each meeting attendee will need to call the hotel
directly to make reservations. The number to call to make reservations is
504.584.3999. Tell the reservationist that you need one of the rooms in the
"Enron Communications" block. If you want a confirmation faxed or mailed, it
must be requested at the time of booking. Those flying into New Orleans on
January 20 need to tell the reservationist that they will need the hotel room
on January 20 as opposed to January 19 and 20. Room reservations must be
made no later than January 12. Each person will be responsible for his/her
hotel room and charges.
The meeting is scheduled to begin at 9:30 AM on January 20 and end around
2:00 PM on January 21. The meeting will be held in the Cambridge Room.
We will be sending out a formal agenda by Thursday this week. During the
meeting , we will be developing our team's objectives and strategy for 2000,
hearing from a number of ECI commercial people, and conducting lots of Q&A.
Please contact myself or Scott to confirm your attendance as soon as
possible.
Best Regards,
Scott & Donald
=====================================
|
2,329 |
Subject: Re:
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/1502.
=====================================
LOOKS OK TO ME. KEAN CALLED AND I FILLED HIM IN OUR PROJECTS.
Jeff Dasovich@ENRON
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON
11/07/2000 02:27 PM
To: [email protected], David Parquet/SF/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:
Here's a start. Try 'em out for size. More to follow.
Best,
Jeff
Price caps have failed in the past and they'll fail again.
FERC's and California's immediate goal ought to be to make the bold reforms
necessary to create real, competitive markets and eliminate the need for
price caps altogether.
The most important reforms include:
Reforming California's siting laws to permit entry of supply---best way to
undermine "high" prices is easy entry by competitors
Reforming the PUC review of utility purchases
Give the utilities financial incentives to purchase efficiently (i.e.,
similar to California's gas market, where a benchmark is set and the IOUs
profit or lose on the basis of whether the IOU does better or worse than the
benchmark). It ain't rocket science, and it works.
The CPUC gets out of the way and stops the practice of "after-the-fact"
reviews of power purchases.
Creating a retail market
If California/FERC adopt these reforms, the need for caps will vanish.
FERC got a lot right in the order, but the price cap proposal is flawed.
Price is too low to incent development of peakers---well-functioning,
efficient markets require peakers.
Information disclosure provisions are too costly and unnecessary.
Disincents energy efficiency.
IEP written comments will offer suggestions on how to remedy the flaws in the
proposed cap.
=====================================
|
2,330 |
Subject: Re: Contact with Prominent UC Berkeley Energy Economist
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/161.
=====================================
My pleasure. Sounds like he's got a big job---glad that Enron can help....
Riccardo Bortolotti@ECT
09/04/2000 03:33 PM
To: Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Re: Contact with Prominent UC Berkeley Energy Economist
Jeff,
thanks a lot for exceeding expectations .
Regards,
R
Jeff Dasovich@EES
31/08/2000 16:49
To: [email protected], Riccardo Bortolotti/LON/ECT@ECT,
[email protected]
cc:
Subject: Contact with Prominent UC Berkeley Energy Economist
Greetings Dr. Gobbo:
If my memory serves, you should have arrived back in Italy, or will return
soon. Since we met, I have spoken with Severin Borenstein, who is intimately
involved with California's electricity restructuring (melodrama?) and a
renowned energy economist at UC Berkeley. Severin has offered to serve as a
contact for you as you continue to take on the formidable task of
restructuring your country's electric industry. I've included his contact
information below. And, of course, if there is ever anything I can do for
you, do not hesitate to contact me.
All the best,
Jeff
Severin Borenstein
E.T. Grether Professor of Business
Administration and Public Policy Director
Haas School of Business U.C. Energy Institute
University of California 2539 Channing Way
Berkeley, CA 94720-1900 Berkeley, CA 94720-5180
(p) 510-642-3689 (p) 510-642-5145
(f) 707-885-2508 http://www.ucei.berkeley.edu/ucei
Email: [email protected]
WWW: http://haas.berkeley.edu/~borenste
=====================================
|
2,331 |
Subject: Pending Refund Order Discussed at Today's Commission Meeting
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/11671.
=====================================
Although a final order is not yet available, we were able to glean the basic
content of the Commission's latest refund order from the discussion had at
the Commission meeting this morning. It appears that the Commission has not
strayed far from Judge Wagner's recommendations, which came out of the
settlement conference ordered by FERC. Highlights include:
In California, refunds/offsets apply only to spot transactions in CAISO and
CalPX, and only as of October 2.
Both public and non-public utilities are subject to refund.
It appears that the refund methodology will be similar to that of the June 19
Order, as refined by Judge Wagner.
Daily spot gas prices will be utilized in the methodology.
A 10% creditworthiness premium will be added.
An evidentiary hearing will be ordered to collect the data needed for the
methodology; it is our understanding that the CAISO will have 15 days to
provide certain information and the Judge must certify the record in 45 days.
A separate preliminary evidentiary hearing will be ordered to consider
Pacific Northwest refunds. It was briefly described as consisting of an
information gathering proceeding of 15 days, followed by an evidentiary
proceeding of 30 days. The Judge would then have an additional 7 days to
report to the Commission. An issue will be the definition of "spot"
transaction for the Pac NW, since counsel to the Commission noted that it
could differ from the spot definition for California.
We are awaiting the final order and will update this report as soon as it
issues.
RA
=====================================
|
2,332 |
Subject: Berkeley Entrepreneurs Forum, August 31
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/730.
=====================================
UC Berkeley Entrepreneurs Forum
Thursday, August 31, 2000
6:30 PM
Haas School of Business
Andersen Auditorium
__________________________________________________________________
Topic:??????????Strategies for Effective Branding on the Web
Speaker: ???????Steven Donaldson, president of BDGI, and Scott Waltz, Chief
Marketing Officer, AllBusiness.com
A discussion of the special problems the net presents for new companies - or
bricks and mortar companies moving to the web - who want to take advantage of
the marketing capabilities of the web.? Learn how to crate a recognizable and
memorable identity on the web.
Registration: There are special rates for faculty and staff. Faculty and
staff are encouraged to pre-register by E-mail.
Note registration procedure for students:
a) in person with cash or check in room F450 or F449, weekdays 9AM to 4PM.
b) with Mc/Visa over the phone, please call (510) 642 4255
The fee for pre- registration is $5. There will be a $10 registration fee at
the door. Note: On-site registration is subject to space available. Pre-
registration for students and staff closes at 4PM on Tuesday, August 29 or
earlier if it is sold out.
Students may also purchase a fall season ticket for $20.
Season ticket forms are available on the Lester Center bulletin board outside
of F449.
Information:
For more information on the series, please visit our Website at
http://www.haas.berkeley.edu/~lester/bef.html
If you wish to read more about this particular event, please go to
http://www.haas.berkeley.edu/~lester/aug00.html
=====================================
|
2,333 |
Subject: Re: Enron's Response to IRF Solicitation
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/9037.
=====================================
Jeff,
I'm working with the California Resturant Association on a member program.
Their Government Affairs Person, Jot Condi has asked for our help. Would you
review his concern and let me know what steps, if any we can take. Feel free
to contact Jot directly at 916-431-2724.
---------------------- Forwarded by Lyle White/HOU/EES on 02/10/2001 09:24 AM
---------------------------
"Pete White" <[email protected]> on 02/09/2001 11:59:00 AM
To: [email protected], [email protected]
cc:
Subject: Re: Enron's Response to IRF Solicitation
Lyle,
Thanks for the quick response. Please send your Terms and Conditions to my
attention.
Peter White
Director of Materials
International Rectifier El Segundo Facility
222 Kansas St
El Segundo Ca 90245
>>> Lyle White <[email protected]> 02/09/01 09:24AM >>>
---------------------- Forwarded by Lyle White/HOU/EES on 02/09/2001 11:08 AM
---------------------------
Lyle White
02/09/2001 10:58 AM
To: [email protected], [email protected]
cc:
Subject: Enron's Response to IRF Solicitation
I received your letter to discuss options with Enron. Based on latest
developments it will be important to discuss options as soon as possible. If
Senate Bill 27X does not pass, or it compromises to favor only accounts under
500 kW, then there is a short window of opportunity to commit to direct access
before AB 1x is enacted.
I will have a contract for review in the next few days, but in the meantime,
please feel free to call me at the following:
Lyle White
Enron Energy Services
602-795-5786 / office
602-614-1143 / cell
=====================================
|
2,334 |
Subject: Re: Customers
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/28216.
=====================================
I appreciate the efforts, but I have questions about whether Enron's presence
does more harm than it does good. I don't think that we want to give Wood
and/or Brown a soap box to stand on by showing our face there. Others may
have a different view of it, but I think that it needs to be consumers,
consumers, consumers. Thoughts?
Best,
Jeff
Scott Govenar <[email protected]>
06/28/2001 04:51 PM
To: Hedy Govenar <[email protected]>, Mike Day <[email protected]>, Bev
Hansen <[email protected]>, Jeff Dasovich <[email protected]>, Susan J Mara
<[email protected]>, Paul Kaufman <[email protected]>, Michael McDonald
<[email protected]>, Rick Shapiro <[email protected]>, Jim Steffes
<[email protected]>, Alan Comnes <[email protected]>, Steven Kean
<[email protected]>, Karen Denne <[email protected]>,
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>, Leslie Lawner
<[email protected]>, Robert Frank <[email protected]>, Ken Smith
<[email protected]>, Janel Guerrero <[email protected]>,
Miyung Buster <[email protected]>, Jennifer Thome
<[email protected]>, Eric Letke <[email protected]>, Mary Schoen
<[email protected]>, David Leboe <[email protected]>, Ban Sharma
<[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: Customers
The California Chamber of Commerce received a call from someone at the
CPUC who requested that they send as many customers as possible to
testify at Tuesday's hearing in favor of direct access. The Chamber
has requested the same thing of Enron.
=====================================
|
2,335 |
Subject: FW: Need your input for Raider Game Schedule
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/deleted_items/854.
=====================================
Sorry for another spam. I promise this all the input that I will request on
Raiders Game.
We do have a third choice of 12/22 (vs. Tennessee) if you prefer. Let me
know.
Thanks,
Tony
-----Original Message-----
From: Kumar, Naresh [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 4:07 PM
To: Tai, Tony
Subject: RE: Need your input for Raider Game Schedule
Tony: I am not here on 11/18 and I doubt I will go for the 12/2 game as I
will be trying to catch-up after missing 2 weeks of classes. My vote goes
for the 12/22 game against Tennessee. May be you should put that as the 3rd
choice now that you are taking input from everyone.
Naresh
-----Original Message-----
From: Tai, Tony [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 3:43 PM
To: Evmba_Social@Haas. Berkeley. Edu (E-mail)
Subject: Need your input for Raider Game Schedule
Hello everyone,
We have a small dilemma on the Raiders Game schedule. The original schedule
was Nov 18 (vs. Chargers), but our HAAS contact indicated that it's going to
be tough to get block tickets for that day. We are still trying to get
tickets for that day. Our other alternative is to have the game on 12/2
(vs. Cardinals). However, the finals will start in the following week on
12/10. 12/2 game maybe cutting a little close to our final schedule.
I need your input to gauge the interest level for either game. Please send
me a quick email if you are interested in going, and which date (12/2 or
11/18) do you prefer. Based on your input, we will finalize our Raiders
Game schedule.
Thanks,
Tony
=====================================
|
2,336 |
Subject: FW: Calif. Governor Davis Hosting Conference Call Today at 4 pm E
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: []
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/28396.
=====================================
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 07/06/2001 06:00 PM -----
Maureen McVicker
07/06/2001 04:11 PM
To: [email protected], [email protected], Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron,
James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Janel Guerrero/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Jennifer Thome/NA/Enron@Enron, Leslie
Lawner/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Paul
Kaufman/Enron@EnronXGate, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Pat
Shortridge/Corp/Enron@Enron, John Shelk/NA/Enron@Enron, Linda
Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Ray Alvarez/NA/Enron@ENRON, Karen
Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Ginger Dernehl/NA/Enron@Enron, Jody Underwood/NA/Enron@Enron, Joseph
Alamo/NA/Enron@Enron, Linda J Noske/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lysa Tracy/ENRON@enronXgate,
Rubena Buerger/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
Subject: FW: Calif. Governor Davis Hosting Conference Call Today at 4 pm E
DT; Will Discuss FERC Refund Settlement Talks
Steve Kean asked that I forward this information to you. We received an
email regarding this call. The call is to take place today at 4:00 pm EDT,
but will be available for replay for 48 hours.
_____________________________________________________________________________
>
> Today at 4 pm, California Governor Gray Davis will host a conference call
> to report progress on energy issues and discuss FERC settlement talks.
>
> The call-in number is (800) 230-1059 and no code is necessary.
>
> The session will be recorded and available as a digitized replay for 48
> hours at 800-475-6701. Access code: 594640.
>
=====================================
|
2,337 |
Subject: California Conference in Santa Fe
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['Debra Davidson/PDX/ECT@ECT', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/4788.
