Split (1)

train · 4.89k rows

dataset_id int64 0 5.47k	email_body stringlengths 800 9.73k
2,900	Subject: Electronic Mail Retention Sender: [email protected] Recipients: ['[email protected]'] File: dasovich-j/all_documents/29151. ===================================== Can you help me with this? I can never get Sanders to respond. Could you try to get an answer for me? Sue Mara Enron Corp. Tel: (415) 782-7802 Fax:(415) 782-7854 ----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 07/26/2001 01:39 PM ----- Susan J Mara 07/25/2001 01:38 PM To: Richard B Sanders/Enron@EnronXGate cc: James D Steffes/Enron@EnronXGate, Richard Shapiro/Enron@EnronXGate, Joseph Alamo/NA/Enron@Enron Subject: Electronic Mail Retention Richard, Several months ago, I was notified by you that my e-mails were being collected. Therefore, I kept doing what I've been doing all along since I joined Enron -- saving those emails I need for my job and deleting others. Given this new notice from you, I am confused about what to do. I do not have enough guidance. I get hundreds of emails every day. I respond to many of them. Do I save all email receipts and responses? Do I save a subset? What is the basis for saving some and deleting others? Can't my trash file and my e-mail system just be stored by IT centrally in Houston? Please respond. Sue Mara Enron Corp. Tel: (415) 782-7802 Fax:(415) 782-7854 ----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 07/25/2001 01:31 PM ----- Mark Haedicke and Richard Sanders Sent by: Enron Announcements 07/25/2001 01:19 PM To: Individuals Exempted from Retention Policy cc: Subject: Electronic Mail Retention This is a reminder that due to the various proceedings ongoing in California, please do not delete any email or electronic data that relates to the Company's past, current or future business in California. Deletion of such data could subject both you and the Company to allegations of deliberate destruction of evidence, contempt of court, and civil and criminal penalties. To preserve such data, please have your assistant create a folder entitled "California Data" and move all emails and other data to that folder. Thank you for your cooperation. If you have any questions, please contact Richard Sanders at x35587 or Mark Haedicke at x36544. =====================================
2,901	Subject: RE: Bluegrass Weekend at Sierra Club Lodge Sender: [email protected] Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]'] File: dasovich-j/all_documents/8449. ===================================== I think we should definitely go. I could not go up until Friday. Please make reservations!!! Cameron Sellers Vice President, Business Development PERFECT 1860 Embarcadero Road - Suite 210 Palo Alto, CA 94303 [email protected] 650.798.3366 (direct dial) 650.269.3366 (cell) 650.858.1095 (fax) -----Original Message----- From: Prentice Sellers [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, January 22, 2001 6:34 PM To: Cameron Sellers; [email protected]; Scott Laughlin Subject: Bluegrass Weekend at Sierra Club Lodge In case it's not on your calendars, the bluegrass weekend at the Sierra Club's Claire Tappan Lodge is: March 16-18 It's $46 per person per night Includes 3 meals If we're going to go, I think we should make reservations right away. If so, do we plan on getting up there Friday night? I can make the reservations if you let me know. I haven't found any info yet on the free one... Here's some info I copied from the Claire Tappan Lodge website: http://www.sierraclub.org/outings/lodges/ctl/index.asp Clair Tappaan is located at 7000 feet, 45 minutes drive west of Reno - 1 mile from Sugar Bowl. The living room has an enormous stone fireplace. There is a library, a large communal dinning room, a social lounge, and a hot tub. The lodge maintains 10 to 12 kilometers of groomed cross-country ski trails and offers excellent instruction in both Nordic track and telemark techniques. Top quality cross-country skis and snowshoes are also available to rent at very reasonable rates. Guests needs to provide their own pillow, toiletries, towel, sleeping bag or comparable linens, and bathing suit if they wish to use the hot tub. We ask guests to choose a house chore to do each day they eat at the lodge. March 16-18: Blue Grass Weekend. Calling amateurs and proffesionals alike to a weekend of great jam sessions in the afternoons and a performance by the Donner Peak Pickers in the evening. The Pickers are a fantastic bunch of widely-experienced musicians playing traditional Bluegrass with superb instrumental craftsmanship. =====================================
2,902	Subject: Re: Special Oversight Committee Sender: [email protected] Recipients: ['[email protected]'] File: dasovich-j/sent/2884. ===================================== Hey buddy. I know that you're up in Sacramento and have a much better lay of the land than I, but this looks a like a sure fire set up for "the man for all seasons" to make an appearance before the legislature. I have deep concerns about us sticking our necks out at these hearings. Again, have much better info, but by all accounts, "witch hunt" seems to be the operative term for the hearings. We are doing very well for ourselves working behind the scenes and the risks to us of having someone at a public leg hearing, with all the cameras, and all the politicians feeling the primordial urge to grandstand are very high. Let's please discuss this one long and hard before making an decision. I'll be in Sac on the 16th for an AB 1890 Group meeting and plan to attend the hearing. Your pal, Jeff Scott Govenar <[email protected]> 01/09/2001 05:15 PM To: Hedy Govenar <[email protected]>, Bruno Gaillard <[email protected]>, Mike Day <[email protected]>, Mona L Petrochko <[email protected]>, Jeff Dasovich <[email protected]>, Susan J Mara <[email protected]>, Paul Kaufman <[email protected]> cc: Subject: Special Oversight Committee There will be an oversight subcommittee of the new committee formed to shape energy policy in the Special Session. In a meeting today, Assembly Member Darryl Steinberg, who will Chair the subcommittee, told us he expects to hold two hearings to "track the money" between utilities, geneators and wholesalers. He hopes to wait until after the completion of the PUC audit, unless that audit drags on longer than the next week or so. He is planning a "constructive investigation" and pledges to be fair. The subcommttee will be staffed by the Speakers Office of Oversight. Also, Enron has been invited to testify at an informational hearing of the Assembly Utilities and Commerce Committee on January 16, 2001. The general topiic is how supply and demand affect the California market and what options are available for new or repowered generation in California. =====================================
2,903	Subject: RE: REVISED Merged Leg Document Sender: [email protected] Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]'] File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/12093. ===================================== We are very close to sending out a redline.? Apologies for the delay.? Thank you. Regards, Linda Y. Sherif, Esq. Alcantar & Kahl, LLP 120 Montgomery Street, Ste.2200 San Francisco, CA 94111 (415) 421-4143 (415) 989-1263 (Fax) PRIVILEGED & CONFIDENTIAL COMMUNICATION: DO NOT read, copy or disseminate this communication unless you are the intended addressee.? This communication may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law.? If you are not the intended recipient, you are on notice that any unauthorized disclosure, copying, distribution, or taking of any action in reliance on the contents of the electronically transmitted materials is prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please call us (collect) immediately and ask to speak to the sender of the communication.? Also, please notify immediately via e-mail the sender that you have received the communication in error. -----Original Message----- From: Delaney Hunter [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, July 09, 2001 1:10 PM To: [email protected]; 'Barbara Barkovich (E-mail)'; 'Dorothy Rothrock (E-mail)'; 'John Fielder (E-mail)'; 'Phil Isenberg (E-mail)'; 'Jeff Dasovich (E-mail)'; 'Keith McCrea (E-mail)'; 'Linda Sherif (E-mail)'; 'Linda Sherif (E-mail 2)'; 'Gary Schoonyan (E-mail)'; 'John White (E-mail)'; Dominic DiMare (E-mail) Subject: REVISED Merged Leg Document Folks- Sorry for the delay --- major computer problems over here. I have used Ann's document and added the changes I made as a template. It is in redline and the questions are highlighted as well. Please look over it carefully and if there is language you are going to provide please do it post haste. WE WILL NOT HAVE A 2:00 CALL --- I think most folks are just too damn busy. So, if there is a question, problem, disagreement, etc on language please work it out amongst yourselves and send me new language if applicable. Remember this is due to Rick BY 5:00 PM TODAY!!!!! Call me with questions, Delaney =====================================
2,904	Subject: VC dinner update - delete if not attending Sender: [email protected] Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]'] File: dasovich-j/all_documents/2847. ===================================== I have attached a list confirmed attendees for this event on Mon 6th November so that you can make your own carpooling arrangements. We will be e-mailing you the address of the venue later this week. I have also included in the list the first 8 people on the waitlist. We are doing our best to organise more VC's and another table so that we can accomodate you as well. We should be able to confirm by Thursday 2nd November whether or not this will be possible. As you will note from the attachment, we have still not received bios from many of you. The purpose of these bios is not only to help the VC's familiarise themselves with all of you in advance of the dinner, but to help us place you on tables with VC's in your particular area of interest. The FINAL deadline to receive your bios will be TUESDAY 31st OCTOBER at 7pm. Please do try to e-mail me your bio by this time. If your bios are not received by then, we will have to place you randomly. Also, many of you have sent me your regular resumes instead of the bios that we asked for. These do not serve the purpose of providing the VC's with personalised and targeted information about you and why you are interested in meeting with them at this event. If you have sent me such a resume, we cannot guarantee that it will be presented in the same format to the VC's. Following are the VC's who have confirmed that they will be attending: Melissa Daniels, Morgan Stanley Venture Partners Jennifer Gil Roberts, Sevin Rosen Funds John Oxaal, Sevin Rosen Funds Alexander Gove, Walden VC Kevin Hartz, iMinds Ventures Russ Irwin, Covergence Partners Andy Lazlo, VantagePoint Matt Ocklo, VantagePoint Peter Loukianoff, Technology Funding Venture Partners Roy Martinez, Intel Capital Susan Mason, Onset Ventures Joe McDonough, Barrington Jay Morrison, Newbury Ventures Adele Oliva, Particof & Co. George Phipps, Patricof & Co. Neil Weintraut, 21st Century Internet Venture Partners This message powered by EMUMAIL. -- http://www.EMUMAIL.com - List_of_attendees_10.30.00.xls =====================================
2,905	Subject: July 4th at Chronicle Pavilion Sender: [email protected] Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]'] File: dasovich-j/all_documents/27843. ===================================== Date 7/4/01 Location Chronicle Pavilion in Concord Event American Independent Celebration with fireworks RSVP Due 6/29/01 Hello everyone, Hope the summer is going well and you are fully enjoying your time off. To once again help you with your recreation activities, we've planned another summer social event. On July 4th at the Chronicle Pavilion in Concord is the American Independent Celebration with fireworks. It's a patriotic family event with the California Symphony performing all your favorite American tunes (from Star Wars to the William Tell Overture). They also have appearances from kids choirs and individual singing artists. Last year they brought a horse and cowboy on stage during one of the Lone Ranger songs. It's a great event for kids and the family, and the finale with fireworks and real cannon fire will bring a patriotic tear to even the most masculine of men. The prices are $29 for lower reserved seats and $24 for general admission. General admission for this show includes lawn seating and the upper seats. Ages 13-18 are only $14 for general admission and children under 12 are free. The show starts at 8:00 pm, so it leaves plenty of time to celebrate at a friend's BBQ and then mosey over to the Pavilion to finish the night off. And best of all, there will be a section in the center lower lawn (prime spots!) reserved for the Haas group, so you don't need to arrive early for good seats. This spot will be staked out by Cindy - as she will be there early as part of the symphony. Her family and friends shoot the cannons in the finale. Depending on security, she may also be able to give tours of the authentic turn-of-the-century cannons to the children of the group. Reply to Tony with RSVP's by 6/29/01. Again, we would appreciate if you buy your tickets directly through the Chronicle Pavilion at (925) 676-8742, or through Ticketmaster at (925) 685-8497. However, please do RSVP so that we may help with carpools, general organization and know how large a spot to reserve on the lawn. Cindy Best & Tony Tai =====================================
2,906	Subject: Re: information request Sender: [email protected] Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]'] File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/12630. ===================================== I am (belatedly) compiling quotations on the California situation that effectively make our points from the good or bad guys. These type quotes can sometimes be used in presentations. My first quotation is the Gov. Davis classic: "If I wanted to raise prices, I could solve this problem in 20 minutes." (WSJ, March 8, 2001). If anyone has some of their own classics, please forward them to me with a full citation. I will share what I come up with later on. - Rob Janel Guerrero 06/10/2001 12:57 PM To: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Jennifer Thome/NA/Enron@Enron, Ban Sharma/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Benner Ursula/HOU/EES@EES, Rob Bradley/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Elizabeth Linnell/NA/Enron@Enron, Alan Comnes/Enron@EnronXGate, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Paul Kaufman/Enron@EnronXGate, Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Mary Schoen/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan M Landwehr/NA/Enron@Enron, Leslie Lawner/NA/Enron@Enron, Howard Fromer/NA/Enron@Enron, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kathleen Sullivan/NA/Enron@ENRON, Linda Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Tom Briggs/NA/Enron@Enron, Lora Sullivan/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Ray Alvarez/NA/Enron@ENRON, Robert Frank/NA/Enron@Enron, Robert Neustaedter/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Steve Walton/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: information request Everyone, Elizabeth Linnell and I are updating the "California Solutions" intranet site. I think you'll find it to be a useful resource in the next couple of weeks, but in the meantime, I am asking that everyone submit to me the following materials to me asap (this applies to NY, DC, the West and California): 1) All white papers/briefing books/one-pagers etc. that you have completed in the past two months. Documents from external sources that are in line with our positions are also welcome. 2) Any upcoming conferences/meetings etc that need to be posted on the calendar. thanks! =====================================
2,907	Subject: Requests to Speak at FERC's November 9th Conference on California Sender: [email protected] Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]'] File: dasovich-j/all_documents/2922. ===================================== ---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Hain/HOU/ECT on 11/01/2000 01:47 PM --------------------------- Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp. From: "Jackie Gallagher" <[email protected]> 11/01/2000 12:58 PM To: <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, <[email protected]> cc: Subject: Requests to Speak at FERC's November 9th Conference on California MEMORANDUM TO: Regulatory Affairs Committee Power Marketing Working Group FROM: Donald Santa, Regulatory Affairs Committee Chair Joe Hartsoe, Power Marketing Working Group Chair Julie Simon, Vice President of Policy Mark Bennett, Senior Manager of Policy Erin Perrigo, Manager of Policy DATE: November 1, 2000 RE: Requests to Speak at FERC's November 9th Conference on California Attached is FERC's Notice of the November 9th Conference, scheduling the meeting and setting out procedures for requesting an opportunity to speak. The conference will be held in Washington, at FERC's headquarters, beginning at 9:00 a.m. Requests to speak should be directed to the Commission's Secretary, David Boergers, by e-mail and in writing, by Friday, November 3rd. Requests to speak should include the name, title and company or parties the speaker represents, along with a brief (not to exceed one page) sumary of the issues the speaker wishes to address. Please let us know if you request a speaking opportunity, so we can attempt to follow-up with the FERC staff. In addition, we will host a pre-meeting for those attending the FERC conference in our conference room on Wednesday, November 8th, from 2:00 to 5:00 p.m. In combination with our weekly conference call we can prepare for the FERC conference and begin planning our comments on today's order. If you have any questions, please contact Julie Simon at 202-789-7200 or [email protected]. - meeting.pdf =====================================
2,908	Subject: Yes! Walters Column highlights CPUC Killing of Long-term contracts Sender: [email protected] Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]'] File: dasovich-j/all_documents/28938. ===================================== The word is getting out! Sue Mara Enron Corp. Tel: (415) 782-7802 Fax:(415) 782-7854 ----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 07/19/2001 11:06 AM ----- =09sue <[email protected]> =0907/19/2001 11:03 AM =09=09=20 =09=09 To: smara <[email protected]> =09=09 cc:=20 =09=09 Subject: Capitol Alert: Dan Walters: Political, financial mischief s= lide=20 quietly into annual state budget This message was e-mailed to you from sacbee.com. Dan Walters: Political, financial mischief slide quietly into annual state= =20 budget (Published July 18, 2001) As wholesale energy prices began to soar last year, California utilities=20 sought relief from the volatile spot market, including the authority to=20 negotiate long-term supply contracts. =20 In early June 2000, the state Public Utilities Commission voted 3-2 -- wi= th=20 PUC President Loretta Lynch in strong dissent -- to allow long-term power= =20 purchases outside the California Power Exchange, which was then the only=20 permissible source. A few days later, someone slipped into a complex, multipart bill related= =20 You can see the remainder of this story at:=20 http://www.capitolalert.com/news/capalert04_20010718.html ADVERTISEMENT This story was sent to you via sacbee.com. Copyright =01, The Sacramento Bee=20 Dan Walters: Political, financial mischief slide quietly into annual state= =20 budget (Published July 18, 2001) As wholesale energy prices began to soar last year, California utilities=20 sought relief from the volatile spot market, including the authority to=20 negotiate long-term supply contracts. In early June 2000, the state Public Utilities Commission voted 3-2 -- with= =20 PUC President Loretta Lynch in strong dissent -- to allow long-term power= =20 purchases outside the California Power Exchange, which was then the only=20 permissible source. A few days later, someone slipped into a complex, multipart bill related=20 You can see the rest of this story at:=20 http://www.capitolalert.com/news/capalert04_20010718.html=20 Copyright =01, The Sacramento Bee =====================================
2,909	Subject: FW: Research - CA Utilities Sender: [email protected] Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]'] File: dasovich-j/all_documents/10065. ===================================== ----- Forwarded by James D Steffes/NA/Enron on 03/16/2001 01:30 PM ----- =09Chip Schneider/ENRON@enronXgate =0903/16/2001 11:39 AM =09=09=20 =09=09 To: Rick Buy/ENRON@enronXgate, David Gorte/ENRON@enronXgate, William= S=20 Bradford/ENRON@enronXgate, Christopher F Calger/PDX/ECT@ECT, W David=20 Duran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Terry W Donovan/HOU/ECT@ECT, George=20 Schaefer/HPL/Enron@Enron, Greg Blair/Corp/Enron@Enron, James D=20 Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT =09=09 cc:=20 =09=09 Subject: FW: Research - CA Utilities -----Original Message----- From: Power, Keith E. =20 Sent: Friday, March 16, 2001 8:44 AM To: Schneider, Chip; Tribolet, Michael Subject: Research - CA Utilities Comments attached from Morgan Stanley and Merrill Lynch on events from=20 yesterday. ? Coram Energy, a small QF, will sign an involuntary bankruptcy petition=20 against Southern California Edison. A Coram spokesman stated that the=20 petition is being circulated to five other QFs (which were not named) and= =20 that it could be filed as soon as next week. If filed, the utilities would= =20 have 20 days to respond, perhaps another 30 days to contest the filing. ? California PUC voted to block Edison and PG&E=01,s layoff plans. The rul= ing=20 requires the companies to halt planned layoffs and to rescind those already= =20 made. Edison had cut 400 jobs, with plans to cut 1,450 more. PGE had laid= =20 off 325, with plans to cut a further 675. ? Proposed QF contract legislation (SB-47X) remains stalled in the State=20 Senate Energy Committee. In a perverse and =01&vicious-circle=018 type twi= st, lack=20 of QF payments to date have forced many off line, reducing supply and drivi= ng=20 up prices. ? National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration=01,s spring forecast. Th= e=20 NOAA reported that the Pacific Northwest has experienced one of the driest= =20 winters on record, second only to 1976-77. Reservoir levels continued to b= e=20 below normal for the end of February and mountain snowpacks in many river= =20 basins are less than 70% of normal. =====================================
2,910	Subject: Re: one-unit courses for Fall 2001 Sender: [email protected] Recipients: ['[email protected]'] File: dasovich-j/sent/4445. ===================================== Thank you. Teresa Janus <[email protected]> 05/04/2001 11:31 AM To: [email protected] cc: Subject: Re: one-unit courses for Fall 2001 I saw that you signed up on Telebears for Non-Profits, and we downloaded those requests too. So you're all set. TJ At 09:50 AM 5/4/01 -0500, you wrote: >Hi TJ: >Work has prevented me from being on campus this week. I registered for >1-unit courses, but have not "signed up" in the office. If that is >mandatory, please let me know and my girlfriend---a student in the day >program who will be there today---can sign me up. > >Best, >Jeff > > > > Teresa Janus > <[email protected]> To: > [email protected] > Sent > by: cc: [email protected] > [email protected] Subject: one-unit > courses for Fall 2001 > rkeley.EDU > 05/02/2001 07:48 PM > Please respond to > Teresa > Janus > > > >Hi, > >ONE-UNIT COURSES: >The demand for one-unit courses is very high, as outlined in the Student >Handbook. It is uncommon for a student to be given a space in more than >ONE one-unit course per semester. > >If you got into your 1st choice of a 1-unit class for Fall 2001, you will >not be put on a waitlist for your 2nd choice at this time. After classes >start in the Fall, if there is room available in any of the 1-units, we'll >let you know. Adds will be based on seniority in the program. > >Thanks! >You'll be given a chance to update your schedules May 4 - May 11. >I will e-mail your Fall 2001 schedules to you this Friday. > >Thanks! >TJ > > =====================================
2,911	Subject: RED Index shows Texas, NY, and Maine advance on retreating Sender: [email protected] Recipients: ['[email protected]'] File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/11811. ===================================== Note to Jeffrey Dasovich The July Update to the Retail Energy Deregulation Index (RED Index), published twice a year by the Center for the Advancement of Energy Markets (CAEM) shows Texas, Maine, and New York are making the most measurable strides in promoting sustainable competition among electricity providers, as customers throughout Pennsylvania retreat to their default providers due to increasing wholesale prices. The RED Index, which is the only known tool that objectively ranks states by 22 attributes on how they are restructuring their power markets, today released the U.S. rankings for all 50 states and the District of Columbia, in a 187 page report. Key results included: 1. Pennsylvania 66 2. Texas 65 3. New York 64 4. Maine 62 17. California 34 "These numbers underscore the importance of building a healthy foundation on which electric competition can grow," said Ken Malloy, CEO of the Center. "While California's crisis has brought a lot of positive attention to Pennsylvania's model, many customers in the Keystone State are returning to their original utility suppliers. It underscores how important it is to put the right fundamentals in place if consumers and suppliers are to benefit over the long haul," Malloy said. In rankings that included all of North America, the province of Alberta actually would rank above all the states with a score of 68. The mid-year RED Index also found that 62% of states expressing an opinion indicated that their commission is not "less likely to take action on energy restructuring as a result of the California crisis." CAEM is an independent, nonprofit, think tank based in Washington, DC whose mission is to promote an effective transition from the monopoly to the competitive model of regulation. For information about obtaining a copy of the RED Index, go to www.caem.org. For more information, please contact: Nancy Etkin at 703-532-6887 or [email protected] If you do not wish to receive announcements from CAEM, please put "remove" in the subject line in a reply to this email. 424 =====================================
2,912	Subject: Re: Netscape Sender: [email protected] Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]'] File: dasovich-j/all_documents/11127. ===================================== Guess I was lazier still. Agree with your assessment, I just neglected to recalc your model in order to determine growth rates necessary to get cash flows high enough to justify $14 and $28. 31% and 40% growth rates are (I would argue) wildly unrealistic. In addition, the capex numbers would (presumably) have to bump up substantially in order to get you there. Therefore, I would argue in the memo that the numbers don't add up for a $28 price (though "irrational exuberance" may permit Netscape to pull it off). Unless other folks have comments on the model, I think you're good to go for the memo. Am ready to look at it when you've got a draft. Great job on the case. Thanks. Best, Jeff [email protected] 04/14/2001 11:16 PM To: [email protected], [email protected] cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Subject: Re: Netscape Jeff, You're obviously right about discounting cash flow. I was getting a little lazy. The capital exp in Exhibit 3 in the book is close to what you have in the model. I agree about your working capital assumption. I guess I'm not clear on your conclusion. The $3+ you calculated a share is based on 16% growth. We are being asked to calculate what growth justifies $28/share. I calculate 31% growth for $14/share and about 40% growth for $28 per share. Reality is their immediate growth is probably going to be higher than both numbers but would not be sustainable for 10 years. Anyway while we bat this around, I've begun putting some bullshit into the memo. I guess I vote we double the price. The other IPO in Exhibit 6 (especially Uunet) demonstrate how hot the high tech IPO market is. IPOs are a lot about emotion and maybe a little about cash flow. What's the down side if the offering doesn't sell well. Netscape has a very hot business they should extract a high price for the potential gold mind they offer (this is my 1999 thinking, not 2000). Comments? Jimmy =====================================
