dataset_id
int64 0
5.47k
| email_body
stringlengths 800
9.73k
|
|---|---|
3,000 |
Subject: Re: FW: Reservation Confirmation
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/7921.
=====================================
Hotel res works for us.
"Eldon Sellers" <[email protected]>
12/21/2000 05:10 PM
Please respond to eldon
To: "Cameron Sellers \(E-mail\)" <[email protected]>, "Cameron Sellers
\(E-mail 2\)" <[email protected]>, "Eldon \(E-mail\)"
<[email protected]>, "Eldon Sellers \(E-mail\)" <[email protected]>,
"Nancy Sellers \(E-mail\)" <[email protected]>, "Jeffrey Dasovich
\(E-mail\)" <[email protected]>, "Prentice Sellers \(E-mail\)"
<[email protected]>, "Prentice Sellers \(E-mail 2\)"
<[email protected]>, "Scott Laughlin \(E-mail\)" <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: FW: Reservation Confirmation
This is what I received from the Westwood Marquis which has undergone a
renovation. (I replied and told them to correct the address.) Let me know
if this is OK. I don't know if we can find a cheaper place, but if you
think this rate is too high I can try. Also, I made reservations to go to
Burbank on Dec. 31 using Southwest Airlines and leaving from Oakland at
10:40 am, arriving at 11:40. Returning on Jan. 1 at 8:15 pm and arriving at
9:20. However, I learned from Cameron that all but your mother and I will
be going on Dec. 30 so I will cancel that part of the reservation. I don't
know what your plans are for returning so I will not be making any other
reservations unless I hear from you. I originally made the returning
reservation at the time I did so that if we came back to the house on Monday
to watch football games and play games we would have some time to do that.
If we don't do that we could possibly get an earlier flight back. Your
mother doesn't want to come back too late, so your mother and I couldn't
possibly watch a movie if Hef has one planned for later, but you might
consider that possibility. Our check-in time at the W is 3:00 pm, possibly
earlier. I assume you got my message left on the answering machine that
everyone has been invited to the party.
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2000 6:08 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Reservation Confirmation
=====================================
|
3,001 |
Subject: The Californian Energy Crisis
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/9152.
=====================================
My apologies. I'm going to send you a few things that I need to print out.
Thanks a bunch.
Jeff
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 02/15/2001 08:32 AM -----
Cindy Derecskey
02/12/2001 09:29 AM
To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Christie Patrick/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael B Rosen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen
Marshall/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melinda McCarty/Corp/Enron@Enron
Subject: The Californian Energy Crisis
Hi Jeff,
As a member of the University Affairs department we try to capitalize on
opportunities that facilitate the exchange of intellectual capital. I
realize that you are extremely busy, but it would be fabulous if you, or
someone else in your immediate department could help us answer this question
for the University of Liverpool. Let me know if you think someone will have
the time to generate an answer to this question...obviously it is NOT a rush.
Regards,
Cindy
----- Forwarded by Cindy Derecskey/Corp/Enron on 02/12/2001 09:25 AM -----
Eddie Ping <[email protected]>
02/12/2001 04:47 AM
To: [email protected]
cc:
Subject: The Californian Energy Crisis
Dear Sir/Madam,
We are a small group of geography students from the University Of
Liverpool, England. We will be visiting Santa Cruz in April on an
educational research visit and are focussing our research on the current
Californian energy crisis. One aspect that we are considering looking at
is effect of the energy crisis on the high-tech industries in and around
Santa Cruz. However, the information available at present is limited.
Therefore, we would appreciate any help or advise you could give us or pass
this e-mail on to somebody else who may be able to assist us.
Has the energy crisis reached Santa Cruz or Silicon Valley yet and if so
has it/will have any affect on the high-tech industries? Have any measures
been taken to mitigate its effects or is it of no concern?
We understand that you are very busy but would appreciate any feedback on
this subject that you may be able to give us.
Thank you for your time and we look forward to hearing from you.
Eddie Ping, Martin Price & Ric Mason
=====================================
|
3,002 |
Subject: Re: Response to ORA/TURN petition
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/8485.
=====================================
Pick a first and second choice: Feb. 8, 14 or 15.
From: Jeff Dasovich on 01/23/2001 03:56 PM
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
To: Leslie Lawner/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeffery Fawcett/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Susan
Scott/ET&S/Enron
cc:
Subject: Re: Response to ORA/TURN petition
Leslie: Jeff and Susan might be able to help with the pipeline charges.
Susan: I'm not ignoring you. Of course I'll come. Give me a call and let's
figure out a date for me to address your illustrious group. Jeff: How's
married life treating you. Leslie: Sorry for all the extraneous babbling.
Best,
Jeff
Leslie Lawner
01/23/2001 03:20 PM
To: [email protected]
cc: Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Harry
Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Rebecca W
Cantrell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Frank Ermis/HOU/ECT@ECT,
James Shirley/HOU/EES@EES, Roger O Ponce/HOU/EES@EES, Don Black/HOU/EES@EES,
Robert Neustaedter/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
Subject: Response to ORA/TURN petition
Mike - Here is the situation. Between ENA and EES, we sell gas to core and
non-core customers, and also have gas in storage as well as in the park and
lend service. I think we can be sympathetic to the ORA argument that the
diversion tariff penalties did not anticipate OFOs and EFOs in situations
such as we face here (shortages due to credit problems rather than lack of
supply). Assessing extreme penalties, as the OFO/EFOs would do, on users who
are not perfectly imbalance under this situation certainly seems unfair.
However, I think we should argue that limiting the payments to
shippers/customers whose gas is diverted to serve core customers to a market
index may not fully compensate for the diversion. The pay back specifically
does not include interstate pipeline charges, and there may be other costs as
well to the marketer/customer who had supplies taken away.
I need an estimate of the cost to make this filing and follow it up for the
RCR process, and I would also like any feedback anyone has on what our
position should be in this matter. The response is due Friday.
=====================================
|
3,003 |
Subject: Re: And the winners are...
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/1762.
=====================================
Dear Poolsters,
I just want you all to know that I, Cameron's boyfriend, the guy who is
behind Cameron's picks (save when we came in #1 last week, when I was out of
town, and Cameron did the picks -- an accomplishment slightly embarrassing,
but wonderful all the same) and the same guy who moved to San Francisco for
Cameron (or for our relationship), and, upon my arrival, pledged my loyalty
-- in front of the whole Sellers' family, hand on Bible -- to the 49ers (it
was easier when Steve Young retired, for Cameron told me that he was the
only man she would ever leave me for... Gosh I love Jeff Garcia!)... Yes
this same guy was begging for Cameron to take the 49ers against Dallas.
Begging. Entrapped by the hubris of winning last week, she refused my
advise. So, we ended up in 3rd. Oh well. Things could be worse. I just
wonder, maybe this is the sign of a true fan, someone who refuses to pick
the 49ers for fear that the heart's involved... Nah, I'll still pick 'em,
even if I have to beg. Good luck to all, and go 49ers!
>Week 4 winners:
>
>1st place - Nancy - (she says she's always been an Elvis sighter). A huge
>jump from #17 to #5. A week's vacation was all she needed.
>
>2nd place - Narvco - still a 49er faithful, and it paid off.
>
>3rd/4th - Cameron, Brady and Hank ((and they ALL put points on Dallas!) I
>don't know how you all feel, but being a 49er fan for over thirty years it
>was sad and shocking for us to see the demonstration by Terrell yesterday,
>and I hope others who have been proud to be such fans post a message with
>the news groups emanating from Dallas, telling them that we will not
>tolerate such unsportsmanlike conduct.
>
>Again, we thank Dave for handling the stats last week.
>
>NO ONE sat down in the Last Person Standing Pool
>
>Standings remain unchanged for Places 1 - 4 - Are they really that good?
>
>
>
>And here is the Week 5 pick sheet:
>
>
>
>
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
http://profiles.msn.com.
=====================================
|
3,004 |
Subject: AB 256
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/11952.
=====================================
Below are the notes from our lobbyist who attended the meeting today of
opponents for the language to change the requirements for those getting
e-signatures for selling products and services to small customers. From the
diversity of the group opposing the bill and the fact that the Attorney
General and Peace are involved, I recommend that we stay on the sidelines and
monitor this. The bill applies to small customers so it does not effect us
at present. What are your thoughts?
Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854
----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 07/12/2001 10:39 PM -----
"Scott Govenar" <[email protected]>
07/12/2001 04:59 PM
Please respond to sgovenar
To: "Jeff Dasovich" <[email protected]>, "Susan J Mara" <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: AB 256
As I mentioned earlier this week, my associate Cliff Berg, representing AOL,
co-sponsored a meeting in our office today regarding AB 256 (Wayne). The
meeting was run by Kay Caldwell on behalf of the Internet Alliance. Kay was
the one who contacted Jeff Dodd in Houston who I believe contacted one or
both of you.
The bill is being opposed by AOL, Microsoft, Charles Schwab, CMTA, Chamber,
GTE/Verizon, AEA, Retailers, Financial Services Association and the Internet
Alliance. All of those parties are scheduled to meet with Assembly Member
Wayne at different times on Wednesday to try and get him to drop the bill
which is being sponsored by the Attorney General. In the event that fails,
the group is also trying to get the bill double-referred to the Senate
Banking Committee where they have a much better chance of stopping it versus
the Senate Judiciary Committee. The bill will be heard by the Judiciary
Committee on August 21.
With respect to Enron's participation in any opposition effort, there was
some concern that the Judiciary Committee may not be the best place because
Peace is on that committee and would likely do anything to get at Enron
(support?). Regardless of anyone's concerns we could submit a letter of
opposition so long as someone provides me with the general framework.
Please advise.
Scott
=====================================
|
3,005 |
Subject: Welcome to alumnijobs
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/1590.
=====================================
--
Welcome to the alumnijobs mailing list!
Please save this message for future reference. Thank you.
If you ever want to remove yourself from this mailing list,
you can send mail to <[email protected]> with the following
command in the body of your email message:
unsubscribe alumnijobs
or from another account, besides [email protected]:
unsubscribe alumnijobs [email protected]
If you ever need to get in contact with the owner of the list,
(if you have trouble unsubscribing, or have questions about the
list itself) send email to <[email protected]> .
This is the general rule for most mailing lists when you need
to contact a human.
Here's the general information for the list you've subscribed to,
in case you don't already have it:
[Last updated on: Tue Jul 20 11:20:11 US/Pacific 1999]
Alumnijobs@haas the weekly newsletter of job postings exclusively for Haas
School of Business Alumni!
John Morel, our new Alumni/EvMBA Career Advisor, will forward all postings
sent to us by companies, Haas recruiters, or fellow alumni via email on a
*WEEKLY* basis with a clear indication of function, industry, FT/PT or
contractual work, geographic location, and whether or not an MBA is required.
If you would like to post a job to this list, please email the complete job
description to <[email protected]>.
Please note: These new features DO NOT REPLACE our on-line job postings
feature within our web-based Haas On-Line Community
(http://www.alumniconnections.com/olc/pub/HAA/ ). This list is an additional
resource and tool for members of the Haas Alumni Network.
This list is moderated by the Haas School Alumni Relations Office and the
Haas School Career Center. To contact the owner of the list (if you have
trouble unsubscribing, or have questions about the list itself), send email
to <[email protected]>
-OR-
Contact the Haas School Alumni Relations Office at [email protected]
or 510-642-7790.
Thank you.
The Haas School Alumni Relations Office
THIS SERVICE IS BROUGHT TO YOU, IN PART, BY SUPPORT FROM THE HAAS SCHOOL
ANNUAL FUND.
=====================================
|
3,006 |
Subject: Re: California ISO Ten-minute market and Cal PX Price Cap
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/896.
=====================================
Jim has mentioned a meeting next week with all of us to talk about strategy,
etc. over the next many months. Might be a good opportunity to clarify how
we coordinate on these matters.
"Mary Hain" <[email protected]> on 08/30/2000 12:43:58 PM
To: Susan J Mara/SFO/EES@EES, Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES
cc: "Paul Kaufman" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: California ISO Ten-minute market and Cal PX Price Cap
In general, please contact me before you call on Sarah, Joe and Donna with
FERC
issues. I was aware of this filing and have been talking to the traders about
whether we want to do anything about it. Thanks!
Sarah Novosel@ENRON
08/30/2000 07:57 AM
To: James D Steffes/HOU/EES@EES, Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES, Susan J
Mara/SFO/EES@EES, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Donna Fulton/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: California ISO Ten-minute market and Cal PX Price Cap
See the email from Donna Fulton below. Donna joined Government Affairs a
couple
of months ago. She was with Enron - GPG for 12 years doing gas regulatory
work,
so she's an expert in FERC matters but is getting up to speed on electric
matters. Please feel free to call her in addition to Joe or me on FERC
regulatory matters.
Also, the Cal PX filed at FERC on August 22 its proposal to implement a $350
price cap. Interventions are due on September 12. A copy of the filing
(Imaging Format) and FERC's notice are attached.
We should discuss what position we want to take, if any, in response to the
Cal
PX's filing.
Sarah
(See attached file: Cal PX $350)(See attached file: Cal PX Notice)
---------------------- Forwarded by Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron on 08/30/2000
09:56
AM ---------------------------
Donna Fulton
08/30/2000 08:51 AM
To: Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: California ISO Ten-minute market
FYI - Attached is the FERC notice of Cal ISO's filing to implement ten-minute
markets effective September 1, 2000. Do you think there is any interest in
our
participation/intervention?
(See attached file: ER002383.00B.TXT)
- Cal PX $350
- Cal PX Notice
- ER002383.00B.TXT
=====================================
|
3,007 |
Subject: Draft Decision from Commissioner Wood
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/2894.
=====================================
Not the retained assets case---Wood wants to cap prices to QFs. Jeanne,
could you try to get any information you can from PUC staff on how they
intend to handle PG&E's advice letter re: "we've stopped selling power from
out retained assets into the PX?" (I'm assuming that the PUC would be
sympathetic, since it should immediately lower the utility's bill for power?)
Thanks very much,
Jeff
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 01/11/2001 12:14 PM -----
"Daniel Douglass" <[email protected]>
01/10/2001 02:33 PM
To: <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: Draft Decision from Commissioner Wood
As you may be aware, there has been an ongoing proceeding at the CPUC
regarding short-run avoided cost (SRAC) payments made by SCE, and the other
utilities to QFs.? The avoided cost posting is based on a Transition Formula
adopted in D.96-12-028 that incorporates various border price indices.? On
July 28, 2000, SCE filed a petition to modify D.96-12-028 to revise its
Transition Formula, claiming that the existing procedure resulted in too
high a price.
?
The draft?decision issued by Commissioner Wood adopts a formula, to be
updated monthly, to revise SCE's factor adopted in D.96-12-028 and adopts an
alternative gas index to replace the Topock index adopted in D.96-12-028.?
?
However, you may be particularly interested to see that the draft decision
also establishes a ceiling price for payments to QFs of $67.45/MWh, based on
the reasonableness standard described by the FERC in its 12/15 order.
?
Dan
- CPUC01-#87303-v1-R9911022_Wood_Comment_Dec__.doc
=====================================
|
3,008 |
Subject: Re: California credit issues
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/7908.
=====================================
S&P threatened publicly yesterday that unless the PUC acts decisively today
to fix the utilities' cash flow issue, they will significantly downgrade
California's IOUs. I assume that's in the WSJ article Rick referenced. As
Rick said, more info to come in a few hours.
Mark Schroeder@ECT
12/21/2000 08:31 AM
To: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, John Sherriff/LON/ECT@ECT, Bryan
Seyfried/LON/ECT@ECT, Markus Fiala/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: California credit issues
Thanks. I inferred from John that we may not be able to get or use
information from our own credit people for our market making activities, that
is why he is looking for info in the (reasonably) public domain. mcs
Richard Shapiro@ENRON
21/12/2000 14:24
To: Mark Schroeder/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron@ECT, John Sherriff/LON/ECT@ECT, Bryan
Seyfried/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: California credit issues
Check out WSJ- Page A2. Also,Bill Bradford in Rick buy's group is person
most proficient on credit issues relative to the three calif. utilities. I
will also get back to you this afternoon........The CPUC is scheduled to
issue orders today at 12:00 CST that may dramatically affect credit ratings
of the 3 utilities.
Mark Schroeder@ECT
12/21/2000 08:13 AM
To: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: John Sherriff/LON/ECT@ECT, Bryan Seyfried/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: California credit issues
Rick/Jeff - I just spoke with John Sherriff and mentioned to him how on top
of California you guys were. As you may be aware, we are making markets in
the credit of many utilities and telcomm companies, via EnronCredit.com.
Brian Seyfried is the commercial leader for this business. John has asked me
to ask you, if you become aware of significant developments, in the public
sector (not privileged/insider information), bearing on
creditworthiness/ability to pay by California utilities, would you please
keep us informed, as we will have a keen interest in these developments?
Please forward to this to any others on your team(s) you think appropriate.
thanks mcs
=====================================
|
3,009 |
Subject: Re: CA ETI tariff(s)
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/9647.
=====================================
I don't have the consumer forms you reference. I assume those were sent to
Jeff, is that correct? Could you please resend. Let's set up a call for 2
p.m. this afternoon and discuss the other items. If that time does not work,
let me know what would. Thanks.
Jeremy Meier <[email protected]> on 03/02/2001 06:52:52 PM
To: [email protected]
cc: [email protected]
Subject: CA ETI tariff(s)
Mona:
Attached are 2 versions of the CA tariff(s) - one has redlines and the other
is clean.? We have included the new national ETI template service
descriptions and terms, as well as California specific regulatory language.
You will recall that we originally filed "placeholder" tariffs with the ETI
CPCN, which were approved with certain required modifications, and these new
tariffs will now be ETI's "Initial Tariff" filed at the CPUC.?? Subsequent
revisions and updates can be made via Advice Letter.
ETI can make the time and materials, special construction, and collo sections
"ICB", though we are unsure why ETI would want to include collo in the tariff
- this is an item you can discuss with Steve and me. Also, the new "early
termination" contract language appears unusual, given especially that your
written contracts would cover this, and that an otherwise "verbal" contract
would be unenforceable.? It is thus not necessary to include the new contract
termination terms in the California tariff.
Items for discussion before filing include:
There is standard early termination protection language in the tariff, and
the new terms may not be necessary;
We still need to establish (high) rates for the transport services, and
insert the figures.
Does ETI want to keep collo in the tariff?
We need ETI's operational approval for the Consumer forms previously sent.
(The Consumer forms must be attached to the tariff).
Please feel free to let me know any questions over the weekend - I can be
reached via office voice mail or cell phone (609-2210).? Otherwise we should
talk on Monday morning before filing.? Thanks,
Jeremy Meier
B&C
- MonaPCaliftariff(clean).doc
- MonaPCaliftariff(redlined).doc
=====================================
|
3,010 |
Subject: EnronOnline
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/28343.
=====================================
As you may recall, Portland General submitted a request to FERC for
authorization to use EnronOnline. Due to FERC's affiliate restrictions, PGE
currently is not able to use EnronOnline and is concerned that it is being
excluded from parts of the market due to the restrictions. We made a similar
filing on behalf of EPMI, proposing to remove the affiliate restrictions for
those transactions that EPMI enters into with PGE through EnronOnline.
The PGE and EPMI filings are on FERC's July 11 agenda. Although the FERC
staffers conducting the inquiry into EnronOnline have told us that their
inquiry is not related to the PGE and EPMI applications, FERC's order will be
the first pronouncement from FERC on EnronOnline since this new inquiry began.
We'll keep you posted and will send out the order as soon as we receive it.
Please let me know if you have any questions.
Sarah
----- Forwarded by Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron on 07/06/2001 09:10 AM -----
"CATHERINE MCCARTHY" <[email protected]>
07/05/2001 10:26 AM
To: [email protected]
cc: "SAMUEL BEHRENDS" <[email protected]>
Subject: EnronOnline
The EPMI and Portland General EnronOnline filings are on next week's FERC
agenda (July 11). We will forward the draft order to you as soon as we
receive it.
Cathy
Catherine P. McCarthy
LeBoeuf, Lamb, Greene & MacRae, LLP
1875 Connecticut Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20009
(202) 986-8253
[email protected]
==============================================================================
This e-mail, including attachments, contains information that is confidential
and may be protected by the attorney/client or other privileges. This
e-mail, including attachments, constitutes non-public information intended to
be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not an intended
recipient, please delete this e-mail, including attachments, and notify me.