=====================================
CONFIDENTIAL DRAFT NOT FOR RELEASE
---------------------- Forwarded by Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT on 03/21/2001 02:02
PM ---------------------------
From: Tim Belden 03/20/2001 12:01 PM
To: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, [email protected], James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Karen
Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Tim Heizenrader/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc: Debra Davidson/PDX/ECT@ECT
Subject: California Conference in Santa Fe
As you know, I plan to speak at a conference in Santa Fe on Monday. I have
adjusted the program so that I am no longer a "witness" who will be
cross-examined. That is, Michael Shames will not have an opportunity to ask
me a series of uninterrupted questions. I have also crafted a presentation
that lays out a bunch of facts and introduces a theory for pricing storable
commodities. I think that my analysis highlights the major shortcomings for
the Kahn/Joskow paper and the approach employed by the Department of Market
Analysis. My presentation has nothing to do with Enron. I can defer any
questions about generators to Gary Ackerman. I can politely dismiss
questions about Enron, its trading activities, or profitability. I still
could use some help on the just and reasonable price questions. Attached
below are the draft power point slides that I will use in the presentation as
well as a word document with a draft script of the speech. Please review and
let me know your thoughts. I will have my assistant, Debra Davidson, set up
a call in the next couple of days to discuss.
=====================================
|
2,338 |
Subject: DJ Calif ISO, PUC Inspect Off-line Duke South Bay Pwr Plant
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/4378.
=====================================
FYI
DJ Calif ISO, PUC Inspect Off-line Duke South Bay Pwr Plant
Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.
LOS ANGELES (Dow Jones)--Representatives of the California Independent System
Operator and Public Utilities Commission inspected Duke Energy Corp.'s (DUK)
off-line 700-MW South Bay Power Plant in Chula Vista, Calif., Wednesday
morning, a Duke spokesman said.
The ISO and PUC have been inspecting all off-line power plants in the state
since Tuesday evening to verify that those plants are shut down for the
reasons generators say they are, ISO spokesman Pat Dorinson said.
About 11,000 MW of power has been off the state's power grid since Monday,
7,000 MW of which is off-line for unplanned maintenance, according to the ISO.
The ISO manages grid reliability.
As previously reported, the ISO told utilities and the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission Wednesday that it would call a stage three power alert
at 5 PM PST (0100 GMT Thursday), meaning power reserves in the state would
dip below 1.5% and rolling blackouts could be implemented to avoid grid
collapse. However, the ISO said the action wouldn't result in rolling
blackouts.
The ISO and PUC also inspected Tuesday plants owned by Dynegy Inc (DYN),
Reliant Energy Inc. (REI) and Southern Energy Inc (SOE).
Duke's 1,500-MW Moss Landing plant was also inspected by PUC representatives
in June, when some units were off-line for repairs, the Duke spokesman said.
-By Jessica Berthold, Dow Jones Newswires; 323-658-3872;
mailto:[email protected]
(END) Dow Jones Newswires 06-12-00
=====================================
|
2,339 |
Subject: SR Technics Palmdale Grand Opening, 3/22
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/3569.
=====================================
FYI.
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 03/12/2001 09:37 AM -----
Ed Ghalib/Western Region/The Bentley Company@Exchange
03/09/2001 11:47 AM
To: Joseph Alamo/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Terry Stelter/Western Region/The Bentley
Company@Exchange
Subject: SR Technics Palmdale Grand Opening, 3/22
Joseph,
Per our telephone conversation, attached is the draft program for the
activities scheduled for our client's Grand Opening which will be attended by
Governor Gray Davis and other Government VIP's. As I told you, my company,
The Bentley Company (Architecture/Engineering/Construction company within
EES), was responsible for a prominent part of this facility's construction
(involving the conversion of a large Boeing factory that SR Technics acquired
with much involvement from the Governor's office) and Enron/Bentley will be
part of the Grand Opening through possible sponsorship of some event(s), full
page ad in the souvenir program, Enron name brand recognition through
banners, etc. I am working out the details of our involvement with the event
coordinator right now. I suspect Enron governmental affairs would like
involvement given the relatively high exposure this event will garner
politically and through the news media (please refer to the attachment).
Please contact me ASAP at 661-609-4886 to discuss.
Regards,
Ed Ghalib, S.E.
Director, Client Management
email: [email protected]
voice: 714.434.1800, ext 310
mobile: 661.609.4886
ENRON/Bentley
611 Anton Blvd., Suite 700
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
=====================================
|
2,340 |
Subject: Re: Meeting with PG&E, Gas Accord OII
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/2301.
=====================================
Vail??? Flagstaff??? Man, I'm in the wrong business. Now listen Stumpy, if
you think you're going to Vail so some half-#%$#ed customer can run over your
OTHER knee with a snow mobile, right before your wedding, well think again,
buster.
I'll see if we can set up a meeting on Thursday the 2nd.
Signed,
Stuck in Lodi Again
Jeffery Fawcett
10/11/2000 03:39 PM
To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Meeting with PG&E, Gas Accord OII
Jeff,
Got your voicemail and I think you've got the right idea. I spoke with the
lovely Ms. Scott and she and I agreed that: (1) we don't want to endure a
marathon afternoon (or two) of PG&E preaching the Gospel according to Baja
Path, and (2) a more compressed 2-hour, mano-y-mano visit with Mr. Cherry to
discuss Enron's and Transwestern's position in the Gas Accord would be much
more useful to all parties. Given the fact that TW has another customer
meeting next week in Vail, and I've made a tentative commitment to meet with
a customer in Flagstaff the following week, the only time I can reasonably
fit in a trip to visit PG&E would be to arrive Wed. night, Nov. 1, and meet
Thursday a.m., Nov. 2. (Remember, I'm getting married that Saturday, Nov.
4th!!!)
If we can't work this schedule out, then, in order to include me, we'll have
to wait until I get back in mid-November. If you think TW needs to get the
face time a little earlier, maybe you and Ms. Scott can meet with him without
the benefit of me dragging you down.
Will you get back with us? Thanks.
=====================================
|
2,341 |
Subject: RE: Grand total is....!
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/10975.
=====================================
You're kidding. You mean they've double billed us? Can you find you're
credit card bill? They can find each and every receipt, who signed it, etc.,
so that we can make sure they don't screw us. I'll bring my stuff over
tonite. If they've double billed us, I'm going to suggest that they owe us a
comp up there. No worries, though. They've got the paper work, and if
we've paid twice, they're just going to need to credit my card. No big
deal. Just a hassle having to deal with 'em. You around tonite?
Cameron Sellers <[email protected]>
04/11/2001 01:53 PM
To: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>, Cameron Sellers
<[email protected]>, [email protected]
cc:
Subject: RE: Grand total is....!
We definitely need to see the paperwork since we already paid a bill of at
least that much so far. Don't worry, though we will make sure that you
don't get stuck with anything and work it all out.
Cameron Sellers
Vice President, Business Development
PERFECT
1860 Embarcadero Road - Suite 210
Palo Alto, CA 94303
[email protected]
650.798.3366 (direct dial)
650.269.3366 (cell)
650.858.1095 (fax)
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2001 11:25 AM
To: [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Grand total is....!
Hi. I've got all the paperwork. The bill (on my bill) for you guys is
$740. I'll get you the paperwork tonite. Sorry for the mix-up (should I
ask Squaw for a discount due to all the mess!?!?).
Best,
Jeff
=====================================
|
2,342 |
Subject: Re: California decisions/orders
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/3291.
=====================================
Mark:
Attached is the FERC order issued in California. The cite to the order is 93
FERC P 61,121 (2000). The FERC web site is FERC.FED.US. There is a special
link established on this site "Bulk Power Markets" that takes you to all of
the FERC orders issued in the California proceeding.
Please let me know if you need anything else.
Sarah
Mark Schroeder@ECT
11/08/2000 01:21 PM
To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Joe
Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: California decisions/orders
I may be wrong, but trying to follow the press and Houston-originated
e-mails, I am under the impression that FERC has issued an order finding that
California prices were NOT unjust and unreasonable, and that generators did
NOT abuse marketpower in recent price setting exercise, and that there may be
a California PUC order relevant to the recent price flare up. Any way, as
Jeff will know, a UK academic is going to be presenting in Berkley and Tokyo
later this month, arguing that hogan and Joskow are wrong about the value of
retail competition, and he expressed an interest in being current on recent
agency pronouncements. To make this long story shorter, are there
citations/references to such orders that I could provide to the good
Professor (admittedly doing a bit of his work for him, but hopefully by being
current his message will be more on)? If yes, can I get the FERC cites (and
web reference) from Joe or Sarah, and any California PUC order citation (and
web reference) from Jeff? many thanks mcs
=====================================
|
2,343 |
Subject: WSCC/WMIC meeting report
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/28246.
=====================================
To All,
Attached to this message is a complete report on issues that are of concern
to Enron.
Below is a highlight version of the key issues contained in the report.
FERC Seam Technical Conference report by Frank Afranji - Key message -
Western RTOs, act now, act responsibly, if you don't FERC will do it for us
and impose the PJM model
OASIS Phase II as reported by Jerry Dempsey - Key message - Western entities
need to be more pro-active in attending and providing input to the NERC
Electronic Scheduling Collaborative otheriwse they run the risk of NERC
imposing standards which are not applicable to western RTO development.
Resource Adequacy - aka - Installed Capacity Markets. NERC is considering
California as an example of how the "Market" has failed to provide adequate
generating resources to meet the needs of the region. There are discussions
now taking place to consider development of "Resource Adequacy" standards.
RTO Congestion Management Updates - When citing how DSTAR will align closly
with RTO West's physical flow-path congestion management paradigm, Jerry
Smith of APS publically corrected Mike Raezer and stated that on "Day-One"
the DSTAR PTOs are implementing contract path.
West of Hatway - Rating decrease from 2800 to 2200, reasons and remidies
along with possible new RAS requirements.
Path Connectivity Map - Does this idea make sense? What would you like to
see added? (Traders input requested)
If you have any questions, concerns or wish to be removed from the
distribution list, please contact me.
Kind Regards,
Dave
=====================================
|
2,344 |
Subject: Re:
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/2319.
=====================================
No worries. I'm not going anywhere. Focus on you. If you're body's
reacting poorly, swift action is warranted. If there's anything I can do to
help, don't hesitate. Hang in there.
Best,
Jeff
Courtney Abernathy <[email protected]>
10/11/2000 11:03 PM
To: [email protected]
cc:
Subject: Re:
Thanks Jeff-
I really appreciate the talk and your perspective.
I'm still undecided about school, still need to have
the talk with my contact guy at eLoyalty. Planning on
that for Friday. No decisions, lots of open emotional
stuff going on. I would like to grab lunch or
whatever at some point, but not in the real near
future...I've got to settle my schedule a bit or I'm
going to literally pass out. My body is reacting to
the abuse quite badly. Maybe if I get back on the
beach in a week or two! Anyway-talk to you later and
thanks again-
Courntey
--- [email protected] wrote:
>
> Hi. Hope the ride back to Sacramento went OK last
> nite. It was nice to
> see you and catch up. I'm sorry things are so crazy,
> but in spite of it
> all, your attitude's pretty good. And your new
> suede jacket is gorgeous.
>
> I know your life is very complicated and I don't
> want to make it worse, but
> if you ever have the time and inclination to go to
> lunch, dinner, movie,
> whatever, I'd definitely be up for it. Hang in
> there. Hope to catch up
> again soon.
>
> Best,
> Jeff
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get Yahoo! Mail - Free email you can access from anywhere!
http://mail.yahoo.com/
=====================================
|
2,345 |
Subject: Re: Fellow referred to me by Ken Lay
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/9880.
=====================================
Thanks, Rosalee.
Best,
Jeff
Rosalee Fleming
03/13/2001 08:46 AM
To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Vanessa Groscrand/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Re: Fellow referred to me by Ken Lay
Hi Steve and Jeff -
This was a cold call to Ken that Vanessa took while we were in Exec. Comm.
meeting. She had asked Ginger who to refer him to as it was CA. and she
mentioned Jeff. Please only call if there is any interest.
Rosie
From: Steven J Kean on 03/12/2001 04:46 PM
To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Vanessa Groscrand/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Rosalee Fleming/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Re: Fellow referred to me by Ken Lay
It was not mentioned to me. I'm copying rosie and vanessa to find out if
this was a simple referral (in which case you should keep the work to a
minimum -- return the call, but don't get distracted from your other efforts)
or whether Ken is especially interested in this and wants us to follow
through.
Jeff Dasovich
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
03/12/2001 03:54 PM
To: [email protected]
cc:
Subject: Fellow referred to me by Ken Lay
Just got a call from a fellow named Jame Edgerly at the Enterprise Zone,
Inc. He told me that Ken Lay (through Ken's secretary Vanessa) referred me
to him. He is very interested in getting us to help him work with the
Legislature to establish an "Enterprise Zone" energy tariff to encourage
investment in California's Enterprice Zones. Before I launch on the effort,
just wanted to check in and see if this rings a bell with you. Thanks.
Best,
Jeff
=====================================
|
2,346 |
Subject: El Paso Merchant may relinquish capacity
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/5193.
=====================================
From today's Gas Daily, in case you haven't seen it yet.......
El Paso Merchant Energy will be passing up on its right of first refusal f=
or=20
up to 1.22 billion
cfd of capacity on El Paso Natural Gas, sources said yesterday. El Paso wou=
ld=20
not comment
on the report but said the company would issue a statement soon.