2,913	Subject: SVMG Energy Committee Members... Sender: [email protected] Recipients: ['[email protected]'] File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/3472. ===================================== ****************** SVMG Energy Committee members, GE-San Jose recently took delivery of four mobile generators (provided by GE Rental Energy.) These units will be used to provide partial power for our operations during rotating block outages affecting GE's site. Each generator is 800 KWs in size and uses diesel fuel. The fuel tank is an integral part of the generator, located underneath the engine itself. These mobile generators were permitted for air emissions under a statewide program and are referred to generically, for that reason, as Statewide Registered Portable Generators. The San Jose fire department, which must grant a permit in order for these generators to operate, inspected the units last week and then refused to grant the approval. The reason given was that the fuel tanks constitute storage tanks containing a hazardous material (Class III-A combustible liquid) and therefore should meet special requirements for permanent tanks, including the possibility that the tanks be stored underground. Our own reading of the California fire code does not lead to this conclusion and seems to be, in fact, silent on the issue. Furthermore, we think rented portable generators permitted to operate in the Statewide Mobile Equipment Program should not require local fire permits. In any case, we believe the mobile generators are presently installed and widely used across the San Jose Fire Department jurisdiction, if not the whole State and that most companies haven't identified their use to the City. Given the perilous state of electricity supplies, we would obviously like to get past this and start using the generators. So....a heads up....if your facility is storing diesel fuel in "non-permanent" tanks, you may be subject to a cease and desist order down the road. My question for the group is...does anyone have any experience in this matter and can, therefore, offer some insight or advice? I would be particularly interested to know if you are using any portable emergency generators in your San Joes operations. Regards, John Redding =====================================
2,914	Subject: Madera Ranch Press Release Sender: [email protected] Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]'] File: dasovich-j/all_documents/58. ===================================== Heads up. This is not to be discussed in advance out side of Enron, but you guys need to know. If there are ways we can be helpful, call Carolyn Green to discuss. ---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/HOU/EES on 10/06/99 01:39 PM --------------------------- Mark Palmer@ENRON 10/06/99 11:18 AM To: Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@EES cc: Subject: Madera Ranch Press Release This will touch off a firestorm. Diane is doing a good job, retaining McNally Temple in CA and even getting some message development help from our old friends at Public Strategies in Austin. I'll stay on top of it. ---------------------- Forwarded by Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron on 10/06/99 11:03 AM --------------------------- Diane Bazelides@AZURIX 10/05/99 04:23 PM To: Rebecca P Mark/HOU/AZURIX@AZURIX, John Ale/HOU/AZURIX@AZURIX, Neil D Meyer/HOU/AZURIX@AZURIX, Rodney Faldyn/HOU/AZURIX@AZURIX, Rodney L Gray/HOU/AZURIX@AZURIX, Andrea Mainelli/HOU/AZURIX@AZURIX, Amanda K Martin/HOU/AZURIX@AZURIX, David Pruner/HOU/AZURIX@AZURIX, Edward Robinson/HOU/AZURIX@AZURIX, Colin Skellett/BTH/AZURIX@AZURIX, Elizabeth Ivers/HOU/AZURIX@AZURIX, Cole Frates/HOU/AZURIX@AZURIX, [email protected], Mark Koenig/Corp/Enron@Enron, Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@Enron, Carol Hensley/HOU/AZURIX@AZURIX cc: Subject: Madera Ranch Press Release Attached is the proposed press release, which includes input from Rebecca, Cole and Neil. We are tentatively planning to issue the release Monday , October 11, but in case word leaks to the media from Cole's meetings with local landowners starting tomorrow, we may need to issue this week. With that in mind, would you please provide me any comments on the attached document by the end of the day tomorrow, October 6. Please note that this project has received tremendous local resistance to date, so we are quoting Cole and adding much more information about the local benefits to try to address these issues. We are drafting a Q&A document and key message points for use with local and national media and the investor audience. =====================================
2,915	Subject: Re: TAR&L MEETING - NOVEMBER 30TH Sender: [email protected] Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]'] File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/2029. ===================================== Angie, Please add Jeff Dasovich and Mike Dahlke to the e-mail distribution list for these meetings. Thanks! Jeff and Mike, I apologize for not forwarding this information in time as I was in DC until now and did not have access to this information. I have 2 laptops and happened to have the other one with me. I hope you were both able to make the call somehow. Regards, Lara Angie Buis 11/27/00 02:40 PM To: Donald Lassere/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Sue Nord/NA/Enron@Enron, Michelle Hicks/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Cynthia Harkness/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Lara Leibman/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Jan Haizmann/LON/ECT@ECT, Rajen Shah/LON/ECT@ECT, James Ginty/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Derenda Plunkett/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, David Merrill/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Robbi Rossi/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Beth Wapner/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Ban Sharma/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Jane Wilson/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Richard Anderson/Enron Communications@Enron Communications cc: Wayne Gardner/Enron Communications@Enron Communications Subject: TAR&L MEETING - NOVEMBER 30TH The next TAR&L meeting will take place on Thursday, November 30, 8:30 a.m. to 12:00 noon, in conference room EB43C1. Breakfast will be provided. The call-in information is listed below. International Participants: (304) 345-7526 Domestic Participants: (888) 271-0949 Passcode: 589792 Host (Houston) number: (888) 271-0949 Passcode: 281574 I have arranged for 4 domestic and 2 international ports. Should extra ports be required, all the person will need to do is dial the appropriate number listed above. Additionally, we have scheduled another TAR&L meeting for Thursday, December 7th, same location, time and dial in numbers. Should you have questions regarding any of the above, please do not hesitate to call me at extension 37097. Thanks. Angie Buis EBS-Tax =====================================
2,916	Subject: RE: Chairman-to-be Wood's assistant Sender: [email protected] Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]'] File: dasovich-j/deleted_items/75. ===================================== One never burns bridges, but geeze this guy's unbelievable. Do we want to send a message about this to anyone? -----Original Message----- From: Dasovich, Jeff Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 11:52 AM To: Kaufman, Paul Subject: RE: Chairman-to-be Wood's assistant I absolutely could not BELIEVE that he sent this note. Unreal. -----Original Message----- From: Kaufman, Paul Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 1:43 PM To: Dasovich, Jeff Cc: Belden, Tim Subject: RE: Chairman-to-be Wood's assistant WHERE does this guy get his DOPE??? -----Original Message----- From: Dasovich, Jeff Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 9:15 AM To: Kaufman, Paul Subject: RE: Chairman-to-be Wood's assistant FYI. Figured you'd want to write a letter personally. Jeff -----Original Message----- From: Rob Gramlich [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 4:05 PM To: [email protected]; Dasovich, Jeff; Belden, Tim Subject: Chairman-to-be Wood's assistant Jim, Jeff, and Tim, I hope all is well. I often wish I were on the Portland trading floor in that gov't affairs job but that's history and my family is here in DC where they correctly thought they belonged. I'm writing because I just interviewed to be Pat Wood's technical advisor, one of FERC's top positions, and wanted to alert you that I mentioned you and your group as a reference. I hope that is ok; in my view we parted on good terms. He gave me the impression that I am very much in the running. I don't know if Enron people are applying and don't want to compete with them. But I think I'm generally on the same page with you on policy issues and I expect you would favor having more familiarity with markets and market-oriented policies on staff there. Given your companies longstanding relationship with Wood I thought you might be consulted on this. If so, I am asking for your support. Thanks! Rob Gramlich 301-280-6195 __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get email alerts & NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo! Messenger http://im.yahoo.com =====================================
2,917	Subject: Telecom CEQA Review Sender: [email protected] Recipients: ['[email protected]'] File: dasovich-j/eci/78. ===================================== The commission has issued a new rulemaking, R. 00-02-003, to address CEQA review for CLECs. Parties should file their responses to the following questions no later than March 15, 2000. 1. Is the Commission's existing practice for authorizing new CLECs adequate to comply with CEQA and to protect California's environmental resources? 2. Is the Commission's existing policy of allowing incumbent local exchange carriers and cellular carriers to construct new facilities without environmental review in compliance with CEQA? Does it promote adequate protection of California's environmental resources? 3. Do local authorities and other government agencies have adequate opportunities to protect local environmental resources under the current set of Commission practices and policies regarding incumbent local exchange carriers and CLECs? If not, how should this circumstance be remedied? 4. Does the Commission's existing practice for authorizing new CLECs create a competitive advantage or disadvantage for certain carriers? If so, how might those disparities be eliminated or reduced? 5. Is the Commission's existing practice for authorizing new long distance carriers adequate to comply with CEQA and to protect California's environmental resources? 6. Is the Commission's existing policy of allowing incumbent long distance carriers to construct new facilities without environmental review in compliance with CEQA? Does it promote adequate protection of California's environmental resources? 7. Do local authorities and other government agencies have adequate opportunities to protect local environmental resources under the current set of Commission practices and policies regarding long distance carriers? If not, how should this circumstance be remedied? 8. Does the Commission's existing practice for authorizing new long distance carriers create a competitive advantage or disadvantage for certain carriers? If so, how might those disparities be eliminated or reduced? Are we interested in this proceeding? Attached is a copy of the rulemaking. =====================================
2,918	Subject: RE: Meeting with Michael Tribolet for Wednesday, 8/29 Sender: [email protected] Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]'] File: dasovich-j/deleted_items/139. ===================================== Jeff, Just wanted to let you know that David will be in Sacramento on Wednesday @ 1 p.m. to meet with John White. Hi Kelly! David wanted for you to be available to attend this meeting in Sacramento. I am not sure how long you will be on vacation but, could you please let me know asap if you would be available to attend the meeting with Jeff Dasovich & David Parquet. The meeting location address is: 1100 - 11th Street (cross streets: K & L) Suite 311 Sacramento Cristina -----Original Message----- From: Dasovich, Jeff Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 4:10 PM To: Zavala, Cristina Subject: RE: Meeting with Michael Tribolet for Wednesday, 8/29 thanks. -----Original Message----- From: Zavala, Cristina Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 3:27 PM To: Dasovich, Jeff; Etringer, Michael Cc: Parquet, David Subject: RE: Meeting with Michael Tribolet for Wednesday, 8/29 David is in NY and will not be back until Wed. Jeff, I did leave David a voicemail with the information for the meeting in Sacramento and I told him to confirm with me if he would be able to attend. I am still waiting for his confirmation. CZ -----Original Message----- From: Dasovich, Jeff Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 10:52 AM To: Etringer, Michael; Zavala, Cristina Cc: Parquet, David Subject: RE: Meeting with Michael Tribolet for Wednesday, 8/29 Dave and I are supposed to be in a meeting in Sacramento with John White at 1 PM in Sacramento. So the timing may be tight. Perhaps we could do 4 PM? Best, Jeff -----Original Message----- From: Etringer, Michael Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 1:24 PM To: Zavala, Cristina Cc: Parquet, David; Dasovich, Jeff Subject: Meeting with Michael Tribolet for Wednesday, 8/29 Cristina, I am not sure what either Dave's or Jeff's schedule looks like but wanted to see if either would be available for a meeting with Michael Tribolet and myself on Wednesday afternoon in SF. Could you let me know. It would likely be after 3:30 in the afternoon. Michael Etringer West Power Origination Phone: 503-464-3836 Cellular: 503-701-4516 =====================================
2,919	Subject: God Bless Texas Sender: [email protected] Recipients: ['[email protected]'] File: dasovich-j/all_documents/67. ===================================== I'm taking a break from my telecom research on "the last mile." Whoda thunk? My prof repeatedly refers to the RBOCs as dinosaurs and lunkheads. Gotta love that required Info Systems class. Life in Texas is pretty swell, despite the midterm anxiety. The weather couldn't be more perfect and Friday afternoons are ideal for mountain biking. I've decided if you're not falling down, you're not riding hard enough. There's great singletrack just down the hill from our place. Sometimes it feels like a glorified placement agency around here and the core classes could more aptly be named chore classes, but for the most part we're having fun. I have tons (well, 400 actually) of interesting and smart classmates and I even like the ones fixated on grades (mostly). I'm writing for the Texas Business Weekly, the student paper for the b-school. I did the cover for the next issue and even got to interview the Dean. It's fun and challenging -- a nice change from all the number crunching. Oh, and I'm playing intramural football. I got to play QB for one series in the last game. We were marching down that field, then ZOWIE, interception! Not to worry, our team is so bad we lose by the mercy rule. I didn't know there was a mercy rule in football. Ted's doing great. He started out as a product analyst for voice and a local telecom firm. That wasn't so exciting. But a couple months ago he got an offer within the same firm to become a Strategic Alliances Manager so now he fancies himself a deal-maker. He's much happier and more engaged by his work, which is a joy for me to see. And he's building a circle of friends there. We're going to a wine-tasting tonight that's being hosted by one of his co-workers. Have any recommendations for "Tuscan" wines? He's also being a trooper about taking care of me and the domestic duties during this school thing. Danger: I could really get used to that. Nice to know we still like each other -- we celebrated our 5th anniversary last month. How are things with you? Still bringing enlightenment to the world? =====================================
2,920	Subject: TURN accounting Sender: [email protected] Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]'] File: dasovich-j/deleted_items/1586. ===================================== In its March 27 decisions, the CPUC granted a petition previously filed by The Utility Reform Network (TURN), a ratepayer advocacy group, that was opposed by SCE and Pacific Gas and Electric Company. The CPUC directed that the balance in SCE's TRA, whether positive or negative, be transferred on a monthly basis to SCE's transition cost balancing account (TCBA), effective retroactively to January 1, 1998. The TRA is a regulatory asset account in which SCE records the difference between revenues received from customers through currently frozen rates and the costs of providing service to customers, including power procurement costs. The TCBA is a regulatory balancing account that tracks the recovery of generation-related transition costs, including stranded investments. The CPUC also ordered SCE to retroactively restate and record balances in its generation memorandum accounts to the TRA on a monthly basis before any transfer of generation revenues to the TCBA. SCE believes that this decision by the CPUC is a fundamental departure from established regulatory accounting and ratemaking procedures and is unlawful and unconstitutional. SCE believes the CPUC's intent was to deny SCE lawful recovery of its costs and to artificially extend the end of the current rate freeze. The CPUC characterized the changes as merely reducing the prior revenues recorded in the TCBA, thereby affecting only the amount of transition cost recovery achieved to date. Based upon the transfer of balances into the TCBA, the CPUC stated that the current rate freeze has not ended and will not end until the earlier of recovery of all specified transition costs or March 31, 2002. The CPUC said that any undercollection in the TRA cannot be recovered after the rate freeze ends. But the CPUC also said that it will monitor the balances remaining in the TCBA and consider how to address remaining balances in the ongoing proceedings. If the CPUC does not modify this decision in a manner consistent with the MOU, SCE intends to challenge this CPUC decision through all appropriate avenues. =====================================
2,921	Subject: Re: Conference Call Advisory/Invitation re: CA Legislative and Sender: [email protected] Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]'] File: dasovich-j/all_documents/780. ===================================== Quick download on today's California conference call: With regard to pending legislative activity, our efforts should 1) not advocate for anything in the San Diego market that we would not want to get in the SCE and PG&E markets; 2) push for a lock-in of the rate freeze in the SCE and PG&E markets through at least 3/02, which will probably mean 12/02 to cover the summer of '02, but resist extension through '03. (No CTC extension, however.) Specific legislative language will start showing up this weekend or Monday. ---------------------- Forwarded by Marcia A Linton/NA/Enron on 08/25/2000 04:03 PM --------------------------- Joseph Alamo @ EES 08/24/2000 06:00 PM To: California Government Affairs, Edward Hamb/HOU/EES@EES, Jennifer Rudolph/HOU/EES@EES, Chris Hendrix/HOU/EES@EES, Greg Cordell/HOU/EES@EES, Harold G Buchanan/HOU/EES@EES, Martin Wenzel/SFO/HOU/EES@EES, Douglas Condon/SFO/EES@EES, James M Wood/HOU/EES@EES, Gary Mirich/HOU/EES@EES, Dennis Benevides/HOU/EES@EES, Roger Yang/SFO/EES@EES, David Parquet@ECT, [email protected], Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Marcie Milner/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary Hain@Enron, Harry Kingerski/HOU/EES@EES, James D Steffes/HOU/EES@EES, Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, Peggy Mahoney/HOU/EES@EES, Karen Denne@Enron, Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Lysa Akin/PDX/ECT@ECT, Ginger Dernehl/NA/Enron@Enron, Maureen McVicker/NA/Enron@Enron, Marcia A Linton/NA/Enron@Enron Subject: Conference Call Advisory/Invitation re: CA Legislative and Regulatory Update On behalf of Enron Host Bruno Gaillard, please consider this an invitation to participate in a conference call regarding California legislative and regulatory updates. You may join the call on: Date: Friday, August 25, 2000 Time: 1:00 PM PDT/3:00 PM CDT/4:00 PM EDT Call-in Number: 1-877-233-7845 Pass Code: 126069 Host Code (Bruno only): 494209 Thanks in advance for your participation. Joseph Alamo Sr. Administrative Assistant Government Affairs - The Americas San Francisco CA =====================================
2,922	Subject: Re:NETSCAPE Sender: [email protected] Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]'] File: dasovich-j/all_documents/11132. ===================================== Hey kids, My two cents. No problems with the model or the assumptions. I thought it would be interesting to look at a 3-stage model where the growth of the company has extremely fast growth in the beginning, and then a slower growth before the terminal valuation stage (zero growth). Under this model, to justify a $28 stock price, Netscape would have to grow 60% annually for the first 5 years, and 30% for the next 5 years. Thinking big picture, it would not be out of the ordinary for Netscape to be generating $1 billion in revenue after 10 years of growth. Netscape would probably be able to generate such revenue but not without branching into other services or products, most of which would not have been developed in 1996, i.e. Netscapes stock price includes the optionality of future services and products that they haven't even generated yet. I was dubious then as I am now that Netscape could be worth so much with a single and free product. We will need to address in our memo the likelihood that Netscape could leverage their early success into other profitable ventures. My simple adjustments to the model are attached. PS Jeff- You asked for an example of the agency dilemma. A good example of this can be demonstrated by the largest (at the time) leveraged buyout of RJR Nabisco where the company was generating a lot of free cash flow that was being spent on perquisites- company jets, golf tournaments, etc. This was because management had different goals than shareholders. Since management could not find profitable investments, instead of giving the FCF back to shareholders, they spent it on themselves. When management has minimal ownership in the company, they frequently do things that are in their own best interests and not necessarily in the best interests of the shareholders like implementing poison pills. ********************************************** Mark D. Guinney, CFA Consultant Watson Wyatt Investment Consulting 345 California Street, Ste. 1400 San Francisco, CA 94104 (415) 733-4487 ph. (415) 733-4190 fax - Netscape.xls =====================================
2,923	Subject: Re: BOMA Meeting 29 Nov 00 Sender: [email protected] Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]'] File: dasovich-j/all_documents/4036. ===================================== Sorry. I guess I'm too late to attend. Re. the prices below $65. I don't know what the customer is talking about. Let us know when ytou find out. George Waidelich@EES 11/28/2000 05:02 PM To: Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Mona L Petrochko/NA/Enron@Enron cc: Eric Letke/DUB/EES@EES Subject: BOMA Meeting 29 Nov 00 Sue, Mona, 1. Tomorrow Martin Wenzel is speaking at a 1200 BOMA Luncheon at the Sheraton Palace Hotel at the Corner of Market and New Montgomery in San Francisco. Martin was hoping that one of you might be available to attend. He thought that if you were not busy it might be valuable to have a government affairs expert available in case any tough regulatory questions came up. If you are both busy I am sure we will get by. We are currently trying to structure a new offering for their membership in the greater East Bay Area. 2. Below is an excerpt from an e-mail I received from a customer. My first inclination is that the customer is talking about the $65.00 rate cap in place in SDG&E and does not understand the implementation. But this customer happens to be very savvy and is normally very involved in the regulatory environment. Is there a new issue regarding some type of $65.00 rate cap that is being discussed for 2001 that is different from the current SDG&E proposal? If so, what are the details. As you can see below, depending on how it is implemented, it could be a problem. My interpretation of the comments below is that this customer thinks a $65.00 rate cap is going to be put in place in 2001 and any charges above this cap are going to be shared by all rate payers equally. Therefore, it does them no good to lock in a higher price with an ESP if the market price is above $65.00. I have a phone call in to the customer to get more details. "We should talk about prices for next year, because it is my belief that UDC prices must be below $65.00 next year; any price above that mark should be ignored by customers, and I would be happy to explain why." George Waidelich 925-543-3801 =====================================
2,924	Subject: EBA-Houston Chapter Luncheon -- February 14, 2001 -- California E Sender: [email protected] Recipients: ['Scott', 'Susan (Energy Bar Association Member Houston)', '[email protected]'] File: dasovich-j/all_documents/8663. ===================================== FYI ---------------------- Forwarded by Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron on 01/26/2001 02:58 PM --------------------------- "Caldwell, Charles" <[email protected]> on 01/26/2001 02:26:18 PM To: Energy Bar Association Houston Members <IMCEAEX-_O=VINSON+20+26+20ELKINS_OU=VELAW_CN=RECIPIENTS_CN=Clients_cn=Energy+ [email protected]> cc: "Scott, Susan (Energy Bar Association Member Houston)" <[email protected]>, "Tran, Dat (Energy Bar Association Member Houston)" <[email protected]> Subject: EBA-Houston Chapter Luncheon -- February 14, 2001 -- California E nergy Crisis <<Houston_443501_1.DOC>> Dear Energy Bar Association-Houston Chapter Member: Attached is a notice of our first EBA Houston Chapter luncheon of 2001, scheduled for Wednesday, February 14th. We are pleased to have Brent Bailey, General Counsel of Duke Energy North America, and Jeff Dasovich, Director of Regulatory Affairs for Enron's California operations, joining us to share their perspectives on the energy crisis in California. This should be an interesting and timely discussion. Please print out and return the attached notice to confirm your seat for the luncheon at the Hyatt Regency-Downtown. The notice will be distributed by mail as well. See you there! Charles F. Caldwell Vinson & Elkins L.L.P. 2300 First City Tower Houston, Texas 77002 Phone: 713-758-4518 Fax: 713-615-5087 Email: [email protected] ++++++CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE+++++ The information in this email may be confidential and/or privileged. This email is intended to be reviewed by only the individual or organization named above. If you are not the intended recipient or an authorized representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination or copying of this email and its attachments, if any, or the information contained herein is prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by return email and delete this email from your system. Thank You - Houston_443501_1.DOC =====================================
