dataset_id
int64 0
5.47k
| email_body
stringlengths 800
9.73k
|
|---|---|
2,500 |
Subject: Re: California Update--09.13.01--3:15 PM
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/deleted_items/1718.
=====================================
please add mike d smith and kelly higgason to your distribution list.
From:=09Jeff Dasovich/ENRON@enronXgate on 09/13/2001 05:19 PM
To:=09Steven J Kean/ENRON@enronXgate, Harry Kingerski/ENRON@enronXgate, Tim=
Belden/ENRON@enronXgate, Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES, Jeremy Blachman/HOU/EES@=
EES, Alan Comnes/ENRON@enronXgate, Michael Tribolet/ENRON@enronXgate, Krist=
in Walsh/ENRON@enronXgate, David W Delainey/HOU/EES@EES, Dan Leff/HOU/EES@E=
ES, Lamar Frazier/HOU/EES@EES, Kevin Keeney/HOU/EES@EES, Jeremy Blachman/HO=
U/EES@EES, Scott Gahn/HOU/EES@EES, Tim Belden/ENRON@enronXgate, Stephen Swa=
in/ENRON@enronXgate, John J Lavorato/ENRON@enronXgate, Paul Kaufman/ENRON@e=
nronXgate, James D Steffes/ENRON@enronXgate, Christopher F Calger/ENRON@enr=
onXgate, Susan J Mara/ENRON@enronXgate, Don Black/ENRON@enronXgate, Jeff Ri=
chter/ENRON@enronXgate, Louise Kitchen/ENRON@enronXgate, Janet Dietrich/HOU=
/EES@EES, Susan J Mara/ENRON@enronXgate, Linda Robertson/ENRON@enronXgate, =
Harry Kingerski/ENRON@enronXgate, Karen Denne/ENRON@enronXgate, Mark Palmer=
/ENRON@enronXgate, Richard Shapiro/ENRON@enronXgate, Wanda Curry/ENRON@enro=
nXgate, Lisa Mellencamp/ENRON@enronXgate
cc:=09=20
Subject:=09California Update--09.13.01--3:15 PM
?=09DWR filed comments with the California PUC today urging the Commission =
to adopt a July 1 suspension date.
?=09In addition, DWR takes the position that, if the Commission does not en=
act a July 1 retroactive suspension date, the Commission should require tha=
t all customers who went DA after July 1 pay a proportionate share of the b=
onds and DWR going-forward contracts.
?=09Customers and providers will strongly oppose DWR's proposal at the PUC.
Best,
Jeff
=====================================
|
2,501 |
Subject: RE: RE: Home Depot Question
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/8847.
=====================================
I am going to Berkeley right now to pick up the case, so I could talk about
it potentially tonight or tomorrow night.? I usually have class on Tuesday,
but I am not going to go tomorrow.? Let me know what works for everyone.? I
would prefer discussing via conference call if possible.
[Carolyn Vavrek]?
?
?-----Original Message-----
From: Anil Sama [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Sunday, February 04, 2001 7:48 PM
To: Mark Guinney; Vavrek; Carolyn (US - San Francisco);
[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Re:RE: Home Depot Question
Hi Team,
I was in class all day yesterday, and could not bear to be indoors on?yet
another awesome day!! Purnima and I spend all day hiking. So - I have
not read the Home Depot case yet - and am only just starting on it :-(?
Good thing we don't have a case to prepare for Tiffany's class Wed!
Let's get an email dialog going once we get Mark's spreadsheets?
I'd also be up for?a meeting/conf call late Mon/Tue eve to do the writeup.
-Anil
? Mark Guinney <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi Carolyn. I'm running the numbers and the rest of you, team, are
responsible
for the strategy and interpretation of the numbers for case 2. Case 1 was
fine.
I have a few questions for our beloved professor and when she responds I'll
e-mail out my spreadsheet models.
**********************************************
Mark D. Guinney, CFA
Consultant
Watson Wyatt Investment Consulting
345 California Street, Ste. 1400
San Francisco, CA 94104
(415) 733-4487 ph.
(415) 733-4190 fax
Do You Yahoo!?
- Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail Personal Address - only
$35 a year!
=====================================
|
2,502 |
Subject: IEP Comments on CAISO Amendment No. 31: Extension of Price Cap
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/1611.
=====================================
Recently, the CAISO filed Amendment 31 to its tariff.? Amendment 31 asks
FERC to grant authority to the CAISO to remove the existing sunset date for
its purchase price cap authority, thereby essentially granting to the CAISO
the authority to set the price cap and determine its duration.? Attached is
a memo from Ellison & Schneider which addresses the amendment.
?
While IEP does not believe that contesting the authority of the CAISO to
impose price caps makes sense, we have concerns that the CAISO Amendment 31
fails to provide any transparent, objective critieria for determining if,
when, and where purchaser price caps would be removed.? This concern is one
we have raised orally and in writing to the CAISO as part of its Congestion
Reform/Market Redesign Project.? As noted in the Ellison & Schneider memo,
this is an important issue which needs to be addressed in order to provide a
"roadmap" to market participants as to if, when, and where price cap
authority may be removed.
?
As we noted in our previous email related to CAISO Amendment #30, IEP's
Restructuring/Transmission Special Fund is essentially depleted.? We are
interested in determining whether the membership wishes us to proceed with
developing comments on CAISO Amendment #31 addressing the points raised in
the Ellison & Schneider memo.? Equally important, we are interested in
determining whether sufficient funding support exists to accomplish this
outcome.? Responses to the CAISO Amendment #31 filing are due October 2.
?
If you are interested in funding IEP's effort in this regard, please let me
know by responding to this email ASAP.? Thanks.
- 000920_IEP_mmo_CAISO_Amnd_31.doc
=====================================
|
2,503 |
Subject: FW: 3/20 field update from Ian, Kevin, David H., James B.
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/10263.
=====================================
Here's the update from the Enron meeting. Let's talk when I get back from
Chicago. Will you be around Thursday night?
Cameron Sellers
Vice President, Business Development
PERFECT
1860 Embarcadero Road - Suite 210
Palo Alto, CA 94303
[email protected]
650.798.3366 (direct dial)
650.269.3366 (cell)
650.858.1095 (fax)
-----Original Message-----
From: Ian Sullivan
Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2001 8:47 PM
To: A - All
Subject: 3/20 field update from Ian, Kevin, David H., James B.
*
ENRON
* Summary - outstanding meeting with a world-class F500 company, these
people understand Strategic Sourcing, there are multiple opportunities
within this account, nice work by David Young to get us in front of the
right people
* Derryl's group (50 people) handles Strategic Sourcing (SS) across 8 major
spend categories for the company (IT/Telco, Pipes/Valves/Fittings, Admin
Svcs, Travel & Entertainment, etc...)
* They currently run a very sophisticated, off-line SS process but... have
ZERO tools to manage this process on-line and are desperate for better
information pre and post sourcing events
* Their SS process is slow (the target for each sourcing event is 90 days,
although many run beyond this) and they are frustrated by the lack of
information available from their SAP system
* Our solution was a direct hit with their needs - the marriage of Perfect
Buyer/Supplier to speed up their req2select process was compelling, the PPD
was a hit (as usual), and Perfect Insight will be huge win for them
* Next steps - they want us to come back and show the product with some of
their info (custom demo), we will also hit other areas of the company
identified in the mtg as potential users of our solution
=====================================
|
2,504 |
Subject: FW: no bull?
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/625.
=====================================
Two sisters, one blonde and one brunette, inherit the family ranch.
Unfortunately, after just a few years, they are in financial trouble.
In order to keep the bank from repossessing the ranch, they need to
purchase a bull so that they can breed their own stock. The brunette balances
their checkbook, then takes their last $600 dollars out west to another
ranch where a man has a prize bull for sale.
Upon leaving, she tells her sister, "When I get there, if I decide
to buy the bull, I'll contact you to drive out after me and haul it home."
The brunette arrives at the man's ranch, inspects the bull, and decides
she does want to buy it. The man tells her that he can sell it for $599,
no less. After paying him, she drives to the nearest town to send her
sister a telegram to tell her the news.
She walks into the telegraph office, and says, "I want to send a
telegram to my sister telling her that I've bought a bull for our ranch. I
need her to hitch the trailer to our pick-up truck and drive out here so we
can haul it home."
The telegraph operator explains that he'll be glad to help her,
then adds, It's just 99 cents a word."
Well, after paying for the bull, the brunette only has $1 left. She
realizes that she'll only be able to send her sister one word.
After thinking for a few minutes, she nods, and says, "I want you to send
her the word, 'comfortable'."
The telegraph operator shakes his head. "How is she ever going to know that
you want her to hitch the trailer to your pick-up truck and drive out
here to haul that bull back to your ranch if you send her the word,
'comfortable'?"
The brunette explains, "My sister's a blonde. She'll read it slow."
=====================================
|
2,505 |
Subject: Re: Interconnection Benefits
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/4868.
=====================================
Alan,
Sorry I was slow getting to this today. I think your changes are good
improvements. I am fine with this basis.
Steve
Alan Comnes
03/19/2001 12:13 AM
To: Steve Walton/HOU/ECT
cc: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Re: Interconnection Benefits
Please read the attached. If OK, I would like to forward to Tim on Monday.
I revised Steve's statement of how to measure benefits. As I read it, it
seem cleaner to measure benefits accross interfaces (PNW-CA; DSW-CA) rather
than for each region seperately.
If you do it my way, price actually falls out of the equation and you
estimate benefits simply by measuring flow times incremental production costs
on both sides of the interface. (That being said, I also propose measuring
economic benefit of trade using basis differentials rather than estimated
costs. Thoughts on which approach is better are welcome).
Steve Walton
03/07/2001 09:45 AM
To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Interconnection Benefits
Enclosed is a first cut at a very rough approximation of interchange
benefits. It assumes that the benefit to the exporting parties is a
contribution to their fixed costs of capacity of base load plants already
built equal to the difference between the sale price and the cost of fuel
(estimated from gas combined cycle operation). The tricky part is trying to
unravel exports from the Southwest from the ownership shares of California
parties. The gain to California is (1) the capital savings of added peaking
plants and (2) the variable cost savings from not operating high heat rate
units.
=====================================
|
2,506 |
Subject: FW: Creating Communities on the Web / Venture Capital vs. Corporate
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/4316.
=====================================
Sorry for the late notice - but if you're free and interested, please send
an email directly to Luiscarlos Paez at [email protected]. He has
reserved 10 tickets for Haas students to attend:
12 Steps to Building Community & Venture Capital vs. Corporate Investment
December 6th, 2000
7:00 PM - 9:30 PM
Startup University
72 Otis Street
San Francisco, CA 94103
(1 block from Mission & Van Ness)
San Francisco
How can you ensure your clients and customers stick around after the first
wave
of marketing is complete? Create a community. Cynthia Typaldos, Founder of
Real
Communities, will show entrepreneurs essential steps to building enduring
community
into your startup.
Bart Schachter from Blueprint Ventures, will delineate the differences
between
receiving investment from venture capitalists and from corporate investors,
respectively.
For More Info, Visit:
http://StartupUniversity.com/sfbay
NOTE FROM LUISCARLOS:
______________________________________________________________
Christine,
I'd like to extend another invitation to those Haas Students that are
interested. On Dec. 6th, we're having a "live taping" of two startup-focused
presentations, one by the Founder of Real Communities, and an expert on
virtual communities, Cynthia Typaldos. Our other speaker is the founding
General Partner of Blueprint Ventures, located in San Francisco. It is a
good opportunity for Haas students to hear expert views and have a chance to
meet them as well. Simply have students RSVP directly to me. The first ten
to respond will be assured a seat (no registration fee).
Best Regards,
Luiscarlos
[email protected]
Program Manager
Startup University
__________________________________
=====================================
|
2,507 |
Subject: Good quote on supply demand
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/4739.
=====================================
Good quick stats on demand
F. What Caused the Electricity Price Increases in California?
The simplistic story of why California=01,s electricity prices skyrocketed =
over=20
the past year is that demand for electricity had grown equal to, and even=
=20
beyond, the supplies of electricity available in the state. Between 1996 an=
d=20
1999, California=01,s electricity demand grew by 5,500 MW (14 percent), eig=
ht=20
times the 672 MW (2 percent) increase in electricity generation capacity=20
added over the same period. Of course, these numbers do not explain why new=
=20
electricity capacity was not added as demand grew, or why demand did not=20
shrink as supplies ran short.
Even detailed studies of the California electricity market oversimplify the=
=20
problem=01*usually highlighting about a half-dozen factors that influence=
=20
prices. In fact, as Figure 2 shows, a tangled web of factors led to price=
=20
increase. The key lesson of this diagram is that simple solutions are not=
=20
possible=01*many different facets have to change for prices to return to no=
rmal=20
levels.
Many of the price influences in Figure 2 (the un-shaded ones) came about du=
e=20
to factors in other markets or natural changes in the economy, and there is=
=20
little that policy makers can do to influence them. But many other price=20
influences (the shaded ones) are shaped, and even created, by state policy=
=20
decisions, most of them part of the restructuring plan. Policy alternatives=
=20
open-ended enough to accommodate the interconnections between factors and=
=20
resilient enough to accommodate changes in some or all factors may be able =
to=20
bring electricity prices back to more normal levels.
=====================================
|
2,508 |
Subject: Re: Meeting 8AM Central Monday
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/11088.
=====================================
The dial-in number is listed below (for Monday, April 16 at 8:00 a.m. (CST).
James D Steffes@ENRON
04/13/2001 01:15 PM
To: Scott Stoness/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Don Black/HOU/EES@EES,
[email protected], Tamara Johnson/HOU/EES@EES, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron,
James W Lewis/HOU/EES@EES, Leslie Lawner/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: Re: Meeting 8AM Central Monday
Scott --
Can your assistant get a call in # for those in CA?
Jim
Scott Stoness@EES
04/13/2001 12:00 PM
To: Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Don Black/HOU/EES@EES, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@ENRON, [email protected]@ENRON, Tamara Johnson/HOU/EES@EES,
Jeff Dasovich/Na/Enron@ENRON, James W Lewis/HOU/EES@EES, Leslie
Lawner/HOU/EES@EES, Leslie Lawner/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Meeting 8AM Central Monday
We have agreed on a strategy, subject to Whaley/Delaney approval, to:
Scott Stoness submit testimony today advocating 2 part real time pricing in CA
Read other parties testimony this weekend from the perspective "Has somebody
filed testimony close enough to Stoness testimony, that we can cross examine
and brief to a favorable outcome?"
Meet on Monday at 8AM to decide whether to rescind Stoness's testimony.
The following dial in number and code corresponds to the Monday 8AM Central
Time meeting.
1 800 713 8600
68266 is PIN
Scott Stoness is host
Action Items:
All on To list above read and have opinion on 2 and 3 above
All on To list above meet on Monday at 8AM. Meet in Stoness office if
possible.
Harry and Jeane polish Stoness testimony and wait to the last minute before
submitting it
Jeane ensure all on this To list get a copy of testimony, emailed as soon as
she gets it.
Scott Stoness
=====================================
|
2,509 |
Subject: Update on Electricity Restructuring Legislation
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/70.
=====================================
---------------------- Forwarded by Ginger Dernehl/HOU/EES on 10/11/99 01:01
PM ---------------------------
Allison Navin@ENRON
10/11/99 10:59 AM
To: Ginger Dernehl/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Update on Electricity Restructuring Legislation
Ginger - please forward to the folks in Rick's group. Many thanks.
Here's an update on the recent developments on electricity restructuring
legislation in the House and Senate. Two legislative mark-up vehicles have
been unveiled, HR 2944 and a Senate bill sponsored by Senator Murkowski that
has yet to be formally introduced. On Tuesday and Wednesday of last week,
the Energy and Power subcommittee held the legislative hearings on
Congressman Barton's bill, HR 2944. Betsy Moler testified on behalf of AAE
and her testimony is attached, along with a one page summary, and a copy of
our proposed amendment submitted to the subcommittee. We support the Barton
bill, if and ONLY if, this amendment is incorporated. Currently, the outlook
is very positive that the amendment will be adopted and the legislation will
move forward for full House consideration. We need your support to contact
state advocates in order to get them to support this amendment.
The second piece of electricity legislation was released last Thursday and
the draft legislative language is attached.
We feel very positive that we can pass electricity legislation this Congress
(ie. next year). We see the critical pitfall as subcommittee action, but
remain confident that enactment is possible. We will be sure to keep you
updated on any developments as they occur and appreciate your continued hard
work in the states to help push federal legislation.
Thanks.
=====================================
|
2,510 |
Subject: Re: Expediting Your Expense Report
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/28139.
=====================================
Go ahead without the gas, unless you can get into my American Express account
and find out what those numbers are. Thanks a million.
Best,
Jeff
Joseph Alamo
06/25/2001 07:10 PM
To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron
cc:
Subject: Expediting Your Expense Report
Jeff -
FYI: due to a change [again] in the system for Expense Reporting, *must*
have submitted your
current Report by Wednesday, the 27th. Otherwise, will have to start over in
the "new" system, however that
will be unavailable until Monday, July 2nd ...or so I understand.
Except for whatever you incurred today, I'm current with your receipts
*except*
whatever you spent on gas with your last (6/18 - 6/21) rental car (you noted
it but neither indicated amount(s)
nor supplied receipts!).
Thanks,
Joseph
---------------------- Forwarded by Joseph Alamo/NA/Enron on 06/25/2001 05:13
PM ---------------------------
From: Integrated Solutions Center 06/22/2001 03:30
PM
Sent by: Enron Announcements
To: All XMS Users
cc:
Subject: Reminder to All XMS Users - Upgrade Information - Please Read!!
Concur Expense (XMS) Upgrade!
With the upgrade of Concur Expense going live on Monday, July 2, this is a
reminder to have all of your open expense reports
submitted and approved in the current XMS system by this Wednesday, June 27.
Logon instructions for the new Concur Expense system will be delivered via
email to everyone on Friday, June 29th.
To review the Transition Schedule, please click on the following link:
http://isc.enron.com/site/XMSchange.htm
If you have any other questions about the new upgrade, please contact the ISC
Call Center at 713-345-4727.
=====================================
|
2,511 |
Subject: Two New Electives
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/1662.
=====================================
Hi Everyone,
I'm pleased to announce that we have two new electives to offer next
semester, as described below. Please note that TJ will be sending you your
class schedules via e-mail on Wednesday and that you have until Monday,
November 20 at noon to adjust your schedules by responding back to TJ via
e-mail (NOT TeleBEARS). Please keep these two courses in mind as you
consider your schedule adjustments.
REMEMBER! The second round of pre-registration is not done on TeleBEARS -
it's done via e-mail to TJ.
(1) E296-10, Pricing (3 units; Thursdays 6:00 - 9:30 pm). This course will
be taught by Scott Davis (Stanford PhD; faculty member at Washington
University and UC Davis; currently is a Principal at Strategic Marketing
Decisions in Sacramento). The objective of this course is to deepen your
understanding of pricing issues faced by organizations and to develop pricing
strategies that will be used to increase profitability. More information is
available in the attachments. I think this is going to be a great course -
Scott has great experience and has won the Outstanding Teacher award in the
EvMBA Program at Washington University.
(2) E296-9, Managing Innovation and Change (3 units; Tuesdays, 6:00 - 9:30
pm;). This course will be taught by David Palmer (Claremont [Drucker School
of Mgmt] Ph.D., Wharton MBA; instructor at Santa Clara University; currently
Partner at Customer Manufacturing Group in Santa Clara). This course will
explore the organizational structures and management processes that
facilitate or impede innovation. Class requirements will include a major
case project. I believe that this course, too, will be excellent.
Cheers,
Diane
=====================================
|
2,512 |
Subject: LNG---California Interstate Pipelines
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/4217.