The unauthorized use, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this
e-mail, including attachments, is prohibited and may be unlawful.
==============================================================================
- sunshine_3.htm
=====================================
|
3,011 |
Subject: RE: SBX 27 - PASSAGE
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/2937.
=====================================
We have confirmed that there is no current agenda item pending for the CPUC
to act on banning direct access. Having said that, there are reports from
highly placed staff that an item to implement the AB-1X ban is being held in
Bilas' office, as he would like to see the legislative process run its
course, but there is a possibility that Lynch will reassign the matter to
another commissioner who opposes direct acess (Wood)in an effort to kill DA
before any other legislation is passed. Please note: The foregoing is
internal speculation/gossip from within the commission, and should not be
considered as confirmed. Notwithstanding the controversy over implementing
AB 1X, Commissioner Brown has written a letter to Bowen endorsing direct
access and her bill, and publicly supported direct access in the Commission
meeting today. That means 3 commissioners have voiced support for DA, and
only 2 opposed. This again raises doubts over the accuracy of Bowen's
statement--which may have been designed to scare opponents into supporting
her bill. We are attempting to get a copy of the letter sent by Brown and
will forward it to the lobbyists if we obtaining. Stay tuned. Mike Day
-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Govenar [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2001 12:29 PM
To: Hedy Govenar; Mike Day; Bev Hansen; Jeff Dasovich; Susan J Mara;
Paul Kaufman; Michael McDonald; Sandra McCubbin; Rick Shapiro; Jim
Steffes; Alan Comnes; Steven Kean; Karen Denne;
[email protected]; Leslie Lawner; Robert Frank; Ken Smith; Janel
Guerrero; Miyung Buster; Jennifer Thome; Eric Letke; Mary Schoen; David
Leboe; Ban Sharma
Subject: SBX 27 - PASSAGE
SBX2 27 (Bowen) passed out of the Senate Appropriations Committee on a
7-5 party-line vote. In her closing, Senator Bowen said that if the
supporters of direct access do not want to help her with her bill she
would just as soon let if fail. She also stated that the CPUC was going
to terminate direct access next week. There was one additional
amendment taken which specifies that DWR must inform customers within 30
days of an inquiry what the projected exit fee will be.
=====================================
|
3,012 |
Subject: Healthcare/Biotech Firm Night tonight
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/deleted_items/1544.
=====================================
Come to the Healthcare/Biotech Firm Night Tonight, Nov. 19,
6-8:30pm. Bring your resume if you didn't submit it already.
Interested in Business Development, Finance, Marketing, Sales, and
Consulting Positions in Biotechnology and Healthcare?
Come find out about exciting careers at premier Biotechnology, Medical
Device, Pharmaceutical, Management Consulting, and Health Services
Companies at the
MBA Healthcare/Biotechnology Firm Night
on
Monday, November 19, 6-8:30pm
Marine?s Memorial Club
609 Sutter Street
San Francisco
Companies that will be attending:
Agilent
Axys Pharmaceuticals
Blue Shield
Chiron
Earnst Young Cap Gemini
ePocrates
Fluidigm
Genentech
Genetics Institute/Novartis
Gilead Sciences
Guidant
Kaiser
Lifescan/J&J
McKesson
PRTM
Food and drinks will be served.
Dress is Business Casual.
To Attend:
1. Bring your resume if you did not submit it to the resume book already.
2. Cost of Admission:
Members of the Haas Biotech Club or Healthcare@Haas Club (ie you have paid
club dues for 2001-2002): FREE ADMISSION
Non-Members have 2 options:
1. Attach a check to your resume payable to the Haas Biotech Club for $15
for admission to Firm Night or
2. Join either the Haas Biotech Club or Healthcare@Haas Club for $20 for
2001-2002 and get into Firm Night free. Attach a check to your resume for
$20 payable to the name of the club you want to join.
Please visit the club websites for more information:
Haas Biotech Club http://groups.haas.berkeley.edu/haasbio/
Healthcare@Haas Club http://groups.haas.berkeley.edu/hcc/
Directions:
? FROM EAST BAY/BAY BRIDGE
Take 5th Street/Downtown Exit (Exit to the left)
Veer Left onto Harrison Street
Take Harrison 1 block West to 6th Street and turn Right
Cross Market Street (becomes Taylor Street)
Follow Taylor to Bush Street, Make a Right on Bush
Follow Bush to Mason, Make a Right on Mason
Follow Mason to Sutter, Make a Right on Sutter
The Club is at 609 Sutter Street on the corner of Mason Street
BART
Take BART from Berkeley and get off at the Powell stop. Walk up Powell St.
and turn left onto Sutter St.
The Club is at 609 Sutter Street on the corner of Mason Street
=====================================
|
3,013 |
Subject: Re: Saturday
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/3597.
=====================================
Eldon: If you're willing to get the stuff necessary to make this menu, I'm
willing to act as "sous-chef" to Cameron to help make it. Just don' t seem
right to have Nancy cook on her birthday.
Nancy Sellers <[email protected]>
11/16/2000 10:16 AM
To: "'Eldon Sellers'" <[email protected]>
cc: Cameron <[email protected]>, Jeff Dasovich <[email protected]>,
"Prentice @ Berkeley" <[email protected]>, Prentice Sellers
<[email protected]>, Scott Laughlin <[email protected]>
Subject: Saturday
This sounds like a very delicious recipe to make for Saturday - relatively
easy too and uses our beautiful sage. It was in my e-mail this morning.
Neapolitan Pork Roast with Potatoes
6 - 8 cloves garlic, finely chopped
2 Tbs (30 ml) chopped fresh sage leaves or 2 tsp (10 ml) dried sage
Salt and freshly ground pepper to taste
1 boneless pork loin roast, 2 to 3 pounds (1 to 1.5 Kg)
2 lbs (1 Kg) potatoes, cut into 1-inch (3 cm) cubes
2 Tbs (30 ml) olive oil
Combine the garlic, sage, salt and pepper in a small bowl. Make holes
in the pork roast with a small paring knife and stuff the garlic
mixture in the holes with your finger, reserving about 1 teaspoon (5
ml) of the garlic mixture. Rub any remaining garlic mixture on the
outside of the roast. Toss the potatoes with the reserved garlic
mixture and the olive oil. Place the roast and the potatoes in a
roasting pan and place in a preheated 425F (220C) oven. Remove from
the oven and stir the potatoes after 30 minutes. Baste the roast with
the pan juices and return to the oven. Lower the heat to 325F (160C)
and continue to cook, stirring the potatoes and basting the roast
about every 15 minutes. Begin checking the internal temperature of
the roast after about 1 1/4 hours total cooking time. Remove the
roast when the internal temperature is 140F (65C) for meat that is
still slightly pink. Let the roast rest for 15 minutes before carving.
Return the potatoes to the oven if they are not crisp and golden. Serves 6 to
8.
Nancy
(707) 251-4870 (phone)
(707) 265-5446 (fax)
"Plus je bois, mieux je chante"
=====================================
|
3,014 |
Subject: RE: Response to ORA/TURN petition
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]; [email protected];', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/8512.
=====================================
FYI, for the RCR on this.
----- Forwarded by Leslie Lawner/NA/Enron on 01/24/2001 08:56 AM -----
MBD <[email protected]>
01/23/2001 04:53 PM
To: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: RE: Response to ORA/TURN petition
My estimate is $2500 or less for drafting the pleading, $1000 or less for
any reply and for monitoring the remainder of the pleadings. If there is a
hearing or other proceeding before the Commission decides, we would have to
increase the estimate if Enron wanted to participate in those proceedings.
Tell me if you require more. Mike Day
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2001 1:21 PM
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Response to ORA/TURN petition
Mike - Here is the situation. Between ENA and EES, we sell gas to core and
non-core customers, and also have gas in storage as well as in the park and
lend service. I think we can be sympathetic to the ORA argument that the
diversion tariff penalties did not anticipate OFOs and EFOs in situations
such as we face here (shortages due to credit problems rather than lack of
supply). Assessing extreme penalties, as the OFO/EFOs would do, on users
who are not perfectly imbalance under this situation certainly seems
unfair. However, I think we should argue that limiting the payments to
shippers/customers whose gas is diverted to serve core customers to a
market index may not fully compensate for the diversion. The pay back
specifically does not include interstate pipeline charges, and there may be
other costs as well to the marketer/customer who had supplies taken away.
I need an estimate of the cost to make this filing and follow it up for the
RCR process, and I would also like any feedback anyone has on what our
position should be in this matter. The response is due Friday.
=====================================
|
3,015 |
Subject: Fwd: US Sens Unveil Bipartisan Bill To Cap Western Pwr Prices
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['Aryeh Fishman" <[email protected]', 'Andrea Settanni', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/11535.
=====================================
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2001 14:17:19 -0500
From: "Tracey Bradley" <[email protected]>
To: "Justin Long" <[email protected]>
Cc: "Aryeh Fishman" <[email protected]>, "Andrea Settanni"
<[email protected]>, "Charles Ingebretson"
<[email protected]>, "Charles Shoneman" <[email protected]>,
"Deanna King" <[email protected]>, "Dan Watkiss" <[email protected]>,
"Gene Godley" <[email protected]>, "Kimberly Curry"
<[email protected]>, "Michael Pate" <[email protected]>, "Paul Fox"
<[email protected]>, "Ronald Carroll" <[email protected]>, "Randall
Rich" <[email protected]>
Subject: US Sens Unveil Bipartisan Bill To Cap Western Pwr Prices
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
FYI
US Sens Unveil Bipartisan Bill To Cap Western Pwr Prices
Updated: Tuesday, April 24, 2001 12:17 PM ET
WASHINGTON (Dow Jones)--U.S. senators Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif, and Gordon
Smith, R-Ore., Tuesday unveiled bipartisan legislation to require federal
regulators to impose cost-based electicity price controls throughout the
western U.S..
The bill was unveiled at a press conference designed to ratchet up pressure
on the Bush administration to relent in its opposition to price controls in
response to a pending electricity supply crisis in the region this summer.
The measure would require the U.S. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to
limit the prices power suppliers can obtain to their cost of production plus
a reasonable rate of return. The bill would allow FERC to determine what rate
of return power providers could obtain. The cost-based price controls would
remain in effect until March 1, 2003.
The bill also targets a FERC decision deemed to be exacerbating California's
electricity crisis by driving up natural gas costs in the state. It would
require FERC to end a temporary suspension of a natural gas transportation
rate cap for sales into California. The bill would mandate that natural gas
providers disclose to FERC commodity and transportation prices for sales into
California.
=====================================
|
3,016 |
Subject: Re: FW: Top Level Energy Person
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/9057.
=====================================
Hi Tom:
From our contact with the Governor's office, seems that Kari Dohn, formerly
in the Governor's office, and recently appointed Chair of the Electricity
Oversight Board, would be the hands-down best candidate.
Best,
Jeff
Tom Riley/Western Region/The Bentley Company@Exchange
02/12/2001 01:02 PM
To: Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Michele
Curtis/Western Region/The Bentley Company@Exchange
Subject: FW: Top Level Energy Person
If any of you have ideas on this, please respond ASAP. As you may know, I
sit on the CSU Foundation Board of Governors, accountable to Chancellor
Reed. Anything we can do to support the upcoming meeting will go a long way.
Regards, Tom
-----Original Message-----
From: "Patricia Linn" <[email protected]>@ENRON@EES
Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2001 2:13 PM
To: <[email protected]>
Subject: Top Level Energy Person
Importance: High
Greetings Tom, in preparation for our upcoming Board of Governors' meeting,
I would like to ask you for your help in getting a speaker for the evening.
The March 11 (Sunday) Board meeting in Sacramento is focused around CSU
Legislative Day scheduled for Monday, March 12. The Board meeting is
scheduled to begin at 4:00 pm followed by a dinner. We will invite the CSU
Trustees to attend the dinner along with other key CSU leaders; we normally
have about 30-40 individuals attend the dinner.
This year, we would like to invite someone from the Governor's office to
come and talk a little about the energy crises in California. Can you help
us identify someone in Davis' administration that may be interested in
speaking to this distinguished group of individuals?
Again, briefly,
Meeting date/time: Sunday, March 11, 2001 at 4:00 pm; dinner is scheduled
for 6:45pm; in Sacramento.
I look forward to hearing from you soon.
Patricia Castillo Linn, CFRE
Senior Director, Advancement Programs
and Vice President, CSU Foundation
The California State University
Office of the Chancellor
401 Golden Shore, 6th Floor
Long Beach, California 90802-4210
562/951-4821
562/951-4983 FAX
- winmail.dat
=====================================
|
3,017 |
Subject: Report on Environmental Justice Hearing
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/1445.
=====================================
Senator Richard Alarcon held a select committee hearing today on
implementation of SB 115 (Solis) related to an environmental justice policy
for the state. Most of the hearing was devoted to testimony from the Office
of Planning and Research, CalEPA, the Air Resources Board, and others.
There was, however, a very interesting exchange between Senator Alarcon and
CEC Commissioner Bob Laurie.
AB 970 includes a provision indicating that projects subject to the six
month siting process must comply with "all regulations adopted by the
commission that ensure that an application addressees disproportionate
impacts in a manner consistent" with environmental justice direction to the
Governor's Office of Planning and Research contained in Government Code
Section 65040.12.
During today's hearing, Senator Alarcon indicated that he believes that AB
970 requires compliance with federal environmental justice guidelines before
a power plant can be sited. Senator Alarcon argues further that the CEC
must adopt regulations to implement the federal environmental justice
guidelines in order to implement the expedited power plant siting process.
He also indicated today in his hearing that AB 970 goes far beyond SB 1622,
which would have required the CEC to adopt environmental justice
regulations, and was defeated earlier this year.
The CEC (Commissioner Bob Laurie) responded that AB 970 provides for a
six-month process for a negative declaration of environmental impacts,
including environmental justice matters. According to the CEC, the
environmental justice issue must be addressed in regulations implementing
the 6-month process but that the CEC is cautious about moving ahead of the
OPR process. That's because the OPR process will apply to all agencies,
including the CEC. As a result, the CEC must implement environmental
justice policies in a conservative fashion.
In an exchange with Commissioner Laurie, Senator Alarcon conceded that the
CEC could not move too far ahead of everyone else. At the same time, he
indicated that he believes that the CEC's work will become a model for other
agency action.
Karen Edson
[email protected]
916/552-7070
=====================================
|
3,018 |
Subject: nan
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/deleted_items/301.
=====================================
Well, this is interesting. Are they talking about the same period during which gas costs were supposed to have been so unreasonably, and allegedly illegally, high due to the actions of those greedy Texas energy firms?
NGI's Daily Gas Price Index
published : August 10, 2001
SoCalGas Posts $223 Million in Gas-Cost Savings
California regulators may be scratching their heads about what to do with gas purchasing incentives for the state's major utilities following Southern California Gas Co.'s filing that claims its purchases over a 12-month period ending last June were $223 million below market prices.
It was the "largest amount of savings on gas costs during any one-year period in our 134-year history" of SoCalGas, which is owned by San Diego-based Sempra Energy, according to Anne Smith, a vice president quoted in a report to the company's employees.
Under a regulator-approved "gas cost incentive mechanism (GCIM) that has been in place in recent years, the utility can apply a formula allowing it to share the savings between customers and shareholders." It's an incentive to the utility "to take reasonable risks to keep gas costs low, while ensuring a reliable supply," SoCalGas's director of gas acquisition, Jim Harrigan, told employees in the recent report.
With this relatively embarrassing "windfall" for shareholders, the utility recommended to the California Public Utilities Commission in June two options for spreading the wealth:
1. Give shareholders a relatively modest $30.8 million and make the utility's proposed adjustments to the GCIM program in future years. The modifications were agreed to many months ago in a settlement among SoCalGas; the CPUC; the Office of Ratepayer Advocates (ORA); and the statewide utility consumer group TURN (The Utility Reform Network); or
2. Award $106 million to the utility's shareholders, which is what SoCalGas says is the shareholders' share under the current GCIM formula.
Both options carry proposed rate increases to implement them. The first would necessitate a 44 cents/month increase for a 12-month period, while the second alternative would require a $1.52/month hike for one year.
=====================================
|
3,019 |
Subject: FW: Texan Talk
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/13242.
=====================================
This is from my friend Jane in Texas - these phrases are pretty funny and I
am sure we can all incorporate them into our everyday conversations!
I am sending this only because I have actually heard several of these in
conversation over the years. Come to think of it, Jack may have used
some of these phrases.
Subject: Whitehouse Language
New language for the press corp and others at the
White House to get used to. The White House is not
just getting a new team, but a whole new language.
George W. Bush will be bringing with him many friends
from Texas, and for anyone not born in the Lone Star
State, the Texan accent and the cowboy colloquialisms
can seem a bit strange.
Here is a guide to a few of the more colorful
expressions they might encounter:
1. The engine's runnin' but ain't nobody driving = Not
overly-intelligent
2. As welcome as a skunk at a lawn party (self-explanatory)
3. Tighter than bark on a tree = Not very generous
4. Big hat, no cattle = All talk and no action
5. We've howdied but we ain't shook yet = We've made a
brief acquaintance, but not been formally introduced
6. He thinks the sun come up just to hear him crow =
He has a pretty high opinion of himself
7. She's got tongue enough for 10 rows of teeth = That
woman can talk
8. It's so dry the trees are bribin' the dogs = We
really could use a little rain around here
9. Just because a chicken has wings doesn't mean it
can fly = Appearances can be deceptive.
10. This ain't my first rodeo = I've been around
awhile.
11. He looks like the dog's been keepin' him under the
porch = Not the most handsome of men
12. They ate supper before they said grace = Living in sin
13. Time to paint your butt white and run with the
antelope = Stop arguing and do as you're told
14. As full of wind as a corn-eating horse = Rather
prone to boasting
15. You can put your boots in the oven, but that
doesn't make them biscuits = You can say whatever you
want about something, but that doesn't change what it is.
16. Yankees are kinda like hemorrhoids, they're not too
bad when they come down and go back up, but they're a
real pain in the butt when they come down and stay.
=====================================
|
3,020 |
Subject: Briefing Book
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/4612.
=====================================
FYI.
---------------------- Forwarded by Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT on 04/02/2001 03:22
PM ---------------------------
Paul Kaufman
03/19/2001 04:24 PM
To: Elizabeth Linnell/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Briefing Book
FYI. Sorry, but I forgot to forward this to you last week.
---------------------- Forwarded by Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT on 03/19/2001 04:29
PM ---------------------------
Paul Kaufman
03/14/2001 10:39 AM
To: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Janel Guerrero/Corp/Enron@Enron, Alan
Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J
Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Jeff Dasovich
cc:
Subject: Briefing Book
I suggest the following contents for the legislative briefing book we
discussed during our 11:30 call yesterday. My goal was to be comprehensive,
even if it sacrifices brevity. My goal was also to put something together
that we could use for more than just California.
Overview of how we ended up in this crisis--include EPSA paper on crisis, EEI
paper on crisis, and 1-2 articles from CA papers on the crisis.
Load growth--California (show in terms of MWs, not percentages) and in WSCC.
Point is to show how load growth in California has been extraordinary
relative to historical growth, show how entire west is growing.
Generation additions--show how California and west did not keep pace with
load growth.
Consumption per capita or other measurements.
Rate comparisons--show how west has had experienced substantial rate
increases. Compare actual increase in California to other states.
MRW Study--show how $1 billion can be produced by 10% increase. Show how
increases experienced in--e.g., Nevada can produce revenues.
Transmission takeover analysis--show $39 billion price tag, compare with
school funding.
Solutions--include the Brulte or Herzberg piece.
I would add the following pieces as well (just not sure where):
Discussion of federal jurisdiction over transmission and
generation--summarize FERC orders, including investigation.
Why price caps aren't a solution.
I started to look at our website yesterday and was unable to find a number of
data points that I think we need to include in the b
=====================================
|
3,021 |
Subject: Media Inquiries
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/1271.
=====================================
perhaps you were a little strong in relaying my concerns to someone?
