dataset_id
int64 0
5.47k
| email_body
stringlengths 800
9.73k
|
|---|---|
2,700 |
Subject: Re: Urgent WPTF Board Meeting to Discuss FERC Order on SDG&E
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/766.
=====================================
As Gary Ackerman requested this afternoon, attached is a summary of the FERC
Order issued yesterday which rejected the SDG&E price cap complaint and
commenced a proceeding which will involve hearings regarding the operation
of the California market, problems with ISO and PX tariffs and resolve any
defects in the operation of competitive power markets in California.
?
Please call or write if you have any questions about the attached memo or
the Order itself.
?
Dan
>>> "Gary Ackerman" <[email protected]> 08/24/00 02:37PM >>>
Folks,
Today the FERC issued an Order on SDG&E's complaint to cap generator
bids at $250, and they did so not only with a flat denial, but also by
opening a Section 206 Proceeding to investigate California's wholesale
power markets. That means there will be full evidentiary hearing at
FERC regarding California's wholesale market. WPTF is an intervenor in
the case, and I think we should discuss WPTF's strategy and position on
this case before the next Board meeting (September 12).
Toward that end, I have asked Rob Lamkin, our Chairman, to establish
date for a Board teleconference call to discuss our position, craft
motion, and vote. I have also asked Dan Douglass to review the attached
Order of FERC (both docs are the same, but slightly different computer
format), prepare a summary, and to prepare an estimate for WPTF's
participation. I would be more than happy to be a witness in the case.
I am also sending this notice to our general member representative who
may wish to be participants in our pleading. Whereas the general
members can not vote on WPTF's major positions, they can participate in
the case development, funding, and preparation.
I will inform you of the date and time for our teleconference Board
meeting in a later e-mail.
gba
- Summary of Order of 8-23-00.doc
=====================================
|
2,701 |
Subject: FW: Egret's Overlook Home
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', 'e-mail <[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/inbox/1478.
=====================================
I just found this in my inbox....I know it's overkill but I'm forwarding the directions, again.
-----Original Message-----
From: Patty Glatt [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2001 8:33 PM
To: 'Thompson, Thomas W.'
Subject: RE: Egret's Overlook Home
Karen,
I received you check. I am sending you the arrival instructions and directions. Please print them out, and read the instructions before your arrival. Let me know if there is any other information you will need before your arrival. My neighbor has expressed a preference that cars be only parked on my property. Please see the details in the instructions. We hope you will enjoy you weekend.
Patty Glatt, Owner
-----Original Message-----
From: Thompson, Thomas W. [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 1:31 PM
To: 'Egret's Overlook Home (E-mail)'
Subject: RE: Egret's Overlook Home
Hi there - Karen and I just put the check and the contract in the mail just this afternoon.
-----Original Message-----
From: Egret's Overlook Home (E-mail)
[<mailto:[email protected]>]
Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 10:04 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Egret's Overlook Home
Dear Karen and Tom,
Here is the information you will need to begin the reservation process.
Please clarify how many guests there will be. If it will be more than four,
there is an additional charge of $10 per night per person above four. Linens
are not provided. The queen is in the master bedroom, a double in the second
bedroom, and a double futon bed in the sleeping loft. You will need to bring
sheets, bath towels, and I suggest a kitchen towel.
Please let me know how many guests there will be if it differs from the
contract I have drafted for four adults.
If you have any questions, or decide that you do not want to pursue the
reservation, please contact me.
=====================================
|
2,702 |
Subject: [Fwd: Collocation Decision(s) discussed 10/27]
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/2817.
=====================================
FYI -
X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2000 12:45:05 -0800
From: Jeremy Meier <[email protected]>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.61 [en] (Win98; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: [email protected]
CC: [email protected]
Subject: Collocation Decision(s) discussed 10/27
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------B38FC1A91B245AEBF4048D17"
Sue:
Attached please find the DC Circuit's federal decision remanding certain
FCC physical collocation rules back to the FCC for reconsideration.
This is the Federal Court of Appeals "advanced services" case Steve
Bowen was discussing on the conference call last Friday re EBS.
The DC Circuit reviewed the FCC's Advanced Services First Report and
Order and affirmed certain aspects of collo (eg cageless, central office
and adjacent collo, and cost recovery). The Court, however, remanded
back to the FCC its rules on physical collocation and cage-to-cage cross
connections (as Steve mentioned). Correct me if I am mistaken, but
apparently EBS/ETI is now facing the hurdle of these uncertain collo
rules in the field.
The FCC has recently reopened the Advanced Services Report and Order per
the DC Cir, has initiated a new proceeding at the FCC (Order on
Reconsideration and Second Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in CC
Docket No. 98-147 and Fifth Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in CC
Docket No. 96-98). Comments at the FCC were filed last month and Reply
Comments on these advanced services collo rules are due in November.
We can send you a (lengthy) copy of the FCC Advanced Services remand
Order on Reconsideration too if you want. Let me know if you have
questions,
Jeremy Meier
Blumenfeld & Cohen
4 Embarcadero Center, Suite 1170
San Francisco, CA 94111
415 394-7500
[email protected]
- advanced services case.doc
=====================================
|
2,703 |
Subject: Siting
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/12216.
=====================================
Here's my proposal for how we cover siting issues for Dave P. and Sam W. in
California. Let me know your response to the discussion and clarify as
necessary. I want to send this to Dave and Sam ASAP.
Legislative activity:
? Issues that affect generation owners and operators: We will rely primarily
on IEP and only take a position on legislation or administrative activity
that uniquely affects us. (Mirant, Southern, AES, etc. have a greater
interest in these issues that we do, given our business plan). [Model is
legislative and adminstrative effort to change basis for taxing power
plants.]
? Issues that affect siting or project development: We will rely primarily
on IEP, but will proceed with legislative proposals that have a high value to
Enron. [Model is the effort that Mike Day has engaged in--i.e., drafting
legislation to consolidate conflicting administrative action on siting, etc.]
? Primary point of contact within Government Affairs: Susan Mara
? Primary point of contact in Sacramento: Scott Govenar
Administrative activity--CEC, CARB, etc.:
? Primary point of contact on environmental issues: Mary Schoen.
? Primary point of contact if high level contacts need to be made within the
agencies: Susan Mara. Our lobbyists have the ability to make these high
level contacts on our behalf--particularly the Governmental Advocates firm.
[From time to time it may be necessary to contact the CEC to expedite permit
writing, etc.]
Local agency/community affairs activities:
? Primary point of contact for issues that arise from local concerns that may
require legislation: Susan Mara. [Model on this issue is the Williamson Act
legislation. The issue and solution was identified at the local level. The
solution required legislation, which was then promoted in Sacramento. GA
acted to coordinate the efforts.]
=====================================
|
2,704 |
Subject: Gas Structure OII: Altra Energy Technologies
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/1069.
=====================================
September 5, 2000
To all persons on the Service List in I.99-07-003 (Gas Structure
OII):
As part of the approved Gas Structure settlements for PG&E and the
Comprehensive Settlement proposed for SoCalGas and SDG&E, SoCalGas and PG&E
would contract with Altra Energy Technologies (Altra) to develop several new
electronic trading services including anonymous imbalance trading, OFO
imbalance rights trading, storage trading and anonymous capacity trading.
Recently, while working on finalizing contracts to provide these services,
Altra informed both SoCalGas and PG&E that they are no longer interested in
offering these new services. Altra restructured their business and has
determined that this service is not the right business direction for them at
this time.
SoCalGas and PG&E were working together to provide a consistent
service prior to the announcement by Altra, and we will continue working
together to seek an alternative service provider for these services. PG&E's
intention is to investigate the possible alternatives and to present those
alternatives to the parties to I.99-07-003 along with our suggested plan of
action as soon as possible. PG&E understands that SoCal Gas intends to work
with parties in a similar fashion. Since it is unknown how long it will
take a service provider other than Altra to develop these services, the
implementation dates for trading services by a third party will need to be
reevaluated once a selection is made and a development schedule set.
We recognize that a replacement service provider raises a number of
questions such as implementation costs and service fees. We will attempt to
address those questions as we investigate the alternatives. Please send any
comments or questions you may have to Ed Vera ([email protected]) of
SoCalGas and Ben Campbell ([email protected]) of PG&E.
Sincerely,
Dan Thomas
=====================================
|
2,705 |
Subject: FW: FERc Questions to SoCal Gas
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['Frank', 'John P; Cherry', '[email protected]', 'David W (Law); Armato', 'Brian; Lindh', 'Anderson']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/27784.
=====================================
Their responses should be itneresting....
-----Original Message-----
From: Guerrero, Gary (Corp)
Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2001 12:00 PM
To: Thomas, Dan (CGT Dir); Lund, Peter; Tomcala, Karen (Corp)
Cc: Anderson, David W (Law); Armato, John P; Cherry, Brian; Lindh, Frank
(Law); Petersen, Donald
Subject: FERc Questions to SoCal Gas
FERC issued a letter order requesting further information to help understand
Lad Lorenz's presentation at the May 24 California Gas Infrastructure
Conference. A copy of the FERC questions, as well as Lad's presentation is
attached.
<<PL01-4.00B.doc>> <<LadLorenz.ppt>>
Specifically FERC seeks to understand:
1. Since SoCal is a matrix system, why is Topock a more desirable
receipt point than Blythe (Ehrenberg) or any other receipt point on the
SoCal system?
2. How SoCal determines the amount of capacity that is available at
each interstate receipt point.
3. How SoCal determines who gets capacity on the SoCal system or if
they rely on El Paso's priority system, and how nominations and
confirmations work.
4. The rationale the current procedures in which non-core customers
cannot contract for firm capacity on SoCal's backbone system.
5. The process of lining up markets if a "marketer" is nominating
capacity on the SoCal system.
6. Curtailments, or lack thereof on the SoCal system.
7. The authority SoCalGas has to construct its proposed 4 smaller
expansion projects at a total cost of $55 million which will add 475 MMcfd
(13.5%) of firm backbone capacity.
8. Whether SoCal has or has in effect proposed an exit fee for
customers that interconnect to new interstate pipeline capacity?
9. Whether SoCal received or requested an "award", increased revenue, a
sharing of savings, or similar monetary benefit from Hub services or the
operation of the Gold Coast Incentive Mechanism?
- PL01-4.00B.doc
- LadLorenz.ppt
=====================================
|
2,706 |
Subject: Re: SDG&E Credits
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/1851.
=====================================
FYI. If you'd like to discuss, don't hesitate...
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 09/28/2000 12:46 PM -----
Marianne Castano@EES
09/28/2000 12:39 PM
To: Dennis Benevides/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Karen A Cordova/HOU/EES@EES, Diann
Huddleson/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: Re: SDG&E Credits
Dennis: Just wanted to bring this item to your attention. We've researched
the terms of our residential agreements and have noted that they are silent
as to the issue of credits/refunds. I've asked Jeff and Mike Day, our
regulatory counsel in CA, for their input on whether we should refund these
credits back to our residential customers.
Notwithstanding the fact that the language of the original decision
allowing the credits does not address direct access customers, Jeff and Mike
recommend, given the current climate in California, that we take action to
refund these credits to our residential customers.
Just want to make sure you're "on board" with this before we direct CSC to
refund the credit back to our residential accounts...Marianne
.
Enron Energy Services
From: Karen A Cordova 09/21/2000 05:00 PM
Phone No: 713.853.3150
713.646.8860 - FAX No.
To: Marianne Castano/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: SDG&E Credits
Diane Huddelston called Lori Pinder about an issue; Here it is:
Due to the merger btw SDG&G & Sempra Energy (about a year or less ago), a
savings was realized. The CPUC said these savings must be passed on to
customers 1 time per year, in September. They are called Annual Merger
Credits.
Pursuant to all commercial contracts, Enron is entitled to keep the savings
(per Diane). What about the residential customer accounts?
Enron keeps the savings or should the residential customer receive?
Who could handle this issue for Diane?
Thanks, KC
=====================================
|
2,707 |
Subject: CBS poll: Americans prioritize environment over energy 2:1
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/11783.
=====================================
FYI - from cbsnews.com (4/26/01)
AP
President Bush=20
(CBS) President Bush continues to receive some of his lowest marks from the=
=20
public for his handling of environmental issues, according to the latest CB=
S=20
News poll. Just 38 percent of the public approves of the way the president =
is=20
handling the environment, and as many =01) 39 percent - disapprove.=20
One of the most telling reasons for Mr. Bush's low ratings on the environme=
nt=20
is that the public views his priorities in this area as the opposite of=20
theirs. By more than 2-1, the public places a priority on protecting the=20
environment over producing energy. However, when asked which they think Mr.=
=20
Bush feels is more important, Americans overwhelmingly think he is on the=
=20
side of producing energy. While 58 percent of the public supports protectin=
g=20
the environment, 70 percent think Mr. Bush supports energy production.=20
These divergent priorities are clearly evident on the issue of drilling for=
=20
oil in the Arctic, something Bush strongly supports. A majority of American=
s=20
oppose opening up the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge in Alaska to drilling=
=20
for oil and natural gas: 54 percent disapprove of this plan, and 37 percent=
=20
approve of it. Public opposition to drilling in the Arctic has remained fir=
m=20
for the past few months.=20
The public is very clear on its priorities when it comes to the environment=
:=20
75 percent think we need to maintain our present environmental laws in orde=
r=20
to preserve the environment for future generations, while 19 percent want t=
o=20
relax environmental laws in order to achieve economic growth.=20
Over the past twenty years, the public has become more supportive of=20
maintaining environmental laws; in 1981, 67 percent supported maintaining=
=20
environmental laws.=20
=====================================
|
2,708 |
Subject: Re: CA Government Affairs
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/11994.
=====================================
Hi Jeff,
Please give me a call at your earliest convenience. I'd like to talk to you
about what political/regulatory options may be available to Pilkington in
California. Thanks.
Steve
---------------------- Forwarded by Steve Beck/HOU/EES on 05/03/2001 10:35 AM
---------------------------
Richard Shapiro@ENRON
04/30/2001 10:41 AM
To: Steve Beck/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Re: CA Government Affairs
Jeff Dasovich, who works in my group in San Francisco, will call you
regarding your e- mail. Thanks.
To: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: CA Government Affairs
Hi Rick,
I read the article in the article in Enron Business that mentions your
group's efforts in California. I'd like to speak with you in order to find
out if your efforts with the California government could possibly assist my
client. I am the EES Account Manager for Pilkington North America.
Pilkington is a lage scale glass manufacturer with a plant in Lathrop,
California. They, like many other PG&E ratepayers, are going to be subjected
to load curtailment this summer. Being a large scale glass manufacturer who
consumes a great deal of energy, they feel that being subjected to a
curtailment would jeopardize the safety of the Lathrop community. If the
plant withstood a full scale meltdown in their furnace, caused by a
curtailment, a plant of that size would require an enormous group of
emergency service personnel. Such a significant presence at the facility
would jeopardize the safety of the rest of that small community.
Pilkington has already forwarded a letter to PG&E documenting this and it is
currently under review. I would like to know if you or a member of your
group could pursue any political avenues with this letter. Please call me at
215-599-7047 at your earliest convenience.
Thank you,
Steve Beck
=====================================
|
2,709 |
Subject: RE: Weekly WGA Skeds for the Week of 9/10 - 9/14/01
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/inbox/119.
=====================================
All: Actually I am in DC 9/11-9/12.
Lysa, in the future can you try to fill Joseph in with my schedule when he requests them?
Thanks,
Alan C.
-----Original Message-----
From: Alamo, Joseph
Sent: Mon 9/10/2001 5:43 PM
To: Kaufman, Paul; Mara, Susan; Dasovich, Jeff; Petrochko, Mona L.; Comnes, Alan
Cc: Tracy, Lysa; Dernehl, Ginger; Perez, Carmen
Subject: Weekly WGA Skeds for the Week of 9/10 - 9/14/01
WESTERN GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS
WEEKLY SCHEDULES
For the Week of September 10 - 14, 2001
Paul Kaufman
Mon 9/10 SALT LAKE CITY UT
Tue 9/11 PORTLAND OR Office
Wed 9/12 PORTLAND OR Office
Thu 9/13 PORTLAND OR Office
Fri 9/14 PORTLAND OR Office
Sue Mara
Mon 9/10 SAN FRANCISCO CA Office; late p.m.: Travel to SACRAMENTO for Latino Caucus dinner
Tue 9/11 SACRAMENTO CA, a.m. (possibly); -or- SAN FRANCISCO CA Office (TBD)
Wed 9/12 SAN FRANCISCO CA Office
Thu 9/13 SAN FRANCISCO CA Office
Fri 9/14 SAN FRANCISCO CA Office
Jeff Dasovich
Mon 9/10 SACRAMENTO CA
Tue 9/11 SACRAMENTO CA
Wed 9/12 SACRAMENTO CA
Thu 9/13 SACRAMENTO CA
Fri 9/14 SACRAMENTO CA
Mona Petrochko
Mon 9/10 SAN FRANCISCO CA Office; late p.m.: Travel to HOUSTON TX
Tue 9/11 HOUSTON TX; late p.m.: Travel to WASHINGTON DC
Wed 9/12 WASHINGTON DC
Thu 9/13 WASHINGTON DC; early p.m.: Travel back to SAN FRANCISCO CA
Fri 9/14 SAN FRANCISCO CA Office
Alan Comnes
Mon 9/10 PORTLAND OR Office
Tue 9/11 PORTLAND OR Office
Wed 9/12 PORTLAND OR Office
Thu 9/13 PORTLAND OR Office
Fri 9/14 PORTLAND OR Office
Joseph Alamo
Sr. Administrative Assistant
Global Government Affairs
ph. (415) 782-7841
fax (415) 782-7854
e-mail: [email protected]
=====================================
|
2,710 |
Subject: Datek Special Offer: Free RealMoney.com Subscription
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/1257.
=====================================
Dear Reader,
You once had a free trial to TheStreet.com and expressed interest in
receiving financial information. Well, here's a great opportunity to
receive a subscription to RealMoney.com - for FREE.
Just open a Datek Online account and fund with a minimum of $1,500,
(current Datek Online account holders qualify by opening a new account and
fund with a minimum of $1,000) and Datek will pay for your one-year
subscription to RealMoney.com regularly valued at $199.95.
Datek Online is the online broker that gives you access to advanced
technology and information once reserved for the privileged few. If you
are serious about online investing, there is only one online broker to
trade with: Datek Online.
If you are ready to open a Datek Online account, apply online at:
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;1657729;2900123;f?http://www.datek.com/email/tsc
e
Please don't forget to enter your special Activation Code: TSCE when
applying for your new Datek Online account.
Or, if you want more information on Datek Online, please go to:
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;1657729;2900123;f?http://www.datek.com/email/tsc
e
and click the "Datek.com" button.
Don't delay, you have until December 31, 2000 to open your Datek Online
account and get your free subscription to RealMoney.com.
Sincerely,
TheStreet.com and Datek Online
System response and access times may vary due to market conditions, system
performance and other factors.
2000 Datek Online Brokerage Services LLC, Member NASD/SIPC
**Please DO NOT reply to this email.**
If you would like to contact Datek in regards to this special offer please
email us at [email protected] or call 1-800-U2-DATEK and speak directly
with a Customer Support Representative, 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.
If you no longer wish to be updated with information from TheStreet.com,
please send an email to: [email protected].
=====================================
|
2,711 |
Subject: Re: WPTF Involvement in Cal PX Code of Conduct
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/1404.
=====================================
Gary,
It was not my intention to have WPTF carry the ball on this effort, but only
to
alert the members of this proposal. Dynegy will be participating on its own.
We
hope that others will also particpate.
Gary Ackerman <[email protected]> on 09/13/2000 06:59:28 PM
Please respond to [email protected]
To: Bill Ross <[email protected]>, Bob Anderson <[email protected]>,
Carolyn Baker <[email protected]>, Corby Gardin
<[email protected]>, curt hatton <[email protected]>,
Curtis Kebler <[email protected]>, Denice Cazalet
<[email protected]>, Gene Waas <[email protected]>, Gregory T
Blue/NGCCorp@NGCCorp, Jack Pigott <[email protected]>, Jeff Dasovich
<[email protected]>, Ken Czarnecki <[email protected]>, Kent
Wheatland/NGCCorp@NGCCorp, "Klemstine, Barbara A(F56661)"
<[email protected]>, Randy Hickok <[email protected]>,
Rob Lamkin <[email protected]>, Rob Nichol
<[email protected]>, robert berry <[email protected]>, Roger Pelote
<[email protected]>, Sue Mara <[email protected]>, Dan Douglass
<[email protected]>, Joseph Paul/NGCCorp@NGCCorp, "Phillip J.
Muller" <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: WPTF Involvement in Cal PX Code of Conduct
Folks,
Reliant and Dynegy have asked if WPTF can work with parties to craft a
Cal PX code of conduct for PX market participants. I have instructed
Dan that he can review documents which need legal attention subject to
the proviso that Dynegy and Reliant will pick up Dan's costs. If the
Board wishes to motion this item, and hold an e-mail vote, I will be
happy to conduct that, and then solicit other funders.
I await your instructions. Specific questions about the COC should go
to either Joe Paul at Dynegy, or Curtis at Reliant.
gba
=====================================
|
2,712 |
Subject: Utility M&A Seminar
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/7862.
=====================================
Please call to discuss. Thanks.
---------------------- Forwarded by Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron on 12/19/2000
07:01 PM ---------------------------
"JOHN G KLAUBERG" <[email protected]> on 12/07/2000 01:44:52 PM
To: [email protected]
cc:
Subject: Utility M&A Seminar
Rick: it was great to catch up with you the other day in NY. It seems like
it was a very long time ago that we worked together on the PECO deal, doesn't
it?
