dataset_id
int64 0
5.47k
| email_body
stringlengths 800
9.73k
|
|---|---|
2,600 |
Subject: Energy Rates - Increases
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/10848.
=====================================
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 04/09/2001 07:11 PM -----
"Carl Guardino" <[email protected]>
04/10/2001 06:10 AM
Please respond to cguardino
To: <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: Energy Rates - Increases
Dear Energy Committee Member -
I just spoke with two of Governor Davis' top energy advisors. As you know,
the Governor mentioned the need for a rate increase in his televised address
last Thursday night. While his speech, and corresponding notes, went into
some detail on how that increase would impact residential customers, it did
not go into great detail on the increase to commercial customers.
As you know, the PUC's proposed increase was not at all proportional
relative to use by residential and commercial customers, and the
corresponding rate increase for each. SVMG has long argued that some level
of increase would probably be necessary, but that any rate increase should
be proportional to use. For instance, since residents use approximately
one-third of the power, then residential customers should absorb one-third
of the increase (taking into account, of course, the most vulnerable
residents), and commercial customers should absorb the two-thirds in a way
that is proportional to use.
I am encouraged by my phone call with the Governor's advisors, in that they
seemed to agree strongly that the PUC proposal was not at all proportional,
and seemed to concur that such a disproportional structure would be damaging
to California employers. They are going to send me more details tomorrow
(Tuesday) about the Governor's plan, and I will then pass that information
along.
In the meantime, I hope this limited information helps, and will keep you
posted as I learn more.
Sincerely,
Carl Guardino
- winmail.dat
=====================================
|
2,601 |
Subject: RE:
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/1204.
=====================================
darling, you must think i am perfectly insane, and i probably am, but i
couldn't possibly sneak out tomorrow, this week is just too insane, can we
please hook up next week? i'm going to LA for work early next week, so maybe
we can lunch or coffee on thursday or friday? and guess the fuck what? i got
an art studio! in SF! and it's cheap! and i can ride my bike there! it's
truly amazing, and i have raphael to thank for having good connections and
this is indeed a very very very good thing cuz it makes me happy......!
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2000 7:07 PM
To: Colleen Silva
Subject: RE:
ferget it. i'm just as swamped. i don't care if you've got a goddamed
boyfriend and a busy job. friday we're having coffee. for 30 rotten
minutes. you name the place and the time.
hugs and kisses,
jeff
Colleen Silva <[email protected]> on 09/06/2000 04:17:16 PM
To: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: RE:
next week would probably be best, as i am swamped with hundreds of emails
and my project/beast... how are you and how is school?
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2000 1:56 PM
To: Colleen Silva
Subject: RE:
i expected as much. and lunch?
Colleen Silva <[email protected]> on 09/06/2000 03:50:49 PM
To: "'Jeff Dasovich'" <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: RE:
burning man was lofty, writer's conference was total debauchery, of course
i'm famous now...
-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff Dasovich [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2000 5:04 PM
To: Colleen Silva
Subject:
did you burn the man? are we having lunch? are you famous now?
=====================================
|
2,602 |
Subject: NETSCAPE FROM DYLAN
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/4261.
=====================================
Sorry guys:
My other email account will not let me send.
I have really dropped the ball on this one. I have been looking at your
stuff all morning and it appears to be pretty good. I like the model for the
projections. One point that I think was missed a little (although Jeff
addressed it somewhat in his revisions to Mark's comments) is the risk to
Netscape of going ahead with the $28 value. I have been looking in the case
and have not found if this is a firm commitment placing or the best effort
type. Obviously from Netscape's stand point, if it is a firm commitment then
the higher the sale price that is underwritten the better. It will provide
more equity funding. This may not be beneficial to the current shareholder's
given Jeff's Hot Issue comments.
Looking at the comparable recent IPOs (particularly UUnet), it appears that
there is enough evidence to support letting it out at $28. The issue is
about the same size and the financials are roughly comparable. UUnet was
actually selling less and losing more than Netscape. Although the increase
in price on the day of issue is a little misleading since it is only a small
portion of shares, UUnet appears to have sustained the stock price level of
at least a few months (and it has increased further).
Anyway, I think I remember that Netscape did go for it and it IPO'd at $28
and close at over $70 on the first day. Is this what Greenspan meant by
irrational exhurberants?
I am about to do the Easter thing and then drive home. I will not be there
until after 8. I do not want to put more time on Jimmy waiting for me. I
will look at the finished product and try and hold my comments to a minimum.
Since I dropped the ball, I will take the lead on the last one to make it up
to you guys.
Dylan
=====================================
|
2,603 |
Subject: Re: Monthly Update Report for ENA Management
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/1541.
=====================================
Jim's e-mail makes it clear that we need to be a bit more specific on our
internal resource reports. In other words, let's identify where we are
assisting ENA on specific projects or transactions. For example, if we're
working on a QF acquisition, then let's identify the project by name so Jim
can inform Dave D. that we are helping ENA.
---------------------- Forwarded by Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT on 09/18/2000 10:39
AM ---------------------------
James D Steffes@EES
09/18/2000 10:27 AM
To: Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Monthly Update Report for ENA Management
Yes.
Jim
Paul Kaufman@ECT
09/18/2000 10:58 AM
To: James D Steffes/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Re: Monthly Update Report for ENA Management
What's the IRTF? Is that the internal resource report?
James D Steffes@EES
09/11/2000 03:42 PM
To: Steve Montovano/DUB/EES@EES, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Janine
Migden/DUB/EES@EES, Robin Kittel/HOU/EES@EES, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Joe Hillings/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, Ginger Dernehl/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Monthly Update Report for ENA Management
Attached please find the monthly report I file to Dave Delainey (CEO of
ENA). I've attached the Sept 2000 report.
Currently I use the IRTF to update this information. It is critical that
everyone submit these forms by the 1st of the month so that I can get this to
Dave by the 5th. If you want to give me this information in a different
form, please feel free. This is a good way to keep EGA in front of the
business people. The better the information you send me the better the
report.
If anyone has any questions, please feel free to call me. I know that
everything is not on the list, only things that have a key focus on ENA.
Jim
=====================================
|
2,604 |
Subject: Re: Mike Day Invoices
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/10044.
=====================================
I'm assuming that since it's the middle of March, that it's only fair that he
should get paid for services rendered in January, but maybe I'm missing
something.
Susan J Mara
03/15/2001 05:59 PM
To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Mike Day Invoices
Do you understand all the big deal about the paying Mike fast?
Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854
----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 03/15/2001 03:57 PM -----
Eric Benson
03/15/2001 11:32 AM
To: Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Joseph
Alamo/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Mike Day Invoices
Paul, Sue and Joseph -
I wanted to give you all a quick update on the Mike Day invoices. I have the
invoice for January and understand from Joseph that he has the invoice for
the special session which once reviewed, coded and approved Joseph will
overnight to Houston. I called Larry Dallman in accounting and Larry
confirmed that Goodin, MacBride is currently on a Net 7 payment term. Larry
said that he could expedite payment for the January and special session
invoices for same day pay. Accounting will call me when the checks are ready
to be picked up and I will fed ex payment to Mr. Day's attention once I have
the checks. Larry and I agreed that it would be best to wait to send the
invoices at one time (this will make it easier for accounting).
Paul - As you and I discussed, I will send an email to Mr. Day once I have
received the invoices to advise him when to expect payment and I will confirm
that he should be the recipient once I have the checks. I'll make sure to
copy you, Sue and Joseph so we all stay on the same page.
Please advise of any questions, comments or concerns.
Eric
713-853-1711
=====================================
|
2,605 |
Subject: 10% OFF + Holiday Gift Guide
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/inbox/1636.
=====================================
Dear Wine Enthusiast,
This past week, we experienced technical difficulties with our email service and
the email you received may not have functioned properly. We sincerely apologize
for this inconvenience. We welcome you to come back and browse our wonderful
holiday entertaining and gift collection with the added bonus of 10% OFF* until
11/30/01. Please remember to use the code E21A when ordering.
Thank you and happy holidays.
Visit us at - http://webmail.wineenthusiast.net/UM/T.asp?A5.6.4.1.50456
Order online or call 1-800-356-8466
Use code E21A at checkout
THE ESSENTIALS FOR HOLIDAY ENTERTAINING & GIFT GUIDE
Plus 10% OFF until 11/30/01
HOLIDAY ENTERTAINING ESSENTIALS
Click here - http://webmail.wineenthusiast.net/UM/T.asp?A5.6.4.2.50456
ESSENTIALS FOR THE HOME BAR
Martinis, decanters, shakers and much more...
Click here - http://webmail.wineenthusiast.net/UM/T.asp?A5.6.4.3.50456
ONE OF A KIND GIFTS
Monogram these wonderful items to add a personal touch
Click here - http://webmail.wineenthusiast.net/UM/T.asp?A5.6.4.4.50456
WINE LOOPS AND CHARMS FOR EVERY OCCASSION
Click here - http://webmail.wineenthusiast.net/UM/T.asp?A5.6.4.5.50456
DELECTABLE CULINARY DELIGHTS
Click here - http://webmail.wineenthusiast.net/UM/T.asp?A5.6.4.6.50456
COMPACT CELLARS - ESSENTIAL FOR ENTERTAINING
Click here - http://webmail.wineenthusiast.net/UM/T.asp?A5.6.4.7.50456
*This offer expires on 11/30/01 and cannot be combined with any other offer.
____________________________________________________________
You are receiving the email because you have subscribed to Enthusiast
Essentials. If you would like to remove yourself from this list, please click:
http://webmail.wineenthusiast.net/UM/U.asp?B5.6.6.50456 and you will be removed
immediately! Thank you!
=====================================
|
2,606 |
Subject: California and National Deregulation Articles
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ["nicholas.o'[email protected]", '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/426.
=====================================
The North American Electric Reliability Council (NERC) asks House Speaker to
act on electric reliability. NERC has written a letter to Speaker of the
House Dennis Hastert urging his support for passage of legislation this
congressional session to promote reliability of the electric power grid.
Anger over pricey power in San Diego key to House race. The soaring bills
for electricity that have been showing up in the mail boxes of southern
Californians are expected to influence the November ballot boxes in a tight
race that pits Republican Representative Brian Bilbray against a Democratic
challenger.
N.H. Electric Deregulation Clears Last Major Hurdle. The three-year battle
over the restructuring of Public Service Co. of New Hampshire has cleared its
last major hurdle with regulatory approval of a state law. But a few
potential stumbling blocks remain, officials said.
In Tallahassee, Fla. the way electricity is generated and delivered to homes
and businesses is likely to be vastly different in a decade. A panel on
Wednesday began to decide how different by developing a statewide energy
policy....One of the most controversial issues is likely to be the prospect
of deregulation and out-of-state power companies that want to challenge the
local monopolies of the state's investor owned utilities.
A California power emergency escalated on Wednesday with some industrial and
commercial customers cut off as scorching temperatures boosted demand and
fires threatened three major transmission lines.
Springville, Utah City officials again face angry power customers....
The City Council will meet at Tuesday evening to talk about payment options
and again try to help
residents understand why they are receiving high utility bills.
=====================================
|
2,607 |
Subject: FW: UPDATED: C4C Halloween Ball Information
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/deleted_items/825.
=====================================
It's time for the Halloween Ball this Saturday! If you are thinking of participating one full-time social activity this semester, this is it!! Last year, the Halloween Ball was a big success, I anticipate this year will be a blast as well. So, go get your new costume and get ready to mingle with the full-time students this Saturday. Please see below for details. Make your check out to "C4C" and drop it off in Jennifer Sang's mailbox in the student lounge.
-----Original Message-----
From: Linda Ng [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Sunday, October 21, 2001 3:24 PM
To: Tai, Tony
Subject: UPDATED: C4C Halloween Ball Information
Hi Tony, this version of my message is corrected/updated - I had forgotten in my earlier one to say that checks are payable to C4C.
C4C HALLOWEEN BALL - THIS SATURDAY!!!
Don't miss out on the "HAAS FREAK SHOW", it's the wildest party of the semester! Everyone is invited - bring your friends and significant others! Costumes are a must!
Date & Time:
Saturday, October 27th
8 pm to 2 am
Location:
Curve Bar & Restaurant
747 Third Street
San Francisco, CA 94107
(415) 896-2286
<http://www.curvebar.com/>
(Located across from PacBell Park)
Ticket Info:
Tickets are free for C4C members, $25 for all others and $30 at the door, so buy early. Tickets are on sale this week at Haas - just leave a check payable to "C4C" in Jennifer Sang's (first-year, full-time program) mailbox in the MBA lounge. She'll make sure your ticket is reserved at the door. Don't miss out on the fun - there will be great music, dancing, appetizers, cash bar, costume contest, and raffle prizes!
All proceeds from the party will be donated to Special Olympics, so you are guaranteed to have an awesome time while also supporting a terrific cause!!!
=====================================
|
2,608 |
Subject: Re: Two sections for CPUC repsonses
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/1241.
=====================================
I've reviewed the drafts, and I think it is good work. The report of the MSC
of the ISO has come out with some of its fixes to the market structure issues
very closely parallels alot of our points. I am at the hearing in San Diego
today where that will be the topic discussed. Will call at the lunch break.
I really like highlighting how much development of retail markets will
alieviate some of the problems, especially since that is something that is
within the Commission's authority to fix.
Question on market power:
Do we want to highlight the myriad of other causes of higher than short-run
marginal costs? ie. low hydro, NOX credits
"Seabron Adamson" <[email protected]> on 09/07/2000
10:00:56 AM
To: "Mona L Petrochko" <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: Two sections for CPUC repsonses
Mona:
I saw the email about the delay. We have attached some draft material for
some of the questions anyway. I will call you in a bit to go through it.
Seab
This e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the
addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or
confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this
e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify me at
(617) 354-0060 and permanently delete the original and any copy of any
e-mail and any printout thereof.
Seabron Adamson
Frontier Economics Inc
Two Brattle Square
Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
Ph: (617) 354-0060
Fax: (617) 354-0640
[email protected]
- 00-09-07 SA Seab additions.doc
- 00-09-07 SS Sabine additions.doc
=====================================
|
2,609 |
Subject: Request for Information by the California State Auditor
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/4261.
=====================================
To All California Power Exchange Participants:
The California State Auditor, as part of an ongoing investigation of
California
markets has requested information that may be confidential under Section 19.3
of
the California Power Exchange Tariff. The data request is attached below for
your reference and requires response by December 15, 2000. The California
State
Auditor's Office had advised that it will respect the legal confidentiality of
these records and will not publicly release them when legal restrictions
prohibit such release (see California Government Code Sections 8545 and 8545.1
and the letter attached hereto). If you desire to assert a claim of privilege
or confidentiality, the California Power Exchange will forward your written
assertion of that claim to the California State Auditor, provided that it is
timely received. Your written statement and its legal basis should be
directed
to the State as follows:
Sharon L. Smagala, CPA
Bureau of State Audits
California State Auditor
555 Capitol Mall, Suite 300
Sacramento, CA 95814
You may deliver your statement to the California Power Exchange as follows:
Karen Koyano
California Power Exchange
1000 S. Fremont Avenue
Unit 20
Alhambra, CA 91801
626.537.3173 facsimile
Any written statement must be received by Ms. Koyano no later than Friday,
December 8, 2000, 5:00 p.m. PT, to be included with any information delivered
to the California State Auditor. You may take any other legal action you deem
appropriate under the circumstances.
(See attached file: TXP PX doc request 11-30-00.doc) (See
attached
file: Ltr from State Audit CLC 10-11-00.doc)
- TXP PX doc request 11-30-00.doc
- Ltr from State Audit CLC 10-11-00.doc
=====================================
|
2,610 |
Subject: Re: Gruma's call for help, re: Cal.
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/5389.
=====================================
SENT ON BEHALF OF GEORGE TOCQUIGNY
Enron Energy Services
From: Marty Sunde 02/08/2001 10:11 AM
Phone No: 713 853-7797 Phone
888-953-9478 SkyTel Pager
EB 889
To: George Tocquigny/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Re: Gruma's call for help, re: Cal.
George, consider Scott Gahn, Rick Shaprio or Jeff Dasovich.
Enron Energy Services
From: George Tocquigny 02/07/2001 03:55 PM
To: Marty Sunde/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Craig H Sutter/HOU/EES@EES, Jeremy Blachman/HOU/EES@EES, Richard L
Zdunkewicz/HOU/EES@EES, Carol Moffett/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: Gruma's call for help, re: Cal.
Marty,
I rec'd. a call from Steve Brunner this afternoon, requesting assistance from
us regarding their California situation.
Irwin Gordon just returned from Cal. and has many questions about the future
direction of California's energy environment, and what Gruma's options might
include. Boiling it down, Irwin and his senior leadership team would like to
meet with Enron's "California expert" to talk about the current and future
scenarios, in order that Gruma can make more intelligent near-term
decisions. They would like to do this next week if at all possible.
FYI, we have already had several conversations with Steve over the past week
pertaining to our current posture in California, and I've furnished him with
the letter we sent to our customers, and the PowerPoint slides prepared for
meetings on the subject. While these were helpful, Gruma's response was "not
enough depth...didn't answer all of our questions."
Steve gave me a good overview of Gruma's questions and issues which I can
discuss further with you or whomever you designate to meet with Gruma.
Let me know if I can further clarify.
George
=====================================
|
2,611 |
Subject: Re: This Week's case
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/1072.
=====================================
No, you're correct. In the spreadsheet, there were three sorts of "items":
discontinued ops, unusual items, extraordinary items, and accounting
changes. The sale of the assets came about in the attempt to "trim the fat"
(or manage earnings, you make the call). Here's the line item from my
spreadsheet:
It came right after the entries for the "unusual loss from the government
ban." I included it with the "unusual" items (right after discontinued ops
and right before extraordinary items. Big question is, is it included
already. I assumed not, since (though it's confusing), the problem makes is
sound like none of the additional "agenda items" were accounted for. I don't
think it's a huge deal, though. The questions left a lot of room for
ambiguity.
Best,
Jeff
Dylan Windham <[email protected]>
11/20/2000 02:16 PM
To: [email protected]
cc:
Subject: Re: This Week's case
Maybe I am confused. I thought that the sale of the assets was separate
from the discontinued operations of the Feed division. Unfortuneatly I do
not have my book here to check.
Dylan
At 10:30 AM 11/20/2000 -0600, you wrote:
>See attached. Just a couple of typos corrected in strike-out-underline.
>Question: Thought I'd included the gain on sale as "unusual" as opposed to
>"extraordinary." If we leave it out, are we assuming it's already included
>in the $9.5MM? If so, we might want to include a note at the bottom of the
>spreadsheet like, $9.5 MM figure includes $750,000 gain on sale of certain
>assets completed in 1995." Or am I just totally out lunch on this one.
>
>Thanks. This one was a little messy. You did a great job of pulling it
>together.
>
>Best,
>Jeff
>
>(See attached file: Agrofeed Final Version 1120.doc)
=====================================
|
2,612 |
Subject: Agenda for December 5 Meeting
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/4233.
=====================================
Please keep this confidential at this point. It's the agenda for the
California "subcommittee" meeting on Tuesday that I mentioned in an earlier
note. They were unable to reschedule the meeting, which starts at 10 AM
tomorrow, but we're on the subcommitte and will have very good access to the
final product, so I'm not too concerned about missing the "kickoff" meeting.
Folks in California are really looking to us to help figure out item #2
"forward contracting." It would be very useful to discuss this outline
tomorrow while we're all together.
Best,
Jeff
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 12/04/2000 03:15 PM -----
Evelyn Kahl Elsesser <[email protected]>
12/04/2000 02:38 PM
To: Keith McCrea <[email protected]>, "Jeff Dasovich (E-mail)"
<[email protected]>, Ralph Cavanagh <[email protected]>, Bill Booth
<[email protected]>, Jan Smutny-Jones <[email protected]>, Delaney Hunter
<[email protected]>, "Aaron Thomas (E-mail)"
<[email protected]>, "Carolyn McIntyre (E-mail)" <[email protected]>,
"John Fielder (E-mail)" <[email protected]>, "Tony Braun (E-mail)"
<[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, Barbara Barkovich
<[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: Agenda for December 5 Meeting
Attached is a discussion agenda for tomorrow's CESG meeting at 10:00 at
the Chamber of Commerce. Our objective for tomorrow is to move through
these and other issues you raise to outline a strawperson proposal for
forward contracting, rate stabilization and TRA undercollections. As
Ralph's email of Sunday evening observed, if we manage to stay narrowly
focused on these issues in the short-run we may have an opportunity to
move the debate.
- California Energy Solutions Group Agenda 120500.doc
=====================================
|
2,613 |
Subject: First Amended Complaint
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/29299.