2,925	Subject: Fwd: FW: H.Res.650 Sender: [email protected] Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]'] File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/1180. ===================================== FYI Message-ID: <[email protected]> From: "Anderson, Paige" <[email protected]> To: "Anderson, Paige" <[email protected]> Subject: FW: H.Res.650 Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2000 11:46:09 -0400
2,926	Subject: Another California Complaint Sender: [email protected] Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]'] File: dasovich-j/all_documents/878. ===================================== The GSR reporting service reported today that a new complaint (California Electricity Oversight Board v. All Sellers of Energy and Ancillary Services/California Independepent System Operator/California Power Exchange Corporation, EL00-104-000 (08/29/00)) was filed yesterday that requests the Commission to direct the CAISO too maintain bid caps of $250/MWh for energy and ancillary services, and $100 for replacement reserves until the Commission has completed its investigation of California markets. The complaint also requests consolidation with the existing investigation in Docket Nos. EL00-95-000 and EL00-98-000. Although I have not seen the complaint as yet (we'll get a copy to you as soon as it is available), this strikes me as largely a frivolous complaint that adds nothing to what is already going on. In addition to the existing investigation, the ISO has indicated that it will file (sometime in mid-September) for authority to impose a price cap on ancillary services beyond 11/15/00, when the existing authority terminates. The Oversight Board's complaint thus strikes me as a politically motivated public relations filing that is designed to maintain pressure on the ISO and to shift blame away from California and onto FERC if things really go bad in the state. Moreover, the Commission has held that the price cap is a "purchaser's cap" that simply establishes the price that the ISO, as a purchaser of ancillary services, is willing to pay. Thus, the Commission has held that it is not establishing a maximum rate by approving the ISO's ability to impose a price cap. By requesting the Commission to direct the ISO to maintain a price cap, rather than allow the ISO to do so on its own, however, the Oversight Board's complaint seems inconsistent with the Commission's theory on this matter. I'll send you FERC's notice as soon as I get it. I assume that I should prepare a plain vanilla intervention for EPMI/EES at the minimum. Please advise if you would like me to include any comments, such as those indicated above. Ron =====================================
2,927	Subject: FERC Affirms ISO's Underscheduling Charge-- no BEEP Split -- Grants Sender: [email protected] Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]'] File: dasovich-j/all_documents/12656. ===================================== FERC issued three CA orders today. Ray Alvarez sent out a summary on the order related to increasing Generation and Transmission in the west. The report below came from IEP's attorney. Underscheduling -- Enron has been on both sides on this issue -- here's what's happened One CA order rejects the requests by PG&E, SoCal Edison and the CAISO to suspend the underscheduling penalty adopted in the December 15th Order. The Commission is currently reviewing data filed by the CAISO in conjunction with a request to waive the underscheduling and will address the underscheduling penalty in a future order. The Order does accept the CAISO's proposal to split the BEEP stack into Operating Reserves and Imbalance Energy. QFs -- Ridgewood Complaint The second order address QF issues. Granting, in part, Ridgewood and CCC's request for emergency relief, the Commission ruled that when QFs sell excess power or make third party sales as authorized by a court, the California utilities must provide interconnection and transmission service to make those sales. The Commission deferred decision on whether QFs that have not been fully paid can make third party bilateral sales. Obstacles -- Subject of Ray's earlier e-mail The third order addresses obstacles to increased energy supply. The Commission takes a number of actions, including allowing premium returns on equity (200 basis points) and accelerated depreciation (10 years) for projects that increase transmission capacity in the short term (July 1, 2001). The basis points go down if the project comes on later. The order also allows rolled-in treatment of interconnection and upgrade costs for new supply, broadens and extends QF waivers of operating and efficiency standards, waives prior notice requirements and grants market-based rate authority for sales from back-up and self-generation in WSCC, authorizes certain demand side sales and management programs, and encourages pipeline construction projects. More to follow when we review the orders. Sue Mara Enron Corp. Tel: (415) 782-7802 Fax:(415) 782-7854 =====================================
2,928	Subject: FW: Order on ISO Amend. 36: Creditworthiness Sender: [email protected] Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]'] File: dasovich-j/all_documents/9162. ===================================== FYI.? In case you have not yet seen. ? -----Original Message----- From: Andy Brown [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2001 4:54 PM To: Katie Kaplan (E-mail); Carol Hudson (E-mail); Steven Kelly (E-mail); '[email protected]' Cc: Julee Malinowsky-Ball (E-mail); Eric Janssen; Douglas Kerner Subject: FERC Valentine: Order on ISO Amend. 36: Creditworthiness Importance: High The FERC issued an order today on ISO's unilateral relaxation of the creditworthiness standards for PG&E and SCE.? The decision is available at http://www.ferc.fed.us/electric/bulkpower/ER01-889-000.pdf.? In the order, the FERC allows the utilities to self schedule for their own generation, but does not allow the relaxation of creditworthiness standards as it would apply to transactions with third parties.? Stated differently, the utilities can schedule at the ISO for load served by their own resource, but they have to meet the ISO tariff creditworthiness requirements if they are buying generation from anyone else.? This means that ISO can't "dump" imbalance / AS costs on the utilities if DWR doesn't buy it.? It also indirectly addresses the Reliant, et. al. / ISO TRO suit, as well as Duke's suit against ISO and DWR.? ABB Andrew B. Brown Ellison, Schneider & Harris, LLP 2015 H Street Sacramento, CA? 95814 Phone: (916) 447-2166 Fax: (916) 447-3512 mailto:[email protected] CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:? This communication and any accompanying document(s) are confidential and privileged.? They are intended for the sole use of the addressee.? If you receive this transmission in error, you are advised that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of any action in reliance upon the communication is strictly prohibited.? Moreover, any such inadvertent disclosure shall not compromise or waive the attorney-client privilege as to this communication or otherwise.? If you have received this communication in error, please contact the sender at the internet address indicated or by telephone at (916)447-2166. Thank you. ? =====================================
2,929	Subject: NEW! Receive your Pacific Bell bill online! Sender: [email protected] Recipients: ['[email protected]'] File: dasovich-j/deleted_items/1186. ===================================== <http://im.os-0.com/campaign/523/help300.gif> <http://im.os-0.com/campaign/523/help300.gif> <http://im.os-0.com/campaign/523/help300.gif> <http://im.os-0.com/campaign/523/help300.gif> <http://im.os-0.com/campaign/523/help300.gif> <http://im.os-0.com/campaign/523/help300.gif> <http://im.os-0.com/campaign/523/pacbell.gif> <http://im.os-0.com/campaign/523/line.gif> <http://im.os-0.com/campaign/523/sbc.gif> <http://im.os-0.com/campaign/523/help300.gif> <http://im.os-0.com/campaign/523/help300.gif> <http://im.os-0.com/campaign/523/help300.gif> Dear Jeffrey Dasovich, We've noticed you are currently paying your Pacific Bell bill online through a bill payment provider. Did you know you can receive your Pacific Bell bill electronically as well? It's convenient, easy, and there's no additional charge! <http://im.os-0.com/campaign/523/makespaying.gif> You can receive your bill, review your charges, and pay with just a few clicks of your mouse. You'll also be able to: <http://im.os-0.com/campaign/523/bullet.gif>Get answers to Frequently Asked Questions <http://im.os-0.com/campaign/523/bullet.gif>Receive your bill sooner than you would through the mail <http://im.os-0.com/campaign/523/bullet.gif>Store your last 6 statements for easy reference <http://im.os-0.com/campaign/523/bullet.gif>Print your online statements for record keeping <http://im.os-0.com/campaign/523/bullet.gif>Access Pacific Bell's website for product and service information <http://im.os-0.com/campaign/523/makepaying.gif> Activate Pacific Bell E-bill today. Simply log in to your payment provider and reference the Frequently Asked Questions for instructions on how to activate an electronic bill. If you have any questions, you can contact your payment provider for support. It's that simple. <http://im.os-0.com/campaign/523/help300.gif> <http://im.os-0.com/campaign/523/help300.gif> To unsubscribe, simply reply to this e-mail and write "unsubscribe" in the subject line. <http://im.os-0.com/campaign/blank.gif?cid=523&uid=2049964> =====================================
2,930	Subject: Re: Comments on Wholesale Issues Sender: [email protected] Recipients: ['[email protected]'] File: dasovich-j/sent/67. ===================================== Sounds good. Given that Sue is going to be back on Tuesday, you may want to coordinate drafting duties with her. Mona L Petrochko 08/30/2000 05:51 PM To: James D Steffes/HOU/EES@EES, Harry Kingerski/HOU/EES@EES, West GA, Mary Hain@Enron, Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, Karen Denne@Enron, Peggy Mahoney/HOU/EES@EES, Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON cc: Subject: Comments on Wholesale Issues Wood, the Assigned Commissioner in the investigation of wholesale electric markets, has asked for comments on the following questions by Friday, September 8. We are an individual party to the case as well as a member of ARM and WPTF. This would be a good opportunity to get our version of what is wrong on the record. The presentation that Tim and Mary put together for FERC will be helpful in answering these questions. I will take a first cut at drafting response to be circulated by Tuesday of next week. We can take liberties in providing responses that go beyond the question asked. Market Structure: Are the market conditions currently being experienced (price spikes and suppy shortages) inevitable under the current market structure? Do generators and/or scheduling coordinators have market power? Is there a need to mitigate such market power? Which market participants or other entities are responsible for reliability planning? Do California regulatory agencies have adequate jurisdiction to ensure reasonable prices and reliable service? Do the structures and governance of the Cal ISO and PX adequately support the goals of providing reasonably priced and reliable service? Market Rules: Are there rules which allow or encourage unacceptable market outcomes? What roles, if any, do underscheduling in forward markets, out of state transfers, uniform PX auction prices and ISO real-time and out-of-market purchases play in the outcomes being experienced? Behavior of Market Participants: What is working and not working in terms of price, reliability, information exchange, resource distribution, equity, service quality, and types of planned generation? =====================================
2,931	Subject: Re: FW: California state regulatory matters Sender: [email protected] Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]'] File: dasovich-j/sent_items/850. ===================================== thanks, paul. apologies, i dont' even remember seeing this. leslie, can we discuss on thursday. i can update you on everything underway w.r.t. cal gas. thursday work for you? best, jeff Paul Kaufman/ENRON@enronXgate 07/03/2001 10:22 AM To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron cc: Subject: FW: California state regulatory matters Knowing your swamped and all ... did you respond to this e-mail or contact Phillip Allen? -----Original Message----- From: Lawner, Leslie Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2001 11:00 AM To: Kaufman, Paul; Dasovich, Jeff; Steffes, James Cc: Kingerski, Harry; Cantrell, Rebecca; Fulton, Donna; Allen, Phillip K. Subject: California state regulatory matters Paul and Jeff, Becky, Donna and I (gas girls) met with Phillip Allen (ENA West) to discuss FERC gas issues today, and Phillip had some issues that were more state than federal, and I told him I would bring them to your attention. He is interested in seeing incentive rates or more hedging on the part of the CA LDC's so that all their needs are not being served by the spot market. In the current market, hedges (longer term contracting and financial) are being done primarily by the producers and marketers, which results in a thin and probably off-kilter market (the LDCs buying for the customers are not participating). I know we have to square this with the EES positions, but I am not up to speed on what is going on in CA on this issue. Phillip also made that point that while the LDCs are focusing on their core load, no one is doing system planning on the macro basis, taking into account the ability of the physical systems to meet the needs of all customers, core and non-core and making sure the system will be adequate. Finally, he is very interested in seeing the CA LDC rates unbundled. Any updates we can provide to Phillip (and the gas girls) would be appreciated, as well as what our plans are to address these issues. From our side, El Paso is having a conference in July and we will be taking up a number of allocation and transportation issues at that time. Thanks. =====================================
2,932	Subject: Senate Switch Affects Energy Bill Outlook Sender: [email protected] Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]'] File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/3013. ===================================== At 1pm Houston time today, Senator James Jeffords (R-VT) will announce that he is switching from the Republican Party to become an Independent voting with the Democrats. If this happens, control of the Senate will switch to the Democrats, which will give the Dems a majority and control of the Senate. ? All committee chairs would become Democratic and the Dems would control the legislative agenda ( Energy bills, California bailout, possible investigation of who influenced the Cheney plan etc.). In a profound ideological shift, Sen. Murkowski (R- AK) would be replaced by Sen. Bingaman (D-NM) as chair of the Senate Energy Committee. When Bingaman takes over the Senate Energy Committee, expect pipeline safety issues to again come to the fore. Bingaman is a strong proponent of tough pipeline safety regulation (particularly in the wake of the Carlsbad explosion last year) and will likely insist on strict safety requirements in the Cheney energy bill. ? The recommendations for loosening regulations for oil/gas drilling, coal and power as well as incentives for new generation contained in the Cheney bill are likely to be heavily revised in favor of more conservation-oriented measures. ? The tax bill will likely be downsized, particularly if Jeffords makes his switch immediately. The timing is important because the Senate-House conference on the bill must be appointed immediately. ? All presidential appointments would be controlled by the Dems. This is significant because of the large number of sub-cabinet level appointments that need to be approved. At the same time, Republicans are trying to convince Sen. Zell Miller (D-GA), who already votes Republican, to switch to the Republican party. If this happens, it will cancel out the expected Jeffords move. Initial reports are that Miller will not switch. One other caveat -- Jeffords has pondered a switch in the past and then flaked out. But if Jeffords goes through with it and Miller stays put, the balance of power in Washington will be tipped in favor of the Democrats. =====================================
2,933	Subject: Re: Sender: [email protected] Recipients: ['[email protected]'] File: dasovich-j/sent/3068. ===================================== will do. Steven J Kean 01/31/2001 05:50 PM To: Linda Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, David Parquet/SF/ECT@ECT, Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON cc: Subject: Thanks to everyone for their work on the Senate hearing. There are a couple of follow-up items: Thanks to the Portland and Washington teams, Sen Wyden is very interested in identifying the kind of information we need from the ISO (and PX to the extent it's still relevant) to make the market work better. We have written this up before, I think we just need to put it in letter form. Alan -- please take the lead on this and get a draft to Linda. I think we should identify the information and also prepare a letter for the Chairman (?) that could be sent to the FERC. Murkowski (the Committee Chairman) asked for an itemized list of things the fed should do to expedite siting as well as anything else we feel is necessary to address the California crisis. We have identified the need for open access across the nation, but he is looking for what can be done in the 2-4 month time frame. Dave, I think your memo to me is a good start. Sue -- could you please put those and any other suggestions in letter form and get them to Linda? Finally, Sen Feinstein asked all of the witnesses to ask their CEOs not to "price gouge" -- yes, that's what she said. She appealed to everyone's community spirit and asked suppliers to forbear charging high prices while California struggles to fix its problems. I think we should send a response from Ken. Jeff -- please take a cut and get to Linda. I think the basic messages should be: we are actively working on solutions with California policymakers (forward contracting was our idea after all); we are actively pursuing demand reduction in the state, etc. We should also explain the nature of our business and pick up on some of the other solutions we identified in the written testimony, offer to meet to discuss further, etc. =====================================
2,934	Subject: Re: Squaw Bill Sender: [email protected] Recipients: ['[email protected]'] File: dasovich-j/sent/4167. ===================================== Agree. I think she's already gotten a helluvalot better--a marked and very positive change. Reflection and realization are powerful things. I'll bring all the paperwork over tonite. We can go over it then. It actually adds up, as far as I can tell. It was fun as hell, but it sure weren't cheap. Best, Jeff "Scott Laughlin" <[email protected]> 04/17/2001 07:20 PM To: [email protected] cc: Subject: Re: Squaw Bill You're right on, what you said yesterday about Cameron's taking responsibility for herself, instead of passing off the blame. But, that's exactly why this whole thing has been good for Cameron. She sees this part of her that isn't fair or compassionate, and really wants to change it. Pinning it on her father only makes her see clearly that it isn't healthy. Half the battle is realizing that these are patterns instilled from sources outside, things she needs to correct, and then move away from. We all go through that very difficult process. "Blame" needs to arise before one can move beyond into a better place. I think we'll all see her try to be better than she's been. As for the bill, don't you think that's high? One night, the dinner, Cameron's rental, and lift tickets should come to about $500, no? How much was your half? Did they provide you with a break-down of the charges? I don't mean to be a pain, but I don't really trust their methods after this debacle. Cheers, Scott >From: [email protected] >To: [email protected] >Subject: Squaw Bill >Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2001 13:45:10 -0500 > >Here's the original note that I sent about the bill (yours and ms >cameron's) that ended up on my bill. >************************************************************************ >Hi. I've got all the paperwork. The bill (on my bill) for you guys is >$740. I'll get you the paperwork tonite. Sorry for the mix-up (should I >ask Squaw for a discount due to all the mess!?!?). > _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com =====================================
2,935	Subject: Emprical Study on High Prices Sender: [email protected] Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]'] File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/1930. ===================================== Attached is a paper that was filed at the FERC by Paul Joskow and Ed Kahn. I assume it was attached to SCE's comments in the FERC price caps proceeding. This study appears to be the most definite analysis so far of the question: did market fundamentals or generator market power cause the price run-ups this summer? Joskow/Kahn conclude that although much of the run up was due to gas prices and NOx costs, that the market was unworkably competitive; i.e., the cost run ups do not fully explain the price run ups. Further, they provide what they claim is evidence that individual generators withheld this summer. Joskow/Kahn state: "Moreover, there is considerable empirical evidence to support a presumption that the high prices experienced in the summer of 2000 were the product of deliberate actions on the part of generators or marketers controlling the dispatch of generating capacity to withhold supply and increase market prices." Biggest withholders in their analysis are: AES/Williams, Reliant, and Dynegy Marketer/traders are largely but not completely spared criticism in their analysis. Joskow/Kahn recommend that FERC staff undertake a study of the entire WSCC data to "Determine the role of marketers in the production and bidding behavior of the California generators." and to find out more why CA imports fell. It will be interesting to see how the CA generators react to this study. My initial read is that this is will be received as an important, influential work. It will fuel the fire for more information release, especially by the UDCs and CA regulators--at least release of physical operational data. I would be interested in your reaction to the study. In terms of potential criticisms: I noticed that their gas prices might be low (used monthly average data rather than daily). They also did not account for generator marginal profit or margin recovery to account for possible outages and noncontiguous schedules. Finally, they do not examine the benefits that would have accrued had additional capacity come on line. Alan Comnes =====================================
2,936	Subject: FW: Comparison Exhibit Templates Sender: [email protected] Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]'] File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/4179. ===================================== Attached is a Comparison Exhibit, put together by Energy Division, that each party submitting testimony has been asked to complete. I am not sure how far we can go with it given the limited nature of our testimony. But please review and give me any thoughts you may have. Jeanne -----Original Message----- From: Roscow, Steve [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2001 6:30 PM To: Walwyn, Christine M.; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; Vanko, Maria; Durgin, Pamela M.; Casey, Sean F.; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]' Subject: Comparison Exhibit Templates All-- Attached are the electronic versions of the "final" draft templates for the Comparison Exhibit. I have tried to send this document to every party who served testimony, and for whom I could find an e-mail address. If I missed anyone, I will provide the material to them during a break in the hearings tomorrow (Thursday). The next step will be for each party to fill out the template, and return it via e-mail to me. Then, we will compile them into one document and distribute it to everyone for review, before we finalize the document. I hope I have incorporated all suggested edits, if not, please let me know. The Word document and the Excel document should BOTH be completed and returned to me. Thank you Steve Roscow CPUC Energy Division 415-703-1189 <<Comparsion Excel Template.xls>> <<Comparison Exhibit WORD template.doc>> - Comparsion Excel Template.xls - Comparison Exhibit WORD template.doc =====================================
2,937	Subject: Final Legislative Update - Third Special Session Sender: [email protected] Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]'] File: dasovich-j/deleted_items/923. ===================================== The Senate did not take up the SCE MOU prior to adjourning. All Assembly bills which passed out of their house of origin but were not heard in the Senate are automatically held, and all Senate bills which were amended in the Assembly but needed to go back to the Senate for concurrence are automatically held. Those bills include, among others: ABX2 2 (Corbett) Windfall profits tax SBX2 1 (Soto/Scott) Windfall profits tax SBX2 78 (Polanco) SCE MOU ABX2 65 (Cardoza) Market power SBX2 27 (Bowen) Direct access SBX2 39 (Speier) CPUC regulatory expansion SB 532 (Sher) Renewable portfolio standard AB 57 (Wright) CPUC reasonableness review Governor Davis issued the following statement in response to the Senate's failure to pass the MOU. This statement was issued prior to adjournment and Senator Burton indicated that he may not be willing to comply with the Governor's request for a third special session, however this is subject to change. If a third special session is called, the above-referenced bills could be reactivated: GOVERNOR DAVIS COMMENTS ON FAILURE OF SENATE TO APPROVE EDISON LEGISLATION Will Call 3rd Special Session to Keep Edison from Bankruptcy SACRAMENTO Governor Gray Davis made the following comments after legislation designed to restore Southern California Edison to creditworthiness failed to win approval in the California State Senate. "I am proud of the work done by the Assembly to get the State out of the business of buying electricity by restoring Edison to creditworthiness. Unfortunately, however, the Senate has not gotten the job done. "It is critical to keep Edison solvent so that we do not lose 3,000 Megawatts of power from renewable energy and small power producers. We worked hard to bring this energy, which was crucial in avoiding blackouts, back on-line earlier this summer. "I will call a Third Extraordinary Session, which will begin in approximately two weeks, so that Edison can avoid bankruptcy. Edison has assured me that it will not seek bankruptcy and that it believes that its creditors will continue to show restraint." ### =====================================
2,938	Subject: Re: AB 1890 Retreat Sender: [email protected] Recipients: ['[email protected]'] File: dasovich-j/all_documents/2000. ===================================== Well, if you're going to want someone from Enron, it's going to have to be me. Let me know if you're still interested. "Delaney Hunter" <[email protected]> 10/02/2000 04:51 PM Please respond to dhunter To: "Jeff Dasovich (E-mail)" <[email protected]> cc: Subject: AB 1890 Retreat Jeff- I am putting together a panel at the AB 1890 Retreat on natural gas issues and would like to include an Enron representative. We are trying to get folks who are dealing with the nuts and bolts issues, someone on the ground -- you get the idea - someone from Houston. Below are the details on the panel: Tuesday November 14th -- 1:30 p.m. - 3:00 p.m. Natural Gas Issues Issue: The future cost and availability of natural gas will become a dominant factor in the generation of electricity in California as more generation is built in future years. We have seen the natural gas price increase over 100% in the last fifteen months. Why has the price increased so dramatically? While the price increases can be expected to spur increased exploration and drilling, and this supply. Where can California expect to procure its natural gas supply and at what price over the next five to ten years? There are now some significant natural gas storage facilities coming on line - will they help hedge future price volatility? Are independent, unregulated generators concerned about our natural gas future? Who are the largest competitors to California for natural gas supply and what will be the role of new technology in increasing capture of new supply? Moderator: Keith McCrea Suggested Panelists: ____________, California Energy Commission (Fuels planner) ____________, El Paso Energy Corporation (Pipeline representative) ____________, Fuels Procurement, Calpine ____________, Enron ____________, Gas Storage Representative Ed Yates, CA League of Food Processors (customer perspective) Can you get back to me and let me know if and who could participate from Enron? Thanks for your help. Delaney P.S. You better be planning to attend this year -- at least the day sessions! :-) =====================================