I look forward to doing the panel with you at the Utility M&A Symposium in NY
on Monday, January 29, 2001. Our panel is set for around 4:00 that
afternoon. I'll get off a brochure to you, but the panel will discuss price
volatility and what strategies there may be for dealing with it. I thought
it would be great if you could address the California situation and your
thoughts on why it occurred and what the causes are and perhaps what remedial
measures should be undertaken. Your thoughts on price caps and the "hard"
and "soft" nature of the various approaches would also be on interest. I
think people would also have a keen interest in the differences between CA
and other markets, such as PA and perhaps the soon to open Texas market.
I'll follow up with more info as the time gets closer, but you probably may
want to think of a talk in the 25 minute range or so. I will let the EXNET
(the seminar sponsor) know of your participation.
As you may also know, LeBoeuf sponsors a dinner that evening at LeCirque for
our energy industry clients. It is usually a good time and many of your
compatriots, including Steve Kean, have attended in the past. If you can
possibly make it, that would be great. My guess is that there also may be
some people in attendance that you may wish to catch up with on various
industry things that you may be working on.
Thanks again, Rick, and I'll be in touch soon. John
=====================================
|
2,713 |
Subject: GA Department Meeting, Friday, March 9
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/9408.
=====================================
Please read this e:mail. Important detailed information provided.
Hi everyone:
I want to follow-up with each of you on some details for the upcoming
Government Affairs-The Americas meeting on Friday, March 9. First thing,
your contacts for this upcoming meeting will be Linda Noske (x36082) &
Geriann Warner (x35036). After Tuesday, February 27, I will be out of the
office and unavailable until Monday, March 12. (Aloha!)
The meeting will take place at the Woodlands Resort in the "Lakeside Room" on
Friday, March 9. A continental breakfast will be available at 7:30am with
the meeting beginning promptly at 8:00am and concluding by 3:00pm (see
attached agenda).
The Woodlands Resort
2301 North Millbend Drive
The Woodlands, TX 77380
Phone# 281-367-1100
Fax# 281-364-6274
Check-In time is 3:00pm
Check-Out time is 12:00pm
(see attached map)
For those of you who will be staying overnight, as an overnight guest at The
Woodlands Resort, you are entitled to dinner the evening of March 8th and
breakfast the next morning at the Woodlands Dining Room. You must let the
server know that your meal should be charged to the Enron master account.
This service is part of the meeting package that Enron has agreed to. If you
have any questions, please feel free to call Linda or Geriann.
The Woodlands Resort provides transportation to and from the airport.
Assistants/Coordinators, please schedule any transportation with the resort
directly, their number is 281-364-6256. PARKING: Valet parking is not
available, you will need to park in a parking lot on site.
ATTIRE: Friday Casual
Below, you will find a list of names with date of arrival/departure for those
needing overnight accommodations. Please check this list for accuracy and
get back with me ASAP if changes are needed.
gngr
713-853-7751
=====================================
|
2,714 |
Subject: RE: Surcharges
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/3101.
=====================================
To help focus our discussion, here is a sample clause (from the McDonald's
contract):
"Taxes and Fees. Allocation and Indemnity for Taxes. Seller shall pay
all Taxes applicable to Energy prior to delivery to each Facility. Buyer
shall pay all Taxes applicable to Energy at and after delivery . . . ,
including without limitation Taxes imposed on the purchase or sale of Energy,
on Buyer's possession, consumption, use or disposition of Energy, or on any
payment by Buyer to Seller hereunder. "Taxes" means all taxes (except taxes
based on net income), fees, charges, surcharges or royalties, and any
interest and penalties thereon."
Please also consider the following variations:
1. What if clause does not include first sentence so that all "Taxes"
are allocated to Buyer?
2. What if the definition of "taxes" is defined as follows:
"Taxes" means any and all new or existing governmental or
quasi-governmental taxes, assessments, levies, duties, fees, charges and
withholdings of any kind or nature whatsoever and howsoever described,
including . . . generation, . . . regulatory, . . . energy, consumption, . .
. ."
3. What if the definition also included "energy resource surcharges"?
(UC/CSU)
4. What if the definition also included "energy procurement charges"?
-----Original Message-----
From: Williams, Robert C.
Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2001 8:42 AM
To: '[email protected]'; Steffes, James; Dasovich, Jeff; '[email protected]'
Cc: Sunde, Marty; Cooley, Jan; Sharp, Vicki
Subject: Surcharges
Jan will be setting up a call today to discuss EES' ability to pass the "3
cent surcharge" through under its contracts. Marty would like our advice on
this today, so I hope you are available. Thanks.
P.S. Vicki and Marty, please let Jan know if you wish to be included in the
call or just want the result.
=====================================
|
2,715 |
Subject: Senate Energy Hearing
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/345.
=====================================
The Senate Energy, Utilities and Communications Committee held a hearing
on February 8 entitled; California=01,s Energy Supply; Will it Be Full
Power Ahead or Lights Out? Legislators in attendance for all or part of
the hearing included Senators Bowen, Peace, Vasconcellos, Alarcon and
Speier. Dave Parquet was one of the presenters. I will send handouts
from the meeting to Joseph tonight.
This was the first of several planned informational hearings for
stakeholders to express their points of view on California=01,s projected
energy needs, hindrances to meeting those needs, and possible
solutions. We expect future hearings to deal more with possible
solutions rather then simply providing a broad overview.
This was the agenda:
California=01,s Energy Supply
William Keese, Chairman, California Energy Commission
Carl Wood, Commissioner, California Public Utilities
Commission
Kellan Fluckiger, California Independent System Operator
Jim Kritikson, California Power Exchange
Marcie Edwards, Los Angeles Department of Water & Power
III. Meeting California=01,s Needs =01) Focusing On The Demand
Ralph Cavanaugh, Natural Resources Defense Council
Mike Weedall, Sacramento Municipal Utility District
Mike Florio, The Utility Reform Network
Rich Ferguson, Sierra Club
Pat McLafferty, NEXTEC Power Systems, representing California
Association of Distributed Energy Resources
Barbara Barkovitch, California Large Energy Consumers
Association
IV. Meeting California=01,s Needs =01) Focusing On The Supply
Steven Schleimer, Pacific Gas & Electric Company
Ron Nunnally, Southern California Edison
Geoff Gaebe, San Diego Gas & Electric
David Parquet, Enron Corporation
Nick Wallace, Dynegy Corporation
=====================================
|
2,716 |
Subject: IMPORTANT INFORMATION REGARDING C4C HALLOWEEN PARTY TOMORROW!
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/2757.
=====================================
C4C presents...
The Haas House of Horrors Halloween Ball
sponsored exclusively by Clorox.
The Halloween Ball is tomorrow (Friday, October 27th) and will definitely be
tons of fun.? Wanted to pass on important information regarding the party.?
Don't forget, you can still pick up your tickets tomorrow in the courtyard or
purchase tickets at the door.
1. BUS INFORMATION
The bus will be leaving from Cronk Gate, and is scheduled to leave PROMPTLYat
7:30 pm and 8:30 pm.? The bus will leave without you! You cannot switch bus
times!? The 7:30 bus will be leaving the Atrium at 12:15 am and the 8:30
will leave at 1:15 am.
2. COSTUMES
Costumes are highly recommended! Dress up and be creative!
3. RAFFLE TICKETS
Raffle tickets are $5 and can be purchased at the door.? Great prizes include
Clorox Prize Pak's, gift certificates (Raleigh's, Triple Rock Brewery, Rick &
Ann's Restaurant and Jimmy Bean's), Microsoft Office 2000, REI Trail Kits,
Haas Computing Credit Vouchers and Alcatel Liquors gift pack.
4. CASH BAR/FOOD
Sorry guys, it is a CASH BAR, NOT open bar, after all it is a fundraiser!
Please remember to eat beforehand.? Food WILL NOT be served.
5. LOCATION/DIRECTIONS
The party is located at the Atrium in San Francisco, 101 California St (on
the corner of California St. and Davis St)
Car:? Take I80 West towards San Francisco; go over the Bay Bridge.? Exit on
Fremont St.? Turn left on Fremont, Fremont becomes Front St.? Turn Right onto
California and Turn right onto Davis St.? Parking is available in the
Embarcadero Garages (located under the Embarcadero Center), entrance is on
Front St.
Bart: Closest stop is Embarcadero St. Station.? One way fare is $2.65 and
don't forget, the last train to leave BART on Friday is at 12:25 am.
Looking forward to seeing everyone tomorrow.? Please feel free to email me
with any questions.
Wendy
=====================================
|
2,717 |
Subject: California Update
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent_items/300.
=====================================
FYI. Latest word is that Assembly, Senate and Administration staff have been locked in a room with orders not to emerge until they've struck a deal on the Edison MOU.
Word on DA is not good. Thus far it appears that the PUC "study" outlined in the letter from Burton & Co. to Lynch is as far as the Senate wants to go at this time, but folks continue to push. Seems to be a possibility that, if the Legislature does reconvene, there may be a push by "green Senators" to pass a "green only" DA bill.
In addition, Lynch is setting the stage to have the PUC reject the rate agreement between DWR and the PUC on Tuesday. This despite the Governor calling to vigorously lobby each of the commissioners. Despite the strong arm tactics, it appears that Brown may be the only aye vote at this point.
The idea is that, if the PUC votes down the rate agreement, the only thing Davis will have left is 18XX.
We'll report back with news as we get it.
Best,
Jeff
-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Govenar [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 12:24 PM
To: Rick Shapiro; Steffes, James D.; Kaufman, Paul; Jeff Dasovich;
Kingerski, Harry; Lawner, Leslie; Susan J Mara; Hedy Govenar; Bev
Hansen; Mike Day
Subject: MOU Update
I spoke to the three primary Senate consultants dealing with energy. As of
9:30 a.m. this morning the Governor has still not officially called for a
Third Extraordinary Session, or, for the Second Extraordinary Session to
reconvene. In fact, Senate staff is continuing to prepare for their annual
golf excursion next Tuesday. In addition, while staff from the Senate and
the Administration have met, the Administration has yet to produce either a
new version of SBX2 78, or, amendments to the existing version of SBX2 78.
Staff reiterated that they believe there is still no chance of passing SBX2
78 in its current form.
=====================================
|
2,718 |
Subject: Re: DRAFT talking points for California PUC Hearings on the
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/7956.
=====================================
2 challenges I see
We do not want the "rate freeze" to end but we do want a interim rate
increase. What about a tenporary tax as a solution. We like taxes in our
contracts - flow through. And it does not require ending rate freeze
I think the front part could be stonger with references to AB1890??
From: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON on 12/26/2000 03:15 PM
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON
To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Dennis
Benevides/HOU/EES@EES, Eric Letke/DUB/EES@EES, George McClellan/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@ENRON, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@ENRON, Jennifer
Rudolph/HOU/EES@EES, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kevin
McGowan/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Lisa Yoho/NA/Enron@ENRON, Lysa Akin/PDX/ECT@ECT,
Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@ENRON, Roger Yang/SFO/EES@EES, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enron@ENRON, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Scott
Stoness/HOU/EES@EES, [email protected], Stuart Staley/LON/ECT@ECT, Susan J
Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES, Wanda Curry/HOU/EES@EES,
[email protected], Robert C Williams/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Mike D
Smith/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: DRAFT talking points for California PUC Hearings on the 27th/28th
Attached is a draft of the talking points for the Commission's hearings. Few
points:
Our time is likely to be limited to 5-10 minutes.
Mike Day, our outside counsel, will make the presentation on our behalf.
Mike Day is fleshing out the legal details of our presentation and he will
forward that along for folks review later today.
Comments can be forwarded to me via email, pager (888.916.7184), voicemail
(415.782.7822), or home (415.621.8317).
We will finalize the message points on tomorrow's daily call (10 AM CST).
The call in number is 800.713.8600. Code is 80435.
The Commission's hearings begin tomorrow at 10 AM (PST).
=====================================
|
2,719 |
Subject: Re: Response
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/5977.
=====================================
I agree.
I think a specific thing we could ask for re QF's re your point 2 below is to
require the CPUC to move the SRAC formula back to a hedgeable basis.
Specifically, get them off of WACOG and back to a border index. That would
allow the least expensive hedges. 5000 MW at SRAC if hedged by the IOUs
would save them alot of money in the near term.
Frank W Vickers
12/29/2000 11:38 AM
To: Dave Parquet
cc:
Subject: Response
Dave, I think that we need to insert some QF based thoughts into the
discussion. See comments to Jeff below.
Frank
---------------------- Forwarded by Frank W Vickers/HOU/ECT on 12/29/2000
11:04 AM ---------------------------
Frank W Vickers
12/29/2000 10:46 AM
To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Terry Donovan
Subject: Response
Jeff, we need to add some discussion focused on QF issues in California and
how resolution to certain items would enhance QF ownership and provide the
utilities with optimal performance of the QF's and perhaps encourage new
capacity development at existing QF locations.
The utilities should be motivated to enter into buyout, buydown, blend and
extend, negotiate fixed energy prices and other restructuring transactions
with the QF's.
The utilites have the ability to hedge the floating price currently being
paid to the QF's. They should be motivated to look into these structures.
Utilities should provide some clarification to the energy prices under QF
PPA's. There is alot of risks around SRAC and PX that affect both the
utilities and the QF owners. It seems like resolution to that risk is
beneficial to both the utility as well as the QF.
QF's should have the ability to move excess capacity and energy into either
the market and/or to the utility. That would create additional economic
incentives for the QF's to run and perhaps increase their capacity.
Frank
=====================================
|
2,720 |
Subject: Confirming What We Already Knew
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/10116.
=====================================
FYI. Go Leslie!
Best,
Jeff
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 03/19/2001 12:54 PM -----
Jeffery Fawcett/ENRON@enronxgate
03/19/2001 10:01 AM
To: Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Shelley Corman/ENRON@enronXgate, Susan
Scott/ENRON@enronXgate, Kevin Hyatt/ENRON@enronxgate, Michelle
Lokay/ENRON@enronXgate, TK Lohman/ENRON@enronxgate, Lorraine
Lindberg/Enron@enronXgate, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Drew
Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Confirming What We Already Knew
Dynegy: Enron a 'Model Competitor'
It doesn't happen very often, so we're noting an apparently spontaneous
comment from Dynegy Counsel Ed Ross at a FERC Roundtable last week that one
of his chief competitors, Enron, "has done an excellent job of being
competitive." He suggested others could look to Enron as a "model competitor.
They've done a very good job of setting up a strong financial desk and a
strong physical desk and we don't see any problem with it. I think they have
set up their books in a way that they truly have separation between the
regulated and unregulated aspects of their business."
Ross had prefaced the remark, midway through a heated debate on affiliate
abuses, with the comment that "this is not an industry-wide problem. I
believe there are good and bad players in the market today."
Earlier, Enron's Leslie Lawner had invited "all of you to spend the day on
Enron's trading floor, because I assure you, you will not see a more
competitive environment anywhere. There is no way these folks, who fight like
cats and dogs among themselves, would voluntarily transfer value to the
pipeline group for the good of the bottom line." Lawner had to quickly back
off the invitation - mentioning confidentiality restrictions - when it
appeared about half the room was ready to troop over to the trading floor.
=====================================
|
2,721 |
Subject: Re: Demand buy-down for Hertzberg
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/4416.
=====================================
Yep.
James D Steffes
04/30/2001 09:05 PM
To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Re: Demand buy-down for Hertzberg
Jeff --
Some thoughts -
1. Your key assumption seems to be that this Summer the energy supply manager
(CDWR buying net short of utility) has enough "power" to sell the negawatts.
I am not so sure. I belive that a more realistic assumption is that in most
hours this Summer, CDWR will be buying energy from the ISO.
2. If my assumption is closer to reality, than CDWR will not be able to sell
"excess" MWs and pay the customer. Even if you are right, CDWR buys at
$80/Mwh (LT contracts delivered today) and sells at $300/Mwh = net benefit to
deliver to customer of $220/Mwh [unless you are saying the $80/Mwh goes to
retail rates and $300/Mwh to customer = which is what I say in #3].
3. I think that we should just call a spade a spade. CDWR should give the
customer for a negawatt $300/Mwh independent of how they manage their
portfolio. The $ should be put into the general expense of power and
collected through CPUC approved rates. Had the customer consumed, that Mwh
would have cost CDWR at least $300/Mwh (and probably more given the increased
load). The state and/or customers still spends the same $. The only
argument that one could have is that the customer who conserves "costs" other
customers $. But these other customers should not feel slighted. Again,
CDWR was already going to pay the generators. Why not pay someone who has a
real business in CA?
4. So let's compute the cost =
2000 MW x 80 hours [5x16] x $350/Mwh = $56MM for a one month, 2,000 MW
on-peak curtailment.
But the other benefit is (a) reliability, (b) less fossil fuel burned =
cleaner environment, (c) sticking it too those damn greedy generators, and
(d) probably lower overall prices and costs because lower demand.
Jim
=====================================
|
2,722 |
Subject: Call for Papers for POWER Research Conference
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: []
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/892.
=====================================
_________________________________________________________________
C A L L F O R P A P E R S
University of California Energy Institute
Sixth Annual POWER Research Conference
on Electricity Industry Restructuring
_________________________________________________________________
The University of California Energy Institute's Program on Workable Energy
Regulation (POWER) invites interested researchers to submit papers for a
one day conference to be held in Berkeley on March 16, 2001. The purpose is
to bring together outstanding researchers from around the world to exchange
ideas and research results on topics related to electricity industry
restructuring.
Topics will include any relevant analytic question associated with
electricity industry restructuring including, but not limited to, the
following subjects:
* Transmission management, pricing, and access
* Operation of wholesale and retail electricity markets
* The interaction of forward and spot electricity markets
* International comparisons of electricity markets
* Market power
* Political economy of restructuring
* Demand responsiveness and real-time pricing
* Conservation, R&D, and low income programs after restructuring
* Future role of regulation in electricity
* Environmental effects of restructuring
Draft papers should be sent by December 1, 2000 to:
POWER Research Conference
University of California Energy Institute
2539 Channing Way
Berkeley, CA 94720-5180
Authors will be notified concerning acceptance for the Conference by
January 2, 2001. Final papers will be due by February 28, 2001.
For inquiries concerning this Call for Papers contact:
Severin Borenstein (510) 642-5145. email: [email protected]
James Bushnell (510) 642-9588. email: [email protected]
For Program Information on past conferences, please visit our website:
http://www.ucei.org/power_conf.html
=====================================
|
2,723 |
Subject: Case 10-3
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/mba__financial_reporting/16.
=====================================
I'm throwing out my thoughts on question 1 for the current case.
1. Evaluate Patten's business strategy.
My first thought centered around the fact that Patten's real expertise is
in real estate development. They have a well thought out strategy of who the
customer is and how to sell effectively to these customers. They have
developed a good business relationship with the large property owners. With
little risk they analyze their ability to subdivide the properties. Once
this is completed and the land purchased, they unleash their marketing
strategy.
The marketing strategy seems to effectively gain sales without
extravegant costs. The sales staff is custom designed to relate personally
to the average customer. Their gross margin for land sales is 54.8%. Even
if you include the selling, general and admin expense their margin is 24%.
The part of their business strategy I struggle with is the finance
business. What do a bunch of land developers know about finance. In my
opinion land financing should be left to the experts. If they established a
preferred financing company, they could negotiate a standard finders fee for
the loans. More importantly they would eliminate the risk in their revenue
streams. When they make a sale the revenue could be immediately booked since
they would not hold the debt, the finance company would. Their current
portfolio of notes receivable is $18.6M. It looks like ignoring expenses
their financing margin is 3%. This only gives $0.56M in revenues. This
number seems pretty small compared to the accounting heartburn it creates.
Obviously this number would be much smaller if they were properly estimating
unrecoverables.
I guess the bottom line is "what is their core competency"? I believe
its land development not land finance.
Anyway give me your thoughts and I'll clean it up in a word document.
Jimmy
=====================================
|
2,724 |
Subject: Re: Still beached
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/1290.
=====================================
Hey, sounds like life in Bay Watch is treating you well. Glad to hear you've
got some classes--8 units? You really are a bit of a Type A+. Week after
next would be best for lunch. Next week is completely nuts. I may miss both
Monday and Tuesday. Happy hour is a great idea. I think it's your turn to
organize. Have a super weekend (I've caught a cold, and haven't cracked a
book since school started, so looks like I'll be buried in books all weekend).
Best,
Jeff
P.S. "Sent by Joseph Alamo" because my computer has completely died, and I'm
using my assistant's computer.
Courtney Abernathy <[email protected]> on 09/08/2000 08:18:01 AM
To: Jeff Dasovich <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: Re: Still beached
Thanks for the invite. I'm still beached. Did a
little shopping yesterday. Cleaned up a photo albumn.
I'm actually beginning to enjoy this. Training
starts next week, and work will start the week after.
Thus all the fun ends. Hey I got into business law,
and Managing in the Internet Age, and Diverity
Management. Went from 0 units to 8. If I can handle
it, I want an early graduation.
I have to drive over to Haas today and pick up my
b-law book so I'm not too buried next week.
It looks like I'll be spending my days in the city for
at least while after next week, perhaps lunch then?
We need to have a happy hour sometime very soon too.
Talk to you soon..Oh-I spotted the chantrelle
mushrooms in the grocery store yesterday and thought
of you mushroom picking.
Courtney
--- Jeff Dasovich <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> Dear Ms Leisure:
>
> If you're still tanning, and still up for lunch, I'm
> game. Besides, I owe you a
> beer. Let me know. Don't work too hard,
>
> Best,
> Jeff
>
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - Free email you can access from anywhere!
http://mail.yahoo.com/
=====================================
|
2,725 |
Subject: RE: Direct Access Application for Rehearing
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', 'Lon W. House; Scott Blaising', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent_items/347.