=====================================
Folks, since many law firms have failed to exit the dark ages, they continue
to use wordperfect. To open this, don't launch. Instead, "detach." Then
open the file that you've "detached" and it should convert from WP to word
and you should be able to open it.
Best,
Jeff
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 07/30/2001 06:12 PM -----
Jeff Dasovich
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
07/30/2001 12:46 PM
To: Karen Denne/Enron@EnronXGate, [email protected], James D
Steffes/Enron@EnronXGate, Richard Shapiro/Enron@EnronXGate, Susan J
Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Paul Kaufman/Enron@EnronXGate, [email protected], Linda
Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Janel Guerrero/Enron@EnronXGate, Susan M
Landwehr/Enron@EnronXGate
cc:
Subject: First Amended Complaint
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 07/30/2001 12:46 PM -----
"Michael Kirby" <[email protected]>
07/30/2001 12:43 PM
To: <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: First Amended Complaint
Attached is a copy of Enron's First Amended Complaint.? If you have
suggestions or comments, you can reach Mr. Kirby on his cell phone (619)
985-9792.
?
The information contained in this e-mail message and any accompanying
documents is subject to the attorney-client privilege and/or the attorney
work product rule and is confidential business information intended only for
the use of the individual or entity named above.? If the reader of this
message is not the intended recipient or representative of the recipient,
you are hereby notified that any dissemination of this communication is
strictly prohibited.? If you have received this communication in error,
please notify the Systems Administrator at [email protected] and immediately
delete this message from your system.
- 289823_1.WPD
=====================================
|
2,614 |
Subject: FW: PX Credit Calculations and Comments
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/deleted_items/317.
=====================================
FYI
-----Original Message-----
From: Johnson, Tamara
Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2001 4:49 PM
To: Stoness, Scott; Curry, Wanda; Huddleson, Diann; Ruffer, Mary Lynne; Savage, Gordon; Steffes, James D.
Cc: Richter, Jeff; Swain, Steve; Mara, Susan
Subject: PX Credit Calculations and Comments
Attached is a Word document with my notes from the PG&E meeting last Thursday August 1.
I am also including an Excel spreadsheet that shows how the PX credit is calculated under the various methods that have been discussed.
My conclusion is:
PG&E continues to make unpredictable and arbitrary decisions without applying with the CPUC. If not for the PX receivable, I would recommend an immediate protest to halt this behaviour.
They are also bending the existing rules so far as to strain credibility.
The SCE method of calculating a PX credit is the best choice both from a logical perspective and does not require an adjustment to our mark. (Again, setting aside the PX receivable issue.) Many external parties support it, the CPUC is heading in this direction.
It makes sense because it keeps DA customers paying for the services they use, i.e. T&D.
DA may be getting a "break" to the extent the current generation rate pays for "past sins", i.e. if market prices are below embedded generation plus the 3-cent surcharge. This is where a yet-to-be determined nonbypassable CTC may come from.
Setting the PX credit equal to the Market Price is unlikely to be approved, on a go-forward basis. If PX Credit = Market, the DA customer will only pay frozen rates. Although this confirms to AB1890 since the rate freeze is not technically over, it is unlikely that this will go forward since:
bundled customers are paying more than rate-freeze rates
there is no agreed-upon market price
=====================================
|
2,615 |
Subject: New Congressional Report on California
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/inbox/457.
=====================================
Ray Alvarez brought to my attention today a news item indicating that the Congressional Budget Office released a report earlier this week entitled "Causes and Lessons of the California Electricity Crisis." The 30+ page report is available on the home page of the CBO's web site at www.cbo.gov. I have quickly read through the summary and it is largely favorable. For example, the summary says:
"Much of the blame for California's electricity crisis attaches to the state's restructuring plan -- but not to its objective, electricity deregulation. (...) But deregulation itself did not fail; rather, it was never achieved."
"The restructuring plan did not remove sufficient barriers on both the supply and demand sides of the market to allow competition to work -- in part because it was not designed to."
"Even without restructuring, California's electric utilities would have faced a difficult challenge in meeting the demand for power and holding down prices in 2000."
"Consequently, wholesale electricity prices were higher than they probably would have been in either a traditionally regulated market or a more fully deregulated market."
"Long-term solutions to California's electricity problems will most likely require three changes: removing barriers to the addition of generating capacity, eliminating bottlenecks in the electricity transmission system, and removing regulatory restrictions on the sale of power throughout the broad western market."
On the negative side, the report summary does state that "some generators may also have withheld supplies at certain times to boost prices even more" and "the plan's auction system for the spot market appears to have created strong incentives for suppliers to bid strategically in a way that raised wholesale prices."
=====================================
|
2,616 |
Subject: Re: FW: R94-04-031/I94-04-032 Enron Wind Corp Response to SCE
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/2962.
=====================================
Does Hap get it now?
From: Jeff Dasovich on 05/22/2001 12:54 PM
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
To: Hap Boyd/EWC/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul
Kaufman/Enron@EnronXGate, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul
Kaufman/Enron@EnronXGate, Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J
Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Re: FW: R94-04-031/I94-04-032 Enron Wind Corp Response to SCE Motion
Greetings Hap:
Hope all's well and Edison's paying you.
Please be absolutely sure in the future to email or phone me with a head's up
on filings like these in California prior to filing.
As you know, it's crazy in California, with a lot flying around in numerous
forums. Even Ken Lay's frequently been to California over the past couple of
months trying to educate and advocate rational, detailed solutions. Want to
make absolutely sure that we don't step on each other in our many attempts to
get this ridiculous state back on track.
Not trying to slow you down, or dictate content; rather, given the
high-stakes nature of the California situation, coordination is critical.
Thanks much.
Best,
Jeff
-----Original Message-----
From: Sara Myers [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 3:38 PM
Subject: R94-04-031/I94-04-032 Enron Wind Corp Response to SCE Motion
TO: All Parties in R.94-04-031/I.94-04-032
Please find attached the Response of Enron Wind Corporation to the
Motion of SCE to Establish a Framework and Criteria for its Power
Procurement Practices. This response was also filed and mailed to all
appearances and the state service list today.
If you have any questions, please contact Sara Steck Myers at (415)
387-1904.
- R94-04-031 & I94-04-032 EWC Response To SCE Motion 5-21-01.doc
- CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE.doc
=====================================
|
2,617 |
Subject: Bandwidth Market Report
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/eci/39.
=====================================
FYI - Steve, Sue the Avista article looks like a good anti-BLM
partner....... Jeff, please note the Sierra Pacific story
----- Forwarded by Scott Bolton/Enron Communications on 05/05/00 08:21 AM
-----
[email protected]
05/04/00 05:59 PM
To: Scott Bolton/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
cc:
Subject: Bandwidth Market Report
To: Recipients of McGraw-Hill Energy's Bandwidth Market Report
From: Brian Jordan, Editorial Director, McGraw-Hill Energy power
group
Please accept our invitation to this free trial and take a look at
the attached issue of Bandwidth Market Report, our new daily publication. We
selected you and about 60 others to receive this free trial because of your
interest in the bandwidth business and the developing market for bandwidth
trading.
We hope you not only will find our publication worthwhile--and
continue to receive this free trial for several weeks--but will let us know
what you like and don't like, and what you would like to see. We are aiming
to bring you one concise daily package with the latest news and analysis on
the bandwidth business, plus market commentary and price information on
bandwidth trading.
Please let us know how we're doing. If you do not wish to keep
receiving this free trial, just send a reply message and ask to be dropped
from our list. But we believe you will find Bandwidth Market Report a
must-read for those who want to take advantage of the huge opportunities
unfolding in this market.
Chris Baltimore, editor--phone: 202-383-2185; e-mail:
[email protected]
Matt Spangler, associate editor: 202-383-2279;
[email protected]
- 842-current.pdf
=====================================
|
2,618 |
Subject: CPUC question
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/inbox/1491.
=====================================
Jeff --
First of all, I wanted to thank you for your positive comments to Karen about my work on behalf of Enron. She asked me to stay on board on an hourly, as-needed basis while they try to figure out what will happen next year. Although I don't expect much work, it's certainly better than being cut out completely and she mentioned that you had appreciated my help during the contempt negotiations.
I don't envy Karen for her job at the moment. I've been getting the clips and Houston doesn't look like a fun place to be right now. I also don't think they're planning too far in advance. Yikes!
I've got a couple of CPUC questions for you. What's the process for making a presentation in regard to either a specific case on the agenda? Is it simply a matter of being present during a public hearing, or is there a list of witnesses/commentors that you have to get on? The reason I ask is that I've been approached by a potential client regarding some telecommunications/broadband issues, with an appearance at the CPUC as a news hook.
How far in advance is the meeting agenda set? I noticed that a meeting is scheduled for Nov. 29, but an agenda was not available on the Web site. Is it likely that it is still being compiled? How do you get on the agenda?
Any light you can shed on this for me would be appreciated. I don't know if this project is going to come through or not, but I'm not sure my possible client is any better versed on CPUC procedures than I am. I figure at least one of us should know what we're talking about.
Thanks! You might give me a heads up if there's anything on one of the upcoming Wednesday calls that you'd like me to comment on. Since I'm basically on call, I probably won't dial in unless someone gives me a reason.
Best,
Ken
=====================================
|
2,619 |
Subject: California Update 3/29/01
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/4648.
=====================================
? Socal and PG&E have both made payments to the state of California (DWR) for
power purchases per the PUC order on Tuesday. Socal made a payment on
Wednesday of $43.5M for purchases between January 19 - February 11 and PG&E
paid $61M.
? Attorney General, Bill Lockyer, has ruled that the media does not have the
right to view the long-term power contracts being negotiated.
? Senator Burton stated on the Senate Floor this morning that legislators
need to set their regular session bill unrelated to energy quickly because
there would be no rule waivers. He also noted that there would probably not
be a lot of money for anything besides energy, and therefore a lot of bills
would probably die in policy committee.
? In a conference call on Tuesday, SoCal stated to a group of commercial
paper holders that it would pay back interest on its commercial paper, which
is approximately $30M. One commercial holder said that since there is no
default rate specified in the paper, the default rate should automatically be
10% under California law. The SoCal representative replied "we don't think
that applies to us." In other words, SoCal does not plan on paying an added
default rate on top of the interest payments.
? At this time, the Legislature announced they would probably not be taking
their Easter break, scheduled for the week of April 9th. According to a
source, Burton is not allowing any passes for any travel or absences.
Hertzberg has gone a step farther and said that any travel has to approved by
his office and the member themselves has to come to his office to pick up the
tickets. Some believe this maybe an attempt to push the Republicans into
breaking the stalemate on AB 8X (voted down last Friday)currently being
debated in the Assembly.
=====================================
|
2,620 |
Subject: Leadership in Difficult Times
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/inbox/725.
=====================================
In just two weeks, a roster of the brightest and most
seasoned technology investment, entrepreneurial and
management talent will be sharing their experiences,
war stories and perspectives on what it's going to
take to continue to build companies through 2002.
They'll share how they financed and structured companies
in past downturns to position them for success. They'll
explain what the leadership focus should be, and
what sales and marketing strategies they adopted
to continue growing while the competition fell by
the wayside.
On November 6, at the Fairmont, San Jose, hear Bill
Campbell, the Chairman of Intuit, define the essence of
leadership in difficult times. Matt L'Heureux, head of
worldwide technology M&A at Goldman Sachs will share
his expertise on what it takes to ensure your company
is a contender on next year's M&A prospect lists.
Ken Wilcox, President & CEO of Silicon Valley Bank,
will reflect on your current and future financing options.
And these are just a sample of the high-caliber speakers
participating at VentureWire's Executive Summit. For
a full list of speakers and profiles, please link to:
http://events.venturewire.com/summit/default.asp
The collected expertise comprehensively covers all
aspects of business management in turbulent times.
Time is running out and places are filling up quickly.
To be sure of your seat, please link to:
http://events.venturewire.com/summitEvent.asp
today to ensure you will be among the leading Valley
Entrepreneurs, CEOs and Investors attending. I very
much hope you can join us.
Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate
to get in touch. I look forward to meeting you at
the Fairmont.
Sincerely,
Allan Cunningham
Managing Director
VentureWire Events
212 343 1900
[email protected]
=====================================
|
2,621 |
Subject: The toughest job. . . .
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/inbox/1027.
=====================================
Dear Jeffrey:
. . . for startup managers these days is raising money,
and we can help. With ideas, and introductions. And you
can get both by spending just one day out of the office.
Today's funding environment is harsh -- we know that --
and investors are both more cautious and more demanding.
Yet there's money to be had and we've put together a one
-day conference of those who know how to get it.
Come learn from the most active investors in later-stage
rounds. From CEOs who have found new money in the last
few months. From hard-to-reach experts like Tracy
Lefteroff, the Global Managing Partner of
PriceWaterhouseCoopers' Venture Capital Practice. Or,
J. Sanford Miller, a co-founder of Thomas Weisel Partners,
most recently appointed Managing Director with 3i, (one of
the most active follow-on funders with 32 deals since June
1, alone). Be sure to check out the site as more and more
speakers accept their invitations.
I hope your calendar allows you to join the other CEOs
and Investors on February 6. To register your place and
hear these and other leading experts, please link to
http://events.venturewire.com/followon/ today and
complete the online registration form. VentureWire's
last company-building summit in November filled quickly,
so please act promptly. If you have any questions,
please contact me by voice on (212)343-1900 x165 or e-mail
at [email protected]
I look forward to hearing from you.
Best Regards,
Allan
Allan Cunningham
Managing Director, Events
VentureWire
P.S. If you choose to NOT receive e-mail promotions
from us, please follow this link:
http://venturewire.com/[email protected]
Expansion Plans
Raising follow-on capital
Santa Clara, Calif.
February 6, 2002
http://events.venturewire.com/followon/
=====================================
|
2,622 |
Subject: Re: Global Photon Systems, Inc.
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/600.
=====================================
Brian/Jeff
I reviewed the articles on Global Photon for more detail, and found
references to the following contracts:
6/7/00 $100 million contract with Alactel to build a fully integrated
submarine and terrestrial Dense Wavelenthg Division Multiplexing network in
California (a 2000 km network called the Global West Network)
4/19/99 Tyco International Ltd.'s Tyco Submarine Systems Ltd. unit signed a
$93 million supply contract for Global West, a five segment fiber optic
undersea cable system that will connect major cities along the California
coast. TYC said an operations, administration and maintenance contract will
bring another $50 million, and two optional segments could increase the value
by an add'l $25 million
The permits obtained to begin the project are referenced in a press release
on the company website. There is no other supporting evidence of these
contracts or any other, nor further mention of Global Photon's Global West
Network project.
--ES
Ethan Schultz
Analyst
Enron Broadband Services - Bandwidth Origination
713-853-4373
713-646-8795 (Fax)
713-582-0637 (Cellular)
Brian Spector
06/20/00 12:03 AM
To: Ethan Schultz/Enron Communications, Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Re: Global Photon Systems, Inc.
Ethan,
Thanks for the research. My cursory review of the articles turned up one
interesting fact: they claim that GP has signed a $100 mm contract with
Alcatel - a euro telecom company. Please:
Re-review the articles to see if that is correct and any other contracts you
can find.
Try to double check the press releases by looking at alcatel's published
financials if any.
This is a pretty low priority thing. Try to have it done by Friday afternoon.
Thanks,
Brian
PS: How is it going with Matt J?
=====================================
|
2,623 |
Subject: good to see you again
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/5759.
=====================================
Jeff,
I tried e-mailing you last night to say how I enjoyed seeing you again, but
my computer keeps crashing and I don't know what if anything was sent.
Here is the e-mail I originally sent, my apologises if you now have
received it three times.
I understand from David Teece this afternoon that Larry Summers has agreed
to be involved. You are making great progress.
All the best
Kieran Murray
-------------Forwarded Message-----------------
From: Kieran Murray, 100352.2057
To: jeff dasovich, INTERNET:[email protected]
Date: 1/22/01 6:27 AM
RE: industry processes
Jeff
this e-mail didn't appear to reach you last night, so re-sending
Jeff
I enjoyed seeing you again at the meeting earlier today. I am not sure how
much of my background you might recall. But I have spent much of my career
advising senior politicians, and more recently (past 6 years or so) leading
industry processes to influence policy outcomes and implement industry lead
reform. Like you I find the issues the issues these processes through up
exciting and challenging. Clearly, the scale of industry and political
administration is greater than NZ and Australia (with a combined population
of about 20m), but some of our experience in thinking through and managing
these processes to achieve useful outcomes might be useful.
Please call me if you need to think out loud or if I can help in anyway. I
have attached my cv to give you an indication of the sort of issues and
processes with which I have been involved. I am currently on a plane back
to NZ tomorrow (Sunday) night, but am up and down reasonably frequently.
My contact numbers are wk (64 4) 472 0590, mobile (64 21) 245 0161 (I have
this with me) and home (64 4) 971 7696.
All the best.
Regards
Kieran
- Kieran Murray's CV.doc
=====================================
|
2,624 |
Subject: Re:More Nagging About the Project
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/9942.
=====================================
I'm having the same problem. She states on the izio site that that the cases
are in the reader. they ain't. if anyone has them and could fax them to me
at 415.782.7854, would be greatly appreciated.
Best,
Jeff
Also, I like both ideas--Anil's and Mark's. I think that we could discuss at
break and write it up then and turn in at beginning of second half of class.
I'd lean a bit toward the Amazon suggestion, but could go either way.
"Mark Guinney" <[email protected]>
03/14/2001 07:39 AM
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>,
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>
cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]"
<[email protected]>
Subject: Re:More Nagging About the Project
Where did we get the readings for Thursday? I can't seem to find them
anywhere.
Can someone please fax me a copy? My fax number is (415) 733-4190.
Thanks
**********************************************
Mark D. Guinney, CFA
Consultant
Watson Wyatt Investment Consulting
345 California Street, Ste. 1400
San Francisco, CA 94104
(415) 733-4487 ph.
(415) 733-4190 fax
____________________Reply Separator____________________
Subject: More Nagging About the Project
Author: [email protected]
Date: 03/13/2001 8:18 PM
Greetings:
Sounds like I'm glad that I missed the quiz last week.
Hate to be a nag, but we've got to turn in what we're doing for our project
on Thursday. I propose doing a nice, clean merger, which would allow us to
do both comparative analysis (who are these companies?) and
merger/valuation analysis. Mark and I talked last night and I pleaded
again not to do strict accounting stuff, but if that's what folks would
like to do, I can certainly suck it up. Any thoughts?
Best,
Jeff
=====================================
|
2,625 |
Subject: DG Federal Funding Opportunity Available
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/deleted_items/1857.
=====================================
Energy Committee Members:
We have been offered an opportunity to benefit from a unique federal funding
program. Sure Power has been funded to implement distributed generation
(DG) into a high-availability, energy-intensive application in the data
communications industry (i.e. telecom hotel, financial processing center,
internet data center, etc.). As you know, Sure Power is the world's leading
supplier of DG-based systems providing six 9's availability (certified by
the Massachusetts Institute of Technology). Sure Power's patented
technology eliminates interconnection issues with the utility, which has
been one of the technical inhibitors to widespread adoption of DG.
Sure Power has already aligned themselves with EPRI to assist them with
measurement and analysis, but are looking for a partner who has a potential
project on the horizon that could benefit from Sure Power's technology and
federal funding assistance (as much as $3M). Please note, the project does
not have to be past the internal approval stage to benefit. Even a
potential project that is still being analyzed for viability could receive
funding for an initial feasibility study. Understanding that the high-tech
industry is going through trying times, and that many projects have been put
on hold; Sure Power has a three-year window in which to apply the funds, so
even a project that may not start for eighteen months would work.
The deadline in which to finalize their project package is September 12, so
Sure Power would need to have a response from a potential partner no later
than COB Tuesday September 4. Feel free to contact Sure Power directly with
any questions.
Whit Allen
Vice President
Sure Power Corporation
+1 (203) 790-8996 TEL
[email protected]
http://www.hi-availability.com
=====================================
|
2,626 |
Subject: CAISO Notice: Subpoena from the CPUC
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/13140.
=====================================
The newest subpoena.
Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854
----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 05/29/2001 11:08 AM -----
CRCommunications <[email protected]>
05/25/2001 04:48 PM
To: ISO Market Participants
<IMCEAEX-_O=CAISO_OU=CORPORATE_CN=DISTRIBUTION+20LISTS_CN=ISO+20MARKET+20PARTI
[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: CAISO Notice: Subpoena from the CPUC
Market Participants and Scheduling Coordinators:
The CA ISO received today a subpoena from the California Public Utilities
Commission (CPUC). The subpoena is attached. The subpoena requires a
response by June 4. The subpoena provides that "information provided by
Respondent pursuant to this subpoena duces tecum will be considered
confidential by the California Public Utilities Commission". Concerns
related to the subpoena should be directed directly to the California Public
Utilities Commission. The CPUC contact related to the subpoena is Robert
Cagen who can be reached at (415) 703-2197. The ISO would appreciate being
notified also of any concerns. The ISO contacts are Jeanne Sol, at
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> and Norma Formanek at
<mailto:[email protected]> [email protected] both of whom should be copied
on correspondence.