The capacity, from the San Juan Basin to California, was open for bids unt=
il=20
Feb. 12, and
El Paso Merchant Energy held a right of first refusal at six receipt points=
=20
until May 31. El Paso
Merchant paid $38.5 million for the capacity, which was previously held by=
=20
Dynegy Energy
Marketing.
The capacity has been the source of controversy in the wake of California=
=01,s=20
ongoing energy
crisis, with companies concerned that an affiliated company held the pipeli=
ne=20
capacity.
The California Public Utilities Commission alleged in a FERC complaint that=
=20
the agreement
between the companies was "rigged" (GD 1/11).
"There has been a lot of pressure," said Gordon Howald, an analyst with=20
Credit Lyonnais
Securities. "Everyone is blaming them for what=01,s going on in California,=
=20
though I believe
FERC did clear them."
Howald said that giving up that capacity and allowing the "market to decid=
e=20
the value"
would help El Paso on two fronts.
"It probably makes sense considering the pressure they=01,ve been under fr=
om=20
regulators,"
Howald said. And "their pipeline operations could essentially garner some=
=20
higher profitability
if they are able to increase the value of that capacity in an open season."=
=20
RW
=====================================
|
2,347 |
Subject: riding mendocino
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/27782.
=====================================
Hi Jeff,
Madeleine asked that I forward this to you at this email address. Looks
like we may have a small group going to Mendocino in September (maybes for
Pat Scatena, Madeleine and Nora, and my husband and I are definitely going).
Let me know if you are interested.
I heard back from Ricochet Ridge (from Lari's executive assistant) that
the
weekend of September 21-23 (Friday through Sunday) would work best for
them
to host an advanced group.
We should probably confirm as soon as possible, and start looking for
accommodations, given that September is a popular time in Mendocino.
Her prices this year are $195.00 per person for an all-day ride (they
generally start at 9ish and finish at around 3:30 or 4:00). We provide
our
own lunch, or for $10 more per person, the ranch will pack us lunch.
Four-hour rides are $125.00, and can include beach, redwoods or both.
The
all-day rides are great, because you can go a little farther and get a
nice
lunch break, usually with a view. But another option would be to do a
four-hour ride each day, selecting either beach or forest, to reduce the
cost somewhat.
Please let me know if you can make it, and what days you would like to
ride
(Friday, Saturday and/or Sunday), and whether you prefer the all-day or
four-hour option. When I know general numbers, we can decide if we
would
like to get a house (if any are available) or if a hotel/B&B option
would
work better.
Amy Gustafson Finch
General Counsel
IASCO
1633 Old Bayshore Hwy #280
Burlingame, CA 94010
(650) 259-8400 x104 (ph)
(650) 259-8404 (fax)
[email protected]
=====================================
|
2,348 |
Subject: CA Energy Conservation - gossip
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/4202.
=====================================
Jeff,
FYI - I saw the following news item and contacted EES to inquire why we
weren't mentioned in the press release as Macerich is an EES customer.
Apparently, it was going to be a joint press release by EES and Macerich, but
the governor's office had other thoughts on the matter and we were taken
out. The nerve!
Catherine
Governor Davis: California's Summer Depends on Conservation
The only way for California to make it through the summer
without blackouts is to cut electricity demand by 10 percent,
Governor Gray Davis announced last week. In a live
address, the governor reiterated the need to save energy in
the state. "Conservation is our best short-term weapon
against blackouts and price-gouging," said Governor Davis.
One company responding to the Governor's request is the
Macerich Company, one of the largest owners and operators
of shopping malls in the United States. While taking
immediate action to cut energy use by roughly 5 percent in
its California malls, the company is also committed to
decreasing energy use at its more than 40 malls across the
country. Macerich anticipates average energy savings of
15 percent through such projects as the installation of high-
efficiency air-conditioning units, thereby saving at least
30 million kilowatt-hours per year. The company is giving
first priority to upgrades at its California properties. See the
Macerich press release at:
<http://www.macerich.com/framing/whatsnewframes/april01energy.zulu>.
See Governor Davis' press releases at:
<http://www.governor.ca.gov/state/govsite/gov_pressroom_main.jsp>.
=====================================
|
2,349 |
Subject: Fwd: DJ Calif Officials Look Into Merging Cal-ISO And CalPX
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/537.
=====================================
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2000 08:10:21 -0500
From: "Tracey Bradley" <[email protected]>
To: "Deanna King" <[email protected]>, "Paul Fox" <[email protected]>,
"Ronald Carroll" <[email protected]>
Subject: DJ Calif Officials Look Into Merging Cal-ISO And CalPX
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
DJ Calif Officials Look Into Merging Cal-ISO And CalPX
Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.
LOS ANGELES (Dow Jones)--California state officials are studying the
possibility of merging the state's Independent System Operator with the
California Power Exchange.
The state auditor's office met Monday with the ISO to look into the
ISO's operations and its relationship with the CalPX, according to documents
obtained by Dow Jones Newswires.
The audit was requested by state senator Steve Peace, D-El Cajon, who
believes a merger between the ISO and the CalPX would make California's
electricity market more competitive, said Jan Smutny-Jones, chairman of the
ISO Board of Governors.
The ISO controls 75% of the state's electricity grid and real-time
electricity market. The CalPX is the spot market where electricity is bought
and sold in the state.
The ISO will meet again with the auditor's office early next week. The
audit will be complete by spring, said state auditor Mary Noble.
By Jessica Berthold, Dow Jones Newswires; 323-658-3761
mailto:[email protected]
(END) Dow Jones Newswires 20-09-00
1603GMT
=====================================
|
2,350 |
Subject: Distributed Generation
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/4019.
=====================================
An email received today reflects a somewhat interesting development in the
distributed generation proceeding.?
Honeywell Power Systems, Inc., in its Phase One testimony, opposed UDC
ownership of distributed generation due to concerns regarding possible
market manipulation and dominance.? However, Honeywell now says that it,
"wishes to restate its position due to the extraordinary times in
California characterized by last summer's high energy pricing and the
continuing 'tight' generation market.? Furthermore, the recent Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) proposal (Market Order Proposing
Remedies for California Wholesale Markets, dated November 1, 2000) has
suggested 'demand response programs be implemented as well as adding
generation to the system.....In addition, there are certain intrinsic
values, both quantitative and qualitative, to all stakeholders, including
the ratepayer, by allowing UDC ownership of distributed generation.?
?
Accordingly, Honeywell now feels that the ratepayer and customer benefits
through utility ownership of DG outweigh the potential negative aspects. The
forecast for next year, especially the summer months, is higher energy
demand with no appreciable increase in the state's capacity.? Given these
extraordinary circumstances, Honeywell feels it is counterintuitive not to
allow the utilities to serve the ratepayer in the quickest and most
practical manner available."?
?
Even though WPTF has not been actively involved in this case, this seemed to
be an interesting development.
?
Dan
=====================================
|
2,351 |
Subject: Re: Regulatory meeting
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/2740.
=====================================
excellent.
Michelle Hicks@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS
10/26/2000 03:17 PM
To: Jeff Dasovich/Na/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Re: Regulatory meeting
I was going to get red beans and rice from Treebeards for lunch tomorrow.
Sound okay?
Jeff Dasovich@ENRON
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON
10/26/00 03:11 PM
To: Michelle Hicks/Enron Communications@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS
cc:
Subject: Re: Regulatory meeting
no, no, no. thank YOU!
Michelle Hicks@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS
10/26/2000 03:10 PM
To: Jeff Dasovich/Na/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Re: Regulatory meeting
Cool. See you tomorrow. We have conference room EB 4598A at 12:00 noon.
Thanks, Michelle
Jeff Dasovich@ENRON
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON
10/26/00 02:21 PM
To: Michelle Hicks/Enron Communications@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS
cc:
Subject: Re: Regulatory meeting
12 it is. i'll need to leave at 1 pm to catch my plane. we should be able
to get things done in an hour.
Best,
Jeff
Michelle Hicks@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS
10/26/2000 02:02 PM
To: Robbi Rossi/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Re: Regulatory meeting
----- Forwarded by Michelle Hicks/Enron Communications on 10/26/00 02:07 PM
-----
JoAnne Garner
10/26/00 01:42 PM
To: Michelle Hicks/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
cc: Melissa Loyd/Contractor/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
Subject: Re: Regulatory meeting
I have reserved 4598A for you guys tomorrow from 12 - 2. Thanks.
Joanne Garner
713 853 3237
=====================================
|
2,352 |
Subject: One-pager
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/11694.
=====================================
Regarding the one-pager we discussed today and for discussion in a later =
=20
call, I wanted to offer a suggestion on an approach.? I=01,d like to see =
=20
something simple that uses headings to show what Enron has done, what=20
concerns remain, and the steps you expect to take in the future.=20
I've put together?some very rough sample bullet points (below) as a start =
to=20
get everyone thinking and as an example of a format that could be =20
effective.? A short preface should also be added to set up the bullets, =20
possibly?something that says Enron has been working diligently to meet =20
elements of the committee's subpoena despite remaining disgreements.
What Enron has done:
Delivered x number of documents
Spent x man-hours compiling information requested by the committee
Retained a depository in Sacramento for documents
Negotiated in good faith on a continuous basis with the committee
Enron=01,s concerns regarding delivery of additional documents:
The committee has failed to implement an acceptable confidentiality =20
agreement that includes sanctions for anyone who breaches the agreement
Confidential documents held by the Legislature -- such as in the Quackenbu=
sh=20
case --?have historically found their way to the press or made public, oft=
en=20
in a selective manner
The broad nature of the committee=01,s request and whether requested docum=
ents=20
are relative to this inquiry
Whether a state legislative committee has jurisdiction over activities tha=
t=20
involve interstate commerce
What Enron will do:
(Bullets on planned steps)
=====================================
|
2,353 |
Subject: FW: CPUC v. El Paso
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/deleted_items/364.
=====================================
This is probably not a good thing for marketing affiliates in general!! =20
We can't figure out what El Paso's strategy is here, but surely they have o=
ne. Either that, or they were afraid to put their guys back on the stand o=
n the affiliate abuse issue.
-----Original Message-----
From: =09Fulton, Donna =20
Sent:=09Monday, August 06, 2001 2:53 PM
To:=09Cantrell, Rebecca W.; Lawner, Leslie; Steffes, James D.
Cc:=09Novosel, Sarah; Nicolay, Christi L.; Dasovich, Jeff; Yoho, Lisa; Thom=
e, Jennifer
Subject:=09CPUC v. El Paso
The California affiliate abuse case of El Paso ended today when El Paso ref=
used to bring CEO William Wise, and Chairman of the pipeline, John Somerhal=
der to testify before the ALJ. The Judge had warned El Paso on Friday that=
it must defend itself against the accusations set forth by the CPUC. Inst=
ead, El Paso made a motion for summary judgement to the Judge. After a ver=
y short recess, the Judge came back and denied the motion finding that the =
CPUC had made its prima facia case and El Paso had failed to provide the fu=
ll record to defend itself. Much of the evidence in the case was reviewed =
by the Judge in camera and put into the record in a redacted format. The =
Judge's Initial Decision is due October 9, 2001. The Judge made further co=
mments that this was clearly a case of a pipeline and merchant affiliate de=
aling both sides of a deal. The Judge indicated that information about all=
aspects of the pipeline and merchant businesses was sent to Wise in memora=
nda with minute detail with cc:s to Somerhalder.
=====================================
|
2,354 |
Subject: Re: CALL-IN NUMBER FOR 11/2 MEETING
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/2877.
=====================================
no problem -- looking forward to it.
Jeff Dasovich@ENRON
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON
10/31/00 04:21 PM
To: Lara Leibman/Enron Communications@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS
cc:
Subject: Re: CALL-IN NUMBER FOR 11/2 MEETING
thanks a million. talk to you then.
Lara Leibman@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS
10/31/2000 03:48 PM
To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@ENRON, Mike
Dahlke/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:
Subject: CALL-IN NUMBER FOR 11/2 MEETING
Here's the info for calling in -- thanks!
Lara
----- Forwarded by Lara Leibman/Enron Communications on 10/31/00 03:52 PM
-----
Angie Buis
10/31/00 02:17 PM
To: Sue Nord/NA/Enron@Enron, Lara Leibman/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Phillip Lord/LON/ET@ETC Richard Anderson/Enron
Communications, Rajen Shah/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Wayne Gardner/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
Subject: CALL-IN NUMBER FOR 11/2 MEETING
The call-in number and instructions for the 11/2 8:30 a.m. meeting are as
follows:
Everyone will dial the toll free number 1-877-331-6867.
All the outside participants will be prompted to enter their access code,
which is 600-480.
Wayne, your access code (room 4434) after dialing the toll free number will
be 857-771.
I have asked for 4 outside ports and should anyone else need to join in, they
may do so with the access code and without operator assistance.
The duration of the call is 3.5 hours. The call will terminate once everyone
has hung up.
Please let me know if any of you need additional information.
Thanks.
Angie Buis
EBS-Tax
x-37097
=====================================
|
2,355 |
Subject: FW: Schedules
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', 'Kortney; Jeffrey Soo/Enron@EnronXGate', '[email protected]', 'Brown', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/3296.