=====================================
Dan: The chamber of commerce (because it never really plays at the PUC) has decided to sign on to CMTA's letter that it will submit, rather than sign on to the ARM filing. Please remove them from the list of signatories. Thanks.
Best,
Jeff
-----Original Message-----
From: Dasovich, Jeff
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2001 6:03 PM
To: Mara, Susan; '[email protected]'
Subject: RE: Direct Access Application for Rehearing
Dan: Please add California Cast Metals Association to the list of signatories.
Thanks.
Jeff
-----Original Message-----
From: Mara, Susan
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2001 5:09 PM
To: Dasovich, Jeff
Subject: FW: Direct Access Application for Rehearing
Importance: High
Please forward this to those who agreed to sign on
-----Original Message-----
From: Dan Douglass [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2001 3:06 PM
To: ARM; 'Fairchild, Tracy'; Norm Plotkin; Gary Ackerman; Vicki Sandler; Anderson, Robert; Merilyn Ferrara; Herb Zinn; John Yurkanin; Max Bulk; Steve Huhman
Cc: Lon W. House; Scott Blaising
Subject: Direct Access Application for Rehearing
Importance: High
Attached for your review and comment is a third draft of the application for rehearing. The main changes are (1) the addition of several more parties (and will those who arranged for these parties to sign on PLEASE forward a copy of this draft to your contacts so that they get to see it and know how to contact me with any comments or suggestions); and (2) a legislative history section which summarizes the various pertinent bills and resolutions.
Please reply with any comments or suggested changes as soon as possible. Thanks!
Dan
Law Offices of Daniel W. Douglass
5959 Topanga Canyon Blvd. Suite 244
Woodland Hills, CA 91367
Tel: (818) 596-2201
Fax: (818) 346-6502
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
=====================================
|
2,726 |
Subject: RE:
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent_items/109.
=====================================
thanks.
-----Original Message-----
From: Hass, Glen
Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 11:23 AM
To: Dasovich, Jeff
Subject: RE:
I've only known Mark (sorry, wrong name below) since May of this year. His company name is Interstate Gas Services, Inc. at 2500 Kitty Hawk Road, Suite 101, Livermore, CA 94550. I did hear that they moved at some point in time so perhaps that caused a phone number change prior to my introduction to him. gh
-----Original Message-----
From: Dasovich, Jeff
Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 11:15 AM
To: Hass, Glen
Subject: RE:
Thanks. Did he change companies, or just phone numbers?
Best,
Jeff
-----Original Message-----
From: Hass, Glen
Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 11:14 AM
To: Dasovich, Jeff
Subject: RE:
Jeff,
No Problem, Steve's number is 925-243-0350. I also have his fax number and address if you need it.
FYI--He recently agreed to provide operational support for the DWR's gas supply contracts.
Glen
-----Original Message-----
From: Dasovich, Jeff
Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 10:57 AM
To: Hass, Glen
Subject: FW:
Greetings. Steve Harris says that you might have a number for Mark Baldwin. Possible to get it from you. Thanks very much.
Best,
Jeff
-----Original Message-----
From: Harris, Steven
Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 10:54 AM
To: Dasovich, Jeff
Subject: RE:
I have not spoken to him directly in a while. I know Glen Hass in our Omaha office talked to him the other day and could give you that number. Thanks.
-----Original Message-----
From: Dasovich, Jeff
Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 10:40 AM
To: Harris, Steven
Subject:
Greetings. Hope, given the circumstances, that you're well. I'm trying to get a hold of Mark Baldwin, and the number I have gets a recording saying that it ain't the number anymore. Do you have a number for him. Greatly appreciated.
Best,
Jeff
=====================================
|
2,727 |
Subject: FERC meeting today
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/12633.
=====================================
I observed today's Commission meeting at 1PM ESTand will report on the
discussion had on the order adopted by the Commission in the proceeding
Removing Obstacles to Increased Electric Generation and Natural gas Supply in
the Western United States (EL01-47):
The order is intended to increase supply, enhance delivery and promote
conservation in the West. This is a follow up to and an affirmation of
FERC's prior order in this proceeding of March 14.
In the order, FERC desires to complement state and local efforts, especially
with regard to promoting conservation and siting of generation, themes that
FERC recognizes are mainly within the purview of the state and local
authorities.
The order attempts to incentivize the immediate construction/expansion of
transmission facilities via an equity return premium based on a fixed in
service deadline. The order contemplates an ROE of 11.5% plus a premium of
up to 200 basis points calculated on some sort of sliding scale relating to
timing of the project. FERC recognizes that this will have little effect
this summer, but more likely summer 2002.
In this order (and another not discussed directly at the meeting), FERC
extends QF waivers and seeks to facilitate interconnection and transmission
service for QF's, while stressing that FERC is not attempting to abrogate
existing contracts.
Commissioner Massey concurs with the order and stresses his preference for
the FERC to deal with interconnection issues in a comprehensive manner,
rather than on a piecemeal basis.
I have not received a draft order yet, so the above discussion at the meeting
is the only info I have at present. I thought you might find some aspects
interesting. If you have any questions or require additional info, please
advise. I will be able to address those as soon as the FERC makes its draft
order available (next couple of days).
=====================================
|
2,728 |
Subject: Re: Draft Comments on DWR Letter
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/3818.
=====================================
I agree with Pat's suggestions. Thanks very much for the great work, Jeanne,
particularly given the short notice.
Best,
Jeff
"Pat Boylston" <[email protected]>
03/21/2001 02:04 PM
To: [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected]
cc: [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: Draft Comments on DWR Letter
Jeanne,
I think you are saying more and going into more detail than we need to. It
was my understanding from the call that you were not going to get into the
statutory interpretation issues at all.
I think modifying the first sentence of the carryover to the top of page 2
(at least as printed on my machine) is fully sufficient if you just say:
"Moreover, EPMI submits that DWR has presented the Commission with a
reasonable [STRIKEOUT interpretation of the STRIKEOUT] approach for
implementing the applicable statutory language."
I do not understand the benefit of the balance of the paragraph. It opens us
up to getting drug into a interpretation argument we do not need to be in.
Similarly, I do not understand why we would want to say "is consistent with
the statutory language" and similar statements in the following paragraph.
I am not sure I agree fully with those statements or that we need to be
limiting our ability to respond to any further proposals which may come out
by taking a firm position of the statutory foundation for CDWR's approach in
this letter.
Am I missing something? Thanks
>>> JBennett <[email protected]> 03/21 11:26 AM >>>
Attached, per our conference call of earlier this morning, are short and
sweet comments on the March 14, 2001 letter of DWR re CPA implementation.
Please provide any comments/questions to me as soon as possible.
<<X22873.DOC>>
Jeanne Bennett
=====================================
|
2,729 |
Subject: Re: Conference call re Tim's top 5
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/1433.
=====================================
10 AM works for me.
Mary Hain@ECT
09/14/2000 12:41 PM
To: James D Steffes/HOU/EES@EES, [email protected], Susan J
Mara/SFO/EES@EES, Mona Petrochko, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Joe
Hartsoe@Enron, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Dennis Benevides, James E
Keller/HOU/EES@EES, Richard Sanders, Donna Fulton/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Harry
Kingerski/HOU/EES@EES, Sandra McCubbin/SFO/EES@EES
cc: Bernadette Hawkins, Joseph Alamo, [email protected],
[email protected]
Subject: Re: Conference call re Tim's top 5
Jim is available at 10:00 pacific time. Does that work for others? Jim -
Ron suggests having Carl Imparato on the call because of his extensive
knowledge of California markets. What do you think? If you were looking for
an attached list, I haven't prepared it yet.
James D Steffes@EES
09/14/2000 09:42 AM
To: Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Conference call re Tim's top 5
9am Central time is bad for me. I could do it at 8am Central or 12noon
Central. Don't hold off for me.
Jim
Mary Hain@ECT
09/14/2000 11:32 AM
To: [email protected], Susan J Mara/SFO/EES@EES, Mona Petrochko, Sarah
Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Joe Hartsoe@Enron, James D Steffes/HOU/EES@EES,
Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Dennis Benevides, Harry Kingerski/HOU/EES@EES,
Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Donna Fulton/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sandra
McCubbin/SFO/EES@EES
cc: Bernadette Hawkins, Joseph Alamo, [email protected],
[email protected]
Subject: Conference call re Tim's top 5
I'd like to have a conference call tommorrow at 9:00 a.m. to review Tim's
"top 5" priorities to fix the wholesale market in California. I need to do
this tomorrow so Seabron and Ron can write our pleading for the Section 206
proceeding while I'm on vacation next week. Please let me know ASAP if 9:00
is a bad time or if you don't want to be on the call.
=====================================
|
2,730 |
Subject: RE: ISO Compliance Filing on Credit May Need Protest
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/3284.
=====================================
CONFIDENTIAL
Sue,
I talked to Tim Belden briefly about this filing. He thinks it is a bit of a
losing battle but is supportive or a coalition (e.g., WPTF or IEP) protest.
Other comments from him were:
(As you noted) the ISO should require PG&E and SCE to file letters of credit,
rather than state that they did not come forward.
The DWR should not be setting the terms of what it will take to provide
credit; the ISO (and FERC) shoudl be.\
If DWR is given access to nonpublic data and real time trading information.
other creditworthy parties that are net short should also be afforded similar
access.
Hope this helps.
Alan
-----Original Message-----
From: Mara, Susan
Sent: Monday, May 14, 2001 3:00 PM
To: [email protected]; Sanders, Richard; Christian Yoder/HOU/ECT@ECT;
[email protected]; Steffes, James; [email protected]; Dasovich, Jeff; Hall,
Steve C.; Tribolet, Michael; Belden, Tim; Ngo, Tracy; Nicolay, Christi
Cc: Alvarez, Ray; Comnes, Alan
Subject: ISO Compliance Filing on Credit May Need Protest
On May 11, the CA ISO made a "compliance filing" for the April 6 order on
credit worthiness in the real-time market. Whereas the FERC order REQUIRED
the ISO to get creditworthy parties -- the ISO portrayed it as an obligation
of the buying party. Therefore, the ISO's letter says that the ONLY party to
come forward to provide credit support was DWR -- and because of DWR's
"fiduciary obligation to conserve the finite resources that have been placed
at its disposal", DWR REQUIRED access to the ISO's control room floor and
non-public data. This is outrageous and just shows that the ISO has, in
effect, become a state-run, vertically-integrated utility. Question -- do we
want to protest this? Or sit by and see what the generators do? If we want to
comment, it would be due June 1.
Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854
=====================================
|
2,731 |
Subject: PRand Legislative News
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/2778.
=====================================
Mirant and Duke Pull In
Mirant and Duke are trying to shut down Gary Ackerman of the WPTF. This
appears to be coming directly from Gov Davis. Mirant admitted that Gov Davis
had pressured them to shut down Gary (presumably as part of Mirant's recently
completed negotiations over a long-term power sale). Mirant said it may be
leaving WPTF if it doesn't get its way. Reliant was also talking general
caution. So far, the majority of WPTF members are holding firm. Gary will
continue his outreach with media but curb the use of any inflammatory
language.
Reliant's FallOut From Advertising
Reliant has run a bit of image advertising in CA in a few newspapers. They
were contacted by an organization that supposedly represents black-owned
newspapers. The organization will begin running a campaign against Reliant
saying the company is racist and should be boycotted.
Direct Access and the Dems (through Alliance for Retail Markets contacts)
The Governor's office has said that "you'll get direct access, but you won't
like it" and mentioned requiring DA customers to pick up $3.5 billion in
"overcharges" -- "You people wanted deregulation and are responsible for
the way it turned out, so now you have to pay for it." Sen. Burton(Majority
Leader) said that its "too soon" for direct access. And Sen. Bowen's (chair
Senate Energy Com) energy advisor said "There will never be an unfettered
right to direct access, so don't keep pushing for it." AReM will step up
efforts to educate the Dems and attempt to get a powerful Dem to champion the
cause. Also, three separate rumor sources said that Loretta Lynch is moving
ahead on her own, without Davis' approval, and that the Governor's office is
in a tizzy about it -- even thinking of politically-correct ways to get her
out of there -- judgeships anyone?
Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854
=====================================
|
2,732 |
Subject: Change to SoCalGas Capacity Policy
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/27817.
=====================================
-----Original Message-----
From: Lohman, TK
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2001 4:02 PM
To: Watson, Kimberly; Lindberg, Lorraine; Lokay, Michelle; Fawcett, Jeffery
Subject: FW: SoCalGas Capacity Policy
Please find attached a letter from Lad and Pat of Socal. TW was requested by
Socal to reallocate the Needles "window" on intraday 1 cycle last Friday.
Socal lowered the "window" below TW's firm requirements. This has not been
the policy previously followed by the two companies. Once the Socal "window"
was established on the timely cycle, the window would not change for that gas
day. I did not want to cut TW's FT shippers late on Friday. I wanted time
to alert them that this policy was changing and they could not rely on
getting the same allocation of gas at Needles during each daily cycle.
Lynn and I talked with Pat Davidson and TW has agreed to accomodate any
changes (increases or decreases) to the "window" during a particular gas day
except for the intraday 2 cycle. Lynn and I told Pat that changing the
allocation during intraday 2 cycle would create imbalances on TW's system,
and TW was not allowed to have shipper imbalances per its tariff.
Lynn has prepared an EBB posting alerting our shippers of this change. It
will be posted today and the policy will go into affect for Friday's gas day.
Any questions, please call Mrs. Blair!
-----Original Message-----
From: "Davidson, Patricia - TPPSD" <[email protected]>@ENRON
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Davidson+2C+20Patricia+20-+20TPPSD+22+20+3CPDavidson+40s
[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2001 11:35 AM
To: 'Blair, Lynn'; 'TK Lohman'; 'TK Lohman'
Subject: SoCalGas Capacity Policy
The attached letter was faxed to Shelly Corman this morning.
<<TWCap0613.doc>>
Pat Davidson
Gas Scheduling Manager
Southern California Gas Company
[email protected]
- TWCap0613.doc
=====================================
|
2,733 |
Subject: Governors update
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/4639.
=====================================
Jeff--forgot to put you on this email.
----- Forwarded by Susan M Landwehr/NA/Enron on 03/30/2001 11:33 AM -----
Susan M Landwehr
03/30/2001 11:32 AM
To: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Janel Guerrero/Corp/Enron@Enron, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Linda Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Steven J
Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, John Neslage/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Paul
Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc: Ginger Dernehl/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Governors update
Last night Ken Lay and I attended an RGA(Republican Governors Association)
business forum/reception at the Governor's mansion in Denver Colorado.
Governor attendees were Tom Ridge (PA), John Rowland (CT), Bill Owens (CO)
and Jim Geringer (WY). Another notable attendee was Corbin McNeill, CEO of
Exelon. It turned out that just about the entire discussion centered around
energy and they strongly stated that the RGA is going to be very active in
the western energy issues.
Strategically this is good for us. Although the WGA was the vehicle for the
past 2 months (Kempthorne and Geringer are the chair/vice chair), it is now
clear that the leadership of the RGA (Ridge, Rowland) will be helping the
"steer the ship". Although not talked about publically, I had a conversation
with one of the governor's staffers (Scott Celley from Hull's office), and he
is likely going to be the RGA policy guy on this effort, having direct and
daily contact with the Cheney energy team. Paul and I have developed a
relationship with him and he is going to be looking to us for further
support/info/talking points etc.
Lastly, it is important to note that Corbin McNeill was singing exactly the
same song as us on the price caps and western issues. Additionally, Mr.
Lay asked him point blank--twice in fact--if he was for full and open non
discriminatory access to the transmission system and he stated that he was.
=====================================
|
2,734 |
Subject: Questions for PG&E Witness's
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/5998.
=====================================
Roger: Please clean up this line of questioning that shows that PG&E is
fishing for a windfall. And that their liquidity problem is contrived or at
least overstated.
Q. How many MW of generation do you have related to Nuclear?
[Expect answer] About 4000MW
Q. What value have you put on these assets?
[Expect much waffling and an answer close to $0]
Q. Would you accept, subject to check, that 12 month forward contracts for
CA are trading at $180/MWh?
A [Expect much wafffling but a high number]
Q. What is the vaiable (non capital related costs) of nuclear units in the
next year?
A [Expect $20/MWh]
Q. Is it true that:
$150/MWH minus $20/MWh = $130/MWh
Q. And that
4,000 MW at 80% availability factor and 8760 hours per year = 28,000,000 MWh
Q. And that
28,000,000 MWh times $130 = 3.6b dolllars
Q. And would you accept subject to check that PG&E would get to keep $1.8b
of this amount given its past settlements?
A Yes
Q. And could you confirm, subject to check
Your total generation 10,000MW times 60% avail factor times $100/MWh gap
would result in an increase in value of your existing assets by $8.8 b in
2001 alone?
Q. And would you expect there to be more value in 2002?
A Expect lots of weaseling and yes
Q. And can you confirm your current estimated shortfall is $6b.
Q. How much did you value your hydro assets at this summer in your previous
filing?
A. Expect 2.8 b
Q. So the increase in value in assets in 2001 alone plus the original value
of hydro is almost double what your current shortfall is even without
counting on value from 2002 and beyond?
Q. Does it strike you that you don't have a debt problem but lack of
communication to investor problem?
A . Sure we remove our request and concede everything :) :) :) :) :) :)
Q. Would you be willing to turn over your existing generation assets to the
government for $20b today?
=====================================
|
2,735 |
Subject: RE: Domaine
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/3945.
=====================================
That's so weird. Prentice left her car door ajar (when she went to go to
school yesterday morning, it was dead and she had to get a jump).
I was surprised that the phone was only 300 pesos. I thought they'd charge
by the minute, but apparently, it's a flat 10 pesos for local (i.e., 800
calls), no matter how long one's one.
Nancy Sellers <[email protected]>
04/03/2001 04:00 PM
To: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: RE: Domaine
I left the car light on - battery totally dead! Freezing cold in SF - no
coats - landed at 9 pm - home at 12:30 am. ugh!!! 300 pesos is just the El
Cid part of the bill - I think the rest will be on your card. Eldon
actually got them to adjust some of that off as well cuz he said your
connection kept going off. I say "If only life always gave us credits when
our connections went off!"
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2001 1:50 PM
To: Nancy Sellers
Subject: RE: Domaine
we got back ok. (i didn't know tulsa had such a neat airport.)
Nancy Sellers
<Nancy.Sellers@RobertMo To:
"'[email protected]'"
ndavi.com> <[email protected]>
cc:
04/03/2001 03:50 PM Subject: RE: Domaine
you don't want to know
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2001 1:47 PM
To: Nancy Sellers
Subject: RE: Domaine
The entire phone bill is 300 pesos??? Yes, please fax to me. And please
email me rest of expenses when you get a chance so I can write you a check
for everything (plane,phone, golf, etc., etc.)
You guys get back OK?
=====================================
|
2,736 |
Subject: RE: Group Project--E221
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/10210.
=====================================
Professor Tasker:
I have the distinct (and sinking) feeling that you may not be getting emails
that I've sent to you, since over the last 3 weeks I've sent a few and
haven't heard back. Is the haas account the correct address?
Best,
Jeff
"Vavrek, Carolyn (US - San Francisco)" <[email protected]>
03/20/2001 06:13 PM
To: [email protected]
cc: Anil Sama <[email protected]>, Mark Guinney
<[email protected]>, [email protected]
Subject: RE: Group Project--E221
I did not see our names on your list. Please see Jeff's e-mail sent to you
last Friday. Sorry for any confusion.
Thanks,
Carolyn
Carolyn M. Vavrek
Manager - Human Capital Advisory Services
Deloitte & Touche
50 Fremont Street
San Francisco, CA 94105
phone: 415-783-5137
fax: 415-783-8760
e-mail: [email protected]
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, March 16, 2001 11:03 AM
To: [email protected]
Cc: Anil Sama; Mark Guinney; Cvavrek
Subject: Group Project--E221
Greetings Professor:
Our group consists of Jeff Dasovich, Mark Guinney, Anil Sama and Carolyn
Vavrek.
We propose to examine the recently failed acquisition by Coke of Quaker
Oats: Why merge? What was the value? Upside? Downside? Why did it go
bust? Should it have gone through? What's up with this Buffet guy,
anyway?
If you have any concerns with this proposal, please let us know.
Finally, if possible, we'd like to present on Thursday, April 26th.
Best,
Jeff
This message (including any attachments) contains confidential information
intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is protected by law. If
you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this message and are
hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this
message, or the taking of any action based on it, is strictly prohibited.
=====================================
|
2,737 |
Subject: MEETING VERIFICATION re: Discussion of Rod Wright Meeting in LA
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', 'Cristina Zavala/SF/ECT@ECT', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/3036.
=====================================
Harry:
Seems like a good idea for you to participate to ensure that EES is in the
loop. Assemblyman Rod Wright's trying to find a solution that the whole
industry can embrace, which he'd then foist on the Governor. Sandi, Parquet
and Day attended the first meeting last week. I'll forward to you Parquet's
notes from the meeting. We'll be setting up a call in number first thing
Monday morning.
Best,
Jeff
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 11/04/2000 05:20 PM -----
Joseph Alamo
11/03/2000 07:11 PM
To: Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@Enron, Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Mona L
Petrochko/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, David
Parquet/SF/ECT@ECT, MBD <[email protected]> @ ENRON
cc: Cristina Zavala/SF/ECT@ECT, [email protected]
Subject: MEETING VERIFICATION re: Discussion of Rod Wright Meeting in LA
Please be advised that the meeting referenced on the attached is now
scheduled as follows:
Date Monday, Nov. 6
Time 12:30 PM PST
Location: Enron Office - 101 California - Suite 1950
SMALL Conference Room
Thanks in advance for your participation.