Jeanne M. Sol,
Regulatory Counsel
California ISO
(916) 608-7144
____________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________
The Foregoing e-Mail Communication (Together With Any Attachments Thereto)
Is Intended For The Designated Recipient(s) Only. Its Terms May Be
Confidential And Protected By Attorney/Client Privilege or Other Applicable
Privileges. Unauthorized Use, Dissemination, Distribution, Or Reproduction
Of This Message Is Strictly Prohibited.
=====================================
|
2,627 |
Subject: Summer Session Evening MBA course
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/10473.
=====================================
Hi Evening MBA students,
This summer, Ana Valenzuela will be teaching E296-2 "International Marketing."
Course: E296-2
Instructor: Ana Valenzuela
Dates: June 4 through July 30
Times: Mondays and Wednesdays, 6:00 - 9:00 p.m. (10-15 minute break)
Location: C210
Cost: $456 (The Office of Summer Session takes credit cards!)
Textbook: "Global Marketing" by Johny K. Johansson (and a reader)
To enroll in this course, you must complete a summer enrollment form in the
Evening MBA Program office. The last day to register for this course is
Friday, April 27. Priority enrollment will be given to those closest to
graduation. Enrollment is not on a first-come, first-served basis.
Please remember that this course is offered through the Office of Summer
Sessions and is not a regular part of our academic program. As such, many
student services that are normally available during the fall and spring
semesters are not available during the summer.
Books:
Students are responsible for the purchase of all required books. We will
have the books available here in the office, but you will need to pay for
them yourselves by check.
Videotaping:
Videotaping services are not available.
Transportation:
Transportation shuttles are not available during the summer session. Free
parking is not available during the summer session. Carpooling is an
option and we'll provide class lists.
Office Hours:
The Evening MBA Office is open 9:00 am - 6:00 pm during the summer months.
The Career Center, Library and Computer Center will be available to you and
we'll update you with the hours in May.
On Monday, April 2, the enrollment forms will be available for the summer
course.
DEADLINE to register: Friday, April 27.
See you,
TJ
- E296-2cv.doc
- E296-2desc.doc
=====================================
|
2,628 |
Subject: Re: Christmas presents:picking names
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/4076.
=====================================
Hi. Thanks for the note. Couple of things. Prentice is going to do Xmas
with us this year cuz her family will be out of town. So we should
absolutely include her, but I think she really wants to be included in the
"picking" so that she gets someone's name. If you'd like to pick the names
and let people know, I'm completely comfortable with that. (Confidentially,
I have a great idea for Mike, so if, by chance, I get him as a pick, that
would be great!)
Also, let me throw this out. You know that if I didn't live in a 1-bedroom
apartment, I'd host (and hopefully, we'll be having Xmas at my place in
Mendocino a few years down the road). Steve and Charry really carry the load
all the time. Have you considered opening presents and having dinner at your
place? I'd be happy to take care of the meal, and hang around to clean up
afterwards. No big deal, just a thought. Alternatively, we could absolutely
have it at Prentice's apartment, which is plenty big enough, and will have a
big beautiful tree, etc. So give that a thought. Might be nice to do it in
the city, and we'd be happy to host it there, too.
Now, the important stuff. What do Katie and Michael want/need for Xmas?
Best,
Jeff
[email protected]
11/29/2000 10:41 PM
To: [email protected]
cc:
Subject: Christmas presents:picking names
Jeff,
Great to see you and Prentice on T-day. The stuffing was delicious! And
congratulations on giving up smoking.
It's time to pick names for gifts. My thought is that Prentice is enough a
part of this family that we add her name to the group. Plan B is that we do
what we did last year: Mom and I just get something for her and she doesn't
have to worry about getting something for whoever's name she "picks". Let me
know.
Debbie
=====================================
|
2,629 |
Subject: RE: Alert- new email address for Avram Siegel, Allison Fisher and
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent_items/2403.
=====================================
Hey. I'm still trying to get through school and now I've come down with a =
cold, so I need to take a pass on tomorrow's lesson. Any chance of coming =
on Friday. I don't know what shape I'll be in, but if there's an opening, =
maybe I can make it.
=20
Best,
Jeff
-----Original Message-----
From: Avram Siegel [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 3:32 PM
To: Jim Nunally
Subject: Alert- new email address for Avram Siegel, Allison Fisher and True=
Blue bluegrass band
Dear Friends,
Since the Excite @home network went down on Saturday morning, all emailed c=
orrespondence directed to AvramSiegel @ home.com or AllisonFisher @home.com=
or TrueBluegrass @home.com has been lost, and will not be recovered. Plea=
se do not attempt to 'reply' to any previous emails sent from us individual=
ly or the True Blue bluegrass Band, because those emails now have an invali=
d reply address. If you have saved a previous email from True Blue, please =
delete it and save this one instead. The Excite network has been replaced =
with the AT&T network, and email addresses have changed from @home.com to A=
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>. If you wish to get in=
touch with True Blue, you can "reply" to this email, or contact any of the=
bandmembers via our website at www.truebluegrass.com <http://www.trueblueg=
rass.com>. There you may send safely send email to trueblue@truebluegrass.=
com <mailto:[email protected]>. We are very sorry for the inconven=
ience. This abrupt termination of service has seriously jeopardized our bo=
okings for the coming year, so we appreciate your help in making this corre=
ction. Thank you for your understanding, and we hope to hear from you at o=
ur new address!
Regards,
Avram, Allison and True Blue
=====================================
|
2,630 |
Subject: Re: FIA assignment
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/3269.
=====================================
was travelling all week. would be happy to discuss this weekend, but i'd
need to be by phone, since i'll be in mendocino. are the handouts from
thursday that i need to get?
Best,
Jeff
Anil Sama <[email protected]>
02/16/2001 12:55 PM
To: "Vavrek, Carolyn \(US - San Francisco\)" <[email protected]>,
[email protected], [email protected]
cc:
Subject: Re: FIA assignment
Jeff, Mark:
Wondering where you were yesterday. Hope you didn't
forget about the in-class quiz!
The next HW and writeup due next week seems like
a heavy one.
Do most of you have Monday off? I'll take a look at the
case/HW Sa/Su, and prefer a meeting / conf call anytime
Monday. Perhaps PM in the city if folks are working
that day? Sunday PM (after 7) works for me too.
-Anil
--- "Vavrek, Carolyn (US - San Francisco)"
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Congrats crew - we got a 9 on case #2.
> When is everyone available between now and Wed pm to talk
> about case #3 and
> the other homework?
> - cv
>
> Carolyn M. Vavrek
> Manager - Human Capital Advisory Services
> Deloitte & Touche
> 50 Fremont Street
> San Francisco, CA 94105
>
> phone: 415-783-5137
> fax: 415-783-8760
> e-mail: [email protected]
>
> - This message (including any attachments) contains
> confidential information
> intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is
> protected by law. -
> If you are not the intended recipient, you should delete
> this message and
> are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, or
> distribution of this
> message, or the taking of any action based on it, is
> strictly prohibited.
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35
a year! http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
=====================================
|
2,631 |
Subject: Final Reminder for April 24th Breakfast Club!
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/11368.
=====================================
Dear Silicon Valley Breakfast Club Member:
Just a reminder to join us for the April meeting of the Silicon Valley
Breakfast Club, scheduled for Tuesday, April 24, from 8:15am until 10am,
hosted by EPRI in their Cafeteria located on their campus at 3412 Hillview
Avenue in Palo Alto.
Our speaker this month is Bob Therkelsen, Manager of Special Projects
Engineering at the California Independent Systems Operator. Mr. Therkelsen
will brief us on the ten generation facilities that have been approved
during the past 18 months and where each is in the construction process, and
the 14 generation facilities currently working through the CEC process.
Everyone agrees this new generation is a key part of the long-term solution
to the energy crisis. Don't miss this presentation on major generation
facilities and how quickly each will come on-line!
For a map, please visit our website at www.svmg.org, under EVENTS. Our host
requests attendees please park in the parking lot above Building 1.
Please note, to log on to the Breakfast Club page you will need the
following information:
Log: breakfast
Password: breakfastmember
Please confirm your attendance by return e-mail as soon as possible.
The following have already confirmed their attendance:
Brice McQueen
Bud Mission
Daniel Duran
Salvador Alvarez
Allison Barrett
Bob Fernandez
Stephen Motzko
Manmohan Dehgal
Linda Gold
John Giovanola
Kevin Bryan
Ted Cunningham
Don McIntosh
Jerry Brown
Stephen Witmer
Lee Sturtevant
Gerry Marmion
Diane Tripousis
Michele Lew
Kathleen Collins
Steve Lane
Ed Jones
Karna Carlson
Deanna Sessums
John Redding
Peter Klok
Diane Vitkovits
Erin Koch
Kindel Blau
John Bruno
Mike Runyan
David Tricaso
Ray Pfeifer
Lori Johnson
Sari Wisch
KC Mares
Wendy Sarsfield
Regrets:
Teresa Alvarado
David Shimmon
Jack Landers
=====================================
|
2,632 |
Subject: RE: Edison's Hedging Proposals Under the Rate Settlement It Reached
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent_items/568.
=====================================
Craver will head up any of these specific deals that Edison enters into. I've known Fielder for a long time (very much the company guy, but pretty easy to work with). I've met Craver, but don't know him as well as Fielder. Won't be a stretch to get a meeting with Craver if we choose to do it. Edison is the counterparty. Regarding the credit issue, in addition to Edison, we should also view the California PUC as a "co-counterparty" to just about anything Edison does over the next 24 months or so.
Best,
Jeff
-----Original Message-----
From: Tycholiz, Barry
Sent: Friday, October 12, 2001 7:25 AM
To: Dasovich, Jeff
Cc: Miller, Stephanie; Tholt, Jane M.
Subject: RE: Edison's Hedging Proposals Under the Rate Settlement It Reached with the California PUC
Jeff, I was talking to Mike Etringer yesterday regarding this subject and he gave me the name of the CFO Ted Craver. I understand that you guys were dealing with John Fielder.
For sure we want to know what they are up to. I think like all deals in California we are going to run into issues with credit, and probably paper but that would pretty much depend on the counterparty. ( is it edison), or DWR?
It is VERY important that trading and marketing are aware of the hedging activities in a very timely fashion so however we need to ensure that happens will be my plan.
Do you know the CFO ?
regards, BT
-----Original Message-----
From: Dasovich, Jeff
Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2001 6:59 PM
To: Tycholiz, Barry; Miller, Stephanie; Tholt, Jane M.
Subject: FW: Edison's Hedging Proposals Under the Rate Settlement It Reached with the California PUC
Importance: High
FYI. Edison's filing for approval to hedge power up to $250MM. If you'd like to get in front of Edison's CFO on this. Let me know.
Best,
Jeff
=====================================
|
2,633 |
Subject: Effect of ECB interest rate jump + min. wage rise
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/mba__macroeconomics/31.
=====================================
A classmate wrote...
>
> 1. From the F.T. 11/9/99 p. 29: Why will the ECB's interest rate increase
> make it "...harder for the [Italian] government to reduce its enormous
public
> debt" ?
One element of net taxes is the transfer = interest payments on the public
debt. Higher i raises interest payments and, thus, the goverment budget
deficit (G-T).
>
> 2. from the same article, why will the rate increase "...put pressure
> on Italian companies with high exposure to short-term loans" ?
Same logic: Short-term loans need to be refinanced regularly (unlike long-term
fixed-rate bonds). If I have loans that need to be refinanced, their
refinanced rate will be roughly 1/2 point higher this month than last due to
the actions of the ECB.
Another classmate asked...
>The senate plans to raise the minimum wage by $1 an hour over the next 3
years. Based on what we learnt in class, a wage hike would tend to typically
go
to teenagers and not
to primary bread-winners.
Lots of min. wage workers are teens, but roughly 40% are low-income heads of
households.
>Also, since a wage hike attracts more workers and
>creates excess labor supply, businesses lay off workers rather than raise
>their pay - this creates more unemployment.
Turnover is high in low-wage jobs, so employment might fall, but not due to
many layoffs -- just lower hiring. The point remains that employment still
declines. Most estimates are that the employment declines are quite small, so
that low-wage workers on average come out ahead with the rise.
David I. Levine Associate professor
Haas School of Business ph: 510/642-1697
University of California fax: 510/643-1420
Berkeley CA 94720-1900 email:
[email protected]
http://web.haas.berkeley.edu/www/levine/
=====================================
|
2,634 |
Subject: RE: spreadsheet
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/3294.
=====================================
that's wierd. i'm, of course, very bummed.
Jacqueline Kelly <[email protected]>
11/09/2000 02:59 PM
To: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: RE: spreadsheet
Agghh!
Tried to protest the move, saying that I couldn't make it to the Tuesday
meeting, so she switched me to yet another team - which I will not mention -
that couldn't have been worse if I had hand picked it. So I told her that a
phone call came in that confirmed I could change my plans and I am back to
the second team - with Courtney, Kimberley, and Anil Sama. It's a good
team, though not as good as my first! :)
Oh, well!
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2000 11:49 AM
To: Jacqueline Kelly
Subject: RE: spreadsheet
I've got an idea. Howzabout Ted cooks and you clean up? Seriously,
though, I'll try to host next time at my humble apartment.
Jacqueline
Kelly To: "'[email protected]'"
<JKelly@FairI <[email protected]>
saac.com> cc:
Subject: RE: spreadsheet
11/09/2000
01:31 PM
No problemo! Maybe I will cook for us next time...oh, that's right I don't
cook anymore...
I thought we did a good job of cranking things out. Have a good weekend!
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2000 10:12 AM
To: Jacqueline Kelly
Subject: Re: spreadsheet
thanks again for hosting. most kind of you, and we seemed to make a lot of
progress. did you get enough money for dinner?
=====================================
|
2,635 |
Subject: William Drayton, Founder of Ashoka, to speak this Friday!
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/inbox/508.
=====================================
You are cordially invited to:
The Fourth Annual Peterson Ethics Lecture
Featuring: William Drayton
Founder of Ashoka, an organization that supports social entrepreneurship
This Friday, October 12, 4:00 pm, Wells Fargo Room
Haas School of Business
About William Drayton:
Drayton founded Ashoka in 1980 to use a venture capital model to support
social entrepreneurs, described by Ashoka as practical visionaries who are
committed to social change. The primary activity of the organization is
identifying social entrepreneurs around the globe as candidates for Ashoka
Fellowships, which provide both financial and professional support. To be
chosen, each prospective fellow goes through a rigorous search and
selection process.
Fellows receive a living stipend (typically for three years) and they join
the Global Fellowship -- a worldwide network of social entrepreneurs. This
year, Paul Rice, MBA 96, was named an Ashoka Fellow for his work founding
TransFair USA, a non-profit certification organization for Fair Trade
products.
Since 1982 the organization has elected over 1,100 Ashoka Fellows in 41
countries. Ashoka Fellows work in six areas: learning/education,
environment, health, human rights, civic participation, and economic
development. Approximately 150 new fellows are elected each year by the
Ashoka staff.
About the Peterson Ethics Lecture:
This annual lecture is sponsored the Peterson Program in Business Ethics,
funded by a gift from Rudolph Peterson, BS 25, president and CEO emeritus
of BankAmerica Corporation. Last year Treasury Secretary Paul H. O'Neill,
then director and chairman of Alcoa, gave the lecture.
For more information on this year's Peterson Ethics Lecture:
http://www.haas.berkeley.edu/groups/newspubs/haasnews/archives/hn092401.html#drayton
=====================================
|
2,636 |
Subject: European Financial Markets - New course, Spring 00
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/mba_program/27.
=====================================
I am visiting Haas this year and will be teaching 'European Financial
Markets' (BA 296-7, E 296-5) in the spring. Since this is a new course,
I thought I should draw it to your attention. The move to monetary union
(EMU) in Europe has created a newly integrated financial area comparable
to the US, with consequences that anyone doing business or advising
businesses in Europe needs to understand. Just consider:
'The dollar's supremacy has been challenged in the global debt markets.'
(FT, 6/14/99). 'The large funds have indulged in a frenzy of
cross-border buying...with the volume of paper launched by European
companies rising five-fold over 1998.' (FT 10/28/99) '...a doubling of
European-based staff at Lehman Brothers, a 50% increase at SSB, and up
to 20% at other banks...follows Europe overtaking the US in M&A
activity...' (FT 10/25/99)
I shall address questions such as: How does the European Central Bank
differ from the Fed? Will the euro compete with the dollar as an
international currency? Can European capital markets challenge the US
for international portfolio managers and for non-European issuers? Will
Europe soon have serious venture capital and junk bond sectors? Will the
European banking sector experience a deep wave of cross-border
restructurings? Will there be a shift from domestic to cross-border M&A
in Europe - and will competition authorities try to restrain it? How
will the East European emerging markets fit into the picture?
If these issues interest you, I look forward to seeing you in January.
--
Richard Portes
Distinguished Global Visiting Professor
Haas School of Business
University of California at Berkeley
Berkeley CA 94720-1900
Email: [email protected]
Tel. 1 510 642 8032
Fax 1 510 642 4700
(on leave from London Business School, 1999-2000)
=====================================
|
2,637 |
Subject: Fwd: DJ - US Richardson To Unveil Calif Pwr Supply Initiatives Wed
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/803.
=====================================
Sandi sez it's actually happening at 10 AM and it's renewable-focused.
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 11/01/2000 11:12 AM -----
"Ronald Carroll" <[email protected]>
11/01/2000 10:50 AM
To: <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: Fwd: DJ - US Richardson To Unveil Calif Pwr Supply Initiatives Wed
----- Message from "Tracey Bradley" <[email protected]> on Wed, 01 Nov
2000 10:34:29 -0600 -----
To: "Deanna King" <[email protected]>, "Jeffrey Watkiss"
<[email protected]>, "Paul Fox" <[email protected]>, "Ronald Carroll"
<[email protected]>
Subject: DJ - US Richardson To Unveil Calif Pwr Supply Initiatives Wed
DJ US Richardson To Unveil Calif Pwr Supply Initiatives Wed
Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.
WASHINGTON (Dow Jones)--U.S. Energy Secretary Bill Richardson will announce
Wednesday a series of initiatives the Clinton administration will undertake
to help alleviate California's power supply crisis, the U.S. Department Of
Energy said in a press release Tuesday.
Richardson will announce the initiatives at a press event in Sacramento. He
will be joined by California Gov. Gray Davis and California congressional and
state lawmakers.
The initiatives will "help California reduce the strain on its
electricity system and increase electric grid reliability," the DOE said in
the release.
The event is scheduled for 11 a.m. PST (1900 GMT) at the Sacramento
Municipal Utility District's Hedge Photovoltaic Facility.
A DOE spokesman declined to provide further information Tuesday.
-By Bryan Lee, Dow Jones Newswires; 202-862-6647,
mailto:[email protected]
(END) Dow Jones Newswires 31-10-00
=====================================
|
2,638 |
Subject: Fwd: Direct Marketing conference
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/inbox/955.
=====================================
>Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 16:08:12 -0500
>To: [email protected],[email protected]
>From: Russell Winer <[email protected]>
>Subject: Direct Marketing conference
>Cc: Tulin
>
>*** DELETE IF YOU ARE NOT INTERESTED IN DIRECT MARKETING***
>
>The Direct Marketing Educational Foundation has an annual conference
>bringing together MBA students from top programs and leading Direct
>Marketing professionals. This year, the program will be held Feb. 1-3 in
>New York. The program is intended for MBA students who have serious
>career interests in direct marketing but who have not yet had a
>significant amount of experience in the field. More information is
>provided in the attached document. In the past, we have sent 2 and
>sometimes 3 students to the program.
>
>This e-mail is being sent to second year Haas full-time MBA students and
>evening program students. I would prefer that the latter applicants be at
>least in the second year of the program. If you are interested in
>attending and can commit to the dates, please send me a one-page resume
>and a one-paragraph statement of how you would benefit from the
>program. The due date for getting this information to me is Monday, Dec.
>3. Please send it to my NYU e-mail address (I'm on leave here this
>academic year), [email protected].