=====================================
fyi
-----Original Message-----
From: Neustaedter, Robert
Sent: Monday, May 14, 2001 9:25 AM
To: Tribolet, Michael
Subject: RE: Schedules
Michael
The numbers for total sales load that are being used in your tables for PGE
and SCE are very much in line with the numbers used in the rate design
hearing, differing by less than 1 GWh that all parties used for testimony
purposes. Consequently, I feel pretty comfortable with those numbers. I
don't have a similar comparison for SDGE, but based on other sources, their
sales load numbers also look in line.
Robert
Michael Tribolet/ENRON@enronXgate 05/12/2001 11:27 AM To: Robert
Neustaedter/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT cc: Subject: RE: Schedules
Did the working schedules yield any more info?
-----Original Message-----
From: Neustaedter, Robert
Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2001 2:23 PM
To: Tribolet, Michael
Cc: Brown, Kortney; Jeffrey Soo/Enron@EnronXGate
Subject: Schedules
Just an update.
I'm still looking at the rate schedule descriptors, but for the most part
they look correct, except for some minor corrections that need to be made.
As far as the schedule not footing, I cannot give you a good answer on that.
Obviously some of the differences are rounding errors, but those are minor.
I've checked with Harry and one of the attorneys in the case to see if there
had been any errata notices with regard to the schedule but they were not
aware of any. The other thing I will do, is look at one of the "working"
schedules filed in the rate design hearing and make a comparison.
=====================================
|
2,356 |
Subject: Re: Skilling Get Davis Straightened Out?
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/1474.
=====================================
Needless to say, given the Governor's press release, I'm a little concerned
about what he might want. Carl Wood and Loretta Lynch were truly abominable
at the FERC hearing. Fortunately, FERC (all 4 Commissioners) really beat up
on the them. I'm convinced that FERC feels that they must do something
between now and November and that if we ever had a chance to get them to be
bold (understanding that "bold" ain't exactly in Hoecker's play book), now's
the chance.
Thanks for the giving Heber the straight dope. He was very gracious
throughout, but after the panel he (very jokingly) ribbed me pretty well,
saying, "Jeff, I let you off the hook. I was going to ask you how in the
hell you ever let California turn into such a mess." I told him that we were
exercising Herculean restraint in not making lengthy "I told you so"
statements.
Best,
Jeff
Steven J Kean@ENRON
09/15/2000 07:54 AM
Sent by: Steven J Kean@ENRON
To: Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Re: Skilling Get Davis Straightened Out?
I'm still waiting for Davis' office to call. The plan currently is for me to
talk to him when and if he calls. Sandi has been in touch with the
governor's office.
By the way, thanks for the summary of the California proceedings. I talked
to Hebert yesterday and he was duly impressed with your remarks ... I had to
remind him that you worked on the right answers for California, not the
abomination that's in place today.
Jeff Dasovich@EES
09/13/2000 06:48 PM
To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Skilling Get Davis Straightened Out?
=====================================
|
2,357 |
Subject: Re: California Meeting
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/203.
=====================================
Looks like I won't be going to Washington, but I will participate in the
strategy meeting by phone on the 12th.
"Mary Hain" <[email protected]> on 09/07/2000 07:15:55 PM
To: Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES, Susan J Mara/SFO/EES@EES, Mona L
Petrochko/SFO/EES@EES, "Sarah Novosel" <[email protected]>, "Joe
Hartsoe" <[email protected]>, James D Steffes/HOU/EES@EES, "Paul Kaufman"
<[email protected]>, Dennis Benevides/HOU/EES@EES, "Richard Sanders"
<[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: California Meeting
Here's the latest info. about the FERC meeting. Only Commissioners and their
Staffs will be attending, no additional FERC Staff (no one from the Office of
Markets and Tariff Rates). The Meeting is mostly an opportunity for customers
to blow off steam. Presentations will be made by the three IOUs, one
generator,
one marketer (Enron) and one ESP, UCAN, and various politicians. When I get
the
list I'll forward it. Each presenter will have about five minutes with no
questions from the audience. Panelists should expect questions and discussion
among panelists or in response to Commissioner's questions.
Attached is the latest FERC notice about the California meeting. It
recognizes
that there may be discussions about pending FERC cases. This does not mean
FERC
will be grilling our panelist about these cases. Rather, FERC has to issue
this
notice so if someone talks about an issue pending in one of those cases, the
Commissioners don't violate the government in the sunshine rules.
(See attached file: EL00-91.1)
- EL00-91.1
=====================================
|
2,358 |
Subject: Re: b-day
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/985.
=====================================
As uncomfortable as it sometimes is, I feel compelled to comment on what in
my humble opinion are quite troubling statements, particularly when those
statements come from the mouths of self-described liberal, open minded,
diversity-loving hipsters. I have a very hard time with stereotyping of any
sort, and a very, very hard time when it comes from people I'm close to.
Believe it or not, in the past, I would have been much more aggressive about
it. Guess I've mellowed. Sorry if it made things, well, fidgety. (I've
come to grips with the fact that deep down, I tend to trend toward socially
libertarian and sometimes even anarchist views---oh well.)
Best,
Jeff
"Scott Laughlin" <[email protected]>
11/13/2000 04:57 PM
To: [email protected]
cc:
Subject: b-day
Dude,
Thanks for the abalone last night. Too bad we had to wash it down with that
discussion. Actually, wasn't so bad, really -- just a bit frusterating.
Anyway, let me know what I can do for Prentice's birthday. Do you want me to
go out there and check it out? Let me know about deposits and stuff like
that as well.
I'm sitting here in the new place in the 'Loin listening to that great
Mingus disk you got me. It's really amazing, a perfect compliment to sorting
out and organizing all my papers.
Hope you're having a good day.
Scott
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
http://profiles.msn.com.
=====================================
|
2,359 |
Subject: RE: DWR - Gas Daily
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent_items/2042.
=====================================
Sounds good.
-----Original Message-----
From: Tycholiz, Barry
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 9:57 AM
To: Dasovich, Jeff
Subject: RE: DWR - Gas Daily
Good stuff... I am out today.. pls call cell ph 713-302-6442 or leave message at work.. I will get back to you today.
BT
-----Original Message-----
From: Dasovich, Jeff
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 9:49 AM
To: Tycholiz, Barry
Subject: RE: DWR - Gas Daily
I'll set it up. This Firday is not good. I'll shoot for Monday or Tuesday. DWR's in Sacramento. Mark is 50 miles east of SF in Livermore.
Best,
Jeff
-----Original Message-----
From: Tycholiz, Barry
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 8:54 AM
To: Dasovich, Jeff
Subject: RE: DWR - Gas Daily
you are up early....
This Friday, Monday a.m. or Tues will be fine. Mark is in San Fransisco... who were we going to see in Sacremento.
BT
[Tycholiz, Barry] -----Original Message-----
From: Dasovich, Jeff
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 8:51 AM
To: Tycholiz, Barry
Subject: RE: DWR - Gas Daily
It's Baldwin. Let me know what dates you want to meet and I'll set it up.
Best,
Jeff
-----Original Message-----
From: Tycholiz, Barry
Sent: Wed 10/24/2001 8:50 AM
To: Dasovich, Jeff
Cc:
Subject: DWR - Gas Daily
Jeff, Gas Daily has an article on DWR activities for purchasing gas.... do you know Pete Garris and is he the guy we want to get together with... or is Balwin's co. going to carry the ball. I remain unclear as to who actually is doing the gas buying..
Further to our conversation of last week... let's meet with these guys soonest.
BT
=====================================
|
2,360 |
Subject: RE: Please see attached documents
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/11783.
=====================================
I talked to Richard today and let him know we're not filling the position
right away. And we had a very good conversation about the negotiations
underway and how we can help each other out.
Best,
Jeff
Paul Kaufman/ENRON@enronXgate
06/21/2001 06:10 PM
To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron,
[email protected]@SMTP@enronXgate
cc:
Subject: RE: Please see attached documents
I don't think we need a position focused solely on Sacto.
-----Original Message-----
From: Dasovich, Jeff
Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 9:08 AM
To: Shapiro, Richard; Kaufman, Paul; [email protected]
Subject: Please see attached documents
I'm assuming that we're not moving to fill the Sacramento position. If this
is correct, let me know and I'll get back to Costigan (who's the Assembly
Republican leader's (i.e., David Cox's) Chief of Staff.
Best,
Jeff
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 06/19/2001 11:02 AM -----
"Costigan, Richard" <[email protected]> 06/19/2001 10:54 AM To:
"'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'"
<[email protected]> cc: Subject: Please see attached documents
<<Enron letter.doc>> <<COS resume.doc>>
Good morning
I understand that there may be an opening in California for in your
Governmental Affairs unit. Please see attached documents.
Richard Costigan, III
Chief of Staff
Office of the Assembly Republican Leader
California State Assembly
Phone:(916) 319-2005
- Enron letter.doc << File: Enron letter.doc >>
- COS resume.doc << File: COS resume.doc >>
=====================================
|
2,361 |
Subject: FW: Ruling Shortening Protest and Response Period for DWR Servici
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/28158.
=====================================
I have electronic copies of the applications referenced in the below note
from ALJ Wong. The servicing agreements between SDG&E and DWR and SCE and
DWR are (based on a cursory review) virtually the same. The agreements seem
pretty straight forward. The only area of real interests are the service
fees (i.e., the costs being assessed DWR by the UDCs for system changes
necessary to do the DWR billing and the ongoing costs of that billing).
Protests on the applications are due on Friday the 29th. Let me know if you
would like copies of the applications.
Jeanne
-----Original Message-----
From: Wong, John S. [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2001 2:42 PM
ter, Todd
Subject: Ruling Shortening Protest and Response Period for DWR Servicing A
greements
To Parties In A.00-10-045, A.01-01-044, A.00-11-038, A.00-11-056 and
A.00-10-028:
Attached are two Chief ALJ Rulings shortening the protest and response time
to the applications filed by San Diego Gas & Electric Company and Southern
California Edison Company that were filed on June 22 and June 25,
respectively. These applications address the servicing agreements to be
entered into between the California Dept. of Water Resources and these two
utilities. Interested parties have until June 29, 2001 to file protests or
responses to the application, and the utilities have until July 2, 2001 to
file a reply.
John S. Wong -ALJ
CPUC
(415) 703-3130
<<Ruling Shortening Time in SDG&E.doc>> <<ruling shortening time in
SCE.doc>>
- Ruling Shortening Time in SDG&E.doc
- ruling shortening time in SCE.doc
=====================================
|
2,362 |
Subject: RE: Conference Call with PG&E to Discuss the Gas Portion of Its
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent_items/2378.
=====================================
Thanks for getting in touch. Yes, we can schedule. Do you know who all would participate?
Best,
Jeff
-----Original Message-----
From: Lokay, Michelle
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 2:19 PM
To: Dasovich, Jeff
Subject: RE: Conference Call with PG&E to Discuss the Gas Portion of Its Proposed Plan of Reorganization that It Will File w/FERC Toward End of November
Jeff,
Was this ever scheduled? When? Thanks.
-----Original Message-----
From: Harris, Steven
Sent: Saturday, November 24, 2001 9:50 AM
To: Dasovich, Jeff
Cc: Kilmer III, Robert; Lokey, Teb; Lokay, Michelle; Rapp, Bill
Subject: RE: Conference Call with PG&E to Discuss the Gas Portion of Its Proposed Plan of Reorganization that It Will File w/FERC Toward End of November
Thanks. I think we would definitely be interested.
-----Original Message-----
From: Dasovich, Jeff
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 4:55 PM
To: Tycholiz, Barry; Tribolet, Michael; Mellencamp, Lisa; Hass, Glen; Miller, Stephanie; Tholt, Jane M.; Lawner, Leslie; Cantrell, Rebecca W.; Steffes, James D.; Novosel, Sarah; Harris, Steven; Fossum, Drew
Subject: Conference Call with PG&E to Discuss the Gas Portion of Its Proposed Plan of Reorganization that It Will File w/FERC Toward End of November
PG&E called. They want to set up a conference call to brief us on the gas piece of their POR that they'll be filing with FERC around November 30th. They want to try to do it in the next couple of weeks. Please let me know if you're interested and please pass this along to anyone else who might be interested. Thanks.
Best,
Jeff
=====================================
|
2,363 |
Subject: RE: Supplemental PHC Stmt of New West
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent_items/2227.
=====================================
FYI. I notified the large customers and it appears they've taken it upon themselves to notify some of New West's customers of New West's new, "supplemental" position.
-----Original Message-----
From: Mara, Susan
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 1:10 PM
To: Dasovich, Jeff; Tribolet, Michael; Curry, Wanda; Mellencamp, Lisa;
'[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; Huddleson, Diann
Subject: FW: Supplemental PHC Stmt of New West
New West has indeed adopted SCE's position hook-line-and-sinker. I left Janie a very pointed e-mail on this topic. They have no customers receiving commodity from them, so, I guess, in the short term, they are not harmed. It is, noehteless, an unprincipled position. A key quote from the filing:
"It is the position of New West Energy that all customers, both bundled service customers and direct access customers, are equally responsible for payment of the net undercollections. Fairness dictates that bundled customers and direct access customers are both assessed their fair share of the responsibility for repaying the amount of the net undercollections as may be determined by the Commission."