Joseph
---------------------- Forwarded by Joseph Alamo/NA/Enron on 11/03/2000 05:04
PM ---------------------------
Joseph Alamo
11/03/2000 10:06 AM
To: Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@Enron, Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Mona L
Petrochko/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, David
Parquet/SF/ECT@ECT, MBD <[email protected]> @ ENRON
cc: Cristina Zavala/SF/ECT@ECT, [email protected]
Subject: MEETING REQUEST: Information & Update RE: Rod Wright Meeting in Los
Angeles
Please be advised that Sandi would like to call a meeting Monday, November 6
to discuss
the above-referenced topic.
Please advise me ASAP your availability for said meeting.
Thanks in advance for your assistance.
Joseph Alamo
Sr. Administrative Assistant
Government Affairs - The Americas
San Francisco CA
=====================================
|
2,738 |
Subject: Reminder: CSFB Hosting Lunch/Conference Call with Chief UK Power
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: []
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/28199.
=====================================
Good Morning,
As a reminder, CSFB will be hosting a lunch with Callum McCarthy-Chief
Executive of the UK Office of Gas and Electricity Markets (OFGEM).
In his position, McCarthy serves as the chief power and gas regulatory in
the UK.
Day: Friday, June 29
Time: 12 pm
Place: CSFB NY Offices, 27th floor, 11 Madison Avenue
You can also listen in via conference call:
Domestic listeners dial-in: 800 683-1575
International: 973 321-2004
The presentation will most likely begin at about 12.15.
Digital replay available: domestic - 888 264-3165; international: 402
220-0140 - pin code for both: 7352
The call will be operator assisted; listeners will be muted; open for Q&A.
Please let us know if you would like to attend.
Regards,
Neil Stein 212/325-4217
This message is for the named person's use only. It may contain
confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information. No
confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission.
If you receive this message in error, please immediately delete it and all
copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies of it and notify the
sender. You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute,
print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended
recipient. CREDIT SUISSE GROUP and each of its subsidiaries each reserve
the right to monitor all e-mail communications through its networks. Any
views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except
where the message states otherwise and the sender is authorised to state
them to be the views of any such entity.
Unless otherwise stated, any pricing information given in this message is
indicative only, is subject to change and does not constitute an offer to
deal at any price quoted.
Any reference to the terms of executed transactions should be treated as
preliminary only and subject to our formal written confirmation.
=====================================
|
2,739 |
Subject: Enron EHS Contact on California Environmental Issues
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/4872.
=====================================
F.Y.I.
----- Forwarded by Maureen McVicker/NA/Enron on 03/19/2001 02:47 PM -----
Jeffrey Keeler
03/16/2001 10:50 AM
To: Maureen McVicker/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Enron EHS Contact on California Environmental Issues
Maureen -- Please forward to the Enron public affairs group. Thanks!
_____________________________________
To: Enron Public Affairs
From: Michael F. Terraso, Vice President, Environment, Health and Safety &
Chief Environmental Officer
Jeff Keeler, Director, Environmental Strategies
Environmental regulations and policies have and will continue to play a
significant role in the current California "energy crisis" situation. It is
a high priority of the Enron Environment, Health and Safety (EHS)
organization to ensure that environmental issues are given serious
consideration as part of Enron's efforts to capitalize on opportunities and
manage risks related to the California crisis.
To that end, we have asked Mary Schoen, Manager, Environmental Strategies, to
serve as the EHS organization's key contact for commercial, government
affairs, EHS and public affairs personnel on environmental issues related to
the California crisis situation. As the primary interface with these
groups, Mary will coordinate the numerous resources of the entire EHS
department in support of Enron's activities, including:
Providing timely intelligence and analysis about environmental policy
developments that affect Enron markets;
Reviewing legislation/regulation, coordinating environmental policy advocacy
strategies and providing input into overall Enron advocacy efforts;
Providing assistance on environmental permitting, due diligence, and other
technical services.
Mary's contact information:
San Francisco Office: 415-782-7803 phone
415-782-7845 fax
Houston Office: 713-345-7402 phone
713-646-8160 fax
Cell Phone: 713-907-4582
=====================================
|
2,740 |
Subject: Fw: ISO Requirements for Generating Unit Direct Telemetry
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/2263.
=====================================
FYI.
----- Original Message -----
From: Dozier, Mike <[email protected]>
To: IEPA <[email protected]>
Cc: Riley, Ed <[email protected]>; Kindel, Barbara <[email protected]>;
Malugani, Carol <[email protected]>; Timson, David <[email protected]>;
Jaschke, Allen <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2000 5:33 PM
Subject: ISO Requirements for Generating Unit Direct Telemetry
> Independent Energy Producers Association (IEP) Representatives:
>
> The attached letter requests your assistance in providing information to
IEP
> members regarding the ISO's recently-adopted requirements for direct
> telemetry from Generating Units that are providing -- or intend to provide
> -- Ancillary Services (other than Regulation) to the ISO. Those
> requirements provide that such Generating Units utilize the Data
Processing
> Gateway (DPG) technology for direct telemetry effective as of June 1,
2001.
> We are particularly interested in ensuring that owners of Generating Units
> that may currently be operating under the terms of existing power purchase
> agreements be aware of the ISO requirements in advance of termination of
> those agreements so that they may plan and budget for the installation of
> the DPG technology in a timely manner.
>
> If time permits, we would also request that you inform IEP members of the
> ISO's December 7 stakeholder meeting to discuss DPG requirements, among
> other matters.
>
> Your assistance in disseminating the information contained in the attached
> letter is greatly appreciated. A hard copy of the attached letter will be
> provided by FedEx. Please feel free to contact me or one of the ISO
> employees identified in the attached letter if you have any questions.
> Thank you.
>
> Mike Dozier
> ISO Manager of Contracts
> (916) 608-5708
>
> > <<Smutny-Jones IEP.GCP DPG QF Letter 001130.doc>>
> >
>
- Smutny-Jones IEP.GCP DPG QF Letter 001130.doc
=====================================
|
2,741 |
Subject: Essential Ammunition for the Upwardly Mobile Evening Student.
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/inbox/469.
=====================================
Hard-Working Evening MBAs
-----
Disclaimer
My apologies about the bulk email. This message is directed to those interested
in upgrading or adding to their suit collection. If you're not interested, please delete now.
This will be the only email sent to the Evmba_social alias.
-----
With an MBA can come added responsiblity. And for better or worse,
with added responsibility can come the need to look your best.
Which is what brings me to you today.
Kenny Keswani has been serving as custom tailor to MBAs for over 20 years.
His business model -- landing young promising MBAs with his inexpensive
prices, and keeping them with his quality. A happy customer is a retained
customer, and that's what Kenny's banking on. Having been a paying
customer before becoming his campus rep, I can attest for the quality.
I plan on staying a customer long after my days as rep are over.
Here's how it works. Kenny will be in residence in the Oakland Airport
Hilton this Friday, and the Hotel Durant Saturday through Monday.
(He will also be in SF Tuesday -Wednesday, and San Jose Thursday-Friday.)
He guides those interested in a fitting through the fabric selection process,
then, once you're settled, measures you every which way.
The result is a custom-made suit (or shirt, or tuxedo) delivered
to your doorstep in 6 to 8 weeks.
Prices are very reasonable given the quality.
Shirts range from $58-$75
Suits from $495-$695
and
Tuxedos from $595-$795
Prices are comparable to off-the-rack, but obviously the fit is custom-made.
I apologize for the short notice, but hope that some students will be interested
in making an appointment.
Best,
Jon
------------------------------------------------------------
Jon J Metzler
MBA/MA-Asian Studies Candidate, Dec. 2001
Haas School of Business
University of California, Berkeley
mailto:[email protected]
http://students.haas.berkeley.edu/metzler
=====================================
|
2,742 |
Subject: Re:
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/582.
=====================================
I am so sorry for the delay! I wanted to make sure I had a better idea of my
schedule. I am thinking the following..either the weekend of the 8th, 9th; the
29th or 30th. I may go to Chicago the 15th or 22nd which I'll know about
within
the next couple of days thus one more weekend may open up. What are your
thoughts? Do you want to check Lari's schedule? Anyone else we should ask?
We missed you on Sunday. The whole gang was there minus Lisa. Carl leaves in 2
weeks. They decided to move because he felt his career with the City would
never go where he wanted it to go. I can explain the rest later.
Madeleine
[email protected] wrote:
> Hello out there. Hello?
>
> Madeleine Todd <[email protected]> on 06/05/2000 11:01:26 PM
>
> To: Jeff Dasovich <[email protected]>
> cc:
> Subject: Re:
>
> Jeff:
> Well June appears to be shot already! I had to move a couple of things into
> the
> weekend of the 23 & 24th. Did you have your heart set on June? Could you do
> something in July? What days were you thinking Fri, Sat and Sunday? Keep me
> posted.
>
> Carl's sudden move is a mystery to me. I thought he was going to wait a few
> years
> to move to SD but then I got Kari's e-mail. I know he and Carol have had
> their eye
> on SD for sometime. I guess we'll find out on the 11th!
> Keep me posted on RRR,
> Madeleine
>
> Jeff Dasovich wrote:
>
> > Hi Darlin':
> > I'm back. Have we picked a weekend to ride with Lari? What's this about
> Carl
> > moving?????? I thought he just bought a house?
> >
> > Signed,
> > Confused
>
> --
>
> Madeleine Todd Executive Recruiting
> 1329 Taylor Street, Suite 114
> San Francisco, CA 94108-1047
> phone: 415-441-7010
> fax: 415-441-7173
> email: [email protected]
--
Madeleine Todd Executive Recruiting
1329 Taylor Street, Suite 114
San Francisco, CA 94108-1047
phone: 415-441-7010
fax: 415-441-7173
email: [email protected]
=====================================
|
2,743 |
Subject: Re: FW: Mexico OnLine
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/1828.
=====================================
Cool. This is in Baja? Can we get pictures?
Cameron Sellers <[email protected]>
09/27/2000 03:26 PM
To: "'Prentice (Berkeley)'" <[email protected]>
cc: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>
Subject: FW: Mexico OnLine
Cameron Sellers
Vice President, Business Development
PERFECT.COM
1860 Embarcadero Road - Suite 210
Palo Alto, CA 94303
[email protected]
650.798.3366 (direct dial)
650.269.3366 (cell)
650.858.1095 (fax)
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2000 1:10 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Mexico OnLine
Dear Cameron
The dates you requested are open.
As you have recognized from our website, we have a lush, lovely, peaceful
garden oasis in an authentic historical pueblo that is also gaining interest
as home to many artists and others interested in living in a most unique
environment. Our aim is to provide a memorable experience with modern
facilities that also reflect the beauty and comfort of Mexican rustic
design. Our casitas have kitchens, baths and covered patios that afford
privacy and a renewing atmosphere. Great care has been taken to provide
service and comfort.
Our prime season is approaching so it is well advised to book early. We have
a number of inquiries for the dates you requested.
The rates as described are $80 USD per night for the casita .which is
separate and very private. The weekly rate is $450 USD. To hold a
reservation we require a 50% deposit when you have your exact dates. Let us
know what they are and I will mail instructions.
If this is your first time to this area or if there are any questions you
might have, please fell free to write. and I will do my best to answer. Our
community site for up to date events is www.todossantos.cc
Mil gracias for your inquiry. Linda Macfarlane for Las Palmas Casitas
=====================================
|
2,744 |
Subject: RE: Western Wholesale Activities - Gas & Power Conf. Call
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/11664.
=====================================
Attached are:
1. Draft comments to CAISO re: CAISO's Draft Proposal to give temporary
waivers to long startup time units. Comments are due to CAISO this Friday.
2. CAISO's draft waiver proposal (for reference)
3. Outline of comments to FERC re: CAISO's implemtation filing of July 10.
Hopefully these comments will be filed with a group of marketers and is due
August 9
4. CAISO's July 10 filing (for reference)
-----Original Message-----
From: Alvarez, Ray
[mailto:IMCEAEX-_O=ENRON_OU=NA_CN=RECIPIENTS_CN=NOTESADDR_CN=EBE4476B-2D94882A
[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2001 1:43 PM
To: Walton, Steve; Mara, Susan; Comnes, Alan; Lawner, Leslie; Cantrell,
Rebecca W.; Fulton, Donna; Dasovich, Jeff; Nicolay, Christi; Steffes, James
D.; [email protected]; Allen, Phillip K.; Noske, Linda J.; Perrino,
Dave; Black, Don; Frank, Robert; Miller, Stephanie; Tycholiz, Barry; Novosel,
Sarah; Thome, Jennifer
Subject: Re: Western Wholesale Activities - Gas & Power Conf. Call Privileged
& Confidential Communication Attorney-Client Communication and Attorney Work
Product Privileges Asserted
PLEASE MARK YOUR CALENDAR
Date: Every Thursday
Time: 7:30 am Pacific, 9:30 am Central, and 10:30 am Eastern time
Number: 1-888-271-0949
Host Code: 661877 (for Ray only)
Participant Code: 936022 (for everyone else)
The table of the on-going FERC issues and proceedings is available to all
team members on the O drive. Please feel free to revise/add to/ update this
table as appropriate.
Proposed agenda for tomorrow:
Refund order discussed at today's Commission meeting; CA refund issues; PacNW
refund issues
NOPR on information and filing requirements discussed at today's Commission
meeting
Answer to motions of CA parties
ISO tariff filing response
Upcoming meeting in Portland
Please feel free to communicate any additional agenda items to the group.
=====================================
|
2,745 |
Subject: RE: Energy Summit II
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/11041.
=====================================
Not sure if anyone is interested, but please call Jeff Dasovich for more info.
Jim
---------------------- Forwarded by James D Steffes/NA/Enron on 04/12/2001
09:17 PM ---------------------------
From: Jeff Dasovich on 04/11/2001 06:09 PM
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
To: [email protected], Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J
Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: RE: Energy Summit II
This seems principally to be a "help Davis now" sort of exercise, but perhaps
there's a business opportunity in it for EES. Thoughts?
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 04/11/2001 06:02 PM -----
"Carl Guardino" <[email protected]>
04/12/2001 01:15 AM
Please respond to cguardino
To: <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: RE: Energy Summit II
Dear Silicon Valley Leader:
Please plan to join the Silicon Valley Manufacturing Group, San Jose Mayor
Ron Gonzales, Santa Clara County Supervisor Jim Beall and other key
community leaders for a "Santa Clara County Energy Summit II."
The goal of the Summit is simple - and critical: What IMMEDIATE steps can
each of us individually and collectively take to get California through the
summer months, to minimize rolling blackouts. With that in mind, we will
focus on QUANTIFIABLE deliverables relative to conservation, load management
during peak periods, generation and state policies.
Special thanks to SVMG Member Company, Synopsys, for offering to host the
Summit, which will take place On Friday, May 4, from 8 a.m. (sharp) until 12
Noon at their Sunnyvale company site, 455 North Mary Avenue, Building 2.
Invitations and registration materials to follow. If you have any
questions, or require additional information, please call the SVMG offices
at 408/501-7864, or simply respond to this e-mail.
- winmail.dat
=====================================
|
2,746 |
Subject: Consumer Group Press Conference
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/1994.
=====================================
The Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights (FTCR), a non-profit public
interest consumer organization headed by Harvey Rosenfield, held a press
conference today in the Capitol to unveil a proposed initiative for the
March 2002 ballot to re-regulate the electricity market. FTCR's key points
of reform:
-- Requires refunds to San Diego customers (and customers of other regions
that may subsequently experience deregulation) of excessive electricity
charges through a windfall profits tax on profiteering power generators;
-- Requires oversight of electricity rates by the Public Utilities
Commission (PUC);
-- Institutes an integrated resource planning process to address future
energy needs;
-- Creates a state power authority to ensure the fulfillment California's
energy needs, promote conservation, and construct and operate power plants,
transmission and distribution facilities;
-- Facilitates the authority of local and state government to exercise the
power of eminent domain if necessary; and
-- Creates strong accountability mechanisms for state agencies.
The press conference was well attended by the media, print and TV, although
there were few insightful questions. In Rosenfield comments, he blamed all
the stakeholders equally on the current problems, including the thieving,
greedy generators; utilities; and California and federal policy makers. His
main point was that this problem can't be fixed until the system is entirely
re-regulated.
Jan made himself available to talk to reporters outside the press conference
and provided a different view of the current market situation and how it
should be fixed. His comments were also well covered by the attending
media.
FTCR handouts can be found at the following web link:
http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/utilities/pr/pr000842.php3.
Julee Malinowski-Ball
Senior Associate
Edson+Modisette
916-552-7070
Fax- 552-7075
[email protected]
=====================================
|
2,747 |
Subject: Re: Dunn Subpoena
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/12158.
=====================================
YES
From: Jeff Dasovich on 07/06/2001 11:09 AM
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
To: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, [email protected]
cc:
Subject: Re: Dunn Subpoena
you mean communicate the fact that mark views me as wholly expendable? i'm
hurt, mark.
best,
jeff
Richard Shapiro
07/05/2001 03:32 PM
To: Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Dunn Subpoena
Please communicate or distribute as you see fit. Thanks.
---------------------- Forwarded by Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron on 07/05/2001
03:32 PM ---------------------------
From: Mark Palmer on 07/05/2001 02:28 PM
To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Dunn Subpoena
Fighting the kangaroo court actually got us some points with the media. If
we can continue without getting anyone (other than Dasovich) thrown in jail,
let's fight.
Mark
----- Forwarded by Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron on 07/05/2001 02:27 PM -----
Robert C Williams/ENRON@enronXgate
07/05/2001 02:20 PM
To: Mark E Haedicke/Enron@EnronXGate
cc: Richard B Sanders/Enron@enronXgate, Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, James
Derrick/ENRON@enronXgate
Subject: Dunn Subpoena
The Dunn Committee will be taking up the contempt citations again on Tuesday,
July 10. We are currently contemplating two actions. First, we intend to
offer to produce some documents, most notably the ISO bid data sought (which
the Committee already has anyway). Secondly, as we do not expect this
voluntary partial production to placate the Committee, we are preparing an
action to file in federal court in Sacramento on Monday challenging the
subpoena to the extent it seeks to require the production of documents other
than those we offered to produce. Robin Gibbs and Mike Kirby are on board
with this. Please let me know if would like any additional information about
these matters. Thank you.
=====================================
|
2,748 |
Subject: Re: final white paper
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/10419.
=====================================
Hi Jeff. I'm here in Orlando with the family (going to Disney World
tomorrow!!!) and am panicked about not getting all of my work and obligations
taken care of...must be like every day for you! There is nothing out of the
ordinary in this document--just wanted you to be in the know on what I'm
saying out there.
----- Forwarded by Susan M Landwehr/NA/Enron on 03/25/2001 07:25 PM -----
Susan M Landwehr
03/25/2001 07:19 PM
To: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Janel
Guerrero/Corp/Enron@Enron, Linda Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON,
[email protected], John Neslage/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Tom
Briggs/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Elizabeth Linnell/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Re: final white paper
All--FYI--here is a copy of the issues/talking points that we used with Gov
Hull's office on Thursday.
----- Forwarded by Susan M Landwehr/NA/Enron on 03/25/2001 07:15 PM -----
"ADAM KRISTENSEN" <[email protected]>
03/22/2001 07:55 AM
To: [email protected]
cc:
Subject: Re: final white paper
Here you go. Good luck.
Adam
On 21 Mar 01, at 19:41, [email protected] wrote:
> Adam--I need an electronic copy of the final white paper that we are
> using tomorrow in Arizona please. All I have in e mail is one of the
> drafts. Thanks.
>
The following section of this message contains a file attachment
prepared for transmission using the Internet MIME message format.
If you are using Pegasus Mail, or any another MIME-compliant system,
you should be able to save it or view it from within your mailer.
If you cannot, please ask your system administrator for assistance.
---- File information -----------
File: Solutions for Western States - 032101.doc
Date: 21 Mar 2001, 16:52
Size: 26112 bytes.
Type: Unknown
- Solutions for Western States - 032101.doc
=====================================
|
2,749 |
Subject: Introducing Amazon.com Outlet
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/5932.
=====================================
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
Dear Amazon Customer,
Don't you love the feeling of getting in on a great
deal? Welcome to Amazon.com Outlet,
where we've conveniently gathered the biggest bargains
throughout the Amazon.com universe. (And yes--they're
going fast!)
How do blowouts of up to 50% off toys and electronics
and up to 60% off kitchen essentials sound? (Don't answer
yet--there's more!) How about books for less than 5 bucks, CDs for
less than $7, and a slew of videos for under $10?
[IMAGE]At Outlet, we're
stocking the shelves with the best deals available
throughout the store. But many are limited to
quantities on hand, so be sure to check early and
often--everything's priced to move!
Happy bargain-hunting,
David Risher
Senior Vice President (As Not Seen on TV)
Amazon.com
PS: Be sure to check out our Amazing Deals for
bargains on seasonal selections such as greeting
cards, decorations, and holiday music. With savings this
good, why not stock up for next year right now?
?
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
We hope you enjoyed receiving this message. However, if you'd
rather not receive future e-mails of this sort from
Amazon.com, please visit your Amazon.com account page
and under the Your Account Settings heading, click the
"Update your communication preferences" link.
Please note that this message was sent to the following e-mail address:
[email protected]
=====================================
|
2,750 |
Subject: Final Report
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent_items/843.
=====================================
FYI. Not for dissemination outside this distribution. Documents delivered to Hertzberg to follow.
Best,
Jeff
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 07/02/2001 10:05 PM -----
Phil Isenberg <[email protected]> 07/02/2001 03:26 PM To: cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>, [email protected] Subject: Final Report
Gang:
The final letter and document will be given to the Speaker shortly. As you
may know, TURN ultimately decided not to participate. Also, late last week
the Utility Workers had an elected change of leadership and there was not
enough time to bring the new officers up to speed by our deadline.