>
>Russ Winer
>
>Professor Russ Winer
>J. Gary Shansby Professor of Marketing Strategy
>Haas School of Business, UC-Berkeley
>Visiting Professor of Marketing
>Stern School of Business
>New York University
>[email protected]
>Phone: 212.998.0517
>Fax: 212.995.4006
Professor Russ Winer
Visiting Professor of Marketing
Stern School of Business, Room 8-90
New York University
44 West 4th Street
New York, NY 10012
[email protected]
Phone: 212.998.0517
Fax: 212.995.4006
=====================================
|
2,639 |
Subject: RE: Comnes Vacation Handoff memo.
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/deleted_items/278.
=====================================
Sue,
I will be happy to cover for Alan and yourself. The week of August 13, I'll be in the office on Monday and Friday, in Portland Tues-Thurs. The following week I am planning on being in Portland on Monday and Tuesday and in the office on Wednesday and in Vancouver on Thursday and Friday (WSCC WMIC meeting).
Kind Regards,
Dave
-----Original Message-----
From: Mara, Susan
Sent: Friday, August 10, 2001 12:00 PM
To: Comnes, Alan; Perrino, Dave; Kaufman, Paul; Dasovich, Jeff; Alvarez, Ray; Scott, Susan; Frank, Robert; Walton, Steve
Subject: RE: Comnes Vacation Handoff memo.
I am in the office next week but off the following week. Dave Perrino-- can you cover for me the week I'm gone (and ALan is too)?
-----Original Message-----
From: Comnes, Alan
Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2001 5:39 PM
To: Perrino, Dave; Kaufman, Paul; Mara, Susan; Dasovich, Jeff; Alvarez, Ray; Scott, Susan; Frank, Robert; Walton, Steve
Subject: Comnes Vacation Handoff memo.
I would like to distribute this when I leave on vacation on Saturday 11 Aug. I have implicated you as my backup. Please let me know if you cannot serve, espcially if you too will be on vacation.
Alan
Comnes Vacation Hand-Off Matrix
Alan Returns on 27 Aug 01
Issue Government Affairs Contact
General Trading Desk Support Dave Perrino, Sue Mara
CAISO Sue Mara
Need something on Alan's hard disk Lysa Akin
California Refund Proceeding Ray Alvarez (D.C.)
Comments on West Wide mitigation due August 17 or 20th (not sure) Dave Perrino
PNW Refund Proceeding Bob Frank (Houston)
RTO West DSTAR Dave Perrino, Steve Walton
Origination Support/QFs Paul Kaufman
Interconnection Issues/Power Market Certificates Susan Scott (Houston)
California Retail Issues Sue Mara
California Special Session/Bankruptcy/SCE MOU Jeff Dasovich
=====================================
|
2,640 |
Subject: RE: Proposal AREM response to UDC Joint Filing - Implementation of
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]; [email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/deleted_items/2094.
=====================================
I would agree that we may need to conference on this. I agree with some of
the points that Janie brings up and would like to discuss with the group...I
am available most of the day if we have a conference call.
Andrea Weller
Market Strategist
Strategic Energy, LLC
Office: (714) 573-1014
Cell: (949) 230-3404
[email protected]
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 11:21 AM
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Proposal AREM response to UDC Joint Filing - Implementation of
Su spension DA
I have had an opportunity to talk to most of you regarding the attached
proposal. I apologize I ran out of time yesterday and didn't catch
everyone.
NWE would like to propose a slightly different take on our AREM filing
having had a chance to think more about it. I wanted to run it by everyone
to get your thoughts before submitting a redline. If you feel this warrants
a conference call I will gladly set one up for today. Time is of the
essence and would appreciate your feedback as soon as possible. If we all
agree, I would like to get the re-write with everyone's blessing to Dan by
tomorrow at 8:00 am. or sooner.
<<arm-puc-plan.doc>>
Proposal Benefits
1. We look more reasonable and agree to much of what UDCs are
proposing.
2. Accommodates most, if not all, of ESP and customer concerns.
3. Strong argument for avoiding any contract review. Our
verification proposal could backfire; PUC could accept our approach, but add
details which goes toward ESPs submitting contracts to the PUC for review
and validation
Thank you,
Janie Mollon
Manager, Legislative and Regulatory Affairs
Office: 602-629-7758
FAX: 602-629-7772
Mobile: 602-625-3892
=====================================
|
2,641 |
Subject: Nevada Governor To Decide On Deregulation By Next Week
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', "nicholas.o'[email protected]", '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/1724.
=====================================
Dow Jones Energy ServiceNevada Governor To Decide On Deregulation By Next
Week ? 09/25/2000 Dow Jones Energy Service (Copyright (c) 2000, Dow
Jones&Company, Inc.)
LOS ANGELES -(Dow Jones)- Nevada governor Kenny Guinn will decide by early
next week on whether to implement electricity deregulation by November, as
recommended by the state's Public Utilities Commission, a spokesman for the
governor said Monday.
Deregulation was set to become law March 1, 2000, but was stalled due to a
lawsuit brought by Sierra Pacific Resources (SRP) Co. unit Nevada power that
challenged deregulation as unconstitutional. Nevada Power withdrew the
lawsuit after the state approved a $110 million rate increase for the
utility's customers.
Guinn's spokesman would not say why the governor was considering a delay in
deregulation.
"All those details will be discussed when the decision is announced," said
spokesman Jack Finn.
The PUC's proposed deregulation schedule calls for competition to begin with
large commercial customers on Nov. 1, 2000, followed by medium commercial
customers April 1, 2001, and residential customers Sept. 1, 2001.
By Jessica Berthold, Dow Jones Newswires;
323-658-3872;[email protected]
Folder Name: Utilities, Electric: Deregulation Relevance Score on Scale of
100: 97______________________________________________________________________
To review or revise your folder, visit Dow Jones CustomClipsor contact Dow
Jones Customer Service by e-mail at [email protected] by phone
at 800-369-7466. (Outside the U.S. and Canada, call 609-452-1511 or contact
your local sales representative.)
______________________________________________________________________
Copyright (c) 2000 Dow Jones &Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved
=====================================
|
2,642 |
Subject: Re: FW: Amendment to Sher Bond bill
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/28369.
=====================================
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 07/06/2001 01:18 PM -----
Jeff Dasovich
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
07/06/2001 01:17 PM
To: MDay <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: Re: FW: Amendment to Sher Bond bill
Thanks very much Mike. The sense of urgency for getting this in "the mix" is
not as high as it was yesterday, though we'll still need to introduce it at
some point very soon. Thanks very much.
Best,
Jeff
MDay <[email protected]>
07/06/2001 01:12 PM
To: "'Bev Hansen, Enron lobbyist'" <[email protected]>, "'Hedy Govenar, Enron
Sacto lobbyist'" <[email protected]>, "'Scott Govenar, Enron lobbyist'"
<[email protected]>
cc: "'Jeff Dasovich Enron SF'" <[email protected]>
Subject: FW: Amendment to Sher Bond bill
FYI Here is the language I gave Jeff to propose for an amendment to the
Sher Bond bill which will make sure Direct Access customers don't pay for
DWR power costs through the bonds EXCEPT for power they actually used that
was purchased by DWR. Houston has to ok this and then Jeff has to sell it.
I also strongly recommend that the next to the last sentence of Water Code
Section 80110 be repealed in the bill. That would leave direct access in
place and force DWR to come to us to get a bill that would have reasonable
exit fee provisions. Without a change like this, the bill would simply
reaffirm the ban on direct access and that could cause us to lose at the
Commission. There is nothing else in the bill which explicitly tells the
PUC to not suspend direct access.
Mike Day
> -----Original Message-----
> From: MDay
> Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2001 12:40 PM
> To: 'Jeff Dasovich Enron SF'
> Subject: Amendment to Sher Bond bill
>
> <<X25946.DOC>>
>
> Here is the very short amendment for the Sher Bond Bill. Mike Day
- X25946.DOC
=====================================
|
2,643 |
Subject: Special Session Notes
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/inbox/407.
=====================================
Hi all,
We spoke to Rick Simpson in Hertzberg's office who related the
following:
The last meeting of Senate, Assembly, and Governor's staff was last
Wednesday. The Senate staff has been advised that the Governor is not
interested in having a bill that could only pass the Senate. He wants
one that can get 41 votes in the Assembly as well, which means direct
access would have to be included. Rick spoke to Brian Kelly of Burton's
office on Friday. Brian said they are working on securitizing the
interest costs. They are looking at something like 50-60 kw for the
core/non-core number which would still be able to be financed even with
fewer customers, although the transaction costs would be higher with a
smaller customer base. I asked Rick if they expect all of their members
to return and he said most of them would. I suggested that it had
better be the right ones, or they'd have trouble getting to 41 votes.
He said he wasn't sure at this point if a compromise bill could be ready
by next Tuesday, but the Assembly is willing to try with the right bill.
I spoke to John Burton a few minutes ago who reiterated that he will not
look favorably upon including direct access although he understands that
some business democrats in the Assembly need it to vote for a
bailout. He said he spoke to an Assembly leader this morning who told
him that even 78xx would get only 36 votes today if it came up for a
vote (it squeeked through on 41). He is considering putting up 78xx for
a vote on Tuesday (it will fail) and continuing discussions with the
Governor's office after that. He said to tell you all that the bailout
bill can't pass next week because it interferes with Scott and Gayle's
wedding on the 14th, and coincidentally that is the last day for the
Governor to sign or veto bills.
=====================================
|
2,644 |
Subject: BA/E296.1 Nonprofit Boards Class
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/inbox/502.
=====================================
Greetings! The Dean's Office has confirmed your registration in E/BA 296.1.
Since E/BA 296.1 meets for only two full class days, I am asking that all
students complete a series of readings prior to the first class on October
27th (as well as a second set for the second class). We have a strong panel
of speakers presenting at each class and the readings will provide important
context. The syllabus for this course is enclosed and assigned readings are
clearly indicated. Please note that class attendance (mandatory at both
classes) and the quality of class participation accounts for 40% of your
grade. As the class will be full I would be most appreciative if you would
bring nameplates with you to class.
The reader for the course is now available and Day MBA students can purchase
it at Copy Central, 2560 Bancroft Way, Berkeley.
Evening MBA students can pick up a copy of the reader from the Evening MBA
Program Office. The syllabus is also enclosed in the reader
and reading assignments are divided by class date. Also please note that I
have asked you to subscribe, on line, to Compass Point, Board Caf?,
http://www.boardcafe.org/index.html. Should you have any questions please
just send me an email.
Within a week of the first class, I will send to you an Introductory
Questionnaire, which I ask that you complete and return to me prior to the
first class. The results will be shared with panelists, guest lecturers and
all class participants.
Thank you and I look forward to our meeting on October 27th!
====================================
Lynne LaMarca Heinrich
Senior Consultant
Marts & Lundy, Inc.
Adjunct Professor
Haas School of Business, UC Berkeley
______________________
1441 Hawthorne Terrace
Berkeley, CA 94708
Office: 510/644-4490
Fax: 510/649-3076
[email protected]
=====================================
|
2,645 |
Subject: RE: Group Project--E221
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/10238.
=====================================
Hi Carolyn, Anil, Mark & Jeff - I'm really sorry but I don't know what
happened to Jeff's email. I have no recollection of receiving it, and I
can't find it anywhere, so I have no idea what happened. A little
disconcerting... Anyhow - my apologies! Thanks Carolyn for forwarding it
along.
At 04:13 PM 3/20/2001 -0800, Vavrek, Carolyn (US - San Francisco) wrote:
>I did not see our names on your list. Please see Jeff's e-mail sent to you
>last Friday. Sorry for any confusion.
>Thanks,
>Carolyn
>
>Carolyn M. Vavrek
>Manager - Human Capital Advisory Services
>Deloitte & Touche
>50 Fremont Street
>San Francisco, CA 94105
>
>phone: 415-783-5137
>fax: 415-783-8760
>e-mail: [email protected]
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
>Sent: Friday, March 16, 2001 11:03 AM
>To: [email protected]
>Cc: Anil Sama; Mark Guinney; Cvavrek
>Subject: Group Project--E221
>
>
>Greetings Professor:
>
>Our group consists of Jeff Dasovich, Mark Guinney, Anil Sama and Carolyn
>Vavrek.
>
>We propose to examine the recently failed acquisition by Coke of Quaker
>Oats: Why merge? What was the value? Upside? Downside? Why did it go
>bust? Should it have gone through? What's up with this Buffet guy,
>anyway?
>
>If you have any concerns with this proposal, please let us know.
>
>Finally, if possible, we'd like to present on Thursday, April 26th.
>
>Best,
>Jeff
>
>
>This message (including any attachments) contains confidential information
>intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is protected by law. If
>you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this message and are
>hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this
>message, or the taking of any action based on it, is strictly prohibited.
>
>
=====================================
|
2,646 |
Subject: CHANGE!!! Conference Call TODAY to discuss response to FERC Order 1
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/1838.
=====================================
By popular demand, there will be a conference call TODAY at 5:00pm Pacific /
7:00pm Central / 8:00pm Eastern to review a draft pelading and affidavit for
our response to FERC's Nov. 1 Order. Mary Hain or I will be forwarding to
you a draft of the pleading at 3:00pm Pacific / 5:00pm Central / 6:00pm
Eastern time today.
Please disregard Mary's and my earlier e-mails concerning the timing of this
call.
Dial in information is as follows:
Date: TODAY, Tuesday, Nov. 21st
Time: 5:00pm Pacific / 7:00pm Central / 8:00pm Eastern
800#: 888/422-7116
Pin#: 109963
Pin # for Mary Hain ONLY: 385359
Please call me at 503/464-7927 or Mary at 503/464-8862 if you have any
questions.
---------------------- Forwarded by Lysa Akin/PDX/ECT on 11/21/2000 12:28 PM
---------------------------
Mary Hain
11/21/2000 11:07 AM
Sent by: Lysa Akin
To: James D Steffes/NA/Enron, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron, Joe
Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@Enron, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@Enron, Tim
Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron, Alan
Comnes/PDX/ECT
cc: Marcia A Linton/NA/Enron, Rubena
Buerger/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Bernadette
Hawkins/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Debra Davidson/PDX/ECT@ECT, Joseph
Alamo/NA/Enron@Enron, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Conference Call to discuss response to FERC 1 Nov. Order
Ron Carroll will have our final response to FERC late tonight for review
first thing tomorrow before filing.
I realize this is short notice, but it is critical that we all speak to
discuss the draft. Therefore, in order to discuss, I have set a conference
call as follows:
Date: Wed., Nov. 22nd
Time: 7:00am Pacific / 9:00am Central / 10:00am Eastern
800#: 888/422-7116
Pin#: 109963
Pin # for Mary Hain ONLY: 385359
Please contact Lysa at 503/464-7927 if you cannot attend.
Thanks!
=====================================
|
2,647 |
Subject: FREE Gift with Purchase of $250
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/deleted_items/2082.
=====================================
ENTHUSIAST ESSENTIALS
Order online or call 1-800-356-8466 Use code E23A at checkout.
If the links in this email do not function, please go directly to
www.wineenthusiast.com. Please remember to use code E23A at checkout to receive
this promotional offer.
GIFT GIVING MADE EASY
EuroCave, The World's Finest Wine Cellar
Click here - http://webmail.wineenthusiast.net/UM/T.asp?A5.6.11.2.50456
FREE* GIFT with a purchase of $250 or more.
Receive a set of 6 Spiegelau Tasting Stems - Valued at $49.95
Our way of saying Thank you and Happy Holidays.
Offer expires 12/15/01.
A GIFT FOR EVERYONE ON YOUR LIST...
Holiday Accents for the Home.
Click here - http://webmail.wineenthusiast.net/UM/T.asp?A5.6.11.3.50456
Corkscrews from A to Z
Click here - http://webmail.wineenthusiast.net/UM/T.asp?A5.6.11.4.50456
Gifts for the Wine Lover
Click here - http://webmail.wineenthusiast.net/UM/T.asp?A5.6.11.5.50456
Dress in Wine Style
Click here - http://webmail.wineenthusiast.net/UM/T.asp?A5.6.11.6.50456
Laguiole Gifts
Click here - http://webmail.wineenthusiast.net/UM/T.asp?A5.6.11.7.50456
Mini-Cellars
Click here - http://webmail.wineenthusiast.net/UM/T.asp?A5.6.11.8.50456
*This offer may not be combined with any other offer and expires 12/15/01. Due
to limited inventory, the free gifts will be given away on a first come fist
serve basis. Other items may be substituted if inventory is depleted. If you
have any questions, please contact customer service at
[email protected].
____________________________________________________________
You are receiving the email because you have subscribed to Enthusiast
Essentials. If you would like to remove yourself from this list, please click:
http://webmail.wineenthusiast.net/UM/U.asp?B5.6.23.50456 and you will be removed
immediately! Thank you!
=====================================
|
2,648 |
Subject: Re: Data on Monthly Generation for SCE
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/4390.
=====================================
I am available at either time.
C
From: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON on 12/07/2000 12:13 PM CST
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON
To: Stephen Swain/PDX/ECT@ECT, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Badeer/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Chris H Foster/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Alan
Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Re: Data on Monthly Generation for SCE
Folks:
The "subcommittee" I've referenced that's trying to come up with a solution
to California's train wreck is moving very quickly. The group's shooting to
have a first cut at a "straw person" proposal sketched out by end of next
week. The group's meeting on Tuesday to continue to bounce around ideas.
I'd like to try to have an internal call on Monday at either 10 AM (PST) or
3 PM (PST) to pin down at least a vaguely detailed conceptual framework that
I can propose to the subcommittee on Tuesday. The agenda items for the
internal meeting are:
Finalize proposal for benchmark(s) for utility procurement.
Goal: increase utility willingness to enter into forward contracts by
replacing PUC after-the-fact "reasonableness" review with a benchmark. (Been
working the Portland desk on a "portfolio benchmark" concept.)
Determine our view of how to treat term contracts w.r.t. the PX credit, i.e.,
should those contracts be disclosed to the market, or should PUC keep them
confidential, calculate the PX credit behind closed doors, and publish the
credit ex poste? The PX credit depends on the overall utility portfolio, not
just the PX price.
Let me know if 10 AM or 3 PM (PST) works better.
Harry: I'll assume that you'll contact the folks from EES that need to
participate.
Best,
Jeff
=====================================
|
2,649 |
Subject: RE: Revised appointment 11/9/01 PG&E Official Creditors Committee
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['G. YOUNG BENNETT (E-mail); Randy Michelson (E-mail)', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/inbox/1626.
=====================================
Yes, we should have anticipated it. No head's up.
We have little recourse legally. Lisa and I are recommending to exit gracefully.
-----Original Message-----
From: Dasovich, Jeff
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 9:50 AM
To: Tribolet, Michael
Subject: RE: Revised appointment 11/9/01 PG&E Official Creditors Committee
Hi Michael:
Few questions:
Is this something that we anticipated? Were we given any sort of "head's up?"
Is it something that we can object to? The combination is far from consummated and we're still owed a heckuvalot of money?
Do we have any recourse?
Best,
Jeff
-----Original Message-----
From: Tribolet, Michael
Sent: Mon 11/12/2001 7:35 AM
To: Buy, Rick; Gorte, David; Curry, Wanda; Bradford, William S.; Kean, Steven J.; Shapiro, Richard; Mara, Susan; Steffes, James D.; Dasovich, Jeff
Cc:
Subject: FW: Revised appointment 11/9/01 PG&E Official Creditors Committee
-----Original Message-----
From: Johnson, Stephen [ <mailto:[email protected]>]
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 5:20 PM
To: Robert Moore (E-mail); Annamarie Fallon JP Morgan Chase; Clara
Strand, Bank of America; David Adante, The Davey Tree Co.; Duane H.
Nelson, GWF Power Systems; Grant Kolling, City of Palo Alto; John C.
Herbert, Dynegy; Kenneth Smith, PE Berkeley; Michael Lurie, Merrill
Lynch; Tribolet, Michael; Mike Jines; Raymond Kennedy; Tom Milne, State
of Tennessee
Cc: G. YOUNG BENNETT (E-mail); Randy Michelson (E-mail)
Subject: Revised appointment 11/9/01 PG&E Official Creditors Committee
Enron has been replaced by Reliant Energy Services, Inc.
Stephen L. Johnson
Attorney
United States Department of Justice
Office of the U.S. Trustee
250 Montgomery Street, Suite 1000
San Francisco, CA 94104
415-705-3333 tel.
415-705-3379 fax
[email protected]
=====================================
|
2,650 |
Subject: New Staff Member!
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/3507.
=====================================
YEAH!
I'm very happy to announce that Seung (pronounced "Sung") Lee has joined our
staff as Program Assistant. Seung brings great experience to the office, so
we feel very fortunate to have found him. Seung comes most recently from
SUNY Purchase College where he was an admissions advisor for three years.
Prior to that, Seung was the Agency Coordinator at The Fresh Air Fund in New
York. Seung has a BA in English, is a trained negotiator, and has taught
fencing (though I think he does these last two things separately). Welcome
to Seung!