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 12/07/2000 12:27 PM -----
[email protected]
12/07/2000 12:19 PM
To: "Jeff Dasovich" <[email protected]>
cc: "Jeff Fawcett" <[email protected]>
Subject: Media Inquiries
Jeff,
It has come to my attention that you were concern by some of my comments
recently televised on CH. 2. Let me try to fill in the blanks. First, the
interview lasted almost 45 minutes of actual camera time. Of course, the
news media took their usually advantage of editing "for their agenda" what
they wanted. The risk you take in any situation like this. During the course
of the interview, I made it quite clear that it would be a mistake to lay
California's current natural gas problems on the doorstep of deregulation.
No one should question I am strongly in favor of gas deregulation in the
state.
On a more direct point, Mr. Vacar was clearly trying to get me to confirm
what he had already been told before my interview that the culprit here was
Enron Online. I disagreed with that conclusion yesterday and this morning.
About 1/2 hour ago, Mr. Vacar phone me to presumably find out what natural
gas prices where doing in the spot market. He quickly brought the
conversation back to Enron Online. I told him that it would be a mistake to
blame these current day prices on Enron Online. While it is convenient for
some to look for a simple singular answer or someone to blame, the answer
isn't Enron Online. He went on to reason that Enron is such a large energy
company they could conceivably "do this". I responded that would also be a
mistake. I acknowledged Enron as a large player but in no way capable of
running up California Gas prices because of some "perceived dominance".
Yesterday, I shared my concern that Mr. Vacar was directing his inquiries
toward Enron with Mr. Fawcett. Obviously , I reserve my right to call them
like I see them independent from anyone of my clients own agendas and will
continue to do so. The source of potential allegations against Enron isn't
me. If I can clarify anything else let me know.
Mark, IGS
=====================================
|
3,022 |
Subject: RE: FW: MPAR Team Assignment Change
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/912.
=====================================
i have no parking. let's meet at your place. kim and i can carpool and take
the "legal" spot. what's the address?
Jacqueline Kelly <[email protected]>
11/08/2000 06:33 PM
To: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>, "Ted Chin
(E-mail)" <[email protected]>, "Kimberely Kupiecki (E-mail)"
<[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: RE: FW: MPAR Team Assignment Change
We can also meet at my meager apartment. Parking is difficult, although,
there is one spot on the sidewalk in front of my house that the neighborhood
has deemed a legal spot. Do you have parking Jeff?
Either is fine with me!
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2000 4:26 PM
To: Jacqueline Kelly
Subject: Re: FW: MPAR Team Assignment Change
We can meet at my meager apartment if you like. Around 7?
Jacqueline
Kelly To: "Jeff Dasovich (E-mail)"
<JKelly@FairI <[email protected]>
saac.com> cc:
Subject: FW: MPAR Team
Assignment Change
11/08/2000
01:54 PM
How lame is this e-mail...
(Did you complain about being on my team??)
Where are we meeting tonight? I think I may have your case study...I have
someone's.
See you tonight,
Jackie
-----Original Message-----
From: Meg St. John [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2000 11:32 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: MPAR Team Assignment Change
Jackie,
We have changed your team assignment for the Mid Program Academic
Retreat. You were assigned to Atlantic 5, but that team had more members
than any other and we needed to reshuffle to achieve some parity.
You are now assigned to Atlantic 4.
This means that your Pre-Meeting will occur on Tuesday, and not Wednesday.
Please do not hesitate to contact me with any questions or concerns that
you may have.
Thank you,
Meg St. John
Assistant Director, Evening MBA Program
(510) 527-1406
=====================================
|
3,023 |
Subject: RE: Thanks.
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/12798.
=====================================
Yes, my trunk can handle that easily. Sounds like a plan! I'm going to
inform folks that I will be off Thursday/Friday. I'll let you what reaction
I get.
Nancy Sellers <[email protected]>
05/21/2001 11:30 AM
To: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>
cc: "'Eldon Sellers'" <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: Thanks.
you were the one who made her day by being so sweet to her! It was a fun
day though. Wednesday night sounds great - we will do our best to get stuff
ready to go. You would have to turn on the frig immediately though -
because you'll have to take up the cooler with the turkeys in it. They will
be frozen and just need to be in a frig until Saturday. Remind Prentice to
get the cooler! As far as the booze goes, we can send all that so the only
big thing would be the rest of the food and your trunk is pretty good size -
right??
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 9:22 AM
To: Nancy Sellers; [email protected]
Subject: Thanks.
You guys are stars. Thanks so much for all you did for Prentice. I think
she had a really, really good time and felt really neat about the whole
thing. She's wonderful and you guys gave her the wonderful day that she
earned and deserved. Thanks so much.
And, as usual, thanks for being great hosts yesterday (Nancy, you outdid
yourself with dinner).
OK, so I am doing everything that I can to leave for the Dome Wednesday
night. If you guys want, we can pack up the Suburban with everything that
needs to go up ( or at least just about everything), and we can drive it up
and then you two can take my SAAB up. Then, coming back, you can drive the
Suburban and I can drive the SAAB. What do you think?
Finally, Eldon, do you have the Blue Book at your house? I'm looking for
the number of someone I can get to haul away all the crap (junk from around
the generator shed, that rotten ol' pile of wood by the driveway, the
un-salvagable wood from the old deck, etc.). Can you find a couple
"hauler" numbers in there and send me the numbers? Thanks a million.
Best,
Jeff
=====================================
|
3,024 |
Subject: FYI - Article on PUC taking away direct access.
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/inbox/273.
=====================================
As you may know, the PUC suspended direct access yesterday but did not do so
retroactively. With the 2001 legislative session now over with little
resolved, our attention and advocacy will increasing go the PUC. See below.
Justin
California Takes Step to Reregulate Power
By REUTERS
AN FRANCISCO, Sept 20 (Reuters) ? State utility regulators revoked the right
of Californians to choose their power provider today, tossing out the
centerpiece of the state's failed effort to deregulate its electricity
industry.
The California Public Utilities Commission voted 3 to 2 to immediately
suspend consumers' direct access to independent power retailers.
The move makes it easier for the state to use revenue from retail power
sales to finance a record $12.5 billion bond issue this year.
The department was chosen in January to secure electricity for most of
California's 34 million residents after soaring wholesale power prices
drained the state's two biggest utilities of their cash and credit.
"Direct access is one half of a failed and collapsed deregulation project,"
a commissioner, Carl Wood, said today. Mr. Wood said the other half of the
problem was the law's retail rate cap, which blocked utilities from passing
on the cost of power to customers, incorrectly assuming wholesale prices
would fall.
When energy supplies tightened and prices soared, the state's largest
utility, Pacific Gas and Electric Company , a unit of PG&E Corporation , and
Edison International 's Southern California Edison had to absorb $13 billion
in unanticipated costs.
Direct access was never a big hit.
Despite an $80 million advertising and public relations campaign to educate
Californians about deregulation and retail choice, most customers stayed
with their local utilities.
Big businesses and industrial customers, however, made deals with energy
companies for cheap bulk power and wanted them to continue.
The utility commission estimated that 5 percent of the state's peak
electricity demand of 46,000 megawatts is in direct access contracts. About
10,000 businesses that signed new deals this summer, when wholesale power
prices dropped, will be able to keep their contracts.
=====================================
|
3,025 |
Subject: California LNG Project
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/11985.
=====================================
This afternoon I met with Kurt Lindahl and Jody Crook (Global Energy Markets)
concerning a proposal to bring LNG into California.
The project consists of converting an oil tanker into a floating vaporization
facility, anchoring it off the coast of California and constructing a subsea
pipeline to bring the gas onshore. The facility would have a daily unloading
rate of 500,000 mmbtu/d. Approximately 172,000 mmbtu/d would go directly to
market, with the remainder being injected into utility storage facilities for
ultimate withdrawal prior to arrival of a new shipment of LNG. The goal is
to baseload a market of 172,000 mmbtu/d.
The project would have a start-up date in early 2003. While other proposals
are being considered to bring LNG into California, the Enron proposal is
unique in that it is considering onshore gas storage vs offshore LNG
storage. Retrofitting the oil tanker takes approximately 18 months.
Constructing an offshore LNG storage facility would take 3 years - providing
Enron a competitive advantage with respect to timing. To protect this
competitive advantage during the development stage of the project, it has
been requested that this particular aspect be kept confidential as long as
possible.
Kurt and Jody have meetings scheduled next week in California with at least
two utilities to discuss operational and tariff considerations associated
with the utilities' providing storage service. I am providing analysis of
SoCalGas's storage tariff and have been requested to review ts reflection in
the economic modeling of the project. Other regulatory support I assume
would be required with respect to FERC and or CPUC authorizations.
Jeff, is this something that can be woven into the overall California
Solutions proposal, and, how would this fit into the discussions currently
ongoing with respect to adequacy of the California gas delivery
infrastucture. As this proposal would deliver gas closer to market (as
oppossed to gas coming from the west) some savings in term of capital and
fuel could be realized.
Kurt has offered to provide a more detailed briefing of the proposal at our
request.
=====================================
|
3,026 |
Subject: Re: PG&E strategy
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/1690.
=====================================
Yes, agree that another call to weave in the comments we received from the
biz units would be useful. Can we shoot for Wednesday, when Mr. Kaufman will
be here in the SF office?
Harry Kingerski
09/25/2000 08:58 AM
To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Re: PG&E strategy
----- Forwarded by Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron on 09/25/2000 08:56 AM -----
Harry Kingerski
09/25/2000 08:54 AM
To: Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES, Susan J
Mara/SFO/EES@EES, Mona L Petrochko/SFO/EES@EES, James D Steffes/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Re: PG&E strategy
More feedback from Dennis .... I think this requires some
scrutiny/scrubbing. Also, I don't think it adheres to the "compromise" that
was struck among EES participants in the earlier discussion. I will pursue
conflict in EES. Jeff - think we need another conference call soon?
----- Forwarded by Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron on 09/25/2000 08:48 AM -----
Dennis Benevides@EES
09/24/2000 09:36 PM
To: Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc: Scott Gahn/HOU/EES@EES, James M Wood/HOU/EES@EES, Scott
Stoness/HOU/EES@EES, Roger Yang/SFO/EES@EES, Marty Sunde/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: Re: PG&E strategy
Please see comments on PG&E strategy. I have made some modifications to be
more consistent with the three main messages of the ISO MSC report dated
9/6/00. Any proposal should address the three messages of this report 1)
Eliminate mandatory UDC day ahead purchase requirement from PX (this may
allow generators to exercise mkt power during time periods of high demand)
and allow utilities to hedge forward purchases in bilateral markets at
shareholder risk, 2) Provide demand price signals in PG&E/SCE service
territories ASAP but no later than 10/1/2001 and 3) eliminate incentive for
large SCs to under schedule in ISO real time market (adopt ISO proposals for
imbalances in excess of 250 MW per hour).
Dennis
From: Harry Kingerski@ENRON on 09/21/2000 02:18 PM
To: Scott Gahn/HOU/EES@EES, Dennis Benevides/HOU/EES@EES, James M
Wood/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: PG&E strategy
Let me know how this looks. I'll be shopping it around Govt Affairs.
=====================================
|
3,027 |
Subject: Large Customers' Response to Hertzberg
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/13286.
=====================================
To add to Bev's comments, I've gotten many calls from large customers today.
I'll be meeting with them in Sacramento on Monday to discuss the core/noncore
structure further and try to craft a core/noncore structure that makes
sense. I've also asked Sandi and the Sacramento team to line up meetings
with key legislators while I'm there to discuss the same.
Business is, as was expected, very unhappy about that portion of the plan
that would stick them with all of Edison's debts. They view it as unfair and
punitive (which it is) and are frustrated that the Democrats would include it
simply to "make the deal Harvey proof." Many questioned Keeley about why the
Democrats are hell bent on pandering to Harvey. Keely said that the Assembly
is also trying to come up with something that will get support from the
Senate (read "Burton").
Keely also mentioned our name in a list of many names as sources of
information used to build the proposal.
Best,
Jeff
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 05/31/2001 06:09 PM -----
---------------------- Forwarded by Joseph Alamo/NA/Enron on 05/31/2001 03:57
PM ---------------------------
"Bev Hansen" <[email protected]> on 05/31/2001 03:39:54 PM
To: "Sandi McCubbin" <[email protected]>, "Rick Shapiro"
<[email protected]>, "Alan Comnes" <[email protected]>, "Harry Kingerski"
<[email protected]>, "Janel Guerrero" <[email protected]>,
"Jim Steffes" <[email protected]>, "Joseph Alamo" <[email protected]>,
"Karen Denne" <[email protected]>, "Lindsay Meade" <[email protected]>, "Marcie
Milner" <[email protected]>, "Mona L Petrochko" <[email protected]>, "Scott
Govenar" <[email protected]>, "Sue Mara" <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: Today's Chamber Meeting
I attended the Chamber meeting today and the discussion focused on P.R.
efforts for large users focusing on core and non-core opposition. Bob Foster
with Edison made a presentation regarding support of M.O.U. and Fred Keeley
came in and described Hertzberg's Plan B which mostly emphasized direct
access. Hertzberg's Plan B was not particularly well received by the user
groups. More details later.
-Bev
=====================================
|
3,028 |
Subject: RE: FW: Rocky Grass Academy Waiting List
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/10202.
=====================================
Face is a little better. I worked from home yesterday because I looked like
a freak.
I leave for Chicago tomorrow around 4pm and get back Thursday night.
ROI is attached. Please tell me anything you can at first bluch. We can
talk about it in more detail in mexico. Hey...its better than hanging out
with Aunt Bobbie and Uncle Glenn!!
<<perfect roi model.XLS>>
Cameron Sellers
Vice President, Business Development
PERFECT
1860 Embarcadero Road - Suite 210
Palo Alto, CA 94303
[email protected]
650.798.3366 (direct dial)
650.269.3366 (cell)
650.858.1095 (fax)
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2001 3:19 PM
To: Cameron Sellers
Subject: Re: FW: Rocky Grass Academy Waiting List
Hey babe. I called you last nite re: ROI model, but only got the answering
machine. Forward along to me and I'll take a peek and get back to you.
How's the face doing? When do you leave on travel?
Cameron
Sellers To: "'PP'"
<[email protected]>, "'Scott
<cameron@perf Laughlin'" <[email protected]>,
ect.com> "'[email protected]'"
<[email protected]>
03/20/2001 cc:
05:12 PM Subject: FW: Rocky Grass
Academy Waiting List
FYI
Cameron Sellers
Vice President, Business Development
PERFECT
1860 Embarcadero Road - Suite 210
Palo Alto, CA 94303
[email protected]
650.798.3366 (direct dial)
650.269.3366 (cell)
650.858.1095 (fax)
-----Original Message-----
From: Matthew Bretz [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, March 19, 2001 11:06 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Rocky Grass Academy Waiting List
Hiya,
Sorry to be a pest but....
Can you get any idea from Steve's past experience whether the rest of my
friends who are on witing lists are liable to get into their workshops?
Scott Laughlin Mandolin
Jeff Dasovitch Guitar
Prentiss Sellars Banjo
Thanks,
Matty
- perfect roi model.XLS
=====================================
|
3,029 |
Subject: Nexis.com Focus Group Participants Needed
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: []
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/5458.
=====================================
Lexis-Nexis has been a trusted source of real-time and archival information
for 28 years. Continuing the Lexis-Nexis tradition of providing the most
comprehensive and credible information in the marketplace, the nexis.comSM
Web interface was released to our corporate subscribers in Fall 2000. To
determine the applicability of this interface for graduate schools of
business, Lexis-Nexis has entered into a pilot program with select leading
business schools. As a pilot program participant at The University of
California - Berkeley, Haas School of Business, Lexis Nexis has provided
you with unlimited access to its nexis.com service. All they want in
return is your opinion on how well the nexis.com service meets your
expectations.
To best understand how the nexis.com service meets your needs, Lexis-Nexis
has chosen an independent market research firm, Shugoll Research, to
conduct a research study with pilot program participants like yourself.
This is strictly market research and there is absolutely no sales effort
involved. The research will be used to identify ways that the nexis.com
service can be improved.
We urge you to participate in this research. Focus group research has been
scheduled for:
February 12, 2001 at 4 PM
In the Haas School of Business
All qualified participants will receive an honorarium as a token of our
appreciation for their time and opinions. All of your answers will be kept
strictly confidential.
If you are interested in participating, or simply learning more about this
important research, please contact Shugoll Research one of two ways:
1. E-mail Shugoll Research at [email protected]. Please include
your first name, a telephone number and the best time of day to reach you
so a representative from Shugoll Research can contact you.
2. Call Shugoll Research toll free at 800-322-4499 and identify yourself as
someone who has been invited to participate in the nexis.com research.
Thank you in advance for your participation in this very important
research.
Maegan Simpson
Research Associate
Shugoll Research
7475 Wisconsin Ave. Suite 200
Bethesda, MD 20814
(301) 656-0310 x109
www.shugollresearch.com
=====================================
|
3,030 |
Subject: California PUC Orders
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/4643.
=====================================
Is there any language that tells us that the surcharges are not applicable to
future DA customers? Obviously it should not since they would be paying for
generation twice but the other surcharge did apply. Please let me know ASAP.
---------------------- Forwarded by Eric Letke/DUB/EES on 03/29/2001 07:17 PM
---------------------------
From: Harry Kingerski@ENRON on 03/28/2001 03:41 PM
To: Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES, Mike D Smith/HOU/EES@EES, Don Black/HOU/EES@EES,
James W Lewis/HOU/EES@EES, Scott Stoness/HOU/EES@EES, Eric Letke/DUB/EES@EES,
Scott Gahn/HOU/EES@EES, Janet R Dietrich/HOU/EES@EES, Tamara
Johnson/HOU/EES@EES
cc: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Jennifer Thome/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: California PUC Orders
Orders the CPUC voted out yesterday:
1) March 27 decision on California Procurement Adjustment:
- CPUC01-#93704-v1-D0103081_A0011038_et_al__.doc
This tells the utilities to start paying DWR an amount per kwh equal to the
utilities' average cost of generation for all power provided by DWR, and asks
for additional comment on how the California Procurement Adjustment is
calculated.
2) March 27 decision on rate increase is not yet available but is largely
unchanged from proposed decision:
http://www.cpuc.ca.gov/cyberdocs/tcquickstart.asp?DOC_ID=93630&docType=LEGAL_P
ROCEED
This is the order that allows the rate increase to take effect.
3) March 27 decision on rate design is not yet available but also is not
likely to change from proposed decision:
http://www.cpuc.ca.gov/cyberdocs/tcquickstart.asp?DOC_ID=93589&docType=LEGAL_P
ROCEED
This is the order that says the rate increase will not be a uniform across
the board increase, but rather will achieve conservation and equity goals.
Regarding the rate increase of 3 cents, it is effective yesterday but the
Commission did not describe exactly how it will be implemented. For example,
they could
a) allow a 3 cent surcharge until the rate design phase is complete, and then
switch over to the new rate design around, say, May 15; or
b) allow a 3 cent surcharge to be billed and then retroactively adjust the
billing based on the new rate design, once it is known.
=====================================
|
3,031 |
Subject: News about Biotech Investing and Special Savings!
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/deleted_items/1773.
=====================================
Dear Jeffrey:
Will you be able to join other VentureWire subscribers
in the Bay Area for this month's Breakfast Briefing?
We'll be gathering at the San Mateo Marriott on
Wednesday, September 19, to hear Mark Klopp's thoughts
on this month's topic:
When Corporate and Venture Worlds Collide - Aligning
Investment Strategies to Drive Innovation and Generate
Returns
While times are certainly tough across the board, new
opportunities for creating profitable, sustainable
investment strategies continue to emerge. Innovative
companies such as Eastman Chemical have led the charge
in using venturing as a way to spur corporate
transformation and create long-term value. Moreover,
by understanding the often complementary strategies
that drive their respective investment decisions,
corporate and private VCs stand to gain a unique
perspective with which to explore mutually profitable
relationships.
=B7 What is the current state of corporate venturing?
=B7 What are some examples of corporations and VCs
working together to build companies?
=B7 How can you balance strategic vs. financial
value?
=B7 How can you prove value despite sagging returns?
=B7 To what extent does the corporate VC serve as an
"inside/outside pipe" for driving innovation?