The Speaker plans on using our product to simultaneously encourage the PUC
not to close the door on direct access and, if necessary, convince the
Legislature to pass this year a meaningful direct access program (if the PUC
goes south on us). Also, I believe he hopes that our work will help
convince the Legislature to move to restore SCE to financial stability - and
to do so rapidly.
This last month has been very interesting to me - "oddly satisfying" is how
I described it, even if most of you did object to the phrasing - and I
appreciate the opportunity of working with you. For whatever reasons, there
is nothing like an intractable social and political problems to get me
interested. Thanks very much for participating.
Phil
=====================================
|
2,751 |
Subject: FW: Google wants adwords coordinator
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent_items/389.
=====================================
-----Original Message-----
From: Chuck Jerian [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 1:18 PM
To: [email protected]; ftjobs
Subject: Google wants adwords coordinator
Mention me as the referer Chuck Jerian so I can enter some contest for refering people.
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
<http://www.google.com/jobs/openings2.html#adsales>
Here's a chance to make your dreams a reality !! All you have to do is refer a candidate you think would be an excellent match for our new Job of the Month :
ADWORDS COORDINATOR .
If your referral is hired, you will be entered twice to win a trip to Hawaii as well as enjoy time at the Tonga Room in San Francisco. **
ADWORDS COORDINATOR
Google, the award-winning search engine, is rapidly growing in popularity around the world. We have an immediate need for someone who can help us manage our advertising accounts. The successful candidate will be responsible for partnering with the sales staff and advertising clients in order to facilitate the sales process and streamline information throughout the company. We need someone who can provide the optimal client service experience. This person should be extremely proactive, organized, responsible, should work well within a group and will be the primary customer service representative for AdWords.
Responsibilities include:
Approve new AdWords ads submissions
Provide an answer to customer service emails
Consistently monitor emails, customer feedback and satisfaction
Troubleshoot existing advertising campaigns and technical problems
Requirements:
1-2 years related experience in an Internet company
Fluent foreign language speaker (German, Japanese, Korean, Chinese, or French preferred)
Advertising operations experience preferred
BA/BS
Detail oriented, excellent written communication skills
Solid computer applications experience
=====================================
|
2,752 |
Subject: Protest ot CalPX Price Cap Filing
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/381.
=====================================
Ron and Seabron - thank you for responding so quickly and putting together
such a good product. I would suggest only the following additions: I would
mention that the Commission should also require simplified interconnections
and encourage faster certification of generation. You simply touch on
hedging, I would explain why, given that they had the opportunity, it would
have been prudent (with a simple example like how going to the spot market
and then asking for a price cap is like day trading your retirement and then
asking for legislation requiring a minimum price or something like that). I
really like the gas industry discussion. Seabron, can you verify the 20
loads and 40 gens - that was just a number Tim Belden through out (although
he should know)? If you send me another version tomorrow, fax it to me at
the Ritz Carlton at Tysons Corner, I'll be in the Consulate Room from 9-11.
After that, call me on my cell phone at 503-807-0929.
---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Hain/HOU/ECT on 09/11/2000 08:55 PM
---------------------------
Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.
From: "Ronald Carroll" <[email protected]>
09/11/2000 03:57 PM
To: "Andrea Settanni" <[email protected]>, "Jeffrey Watkiss"
<[email protected]>, "Kimberly Curry" <[email protected]>, "Nancy
Pickover" <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: Protest ot CalPX Price Cap Filing
The attached is a first draft that I wanted to get out today since it must be
filed tomorrow (Tuesday, Sept. 12). I have not had a chance to review it so
it may be rough in parts. Please give me your comments ASAP. Thanks.
Thanks also to all who contributed to turning this around so quickly. Ron
- 0130864.01
=====================================
|
2,753 |
Subject: Berkeley Entrepreneurs Forum, August 31
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/deleted_items/1739.
=====================================
UC Berkeley Entrepreneurs Forum
Thursday, September 20, 2001
6:30 - 8:30 PM
Haas School of Business
Arthur Andersen Auditorium
__________________________________________________________________
Topic: The Window Cracks Open: IPOs in the 2001 Market
Speakers: James Socas, Managing Director, Credit Suisse First Boston;
Stephen R. Wong, CEO, President & Co-Founder, Embarcadero Technologies, Raj
P. Sabhlok, Sr VP, Finance & Development, Embarcadero Technologies.
What is the health of the public markets today? Is it possible for young
companies to go public in this environment? It is no secret that we are in
the midst of a severe contraction in start-up funding. Venture capitalists
are reserving cash to support their existing portfolio and to invest in
later round financings. When will this situation free up? Will a revived
public market make start-up financing more available?
Our September 20th U.C. Berkeley Entrepreneurs Forum will feature an expert
in the current IPO market and the CEO and VP of Finance of a firm that has
recently completed the IPO process.
Registration: There are special rates for faculty and staff. Faculty and
staff are encouraged to pre-register by E-mail.
Note registration procedure for students:
a) in person with cash or check in room F450 or F449, weekdays 8AM to 5PM.
b) with Mc/Visa over the phone, please call (510) 642 4255
The fee for pre- registration is $5. There will be a $10 registration fee
at the door. Note: On-site registration is subject to space available. Pre-
registration for students and staff closes at 4PM on Tuesday, September 18,
or earlier if it is sold out.
Information:
For more information on the series, please visit our Website at
http://www.haas.berkeley.edu/groups/lester/bef.html
If you wish to read more about this particular event, please go to
http://www.haas.berkeley.edu/groups/lester/sep01.html
=====================================
|
2,754 |
Subject: New Fall 2001 class WEDNESDAYS
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/12238.
=====================================
Hi Continuing Evening MBA Students:
We have just added E228 Taxes & Firm Strategy on WEDNESDAYS, 6:00-9:00
p.m. It is cross-listed with the Day MBA Program for Fall 2001.
This 3-unit course is taught by Suneel Udpa. A description follows below.
If you are interested, please e-mail TJ on or before Friday, May 11.
Thanks,
TJ
COURSE NUMBER: E228
COURSE TITLE: Topics in Taxation:Taxes and Firm Strategy
UNITS OF CREDIT: 3 units
INSTRUCTOR: Suneel Udpa
E-MAIL ADDRESS:[email protected]
CLASS WEB PAGE LOCATION (HTTP URL): On Izio
DAYS: WEDNESDAYS 6:00-9:00
PREREQUISITE(S): None
CLASS FORMAT: lectures
REQUIRED READINGS: Textbook/CD, Course Reader, and Handouts
BASIS FOR FINAL GRADE: Midterm and Final
ABSTRACT OF COURSE'S CONTENT AND OBJECTIVES:
This course offers a framework to understand how taxes affect a firm's
investment and financing strategies. Taxes affect investment strategies
because the differential tax treatment of the various investments affect
both their before and after tax rates of return. Taxes influence financing
decisions because of their impact on a firm's cost of capital. This course
will downplay the technical detail under the assumption that you
intend to become effective managers not tax experts. Tax rules and
regulations will be presented and discussed in the broader context of firm
strategy. We will focus on fundamental tax principles, the understanding of
which will provide you with a framework to integrate the constant
changes in the tax laws. Note that we will focus on both individual and
corporate tax, under the assumption that good tax decisions consider
the impact of all parties in a transaction. For instance, when a firm is
deciding on a compensation policy for its managers, it has consider both
the managers' tax situation as well as its own.
BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH:
Available on the web at: http://www.haas.berkeley.edu/faculty/udpa.html
=====================================
|
2,755 |
Subject: Fw: Enron's Secrets Revealed
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/12175.
=====================================
Jeez, this takes the cake. Cameron, Perfect may want to get the publication!
Best,
Jeff
----- Original Message -----
From: "Global Change Associates" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, July 27, 2001 9:13 PM
Subject: Enron's Secrets Revealed
How has Enron managed to achieve such success while other energy firms have
struggled to deal with the changing market landscape?
Global Change Associates is pleased to announce the publication of a new
corporate profile entitled, "Enron 2001: An Inside View". This objective
study takes an insider's look at Enron, specifically, how the firm operates
and the keys to its success. Much of the information provided comes from
first hand accounts and covers areas such as:
? The firm's structure and operations
? The recruitment and training of new employees
? How Enron empowers and compensates its employees
? The keys to structuring Enron type "risk free" transactions
? How to negotiate with Enron
? Why Enron occasionally forgives counterparty obligations
? Is the Enron model right for your organization?
Enron 2001: An Inside View is a unique publication. It provides valuable
insight into the firm's operations and analyzes its successes and failures.
For those firms dealing directly with Enron, or thinking about adopting some
of Enron's business practices, it is an invaluable, must have tool.
This innovative study is available for purchase at $995.00.
For a detailed Table of Contents please open the attached file,
Enron2001TOC. To order please go to www.global-change.com, click on
"Reports" or complete the attached order form and fax to 212-625-8810.
For more information on this product please contact Alan M. Herbst at
212-625-1711 or via email at [email protected].
To be removed from this distribution list, please reply with the word REMOVE
in the subject line.
- Enron 2001TOC.pdf
- Enron2001Order.pdf
=====================================
|
2,756 |
Subject: Tamara's input to the CA Regulatory Strategy Work.
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/2552.
=====================================
In support of (as per Gord/Jaime's CA Action Plan)
? Reducing the exposure of EES to the market opening in 2001 (see ISSUES 1=
=20
and 2, below)
? Influencing the market structure of California to support sustainable EES=
=20
profit-making opportunities (see ISSUE 3).
The following matrix is structured so as to show a link between these goals=
=20
and the recommended regulatory action:
Note: I think our focus on the current valuation processes is=20
over-emphasized. I think it doubtful that the contentious valuation proces=
s=20
that is already underway in the regulatory arena will be circumvented or=20
brought forward in time because of current cash-flow problems. The=20
valuations will likely continue along their current regulatory paths. I=20
would recommend developing other alternatives to the IOU=01,s cash-flow=20
problem. These should be developed in conjunction with a =01+transition to=
=20
deregulation=01, plan that we can lobby witih. (See the attached Word docu=
ment=20
for a fuller description).
ISSUES=09TIME-FRAME=09RISK=09LIKELIHOOD=09RECOMMENDED ACTION
1. Transition to De-Reg ends in 2001
D pay market prices=092001=09VERY HIGH.=09LOW=09? Ensure snail-pace valuati=
on continues.
2. Frozen rate levels do not cover incremental costs
D Rate Increase in 2001=092001=09HIGH.=09HIGH=09? Develop alternatives that=
minimize impact=20
to EES.=20
=09=09=09=09? Make sure that rate increase alternatives support path to sus=
tainable=20
de-reg (ISSUE #3)
3. Public and Legislature do not like current situation.
D CPUC makes rash decision in short-term=09On-going=09AFFECTS FUTURE OPPORT=
UNITIES=09HIGH=09? Show stakeholders=20
that return to regulation is impossible to achieve in today=01,s marketplac=
e.=20
=09=09=09=09? Bring transition plan to de-reg to stakeholders.
=09=09=09=09? Ensure that benefit-sharing mechanisms are defined and implem=
ented as part=20
of transition.
=====================================
|
2,757 |
Subject: Electrical Commodity for Edwards AFB
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/edwards_air_force/7.
=====================================
For whatever reason, our calls, messages and emails have not received a
response to date. We need to understand the nature of the transaction before
we can move forward with the CPUC. We have put them on hold, telling them we
are waiting for Edwards to describe what they intend to put out for bid. Can
you let me know?
---------------------- Forwarded by William Gang/HOU/EES on 12/02/99 01:03 PM
---------------------------
William Gang
11/11/99 10:31 AM
To: [email protected]
cc: Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES, Robert Frank/HOU/EES@EES,
[email protected]
Subject: Electrica Commodity for Edwards AFB
Hey, Mike! Is commodity in or out? What's the current thinking? We need
to know so we can go forward with the Commission.
---------------------- Forwarded by William Gang/HOU/EES on 11/11/99 08:28 AM
---------------------------
William Gang
11/08/99 01:52 PM
To: [email protected]
cc: Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES, Robert Frank/HOU/EES@EES, Alexis
Carroll/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: Electrica Commodity for Edwards AFB
Mike, attached are the parameters that we would prefer to see in an RFP for
the electrical commodity in California. This approach in any RFP would help
us get the best bid possible for a solicitation.
I understand from our converstaion of last week that Edwards is contemplating
adding the electrical commodity to the RFP that is intended to be used for
privatization of the Edwards electrical distribution system. Given this, we
have put our jurisdictional discussions with the CPUC on hold pending your
resolution of the content of the RFP. We cannot request any dispositive
action from the commission on jurisdiction until we can accurately
characterize the elements of the transaction. Please advise us, as early as
possible whether or not the commodity will be included, and if so, how its
inclusion will be structured.
=====================================
|
2,758 |
Subject: Re: PG&E Advice Letter Implementing Surcharge
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/8209.
=====================================
Sounds like a good idea.
Vicki Sharp@EES
01/07/2001 12:12 PM
To: JMB <[email protected]> @ ENRON
cc: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>@ENRON, "'[email protected]'"
<[email protected]>@ENRON, "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>@ENRON,
"'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>@ENRON, MBD <[email protected]>@ENRON
Subject: Re: PG&E Advice Letter Implementing Surcharge
Can we discuss this on the MOnday call?
JMB <[email protected]> on 01/05/2001 04:21:14 PM
To: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'"
<[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>,
"'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>
cc: MBD <[email protected]>
Subject: PG&E Advice Letter Implementing Surcharge
Something I forgot to mention in the last e-mail regarding PG&E's Advice
Letter implementing the surcharge is that they appear to have gone a step
beyond what the Commission directed them to do.
The Commission directed them to create a balancing account to track the
revenues obtained from the surcharge (just in case, in the unlikely event,
they have to refund them). PG&E created the balancing account for this
purpose but also stated that they would transfer (on a monthly basis) any
ongoing procurement costs which were not recovered through the TRA (i.e.,
from ongoing revenues) to this new balancing account as well. It is unclear
what PG&E's purpose is for doing such except maybe to stop the
undercollection in the TRA from getting any bigger and hope that they will
have a better shot of recovering undercollections in the new balancing
account.
Again let us know if you want us to comment on the advice letter with
respect to this issue and the direct access issue mentioned in the previous
e-mail. Energy Division only has five business days to review the Advice
Filing -- so any comments/protest of the filing must go in early next week.
Jeanne Bennett
=====================================
|
2,759 |
Subject: Re: Transwestern Press Release
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', 'Keith Petersen/ENRON@enronXgate', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/3888.
=====================================
Thank you. FYI: No certain at this time, but here may be some air quality
issues associated with the compressors that TW might need GA to assist them
with.
Best,
Jeff
Karen Denne
03/28/2001 04:47 PM
To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Janel Guerrero/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Transwestern Press Release
fyi, since there's a CA connection increasing capacity at the border...
---------------------- Forwarded by Karen Denne/Corp/Enron on 03/28/2001
04:46 PM ---------------------------
From: Gina Taylor/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/28/2001 03:21 PM
To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Ellen
Miller/ENRON@enronxgate, Shelley Corman/ENRON@enronXgate, Susan
Scott/ENRON@enronXgate, Stanley Horton/Corp/Enron@Enron, Rex
Rogers/ENRON@enronXgate, Scott Vonderheide/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Karen
Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sherri Sera/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Rosalee
Fleming/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Danny McCarty/ET&S/Enron@Enron
cc: Keith Petersen/ENRON@enronXgate
Subject: Transwestern Press Release
Attached is the TW expansion filing press release. With the filing being
made on Thursday, March 29, we'll plan to issue the release to natural gas
industry publications after the market closes on Thursday, March 29.
Please review the press release one last time. This draft includes changes I
previously received from Rex, Drew, Steve Harris, Mary Kay Miller, Stan and
Shelley Corman.
Please let me know if you have additional changes by noon on Thursday, March
29.
Also attached is a filing fact sheet that will be used as reference for media
calls. Please let me know of changes to the fact sheet by Thursday, March
29, at noon as well.
Thanks for your immediate attention.
Gina
=====================================
|
2,760 |
Subject: Re: Credit Link Notes - California Disclosure
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/11645.
=====================================
Can you review and comment back to me? Thanks.
---------------------- Forwarded by Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron on 04/26/2001
10:34 AM ---------------------------
Dan Boyle
04/26/2001 10:33 AM
To: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Re: Credit Link Notes - California Disclosure
Jim and Rick:
Please see the attached emails and comments from Vicky. Please give me a
call, appreciate your help.
Dan O. Boyle
Enron Global Finance
Office: 713-853-1532
Mobile: 713-417-3532
----- Forwarded by Dan Boyle/Corp/Enron on 04/26/2001 10:31 AM -----
Vicki Sharp@EES
04/26/2001 10:28 AM
To: Dan Boyle/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Paula Rieker/Enron@EnronXGate@ENRON, Mark Koenig/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Gareth Bahlmann/Enron@EnronXGate@ENRON, Tim DeSpain/HOU/ECT@ECT@ENRON, Rex
Rogers/Enron@EnronXGate@ENRON
Subject: Re: Credit Link Notes - California Disclosure
I would like someone from the regulatory group to bless this . I would
recommend Jim Steffes or Rick Shapiro.
Dan Boyle@ENRON
04/26/2001 09:13 AM
To: Paula Rieker/Enron@EnronXGate
cc: Mark Koenig/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Gareth Bahlmann/Enron@EnronXGate, Tim
DeSpain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rex Rogers/Enron@EnronXGate, Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: Credit Link Notes - California Disclosure
Paula:
Attached is a draft of the proposed disclosure relating to California for the
Credit Linked Note offering memorandum.
While the concept of the disclosure was proposed by Salomon and Milbank, the
enclosed draft has been fully reviewed and edited by Vicky Sharp, Rex Rogers,
Ron Astin, Gareth Bahlmann, Tim De Spain and me. Before returning the draft
to Salomon, I wanted your group to review as well.
Please let me know if you have any questions, we would like to get this back
to Salomon by the end of the day if possible.
Thanks
Dan O. Boyle
Enron Global Finance
Office: 713-853-1532
Mobile: 713-417-3532
=====================================
|
2,761 |
Subject: Re: Update on Calif PX price cap
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/957.
=====================================
The PX proposed its price cap to become effective on the earlier of October
22.
FERC issued a letter requiring the PX to file (and serve on all intervenors
(including EPMI)) the following proof by October 20th:
Any data demonstrating market distortions without the price caps
Any data indicating that in certain hours the PX prices have not been
disciplined by the ISO's prices
Any data demonstrating that the CalPX Day-of and Day-Ahead and the CalISO
Real time markets do not operate in an inter-related manner.
Since the data is due on a Friday and the proposed effective date is a
Sunday, its seems unlikely that FERC will have enough time to act on the
proposal before the effective date unless FERC has the order already
drafted. Either they're just trying to cover themselves or they're trying to
find a reason to reject the filing.
Ron - please make sure we get this information as soon as it's filed.
From: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON on 10/13/2000 10:08 AM CDT
To: Jeannie Mandelker/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: David Parquet/SF/ECT@ECT, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Update on Calif PX price cap
My understanding is that the cap is $2500, but that the PX has filed with
FERC to change it ot $350. My understanding is that FERC has not acted on
the request to change it to $350, but I could be wrong. Dave, Mary, is this
your understanding?
Jeannie Mandelker@ECT
10/13/2000 08:03 AM
To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Eric Thode/OTS/Enron@Enron
Subject: Update on Calif PX price cap
Dave Parquet read a story we have for ENA's customer magazine, Exchange,
about California Power problems.
He says we may have the price cap wrong for the PX. We have $2,500 for the
PX and $250 for Cal-ISO.
Are those figures accurate? He says the PX applied to FERC for a $350 cap.
Please advise ASAP as this publication has gone to press and I'm not even
sure we can change it.
Thanks,
Jeannie
=====================================
|
2,762 |
Subject: PUC Press Release Regarding Utility Solvency
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/2672.
=====================================
FYI. Here's the release that I referenced yesterday evening.
?
CONTACT:
Armando Rend?n
December 13, 2000
CPUC: 103
?
415-703-1366
[email protected]
?
CPUC PRESIDENT LYNCH AND COMMISSIONER DUQUE STATEMENT
California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) President Loretta Lynch and
Commissioner Henry Duque today issued a statement regarding revisions to item
8 on the Commissioner agenda of December 21, 2000:
We note certain revisions to the Commission's published agenda for December
21st. Item 8 has been revised to reflect the scope of options available to
the Commission in addressing current financial conditions facing Pacific Gas
and Electric and Southern California Edison. The financial problems faced by
California's utilities are the result of the failure of the wholesale
electric market to ensure just and reasonable prices for this necessity. The
Commission need not act on this agenda item on December 21st, but the fact
that it is on our agenda allows the Commission to act if necessary.
The financial stability of California's utilities is of paramount importance
to California, and to this Commission. The CPUC stands ready to act to
protect the financial viability of California utilities. The exorbitant and
unjustified prices now being charged in California's electricity market
demonstrate the necessity for the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC)
to intervene and control the opportunism of the electricity sellers. FERC
must act to solve the underlying market failure so that all energy consumers
are assured of reliable delivery of power and protected from exorbitant
energy costs. We urge FERC to act immediately.
For information on this item, please contact Harriett Burt, Deputy Chief of
Staff for Loretta Lynch at 415-703- 2444, Mary Lou Tousey, 415-703-2593, or
Commissioner Carl Wood, 415-703- 2440.
###
=====================================
|
2,763 |
Subject: Re: Greetings from San Diego
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/1648.
=====================================
Hi, Jeff --
That would be great! I understand that things are crazy. And I can
imagine, looking ahead to January's start of the legislative season, that
it will only get nuttier. Let me know what your schedule is like, and I
can meet you near where you'll be having meetings.