2,939	Subject: Gine Project- Briefing book sections DRAFT Sender: [email protected] Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]'] File: dasovich-j/inbox/51. ===================================== Sue, Jim, Jeff, Paul: In the context of GNIE Project and the papers that shall be put forward to the participants, I am seeking your help in providing comments on paper one in the list below. I can not recommend it in its current form since it departs from Enron's line of thinking in many places. There is a tendency to make these papers neutral, but I found it actually going the other direction. Kindly advise of your point of view. It is time sensitve, and I appreciate your help Brgrds AI Dennis: I shall ask for a delay in reference to this paper for 48 hours till I consult with the colleagues above. Thank you. AI -----Original Message----- From: Vegas, Dennis Sent: Friday, August 31, 2001 1:19 PM To: Ibrahim, Amr; Shortridge, Pat; Shelk, John Cc: Robertson, Linda; Shapiro, Richard; Allen, Margaret Subject: FW: Briefing book sections DRAFT Attached as discussed is the second draft of the briefing documents for the Oct event. They have been separated per our request. These are fresh from Intellibridge and we in Houston have not reviewed them as well, but will be doing so over the weekend. The documents are attached in the order in which we intend them to appear in the Briefing Book: 1. Brief History of the Western Power Crisis (Western Power Crisis.doc) 2. Western Power Crisis Timeline (timeline.pdf) -- (Please note that on this timeline, we still need to cite sources for each of the date entries. Their graphic designer will be able to do this for us on Wednesday of next week). 3. Responses to the Nation's Energy Crunch (energy crunch clean.doc) 4. Federal vs. State Energy Policy Jurisdiction (fedvsstate.doc) 5. The Status of U.S. Electricity Restructuring (progress of states.doc) If the regulatory and government team could consolidate their feedback, it would be helpful. Once done, we would like to schedule a call for next Thursday at 3:30 pm, since we would like to do it when Intellibridge is in the DC office. Regards, - Western Power Crisis.doc - timeline.pdf - energy crunch clean.doc - fedvsstate.doc - progress of states.doc =====================================
2,940	Subject: Re: FW: Need your input for Raider Game Schedule Sender: [email protected] Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]'] File: dasovich-j/deleted_items/839. ===================================== i would goto the 12/22 game but it is in the middle of christmas shopping season and many people will have already left for the holidays or have relative over. either way, i am game for that weekend. brad --- "Tai, Tony" <[email protected]> wrote: > Sorry for another spam. I promise this all the > input that I will request on > Raiders Game. > > We do have a third choice of 12/22 (vs. Tennessee) > if you prefer. Let me > know. > > Thanks, > Tony > > -----Original Message----- > From: Kumar, Naresh [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 4:07 PM > To: Tai, Tony > Subject: RE: Need your input for Raider Game > Schedule > > > Tony: I am not here on 11/18 and I doubt I will go > for the 12/2 game as I > will be trying to catch-up after missing 2 weeks of > classes. My vote goes > for the 12/22 game against Tennessee. May be you > should put that as the 3rd > choice now that you are taking input from everyone. > > Naresh > > -----Original Message----- > From: Tai, Tony [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 3:43 PM > To: Evmba_Social@Haas. Berkeley. Edu (E-mail) > Subject: Need your input for Raider Game Schedule > > > Hello everyone, > > We have a small dilemma on the Raiders Game > schedule. The original schedule > was Nov 18 (vs. Chargers), but our HAAS contact > indicated that it's going to > be tough to get block tickets for that day. We are > still trying to get > tickets for that day. Our other alternative is to > have the game on 12/2 > (vs. Cardinals). However, the finals will start in > the following week on > 12/10. 12/2 game maybe cutting a little close to > our final schedule. > > I need your input to gauge the interest level for > either game. Please send > me a quick email if you are interested in going, and > which date (12/2 or > 11/18) do you prefer. Based on your input, we will > finalize our Raiders > Game schedule. > > Thanks, > Tony __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Make a great connection at Yahoo! Personals. http://personals.yahoo.com =====================================
2,941	Subject: Budget Cuts Sender: [email protected] Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]'] File: dasovich-j/inbox/855. ===================================== Jeff and Sue: The Governor proposed the following energy-related budget cuts today: Biomass Grant Program - Revert $5.5 million of the $11.5 million budget back to the General Fund. The program provides grants to operators of biomass plants to offset loses. Renewable Energy Loan Guarantee Fund - Revert $29.9 million back to the General Fund. The program would have required the Trade and Commerce Agency to guarantee loans made by financial institutions to eligible businesses for the permitting, manufacturing, acquisition, construction, or installation of renewable energy systems that are intended to decrease demand on the grid. Powerwalk Program - Revert $3.2 million of the $20 million budget back to the General Fund. The program requires the Conservation Corps to distribute energy efficiency information and light bulbs in low income communities. Agricultural Peak Demand - Revert $29.4 million of the $86.3 million budget back to the General Fund. The program requires the state to provide grants to the agriculture industry to install energy efficient hardware. Expedited Siting Applications - Revert $3 million back to the General Fund. The program would have aided local governments by enabling them to hire additional consultants to review siting applications. Power Plant Construction Bonuses - Revert $14 million of the $20 million budget back to the General Fund. The program provided bonuses to power plant owners who got their plants on-line within a specified time period. Renewable Energy Program - Revert $24.9 million of the $25 million budget back to the General Fund. The program would have required the state to establish a renewable energy program to provide financial assistance to public power entities, independent generators, utilities, or businesses manufacturing renewable energy generation components or systems, or both, to generate new and renewable energy sources. Oil and Natural Gas Pumping - Revert $9.6 million back to the General Fund. The program would have provided for energy efficiency audits of various oil and natural gas facilities. =====================================
2,942	Subject: For the 5th consecutive year, BA294.1 Corporate Social Sender: [email protected] Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]'] File: dasovich-j/deleted_items/724. ===================================== BA294.1 Corporate Social Responsibility brings top-notch speakers who will discuss how today's companies deal with increasingly complex issues of social concern, and how their companies cope with the challenges and take advantage of the opportunities arising in this rapidly changing world. "As the globalisation debate develops, from the events at Seattle to Davos this year, companies are seeing there is something out there they haven't understood -- that society wants more from business" (Financial Times, 02-02-2001) Why does an institution such as UBS Financial Services Group take Corporate Social Responsibility so seriously? Want to find out what it is and how to deliver it? Sign up for BA294.1 Corporate Social Responsibility. BA294.1 Corporate Social Responsibility Thursdays 4-6pm, Spring 2002 One unit Guest lecture series How can corporations enhance customer value and build competitive advantage through social responsibility? This class will explore current challenges and opportunities facing companies in areas of corporate social responsibility. Through discussions with speakers each week we will examine and evaluate contemporary trends in corporate responsibility with respect to environmental protection, community development, employee welfare etc. and relate these elements to their business strategy and business opportunities. The speaker schedule is not yet finalized, but it will be comparable to last years schedule. Past speakers have included Paul Rice (Transfair USA), Ray Anderson (Interface), Amory Lovins (Rocky Mountain Institute), David Olsen (Patagonia), Paul Dolan (Fetzer Vineyards), George Zimmer (Men's Warehouse), Amanda Tucker (Nike), Geoffrey Ashton (Calvert Investment Funds), Thomas W. Van Dyck (US Bancorp Piper Jaffray), and Gail Brownell (Agilent). "Sustainability has become a crucial success factor in business. Moving proactively to meet future economic, environmental and social challenges is increasingly seen as an important lever to increase long-term shareholder value." (STOXX Limited's Managing Director Scott Stark) =====================================
2,943	Subject: PDF Attachment-Request for Confidential Information by the GAO Sender: [email protected] Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]'] File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/761. ===================================== A PDF version of the original letter is attached below. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------ To All California Power Exchange Participants: Notice is hereby provided pursuant to Section 19.3.4 of the California Power Exchange Tariff that the United States General Accounting Office (GAO), as part of the ongoing investigation of California markets, has requested the same information to be provided to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC). Such information may be confidential under Section 19.3.2 of the Tariff. The manner in which the GAO will treat such confidential information is outlined in the attached letter. The GAO states that it has authority under 31 U.S.C. 717 to evaluate programs or activities of the Federal Government, in this case, deregulation of the electricity markets initiated by FERC. The GAO has requested the California Power Exchange to provide such information no later than Thursday, October 5, 2000. If you desire to assert a claim of privilege or confidentiality pursuant to legal authority, the California Power Exchange will include your written assertion of that claim together with its submittal to the GAO, provided that it is timely received. Your written statement should be directed to the GAO as follows: Mr. Jim Wells Director, Energy Resources, and Science Issues United States General Accounting Office Washington, DC 20548 You may deliver your statement to the California Power Exchange as follows: Karen Koyano California Power Exchange 1000 S. Fremont Avenue Unit 20 Alhambra, CA 91801 626.537.3173 facsimile Any written statement must be received by Ms. Koyano no later than Wednesday, October 4, 2000, 5:00 p.m. Pacific Daylight Time, to be included with any information delivered to the GAO. You are also free to take any other legal action you may deem appropriate in the circumstances of this investigation. Thank you. (See attached file: GAO Letter 9-22-00.pdf) - GAO Letter 9-22-00.pdf =====================================
2,944	Subject: Important info. for MAY GRADS. and continuing students in regards Sender: [email protected] Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]'] File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/3580. ===================================== FOR MAY GRADUATES:? PLEASE MAKE SURE AND REGISTER WITH THE HAAS ALUMNI WEB SITES ON-LINE-COMMUNITY DIRECTOR http://www.alumniconnections.com/olc/pub/HAA/ IMPORTANT CAREER INFO. FOR 5/01 GRADS: YOU CAN USE ALL OF THE CAREER CENTERS RESOURCES FOR FREE ANYTIME, SOME OF THE RESOURCES ARE:? BEARTRACKS, EXECUTIVE RECRUITER DIRECTORY, THE VARIOUS BOOKS; ON RESUMES, COVER LETTERS, SALARY NEGOTIATIONS, CASE INTERVIEWING, SALARY NEGOTIATIONS, INTERVIEWING, NETWORKING ETC... YOU ARE ELIGIBLE TO RECEIVE CAREER ADVISING FOR FREE DURING YOUR 1ST SIX MONTHS OUT OF THE PROGRAM (till December 01).? AFTER THE FIRST SIX MONTHS THERE IS A $150 FEE FOR UP TO 3 SESSIONS WITH THE HAAS ALUMNI CAREER ADVISOR (That's me) FOR CONTINUING STUDENTS PLEASE READ ON IF YOU ARE INTERESTED IN CAREER RELATED SERVICES DURING THE SUMMER CAREER CHANGERS SEMINAR: (May 01 grads. are welcome to attend) a seminar for individuals considering transitioning into a different line of work.? We will focus on how to leverage transferrable ability, skills and knowledge into a different career path.? This seminar will be on a Saturday in June, tentatively either 6/9 or 6/16 from 10 to 3.? If you are interested in attending please send me an email, letting me know your preference as far as a date.? We will hold the seminar on the date with that has greatest preference. On-Campus-Recruiting Boot Camp (final date 7/28):? If you are within 12 months of graduating and haven't already sent me an email, please reply letting me know you are eligible and interested in participating in registering for the fall 01 - spring 02 OCR program.? In this seminar we will cover all related OCR topics/process. For your convenience the career center and the EveMBA Career Advisor are available during the summer.?? The career center will be open M-F from 9 to 4, I will be available during those hours, as well as by appointment after 4:00, with a 24 hour advanced notice.?? If you want to work on any career related issue please feel free to contact me during the summer 510-642-7731 or [email protected] =====================================
2,945	Subject: TARL Agenda for Wednesday March 14 Sender: [email protected] Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]'] File: dasovich-j/all_documents/9793. ===================================== The details of the time and place for the meeting are forthcoming (as soon as my assistant arranges everything). W. Wayne Gardner Enron Broadband Services 1400 Smith Street Houston, TX 77002-7361 Phone: 713 853 3547 Fax: 713 646 2532 ----- Forwarded by Wayne Gardner/Enron Communications on 09/03/2001 11:25 ----- Wayne Gardner 09/03/2001 11:17 To: Alisa Christensen/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Beth Wapner/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Cynthia Harkness/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, David DeGabriele/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Derenda Plunkett/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Donald Lassere/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, James Ginty/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Jan Haizmann/LON/ECT@ECT, Jane Wilson/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@ENRON, Lara Leibman/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Michelle Hicks/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Mike Dahlke/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Paul Racicot/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Rajen Shah/LON/ECT@ECT, Richard Anderson/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Robbi Rossi/Enron Communications, Sue Nord/NA/Enron@ENRON, Vicky Gregorcyk/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Xi Xi/Enron Communications cc: Subject: TARL Agenda for Wednesday March 14 Below is the proposed agenda for the next TARL meeting: 1. Discussion of Singapore license fee response from IDA (All) 2. Follow-up on preliminary tax analysis of trading Hong Kong bandwidth through other trading desk entities (Wayne Gardner) 3. Licensing of EBS L.P. for trading Canadian bandwidth (Sue Nord) 4. Status of bandwidth trading in Latin America. (Sue Nord and Wayne Gardner) 5. Licensing the US and UK trading desks (in addition to the Singapore desk) to trade in Asia and Latin America. (Jan Haizmann and Sue Nord) As always, comments are welcome. W. Wayne Gardner Enron Broadband Services 1400 Smith Street Houston, TX 77002-7361 Phone: 713 853 3547 Fax: 713 646 2532 =====================================
2,946	Subject: RE: Party Sender: [email protected] Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]'] File: dasovich-j/all_documents/11102. ===================================== FYI on attire for Scott's birthday dinner next Friday night (of which you must attend)... Cameron Sellers Vice President, Business Development PERFECT 1860 Embarcadero Road - Suite 210 Palo Alto, CA 94303 [email protected] 650.798.3366 (direct dial) 650.269.3366 (cell) 650.858.1095 (fax) -----Original Message----- From: Rogers, Sarah [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, April 13, 2001 2:58 PM To: 'Cameron Sellers' Cc: 'Scott Laughlin' Subject: RE: Party OK. Please inform Prentice and Jeff of this rule. Anyone not in compliance will be referred to only as "the riff-raff" over dinner. Fondly, Sarah E. Rogers -----Original Message----- From: Cameron Sellers [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, April 13, 2001 3:02 PM To: 'Rogers, Sarah' Cc: 'Scott Laughlin' Subject: RE: Party Definitely dress up. What I am is what I wear. Signed, Birthday Boy's Beloved Cameron Sellers Vice President, Business Development PERFECT 1860 Embarcadero Road - Suite 210 Palo Alto, CA 94303 [email protected] 650.798.3366 (direct dial) 650.269.3366 (cell) 650.858.1095 (fax) -----Original Message----- From: Rogers, Sarah [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, April 13, 2001 2:52 PM To: Scott Laughlin (E-mail); Cameron Sellers (E-mail) Subject: Party Let me start off by thanking Scott for going with me to the New Yorker thing - that and the Oriental "massage" parlor afterwards were great! Secondly, Alison and I were thinking that it might be fun to get somewhat dressed up for the party on Friday, since it is THE social event of the season. What do you guys think? I'm not talking black-tie, but I am looking for an excuse to wear a skirt or dress. But I leave it up to the birthday boy and the birthday boy's beloved. Please advise. ________________ Sarah Rogers Solutions Marketing Jamcracker, Inc. 19000 Homestead Rd. Cupertino, CA 95014 p: 408-725-4301 f: 408-725-4310 www.jamcracker.com - Sounds like a job for Jamcracker. More about the Jamcracker solution: www.jamcracker.com/solution/s1.shtml Jamcracker in the news: www.jamcracker.com/news/n1.shtml =====================================
2,947	Subject: Re: Teams Sender: [email protected] Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]'] File: dasovich-j/all_documents/1975. ===================================== Hi Christine: Yes, forwarded the email you sent last week. Here's where folks came out. First, we think that the folks in your first group are mean. Second, it's a real challenge managing a group of four and there's concern that five will break the camel's back. Suggestion came up that it might be much more mangageable if you could try to link up with a smaller group first. If there's a problem finding a smaller group, then we could try to do five and hope the ship don't sink? Sound reasonable? Best, Jeff Christine Piesco <[email protected]> 10/02/2000 01:14 PM To: [email protected] cc: Subject: Re: Teams Jeff, Have you had a chance to convey what I said to the group, and can I join? Professor Aceves was aware that I talked to you about joining your group, and he sent me an email asking to confirm that I was now in a group. I'd certainly like to be! As you know, I want to make sure I am in one to do the next assignment with. Please let me know, so that if I am joining your group I can make the meetings and contribute to the next case. I do really appreciate your help. :) Thanks, Christine [email protected] wrote: > Christine: > > My apologies. My schedule melted down after we talked on Monday. Here's > where folks came out. There's some concern about size. We're supposed to > be no larger than 3, but we lobbied Aceves and he apparently Ok'd our > "oversized" group. The other folks in the group--who talked to him > originally--are pretty sure that five will violate the rules. Folks > wondered if there were other groups that are smaller than ours that you > could hook up with. Sorry about that---it's a wrinkle that I didn't think > about when we spoke. If it gets real ugly trying to find a smaller group, > let me know. Fortunately there's not another team case due for two weeks. > > Best, > Jeff -- Christine Piesco Industrials Account Manager Oracle Corporation 500 Oracle Parkway Redwood Shores, CA 94065 Phone: (650) 506-3640 Fax: (650) 633-3753 [email protected] - christine.piesco.vcf =====================================
2,948	Subject: Re: Network Performance and Reliability Sender: [email protected] Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]'] File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/4785. ===================================== Some of the interconnection agreements that we are looking at, have metrics for performance. However, those metrics are specific to how the ILEC performs with regard to the CLEC. I believe those metrics are confidential between the parties to the interconnection agreement. Once we sign agreements, we will receive reports from the ILECs on their performance relative to us, in a very limited way. We would not receive information relative to that ILECs performance for any other carrier. Sue Nord 03/21/2001 02:41 PM To: Dung Tran/Enron Communications@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS cc: Barbara A Hueter/NA/Enron@Enron, [email protected], Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, John Neslage/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Lara Leibman/NA/Enron@Enron, Linda Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Marchris Robinson/NA/Enron@Enron, Margo Reyna/NA/Enron@Enron, Mona L Petrochko/NA/Enron@Enron, Ricardo Charvel/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Scott Bolton/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Stephen D Burns/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Susan M Landwehr/NA/Enron@Enron, [email protected], Eric Benson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Mike Dahlke/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Allison Navin/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Carmen Perez/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Karen Huang/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Ginger Dernehl/NA/Enron@Enron, Maureen McVicker/NA/Enron@Enron, Elizabeth Linnell/NA/Enron@Enron Subject: Re: Network Performance and Reliability Hi Dung, I haven't seen anything with performance or reliability metrics. I'll send this around to the other people in our group to see if they've seen anything. Sue Dung Tran@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS 03/20/2001 04:18 PM To: Sue Nord/NA/Enron@Enron cc: Subject: Network Performance and Reliability Sue, We're looking at evaluating our network metrics vs. other carriers. Most of the information I have found centers on reach (i.e. miles of fiber, presence, etc.) as opposed ot performance or reliability. Has anything crossed your attention in the Regulatory space that looks at this type of issue? Dung =====================================
2,949	Subject: Registration Confirmation: Larry Summers on 12/6 at 1:45pm (was Re: Sender: [email protected] Recipients: ['[email protected]'] File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/1711. ===================================== At 03:42 PM 11/15/00 -0600, you wrote: I would like to attend the event with Secretary Summers. PLEASE READ THE FOLLOWING ANNOUNCEMENT CAREFULLY Thank you for your interest in attending the program at the Haas School of= =20 Business featuring United States Secretary of the Treasury Larry Summers.?= =20 Secretary Summers will be at the Haas School on Wednesday December 6, 2000 = as=20 part of the 2000-2001 Haas Business Faculty Research Dialogue.? His speech= =20 will take place in the Haas School=01,s Arthur Andersen Auditorium at 1:45p= m.?=20 Secretary Summers will talk about his experiences as a primary shaper of U.= S.=20 economic policy during the past eight years, first as Robert Rubin=01,s dep= uty=20 in the first Clinton Administration and later replacing Rubin as Secretary = of=20 the Treasury.? Secretary Summers will also talk about the prospects for=20 continued growth in the U.S. economy under the next presidential=20 administration. All seats for the program on Wednesday December 6, 2000 will be allocated o= n=20 a first-come, first served basis and seating will be limited.? All Haas=20 School faculty and students are being requested to reserve a seat in the=20 Auditorium by sending an email to [email protected] by=20 Monday November 20, as you have done.? All emailed requests should include = a=20 full name as well as Haas School affiliation/class.? After November 20, sea= ts=20 will be made available to other members of the UC Berkeley community.?=20 Therefore, please remind your colleagues to send their requests soon to=20 guarantee their seating in the Auditorium. If you have qualified for a seat in the Auditorium for the program with=20 Secretary of the Treasury Larry Summers, you will receive confirmation by= =20 email no later than Monday November 27.? If you were not able to get a seat= =20 in the Auditorium, you will receive notification about how you may be able = to=20 view the program via simulcast.? If you have additional questions about the= =20 program, please contact Pam Gleason in the Dean=01,s Office at 510-643-2027= . =====================================
2,950	Subject: E206, Main ideas of cases Sender: [email protected] Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]'] File: dasovich-j/mba__marketing/10. ===================================== Some of you have asked me to give you a brief summary of the main ideas in= =20 the cases until this week. Please find below such summary, and the readings= =20 that are most associated with each case. Miguel Main Ideas for Cases until this week "Fieldcrest: St. Mary=01,s Blankets" (introduction to marketing analysis and basic concepts) Marketing-Mix - 4 P=01,s=20 Consumer analysis=20 Trade analysis Push or Pull marketing programs "Xerox Corporation: The Customer Satisfaction Program" (customer needs; W: Chap. 1, pp. 364-367; you may also want to look at pp.= =20 391-397 for extra reading) Customer needs and marketing concept=20 Customer satisfaction Implementation of Customer Satisfaction programs Choice of a product guarantee - signaling quality "Procter & Gamble Company (A)" (segmentation and marketing strategy; W: Chap. 3 and Chap. 5, "Note on=20 Consumer Market Segmentation") benefit segmentation =3D> product positioning product line logic in positioning and segmentation problem of cannibalization in product introductions interbrand competition versus coordination communications of desired positioning issue of umbrella branding break-even analysis "Barco Projection Systems (A)" (product strategy and segmentation; W: pp.65-71, pp. 111-118, pp. 176-186;= =20 after the course you may also want to look at Chap. 15 for extra reading on= =20 technology-based industries) (also competitive pricing which are covered in th and th sessions) Strategic segmentation using product line Price dynamics in technology based industries R&D competition Understanding the competitors "EMI and the CT Scanner (A) & (B)" All material until 4th session "Tweeter, etc." (Pricing, competitive strategies; W: Chap. 7 and 11) "Dell Online" (Distribution channels, W: Chap. 9) "Ford Motor Co." All material in course =20 J. Miguel Villas-Boas Associate Professor Haas School of Business University of California at Berkeley Berkeley CA 94720-1900 (510) 642-1250 Fax: (510) 643-1420 e-mail: [email protected] http://www.haas.berkeley.edu/~market/PROFILES/PROFS/villas.html =====================================