=B7 How can corporate VCs and private VCs leverage
distinct skill sets in a spirit of cooperation to
drive innovation and change?
Join us for a provocative discussion of these and
other important questions led by Mark Klopp, managing
director of Eastman Ventures, Eastman Chemical Co.
Register by Thursday, September 13th and you'll pay
only $99 and ensure your name in the attendance
roster. Register online for this VentureWire Breakfast
Briefing at:
http://events.venturewire.com/briefingEvent.asp.
Hope you'll be able to join us on September 19!
Sincerely,
Omar Divina
Events Editor
[email protected]
If you'd prefer not to receive such messages from us,
click: http://venturewire.com/[email protected]
VentureWire and VentureWire Breakfast Briefings are trademarks
and service marks of Technologic Partners
©2001 Technologic Partners
=====================================
|
3,032 |
Subject: Only two people left on the EvMBA board in May--act now!
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/5361.
=====================================
I thought about putting free jeans on the subject header to get your
attention but I am not at the point that I am willing to bribe you all
(yet). As I finish up my last semester at Haas, I am determined to get
the 1st and 2nd year students involved--to help carry on some of the
programs that the EvMBA board has supported over the past few years. One
of the most valuable and fun experiences I have had over the past three
years at Haas has been being able to make a difference through my
involvement on the EvMBAA board.
You ask, what does the board do? In addition to supporting and
organizing social events (Back to School Party, Wine Trip, Raiders game,
etc.), the board supports the Career Center Roundtable (thanks Albert)
and other activities such as this year's Elective Scoop Night (more
details to follow.)
Seven out of the ten board members have finished the program in December
or will finish the program this semester, so it is time for you to get
involved (or Albert Demery and Alessandro Ratti will have to carry the
entire load!) The following positions are currently open or will be in
the next few months. I urge you to get involved now so that we can have
some overlap between outgoing and incoming board members.
President (Dawn Taketa, May '01)
VP Communications (Thera Kaljmin, May '01)
VP Finance (Todd Wells, May '01)
Social Co-Chair (open)
Social Co-Chair (open)
Corporate Outreach (Christine Piesco, May '01)
Day Program Liaison (open)
Student Advisory Committee Chairperson (Mike Plumb, May '01)
Attached are the descriptions of each position and the responsibilities
for each. How much of a time commitment will you need to make? At
minimum, it is about 6-8 hours per months (a little higher for the
President and SAC Chairperson positions)--but with all the great ideas
that I am sure all of you have, it can be as much time as you want to
put into it.
If you are interested in applying, please send me an email with a couple
of paragraphs stating which position you are interested in and why you
want to get involved/what you would like to accomplish in the position.
Thanks.
Dawn Taketa
EvMBAA President
- EMBAA Board Descriptions.doc
=====================================
|
3,033 |
Subject: Re: SB 1217 (Alarcon)
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/334.
=====================================
Your welcome. Also take a look at AB 1007 (Wayne) relating to internet
privacy
(I've linked it below). If you're concerned with privacy issues, another hot
topic
is SB 129 (Peace). That bill intends to set up a privacy ombudsperson
within the
Secretary of State's office and establish administrative penalties for privacy
violations. It's currently in a conference committee.
With respect to SB 1217, the bill was aimed directly at Excite@Home and their
deal
with TCI. Certainly Excite and TCI opposed the bill. I believe other cable
companies, including TimeWarner Cable also opposed the bill. Supporters
included
GTE and AOL. It is my understanding that AOL will probably oppose the bill
now
because of the merger.
I'll let you know if anything else develops.
http://info.sen.ca.gov/cgi-bin/postquery?bill_number=ab_1007&sess=CUR&house=B&
site=sen
Jeff Dasovich wrote:
> Scott:
> Thanks very much for the info. Greatly appreciated. And thanks for faxing
the
> memo.
>
> I've been given the task of being point person watching over the wacky
> information industry in the West on behalf of Enron Broadband Services. Any
> on-going intelligence you can provide with respect to legislative
activities in
> this area would be a great help.
>
> Couple of questions:
>
> Is the bill targeted at cable? Any clear opposition/support from any
particular
> interest groups?
>
> Thanks again,
> Jeff
>
> Scott Govenar <[email protected]> on 02/04/2000 04:36:50 PM
>
>
>
> To: Bruno Gaillard/SFO/EES@EES, Jeff
> Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES
>
> cc:
>
>
>
> Subject: SB 1217 (Alarcon)
>
>
> SB 1217 is sponsored by GTE. AOL was initially a big supporter, but
> with their recent merger they will probably will not maintain that
> position. The bill is sitting in the Assembly Utilities Committee with
> no hearing date, probably due to Assemblyman Rod Wright's contempt for
> the notion of open access. I will fax you both a copy of a memorandum I
> sent to Scott Bolton on October 28 explaining my point further.
> According to Senator Alarcon's office, they do intend to bring the bill
> up, but not until much later in the session.
>
> Scott
=====================================
|
3,034 |
Subject: RE: Call with Fielder
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent_items/131.
=====================================
That ain't gonna do it, in my view. We're going to need to be creative. Figure what number we'll take and how we'll take it and get out. Note that Edison is going to be very wary of showing any "preferential treatment," lest another creditor get wind of it and yank them in on an involuntary. I'm going to call Tribolet and get his thoughts. I'll let you know what he says.
Best,
Jeff
-----Original Message-----
From: Steffes, James D.
Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 11:49 AM
To: Dasovich, Jeff
Subject: FW: Call with Fielder
FYI
-----Original Message-----
From: Williams, Robert C.
Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 11:40 AM
To: Steffes, James D.
Cc: Sharp, Vicki
Subject: RE: Call with Fielder
I think you should go talk with them and convince them they should reinstate our credit.
-----Original Message-----
From: Steffes, James D.
Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 11:35 AM
To: Williams, Robert C.
Subject: FW: Call with Fielder
Bob --
Jeff talked with Fielder. Your thoughts on next steps?
Jim
-----Original Message-----
From: Dasovich, Jeff
Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 11:13 AM
To: Kean, Steven J.; Shapiro, Richard; Steffes, James D.
Subject: Call with Fielder
Fielder agreed to sit down and talk as soon as we'd like.
He said that his "legal and tariff guys" told him that "they're on solid ground"; but John admitted that doesn't mean that Edison "is right."
I told him that his lawyers and tariff people may think they're on solid ground with the PUC, but that in no way means that an appellate or ("god forbid) bankruptcy judge will concur with either Edison or the PUC.
I stressed that we weren't interested in meeting to re-hash our respective positions and that we wanted a meeting where we and they come to the table with constructive, good faith options to resolve the issue.
He said that he'd be willing to do that (though most deeply discount anything Edison says these days).
He suggested that we start without lawyers. I said that we could do that, but that I'd have to check.
I told him that we'd try to get back to him sometime today regarding what we'd like to do.
Possible to discuss briefly?
Best,
Jeff
=====================================
|
3,035 |
Subject: FW: Friday's hearing in San Diego
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/1154.
=====================================
FYI. More info about CPUC's hearing on Friday (9/8). Also looks like the
CPUC hearings on 9/14 and /15 are cancelled.
---------------------- Forwarded by Mona L Petrochko/SFO/EES on 09/06/2000
04:41 PM ---------------------------
JMB <[email protected]> on 09/06/2000 03:51:09 PM
To: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: FW: Friday's hearing in San Diego
> -----Original Message-----
> From: BTC
> Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2000 3:43 PM
> To: '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]';
> '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]';
> '[email protected]'
> Cc: JDS; MBD; JMB
> Subject: Friday's hearing in San Diego
>
> I ran into Steve Weissman, the Commission's new Energy Re-Restructuring
> Czar, and got some information about the "evidentiary" hearings to be held
> in San Diego. He told me that the additional two days of hearings will be
> canceled, so the only day of hearings will be this Friday. It won't
> really be like the usual Commission evidentiary hearing. Instead,
> representatives of the PX and ISO will present some of the findings of
> their Market Surveillance Committees on this summer's events. In
> addition, Harvey Morris of the Commission may moderate a panel on gas
> prices (for those of you who don't know him, Harvey has been the PUC's
> point man on gas issues at the FERC for years now, and the preceding may
> have been the first time "Harvey Morris" and "moderate" have been used in
> the same sentence). Also there will be a presentation on the Project
> Reclaim air emissions credit program. So the idea is to get information
> on the three main reasons that have been cited to explain the electricity
> prices this summer. All this is primarily a preface for the Legislative
> Committee hearings to be held in San Diego on Monday, and FERC
> investigative hearings to be held on Tuesday. The schedule, topics, and
> participants for Friday's hearings are still somewhat up in the air, but
> this information was current as of about 1 p.m. this afternoon. After
> this flurry of activity, Steve expects and hopes that things will quiet
> down for a while.
> Brian
=====================================
|
3,036 |
Subject: Re: Affiliate Relook case [PLEASE RESPOND TODAY]
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', 'Susan J', 'James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron', 'Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron']
File: dasovich-j/sent/3620.
=====================================
It's a love fest! How goes it?
Paul Kaufman@ECT
03/13/2001 11:26 AM
To: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc: Jeff Dasovich, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Re: Affiliate Relook case [PLEASE RESPOND TODAY]
I agree as well.
Richard Shapiro@ENRON
03/13/2001 09:28 AM
To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J
Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Re: Affiliate Relook case [PLEASE RESPOND TODAY]
Agree.
From: Jeff Dasovich on 03/13/2001 11:24 AM
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
To: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J
Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Affiliate Relook case [PLEASE RESPOND TODAY]
Given everything that we've got on our plate, and the relative priority of
the affiliate issue, and the fact that ARM and Wild Goose are involved, I
would propose that we take a pass on this one. Thoughts?
Best,
Jeff
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 03/13/2001 11:18 AM -----
JMcTarnaghan <[email protected]>
03/13/2001 10:59 AM
To: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>, "'Jeff Dasovich'"
<[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: Affiliate Relook case [PLEASE RESPOND TODAY]
Dear Jeff and Sue:
Sorry to be a broken record on this one....but I don't know what you want to
do about the Affiliates case. There is a PHC tomorrow and comments were
filed. SCE's comments make a nasty jab at Enron for proposing the rules in
the first place. I see that AReM is participating as well. If your plan is
to participate in this proceeding only through AReM, that's fine but please
let me know so that I can remove my appearance. I will be at the PHC for
Wild Goose but would like to be very clear about who I am representing in
the docket in order to avoid confusion.
Thanks,
Jim McTarnaghan
Goodin, MacBride, Squeri, Ritchie & Day
505 Sansome Street, Suite 900
San Francisco, CA 94111
415-765-8409 (Direct Line)
415-398-4321 (Fax)
[email protected] (Email)
=====================================
|
3,037 |
Subject: Fwd: Crystal Ball
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/mba__quant/14.
=====================================
Dear E204-1 and E204-2 students,
Erik Magner has informed me that the academic version of Crystal Ball
that you received does not have the decision variable function that we
discussed in class. I was under the distinct impression that your version
would have the decision variable function but limited to two choices for
cells that could operate as decisions. I would suggest that you try
Tools - Crystal Ball Decision and see if your software permits access.
If not, you may have to try several decision choices in separate simulations
(a little more tedious but this is essentially what Crystal Ball would do).
I spoke with the same person at Decisioneering, and she indicated the
student version of Crystal Ball should be able to set up the decision cells
and function correctly (as long as you go through the Tools - CB Decision
steps, not just the simulation (triangular) start icon. You can test your
software with the attached simulation for airline reservations.
--Tom McCullough
>Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2000 10:00:32 -0700
>From: "Erik Magner" <[email protected]>
>Organization: Nieco Corporation
>X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.61 [en] (Win95; U)
>X-Accept-Language: en
>To: Tom McCullough <[email protected]>
>CC: Elizabeth Joy <[email protected]>,
> "Mendelson, Aaron" <[email protected]>
>Subject: Crystal Ball
>
>Dear Prof. McCullough:
>I just talked to the technical service from Decisioneering, the
>programmers of Crystal Ball. They told me that the decision variable
>function will not work with the academic version of the program. That
>is the version we have.
>
>The decision variable function could be used in problem 13.19b. It may
>be a good idea to inform all students to find a solution manually for
>problem 13.19b before the weekend frustration starts.
>Thanks
>Erik Magner
>[email protected]
>[email protected]
>
>Copy: Aaron Mendelson, Class Representative
- E204_Airline_Overbooking_sim-2.xls
=======================================================================
Tom McCullough
Senior Lecturer
Haas School of Business
University of California at Berkeley
==========================================================================
=====================================
|
3,038 |
Subject: CSG/Global E Commerce
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/270.
=====================================
Scott et al---the annual Council of State Governments meeting was held last
week in Quebec City and one of the panel presentations during the week was on
"Global E Commerce:State Roles.
The panel was moderated by the Conference of World Regions (Jmaes Gardner and
Lucy Duncan). Participants were:
Rep. Matthew Kisber--Tennesee (he is also co chair of the NCSL task force
on e commerce)
Arthur Kerrigan---section chief of e commerce for the European Commission in
Brussels
David Cliche--Minister for Information Highway/Government of Quebec
DAvid Hite--CEO of Veronex Technologies
Todd Finch---President, Netscape/Canada
Bernard McKay---Vice President, INTUIT
The government folks focused most of their discussions on the need to
continue to be able to collect taxes on sales, but said they were not looking
to increase those taxes--just to be able to make it easy to collect. Kisber
seemed to be in the Governor Leavitt camp on e commerce solutions--he
referenced Leavitt's proposals several times. Cliche made some interesting
statements about Quebec having all of it's government work being done via e
mail by the end of 2001---anybody who wants to do business with the
government will have to do it via e commerce.
THe private sector folks talked about the difficulty in dealing with 50
different state rules and regulations in order to do their business and the
need for uniformity and commonality. Finch talked about the need for global
governance of the internet rather than local or parochial which will only
inhibit development of e commerce. He also talked about if and when states
or entities will start thinking about trying to tax information that is
exchanged via e commerce and how this would be counterproductive. McKay
brought up the concept of government becoming a competitor with the private
sector as e commerce changes the way we do business.
It was a fairly interesting discussion, but no real bombshells.
Scott--Kisber mentioned that there was going to be a meeting of the
COngressional interent taxation committee next week in San Francisco (this is
the Governor Gilmore group). Are you attending that meeting?
=====================================
|
3,039 |
Subject: Re: Dow
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/1003.
=====================================
Greetings. The reference is specific to statements that we made when FERC
first issued it's proposed order on Nov. 1 regarding how to fix the mess in
California. We said (and FERC was a little cranky about this) that we were
pulling 300 MWs of power plants that we'd planned to build in California on
the basis of the price cap proposal included in FERC's proposed order. It
was in the press. So it was narrowly confined to the power plant proposals.
Calpine subsequently announced that it, too, would pull the peaking plants it
had planned to developed. I think that they announced the same amount would
be pulled---300 MWs.
If you need anything else, don't hesitate to call.
Best,
Jeff
Cynthia Sandherr
11/14/2000 05:40 PM
To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Tom Briggs/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Dow
Jeff: is this story true that "Enron plans to pull out of the market in
California?"
* FERC COMMISSIONER HERBERT SKIPS SAN DIEGO HEARING
FERC's sole Republican commissioner will not be attending
today's hearings in San Diego, saying the situation has gotten
too political, according to Dow Jones Newswires.
Commissioner Curt Herbert was quoted as saying: "California
would rather fight this out for the next five to ten years rather
than take steps now to solve the problem." He also expects
additional companies to join Enron Corp. and Calpine Corp. in
pulling out of the state's market, causing blackouts and ongoing
high prices next summer. "We've had three hearings already,"
Herbert added. "Are customers better off? I don't think so."
Meanwhile, State senator Debra Bowen, head of the state
Senate Energy Committee, told a hearing in Sacramento yesterday
that FERC's plan could lead to re-regulation if residents were
not protected from market manipulation. Reuters quotes Bowen as
saying: "If there's not political accountability between the
people that are making the decisions about what California
customers pay and the people who are paying those rates, we're
likely to have a revolution at the consumer level that leads to
re-regulation regardless of what's in a FERC order" (Dow Jones
Newswires, Reuters, Nov. 13).
=====================================
|
3,040 |
Subject: Update--Day 3 of California PUC Hearings
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/8016.
=====================================
The Hearings
The hearings have transitioned to the more traditional, courtroom-like
environment, with lawyers engaged in detailed cross-examination of utility
witnesses.
The hearing focused solely on the utility claims of financial hardship.
The hearings went from 9AM-5PM and only managed to make it through two PG&E
witnesses--extensive, detailed questions on PG&E's cash management practices
since restructuring started in 1998.
Questions to witnesses focused in particular on PG&E's use of cash for
investment and financing activities over the past 2-3 years (e.g.,
dividend/stock repurchase activities, transfer of cash from IOU to parent and
parent's use of that cash for investment activities).
Questions also focused on options other than rate increases available to the
utility (e.g., liquidate certain assets of unregulated biz units, loans from
parent, bankruptcy).
The commissioners and the ALJ have reacted in extremely hostile manner toward
PG&E's repeated attempts to amend and add to their proposal as the hearings
progress.
Questioning of PG&E witnesses will continue at 10 AM on Tuesday, followed by
Edison witness.
Unclear when the hearings will end, though the Commission is scheduled to
issue its decision on Thursday.
At this point, it seems very unlikely that the Commission will have developed
the record necessary to do anything other than raise rates under its general
ratemaking authority.
Outside the Hearing
Intense negotiations between Governor's office and utility management
continue.
Seems that the Commission/Administration is beating up on the utilities
inside the hearing room in an attempt to soften the utilities up and gain
some leverage in the negotiations taking place outside the hearing room.
Governor continues to try to bring consumer groups into the negotiations with
utilities, but consumer groups continue to resist and continue to oppose any
rate increases.
Governor seems to be attempting to set up a situation where the Commission
absorbs the political heat for raising rates on the 4th, and the Governor
follows-up with a more comprehensive set of proposals as part of his state of
the state speech on the 8th.
=====================================
|
3,041 |
Subject: RE: bluegrass
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/3523.
=====================================
I suggest we meet at La Ginestra at 6:30 tomorrow night (its right next door
so we'll be able to run over when it looks like we need to). We should
leave the city at 6pm and I told Molly that we would pick her up. Whoever
gets there first get a table for 7 (if Don is coming, Stacy).
Can't wait!!
-C
Cameron Sellers
Vice President, Business Development
PERFECT
1860 Embarcadero Road - Suite 210
Palo Alto, CA 94303
[email protected]
650.798.3366 (direct dial)
650.269.3366 (cell)
650.858.1095 (fax)
-----Original Message-----
From: Stacy Miller Azcarate [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, May 07, 2001 2:55 PM
To: Cameron Sellers
Subject: RE: bluegrass
Yes. Let's go to La Ginestra right next door before. Say 7:30? It's fabulous
Italian Food...
-----Original Message-----
From: Cameron Sellers [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, May 07, 2001 2:57 PM
To: 'Stacy Miller Azcarate'
Subject: RE: bluegrass
Cool!!! It's at 8:30 on Thursday and you can call to reserve tickets if you
want (415-388-2820) but I am pretty sure it won't sell out. They are a new
band, but a bunch of people we know that are really good.
I can't wait to see you!! Is there a good place to go to dinner before hand
that you recommend?
Cameron Sellers
Vice President, Business Development
PERFECT
1860 Embarcadero Road - Suite 210
Palo Alto, CA 94303
[email protected]
650.798.3366 (direct dial)
650.269.3366 (cell)
650.858.1095 (fax)
-----Original Message-----
From: Stacy Miller Azcarate [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, May 07, 2001 2:49 PM
To: Cameron Sellers
Subject: RE: bluegrass
Yes. yes. Yes. What time?
-----Original Message-----
From: Cameron Sellers [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, May 07, 2001 2:48 PM
To: 'Stacy Miller Azcarate'
Subject: bluegrass
Not sure if you are interested, but there is a fun bluegrass band playing at
Sweetwater this Thursday night. Since you are in the area it would be great
to see you!! Can you join us????
Cameron Sellers
Vice President, Business Development
PERFECT
1860 Embarcadero Road - Suite 210
Palo Alto, CA 94303
[email protected]
650.798.3366 (direct dial)
650.269.3366 (cell)
650.858.1095 (fax)
=====================================
|
3,042 |
Subject: Recent Emergency Filings
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/2975.