Looking forward to it --
DanaAt 01:35 PM 9/22/00 -0500, you wrote:
>Hi Dana:
>
>Please accept my apologies for not having responded sooner. Things, as you
>know, are, well, a little nuts. It was great to meet you and I would be
>happy to discuss opportunities. I need to be in S.D. in the next few
>weeks. Perhaps we could have lunch, or something, and you could fill me in
>on what you folks do.
>
>Best,
>Jeff
>
>
>
>
Dana
Perino
<dana@gablegr To: [email protected]
oup.com> cc:
Subject: Greetings from San
Diego
> 09/14/2000
>
06:40
PM
>
>
>
>Hi, Jeff --
>
>It was great to meet you this week while you were in San Diego for the
>hearings. Cathy Van Way and I had a blast catching up on old times and
>trying to think of every pun possible that led directly back to
>electricity.
>
>I know Enron has extensive communications support, but in the future if you
>have need on a project or public relations campaign, I hope you'll keep me
>in mind. Although it took me a while to understand the difference between
>a megawatt and a megaphone before Rep. Schaefer introduced the first bill,
>once I finally "got it" I developed an ability to help the media understand
>the issue -- so that misinformation, as experienced in San Diego -- can be
>avoided. I've also maintained excellent contacts with the media covering
>electricity and can help with corporate pr as well as issue communications.
>
>As you're well aware, the light won't go out on this issue for a long time
>(pun practice).
>
>Best regards,
>
>Dana
>
>
>
>
>Dana Perino
>[email protected]
>619-234-1300 ext. 238
>
>
=====================================
|
2,764 |
Subject: FW: CSO - Haas MBA Job Fairs Begin in November - Resume Drop
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]; [email protected];']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/1299.
=====================================
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Rich Wong
Sent: Monday, October 30, 2000 4:49 PM
To: [email protected]; [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]
Subject: CSO - Haas MBA Job Fairs Begin in November - Resume Drop
Deadline
The Haas Career Center sponsors several job fairs throughout the year.
Approximately a dozen companies with career and/or summer internship
opportunities
come to the BankAmerica Forum area during the 12:30pm-2:00pm break on the
event day.
All MBA students are welcome to come meet the representatives.
The first two job fairs are scheduled for November 15th and 29th (followed
by fairs in February and March). While most companies that attend are
high-tech,
a variety of industries are invited. Companies registered so far for the
November
fairs range from start-ups to Cisco and Lucent. Levi Strauss and Acer
Technology Ventures
are planning to come in the Spring. As the participant lists are finalized,
we will send them out to you.
One of the facets of the job fair is that we provide the participating
companies with a
mini-resume book of students planning to attend the event. This is provided
to the companies
in advance so that they may contact the students if they desire.
If you are interested in having your resume included in this book to be sent
to the
participants of the two November job fairs, please email it to
"recruiting@haas", labeled
in the subject section "Nov Job Fair - Career Position" or "Nov Job Fair -
Summer Intern"
as applicable BY WEDNESDAY NOVEMBER 1ST AT NOON. We can't guarantee that
resumes received
after the deadline will be included. A separate book will be generated for
the Spring job
fairs.
Regards,
Rich Wong
Account Manager, Technology
Haas Career Center
=====================================
|
2,765 |
Subject: CGT Gas Accord II Team
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/8144.
=====================================
CONFIDENTIAL SETTLEMENT DOCUMENT
PER CPUC RULE 51
ALL INTERESTED PARTIES:
This is a reminder that PG&E will hold the first Gas Accord II Workshop of
the new year on Wednesday and Thursday, January 10 and 11. The workshop
will be held at PG&E headquarters in San Francisco, 77 Beale Street, in
Conference Room 300.
Our objective for this workshop is to review and explain PG&E's
comprehensive settlement proposal, which was distributed by e-mail on
December 21, 2000, to those parties who have explicitly agreed to abide by
CPUC Rule 51.
If you did not receive a copy of the December 21 transmittal and would like
one, please complete the attached Rule 51 form and return it by e-mail to
Frank Lindh ([email protected]) and Geoff Bellenger ([email protected]), or by FAX to
Geoff at 415-973-0881.
Because we will be discussing the substance of PG&E's settlement proposal at
next week's workshop, any party who wishes to attend will be required to
have completed the Rule 51 form. (Please note, if you received our December
21 transmittal, then that means PG&E has your Rule 51 form on file, so there
is no need to fill it out again.)
Also attached below is a proposed Agenda for next week's workshop. We will
start the sessions at 9:30 a.m. on Wednesday and at 9:00 a.m. on Thursday.
We will provide coffee and juice in the morning, and lunch each day.
If you do plan to attend next week's workshop, we request that you please
confirm your attendance, so that we can get a headcount for the food and
drink orders. Please e-mail a response to Darcy Morrison ([email protected]), or
telephone Darcy at (415) 973-6644.
We look forward to seeing you next week and having a productive discussion.
Frank Lindh Ray Williams
415-973-2776 415-973-3634
[email protected] [email protected]
<<Gas Accord II Information Form.doc>> <<Agenda 1-10&11-01 Workshop.doc>>
- Gas Accord II Information Form.doc
- Agenda 1-10&11-01 Workshop.doc
=====================================
|
2,766 |
Subject: IEP Year 2001 Membership Dues
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/7993.
=====================================
To:??? ??? IEP Membership
From:??? Jan Smutny-Jones
?
RE:? Year 2001 Membership
?
?
This past year the energy business was characterized by turmoil, chaos, and
abundent activity.? The Year 2001 promises to be just as lively.??
?
IEP is proud of the?record of success we have achieved representing energy
producers and traders.?? This past year, we developed and implemented a
project to respond to inaccurate and all too often misleading reports in the
press and elsewhere regarding the Californnia marketplace.? On the
regulatory front, we?intervened at FERC on market structure issues, and FERC
has quoted our filings during their deliberations; we have defended the
sanctity of QF contracts and the AB1890 "deal" in the face of mounting
pressure; and we have pushed aggressively for continuing support for
existing renewables as well as implementing state programs that will incent
the timely introduction of new renewables.
?
The Year 2001 will be particularly important for our industry as the
California legisature addresses new energy legislation; the CPUC and FERC
move to solve QF/SRAC and market strucuture matters; and the CEC engages a
new OII on generation siting.??We hope that you all continue to support
these critical activities by renewing your membership and actively engaging
in the IEP deliberation of these matters.? At this point in time, the IEP
Board has not determined that an increase in dues for the upcoming year is
necessary; therefore, you will be receiving an invoice in the very near
future for Year 2001 dues which will be at the same level as last year.?
Please respond promptly to this invoice, as the funding will enable IEP to
make a smooth transition to the new year.?
?
If you have any questions, concerns, or wish to change your membership
level, please contact IEP as soon as possible.? Thank you for your prompt
attention to this matter.?
=====================================
|
2,767 |
Subject: Message Points on Current Status of Company
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/inbox/802.
=====================================
Message Points on Current Status of Company
A. Our core businesses are strong, performing well and customers continue to demonstrate their confidence in us.
B. EnronOnline experienced above average levels for number of transactions
Wednesday (10/24/01), Enron recorded more than 8000 transactions with 1399 external users for a gross notional value of approximately $4 billion
We continue to be the market maker of choice in wholesale gas and power
C. Our gas and power numbers indicate that our customer base is not withdrawing, closing out positions, nor reducing transaction levels with us.
Indeed, customers are transacting at higher levels as they prepare their portfolios for the upcoming winter and protect themselves from price volatility.
Media Q & A
What did you receive from the SEC?
Enron received a letter and subsequent phone call requesting that we voluntarily provide information regarding certain related party transactions.
When did you receive the request from the SEC?
We received a fax on Wednesday afternoon, October 19, 2001, and a phone call on Thursday afternoon, October 20, 2001.
What did you do about the request from the SEC when you received it?
An informal inquiry is not a material event; however, because of the high visibility of Enron and the recent public spotlight on the transaction, we convened a meeting of our Board as soon as possible. We recommended that we announce the SEC request; the Board agreed, and we made the release prior to the market opening on Monday, October 22, 2001.
What are you going to do about the request?
We are cooperating fully with the SEC and see the request as an opportunity to put this issue behind us.
These message points will be constantly changing and we will update you as the changes occur.
Also, attached below is the Enron link for the Press Room that contains "Frequently Asked Questions".
http://www.enron.com/corp/pressroom/faq.html
=====================================
|
2,768 |
Subject: IEP Restructuring/Transmission Task Force Meeting Scheduled for
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/2824.
=====================================
IEP has scheduled a Restructuring/Transmission Task Force meeting for 9:30
a.m. on Friday, Nov. 3.? The meeting will be held here at IEP.? While we
would prefer an in-person meeting, we will also provide teleconferencing
capabilities for those who would like to participate by phone.
?
The purpose of the meeting will be to review and discuss the draft IEP
response to the various FERC filings addressing a dysfunctional market in
California and alledging generator/marketer market power abuse.? As noted in
our previous email, IEP is developing a response to these FERC filings
compatible to the work being accomplished by the Market Response Project.?
?
In addition to reviewing and discussing the draft response, we will be
discussing specific recommedations to the FERC/CPUC/EOB, etc. to improve the
functioning of the marketplace.? We will be circulating prior to the meeting
the latest thinking on this, and we expect to discuss in detail the range of
recommendations which might be inserted into the FERC response filing.? This
will be a followup to the IEP Board discussion on Wednesday at IEP's Annual
Meeting.
?
A draft agenda for the meeting is as follows:
?
9:30??? ??? Review of Regulatory Environment at FERC, EOB, CPUC
?
10:00??? ??Discussion?of FERC California Report (To Be Released on
Wednesday, November 1)
?
11:00??????Review and Discussion of IEP Draft FERC Filing (To Be Distributed
on Wed/Thursday, November 1-2)
?
12:00??????Lunch
?
1:00??????? Discussion of Specific Recommendations To FERC To Improve
Marketplace
?
3:00??? ??? End
?
?
Schedule of Upcoming Events
As an FYI, I note the following calendar events:
?
November 1??? ??? ??? ??? FERC Releases "California Report"
November 9??? ??? ??? ??? FERC Convenes Meeting/Workshop To Receive
Responses on California Report/Marketplace
November 21??????????????Parties Comments Due To FERC on California Report
=====================================
|
2,769 |
Subject: Important - CPUC Motion - Confidential Attorney Client Privilege
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/3192.
=====================================
As you may already know, the CPUC filed a motion at FERC asking for a
protective order and to compel production of the information they subpoened
from us in the CPUC's OII case. Given the timing, we should discuss this on
our conference call scheduled for tomorrow.
They request that we be required:
to answer their motion on Thursday,
to provide the information within 5 working days of a FERC ordering
production, and
to provide of P&L information and spread sheets detailing our deals,
specifically delivery point, delivery date, counterparty, volume and price.
We may not have a problem providing this information for use by FERC in its
proceeding subject to a confidentiality agreement but I think we would oppose
their requests for:
the information to be provided for "government eyes only" - this would
prohibit EPMI from defending itself vis-a-vis other market participants.
a FERC confidentiality order that would could allow FERC to "share" this
information with the CPUC (for purposes of the PUC's OII proceeding) pursuant
to 16 U.S.C. 824h(c). 16 USC 824g(c) requires the Commission to make
information available to state commissions as may be of assistance in state
regulation of public utilities. We should argue that 16 USC 824h(c) does not
apply here given that we are not a public utility nor does the PUC regulate
how much market power wholesale marketers exercise or the level of market
power mitigation (these are the bases the PUC provides for explaining why it
should have this information.)
the above contractual information to allow them to analyze the
competitiveness of the forward market to evaluate the wisdom of the
Commission's decision to allow the UDC's "unfettered access" to the forwards
market. This argument is unpersuasive given that the CPUC can get
information about the competitiveness of the forward markets from the Wall
Street Journal's listing of NYMEX prices.
=====================================
|
2,770 |
Subject: Fwd: California: U.S. energy sec says FERC proposals not enough-WSJ
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/3778.
=====================================
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2000 08:52:22 -0600
From: "Tracey Bradley" <[email protected]>
To: "Deanna King" <[email protected]>, "Paul Fox" <[email protected]>,
"Ronald Carroll" <[email protected]>
Subject: California: U.S. energy sec says FERC proposals not enough-WSJ
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Disposition: inline
U.S. energy sec says FERC proposals not enough-WSJ
NEW YORK, Nov 22 (Reuters) - U.S. Energy Secretary Bill Richardson will
propose on Wednesday stricter bidding rules in California's energy auction
market and a broader investigation of market abuse, the Wall Street Journal
reported in its electronic edition Wednesday.
The paper reported Richardson as saying fixes proposed by the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission (FERC) for the troubled California electricity market
stopped short of what was needed to control runaway prices.
Earlier this month FERC issued a plan designed to reform California's
deregulated power market after prices soared to record levels this year,
sparking a public outcry.
On Tuesday, the California Public Utilities Commission on voted to ask
federal regulators to impose price caps on the state's wholesale power market.
The state regulator also said in a statement it is to make a filing with FERC
on Wednesday arguing FERC's proposed remedies for the state's troubled power
market were inadequate to protect consumers.
Richardson is offering to be a mediator, and says he wants to end fierce
bickering between federal and state officials over who is to blame for dozens
of electrical emergencies this year, the newspaper said.
The energy secretary said he thinks the FERC, which regulates wholesale U.S.
energy markets, needed to investigate allegations of market abuse more
aggressively, utilising its subpoena powers, the paper added.
New York Newsroom (212) 859-1700
=====================================
|
2,771 |
Subject: Cal-Tax
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/3653.
=====================================
FYI...
---------------------- Forwarded by Karen Denne/Corp/Enron on 11/20/2000
10:14 AM ---------------------------
[email protected] on 11/20/2000 10:08:44 AM
To: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected]
cc:
Subject: Cal-Tax
Reliant has recently joined the California Taxpayers Association and I
attended their Board meeting last week. I recommend that all CA generators
and market participants join the group. It is likely that there will be
tax legislation impacting our industry; it would be to our advantage to
have an active, well-respected group on our side during any legislative
battles. When there was a threat of a windfall profits tax on the
gasoline companies earlier this year, Cal-Tax responded quickly and helped
stop the effort.
As the legislative rhetoric heats up we need to start thinking about
becoming more proactive. This membership is one way of getting help on tax
issues. I encourage others to suggest other proactive steps we might take
individually or as a group. And while I'm at it --- I also recommend
membership in Cal. Manufacturers Assoc.
The Cal-Tax membership is very reasonable, $10,000 for a Board position and
5,000 for corporate non-Board level. The group has very good information
and email services which your tax people would appreciate. For information
on membership, pls call Joyce Showalter, 530/335-4032. Currently Duke and
Reliant are board members; I'm not sure if any others are members. Pls
call if you have questions.
=====================================
|
2,772 |
Subject: Observations on the Hearings this Week
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/276.
=====================================
We're in the process of developing a strategy to take us through the next few
months. But while the (otherwise perishable) thoughts are still fresh in my
mind from the hearings on Monday and Tuesday, I wanted to throw out some
observations for discussion in the days/weeks ahead.
OBSERVATION--The pressure to finger somebody for "price gouging" is
increasing.
The administration is hell bent on finding a "fall guy." The price spikes
pose real political risks for Davis and he and his folks need and want an
easy way out. His press release following the hearing renewed the call for
"refunds." On my panel, Loretta Lynch asked Reliant and Duke to supply her
with the details of the contracts they cut to sell their power forward to
marketers. And Carl Wood's remarks were extreme.
At the Barton hearing, a liberal democrat (Filner) and a conservative
Republican (Hunter) locked arms in calling for refunds. Bilbray joined the
"gouging" band wagon.
The utilities repeatedly called on FERC to do a "real" investigation, with
hearings, testimony, data discovery---the works.
On the positive side, the FERC commissioners lauded Wolak, his analysis, and
his remarks on the panel. Wolak said somewhat emphatically that the nature
of California's market structure makes it impossible to single out a single
participant as the culprit. He also stated that just everyone's just acting
in their own self-interest, responding to the screwed incentives embedded in
the structure.
IMPLICATION--It seems prudent for Enron to understand better its risks of
getting fingered.
In the best case, the clamoring for a "refund" subsides. In which case, the
only cost to Enron is the internal cost incurred to understand better the
risks of getting fingered.
In the medium case, investigations find that Enron (like others) "played by
the rules," but the rules stunk, and Enron profited at the expense of
California consumers.
=====================================
|
2,773 |
Subject: More messages
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/12039.
=====================================
Here's another set -- sorry for the delay, had to take a phone call.
?
Karen -- John Howard from the Orange County Register called, and I just=20
tried to call him back.? He's doing a set up story on the hearing, so you=
=20
may be getting a call from him.
?
?
Outside of a wind power facility in California and co-generation plant in =
=20
Nevada, both of which are committed to long-term contracts, Enron is not a =
=20
generator. It is a trading company that seeks to increase efficiency in the=
=20
marketplace and has no assets that can be used to build a market power=20
position. It is impossible to argue that sales representing just a few=20
percentage points of California=01,s power needs equate to "market power."
Enron has consistently worked to bring choice and stable electric rates to =
=20
California consumers, but has largely been thwarted by policy decisions mad=
e=20
by the Legislature and PUC. It is ironic that we are now portrayed as the=
=20
villains of a marketplace gone awry. The resources of this committee shoul=
d=20
be used to find answers to restructuring=01,s problems rather than to shif=
t=20
blame to politically appealing targets.
Enron is more than willing to participate in a procedure that fairly and =
=20
appropriately examines the true causes of California=01,s energy crisis.=20
However, we cannot participate in a fishing expedition that broadly asks f=
or=20
confidential documents =01) whose release would breach agreements with our=
=20
customers =01) yet fails to provide any sanctions for those who may releas=
e=20
them to the public.=20
While we do not have anything to hide, we must protect our customers=01, =
=20
interests. Without sanctions and protections, it is a foregone conclusion=
=20
that confidential documents given to the committee will find their way to=
=20
the press and be distributed in a selective manner that fails to tell the=
=20
whole story.
=====================================
|
2,774 |
Subject: IDEA: Let's Agree with SCE and PG&E on Rate Freeze
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/866.
=====================================
Here's a new legislative strategy in Sacremento idea based on the attached
e-mail --
1. Let other's worry about SDG&E fixes. First, even if the legislature
doesn't do anything, the CPUC fix is already in place. SDG&E doesn't need
any statues to "do the right thing". We should just leverage the CPUC.
Second, it looks like the Dems and Reps are going to reach conclusion on a
SDG&E bill; our language is in the mix. Let's not be too close in case
something blows up.
2. Finish the Williamson Act. Dave Parquet says that having the fixes now is
probably worth $10MM because he can flip the property this year instead of
next year (need 4Q00 earnings).
3. Cut a deal with SCE / PG&E / CMA. The big issue in California is to make
money in the place where the market is the biggest. Also, we need to protect
(a) EES' book and (b) ENA's ability to buy and sell in CA without wholesale
price caps (this takes no retail rate volatility). Maybe we could get
these parties to agree on some key going forward issues for the market -
natural gas restructuring, wholesale market with Flowgate model, deal on key
FERC Unresolved Issues, maybe something commercial with PG&E? The deal is
to have the retail rate cap extended, but not the CTC collection, until
12/31/03 with a CPUC opener to 12/31/04. Not sure if this sales or if
they'll let us in the tent, but would be interesting to discuss with Sandi.
From what I can tell we seem to be preventing this bill. Let' remember that
this is just going to be an issue next Summer and so why not deal with it now.
Please let me know your feedback.
Jim
---------------------- Forwarded by James D Steffes/HOU/EES on 08/29/2000
06:52 PM ---------------------------
Jeff Dasovich
08/29/2000 06:50 PM
To: James D Steffes/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject:
FYI. According to Roger, if the freeze is extended out toward 2004 for PG&E
and Edison, his book makes BIG money.
=====================================
|
2,775 |
Subject: RCR Re: California Investigation
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/116.
=====================================
Please see the email below from Ron Carroll regarding FERC's order
establishing the section 206 proceeding. Let me know what you think.
Sarah
---------------------- Forwarded by Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron on 08/30/2000
09:53 AM ---------------------------
"Ronald Carroll" <[email protected]> on 08/29/2000 05:06:43 PM
To: <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: RCR Re: California Investigation
Joe and Sarah,
As you know, FERC recently established an investigation into whether market
activities and design in California are resulting in anamolous prices that
are unjust and unreasonble. FERC also established a refund effective date
under FPA Section 206 to begin 60 days after the Federal Register notice is
published. (The refund effective date will thus apply to periods on and
after approximately November 1, 2000.) Although FERC hinted that refunds
were not likely in this matter, by establishing a refund effective date, it
held open the possibility that it could order refunds for such periods.
This raises several interesting legal questions. For instance, can FERC,
under FPA Section 206, establish a refund effective date where there is no
known defendant and no specific allegation of improper conduct. We (Dan and
I) do not know the answers to these questions but believe that they are worth
researching if you have concern for possible refunds. Depending on the
results of our research, it may be prudent to seek rehearing of the 8/23
order if for no other reasons than to preserve a possible appeal. (This
raises the ancillary question as to whether this is now ripe for raising
these issues or whether we should wait until when (and if) refunds are
actually ordered.)
After consulting with Dan, we believe an RCR of approximately $8,000 for the
research and request for rehearing (if necessary) would be appropriate.
Rehearing must be filed on or before 9/22.
Ron
=====================================
|
2,776 |
Subject: Re: thanks
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/6118.
=====================================
Agree with most of what you've said. I also would like a good handle on TRA
undercollection ##s. We've had great difficulty getting agreement on ##s.
I'll give it a try before tomorrow.