=====================================
FYI. Looks like this is moving along. I'll get this folks what they need
and let you know how it's going.
Best,
Jeff
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 04/20/2001 03:48 PM -----
Kurt Lindahl@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
04/19/2001 01:13 PM
To: Jeff Dasovich@EES
cc: Michael McGarry/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
Subject: California Interstate Pipelines
Jeff,
My name is Kurt Lindahl. I recently joined Enron Global Markets on the LNG
team. I'm the Lead Developer for the West Coast and have been charged with
building a (several) LNG terminal(s) on the west coast. Michael McGarry,
from Enron Engineering and Operational Services Company, is the lead
Development Engineer on the project.
A key question in this effort is, "Where is the best entry point into the
Socal/SG&E/PG&E pipeline systems. In other words, where can we site a LNG
terminal and deliver natural gas into their systems, such that the amount of
facilities they require is minimal? I spoke with Ben Asante who heads up the
optimization department in ETS. He said that if we could get annual flow
diagrams for the California intrastate systems, he could prepare a model in
about 2 weeks time. Interstate pipelines have to file Annual Flow Diagrams
at FERC, but I'm not sure what Intrastates' are obligated to file with the
CPUC? That's where I need your help. This is a hot subject, because the
race to site an LNG terminal is intense.
Could you please call me at 713 345 5044 (O) or 713 515 2759 so that we can
discuss. We want to keep this effort very confidential, so please maintain
secrecy.
I will also want to talk to you about permitting and state approvals.
Regards,
Kurt Lindahl
=====================================
|
2,513 |
Subject: Valuation of GA Activities
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/297.
=====================================
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES on 09/15/2000 07:23
PM ---------------------------
Jeff Dasovich
09/08/2000 06:44 PM
Sent by: Joseph Alamo
To: Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Susan J Mara/SFO/EES@EES, Mona L
Petrochko/SFO/EES@EES, Sandra McCubbin/SFO/EES@EES, John
Neslage/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Gia
Maisashvili/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:
Subject: Valuation of GA Activities
John/Gia:
You asked that we attempt to evaluate our activities. Working with TW, I've
valued this one.
The California Commission ruled that the "Hector Road" natural gas recent
point in California ought to be made a primary receipt point. This would
have had the effect of TW losing access right to 200 MMcf/d of capacity at
SoCalGas' Needles receipt point.
Best case scenario: Under SFV rates, loss to TW is commodity rates (wash)
and the fuel margin. TW calculates the fuel margin to be $5.8MM/yr.
Bad case: If shippers on TW try to make the case that TW is at fault for
losing the primary access rights, then TW is at risk for the demand component
of the contracts associated with the 200 MMcf/d. TW calculates the demand
charges loss to be $16.5 MM/yr.
Worse case: In addition to actual damages listed above, shippers face
performance penalties and other contractual damages (from their customers)
and they try to pass those costs on to TW.
In discussions with TW, we concluded that the most likely case fell between
"best" and "bad," somewhere in the $12-15MM/yr range (nominal).
TW believes that without the assistance of CA Gov't Affairs in the case, the
$12-15 MM/yr would have been lost.
Be happy to discuss with you further.
Best,
Jeff
=====================================
|
2,514 |
Subject: Changes to DA bill
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/10502.
=====================================
Highlights of AB21X that passed the AB and new Bowen version:
AB 21X contained: Changes in new Bowen SB 27
before effective date, customer can go DA without limitation but only if
customer was not purchasing from utility after Jan 17. Exit fee may apply if
customer was purchasing from utility after Jan 17
existing DA can stay DA
after effective date, customer can go DA upon payment of exit fee based on
DWR's unavoidable costs
after effective date, customer can go DA w/o exit fee if using self-gen or
cogen and with 180 days advance notice DELETE
re-entry fee applies for return to bundled service from DA, unless 12 months
advance notice is given opportunity to avoid with 12 months advance notice is
deleted
portion of the customer's load served by utility is not limited from going DA
under this bill DELETE
load growth may be used to allow residential and small commercial to go DA
w/o exit fee DELETE
Commission notifies customers of their choices within 30 days of effective
date 90 days
The first point is the most critical. It exposes customers to exit fees if
they go DA before the effective date. If we can argue to the DWR that no
costs were really incurred by them - in fact, their burden was relieved by
load going DA - this problem goes away. Better to clarify in the legislation
if we can. Other than that, a couple of the Christmas tree ornaments have
been taken off. (These were nice, but, let's be realistic).
Seems to me this is still a pretty good bill! (especially if we can clarify
that CPUC's new 3 cent surcharge doesn't apply to DA. ) With either bill, we
still have the issue of how to measure net avoidable DWR costs for exit fee
purposes.
=====================================
|
2,515 |
Subject: Draft Agenda for next TAR&L meeting - Comments welcome
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/3367.
=====================================
FYI.
----- Forwarded by Lara Leibman/Enron Communications on 11/10/00 05:55 PM
-----
Wayne Gardner
11/10/00 04:43 PM
To: Donald Lassere/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Sue
Nord/NA/Enron@Enron, Michelle Hicks/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Cynthia Harkness/Enron Communications@Enron Communications,
Lara Leibman/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Jan
Haizmann/LON/ECT@ECT, Rajen Shah/LON/ECT@ECT, James Ginty/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Derenda Plunkett/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Alisa Christensen/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, David
Merrill/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Robbi Rossi/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications
cc:
Subject: Draft Agenda for next TAR&L meeting - Comments welcome
1. Based on discussions from the 11/8 meeting, step through a specific
US/Japan trading example, specifically determining what the US trading desk
can and cannot do with respect to each piece of the international capacity
segment (see attached file).
2. Review and discuss Dave Merril's note on Korea.
3. Step through a specific US/Korea trading example as in point one above.
4. Time permitting, step through a US/Japan trading example, specifically
determining what a hypothetical Singapore trading desk could and could not do
with respect to each piece of the international capacity segment.
5. Time permitting, determine the best general trading structure for Asia
and highlight specific problem areas that need to be identified with respect
to the structure.
W. Wayne Gardner
Enron Broadband Services
1400 Smith Street
Houston, TX 77002-7361
Phone: 713 853 3547
Fax: 713 646 2532
=====================================
|
2,516 |
Subject: San Diego Rate Freeze/ 3 Cent Surcharge
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/11067.
=====================================
Jennifer;
Just a little more info with regard to the San Diego rate freeze
legislation. SB 43 (the Alpert bill) was signed by the Governor April 6 and
filed with the Secretary of State April 9. The language in the bill provides
that the frozen rate would apply to the energy component of electric bills
for electricity supplied to all customers by SDG&E not subject to the ceiling
imposed by existing law (ie residential, small commercial and street
lighting). Review of that language would imply the rate freeze would not
apply to direct access customers. One caveat however. The CPUC must now
implement the passed legislation through its regulations. While the intent
of the legislation seems clear, the past record of the CPUC in implementing
such legislative acts does not provide 100% assurance that logic will prevail.
As a footnote to the above, AB 43 (Correa - passing the Assembly and Senate
April 5) is a "companion clean-up" bill to SB 43. This bill is almost
identical to SB 43 but reflects some limited technical corrections to SB 43.
To our knowledge, as of yesterday, AB 43 had not been signed by the Governor.
In addition, there have been repeated questions with regard to the
applicability of the 3 cent surcharge to direct access customers.
Unfortunately, the status of its applicability is still up in the air.
Various parties have raised this issue directly with the CPUC and in their
comments with respect to the rate design phase of its implementation and will
be one of the issues to be addressed (though perhaps not answered) next week
in the Commission's rate design hearing.
If you could forward this to the rest of the CA team it would be appreciated.
=====================================
|
2,517 |
Subject: Get Well Card for Graeme White (TEESSIDE POWER STATION)
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/deleted_items/284.
=====================================
Hi Everybody.
Please stop by the front desk between now and next Tues. (8/14) to sign the get well card we will be
sending to Graeme on Tuesday evening.
Thank you,
April
-----Original Message-----
From: Enron Announcements/Corp/Enron@ENRON [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of STEVE ROY- DIRECTOR, HUMAN RESOURCES, TEESSIDE POWER STATION@ENRON
Sent: Friday, August 10, 2001 9:18 AM
To: All Enron Worldwide@ENRON
Subject: UPDATE: TEESSIDE POWER STATION
UPDATE ON GRAEME WHITE
We are pleased to be able to give you a progress report on the condition of Graeme White who was injured in Wednesday's explosion at Teesside Power Station. Graeme has now been moved from the Intensive Care Unit at Middlesbrough General Hospital to Ward 46 - a specialised skincare unit - where he is receiving treatment for burns. He has been able to open his eyes now and is taking food. His condition is still described as "stable".
Please don't send flowers, but cards and messages for Graeme will be welcome. They should be sent to the address below or c/o Julie Webster at Enron's Stockton office who will ensure they are promptly delivered.
Graeme was visited last night by Jeff Skilling and Brian Stanley and they also met members of his family. Other colleagues planning a visit should contact Julie Webster (+44 1642 623004) or Graham Moore (+44 1642 442133) who are coordinating the program.
Address for cards and messages:
Graeme White
Ward 46
Middlesbrough General Hospital
Ayresome Green Lane
Middlesbrough TS5 5AZ
UK
Julie Webster
Enron Power Operations Ltd.,
Merchants Wharf
Westpoint Road
Stockton on Tees
Cleveland TS17 6BF
UK
With thanks,
Steve Roy
=====================================
|
2,518 |
Subject: Conflicts of Interest
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/5664.
=====================================
Jeff
I have never been accused of being subtle. However, someone had to say it
and it is better to say it now than to have it come out later.
Phil
Dear David:
I am writing this note to you and not the committee. I am worried
that too many of the signatories can be accused of trying use their
academic positions to achieve results desired by their consulting clients.
I riase this issue because more than one person has told me that "Paul
Joscow is owned by Edison." While such statements are generally wrong I
believe you need to be sensitive to the potential attack. In particular, I
worry that our efforts will be undermined if too many of the individuals
signing the report have had extensive dealings with the state's three
largest utilities. I can just see the headline "Apologists for utilities
offer solutions to state's energy problems."
You know we will be attacked after we issue the manifesto. The
question is, will the attacks have merit. If we were all white as the
driven snow there would be no problem. However, under such circumstances
we would all be poor.
For this reason it is important to get independent academics and
non-academics with no connections to the utilities or generators to sign
the manifesto. I fall into this later category as, I believe, do a number
of other individuals. The addition of Solow would obviously help as would
Arrow or McFadden. Dale Jorgenson would also be a great addition because
he has never worked or testified for these firms. The same goes for Paul
Krugman. On the other hand, Pual brings some heavy baggage.
I understand it is important to have as many names attached to the
manifesto as possible. However, Paul's name may hurt.
Phil
=====================================
|
2,519 |
Subject: ABX 5 / ABX 6
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/2904.
=====================================
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 01/12/2001 07:40 PM -----
=09Scott Govenar <[email protected]>
=0901/12/2001 01:24 PM
=09=09=20
=09=09 To: Hedy Govenar <[email protected]>, Mike Day <[email protected]>, B=
ev=20
Hansen <[email protected]>, Jeff Dasovich <[email protected]>, Susan J Mara=
=20
<[email protected]>, Joseph Alamo <[email protected]>, Paul Kaufman=20
<[email protected]>, David Parquet <[email protected]>, Marcie=
=20
Milner <[email protected]>, Tim Belden <[email protected]>, Rick Shapiro=
=20
<[email protected]>, Jim Steffes <[email protected]>, Alan Comnes=
=20
<[email protected]>, Chris Calger <[email protected]>, Mary Hain=20
<[email protected]>
=09=09 cc:=20
=09=09 Subject: ABX 5 / ABX 6
ABX 5 and ABX 6 both passed out of the Assembly this morning.
ABX 5 =01) Regarding ISO/PX governance, passed off of the Assembly floor on
a vote of 60-9. All 9 =01&no=018 votes were cast by Republicans. The only
legislator to speak against the bill was Assemblyman Phil Wyman who
objected to the idea of giving Governor Davis the sole authority to
appoint ISO and PX members.
ABX 6 =01) Regarding retention of IOU generation assets, passed off of the
Assembly floor on a vote of 60-10. All 10 =01&no=018 votes were cast by
Republicans. Three legislators spoke against the bill: Assemblyman John
Campbell, who indicated that he could support the bill if it had a
sunset provision, and Assemblyman Sam Aanestad and Assemblyman Rod
Pacheco, both of whom objected to the idea of giving the CPUC more
authority. Assemblyman Aanestad indicated that he does not believe
deregulation is the cause of our current situation, but rather, previous
decisions by the CPUC.
=====================================
|
2,520 |
Subject: Collocation Decision(s) discussed 10/27
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/1327.
=====================================
For your reading pleasure...
----- Forwarded by Sue Nord/NA/Enron on 11/01/2000 01:16 PM -----
Jeremy Meier <[email protected]>
10/29/2000 02:45 PM
To: [email protected]
cc: [email protected]
Subject: Collocation Decision(s) discussed 10/27
Sue:
Attached please find the DC Circuit's federal decision remanding certain
FCC physical collocation rules back to the FCC for reconsideration.
This is the Federal Court of Appeals "advanced services" case Steve
Bowen was discussing on the conference call last Friday re EBS.
The DC Circuit reviewed the FCC's Advanced Services First Report and
Order and affirmed certain aspects of collo (eg cageless, central office
and adjacent collo, and cost recovery). The Court, however, remanded
back to the FCC its rules on physical collocation and cage-to-cage cross
connections (as Steve mentioned). Correct me if I am mistaken, but
apparently EBS/ETI is now facing the hurdle of these uncertain collo
rules in the field.
The FCC has recently reopened the Advanced Services Report and Order per
the DC Cir, has initiated a new proceeding at the FCC (Order on
Reconsideration and Second Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in CC
Docket No. 98-147 and Fifth Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in CC
Docket No. 96-98). Comments at the FCC were filed last month and Reply
Comments on these advanced services collo rules are due in November.
We can send you a (lengthy) copy of the FCC Advanced Services remand
Order on Reconsideration too if you want. Let me know if you have
questions,
Jeremy Meier
Blumenfeld & Cohen
4 Embarcadero Center, Suite 1170
San Francisco, CA 94111
415 394-7500
[email protected]
- advanced services case.doc
=====================================
|
2,521 |
Subject: Accenture offering Practice job interview experience Plus $$$
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/11287.
=====================================
To follow is a message regarding practice interviews offered by Accenture.
THIS IS NOT AN AVENUE TO A JOB WITH ACCENTURE, rather, you're helping the
company to develop their interview process and train their recruiters. So if
you volunteer, please don't put the press on these people . . .
Accenture is looking for seven individuals to serve as experienced practice
interviewees at our San Francisco office on Thursday, May 24th. The session
will be held from 1pm-5pm, and lunch will be served. In addition to earning
$50, participants will be reimbursed for their travel expenses to and from
the session.
Participants will:
Meet with Accenture executives to conduct practice interviews.
Receive feedback from real interviewers.
Get paid $50 plus round trip transportation expenses.
Criteria : Individuals in any master's degree program with a 3.0 GPA and 2+
years of work experience.
Interested students should email resumes to Christina Roemer at
[email protected]. Resumes will be reviewed and potential
participants will be contacted via telephone. Then a confirmation for
participation will be sent via email with specific information regarding
the session.
***NOTE: These interviews are for PRACTICE PURPOSES ONLY and have no
bearing on future interviewing and/or employment opportunities with
Accenture.***
Christina Roemer
Accenture - St. Charles, IL
People Enablement - Training Operations, Conduct & Support
Phone: 1.630.444.5449
VPN: 49/45449
Email: [email protected]
It's a great chance to buff up your skills--
Jenny
Account Representative, MBA Recruiting
Haas School of Business, UC Berkeley
T 510-643-4212
F 510-643-5257
E [email protected]
SanFran Grad.doc
=====================================
|
2,522 |
Subject: Re: Tomorrow's Meeting at the Woodlands
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/1529.
=====================================
Immensely helpful. Thanks so much. That's all I'll need. FYI. My plane
lands at 12:20 and I'll be going directly to the Woodlands. Oh, one thing.
If you could get info to Joseph on where the Woodlands is and where I need to
go once I arrive there, I'd be eternally indebted.
Best,
Jeff
Ginger Dernehl@ENRON
09/18/2000 11:53 AM
To: Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Re: Tomorrow's Meeting at the Woodlands
I am in the process of putting something together right now. It looks like
the meeting will begin tomorrow at 1pm and continue through the evening (if
necessary). Rick has only made arrangements for the one day (Tuesday). I do
not have an agenda, but Rick and Jim have asked that a notebook be put
together with information (e:mails, attachments, etc...) from way back when
to the present. Also, just FYI, I have made arrangements for a deli lunch to
be provided in the room beginning at 12:30pm. (detailed e:mail to follow)
I hope this helps and please call me if you have any questions.
gngr
Jeff Dasovich@EES
09/18/2000 11:18 AM
To: Ginger Dernehl/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Tomorrow's Meeting at the Woodlands
Hi:
Hope you had a nice weekend. Sorry I missed you all in Washington. Rick's
asked me to attend the meeting at the Woodlands tomorrow. Do we have a list
of attendants/agenda? No big deal, but would help me in preparing for the
meeting. I'm assuming that the meeting takes place tomorrow only? I'm
staying through Wednesday, nonetheless, and have booked a room at the
Lancaster. But if the meeting's going to continue through Wed, I was
wondering if I should be staying at the Woodlands. Thanks (as always) for
you help.
Signed,
Clueless
=====================================
|
2,523 |
Subject: Re: Vacation, Sweet Vacation
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/4272.
=====================================
Jeff, it appears everything is alright for you to log into eHRonline to make
your deferral elections. What kind of problem are you having?
Thanks,
Mary
---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Lessor/HR/Corp/Enron on 12/05/2000
08:10 AM ---------------------------
Michelle Hargrave@ECT
12/04/2000 04:19 PM
To: Jeff Dasovich/Na/Enron@ENRON
cc: Mary Lessor/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Re: Vacation, Sweet Vacation
Hello My Favorite Problem Child!! (Just kidding!)
You truly only have 27 hrs remaining. What is confusing is the "entitlement"
piece. What that means that as of 7/1/00 you had 75 hrs remaining when we
moved to SAP. You begain the year with 126 hrs, took 51 hrs prior to 7/1/00
leaving you 75 hrs. After 7/1/00 you took 48 hrs leaving you with 27 hrs as
your balance. Hope this helps!
Mary - can you help Jeff with his deferral enrollment? He apparently does
not have that piece on his eHRonline. He is way out in San Francisco and a
really nice guy - can you help him please???
Regards,
Michelle
From: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON on 12/04/2000 12:51 PM
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON
To: Michelle Hargrave/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Vacation, Sweet Vacation
Hi Michelle:
Guess who? Just went into Ehronline and noticed that under vacation it sez
that I'm entitled to 75 hours of vacation, and that I've used 48 hours,
leaving 27. I think that I'm actually entitled to more than 75 hours.
Please tell me that I am. Thanks very much.
Signed,
Desperately in need of vacation
Also, I clicked on deferral enrollment, and by-golly if I couldn't find the
election form to download. Am I just clueless, or is there another place
that I need to look for it? Thanks a million.
=====================================
|
2,524 |
Subject: APX withdraws proposal for an Adjustment Bid Market in CA
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/10074.
=====================================
I would personally like to thank each of you for your support in exploring
the possibility of an adjustment bid market in CA.
The active participation in our February 21st Conference and the innovative
ideas and suggestions were very helpful. They clarified a viable approach
for action we proposed to the CAISO.
APX proposed the adjustment bid market to the CAISO board meeting on
February 28th. The implications of not moving forward were identified and
your support was extremely helpful in creating momentum for the CAISO to
take action.