2,951	Subject: Utilities, Electric: Deregulation: Electric Utilities Ask U.S. Sender: [email protected] Recipients: ['[email protected]', "nicholas.o'[email protected]", '[email protected]', '[email protected]'] File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/829. ===================================== ----- Forwarded by Miyung Buster/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 10/05/2000 09:41 AM ----- [email protected] 09/29/2000 09:43 AM Please respond to nobody To: [email protected] cc: Subject: Utilities, Electric: Deregulation: Electric Utilities Ask U.S. Agency for Help Metropolitan Desk; Section B Electric Utilities Ask U.S. Agency for Help By Joseph P. Fried ? 09/29/2000 The New York Times Page 6, Column 5 c. 2000 New York Times Company Consolidated Edison and Orange and Rockland Utilities urged federal energy regulators yesterday to reform New York State's wholesale electricity market to reduce energy prices. The utility companies, blamed by many of their customers for this summer's high electricity bills, contended that they were not responsible for the higher charges, which they called the result of excessively high wholesale energy costs in the state's deregulated electricity market. The utilities' request came in papers filed with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission in a proceeding involving the New York State Independent System Operator, which administrates the wholesale energy market in the state. Among the changes the two utilities urged was revision of Independent System Operator ''market rules and procedures that discourage economically efficient imports'' of electricity from other regions, like New England. They also called for changes in rules power generators must follow, to avoid severe day-to-day fluctuation in electricity prices. Joseph P. Fried Folder Name: Utilities, Electric: Deregulation Relevance Score on Scale of 100: 98 ______________________________________________________________________ To review or revise your folder, visit Dow Jones CustomClipsor contact Dow Jones Customer Service by e-mail at [email protected] by phone at 800-369-7466. (Outside the U.S. and Canada, call 609-452-1511 or contact your local sales representative.) ______________________________________________________________________ Copyright (c) 2000 Dow Jones &Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved =====================================
2,952	Subject: Re: Meeting 8AM Central Monday Sender: [email protected] Recipients: ['Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron', '[email protected]', 'Don Black/HOU/EES@EES'] File: dasovich-j/sent/4135. ===================================== ----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 04/14/2001 06:09 PM ----- Scott Stoness@EES Sent by: Rosalinda Tijerina@EES 04/13/2001 01:51 PM To: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@ENRON cc: Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Don Black/HOU/EES@EES, [email protected]@ENRON, Tamara Johnson/HOU/EES@EES, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, James W Lewis/HOU/EES@EES Subject: Re: Meeting 8AM Central Monday The dial-in number is listed below (for Monday, April 16 at 8:00 a.m. (CST). James D Steffes@ENRON 04/13/2001 01:15 PM To: Scott Stoness/HOU/EES@EES cc: Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Don Black/HOU/EES@EES, [email protected], Tamara Johnson/HOU/EES@EES, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, James W Lewis/HOU/EES@EES, Leslie Lawner/HOU/EES@EES Subject: Re: Meeting 8AM Central Monday Scott -- Can your assistant get a call in # for those in CA? Jim Scott Stoness@EES 04/13/2001 12:00 PM To: Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Don Black/HOU/EES@EES, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@ENRON, [email protected]@ENRON, Tamara Johnson/HOU/EES@EES, Jeff Dasovich/Na/Enron@ENRON, James W Lewis/HOU/EES@EES, Leslie Lawner/HOU/EES@EES, Leslie Lawner/HOU/EES@EES cc: Subject: Meeting 8AM Central Monday We have agreed on a strategy, subject to Whaley/Delaney approval, to: Scott Stoness submit testimony today advocating 2 part real time pricing in CA Read other parties testimony this weekend from the perspective "Has somebody filed testimony close enough to Stoness testimony, that we can cross examine and brief to a favorable outcome?" Meet on Monday at 8AM to decide whether to rescind Stoness's testimony. The following dial in number and code corresponds to the Monday 8AM Central Time meeting. 1 800 713 8600 68266 is PIN Scott Stoness is host Action Items: All on To list above read and have opinion on 2 and 3 above All on To list above meet on Monday at 8AM. Meet in Stoness office if possible. Harry and Jeane polish Stoness testimony and wait to the last minute before submitting it Jeane ensure all on this To list get a copy of testimony, emailed as soon as she gets it. Scott Stoness =====================================
2,953	Subject: Re: Group Think Sender: [email protected] Recipients: ['[email protected]'] File: dasovich-j/mba__managerial_accting/2. ===================================== Hi Jeff, I changed my 'out of town' plans and will be making it to the case review session this weekend. see you on Saturday!! ps. is your office easily accessible via bart? - Kelly Also, here's fyi some of the questions that I came up with when going over the case... 1. Problem #1 and #2: When calculating incremental cost do we include fixed costs (i.e. $10,000 for tooling plastic rings) and do we include sunk costs materials for the steel inventory? In addition, do we need to break out the overhead into fixed and variable and include only the variable portion in the calculation of incremental cost? 2. Problem #3: What are we supposed to be comparing to calculate differential cost of the 25,450 steel rings? 3. Problem #4: What time period should we include in calculating profit? Is it enough to look strictly at present time (per unit costs)? Or should we look at profit over for example 5 years (from looking at the replacement rate of plastic rings)? 4. Problem #5: Once we calculate problems #1 - #3, do we assume that Burggeman is the only plastic ring producer? And should we look at customer desire to reduce their costs by buying plastic over steel rings because of the difference in usable life? --- [email protected] wrote: > > Ok, looks like the Orbit Room can't handle the size of our group so there's > been a proposed change of venue for Saturday's meeting. If anyone has > alternative suggestions, feel free to propose. > > Accounting discussion 10AM-11AM (for Tues/Thurs folks) > Marketing discussion 11AM-Noon (for all) > > Meet at my office. > > 101 California Street (one block from the cable car turnaround) > Suite 1950 > > Enter at the California Street entrance > Buzz at the door; guard will let you in > Guard will know to enable elevator to get you to the 19th floor > I'll keep the door to the office ajar so that folks can enter easily once > on 19th floor > > Sound reasonable? Did I miss anything. > > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger. http://im.yahoo.com =====================================
2,954	Subject: RE: Grand total is....! Sender: [email protected] Recipients: ['[email protected]'] File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/4375. ===================================== Yes and I was around last night when you didn't show up. I waited all night. Cameron Sellers Vice President, Business Development PERFECT 1860 Embarcadero Road - Suite 210 Palo Alto, CA 94303 [email protected] 650.798.3366 (direct dial) 650.269.3366 (cell) 650.858.1095 (fax) -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2001 12:30 PM To: Cameron Sellers Subject: RE: Grand total is....! You're kidding. You mean they've double billed us? Can you find you're credit card bill? They can find each and every receipt, who signed it, etc., so that we can make sure they don't screw us. I'll bring my stuff over tonite. If they've double billed us, I'm going to suggest that they owe us a comp up there. No worries, though. They've got the paper work, and if we've paid twice, they're just going to need to credit my card. No big deal. Just a hassle having to deal with 'em. You around tonite? Cameron Sellers To: "'[email protected]'" <cameron@perf <[email protected]>, Cameron Sellers ect.com> <[email protected]>, [email protected] cc: 04/11/2001 Subject: RE: Grand total is....! 01:53 PM We definitely need to see the paperwork since we already paid a bill of at least that much so far. Don't worry, though we will make sure that you don't get stuck with anything and work it all out. Cameron Sellers Vice President, Business Development PERFECT 1860 Embarcadero Road - Suite 210 Palo Alto, CA 94303 [email protected] 650.798.3366 (direct dial) 650.269.3366 (cell) 650.858.1095 (fax) -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2001 11:25 AM To: [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Grand total is....! Hi. I've got all the paperwork. The bill (on my bill) for you guys is $740. I'll get you the paperwork tonite. Sorry for the mix-up (should I ask Squaw for a discount due to all the mess!?!?). Best, Jeff =====================================
2,955	Subject: FW: Comments on MOU/SCE memo of April 20, 2001 Sender: [email protected] Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]'] File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/3841. ===================================== -----Original Message----- From: Tribolet, Michael Sent: Saturday, April 28, 2001 1:23 PM To: '[email protected]' Subject: Comments on MOU/SCE memo of April 20, 2001 As we discussed, here are my comments/questions on the presentation. 1. On page 17, in 2003-4, the DWR purchases $4.7B in power. The MOU states that SCE would be obligated for purchased power beginning in 2003. 2. On page 17, the debt service figure did not tie to the footnotes. Using both the $2.7B and $1.5B DWR note issuances, the annual debt service is approximately $430 mln per year on a mortgage type amortization and about $500 million per year on a straight-line amortization. The table indicates approximately $750 mln per year in debt service. Was the $3B SCE issue's debt service accidentally captured in these figures? 3. The SCE day one pre-tax sources appear to be : Bond issuance by SCE $3,000 mln Payment by parent $ 400 mln (at least) Sale of transmission $2,760 mln Total SCE inflows $6,160 mln What is needed is the model that shows that the original 4.9 cents covers cost of service and QF's, plus debt service, after these inflows reduce the current debt and past due vendors amounts. We have no way to test the sufficiency of these amount versus a pro-forma debt structure. 4. The MOU states that SCE shall securitize its full net undercollected amount (approx. $3.5 billion), yet the presentation shows a $3B financing. What is the difference? 5. We need the economic assumptions on the DWR power purchases (volume, tenor, cost, etc.) 6. Is the total consumption figure listed prior to the 3% buydown or after giving effect for it (pages 27 to 29)? 7. The transmission sale to the State of California's SPV does not appear to finance itself at the current rates of return. If the current pretax, pre interest return is approximately 13%, the return after giving effect for the 2.3x purchase price is only about 5.5%. This does not appear to be sufficient to service the associated debt. Regards, Michael A. Tribolet =====================================
2,956	Subject: CDWR Message Points Sender: [email protected] Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]'] File: dasovich-j/all_documents/27928. ===================================== Agreed. My initial thoughts -- 1. More Government isn't the answer. If this proves anything, it is that Government is the wrong party to manage consumer's energy price risk. 2. This is a 10 year hangover. The total bill = $### billion. 3. Direct Access is a better solution for California. Let businesses manage their own needs, rather than a small public agency never designed to take on this task. 4. Too much, too late. CDWR should have been buying to manage the cost for 2001, not worrying about 2007. Any contract that starts after Sept 2002 is simply not a part of any real solution. By the way, I think that if pressed, Enron has to be very clear - we are not advocating abrogation of contracts. Jim P.S. Jennifer will be ready to present something at the call. From: Paul Kaufman/ENRON@enronXgate on 06/18/2001 07:37 PM To: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron cc: Subject: RE: CDWR Contract Analysis Given Jeff's work on the comprehensive solution, we will need to develop a relatively quick public posture on the contracts to convey to our lobbyist folks. Bev has already asked for some input. I told her we would have an initial view on Tuesday for our California call. -----Original Message----- From: Steffes, James Sent: Monday, June 18, 2001 9:39 AM To: Kean, Steven; Shapiro, Richard; Kaufman, Paul; Dasovich, Jeff; Mara, Susan; Comnes, Alan; Alvarez, Ray; Robertson, Linda; Palmer, Mark; Denne, Karen; Sharma, Ban; Fraser, Jennifer; Tribolet, Michael; Thome, Jennifer; Linnell, Elizabeth; Guerrero, Janel Subject: CDWR Contract Analysis Jennifer Thome will be coordinating the review of CDWR's contracts beginning this morning. If anyone has any issues that need to be considered in the review, please make sure that Jennifer understands the issues. Jennifer Fraser has volunteered someone from her team to help. We will be working with ENA Legal in Portland (through Alan Comnes) to help with the review. Please call Jennifer Thome if there are any questions. Jennifer will provide an update on timing etc. at the end of the day. Thanks, Jim =====================================
2,957	Subject: Healthcare/Biotech Firm Night, Monday, Nov. 19 Sender: [email protected] Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]'] File: dasovich-j/inbox/1553. ===================================== Interested in Business Development, Finance, Marketing, Sales, and Consulting Positions in Biotechnology and Healthcare? Come find out about exciting careers at premier Biotechnology, Medical Device, Pharmaceutical, Management Consulting, and Health Services Companies at the MBA Healthcare/Biotechnology Firm Night on Monday, November 19, 6-8:30pm Marine?s Memorial Club 609 Sutter Street San Francisco Companies that are attending: Axys Pharmaceuticals Blue Shield Chiron Earnst Young Cap Gemini ePocrates Fluidigm Genentech Genetics Institute/Novartis Gilead Sciences Guidant Kaiser Lifescan/J&J McKesson PRTM Food and drinks will be served. Dress is Business Casual. To Attend: 1. Submit your resume in the box labeled Healthcare/Biotech Firm Night in the MBA student lounge by 5pm, Wednesday, November 14. 2. Cost of Admission: Members of the Haas Biotech Club or Healthcare@Haas Club (ie you have paid club dues for 2001-2002): FREE ADMISSION Non-Members have 2 options: 1. Attach a check to your resume payable to the Haas Biotech Club for $15 for admission to Firm Night or 2. Join either the Haas Biotech Club or Healthcare@Haas Club for $20 for 2001-2002 and get into Firm Night free. Attach a check to your resume for $20 payable to the name of the club you want to join. Please visit the club websites for more information: Haas Biotech Club http://groups.haas.berkeley.edu/haasbio/ Healthcare@Haas Club http://groups.haas.berkeley.edu/hcc/ Directions: ? FROM EAST BAY/BAY BRIDGE Take 5th Street/Downtown Exit (Exit to the left) Veer Left onto Harrison Street Take Harrison 1 block West to 6th Street and turn Right Cross Market Street (becomes Taylor Street) Follow Taylor to Bush Street, Make a Right on Bush Follow Bush to Mason, Make a Right on Mason Follow Mason to Sutter, Make a Right on Sutter The Club is at 609 Sutter Street on the corner of Mason Street BART Take BART from Berkeley and get off at the Powell stop. Walk up Powell St. and turn left onto Sutter St. The Club is at 609 Sutter Street on the corner of Mason Street =====================================
2,958	Subject: Berkeley Entrepreneurs Forum, November 29, 2001 Sender: [email protected] Recipients: ['[email protected]'] File: dasovich-j/inbox/874. ===================================== UC Berkeley Entrepreneurs Forum Thursday, November 29, 2001 6:30 - 8:30 PM Haas School of Business Arthur Andersen Auditorium _________________________________ Topic: The Indus Connection: East Meets West In Silicon Valley Speakers: Dr. Kailash Joshi, President, TiE World-wide; Vani Kola, CEO & Founder, NthOrbit; Kumar Malavalli, Co-Founder & VP Technology, Brocade; Moderated by Gurmeet Naroola, Author, The Entrepreneurial Connection. Silicon Vallley's rapid growth and vibrant development has benefited significantly from new entrants from all over the world. Over 30% of new ventures in the Valley since 1980 have been founded by Indian and Chinese emigrants. Unusually open and meritocratic, the Valley's strong network -based culture has provided a home for many bright young engineers seeking to establish themselves in the United States. Natural risk takers, having already chosen to emigrate to the U.S., they often opt to found their own companies if careers in big firms do not prove rewarding. Mutual support and networking groups of all kinds enhanced the ability of these new entrants to succeed- and succeed they did! On November 29, we are happy to host a panel of entrepreneurs who exemplify this important phenomenon. Registration: You may pre- register until Tuesday, November 27, 2001 at 4 PM. The pre- registration fee is $35. The fee for on-site registration will be $45. Note: On-site registration is subject to space available. The pre-registration by MC/Visa may be faxed to (510) 642 4110 or you may call (510) 642 4255 and pre-register over the phone. Our office hours are Monday through Friday 8-12 and 1-5. REMEMBER TO PRE- REGISTER!!!!! Parking: Throughout the time of pre-registration you can request a parking reservation. You will be charged an additional $15 for reserved parking. Information: For more information on the series, please visit our web site at http://www.haas.berkeley.edu/groups/lester/bef.html If you wish to read more about this particular event, please go to http://www.haas.berkeley.edu/groups/lester/nov01.html =====================================
2,959	Subject: Fwd: FW: Fessler - what went wrong in CA Sender: [email protected] Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]'] File: dasovich-j/all_documents/9648. ===================================== > > > -----Original Message----- > > Electricity Daily > > > > March 2, 2001 > > > > Fessler Fesses Up to What Went Wrong in California > > Breaking a lengthy refusal to comment publicly on the California > > electricity "Perfect Storm," Dan Fessler (chairman and a member of the > > California Public Utilities Commission from 1991 to December 1996) > > described to a recent conference in New York why things have gone so awry > > in the state and what he thinks might now be done. > > His explanation of why the crisis arose is fairly conventional: a shortage > > of generation capacity; grossly erroneous predictions of the timing and > > strength of the economic recovery in the state; and a fatal decision to > > separate the California Power Exchange from the California Independent > > System Operator. That's a policy to which Fessler (now with the meaty > > LeBouef, Lamb law firm) believes that the PUC should never have agreed. > > "Little did I realize," he told the meeting, "that the market design to > > which the commission and legislature had acceded would turn out to bear a > > striking resemblance to the battle cruiser, that ill-fated darling of > > virtually every naval power in the period 1910-1914. At Jutland, it was > > belatedly discovered that these vessels-imbued with attributes of speed > > and weaponry that made them so appealing on paper-could not take a punch. > > Their armor was too thin: a fatal design flaw revealed only when they were > > tested in battle." > > So what do we do now? Fessler suggests "a technique which I advocated in > > 1996 and which remains available for deployment next week. If successfully > > implemented, my suggestion would directly assail the vehicle of high > > prices by enlisting self-interested opportunistic behavior to make the > > demand curve elastic for the first time in the power crisis. > > "I propose that California pay large users to get off the system the > > moment reserves approach Stage One conditions. Demand bidding would > > replace interruptible tariffs for the simple reason that [the latter] have > > not worked." > > =====================================
2,960	Subject: Colorado Springs Meeting Sender: [email protected] Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]'] File: dasovich-j/budget/6. ===================================== One more thing, Continental Breakfast, in the Gaylord Room, will be available beginning at 7:30am on Thursday & Friday. gngr ---------------------- Forwarded by Ginger Dernehl/HOU/EES on 11/12/99 01:41 PM --------------------------- Enron Energy Services From: Ginger Dernehl 11/12/99 12:47 PM Phone No: 713 853-7751 To: Direct Reports US/Canada Government Affairs, James D Steffes/HOU/EES@EES, Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES cc: Direct Report (only) Assistants, Marcia A Linton/HOU/EES@EES, Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES Subject: Colorado Springs Meeting The meeting is upon us and I will keep everyone posted on the weather. I was told yesterday that it was in the high 70's during the day and in the low 40's during the night. But we know how that darn weather is. Anyway, our stay at the hotel is located on the "west" side of the Broadmoor. There are two main buildings to the Broadmoor so be sure to mention the "west" side when you arrive. The meetings will take place in the Gaylord Board Room beginning at 8:00am and concluding by 3:00pm on Thursday and Friday, November 18 & 19. Transportation: Airport transportation from the Colorado Springs Airport is available through the Broadmoor Transportation Service. The number is 719-577-5769. Fares: $10.50 per person one way $20.00 per person round trip The Broadmoor Transportation Desk at the Colorado Springs Airport is staffed daily from 9:00am-11:30pm. The desk is located at the base of the escalator in the Baggage Claim area, across from Baggage Terminal #3 (next to theHertz desk). Airport transportation is by reservation only. Also, below I have listed everyone's confirmation #'s. Thanks and please don't hesitate to call me with questions. gngr Joe Allen 7112261 Scott Bolton 7112275 Jeff Brown 7112276 Aleck Dadson 7112262 Jeff Dasovich 7112281 Joe Hartsoe 7112268 Paul Kaufman 7112277 Harry Kingerski 7112263 Kathleen Magruder 7112264 Sue Mara 7112278 Janine Migden 7112279 Steve Montovano 7112265 Sue Nord 7112280 Rick Shapiro 7112266 Jim Steffes 7366163 =====================================
2,961	Subject: ONLY 1 MONTH LEFT to reserve your spot at CCMI's exclusive TELECOM Sender: [email protected] Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]'] File: dasovich-j/all_documents/9366. ===================================== FYI ----- Forwarded by Scott Bolton/Enron Communications on 02/23/01 08:46 AM ----- [email protected] 02/22/01 02:53 PM To: Scott Bolton/Enron Communications@Enron Communications cc: Subject: ONLY 1 MONTH LEFT to reserve your spot at CCMI's exclusive TELECOM TARIFF WORKSHOP! ONLY 1 MONTH LEFT to reserve your spot at CCMI's exclusive TELECOM TARIFF WORKSHOP! Register today at http://www.ccmi.com/tariffworkshop/ for CCMI's Telecom Tariff Workshop on March 21, 2001 at the Oxford Hotel, Denver, CO. If you can't make this workshop in Denver, check out the remaining 4 dates & locations in 2001. We'll cover everything you need to know to start using telecommunications tariffs. Plus, we'll unveil timesaving tips for finding information you need using CCMI's TelView Tariff Library. Part I of the workshop focuses on general Tariff Training. Part II covers using the TelView Tariff Library. When you attend, you will: * Discover the differences between General Exchange Tariffs, Access Tariffs, "Negotiated Tariffs", and how they can help you. * Find out how tariffs are organized, so you can find exactly what you're looking for. * Learn where to find tariff sections like Switched and Special Access, Local Calling Areas and Plans, ISDN, and more. * Get searching tips that'll save you hours of time when using TelView's search functions. * Find out how to use TelView's convenient bookmarks to zero in on key tariff sections. * And much more! SEATING IS LIMITED TO 50 and at $139 - breakfast buffet, morning refreshments, lunch and valuable course materials included - they won't last long! Every workshop last year was a sellout! TWO EASY WAYS TO REGISTER: 1) Register online today at http://www.ccmi.com/tariffworkshop/ 2) Call the CCMI Conference Department at 1-800-260-1545. Don't Delay! Register your whole department TODAY!! CCMI's Telecom Tariff Workshop Emails are intended to inform you of exclusive CCMI conferences. To unsubscribe to this service, please reply to this message with the word UNSUBSCRIBE in the subject line. =====================================
2,962	Subject: Angelides Quotes Regarding State Fiscal Position in the Event Bond Sender: [email protected] Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]'] File: dasovich-j/sent_items/139. ===================================== Kip: Thanks for taking the time to talk. Here's the quote and the cite from Ang= elides re: state position in the event bond issuance stalls. If there's an= ything you need, don't hestitate to call me at 415.782.7822. Please confir= m that you got this, since I'm not sure if I have your email address right. Best, Jeff *************************************************************************= ***** "The Administration does not project that the State will need to make addit= ional State loans to support the DWR Power Supply Program even if DWR does = not issue its revenue bonds as planned during the 2001-02 fiscal year. DWR = projects that its funds on hand at the date of this Official Statement and = projected revenues appear to be sufficient to finance the Power Supply Prog= ram. The cash needs of the Power Supply Program depend, among other things,= on future power purchase costs, the timing and amount of revenues from pow= er sales, the availability of additional interim loans, and the timing of t= he issuance of revenue bonds by DWR. The Power Supply Act limits loans and = advances from the State under the Power Supply Act after November 15, 2001,= to amounts required for short-term cash flow purposes of no more than $500= million in the aggregate and requires repayment within 180 days. However, = the Governor has the power under the Emergency Services Act to order additi= onal loans or other advances to DWR if needed to further mitigate the emerg= ency. =09The State expects to maintain adequate cash reserves to fund its normal = operations during the 2001-02 fiscal year whether or not DWR repays the Sta= te loans during the fiscal year. The State plans to issue short-term notes = to assure that adequate cash balances are maintained. The State has regular= ly issued short-term debt in the past to meet its cash flow needs. See 'Sta= te Indebtedness-Cash Flow Borrowings.'" (California Treasurer's Office, Preliminary Official Statement, August 31, = 2001, $5,700,000,000 State of California 2001-02 Revenue Anticipation Notes= , Appendix A, p. A-4) (emphasis added.) =====================================