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 10:25 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: FW: Supplemental PHC Stmt of New West
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 4:46 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Supplemental PHC Stmt of New West
(See attached file: Document1.doc)
=====================================
|
2,364 |
Subject: RE: Participation in Roundtable on Lessons Learned in California on
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/deleted_items/1565.
=====================================
Looks good.
-----Original Message-----
From: Dasovich, Jeff
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2001 7:12 PM
To: Kean, Steven J.; Shapiro, Richard; Steffes, James D.; Robertson, Linda; Landwehr, Susan M.; Denne, Karen; Mara, Susan; Kaufman, Paul; Nord, Sue; Palmer, Mark A. (PR); Guerrero, Janel
Subject: Participation in Roundtable on Lessons Learned in California on October 4th
On October 4th, I'll be trying to fill Rob Bradley's rather large shoes at the Cal State University Center for California Studies' 13th annual envisioning California conference, "Our Year of Disconnect: The Politics of Power in California."
I'll be participating in a Roundtable at the plenary session entitled: "Lessons Learned, Unlearned & To Be Learned: A Roundtable on California's Utility Deregulation."
The Roundtable will be moderated by the State Librarian, Kevin Starr. The other roundtable-ists include:
Chuck Cicchetti (Edison plant? Anyone know what he's up to these days?)
Bob Foster--Edison
Nettie Hoge--head of TURN
Glen Thomas--Chair of the Pennsylvania PUC (any info on Chair Thomas is appreciated)
State Senator Debra Bowen
David Freeman--Self-appointed emporer
Dr. Joseph Pratt--History prof., University of Houston (any info on the professor is also appreciated)
Each of us will have two minutes to open and then Dr. Starr will moderate the ensuing mud-slinging.
Attached are some draft talking points that I threw together for your review. All comments, suggestions, guffaws, etc. are welcome and appreciated.
Best,
Jeff
<< File: CSU Rountable draft talking points 0927.doc >>
=====================================
|
2,365 |
Subject: First "Status Report" for California
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/1283.
=====================================
Folks:
As you recall from out meeting on Tuesday, we decided that I'd pull together
a brief description of our key priorities and the actions underway to achieve
them. The status report will be updated weekly. We'll use the weekly update
as an important internal communication tool to keep folks abreast of
activities and developments in CA. It will also serve as a a tool to help
identify the need to modify our priorities and/or actions in light of
ever-changing circumstances.
We were going to try to get the first report out this week, but with the
meeting in Houston, Sue's doctor appt and Karen's meetings with Marathon,
we'll get the first one out Monday.
My notes suggest that (today's) key priorities---understanding that
everything's subject to change on a daily basis---are:
1. ENA
No refunds
End wholesale price caps as soon as possible
Get forward markets working in CA
Expedite plant siting
2. EES
No early roll of/maintain the rate freeze (till ~01/02)
Maintain current PX credit framework (till ~01/02)
Please forward to me the actions underway and planned in the area for which
you've been designated "lead." Given how fluid things are, It seems prudent
to limit "planned" items to those we've got planned for the next 2-4 weeks.
I'll compile for distribution by COB Monday. My notes show the following
leads:
Legislative--Sandi
PR--Karen
FERC-Sue
PUC--Jeff/Sue
Miscellaneous (e.g., AB 1890 "subcommittee)--Jeff
Also please let me know if my notes w.r.t. leads is consistent with yours.
Thanks very much and have a great weekend.
Best,
Jeff
=====================================
|
2,366 |
Subject: Product Manager in the Networking/Telecom industry
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/3112.
=====================================
LOCATION: San Jose, CA
TITLE: Product Manager
COMPANY: Maple Optical System
Company Overview
Maple Optical Systems is developing leading edge multi-service optical
systems that will enable service providers to build MPLS/GMPLS centric
next generation networks. Maple Optical Systems was founded by former
executives and technology experts from Cisco, Lucent, Nortel and Hewlett
Packard. Headquartered in San Jose, California, Maple is a
venture-funded privately held company.
Job description: Product Manager
We=01,re seeking a senior marketing professional with strong background in
the Networking/Telecom industry and at least 5 years of product
management experience. This individual will establish product direction,
integrate customer and market requirements with Maple's products to
create solutions, communicate with external partners and customers,
manage product life cycles, and work closely and effectively with
Maple's design team to lead, define and develop Maple=01,s high performance
MPLS products.
Requirements:
Qualified candidates must have a BSEE/CS, MSEE/CS preferred or
equivalent experience (MBA is preferred) and must have experience with
LAN and WAN protocols and networks. Experience with Frame Relay, ATM,
SONET and routing protocols such as OSPF, IS-IS and BGP-4 is required,
MPLS experience is preferred. Effective communication skills,
flexibility, a strong teamwork approach, and the desire to work in a
fast-paced start up environment are necessary for success.
Please send resumes to:
Dileep Kumar
E-Mail: [email protected] or [email protected]
=====================================
|
2,367 |
Subject: Summary of AB 128x Amendments
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/12070.
=====================================
The following author's amendments are expected in committee on Monday
afternoon (actual Leg Counsel language is supposed to come back Monday
morning):
1.? The tax will be on excess gross receipts from electrical energy
distribution.
2. The tax will be imposed on the person making the first sale of electrical
power in or into CA for consumer consumption.
3. The tax will be based upon the amount by which the gross receipts from
the sale exceed the amount that would have been received if the sale had
been made at a specified "base price" (to be determined by the PUC).
4.? There will be a rebuttable presumption that the base price represents
afair sales price.
5.? There will be a withholding mechnism of this excess tax from the
purchasers, other than purchasers who are residential consumers or small
business users.
6.? It will require sellers to file annual tax returns to report the tax on
excess gross receipts and pay any remaining taxes due.
7.? It will allow sellers to file a claim for refund in an attempt to rebut
the presumption that the base price was a fair sales price.
8.? Provide certain nexus standards to California to provide the basis to
impose tax liability.
9. Include a 5-year sunset date.
No opposition has been received by the Rev & Tax Cmte as of Wednesday of
this week.? Therefore, no opposition (or support) will be listed in the
committee's analysis.
Chris Micheli, Esq.
Carpenter Snodgrass & Associates
1201 K Street, Suite 710
Sacramento, CA? 95814
(916) 447-2251
FAX: (916) 445-5624
EMAIL: [email protected]
=====================================
|
2,368 |
Subject: Report on ARM Press Conference 6-26-01 in Sacramento
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/28170.
=====================================
Monday, last week, I urged our retail coalition, Alliance for Retail Energy
Markets (AReM), to hold a press conference this week to draw media attention
to the CPUC's vote on Thursday to suspend direct access. AReM and its PR
Firm agreed. After a lot of work to line up customers, the press conference
was held Tuesday morning in Scaramento.
We had excellent turnout from customer groups. Public statements of support
for continuing direct access were made by the California Chamber of Commerce,
CA Manufacturing and Technology Association, CA Large Electric Consumers
Association, CA Retailers Association, School Project for RR (SPURR - forget
the whole acronym but the org purchases gas and electricity for aggregated
elementary and high schools), QUALCOM, City of Palm Springs, NYMEX, and the
ESPs of Green Mountain, New Energy , Enron (me), and Strategic Energy. All
the major papers were there, San Jose Mercury News, SF Chronicle, LA Times,
SD Union, OC Register, Wall Street Jr. Also there were the energy trade
press, Bloomberg, Public Radio and a capitol TV station. All had the
opportunity to ask questions of the customers.
As planned, we let the customers take the limelight. They made forceful
cases for why the CPUC should not suspend DA and stressed that the
Treasurer's concerns have been addressed in legislation (that has not yet
been acted on) and are actively being negotiated at the Capitol. They urged
the CPUC not to take this action. I'll forward any media that results from
this
Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854
=====================================
|
2,369 |
Subject: Re: MESSAGE POINTS - CONFIDENTIAL
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/9269.
=====================================
Well, this would seem to indicate one of two things: either Hertzberg's is
now an absolute lost cause, or it's more urgent than ever to have Ken Lay
talk to him. Given the situation, it would still seem prudent to have Ken
Lay talk to the Speaker.
Best,
Jeff
Scott Govenar <[email protected]>
02/20/2001 09:12 AM
To: Rick Shapiro <[email protected]>, Jim Steffes
<[email protected]>, Jeff Dasovich <[email protected]>, Paul Kaufman
<[email protected]>, Jeff Dasovich <[email protected]>, Sandra McCubbin
<[email protected]>, "[email protected]"
<[email protected]>, Hedy Govenar <[email protected]>, Bev Hansen
<[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: MESSAGE POINTS - CONFIDENTIAL
The following message points are being circulated by Assembly Speaker Robert
Hertzberg. These are very confidential and should not be distributed.
Deregulation has been a failure of epic proportions, and Californians are
hurting because of it.
This is bigger than politics. People have energy bills they cannot afford.
Rolling blackouts threaten our economy - as well as the safety of our people.
We cannot allow this to continue.
This is not a bailout, it's a lifeboat for consumers. We support the
Governor's plan as a framework for negotiations with the utilities.
The state purchase of transmission lines -- at the right price and under the
right terms - will restore a measure of control to a system that is out of
control.
Our goal continues to be restoring reliable, reasonably priced power to all
of California.
=====================================
|
2,370 |
Subject: question for you
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/3398.
=====================================
Hey, how's things? Long time not chat. What's up? Anywho, you seem like the
right person to respond to this email. (And I have no idea.)
Best,
Jeff
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 02/27/2001 10:44 AM -----
Catherine McKalip-Thompson@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS
02/26/2001 09:14 PM
To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: question for you
Jeff,
I'd meant to stop in your office today to ask you about this in person, but
you seemed rather busy whenever I went by. Now I'll be out for awhile so am
sending you this note instead.
I got a call from KKSF who is putting on an Earth Day Jazz concert at the
Chronicle (Concord) Pavillion on 4/29 asking if we are interested in
sponsoring the vent, expected to draw 20,000 Northern Calif consumers with a
high income/education demographic. In addition to signage, display
opportunities, etc. there is the opportunity for a feature story on CNET
Radio for promotion of companies' involvement in the community (energy
efficiency, quality of life whatever).
Previous sponsors of interst are PG&E, Green Mountain, and the Renewable
Energy Marketing Board.
My question for you is whether Enron would be interested in the opportunity
for positive PR here in CA, or whether we are trying to keep a low profile.
Is an opportunity like this something any part of Enron (EES included) would
be interested in?
Thanks for advising.
Catherine
Catherine McKalip-Thompson
Manager, Environmental Responsibility
Enron Corp.
101 California Street, Suite 1950
San Francisco, CA 94111
Tel: 415.782.7842
Fax: 415.782.7854
=====================================
|
2,371 |
Subject: Re: Conversations with Customers on Date Certain for End of Rate
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/8711.
=====================================
I know that it is a finesse but I would rather not have a specific date
(although we would prefer a specific date relative to no clarity on this
matter):
If I were writing it it would something like:
In no case shall the rate freeze, as defined by AB1890, end before the CPUC
has determined replacement rates. And in no case shall such determination of
replacement rates, beyond the end of AB 1890 term (Mar 2002).
Such wording means supports our claim of negative ctc up to new setting of
rates. It also allows us to argue with customers that we switched them for
their own good.
From: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON on 01/29/2001 12:37 PM
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON
To: [email protected], Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul
Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Harry
Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES, Mike D Smith/HOU/EES@EES,
Robert C Williams/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Scott
Stoness/HOU/EES@EES, Wanda Curry/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Conversations with Customers on Date Certain for End of Rate Freeze
in Legislation
I've left messages describing our idea with TURN and the large
cogenerators/marketers/producers, and I've spoken with the Farm Bureau and
the California Manufacturers Association. The Bureau and CMA agree with our
idea and I've asked them to "pass the word along" to other customer groups
and to try to ensure that its an integral part of the negotiations. I'll be
calling other customer groups and will report back on those conversations.
Best,
Jeff
=====================================
|
2,372 |
Subject: Digital Divide Issue - NARUC weighs in...
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/2009.
=====================================
Steve/Lara - this is the senate bill we discussed with George Foote. I had
some discussions w/ Sen. Wyden about this last session and I think we should
be on board to support it next Congress.
NARUC's ROWE VOICES `PERSONAL SUPPORT' FOR BROADBAND TAX CREDIT
BILL
National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners (NARUC)
President Bob Rowe has expressed his "personal support" for a
Senate bill to establish a five-year, two-tier tax credit plan to
encourage telecom carrier investments in broadband services
equipment. Mr. Rowe also is a member of the Montana Public Service
Commission.
Writing today to President Clinton and three top U.S. senators, Mr.
Rowe said the Broadband Internet Access Act, S 2698, is consistent
with a broadband services resolution adopted by NARUC's Executive
Board during the association's meetings in Los Angeles last summer
(TR, July 24). He noted that "the resolution states that NARUC
generally supports legislation that encourages the deployment of
broadband technology and advanced services to underserved areas
without removing the market-opening incentives contained in section
271 of the Telecommunications Act."