In the CAISO board meeting on March 15th, the CAISO staff proposed a
comprehensive proposal for moving forward. That proposal created a day
ahead and hour ahead energy market as well as simultaneously resolving
transmission congestion and potentially ancillary service requirements
through a new commitment and dispatch approach. Although the software
changes and system changes are significant, the CAISO staff feels confident
that this can be accomplished by summer.
With the comprehensive plan, there will be no need for using the existing
CONG software at the CAISO to alleviate congestion among SCs with adjustment
bids.
APX stands ready to cooperate in finding solutions for this summer. We will
focus on the development of forward markets for power. We have the
capability to provide forward markets for transmission if there is
sufficient interest. If you have interest in such markets or other ideas
where APX could provide products of value to you and the market please
contact me.
Thank you for your support.
John Stremel
Vice President
Automated Power Exchange, Inc.
5201 Great America Parkway, Suite 522
Santa Clara, CA
408.517.2120
[email protected]
=====================================
|
2,525 |
Subject: Fw: Comments to Wood ACR
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/399.
=====================================
attached for your review and comment are IEP's Draft Comments on the Wood
ACR. Please provide comments to IEP no later than COB Thursday as these
comments are due to be filed on Friday, Sept. 15.
----- Original Message -----
From: Eric Janssen <[email protected]>
To: 'Steven Kelly' <[email protected]>; 'Katie Kaplan' <[email protected]>
Cc: 'DKK' <[email protected]>; Andy Brown <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2000 1:49 PM
Subject: Comments to Wood ACR
> Steven/Katie: attached is Doug's draft of the Comments to the Wood ACR in
> the Wholesale Market investigation for your and the members' comment.
(This
> is the same document that Doug said he'd have ready for you by tomorrow -
> it's a day early.) FILING DATE IS FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 15. Please call if
you
> have any questions.
> <<Comments to Wood ACR dkk2.doc>>
>
> Eric Janssen
> Ellison Schneider & Harris LLP
> 2015 H Street
> Sacramento, CA 95814
> Phone: (916) 447-2166
> Fax: (916) 447-3512
> mailto:[email protected]
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This communication and any accompanying
document(s)
> are confidential and privileged. They are intended for the sole use of
the
> addressee. If you receive this transmission in error, you are advised
that
> any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of any action in
> reliance upon the communication is strictly prohibited. Moreover, any
such
> inadvertent disclosure shall not compromise or waive the attorney-client
> privilege as to this communication or otherwise. If you have received
this
> communication in error, please contact the sender at the internet address
> indicated or by telephone at (916)447-2166. Thank you.
>
>
- Comments to Wood ACR dkk2.doc
=====================================
|
2,526 |
Subject: FW: Regulatory / Commercial Focus Q3/Q4 2001
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/28838.
=====================================
FYI.
Best,
Jeff
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 07/17/2001 01:24 PM -----
Barry Tycholiz/ENRON@enronXgate
07/17/2001 01:21 PM
To: Jessica Presas/ENRON@enronXgate
cc: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: FW: Regulatory / Commercial Focus Q3/Q4 2001
can you get leslie included in this conference call for thurs a.m.
BT
-----Original Message-----
From: Dasovich, Jeff
Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2001 1:19 PM
To: Tycholiz, Barry
Subject: Re: Regulatory / Commercial Focus Q3/Q4 2001
Sounds good. You can reach me at 415.782.7822. Because my schedule is a
mess (thanks to the mess California has created), if you don't reach me on my
office line, please try 415.505.6633. Also, I think that it would be very
useful to have Leslie Lawner on, since she's involved a lot in California gas
matters, but it's your call. Just let me know.
Best,
Jeff
Barry Tycholiz/ENRON@enronXgate 07/17/2001 08:30 AM To: Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Stephanie Miller/ENRON@enronXgate, Jane M
Tholt/ENRON@enronXgate, Mike Grigsby/ENRON@enronXgate cc: Jessica
Presas/ENRON@enronXgate Subject: Regulatory / Commercial Focus Q3/Q4 2001
Jeff, for the meeting on Thurs a.m. 9:30 ( Houston Time ), we should keep
our group to the list I have identified. I would like to start with a simple
plan and work out from there. We are working towards an action plan for
handling PUC issues ( from a commercial perspective) in california and other
states, prior to anybody addressing the PUC we need agreement as to what it
is we want to put forward.
We will call you on thurs a.m. Can you please verify your contact phone
number.
Thanks in advance.
Jessica, pls reserve a room.
BT
=====================================
|
2,527 |
Subject: RE: you & me & ian
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/11075.
=====================================
I'd love to talk but I never see you. I assume you are doing the big
catholic thing for easter (not). I, of course, will be in San Diego.
Just give me some nights that work for you in the next couple weeks...
Have a good weekend!!
Cameron Sellers
Vice President, Business Development
PERFECT
1860 Embarcadero Road - Suite 210
Palo Alto, CA 94303
[email protected]
650.798.3366 (direct dial)
650.269.3366 (cell)
650.858.1095 (fax)
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2001 4:57 PM
To: Cameron Sellers
Subject: Re: you & me & ian
let's talk and figure out a time. i'm off for school now.
Best,
jeff
Cameron
Sellers To: "'[email protected]'"
<cameron@perf <[email protected]>
ect.com> cc:
Subject: you & me & ian
04/12/2001
05:44 PM
I would love for you to meet our new VP of Professional Services (who is,
incidentally, now for all intents and purposes running our company). I
think you will love him. He is very interested in the idea of working with
Enron and I want you to meet him. Can we set up a dinner for the three of
us sometime in the next couple weeks? I know your schedule is busy with
school, so why don't you tell me a couple nights that work (other than
Mondays) and I will make it work on our end. Please oh please.
Love,
Your Pal Cameron
P.S. Going to Colleen's new (to me) place for some wine tonight. I'll
tell
her hello for you?
Cameron Sellers
Vice President, Business Development
PERFECT
1860 Embarcadero Road - Suite 210
Palo Alto, CA 94303
[email protected]
650.798.3366 (direct dial)
650.269.3366 (cell)
650.858.1095 (fax)
=====================================
|
2,528 |
Subject: Nord Pool
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/8079.
=====================================
This is material that I received re: Nord Pool from Davies (one of
Schroeder's guys). If you want to take a wack at putting together a few
bullets on what Nord Pool is, how it differs from Cal model and why it's
preferable, that would help me immensely and free me up to focus on 1)
comments to Gov's proposal and 2) more detail on demand buy-down. That
possible? Let me know. Greatly appreciated.
Best,
Jeff
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 01/03/2001 09:43 AM -----
Philip Davies@ECT
01/02/2001 10:46 AM
To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Mark Schroeder
Subject: Nord Pool
Jeff,
A couple of presentations attached which give you some quick info comparing
the Nordic market to others, notably UK. The first is a presentation
prepared for our Mexcian colleagues 18 months ago, drawing out key features
and success factors in selected liberalised markets, including Nord Pool.
The second overlaps a little with the first in terms of Nordic content and
compares the NP arrangements to the existing and proposed new UK
arrangements. This one is over 2 years old now. I would urge caution in
using both of them to the extent that they are (particularly the latter) a
little dated now.
One very good non-Enron comparative source (although again not completely up
to date), (sorted by market design issue rather than by market but including
plenty on Nord Pool) can be found at http://www.ofgem.gov.uk/elarch/aback.htm
. Open the document dated Feb 98, comparing trading arrangements in "other
countries" (than UK). This was prepared by the regulator in the early phase
of the redesign of the UK market.
Let us know if you need more help.
Regards
Philip Davies
=====================================
|
2,529 |
Subject: Re: Dunn Subpoena
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent_items/863.
=====================================
you mean communicate the fact that mark views me as wholly expendable? i'm hurt, mark.
best,
jeff
Richard Shapiro 07/05/2001 03:32 PM To: Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron cc: Subject: Dunn Subpoena
Please communicate or distribute as you see fit. Thanks.
---------------------- Forwarded by Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron on 07/05/2001 03:32 PM ---------------------------
From: Mark Palmer on 07/05/2001 02:28 PM
To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Dunn Subpoena
Fighting the kangaroo court actually got us some points with the media. If we can continue without getting anyone (other than Dasovich) thrown in jail, let's fight.
Mark
----- Forwarded by Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron on 07/05/2001 02:27 PM -----
Robert C Williams/ENRON@enronXgate 07/05/2001 02:20 PM To: Mark E Haedicke/Enron@EnronXGate cc: Richard B Sanders/Enron@enronXgate, Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, James Derrick/ENRON@enronXgate Subject: Dunn Subpoena
The Dunn Committee will be taking up the contempt citations again on Tuesday, July 10. We are currently contemplating two actions. First, we intend to offer to produce some documents, most notably the ISO bid data sought (which the Committee already has anyway). Secondly, as we do not expect this voluntary partial production to placate the Committee, we are preparing an action to file in federal court in Sacramento on Monday challenging the subpoena to the extent it seeks to require the production of documents other than those we offered to produce. Robin Gibbs and Mike Kirby are on board with this. Please let me know if would like any additional information about these matters. Thank you.
=====================================
|
2,530 |
Subject: Online Bandwidth Exchanges.
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/eci/136.
=====================================
Umer Saeed
01/16/01 02:21 PM
To: EBS Sales Engineering@Enron Communications
cc:
Subject: Online Bandwidth Exchanges.
Hi everybody, found this list of all the active major exchanges.......
ACE
The Asia Capacity Exchange (ACE) is web-based virtual trading floor for
exchanging network capacity, circuit-switched voice minutes and voice-over-IP
capacity between telecom companies, ISPs and large enterprises
Arbinet
Arbinet is an electronic web-based trading platform, carriers efficiently
buy, sell and deliver capacity globally.
Band-X
Band-X is an online trading floor for network capacity, co-location, switched
minutes, routed IP, telecom recruitment and dig coordination.
Bandwidth.com
Bandwidth.com is an efficient buyers' market for broadband telecommunications
capacity.?
EnronOnline
Enron Broadband Services has created standardized contracts to enable
efficient trading of bandwidth as a commodity. Market participants can use
these contracts to manage their price exposure and mitigate risk.
e-sax
The London Satellite Exchange (e-sax) is an online trading floor for the
satellite communications industry.
Fiberloops.com
Fiberloops.com offers interactive mapping of available fiber, colo space, and
telecom hotels in the US
The Global TeleExchange
The GTX currently operates a worldwide telecom grid and reservation system
that enables carriers to connect to six exchange points on three continents.
RateXchange
RateXchange offers a neutral, electronic trading system that allows
telecommunications companies to anonymously buy, sell and deliver standard
wholesale bandwidth capacity around the world.
<><><><><><><><><><><>
Umer Saeed
Sales Engineer
Enron Broadband Services
=====================================
|
2,531 |
Subject: nan
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent_items/205.
=====================================
Being a patent maven and auction babe, thought you might find interest in this.
Best,
Jeff
Enron Accused of Infringing Electronic Trading Patent (Update2)
2001-09-21 16:39 (New York)
Enron Accused of Infringing Electronic Trading Patent (Update2)
(Adds company comment in seventh paragraph.)
Marshall, Texas, Sept. 21 (Bloomberg) -- Enron Corp., the
largest energy trader, and its online unit are accused in a
lawsuit of infringing a Texas company's patent for an electronic
trading system.
Bid/Ask LLC of Baird, Texas, formerly called Auction Source
LLC, said it is the sole rights owner of a patent issued in May
2000 for a ``Real-time Network Exchange with Seller Specified
Exchange Parameters and Interactive Seller Participation.''
Houston-based Enron and its EnronOnline unit are improperly
using that patented technology through its Internet-based
electronic trading facility, according to the lawsuit filed Sept.
17 in federal court in Marshall, Texas. Enron trades commodities
such as natural gas and electricity on that trading network.
Bid/Ask seeks a court order blocking Enron from infringing
the patent, and is asking for damages.
EnronOnline began trading electricity and natural gas in
November 1999. Between then and the second quarter of 2001, it's
handled more than 1 million transactions valued at more than $685
billion, the company has said.
Enron, which also trades space on fiber-optic networks, coal,
paper and other commodities, had net income of $979 million on
revenue of $100.8 billion in 2000.
``We have not reviewed the suit, so we can't comment on it,''
said Enron spokesman Vance Meyer.
Shares of Enron fell 9 cents to $28.30 today.
=====================================
|
2,532 |
Subject: Edison's SO2 credits
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/3518.
=====================================
Lisa:
Here's the information regarding Edison's SO2 credits before the PUC. Fax to
follow. If you need anything else, just let me know.
Best,
Jeff
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 03/06/2001 04:03 PM -----
BCragg <[email protected]>
03/06/2001 03:56 PM
To: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: Edison's SO2 credits
Edison filed A.00-05-027, its applications to divest its remaining SO2
credits, on May 15, 2000. ORA protested on June 30, and Edison and ORA
worked out their differences and filed a joint recommendation on October 2.
According to the joint recommendation, which I will fax over to you,
Edison's original proposal was to auction off its SO2 credits. The joint
recommendation accepts the auction approach, except that if no bids are
received for some credits, then those credits will be retained within the
regulated utility, and any future net proceeds will be credited to
ratepayers. It appears that Edison's original proposal would have
transferred such no-bid credits to an unregulated affiliate at zero cost.
The joint recommendation also states that any no-bid credits retained by the
regulated utility will be deemed to have been market valued, and will have a
zero market value for purposes of determining transition costs.
No Commission decision has been issued on this matter. No decision in this
matter appears on the Commission's agenda for March 15. I can follow up on
the status and likely date of decision if you like.
Other than the joint recommendation I am about to fax to you, the only other
documents filed in this case were Edison's application and ORA's protest.
Please let me know if you would like a copy of either of them.
Brian
=====================================
|
2,533 |
Subject: Ca Energy Commission recommends Moss Landing Licensing
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/92.
=====================================
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES on 08/31/2000 02:10
PM ---------------------------
Lynnette Barnes
08/31/2000 01:58 PM
To: Montovano's group, Harry's group, Janine's group, Susan J
Mara/SFO/EES@EES, Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES, Bruno Gaillard/SFO/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Ca Energy Commission recommends Moss Landing Licensing
Article appeared on Energy Insight's web.
Energy Commission Committee Recommends Moss Landing Licensing
A California Energy Commission Siting Committee has recommended that Duke
Energy's proposed 1,060 MW Moss Landing Power Project located in Monterey
County should be given full Commission approval.
The Moss Landing Siting Committee recommends the plant be approved for
construction and operation at the existing Moss Landing Power Plant site that
was previously operated by PG&E for approximately 50 years. According to the
Committee, the Moss Landing project is entitled to certification not only
under local ordinances and regulations but under the Warren-Alquist Act and
the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), based upon evidence
presented at formal public hearings.
The Committee has specified that Duke Energy will pay $7 million to support
steps that mitigate the impacts of the power plant's operations on the area's
marine biology. The $500 million Moss Landing Power Plant Project is a
natural gas-fired combined cycle power plant to be located near the Moss
Landing Harbor. The Commission began its review of the project in August
1999.
The proposed project is scheduled to be on-line by summer of 2002. If
approved, the project will increase the total generating capacity of the Moss
Landing plant to approximately 2,590 MW.
=====================================
|
2,534 |
Subject: IEPA call
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/4991.
=====================================
Re: Today's IEPA Call
?
The early discussion was about the Chronicle article?on Sunday -- which said
that demand was not much greater than last year, which California met -- and
the methodology used.? IEPA/McNally has send the MRW info to KFBK
(Sacramento's leading news station), which picked up on the story, and is
preparing a response for the Chron.? It may be in the form of a short op-ed
or a letter to the editor.?
?
The line on the FERC refund order is that what it does is eliminate some
uncertainty about the rules producers operate under.? There was a strong
message that the producers have been playing by the rules -- somewhat
uncertain though they were -- and will continue playing by the rules.? The
positive is that FERC has now offered a methodology that will eliminate
short-term uncertainty.
?
IEPA has issued a floor alert to oppose AB 39x.? The alert has been issued
in conjunction with the California Chamber of Commerce, Western States
Petroleum Assn. and others.
?
There is a target date of the end of next week for completion and possibly
printing of the packet they are developing.? There may be a new round of
editorial board meetings and it sounds as if there will be an effort to meet
with the Senate Republican Caucus to follow on a similar meeting recently
held with Assembly Republicans.?
?
Greg and Stephanie (whose name and affiliation I did not get but I'm sure
you can tell me) have been named co-chairs of the group.? They'll coordinate
the calls and items such as staff.? Budget issues will go to the whole group.
?
Those were the main points.? If there was a summary prepared by IEPA or
McNally and it comes to me by e-mail, I'll pass it along.
=====================================
|
2,535 |
Subject: Re: From Michael L. Kirby, Esq.
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/12037.
=====================================
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 07/17/2001 03:18 PM -----
Steven J Kean
07/17/2001 09:08 AM
To: "Bonnie Hugyez" <[email protected]>
cc: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: From Michael L. Kirby, Esq.
Bonnie: Please forward to Michael Kirby.
I think the draft looks good. Could you also prepare a draft of the letter
we discussed yesterday to convey the proposal to the committee?
"Bonnie Hugyez" <[email protected]> on 07/17/2001 12:34:20 AM
To: <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: From Michael L. Kirby, Esq.
Attached is a draft Nonwaiver Agreement per our telephone conferences of
yesterday after the meetings with Senator Dunn. I am available in my office
for a conference call to discuss this.
The information contained in this e-mail message and any accompanying
documents is subject to the attorney-client privilege and/or the attorney
work product rule and is confidential business information intended only for
the use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this
message is not the intended recipient or representative of the recipient, you
are hereby notified that any dissemination of this communication is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify
Kathryn A. Pugh at [email protected] and immediately delete this message from
your system.
- 289271_1.WPD
=====================================
|
2,536 |
Subject: Citizens Utilities
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['Mona L Petrochko/SFO/EES@EES', 'Jeff', '[email protected]', 'Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/1135.
=====================================
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES on 09/06/2000 02:18
PM ---------------------------
From: Marcie Milner@ENRON on 09/06/2000 11:19 AM MST
To: Chris H Foster/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kim Ward/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Roger Yang/SFO/EES@EES
cc: Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Mona L Petrochko/SFO/EES@EES, Jeff
Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES, [email protected], Leslie Lawner/HOU/EES@EES, Dave
Fuller/PDX/ECT@ECT
Subject: Citizens Utilities
The following article appeared in the Arizona Republic last week. I will
keep an eye out for the filing.
"Citizens Utilities says it won't triple its rates"
Citizens Utilities is assuring customers that it won't double or triple
rates, even though the electric company is paying triple the normal amount to
purchase energy. Citizens recently announced a possible rate increase due to
higher charges from its energy supplier, Arizona Public Service Co. The
company estimates it paid $19 million to APS for energy in June. Citizens
normally pays $6 million a month, spokesman Tom Ferry said. Citizens
customers can expect a rate increase, but the utility company is proposing to
spread out the increases through a three year recovery period for the rate
increase expected for June, July and August, Ferry said.
Citizens will file a plan requesting a rate increase with the ACC in a week
or two. Ferry wouldn't say what the rate increase would be if the ACC
approves a shorter recovery period than the one Citizens proposes. The
earliest any rate increase could take effect would be February, an ACC
spokeswoman said. Ferry blamed the increase on a rise in summer temperatures
and economic growth resulting in above-normal demand for electricity.
=====================================
|
2,537 |
Subject: RE: Tentative meeting Monday 8/28 at 5 pm/2 pm
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/823.
=====================================
Likewise. Hope I'm not being to much of a pain on the calls. Just that
Enron---I'm quite certain---won't lend it's name to anything that's less than
stellar. And I'm sure GSPP would like for the conference to be all that it
can be, too. How'd things go in Portland?