=====================================
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 01/23/2001 07:34 PM -----
MBD <[email protected]>
01/23/2001 07:13 PM
To: "'Jeff Dasovich Enron SF'" <[email protected]>, "'Sue Mara at Enron
SF'" <[email protected]>, "'Sandi McCubbin Enron SF'" <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: Recent Emergency Filings
Here is the current list of emergency actions, motions, etc. by the
utilities and other notable parties in recent days.
1. SCE has filed a motion for summary judgement and a motion for injunctive
relief in its "filed rate doctrine" case in Federal District Court in LA to
require the CPUC to declare the rate freeze over and for a court order
requiring the CPUC to raise Edison's rates to recover all past and current
power costs. This is a potentially critical case.
2. PG&E filed a motion to require SoCalGas to deliver gas to it for core
consumption under the mutual assistance statute and their agreement with
SoCalGas. SoCalGas has strongly protested the motion.
3. PG&E has filed a motion to permit gas suppliers to receive a security
interest in the utility's accounts receiveables (CPUC approval required
under Sec. 851) in order for such suppliers to obtain collateral from the
utility which does not require cash. Expedited two day response time was
requested. The ALJ will issue a ruling determining how much time we will
have to respond.
4. PG&E has filed an advice letter seeking to replace the weighted day
ahead PX price with the ISO ex post energy price as the cost element in the
PX credit for direct access customers.
5. ORA/TURN have filed an emergency petition seeking to modify the EFO and
OFO procedures under the PG&E gas accord, specifically seeking to waive EFO
and OFO penalties and reducing the diversion charges the core would pay when
the noncore's gas is diverted to serve core load. The charge would be
reduced to the actual cost of gas, thereby depriving noncore customers and
their suppliers of the cost of interstate transmission and any costs
assciated with the loss of the gas supply and its effect on the customers'
operations. CMTA has filed strong opposition.
This is what we are aware of as of today.
Mike Day
=====================================
|
3,043 |
Subject: Message status - undeliverable
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/9373.
=====================================
The message that you sent was undeliverable to the following:
[email protected] (user not found)
Possibly truncated original message follows:
Received: from postmaster.enron.com (outbound5.enron.com [192.152.140.9]) by
mail.mcm.org; Fri, 23 Feb 2001 15:55:32 -0600
Received: from mailman.enron.com (mailman.enron.com [192.168.189.66]) by
postmaster.enron.com (8.8.8/8.8.8/postmaster-1.00) with ESMTP id VAA22824 for
<[email protected]>; Fri, 23 Feb 2001 21:53:53 GMT
From: [email protected]
Received: from nahou-msmsw02px.corp.enron.com ([172.28.10.38]) by
mailman.enron.com (8.10.1/8.10.1/corp-1.05) with ESMTP id f1NLrqa09405 for
<[email protected]>; Fri, 23 Feb 2001 15:53:52 -0600 (CST)
Received: from ene-mta01.enron.com (unverified) by
nahou-msmsw02px.corp.enron.com (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.1.5) with ESMTP
id <[email protected]> for
<[email protected]>; Fri, 23 Feb 2001 15:53:51 -0600
Subject: Referred to You By the Greens about Possibly Growing Grapes on My
Property
To: [email protected]
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.3 March 21, 2000
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2001 15:53:45 -0600
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on ENE-MTA01/Enron(Release 5.0.6 |December
14, 2000) at 02/23/2001 03:51:24 PM
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Greetings Sally:
My name is Jeff Dasovich. The Greens have been helping me develop 40 acres
of land that I bought just north of Anchor Bay (a couple of miles up the
hill from Highway One, about 1200 ft or so up) and they suggested that I
contact you.
The property is right in the heart of the Banana Belt and my property faces
south, is protected, and a such is very hot and sunny from late spring
through later summer/early fall. The property has an abundance of water on
it. Of course, the possibility of evening fog raises some tricky issues,
and I haven't done soil tests. In short, while I think there are some
challenges, I'm convinced that there is at least the strong possibility
that I could grow grapes--around 10 acres or so.
I'm sure that you're extremely busy, but I'd be very interested in talking
=====================================
|
3,044 |
Subject: RE: Special Energy Committee Formed
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/5860.
=====================================
Thanks for the info. Marie Moretti and I have new e-mail addresses. They
are: [email protected] and [email protected] Our
new office address is 1215 K Street, Suite 2005, Sacramento, CA 95814
Phone number: (916) 552-2666.
-----Original Message-----
From: Julee Malinowski-Ball [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, January 08, 2001 3:02 PM
To: kent Palmerton; Bill Carlson; Bill Woods; Bob Ellery; Bob Escalante;
Carolyn Baker; Curtis Kebler; David Keane; David Parquet; Dean Gosselin;
Duane Nelson; Ed Tomeo; Frank DeRosa; Greg Blue; Hap Boyd; Jack Pigott;
Jeff Dasovich; Jim Willey; Joe Greco; Joe Ronan; John Stout; Jonathan
Weisgall; Kassandra Gough; Ken Hoffman; Kent Fickett; Lynn Lednicky;
Marty McFadden; Nam Nguyen; Paula Soos; Richard Hyde; Robert Lamkin;
Roger Pelote; Stephanie Newell; Steve Ponder; Steven Kelley; Sue Mara;
Tandy McMannes; Tony Wetzel; Trond Aschehoug; William Hall
Cc: Susan McCabe; Scott Govenar; Ron Tom; Robert Ross; Phil Isenberg;
Mike Monagan; Maureen OHaren; Marie Moretti; Kassandra Gough; Jenn
Paulsen; Jamie Parker; Hedy Govenar; DJ Smith; Delany Hunter; Cary
Rudman; Bev Hansen; Anne Kelly; Chuck Cole
Subject: Special Energy Committee Formed
Asm. Speaker Bob Hertzberg announced today the formation of a special
committee that will "hold public hearings across the state, shape
legislation and probe financial practices among utility generators."
"The committee will work with the staff of the Speaker's Office of Oversight
to determine how utility companies have spent the money they received for
their stranded costs, and what generators have done with their dramatic
influx of cash."
The members of the Assembly Committee on Energy Costs and Availability are:
Rod Wright - D - Chair
Anthony Pescetti - R - Vice-chair
Fred Keeley - D
Darrell Steinberg - D
Juan Vargas - D
Jenny Oropeza - D
Manny Diaz - D
Charlene Zettle - R
Keith Richman - R
Dick Dickerson - R
Joe Canciamilla - D
John Dutra - D
Hannah-Beth Jackson - D
Carole Migden - D
Sarah Reyes - D
Bill Leonard - R
John Campbell - R
Mike Briggs - R
(11-D, 7-R)
Julee Malinowski-Ball
Senior Associate
Edson + Modsette
916-552-7070
FAX-552-7075
[email protected]
=====================================
|
3,045 |
Subject: CAISO FERC FILING: MARKET STABILIZATION PLAN
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/1079.
=====================================
During a conference call today (Friday), the CAISO announced a FERC Section
206 "Market Stabilization Filing."? As of noon today, the filing had not yet
been posted on the CAISO web-site.? According to the CAISO, the filings is
designed to meet three objectives:? (1) respond to the lack of a forward
market in California, (2) respond to the problem of underscheduling, and (3)
protect consumers from the exercise of market power.? Below is a brief
description of the CAISO proposal/filing as discussed on today's conference
call.
?
?
A summary of the CAISO proposal/filing is as follows:
To protect consumers from the exercise of market power, impose "Bid Caps" of
$100/MWH.? Provide a means for generators to justify higher bid caps based
on their costs.? For generators/marketers committing/selling 70% of their
supply in the forward markets (presumedly including the day ahead) to serve
California load, then their would be no bid-cap but the existing FERC
approved $250/MWH "purchasers cap" would apply.
To incent forward contracting, the UDCs would have a requirement to
procurement 85% of their supply in the forward markets.
To incent forward scheduling and minimize uninstructed deviations, the CAISO
would impose a Real-Time Deficiency Charge for schedulers outside a
pre-specified bandwidth (e.g. 10% of your scheduled supply/load).? The
Real-Time Deficiency Charge, as yet unspecified, is contemplated to be in
the $25-$50/MWH range.?
The CAISO indicated its desire to bring these important issues to the FERC
in?the form of a proposal for its timely consideration.? Clearly, this
proposal raises a number of questions.? For example, how does the CAISO
determine that 70% of a generator/ESP supply has been offered in the forward
markets (Do you provide affidavits, contracts?).? How does the CAISO require
UDCs to buy in the forward markets?? How were the target levels determined
(e.g. 70% sold forward as opposed to 60%).?
?
The IEP Market Response Project team members are scheduled to have a
conference call on Friday, October 27 to discuss this filing (as well as
other filings seemingly coming out of the woodwork).
=====================================
|
3,046 |
Subject: Re: news/updates
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/5002.
=====================================
I am curious about the formula used in the last sentence of your first
paragraph. Is FERC trying to find a "cost based" price, above which is
"unjust and unreasonable"? Aren't these companies entitled to charge
market-based rates, which may be above cost in the event of scarcity?
thanks mcs
My team: FYI, below. mcs
Beverley - please print the attachments for my review upon my return.
thansk mcs
From: Steven J Kean@ENRON on 12/03/2001 08:52 CST
To: Mark Schroeder/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Re: news/updates
I am attaching the FERC order and staff recommendations. The order provides
for $69 million in "potential" refunds (either pay up or provide cost
justification). Enron was not named as one of the 13 overcharging parties,
but PGE was ($3.18 million). It's not over yet, though. The order deals
only with Jan 01 and promises further orders regarding Dec 00 and benchmark
prices through April 01. The prices used to determine refunds were fairly
high ($273/mwh based on gas prices, emissions costs and an assumed heat rate
of over 16000).
With respect to sales to California, we have concluded at least one short
term sale and have talked with Cal Dept of Water Resources about longer term
deals, but we were still struggling with credit issues, last I heard. I'm
copying Jeff Dasovich because I'm sure he has more up to date information.
Mark Schroeder@ECT
03/11/2001 02:11 PM
To: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: news/updates
In the press, I saw two news stories that I wondered if we (Enron) had any
role/hand in, and what was the offical "spin" in both cases. 1) The FERC
Order requiring something like 55-65 million dollars in refunds by generators
(or did it include traders) for overcharging in California in December, if I
recall my facts/news stories correctly, and 2) the reports of 40 companies
entering into 10-year contracts with California (touted by Davis). Was Enron
a contracting party? Do we think this is a good solution (I think I know the
answer, but defer to your lead on this, so we stay on your message)? thanks
mcs
=====================================
|
3,047 |
Subject: RE: details on ATR briefing at the ALEC conference
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/11579.
=====================================
The only thing in particular I think you need to be ready for are the
"federalism" questions. If past history is an indication, there will
probably be a split in the group between those who support giving FERC
greater authority and control and those who oppose it on the grounds that it
takes power away from states and smaller, more localized entities.
From: Rob Bradley/ENRON@enronXgate on 07/30/2001 01:38 PM CDT
To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Pat Shortridge/Corp/Enron@Enron
Subject: RE: details on ATR briefing at the ALEC conference
You will do a great job with this.
I think it would be neat to begin with the old Blue Book vision that you were
so involved with and then fast forward to the present and let Davis have it!
The crowd needs to understand the political "why's" behind his strategy and
where we are now.
Also, a look at what the industry did right and wrong would be interesting to
this group.
How can the think tank crowd help us going forward on the general issue of
"trusting" and de-politicizing the market?
- Rob
-----Original Message-----
From: Dasovich, Jeff
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2001 1:28 PM
To: Shortridge, Pat
Cc: Hueter, Barbara A.; Guerrero, Janel; Robertson, Linda; Palmer, Mark S.
(ENW); Shapiro, Richard; Bradley, Rob; Guerrero, Janel
Subject: Re: details on ATR briefing at the ALEC conference
Thanks Pat.
Do you know who will be in the audience? And how many folks we are
expecting? Also, if there are specific things that you folks want/don't want
me to say, please let me know.
Best,
Jeff
Pat Shortridge 07/30/2001 10:42 AM To: Jeff Dasovich, Rob Bradley, Barbara
Hueter, Janel Guerrero cc: Linda Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Richard
Shapiro/Enron@EnronXGate, Mark Palmer Subject: details on ATR briefing at
the ALEC conference
The Enron-sponsored briefing on energy policy will be from 5-6:30 pm in the
Booth Room on the 5th floor of the Marriott Marquis on Friday, August 3. Our
presentation will be done by Jeff Dasovich. Grover Norquist and Americans
for Tax Reform will be carrying out all logistics.
There should be time for the presentation, questions, and discussion.
Best,
Pat
=====================================
|
3,048 |
Subject: Attn First Year MBAs: Onesource
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/deleted_items/186.
=====================================
Dear Incoming Evening MBA Students,
You all have access to most of the library's databases and electronic
journals remotely after you have configured your browser to communicate
with the library's proxy server.
The one database for which you don't need a proxy intermediary is
"Onesource" - you will find Onesource to be one of the most useful
databases while you are at Haas. Onesource seamlessly integrates
information from a lot of excellent international business publications and
just like its name suggests, it is a one-stop source for much of your
business research.
You will need a password and username to access Onesource. The initial
password and username will be:
yourhasslogin.ucb
so, if you are [email protected], you will login to Onesource using
philemon.ucb
for both your username and your password.
Onesource is accessible at, believe-it-or-not, http://www.onesource.com and
you can access this database from any browser anywhere anytime with your
password. After you have logged in for the first time, please change your
username and password to one you will easily remember.
You can change your password when you are at the initial search screen by
clicking on the Account Maintenance link and the rest should be self
explanatory. If you forget the password you set for yourself, you will
have to contact Onesource directly yourselves to be issued another one.
(If you can't get in using the initial password that has been set for you,
please email me. There are a few of you and I don't know who you are yet,
who have been issued passwords that are different from your haas logins. I
will have a list of passwords that are something other than haas logins by
Monday, the 27th. I won't be able to do anything before then if you can't
get in.)
Most of the rest of the library's electronic products require the proxy
setup on your end. If you haven't done this yet, instructions for this
deceptively simple procedure are at http://proxy.lib.berkeley.edu - you
will also find information on username and password, troubleshooting your
setup, known problems, at this site.
Email me with questions. I'll respond on Monday, the 27th.
Monica Singh
=====================================
|
3,049 |
Subject: Don't let this chance slip by.......
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/1639.
=====================================
??????????????????????????
Don't Miss This Great Opportunity!!!!
Over the next few days, the Haas School of Business Investment Club (HSBIC)
will be placing in your mailbox an investment form which you can use to be a
part of the HSBIC Investment Fund. Since its inception in February of 1996
through August 2000, HSBIC has returned it investors a compound annual return
of roughly 18.3%!!!!
And not only will you have this investment opportunity, you will be providing
fellow classmates with an invaluable opportunity to research stocks and learn
fund management skills.? Unlike tution and other demands Haas makes on your
money, this is one case where the money remains yours, we are just managing
it for you. Twice a year you will have the opportunity to withdrawal your
money from the fund. But while your money is invested, you are not only
sharing the investment performance of the fund, you are showing your support
and belief in the students at Haas.
So, you ask, there must be some sort of minimum investment, but how much for
such a great cause that helps students and puts your own money to work for
you at the same time.
One may expect to require $10k, but during our limited semiannual enrollment
window, we not requesting $10K
not $5K
not even $1K
An initial investment of $250 is all we require!!!! Of course, most of you
will want to invest more?(the average invstment is $1700) and its nice to
know there is no maximum investment cap.
Either way, DON'T let this opportunity pass you by. LOOK in your mailbox for
enrollment information, fill out the form and return it, along with a check
made out to 'Haas School of Business Investment Club', to my mail box.
And should you have any questions about the fund, have some great stock picks
or would like to get involved in the club, please feel free to give me a
call.
Thanks for your support,
John Litschke
HSBIC Treasurer
510-525-9565
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
http://profiles.msn.com .
=====================================
|
3,050 |
Subject: Re: Comments on SBX143
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/3524.
=====================================
Also might add that it conflicts directly with and is likely to thwart Gov's
efforts to dramatically reduce demand this summer and avoid rolling black
outs. Seems like legislators would benefit from more information, along the
lines of the points that Harry makes, to better understand that this bill
would only add to the problems.
Best,
Jeff
Harry Kingerski
03/06/2001 05:00 PM
To: Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, [email protected]
cc: Leslie Lawner/NA/Enron@Enron, Robert Frank/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Comments on SBX143
Regarding proposed rate freeze for large SDG&E customers at 6.5 cents:
Adds to DWR's burden of covering the net short positions without any further
clarification of how shortfall will be funded. The incentive these customers
now have to participate in DA and thereby remove burden from DWR is removed.
Creates incentives to increase usage and decrease conservation, exactly at
the time that just the opposite effect is desired. Rate at frozen level
removes all price signal effect in unregulated market.
These are customers who under existing law already have had choice, as an
alternative to paying market price, of 1) voluntarily opting in to a one
year 6.5 cent rate freeze, with a true-up, or 2) buying commodity and risk
management products in the competitive market, as many of them have already
done, and 3) reducing usage to save money. This bill takes takes away the
last two choices/incentives.
Adopting "rates by proxy" (in a sense, indexed to PG&E and SCE rates) creates
the potential for a regulatory nightmare.
As an alternative, the Legislature should consider extending the voluntary
opt-in program under existing law. This would preserve existing protection,
keep choices available to customers, and not unduly add to DWR's burden.
As another alternative, we could be a lot more willing to accept this IF the
"end of the rate freeze" date in (f) were specified to occur no earlier than
the date new rates are put in place (the proposed language from 18X,
remember?) and it were clear that existing DA contracts were not overturned
by this Act.
=====================================
|
3,051 |
Subject: Re: Draft questions on regulatory aspects of bandwidth trading
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/1484.
=====================================
I'm fine with Thursdays as long as the meetings take place in Houston, not
Houstons. :+)
Jeff Dasovich@ENRON
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON
11/07/00 10:15 AM
To: Wayne Gardner/Enron Communications@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS, Sue
Nord/NA/Enron@Enron, Donald Lassere/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Scott Bolton/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Lara
Leibman/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
cc:
Subject: Re: Draft questions on regulatory aspects of bandwidth trading
Wayne: If you insist, we can pass on Thanksgiving.
Others: Any problems with changing the meeting to Thursdays? If the
meetings are going to continue on a weekly basis, I'd like to try to attend
in person as much as possible (i.e., schedule permitting). Currently, my
schedule doesn't permit me to be in Houstons on Wednesday mornings. But
Thursdays would work. If it makes things too complicated, not a problem.
Best,
Jeff
Wayne Gardner@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS
11/06/2000 06:08 PM
To: Jeff Dasovich/Na/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Re: Draft questions on regulatory aspects of bandwidth trading
Thursdays would be OK by me provided that we don't have to meet on
Thanksgiving.
W. Wayne Gardner
Enron Broadband Services
1400 Smith Street
Houston, TX 77002-7361
Phone: 713 853 3547
Fax: 713 646 2532
Jeff Dasovich@ENRON
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON
06/11/2000 17:17
To: Wayne Gardner/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
cc:
Subject: Re: Draft questions on regulatory aspects of bandwidth trading
Greetings Wayne:
Sorry that I missed the last meeting. I'll be attending by phone this week,
but would like to attend in person as often as I can (understanding that our
meetings will be weekly). Now don't shoot me, but I was wondering if it
might be possible to have the meetings on Thursday mornings. That way I
could actually be in Houston for the meetings (which my schedule doesn't
permit me to do on Wednesdays). If it's too complicated, don't sweat it; I
can continue to do the meetings by phone. But if Thursdays can fit into
folks' schedule, that would be great. Thanks and talk to you on Wednesday.
Best,
Jeff
=====================================
|
3,052 |
Subject: Re: FERC response to CPUC paper
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/28109.
=====================================
Chairman Hebert's response to CPUC White Paper- see attached.
Docket RP00-241-000
From: Christi L Nicolay @ ECT 06/25/2001 09:44 AM
To: Linda L Lawrence/NA/Enron@Enron, Jennifer Thome/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Re: FERC response to CPUC paper
And include Jennifer Thome too. Thanks.