2,963	Subject: Re: Appeal Rights Sender: [email protected] Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]'] File: dasovich-j/all_documents/7997. ===================================== ----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 12/28/2000 06:53 PM ----- Robert C Williams@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT 12/28/2000 04:18 PM To: Stephanie Truss/NA/Enron@ENRON cc: [email protected]@ENRON, [email protected]@ENRON, [email protected]@ENRON, Jeff Dasovich@EES, Mike D Smith@EES, [email protected], [email protected], Vicki Sharp@EES Subject: Re: Appeal Rights At Jeff's and several of your suggestion, this call has been postponed to tomorrow at 10:30 CST immediately following the regular call. The call-in number is 1-800-713-8600; passcode 80435. Thank you. Stephanie Truss @ ENRON 12/28/2000 01:51 PM To: Robert C Williams/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Jeff Dasovich@EES@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, [email protected]@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Vicki Sharp@EES@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Mike D Smith@EES@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, [email protected] cc: [email protected], [email protected] Subject: Re: Appeal Rights The conference call has been scheduled for today, December 28, 2000 at 7:00 p.m. CST. The call-in number is (800) 991-9019, passcode: 6045742, confirmation: 3335288. Should you have any questions regarding this information, please call me at (713) 345-5965. Thank you. Robert C Williams@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT 12/28/2000 11:52 AM To: Jeff Dasovich@EES, [email protected], Vicki Sharp@EES, Mike D Smith@EES cc: Stephanie Truss@ENRON Subject: Appeal Rights Mike Day, I have asked my assistant to set up a conference call for this evening to discuss preserving our argments and rights of appeal, both generally and specifically (with respect to the negative CTC issue), during and after the present hearing. I know that we covered some of this in our previous call, and that a record on due process is being made, but I'd like for all of us to explore whether there is anything else we should be doing now, and what, if anything, we will need to do after the proceeding is concluded. I will see if Larry Mollman from Brobeck can join us as well for the state court litigation perspective. Stephanie will circulate the call-in information. Thanks. =====================================
2,964	Subject: UPDATED Dow Jones Index information Sender: [email protected] Recipients: ['[email protected]', 'Marc', 'Jubran Whalan/HOU/EES@EES', 'Neil Bresnan/HOU/EES@EES', '[email protected]'] File: dasovich-j/sent/2985. ===================================== let's talk about these notes prior to your drafting. please give me a call. ----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 01/24/2001 11:26 AM ----- Tamara Johnson@EES 01/24/2001 11:11 AM To: Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, JMB <[email protected]> @ ENRON cc: Neil Bresnan/HOU/EES@EES, Jubran Whalan/HOU/EES@EES, Marc Ulrich/HOU/EES@EES Subject: UPDATED Dow Jones Index information ---------------------- Forwarded by Tamara Johnson/HOU/EES on 01/24/2001 11:02 AM --------------------------- Tamara Johnson 01/24/2001 11:10 AM To: Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, JMB <[email protected]> @ ENRON cc: Neil Bresnan/HOU/EES@EES, Jubran Whalan/HOU/EES@EES, Marc Ulrich/HOU/EES@EES Subject: Dow Jones Index information Additions from Jubran... Proposed pricing mechanism: Dow Jones Electricity Indexes, specifically their NP15/SP15 indexes. - the indexes are based on weighted average prices and total volumes - they measure "bilateral one-day prescheduled, financially firm transactions" => therefore the Dow Jones Index more accurately reflects market pricing - Dow Jones has the right to randomly audit the data providers why not the ex-post ISO? - generators are not selling to California's ISO because of the $150/MWh price cap, => therefore prices coming out of the ISO do not reflect real market prices - there are purchases above the $150 soft cap, but the pricing of the out of market transactions is explained to FERC only, this information is not in the public domain - if generators are not selling into the market, there is no liquidity, therefore prices are not reflective of the prices that buyers must pay - and generators may not be selling into the market due to the credit exposure why not use the ex-post ISO price on an interim basis? - because putting a false cap on the market price will result in price increases to DA customers, contrary to AB1890, without due process - Decision 99-06-058 set the foundation for the PX credit to reflect real market prices, PG&E's proposal does not adhere to this. =====================================
2,965	Subject: PUC filling Sender: [email protected] Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]'] File: dasovich-j/sent_items/318. ===================================== FYI. Don't think it's anything that raises any concerns, but since you're signing on, thought you might want to peruse. Best, Jeff -----Original Message----- From: Dan Douglass [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2001 1:16 AM To: ARM; Gary Ackerman; Vicki Sandler; Anderson, Robert; Max Bulk; John Yurkanin; Steve Huhman; Mike Day; Paul Fenn Subject: ______________ Attached for your review and comment is a revised draft of the application for rehearing to be filed on Friday the 28th. There are two primary changes. The California Chamber of Commerce has been added to the application and an argument has been added that the Decision contradicts the most recent legislative intent expressed in ABX2 9 that direct access continue, at least for aggregation and community choice purposes. Any and all comments will be very much appreciated. Also, I would appreciate it if Sue Mara would forward the document to her contact at the Chamber so that they can also review the draft. Thanks! Dan Law Offices of Daniel W. Douglass 5959 Topanga Canyon Blvd. Suite 244 Woodland Hills, CA 91367 Tel: (818) 596-2201 Fax: (818) 346-6502 [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at [email protected] and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you. ********************************************************************** =====================================
2,966	Subject: RE: Call with Fielder Sender: [email protected] Recipients: ['[email protected]'] File: dasovich-j/sent_items/145. ===================================== Thanks a bunch. -----Original Message----- From: McVicker, Maureen Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 2:19 PM To: Dasovich, Jeff Subject: RE: Call with Fielder Rick and Jim will call you at 3:30 pm (your time)/ 5:30 (Texas time). Steve is in a meeting at that time, so Rick and Jim will handle. -----Original Message----- From: Dasovich, Jeff Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 1:37 PM To: McVicker, Maureen Subject: RE: Call with Fielder If it's possible to talk around 3 pm California time for about 10-15 minutes, that would be great. Would need to get Jim and Rick on the call, too. Don't break your back, but would be very good if we could arrange it. Just let me know. Thanks a million. Best, Jeff -----Original Message----- From: McVicker, Maureen Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 1:18 PM To: Dasovich, Jeff Subject: RE: Call with Fielder Jeff: Steve is out of town until Friday. If you need me to track him down, just let me know. -----Original Message----- From: Dasovich, Jeff Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 11:13 AM To: Kean, Steven J.; Shapiro, Richard; Steffes, James D. Subject: Call with Fielder Fielder agreed to sit down and talk as soon as we'd like. He said that his "legal and tariff guys" told him that "they're on solid ground"; but John admitted that doesn't mean that Edison "is right." I told him that his lawyers and tariff people may think they're on solid ground with the PUC, but that in no way means that an appellate or ("god forbid) bankruptcy judge will concur with either Edison or the PUC. I stressed that we weren't interested in meeting to re-hash our respective positions and that we wanted a meeting where we and they come to the table with constructive, good faith options to resolve the issue. He said that he'd be willing to do that (though most deeply discount anything Edison says these days). He suggested that we start without lawyers. I said that we could do that, but that I'd have to check. I told him that we'd try to get back to him sometime today regarding what we'd like to do. Possible to discuss briefly? Best, Jeff =====================================
2,967	Subject: FW: Energy Action Report Sender: [email protected] Recipients: ['[email protected]'] File: dasovich-j/all_documents/28638. ===================================== ? -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2001 9:18 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Energy Action Report CEA Campaign Headquarters RELEASE DATE: July 11, 2001,? 16:15:28 PST =20 Energy Action Report=20 MEMORANDUM ? TO:????????????????? Californians for Energy Action FROM:??????????? KPC Communications & Woodward & McDowell RE:?????????????????? First Newspaper Ad, Media Briefing Californians for Energy Action=0F2s first newspaper ad appeared this morni= ng in=20 the Sacramento Bee.? Jack Stewart, president of the California=20 Manufacturers and Technology Association, and Allan Zaremberg, president o= f=20 the California Chamber of Commerce, conducted a successful briefing for=20 Sacramento-based news media this morning as well to introduce the coalitio= n=20 and the business community=0F2s perspective on energy issues. Media that attended the briefing included KCRA TV, California Public Radio= ,=20 KFBK News Radio, the Wall Street Journal, the San Jose Mercury News, the D= ow=20 Jones News Service (via telephone), and the San Diego Union Tribune.? In = =20 addition to the briefing, we distributed a news release on the coalition a= nd=20 the ad to the Capitol Press Corps, which includes all of the major =20 newspapers in the state.? Additionally, the California Channel taped the= =20 entire briefing and is broadcasting it in its entirety today. Allan and Jack did a great job focusing the discussion on the issue of=20 direct access and concerns about maintaining a competitive and healthy=20 business climate in California.? The questions were generally informed and= =20 seemed accepting of the fact that there are legitimate and serious concern= s=20 over the direction some of the energy debate is taking in Sacramento. The news release, ad copy, and other coalition material is posted on=20 Californians for Energy Action web site soon. The address is=20 www.energyaction.org. Jason Barnett [email protected] =20 CEA Campaign Headquarters Californians for Energy Action =====================================
2,968	Subject: Governor Davis Announces Principles of Agreement with SCE Sender: [email protected] Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]'] File: dasovich-j/sent/3367. ===================================== ----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 02/23/2001 04:53 PM ----- Jean Munoz <[email protected]> 02/23/2001 04:18 PM To: IEP <[email protected]> cc: Subject: Governor Davis Announces Principles of Agreement with SCE Jan will be responding to the attached remarks by Governor Davis during the IEP press call at 3:00 PST. Call in # is 1-800-374-2393, Pass code: Independent Energy Producers. Thanks, Jean -- Jean Munoz McNally Temple Associates, Inc. 916-447-8186 916-447-6326 (fx) PR01:065 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE 02/23/2001 02:05 PM GOVERNOR DAVIS ANNOUNCES PRINCIPLES OF AGREEMENT WITH SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON LOS ANGELES Governor Gray Davis today announced an agreement in principle with Southern California Edison to keep the utility solvent. "This is the framework of a good, balanced deal," said Governor Davis. "It's not a final deal. There's a lot of work to be done. But we're making progress. "This is a complex transaction with a lot of moving parts. With these terms in place, I'm confident we'll be able to hammer out a final agreement shortly." The State has agreed to purchase the utility's transmission lines for an estimated $2.76 billion (2.3 times estimated book value) and allow Edison to issue bonds for a substantial portion of its undercollection. In exchange, Southern California Edison has agreed to: * Make payments from its parent company, Edison International, to the utility of approximately $420 million; * Commit the entire output of the parent company's Sunrise Mission power project at low "cost-based" rates for 10 years (a value to ratepayers of $500 million over the next two years); * Provide cost-based rates from the generating facilities they own for another 10 years; * Conservation easements on 20,000 acres of watershed lands for 99 years; and * Drop their pending litigation against the Public Utilities Commission that would have resulted in immediate higher electric rates for consumers if they had prevailed in court. Negotiations will continue during the next several days with the utility. ### =====================================
2,969	Subject: Recent Republican Proposals on SB 27X Sender: [email protected] Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]'] File: dasovich-j/all_documents/10271. ===================================== The draft language on SB 27X appears to be consistent with ideas offered by Bowen's staffer Lingbloom and TURN. It makes the following changes in the language the direct access coalition proposed: 1. It reinserts the provision allowing a customer to select direct access for that portion of its load not served by DWR. Neither the utilities nor customers nor ESPs like this. It should be deleted. 2. It provides for an open season to switch to DA until June 1 instead of Oct 1 as the DA coalition proposed. We believe customers will need more time to choose what they want to do. 3. It omits the language in (d) of the DA coalition draft which ensures all customers pay for unrecovered bond costs. This can be covered by the other language in the bill but it could leave some gaps. 4. Residential and small commercial DA is unrestricted only to the extent of load growth on the entire utility system. This may be too restrictive to implement AB 48X easily. It is also somewhat unfair to allocate all load growth to the residential class. 5. The language about large customers switching is ok, but fails to clarify that the standard is limited to the long term contracts of DWR (> 1 yr.) so that we are not squeezed by their short term purchases, too. 6. It omits our language that customers can select DA on an first come first served basis for each of these "open enrollement" options. This is an important clarification. 7. It omits the required notices that DWR and large customers must give each other that they are about to switch or have power contracts commence or terminate. This is important for large customers in particular so that they know when they will have chances to elect DA as the DWR sheds contracts over time. 8. It omits the section requring for public access to the exit fees or their calculation in advance, so customers know what their choices are. This is very important. Bottom Line: All the provisions they deleted from our proposal are worthwhile and we would like to reinsert them. They do not alter tha basic framework of this amendment, they just make it work better. =====================================
2,970	Subject: Re: Sales to California Sender: [email protected] Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]'] File: dasovich-j/all_documents/9673. ===================================== Despite the fact the governor mentioned our name in his press release, we have a confidentiality provision in the agreement and therefore should not discuss terms. If anything, I think you could say that we are continuing to work with DWR to help the situation in CA. Also, the size of the contracts being discussed with DWR (and therefore magnitude of credit exposure) is much smaller than what other companies have press-released. Kathryn Corbally@ENRON 03/06/2001 07:34 AM To: Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Christopher F Calger/PDX/ECT@ECT Subject: Re: Sales to California Thank you for the info.......is this confidential? Can we talk about the fact we are requiring weekly payments to minimise the credit risk? Is this the only delivery we have made recently into California ? - we have many investors calling us to ask what our participation in the market has been recently [ - they are concerned about a growing credit exposure] - to which we generally answer that as a merchant participant and not a generator we can selectively choose whether or not to participate depending on the terms especially credit which does not really answer their question - mainly 'cos I did not know whether or not we were still selectively selling into California. Many thanks Kathryn From: Tim Belden @ ECT 03/06/2001 09:06 AM To: Kathryn Corbally/Corp/Enron@ENRON cc: Christopher F Calger/PDX/ECT@ECT Subject: Sales to California we executed a one-month contract for 200 MW that lasts through the end of march. we have an option to extend that contract, under revised pricing, for 5 years. there are still many legal and credit issues associated with transacting with the calfornia department of water resources (governor davis' vehicle for buying power). we have overcome the credit issues for the short term contract by requiring them to pay us on a weekly basis. the state needs to get a few things done to improve cdwr's credit before we would exercise the long term option. please contact me or chris calger if you have any further questions. =====================================
2,971	Subject: Washington, DC Dept. Meeting Sender: [email protected] Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]'] File: dasovich-j/all_documents/963. ===================================== Please read this e:mail carefully, detailed information to follow. The next Government Affairs-The Americas department meeting is quickly approaching us. The meeting will take place at: The Ritz-Carlton Tyson's Corner 1700 Tyson's Boulevard McLean, VA 22102 Phone# 703-506-4300 Guest Fax# 703-506-2694 Attached to this e:mail you will find a document with the listed confirmation #'s for each of you who require an overnight stay. Please note, another hotel has been contacted for reservations for several individuals because the block of rooms at The Ritz-Carlton ran out. The document does show who will be staying at the other hotel (The DoubleTree, Tyson's Corner, please note address on attachment). Also, please confirm the arrival/departure date on the rooming list. It is very important that this information be correct. For those staying at the Doubletree Hotel, I have requested shuttle service for the morning of the 13th at 7:15am for travel to The Ritz Carlton hotel. Tuesday, September 12 ---- The first item on the agenda is dinner on September 12 (day of arrival). Dinner will take place at Maggiano's Little Italy Restaurant at 7pm. The restaurant is located in the Mall at Tyson's Corner which is connected to The Ritz Carlton. The dress for this restaurant is casual to business casual. Please confirm your attendance with me again. I'd like to get an accurate head count. Wednesday, September 13 ----- Department Meeting: Meeting will begin at 8:00am with a continental breakfast available starting at 7:15am. The location of the meeting will be in Salon I (located on the 5th floor). Lunch will take place at 12:00 (noon) and end at 1:30pm. The extra time for the lunch hour will allow for checking messages. The breakout sessions will start at 2:15pm and conclude by 4:00pm. The sessions will take place in the Consulate Room and The Plaza Room which are both located on the 6th floor. An agenda is attached to this e:mail for your viewing. Dress for the meeting will be casual to business casual. Thanks and please call if you have any questions. gngr =====================================
2,972	Subject: Re: Environmental Strategy Meeting Sender: [email protected] Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]'] File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/467. ===================================== The meeting went well. There was a lot of discussion regarding the current deals involving the env. market. ENA global markets presented their strategy on trading/marketing emissions as well as compliance outsourcing (comprehensive services related to emissions reductions.); EES talked about capturing bypassed emissions from current bundled deals as well as the challenges of doing retail in states w/ varying mandates & reporting requirements; EES (Bruce Stram) talked a bit about dg; ENA origination talked about a massive fuel cell project they are working on (they are keeping it confidential currently); ENA West Structuring talked about financial packages to offset intermittent risk assc. w/ wind; Michael Payne EWC talked about wind development in the states and the associated opportunities w/ renewable energy credits; New Power talked a bit about their rollout in NJ, PA and upcoming CA. New Power is at a point where they need to get up on the curve w/ regard to renewable mandates and reporting standards. Everyone seemed to agree that it makes sense for environmental strategies to act as the "link" between the groups w/ regard to env. market opportunities. There are considerable synergies involved w/ ee, renewables, air emissions and technology control, and as we interface across the commercial groups, ensure that the left hand is talking to the right (i.e. the deals are capturing the most value and groups are aware of what others are working on.) We are rolling out an intranet page where we intend to offer business intelligence and env. regulation info. In the near term, I'll be circulating the presentations and the contact list. There will be some sort of follow up meeting that is structured completely differently than this one. Hope this is helpful. Have a good weekend. Stacey Jeff Dasovich 09/15/2000 11:35 AM To: Stacey Bolton/HOU/EES@EES cc: Subject: Re: Environmental Strategy Meeting My apologies, but as you can imagine, California's little crisis has me a bit preoccupied. Would love to know what comes out of the meeting, though. Best, Jeff =====================================
2,973	Subject: RE: Lari - Harvey wedding photo/Mendocino Sender: [email protected] Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]'] File: dasovich-j/sent/11736. ===================================== I'm very interested and will try to commit soon. Best, Jeff "Amy Gustafson Finch" <[email protected]> 06/18/2001 10:55 AM Please respond to afinch To: "'Madeleine Todd'" <[email protected]>, "'Jeff Dasovich $E-mail$'" <[email protected]>, "'Patrice C Scatena $E-mail$'" <[email protected]>, "'Nora McGee $E-mail$'" <[email protected]>, "'Kari Ontko $E-mail$'" <[email protected]>, "'Lori Hom $E-mail$'" <[email protected]>, "'Jeff Walker $E-mail$'" <[email protected]>, "'Jeff Walker $E-mail 2$'" <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, <[email protected]> cc: <[email protected]> Subject: RE: Lari - Harvey wedding photo/Mendocino Thanks Madeleine. What a great picture and so perfect for Lari to marry on horseback! Here's the tally for the weekend of Sept. 23 and preferred riding schedules: Cal and me -- at least Sat and Sun, prefer 1/2 day ride each day, one on beach, one in forest, but also okay with one full day forest (Sat) and half day beach (Sun). Madeleine -- all day Sat. and 1/2 day Sun. Pippa Murray -- interested (not sure of her riding preference). Pat -- interested but cannot commit until the date is closer. Nora -- interested in a 1/2 day ride but cannot commit until date is closer. Not interested in "man from snowy river" route. Alice -- can't make it. I have not heard from the others. Anyone else want to join? Accommodations: Because of the uncertain numbers, it looks like getting a house to rent would not work. As for B&B or hotel accommodations, I think I might prefer being closer to Fort Bragg than Howard Creek Ranch. It might make sense to reserve rooms at a couple of places and decide later when we've heard more definitively from the group.... I'll scout around this week and see what's still available, and let you all know. Riding: Based on the above, unless someone tells me differently today, I'll tell the ranch we have five people for an all-day Sat (Cal, me, Madeleine, Pippa, Pat), and six for half-day Sunday (same plus Nora). We can always cancel later if we have to. Tally ho! Amy =====================================
2,974	Subject: October 26 OFO by PG&E Sender: [email protected] Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]'] File: dasovich-j/all_documents/114. ===================================== Jeff I am responding to your question to Ben Campbell regarding the October 26, OFO. Below is a portion of the explanation I prepared so the Customer Services folks could respond to others who had questions. Following is a partial recap of the Plans, Plan versions, and times that lead to calling the OFO on Monday for the gas day of Tuesday, October 26. Plan 1 prepared at 06:38 AM on October 25 was used to make the decision to call for the OFO effective on Tuesday. The version of the plan printed at 6:38 AM was used to make the OFO decision but this plan was not posted to the Pipe Ranger. After the OFO decision was made and announced to the market, the Golden Gate Market Center called to inform the Sr Transmission Coordinator that non core customers had request approximately 205 Mdth of total non core withdrawal rights so this request was included in the planning process even though the gas had not yet been scheduled. This version of the plan with the tentative (but not scheduled) non core withdrawal was posted to the Pipe Ranger at approximately 8:08 AM. The additional withdrawal increased the system inventory to a level above that which we would call for an OFO. It has been our policy not to recind OFO announcements once the market has begun to make adjustments and in this case the additional withdraw had not been nominated or scheduled. If the OFO had been recinded it is quite possible the the withdrawal may not have been scheduled. Our criteria for calling OFOs remains what was outlined in the OFO Settlement agreement which was met according the Plan produced at 6:38 AM but not posted to the Pipe Ranger. The later Plan which was posted to Pipe Ranger incorporated later information and therefore indicated that the OFO criteria that we are using was not met - hence the confusion. > To make sure that the market sees the information we use to make OFO > decisions, we have issued explicit instructions to the Sr. Transmission > Coordinators to post the plan they use to make the OFO decision. > Please call or email if you have additional questions. <<...>> Jack Dunlap 223-2039 =====================================