Best,
Jeff
[email protected] on 08/29/2000 07:12:41 AM
To: [email protected]
cc:
Subject: RE: Tentative meeting Monday 8/28 at 5 pm/2 pm
I got the message but not til today because our e-mail was down. It was good
to
talk to you last night.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [SMTP:[email protected]]
> Sent: Monday, August 28, 2000 3:02 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Tentative meeting Monday 8/28 at 5 pm/2 pm
>
>
> I can be on the call. Please let me know if you get this, since I've been
> having severe email problems. Thanks.
>
>
> Best,
> Jeff
>
>
>
>
> [email protected] on 08/25/2000 07:04:27 AM
>
> To: [email protected], [email protected],
> [email protected], [email protected],
> [email protected], [email protected],
> [email protected]
> cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Tentative meeting Monday 8/28 at 5 pm/2 pm
>
>
> Please confirm that this schedule works. It is the only day
> that worked for everyone. Jeff Dasovich is still in the Sierras so I can
> check
> in with him Monday.
>
> The agenda sounds simple but don't be deceived, there are many
> many options. Please be prepared with a list of 3 top speaker choices.
>
> 1. Topics of panels.
>
> 2. Speaker list. Try to agree on an 'A' list who we can start
> calling and a 'B' list of alternates.
>
>
>
=====================================
|
2,538 |
Subject: RE: hey whassup?
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/11929.
=====================================
fear not o boisterous one. you know that eggers is speaking in SF in the
fall, right?
Colleen Silva <[email protected]>
07/10/2001 02:50 PM
To: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: RE: hey whassup?
darling boy-
i'm never mad at you, never ever, and i really do adore you to death and
forever and can't bear the idea that we wouldn't be friends till death do us
part, and that i wouldn't be welcome in your life, so no, i was never mad
and don't even remember which of my (many) soliloquoys you may have
interrupted or are referring to but i do know that i have a rather
boisterous personality and perhaps i stepped on your toes and this is not my
intention and i adore you and my company is about to go under so the idea of
being unemployed AND having you upset with me is far too much for my
delicate self to handle...
xo
colleen
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2001 12:48 PM
To: Colleen Silva
Subject: Re: hey whassup?
i was never mad at you. i thought that you were mad at me for interrupting
your soliloquy.
Colleen Silva
<Csilva@redsk To: "'[email protected]'"
y.com> <[email protected]>
cc:
07/10/2001 Subject: hey whassup?
02:26 PM
you still mad at moi?
don't be....
-------------------------------------------------------------++
colleen silva
producer
RED SKY >san francisco
v 415-633-2023
c 415-336-2219
<http://www.redsky.com>
=====================================
|
2,539 |
Subject: Read this before responding to the Outlook Mail Notification emails
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/deleted_items/433.
=====================================
Please use the following instructions for the four Outlook emails.
1-URGENT: Please read (Do not delete emails, because of the lawsuit)
2-URGENT: Please read
3-URGENT: Click the Save My Data button
4- URGENT: Please read, but you do not have to fill in this info (All this info has already been submitted to Wilma Bleshman,
who will be here next week for our conversions)
Important Note: Due to the lawsuit we should not be deleting any emails. When our lotus notes are transferred to outlook we will still
have access to read all of our old notes. Eventually notes will go away, but because of the lawsuit nothing can be deleted
until a later date. Also, I know everyone has concerns about the size restriction, and purge process in outlook. (Please remain
calm; breath in through the nose, out through the mouth.) Until the lawsuit is cleared up the SF office will not be bound by Enron's
Outlook rules. However, there will come a day when we will have to adhere to the policies.
Extra Cool Note: In outlook you can save an entire email, headings & attachments too, as a word document. It is very, very exciting. This will be the
feature that helps us keep our in-boxes, and outlook folders fairly empty. I will show everyone how easy it is once we have been
completely converted.
I think everyone is going to like outlook. Please give it a chance. I promise Wilma and I will address all of your concerns.
Thanks,
April Hrach
Administrative Coordinator
Phone: 415-782-7825
Fax: 415-782-7851
=====================================
|
2,540 |
Subject: JobReviews.Com: salary, interview, and job reviews
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/personal/20.
=====================================
Hi!
I would like to introduce you to a new service that you would find useful:
http://www.jobreviews.com
JobReviews.Com offers interview, salary, and job position reviews so that
any current or aspiring job hunter can get the inside scoop on actual
interview scenarios, salary offers, and prospective jobs.
I think this service is especially appropriate during this time of year
since the recruiting season is in full swing!
Check it out, and if possible, please forward this e-mail to your friends.
Thank you!
Julie Bard
Marketing Associate, JobReviews.com
JobReviews.COM
OUR MISSION
-We want our users to get the best job possible. Through the generosity of
our users, they have shared their personal job, interview, and salary
experiences so that each job hunter has an accurate picture of what a
job or interview scenario is like. This service is useful because quite
often people are misinformed about an actual job's prospects. By the time
they
sign the hiring contract, it's too late to back out!
FEATURES
-INTERVIEW REVIEWS from people who have gone through the
process themselves
-SALARY REVIEWS featuring information from actual job offers
-JOB POSITION REVIEWS detailing what a job is actually like
-Solutions to REAL management consulting case interview questions
-MESSAGE BOARDS and CHAT ROOMS to discuss jobs and
job hunting
-PROFESSIONAL TIPS for writing resumes, interviewing, and
negotiating salaries
-Links to the employers
-RECOMMENDED READING LIST suggesting the best job hunting,
management consulting, investment banking, and business school books
and guides available
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, simply reply to this e-mail with the
words
"remove" in the subject header.
=====================================
|
2,541 |
Subject: Important Reminder for NARUC-DOE Summit
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/2407.
=====================================
All stakeholders are reminded to register early for the NARUC-DOE North
American Summit on Harmonizing Business Practices in Energy Restructuring to
be held in Dallas, Texas, from November 29th to December 1st, 2000. Early
registration entitles you to a significant discount off the registration fee
and reserves your place at this important event. Early registration closes
on October 27th, 2000.
The Summit will be the only event this year co-hosted by the National
Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners (NARUC) and the U.S.
Department of Energy. The Summit is intended to address the most pressing
issues facing the North American energy industry as we move towards a more
competitive, transnational marketplace. A blue-ribbon group of energy
experts and leaders are committed to attend and discuss the issues with the
stakeholders.
Your participation and input are critical to the success of this effort.
However, time is short and the Summit is filling up fast. Please plan to
join the leading regulatory and government officials, consumer advocates and
industry leaders by registering today.
To register early, you simply need to go to
www.energymarkets.org/registration.htm For more information, please feel
free to contact Ken Malloy, President of the Center for the Advancement of
Energy Markets (CAEM), by responding to this e-mail or call the Summit
hotline at (703) 234-3375. Be sure to sign up for program and speaker
updates via e-mail at www.energymarkets.org.
Please forward this email to colleagues who you think might be interested in
the Summit.
We are looking forward to seeing you in Dallas in November.
Sincerely,
Ken Malloy
President
Center for the Advancement of Energy Markets
=====================================
|
2,542 |
Subject: nan
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/4174.
=====================================
Today Mona and I attended a meeting of the "California Energy Solutions
Group" (formerly the AB 1890 Implementation Group). But for the issues
discussed below, there's not much else to report from the meeting other than
folks engaged in a good deal of posturing.
At our urging, the group decided to form a "subcommittee" comprised of a
subset of the group. The group will work quickly to develop a "strawperson"
proposal to present to the larger group for consideration. The goal is to
quickly arrive at a "settlement"---ideally by year end, or sooner---that
everyone can agree to and offer up to Davis, legislators, etc.
Our "reward" for coming up with the idea is the requirement that we serve on
the "committee." In addition to us, the other people on the committee are:
Eve Elsesser will chair the committee---Cogen types
John Fielder---Edison
Mike Florio--TURN
Bill Booth---CLECA
Carolyn McIntyre---Sempra
Smutney--Generators
Aaron Thomas--AES (retail)
Tony Braun--Munis
Ralph Cavanagh--NRDC
John Flory--CALPX
It is clear that one of the key issues is devising the "benchmark" that the
CPUC can use to judge the reasonableness of utility purchases---similar to
the model used for utility procurement on the gas side. Chris Calger is in
the office working on the power plant deals and I briefly discussed with him
ways of devising a politically palatable, commercially defensible benchmark.
We came up with some ideas that he suggested I pursue further with Bob
Badeer, Chris Foster and Tim Belden, which I'll do on Monday. The first
meeting of the subcommittee is on Tuesday.
If possible, I'd like to add the "benchmark" and "committee" issues to our
agenda for Tuesday's meeting.
Best,
Jeff
=====================================
|
2,543 |
Subject: RE: meeting with Enron
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent_items/213.
=====================================
This won't work. Try again, please.
KIDDING! Looks great. Thanks. I'll forward along to Greg and Brad and get back to you soon as I know something.
Toodles,
Jeff
-----Original Message-----
From: Cameron Sellers [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, September 21, 2001 6:56 PM
To: Dasovich, Jeff
Subject: meeting with Enron
Jeff,
It was great to talk to you today. Thank you so much for taking the time to
hear about our latest developments. As I said earlier, we are very
interested in talking to your folks in the Net Works group at Enron. The
pilot we are implementing for the Enron Energy Services group is going
extremely well. We've been on site now for about two weeks and have pretty
much completed our user training sessions. Everyone at Enron is very
pleased with the success of the project so far.
I think the best thing would be to schedule a meeting for sometime in
mid-October. That way, the Pilot Program will be completely implemented and
we will have more feedback on the use of our application. How about the
week of October 15th? Anytime that week will work with us and, as I told
you earlier, we are in Houston very frequently.
The people who would be a part of the discussion would be Ian Sullivan (who
heads up all implementation and professional services) and myself.
If anyone would like more information about Perfect Commerce prior to the
meeting I would be more than happy to send that over. Just let me know.
Look forward to hearing from you.
Best regards,
Cameron
Cameron Sellers
Vice President, Business Development
PERFECT
1860 Embarcadero Road - Suite 210
Palo Alto, CA 94303
[email protected]
650.798.3366 (direct dial)
650.269.3366 (cell)
650.858.1095 (fax)
=====================================
|
2,544 |
Subject: Dept. of Finance
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/9275.
=====================================
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 02/20/2001 04:15 PM -----
Susan J Mara
02/20/2001 02:22 PM
To: Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Michael
Tribolet/ENRON@enronXgate, jklauber@llgm, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron,
James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul
Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Dept. of Finance
More info on Dept of Finance's response to the coalition seeking direct
access, from ARm's lobbyist
Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854
----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 02/20/2001 12:19 PM -----
[email protected] (Norman Plotkin)
02/20/2001 08:57 AM
To: [email protected]
cc:
Subject: Dept. of Finance
Update:
I spoke with Robert Miyashiro at Finance (DOFs point person for those who
have inquired) late Friday evening. I tried to schedule some time to speak
with him and bond counsel, but he begged off, but with good reason.
Through our conversation he intimated that they were greatly encouraged by
the coalition proposal vis-a-vis reasonable controls on opt-in/opt-out and
surcharges for incremental state costs. It seems that they gave their canned
presentation in the meeting and did not respond publicly to our proposal.
When pushed for direction relative to quantifying specific formulas, he
expressed concern over the "proprietary" (he didn't say the word expressly)
nature of DWRs rate calculations and a general reluctance to talk numbers at
this stage of the game.
Much remains to be done, but I wanted to convey my relief and concur with
Aaron that our position is not as gloomy as my initial impression.
More later,
Norm
=====================================
|
2,545 |
Subject: Calif Energy Panel OKs First Step For 1160MW In Projects
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent_items/1129.
=====================================
Sam: Congratulations. But I've been informed that the buring chicken in the office kitchen ate up about 10% of the emission credits previously secured for the plant. The CEC is revising the credit numbers and may have to modify today's decision as a result.
Best,
Jeff
Calif Energy Panel OKs First Step For 1160MW In Projects
10/18/2001
Dow Jones Energy Service
(Copyright (c) 2001, Dow Jones & Company, Inc.)
LOS ANGELES -(Dow Jones)- The California Energy Commission has accepted as "data adequate" applications to build a 900-megawatt power plant and two peaker plants totaling 260 megawatts, a press release said.
The data adequacy vote means an application has been accepted as having sufficient information to proceed with the commission's approval process.
Enron Corp.'s (ENE) Roseville Energy Facility LLC unit has proposed building a 900-MW natural gas-fired plant in Sacramento, Calif., to be online by the fourth quarter of 2004. The construction cost will be $350-$450 million for the combined-cycle project, which will undergo a 12-month review process by the commission.
GWF Energy LLC has applied to build the 169-MW Tracy Peaker Project, a simple cycle plant in the San Joaquin Valley, Calif., that would be online by July 2002. Peaker plants operate during times of high electricity demand.
The company also applied to build the 91-MW Henrietta Peaker Project, 20 miles south of Hanford, Calif., which would consist of two turbine generators and come on line by June 2002.
Electricity generated from the two peaker projects will be sold to the state's Department of Water Resources under a 10-year contract.
-By Jessica Berthold, Dow Jones Newswires; 323-658-3872; [email protected]
=====================================
|
2,546 |
Subject: Senate Energy
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/3125.
=====================================
Senate Energy is going to meet tomorrow to take up the following bills,
all of which are in spot format:
SBX2 41 (Speier) The bill would require the CPUC to also take into
account the number of inhabitants located at the site of a residential
customer, and increase baseline quantities accordingly, up to an
unspecified maximum number of inhabitants.
SBX2 68 (Battin) The bill would require the ISO to take into account the
general well being of residents in a particular area to determine the
feasibility of blackouts.
SBX2 73 (Alpert) The bill would find and declare that where
cost-effective electric supply cannot be secured by the Independent
System Operator or the state, any system outages should be managed so as
to minimize disruption to the customers. This bill would require the
Governor, if cost-effective electric supply cannot be secured by the ISO
or the state, in collaboration with certain entities, to establish
certain purchasing guidelines and to create a system of managing any
interruptions in a manner so as to minimize disruption to the
customers. This bill would also require the commission to create
interruptibility programs in which larger customers or communities
desiring higher levels of reliability may secure that reliability in
exchange for fees established by the commission. The bill would require
the programs to require public utility electrical corporations to
configure their distribution so that selective and identifiable blocks
of customers can be provided differing levels of reliability, and to
alert customers of potential outages.
Following the bill hearing, the Committee is going to have an
informational hearing entitled:
"The Impacts of Creating An Energy Buyer's Cartel"
=====================================
|
2,547 |
Subject: Independent Institute Price Cap Protest Letter from Economists
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/deleted_items/440.
=====================================
David Theroux at the Independent Institute in Oakland, California became concerned over Enron's involvement in this project, so he has decided to fund the project internally.
He anticipates that the letters will go out to economists around the country when the school year starts (just several weeks away in some places) and hopes to complete the project by October. They got around 540 economists for their health care price cap letter. It will be interesting to see how many signatures they get for electricity price caps. I sent him our draft letter, and he is massaging the language between wholesale price decontrol and the use of real-time pricing at retail.
I offered the use of our university contacts to help gather signatures, but I don't know if he will even want in-kind help. Anyway, we can do something else with the $30,000 that we were going to try to funnel to them.
- Rob
-----Original Message-----
From: David Theroux <[email protected]>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-David+20Theroux+20+3CDTheroux+40independent+2Eorg+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2001 3:44 PM
To: [email protected] (Ropb Bradley)
Subject: Hello
Dear Rob,
We have been pursuing the possibility of addressing the matter of
price controls as they pertain to electricity markets as we have done
in the past with our other Open Letters.
But in doing so, we would only pursue the matter independently
without the involvement or support of any businesses or other
organizations in this or related fields.
Best regards,
David
--
David J. Theroux
Founder and President
The Independent Institute
100 Swan Way
Oakland, CA 94621-1428
510-632-1366 Phone
510-568-6040 Fax
[email protected]
http://www.independent.org
=====================================
|
2,548 |
Subject: Re: Phone Calls w/Large Customers re: Core/Noncore Proposal
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/4804.
=====================================
I'm trying. I've got cauliflower ear from all the phone calls. I'll be in
Sacramento Monday. Will keep you apprised. I followed up with a call to
Brulte and I'll try to meet with him on Monday, too.
Best,
Jeff
Karen Denne
06/01/2001 01:01 PM
To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Re: Phone Calls w/Large Customers re: Core/Noncore Proposal
good job! keep it up!
From: Jeff Dasovich on 06/01/2001 11:53 AM
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
To: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, [email protected], [email protected], Karen
Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Paul Kaufman/Enron@EnronXGate, Susan J
Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Janel Guerrero/Corp/Enron@Enron, Susan M
Landwehr/NA/Enron@Enron, Linda Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Michael Tribolet/ENRON@enronXgate, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Phone Calls w/Large Customers re: Core/Noncore Proposal
I've had several phone calls with large customer groups over the past
24-hours, mostly explaining our noncore/core proposal (in contrast to the one
that the Assembly Democrats have launched which would saddle business with
100% of the utilities' past debts). As folks know, the cost shift provision
of the Dems plans have been erroneously attributed to us in some cases.
The business folks have been very appreciative of the discussions and have
recognized that, generally, our proposal is a fair and reasonable one. They
are going to try to set up direct negotiations with Hertzberg and have
requested that I be part of those negotiations. They are not sure that
Hertzberg will go along with the idea, but they're going to try. They will
get back to me when they find out. I'll report back soon as I hear something.
=====================================
|
2,549 |
Subject: Re: I-6
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/1339.
=====================================
John,
I can't answer your questions with any degree of confidence. I don't know if
it has ever been done, but I don't know of any prohibitions. For example,
many essential emergency facilities such as hospitals have back-up
generation. The only difference in this case is that there would still be
energy
delivered from the grid. However, this type of physical interconnection is
accommodated for Standby customers.
Additionally, there currently is an open distributed generation proceeding in
California. You can contact Harry Kingerski on the status of that proceeding.
With respect to your question about the EPA, that seems more like a
siting/environmental issue which is way beyond my expertise. You can try
calling
Jeff Dasovich. He will be able to put you in contact with other projects and
people who may have had to address similar issues.
In the meantime, you can access SCE's I-6 Tariff and Rules through
http://www.sce.com/regulatesca/index_re.htm.
Roger
John Wack
09/11/2000 04:07 PM
To: Roger Yang
cc: Brad J Snyder/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: I-6
Roger, We are working with a customer in California (Starwood) who we have a
longer term deal with. Some of their Hotels are on I-6 rider.
The customer is on I-6 and are considering installation of diesel generation
to run when called for curtailment under I-6. Can they run the DG or is
this not allowed under California rules?
I believe that if a customer elects to be on I-6, the customer cannot claim
that an emergency condition exist that allows them the use of the DG when
curtailed under I-6. In some states the EPA allows DG use in price or
emergency times. Or in California will the EPA allow specific under their
rules?
=====================================
|
2,550 |
Subject: Re: Meeting 8AM Central Monday
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/4297.
=====================================
Scott, etal --
My final concern.
Is anyone at EES concerned with this outcome --
(1) Accept EES' tiering but use 60% of current usage as baseline,
(2) all above 60% is DJ Index, and
(3) demand below 60% is paid at $500/Mwh (or the ISO price)?
This is an adaption of our proposal. Would this be painful?
My big fear is that somehow the CPUC uses our filing against us. We need to
make sure that these discussions don't get away from us to allow that outcome.