---------------------- Forwarded by Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT on 06/25/2001
09:44 AM ---------------------------
Christi L Nicolay
06/25/2001 09:27 AM
To: Linda L Lawrence/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Leslie Lawner/NA/Enron@Enron, Rebecca W Cantrell/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: FERC response to CPUC paper
Linda -- Also include Leslie and Becky. Thanks.
From: Christi L Nicolay 06/25/2001 09:26 AM
To: Alan Comnes/Enron@EnronXGate, Ray Alvarez/NA/Enron@ENRON, Susan J
Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Sarah
Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Linda Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Steve
Walton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dave Perrino/SF/ECT@ECT, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Linda L Lawrence/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: FERC response to CPUC paper
FYI.
.????? FERC Responds to California Energy Commissioner's White Paper on
Natural Gas Infrastructure Issues. Chairman Hebert responded to the May 17,
2001 letter from California Energy Commission Michal Moore who invited Hebert
to comment on a draft staff white paper on natural gas infrastructure issues
by the CEC Electricity and Natural Gas Committee. Hebert expressed agreement
with the white paper's general conclusion the natural gas system in
California is strained in meeting growing demand. Hebert is encouraged that
the report recommends, "supporting intrastate system expansions and exploring
the role that enhanced storage can play in meeting future demand." Comments
and recommendations from FERC Staff attached to Hebert's letter include
expanding the discussion on the need for slack pipeline capacity to achieve
price stability, detailing possible options for shippers to avoid
interruption, and an examination of possible anti-competitive provisions in
intrastate tariffs.
?
LINDA L. -- Can you email Herbert's response to this group? Thanks.
=====================================
|
3,053 |
Subject: Re: Reponse to Angelides
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['e-mail <[email protected]', '[email protected]', "dimare'.'[email protected]"]
File: dasovich-j/inbox/792.
=====================================
I agree with Bill's additions, with the exception of the sentence on DWR being
terribly misguided and therefore no one should have to pay the costs of going
100% to long contracts. Not sure who else we recommend pay for DWR power besides
customers.
I've attached the AReM letter in case you haven't seen it.....they go on quite a
rant.
Dot
William Booth wrote:
> Dorothy -- Attached is a another version of the letter that takes a little
> different approach. What do you think? I worried that your first letter
> looks a little like an invitation to pile on the exit fees, of all types and
> in any magnitude. I think we need to attack the premise that any DA causes
> an increase in DWR costs for other customers. Bill
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dorothy Rothrock [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 1:35 PM
> To: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; Derek Naten;
> 'Dominic DiMare'
> Cc: Dasovich, Jeff; Evelyn Elsesser; Loren Kaye
> Subject: Reponse to Angelides
>
> Wanna sign onto this letter to Loretta? Any suggestions? We could make it a
> CEA thing.
>
> (I am copying Jeff D. as a courtesy...I think we need this to be just a
> customer deal).
>
> Dot
> 498-3319
>
> This e-mail is intended solely for use of the individual to whom it is
> addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or
> otherwise exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of
> this e-mail is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent
> responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are
> hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this
> communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
> communication in error, please immediately notify us by replying to the
> original sender of this note. Thank You.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Name: Response to Angelides.doc
> Response to Angelides.doc Type: Winword File (application/msword)
> Encoding: base64
=====================================
|
3,054 |
Subject: PG&E/SCE filing
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/2489.
=====================================
If you had not seen this, it looks like the utilities are now trying to
"help" FERC find the guilty.
What do people thin about beginning to quietly discuss with members of the
California state house that the damages of the summer are not (or don't need
to) being charged to end use customers. The utilities are doing a really
good job of wrapping themselves with little households. In fact, TURN signed
on to this pleading.
While San Diego customers are harmed, other consumers in California are just
fine. Utility shareholders are taking it on the chin. We need to make sure
that policymakers (especially FERC) recognize that in making any kind of
refund the real choice is between Power Marketer shareholders and Utility
shareholders.
Jim
----- Forwarded by James D Steffes/NA/Enron on 10/18/2000 11:24 AM -----
"Seabron Adamson" <[email protected]>
10/17/2000 04:39 PM
To: <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: PG&E/SCE filing
Mary and Jim:
Did you see in the PG&E/SCE filing that the two companies have kindly
volunteered (p. 32) to "assist the Commission in developing a full record
and in undertaking the rigorous analysis needed to fix the problems in the
California markets and determine refund responsibility". How kind and
public-spirited of them. More seriously, I would expect that they already
have a full economic analysis going on prices, damages, etc.
Seab
This e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the
addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or
confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this
e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify me at
(617) 354-0060 and permanently delete the original and any copy of any
e-mail and any printout thereof.
Seabron Adamson
Frontier Economics Inc
Two Brattle Square
Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
Ph: (617) 354-0060
Fax: (617) 354-0640
[email protected]
www.frontier-economics.com
=====================================
|
3,055 |
Subject: SWPTF
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/2267.
=====================================
The Southwest Power Trading Forum met yesterday to discuss in detail the two
draft filings that are planned for submission in the Southwest. A great deal
of interest was expressed in evolving the ad hoc group into a viable
organization dedicated to advocating issues and addresssing filings as they
arise in the southwest. A task force was formed in order to explore a
two-tier member organization structure with an opt in/opt out feature for
members. The catalyst to this discussion was that SRP is in the process of
forming a "competitive generation coalition" in Arizona to effectively
control any efforts related to state tax legislation and eventually RTO
activity.
Reliant offered information concerning their meeting with FERC and indicated
that Massey likes the RTO West model and believes it was a collaborative
process that other western RTO's can utilize as an example. Carl Imparato
expressed his concerns with RTO West citing transmission access and the scope
of duties as the two main problems with RTO West. With respect to
transmission access, FTRs are assigned to the incumbents but the incumbents
are not required to put them up for auction. With respect to the scope of
duties the RTO does not offer all FERC jurisdictional services including
generation interconnection and low voltage sections of the grid.
The group submitted a letter to the DSTAR advisory committee meeting today
and plans to submit it to the Board tomorrow that essentially requests
immediate attention and resolution to the issues prior to the December
filing. There are approximately 50 problems that require resolution
(approximately 80 problems in the filing IOU documents) and if left in their
current state would undermine the basic objective of the RTO. The issues
fall into the following five categories:
? Insufficient Scope of RTO Authority
? Foreclosure of Meaningful Transmission Access to the DSTAR Grid
? Undue Discrimination Against Non-Incumbent Uses of the DSTAR Grid
? Inefficient and Inequitable Pricing Mechanisms
? Restrictions on RTO Independence.
A draft of the letter is attached for your review. Please let me know if you
have any questions.
Marcie
=====================================
|
3,056 |
Subject: Re: Enron's Response Today - Key Point to Focus On
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/3783.
=====================================
While there are certainly pros and cons both ways, I agree with Jim to lead
with the market structure issues. This was the focus of FERC's order and we
perhaps overemphasize the refund issue by elevating it to number 1. Plus, we
lose a little credibility since, like the UDCs, we would come across as, at
bottom, primiarily concerned only with maximizing our financial position, and
less concerned with trying to be a constructive force in shaping a
competitive market in California. That is not FERC's priority. Finally, and
I say this will great equivocation, I believe that FERC carefully drafted the
refund language, that it knew exactly what it was doing, and is unlikely to
move off that formulation either way. The issue is still of utmost
importance but for the foregoing reasons as well as those stated by Jim, I
would prioritize it just below the $150 soft cap and prospective refund
issue. Ron
>>> <[email protected]> 11/22/00 10:30AM >>>
As I've been thinking about our response today, I would like Enron to focus
on making sure that the California (WSCC) markets are as good a possible
for business over the next 15 to 24 months. Following that idea, I think
that the key points are (1) clarifying/raising the soft cap and (2)
reducing the burden/risk of the prospective refund period.
I know that we had discussed leading off with the debate over market power
/ retroactive refunds, but I think that (a) FERC is not inclined to do much
more on this issue, (b) FERC wants to fix the market as much as it can
given the current political realities, and (c) if retroactive refunds
become an issue, we still have our full compliment of resources to later
fight this fight.
I would recommend that the pleading and Alan's testimony be modified to
bring these issues to the top of the ticket. We should still include all
of our other arguments.
Finally, I want to make sure that Enron is taking the right position by
quietly supporting a $250/Mwh soft cap with safe harbor fixes? Sue Mara,
can you please try and find out what EPSA, IEPCA, and WPTF are going to
file? I want to make sure that we are in the ball park on this issue but
not getting too soft.
Jim
=====================================
|
3,057 |
Subject: Haas Consulting Club Firm Night on Thursday, Sept. 28th
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/382.
=====================================
Hi everyone -
The Consulting Club will be hosting its annual Firm Night on Thursday,
September 28th.? We will have representatives from both traditional, larger
firms (such as McKinsey, A.T. Kearney, Andersen Consulting, Deloitte) as well
as from newer, Internet-focused firms (such as Scient and Zefer).? We expect
between 20-25 firms (and maybe even more) to be in attendance.? We will send
out a final listing of all confirmed participants towards the end of next
week.
Details / Event Logistics
Date:? Thursday, September 28th
Time:? 6:30pm-9:30pm
Location:? Hyatt Regency in Embarcadero Center; Garden Room (on the Atrium
Lobby Level / 3rd floor)
Fee:? $5 for Consulting Club members, $20 for everyone else (this
automatically gives you a one-year membership)
Food:? Hors d'oeuvres and drinks will be served
The Hyatt Regency in Embarcadero Center is located within 5 Embarcadero
Center (right off Market St. - where California St. begins).? Taking BART is
very easy/convenient - coming from Berkeley, you need to get off at the first
SF stop (Embarcadero).? Depending on which station entrance you come out of,
you will be within a block or less of the hotel.
Resume Book
We will be putting together a resume book for this event.? This will only be
for those looking for full-time positions (a separate resume book for those
interested in summer internships will be assembled towards the end of this
semester).? Please be on the lookout for an email from Seann Birkelund who
will be coordinating this over the course of the next several weeks.
The Consulting Club Firm Night is open to all Haas MBAs (first years, second
years, Evening MBAs).? First years - while most firms won't be recruiting for
summer internships until the Spring semester, this is a GREAT way to learn
about many of these firms and develop some contacts (many of whom are Haas
grads) at the places you have a strong interest in.
Finally, given that most consulting firms are in the midst of interviewing
for full-time positions, we ask first-years to wait until 7:30pm before
arriving at this event.
Thanks and we look forward to seeing you at the Firm Night on Sept. 28th
Dave
Haas Consulting Club
=====================================
|
3,058 |
Subject: Izio Pro: Learning Management System
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/deleted_items/88.
=====================================
Dear Students,
Izio is a Learning Management System that the Haas School is using in a
pilot study. Two LMS systems are currently being evaluated, Izio and
another one called Prometheus. Izio provides many useful tools to help you
with your courses throughout the semester. To learn more about Izio, see
http://support.convene.com/stud/index.htm
Also, be aware that the use of Izio is an "opt-in" choice for each faculty
person. That is, each faculty person may choose whether or not to use
it. Ask your instructor to find out if he/she is using Izio this semester.
For the Fall semester, Convene has released an enhanced version of our
learning management system called IZIO PRO. You can access Izio Pro by
using the same URL as the previous version at http://haas.izio.convenve.com
By now most students should have received an email containing their login name
and password.
To avoid the duplicate accounts issue we encountered last semester, Convene
has created a method for creating accounts and posting student course
registration information from Haas and Berkeley Campus Systems of Records
(e.g., EDULink, SIS/TeleBears).
Self registration has been removed. CHANGES TO STUDENT REGISTRATION DATA
will be obtained from the Systems of Record and POSTED TO IZIO ONCE PER WEEK
UNTIL THE ADD/DROP PERIOD ENDS.
Convene has also changed the naming convention for Izio Pro accounts. The
naming convention goes as follows, first initial_last name1. This is a
locked field and cannot be changed by Haas Computing Services. The Izio
software does however allow for users to changed
their unique password.
As always Haas Computing Services is pleased to assist you with any support
issues if you contact the Help Desk at (510)642-0434,
mailto:[email protected], or http://helpdesk.haas.berkeley.edu.
Thank You
______________________________________________________
Philip
Mahoney Work:(510)642-4278
Asst. Director for Student Computing FAX: (510)642-4769
Haas Computing Services [email protected]
Walter A Haas School of
Business http://groups.haas.berkeley.edu/HCS/
=====================================
|
3,059 |
Subject: Re: Asian Regulatory Affairs
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/8269.
=====================================
Any time in the periods indicated is fine.
Regards,
Jan Haizmann@ECT
01/10/01 11:16 AM
To: Donald Lassere/Enron Communications@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS@ENRON
cc: Alisa Christensen/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Angie
Buis/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Beth Wapner/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Cynthia Harkness/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, David DeGabriele/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, David
Merrill/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Derenda Plunkett/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Gerry Willis/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, James Ginty/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@ENRON, Lara Leibman/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Malini Mallikarjun/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
[email protected], Michelle Hicks/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Mike Dahlke/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Rajen
Shah/LON/ECT@ECT, Richard Anderson/Enron Communications@Enron Communications,
Robbi Rossi/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Sue Nord/NA/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Asian Regulatory Affairs
Dear all:
Due to the departure of David Merrill we will have to re-organise our
regulative effort for Asia. Mark Schroeder has asked me to co-ordinate our
efforts for Asia excluding India for the time until we will hire a regulatory
manager for this region.
Since I have not been involved in all issues, we decided that I will come to
Houston next week in order to meet as many of you as possible in order to get
a clearer understanding of the pending questions. I asked Beverley Ashcroft
to schedule individual meetings with you for the period between Tuesday, 16/1
and Friday, 18/1.
Could you please indicate a time for a meeting and where your offices are
located. After Beverley will have brought everything into schedule,we will
confirm. Her direct line is +44 207 783 53 02.Thanks.
I look forward to seeing you soon
Jan D. Haizmann
Enron Broadband Services
40 Grosvenor Place Enron House
London SW1X 7EN
Telephone: +44 (0) 207 783 4474
Fax: +44 (0) 207 783 1045
e-mail: [email protected]
http://www.enron.net
=====================================
|
3,060 |
Subject: scoping memo
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/1322.
=====================================
The following are my thoughts on how we should proceed this Fall.
this is a first cut to stimulate discussion, and I welcome any suggestions,
criticisms, or changes. We ended this year with a relatively positive image
of Enron by the legislature. We have good relationships with leaders on both
sides of the aisle. Steve Peace's power has diminished greatly. We have
developed a good working relationship with Debra Bowen and her staff, who, as
of now, will continue as chair of Senate Energy and we have a vastly improved
our relationship with Rod Wright, to the point where he will not have a
meeting on contentious legislation, unless we are involved (his public
purpose bill, was an example from this year's session, we started out
opposing it and ended up supporting it) He was also a coauthor and
instramental in passing the Williamson Act Bill. Leadership in both houses
should stay the same, although there will be 36 new members in the two
houses, thanks to term limits. I have spent time getting to know those who
are in secure races and making sure they know Enron.
In light of developing a strategy for California, I feel it needs to be
broken into the following components:
A session on what we see as the issues that will be facing us this
fall and next year in the legislative and regulatory arena. I see the
following as highly probably in Sacramento and there may be more.
Revisions of 1890
Rate stabilization of Edison and PG&E
legislation combining the ISO and PX
Legislation dealing with the governance of ISO/PX
Pressure for price caps in all segments of the market
clean up legislation on siting
A session with the business units to develop the following:
Resolve conflicts between ENA and EES regarding messages
Develop priorities
Develop messages
Set tone of messsages
Followup meeting on strategy
Media
Meetings with key officials
Meetings with customers
Coalition building
Once we have accompished this, GA, plus the business units can start
delivering the message. Looking forward to comments
=====================================
|
3,061 |
Subject: RE: California Rate Exposure
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/deleted_items/204.
=====================================
All:
I changed the following:
1. Reduced total load from 185,000 GWh to 178,000 GWh.
2. Allocated the "costs" by utility based on total demand
3. Changed the DWR negative MTM on contracts from $7.5B to $9.55B
4. Added an undercollection of $.932 Billion for SDG&E (more below)
I did not:
1. Add the Nuclear decommissioning as it is funded on balance sheet.
I added the following:
1. Allocated the Bonds and Contracts on DWR share of Revenue Requirement %.
2. The CTC is the softest assumption. The utilities wrote off considerable Transition Revenue Account (undercollection) and Transition Cost Balancing Account Balance (primarily stranded cost) at year end. The Regulatory Asset for PG&E and Edison is assumed to be primarily TCBA at 6-30-01, but there is no footnote to absolutely corroborate this. The Undercollection for SDG&E is assumed at the Regulatory Asset balance at 6-30-01. This is due to the rate freeze having ended for SDG&E and therefore their TCBA should be recovered (reduced to zero).
Results:
One of the key driver to the utility-by-utility allocation is the difference between total volume and share of DWR costs. DWR allocated costs to have a uniform "rate" across the net short by utility. Thus those with a larger portion of their total demand (SDG&E and to a lesser extent PG&E) which is covered by DWR, have a higher unit cost across all rates for the Bonds and Contracts. Edison has the converse.
Any changes in assumptions are welcomed.
Regards,
Michael
-----Original Message-----
From: Neustaedter, Robert
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 5:28 PM
To: Tribolet, Michael
Cc: Dasovich, Jeff; Steffes, James D.; Thome, Jennifer
Subject: California Rate Exposure
Michael,
Jim has asked Jennifer and me to estimate the potential exposure (worst case) to the Company's book position for DA customers in California. Starting from the model you and Jeff developed we have added other possible categories of charges allowed by existing regulations.
We would appreciate if you could please review the attached and provide us with any feedback. If available we would like to call you Wednesday morning to discuss.
<< File: direct access.xls >>
=====================================
|
3,062 |
Subject: FW: Special Session Canceled
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['pr <[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent_items/443.
=====================================
-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Govenar [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 6:19 PM
To: Sharma, Ban; Leboe, David; Eric Letke; Thome, Jennifer; Ken Smith;
Bev Hansen; Hedy Govenar; Buster, Miyung; Guerrero, Janel; Robert Frank;
Mike Day; Lawner, Leslie; Kingerski, Harry; Karen Denne; Kean, Steven
J.; Alan Comnes; Susan J Mara; Kaufman, Paul; Jeff Dasovich; Steffes,
James D.; Rick Shapiro
Subject: Special Session Canceled
Press Release
OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
PR01:456
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
10/02/2001
GOVERNOR MAKES STATEMENT ON PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION ACTIONS 10/2/2001
SACRAMENTO
Governor Gray Davis today made the following statement regarding PUC
actions:
"I applaud the mutual efforts of the California Public Utilities Commission
and Southern California Edison. Their settlement has protected the public
interest, and will allow the State's second largest utility to return to
financial health. I am pleased to hear the PUC's assurance that this can be
accomplished without a rate hike.
"In light of the agreement between the PUC and Edison, there is no need for
the Legislature to return next week for a special session. Therefore, I am
rescinding my call for the Third Extraordinary Session.
"In January, the Legislature passed AB 1X which authorized the State to
purchase power since our two largest utilities were brought to their
financial knees by runaway wholesale energy costs. Despite long odds, the
State was able to keep the lights on this summer and has spent approximately
$6.1 billion from the General Fund and $5 billion from the DWR Power Fund
doing so. AB 1X envisioned the sale of revenue bonds to repay the General
Fund with interest.
"The Public Utilities Commission's refusal today to adopt the rate agreement
necessary for the bonds to be sold was an irresponsible act. It creates
uncertainty about our ability to sell the bonds necessary to repay the
General Fund when California can least afford additional fiscal uncertainty.
In fact, preliminary financial estimates show that State revenues are $1.1
billion short of budget projections.
=====================================
|
3,063 |
Subject: Aiaz's draft
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/549.
=====================================
OK this has started out as one heck of a day, but first here's my draft.
Now the competitive section needs to be beefed up. Sama: I did not have an
electronic copy of the grid we worked on, and it didn't make sense to call
you at 2.00 a.m. in the morning.
Versata's e-mail is very erratic right now, from dealing with clones of the
Love virus.