2,975	Subject: Re: Follow Up On California Information Sender: [email protected] Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]'] File: dasovich-j/sent/11795. ===================================== Thanks, John. Couple of things. First, I was involved with the analysis in point number one (i.e., if California had bought at 5 cents.....), but would be happy to discuss with those who worked on it. Second, we've just about go the numbers scrubbed for #2 (working with Comnes and Tribolet on that analysis). Key to the "back up" on point number two will be internal sign off on releasing information that uses our curves as the benchmark in the mark to market assessment. I'm checking with Steve Kean on that and will get back to you ASAP. Best, Jeff John Shelk 06/26/2001 09:14 AM To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Alan Comnes/Enron@EnronXGate cc: Linda Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Tom Briggs/NA/Enron@Enron, Carin Nersesian/NA/Enron@Enron, Pat Shortridge/Corp/Enron@Enron Subject: Follow Up On California Information Just following up on the Monday conference call discussion yesterday with Rick and others about nailing down the numbers and documentation so we can feed the Hill information on the mistakes Governor Davis made last year and this year on power supply contracts. As I understand it, there are two aspects of this: 1. The offer of Enron and others last year to sell power to California utilities for 5 cents per kw. Failure to accept these offers resulted in higher power costs in the range of $15 billion, as I recall from yesterday's call. 2. The long term contracts that California signed this year after taking actions and making statements that drove up the forward price curves are now under water to the tune of $20 billion. On both counts we will be pressed for assumptions and documentation to pursue these arguments, which parallel the comments made by senior management in Capitol Hill meeting last week. We will work on back up on this end, but we would greatly appreciate your assistance in this regard as well. With Congress out of session starting COB on Thursday, we will need information pulled together by tomorrow COB to get the final product in the hands of congressional types and others who can use it on a timely basis. Thanks. =====================================
2,976	Subject: Save on That Perfect Gift for Mom Sender: [email protected] Recipients: ['[email protected]'] File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/3824. ===================================== [IMAGE][IMAGE] Dear Amazon Customer, At the risk of sounding like a mom, we must say it's been a while since yo= u=20 paid us a visit (and shopped using this address). But we have the perfect= =20 reason to come see us again--our Mother's Day Store. Discover great gift= s=20 for all the special moms in your life, along with extra savings for you=20 (such as free shipping on Kitchen & Housewares orders of $99 or more). Shop by price or by interest--whether you're buying for a gardener or a=20 gourmet cook, a professional or a homebody, you're sure to find that=20 perfect, personal gift. Or, for the mom who truly has everything, let her = =20 choose--send a fun e-card with an Amazon.com gift certificate. Let all the moms in your life know just how much you appreciate them, and= =20 check out our Mother's Day Store today. (And don't be such a stranger ne= xt=20 time, OK?) =20 Sincerely, [IMAGE] David Risher Senior Vice President=20 Amazon.com [IMAGE] =20 [IMAGE] Pick by Price =0F=07??Under $10 =0F=07??Under $25=20 =0F=07??Under $50=20 Is Your Mom... =0F=07??Stressed Out=20 =0F=07??One Who Has ? ?It All =0F=07??A Gardener =0F=07??A Grandmother For the Mom Who... =0F=07??Loves Flowers =0F=07??Loves Cooking =0F=07??Loves Crafts [IMAGE] All Products Books Music DVD VHS Toys Video Games Electronics Software=20 Outdoor Living Kitchen Outlet Auctions zShops=20 [IMAGE] PS: Don't tell my wife (and the mother of our two darling girls), but I've= =20 already picked up a copy of the gift book Hollywood Moms, filled with=20 photos of famous mothers and daughters. A portion of the proceeds even=20 benefits breast and ovarian cancer research.=20 ? ? ? ? We hope you enjoyed receiving this message. However, if you'd rather not= =20 receive future e-mails of this sort from Amazon.com, please visit your =20 Amazon.com account page. Under the Your Account Settings heading, click th= e =20 "Update your communication preferences" link. Please note this e-mail was sent to the following address: =20 [email protected] =====================================
2,977	Subject: E291B-1 Speaking for Management Sender: [email protected] Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]'] File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/5737. ===================================== Hi, This is from Bill Sonnenschein, the instructor for E291B-1 Speaking for Management. Hello all. And welcome in advance. I want to pass on some information to you to prepare you for the first class session. Class will meet on February 3 & 24, 2001, from 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. The time is very short for a speech course. I am asking you to prepare a little before the first session, to assure you get as much as you can out of the course. Please come to the first day of class with a prepared persuasive speech (a speech that moves the audience to action). The speech should be three to five minutes in length, and on a topic you feel very strongly about. I do not care if the topic concerns business. It could be political, social, moral, or even spiritual. The most important thing is that you believe strongly in the message. Leaders must learn to speak "from the heart." The focus of the course will be on speaking in a business context, but it is important to speak with feeling first, and learn to transfer that skill to a business context. I do not care if you write the speech out, or create an outline and rehearse giving the speech extemporaneously. The idea is to be prepared. I will talk about delivering from a manuscript as well as the advantages of extemporaneous speaking as part of one lecture. You may also want to buy a blank video tape. You will not need it till the second Saturday, and even then using it will be optional. Videotaping speeches is an excellent learning tool, but can be counter-productive if students get too nervous doing it. I never use tape the first class session, and you choose if you want to be taped the second session. If you have any questions, please feel free to call me at 510-336-1239, or e-mail me at [email protected]. Thanks. I am looking forward to working with you. Bill ======================================================= William Sonnenschein Communications Group Faculty Haas School of Business University of California, Berkeley 510-643-8005 (Office) or 510-336-1239 (Home) ======================================================= =====================================
2,978	Subject: RE: Sender: [email protected] Recipients: ['[email protected]'] File: dasovich-j/all_documents/947. ===================================== god bless you. Nancy Sellers <[email protected]> on 08/31/2000 01:01:33 PM To: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]> cc: Subject: RE: Amber's address:? 25664 Carmel Knolls Road, Carmel, CA 93923.? She is 20 years old on Sunday!. I wrote you because I am not sure if Prentice is getting e-mails. Remember that some of your stuff might still be outside if I don't remember to bring it in.? There is also a folder of pick sheets to take up to the dome and leave on my desk, so we have them when any of us are up there. -----Original Message----- From:?? [email protected] [SMTP:[email protected]] Sent:?? Thursday, August 31, 2000 8:02 AM To:???? [email protected] Subject:??????? Re: We'll send a card.? She's 19?? Well, if we have to, we'll take some tomotoes.....Taking the suit and (if Prentice permits) Annie, too. Could you discuss with Eldon whether you guys want to do the Dome road while my is doing my road at the end of the month??? He's going to fax me the estimate based on his visit when we were all up there last.? To be honest, the deck's got me pretty darned gun-shy about "projects" and this guy is really nice and I want to work with him for years to come.? He's pretty willing to do whatever you folks want, i.e., from Yugo-style road to Rolls Royce-style road.? And if you want to take a pass, that's of course great, too.? I just want to make sure it doesn't turn in to a cluster-you-know-what....Just let me know. Nancy Sellers <[email protected]> on 08/31/2000 09:53:11 AM To:?? "'Prentice @ Berkeley'" <[email protected]>, "'Jeff ????? Dasovich'" <[email protected]> cc: Subject: I don't know if Prentice will get the e-mail, Jeff - so could you try to help make sure this happens.? Sunday is Amber's birthday.? Since we will be at the Cubs game it would be great if you guys could send her a card. When you come to get your stuff, take all the tomatoes you want with you! Are you going to take Annie? Nancy (707) 251-4870 (phone) (707) 265-5446 (fax) "Plus je bois, mieux je chante" =====================================
2,979	Subject: RE: Conf call with Cameron and Ian Sender: [email protected] Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]'] File: dasovich-j/all_documents/28338. ===================================== Enron notes to discuss tomorrow... Background: 1. Late March - we met with members of GSS (Global Strategic Sourcing group) and the CIO from ETS (Enron Transportation Services) 2. Mid May - we showed a demo to a mix of EES (Enron Energy Services), GSS (John Gillespie, John Will, Craig Brown), and ETS contacts 3. EES and ETS were interested, mentioned DealBench as too costly for their needs, we followed with a proposal to GSS for a Pilot, response was that we need to get a divisions on board 4. Late June (6/28) - met with 2 contacts from EES (Procurement Mgrs who were in the May mtg, they suggested we show how our system can help their upstream counterparts who structure the "deals" (since the Proc. Mgrs are simply the downstream execution piece), they also mentioned that GSS is busy with SAP/C1 ibuyit rollout right now Questions: 1. Who are the "deal makers", what is their function, what tools do they use, how do we best position our solution with them? 2. How are decisions made? Should we target a solution to a particular division e.g. EES? Our contacts have said solutions are purchased both through GSS as a "gatekeeper" and by a single divison on its own (as there seems to be a number of maverick projects going on at the moment) -----Original Message----- From: Robin Deguara Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2001 9:34 AM To: Cameron Sellers Subject: FW: Conf call with Cameron and Ian -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2001 9:12 AM To: Robin Deguara Subject: Re: Conf call with Cameron and Ian 8 AM. 10 AM. 3 PM. Best, Jeff Robin Deguara <robin@perfec To: "'[email protected]'" t.com> <[email protected]> cc: 06/29/2001 Subject: Conf call with Cameron and Ian 06:51 PM Jeff, Please provide me with three time slots you would be available to have a conf call on Friday the 6th between Cameron and Ian. Thank you, Robin Deguara Executive Assistant <<...OLE_Obj...>> Perfect Commerce, Inc. tel: 650-798-3367 fax: 650-858-1095 email: [email protected] =====================================
2,980	Subject: Staff Conference on Market Monitoring in California Sender: [email protected] Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]'] File: dasovich-j/all_documents/8528. ===================================== Alan and Mary -- Below are my comments and attached documents for the Conference on Market Monitoring in California at the FERC. I will call later to discuss further. I suggest filing comments and would propose something along the lines of PJM's market monitoring program for Enron's Proposal. Please forward to anyone else you think appropriate. Comments and documents -- Attached are the four proposals discussed at the conference. Comments are due February 6. Staff intends to issue its report/recommendations to the Commission March 1. We can comment on the Staff recommendations in March and Commission action is anticipated around May 1. Conference -- Scott Miller chaired this informal Staff conference. The morning was spent discussing principles and the afternoon on specific proposals. This included the explanations of the attached plans, as well as a discussion of the PJM Market Monitoring Program. The conference can be summarized as follows -- screens can be developed to determine if market power exists and is being exercised. an appropriate role of the market monitor is to suggest structural reforms. Independence is necessary, but undefined. due process is necessary for any person under scrutiny. the debate on mitigation continues -- if mitigation, by whom and when are the hot topics. one key is to get the market structure right -- mitigation becomes unnecessary. California is different -- too much dependence on spot market/limited long term contracts; and insufficient demand response. The good news is that -- Staff does not consider the ISO proposal as a starting point, but as a vehicle to generate discussions (Staff succeeded -- Duke and Dynegy went to great lengths to critize it). Staff has an open mind on the appropriate approach to market monitoring and are soliciting written proposals and comparisons to existing programs. Staff is not trying to fix the structure of the California market here -- ISO should do so under the December 15 order. Regional scope and access to information are legitimate questions for comment. =====================================
2,981	Subject: IEP Response to ISO Report Sender: [email protected] Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]'] File: dasovich-j/all_documents/10338. ===================================== Greetings: IEP has been responding all day to pres questions on the ISO report and=20 filing at FERC. We issued the below statement and are also holding a press= =20 availability tomorrow at 1:00 p.m. Today=01,s television interviews have=20 included, Fox, ABC and NBC.? Thank you to those of you who have forwarded= =20 your company positions to IEP and if you would like to include anything els= e=20 additional please let me know and we will incorporate it into Jan=01,s=20 responses.? In addition to the below points we have been indicating that=20 people have been playing by the rules, timing is rather coincidental,=20 economics don=01,t keep the lights on, and the alleged cost calculation the= ISO=20 has historically used do not include many fixed costs or real costs=20 associated with running the units.?=20 ? Once again if you have any other thoughts please forward them to me. Thanks! ? ?FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE ?March22, 2001 Statement by Jan Smutny-Jones, Executive Director of Independent Energy Producers, In Response to Report Issued by the Independent System Operator ???"More than ever, we?re looking forward to a fair and impartial hearing= =20 before the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to deal with the ISO?s late= st=20 round of unsubstantiated charges. ???"Until then, what seems increasingly clear, is that the ISO?s real agend= a=20 is to get out of paying for power it?s already purchased and used by renegi= ng=20 on its obligations and changing the rules after the race is over. ???"Generators have been playing by the rules and have been offering to sel= l=20 power at substantially lower long-term contract rates since last summer. ?H= ad=20 the PUC allowed this, California wouldn?t be facing today?s energy crisis. = ? ???"This latest attempt by the ISO to poison the atmosphere against the=20 generators and use them as scapegoats is clearly more about politics than= =20 trying to solve the problem and keep the lights on in California." # ????????# ????????# ? Katie Kaplan Manager of State Policy Affairs Independent Energy Producers Association (916) 448-9499 ? =====================================
2,982	Subject: VERY URGENT - $600million Cost Shifting to PG&E Customers Sender: [email protected] Recipients: ['[email protected]'] File: dasovich-j/inbox/77. ===================================== HELP STOP THE SHIFT OF OVER $600 MILLION OF POWER COSTS FROM S. CALIFORNIA TO N. AND CENTRAL CALIFORNIA RATEPAYERS. Please call the PUC at 415 703 2074 to voice your opposition to this unfair plan. Details and talking points are below. *********** According to the California Public Utilities Commission's (CPUC) draft decision on the California Department of Water Resources?s (DWR) revenue requirement (attached), the CPUC is proposing to shift over $600 million of unreviewed DWR power costs to PG&E?s customers from Southern California customers. If adopted by the CPUC, this would lock PG&E customers into 40-55 percent higher rates for DWR power over the next 10 years, compared to customers of Southern California Edison and SDG&E. It discriminates against PG&E?s customers and has not been subject to public review, due process, or cost justification by DWR or the CPUC. The CPUC has postponed the vote on the DWR cost shifting issue until later this month (Sept 20th, or sooner). Without a full public hearing at which all the cost and ratemaking issues can be aired, Northern and Central California customers will not have a full and fair opportunity to review DWR ?s multi-billion dollar rate demands and will be unable to influence these proceedings. The SVMG is strongly urging you to call the CPUC as well as your local legislators (contact information attached) to gain their support in opposing this unjustified and discriminatory rate shift. Main issues of concern are: 1)the unfair shift of over $600 million in costs from SCE customers to PG&E customers; 2)imposes higher Direct Access exit fees in Northern CA. than in Southern CA.; 3)appears to fund a portion of SCE's debt repayment on the backs of PG&E customers without any justification from the CPUC (please find further talking points attached). We are asking that the CPUC conduct open public hearings so that public comment can be provided, and the DWR's basis for cost recovery can be reviewed. Thank you for your prompt support in this crucial effort. If you have any further questions, contact Justin Bradley at the SVMG at 408-501-7852. =====================================
2,983	Subject: DPCA Congressional Distributed Power Day Sender: [email protected] Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]'] File: dasovich-j/all_documents/12771. ===================================== To DPCA Friends and members: By now you have received Dan Dessanti's email to you telling about the Congressional ?Distributed Power Day scheduled on June 6 ( please see attached Announcement). ?For those of you who received this message at least twice or some reason did not receive Dan's email I apologize. ?We are still trying to update our mailing list. ? DPCA has retained Burson-Marstellar to provide logistical guidance and assistance in the event planning. ?To highlight the value of ?this event, they will also craft and generate the proper messages to the public, Congress and the energy market on the value of distributed energy and the importance it should ?provide in the President's National Energy Strategy. ?Therefore, I have been asked by Burson to contact old, current and potential DPCA members to provide them (please use the cc's on this email) information on your respective involvement and activity in the development and use of distributed energy. Such information should include, where relevant : ? 1.DE mission; 2. types of DE technologies, products, systems you manufacture, develop, deploy; 3. amount of private investment to develop these technologies, 4. collaborative projects - size and customers served, 5. number of customers served, product volume sold or deployed, nationally and internationally, 6. where you and your customers are located . ? Also please provide Burson with copies of press announcements pertaining to your Distributed Energy activity across the country and ?the Public Affairs Contact for your respective organizations and companies. The Burson- Marstellar contact is Greg Larson. He can be reached at 916-341-1000. ?His Fax number is 916-341-1000 Finally, if your organization is not a member and would like to join DPCA, and participate in this event and similar ones throughout the year please fill out the attached form ASAP. ?On behalf of the Executive Committee of DPCA we look forward to seeing you on June 6. Thank You Tod O'Connor 818-883-1038 (o) 818-317-9804 (cell) - me.annoucementfinal.doc =====================================
2,984	Subject: RE: Pac Tel - CPUC Customer Switch Complaint Sender: [email protected] Recipients: ['[email protected]'] File: dasovich-j/sent_items/2305. ===================================== Thanks very much. -----Original Message----- From: Pollard, Geoff Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 12:02 PM To: Dasovich, Jeff; Frazier, Lamar; Steffes, James D. Cc: Mara, Susan; Smith, Mike B; Huddleson, Diann; Hughes, Evan; Fite, Rebecca; Riley, Tom Subject: RE: Pac Tel - CPUC Customer Switch Complaint Yes, I will keep you all posted. I placed a call to the customer at 7:30 this morning, but have not heard back from them yet. Geoff -----Original Message----- From: Jeff Dasovich/ENRON@enronXgate@ENRON@EES Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 10:00 AM To: Frazier,Lamar; James D Steffes/ENRON@enronXgate; Pollard, Geoff Cc: Susan J Mara/ENRON@enronXgate; Smith,Mike B; Huddleson,Diann; Evan Hughes/ENRON@enronxgate; Rebecca Fite/ENRON@enronxgate; Riley, Tom Subject: RE: Pac Tel - CPUC Customer Switch Complaint Thanks, Lamar. Geoff, could you let us know how it goes with the customer and if this a mix-up on the customer's end. Thanks very much. Best, Jeff -----Original Message----- From: Frazier, Lamar Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 9:32 AM To: Steffes, James D.; Pollard, Geoff Cc: Dasovich, Jeff; Mara, Susan; Smith, Mike B; Huddleson, Diann; Hughes, Evan; Fite, Rebecca; Riley, Tom Subject: Re: Pac Tel - CPUC Customer Switch Complaint Geoff Pollard is the SM for Pac Tel. From: James D Steffes/ENRON@enronXgate on 11/21/2001 04:01 PM To: Lamar Frazier/HOU/EES@EES cc: Jeff Dasovich/ENRON@enronXgate, Susan J Mara/ENRON@enronXgate, Mike B Smith/ENRON@enronXgate, Diann Huddleson/HOU/EES@EES, Evan Hughes/ENRON@enronxgate, Rebecca Fite/ENRON@enronxgate Subject: Pac Tel - CPUC Customer Switch Complaint I received a call late today from the CPUC (Joyce @ 415-703-2199). Someone from Pac Tel called and said that his service was switched without authorization - Mike Benson with Payphone group @707-253-8892 or 707-292-1766. Lamar -- who is the client rep for Pac Tel? Can they get into Pac Tel and try and find out if we have done something inappropriate? We need to call this guy back by Monday EOB. Please let Jeff Dasovich know so he can call Joyce back - I'll be out on vacation next week. Jim =====================================
2,985	Subject: DOE-NARUC North American Summit announces new speakers and an Sender: [email protected] Recipients: ['[email protected]'] File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/1606. ===================================== [[ MAPI 1.0 storage : 5419 in winmail.dat ]] NARUC and DOE are the hosting the North American Summit on Harmonizing Business Practices in Energy Restructuring in Dallas, Texas, on November 29 to December 1. This email is an update on recent developments in the Summit. Newly confirmed speakers include Commissioner Linda Breathitt, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission; Rep. Joe Barton (R-Texas), chairman of the House Energy and Power Subcommittee; Phil Sharp, Lecturer in Public Policy, Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University; Kurt Yaeger, president and CEO, Electric Power Research Institute; Bob Anderson, commissioner, Montana Public Service Commission; Karen O'Neill, vice president for new markets, GreenMountain.com; Steve Ward, public advocate, Maine Attorney General's office; Donato Eassay, vice president, securities research and economics, Merrill Lynch; Rick Rumbarger, president and CEO, PowerTrust.com; Kathleen Magruder, Vice President, Government Affairs, The New Power Company (a joint venture of IBM, Enron, and AOL) We have established a bulletin board for the Summit. You can access the bulletin board through the following link: http://www.energymarkets.org/cgi-bin/Ultimate.cgi?action=intro. The Forums in this board will permit you to ask questions or raise issues for the speakers on each of the panels at the Summit. You can register for the Summit at http://www.energymarkets.org/registration.htm. Information on reserving a room a the Adams Mark is at http://www.energymarkets.org/city_site.htm. Please forward this email to colleagues who may be interested in the subject of the Summit. Thanks! Isabel Barreto North American Summit Coordinator Center for the Advancement of Energy Markets 5765-F Burke Center Parkway (PMB333) Burke, VA 22015-2233 Voicemail and Fax: (703) 234-3373 E-mail: [email protected] http://www.caem.org Thanks! Isabel Barreto North American Summit Coordinator Center for the Advancement of Energy Markets 5765-F Burke Center Parkway (PMB333) Burke, VA 22015-2233 Voicemail and Fax: (703) 234-3373 E-mail: [email protected] http://www.caem.org - winmail.dat =====================================
2,986	Subject: Re: FW: Emergency Petition of ORA and TURN for Modification of Sender: [email protected] Recipients: ['[email protected]'] File: dasovich-j/all_documents/8392. ===================================== Yes, we can. Others are considering doing the same. Let's discuss on Monday. Leslie Lawner 01/18/2001 01:18 PM To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron cc: Subject: Re: FW: Emergency Petition of ORA and TURN for Modification of Decisi on and Resolution on A.92-12-043 et al. Jeff, Can we oppose these changes? Jeff Dasovich Sent by: Jeff Dasovich 01/18/2001 11:32 AM To: Leslie Lawner/NA/Enron@Enron, [email protected], James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron cc: Subject: FW: Emergency Petition of ORA and TURN for Modification of Decisi on and Resolution on A.92-12-043 et al. ----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 01/18/2001 11:31 AM ----- "Cherry, Brian" <[email protected]> 01/17/2001 11:35 AM To: "'Dasovich, Jeff'" <[email protected]> cc: Subject: FW: Emergency Petition of ORA and TURN for Modification of Decisi on and Resolution on A.92-12-043 et al. Jeff - Thought you'd be interested.? Let's try for lunch next week. ? -----Original Message----- From: Pocta, Robert M. [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2001 9:28 AM To: Cherry, Brian Subject: FW: Emergency Petition of ORA and TURN for Modification of Decisi on and Resolution on A.92-12-043 et al. ??????? Brian - This is a copy of an emergency petition to modify the gas accord decision that was filed yesterday.? It basically requests that penalties to core customers for diversions be waived and any diversion be priced at the market price up to $50 per dth.? Unfortunately, we felt it had to be filed because we couldn't let the core be exposed to $100 per Dth gas supply when PG&E can't buy at $10 per dth.? Hopefully, the crisis will be resolved and petition will have no bearing.? ??????? It was mailed to the Gas Accord service list and our legal division e-mailed to an unknown service list which I had wished they hadn't done. (We are not trying to add to any problem, but based on a worst case scenario we couldn't have the core exposed to buying $100 per dth gas for all its gas supply)??? ? ? - CPUC01-#87842-v1-emergency_petition_on_A9212043_.doc =====================================
2,987	Subject: DRAFT presentation--Status report on California Sender: [email protected] Recipients: ['[email protected]'] File: dasovich-j/sent/3914. ===================================== Here's what I sent Rick and Jim before I left. Best, Jeff ----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 04/02/2001 05:27 PM ----- Jeff Dasovich Sent by: Jeff Dasovich 03/25/2001 05:37 PM To: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron cc: Subject: DRAFT presentation--Status report on California Attached is the draft that we've discussed. Few points: It's a draft. It would benefit from more tinkering. It takes our core messages (what's the problem? what's the solution?) and tries to weave in current events, understanding that by the time you're giving the presentation it may need to be further modified to correspond with rapidly changing circumstances and events. It's frank but (hopefully) measured in describing the mess that is California. It's set up so that it's easy to modify the more pointed statements. Leaves plenty of room for you to tailor the presentation to particular points that you'd like to make, or data and/or information that you'd like to include. I didn't have ready access to charts and graphs to back up the stats used in the text of the presentation, but I'm sure that it will be relatively easy for someone in Houston to pull that together (e.g., may want to poach a bit from Belden's presentation to include some PNW hydro stats (which I've also attached), or from ISO website to show load-resource balance info). Though I'll be on vacation, I'll be checking in on voicemail and email, so if you have any questions, or need something additional to get the presentation ready, just let me know. I may be in an airplane on Monday during both the leadership call and the newly restructured California call. Otherwise, I'll be trying to make those calls dailywhile I'm away. And Jim, I'll also be available to participate in any calls regarding Calger's proposed deal with CDWR. Finally, when the darn thing prints out, it prints borders around the heading/title box and the text box, though I don't know why. Tried just about everything to get rid of them. May want to have a PP guru in Houston see if (s)he can disable the boders. Best, Jeff =====================================