So, to summarize the EvMBA office staff members' responsibilities:
TJ Janus, Associate Director for Student Services. TJ is responsible for
registration, books and materials, and all the student services that are so
critical to getting you through your program. Contact: tj@haas; 510/643-0435
Julie Ito, Associate Director for Admissions and Marketing. Julie is
responsible for the admissions process and for our marketing efforts. Julie
will be contacting you about attending Open Houses and other marketing
events, and she is the one to whom you should refer any interested colleagues
and friends. Contact: jito@haas; 510/643-3258
Meg St. John, Assistant Director. Meg's responsibilities are in all three
areas - student services, admissions, and marketing. In the student
services area, you will be hearing from Meg about MPAR and other
non-registration-type services. Contact: mstjohn@haas; 510/642-1406
Seung Lee, Program Assistant. Seung's responsibilities support all the
student services, admissions, and marketing efforts, and he's likely to be
the first point of contact with the EvMBA office. Contact: slee@haas;
510/642-1406
Cheers,
Diane
(I'm the one who's responsible for choosing the menus for Catered Dinners!)
=====================================
|
2,651 |
Subject: Interesting news item: Municipal Franchise / ROW
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/1840.
=====================================
STATE & LOCAL GOVERNMENT
MICHIGAN
ALJ says Rochester violated state law
A Michigan Public Service Commission administrative law judge (ALJ) has
recommended that the commission fine the city of Rochester $30,000 for its
practices in permitting use of its rights-of-way. The ALJ's recommendation
addresses a complaint filed by Coast to Coast Telecommunications, Inc.,
against Rochester.
Coast to Coast plans to construct a 400-mile fiber optic cable network using
asynchronous transfer mode and synchronous optical network technology in
Oakland, Macomb, Wayne, Washtenaw, and Monroe counties. In May Rochester
granted Coast to Coast a permit to use the city's rights-of-way, but the
permit didn't specify the monetary amount of the application fee or the
annual fees.
The ALJ found the permit to be unreasonable in its terms and conditions, in
violation of section 251(3) of the Michigan Telecommunications Act (MTA). The
ALJ agreed with Coast to Coast's assertions that in order for there to be a
valid permit, the amount of the fees must be specified.
According to the ALJ, Rochester had signed a franchise agreement with
McLeodUSA Telecommunications, Inc., before it considered Coast to Coast's
request. The city charges McLeodUSA 25 cents per aerial lineal foot but
proposed to charge Coast to Coast 76 cents per aerial lineal foot. The ALJ
found Rochester's actions to be "blatantly discriminatory" in violation of
section 253 of the MTA.
If the PSC acts on the ALJ's recommendation, it will be the second time a
municipality is fined for the MTA. Last month the PSC fined the city of
Birmingham $10,000 for violating the MTA. (10/25/00 a.m.) (Case no. U-12462 -
In the matter of the application and complaint of Coast to Coast
Telecommunications, Inc., against the City of Rochester, Michigan)
=====================================
|
2,652 |
Subject: Re: E220 Case #1
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/221.
=====================================
Greetings folks. We should decide how we want to handle. One thing I'm not
clear on and that I couldn't find in the syllabus is, what's the format for
the write up? If we're called on to discuss, do we simply discuss orally,
some sort of simplistic PP slides, spreadsheets, other? Anyway to discuss
between now and Monday, or do we want to just take Dylan up on his offer?
Best,
Jeff
Kimberly Kupiecki <[email protected]> on 09/07/2000 06:56:44 PM
To: [email protected]
cc: [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected]
Subject: Re: E220 Case #1
Hello all,
I will take a look at the case tonight.
Divvying is fine with me.
At 03:22 PM 9/7/00, [email protected] wrote:
>would seem useful if we all contribute in some manner, but i'm open to
>suggestions. perhaps we could divvy up the questions.
>
>
>
>
>Dylan Windham <[email protected]> on 09/07/2000 04:50:31 PM
>
>To: [email protected], [email protected],
> [email protected]
>cc:
>Subject: E220 Case #1
>
>
>
>Hello,
>
>I have started to look at the case assignment for Monday. Since, I will be
>out of town the following week I will volunteer to write this one up. I
>don't know how he want to divvy up the work (by Questions or everyone does
>it all), but let me know. I have already made a spreadsheet with the
>combined cash flow statement that I will send to you tomorrow. Let me know
>how we want to handle this.
>
>--Dylan
>
>
>Ofc. Dylan H. Windham
>Threat Management/Domestic Violence Unit
>University of California Police - Berkeley
>Room 1 Sproul Hall
>Berkeley, CA 94720
>(510) 642-1606
Kimberly Kupiecki
Senior Account Executive
A&R Partners
[email protected]
(650) 762 2800 main
(650) 762 2825 direct
fax (650) 762 2801
=====================================
|
2,653 |
Subject: Re: trying to locate PX Credit information
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/28786.
=====================================
PG&E submitted an advice letter a while ago that we (through ARM) protested.
I don't know of any other communication
Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854
Jeff Dasovich
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
07/16/2001 02:59 PM
To: Wanda Curry/Enron@EnronXGate, Michael Tribolet/ENRON@enronXgate
cc: Harry Kingerski/Enron@EnronXGate, Leslie Lawner/Enron@EnronXGate, James
D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON
Subject: trying to locate PX Credit information
Hi Wanda/Michael. You aware of this? I don't recall having received
anything from PG&E.
Best,
Jeff
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 07/16/2001 04:57 PM -----
Tamara Johnson@EES
07/16/2001 04:19 PM
To: JMB <[email protected]>, Harry Kingerski/Enron@EnronXGate, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Leslie Lawner/Enron@EnronXGate, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Diann Huddleson/HOU/EES@EES, Mary Lynne
Ruffer/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: trying to locate PX Credit information
PG&E has changed the method of calculating the PX Credit recently. Prior to
June they appeared to be using a market based price for power, but in June
the credit dropped to about $40/MWh which looks like utility-owned gen.
We want to make sure we are not missing a utility-levied charge in our
forward curves ( e.g. CTC charge that will be applied to DA) so we're trying
to verify the utilities' method of calculating PX credits.
I talked to the PG&E accounting person who said that their Regulatory group
has sent Enron's regulatory group information on the way the PX Credit is
calculated. Can someone locate this information and forward it to me as soon
as possible? Given that our customers are all switching to DA we don't want
to discover there's a charge we don't know about.
Thanks,
Tamara.
=====================================
|
2,654 |
Subject: RE: Need info on where to have check sent from customer for $800K
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/inbox/1111.
=====================================
Our fax # is 713-646-2443. Thanks, Leslie
-----Original Message-----
From: Dasovich, Jeff
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 12:57 PM
To: Reeves, Leslie
Subject: RE: Need info on where to have check sent from customer for $800K
Hi Leslie: What's your fax number? Thanks.
Jeff
-----Original Message-----
From: Reeves, Leslie
Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2001 2:52 PM
To: Dasovich, Jeff
Subject: FW: Need info on where to have check sent from customer for $800K
Jeff - Could you please forward the name of the customer to me so settlements can follow up on this payment.
Thank you,
Leslie Reeves
ext. 37962
-----Original Message-----
From: Sacks, Edward
Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2001 1:00 PM
To: Reeves, Leslie
Subject: RE: Need info on where to have check sent from customer for $800K
I don't, sorry.
-----Original Message-----
From: Reeves, Leslie
Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2001 12:11 PM
To: Sacks, Edward
Subject: RE: Need info on where to have check sent from customer for $800K
Ed - do you know who the customer is so we can follow up with them. Thanks, Leslie
-----Original Message-----
From: Sacks, Edward
Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2001 7:45 AM
To: Reeves, Leslie
Cc: Dasovich, Jeff; Brackett, Debbie R.; Bradford, William S.
Subject: RE: Need info on where to have check sent from customer for $800K
Leslie - Please have someone in your group follow up. Thks.
-----Original Message-----
From: Dasovich, Jeff
Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 3:25 PM
To: Sacks, Edward; Brackett, Debbie R.; Bradford, William S.
Subject: Need info on where to have check sent from customer for $800K
An EPMI customer is trying to find out where to send a check for power services rendered for $800K. Can you let me know where I should have him send it. Thanks.
Best,
Jeff
=====================================
|
2,655 |
Subject: Status of Revised draft of White Paper
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/2498.
=====================================
Tim gave some final comments to Seab this morning and is getting together
some data for him. Tim will provide the data shortly (today). Then the
paper will be ready for filing. So please get any other comments to me
NOW. Thanks.
---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Hain/HOU/ECT on 10/19/2000 08:51 AM
---------------------------
Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.
From: "Seabron Adamson" <[email protected]>
10/18/2000 04:16 PM
To: <[email protected]>
cc: <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>
Subject: Revised draft of White Paper
Mary, Tim and Ron:
Dear all:
OK. I think we have all of Tim's comments and suggestions in. I wanted to
make sure this got out while folks were still there. Please see the sections
we discussed this morning. I have concentrated on the analysis and not the
typos so be on the lookout.
I will be in my office in the morning if anyone needs to reach me, or try my
cellphone (617) 513-5904.
All the best,
Seab
This e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the
addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or
confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this
e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify me at
(617) 354-0060 and permanently delete the original and any copy of any
e-mail and any printout thereof.
Seabron Adamson
Frontier Economics Inc
Two Brattle Square
Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
Ph: (617) 354-0060
Fax: (617) 354-0640
[email protected]
www.frontier-economics.com
- 00-10-18-SA Draft Enron White Paper.doc
=====================================
|
2,656 |
Subject: Here it is
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/inbox/1079.
=====================================
Jeff - per Beth Apollo's message. The bottom line is what CSC really
needs to be able to invoice Calif power customers is the 810 EDI files from
all 3 CA utitlities. They have stopped sending 810s to us and are only
providing 867's. If we can't get the 810s going then the information
provided in the attached spreadsheets needs to get to us in order to
invoice. This info could come via spreadsheet, or line item within the
867. The business impact to Enron is that we have not been able to
invoice for these customers since Dec 5 and this is a large revenue amount.
Please call me - my cell phone is 713.305.1659 if you have questions.
After 11:30 central today, I will be on vacation and my backup Maggie Brown
can be reached 713.822.3753.
Teresa
----- Forwarded by Teresa D Carroll-Childers/TMG/CSC on 12/20/01 08:09 AM
-----
Barbara
Blount To: Teresa D Carroll-Childers/TMG/CSC@CSC
/TMG/CSC cc:
Subject: Here it is
12/20/01
07:55 AM
(See attached file: PRICING_OPTIONS_DUAL_BILLING_UDC_DATA_REQUIREMENTS.doc)
=====================================
|
2,657 |
Subject: Re: California Meeting
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/305.
=====================================
cool beans
Jeff Dasovich@EES
09/07/2000 05:56 PM
To: Lysa Akin/PDX/ECT@ECT, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT,
[email protected], Mona L Petrochko/SFO/EES@EES, Susan J
Mara/SFO/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Re: California Meeting
Looks like I won't be going to Washington, but I will participate in the
strategy meeting by phone on the 12th.
"Mary Hain" <[email protected]> on 09/07/2000 07:15:55 PM
To: Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES, Susan J Mara/SFO/EES@EES, Mona L
Petrochko/SFO/EES@EES, "Sarah Novosel" <[email protected]>, "Joe
Hartsoe" <[email protected]>, James D Steffes/HOU/EES@EES, "Paul Kaufman"
<[email protected]>, Dennis Benevides/HOU/EES@EES, "Richard Sanders"
<[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: California Meeting
Here's the latest info. about the FERC meeting. Only Commissioners and their
Staffs will be attending, no additional FERC Staff (no one from the Office of
Markets and Tariff Rates). The Meeting is mostly an opportunity for customers
to blow off steam. Presentations will be made by the three IOUs, one
generator,
one marketer (Enron) and one ESP, UCAN, and various politicians. When I get
the
list I'll forward it. Each presenter will have about five minutes with no
questions from the audience. Panelists should expect questions and discussion
among panelists or in response to Commissioner's questions.
Attached is the latest FERC notice about the California meeting. It
recognizes
that there may be discussions about pending FERC cases. This does not mean
FERC
will be grilling our panelist about these cases. Rather, FERC has to issue
this
notice so if someone talks about an issue pending in one of those cases, the
Commissioners don't violate the government in the sunshine rules.
(See attached file: EL00-91.1)
- EL00-91.1
=====================================
|
2,658 |
Subject: Re: FW: Amendment to Sher Bond bill
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent_items/871.
=====================================
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 07/06/2001 01:18 PM -----
Jeff Dasovich Sent by: Jeff Dasovich 07/06/2001 01:17 PM To: MDay <[email protected]> cc: Subject: Re: FW: Amendment to Sher Bond bill
Thanks very much Mike. The sense of urgency for getting this in "the mix" is not as high as it was yesterday, though we'll still need to introduce it at some point very soon. Thanks very much.
Best,
Jeff
MDay <[email protected]> 07/06/2001 01:12 PM To: "'Bev Hansen, Enron lobbyist'" <[email protected]>, "'Hedy Govenar, Enron Sacto lobbyist'" <[email protected]>, "'Scott Govenar, Enron lobbyist'" <[email protected]> cc: "'Jeff Dasovich Enron SF'" <[email protected]> Subject: FW: Amendment to Sher Bond bill
FYI Here is the language I gave Jeff to propose for an amendment to the
Sher Bond bill which will make sure Direct Access customers don't pay for
DWR power costs through the bonds EXCEPT for power they actually used that
was purchased by DWR. Houston has to ok this and then Jeff has to sell it.
I also strongly recommend that the next to the last sentence of Water Code
Section 80110 be repealed in the bill. That would leave direct access in
place and force DWR to come to us to get a bill that would have reasonable
exit fee provisions. Without a change like this, the bill would simply
reaffirm the ban on direct access and that could cause us to lose at the
Commission. There is nothing else in the bill which explicitly tells the
PUC to not suspend direct access.
Mike Day
> -----Original Message-----
> From: MDay
> Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2001 12:40 PM
> To: 'Jeff Dasovich Enron SF'
> Subject: Amendment to Sher Bond bill
>
> <<X25946.DOC>>
>
> Here is the very short amendment for the Sher Bond Bill. Mike Day
- X25946.DOC
<Embedded StdOleLink>
=====================================
|
2,659 |
Subject: Redwoods - Marin hike this Saturday May 5 w/new admits
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/3739.
=====================================
For those that missed this trip during the last day at Haas or for those
that would like to do it again?I hope?you can join us this Saturday. The
last trip was awesome!
?
Redwoods@Haas - Marin Coast hike this Saturday, May 5?
?
Join Redwoods@Haas and new admits for a Day at Haas/Redwoods trip this
Saturday.
?
We will meet at Cronk Gate at?12:00pm?for the drive over to Muir Beach in
Marin County. We will hike??up Green Gulch?Valley??then hike back along the
spectacular Marin coast admist??streams, cliffs and spring wildflowers back
to Muir Beach. The hike has great views of the ocean, San Francisco, Mount
Tam and even distant Mount Diablo. Along the way we will have a picnic
lunch.? We will return to Haas by??5?:00pm at the latest. The hike covers
about 4 miles/1,?200 vertical feet and is moderately strenuous but not too
bad if you are somewhat fit?.
What to bring:
- Water!!!
- Sturdy walking/hiking shoes
- A windbreaker and warm clothes (although the weather forecast is good it
can be quite chilly and breezy on the coast)
?
Redwoods will provide:
- Picnic lunch
- A healthy workout
?
If you can drive, we need drivers!
?
If you are coming from SF or elsewhere please let me know so we can arrange
meeting up in Marin.
?
Please RSVP to campbell@haas. Even if you are not sure if you can make it or
drive please let me know so we can estimate how much food and transportation
to provide.
?
Hope you can join us, it should be a great trip!
Matt Campbell
Redwoods@Haas?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
I apologize if you happened to receive this message twice. There has?been a
problem with the?Mailing List Server...I guess you cannot send a message
to?the?MBA_social alias with an embeded picture, must be something to do
with the aftermath of el famoso Navidad.exe.
?
?
?
=====================================
|
2,660 |
Subject: Draft EPSA Comments on FERC's November 1 California Order
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/3649.
=====================================
----- Forwarded by Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron on 11/20/2000 09:07 AM -----
"Samantha Slater" <[email protected]>
11/17/2000 09:08 AM
To: <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: Draft EPSA Comments on FERC's November 1 California Order
MEMORANDUM
TO: Regulatory Affairs CommitteePower Marketers Working Group
FROM: Don Santa, Regulatory Affairs Committee Chair
Joe Hartsoe, Power Marketing Working Group Chair
Julie Simon, Vice President of Policy
Mark Bennett, Senior Manager of Policy
Erin Perrigo, Manager of Policy
DATE: November 17, 2000
RE: Draft EPSA Comments on FERC's November 1st California Order
Conference Call on Monday, November 20th at 4:00 p.m. (EST)
In its November 1st Order Proposing Remedies for California Wholesale
Electric Markets, the Commission invited comments on the proposed remedies by
Wednesday, November 22nd. Based on the memorandum circulated to the
Regulatory Affairs Committee on November 6th and the discussion held on a
conference call on November 9th, EPSA has prepared the attached draft
comments for filing at FERC.
Please review the attached draft. We will hold a conference call to review
the draft comments on Monday, November 20th at 4:00 p.m. (EST). To access the
call, dial 1-800-937-6563. Ask for the Julie Simon/EPSA Call. If you cannot
be on the call, please forward any comments to Julie Simon at EPSA, by e-mail
at [email protected], phone or fax, before the call begins.
Attachment
- Draft Comments on California Order 11-17-00.DOC
=====================================
|
2,661 |
Subject: Save 20% to 40% on Summer's Hottest Titles
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/3046.
=====================================
[IMAGE][IMAGE]
Dear Amazon Customer,
Since you haven't shopped with us for some time (using this e-mail address=
),=20
we wanted to let you know about a great reason to stop back: our first-eve=
r =20
Summer Reading Sale. You can save 20% to 40% on a wide selection of =20
summer-friendly books from now until June 10.=20
Whether you tote your books to the beach or prefer to curl up in a cool,=
=20
comfy chair at home, you'll find summer reading for every mood. We have=20
lazy-day fiction, lighthearted humor, historical romps, and the latest fro=
m=20
favorite authors Dean Koontz, Anne Tyler, P.D. James, and many others. Plu=
s,=20
it's all discounted to get you started for the season.
Come get it while it's hot, and choose all your summer books now while=
=20
they're 20% to 40% off. Hurry, though--like summer, these prices will be=
=20
gone before you know it. Sale ends June 10. =20
Sincerely,
[IMAGE]
Steve Kessel
General Manager and Poolside Page-turner
Amazon.com
[IMAGE]
Summer Sampler
=0F=07
All Sale Titles
=0F=07
Books That Became Movies
=0F=07
Crime & Detective Stories
=0F=07
Fantasy & Science Fiction
=0F=07
General Fiction
=0F=07
Historical Fiction
=0F=07
Humor & Comedy
=0F=07
International Stories
=0F=07
Mystery & Thrillers
=0F=07
Romance & Love Stories
[IMAGE]See more
[IMAGE]
All Products Books Rare Books Used BooksKids' Books Spanish Books=20
?=20
We hope you enjoyed receiving this message. However, if you'd rather not=
=20
receive future e-mails of this sort from Amazon.com, please visit your =20
Amazon.com account page. Under the Your Account Settings heading, click th=
e =20
"Update your communication preferences" link.
Please note that this e-mail was sent to the following address: =20
[email protected]
=====================================
|
2,662 |
Subject: [Fwd: your client]
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/inbox/527.
=====================================
We've worked with this group in the past. You asked for names of firms
which do local government work in the S.F. area. I called Sam and asked
if they worked with BART and he said "yes". I did not identify the
project. Feel free to check them out if you have the need.
Hedy
--------- Inline attachment follows ---------
From: <[email protected]>
To: Hedy Govenar (E-mail) <[email protected]>
Date: Tuesday, October 9, 2001 5:06:33 GMT
Subject:
Hedy,
We'd be delighted to work with your client to handle their needs in the San
Francisco Bay Area. We are well-positioned as the most effective public
affairs and political consulting firm handling issues affecting multi-county
and city jurisdictions in the Bay Area. We are particularly well-positioned
in Alameda, Contra Costa, San Francisco and San Mateo counties.
Our relationships are extensive, from local city halls, the Boards of
Supervisors, to the state and federal delegations. Our clients and allies
include, among others, State Senator Don Perata, Oakland Mayor Jerry Brown
and San Francisco Mayor Willie Brown. In addition to our public affairs
work, we have run numerous candidate and initiative campaigns in the Bay
Area that have positioned us to be able to the open door of a great number
of the elected officials in the area. We are particularly close to a
majority of the Boards of Supervisors in Alameda, San Francisco and San
Mateo counties, plus a number of the mayors in the cities of Alameda County.