Jim
Scott Stoness@EES
04/13/2001 12:00 PM
To: Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Don Black/HOU/EES@EES, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@ENRON, [email protected]@ENRON, Tamara Johnson/HOU/EES@EES,
Jeff Dasovich/Na/Enron@ENRON, James W Lewis/HOU/EES@EES, Leslie
Lawner/HOU/EES@EES, Leslie Lawner/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Meeting 8AM Central Monday
We have agreed on a strategy, subject to Whaley/Delaney approval, to:
Scott Stoness submit testimony today advocating 2 part real time pricing in CA
Read other parties testimony this weekend from the perspective "Has somebody
filed testimony close enough to Stoness testimony, that we can cross examine
and brief to a favorable outcome?"
Meet on Monday at 8AM to decide whether to rescind Stoness's testimony.
The following dial in number and code corresponds to the Monday 8AM Central
Time meeting.
1 800 713 8600
68266 is PIN
Scott Stoness is host
Action Items:
All on To list above read and have opinion on 2 and 3 above
All on To list above meet on Monday at 8AM. Meet in Stoness office if
possible.
Harry and Jeane polish Stoness testimony and wait to the last minute before
submitting it
Jeane ensure all on this To list get a copy of testimony, emailed as soon as
she gets it.
Scott Stoness
=====================================
|
2,551 |
Subject: Re:
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/556.
=====================================
Thanks Harry. This is very helpful. Sue and I participated in an ARM
meeting where a proposal for default provider was developed. I will forward
to business folks, and to you, to see whether we can support it.
From: Harry Kingerski@ENRON on 09/21/2000 03:54 PM CDT
To: James D Steffes/HOU/EES@EES, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Jeff
Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES, Mona L Petrochko/SFO/EES@EES, Susan J Mara/SFO/EES@EES
cc: Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, Roger Yang/SFO/EES@EES
Subject:
I met with Dennis Benevides, Jim Wood and Scott Gahn about the PG&E strategy
we discussed and the EES perspective. Suggestions:
Endorse the recent CAL ISO report on causes of the problem (no utility
forward buying, no demand responsiveness, etc) and say, with a few tweaks,
their proposals were on target.
Get CTC roll-off no earlier than Spring '01. Retroactive roll-off would be
devastating.
Use PG&E $15 billion exposure as leverage to get competitive default supplier
in place (get them out of merchant supply).
Impose a stair-step shape on the rate increase, to prompt customer migration.
Keep PG&E somewhat at risk for wholesale cost recovery, delay recovery of
under-recoveries until out years.
Keep rate freeze (which is preferable to rate cap) to as short a period as
possible, post '01.
Here is a rework of Jim's bullet points to incorporate these thoughts:
Keep in mind the numbers are all just placeholders and are not meant to be
definitive. Once we start to hone in on the concept, we can develop the
right numbers.
From a retail perspective, this blends protection of the book with
advancement of new market opportunity. I may still get more feedback from
the EES guys, but wanted to give you what I got so far.
=====================================
|
2,552 |
Subject: RE: IMPORTANT MEETING NOTICE REMINDER/DISCUSSION TOPICS
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/1192.
=====================================
Super. Thanks a bunch. See you tomorrow.
"Delaney Hunter" <[email protected]>
11/30/2000 10:55 AM
Please respond to dhunter
To: "Jeff Dasovich (E-mail)" <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: RE: IMPORTANT MEETING NOTICE REMINDER/DISCUSSION TOPICS
Jeff-
I think their predictions are correct about members getting active -- though
next week is mostly ceremonious I do expect there to be many bills
introduced on the subject. I agree that the agenda looks ambitious but our
hope is directly in line with yours -- the material is background for what I
hope is lively and productive discussion. Glad you can make it. See you
there!
Delaney
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2000 8:35 AM
To: [email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Re: IMPORTANT MEETING NOTICE REMINDER/DISCUSSION TOPICS
Thanks, Delaney. See you on Friday.
Quick comment: Though just about everything's uncertain these days, folks
seem to think that Legislators are likely to get very active just as soon
as they arrive in Sacramento (next week?). Seems that a key--if not
dominant--part of the agenda ought to be how this group can (quickly) come
to agreement on a comprehensive solution that it can offer to the
Legislature and the Governor as a pragmatic and positive way out. Sure you
folks are very focused on this, but it struck me that the agenda looks
pretty ambitious for a 3-hour meeting. In any case, just a thought that I
wanted to share.
Thanks and can't thank you enough for all your efforts.
Best,
Jeff
=====================================
|
2,553 |
Subject: Re: news/updates
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/9810.
=====================================
As to whether long term contracting by Cal. is a good idea, the answer is
somewhat mixed. We were one of the early parties pointing out the problems
with total reliance on the spot market and encouraging more forward
contracting. Given the utilities' precarious financial position there were
two options: 1) outsource the default provider obligation to the market (this
is what we prefer but there was no political support for it), or 2) have the
state put its credit behind the purchases. California is pursuing the
latter, with CDWR prucahsing the utilities' requirements. In the short term,
we have criticized the state's plan because it contemplates state takeover of
the grid; state participation in power plant financing, construction, and
ownership; and they have not made it clear that CDWR really has the money to
pay for all the purchases. I am attaching text I have used as the base for a
number of communications with policymakers.
Mark Schroeder@ECT
03/11/2001 02:11 PM
To: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: news/updates
In the press, I saw two news stories that I wondered if we (Enron) had any
role/hand in, and what was the offical "spin" in both cases. 1) The FERC
Order requiring something like 55-65 million dollars in refunds by generators
(or did it include traders) for overcharging in California in December, if I
recall my facts/news stories correctly, and 2) the reports of 40 companies
entering into 10-year contracts with California (touted by Davis). Was Enron
a contracting party? Do we think this is a good solution (I think I know the
answer, but defer to your lead on this, so we stay on your message)? thanks
mcs
=====================================
|
2,554 |
Subject: Read this before responding to the Outlook Mail Notification emails
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/11629.
=====================================
Please use the following instructions for the four Outlook emails.
1-URGENT: Please read (Do not delete emails, because of the lawsuit)
2-URGENT: Please read
3-URGENT: Click the Save My Data button
4- URGENT: Please read, but you do not have to fill in this info (All this
info has already been submitted to Wilma Bleshman,
who will be here next week for our conversions)
Important Note: Due to the lawsuit we should not be deleting any emails.
When our lotus notes are transferred to outlook we will still
have access to read all of our
old notes. Eventually notes will go away, but because of the lawsuit nothing
can be deleted
until a later date. Also, I know everyone has concerns about
the size restriction, and purge process in outlook. (Please remain
calm; breath in through the nose, out through the mouth.)
Until the lawsuit is cleared up the SF office will not be bound by Enron's
Outlook rules. However, there will come a day when we will
have to adhere to the policies.
Extra Cool Note: In outlook you can save an entire email, headings &
attachments too, as a word document. It is very, very exciting. This will
be the
feature that helps us keep our
in-boxes, and outlook folders fairly empty. I will show everyone how easy it
is once we have been
completely converted.
I think everyone is going to like outlook. Please give it a chance. I
promise Wilma and I will address all of your concerns.
Thanks,
April Hrach
Administrative Coordinator
Phone: 415-782-7825
Fax: 415-782-7851
=====================================
|
2,555 |
Subject: Northwest Power wants to retrofit Applegate
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/2708.
=====================================
Applegate is eyed for power plant
Jun. 2, 2001
Associated Press Newswires
Copyright 2001. The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved.
MEDFORD, Ore. (AP) - A hydropower firm has applied for a preliminary permit
from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to study the feasibility of
building a hydropower plant at Applegate Dam.
Symbiotics LLC, a subsidiary of Northwest Power Services Inc., based in
Rigby, Idaho, and Ecosystem Research Institute in Logan, Utah, want to
retrofit the dam to produce about 12 megawatts of electricity.
The dam, on the Applegate River about 20 miles south of Medford, currently
has no hydropower capacity. It was built in 1980 by the U.S. Corps of
Engineers.
"The price of energy has made it economical now to look at a project of this
kind," said Hart Evans, a spokesman for ERI. "We started looking at a lot of
different dams this year to see what the potential is for hydropower plants."
Applegate Dam is one of more than 100 dams for which ERI has filed
preliminary permit applications in the Pacific Northwest, including Savage
Rapids Dam on the Rogue River just upstream from Grants Pass, Evans said.
Northwest Power and ERI, which he described as an environmental consulting
firm, have been working jointly on power projects for 25 years, Evans said.
Symbiotics was launched early this year to focus exclusively on hydropower,
he said.
The permit, if granted, would give the firm three years to study the project,
said FERC spokeswoman Celeste Miller in Washington, D.C.
"It does not authorize any construction," Miller said. "If an applicant
determines at the end of the permit period that they want to develop the
project, then they would have to file for a license."
=====================================
|
2,556 |
Subject: Re:
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/4154.
=====================================
Hey Jeff. I've got the details on the RGA meeting and am working with Rosie
on that, so when you get a chance, give me a buzz and we can compare notes.
I will fax you info so you know location/time/etc. I'm also focused on
getting 15-30 minutes of time that afternoon for Ken Lay to talk with John
Rowe (co chair of Exelon) on open access/FERC positions.
Jeff Dasovich
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
04/19/2001 12:40 PM
To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@ENRON, Janel Guerrero/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Paul
Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@ENRON, Rosalee
Fleming/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@ENRON, Susan M
Landwehr/NA/Enron@ENRON, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Karen
Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, [email protected]
Subject: Re:
Thanks, Steve. I'll coordinate with Rosie.
Best,
Jeff
Steven J Kean
04/19/2001 12:31 PM
To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan M Landwehr/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Rosalee
Fleming/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Janel
Guerrero/Corp/Enron@Enron, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT
Subject:
I got a voicemail fro Ken. He would be happy to meet with Freeman. He is
willing to work on other times, but suggested the following
After 3:00 on May 2nd (right after Ken's speech to the RGA) or late the day
before or in the morning of the second (to do this though he would have to
cancel his speech to the Texas Governor's business council but he is willing
to do this if necessary)
His least preferred alternative in this general time frame would be early
morning on the third.
Jeff -- could you coordinate with Rosie to get the time and place nailed down?
=====================================
|
2,557 |
Subject: Request for Confidential Information from The Attorney General
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/2427.
=====================================
***Sent on behalf of Sandi Thompson***
To All California Power Exchange Participants:
Notice is hereby provided pursuant to Section 19.3.4 of the California Power
Exchange Tariff that the Attorney General for the State of California (AG), as
part of an ongoing investigation of California markets, has requested
information that may be confidential under Section 19.3.2 of the Tariff.
Such
information is detailed in the attached subpoena. The California Power
Exchange
will provide such information no later than Wednesday, October 25, 2000. If
you
desire to assert a claim of privilege or confidentiality pursuant to legal
authority, the California Power Exchange will include your written assertion
of
that claim together with its submittal to the AG, provided that it is timely
received. Your written statement should be directed to the AG as follows:
Bill Lockyer, Attorney General
Attn: Richard Rochman, Deputy Attorney General
455 Golden Gate Avenue, Suite 11000
San Francisco, CA 94102-7004
Please deliver your statement to the California Power Exchange as follows:
Karen Koyano
California Power Exchange
1000 S. Fremont Avenue
Unit 20
Alhambra, CA 91801
626.537.3173 facsimile
Any written statement must be received no later than Friday, October 20, 2000,
5:00 p.m. Pacific Daylight Time, to be included with any information delivered
to the AG. You are also free to take any other legal action you may deem
appropriate in the circumstances of this inquiry.
Thank you.
(See attached file: calpxsubpoena1 AG 10-3-00.doc) (See attached
file:
AG Confidentiality Ltr 10-13-00.doc)
- calpxsubpoena1 AG 10-3-00.doc
- AG Confidentiality Ltr 10-13-00.doc
=====================================
|
2,558 |
Subject: Re: core/non-core
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/4605.
=====================================
Thanks Robert:
One caution. It's important that the first-cut analysis be "simple" and
uses, to the maximum extent possible, the MOU numbers and modeling. This
allows us to explain a complex situation to people who aren't necessarily
"numbers oriented" and to do so with an "apples-to-apples" comparison.
That's not to say that we won't be doing scenarios--we will--but it's
important to have, at the outset, the cleanest, simplest version of "here's
what core/noncore looks like when we apply your numbers to your model." That
said, I understand that even with the simple base case, some tweeks are
likely. Talk to you in an hour. Thanks again for the help.
Best,
Jeff
Robert Neustaedter@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
05/15/2001 11:24 AM
To: Michael Tribolet/ENRON@enronXgate, Kortney Brown/Enron@EnronXGate,
Jeffrey A Soo/Enron@EnronXGate, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@ENRON, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: core/non-core
The CPUC decision on rate design should be used to develop the core rate
comparison. That decision has not been issued yet, but it may happen today.
It would take the form as the schedules that have been previously used, but I
think we can use a more summarized version of it.
With regard to calculation of the transmission component, I agree that the
T&D rate for core, if allocated on a system average basis is understated.
Reviewing some data filed by PG&E in the rate design hearing, I suggest that
the T&D component be factored up by 1.25. This is based on the average T&D
component for PG&E's "core" customers to the average system T&D rate
component. Similar information was not available for SCE and San Diego, but
suggest it could be used as a proxy.
Robert
=====================================
|
2,559 |
Subject: Re:
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/4236.
=====================================
thanks. my assumption is that, with respect to power plant siting and what
we ought to do, you'll take the lead tomorrow. does it make sense for now to
leave a "placeholder' under that one and we can discuss further tomorrow, or
would you prefer to put a specific item in there now, like "Legislature
should revisit last session's streamlining bill?"
Sandra McCubbin
12/04/2000 03:15 PM
To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Re:
thoughts on messages..couldn't 1 and 2 be combined...the thinking in Sacto by
people like Rod is to come up with a portolio approach for the utilities..do
you think considering what has been going on at the CPUC that using natural
gas deregulation is a good example, even though it is, but it may set off red
flags. I think that the action point on 3 should not focus on the CPUC as
with the current climate it will never happen there..I assume it will have to
be legislative action or the legislature ordering the CPUC to do it.As to
streamlining of regulations, we should talk about a clean up of last year's
legislation..particularly regarding union contracts...as to air quality, Sam
is hesitant at this time, to raise air issues, while they are in serious
negotiations with some of the projects, and he is afraid that the legislature
could highlight these and they could go south..inter basin transfers is a
good example..it can be done without legislation..having local permitting
done concurrent with the CEC process is one important issue..in terms of
actions, I would rather say that we are working closely with the CEC. We may
also want to mention Rod's idea of public private partnership and how we want
to flesh that out..he is open to suggestions.
=====================================
|
2,560 |
Subject: Independent Institute Price Cap Protest Letter from Economists
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/11642.
=====================================
David Theroux at the Independent Institute in Oakland, California became
concerned over Enron's involvement in this project, so he has decided to fund
the project internally.
He anticipates that the letters will go out to economists around the country
when the school year starts (just several weeks away in some places) and
hopes to complete the project by October. They got around 540 economists for
their health care price cap letter. It will be interesting to see how many
signatures they get for electricity price caps. I sent him our draft letter,
and he is massaging the language between wholesale price decontrol and the
use of real-time pricing at retail.
I offered the use of our university contacts to help gather signatures, but I
don't know if he will even want in-kind help. Anyway, we can do something
else with the $30,000 that we were going to try to funnel to them.
- Rob
-----Original Message-----
From: David Theroux <[email protected]>@ENRON
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-David+20Theroux+20+3CDTheroux+40independent+2Eorg+3E+40ENRO
[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2001 3:44 PM
To: [email protected] (Ropb Bradley)
Subject: Hello
Dear Rob,
We have been pursuing the possibility of addressing the matter of
price controls as they pertain to electricity markets as we have done
in the past with our other Open Letters.
But in doing so, we would only pursue the matter independently
without the involvement or support of any businesses or other
organizations in this or related fields.
Best regards,
David
--
David J. Theroux
Founder and President
The Independent Institute
100 Swan Way
Oakland, CA 94621-1428
510-632-1366 Phone
510-568-6040 Fax
[email protected]
http://www.independent.org
=====================================
|
2,561 |
Subject: E204 Team Assignments
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/454.
=====================================
Dear E204-1 and E204-2 Students,
Next time, I will keep my cursor away from the Send button until I've
finished with my message! Here are the attached sheets with the
student sign-ups. Refer to the prior message (Subject-less) for
notes on who has been added/deleted from a team. Team Assignment #1
is due by 6 PM Wed (4/19) or Thurs (4/20) according to your team
listing (as attached). 1-pt penalty for each day late. All team members
must print Last Name, First Name and initial the front sheet, which is to be
handed in as the front-sheet to your report. You do NOT have to use color
printing, a binder, etc. However, you should print out your Excel
spreadsheets
with the row and column labels (use Format - Page Setup commands to print
lines
and row/col labels, and you can print Landscape if it fits your spreadsheet
better.
To print the formula cells, you can hit Control - ~ (the tilda key in
upper left of keyboard) together, and the spreadsheet will display the
formulae for printing
--make sure the columns are wide enough to display them. You should show your
original spreadsheet, formula cell spreadsheet, and final/optimal
spreadsheet for
the problems, with clear labels as to which problem part they refer. You
should also
print the (completed) Solver Dialogue Box (you can click on it and
paste/copy it).
The presumption will be that anyone whose name is not printed and initialed on
the front sheet of the report did not contribute and will not earn credit.
--Tom McCullough
=======================================================================
Tom McCullough
Senior Lecturer
Haas School of Business
University of California at Berkeley
==========================================================================
=====================================
|
2,562 |
Subject: Re: Strategy
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/188.
=====================================
Great food for thought. Thanks. My only concern is timing. Likely to be
spending the balance of the week (tomorrow and Friday) on prep for the
FERC/House subcomittee hearings. We can discuss further on the staff meeting
call tomorrow.
Paul Kaufman@ECT
09/06/2000 07:16 PM
To: Sandra McCubbin/SFO/EES@EES, Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES
cc: James D Steffes/HOU/EES@EES, Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: Strategy
I'd like us to take a stab at drafting the California strategy so we can
present initial thoughts at the meeting I'm hoping to set up next Wednesday
in D.C. (Discussed under separate e-mail). To that end, I suggest the
following outline for the strategy:
What are our specific business interests in California? Let's be as specific
as possible, but limit the list to "hot buttons." In this regard, Jim
Steffes identified "the imposition of price caps in the summer of 2001" as
the hot button. Are there others?
What are the forums we expect will affect our business interests?
For each forum, how do we want to posture Enron? Do we want to be the most
aggressive company? Do we want to act alone? Do we want to work only in
coalitions? What about IEP? What will motivate us to act independently?
What is our overall strategy? Do we want to go back to our pre-1999
rhetoric? We can scream louder than anyone else that California didn't do it
right.. Peace will be gone ... should we breach Steve K.'s promise to play
nice? Do we want to tear down AB 1890 or shore it up?
Forum-by-forum identify our: (a) goals; (b) strategy; (c) what we (Enron)
want out of the forum. For example, re: the legislature, do we want to
identify legislation that we will seek affirmatively? If not, why not?
=====================================
|
2,563 |
Subject: IMPORTANT-- your own Nexis password
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/1636.
=====================================
Dear Students,
You will be receiving a folded, sealed letter from CIS in your MBA mailbox
this week. DO NOT DISCARD IT. It contains your ID and password for
accessing a powerful version of Nexis-Lexis. Please keep this letter
and/or write down your ID and password in a secure location for future
reference. IDs and passwords are not case sensitive and should contain no
spaces.
This version of Nexis, Nexis.Com, contains significantly more resources
than you will find on the unpassworded, Nexis Academic Universe that we
have had access to in the past. Also unlike Academic Universe, you will
now be able to search across a number of different publication types all at
once, download and print multiple records, and have Nexis automatically
email you updated information on topics that you have researched.
We have been chosen as a test site for this new B-School program. As noted
in your letter, you will have access to Nexis.Com until the end of the May
when the trial ends. Please be sure to read and honor the restrictions
outliined on your letter.