"I believe [the] legislation is consistent with the view that while
the 1996 Act is generally working, additional incentives to serve
certain rural or urban communities are appropriate," he said in
letters to President Clinton, Senate Majority Leader Trent Lott
(R., Miss.), Senate Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee
Chairman John McCain (R., Ariz.), and Sen. Daniel Patrick Moynihan
(D., N.Y.), the author of S 2698.
=====================================
|
2,373 |
Subject: NGI Article: Kern River Shippers to See Rate Decrease Oct. 1, More
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/deleted_items/1609.
=====================================
NGI's Daily Gas Price Index
published : September 26, 2001
Kern River Shippers to See Rate Decrease Oct. 1, More in 2002
Finally, some good news: a unit of Williams said Tuesday that firm transportation rates will drop by as much as 36.5% for all original shippers on its Kern River natural gas transmission system beginning Monday (Oct. 1). The lower rates will be implemented under Kern River's previously approved extended-term rate program. Williams, which developed a strategy to lower rates in response to customer requests as part of its rate-reduction settlement in 1999, projects more rate reductions next May, when the costs and revenues of the 2002 expansion are reflected in rates.
"The extended-term rate program was designed to provide long-term, firm shippers with an option to pay lower, more market-responsive rates today in return for extending their contract terms," said Kirk Morgan, director of business development.
Bruce Warner, manager of rates and planning for Tulsa-based Williams, said the company had looked at its "financial situation and found that if customers could live with longer contracts, we could live with lower rates. The lower rates will be offset by lower depreciation expenses and will not negatively impact Kern River's financial performance."
Williams' gas pipeline unit is one of the largest-volume transporters of natural gas in the United States. Its gas pipeline unit's Kern River Gas Transmission, based in Salt Lake City, operates a 922-mile system delivering Rocky Mountain and Canadian natural gas to markets in California, Nevada and Utah.
=====================================
|
2,374 |
Subject: Sempra's Marketing in Jersey
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/1.
=====================================
Will we be covering this? The utilities in California have been heavily
engaged in maintaining "fortress monopoly" at home while advocating
"openness" abroad. Any info showing the discrepancy is useful. No big
deal. Just curious. And if someone does, a very brief update would be
greatly appreciated. Best, Jeff
Energy America to Discuss Marketing Practices in New Jersey
Energy Choice Program
PR Newswire - 10/27/1999
(Copyright (c) 1999, PR Newswire)
WHEN: THURSDAY, Oct. 28, at 9:30 AM
WHAT: Energy America, an energy marketer bringing choice and savings
to New Jersey consumers in the state's deregulated electricity
market, will make a major announcement regarding its marketing
practices and participation in New Jersey's Energy Choice
program.
WHO: Donald E. Felsinger
Group President
Sempra Energy
(Energy America is a joint venture between Sempra Energy, a
Fortune 500 energy services holding company, and Direct Energy
Marketing, Ltd., one of the largest natural gas marketers in
Canada.)
WHERE: Newark Club
Grill Room
22nd Floor, One Newark Center
Raymond Boulevard at McCarter Highway
Newark, New Jersey
973-242-0658
Energy America is not the same company as SDG&E/SoCalGas, the utilities.
Energy America is not
regulated by the California Public Utilities Commission and customers do not
have to buy products or
services from them to continue to receive quality regulated service from the
utilities.
CONTACT: Regina Parundik of Jampole Communications, 412-471-2463, for Energy
America. 08:48 EDT
=====================================
|
2,375 |
Subject: RE: Angelides' Memo to Investors 9/ 25/01
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['Manuel', '[email protected]', "Erica; '[email protected]"]
File: dasovich-j/sent_items/282.
=====================================
Can you send the draft letter Tracy refers to re: letter to legislators?
-----Original Message-----
From: Mara, Susan
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 12:28 PM
To: Kean, Steven J.; Tribolet, Michael; Mellencamp, Lisa; Denne, Karen;
Kaufman, Paul; Shapiro, Richard; Steffes, James D.; Dasovich, Jeff
Subject: FW: Angelides' Memo to Investors 9/ 25/01
-----Original Message-----
From: Fairchild, Tracy [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 9:42 AM
To: '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'
Cc: Manuel, Erica; '[email protected]'
Subject: California State Treasurer Philip Angelides' Memo to Investors
9/ 25/01
AReMers:
This memo from Angelides outlines what has happened and what still needs to
happen at the PUC before bonds can be issued. He mentions that no appeals
to the DA suspension have yet been filed but that the deadline has not yet
passed. When are we filing our appeal? I'd like to send out a news release
the morning we file the appeal if AReM agrees.
On another matter, just so we're all on the same page, Norm and I produced
the letter to Davis and legislative leadership which you all received
yesterday for final approval. The Weintraub column handout has also been
mocked up and Norm is going to pick that up this morning from our office.
Tracy
-----Original Message-----
From: Philip Angelides, Calif State Treasurer
To: SARRON, Christina
Sent: 9/25/2001 12:35 PM
Subject: California State Treasurer Philip Angelides' Memo to Investors 9/
25/01
<<STO Investor Memo 92501.pdf>>
<<STO Investor Memo 92501.pdf>>
=====================================
|
2,376 |
Subject: Heads Up on Funding solicitation
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/28113.
=====================================
The economist's name is Ben Zycher (not Zucher). Do we have any interest in
this?
Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854
----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 06/25/2001 02:33 PM -----
Gary Ackerman <[email protected]>
06/25/2001 10:25 AM
Please respond to foothillservices
To: Bill Ross <[email protected]>, Bob Anderson <[email protected]>,
Carolyn Baker <[email protected]>, CHARLES A MIESSNER
<[email protected]>, curt hatton <[email protected]>, Curtis
Kebler <[email protected]>, Greg Blue <[email protected]>, Jack
Pigott <[email protected]>, Nam Nguyen <[email protected]>, Randy
Hickok <[email protected]>, Rob Nichol <[email protected]>,
Roger Pelote <[email protected]>, Sue Mara <[email protected]>, George
Vaughn <[email protected]>, Max Bulk <[email protected]>, "Huhman, Steve"
<[email protected]>, Steve Schleimer <[email protected]>, Dan
Douglass <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: Heads Up on Funding solicitation
I was approached last week by the Pacific Research Institute for Public
Policy, a conservative think tank, to have WPTF help fund a study they
are undertaking by well-known economist Ben Zucher. I thought I would
just give you this heads up that a formal proposal will be forthcoming,
that I will copy you all on it, and we should discuss it at our July
Board meeting. Ben's paper will be entitled The Economics and Politics
of Electricity Deregulation, and it will be a substantial body of work.
gba
=====================================
|
2,377 |
Subject: ICAF to San Francisco, week of April 8
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/9301.
=====================================
Jeff - Cynthia Sandherr said you were once again the person to write to. We
talked in the fall of 1999 when I was thinking about bringing the energy
seminar to San Franciso in 2000. We did manage Alaska last year after all,
so now I am trying to resume the regular alternation between California and
Houston. I am several shades whiter of head as a result of bringing the
Alaska trip to closure.
?
We did manage Alaska last year after all, so now I am trying to resume the
regular alternation between California and Houston. I am several shades
whiter of head as a result of bringing the Alaska trip to closure.
??
17 senior military and civilians in our group this year, who are really
interested in gas and electricity matters, especially in CA. 14 students
including a BGen from Croatia, and 3 faculty. We would like to call on you
and hear Enron's thoughts on gas and electricity matters, both from a
California perspective and from the point of date-certain national
legislation.
?
At this point, the time that looks best for us would be Monday afternoon, 9
April. I am hoping this will be possible for you - it will be just about 3
years to the day since we last visited your California offices, in the very
first moments of electricity deregulation.
?
Draft schedule attached for your consideration of where we are in the
planning process.
?
Best regards,
?
Maureen Crandall
Professor of Economics
Industrial College of the Armed Forces
National Defense University
Fort McNair, DC 20319
tel (202) 685-4319?? fax(202) 685-4175
- IS2001 dom trav Cal.doc
=====================================
|
2,378 |
Subject: RE: Whoops, forgot the document
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/3815.
=====================================
Ron,
I am comfortable with the reorganization and the treatment of market
power in the brief. I believe you should make the changes I suggested to
the penalty for underscheduling load section.
Thanks
Gary
-----Original Message-----
From: Ronald Carroll [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2000 11:51 AM
To: Kimberly Curry; [email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Whoops, forgot the document
Sorry about that.
=======================================================
This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may
contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review,
use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of
the original message.
To reply to our email administrator directly, send an email to
[email protected]
BROBECK PHLEGER & HARRISON LLP
http://www.brobeck.com
=====================================
|
2,379 |
Subject: Re: PROOF OF ALBERTA POWER NOT FLOWING TO CALIFORNIA
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/11043.
=====================================
Not good news from Canada. Power lines are full when appropriate. Just
Powerex's power.
Jim
---------------------- Forwarded by James D Steffes/NA/Enron on 04/12/2001
09:59 PM ---------------------------
From: Robert Hemstock@ECT on 04/12/2001 06:24 PM MDT
To: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc: Ray Alvarez/NA/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Re: PROOF OF ALBERTA POWER NOT FLOWING TO CALIFORNIA
I spoke to Ray Alvarez about this today. British Columbia Hydro has a FERC
888 Wholesale Transmission Tariff in place and the actual available
transmission capacity is primarily owned by B.C. Hydro's marketing affiliate,
Powerex, with some small amounts of interruptible capacity owned off and on
by other market participants, including Enron.
Although Enron Canada would like to export more power to the US as we can
supply it from our PPA or even buy it in Alberta's Power Pool, there is
rarely any available transmission capacity as what is available was fully
subscribed for (mainly by Powerex) and is used. I just confirmed with our
trader that none of BC Hydro's transmission export capacity has gone unused
when Alberta or BC had excess generation available for export and the
economics of selling from Alberta or BC into Mid-C were favorable.
Regards,
Rob
James D Steffes@ENRON
04/12/2001 05:18 PM
To: Robert Hemstock/CAL/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: PROOF OF ALBERTA POWER NOT FLOWING TO CALIFORNIA
Rob -
Is there any information that would highlight that Alberta had excess
generation that couldn't get into the California market this year or later?
I need this ASAP.
Jim
=====================================
|
2,380 |
Subject: Re: Comnes Affidavit Revised
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/3777.
=====================================
Alan --
Some other thoughts:
1. Are we sure that we have the permission from the SC customers that we can
give out their information? Someone may want to get the names of these
parties and more details.
2. Should we move the market power section to the third point and bring up
points 2 and 3?
Thanks.
Jim
Alan Comnes@ECT
11/21/2000 09:09 PM
To: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@Enron, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul
Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, [email protected], [email protected], Tim
Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Badeer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Richter/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Dennis Benevides/HOU/EES@EES, Jubran Whalan/HOU/EES@EES, Neil
Bresnan/HOU/EES@EES, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Mona L Petrochko/NA/Enron@Enron, Alan
Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@Enron, Christopher F
Calger/PDX/ECT@ECT, David Parquet/SF/ECT@ECT, [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Marcia A Linton/NA/Enron@Enron, Ginger Dernehl/NA/Enron@Enron, Maureen
McVicker/NA/Enron@Enron, Debra Davidson/PDX/ECT@ECT, Joseph
Alamo/NA/Enron@Enron, Bernadette Hawkins/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Comnes Affidavit Revised
Here's the latest. If you make comments, please make them on this version.
Fax comments to BOTH 530-327-9235 (yes, "530") and 503-464-3740 or email the
comments to [email protected] with redline/strikout turned on.
Kim Curry, please take a formatting pass if you can first thing Wed and email
back to me when done.
Alan Comnes
=====================================
|
2,381 |
Subject: RE: Utility authority to engage in derivative transactions
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/deleted_items/578.
=====================================
Jeff, Jane is off to the technical hearing in Washington tommorrow. Are you available today to discuss regulatory issues. pls advise and we can set up a time.
BT
-----Original Message-----
From: Dasovich, Jeff
Sent: Monday, July 16, 2001 1:41 PM
To: Tycholiz, Barry; Lawner, Leslie; Miller, Stephen; Cantrell, Rebecca W.
Subject: Utility authority to engage in derivative transactions
Barry, et al:
FYI. Some initial info I got from our outside council regarding utility authority to engage in financial risk management tools. More info to follow as we get it. If you have quesitons, comments, or suggestions for additional research needed, just holler. Please forward to others who might need it.
Best,
Jeff
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Electric: SCE, PG&E and SDG&E are all authorized to enter into bilateral
forward transactions with non-ISO or PX parties. D.00-08-023 and
D.00-09-075. These transactions are limited to contracts which must expire
on or before 12-31-05. Initial contracts are subject to a blanket
reasonableness test (if less than 5% above cost of non-forward cost of
portfolio=deemed reasonable) but contracts after 12-31-02 will be subject
to a CPUC preapproval process.
Gas: PG&E authorized to use gas hedges for all purposes (D.98-12-082) but
limited to contracts expiring on or beforce 12-31-02 and limited to $200
million in cost or 800 MMcfd in volume. We are looking for a similar
resolution or decision for Sempra. Haven't found it yet, but we believe
they have been given similar authority.
=====================================
|
2,382 |
Subject: FW: United We Stand
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent_items/67.