We also have deep access to members of a variety of regional boards,
including BART and BCDC.
I suggest you look at our website for further information
(www.bmwandpartners.com). We would be more than happy to meet with your
client at the appropriate time. Thank you for your interest.
Best regards,
Sam Lauter
Principal
=====================================
|
2,663 |
Subject: Re: CEO Letter
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/4463.
=====================================
Agree with your suggestion on how to "re-package" the solution. They should
write and call legislators and the governor and all sign a document endorsing
it.
Best,
Jeff
Karen Denne
05/08/2001 11:47 AM
To: Janel Guerrero/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul
Kaufman/Enron@EnronXGate, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J
Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: CEO Letter
Attached is a letter Marathon drafted to send to the top 100+ CA businesses
in our database giving them info on our "comprehensive solution." Rather
than attach the solution document as is, I'd recommend a shorter, simplified
version, plus an overview page that answers "What does this do for:
customers? the state? utilities? marketers/generators?"
Also, what is it we want these business leaders to do? Do we want them to
write/call/weigh-in w/ their legislators and the governor? Do we want them
to be signatories on a formal proposal?
Please let me know what you think.
Thanks.
kd
---------------------- Forwarded by Karen Denne/Corp/Enron on 05/08/2001
11:41 AM ---------------------------
Sandra Yamane <[email protected]> on 05/07/2001 04:53:24 PM
To: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: CEO Letter
Hi Karen:
It was good to see you Friday. I hope you had a nice visit in So. Cal.
I've attached a draft letter to existing list of CEO's from Ken Lay for your
review. The attached draft letter assumes that the background material from
Jeff will be enclosed and that the sample letter to Gov. Davis, et. al. asks
for support of specific legislation, policies.
If we've got this wrong, let us know and we will try again.
Sandra
<<CEO Letter May 7 2001.doc>>
- CEO Letter May 7 2001.doc
=====================================
|
2,664 |
Subject: Ownership of California Transmission System
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/8998.
=====================================
Jim Steffes suggested that I forward this to you for discussion at the
California Conference call tomorrow.
Steve Walton
----- Forwarded by Steve Walton/HOU/ECT on 02/08/2001 05:08 PM -----
Steve Walton
02/08/2001 04:50 PM
To: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Ownership of California Transmission System
Jim,
I got a call this afternoon from Paul McCoy, a principal in TransElect. We
spoke to them about being a transmission operator during the E-Trans
consortium discussion last fall. Paul told me that they have been actively
pursuing an offer for the transmission systems of PG&E and SCE as an
alternative to the State of California taking title to the transmission
system as part of the legislative solution. Some of our fellow marketers are
sufficiently concerned about California ownership that they have offered to
provide funding to the effort, not as investors which would taint the
acquisition, but more of grant to assist the effort. Paul did not tell me
who the parties are, but it is probably the "usual suspects" who own
generation in California (my guess).
Paul called to see how we would view this effort. They are interested in the
possibility of our supporting a private acquisition of the transmission
assets, not necessarily financial, but the use of our contacts and personnel
to provide public and private support to such an effort.
As I think about the State owning the transmission system and being the
purchaser of energy, it seems like they are assembling a large vertically
integrated public power utility under the control of the Governor -- de facto
re-regulation only worse. Once the state own the transmission system, I
doubt it would every be privatized.
What are your views? Would Enron be interested in supporting this effort?
Steve
=====================================
|
2,665 |
Subject: RE: campaign leadership agenda
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['Terri', 'Lora; Dernehl', 'Sullivan', 'Linda; Miller', '[email protected]', 'Ginger; Noske']
File: dasovich-j/sent/4511.
=====================================
why? (touchee)
Paul Kaufman/ENRON@enronXgate
05/10/2001 01:54 PM
To: Janel Guerrero/Corp/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark
Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Linda
Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Ray Alvarez/NA/Enron@ENRON, Daniel
Allegretti/NA/Enron@Enron, Howard Fromer/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan M Landwehr/NA/Enron@Enron, Karen
Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Lora Sullivan/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Ginger Dernehl/NA/Enron@Enron, Linda J
Noske/HOU/ECT@ECT, Terri Miller/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: RE: campaign leadership agenda
I'd like to add a report on the WGA meeting yesterday re: RTO West and
Transmission.
-----Original Message-----
From: Guerrero, Janel
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2001 9:40 AM
To: Shapiro, Richard; Palmer, Mark; Steffes, James; Robertson, Linda;
Alvarez, Ray; Allegretti, Daniel; Fromer, Howard; Kaufman, Paul; Dasovich,
Jeff; Landwehr, Susan; Denne, Karen
Cc: Sullivan, Lora; Dernehl, Ginger; Noske, Linda; Miller, Terri
Subject: campaign leadership agenda
May 10, 2001
Agenda
California
Update on meetings with Governor Davis
outlook for solution package
Update on meetings with Chamber/CMA et al
Ending of special session/passage of bonds legislation
CPUC tiered rate increases
ISO update
IEP/DA coalition update
Press update
CA briefing book
Other issues??
Western States
Upcoming meetings/scheduling
Press outreach
New York
FERC adoption of NY ISO rules
Official coalition name: Empire State Energy Suppliers
Registration as non-profit with the state
By laws
Letter of Agreement with the state
Update on development of message
Advertising effort
IPPNY message
Washington, DC
Barton markup
Bush energy plan
FERC update
DOE update
CEO Summitt
Press update
Other issues?
Price Risk Managment
Update
Litigation
Update
=====================================
|
2,666 |
Subject: Re:Financial Info Analysis
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/5559.
=====================================
Congratulations. Question: If you delivered on Friday then what is your
excuse
for missing Thursday class? Actually, I'm surprised it took so long. Glad to
hear you are well and back home.
Our group includes: Anil, Ted Chin, you, Jeff Dasovich, and me.
Will be starting the first assignment tonight.
**********************************************
Mark D. Guinney, CFA
Consultant
Watson Wyatt Investment Consulting
345 California Street, Ste. 1400
San Francisco, CA 94104
(415) 733-4487 ph.
(415) 733-4190 fax
____________________Reply Separator____________________
Subject: Financial Info Analysis
Author: "Vavrek; Carolyn (US - San Francisco)" <SMTP:[email protected]>
Date: 01/30/2001 5:05 PM
Hi guys -
Well, my little bundle of joy arrived in the world on Friday am. Her name is
Zo% Nicole and she is very sweet. I am finally home from the hospital (I had
to
have an emergency c-section so they kept me longer than expected).
I was wondering if you formed a group for FIA class? I just e-mailed the
instructor that I would miss class this week and asked to be excused from the
first assignment. I would like to stay on track after that, starting with
Case
Write-Up #2. What is your plan for this class and these case write-ups?
- cv
Carolyn M. Vavrek
Manager - Human Capital Advisory Services
Deloitte & Touche
50 Fremont Street
San Francisco, CA 94105
phone: 415-783-5137
fax: 415-783-8760
e-mail: [email protected]
- This message (including any attachments) contains confidential information
intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is protected by law. - If
you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this message and are
hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this message,
or the taking of any action based on it, is strictly prohibited.
=====================================
|
2,667 |
Subject: Re: ResCo S-1, CA Summary
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/495.
=====================================
Attached are some edits on your summary and some comments from Roger about
future rate affects. Please call me if you have questions.
---------------------- Forwarded by Mona L Petrochko/SFO/EES on 04/20/2000
09:47 AM ---------------------------
Roger Yang
04/20/2000 08:52 AM
To: Mona L Petrochko/SFO/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Re: ResCo S-1, CA Summary
Edits look great. Another item that may be worth mentioning is that expected
declining CTC rates and the eventual drop off of the charge to payback Rate
Reduction Bonds will offset potential increases in future transmission and
distribution rates. Transmission rates are expected to increase from cost
shifting under the ISO TAC proposal. Also transmission investments to
alleviate transmission constraints will be partially offset by the avoidance
of RMR costs. PG&E will file another distribution rate change for 2002 that
may result in a significant adjustment, but distribution rates are expected
to level off after that once a PBR has been implemented. ND and PPP are
expected to be relatively flat. All this is important to know to understand
the risks for products with commitments exceeding 1 year.
Roger
Mona L Petrochko
04/19/2000 05:04 PM
To: SF GA, Roger Yang
cc:
Subject: ResCo S-1, CA Summary
I made some edits, ignoring the "rosy" picture except as it relates to
meter/bill. Any additional comments before we send a response to Thom?
---------------------- Forwarded by Mona L Petrochko/SFO/EES on 04/19/2000
05:01 PM ---------------------------
Thomas S Reichelderfer
04/19/2000 04:05 PM
To: Susan J Mara/SFO/EES@EES, Mona L Petrochko/SFO/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: ResCo S-1, CA Summary
Sue & Mona - Please take a look at this "optimistic" summary of the CA
situation and make sure that it is factually correct. Thanks. Thom
=====================================
|
2,668 |
Subject: Argus Company Report on OAT
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/4500.
=====================================
See attached pdf that I mentioned last night. Lots of goodies in there
about synergies, cost savings and EPS accretion. I have no idea who Argus
Company is - got the file through my Fidelity brokerage act. No reason to
believe it is not reputable.
Here are the highlights:
- with the merger Pepsi will have 25% of non-carbonated drink market vs.
coke's 10% share; non-carb drinks are growing at 8% annually
- Pepsi mgt is projecting revenue and cost savings increase of $230 million
in operating income by 2005; half from distribution system and half from
reduced procurement costs and SGA savings
- Pepsi mgt forecasts a restructing charge of $400 million after
finalization of deal; not accretive to EPS in 2001
- earnings will increase by $.02 in 2002 b/c of the merger
I also attached another report with lots of industry comps and ratios for
OAT.
Hope this helps.
- cv
Carolyn M. Vavrek
Manager - Human Capital Advisory Services
Deloitte & Touche
50 Fremont Street
San Francisco, CA 94105
phone: 415-783-5137
fax: 415-783-8760
e-mail: [email protected]
-----Original Message-----
From: Sama, Anil [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2001 10:45 PM
To: [email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]
Subject: Here is what I've found on OAT/COKE acquisition
Probably very similar to what Carolyn sent out...
<<Coke_Quaker.ZIP>>
This message (including any attachments) contains confidential information
intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is protected by law. If
you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this message and are
hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this
message, or the taking of any action based on it, is strictly prohibited.
- oat argus report.pdf
- oat provestor plus report.pdf
=====================================
|
2,669 |
Subject: Commission Hearings -- Day Seven
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/11524.
=====================================
Two of the three Commission-hired witnesses testified today -- Peter
Bradford and George Sterzinger. While Bradford did nothing to really help
or hurt our cause, Sterzinger was amazingly helpful. He practically
endorsed Enron's proposal. He noted that it was the best design to elicit
strong conservation response by, as he put it, "grabbing hold of some of the
usage and making it responsive to the manipulation of the market." The idea
was that customers would respond to the high prices which, are the product
of market manipulation, by reducing usage. He focused alot on the
decremenatal usage credit and the incentive it would provide to conserve.
He proposed an alternative manner of funding in that the rebate would be
flowed back to customers as a bill reduction over an extended period of
time. He also noted that he would implement the proposal as a voluntary one
(at least initially).
As to the other parties proposals, on cross, he expressed strong concerns
about shifting usage from peak to should peak (as that does nothing but
shift the peak period) and stressed that the Commission should carefully
examine any rate design which would have the potential to do such. He also
testified that of the two forms of conservation being discussed in this
proceeding -- load shifting or load reduction -- the latter was far more
important and that the goal should be to lower energy usage at all times.
All in all, not a bad afternoon for our proposal. His testimony appears to
have renewed interest in what was beginning to look like a nonstarter.
Tomorrow, the remaining Commission witness (Bornstein) is up. Followed by
Bill Marcus for TURN, and PG&E witness Coyne. The billing constraint
witnesses are up Thursday. The hearing should conclude by noon on Thursday,
with briefs due noon on Monday.
Jeanne Bennett
=====================================
|
2,670 |
Subject: Teleconference: CALIFORNIA POWER CRISIS UPDATE
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/12596.
=====================================
If anyone is interested, the call-in information is listed below in red
(thanks, Mary Sue, for the lead!)
---------------------- Forwarded by Jennifer Rudolph/HOU/EES on 05/16/2001=
=20
09:11 AM ---------------------------
Mary Sue Rose
05/16/2001 09:06 AM
To: Jennifer Rudolph/HOU/EES@EES
cc: =20
Subject: Teleconference: CALIFORNIA POWER CRISIS UPDATE
FYI
Teleconference:
CALIFORNIA POWER CRISIS UPDATE
Wednesday, May 16, 2001
2:00PM (New York Time)
Dear Client:
Moody=01,s has scheduled a teleconference to discuss the California power=
=20
crisis including : Moody=01,s recent downgrade of California=01,s Gener=
al=20
Obligation bond rating; update on the State=01,s Power Purchase Revenue =
Bonds=20
and the credit position of SCE and PGE. Renee Boicourt, Managing Director=
,=20
Public Finance Group and the lead credit analysts for California, Ray Murp=
hy=20
and Tim Blake , AJ Sabatelle, lead credit analyst for PGE and SCE and , Da=
n=20
Aschenbach, Senior Vice President, Infrastruture Finance Group will=20
participate in the call.
Key highlights of the discussion will include:
California Power Crisis Update
State of California General Obligation Credit Update
PGE and SCE credit update
State Power Purchase Revenue Bonds
The analysts will provide a 20-minute presentation and afterwards respond t=
o=20
questions from investors.
To participate in the teleconference, please dial in 5 minutes prior to the=
=20
start of the call.
The dial in numbers are:
US & Canada: (888) 921-6949
Outside US: (712)-271-3641
Password: California
If you are unable to participate in the live call, a replay will be availab=
le=20
through June 16, 2001 by dialing:
US & Canada: 800-944-3543
Outside US: 402-998-1738
(No password is necessary).
For more information, contact Jennifer Davis at 212-553-7905.
=====================================
|
2,671 |
Subject: New PG&E Schedule G-CFS
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/608.
=====================================
Jeff,
I wanted to call attention to one of the new PG&E rate schedules (G-CFS)
which Randy Litteneker distributed on Friday evening.
The Assigned Storage Monthly Charge under G-CFS indicates the charge will
become retroactively effective January 2000. How can PG&E implement a back
charge of this nature? I believe these charges under this rate schedule
should not commence until April 2000. The basis for my argument is as
follows....
Proposed Schedule G-CT indicates that "In any storage year under this rate
schedule, a CTA will be allowed one annual cycle for injection, inventory and
withdrawal of gas in storage." While the typical storage year remains in
effect, the charges would start in mid storage season when operational and
economic decisions have already been completed.
Proposed Schedule G-CT indicates that "Prior to March 1, each CTA will be
given the option to reject a percentage of its initial Storage Allocation, up
to 100 percent (%), for the upcoming storage year of April 1 through March 31
(Storage Year)". This option was not given for the current storage year April
2000 - March 2001. Further evidence in the current Schedule G-CT states that
"PG&E will allocate to the CTA, acting on behalf of Customers in the Group, a
pro rate share of of PG&E's total core storage capacity reservations." The
current schedule makes no indication of ability to reject any allocated
portion.
I apologize for continuing to harp on this issue but as stated in proposed
G-CFS, I would incur charges of $506,700 (this is different from the $420,000
I mentioned on the phone because I neglected to include the capacity we will
receive from the PG&E Eneryg Services acquisition. This charge would
obliterate the Gas Desk goals for 2000.
Please call me to discuss when you have a chance. Thanks.
Tim
=====================================
|
2,672 |
Subject: Special gift offer for Palm(tm) handheld owners
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/deleted_items/108.
=====================================
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
At $129, it's a Gift!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Dear Jeffrey,
Now, until October 1, 2001, when you buy the Palm(TM)
m100 handheld for just $129 you'll receive three stylish
faceplates for free! That's over $49 in savings.
This special package makes a gift that anyone would love.
Buy one for a friend or a loved one, and they'll probably
think you paid a lot more than you actually did.
So give someone the gift of organization with these
helpful tools:
* Date book
* To do list
* Calculator
* Address book
* Memo pad
All this, plus three interchangeable faceplates makes it
easy to match anyone's mood. It's all available for the
limited-time price of $129, which makes it the perfect
gift. Just don't forget to remove the price tag! Click
below to purchase. Or call 1-800-881-7256 to order via
phone.
http://insync-online.p04.com/u.d?qEQUuPZZec5CB=0
Sincerely,
The Palm Team
p.s. Remember, all orders from the Palm Store are covered
by our 30-day money back guarantee.
*************
If you wish not to receive these special offers from
Palm, please respond to this email with the word
"unsubscribe" in the Subject line.
Copyright(C)2001 Palm, Inc. Palm OS, Palm Computing,
HandFAX, HandSTAMP, HandWEB, Graffiti, HotSync,
iMessenger, MultiMail, Palm.Net, PalmConnect, PalmGlove,
PalmModem, PalmPoint, PalmPrint, and the Palm Platform
Compatible Logo are registered trademarks of Palm,
Inc. Palm, the Palm logo, AnyDay, EventClub, HandMAIL,
the HotSync Logo, PalmGear, PalmGlove, PalmPix, Palm
Powered, the Palm trade dress, PalmSource, Smartcode,
and Simply Palm are trademarks of Palm, Inc. All other
brands and product names may be trademarks or registered
trademarks of their respective owners.
=====================================
|
2,673 |
Subject: nan
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: []
File: dasovich-j/inbox/154.
=====================================
Dear Energy Researchers:
Richard Green and I are editing a special issue of the Journal of Industry,
Competition and Trade on recent experience with energy markets in
California. If you have something you would like to contribute, please see
the call for papers below.
Sincerely,
Carl Blumstein
Energy Policy Analyst
UC Energy Institute
___________________________________________________
Call for Papers on the California Energy Crisis
The Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade
(http://www.wkap.nl/journalhome.htm/1566-1679) will be publishing a special
issue on the California Energy Crisis. We are seeking papers on any aspect
of the crisis, but particularly papers that seek to bring out the policy
lessons, or the implications for other countries engaged in electricity
restructuring. The journal aims to bridge the gaps between theory and
empirical analysis, and between academic and policy-oriented economists in
the field of microeconomic policy.
Papers should be between 10 and 20 sides of double-spaced A4 paper. Please
send an outline of one or two pages by September 30th to:
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
Carl Blumstein and Richard Green are editors for the special issue; Karl
Aiginger and Andre Sapir are the editors of the journal
Conditional acceptances will be based upon these outlines. Full papers will
be required by December 15, and final versions (after receiving referees'
comments) by February 28th, 2002.
Professor Richard Green
Department of Economics
University of Hull
Hull HU6 7RX UK
[email protected]
Tel: +44 1482 465720
Fax: +44 1482 466216
Carl Blumstein
University of California Energy Institute
2539 Channing Way
Berkeley, CA 94720-5180
[email protected]
Tel: +1 510 643-0505
Fax: +1 510 643-5180
=====================================
|
2,674 |
Subject: RE: Dual Auction Restructuring
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent_items/617.
=====================================
Well, I guess my good friend Jerry's a little to busy these days. I'm going to contact another lawyer who represents some big QFs and then loop back with Jerry.
Best,
Jeff
-----Original Message-----
From: Etringer, Michael
Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2001 3:40 PM
To: '[email protected]'
Cc: Dasovich, Jeff
Subject: Dual Auction Restructuring
Jerry,
First off I would like to again commend you on your presentation yesterday. It would be an understatement to say that the last year's worth events have been amazing at best.
As we discussed at lunch, Enron has developed a unique approach to QF contract restructuring. The main premise is that of conducting a dual auction to determine, on a completely voluntary and open process, the QF buyout economics and the market clearing price for replacement energy. As discussed yesterday, I am enclosing copies of the presentations made to PG&E and SCE on this topic. I would be very interested in your feedback on this concept and on the presentations provided. I must footnote that the economic shown in the presentations are Enron estimates. Individual feedback, particularly in this area would be appreciated.
Jeff Dasovitch out of our SF office has been working with me on this proposal and will likely be contacting you within the next day to further discuss this idea as well as the benefits and possible strategies for initiating such an auction process.
Thanks for your time and look forward to hearing from you.
Best Regards,
Mike
<< File: Dual Auction PG&E.ppt >> << File: Dual Auction SCE.ppt >>
Mike Etringer 503.464.3836 (w)
Enron North America 503.701.4516 (c)
West Power Origination 503.464.3740 (fax)
121 SW Salmon Street 3WTC0306 [email protected]
Portland, OR 97232
=====================================
|
2,675 |
Subject: [WPTF: APX Congestion Management Solution]
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['Lynn Fisher <[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/9041.