If there is enough interest, we will schedule some training sessions that
highlight the advanced search features of Nexis.Com. In the meantime,
please be sure to try the online tutorial and read the help and search tip
screens available on Nexis.
We hope you find this helpful,
Your Long Library Reference Staff,
Rebecca L'Hermitte
Gary Peete
Monica Singh
Milton Ternberg
___________________________________________________________
Gary Peete
Manager, Financial Engineering Laboratory
Haas School of Business &
Head of Reference Services
Thomas J. Long Business & Economics Library
Walter A. Haas School of Business
University of California
Berkeley, California
510 643-6471
=====================================
|
2,564 |
Subject: Project Tracking
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/3641.
=====================================
fyi
gngr
713-853-7751
----- Forwarded by Ginger Dernehl/NA/Enron on 11/18/2000 07:35 AM -----
Elizabeth Linnell
11/17/2000 02:36 PM
To: Ginger Dernehl/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Project Tracking
Ginger - This has been tested and should now work for everyone. Please
forward this message to Rick's group.
Project Tracking (with RCRs) has been moved from the EES server to the Corp
server. We need to re-establish everyone's connection to the application.
To check to see if you have a link to the correct copy of the application, in
Lotus Notes right click on each link to the application, then select
Database, Properties, and check the server name, which should be ENE-NS05.
If it is this server name, you can skip the rest of this message.
If that's not the server you're accessing for each link, follow these steps.
- Delete from your Lotus Notes workspace your existing links to the project
tracking system. You should have three links - Project Tracking, Projects
and Contacts. To delete each link, click on the link and press the delete
key.
- Click on each of the attached links to re-load the system on the new
server. When you click each one, it will add the link to your Lotus Notes
workspace. You should be launched into the database as each database loads.
Please double check each link following the directions at the beginning of
this message to make sure it's linked to the ENE-NS05 server.
- If the server name is different, please leave me a voicemail or send me an
e-mail.
The Projects database is the one you'll access for project management and
RCRs. The Contacts database was created for future use, and the Project
Management database is necessary for administrative purposes.
=====================================
|
2,565 |
Subject: Menus for Friday Lunch
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/deleted_items/1964.
=====================================
Please look at the "box lunch menu's" at the bottom of this e:mail and let me know if you would like me to order you anything for lunch on Friday, November 9. The meeting will be ending at 12:00 (noon) and some will be rushing to catch flights and might not have time for lunch. My original plan was to order box lunches for everyone, but I thought some of you may not be in a rush and have an interest in dining out. So, please let me know either way what you chose to do.
Thanks!
BOX LUNCHES
THE HERO
Ham, Turkey, Provolone, Salami, Lettuce and Tomato served on a Hoagie Bun
Pickle Spear, Olive and Pepperoncini
Farfalle Pasta Salad
Deli Potato Chips Peanut M&M's
Nutri-Grain Bar Ripe Banana
Chocolate Chip Cookie
Broadmoor Non-sparkling Spring Water
Soda of choice
A MATTER OF CHOICE
Variety of Three Sandwiches
Half Turkey on Whole Wheat with Provolone Cheese
Roast Beef with Cheddar on Petite Onion Roll
Smoked Ham and Swiss Cheese on Marble Rye Bread
*
Mustard Potato Salad
Pickle Spear
Deli Potato Chips Red Delicious Apple
Snickers Bar Magic Coconut Square
Broadmoor Non-sparkling Spring Water
Soda of Choice
CUISINE VIVANTE BOX LUNCH
Water Boiled Bagel and Vegetable Sandwich
Lettuce, Tomato, Cucumber, Alfalfa Sprouts, Mushrooms
Ranch Dressing
*
Crudite of Celery, Carrots and Radishes
Broccoli Florettes and Olives
Low-Fat Italian Dressing
*
Fruit Yogurt Granola Bar
Fruit Salad Cup
Low-Fat Pretzels
Broadmoor Non-sparkling Spring water
Soda of Choice
THE SOUTHWESTERNER
Sliced Roast Sirloin of Beef with Jalapeno Cheese
Seven Grain Kaiser Roll
*
Tortilla Chips, Salsa Dip
Rocky Ford Melon Cocktail
Taos Corn Salad
Kosher Dill Pickle
*
Peanut M&M's
Butterscotch Blondie
Broadmoor Non-sparkling Spring Water
Soda of Choice
=====================================
|
2,566 |
Subject: Re:FIA assignment: Monday pm?
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/9228.
=====================================
I apologize, but I won't be in SF Monday evening, and this week coming up
will be a grinder. I have a lot of time to work on it over the weekend,
though. I can provide a fax number tomorrow where the materials can be sent
to me. And I assume that they are on the Izio site, too. I'm going to go
there now. Tomorrow, I'll try to crunch some numbers and outline the
one-pager and distribute to folks by the end of the day. Then perhaps we can
email each other on Monday and try to make some progress on the memo by the
end of the day. That should put us in pretty good shape to finish it up
Tuesday and Wednesday. If I can't get the materials off of Izio, I'll let
you know. I'll report back in the AM tomorrow with a proposed game plan,
once I've collected all the materials and pondered things a bit. Sound
reasonable? Thoughts? Just let me know.
Mark, I hope that if you're in Denver, that means you're skiing.
Best,
Jeff
"Mark Guinney" <[email protected]>
02/17/2001 12:04 PM
To: "Vavrek; Carolyn (US - San Francisco)" <[email protected]>,
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]"
<[email protected]>, "[email protected]"
<[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: Re:FIA assignment: Monday pm?
Can we schedule a conference call at 8pm on Monday night? I'm returning from
Denver that evening and assuming all goes according to schedule I should be
home
by then.
Jeff- we'll need your conference call making capabilities. You up for it?
**********************************************
Mark D. Guinney, CFA
Consultant
Watson Wyatt Investment Consulting
345 California Street, Ste. 1400
San Francisco, CA 94104
(415) 733-4487 ph.
(415) 733-4190 fax
=====================================
|
2,567 |
Subject: Replay Available for Power Generation Conference Call
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/deleted_items/1656.
=====================================
Good Morning,
For those interested, there is a replay available of our Power Generation
Conference Call which took place yesterday.
The replay number is: 402/220-0140
Pin Number: 7493
The called featured Judah Rose with ICF Consulting.
Topics discussed included: 1. Our private market valuation analysis for the
IPPs; 2. Recent trends in the US power market; 3. Their impact on the
generation supply chain; 4. The relationship between power demand and GDP.
Please email us if you would like a copy of the slides that go along with
Judah's presentation.
Regards,
Neil Stein 212/325-4217
This message is for the named person's use only. It may contain
confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information. No
confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission.
If you receive this message in error, please immediately delete it and all
copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies of it and notify the
sender. You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute,
print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended
recipient. CREDIT SUISSE GROUP and each of its subsidiaries each reserve
the right to monitor all e-mail communications through its networks. Any
views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except
where the message states otherwise and the sender is authorised to state
them to be the views of any such entity.
Unless otherwise stated, any pricing information given in this message is
indicative only, is subject to change and does not constitute an offer to
deal at any price quoted.
Any reference to the terms of executed transactions should be treated as
preliminary only and subject to our formal written confirmation.
=====================================
|
2,568 |
Subject: RE:
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/9062.
=====================================
Don't even worry about it. Thanks for being sensitive to the issue. Good to
see you guys this weekend, despite all the excitement.
Best,
Jeff
"Eldon Sellers" <[email protected]>
02/12/2001 12:24 PM
Please respond to eldon
To: <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: RE:
I didn't get this e-mail until today (I mean I hadn't downloaded anything
for a couple of days and therefore didn't even know it was there). If I had
seen it, I wouldn't have made the comments I made at the dome about wanting
to hear what you had to say about the very things you specified in your
e-mail you didn't want to hear. You must have thought I was deliberately
going against your wishes and I apologize for that. If you remember, the
last time we had talked about the problem re energy, you were not reluctant
to discuss it so I thought something had happened at the dome that needed to
be straightened out. So, as I stated above, if I had seen your e-mail
before going to the dome, I would have understood what was going on.
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2001 12:27 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject:
hi. how's things. my cars getting fixed as we speak! it'll be ready next
tues/wed. I'm very excited about going to the dome this weekend and
looking forward to seeing you guys. can you please bring annie with you?
one small request: i'm pretty frazzled with work, school, etc. and am
looking forward to relaxing and hanging out with you guys. it would be
great to talk about anything other than 1) the electricity crisis and 2)
george w. bush. i figure we can talk for hours about how to get the
railing done on the deck!
best,
jeff
=====================================
|
2,569 |
Subject: Re: Address Information you requested
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/4020.
=====================================
hey, Adam!
My name is Joseph and I'm assistant to Jeff Dasovich, who forwarded your
e-mail to me, as well
as Mona Petrochko, both of whom are directors here in the San Francisco
office.
Please note our address as follows, which applies to Jeff, Mona and myself:
Enron Corp.
101 California Street
Suite 1950
San Francisco CA 94111
Jeff's phone: 415.782.7822
e-mail: [email protected]
Mona's phone: 415.782.7821
e-mail: [email protected]
my phone: 415.782.7841
e-mail: [email protected]
Our fax number: 415.782.7854
Adam, I hope this helps, and if you have any more questions or need any more
info, please do not
hesitate to contact me. (Are you new?? Welcome aboard, fellow Admin!)
Thanks,
Joseph Alamo
Sr. Administrative Assistant
Government Affairs - The Americas
San Francisco CA
---------------------- Forwarded by Joseph Alamo/NA/Enron on 11/29/2000 02:01
PM ---------------------------
From: Jeff Dasovich on 11/29/2000 03:43 PM CST
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
To: Joseph Alamo/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Re: Address Information
Can you get this kind person the info? Thanks very much.
"ADAM KRISTENSEN" <[email protected]>
11/29/2000 03:32 PM
To: [email protected]
cc:
Subject: Address Information
Mr. Dasovich,
Hello, my name is Adam, and I work as an administrative assistant to
Ms. Susan Landwehr in Enron's Minneapolis satellite office. She has
asked me to compile an address list of several of her colleagues,
including yourself.
Unfortunately, I have been unable to find your street address or that
of your coworker, Mona Petrochko. If you could email this
information back to me, it would be much appreciated. Thanks.
Adam Kristensen
ENRON Corp.
=====================================
|
2,570 |
Subject: RE: Accounting PS#4
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/mba__accounting/4.
=====================================
Looks good to me. The only difference I had was on the last question.
Since municipal bond interest is taxable on the book income, but not on the
irs income:
book income - irs income = 100,000-70,000 = 30,000, of which 25,000 is from
municipal bond interest, the other 5,000 is from additional depreciation exp
deducted from the irs income.
AARON, KELLY and MICHAEL are the only ones signed up for tonight. Let them
know if you still want to meet. I will be over in Berkeley studying
tonight. (Maybe I'll cruz by the Wells Fargo room at 7:30 and grab a
burrito!)
See you guys tomorrow!
-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff Dasovich [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 1999 8:42 AM
To: [email protected]; Kimberly Kupiecki; [email protected];
[email protected]
Subject: Accounting PS#4
ooops. here it is.(See attached file: PS#4.xls)
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES on 11/30/99 08:41
AM ---------------------------
Jeff Dasovich on 11/30/99 08:28:12 AM
To: [email protected], Kimberly Kupiecki <[email protected]> @
ENRON, [email protected], [email protected]
cc:
Subject: Accounting PS#4
greetings. first, I think the class is excessively rude to professor zhan.
there, i got that off my chest. i'll shut up now.
second, for what it's worth, here's the accounting homework i took a stab
at over the weekend. it's an excel worksheet. can't vouch for
correctness, but thought i'd throw it out there (as we discussed last nite)
for target practice. can't make the review tonite, but if you find any
glaring errors--or anything else of note--in the homewor,k would love to
hear about them.
best to all during the next couple of weeks,
jeff
=====================================
|
2,571 |
Subject: FW: Save the Golden Gate Park Stables.html
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/2668.
=====================================
Jeff & Alice:
I do not think I forwarded this to you earlier. I hope all is well. I'm
still leasing Bentley but, the Saturday AM classes have been completely
cancelled. I haven't yet determined another option.
I hope to see you at Kari's.
Madeleine
-----Original Message-----
From: Madeleine Todd
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2001 1:16 PM
To: Jeff Walker (E-mail); Jeff Walker (E-mail 2); Pippa Murray (E-mail);
Pippa Murray (E-mail 2); Aimee Ransel (E-mail); Nancy Duval (E-mail);
Edith & Helmut Marsiske (E-mail); Patrice C Scatena (E-mail); Kari Ontko
(E-mail); Lori Hom (E-mail); Nora McGee (E-mail); Michael Spear
(E-mail); Michael Spear (E-mail 2); Laura Newman-Sciarrino (E-mail);
Elise Geske (E-mail); '[email protected]'; Lari Shea (E-mail); Toria
Morrison (E-mail); Amy Gustafson (E-mail); Rob Levy (E-mail)
Subject: Save the Golden Gate Park Stables.html
I thought you might like to know about this web site (below) built to
help save the stables in Golden Gate Park. Please visit the site and do
what you can to help. The site enables easy access to the mayor and the
supervisors.
It would be great if stables received an infusion of capital and became
a first class facility, baring this it would be great to at least keep
horses in the park to keep riding accessible for children in the city.
Please also spread the word that there are many older/beginning horses
looking for peaceful homes. Please let me know if I should contact any
stables directly to determine their interest in adopting these horses.
Thank you,
Madeleine
PS Lori and Kari the barn is eternally grateful for you taking Hobbs,
Yorkie and Oscar.
http://www.savethestables.com/
<<Save the Golden Gate Park Stables.html>>
- Save the Golden Gate Park Stables.html
=====================================
|
2,572 |
Subject: RE: Proposed SCE Negotiation Strategy
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/inbox/821.
=====================================
The Meet & Confer will be meetings and teleconfs held simultaneously at the three utilities' offices. The plan is that I am going over to the meeting at PG&E along with Jeanne Bennett and Dian Grueneich (who represents UC/CSU). AReM's attorney will be at the SCE meeting. AReM has put together a proposal for implementing the suspension (attached) -- that has been sent to all the parties. I think we have New West under control. New West will be at the SCE meeting. Jeff plans to listen in.
-----Original Message-----
From: Steffes, James D.
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 6:04 AM
To: Dasovich, Jeff; Mara, Susan; Tribolet, Michael; Mellencamp, Lisa; Curry, Wanda; Williams, Robert C.; Mike Day (E-mail)
Cc: Shapiro, Richard; Sanders, Richard B.; Sharp, Vicki
Subject: Proposed SCE Negotiation Strategy
Following last week's meeting, here is my recommendation on how to proceed with SCE.
1. Form Enron Negotiation Team
My recommendation is to use the same team we used with PG&E + Jeff Dasovich. My understanding was that Lisa M. was the lead negotiator - I would not change this. Jeff should only be there to make introductions.
2. Meet & Confer (10/29)
Sue Mara and Jeff Dasovich will listen and report back to everyone on what happens.
3. Reformed Stipulation
I would propose that we take a wait and see approach to this document. Based on Dasovich's idea to get together with SCE on Thursday, maybe let this ride.
4. Meeting
My understanding is that (Jeff D. please correct) SCE can meet with us this Thursday. Can everyone make it that needs to be there? Probably meet in California. We should put the laundry list on the table.
Please let me know what else we need to discuss or if anyone disagrees.
Thanks,
Jim
=====================================
|
2,573 |
Subject: RE: Team Project #2---Problem #2
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/mba__quant/4.
=====================================
I worked with Pat on #1. Please find attached what Pat and I put together
for #1
Regards,
-- Shawne
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Saturday, May 06, 2000 10:52 AM
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Team Project #2---Problem #2
I think Dennis, Shawne and I were supposed to work more on #2, but since I
can't recall, I'm sending to all.
First, I apologize. I tried to work directly with the excellent
spreadsheet Carolyn put together, but I kept fumbling, butchering, etc. So
I canibalized her great stuff and created a new spreadsheet, attempting to
incorporate the "clarifications" (yeah, right) that Prof McCullough
distributed via email, and the stuff we talked about during break (i.e.,
timing of cash flows). The answers are at the bottom of the work sheet.
And I've also included the report (though I did not peruse it for errors,
relevancy, etc.).
My biggest concern is question 6. My answer (despite some outliers) sez
that there ain't no loan in June. (This may mean my spreadsheet's got a
fatal flaw--significant probability.)
Finally, doing a series of 1,000 trials resulted in some considerable
variability across runs--again, could be due to screw up on my part--so the
answers I generatd comes from a run of 5,000 trials. (If you run the
sheet, beware, 5,000 takes some time, unless you've got DSL or something.)
Let me know if this is completely out to lunch, or if you're coming up with
something remotely similar.
Best,
Jeff
(See attached file: Problem #2--Dasovich version.xls)(See attached file:
Report for Dasovich Problem #2.xls)
- problem 1.xls
- team assignment 2-1.doc
=====================================
|
2,574 |
Subject: Re: California ISO Credit
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/3384.
=====================================
We should cast a little broader net on this internally--Yoder, Calger,
Belden, Foster, Sanders, etc.--but seems that, given the Governor's actions
as of late, the likelihood of nonpayment might even be a bit higher than 25%.
Best,
Jeff
Harry Kingerski
02/25/2001 08:54 PM
To: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: California ISO Credit
ok swammies -
I told Neil I'd gather some input - my assessment is 25% probability that
payment is not received within one year; probability is nil that it won't be
received at all. Your thoughts?
----- Forwarded by Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron on 02/25/2001 08:52 PM -----
Neil Bresnan@EES
02/23/2001 05:45 PM
To: Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Michael Tribolet/ENRON@enronXgate
cc: Don Black/HOU/EES@EES, Dennis Benevides/HOU/EES@EES, Jubran
Whalan/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: California ISO Credit
Michael,
With the dissolution of the PX we are exploring various markets in an attempt
to shape our load and minimise our credit exposure to counterparts such as
the ISO. We are continuing to work with EPMI to manage the risk associated
with selling any volume into the Cal ISO. Currently we are purchasing power
on a daily basis from the market to meet the highest common on and off peak
hour. This strategy leaves us long for all the other hours but reduces our
exposure to ISO penalties for under scheduling . Our most promising options
are to sell the excess shoulder power into the PX imbalance market or OTC
hour ahead. We are concerned about any receivable from the ISO and would like
to know what you think the probability is of non-payment. If we do receive
payment over what time period can we expect to receive it.
NFB
=====================================
|
2,575 |
Subject: Open Immediately - Data Request for Bulk Power Investigation
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['Richard Shapiro', 'Susan J Mara/SFO/EES@EES', 'Lysa Akin/PDX/ECT@ECT', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/186.
=====================================
---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Hain/HOU/ECT on 09/05/2000 09:45
AM
---------------------------
Mary Hain
09/05/2000 09:33 AM
To: Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, James D
Steffes/HOU/EES@EES, Richard Sanders, Joe Hartsoe@Enron, Mark E
Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT, [email protected]
cc: Richard Shapiro, Susan J Mara/SFO/EES@EES, Lysa Akin/PDX/ECT@ECT
Subject: Open Immediately - Data Request for Bulk Power Investigation
We need to have a conference call about this ASAP. These are due Friday!
---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Hain/HOU/ECT on 09/05/2000 09:35
AM
---------------------------
(Embedded Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.
image moved
to file: From: "Michelle Veloso"
pic14271.pcx) <[email protected]>
09/05/2000 08:57 AM
To: <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: Data Request for Bulk Power Investigation
Mary:
Attached is a copy of the data request for FERC's Bulk Power Investigation=
.
Please consider this e-mail as our official data request.