I got stuck for 45 minutes in BART this morning, just before we pulled into
19th street, Oakland.
Things to do:
1. Sama, we need to merge our sections
2. Sama, can you send me the competitive grid. I'll see if I can work that in
before class, if not it'll have to be done either during or after class
tonight.
3. Exec summary of our section
4. My stuff is 4 pages single spaced right now, and some of the competitive
stuff has yet to get in. Add to that the three scenarios we did (and the
additions from yesterday), that makes another 3 pages, plus the SWOT makes
another 4? We have some serious precis writing to do.
Later...
Aiaz
--
On Mon, 8 May 2000 11:42:10 Jeff Dasovich wrote:
>
>
>I tried to send this to you twice at versata. Both times it got bounced
>back---"user unknown."
>---------------------- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES on 05/08/2000
09:41 AM
>---------------------------
>
>
>Jeff Dasovich on 05/08/2000 09:06:26 AM
>
>To: Aiaz Kazi <[email protected]> @ ENRON, Anil Sama <[email protected]>
@
> ENRON
>cc:
>Subject: Jeff's draft
>
>What's Kelly's email address at sendmail?
>
>Ok, here it is. Few things still to work on:
>
> Clean up value prop section.
> Finish and clean up matrix showing biz models people are using
> Finish recommedations--likely about another 1/2 to 1 page.
>
>
>Other things to think about:
> Find out when the pesky think is due.
> Start compiling bibliography in a file; we can merge later.
> Once the section's complete, remember to summarize your section in
"Executive
> Summary" format, which we can also merge together later to make on "exec
> sum."
>
>I'm sure I've missed something.
>
>See you tonite.
>
>Best,
>Jeff
>(See attached file: Perfect paper--Dasovich draft0507.rtf)
>
>
HotBot - Search smarter.
http://www.hotbot.com
- Industry_Analysis.doc
=====================================
|
3,064 |
Subject: Haas CEO Exchange
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/10444.
=====================================
Tickets for Haas CEO Exchange with HP's Fiorina and Cisco's Chambers
Available April 2
Tickets will be available April 2 to hear two of Silicon Valley's most
high-powered CEOs: Hewlett Packard's Carly Fiorina and Cisco Systems' John
Chambers speak at an event hosted by the Haas School on April 11 at
Zellerbach Hall. The event will be taped for the PBS television series CEO
Exchange.
The show will be introduced by Dean Laura Tyson and moderated by CNN's Jeff
Greenfield. Students will have a opportunity to ask the CEOs questions at
the end of the program. A raffle and a reception will follow the taping of
the show.
The event is free and open to all Haas students. Tickets are required and
will be available to Evening MBA students at the Evening MBA office during
the week of April 2, 2000.
Wednesday, April 11, seating begins at 5:30, doors close at 5:45 pm
Place: Zellerbach Hall on the UC Berkeley campus
AT Kearney, the exclusive sponsor of CEO Exchange, will raffle off two Pen
Cam Trios by AIPTEK to the students at the end of the taping. The Pen Cam
is a three-in-one camera: it's a PC camera, a digital camera, and a digital
camcorder. You can view it at http://www.aiptek.com/Products_PenCam-Trio.htm.
HOLD ON TO YOUR TICKETS! You will need them for admission to the show, for
the raffle, and for admission to the catered reception with the speakers
and special guests that takes place after the show at the new Haas Pavilion.
For AT Kearney, the show's exclusive sponsor, CEO Exchange presents a
unique opportunity to meet and network with business students and graduates
at top schools. AT Kearney's new CEO, Dietmar Ostermann, will attend the
show and the reception. He will be joined by members of his senior
management staff and Haas alumni working at AT Kearney.
For more information on CEO Exchange, go to
http://haas.berkeley.edu/groups/pubs/news/articles/CEOexchange41101.html
This event is organized by the Haas School's Marketing & Communications
Office.
We'll see you there.
Ute Frey
Associate Director
Marketing & Communications
Haas School of Business
University of California
Berkeley, CA 94720-1900
Phone 1-510-642-0342
Fax 1-510-642-4700
http://www.haas.berkeley.edu
=====================================
|
3,065 |
Subject: Re:
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/11438.
=====================================
Thanks, man. Up until the trauma and the drama (the genesis of which remains
a mystery), I had a great time. Please thank Sarah and Bob---great food,
great company, etc. Tell them sorry for leaving all my stuff lying around.
Thanks for sending a single check. $736 is the amount. Talk to you soon.
Best,
Jeff
"Scott Laughlin" <[email protected]>
04/23/2001 04:23 PM
To: [email protected]
cc:
Subject: Re:
Sarah has the parka. I'll let you know as soon as I get it sometime this
week. I actually came home that night wearing Bob's jacket, and Kent went
home clad in mine... Shows you the state of affairs. Drinking red wine like
that really fucks me up big time. I need to switch to beer at some point...
Unfortunately, there wasn't much of it there. I had a great time, though.
Thanks for coming. I hope you had an okay time.
No problem about the check. I actually thought afterwards that that might be
easier for you. Could you just tell me the amount again, and I'll put it in
the mail today.
Good luck with school.
Cheers!
Scott
>From: [email protected]
>To: [email protected]
>Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2001 12:39:41 -0500
>
>Dude:
>Two things. First, in the midst of the craziness on Friday, my black,
>Northface parka ended up getting put someplace at Sarah's that I wasn't
>privvy to, and consequently I couldn't find it. My house keys are in it,
>so it would great to get it back. Could you check with Bob/Sarah and see
>if it's floating around someplace over there? Muchos gracias.
>
>Second, could you do me a favor? Could you pay me the full amount for
>Squaw and then collect from Cameron for what she owes you? Sorry to be a
>pain in the ass, but I think logistically, it'll be a whole helluvalot
>easier to manage it that way (at least from my end). And to be an even
>bigger pain.....since my schedule's a disaster with school coming to a
>close, could you stick the check in the mail? My address is:
>
>366 Dolores St., #3
>SF, 94110
>
>Sorry for all the hassle.
>
>Happy birthday, man.
>
>Best,
>Jeff
>
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
=====================================
|
3,066 |
Subject: Energy prices embedded in the Duque Interim Bill Cap
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/737.
=====================================
The spreadsheet below gives the implicit commodity based on the effective
date of four different rates for the same rate schedule (Schedule DR). The
rate schedule effective August 2000 through September 2000 yields a much
larger commodity charge because SDG&E customers will receive a lump sum
reimbursement from SDG&E over those two months. SDG&E customers will expect
lower electric bills.
Assuming that the lump sum reimbursement is not included in the implicit
energy component, the average for June 2000 through January 2001 is 6.2 cts
and the implicit commodity average from February 2001 through December 2001
is 7.3 cts.
The average implicit commodity from June 2000 through December 2001 is 6.9
cts
For deliveries starting September 1, 2000, the average would still be 6.9 cts.
Assuming that the lump sum reimbursement is included in the implicit energy
component, the average for June 2000 through January 2001 is 7.4 cts and the
implicit commodity average from February 2001 through December 2001 is 7.3
cts.
The average implicit commodity from June 2000 through December 2001 is 7.3
cts
For deliveries starting September 1, 2000, the average would be 7.2 cts.
Clarification: The caps apply the first 500 kWh consumed by all residential
customers. For those who consume more than 500 kWh per month, the market
rates will only apply for all consumption above 500 kWh.
---------------------- Forwarded by Bruno Gaillard/SFO/EES on 08/23/2000
02:55 PM ---------------------------
Bruno Gaillard
08/23/2000 02:33 PM
To: Christopher F Calger/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc: Roger Yang/SFO/EES@EES, James D Steffes/HOU/EES@EES, Thane
Twiggs/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, SF Directors, Paul
Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Energy prices embedded in the Duque Interim Bill Cap
Attached is an internal analyses put together by Roger Yang and myself
reflecting the implicit energy charge as a result of Duque's bill cap. The
energy charge varies as new delivery rates are implemented throughout 2000
and 2001.
The total number of residential customers in the SDG&E territory is
approximately 1.1 Million. According to Duque's Decision only 70% will be
protected by the cap.
=====================================
|
3,067 |
Subject: GSPP forum
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/651.
=====================================
Jeff,
Annette Doornbos called from the school and we talked over the forum a little.
As for cost her initial thought was in the range of $10,000 for an early
evening
forum including dinner for speakers afterwards, with these costs mostly being
in
the form of paying for the school's events person to organize and advertise.
An
all day event would be higher.
Let's try to set up a conference call this week or early next week so the
three
of us plus Heather Cameron and possibly the Dean can agree on a general plan.
Agenda items are:
1) Structure of the forum: all day or afternoon/evening.
We should all think about whether an all day event would have a big enough
audience because its a bigger commitment. We could probably do it either way
but we need to decide how much effort and investment we're ready for. Since
this
is sort of a test drive/demonstration project, we might want to shoot for one
panel with 4-5 speakers representing opposing viewpoints plus a moderator. I
think that type of forum might maximize attendance and press attention.
While I
tend to think the issues are so complex that its hard to address them in such
a
short time, they have presidential debates in this time frame that are
certainly
much more broad yet useful. It could be like a congressional hearing, yet
controlled by policy questions rather than politics. We might think about
asking the Dean moderate to raise the profile and the objectivity, and he's a
strong presence who can keep people in line.
2) Sponsorship
Jeff, if Enron supports this, are there certain companies or groups it not
want
to jointly sponsor an event with? Its in the school's interest to have a
variety of funders so as to appear more objective.
3) Description for discussions with press
We need to put together a one-pager or so on the potential speakers and
issues,
to assist Annette in seeking input from the press. She may contact a GSPP
alum
who owns (?) runs (?) the Sacramento Bee and other newspapers plus the UC
public
affairs office.
4) Initial speaker list (the "shoot high" list).
Please respond and we'll try to set something up.
Rob
Rob Gramlich
PJM Market Monitoring Unit
(610) 666-4291
[email protected]
=====================================
|
3,068 |
Subject: RE: SCE QF Meeting
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', 'Jeff; Etringer', '[email protected]', 'Dasovich', 'Michael']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/2700.
=====================================
For information purposes I am attaching a spreadsheet showing what the
potential value of this transaction may be given various terms and volumes.
Given the scenario outlined in the recent draft decision from the CPUC
regarding back payments, there may be an oportunity on behald of the QFs to
negotiate a modified agreement with dispatch in return for relief on payables
by the IOUs.
Mike
-----Original Message-----
From: Parquet, David
Sent: Monday, June 04, 2001 10:29 AM
To: Calger, Christopher F.
Cc: Dasovich, Jeff; Etringer, Michael
Subject: Re: SCE QF Meeting
The structure is the same as we tried 4 years ago with no success. ("ABE" -
"anybody but Enron", being the primary reason we failed.) The deal we were
offering was the option to supply from the market in exchange for a 20%
discount in the capacity payment. At the time, we WERE going to shut down
the QF and pay them more PV than they would have gotten by running, the
"grease" coming from the relatively high O&M, which could be extinguished
with the proposed structure.
This structure sounds like a strict option, but should still work great. The
"grease" in this case is the arbitrage between market price and QF operating
cost.
In the past, I have called John Fielder, VP Regulatory Affairs, when I want
to talk about something strategic with SCE. He was my fellow board member on
the ISO board. I could call him for you.
Christopher F Calger/ENRON@enronXgate 06/04/2001 09:33 AM To: David
Parquet/SF/ECT@ECT, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron cc: Michael
Etringer/ENRON@enronXgate Subject: SCE QF Meeting
Guys,
Mike Etringer has a real good structure to present to SCE. Basically, Enron
would pay for the right to dispatch the QF so that their obligations to the
utility could be met by either the plant or the market. For that right,
Enron would be able to pay for/absorb most of the past due receivables owed
to the QF. Several QF's have expressed interest, but the utility wont return
calls. We could not do this for the whole QF group, but we could do it for
500MW+, which could save everyone $200MM+ in past due receivables.
Who should we meet with to putch this idea?
Chris
=====================================
|
3,069 |
Subject: RE: Auction of Default Supplier Obligation
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/1984.
=====================================
Jeff --
Can you try and call Seabron today to discuss. See if his understanding
helps with California issues.
Jim
----- Forwarded by James D Steffes/NA/Enron on 10/02/2000 02:49 PM -----
"Seabron Adamson" <[email protected]>
10/02/2000 09:43 AM
To: <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: RE: Auction of Default Supplier Obligation
Jim:
>Have you ever seen a model for a bid process like this? Any auctions (in
>any commodity) that would work? We are trying to get back to key policy
>makers mid-day on Monday.
Yes, there are numerous default service auction models in operation or
proposed, both in electricity and other utilities. The government of New
South Wales in Australia is implementing a model similar to this. In
Georgia, I think they recently had an auction to serve customers served by a
gas retailer that went bust. Similar mechanisms have been used for years in
the telecoms business for serving specific client bases, such as rural
customers. Examples have been in Chile, and even in the U.S. (auctions for
"universal service obligations").
We proposed a model for "third-party" default service standard supply for
Ontario (working for Aleck Dadson of Enron Canada). This allowed the
standard supply provider to meet its obligation by competitive means,
including holding an auction. The idea was to provide customers hedging in a
framework that allowed for competition in default service.
Let me know if you want a briefing or futher info. I'll be in the office
until 4:00 or so (I'm then heading to the airport for Portland). My office
number is (617) 354-0060, or (617) 513-5904 (mobile).
Seab
This e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the
addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or
confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this
e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify me at
(617) 354-0060 and permanently delete the original and any copy of any
e-mail and any printout thereof.
=====================================
|
3,070 |
Subject: Learn What the Elections Mean for Pennsylvania's Environment and
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: []
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/1111.
=====================================
Learn What the Elections Mean for Pennsylvania's Environment and Economy.
PennFuture's November 13th Luncheon featuring State Treasurer Barbara Hafer,
Auditor Bob Casey, Jr., and Professor and Pollster Terry Madonna is rapidly
approaching!
Reserve your seat now for this exciting review of the 2000 elections.
Barbara Hafer and Bob Casey, Jr. are considered to be frontrunners for their
party's gubernatorial nomination in 2002. Hear their post-election reactions
and predictions for Pennsylvania's Future.
Professor Madonna, Pennsylvania's best-known and widely respected pollster,
will provide his analysis of the 2000 election.
Luncheon Program
November 13, 2000 at Noon
Crown Plaza - Harrisburg
23 South Second Street
$100.00 per ticket
Pre-Luncheon Reception with the Speakers
Noon November 13, 2000 - 11 a.m. to Noon
Crown Plaza - Harrisburg
23 South Second Street
$500.00 per ticket, includes luncheon
Please R.S.V.P. by November 1, 2000
Respond to this email;
call 717-214-7920/1-800-321-7775;
or fax a copy of the reply at the bottom of this email to:
Citizens for Pennsylvania's Future
212 Locust Street, Suite 410
Harrisburg, PA 17101-1510
717-214-7927 (fax)
Contributions to PennFuture (less the cost of the event) are tax deductible.
You are receiving this message as someone interested in energy and
environment issues - it is not intended as spam. If you prefer not to
receive event notices from PennFuture, please reply to this message with "no
events" in the subject. To be removed from all distribution lists, type
"remove all" in the subject.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
PennFuture Luncheon Program
PLEASE RESERVE _________ LUNCHEON PLACES AT $100.00 EACH
PLEASE RESERVE _________ RECEPTION AND LUNCHEON PLACES AT $500.00 EACH
( ) CHECK HERE FOR VEGETARIAN MEAL
ENCLOSED IS MY CHECK FOR $_______
YOUR NAME ____________________________________________________________
YOUR PHONE NUMBER ___________________________________________________
MASTERCARD OR VISA __________________________
#________________________ EXP. DATE __________
_______________________________________________
(SIGNATURE)
=====================================
|
3,071 |
Subject: Invitation to Participate
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: []
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/5714.
=====================================
Lexis-Nexis has been a trusted source of real-time and archival information
for 28 years. Continuing the Lexis-Nexis tradition of providing the most
comprehensive and credible information in the marketplace, the nexis.comSM
Web interface was released to our corporate subscribers in Fall 2000. To
determine the applicability of this interface for graduate schools of
business, Lexis-Nexis has entered into a pilot program with select leading
business schools. As a pilot program participant at The University of
California - Berkeley, Haas School of Business, Lexis Nexis has provided
you with unlimited access to its nexis.com service. All they want in
return is your opinion on how well the nexis.com service meets your
expectations.
To best understand how the nexis.com service meets your needs, Lexis-Nexis
has chosen an independent market research firm, Shugoll Research, to
conduct a research study with pilot program participants like yourself.
This is strictly market research and there is absolutely no sales effort
involved. The research will be used to identify ways that the nexis.com
service can be improved.
We urge you to participate in this research which will take place on
February 12, 2001. All qualified participants will receive a cash
honorarium as a token of our appreciation for their time and opinions. All
of your answers will be kept strictly confidential.
If you are interested in participating, or simply learning more about this
important research, please contact Shugoll Research one of two ways:
1. E-mail Shugoll Research at [email protected]. Please include
your first name, a telephone number and the best time of day to reach you
so a representative from Shugoll Research can contact you.
2. Call Shugoll Research toll free at 800-322-4499 and identify yourself as
someone who has been invited to participate in the nexis.com research.
If you have any questions or concerns, please contact your school's
liaison, Gary Peete, at (510) 643-6471 or [email protected].
Thank you in advance for your participation in this very important
research.
Shugoll Research
7475 Wisconsin Ave. Suite 200
Bethesda, MD 20814
(800) 322-4499
www.shugollresearch.com
=====================================
|
3,072 |
Subject: Re: Tale of Two Power Plants
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/9347.
=====================================
I reviewed the numbers with Linda Lawrence, and Steve Walton gave us some
background info as well, which makes me comfortable with these numbers.
Alan Comnes@ECT
02/22/2001 01:30 PM
To: John Neslage/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Steve
Walton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Linda L Lawrence/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Tale of Two Power Plants
Based on some additional information, here is a revised comparison:
Intermountain Power Project's (IPP) cost per MWh in 1997 was $46/MWh,
relatively expensive for its vintage (1984) and fuel type (coal). At an
orgininal cost of $2,776,988,000 for 1,640 MW of capacity, that translates
into $1,700/kW. Source: US DOE EIA, Financial Statistics for Publicly Owned
Utilities 1997. IPP is owned and operated by the Intermountain Power Agency
but all of the output is sold under contract to LADWP and other SoCal munies.
By contrast, consider a plant built at the same time and location and has
the same fuel source:
Plant Name Year
Originally
Constructed Total Installed
Capacity
(Maximum Generator Name
Plate Ratings in
(MW) Cost of
Plant: Total
Cost Cost per
kW of
Installed
Capacity Production
Expenses:
Fuel
Hunter Unit No.3 1983 446.40 MW 487,543,950 1,092.1683 25,007.036
The installed cost per MW of Hunter 3 is 35% lower than the cost of the
project built for LADWP.
From: John Neslage@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 02/21/2001 06:07 PM CST
To: Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT@ENRON
cc: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Re: Cost of Takeover
Yes. We should be able to get at them on FERC's website, which I can check
for us now. Otherwise, Linda Lawrence should be able to help us first thing
in the morning.
Alan Comnes@ECT
02/21/2001 05:58 PM
To: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc: Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, John
Neslage/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON, Mark
Palmer/Corp/Enron@Enron, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul
Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Re: Cost of Takeover
=====================================
|
3,073 |
Subject: I need your help!
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/5387.
=====================================
Jeff:
I took a crack at expressing our thoughts on the exit strategy below. I am
not really happy with it in either tone or content and would welcome your
input so that we can have more persuasive testimony tonight.
Gratefully,
Justin
Principles to Create a Healthy Competitive Electricity Market
The Silicon Valley Manufacturing Group is concerned by the absence of a
systematic and expedited exit strategy for the state from the power
business. We are convinced that planning for and creating a competitive
electricity market is the most effective means to long-term stability and
cost-competitiveness for all consumers in California.