[email protected] wrote:
> Sorry. Been a bit crazy around here. Thanks for the note, and thank you
> for doing such a good job at driving this process. My thoughts on your
> proposal (and these are very preliminary): 1) politicians may not be
> willing to go as high as 25% for fear of being accused of a "utility
> bailout"--maybe 10-15%? though utility solvency may force their hands. 2)
> TURN will go ape-#%#$ if we make the "roll off" retroactive to October. 3)
> I'm willing to allow utilities to collect TRA undercollections, but feel
> that customers and utilities (not me) need to figure out precisely what
> that number is.
>
> Look forward to getting closure tomorrow, though I'm very concerned that
> we've lost Edison, given Bryson's public calls to return to 1950.
>
> Best,
> Jeff
>
>
> Evelyn Kahl
> Elsesser To: "Jeff Dasovich (E-mail)"
> <[email protected] <[email protected]>
> m> cc:
> Subject: thanks
> 12/12/2000
> 06:57 PM
>
>
>
> I really appreciated your participation today...very substantive and
> constructive. I particularly liked the idea of a migration "trigger",
> which I included in the outline. I personally think that the big ticket
> items are rate level, rate freeze end and TRA allocation. I wish we
> could start facing that dance. I'd play with (a) 25% immediate increase
> in commodity price (explicit, rather than residual); (b) rate freeze end
> on October 2, 2000 (c) pre EOF TRA undercollections to utilities,
> everything after is allocated forward to procurement customers.
> Thoughts?
=====================================
|
2,777 |
Subject: REVISED- CA gas talking points
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/13272.
=====================================
Thank you to Nancy and Joe for pointing out a typo in the document I just
sent. With a very red face (!), I am sending the corrected version.
My apologies for the confusion.
Jennifer
----- Forwarded by Jennifer Thome/NA/Enron on 05/31/2001 04:06 PM -----
Jennifer Thome
05/31/2001 01:29 PM
To: Nancy Bagot/OTS/Enron@ENRON
cc: Leslie Lawner/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, John
Shelk/NA/Enron@Enron, Rebecca W Cantrell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christi L
Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janel Guerrero/Corp/Enron@Enron, Ray
Alvarez/NA/Enron@ENRON, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Ban
Sharma/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
Subject: Re: Talking points on natural gas in CA
Nancy: Yesterday we made a very slight change in language used (1st page,
2nd bulletpoint). I have attached the document reflecting this change.
Given feedback from Jim on Friday, and Leslie today, the document is ready
for use.
Let me know if there are questions.
Thanks, Jennifer
Nancy Bagot
05/31/2001 01:10 PM
To: Jennifer Thome/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Re: Talking points on natural gas in CA
Jennifer, I just want to verify that this last version I have is the most
recent and we can use it to 'shop around'.
Thanks,
Nancy
Jennifer Thome
05/25/2001 04:54 PM
To: Nancy Bagot/OTS/Enron@ENRON
cc: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Ban
Sharma/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron,
Janel Guerrero/Corp/Enron@Enron, Donna Fulton/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Rebecca W
Cantrell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leslie Lawner/NA/Enron@Enron, Ray
Alvarez/NA/Enron@ENRON, Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Talking points on natural gas in CA
Nancy:
Per Linda's request, attached are the talking points on natural gas in CA.
Note that we will continue updating these points are new data becomes
available.
Please contact me with any questions.
Have a nice weekend.
Jennifer
713.345.3550
=====================================
|
2,778 |
Subject: Entrepreneurship @ UCSF Innovation accelerator
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/inbox/1578.
=====================================
For those of you interested in Entrepreneurship or Biotech/Healthcare,
they're doing some cool stuff at UCSF.
There's an e-mail list, plus several speaker/networking events. Sam
Collela of Versant Vertures spoke at their first event two weeks ago.
Our very own Peter Fiske will speak at an event on Dec 5th.
The organizers specifically asked that Evening MBA students were invited
to participate (our fame precedes us). Great opportunity to meet up with
clinicians/scientists with new ideas who need help with commercialization.
See below for details.
Tom McVey
-----
Hello ,
We have an exciting new program here at UCSF called the UCSF Innovation Accelerator
(UCSF-IA), whose mission is to engage and educate the UCSF community in
entrepreneurial ventures. This year UCSF-IA is hosting a number of
activities including:
an Entrepreneur's Discussion Group, three workshops: Opportunity
Recognition in Life
Sciences, Writing a Winning Executive Summary, and Intellectual Property
in Life
Sciences (two will be mixers with the Biotech Club of Berkeley's Haas
School of
Business), and an Executive Summary Competition with an Awards Ceremony.
These activities aim to provide a forum for UCSF
students/postdocs/clinicians/scientists to
learn about the biotech business and writing business plans, to
encourage interest in
entrepreneurship, and to network with Bay Area scientists and business
professionals and MBAs.
We encourage you to sign-up on our listserv: ucsf-ia to receive
up-to-date information and
e-mail announcements about these and related activities hosted
throughout the year by
UCSF-IA.
To subscribe to the list send a one line email message to:
[email protected] -the
one line of the message is:
subscribe ucsf-ia your_first_name your_last_name
If you have any questions or comments please contact:
Rebecca Seal [email protected]
Katherine Woo [email protected]
http://oird.ucsf.edu/ia/index.html
=====================================
|
2,779 |
Subject: Don't be left behind in today's volatile markets
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/inbox/564.
=====================================
Dear FT.com user As an active investor, you've heard of the Nikkei, Hang S=
eng, FTSE and the other major stock exchanges around the world. What you m=
ight not know is that since March 2001, the Global Investing section in the=
Financial Times US edition has been providing information and analysis tha=
t uncovers a world full of investment opportunities across international bo=
rders. Now Global Investing is available on FT.com Global Investing on =
FT.com offers detailed reporting on long-term trends in investment vehicles=
, in-depth investigative reports on market developments, exclusive intervie=
ws with key players, and measured analysis of investment opportunities. =
You'll get even more out of Global Investing in the daily News by Email. T=
his free wealth management briefing gives you a daily summary of developmen=
ts and a quick link through to the site - just click here to register: htt=
p://tm0.com/821/sbct.cgi?s=3D221472852&i=3D403159&d=3D1887039 You want to =
hear from people who know what they're talking about. Global Investing att=
racts the most respected and best-informed contributors from around the wor=
ld, so you can rely on their authority and experience to help you succeed. =
Global Investing can increase your expertise, minimizes risk and strengthe=
ns planning. Join the experts - start using this powerful investment reso=
urce today. Yours sincerely, FT.com P.S. If you're looking to make more=
of your money, Global Investing gives you professional advice and informat=
ion at the highest level. To see for yourself, and to have Global Investin=
g News by Email sent to you FREE every work day, just click here: http://tm=
0.com/821/sbct.cgi?s=3D221472852&i=3D403159&d=3D1887040 To unsubscribe fr=
om this FT.com correspondence, please reply to this message with the single=
word 'unsubscribe' in the subject line. Your name will then be removed fro=
m our mailing list.
=====================================
|
2,780 |
Subject: Re: Campaign Leadership Call "Mandatory"
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/4654.
=====================================
$25 not applicable to those on vacation. Bet they love the lime shirt down
there.
From: Jeff Dasovich on 03/28/2001 09:04 PM
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
To: Ginger Dernehl/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Re: Campaign Leadership Call "Mandatory"
Rick:
My apologies. The family events here in Mexico have conflicted with the
calls. But I will be on the call tomorrow. (Anything to save $25!)
One thing. I'm not sure that I can dial into an 800 number here in Mexico.
Ginger: Could I possibly call you at 4:30 and have you conference me in to
the 800 number?
Best,
Jeff
Ginger Dernehl
03/28/2001 11:46 AM
To: Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Janel
Guerrero/Corp/Enron@Enron, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Howard Fromer/NA/Enron@Enron, Joe
Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Linda Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan M Landwehr/NA/Enron@Enron, Daniel
Allegretti/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Cindy Derecskey/Corp/Enron@Enron, Marcia A Linton/NA/Enron@Enron, Linda
J Noske/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lysa Akin/PDX/ECT@ECT, Joseph Alamo/NA/Enron@Enron,
Bernadette Hawkins/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Lora Sullivan/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Terri
Miller/NA/Enron@Enron, Ginger Dernehl/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Campaign Leadership Call "Mandatory"
Message from Rick:
The Campaign Leadership Call, which takes place daily at 4:30pm CST, is
"Mandatory". If you are unable to attend, it will be necessary for you to
have someone participate on the call in your behalf. Please notify Rick or
myself, if you are unable to participate and let us know who will be
participating for you. A fine of $25.00 will be assessed to those who do not
participate or have someone participate for them. The monies collected will
go to a charity of the group's choice.
Thanks and please don't hesitate to call me if you have any questions.
gngr
713-853-7751
=====================================
|
2,781 |
Subject: Re: One-pager
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/12134.
=====================================
Thanks very much, Ken. This is a helpful start.
Best,
Jeff
=09"Ken Smith" <[email protected]>
=0907/24/2001 05:50 PM
=09Please respond to "Ken Smith"
=09=09=20
=09=09 To: "Scott Govenar" <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>=
, "Karen=20
Denne" <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>
=09=09 cc: <[email protected]>
=09=09 Subject: One-pager
Regarding the one-pager we discussed today and for discussion in a later=20
call, I wanted to offer a suggestion on an approach. I=01,d like to see=20
something simple that uses headings to show what Enron has done, what=20
concerns remain, and the steps you expect to take in the future.=20
I've put together some very rough sample bullet points (below) as a start t=
o=20
get everyone thinking and as an example of a format that could be effective=
. =20
A short preface should also be added to set up the bullets, possibly=20
something that says Enron has been working diligently to meet elements of t=
he=20
committee's subpoena despite remaining disgreements.
What Enron has done:
Delivered x number of documents
Spent x man-hours compiling information requested by the committee
Retained a depository in Sacramento for documents
Negotiated in good faith on a continuous basis with the committee
Enron=01,s concerns regarding delivery of additional documents:
The committee has failed to implement an acceptable confidentiality agreeme=
nt=20
that includes sanctions for anyone who breaches the agreement
Confidential documents held by the Legislature -- such as in the Quackenbus=
h=20
case -- have historically found their way to the press or made public, ofte=
n=20
in a selective manner
The broad nature of the committee=01,s request and whether requested docume=
nts=20
are relative to this inquiry
Whether a state legislative committee has jurisdiction over activities that=
=20
involve interstate commerce
What Enron will do:
(Bullets on planned steps)
=====================================
|
2,782 |
Subject: California Update 6/25/01
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/28112.
=====================================
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
? California Budget Resolved
? FERC Ordered Energy Settlements Stall MOU/Plan B
BUDGET
California legislators in the House have once again established a tentative
reserve amount for the state's depleted budget. Both sides are reportedly
uneasy with the $2.74B compromise and sources indicate that the four
Republican votes needed to pass the budget in the Assembly are likely far
more obtainable than the one Republican vote needed in the Senate.
California's current redistricting process may provide Republicans with
future seats that could translate into immediate bargaining power in energy
and budget matters. Adding to the frustration, sources indicate that
consumer activist Harvey Rosenfield plans to pressure State Treasurer
Angelides into battling with legislators for progress on the budget and
revenue bonds.
ENERGY SETTLEMENTS
Today marked opening negotiations for California state energy officials and
the several large energy providers who are charged with price gouging
Californians. Sources close to California State Sen. Burton report that the
results from the15 days of negotiations before the FERC appointed
Administrative Law Judge, Curtis Wagener, will significantly influence the
state's efforts in promoting any Plan B or MOU. Burton indicated that FERC
would need to order between $3 and $4B in generator refunds before the state
would finalize a SoCal bail-out. Of that amount, SoCal would most likely be
infused with $1B, however, without substantial contributions from power
providers that sold into California and currently fall outside FERC's
jurisdiction (i.e. BC Hydro & LA DWP), a $3 to $5B refund would be impossible
to achieve. Regardless of legislators' desires, sources believe that
consistent with the PG&E bankruptcy advisor's view, a multibillion dollar
refund from FERC is unlikely. Sources will continue to monitor and report on
these negotiations.
=====================================
|
2,783 |
Subject: Re: Draft IEP Hydro Comments: Including Attachment
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/127.
=====================================
Steven (and all):
I reviewed the draft and have the following comments which I have already
communicated to Diane Fellman, before I realized that you asked for comments
to go through you.
1. Might want to further clarify that the scope of issues addressing
disposition, whether or not the Commission grants an OII, should address
environmental review, market power and interim credit. This should go into
the Introductory section.
2. Page 6, Data that is of a non-confidential nature should be publically
available. Data which is confidential should be available to bidders
subject to a confidentiality agreement. PG&E should also consider other
means to access such data other than through visiting the data room, ie.
electronically.
3. Page 9, CAPPA, in addition to determine whether or not it is appropriate
for the utility to retain the contracts, the Commission should require that
PG&E value these assets, in accordance w/ the draft decision (should be voted
out on Thursday) and in compliance w/ the statute which requires the net
valuation of all above and below market assets.
4. I understand the reason for pursuing interim credit vs. interim
valuation. It is likely to become a semantic discussion though.
5. Suggested that you include the basis of evaluating bids as between
individual bundles and watershed.
Please call me if you have comments/questions. 415-782-7821
"Steven Kelly" <[email protected]> on 11/01/99 07:06:13 AM
Please respond to "Steven Kelly" <[email protected]>
To: Mona L Petrochko/SFO/EES@EES, "Jake M. Rudisill" <[email protected]>, "Bill
Woods" <[email protected]>, "William F Hall III" <[email protected]>,
"Curtis Kebler" <[email protected]>, "Steve Ponder"
<[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: Draft IEP Hydro Comments: Including Attachment
Oops! I forgot the attachment.
- att1.htm
- Hydro - IEP Limited Protest to PG&E - Draft 11-1-99.rtf
=====================================
|
2,784 |
Subject: "100 Years of Energy" - ABC Channel 13
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/5818.
=====================================
We are proud to announce that Enron is one of the title sponsors of the "100
Years of Energy" special to air locally on ABC Channel 13, January 13th and
20th at 6:30 p.m. Ken Lay, as a leader in the energy industry, will be one
of the featured executives. This special was produced in commemoration of
the 100th anniversary of Spindletop.
With our sponsorship, we also received the opportunity to have four :30
second vignettes about Enron produced by the Channel 13 staff. These spots
will run throughout January and February. The spots highlight Enron as a
leader in innovation, energy and technology; Enron's involvement in the
Houston community; and our corporate environment. I have included the
schedule for the next two weeks (see below).
Our level of sponsorship also includes two weeks of radio promotion on KTRH
and three insertions in the Houston Business Journal. Copies of the special
will also be distributed to local schools.
I would like to encourage each of you to tune in and watch the special on the
13th or 20th.
If you would like copies of the special or the vignettes please let me know.
Reproductions are available.
I can be reached at x 3-4535.
Thank you! Laura Schwartz
Schedule
5-7AM -- Eyewitness News
1/8/01 -- 6:27AM -- 1X
1/9/01 -- 6:47AM -- 1X
1/9/01 -- 8:15AM -- 1X
1/10/01 -- 1X
1/11/01 -- 1X
6:30-7AM -- Eyewitness News
1/10/01 -- 1X :30 & BB in Moneyscope Report
5AM-12M -- Daytime Rotator
1/11/01 -- 1X
1/12/01 -- 1X
1/13/01 -- 1X
1/14/01 -- 1X
5-5:30PM -- Live @ 5PM
1/12/01 -- 1X
6-7PM -- Eyewitness News
1/10/01 -- 1X
1/12/01 -- 1X
10-10:35PM -- Eyewitness News
1/14/01 -- 1X
10-11:05PM -- Eyewitness News/Nightline
1/8/01 -- 10:46PM -- 1X
1/10/01 -- 1X
10-11AM -- This Week
1/13/01 -- 1X
12N-6PM -- Weekend Sports Rotator
1/13/01 -- 1X
6:30-7PM -- "100 Years of Energy" Special
1/13/01 -- 1X + Open and Close BB's
5:30-6PM -- Eyewitness News
1/14/01 -- 1X
=====================================
|
2,785 |
Subject: CRIME ALERT
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/1646.
=====================================
To All,
A hard copy of the following crime alert was delivered by UCPD with the
request to send it to everyone.
STRONG ARM ROBBERY
Central Campus
"On Sunday, September 17, 2000 at about 9:00 p.m., a strong arm robbery
occurred on the Esplanade between Sather Tower and Doe Library on the
Berkeley campus.
The victim was an 18 year old male UCB student. he was walking from the
Unit III Residence Halls to Doe Library when he was approached by 5-6
individuals. Suspect #1 asked, 'Where is Building 1B?' The victim replied
that he did not know. As the victim backed away, Suspect #1 hit him on the
right side of his face and knocked him to the ground. The victim felt his
backpack being pulled away and grabbed for it, but was knocked down
again. The victim saw the other suspects approaching, so he released his
backpack and ran into Doe Library to report the crime. A witness saw the
crime occur and said the suspects fled in a southeast direction towards
Stephens Hall. The victim received scrapes and bruises, but was not
seriously hurt. His backpack and contents were taken.
The robbers were all described as African-American men:
#1 was 17-29 years old, about 5'-9" tall, about 140 pounds, thin build,
black hair in cornrowed cut, goatee, wearing a black t-shirt with white
lettering and black pants.
#2 and #3 were 17-29 years old, medium height and weight, black hair,
wearing white 5-shirts.
#4 and #5 were 17-29 years old, medium height and medium build, black hair,
wearing dark t-shirts.
Anyone with information about this case should immediately call the
University of California Police Department Detective Kenneth Moody (510)
642-3184.
As with any emergency situation, if you see suspicious activity, call
9-911, from a campus phone."
Patsy Shaughnessy
Facilities Manager
Haas School of Business
S545 Student Services Bldg.
University of California
Berkeley, CA 94720-1900
Tel: (510) 642-4617
Fax: (510) 642-4700
=====================================
|
2,786 |
Subject: Re: Savings for CWDR
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/4056.
=====================================
Here are the components as I see them:
1999 numbers for C&I are fine; I'd do 10%, 15%, 20% reductions.
Assume C&I takes its proportionate share of the DWR's net short (i.e., if C&I
is 2/3 of load, then 2/3 of CDW purchases should go to C&I)
You can use the average price used in the DWR presentation to Legislators to
the $ amount. The copy I've got sez that the average price for the first 5
years is $79/MWH. That seems like the # we ought to use.
Now the hard part. The state reportedly sez that they aren't buying the
entire net short---only that part that they feel like covering. So how do we
factor that in? Not sure that we can get detailed data (but check with Alan
Comnes, who might be able to provide ISO real time prices (which is where the
net short (of the net short) is being filled ISO---the ISO then sends that
bill to PG&E.
An easier way might be to use PG&E's numbers. In their bankruptcy
announcement, PG&E sez that it's been costing them $300MM per month ($300MM *
0.67 * 0.10 =~$20MM). We could scale this number up to account for summer
purchases.
Alternatively, we could use ENA's forward curve.
This is very quick and dirty (apologies) and I may have gotten something very
wrong. If I've got any fatal flaws in the thinking (which happens often),
please point them out. And if you have any questions, don't hesitate.
Best,
Jeff
Jennifer Thome
04/10/2001 12:17 PM
To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: [email protected]
Subject: Savings for CWDR
Jeff:
Robert and I wanted to follow up with you on your question about savings that
could be realized if 10% of lg. C&Is found other energy suppliers.
Please provide a bit more info. about what you are interested in:
*Would it be a subtraction of 10% of C&I load or customers?
*How precise do we need to be, i.e., can I estimate figures based on 1999
load?
It is probably best to reply via e-mail.
Thanks, Jennifer
=====================================
|
2,787 |
Subject: Follow-up on regulation of mixed-use facilities
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/1464.
=====================================
----- Forwarded by Scott Bolton/Enron Communications on 11/06/00 04:35 PM
-----
[email protected]
11/01/00 03:11 PM
To: Scott Bolton/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
cc: [email protected], Tracy Cooper/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications
Subject: Follow-up on regulation of mixed-use facilities
Scott,
Donald and I just spoke about the mixed-use facilities analysis employed by
the FCC, and I just wanted to follow up with you (as I'm sure Donald will do
as well, if in fact the two of you haven't already spoken as I've been
drafting), now that I have the contextual background from Donald. I think
the three of us are all of the same opinion that the sale of a private line
between LA and San Jose is an intrastate service under part I of the
analysis that I forwarded, as the transmission is explicitly defined as an
offering between two points in one state, and does not form part of an
integrated interstate offering. (Enron's customer may use that capacity to
provide an end-to-end transmission between LA and Portland, meaning that the
customer is offering an interstate service to its own customers, but that
doesn't affect the jurisdictional classification of Enron's offering, which
is based on what Enron sells to its customer.) The state PUCs typically
take an aggressive approach in intrastate regulation, and the FCC would not
have a strong argument that this was an interstate service (as there is no
uncertainty about the end points of the transmission or traffic, and there
is no argument that the private line service is an enhanced/information
service). Enron will be hard-pressed to say that it had no idea the service
was intrastate when it specifically sells capacity on an intrastate route
with identified end points in a single state.
Please let me know if you have further questions, or need any of the
documents noted in my previous communication.
All the best,
Kent
=====================================
|
2,788 |
Subject: CAISO MCP Postings
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/2657.
=====================================
To All,
As per todays (6/6/01) conversation with Keoni Almeida (Enron's customer rep
at the CAISO) the CAISO has been directed by their board to post only the
Market Clearing prices. What this means is the following:
During "Normal" operating periods the Market Clearing Price may be the true
cost of energy in the ISO. The component that could be missing is the cost
and volume of the Out Of Market calls, if any - but there's no way to know,
since this information is not posted.