As far as the deadline, we'd like to have the information as soon as possi=
ble
but we realize that doesn't give you much time.=01; As I mentioned, some o=
f the
information probably won't require much effort, but we are asking =20
for=01;specifics
on generators which may take longer.=01; Just do the best you can.=01; Als=
o, if you
find that you have the information in a different format from the way we'v=
e
requested it, that will probably be fine for our purposes.
Please feel free to call if you have any questions.
Thanks.
Michelle Veloso
202/208-2008
(See attached file: generators&marketers.wpd)
- pic14271.pcx
- generators&marketers.wpd
=====================================
|
2,576 |
Subject: Re: Secone Extraordinary Session
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/4527.
=====================================
So does this mean we're right where we left off with respect to status of
bills like wind-fall profits, jails for generators, etc.?
Scott Govenar <[email protected]>
05/10/2001 05:28 PM
To: Hedy Govenar <[email protected]>, Mike Day <[email protected]>, Bev
Hansen <[email protected]>, Jeff Dasovich <[email protected]>, Susan J Mara
<[email protected]>, Paul Kaufman <[email protected]>, Michael McDonald
<[email protected]>, Sandra McCubbin <[email protected]>,
Rick Shapiro <[email protected]>, Jim Steffes <[email protected]>,
Alan Comnes <[email protected]>, Steven Kean <[email protected]>, Karen
Denne <[email protected]>, "[email protected]"
<[email protected]>, Mike D Smith <[email protected]>, Leslie Lawner
<[email protected]>, Robert Frank <[email protected]>, Ken Smith
<[email protected]>, Janel Guerrero <[email protected]>,
Miyung Buster <[email protected]>, Jennifer Thome
<[email protected]>, Eric Letke <[email protected]>, Mary Schoen
<[email protected]>, David Leboe <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: Secone Extraordinary Session
At the request of Senate President Pro Tem John Burton and Senate
Minority Leader Jim Brulte, the Senate desk has arranged for the
preparation of all First Ex bills for reintroduction as Second Ex bills,
retaining the same numbers. These measures will be redrafted in their
last First Ex version or, in the case of those already having reached
the Assembly, in the form in which they left the Senate.
It is the intention of the President Pro Tem to move all measures in the
new extraordinary session to the same place they remained at the end of
the first extraordinary session.
=====================================
|
2,577 |
Subject: Re:
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/3508.
=====================================
Dr. Littlechild.
I'm very disappointed that our schedules seemed to pass in the night. I had
an engagement on Monday night, which regrettably kept me from having dinner
with the speakers. And Tuesday I was traveling. I tried to call the
Claremont and had a dreadful time trying to leave you a message. If you
haven't left the states yet, I would very much like to get together.
Otherwise, I'll just have to come to London. I understand that David Teece
has filled you in on our discussions. Would like to discuss that futher with
you. It was a great pleasure to meet you, however briefly, and I hope that
our paths cross again very soon.
All the best,
Jeff
"Stephen Littlechild" <[email protected]>
11/14/2000 11:46 AM
To: [email protected]
cc:
Subject:
Jeff
Sorry we missed last night. I was expecting to see you at the dinner. I
should like to visit the office if there is time. My constraints today are
lecture at Berkeley 12.30 to 2pm, and they suggest I should be there around
11.30 beforehand. Also a request to meet someone from STG consulting, with
whom I am doing some work, probably in Menlo Park, and an invitation to
dinner in Berkeley area. I had thought we might meet this morning before the
lecture, but probably too late now. Could do afterwards, en route to Menlo
Park? I am at Claremont Hotel until around 11.15, tel 510 843 3000 room 325.
Am in Business Centre on Hotmail at present but computer's a bit slow here.
Regards
Stephen
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
http://profiles.msn.com.
=====================================
|
2,578 |
Subject: Fwd: Jazz on a Summer's Day / "music" list
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/62.
=====================================
? Ajay Sreekanth <[email protected]> wrote:
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2000 13:00:06 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ajay Sreekanth
To: [email protected]
CC: [email protected]
Subject: Jazz on a Summer's Day / "music" list
"Jazz on a Summer's Day, the FABULOUS documentary featuring
performances from the 1958 Newport Jazz Festival is playing on the big
screen in Berkeley!!! It's at the Fine Arts Cinema (at 2451 Shattuck
@ Haste) from the 23rd to the 29th at 9:10 p.m. daily.
Forget the Woodstock film - this is the first live concert film and is
unanimously considered to be the best. In my opinion, Mahalia
Jackson's closing performance is worth the price of admission alone,
but in addition it features Louis Armstrong, Thelonious Monk, Art
Pepper, Chuck Berry (I think) and a whole bunch of other legends.
Even better, it's part of a double feature, with "Louis Prima:! T! he
Wildest" at 7:30 p.m. daily. I haven't seen this, but it promises to
be a blast too - to hell with the Gap commercials - see the original
"Jump, Jive An' Wail" swing master whom everyone from Brian Setzer to
David Lee Roth ripped off. He also wrote "Sing, Sing, Sing" that was
popularized by Benny Goodman.
MBA '02-ers, I will not spam your whole class again. The "music"
mailing list is used to send out information about upcoming live
music events in the area, and often coordinate ticket purchases,
rides, etc.
If you'd like, subscribe to the list in the usual way - either mail
subscribe music
in the body of the message to "majordomo@haas", or do so over the Web.
---
- Ajay Sreekanth "A bear however hard he tries,
([email protected]) Grows tubby without exercise."
- A. A. Milne
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - Free email you can access from anywhere!
=====================================
|
2,579 |
Subject: PICKS OF THE WEEK - WEEK 1
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['e-mail <[email protected]', 'e-mail <[email protected]', 'e-mail <[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/inbox/59.
=====================================
Welcome back all of you veteran pickers! I?d like to introduce our three
new rookies:
The Deitrick?s - Val and Scott - from napa
Andy Bledsoe - from Napa
Kent Deverell - from San Francisco
Good luck to all!!
Steve McCarthy is not in the pool this year (we'll miss his bazaar picks)
and we aren't sure if Carlton is still in. If he is, we'll have a total of
27; if not it'll be 26. We'll send out a completed report of the projected
payouts before the first week of the season starts.
Attached are two Excel files. The first one just has the pick sheet for
week #1
One easy way to submit the weekly picks is to:
1) Click on this sheet and open it in Excel
2) Fill in the information at the top
3) Make your weekly picks by putting numbers in the cell with the line under
it by the team you want to pick. (This will also give you a check figure at
the bottom to be sure you have gotten, at least, the correct total - not
necessarily the WINNING numbers, however!)
4) Save and close the file
5) Use "FORWARD" to get the e-mail back to me at [email protected]
6) If you use "REPLY" the attachment does not get sent
It really makes a huge difference in the amount of time it takes to do the
statistical work if you use this form so we really appreciate getting your
picks this way.
Here is an Excel workbook that contains a tab for every week - so all 17
weeks are here plus a sample. However, all you need to send back is the
sheet for the current week. Just to make it easier, (or in case you've
misplaced the attachment) we'll send out, via e-mail, each upcoming week's
pick sheet in time for you to make your selections. If you have any
questions about Excel please give me a call at (707) 255-4813 or call Nancy
at (707) 251-4870.
Eldon
=====================================
|
2,580 |
Subject: Re: tax issues
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/2176.
=====================================
Yes, definitely. We need to get a handle on compliance issues, generally,
including tax.
Susan M Landwehr
11/29/2000 05:21 PM
To: Sue Nord/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Tracy Cooper/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Ricardo
Charvel/NA/Enron@Enron, [email protected], Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron,
Barbara A Hueter/NA/Enron@Enron, Donald Lassere/NA/Enron@Enron, Lara
Leibman/NA/Enron@Enron, Sue Nord/NA/Enron@Enron, Mona L
Petrochko/NA/Enron@Enron, Margo Reyna/NA/Enron@Enron, Marchris
Robinson/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Xi Xi/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Scott Bolton/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications
Subject: tax issues
Sue--a suggestion for discussion at our next weekly call. As one of our
Illinios IXC certification reporting requirements, EBS must file an
application/registration with the Illinois Dept of Revenue and presumably
will need to pay taxes to the the State of Illinois. Our lawyer passed on
the form to be completed, and Tracy had sent it to the tax department in
Portland. There seems to be ongoing confusion as to who should actually file
this document (I would argue that the EBS tax department is the group that
needs to do so, as well as establish an ongoing relationship with the folks
at the Dept of Revenue) and who administratively needs to set up a system to
handle any interaction with the Revenue dept.
Since our IXC certifcations have only started to take place in 2000 this
issue may not have hit the tax department before, but I've got to believe
that just about every state in the union is going to want to tax us on
something, so I think we need to explore the issue further. Could you please
add to our agenda for next week?
=====================================
|
2,581 |
Subject: Comercial Opps. T.F.
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/commercial_opportunities_task_force/4.
=====================================
In follow-up to our off-site in N.O. I felt it would be good to have a
conference call and discuss our next steps. I am looking at sometime on
Friday the 10th at 11:00 Central. If too many people have a conflict with
the 10th then we can go to monday the 13th. Please call Terri Miller at
603-223-2520 and let her know if the 10th is impossible.
First, I want to thank Margaret Carson for putting together the information
summaries that Martin Wenzel requested at our meeting. I understand the Tier
I summaries were very well received at Martin's staff meeting and that Martin
is looking forward to getting something on theTier II states soon as well.
Second, I have attempted to take what we learned from Jeff and Martin in New
Orleans and to condense it into a powerpoint presentation which is attached.
This is just a rough draft so please take a look at it and give me your
comments on the 10th. It needs work and I want your input. If we have
something ready in time I may try to present this at the Woodlands meeting.
Let me know what you think.
Third, we need to start thinking about communications. I was hoping to meet
in Houston in connection with the Woodlands meeting and get some input from
ECI like we did with Jeff and Martin. So please check your schedules around
the 30th and let me know if that works.
Finally, and perhaps most importently, I want to get a deal pipeline going as
our May 1 deliverable approaches. Please give some thought as to how we can
work with everyone at Government Affairs in each of the four regions to
collect a list of the potential commercial opportunities we are, or could be,
pursuing with the business units.
Thanks again for your help. I look forward to talking to you all.
=====================================
|
2,582 |
Subject: Re: Brief on Rate Design
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/3982.
=====================================
Jeanne,
I am included my modifications to your brief.
I have rearranged the topics somewhat because I think our most important
point in to stress the importance of using market based prices -- and,
failing the acceptance of our proposal -- to stress that on-peak pricing not
be unduly or arbitrarily high.
My comments have been restricted to this section on market based pricing. I
have also tried to answer the questions you had in [ ...].
Please consider my comments to be from Scott and me since we are working
together on this brief. I have other suggestions but wanted to get these to
you first.
Thanks,
/TJ
JBennett <[email protected]> on 04/23/2001 11:14:00 AM
To: "Harry Kingerski (E-mail)" <[email protected]>,
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
cc:
Subject: Brief on Rate Design
Attached is the initial draft of the brief on rate design. As of now it is
still due on Friday the 27th (although the ALJ indicated Friday afternoon
that there may be some slippage until Monday).
Keeping with a discussion that Leslie, Harry and I had on Friday, I have
kept the brief short -- focusing solely on our proposal. As Leslie said in
her e-mail about Friday's hearing, there is alot of animosity towards Enron.
The ALJ is clearly no on our side. Weighing in on issues where others are
carrying the ball (direct access, reallocation of 130% of baseline exemption
revenues) is unnecessary and may hurt instead of help our cause.
Any way, take a look at the brief, and we can perhaps have a call on
Wednesday to discuss.
<<X23764.DOC>>
- X23764.DOC
=====================================
|
2,583 |
Subject: RE: Transmission Data/PG&E and SCE
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/9280.
=====================================
I ran two scenarios below to illustrate Enterprise Value in a sale
scenario. If a company is upside down (more debt than enterprise value),
the losses to creditors are only reduced if someone overpays for the assets.
Otherwise it just shrinks the enterprise value and debt $1:$1. The proceeds
would first go to the secured mortgage bonds then to the unsecureds (they
funded a good deal of the undercollection).
Scenario 1 (at FMV) Current Sale Proforma
Enterprise value 800 -200 600
Debt 1,000 -200 800
Loss $ (200) (200)
Loss % -20% -25%
Scenario 1 (at $100 over FMV) Current Sale Proforma
Enterprise value 800 -200 600
Debt 1,000 -300 700
Loss $ (200) (100)
Loss % -20% -14%
-----Original Message-----
From: Comnes, Alan
Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2001 5:14 PM
To: Kingerski, Harry; Tribolet, Michael
Cc: Dasovich, Jeff
Subject: Re: Transmission Data/PG&E and SCE
Harry,
Thanks. Let me know what else I can do.
Harry or Michael T:
If you see anything that gives more details to the securitization proposal, I
would like to see it.
Once question I have is the assets are currently supported by corporate
debt: probably to the tune of 50-60%. If the state buys that portion, it
will reduce the debt coverage ratio of the corporate debt that now must be
supported by only distribution operations. Thus, it would seem to me that
some of the state purchase proceeds would need to go to retiring corporate
debt before it could be used to pay down the undercollection.
Alan Comnes
=====================================
|
2,584 |
Subject: fia group project
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/4691.
=====================================
attached is a word doc of some basic articles from the web re: the coke/oat
almost deal
it seems that pepsi took coke by surprise in announcing an offer for oat at
14.8 billion, which oat rejected thinking it was worth at least 15 billion
then coke put together a deal for 15.75 billion which was nixed at the last
minute by the coke board (buffet, etc.) although it was not formally voted on
french co. danone also contemplated a bid for oat
oat accepted a bid by pepsi for 13.4 billion (or more depending on pepsi's
stock price) but can still walk away if pepsi's stock drops below 40/share
everyone wanted the gatorade brand, which accounts for 1/2 of oat's earnings
- are going to expand its distribution in both the us and especially overseas
given that there were so many parties bidding on oat over a short period of
time, perhaps our project could focus on:
- oats business strategy
- how we would value oat
- what advice we would give to one or all of the companies (oat, coke, pepsi
or danone)
- how the market reacted to this deal (look at the stock prices of oat, coke,
pepsi and danone during this time)
- cv
<<oat research 1.doc>>
Carolyn M. Vavrek
Manager - Human Capital Advisory Services
Deloitte & Touche
50 Fremont Street
San Francisco, CA? 94105
phone: 415-783-5137
fax: 415-783-8760
e-mail: [email protected]
This message (including any attachments) contains confidential information
intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is protected by law.? If
you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this message and are
hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this
message, or the taking of any action based on it, is strictly prohibited.
- oat research 1.doc
=====================================
|
2,585 |
Subject: MEETING RE: CALIFORNIA
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/1199.
=====================================
Per Paul's message below, we have finalized the details of the meeting as
follows:
Date: Tuesday, Sept. 12th
Time: 5:00pm-6:30pm
Place: Consulate Room - Ritz Carlton Hotel (6th Floor)
If you have any questions, please call Paul at 503/464-7945 or you can reach
me via e-mail or at 503/464-7927.
---------------------- Forwarded by Lysa Akin/PDX/ECT on 09/07/2000 11:06 AM
---------------------------
Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.
From: "Paul Kaufman" <[email protected]>
09/06/2000 05:06 PM
To: "James D Steffes" <[email protected]>, "Susan J Mara"
<[email protected]>, "Mary Hain" <[email protected]>, "Jeff Dasovich"
<[email protected]>, "Mona Petrochko" <[email protected]>,
"Sandra McCubbin" <[email protected]>, "Joe Hartsoe"
<[email protected]>, "Sarah Novosel" <[email protected]>
cc: [email protected]
Subject: MEETING RE: CALIFORNIA
By this e-mail I'm requesting that we all meet on Wednesday, September 13,
2000,
for breakfast to discuss the California/FERC wholesale issues that have been
plaguing us and will plague us over the next year or so. I suggest that the
meeting be limited to: (1) an identification of the inventory of forums we
are
facing; and (2) our allocation of resources to the inventory. If time
permits,
we can also have a substantive discussion of the issues. In this regard, if
its
ready, we can present an overview of the California strategy that is being
developed (initially) by Sandi and Jeff.
Respond ASAP directly to Lysa Akin with your interest in participating in this
meeting.
Lysa: once we have a head count, please get us a meeting room and breakfast.
We'll need an easel with paper and markers.
=====================================
|
2,586 |
Subject: Financial Times
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/204.
=====================================
Hi all,
I hope the Financial Times has been working with you to get the paper
delivered to you. For those of you who are still having trouble, I have
arranged for 20 papers a day to come to the Evening MBA Program office as a
work-around for the rest of the term. We will keep a few days worth as
space allows.
Please follow a couple of ground rules so that this will work for everyone:
*Please be considerate and only take a paper if you are sure that you did
not receive one at home. Do not take one just because you left yours at
home. If you want to review the paper at Haas before class, please use the
Web or the Long Library copies.
*In the event of a delivery problem, please call or e-mail the Financial
Times (see below), unless they have just told you that they cannot get the
paper to you. In this case, ask FT to mail the paper to you instead of
reluctantly trying to get a carrier to go to your house.
*Be patient if you come to the office and we have run out of papers. We
will try to increase the number of back-ups if necessary.
*When you come to the office to pick up a paper we will have a list for you
to record the missed delivery. Please help us to track the problems.
We received our first papers today and have last Friday's as well.
For contacting the Financial Times in the event of problems or address
changes, please ask for Gayle at: FT Education [[email protected]]
or (800) 628-8088.
I hope this is helpful to those of you who have had severe problems with
the paper.
Have a great SHORT week and a happy Thanksgiving.
-Shawn
_________________________________________
Shawn Allison, Associate Director
Evening MBA Program, Haas School of Business
University of California, Berkeley
Tel (510) 643-0435 Fax (510) 643-5902
=====================================
|
2,587 |
Subject: FW: CLECA/CIU/SVMG
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent_items/50.
=====================================
FYI.
-----Original Message-----
From: Dan Douglass [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 10:36 PM
To: Vicki Sandler; Tamara Johnson; Mara, Susan; Steve Huhman; Roger Pelote;=
Rob Nichol; Randy Hickok; Nam Nguyen; Jim Crossen; Dasovich, Jeff; Janie M=
ollon; Jack Pigott; Greg Blue; George Vaughn; Gary Ackerman; Ed Cazalet; De=
nice Cazalet Purdum; Curtis Kebler; Curt Hatton; Corby Gardiner; Charles Mi=
essner; Carolyn Baker; Bill Ross; Karen Shea; Max Bulk; ARM
Subject: CLECA/CIU/SVMG
CLECA, CIU and the Silicon Valley Manufacturing Group have also come out wi=
th all guns blazing against the draft decision dealing with the DWR revenue=
requirement. They decry the lack of hearings, state that there are fundam=
ental untruths in the decision and conclude that, "The DWR has made it clea=
r that it needs to have a decision on its revenue requirements quickly so t=
hat it can successfully issue bonds to generate revenue to re-pay the gener=
al fund. No one has been permitted to test that proposition, but it seems =
to be accepted as fact by decision makers. The problem is that this record=
does not support approval of any particular revenue requirement for DWR an=
d it certainly does not support the allocation proposed in the DD. If the =
Commission must act quickly, then it must act provisionally and set for fur=
ther hearings the many questions identified here and, we suspect, in the co=
mments of many other interested parties concerning the basis of the allocat=
ion among the utilities."
=20
Dan
=20
Law Offices of Daniel W. Douglass
5959 Topanga Canyon Blvd. Suite 244
Woodland Hills, CA 91367
Tel: (818) 596-2201
Fax: (818) 346-6502
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
=====================================
|
2,588 |
Subject: RE: FW: Deregulation Paper
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/3006.