2,988	Subject: RE: Graduation in Tahoe - Please respond by Fri 12/7 Sender: [email protected] Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]'] File: dasovich-j/inbox/982. ===================================== Folks I am looking into getting a cabin in the North Shore Area for this trip. Can you please let me know if you are interested in sharing this cabin, and how many will be going. Please let me know by Fri so that I can confirm it by this weekend. Cuba libre group - Just a reminder to bring your cigars .... - Chris ---------- From: Kelly, Jacqueline [SMTP:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 8:56 AM To: Aiaz Kazi (E-mail 2); Cathy Langridge (E-mail); Erin Brewer (E-mail); Florian Pestoni (E-mail); Jeff Dasovich (E-mail); Joseph Yarak (E-mail); Kelly Davis (E-mail); Kimberely Kupiecki (E-mail); Mark Guinney (E-mail); Pamela Smith (E-mail); [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; '[email protected]' Cc: '[email protected]' Subject: Graduation in Tahoe The semester is coming to a close and most of us are graduating. A group of us are celebrating with a three-day weekend in a house on Lake Tahoe, Dec 14 - 16. All are welcome to come, including families, significant others, and other students whose e-mail address I don't have. What do you need to do? * Find other students that are interest in going (I know Florian and Anil are looking for housemates) * Find a house or lodging for the 2-3 nights * Let me know where you are staying and I will create a list and distribute so we can all connect up there. If you want to stay in the vicinity, our house is located at: Petrick House Lakeview 3170 Meadowbrook Drive Tahoe City, CA Sorry we can't fit you all in our house, but you should be able to find something on the web. Try www.enjoytahoe.com. Please forward to others that may be interested, and hope to see you up there! -Jackie Jacqueline Kelly Treasury Charles Schwab & Co, Inc (415) 667-3915 Warning: All e-mail sent to or from this address will be received or otherwise recorded by the Charles Schwab corporate e-mail system and is subject to archival, monitoring or review by, and/or disclosure to, someone other than the recipient. =====================================
2,989	Subject: Possible Messages on Legislation in California Sender: [email protected] Recipients: ['[email protected]'] File: dasovich-j/all_documents/1023. ===================================== Here's an attempt at being frank about the legislation without jeopardizing our relationships or commercial prospects. Overall, we respect the effort, but California failed to get the ball over the goal line: On Siting Intentionally or not, California has designed power plant siting laws that make it excruciatingly difficult to construct power plants in the state. Folks seem to have lost sight of the need to balance growth and environmental quality in California. That's why nothing's been built in the state for a decade and developers are going outside the state to build power plants. Tinkering around the edges won't help; and (with all due respect) the legislation passed yesterday tinkers. Real reform is required if California hopes to build the supply necessary to keep pace with Silicon Valley and a high tech culture and tame the price spikes. If developers continue to have to navigate through a maze of a half a dozen--or more--state and local agencies, California's supply problems will continue, or worsen. California needs real, one-stop shopping and it needs it now. On the retail price cap They don't work (we've already developed all the arguments, so I won't repeat them hear) The press has already reported that the measure the Legislature passed simply puts off the day of reckoning. It's like using your credit card--eventually they're going to knock on your door to collect. Now, families and businesses will have a hard time managing their budgets because they can't gauge the size of the balloon payment they'll face a couple of years down the road. So San Diegans who continue to take service from SDG&E will pay the same amount, but the cap will remove the powerful incentive prices create to use electricity wisely. There's a better answer: Instead of urging consumers not to switch, encourage customers to sign with another retail provider. Clearly, the biggest mistake California made was The press and decision makers should spend more time talking to folks who signed fixed price deals with companies like Enron. But for the press reports, they hardly know there's a crisis. =====================================
2,990	Subject: Gas Accord II: Feb. 7 Workshop Canceled Sender: [email protected] Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]'] File: dasovich-j/all_documents/8849. ===================================== CONFIDENTIAL SETTLEMENT MATERIAL PER CPUC RULE 51 ALL PARTIES: In light of the ongoing energy crisis affecting both gas and electric operations in California, PG&E has decided to cancel the Gas Accord II informational workshop previously scheduled for this Wednesday, February 7. We are sorry for this late notice of cancellation, but we hope you will understand that everyone involved is dealing with a difficult and fluid situation. As you know, we originally had concluded, based on feedback from many parties, that it would be beneficial to hold an informational workshop here in early February, in order to explain more fully the comprehensive Settlement Offer PG&E circulated to all "Rule 51 Parties" in December 2000. Unfortunately, however, the crisis situation has overtaken us, and so we are canceling the February 7 informational workshop. PG&E also will not be holding the previously-planned series of negotiation sessions, the first of which was scheduled to occur on February 21-22. Instead, PG&E will focus its efforts on resolving the crisis issues, and working towards a formal Gas Accord II Application with the California Public Utilities Commission, hopefully by June 1 of this year. We are keenly aware that the current energy crisis necessarily requires priority attention. By the same token, we also are aware that it will be incumbent upon PG&E to file some form of Gas Accord II proposal with the Commission in the near future, so that the Commission has the time and the opportunity to consider fully all of the many issues that will arise upon expiration of the current Gas Accord at the end of 2002. PG&E continues to encourage individual Parties to stay in touch with PG&E in the weeks and months ahead. We hope to be able to respond to any questions you might have regarding the December 2000 comprehensive Settlement Proposal, and we also would welcome your continued feedback on issues of concern to you. Please feel free to e-mail or call us, or your other PG&E contacts, if you have questions or concerns Frank Lindh Ray Williams [email protected] [email protected] (415) 973-2776 (415) 973-3634 =====================================
2,991	Subject: nan Sender: [email protected] Recipients: ['[email protected]'] File: dasovich-j/all_documents/2347. ===================================== DJ PG&E Says Won't Try To Escape Rate Freeze For Now >PCG Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. SAN FRANCISCO (Dow Jones)--PG&E Corp. (PCG) won't try to lift California's state-mandated rate freeze before the end of the transition to a deregulated market, saying it wants to protect its customers from volatile power prices, senior company officials said Wednesday. "We aren't moving at this time to end the rate freeze. But that view might change in the future," said a senior company official, who requested anonymity. PG&E invited reporters to its headquarters Wednesday to discuss plans for repairing a "not workably competitive power market" and several steps the utility plans to file with federal regulators to do that. One proposal that is expected to be filed with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission is a return to cost-based rates, where the price for power would be predetermined based on generation costs. The company wants to temporarily put an end to market-based rates. The utility will also request that California's independent system operator reduce the wholesale power price cap to $100 a megawatt-hour from $250/MWh. Company officials said those steps would allow them to recover billions of dollars in unpaid power costs and would stabilize wholesale power prices and protect retail customers. PG&E said generators would still be able to make a profit on power sold in California with the reduced cap, and the company doesn't believe the state's power supply would be in jeopardy from such an action. -By Jason Leopold, Dow Jones Newswires; 323-658-3874; mailto:[email protected] =====================================
2,992	Subject: Re: SoCalEd Petition for a Writ of Mandamus Sender: [email protected] Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]'] File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/5996. ===================================== As a follow up to my email from yesterday, responses to SoCalEd's Petition are due on Tuesday, January 2. Dan Watkiss has spoken to the FERC attorneys who will be answering the Petition, and he is comfortable that FERC will be able to adequately defend FERC against the Petition. Additionally, Sue Mara will contact IEP to see if they will be responding to the Petition, and I have a call in to EPSA to see if they will be responding. Therefore, because the responses seem to be adequately covered, and to keep Enron's name out of the headlines, we do not plan on responding separately to the Petition. If you have any comments or questions, please let us know. Sarah Sarah Novosel 12/27/2000 02:19 PM To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Linda Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, [email protected], Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Mona L Petrochko/NA/Enron@Enron, Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, [email protected], Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Tom Briggs/NA/Enron@Enron, Cynthia Sandherr/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Donna Fulton/Corp/Enron@ENRON, David Parquet/SF/ECT@ECT, Christopher F Calger/PDX/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: SoCalEd Petition for a Writ of Mandamus On December 26, SoCalEd filed a Petition for a Writ of Mandamus against FERC regarding FERC's December 15 order, asking the Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit to direct FERC to establish and order "just and reasonable cost-based rates" for sales in the California ISO and PX markets. SoCal requests that the Court act by January 5. SoCal argues that its lenders have said that unless FERC acts immediately to "restore creditor confidence" in SoCal's ability to repay its loans, that SoCal will not be able to access additional funding, so that by mid-January SoCal will be unable to buy electricity, resulting in rolling blackouts to its customers. Please let me know if you have any questions or would like a faxed copy of the petition. Sarah =====================================
2,993	Subject: RE: stakeholder list Sender: [email protected] Recipients: ['[email protected]'] File: dasovich-j/sent_items/124. ===================================== No problem. If you need anything else, just let me know. -----Original Message----- From: McKalip-Thompson, Catherine Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 6:57 PM To: Dasovich, Jeff Subject: RE: stakeholder list That is perfect, Jeff, thanks so much! Catherine -----Original Message----- From: Dasovich, Jeff Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 3:52 PM To: McKalip-Thompson, Catherine Subject: RE: stakeholder list Here's a start. Be happy to add. Just let me know. Best, Jeff CPUC-- Geoff Brown--Commissioner Paul Clanon--Chief, Energy Division General Counsel (don't know name) CEC-- Chairman of Commission Chief of power plant siting department Person in charge of "green marketing" (Stacey Bolton will know who the person is) Enviros-- Ralph Cavanagh, NRDC, SF Dan Kirshner, EDF, Oakland V. John White, Sierra Club, Sacramento Consumer reps--Mike Florio, TURN, SF Michael Shames, UCAN, San Diego -----Original Message----- From: Thompson, Catherine Sent: Monday, September 17, 2001 3:15 PM To: Dasovich, Jeff Subject: stakeholder list Jeff, Thanks, in advance, for your help with this. The project is a "Corporate Responsibility Stakeholder Perception Survey" designed to gather baseline information on how our stakeholders view the issue of corporate social responsibility in general, and Enron in that regard in our major markets US, UK and Japan. Stakeholders are defined as those who are affected by our business, can affect our business or have an interest in Enron - customers, suppliers, governments, regulators, NGOs, employees, shareholders, etc. What I would like from you is which stakeholders you think are important to include from Enron Corp's perspective here in California, and the job title or name therein. Please just take 5 minutes or so to list them, don't spend any longer than that. CPUC - who? CEC - who? any others... I already have the major environmental organizations, but if you think TURN or others should be included, let me know. Thanks so much! Catherine Catherine McKalip-Thompson Manager, Corporate Responsibility Enron Corp. Tel: 415-782-7842 Fax: 415-782-7854 =====================================
2,994	Subject: article fyi Sender: [email protected] Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]'] File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/4575. ===================================== Public Power Renewable Energy Action Team Launched; Non-Profit Center for Resource Solutions Assumes Management Responsibilities SAN FRANCISCO--(BUSINESS WIRE)--April 3, 2001 via NewsEdge Corporation - Municipal utilities in California have come together behind renewable resources. Volatile electricity markets are making renewable energy increasingly cost-effective, and a team of municipal utilities plans to deploy renewable resources as a means to ensure the continued competitiveness of public power. The Center for Resource Solutions (CRS), a non-profit organization based in San Francisco, has assumed management and organizational responsibilities for the group, which is called the Public Power Renewable Energy Action Team (PPREAT). Key supporters of PPREAT include the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power, City of Anaheim, Northern California Power Agency and many other municipal utilities in California. PPREAT aims to: -- Aggregate demand for renewable energy among public power utilities; -- Move renewable energy into mainstream power planning processes; -- Identify opportunities for public power joint-ownership of renewable energy projects; -- Leverage federal and state renewable energy project development technical assistance; -- Hedge against future volatile electricity prices; -- Create a common public power branding strategy around renewable energy resources; and -- Develop a replicable model for joint-ownership of renewable energy projects. While PRPEAT's initial collaborators come from California, PPREAT participants ultimately hope to work with public power agencies from across the nation. Information on PPREAT and its activities will be available at www.resource-solutions.org. CRS will soon issue a Request For Proposals for soliciting partners in the renewable energy industry to collaborate with PPREAT in response to the CEC PIER Renewable Energy Program Area Grant RFP. For more information, contact Kirk Brown at CRS at 415-561-2100 or email at: [email protected]. CONTACT: CRS \| Keri Bolding, 415/561-2100, \| [email protected] =====================================
2,995	Subject: California Planning Session - May 1 and 2 Sender: [email protected] Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', 'Rachel Bryant/HOU/EES@EES', '[email protected]', 'John', 'Karen Street/HOU/EES@EES'] File: dasovich-j/all_documents/11706. ===================================== FYI. Need your support to move this process. Jim ---------------------- Forwarded by James D Steffes/NA/Enron on 04/26/2001 08:25 AM --------------------------- From: Carol Moffett@EES on 04/25/2001 01:06 PM To: Mark Bernstein/HOU/EES@EES, Jeff Golden/HOU/EES@EES, Don Black/HOU/EES@EES, David Gilleland/HOU/EES@EES, Eric Melvin/HOU/EES@EES, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Gary Weiss/HOU/EES@EES, Mark Dobler/HOU/EES@EES, James M Wood/HOU/EES@EES, Richard L Zdunkewicz/HOU/EES@EES cc: Karen Street/HOU/EES@EES, Rachel Bryant/HOU/EES@EES, John Wack/HOU/EES@EES, Rossana Booty/HOU/EES@EES, Michelle Mayo/HOU/EES@EES, Linda Rhymes/HOU/EES@EES, Cheryl Brashier/HOU/EES@EES, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Marcia A Linton/NA/Enron@Enron, Sandy Hoelscher/HOU/EES@EES Subject: California Planning Session - May 1 and 2 A team of folks (see attendee list below) will be conducting a California planning session next Tuesday and Wednesday. We would like for you to come and spend about 30 to 45 minutes giving them your view of what you think the potential is for your area for the California market for the next 0 - 6 months and opportunities you think would be worth pursuing there. Assistants , could get back to me with times when your manager is available to address the group. I'll build an agenda based on everyone's feedback. Mark Bernstein and Jeff Golden Cogeneration and distributed generation Don Black (and yr invitee) Power and gas positions and products going forward David Gilleland California DSM and DG monies made available by SB 5X and AB 29X Eric Melvin Power quality Jim Steffes (w/Dasovich and McCubbin) Regulatory update (rules, regulations, risks, plans) Gary Weiss and Mark Dobler IAM book Jim Wood Commodity products Richard Zdunkewicz DSM or labor-related products Here are the meeting details: Date: Tuesday and Wednesday - May 1 and 2, 2001 Place: Conference Room 872 Attendees: Dennis Benevides Lamar Frazier Doug Huth Tom Riley Mike Smith and Andy Wu (pls attend as much as you can) Marty Sunde Dirk vanUlden Jim Wright Thank you. =====================================
2,996	Subject: Re: Utility M&A Seminar Sender: [email protected] Recipients: ['[email protected]'] File: dasovich-j/all_documents/8035. ===================================== Thanks. From: Jeff Dasovich on 01/02/2001 10:13 AM Sent by: Jeff Dasovich To: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron cc: Subject: Re: Utility M&A Seminar Yep. Richard Shapiro 01/02/2001 09:52 AM To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron cc: Subject: Utility M&A Seminar Can you do this? ---------------------- Forwarded by Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron on 01/02/2001 09:52 AM --------------------------- "JOHN G KLAUBERG" <[email protected]> on 12/07/2000 01:44:52 PM To: [email protected] cc: Subject: Utility M&A Seminar Rick: it was great to catch up with you the other day in NY. It seems like it was a very long time ago that we worked together on the PECO deal, doesn't it? I look forward to doing the panel with you at the Utility M&A Symposium in NY on Monday, January 29, 2001. Our panel is set for around 4:00 that afternoon. I'll get off a brochure to you, but the panel will discuss price volatility and what strategies there may be for dealing with it. I thought it would be great if you could address the California situation and your thoughts on why it occurred and what the causes are and perhaps what remedial measures should be undertaken. Your thoughts on price caps and the "hard" and "soft" nature of the various approaches would also be on interest. I think people would also have a keen interest in the differences between CA and other markets, such as PA and perhaps the soon to open Texas market. I'll follow up with more info as the time gets closer, but you probably may want to think of a talk in the 25 minute range or so. I will let the EXNET (the seminar sponsor) know of your participation. As you may also know, LeBoeuf sponsors a dinner that evening at LeCirque for our energy industry clients. It is usually a good time and many of your compatriots, including Steve Kean, have attended in the past. If you can possibly make it, that would be great. My guess is that there also may be some people in attendance that you may wish to catch up with on various industry things that you may be working on. Thanks again, Rick, and I'll be in touch soon. John =====================================
2,997	Subject: Re: www.ChooseEnron.com Web Site Sender: [email protected] Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]'] File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/927. ===================================== How is it going? Can we go public with it yet? Enron Energy Services From: Suzanne Farrow 09/27/2000 03:14 PM Phone No: 713-853-0665 To: Susan J Mara/SFO/EES@EES cc: Subject: www.ChooseEnron.com Web Site Sue, I left you a voice mail on the www.ChooseEnron.com project. Mona (through legal) has reviewed the site. The purpose of the site is to provide commercial customers within certain industries (restaurants, hotels, motels, hospitals, nursing homes, grocery stores, convenience stores) the opportunity to purchase power from Enron. At this time, this isn't truly an "online" purchase. The customer is sent a mailer directing them to the site and providing them a unique customer ID and password. When they arrive at the site, they will be asked to enter customer contact information and basic energy usage information for up to 5 meters and/or up to 2,000,000 kWh of aggregate usage. (The minimum usage size corresponds to the 20 kW per meter peak demand.) When the customer requests a price, the site is currently configured to pull the price from the executable pricing matrix and fill-in a contract. The contract is then emailed to the customer within minutes (at worst within 4 hours when the system is extremely busy). The customer must physically sign the contract and fax that back to Enron. At that time, the customer goes into the normal set -up and billing process. The site is available 24 hours/day and 7 days/week unless the power desk shuts it down during times when the desk is reaching it's open position limits. I've reserved several customer IDs for you. Those are: The password for each of these user IDs is "begin". Keep in mind, we've set this up to protect ourselves against arbitrage risk. If you enter a request for a price quote(s) under a particular user ID, you cannot log in under that ID again until those quotes have expired (5PM CST the next business day). That's why I've given you so many user IDs. I hope you'll have a chance to look at the site. Please let me know if you have any questions or comments. Suzanne x30665 =====================================
2,998	Subject: Re: Sacramento Pres Final 4_13_01(projected).ppt Sender: [email protected] Recipients: ['[email protected]'] File: dasovich-j/all_documents/11285. ===================================== Jeff - please call me regarding the growing turmoil surrounding the allocation of Socal and PG&E backbone capacity. In case you did not know, we own 550 MMcf/d on El Paso for a 5 year term in addition to 25 MMcf/d of incremental capacity on Kern's emergency open season. We need to be very plugged in to discussions/meetings/regulatroy proceedings in California. (GIR/Gas Accord etc.) Do you have adequate resources to handle the gas issues in CA? I imagine that you are totally booked just dealing with the power issues. Please advise. Regards, Stephanie From: Jeff Dasovich on 04/19/2001 12:28 PM Sent by: Jeff Dasovich To: Jeffery Fawcett/Enron@EnronXGate, Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew Fossum/Enron@EnronXGate, Julie A Gomez/Enron@EnronXGate, Shelley Corman/Enron@EnronXGate, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Stephanie Miller/Corp/Enron@ENRON, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, [email protected], Linda Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Janel Guerrero/Corp/Enron@Enron, Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, [email protected], Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Donna Fulton/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Leslie Lawner/NA/Enron@Enron cc: Subject: Sacramento Pres Final 4_13_01(projected).ppt FYI. Presentation by Brattle Group before CA leg committee yesterday in which they assert market power at the CA border (held by "out-of-state suppliers") explains high gas prices in California. If you have any questions, call me at 415.782.7822. Please forward to others whom you think might be interested. Stephanie, could you forward along to Barry? Best, Jeff ----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 04/19/2001 12:23 PM ----- [email protected] 04/19/2001 11:36 AM To: [email protected] cc: Subject: Sacramento Pres Final 4_13_01(projected).ppt Per your request, attached are the presentation slides from yesterday. Douglas Porter, Senior Attorney Southern California Edison Company (626)302-3964 (626)302-3990(fax) [email protected](See attached file: DRT2486.PPT) - DRT2486.PPT =====================================
2,999	Subject: Re: Electronic Copy of Bios of EBS Management Sender: [email protected] Recipients: ['[email protected]'] File: dasovich-j/eci/41. ===================================== Here you go! Tracy J. McLaughlin Enron Broadband Services Government Affairs Coordinator (503) 886-0396 ----- Forwarded by Tracy McLaughlin/Enron Communications on 05/02/00 10:34 AM ----- Kris Caldwell 05/02/00 10:20 AM To: Tracy McLaughlin/Enron Communications@Enron Communications cc: Subject: Re: Electronic Copy of Bios of EBS Management Tracy, I'm doing just swell thank you. I'm attaching the most recent list that I have..........of course, this is always to be viewed as a living document since things change so quickly in terms of personnel here. Don't know that they need every single name on the attached list, so feel free to cut and paste as needed. thks, Kris Caldwell Enron Communications, Inc. Public Relations Manager (503) 886-0269 Tracy McLaughlin 05/02/00 09:12 AM To: Kris Caldwell/Enron Communications@Enron Communications cc: Subject: Electronic Copy of Bios of EBS Management Hey KC What's up? How are you today? Kris, can u help me out with this bio question -- do we have them in a database? Or do you have the readily available version? If so, would you mind terribly forwarding to me and/or Jeff Dasovich at the address below -- I know that we have the hard copy available and where to get that, but I don't know where the e version is. thanks KC T.:) Tracy J. McLaughlin Enron Broadband Services Government Affairs Coordinator (503) 886-0396 ----- Forwarded by Tracy McLaughlin/Enron Communications on 05/02/00 09:14 AM ----- Jeff Dasovich@EES 05/01/00 04:44 PM To: Tracy McLaughlin/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Sue Nord/HOU/EES@EES, [email protected] @ ENRON cc: Subject: Electronic Copy of Bios of EBS Management Tracy: My apologies, but I don't seem to have the final, electronic version of the bios of EBS management that we included in the California filing (Scott did the last version to ensure accuracy--the filed version reads "As of March 1, 2000.") Ms Nord needs an electronic copy. Might you have one that you could pass along to her (and to me)? As always, many thanks. Jeff =====================================

Subsets and Splits

No community queries yet

The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.