During any Stage 1-3 market mitigation procedures, the Market Clearing Price
is the highest Proxy Price of the least efficient unit selected under the
mitigation procedures. The ISO is setting the emission credit value to zero
and the proxy has never included gas transportation costs, the proxy MCP is
not really a measure of marginal cost. Further the proxy MCP excludes the
cost and volumes of the Out Of Market calls and any accepted "pay-as-bid"
costs and volumes.
To find the MCP (Proxy Price during Stage 1-3) the following link
http://www.caiso.com/marketops/OASIS/pubmkt2.html button number 17.
The impacts of the lack of this information include, but are not limited to,
our knowing what the real-time cost of going short as a scheduling
coordinator would be or the actual cost of congestion. Not having access to
the complete pricing picture hampers the ability of the real-time traders in
the west from making the best business decisions possible.
Since it has been articulated by Kenoi that the CAISO Board has made a
conscious decision not to post a complete picture of the costs of energy from
hour to hour it would seem that it would be appropriate for Enron to consider
making an attempt to persuade the ISO to reconsider it's decision and that it
would be of significant benefit to the market and the ISO to publish all
pertinent pricing data.
Do you agree? If yes, how do we proceed? If no, why not?
Thanks,
Dave
=====================================
|
2,789 |
Subject: Re: Next DG Event
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/585.
=====================================
This follows up on Jeff's message. Attached are the Phase 2 questions issued
by the ALJ in the California DG proceeding. The questions relate to stranded
costs, standby charges, distribution wheeling, exit/bypass fees, PBR
structures and other rate design issues. We're looking for your input on
which questions raise the most important policy issues for Enron. -Bob
Jeff Dasovich on 06/12/2000 07:59:47 PM
To: Steve Montovano/DUB/EES@EES, Harry Kingerski/HOU/EES@EES, Lisa
Yoho/HOU/EES@EES, Robert Frank/HOU/EES@EES, Susan J Mara/SFO/EES@EES, Bruno
Gaillard/SFO/EES@EES, Paul Kaufman@EES, Mona L Petrochko/SFO/EES@EES, Sandra
McCubbin/SFO/EES@EES, Kerry Stroup/DUB/EES@EES, Susan M Landwehr/HOU/EES@EES,
[email protected], James D Steffes/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Next DG Event
Please forward to others whom you think might want to participate. I
apologize in advance if I've missed anyone from the original team.
Now that Sue Mara and Tom Hoatson have brilliantly represented Enron's views
in Phase 1 of California's DG proceeding (aided significantly by Bob Frank's
stellar legal skills), it's time to move on to the next set of issues for
Phase 2. The Phase 2 issues principally address rates issues (e.g.,
stand-by, back-up, stranded cost recovery), but also include about 40
questions issued recently by the judge presiding over the festivities. Bob
Frank will distribute the questions first thing tomorrow morning.
Would like to have a call either Thursday afternoon, or Friday morning (CST)
to determine:
1) which, if any, of the issues/questions posed by the California PUC Enron
cares to prepare responses for, and,
2) Enron's position on the issues identified.
Would very much like to profit from any recent DG activities others have been
engaged in elsewhere (e.g., Lisa and Harry in Maryland).
Is there a preference for Thursday afternoon or Friday morning. Please let
me know.
Best,
Jeff
=====================================
|
2,790 |
Subject: Re: Flight Options
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/28794.
=====================================
you're welcome ...but *remember* the prices are invariably going to be higher
the longer you wait to
book & ticket!
From: Jeff Dasovich on 07/16/2001 06:31 PM CDT
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
To: Joseph Alamo/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Re: Flight Options
thank you much.
Best,
Jeff
Joseph Alamo
07/16/2001 06:28 PM
To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron
cc:
Subject: Re: Flight Options
starting around $600 -- but bear in mind will depend on how far in advance
you end up ticketing
(should do at least 7 day advance, which would be by this Friday!)
From: Jeff Dasovich on 07/16/2001 06:22 PM CDT
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
To: Joseph Alamo/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Re: Flight Options
Thanks so much. What's the RT fare for SF/Denver?
Best,
Jeff
Joseph Alamo
07/16/2001 06:18 PM
To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron
cc:
Subject: Flight Options
Flight Options
SFO-Denver
Friday, July 27:
One way fare $345 as of today, anyway; all Non-stop flights:
United departs SFO 1:20 PM arrives DEN 4:49 PM
-or-
United departs SFO 2:35 PM arrives DEN 6:00 PM
-or-
United departs SFO 3:35 PM arrives DEN 7:00 PM
-or-
United departs SFO 4:40 PM arrives DEN 8:03 PM
Return Flights all Non-stop:
United departs DEN 6:15 PM arrives SFO 7:45 PM
-or-
United departs DEN 7:15 PM arrives SFO 8:47 PM
-or-
United departs DEN 8:05 PM arrives SFO 9:35 PM
For RT SFO to Boston [Most RT itins currently approx. $600]
Outbound: Sunday, Sep 2: (Only Non-stops listed)
United departs SFO 7:00 AM arrives BOS 3:34 PM
-or-
American departs SFO 7:15 AM arrives BOS 3:50 PM
-or-
United departs SFO 8:00 AM arrives BOS 4:45 PM
-or-
United departs SFO 9:00 AM arrives BOS 5:45 PM
Return: Sunday, Sep 9: (Only Non-stops listed)
United departs BOS 10:45 AM arrives SFO 2:02 PM
-or-
American departs BOS 10:53 AM arrives SFO 4:25 PM
-or-
United departs BOS 12:55 PM arrives SFO 4:10 PM
-or-
American departs BOS 3:00 PM arrives SFO 6:30 PM
=====================================
|
2,791 |
Subject: FW: THE NEW OBMC
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/4431.
=====================================
Team -looks like you did do a fine job in getting some good
concessions from the PUC on the OBMC. Please read the following...
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stone, Dave
> Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2001 11:31 AM
> To: Dias, Keith; Jones, Edward; Hunter, Jim (FRM)
> Subject: THE NEW OBMC
>
> Feels like we made lots of progress on the final OBMC. I think the
> key points are as follows:
>
> First, they dropped the maximum reduction from 20% to 15%.
> We are persuaded by many parties, however, that 20% for OBMC is
> simply too onerous . . . We
> adopt 15% . . .
>
> Second, they require the Utilities to help facilitate joint plans -
> including an idea for how to
> get it done - wonder where this idea came from?
> We require utilities to facilitate joint curtailment plans . . .
> one or more interested customers (or the utility) can arrange a meeting,
> and prepare an
> invitation. The utility can mail the invitation to all customers on an
> individual circuit. The
> utility can attend the meeting to help explain OBMC
>
> They eliminate the economic damage criteria
> The current OBMC program requires that a customer meet the criteria for
> economic damage
> We are persuaded to eliminate the criteria altogether
>
> Finally, I think the following gives us some room to work with PG&E on how
> this might
> actually work, meaning from the baseline or to the baseline
> The customer's plan must show how reduction on the entire circuit can be
> achieved in various increments, and how compliance can be monitored and
> enforced. The burden is on the customer
> to demonstrate that the proposal is realistic, workable, measurable, and
> enforceable. At the same
> time, we direct respondent utilities to use the OBMC program as an
> opportunity to work with each interested customer to reach a
> solution not only in the best interest of that customer, but in the
> overall best interest of the electrical system.
>
=====================================
|
2,792 |
Subject: CERA Western Energy Roundtable - 4/26
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/11308.
=====================================
=09Jeff:
=09
=09Are you aware of this roundtable? A friend who works at the CERA office=
in=20
Cambridge just got me in touch with Michael Zenker (who is leading this=20
roundtable) and he mentioned it. =20
=09
=09Were you planning on going? Do you think it is worth me looking into go=
ing?
=09
=09Jennifer
=09
=09
=09
=09
=09Western Energy Roundtable
April 26, 2001 | San Francisco=20
=09
=09
CERA is pleased to announce a Member Executive Roundtable session in San=20
Francisco on April 26, 2001. These meetings will feature presentations and=
=20
interactive discussions with experts from CERA's Western Energy team.=20
Enrollment Form
PDF Enrollment Form
=09
=09
=09
=09Schedule=20
=09
=0912:30=01)1:30 pm
Luncheon
=091:30=01)5:30 pm
Session
=09
=09Topics=20
=09
=09Western Power and Gas Markets Outlook?=20
=09Power and Gas Infrastructure:?When will Relief Come? A Look Ahead Throug=
h=20
2005?=20
=09California's Power Crisis: Update, Implications, and Market Outcomes
=09
=09Speakers=20
=09
=09Michael Zenker, Director, Western Energy=20
=09Ed Small, Director, North American Gas
=09Jennifer Snyder, Director, North American Gas
=09Peter Moritzburke, Associate, Western Energy
=09Bryan Sanderson, Associate, North American Gas
=09
=09Location and Accomodations=20
=09
=09The Parc 55 Hotel
55 Cyril Magnin Street
Market at Fifth
San Francisco, CA 94102
=09Tel.: +1 415 392 8000
Fax: +1 415 403 6602
=09Please contact the hotel directly for room reservations.
=09
=09Enrollment=20
=09
=09To enroll, please complete enrollment form and fax to CERA Registration:
CERA?
20 University Road
Cambridge, MA 02138
USA
Fax: +1 617 498 9176
Tel.: +1 617 497 6446 x 800
e-mail: [email protected]?=20
=09Dates and locations of events are subject to change. Client eligibility =
is=20
determined by service level. For more information about eligibility, please=
=20
contact CERA Registration.
=09?
=09RELATED ATTACHMENTS
PDF Enrollment Form
=09
=09
=====================================
|
2,793 |
Subject: Petition for Modification of SDG&E ATCP Decision
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/4091.
=====================================
This is a draft that Jeanne did responding to Roger. San Diego has inflated
their revenue requirement for 2001, as evidenced by a $200 million
overcollection in their 2002 filing.
I will submit an RCR for this. We can hold off filing until we get approval.
---------------------- Forwarded by Mona L Petrochko/NA/Enron on 11/30/2000
12:13 PM ---------------------------
JMB <[email protected]> on 11/16/2000 12:34:57 PM
To: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'"
<[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: Petition for Modification of SDG&E ATCP Decision
Mona / Roger ----
Attached is a draft of the petition for modification to SDG&E ATCP Decision
adopting a $115 million CTC Revenue Requirement for 2001. It is incomplete
as we need to talk about two items:
(1) if we ask the Commission to modify the $115 million revenue requirement
-- are we proposing something in its stead? Are we asking the Commission to
require SDG&E to file a new proposal???
(2) In Decision 00-09-040 the Commission authorized SDG&E to establish a
subaccount in the TCBA to record any undercollections from its rate ceiling.
It also authorized SDG&E to offset those undercollection against any
revenues from SONGS, QFs, etc. In its advice letter implementing the
commission's directive, SDG&E has stated that the shortfall in the new
subaccount will be reduced "by the portion of the monthly TCBA
overcollections allocated to eligible customers a defined in Rule 1"Energy
Rate Ceiling" (i.e., only the portion of the CTC overcollection attributable
to customers under the rate ceiling will be used to offset the rate ceiling
undercollection). In short, SDG&E is not attempting to use the CTC revenue
overcollected from large customers to offset commodity undercollections from
small customers. Does this make a difference to our wanting to go for
modification?
We should talk about these items.
<<X18426.DOC>>
Jeanne
- X18426.DOC
=====================================
|
2,794 |
Subject: Get Real-Time Streaming Quotes from TheStreet.com!
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/11934.
=====================================
Dear Former Subscriber:
We want to let you know about a special offer we have just
for you. TheStreet.com is now offering a new and improved
portfolio tracker. It allows you to get real-time streaming
quotes and tick by tick charts all day long! Click below for
a 30-day FREE trial!
http://realtime.money.net/scripts/marketing?partnerid=TSC&t=Y&a=1126
Brought to you by Money.net, you'll get charts, profiles,
financials and more, directly from the pull down menu! In addition,
you'll also get streaming news headlines from TheStreet.com to
help you stay abreast of what's going on in the market.
So what are you waiting for? Just click below to sign up today
for your 30-day FREE trial.
http://realtime.money.net/scripts/marketing?partnerid=TSC&t=Y&a=1126
After your first 30 days, the cost per month is just $9.99.
Sign up today!
Best wishes,
Karen Smith Singer
Marketing Director
P.S. Do you want to receive our FREE newsletters? By becoming a free
member of TheStreet.com you can choose from a variety of
newsletters, designed to help you stay on top of Wall Street.
Just click here now!
http://www.thestreet.com/f/Register/register.jhtml
===============================================================
This email has been sent to you by TheStreet.com because you are
a current or former subscriber (either free-trial or paid)
to one of our web sites, http://www.thestreet.com/ or
http://www.realmoney.com/. If you would prefer not to receive
these types of emails from us in the future, please click here:
http://www.thestreet.com/z/unsubscribe.jhtml?Type=M If you are
not a current or former subscriber, and you believe you received
this message in error, please forward this message to
[email protected], or call our customer service department
at 1-800-562-9571.
Please be assured that we respect the privacy of our subscribers.
To view our privacy policy, please click here:
http://www.thestreet.com/tsc/about/privacy.html
=====================================
|
2,795 |
Subject: DG revised draft tariff language
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/2477.
=====================================
FYI. Not sure who (if anyone) is responding.
Jim
----- Forwarded by James D Steffes/NA/Enron on 12/11/2000 10:06 PM -----
Mary Hain@ECT
12/11/2000 02:48 PM
To: Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Alan
Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT
Subject: DG revised draft tariff language
The ISO is proposing to file the attached DG tariff provision with FERC. I
assume you are all over this(?)
---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Hain/HOU/ECT on 12/11/2000 12:56 PM
---------------------------
Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.
From: "Fuller, Don" <[email protected]>@caiso.com>
12/08/2000 09:03 AM
Please respond to "Sole, Jeanne" <[email protected]>
Sent by: "Happ, Susan" <[email protected]>
To: ISO Market Participants
<IMCEAEX-_O=CAISO_OU=CORPORATE_CN=DISTRIBUTION+20LISTS_CN=ISO+20MARKET+20PARTI
[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: DG revised draft tariff language
Market Participants:
Attached please find revised tariff language related to distributed
generation incorporating stakeholder comments. The ISO intends to file this
language with FERC by December 15. If you have any comments on the changes
from the draft circulated a few weeks ago please provide them to Jeanne Sole
at [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> by close of business Tuesday
December 12. Thank you.
Jeanne M. Sol,
Regulatory Counsel
California ISO
(916) 608-7144
____________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________
The Foregoing e-Mail Communication (Together With Any Attachments Thereto)
Is Intended For The Designated Recipient(s) Only. Its Terms May Be
Confidential And Protected By Attorney/Client Privilege or Other Applicable
Privileges. Unauthorized Use, Dissemination, Distribution, Or Reproduction
Of This Message Is Strictly Prohibited.
- 12-8tarifflanguagetostakeholders.doc
=====================================
|
2,796 |
Subject: Re: California Senator Bowen Calls for Electricity Hearing in CA on
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/973.
=====================================
That's a great idea, and I think that it would be useful to meet with her.
In fact, I think it's important to meet one-on-one with as many legislators
as possible, because I agree that the facts are pretty darned friendly. I'll
look into setting up a meeting with her.
Bowen in particular is being advised by enviros who think de-regulation is
still the best way to go. And if it weren't for the for the
"undercollection/refund" issues, I think that she'd be pushing to move
ahead.
Unfortunately, while she may not be focused principally on a hanging, that's
likely to be where the hearing goes. She's been unable in past to control
Peace at her hearings.
Best,
Jeff
Steven J Kean
11/12/2000 02:35 PM
To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Re: California Senator Bowen Calls for Electricity Hearing in CA on
Monday
Does she have any interest in meeting one-on-one or is she just looking for a
public hanging? I remain convinced that if we can just get the facts in
front of people they will modulate their approach.
Jeff Dasovich
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
11/10/2000 12:21 PM
To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Ginger Dernehl/NA/Enron@ENRON, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@ENRON, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Karen
Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Maureen
McVicker/NA/Enron@ENRON, Mona L Petrochko/NA/Enron@ENRON, [email protected],
Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@ENRON, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enron@ENRON, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, [email protected],
Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Re: California Senator Bowen Calls for Electricity Hearing in CA on
Monday
Given the short notice, we will politely decline to participate at the
hearing on Monday, but will let the good Senator know that, in general, we
intend to engage actively in the process and plan to help California find a
solution that works for everybody. Amen.
=====================================
|
2,797 |
Subject: RE: Meeting with Perfect
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent_items/2191.
=====================================
No problem. I'll let them know.
Best,
Jeff
-----Original Message-----
From: Richter, Brad
Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2001 5:52 PM
To: Dasovich, Jeff
Subject: RE: Meeting with Perfect
I plan (at this point) to be in New York until the morning of the 14th. Maybe we need to stretch out this meeting while the company catches its wind.
-----Original Message-----
From: Dasovich, Jeff
Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2001 2:08 PM
To: Richter, Brad
Cc: Cannon, Lydia
Subject: RE: Meeting with Perfect
Brad: Lot of water under the bridge since the 25th, but I just got a note from Perfect. They're still planning on being in Houston to meet on the afternoon of the 13th. Let me know if anything's changed and I'll get you the information on Perfect ASAP. Thanks.
Best,
Jeff
-----Original Message-----
From: Richter, Brad
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 4:20 PM
To: Dasovich, Jeff
Cc: Cannon, Lydia
Subject: RE: Meeting with Perfect
The 13th would work much better, preferably in the afternoon. Please contact Lydia Cannon (713-853-4893) to get a specific time on my calendar. Also, any specific Perfect company information beforehand would be helpful.
Thanks,
Brad
-----Original Message-----
From: Dasovich, Jeff
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 4:14 PM
To: Richter, Brad
Subject: RE: Meeting with Perfect
How do the 13th or 20th of November work?
-----Original Message-----
From: Richter, Brad
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 1:03 PM
To: Dasovich, Jeff
Subject: RE: Meeting with Perfect
The 15th is Enron's Management Conference and the 22nd is Thanksgiving. Any other dates?
-----Original Message-----
From: Dasovich, Jeff
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 6:29 PM
To: Richter, Brad
Subject: Meeting with Perfect
Hi Brad:
I finally got in touch with the people from Perfect. They'll be in Houston on the 15th and the 22nd of November. Either of those days work for you? If so, any time preference?
Best,
Jeff
=====================================
|
2,798 |
Subject: Summary Annual Reports
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/260.
=====================================
Enron Benefit Plans
Summary Annual Report
The basic financial and insurance information along with file attached
provides a Summary Annual Report for the Enron Benefit Plans. The annual
report for each plan has been filed with the Internal Revenue Service, as
required by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA).
NOTE: You may receive a report for a benefit plan in which you are not a
participant or under which you are not entitled. Entitlement to benefits
under any of the plans is based on the provisions of each plan.
Your Rights to Additional Information
You have the right to receive, upon request, a copy of the full annual
report, or any part thereof, for any plan. For insured plans, insurance
information (including any sales commissions paid by insurance carriers) is
shown in the annual reports.
To obtain a copy of the full annual report, or any part thereof, for any
plan, write or call:
Enron Corp
1400 Smith Street
Houston, TX 77002-7311
(713) 853-6161
You also have the right to receive from the plan administrator, on request
and at no charge, a statement of the assets and liabilities of the plan and
accompanying notes, or a statement of income and expenses of the plan and
accompanying notes, or both. If you request a copy of the full annual report
from the plan administrator, these two statements and accompanying notes will
be included as part of that report.
You also have the legally protected right to examine the annual report at the
main office of the plan (Enron Corp., 1400 Smith Street, Houston, TX
77002-7311) and at the U.S. Department of Labor in Washington, D.C., or to
obtain a copy from the U.S. Department of Labor upon payment of copying
costs. Requests to the Department should be addressed to: Public Disclosure
Room, N-5638, Pension and Welfare Benefits Administration, U.S. Department of
Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20210.
=====================================
|
2,799 |
Subject: Get Real-Time Streaming Quotes From TheStreet.com!
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/2600.
=====================================
Dear Former Subscriber:
You might have missed this special offer the first time you
received it. TheStreet.com is now offering a new and improved
portfolio tracker. It allows you to get real-time streaming
quotes and tick by tick charts all day long! Click below for
a 30-day FREE trial!
http://realtime.money.net/scripts/marketing?partnerid=TSC&t=Y&a=1134
Brought to you by Money.net, you'll get charts, profiles,
financials and more, directly from the pull down menu! In addition,
you'll also get streaming news headlines from TheStreet.com to
help you stay abreast of what's going on in the market.
So what are you waiting for? Just click below to sign up today
for your 30-day FREE trial.
http://realtime.money.net/scripts/marketing?partnerid=TSC&t=Y&a=1134
After your first 30 days, the cost per month is just $9.99.
Sign up today!
Best wishes,
Karen Smith Singer
Marketing Director
P.S. Do you want to receive our FREE newsletters? By becoming a free
member of TheStreet.com you can choose from a variety of
newsletters, designed to help you stay on top of Wall Street.
Just click here now!
http://www.thestreet.com/f/Register/register.jhtml
===============================================================
This email has been sent to you by TheStreet.com because you are
a current or former subscriber (either free-trial or paid)
to one of our web sites, http://www.thestreet.com/or
http://www.realmoney.com/. If you would prefer not to receive
these types of emails from us in the future, please click here:
http://www.thestreet.com/z/unsubscribe.jhtml?Type=M If you are
not a current or former subscriber, and you believe you received
this message in error, please forward this message to
[email protected], or call our customer service department
at 1-800-562-9571.
Please be assured that we respect the privacy of our subscribers.
To view our privacy policy, please click here:
http://www.thestreet.com/tsc/about/privacy.html
=====================================
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.