=====================================
Folks,
John Stremel of APX asked me to forward this to you. The content is
quite important.
gba
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from wizard.apx.com (wizard.apx.com [207.240.202.249]) by
lanfill.lanminds.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id MAA25600 for
<[email protected]>; Sat, 10 Feb 2001 12:09:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: by wizard.apx.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id
<DVCB3SPH>; Sat, 10 Feb 2001 12:09:48 -0800
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
From: John Stremel <[email protected]>
To: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>
Cc: Lynn Fisher <[email protected]>
Subject: APX Congestion Management Solution
Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2001 12:09:47 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary="----_=_NextPart_000_01C0939D.6A979035"
X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000
Gary.
Thank you for the opportunity to discuss the Congestion Management
difficulties faced by the market with your membership. WPTF has sponsored a
market approach to Congestion Management since its inception. Last summer
produced good ideas and several proposals to the CAISO.
But now there is a need for immediate action created by the closing of the
CalPX. APX can fill that void if we take action now. And, we can jointly
move the solution to a market based approach.
Attached is the agenda for the meetings we have planned for February 21 at
APX to discuss the implementation with market participants. You mentioned
that you would forward the agenda to your readership. I appreciate your
support <<Draft Agenda 02_10_2001.doc>> and hope you can join us as well.
John Stremel
Vice President Engineering
Automated Power Exchange, Inc.
5201 Great America Parkway, Suite 522
Santa Clara, CA
408.517.2120
[email protected]
- Draft Agenda 02_10_2001.doc
=====================================
|
2,676 |
Subject: Re: California Senator Bowen Calls for Electricity Hearing in CA on
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['Maureen McVicker/NA/Enron@Enron', 'Ginger Dernehl/NA/Enron@Enron', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/1588.
=====================================
Call at that time Friday is fine. Don't you think California trotting out
Peace was a total mistake? Considering the FERC order was designed to pull
the plug on him, it seemed really bad having him talk.
From: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON on 11/09/2000 07:51 PM CST
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON
To: [email protected], Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul
Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@Enron, Mona L Petrochko/NA/Enron@Enron, Alan
Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, [email protected], James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Maureen McVicker/NA/Enron@Enron, Ginger Dernehl/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: California Senator Bowen Calls for Electricity Hearing in CA on
Monday
Greetings:
Bowen's aide just called Mona and said that California State Senator Bowen is
going to have a hearing on MONDAY in California as a follow-on to the FERC
hearing that took place today. We've been invited to attend. Focus of
hearing: Repeat of today's hearing, but have it California's house, rather
than FERC's. Based on his Oscar-winning performance at today's hearing,
Steve Kean's the one Bowen's office has requested.
Possible to have a very quick call to get folks' view on the pros and cons of
participating in the hearing---recall that Peace sits on Bowen's
committee---and whether Steve Kean can be persuaded to come to California?
Or perhaps we can send a video-tape of Steve to be played to the Committee?
("You people in California are crazy, but other than that you're a swell
group of people.")
If possible, we would like to have the call at 10 AM (CST)/8 AM (PST).
Please let me know if this works for folks. And if it does work, Ginger
could you set up a call-in number?
Best,
Jeff
=====================================
|
2,677 |
Subject: Bandwidth Market Report
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/eci/49.
=====================================
Everyone, this is a new industry rag that we are trying out. Of particular
interest to the SF office is the article on Aerie Communication / PG&E. Just
thought you'd like to know!
----- Forwarded by Scott Bolton/Enron Communications on 04/13/00 08:02 AM
-----
[email protected]
04/13/00 07:01 AM
To: Scott Bolton/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
cc:
Subject: Bandwidth Market Report
To: Recipients of McGraw-Hill Energy's Bandwidth Market Report
From: Brian Jordan, Editorial Director, McGraw-Hill Energy power
group
Please accept our invitation to this free trial and take a look at
the attached issue of Bandwidth Market Report, our new daily publication. We
selected you and about 60 others to receive this free trial because of your
interest in the bandwidth business and the developing market for bandwidth
trading.
We hope you not only will find our publication worthwhile--and
continue to receive this free trial for several weeks--but will let us know
what you like and don't like, and what you would like to see. We are aiming
to bring you one concise daily package with the latest news and analysis on
the bandwidth business, plus market commentary and price information on
bandwidth trading.
Please let us know how we're doing. If you do not wish to keep
receiving this free trial, just send a reply message and ask to be dropped
from our list. But we believe you will find Bandwidth Market Report a
must-read for those who want to take advantage of the huge opportunities
unfolding in this market.
Chris Baltimore, editor--phone: 202-383-2185; e-mail:
[email protected]
Matt Spangler, associate editor: 202-383-2279;
[email protected]
- 842-current.pdf
=====================================
|
2,678 |
Subject: Re: Enron liquids inquiry
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/28808.
=====================================
Jeff: I am on vacation this week. Can you take care of this inquiry?
Thank you - Lisa
----- Forwarded by Lisa Yoho/NA/Enron on 07/17/2001 09:03 AM -----
Janel Guerrero
07/16/2001 10:30 AM
To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Lisa Yoho/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Re: Enron liquids inquiry
jeff and lisa.....rick asked me to foward this inquiry to you. I'll assume
the two of you can coordinate and will get back to David. If you have
questions or if there's a problem just call me. thanks!!
----- Forwarded by Janel Guerrero/Corp/Enron on 07/16/2001 10:28 AM -----
Richard Shapiro
07/16/2001 10:24 AM
To: Janel Guerrero/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Re: Enron liquids inquiry
Please talk to Jeff and Lisa Yoho- Thanks.
From: Janel Guerrero on 07/16/2001 10:17 AM
To: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Enron liquids inquiry
I took a call on Friday from one of the guys I worked with in Global Markets,
and he was asking about the CA market....specifically the following:
Apparently as a result of the BP/Arco merger a bunch of storage agreements
for diesel fuel are being cancelled and there isn't a home for the barrels
any longer.
Enron is looking into initiating a deal with Kinder Morgan and/or EOTT
wherebuy KM/EOTT would own and operate a new set of storage tanks and Enron
would lease the tanks and then sublet them to our counterparties. (probably
near LA).
David was inquiring about the regulatory process and the political climate in
CA as a result of the energy crisis. I told him that I wasn't sure on
process/timeframe for obtaining permits for storage tanks and that it was
worth looking into.
Do you want me to send this inquiry to Dasovich or someone else in CA? David
needs an answer by Wednesday.
David Loosley
3-9109
=====================================
|
2,679 |
Subject: Alaska cruise/gift for Mom's retirement
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/personal/39.
=====================================
Hello all:
At Jeff's request, I called 1-800-CRUISES to get some info. Here is what I
found in summary:
Royal Caribbean, "Vision of the Seas"--glassed in area for viewing
July 17 departure, 7 day cruise June 18, 7 day
cruise
$1499/per person, inside room $1300/person,
inside room
$1699/per person, ocean view $1599/person,
ocean room
Leave out of Vancouver, visit Hubbard Glacier, Skagway, Haines, Misty fjords,
Inside passage, Ketchikan, Juneau. New ship( built in 1997) 2200 passengers,
large glassed in area to view scenery/wildlife.
For an extra approximately $900/person, you can add a 3 day land package
which is basically a visit to McKinley and Denali, and probably Fairbanks.
Representative said as long as you are all the way up there, you should go
see the wildlife.
Carnival Cruises goes too but this cruise sounded more suited to mom and dad.
According to the rep, more elegant, good food, etc.
I have a courtesy reservation for the July cruise (figuring it might be
warmer, though she said that June and July are warmest) I got the ocean view
room.
I don't know 1-800 CRUISES from Adam. I will try and call my travel agent
tomorrow just to see what she says about Royal Caribbean.
If we do the July cruise and land package, it is $4998 (air fare, cruise,
port costs) for mom and dad which comes to $1300 for each one of us.
I leave Saturday for a week so I'd appreciate some feedback before I go if
possible (not necessarily a commitment, just feedback). I think they have
this hold for a few days though I don't necessarily think we have to decide
immediately. If we want to do this, there is a $300/person deposit (didn't
ask if it is refundable or not), with the balance due 75 days before
departure.
What do you think?
Debbie
=====================================
|
2,680 |
Subject: Re: Reliant
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/4094.
=====================================
If you could fax it that would be great. #612-339-4392 I'm assuming that we
would be comfortable with the outline they are proposing?
Jim--could you let me know what contacts you are making/what the discussion
is? Maybe we could discuss on todays leadership call?
Jeff Dasovich
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
04/23/2001 10:18 AM
To: Susan M Landwehr/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Susan J
Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, [email protected], Linda Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Re: Reliant
Yes, we have been working with them. Stephanie and I were asked to meet last
week with the heads of the California Chamber and the California
Manufacturer's Association, at which we discussed demand buy down, etc. at
length. It was a very positive meeting.
Stephanie left them with Reliant's Westwide demand exchange program. And I
believe that our folks (Jim?) are meeting with Reliant to discuss it further
in D.C.
I can fax you a copy of what they're walking around if you don't have it.
I'll let others chime in, but seems to me that it would be very useful to
contact him.
Best,
Jeff
Susan M Landwehr
04/22/2001 05:12 PM
To: Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J
Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc: Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Reliant
Hey guys. Are we in communication or working with Reliant in California? In
particular, a guy by the name of John Stout or a woman (I think she's PR)
named Stephanie Newell? My understanding is that they are shopping a demand
exchange idea---in particular in Utah. I would like to contact him in
preparation for the RGA meeting in Los Angeles, but wanted to check with you
all first to see what we might already be doing with them.
=====================================
|
2,681 |
Subject: CPUC Meeting 3/15/01 Recap
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/4924.
=====================================
FYI. I have been calling Brian for insights on QF issues
---------------------- Forwarded by Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT on 03/15/2001 02:52
PM ---------------------------
BCragg <[email protected]> on 03/15/2001 02:44:55 PM
To: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>
cc: [email protected]
Subject: RE: FW: News Article - Keeley Says 47x Won't Pass
Helping clients IS my job description--how's that for a slogan? The
Commission did precious little today, so the inaction was more significant
that the action. It held all items related to QF issues, including the Wood
decision. That should mean that the March SRAC posting will be under the
old formula (unless the assigned commissioners issue a ruling extending the
current suspension to March 27, the date of the next meeting). They also
held 4 orders that related to the funding of DWR's power pruchases through
rates (the California Procurement Adjustment of AB 1X) and similar issues,
leaving DWR in limbo for a while longer. They did issue an order preventing
the utilities from cutting costs by laying off workers or reducing services.
They opened a rulemaking on whether PG&E and SoCalGas' gas curtailment and
diversion rules should give greater priority to electric generators--SDG&E
already has its own proceeding on this subject. They approved a low-income
assistance order. That's about it, No continuation meeting, so the next
opportunity for mischief is March 27.
Brian
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2001 1:48 PM
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: FW: News Article - Keeley Says 47x Won't Pass
Brian,
Thanks. I know this is not in your job description but if there was
anything to report from today's meeting, could you let Mark or I know?
Alan
=====================================
|
2,682 |
Subject: RE: California Treasurers Calls on Lynch to Immediately Set DA
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['Alamo', 'Joseph', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/deleted_items/843.
=====================================
thanks for all your work.
Richter
-----Original Message-----
From: Dasovich, Jeff
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 7:20 AM
To: Richter, Jeff
Subject: RE: California Treasurers Calls on Lynch to Immediately Set DA Suspension Date Back to July 1
Could be a soon as the next week or two. We'll make sure that you're up to date on the latest.
Best,
Jeff
-----Original Message-----
From: Richter, Jeff
Sent: Mon 10/22/2001 9:12 AM
To: Dasovich, Jeff
Cc:
Subject: RE: California Treasurers Calls on Lynch to Immediately Set DA Suspension Date Back to July 1
Jeff,
In what time frame are these decisions looking at being made? keep me posted on the July 1st roll back since it would have the biggest implications for EWS/EES existing positions.
Thank you,
Jeff Richter
-----Original Message-----
From: Dasovich, Jeff
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 5:02 PM
To: Dasovich, Jeff; Kean, Steven J.; Shapiro, Richard; Steffes, James D.; Kaufman, Paul; Mara, Susan; Calger, Christopher F.; Tycholiz, Barry; Richter, Jeff; Belden, Tim; Comnes, Alan; Swain, Steve; Sharp, Vicki; Blachman, Jeremy; Dietrich, Janet; Delainey, David; Leff, Dan; Hughes, Evan; Herod, Brenda F.; Parquet, David; Frazier, Lamar; Denne, Karen; O'Neil, Murray P.; Huddleson, Diann
Cc: Alamo, Joseph
Subject: California Treasurers Calls on Lynch to Immediately Set DA Suspension Date Back to July 1
The state treasurer sent a letter this afternoon to Loretta Lynch.
The treasurer claims in the letter that, by extending DA through Sept. 20th, the PUC could have shifted more than $8 billion to small customers.
He urges Lynch to immediately roll back the date to July 1.
We have started working with large customers to refute the letter.
If you would like a copy of the letter, please send your fax number to Joseph Alamo.
Best,
Jeff
=====================================
|
2,683 |
Subject: Request
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/deleted_items/1712.
=====================================
Dear Mr. Dasovich:
I am looking for a position in the Bay area as my wife will begin teaching at the Goldman School of Public Policy in January. Cecille Cabacungan from GSPP suggested that I contact you.
Currently, I am with Mercer Management Consulting, a strategy consulting firm. While I enjoy my work with Mercer, the timing of transfers to our San Francisco office is uncertain. Mercer, however, has two programs through which I could move to the Bay area.
The first is an externship program through which I could consult to a company for 6 - 12 months, or longer. As my attached resume reflects, I have several years of experience developing business plans and assessing market conditions.
The second is a fellowship program through which I could consult to a non-profit organization for up to 12 months at a small fraction of Mercer's standard fees. I am particularly interested in organizations that work on economic development issues, but would be happy to help a range of organizations develop and implement their long-term strategic goals. Specific types of work I could perform include:
* Assessing market size and growth opportunities, e.g., utility/profitability of new services or products
* Managing co-operative efforts with other institutions, e.g., pooling resources to increase leverage and efficiency of operations
* Benchmarking and redistributing resources to focus on highest impact areas
I would like to learn whether you think Enron could benefit from my services or know of a corporation or non-profit that could. I am arranging interviews for the first week of December, and would greatly appreciate talking to you before then to hear of any suggestions you may have. I look forward to hearing from you, and thank you in advance for your assistance.
Sincerely,
Angelo Del Priore
<<Mercer 914.doc>>
=====================================
|
2,684 |
Subject: California "Top Five" list
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/461.
=====================================
Jim Steffes asked me to call Seabron Adamson to get his take on what a "Top
5" list should include for California. Seabron sent me the attached list,
which, as you will notice, is just his first cut on this. I thought it might
be helpful for everyone for the conference call today -- but please remember
that this is really just a first attempt at putting the problems down on
paper.
Sarah
---------------------- Forwarded by Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron on 09/15/2000
11:39 AM ---------------------------
"Seabron Adamson" <[email protected]> on 09/13/2000
02:32:30 PM
To: <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: California "Top Five" list
Sarah:
Please find attached a "top five" list on California market reform, as
requested, with some annotations on why I think these changes would be
beneficial etc. It is quite rough - not much more than a brain dump really -
but can serve as a basis for discussion.
Have a look and see what you think. Perhaps we should set up a call to
discuss sometime later this week?
Seabron
This e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the
addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or
confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this
e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify me at
(617) 354-0060 and permanently delete the original and any copy of any
e-mail and any printout thereof.
Seabron Adamson
Frontier Economics Inc
Two Brattle Square
Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
Ph: (617) 354-0060
Fax: (617) 354-0640
[email protected]
www.frontier-economics.com
- 00-09-12 SA California market reform top five list.doc
=====================================
|
2,685 |
Subject: RE:
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/deleted_items/369.
=====================================
Which one of the documents below should we use as the starting point for Rick's other request (that we identify the positions we think are critical for legislators)?
I think we should get the document to Rick early next week.
-----Original Message-----
From: Dasovich, Jeff
Sent: Friday, August 03, 2001 11:31 AM
To: Denne, Karen; Kaufman, Paul; Mara, Susan
Subject: FW:
FYI.
-----Original Message-----
From: Dasovich, Jeff
Sent: Friday, August 03, 2001 1:22 PM
To: Shapiro, Richard; Dernehl, Ginger
Subject:
Rick:
In preparation for Monday's meeting with Mayor Brown, attached are the following:
A backgrounder, providing an overview of recent events in California's ongoing energy crisis.
A condensed version of the presenation that you and others in Government Affairs have been using to convey Enron's view of California's crisis.
A "California Solutions" word document and presentation that Ken Lay used when he was in California a few months ago.
The letter that we sent to Senator Dunn in response to his committee's treatment of Enron as part of the investigation in California's wholesale markets.
Message points that PR's been using to respond to the Dunn contempt charges.
The draft of the letter that we intend to send to all California State Senators urging them to vote no on Dunn's contempt recommendation.
Hope this helps. If there's anything else you need, don't hesitate. I'll be giving the presentation today from 5:30-7:00 PM EDT. If you need me, try my cell phone 415.505.6633, or pager 888.916.7184.
Best,
Jeff
<< File: California Update_0803.doc >> << File: California Crisis 0803.ppt >> << File: CaliforniaElectricitySolution0525.doc >> << File: California solution.ppt >> << File: Dunn Letter0711_KeanFinal.DOC >> << File: Contempt Charge Messages.doc >> << File: DRAFT Dunn letter 0731.doc >>
=====================================
|
2,686 |
Subject: International Business Quiz - Travel To India
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/deleted_items/191.
=====================================
Welcome (back) to Haas,
This message is being sent to you now because the program described below
has a deadline of August 31. In short, you are invited to pit your
international business acumen against those of MBAs from around the world.
The first round is on line. If you manage to get past the first round you
will be flown to India (according to the organizers - Haas takes no
responsibility for any details described herein) for subsequent rounds.
Think you've got the stufff? Read On.
NITIE, the leading Business school of India, takes this opportunity to
extend a warm invitation to your esteemed institute for the FIAT
International Business Quiz to be held during PRERANA 2001. PRERANA is the
flagship event of the Business School Community where the best brains from
across the Globe battle it out for the top honour. PRERANA 2001 will be
held from 19th October 2001 to 21st October 2001. The FIAT International
Business Quiz is scheduled on 21st October 2001.
We invite registration from the full time Business Management / MBA
Students for the FIAT International Business Quiz from your Institute.
There would be online preliminary round to select the teams for the finals
to be held at NITIE, India. The details of which are enclosed. The selected
Team(s) shall be provided to & fro airfare for their trip to India.
Please find enclosed a detail note on NITIE and the FIAT International
Business Quiz. The last date for registration for the FIAT International
Business Quiz has been extended to 31st August 2001.
We look forward to your active participation
Regards.
Pawan, Coordinator (Prerana Management Group)
Email id: [email protected]
Website: www.prerana-nitie.com
Please note, the attached file can be opened as a WORD file even though it
does not show the .doc extension. I've done it and it is safe.
=====================================
|
2,687 |
Subject: Fwd: Energy Preparedness Update
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/13042.
=====================================
To All,
To the Campus Community:
RE: Two Campus Tests Pertaining to Electrical Emergencies
In order to prepare for a difficult summer of campus electricity
curtailments caused by the state's energy crisis, two different tests
are planned for this week.
LOAD REDUCTION TEST: Thursday, May 24, 2001, 1:00pm - 2:30pm
Our campus will participate in a UC systemwide test of electric load
reduction capability. Please notify occupants of your building to turn
off un-needed electrical equipment (lights, computer monitors,?
computers, printers, copy machines, water coolers, etc.) between the
hours of 1:00pm and 2:30pm on Thursday, May 24, 2001. The purpose of
the test is to determine how much power the campus can save while
employees continue to do their normal work. Therefore, only unneeded
equipment should be shut off.
PP-CS will be implementing a "rolling" style curtailment of heating
and ventilating equipment in non-laboratory buildings during the test
period.
EMERGENCY COMMUNICATION TEST: Friday, May 25, 2001, 12:30pm
The campus emergency public address system was developed for use
during earthquakes, fires, and other disasters.? This summer it will
be used to notify the campus community of impending power blackouts.
Please notify occupants of your building that on? Friday, May 25,
2001, the emergency siren and public address system will be activated
at 12:30 pm. Upon hearing the signal, NO ACTION is required by the
campus community. This is just a test of the ability of people to hear
the system. It is not a load reduction test.