=====================================
Hope you're well.
best,
Jeff
-----Original Message-----
From: Vavrek, Carolyn (US - San Francisco) [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 12:40 PM
To: Aiaz Kazi (E-mail); Alyson Huey (E-mail); Ann Marie Jacks (E-mail); Bierte Scholz (E-mail); Chris Hornbeck (E-mail); Colleen Finnegan (E-mail); Dee Frye (E-mail); Dennis Sidbury (E-mail); Donna Sikora (E-mail); Erica Hoholick (E-mail); Francis and Don Sikora (E-mail); Frank Culotta Sr. (E-mail); Franklyn Arthur (E-mail); Jeff Dasovich (E-mail); Judy Howe (E-mail); Julie D'Elena (E-mail); Karen Gemmill (E-mail); Karen Roberts (E-mail); Karl Vavrek (E-mail); Katy Jenkins (E-mail); AddressListTooLong-Suppressed
Subject: FW: United We Stand
Subject: Americans Show Unity Against Terrorism - Friday, Sept 14, 2001
Friday Night at 7:00 p.m. step out your door, stop your car, or step out of
your establishment and light a candle. We will show the world that
Americans are strong and united together against terrorism. Please
pass this to everyone on your e-mail list. We need to reach everyone
across the United States quickly.
The message: WE STAND UNITED - WE WILL NOT TOLERATE TERRORISM!
Thank you.
We need press to cover this - we need the world to see.
This message (including any attachments) contains confidential information intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is protected by law. If you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this message. Any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this message, or the taking of any action based on it, is strictly prohibited.
=====================================
|
2,383 |
Subject: Re: Yellow Book
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/10108.
=====================================
Hi Dale:
Please call me to discuss your question. (415.782.7822) Customers could try
to "bypass" the utility, but until Dec. '95 (PUC final policy decision) and
AB 1890, it was against the law to have direct access, so you may be
misinterpreting the yellow book just a bit. There were other forms of
"bypass" at that time, but DA as we think of it today was illegal. Give me a
call and we can try to clear things up (specific references to where in the
YB you're getting this impression will be helpful). Glad to talk to you on
Friday and be happy to talk more if you have any other questions, or desire
any follow up.
Best,
Jeff
Dale Kasler <[email protected]>
03/19/2001 11:10 AM
To: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: Yellow Book
Jeff,
The Yellow Book is in the mail. I read it over the weekend and found
it to be a very good backgrounder for this whole thing. Thanks for lending it
to me, and thanks again for your time Friday.
A followup question: You had told me Friday that the arrival of QF's
and other non-utility generators, including plants in neighboring states, had
large customers chomping at the bit for competition, but frustrated because
the big IOUs still controlled the grid and held the customers captive. But
the Yellow book said that already some large customers had found ways to
bypass the IOUs and get direct access/retail wheeling.
Could you explain?
Thanks,
Dale.
PS - Please don't forget to call Steve Kean to let him know I'll be calling
him. Thanks.
=====================================
|
2,384 |
Subject: Re: Reviews
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/1082.
=====================================
I threw out the green shirt. Swear to god.
Richard Shapiro
11/20/2000 05:18 PM
To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Re: Reviews
I will weigh in on your review. Don't worry.
From: Jeff Dasovich on 11/20/2000 05:08 PM
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
To: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Reviews
Rick:
Just want to let you know that I missed the boat a bit in coordinating my
reviewers with Paul. In my first attempt to input them in the system, I
hesitated including you for the simple reason that I'm certain you have
countless other reviews to do already, and, frankly, I feel that you're an
integral part of my review whether you're formally on the list or not. When
I went back to make my final additions to the list, the systerm was already
closed--Paul had approved the first round, which I guess shuts it down.
It's likely not appropriate for reviews to happen outside the system, but I
wanted to let you know that, from my perspective, it would be great to
receive from you. I'd value it a lot. And I think we've worked closely
enough together over the last year for you to have a basis for reviewing me.
But again, I'm of the view that irrespective of the list, you partake in my
review of necessity, and I don't want to add any additional burdens to an
already loaded schedule.
No big deal, just wanted to let you know.
And I'm having a field day filling out your review. ("Rick discriminates
unfairly against neon-colored shirts.") Seriously, I was quite pleasantly
surprised to have ended up as one of your reviewers.
Best,
Jeff
=====================================
|
2,385 |
Subject: Latest draft
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/1836.
=====================================
Attached find the latest draft of Alan's technical paper. This is still a
work in progress. The paper will serve as the basis for our comments on the
FERC's November 1 order on the California market. Alan developed this paper
in close coordination with Tim Belden and Greg Wolfe. I wanted to run this
by you so you would have an opportunity to give us any input from EES's
perspective. Ron Carroll will also be sending us a draft pleading that will
accompany this paper. However, the pleading will simply summarize the
positions set out in Alan's paper and lay out a few additional legal
arguments, so it is most important for you to focus on this paper. Ron will
be getting us a draft by the end of the day today so we can discuss it in our
conference call early tomorrow.
---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Hain/HOU/ECT on 11/21/2000 11:47 AM
---------------------------
Alan Comnes
11/21/2000 11:15 AM
To: [email protected]
cc: Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Latest draft
This is the Tues late a.m. (PST) version of the technical affidavit.
Since yesterday's version, the following is most new
conversion to Q/A format
addition of my quals (are they sufficient?)
argument that forward contracting is liquid TODAY (in price caps section)
section on information provision has been simplified
new arguments with regard to load-based penalties and why they should not
apply to generation.
Would there be anyone available in DC to do a formatting pass either late
tonight your time or early a.m. Wed? (Don't start such a process with out
checking Mary or I, however.)
=====================================
|
2,386 |
Subject: CPUC Data Request
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/1654.
=====================================
** Sent for Sandi Thompson**
To All California Power Exchange Participants:
Notice is hereby provided pursuant to Section 19.3.4 of the California Power
Exchange Tariff that the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC), as
part
of an ongoing investigation of California markets, has requested information
that may be confidential under Section 19.3.2 of the Tariff. The CPUC has
requested the California Power Exchange to provide such information no later
than Wednesday, October 4, 2000. If you desire to assert a claim of privilege
or confidentiality pursuant to legal authority, the California Power Exchange
will include your written assertion of that claim together with its submittal
to
the CPUC, provided that it is timely received. Your written statement should
be
directed to the CPUC as follows:
Sean H. Gallagher
California Public Utilities Commission
505 Van Ness Avenue
San Francisco, CA 94102
You may deliver your statement to the California Power Exchange as follows:
Karen Koyano
California Power Exchange
1000 S. Fremont Avenue
Unit 20
Alhambra, CA 91801
626.537.3173 facsimile
Any written statement must be received by Ms. Koyano no later than Friday,
September 29, 2000, 5:00 p.m. PDT, to be included with any information
delivered
to the CPUC. You are also free to take any other legal action you may deem
appropriate in the circumstances of this investigation. A copy of the
subpoena
is attached for your reference.
Thank you.
(See attached file: CPUC subpeona #2 9-20-00.doc)
- CPUC subpeona #2 9-20-00.doc
=====================================
|
2,387 |
Subject: Saturday
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/1707.
=====================================
This sounds like a very delicious recipe to make for Saturday - relatively
easy too and uses our beautiful sage.? It was in my e-mail this morning.
Neapolitan Pork Roast with Potatoes
6 - 8 cloves garlic, finely chopped
2 Tbs (30 ml) chopped fresh sage leaves or 2 tsp (10 ml) dried sage
Salt and freshly ground pepper to taste
1 boneless pork loin roast, 2 to 3 pounds (1 to 1.5 Kg)
2 lbs (1 Kg) potatoes, cut into 1-inch (3 cm) cubes
2 Tbs (30 ml) olive oil
Combine the garlic, sage, salt and pepper in a small bowl.? Make holes
in the pork roast with a small paring knife and stuff the garlic
mixture in the holes with your finger, reserving about 1 teaspoon (5
ml) of the garlic mixture.? Rub any remaining garlic mixture on the
outside of the roast.? Toss the potatoes with the reserved garlic
mixture and the olive oil.? Place the roast and the potatoes in a
roasting pan and place in a preheated 425F (220C) oven.? Remove from
the oven and stir the potatoes after 30 minutes.? Baste the roast with
the pan juices and return to the oven.? Lower the heat to 325F (160C)
and continue to cook, stirring the potatoes and basting the roast
about every 15 minutes.? Begin checking the internal temperature of
the roast after about 1 1/4 hours total cooking time.? Remove the
roast when the internal temperature is 140F (65C) for meat that is
still slightly pink.? Let the roast rest for 15 minutes before carving.?
Return the potatoes to the oven if
they are not crisp and golden. Serves 6 to 8.
Nancy
(707) 251-4870 (phone)
(707) 265-5446 (fax)
"Plus je bois, mieux je chante"
=====================================
|
2,388 |
Subject: RE: Utility authority to engage in derivative transactions
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/11891.
=====================================
Jeff, Jane is off to the technical hearing in Washington tommorrow. Are you
available today to discuss regulatory issues. pls advise and we can set up a
time.
BT
-----Original Message-----
From: Dasovich, Jeff
Sent: Monday, July 16, 2001 1:41 PM
To: Tycholiz, Barry; Lawner, Leslie; Miller, Stephen; Cantrell, Rebecca W.
Subject: Utility authority to engage in derivative transactions
Barry, et al:
FYI. Some initial info I got from our outside council regarding utility
authority to engage in financial risk management tools. More info to follow
as we get it. If you have quesitons, comments, or suggestions for additional
research needed, just holler. Please forward to others who might need it.
Best,
Jeff
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
++
Electric: SCE, PG&E and SDG&E are all authorized to enter into bilateral
forward transactions with non-ISO or PX parties. D.00-08-023 and
D.00-09-075. These transactions are limited to contracts which must expire
on or before 12-31-05. Initial contracts are subject to a blanket
reasonableness test (if less than 5% above cost of non-forward cost of
portfolio=deemed reasonable) but contracts after 12-31-02 will be subject
to a CPUC preapproval process.
Gas: PG&E authorized to use gas hedges for all purposes (D.98-12-082) but
limited to contracts expiring on or beforce 12-31-02 and limited to $200
million in cost or 800 MMcfd in volume. We are looking for a similar
resolution or decision for Sempra. Haven't found it yet, but we believe
they have been given similar authority.
=====================================
|
2,389 |
Subject: Re: car reservation for jeff dasovich
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/4808.
=====================================
Looks great. I'd like to be able to pick it up at 7 AM. Thanks very much
for the assistance.
Best,
Jeff
Joseph Alamo
06/01/2001 12:59 PM
To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron
cc:
Subject: car reservation for jeff dasovich
pls review to see if this will work for you.........!
---------------------- Forwarded by Joseph Alamo/NA/Enron on 06/01/2001 10:57
AM ---------------------------
Cynthia Biggs <[email protected]> on 06/01/2001 10:49:33 AM
To: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: car reservation for jeff dasovich
AGENT CB/CB BOOKING REF YYSCQM
DASOVICH/JEFF
ENRON CORP
101 CALIFORNIA ST STE 1950
ENRON CORP SAN FRANCISCO CA 94111
CAR RES ONLYH
DATE: JUN 01 2001
CAR 04JUN HERTZ SAN F CA
05JUN CONFIRMATION: B4752A11825
FULL 4-DOOR CAR AUTOMATIC AIR
RATE: USD53.99- .00 UNL DY 27.00- UNL XH
RATE GUARANTEED
PICK-UP: 433 MASON STREET, SAN FRANCISCO
DROP-OFF: 433 MASON STREET, SAN FRANCISCO
SCO
MISCELLANEOUS 03OCT HOUSTON TX
WED ** THANK YOU FOR USING THE TAP **
DASOVICH/JEFF S0C0011R1000
ALL FARES ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE UNTIL TICKETED/PURCHASED
=====================================
|
2,390 |
Subject: re-restructuring: energy/communication industry convergence
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/79.
=====================================
Yes, please forward along. Kathleen and Thom, Don Schultz is, and has been
for about two decades, a rather earnest and tenacious crusader for DSM. Very
detail-oriented sort of fellow. Works for the California Commission's
"Division of Ratepayer Advocates." Just a heads up.
Best,
Jeff
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES on 08/31/2000 10:05
AM ---------------------------
Elizabeth Linnell@ENRON
08/29/2000 10:11 AM
Sent by: Elizabeth Linnell@ENRON
To: Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: re-restructuring: energy/communication industry convergence
See the attached message received through www.enron.com. I don't see
anything in the articles I opened that reference anything to do with New
Power Company. Shall I forward this to Kathleen or Thom as well?
---------------------- Forwarded by Elizabeth Linnell/NA/Enron on 08/29/2000
10:10 AM ---------------------------
"Don Schultz" <[email protected]> on 08/26/2000 09:02:31 PM
To: <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: re-restructuring: energy/communication industry convergence
I would like to establish contact (phone and email) with a former colleague
of mine, Jeff Dasovich. I have specific questions related to Enron/New
Power capabilities for providing total bill (gas and electricity) reduction
and rate stabilization (gas and electric) services that include the
installation of current generation of "micro-power" technologies. The
specifics of my querie and request for additional information, are based on
the information and products/services identified in the attached documents.