=====================================
If Morrow would only think for himself (instead of trying to anticipate what
his Sempra-masters think), he would understand your comments better. I gave
SoCalGas a hardball because they refuse to deal with our concerns in a
pragmatic way. I'm trying to convince them that it is better to reach
accommodations with PG&E outside of the public arena and that failure to do
so only makes things more difficult for them. Plus, I wanted the
Commissioner's to see some passion. Too many of the speakers were
bloodless, despite their good points, and it went over the heads of the
Commissioners. The Commissioner's want sound bites, so you have to give it
to them. I offered to help on the CSA behind the scenes if the Commission
goes the alternate route to Day and Lorenz .
And I'm having a great time.
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2001 9:26 AM
To: Cherry, Brian
Subject: Re: FW: Deregulation Paper
Rick Morrow was very unhappy with it, which in some ways surprised me.
Man, you were loaded for bear! The points you made came off very
compelling. You enjoying the new role?
"Cherry,
Brian" To: "Dasovich Jeff (E-mail)"
<[email protected] <[email protected]>
> cc:
Subject: FW: Deregulation Paper
05/23/2001
10:39 AM
Here's an interesting paper.....
..by the way, I loved your superhighway/dirt road analogy and expect to
see it in CEM on Friday....
-----Original Message-----
From: Martin Collette [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2001 7:19 PM
To: Cherry, Brian; [email protected]
Subject: Deregulation Paper
(See attached file: Tamiment Paper.doc)
(See attached file: Figures1.ppt)
=====================================
|
2,589 |
Subject: Re: Talking points on gas in CA
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/2979.
=====================================
Christi - I think your two suggested solutions with environmental
implications are probably doable. The issue with retrofitting and burning
fuel oil is going to be the fact that fuel oil has greater emissions and thus
more offsets will be needed. The repowering/increasing of efficiency at
existing generation I believe has been addressed in the just signed SBX 28.
Christi L Nicolay@ECT
05/23/2001 02:27 PM
To: Jennifer Thome/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc: Rebecca W Cantrell/HOU/ECT@ECT, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Ban
Sharma/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Ray
Alvarez/NA/Enron@ENRON, Nancy Bagot/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Janel
Guerrero/Corp/Enron@Enron, Stephanie Miller/Enron@EnronXGate, Mary
Schoen/NA/Enron@Enron, Leslie Lawner/NA/Enron@Enron, Donna
Fulton/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Re: Talking points on gas in CA
Some comments, including a couple environmental ideas (that may not be
feasible--please check).
Jennifer Thome@ENRON
05/23/2001 08:13 AM
To: Rebecca W Cantrell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Ban
Sharma/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Joe
Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Ray Alvarez/NA/Enron@ENRON, Nancy
Bagot/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Janel Guerrero/Corp/Enron@Enron
Subject: Talking points on gas in CA
Becky and Christi:
Attached are revised talking points on natural gas in CA. I have made
revisions to reflect our discussion yesterday (e.g., no price caps, basis
differential is not explained by transportation costs, etc.).
As discussed, I hope to get input from the gas fundamentals group tomorrow
and finalize this document by Friday.
I welcome your feedback.
Jennifer
5-3550
=====================================
|
2,590 |
Subject: Re: Bill Julien
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/29162.
=====================================
Thanks, Hedy:
Not good. John White has a similar view, i.e., Loretta doesn't have many
choices given that the Legislature hasn't executed. John did say, however,
that if we can provide the legal analysis to support doing something other
than "suspend," Loretta is likely to be amenable. Seems like it would be
useful to try to get the analysis, assuming that there's legal analysis to
support an alternative to "suspend."
Hertzberg and I are trading calls. Will report back as soon as I hear
anything.
Best,
Jeff
Hedy Govenar <[email protected]>
07/26/2001 04:02 PM
To: Paul Kaufman <[email protected]>, Jeff Dasovich
<[email protected]>, Bev Hansen <[email protected]>, [email protected]
cc:
Subject: Bill Julien
I spoke with Bill and gave him the background on the DA issue (Turn's
core/noncore, the green portfolio, etc) and asked him about some
possibilities - i.e. could Loretta delay action until after the
Legislature acts on SB18, and/or AB 82, etc.
He responded that Loretta likes the SB18 approach, which she sees as
cheaper and cleaner. But she also is very loyal to the state and
believes the timing is dependent upon the Treasurer's assessment of the
need. Right now Angelides accepts counsel's view that DA has to be
eliminated to market the bonds. Loretta believes the only authority the
Commission has is when to suspend DA, not whether to suspend it.
Angelides is continuing to press her to eliminate it, but she had hoped
the Legislature would take action to give the Commission some
flexibility. That hasn't happened. Their view is that the language of
AB 1x needs to be changed legislatively, since their authority is so
limited. He expects action in the near future, but doesn't know exactly
when.
=====================================
|
2,591 |
Subject: FW: Course Recommendations
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/2755.
=====================================
Sorry to bother you all again, but I have received limited response to my
inquiry for course recommendations for your fellow evening students. I was
hoping to include these recommendations in a Student Advisory Committee
Newsletter I was hoping to distribute before registration for next semester
begins. Thus, if you have any recommendations, please take just a few
moments to send me an e-mail with your thoughts.
Thanks,
Mike Plumb
SAC Chair
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Plumb Michael D
> Sent: Sunday, October 22, 2000 3:11 PM
> To: '[email protected]'
> Subject: Course Recommendations
>
> Fellow Evening Students,
> The time to register for classes for next semester is rapidly approaching.
> I hope to be publishing the first ever Student Advisory Committee (SAC)
> newsletter in the next week or so, and I want to include a section on
> course recommendations from fellow students. I'm sure most of you have
> been at the Pizza dinners in the past and heard a student chime in when
> Diane is discussing a particular course to say what a great class it is.
> I want to capture these recommendations and include them in the newsletter
> for everyone's benefit. I assume most of you have seen, or will see this
> week at the pizza dinners, the tentative evening schedule for next
> semester. If there is a particular course that is offered that you have
> taken and would like to strongly recommend to your fellow students, please
> forward me your recommendation with an explanation via e-mail. Please try
> to get your recommendation to me by the end of the week.
>
> Thanks,
> Mike Plumb
> SAC Chair
>
> Michael Plumb
> Director, Health Services Actuarial - Northern California
> PacifiCare of California
> 415-356-7430
> MS CN81-200
>
=====================================
|
2,592 |
Subject: Rod Wright Meeting
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent_items/230.
=====================================
Steve:
Here's our assessment of Wright's performance in California.
On the plus side:
He is generally pro-business, and has opposed bills that threaten economic growth, e.g., he opposed the windfall profits, and related, bills.
He sided with the California Assembly Republicans to craft an alternative to the "MOU" for Edison that included direct access as a core feature of any MOU.
His decision to work with the Republicans helped move the political "center of gravity"--albeit marginally--more favorably toward direct access in California.
On the negative side:
In each and every case that Rod has had to make a choice between the market, customers and competition on the one hand, and the utility on the other, he has never waivered in his decision--he always put the utility first.
Here are three examples (and there are more):
1) During this extraordinary session, he sponsored a bill that would have explicitly created a "stranded cost charge" for utilities. Yet by most accounts, Californians have already paid off the utilties' stranded costs. How many times must Californians pay? We worked with consumer and business groups to oppose the bill.
2) In the "alternative MOU" that Rod worked on with Republicans, the Replicans told us that Rod insisted on suspending Direct Access until January 1, 2003--a demand that most believe originated with Edison.
3) Rod sponsored a bill two years ago that would prevent any market participant other than the utilities to provide metering and billing services. Today, this issue is less important to us, but it was very important to us at the time, and Rod remained unswervingly in the utilities' camp, despite our efforts.
Hope this helps. If you need any other information, just let me know.
Best,
Jeff
=====================================
|
2,593 |
Subject: White House To Support FERC Action Today
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/12503.
=====================================
FYI regarding the Commission meeting to be held this afternoon. Ray
---------------------- Forwarded by Ray Alvarez/NA/Enron on 06/18/2001 09:43
AM ---------------------------
John Shelk
06/18/2001 08:15 AM
To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Linda Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Tim
Belden/Enron@EnronXGate, Alan Comnes/Enron@EnronXGate, Kevin M
Presto/Enron@EnronXGate, Robert G Johnston/Enron@EnronXGate, Tom
Briggs/NA/Enron@Enron, Pat Shortridge/Corp/Enron@Enron, Carin
Nersesian/NA/Enron@Enron, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Ray
Alvarez/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: White House To Support FERC Action Today
According to this morning's Washington Post, the Bush Administration will
support the expected FERC action today of extending the existing California
price mitigation regime to 10 other Western states and to all days/all hours,
not just during California emergencies (stages 1, 2 and 3). This action
comes only a day before FERC and other witnesses will testify on the
Feinstein/Smith price cap legislation before the Senate Energy Committee,
Gov. Davis and FERC will testify before the Senate Governmental Affairs
Committee on Wednesday, and the House Financial Services Committee joins the
fray with a hearing on the California energy situation on Wednesday. The
latter committee will probably base its jurisdiction over some aspect of
energy policy on a number of factors, including its jurisdiction over
presidential economic emergency powers. The committee staff has in the past
expressed interest in derivatives and other financial aspects of energy
trading and markets. We are checking now to quietly determine whether these
issues will be on Wednesday's agenda.
=====================================
|
2,594 |
Subject: FW: Ted & My Spreadsheet
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/mba__marketing/7.
=====================================
If you are planning on attending Saturday's session, here is the scoop:
1) Please e-mail Jeff to RSVP
2) If you were not at our Tuesday's meeting, attached are two spreadsheets
of the work we covered - you may want to read before Saturday. I have put
names next to some questions based on what Christine put together. If you
don't see your name and plan on coming, either pick a question or address
another area.
2.5) Chris Sklarin will be sending the third
3) Directions are below on how to get to Jeff's office
4) It's almost over!! :) See you on Saturday!!
-Jackie
(I think that we will need to celebrate after the March 8th class!!
Jonathan?)
Jackie, The spreadsheet is attached, pls. distribute to our study group (I
don't have all the e-mail addresses).
The additional questions for any newcomers that can be answered are:
1) Compare the five options given in 'The Decision'. (Jonathan, Alyson)
2) What would happen if all manufacturers (including GM) all retained their
original warranty plans. (Jeff, aiaz)
3) When should the change be implemented? (nick, Courtney)
4) Should the change be implemented for all cars, non-luxury? luxury?
(Cathy, Chris)
Answers should be backed by data (numbers, tables, etc) rather than just
qualitatitve answers.
Crystine
Directions:
Enron Corp
101 California Street (one block from the cable car turnaround)
Suite 1950
>
Enter at the California Street entrance.
Buzz at the door; guard will let you in.
Guard will know to enable elevator to get you to the 19th floor.
I'll keep the door to the office ajar so that folks can enter easily once
on 19th floor.
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
- E206-Mkting-Ford SpreadMS95.xls
- Ford2.xls
=====================================
|
2,595 |
Subject: Exclusive Holiday Offers from Europe
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['ft.com.users":@enron.com']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/1706.
=====================================
Dear FT.com User:
Get a head start on your holiday shopping with these
specialties from the most established and renowned retailers
in Europe. For truly unique gifts, take a look at some of these
exclusive offers at FT.com:
*** Longmire Cufflinks ***
Independent London jeweller and designer of contemporary, classic
or custom-made cufflinks. Warrants of Appointment: Her Majesty the
Queen, The Queen Mother and Prince Phillip.
*** Liberty Fashions ***
An eclectic mix of fashions and homewares united by a vision and
taste that has thrived for 125 years. Traditional materials used
with modern flair have defined Liberty as a European stand-out.
*** Limited edition contemporary art prints from Eyestorm ***
Prints from Andy Warhol, Jeff Koons and Helmut Newton to name a few
at affordable prices.
*** Grays of Cheltenham Customized Gifts ***
For the discerning customer, Grays offers treasures that you can personalize
with initials or sentiments. Choose from a range of traditional to unique
goods including flasks, fountain pens, lighters, clocks, office gifts,
chess sets, trophies, and collectibles.
This holiday season make sure all your gifts are originals, visit:
http://specials.ft.com/timeoff/seasonsgreetings/
Regards,
FT.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Why not forward this e-mail to a friend or colleague who
may find this information useful?
If you no longer wish to receive further e-mails from FT.com,
please send an e-mail to: [email protected]
with the single word "unsubscribe" as the subject of the message.
Your name will then be removed from our mailing list.
If you have forgotten your password for FT.com, please visit:
http://registration.ft.com/registration/passwordLookup.jsp
=====================================
|
2,596 |
Subject: Save the Date- July 9 for a Roundtable on Water/Energy/Public
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/12372.
=====================================
FYI Energy Committee Members
Interested folks:
The Board of Directors of the Silicon Valley Pollution Prevention Center
invites you to join them for a roundtable discussion of creating sustainable
water and energy systems which protect public health.
The Roundtable will begin at 3:00 PM and adjourn at 5:30 PM. Registration
will begin at 2:30 PM in the lobby of the Santa Clara Valley Water District
Board Room, 5700 Almaden Expressway, San Jose, CA (408 265-2600)
The agenda for the Roundtable is as follows:
2:30 to 3:00 PM Registration and refreshments in SCVWD Lobby
3:00 to 3:10 PM Welcome and Introductory remarks: Stan Williams, SCVWD CEO
and President, SV P2 Center & Ted Smith VP SVP2Center
3:10 to 3:20 PM Goals and Guideline: Dennis Church, Facilitator
3:20 to 3:50 PM Energy Systems Discussion: Peter Melhus, PG & E Policy
Consultant
3:50 to 4:00 PM Respondent and Q &A
4:00 to 4:20 PM Water Systems Discussion: Steve Ritchie, Director URS Water
Div.
(former CALFED Manager & SFRWQCB Exec Officer)
4:20 to 4:30 PM Respondent and Q&A
4:30 to 4:50 PM Public Health Discussion of Water & Energy Systems: Lauren
Zeiss, CA Department of Health Services (invited)
4:50 to 5:00 PM Respondent and Q & A
5:00 to 5:20 PM Roundtable Discussion and Next Steps: Dennis Church,
Facilitator
5:20 to 5:30 PM Closing Remarks: Stan Williams, President/Ted Smith VP
SVP2Center
We hope you will be able to attend and participate in this timely and
important discussion. Please respond to this e-mail of your ability and
intentions for attendance. Thanks!
Patrick T. Ferraro, Executive Director
The Silicon Valley Pollution Prevention Center
351 Brookwood Drive, San Jose, CA 95116-2742
Ph: 408 291-0131 Fax: 408 294-1239
E-mail: [email protected],
Web Site: www.svp2center.org
=====================================
|
2,597 |
Subject: Re: Gruma Corp. Cal. mtg--UPDATE
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', 'Craig H Sutter/HOU/EES@EES', 'Kathy']
File: dasovich-j/sent/3181.
=====================================
George:
If you get a minute, could you call to de-brief on the meeting we had the
Gruma? Just want to touch base in the event that there's any follow up.
Hope that it was helpful.
Best,
Jeff
George Tocquigny@EES
02/11/2001 10:15 AM
To: Jeff Dasovich/Na/Enron@ENRON
cc: Kathy Gibbins/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: Re: Gruma Corp. Cal. mtg--UPDATE
thanks, Jeff. It will be 1:30 cst. Kathy will advise a dial-in number.
George
From: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON on 02/10/2001 08:11 PM
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON
To: George Tocquigny/HOU/EES@EES
cc: [email protected], [email protected], Craig H Sutter/HOU/EES@EES, Kathy
Gibbins/HOU/EES@EES, Richard L Zdunkewicz/HOU/EES@EES, Scott Gahn/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: Re: Gruma Corp. Cal. mtg--UPDATE
Just let me know the time of the call. I'll adjust my schedule as needed on
Monday.
Jeff
George Tocquigny@EES
02/09/2001 03:03 PM
To: Jeff Dasovich/Na/Enron@ENRON
cc: Scott Gahn/HOU/EES@EES, Craig H Sutter/HOU/EES@EES, Richard L
Zdunkewicz/HOU/EES@EES, Kathy Gibbins/HOU/EES@EES, [email protected],
[email protected]
Subject: Re: Gruma Corp. Cal. mtg--UPDATE
Jeff,
Thanks for your responsiveness....your willingness to adjust your schedule as
necessary is appreciated. Here's an update on meeting with Gruma.
I've learned that Gruma's Irwin Gordon is in town only Monday before he
leaves for Europe, so assuming he still wants to participate, we will try to
do Monday via conf. call. Please advise any conflicts you have on Monday.
Steve Brunner, Gruma's SVP is supposed to let me know asap.
Craig Sutter and I (at least) will be at Gruma's offices Mon. afternoon for a
previously scheduled meeting.
I will let you know as soon as I learn of Gruma's preferences.
George
303-663-1964
=====================================
|
2,598 |
Subject: Re: funders for PRI study
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/29015.
=====================================
How long do you think it will take for Davis' people and the crazies in the
Legislature to link the study and PRI to the funders?
Susan J Mara
07/23/2001 02:02 PM
To: Richard Shapiro/Enron@EnronXGate, James D Steffes/Enron@EnronXGate, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Karen Denne/Enron@EnronXGate, Paul
Kaufman/Enron@EnronXGate, Linda Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: funders for PRI study
The Pacific Research Institute has agreed to get an abstract out in early
August, and according to Gary, will be marketing it. Will have more info
shortly.
Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854
----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 07/23/2001 11:34 AM -----
Gary Ackerman <[email protected]>
07/23/2001 11:20 AM
Please respond to foothillservices
To: Sue Mara <[email protected]>, Curtis Kebler
<[email protected]>, "Huhman, Steve"
<[email protected]>, Roger Pelote <[email protected]>, Greg
Blue <[email protected]>, George Vaughn <[email protected]>, Mark Smith
<[email protected]>, Bob Anderson <[email protected]>, Marcie
Milner <[email protected]>, John Marchand <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: funders for PRI study
Whereas some of you have not yet committed to funding the PRI study by
Dr. Ben Zycher, five of you have. Those who have not confirmed
participation, please do so ASAP. Per the request of Enron, and agreed
to by PRI, a preliminary abstract of the study will go out in early
August to members of the California Legislature. This is to not only
wet their appetites, but also to provide some timely information in a
positive way while the Legislature remains in session. The abstract
will be distributed by PRI.
gba
=====================================
|
2,599 |
Subject: California Gov. Davis Reaction to CAISO FERC Filing To Raise Price
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/2479.
=====================================
Electric Power Alert - PowerPlus Service
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
California Gov. Davis Decries Cal-ISO FERC Filing To Raise Price Cap
In what California Governor Gray Davis is calling "an outrageous assault on
the consumers and businesses of California," the California Independent
System Operator (Cal-ISO) petitioned FERC Dec. 8 to implement a $250 per
megawatt hour (MWH) "soft cap" on the real-time energy market, replacing the
previous $250 "hard cap." The move has led the Governor to call for swift
draft legislation to dismantle the ISO.
FERC approved the petition the same day, immediately allowing bids beyond
$250 MWH using a "soft cap" which provides for higher bids from power
merchants "if they submit verifiable costs." The Nov. 1 order had suggested a
$150 soft cap, while the Governor had advocated a $100 price cap.
The ISO made the move as California faced a Stage Two Emergency -- and one
day after the state's first ever Stage Three Emergency. The ISO claims the
action was necessary to address a shortage of bids in the ISO market and the
serious under-scheduling of electricity in forward markets. They claim the
new bids create incentive to sell power in the market, and allows the ISO to
compete better for regional energy in the western United States.
The late filing was immediately slammed by Davis, who said he met earlier in
the day with ISO staff who did not disclose that anything was afoot. In a
statement, he declared that this was the work of "a federal agency answerable
to no one and an unaccountable entity that acted without the authorization of
its board of directors." He demanded that the current ISO be dismantled, and
called on Congress to investigate.
=====================================
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.