Beth Burnside, Chair
Chancellor's Task Force on Energy Emergency Preparedness, and
Vice Chancellor for Research
Edward Madera
Facilities Manager
HAAS School of Business
516 Faculty Bldg.? # 1900
Berkeley, CA 94720-1900
Area code 510
Office: 642-4617
Fax:? 642-4700
=====================================
|
2,688 |
Subject: PG&E OFO Quarterly Report (Jan-Mar, 2001)
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/3755.
=====================================
Gas OII/OFO Settlement Parties:
Attached please find PG&E's OFO Report for the First Quarter of 2001. This
is provided to you in accordance with the Operational Flow Order ("OFO")
Settlement Agreement, filed in the CPUC's Gas Strategy OII 99-07-003, and
approved by the CPUC by Decision 00-02-050.
The attachments consist of the Report (in Word) and two Appendices (in
Excel). The Report will also be posted on the Pipe Ranger web site at
<http://www.pge.com/pipeline/library/index.html#settlements>
This is the fourth quarterly report since the implementation of the OFO
Settlement. With a year of operating experience completed, we believe the
Settlement is a success in terms of 1) reducing the impact of OFOs on the
market, 2) improving market access to operational information, 3) improving
the ability of the market to foresee OFO events, and 4) significantly
reducing the number of system-wide OFOs.
An OFO Forum meeting was held on August 29, 2000. There have not been any
significant developments that have arisen from the data or discussion in the
past several Quarterly Reports. We see no current need for an OFO Forum
meeting in the near term. Please let us know if you have issues you feel
would be best addressed by holding a meeting of the OFO Forum.
If you have any questions on this report, please contact Rich Hall at (415)
972-5115 or email address [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>.
Frank Lindh
Attorney
Pacific Gas and Electric Company
415-973-2776
[email protected]
Attachments
<<OFO Report 1st QTR 2001.doc>> <<1st QTR 2001 - Appdx A Final.xls>>
<<Appdx B 1st Qtr 2001 Final.xls>>
And, a Word 6.0/95 version of the report:
<<OFO Report 1st QTR 2001 w6_95.doc>>
- OFO Report 1st QTR 2001.doc
- 1st QTR 2001 - Appdx A Final.xls
- Appdx B 1st Qtr 2001 Final.xls
- OFO Report 1st QTR 2001 w6_95.doc
=====================================
|
2,689 |
Subject: Smile. Something new from Amazon.com!
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/938.
=====================================
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
Dear Amazon Customer,
Something exciting has developed at Amazon.com: a new Camera & Photo
store--and right now, you can get 25 free
prints.
Whether you're a novice or an ace, Amazon.com's Camera
& Photo store is your full-service
resource for photography products, services,
and information. You'll find everything to
fill your camera bag--digital and film
cameras, camcorders, binoculars, telescopes,
accessories, and more. Plus, helpful reviews from
our customers and expert editors, buying guides, and
detailed product descriptions will help make purchasing
the right products easy.
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
Get 25 Free Prints
?
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
?
?
?
[IMAGE]
So stop in and check
out the new Camera & Photo Store. And let us help you handle all of
your photography needs.
Sincerely,
[IMAGE]
Shawn Haynes
Director, Camera & Photo
PS: We hope you enjoyed receiving this message. However,
if you'd rather not receive future e-mails of this sort from
Amazon.com, please visit your Amazon.com account page and
under the Your Account Settings heading, click the "Update your
communication preferences" link.
Please note that this message was sent to the following e-mail address:
[email protected]
?
?
?
=====================================
|
2,690 |
Subject: Reminder: Tickets to the Giants Game 5/13
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/11115.
=====================================
* Delete if not interested in the Giants game on 5/13 *
Thank you to all who have responded so far.? Please double check your name
and ticket order on the attached file.?
Others, please let me know by Monday at noon if you are interested in
tickets.? I will finalize the order with the Giants box office on Monday and
contact only those who are interested with further details.
Thank you,
Carolyn
<<giants tickets.xls>>
?-----Original Message-----
From: ? Vavrek, Carolyn (US - San Francisco)?
Sent:?? Thursday, April 12, 2001 10:43 AM
To:???? '[email protected]'
Subject:??????? Giants Game - May 13th - Please Respond ASAP
To celebrate the end of another semester (and the Program for some), I looked
into purchasing a block of tickets to a SF Giants game at Pac Bell Park.? We
have the opportunity to purchase up to 90 tickets at $16/ticket for the game
against the New York Mets on Sunday, May 13th at 1:05pm.? Seats are in the
View Reserved Area (i.e., upper deck).
* * Please let me know ASAP how many tickets you would like. * *?
Feel free to invite friends and family as well.? I will place the order based
on your initial response, so only respond if you are definitely interested.?
GO GIANTS!
- Carolyn
Carolyn M. Vavrek
Manager - Human Capital Advisory Services
Deloitte & Touche
50 Fremont Street
San Francisco, CA? 94105
phone: 415-783-5137
fax: 415-783-8760
e-mail: [email protected]
This message (including any attachments) contains confidential information
intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is protected by law.? If
you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this message and are
hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this
message, or the taking of any action based on it, is strictly prohibited.
- giants tickets.xls
=====================================
|
2,691 |
Subject: Re: Negative CTC Meeting - 11:30 a.m. Today
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/3537.
=====================================
Attached is a rough draft of some scenario development around the PX credit
and rate issues. Few points:
Apologies in advance for any errors and inaccuracies.
Given time crunch, the model developed is quite crude and will need
refinement (to be sure).
The bankruptcy scenario is included (scenario 4), but (again, given the time
crunch) has not been analyzed to the same extent as the other scenarios.
Tribolet should be able to provide good insights there, however.
The exposure has not been calculated since GA does not have the numbers, but
EES should be able---once there's agreement on scenarios and
probabilities---to run the numbers very quickly.
I've assigned my view of what the probabilities are. These are key inputs
and the team will need to scrub them thoroughly.
For ease of use by all, and given time considerations, I've done the
conceptual model in word format, rather than excel. It will be simple to
translate this conceptual model to a spreadsheet model (in excel).
Best,
Jeff
Marcia A Linton
03/07/2001 08:22 AM
To: Mike D Smith/HOU/EES@EES, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, [email protected], [email protected], Vicki
Sharp/HOU/EES@EES, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, [email protected]
cc: Iris Waser/HOU/EES@EES, Rubena
Buerger/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Leasa Lopez/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: Negative CTC Meeting - 11:30 a.m. Today
A conference call meeting has been set up for 11:30 am today, March 7 to
discuss EES Negative CTC. Conference room EB-4746 has been reserved for the
Houston participants. The call-in number for the call will be:
888-422-7137
Host Code (for Jim only) - 438907
Participant Code (for everyone else) - 865493
If you have any questions regarding this call, please give me a call at
713-853-3226.
Thanks,
Marcia
=====================================
|
2,692 |
Subject: Re: INFO
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/12334.
=====================================
Thank you.
James D Steffes
05/11/2001 09:10 AM
To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Jennifer Thome/NA/Enron@Enron, Janel
Guerrero/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: INFO
Jeff -
I would recommend that you (if needed) use Jennifer to help.
Jim
---------------------- Forwarded by James D Steffes/NA/Enron on 05/11/2001
09:09 AM ---------------------------
Steven J Kean
05/11/2001 08:35 AM
To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul Kaufman/Enron@EnronXGate, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J
Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON
Subject:
Ken Lay spoke with several California CEOs this morning and urged them to get
personally involved in pushing for a comprehensive set of reforms. Three
expressed willingness to help.
Scott McNealy (Sun): contact person - Piper Cole ([email protected]);
[email protected]. Mcnealy wants, by close of business today, a
"cheat sheet" of the talking points to use with politicians (the "8 or 10
elements of the solution") with the expected comeback he may hear from the
political leaders and our response to that comeback. He says he hasn't spent
time working on issues in Sacremento so we may also want to include a list of
suggested contacts.
Kevin Sharer (Amgen): contact person - Sarah Jensen, VP of Engineering and
Operations (805.447.6785); [email protected]. Sharer wants the same
information as McNealy and he and McNealy both indicated their willingness to
call a meeting of other California CEOs. Sharer will also be having
breakfast with Hertzberg one week from today.
Robert Day (Trust Co of the West): said that he is very close to the mayor
of Los Angeles. He urged Ken to call the mayor (mentioning Day). Ken would
like some talking points for that call.
Jeff - please put these items together.
=====================================
|
2,693 |
Subject: UC-CSU Call
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/5098.
=====================================
FYI. Will try and keep everyone informed.
Jim
----- Forwarded by James D Steffes/NA/Enron on 03/04/2001 07:50 PM -----
Mike D Smith@EES
03/02/2001 05:08 PM
To: Dan Leff/HOU/EES@EES, Marty Sunde/HOU/EES@EES, Don Black/HOU/EES@EES,
Wanda Curry/HOU/EES@EES, Evan Hughes/HOU/EES@EES, Dennis
Benevides/HOU/EES@EES, Peggy Mahoney/HOU/EES@EES, Harry
Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark
Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mark Koenig/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES, Robert C Williams/Enron@EnronXGate
Subject: UC-CSU Call
Here is a brief summary of today's call with UC-CSU:
Attended by business and legal representatives from each side (including
University outside counsel) to discuss views of the dispute
Universities are entrenched in their position that we did not have the right
to D-DASR their accounts; their demeanor was relatively aggressive
They have asked us to explain in more detail our reason for D-DASRing their
accounts, including how that action "enhances our ability to fulfill the cost
guarantee" under the agreement
They demanded again that we return their accounts to our service, and we
refused again
We reiterated our position that we have the right under the contract to
D-DASR and that continued performance of physical delivery was and continues
to be commercially impracticable.
We pointed out that their actions are impeding our exercise of our rights
under the agreement.
They expressed an unwillingness to continue the dialogue around a commercial
solution until we return their accounts to our service.
We agreed to have another telephone conference Monday, but we do not expect
much progress.
Although not threatened, it remains likely that the universities are
considering seeking some sort of injunctive relief
Please let me know if you have any questions. MDS
=====================================
|
2,694 |
Subject: Re: FOR FINAL REVIEW -- ENA Comments in Support of Kern River
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/27798.
=====================================
I have added a reference to recent FERC decision in a Kern River case which
rejected a contract provision between Kern and Union Pacific which would have
given UP priority rights to reduce its CD. This is on page 9.
Rebecca W Cantrell@ECT
06/12/01 05:20 PM
To: Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Barry Tycholiz/Enron@EnronXGate, Christi L
Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dave Perrino/SF/ECT@ECT, Don Black/HOU/EES@EES, Donna
Fulton/Corp/Enron@ENRON, [email protected], James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Jennifer
Thome/NA/Enron@Enron, Leslie Lawner/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul
Kaufman/Enron@EnronXGate, Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ray
Alvarez/NA/Enron@ENRON, Robert Frank/NA/Enron@Enron, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Stephanie Miller/Enron@EnronXGate, Steve
Walton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Steven P
South/Enron@EnronXGate, Randall L Gay/Enron@EnronXGate, Patti
Sullivan/Enron@EnronXGate, Kristann Shireman/HOU/EES@EES, Robert
Superty/HOU/ECT@ECT, Suzanne Calcagno/Enron@EnronXGate, Ed
McMichael/Enron@EnronXGate, George F Smith/Enron@EnronXGate
cc:
Subject: FOR FINAL REVIEW -- ENA Comments in Support of Kern River
Attached for your review and comments are ENA's comments in support of Kern
River's petition for a declaratory order relating to SoCal Gas' assertion
that it has the first right to expansion capacity now being constructed in
the California Emergency Action Project to add 135,000 Mcf/d of capacity to
California that would come on-line during July.
The comments must be filed at FERC by Friday, June 15. If you have issues or
comments, please contact Leslie Lawner or me as soon as you can. Leslie is
at 505-623-6778 and my extension in Houston is 35840. If possible, e-mail us
since we will both be traveling or at an off-site meeting beginning mid-day
Wednesday.
=====================================
|
2,695 |
Subject: RE: California bullets
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent_items/499.
=====================================
de nada
-----Original Message-----
From: Linnell, Elizabeth
Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2001 10:50 AM
To: Dasovich, Jeff
Subject: RE: California bullets
Fab, thanks!
-----Original Message-----
From: Dasovich, Jeff
Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2001 9:25 AM
To: Linnell, Elizabeth
Subject: California bullets
Elizabeth:
Let me know it this works, or if you need anything else.
Best,
Jeff
*********************************************************************
Fallout in California
PG&E remains in bankruptcy
The company's proposed plan of reorganization places the bulk of its gas and electric assets under FERC jurisdiction, leaving distribution under control of the California PUC
The California PUC and Edison reached agreement designed to keep Edison out of bankruptcy
On the heels of a failed legislative effort to return Edison to solvency, the California PUC has agreed to a rate plan to permit Edison to pay its creditors
The Davis administration still can't agree on a plan to use utility rates to reimburse the State's General Fund and pay for long-term power contracts
California used about $12.5 billion of taxpayer dollars to buy power on behalf of the state's cash-strapped utilities and signed more than $45 billion in long-term contracts
Unless California devises a plan to finance its foray into the energy business, California could turn its energy crisis into a fiscal crisis
California suspends the only successful piece of its failed restructuring scheme--customer choice
Fearful that customers will find better prices for power than it can provide, the State decided to temporarily suspend Direct Access in California and force customers to remain with the utility
The suspension is very controversial, prompting market participants to threaten litigation in the attempt to get Direct Access reinstated in California
=====================================
|
2,696 |
Subject: FW: A healthy tip for us all
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/1218.
=====================================
Subject:? HOW TO SURVIVE A HEART ATTACK WHEN ALONE - REALLY!
Let's say it's 6:15 p.m. and you're driving home (alone of course), after an
unusually hard day on the job. You're really tired,? upset and frustrated.
Suddenly you start experiencing severe pain in your chest that starts to
radiate out into your arm and up into your jaw.
You are only about five miles from the hospital nearest your? home;
unfortunately you don't know if you'll be able to make it that far.?? What
can you do? You've been trained in CPR but the guy that taught the course
neglected to tell you how to perform it on yourself.
HOW TO SURVIVE A HEART ATTACK WHEN ALONE
(Since many people are alone when they suffer a heart attack, this article
seemed in order.)
Without help, the person whose heart stops beating properly and who begins to
feel faint, has
only about 10 seconds left before losing consciousness.? However, these
victims can help themselves by coughing repeatedly and very vigorously.?? A
deep breath should be taken before each cough, and the cough
must be deep and prolonged, as when producing sputum from deep inside the
chest. A breath and? a cough must be repeated about every two seconds without
let up until help arrives, or until the heart is to be beating
normally again.
Deep breaths get oxygen into the lungs and coughing movements squeeze the
heart and keep the blood circulating. The squeezing pressure on the heart
also helps it regain normal rhythm. In this way, heart victims can get to a
hospital.
Tell as many other people as possible about this, it could save their lives!
>From Health Cares, Rochester General Hospital via Chapter 240's newsletter
AND THE BEAT GOES ON ... (reprint from The Mended Hearts, Inc. publication,
Heart Response)
.
Nancy
(707) 251-4870 (phone)
(707) 265-5446 (fax)
"Plus je bois, mieux je chante"
=====================================
|
2,697 |
Subject: Fwd: Calif. Gov. says near deal to buy SDG&E power grid
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['Ronald Carroll', 'Dan Watkiss" <[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/3579.
=====================================
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Mon, 07 May 2001 16:00:17 -0500
From: "Tracey Bradley" <[email protected]>
To: "Justin Long" <[email protected]>, "Paul Fox" <[email protected]>
Cc: "Dan Watkiss" <[email protected]>, "Ronald Carroll"
<[email protected]>
Subject: Calif. Gov. says near deal to buy SDG&E power grid
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
FYI
Monday May 7, 4:37 pm Eastern Time
Calif. Gov. says near deal to buy SDG&E power grid
LOS ANGELES, May 7 (Reuters) - California Gov. Gray Davis, seeking to piece
together a takeover of the state's power transmission grid, said Monday he
hoped to have an agreement by the end of the week to buy the high voltage
power lines owned by Sempra Energy (NYSE:SRE - news) utility subsidiary San
Diego Gas & Electric (SDG&E).
``I think that will be resolved, hopefully before the week is out ... I
believe we are very, very close to resolving that issue,'' Davis told a news
conference here.
Davis has made state ownership of the transmission grid a key part of his
plan to solve the state's energy crisis and revive its three cash-strapped
investor owned utilities.
SDG&E owns about 1,800 miles (2,897 km) of transmission lines. The deal is
believed to be priced at roughly $1 billion plus the assumption of around 200
million of debt, which equates to around 2.3 times book value
Davis has reached a tentative agreement to buy Edison International (NYSE:EIX
- news) unit Southern California Edison's transmission grid for $2.76
billion, also roughly 2.3 times its book value.
Similar talks to buy the grid belonging to San Francisco- based Pacific Gas
and Electric Co., a unit of PG&E Corp. (NYSE:PCG - news) collapsed in early
April when the utility put itself into voluntary bankruptcy protection.
=====================================
|
2,698 |
Subject: Level Setting Meeting for the California Markets Focus Group
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/6102.
=====================================
Call in # for the referenced meeting is:
1-800-713-8600 Pass Code# 80435
Note: 10:00 a.m. - 11:00 a.m. (Houston Time)
Please call me if you have any questions.
Thank You
Leticia Botello
x-58752
---------------------- Forwarded by Leticia Botello/HOU/EES on 12/15/2000
09:09 AM ---------------------------
Wanda Curry
12/14/2000 04:01 PM
To: Dennis Benevides/HOU/EES@EES, James W Lewis/HOU/EES@EES, Scott
Stoness/HOU/EES@EES, Don Black/HOU/EES@EES, Tony Spruiell/HOU/EES@EES, Mike M
Smith/HOU/EES@EES, Meredith M Eggleston/HOU/EES@EES, Neil Hong/HOU/EES@EES,
Evan Hughes/HOU/EES@EES, Neil Bresnan/HOU/EES@EES, Jess Hewitt/HOU/EES@EES,
Vladimir Gorny/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Eric Melvin/HOU/EES@EES, Scott Stoness/HOU/EES@EES,
Gayle W Muench/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Marty Sunde/HOU/EES@EES, Dan Leff/HOU/EES@EES, Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES,
Kevin Hughes/HOU/EES@EES, Jeremy Blachman/HOU/EES@EES, Harold G
Buchanan/HOU/EES@EES, Mark S Muller/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: Level Setting Meeting for the California Markets Focus Group
A California Markets Focus Group meeting will be held daily starting
tomorrow, December 15th. Please plan to attend this meeting starting at
10:00 a.m. to be held in conference room EB 2868.
This will be a level setting meeting to determine what topics should be
reviewed with the group on a daily basis. This forum will also allow for an
overview of changes in market prices, positions and identify strategies.
The recurring time and location of these daily meetings will be determined
tomorrow as well.
Participation by you (or your pre-identified representative) in these
meetings on a daily basis is critical. We will be preparing a report for the
EES G-9 daily and your input is required.
Any questions, please call Wanda Curry @ x-33411.
Thanks
=====================================
|
2,699 |
Subject: CAEM Predictions 2002
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/inbox/1060.
=====================================
Center for the Advancement of Energy Markets
Wow! What a year 2001 has been for the supporters of energy competition.
For every good bit of news (Pat Wood, one of our heroes at CAEM, being
selected to head the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, and the
continuing progress that the Canadians - yes, the Canadians - have made
towards energy competition), we have had to bear one disaster and misstep
after another throughout the year. Let's see, in December 2000, who could
have predicted..
1. The tragic events of September 11th.
2. The California implosion.
3. Pennsylvania marketer retrenchment.
4. Price volatility and high prices (but it could have been worse if Mother
Nature did not help out).
5. Bush Energy Plan ignores meaningful restructuring.
6. Enron collapse.
7. FERC Blinks on Super RTO.
8. Texas missteps in pilots for opening the market.
9. No leadership emerged to meet the crisis in restructuring.
2001 was one heck of a year - but thankfully, probably the nadir of the
movement towards energy competition in North America. As CAEM looks into
our crystal ball (natural gas fired, of course) for the coming year, we see
a better year. Below are some of the predictions and responses from the
CAEM staff about what we expect to occur. The responses below are primarily
concerned with electricity, but to a lesser extent, may be applied to
natural gas as well.
As always, do not bet the house on what we have to say. We are just a
little think tank, kind of like the little engine that could. And we can.
And we do.
Happy New Year!
The CAEM Staff
P.S. If you would like to add a prediction or two, please send an e-mail
with your name and contact information to Hope Duncan at [email protected] We
will post them to our web site - www.caem.org Please identify which
question below is being addressed by your prediction.
=====================================
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.