=====================================
|
2,391 |
Subject: RE: Rescheduling California Call
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent_items/240.
=====================================
Thanks. My apologies, Melinda. I will remember. Bear with me. Lots of new names associated with California these days.
Best,
Jeff
-----Original Message-----
From: Thome, Jennifer
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 2:43 PM
To: Dasovich, Jeff
Cc: Pharms, Melinda
Subject: RE: Rescheduling California Call
Jeff:
Melinda Pharms, who has primarily worked with Becky Cantrell in the past, has been joining our calls. I already forwarded to her the message about the rescheduled call.
Jennifer
-----Original Message-----
From: Dasovich, Jeff
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 2:36 PM
To: Thome, Jennifer
Subject: RE: Rescheduling California Call
Could you please refresh my memory of the other person in the group who's working on California? Thanks a bunch.
Best,
Jeff
-----Original Message-----
From: Thome, Jennifer
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 2:31 PM
To: Dasovich, Jeff
Subject: RE: Rescheduling California Call
Jeff:
Works for me. Thanks, Jennifer
-----Original Message-----
From: Dasovich, Jeff
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 2:09 PM
To: Shapiro, Richard; Steffes, James D.; Mara, Susan; Kaufman, Paul; Scott Govenar (E-mail); '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; Denne, Karen; Kingerski, Harry; Thome, Jennifer; Lawner, Leslie
Subject: Rescheduling California Call
For this week, we'd like to cancel both the Tuesday and Thursday calls and instead reschedule to Wednesday at 9 AM PDT (11 AM CDT). We'll try to use the same call-in number. Scott, could you let Ken know of the plan?
Please let me know if this change presents a problem for anyone.
Best,
Jeff
=====================================
|
2,392 |
Subject: CSU Fresno 115kV Substation Status
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/326.
=====================================
Team
Listed below is a brief description on the status for the Project.
? EIP Associates is currently working on the CEQA Initial Draft Study. The
draft will be complete on February 11th, 2000. At this point it will be in
our hands for review and comment. I have scheduled for our review period to
take no longer than one week. So please be prepared, the Study will be
coming to you on February 14th. I want to get this Study out to public
review ASAP!
? EES will be sending out an Request for Proposal (RFP) to three contractors
this week to obtain costs to compare to the PG&E numbers received in their
Detailed Study. The RFP will contain various sketches and documents
detailing the following scopes of work. The overbuilding of the existing
12kV line to accommodate a 115kV circuit from the PG&E Herndon - Bullard Sub.
to the new CSUF Sub. The installation of an underground 115kV circuit from
the PG&E Herndon - Bullard Sub. to the new CSUF Sub. The yard work at the
PG&E Herndon - Bullard Sub.
? Developing a strategy for the upcoming meeting with PG&E to go over the
Detailed Study. I am shooting for this meeting to take place during the last
week of February. I will be working with all of you in the mean time to make
sure all bases are covered and that a correct, thorough agenda is developed.
I hope this gives everyone an idea of where we stand. Feel free to call or
respond back with any questions or comments.
Rob Cone
Project Manager
Enron Energy Services
12647 Alcosta Blvd., Suite 500
San Ramon, CA 94583
Ph:925.543.3701, Fax:925.543.3550
Pager:888.397.5826
=====================================
|
2,393 |
Subject: Strategy
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', 'Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES', 'James D Steffes/HOU/EES@EES', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/295.
=====================================
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES on 09/15/2000 07:00
PM ---------------------------
Paul Kaufman@ECT
09/06/2000 07:16 PM
To: Sandra McCubbin/SFO/EES@EES, Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES
cc: James D Steffes/HOU/EES@EES, Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: Strategy
I'd like us to take a stab at drafting the California strategy so we can
present initial thoughts at the meeting I'm hoping to set up next Wednesday
in D.C. (Discussed under separate e-mail). To that end, I suggest the
following outline for the strategy:
What are our specific business interests in California? Let's be as specific
as possible, but limit the list to "hot buttons." In this regard, Jim
Steffes identified "the imposition of price caps in the summer of 2001" as
the hot button. Are there others?
What are the forums we expect will affect our business interests?
For each forum, how do we want to posture Enron? Do we want to be the most
aggressive company? Do we want to act alone? Do we want to work only in
coalitions? What about IEP? What will motivate us to act independently?
What is our overall strategy? Do we want to go back to our pre-1999
rhetoric? We can scream louder than anyone else that California didn't do it
right.. Peace will be gone ... should we breach Steve K.'s promise to play
nice? Do we want to tear down AB 1890 or shore it up?
Forum-by-forum identify our: (a) goals; (b) strategy; (c) what we (Enron)
want out of the forum. For example, re: the legislature, do we want to
identify legislation that we will seek affirmatively? If not, why not?
=====================================
|
2,394 |
Subject: SDG&E Merger Credits
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/1834.
=====================================
We have looked into the issue of whether Enron should be able to keep the
merger credits or whether they must be passed through to the customer.
The Commission decision (D. 98-03-073) which approved the merger and
directed SDG&E and SoCalGas to share the merger savings with "each" of their
customers through annual bill credits does not directly mention direct
access customers or how (or if) those credits must be passed through to DA
customers by their ESP. The intent of the Commission's directive appears to
be that all of SDG&E's and SoCalGas' customers share in the savings.
In the advice letter filed by SDG&E to implement the credits, it states,
with respect to residential customers, that they will receive a fixed amount
"per active meter". An active meter is defined as that receiving service on
the day a one-time scan of the customer data base is performed. With
respect to non-residential, the bill credit is based on billed them and Kwh
usage. SDG&E states very specifically with respect to non-residentials that
"a customer's bill credit will not be affected should the customer opt for
direct access."
Given the ambiguity in the Commission's decision, and the fact that SDG&E
made no specific directive with respect to how the credit should be handled
for residential DA customers, an argument could be made that the ESP should
be allowed to keep the credit. However, given the current political
environment down in San Diego, we do not believe that keeping the credit,
rather than passing it through to the residential consumers, is in the long
term interest of Enron.
Jeanne Bennett
=====================================
|
2,395 |
Subject: Re: DRAFT Talking Points for Cal Energy Markets Talk
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/1298.
=====================================
Message points are fine. Here's a point or two more:
It doesn't make sense to return resource construction and procurement to
utilities.
Resources owned by the utility stay in the utility's rate base (and,
accordingly, in rates) well beyond the time in which market prices drop and
cheaper alternatives exist.
The empircal evidence is unequivocal. Stranded costs were paid for by
California consumers because the resources utilities had in their rate base
were above market prices. SDG&E consumers paid ____ dollars; PG&E ____
dollars to date, etc.
If merchant plants are built, the merchant plant's owners take the risk of
dropping market prices, not the utility's ratepayers.
Mid-west also experienced price spikes. However,
Market responded with resource construction.
Prices dropped through the floor.
Note: Tim Heizenreider provided tons of articles to me on this point. We've
not used it very much and I don't know why. You may want to check with Jim
Steffes. Also note that the spikes were much more pronounced than we're
seeing in California--possibly due to the reliance on spot markets.
From: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON on 10/31/2000 11:28 AM CST
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON
To: Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J
Mara/SFO/EES@EES, Mona L Petrochko/NA/Enron@Enron, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: DRAFT Talking Points for Cal Energy Markets Talk
Attached for your review are draft talking points for the Cal Energy Markets
conference I'm speaking at on Thursday in SF. All comments, suggestions,
etc. are appreciated. Thanks.
=====================================
|
2,396 |
Subject: nan
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/503.
=====================================
Dear E204-1 and E204-2 students,
I have attached the simulation files from lecture on the past
Wednesday/Thursday. There are three Haasville attachments
--the blank one has no assumption cells (for you to work with),
the 'A" has the simulation for Problem 1, and the 'AB' has the
simulation for both technologies (problems 2 and 3).
We will start project management next week followed by
inventory management.
For the discussion session on April 22 (Saturday),
Elizabeth Joy will plan to (see below) review simulation techniques
with you and any of the class examples (as attached),
and offer help on prior work in linear/non-linear programming
and Team Assignment problems you may have had. PLEASE
send Elizabeth an e-mail if you plan to attend so she can have an
idea of the total number for any photocopying. IF NO ONE
indicates that they are planning to come this weekend
(if she doesn't receive an e-mail by Friday, 6 PM, she may
not hold the session). If the session is not held, you can
send e-mail questions instead ([email protected])
during this period. We are assuming that some of you
will want to attend a review session, but if not, then I don't
want Elizabeth to come here and find an empty classroom.
--Tom McCullough
- E204_HaasvilleA(Blank)_sim.xls
- E204_HaasvilleA_sim.xls
- E204_HaasvilleAB_sim.xls
- E204_Airline_Overbooking_sim-2.xls
=======================================================================
Tom McCullough
Senior Lecturer
Haas School of Business
University of California at Berkeley
==========================================================================
=====================================
|
2,397 |
Subject: We beat the blackouts so far - how did your company do it?
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/deleted_items/357.
=====================================
Energy Committee Members & Liaison Representatives:
When we began our endeavor on energy more than a year ago we presented to
our Board of Directors a commitment to reduce our energy consumption by 10%,
an expression of our dedication to the Silicon Valley during its energy
crisis. Furthermore, the SVMG and a number of individual member companies
also signed on to the Energy Conservation Declaration of Action, increasing
our commitment to conserve.
In an attempt to assess our efforts on energy conservation, and to present
them to Carl Guardino and our Board of Directors, we are asking that you
provide to the SVMG a very brief (one paragraph) quantitative summary of
your company's energy efficiency results over the past year. This is your
opportunity to be recognized for all the hard work you have done to help
California survive its energy crisis.
We are interested in the following information:
-Adjusted for weather differences, how much less energy did your
organization use this year vs. last year
-What measures did you take to achieve this reduction (be specific)
-Tell us of any unique or cutting edge approaches or technologies you have
used
-What are the greatest obstacles and frustrations you have encountered
during this process
We are hoping to receive at least 20 responses from our 190 member
companies. Many of you are already aware of how well you have done and are
ready to share your success stories with us. We look forward to hearing
them. Please send your summaries to [email protected] by close of business
on Friday, August 10.
Thank you & Best regards,
Justin Bradley
=====================================
|
2,398 |
Subject: Re: Initial memo on California study proposal
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/681.
=====================================
Robert Michaels is proposing a consultant study looking at the California
electricity chaos (see attached). It is roughly a $100,000 study before
printing and distribution costs with a delivery date of December 1. The
study would also involve Ken Malloy's Center for the Advancement of Energy
Markets.
I think Robert would do a good job but raise these issues:
1) This is expensive. It is at consultant rates and is not an academic study
where a think tank can get the professors to do something at less cost
2) Malloy is pretty heavy into this at a cost of $14,400 of about 40% of
Michaels. His NARUC connections are very important, and we would want him on
the popularization side, but this is too much.
3) The study might need a co-author with lots of academic credibility to join
Robert as good as he is.
I'm glad that we have this proposal--it will force us to think about what we
want, who does it, and how it should be distributed. We should also think
about how much industry money we could gather to fund such an effort (it
should be large given the stakes).
Can you provide your impressions so I can get back to Robert?
- Rob
Robert Michaels <[email protected]> on 08/18/2000 03:34:12 PM
Please respond to [email protected]
To: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
cc:
Subject: Initial memo on California study proposal
All --
Here's the memo I said you'd have today, and a preliminary budgeting
sheet. Gimme a call as soon as is reasonably possible.
Thanx,
RM
- 818 Proposal Memo.doc
- 818 Malloy California Report (Michaels).xls
=====================================
|
2,399 |
Subject: FW: Loaning money to a frog
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/884.
=====================================
> A frog goes into a bank and approaches the teller. He can see from her
> >nameplate that the teller's name is Patricia Whack. So he says,
> "Ms.Whack,
> I'd like to get a loan to buy a boat and go on a long vacation."
> Patti looks at the frog in disbelief and asks how much he wants to
> borrow.
> The frog says $30,000. The teller asks his name and the frog says that
> his
> name is Kermit Jagger, his dad is Mick Jagger, and that it's OK, he knows
> the bank manager.
> Patti explains that $30,000 is a substantial amount of money and that he
> will need to secure some collateral against the loan. She asks if he has
> anything he can use as collateral.
> The frog says, "Sure. I have this," and produces a tiny pink porcelain
> elephant, about half an inch tall. Bright pink and perfectly formed.
> Very confused, Patti explains that she'll have to consult with the
> manager
> and disappears into a back office. She finds the manager and says:
> "There's a frog called Kermit Jagger out there who claims to know you and
> wants to borrow $30,000, and he wants to use this as collateral."
> She holds up the tiny pink elephant. "I mean, what the heck is this?"
>
> (Are you ready???)
>
>
> (You're gonna hate me!)
>
>
>
>
>
> "The bank manager looks back at her and says:
> "It's a knick knack, Patti Whack. Give the frog a loan. His old man's a
> Rolling Stone.
>
> Carolyn Roberts, MSN, RN, CNP??? <[email protected]>
> College of Santa Fe Health Service
> 1600 St. Michaels Drive
> Santa Fe, NM 87505-7634
> "You must have chaos to give birth to a dancing star!"
>
>
=====================================
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.