There are certain principles that, if followed, will help lead us to the
kind of stability and cost-effective power that Californians want. We
recommend that follow-up legislation to AB1X provide the guidelines for thi=
s
exit strategy with the following concepts:
1. Keep the utilities solvent and spread out the payback of the CTC over
several years
2. Encourage the DWR to buy the least amount of power necessary to stabiliz=
e
the market for the least amount of time. It does not take a lot of fixed
priced contracts to stabilize the market
3. Establish an objective trigger (based on credit worthiness) for the
utilities to assume long-term contracts.
4. Allow customers to have direct access and real choice while providing
necessary protections to assure the state that the bonds can be repaid =01)
5. Direct long-term customer contracts are beneficial for the State because
it lessens the burden of the DWR to obtain power, particularly at peak
demand times.
6. Remove barriers to on-site generation to meet customer needs and put
excess power onto the grid.
Even though we are in a crisis, we should not postpone accounting for
long-term and unintended consequences of our short-term measures. Effectiv=
e
energy policy should be based on sound economic principles. Together, we
can accomplish this.
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2001 11:41 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject:
(See attached file: SVMG Talking Points--JBradley.doc)
- SVMG Talking Points--JBradley.doc
=====================================
|
3,074 |
Subject: Town Hall Meeting
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/13276.
=====================================
ENERGY COMMITTEE MEMBERS:
(Please pass on as appropriate)
Congresswoman Anna Eshoo has organized a town hall meeting to bring everyone
together to talk about what residential and commercial customers can do
during the current energy crisis, and to promote energy efficiency and
conservation.
The event will be held 9:00 - 11:00am, on Saturday, June 2, 2001, at the
Menlo Park campus of the USGS at 345 Middlefield Road, Menlo Park.
Directions are attached below.
Panel speakers will focus on recent Federal and State action and energy
efficiancy and conservation. Speakers include Ambassador Dick Sklar,
Assemblyman Joe Simitian, Ralph Cavanagh of NRDC and local business owner
Larry Hassett.
Please join us on Saturday for Congresswoman Anna Eshoo's Town Hall Meeting.
If you have questions, please call the Congresswoman's Palo Alto office at
650-323-2984
DIRECTIONS:
The USGS campus is actually on Survey Lane, a short road (1 block long)
south of Middlefield Road between Marsh Rd and Willow Rd in Menlo Park.
US 101: take the Willow Road exit. Take Willow Road south / west towards
Menlo Park about one mile, and turn right onto Middlefield Road. Take the
second left onto Survey Lane.
I-280 from the South: Take I-280 N to Highway 85 N (towards Mountain View).
Take US-101 N to the Willow Road exit. Take Willow Road about a mile, and
turn right onto Middlefield Road. Take the second left onto Survey Lane.
To Use Public Transportation on the Peninsula: Take Caltrain to the Menlo
Park Station. Caltrain schedules can be obtained at www.caltrain.com or by
calling 1-800-660-4287. Thanks to SamTrans, a special shuttle will be
available at the Menlo Park station starting at 8:20am to take those
arriving by train to the USGS campus. The special shuttle will also be
available after the townhall meeting to return to the Menlo Park station.
The shuttle is ADA accessible. Also note, the train station is less than a
mile to the USGS campus. To bike or walk to the campus, head south from the
train station about 100 yards to Ravenswood Avenue. TURN LEFT (east) and go
down Ravenswood Avenue about a half a mile to Middlefield Road, turn right
(south) and the campus is on the right side of the street.
=====================================
|
3,075 |
Subject: Gary Ackerman Letter re "Edison's Agony" -- LA Times
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/3286.
=====================================
Gary's letter responding to a series on "poor Edison" in the LA Times. I
reviewed it in advance -- looked good to me.
Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854
----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 05/16/2001 08:27 AM -----
Gary Ackerman <[email protected]>
05/15/2001 11:36 PM
Please respond to foothillservices
To: [email protected]
cc:
Subject: Letter in re "Edison's Agony"
To the Editor;
The series of articles published last week by Ms. Cleeland called "Edison's
Agony" continues your unbroken string
of balanced and informative reporting on the California energy crisis. My
group of merchant generators and power
marketers include many pre-competition Edison empoyees, and employees from
other utilities as well. We are
sympathetic to the situation of those who currently serve under the Edison
banner.
We note, however, that something is amiss in your series, and only lightly
touched. That is, the role of SCE in
advancing the legislation and policies in favor of competition in Californa.
It was SCE, and its CEO Mr. Bryson who masterminded the state deregulation
legislation. Although SCE's Mr.
Bryson objected vigorously to forced sales of power plants, and asked for
long terms power purchase contracts, those
lost battles gave way to winning the stranded-cost-recovery war.
SCE did well in adopting to the new reality, until the wholesale rates flew
up, and left the utility unable to recover its
costs. SCE made a deliberate calculation in May of 2000 to leave its
customers unprotected from cost shocks. There
was no hedging undertaken for future power purchases when the wholesale
forward prices exceeded SCE's historical
generation component of rates. As a result, the debts piled up.
Empathize with career employees of SCE, and with dedicated, hard working
linemen who are always ready to serve at
the cost of their private pleasures. But please, get it right. Much of this
misery was the avoidable direct consequence
of actions taken by, not avoided, by the SCE management team.
Gary B. Ackerman
Executive Director
Western Power Trading Forum
6155 Almaden Expy, Suite 230
San Jose, CA 95120
650-324-3250
=====================================
|
3,076 |
Subject: NARUC Telecommunication Committee agenda
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/12435.
=====================================
Previously I distributed the Staff Subcommittee on Telecommunications Agenda
for the upcoming NARUC Summer Meetings in Seattle. Here is the Agenda for
the Committee on Telecommunications.
Committee on Telecommunications
Sunday, July 15, 2001
3:00 pm - 5:00 pm
3:45 pm Discussions of Resolutions
4:45 pm Policy Subgroups Meet
Consumer Issues
International
Regulatory Methodology
Technology
Federal Legislation and Regulation
5:30 pm Recess
Monday, July 16, 2001
8:00 am - 5:00 pm
8:30 am - 9:45 am General Session - The National Energy Policy
9:45 am - 10:15 am Networking Break
10:15 am - 12:00 pm Call to Order
Chairman Smith
Roll Call: Brad Ramsay, NARUC General Counsel
Introduction of new members, Review of Agenda, etc.: Chairman Smith
Approval of Minutes of Last Meeting
Staff Subcommittee Report: Julie VanderLaan, Chair
Litigation Report: Brad Ramsay
Legislative Report: Jessica Zufolo
NRRI Report: Frank Darr
Universal Service Joint Board Report
Separations Joint Board Report
706 Joint Conference Report
USAC - Cheryl Parrino (T)
Policy Subgroup Reports and Resolutions
Consumer Issues
International
Regulatory Methodology
Technology
Federal Legislation and Regulation
12:00 pm - 1:30 pm Lunch
1:30 pm - 3:00 pm Promise of Wireless Video
John Stanton, CEO of Western Wireless
3:00 pm - 3:30 pm Networking Break
3:30 pm - 5:00 pm Service Quality: Measurement & Enforcement
Ed Hurly (IL)
4:45 pm Recess
5:00 pm Commissioner Reception
Tuesday, July 17, 2001
8:30 am - 5:00 pm
8:30 am - 9:45 am General Session - Managing Risk in the Energy Markets
9:45 am - 10:15 am Networking Break
10:15 pm - 12:00 pm Status of Open Access Trials and Cable Telephony Robert
Sachs, NCTA
12:00 pm - 1:45 pm Lunch
1:45 pm - 3:00 pm Business - continued
3:00 pm - 3:30 pm NARUC Network Study Group Report
3:30 pm - 5:00 pm Introduction: Kathy Brown
Moderator: Tom Welch, Chair (ME)
Study Group
3:00 pm - 3:30 pm Networking Break
Recess
Wednesday, July 18, 2001
8:00 am - 12:30 pm
8:30 am - 10:00 am Right-of-Way Charges: How much is fair?
Tom Dunleavey (NY)
10:00 am - 10:30 am Networking Break
10:30 am - 12:00 pm Pole Attachment (with electricity)
John Burke (VT)
Adjourn
Officer Lunch
=====================================
|
3,077 |
Subject: A Special Offer for Wine Lovers!
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/inbox/850.
=====================================
Dear Friend,
Happy Holidays. At The Wine Enthusiast we're committed to offering you the
finest selection of wine cellars and unique wine accessories. We also love to
let you in on opportunities for new adventures in wine.
Our friends at Robert Mondavi have graciously extended a special offer for
membership in their wine club, Robert Mondavi Ensemble. Ensemble provides access
to limited, pre-release and library vintages from this world-renowned winemaker
at special member prices. In addition, you'll enjoy member benefits at Robert
Mondavi Winery, including special pricing, VIP tours and invitations to
exclusive Ensemble events.
As an Ensemble member, you will receive four Seasonal Shipments per year that
each include 2-5 bottles of wine. The special Ensemble price is $75 to $100 per
shipment after applying your 15% member discount (plus shipping and applicable
tax). Join Ensemble on or before December 31, 2001, and Robert Mondavi will
include two elegant wineglasses with your first shipment.
You are invited to review the current and past shipments of Robert Mondavi
Ensemble to see the quality and variety of wines offered.
Visit Ensemble Online -
http://webmail.wineenthusiast.net/UM/T.asp?A5.14.8.1.50456
View Current Shipments -
http://webmail.wineenthusiast.net/UM/T.asp?A5.14.8.2.50456
View Past Shipments -
http://webmail.wineenthusiast.net/UM/T.asp?A5.14.8.3.50456
Enjoy the member benefits of Robert Mondavi Ensemble, or give someone close to
you a holiday gift that lasts year-round. Visit Ensemble Online or call the
Ensemble Concierge at 1.888.766.6328, ext. 3490 for more information on this
special offer.
Wishing you and your loved ones a safe and joyous holiday season.
By law, Robert Mondavi can only ship to recipients in the following states: CA,
CO, IA, ID, IL, MN, MO, ND, NE, NM, OR, WA, WI and WV. Some restrictions and
limits may apply. Void where prohibited by law.
____________________________________________________________
You are receiving the email because you have subscribed to this list. If you
would like to remove yourself from this list, please click:
http://webmail.wineenthusiast.net/UM/U.asp?B5.14.14.50456 and you will be
removed immediately! Thank you!
=====================================
|
3,078 |
Subject: Re: Interconnection agreements
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/135.
=====================================
Steve talked to us and it is now clear - re point to point services, etc for
tariffs for ETI.
[email protected] wrote:
> We talked about this in detail with Steve when he was in Houston. Please
> check with him. The idea is that there would be the flexibility necessary
> to do just about anything. Also, there are problems with the decision that
> Steve was going to talk with Pulsifer about. Need to get status of those
> conversations.My understanding was that, if there's a problem with the
> decision, perhaps our filing would be pushed a bit past the Tuesday. We'll
> need to find that out, too.
>
> Jeremy Meier <[email protected]> on 08/30/2000 11:27:10 AM
>
> To: [email protected]
> cc:
> Subject: Re: Interconnection agreements
>
> J:
>
> Are there additional service offerings (DWDM, etc.) that Enron wants to
> offer in California (Steve indicated you guys talked about that) - and if
> so, is there a narrative or did Steve get any specific info - for filing
> with CPUC per final Decision?
>
> We have to file updated tariffs next Tuesday - and want to include the
> latest company service offerings.
>
> J
>
> [email protected] wrote:
>
> > Hi. Thanks for all the help. Life's nuts. I'll try to give you a call
> > later in the day and catch up.
> >
> > Jeremy Meier <[email protected]> on 08/25/2000 05:56:29 PM
> >
> > To: [email protected]
> > cc:
> > Subject: Interconnection agreements
> >
> > Jeff:
> >
> > Welcome back. We did send the Analysis Memo last week to all, with some
> > small difficulty discerning correct email addresses for the various
> > folks. Please let us know if anyone did not get their copy.
> >
> > You have several electronic version of interconnection agreements for
> > California, and we can discuss at your convenience. The process for
> > adopting an agreement "as is" is fairly straightforward in Calif and
> > will not take that long (a few weeks).
> >
> > We are also filing updated pages for tariffs, including substantive
> > service changes which Steve mentioned. We can show you any documents
> > before filing (9/5/00 is the last day).
> >
> > Please feel free to let us know any questions,
> >
> > Jeremy Meier
> > Blumenfeld & Cohen
=====================================
|
3,079 |
Subject: RE: Calif PUC Postpones Vote On CDWR Rev Requirement
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent_items/4.
=====================================
Thanks. I'm in Goucester Mass this week but am getting the message to folks from here. You launching on the contracts?
Best,
Jeff
-----Original Message-----
From: V. John White [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 10:46 PM
To: Dasovich, Jeff
Subject: Fw: Calif PUC Postpones Vote On CDWR Rev Requirement
I talked to Loretta today. She is pleased with the business support for SB 18x, but wants to see similar effort for the PUC members. She said the Bilas alternate doesn't work, and that the votes need to be rallied to defeating the rate agreement.
Peace, vjw
----- Original Message -----
From: John Shahabian <mailto:[email protected]>
To: V John White (E-mail) <mailto:[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 5:53 PM
Subject: Calif PUC Postpones Vote On CDWR Rev Requirement
_____
[WSJ.com] <http://interactive.wsj.com/media/print-wsjie-savin.gif>
September 4, 2001
Dow Jones Newswires
Calif PUC Postpones Vote On CDWR Rev Requirement
LOS ANGELES -- The California Public Utilities Commission has postponed until after Sept. 11 a vote to establish how much revenue the California Department of Water Resources will receive for power purchases through 2002, a spokeswoman said.
The CDWR has been buying power on behalf of the state's three investor-owned utilities since January. The CPUC decision would establish how much the CDWR could recover through rates from each utility for those power buys.
The proposed decision, originally scheduled for a vote Thursday, was made available for the first time Tuesday night. The vote on the proposal was postponed in order to allow time for parties to file comments, which are due by 5 p.m. Sept. 11.
A new date for a vote hasn't been set, but will occur "some time after comments are received," the CPUC said in a press release.
- - 05/09/01 00-06G
_____
URL for this Article:
http://interactive.wsj.com/archive/retrieve.cgi?id=BT-CO-20010904-005920.djm
_____
Copyright ? 2001 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Printing, distribution, and use of this material is governed by your Subscription Agreement and copyright laws.
For information about subscribing, go to http://wsj.com
=====================================
|
3,080 |
Subject: IMPORTANT DOE/NARUC ANNOUNCEMENT
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: []
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/1799.
=====================================
The North American energy industry is facing some of the biggest challenges
in its history. Many important decisions need to soon be made by
policymakers to smooth the transition to a competitive marketplace in order
to address these critical challenges at this crucial moment in the
development of restructured markets.
Recognizing the need for stakeholder input, the U.S. Department of Energy
and the National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners (NARUC)
invite all public officials and industry stakeholders to attend the North
American Summit on Harmonizing Business Practices in Energy Restructuring.
The Summit will be held from November 29 to December 1, 2000, in Dallas,
Texas.
The Summit is designed to tackle the fundamental issues that lead to a
competitive marketplace. Your expertise and participation are critical to
the success of this effort. The Summit is designed to maximize interaction
between public officials and industry stakeholders.
As this will be the only joint meeting hosted by DOE and NARUC this year,
early registration is strongly encouraged. To register, go to
http://www.energymarkets.org.
Remarks from The Honorable Bob Rowe, President of NARUC and Commissioner for
the State of Montana, on the importance of the Summit:
"We now have a better understanding of some of the challenges we face in
energy restructuring. The development of different business practices by
different agencies and network companies could become a significant
impediment to efficiently doing business across many different network
systems. This is an issue not only for suppliers who must do business on
many networks but also for utilities who must increasingly face the
challenge of consolidating diverse network systems. Obviously the main
beneficiary of harmonizing such efforts is the consumer."
Please send this email message to colleagues who would benefit from
receiving information about the Summit.
****************************************************************************
****************
The Center for the Advancement of Energy Markets (CAEM) is responsible for
stakeholder coordination, program development, speaker invitations, and
outreach, in coordination with DOE and NARUC.
=====================================
|
3,081 |
Subject: FW: Energy Restructuring, Comm industry buildout;dist gen opportu
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/1068.
=====================================
I guess it doesn't matter whether you or I are "unreasonable;" the leg has
spoken:? "DG" will be supported at CPUC and CEC.
?
<<Energy Security and Reliability Act of 2000_CPUC demand side
direction.doc>> <<Energy Security and Reliability Act 2000_CEC demand side
direction.doc>>
-----Original Message-----
From:?? Schultz, Don
Sent:?? Tuesday, September 05, 2000 7:53 AM
To:???? Morse, David E.; Cauchois, Scott; McNamara, Michael D.; Mowrey, Terry
R.; Danforth, Christopher; Linsey, Steve; Casey, Sean F.; Kinosian, Robert;
Thompson, Thomas W.; Pocta, Robert M.; Hallman, Jeanne; Morse, Jay; Logan,
Scott; Kinser, Alannah; Fest, Anthony D.; Smith, Don; Webb, Josephine;
Quiroz, Edgar A.; Maack, Lynn A.; Milano, Gaetano R.; Boyd, Kelly; Sanchez,
Danilo E.; Johnston, William
Subject:??????? Energy Restructuring, Comm industry buildout;dist gen
opportunities
The attached news accounts provide more evidence of: the impact of
communications industry growth (broadband) on electric grid (Silicon Valley
and Sacto), PG&E's plans for "T&D" buildout of Northern Calif grid; the
potential for the recently passed leg (Energy Security and Reliability Act)
to reduce need/impact of all of above via distributed generation technologies.
<<Market manip_ SV buildout_PG&E_Gen_Leg Response SJMN 9_00.doc>>
<<communications industry buildout_local effects_Cisco EIR_SJMN 9_00.doc>>
<<communications industry energy and e-commerce load shift_SV to Sacto SBee
9_00.doc>> <<dpca news 9-1-00.pdf>> <<dereg_financial market
response_Barrons_DG Comp reports 8_00.pdf>> <<communications industry
buildout_market respnose_Dist Gen_NYCity_NYT 9_00.pdf>>
- Energy Security and Reliability Act of 2000_CPUC demand side direction.doc
- Energy Security and Reliability Act 2000_CEC demand side direction.doc
- Market manip_ SV buildout_PG&E_Gen_Leg Response SJMN 9_00.doc
- communications industry buildout_local effects_Cisco EIR_SJMN 9_00.doc
- communications industry energy and e-commerce load shift_SV to Sacto SBee
9_00.doc
- dpca news 9-1-00.pdf
- dereg_financial market response_Barrons_DG Comp reports 8_00.pdf
- communications industry buildout_market respnose_Dist Gen_NYCity_NYT
9_00.pdf
=====================================
|
3,082 |
Subject: Payback Time
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/inbox/1006.
=====================================
Comrades:
Each year, we students have the opportunity to
recognize from among the esteemed faculty members of
Haas those who have distinguished themselves from
their peers by their commitment to the least glamorous
of their tasks: teaching us stupid kids how to read,
write and do complicated long division sums. The Earl
F. Cheit Award for Outstanding Teaching goes to that
individual we deem worthy, from a pool of candidates
we nominate, based solely on our judgment as students
about our instructors (or maybe we just like their
looks--but let that not dissuade us from our sense of
duty). The administration and faculty have no voice
in this award process, but must gaze upon us silently,
in awe and amazement at our power of discernment.
Faculty who receive the Outstanding Teacher Award are
recognized for this important accomplishment by both
the UC Berkeley Campus and the Haas School of
Business. Last year's award went to Jonathan Leonard
(Core: Micro) with honorable mentions to Jonathan
Berke (Core: Finance) and Sarah Tasker (Elective:
Financial Information Analysis.)
We are currently soliciting nominations for Fall 2001
courses. So, if you have gotten over your indignation
for having been put in the dunce corner once too
often, and finished copying ?I will not put motor oil
in Professor Lyon?s hot cocoa ever again? one hundred
times, you may reply to this email with your
nomination. Alternatively, if your server is as balky
as mine, submit a hard copy to the Evening MBA office.
We can only consider nominations with a written
explanation. There will be another round of
nominations for Spring 2002, but please remember that
only one nomination per student is accepted, so if you
nominate another faculty member in the Spring, it will
supercede this Fall's nomination. In May, we will
select one individual from all nominations, based on
number of nominations received and the strength of
feeling exhibited by the nominors.
Thanks, in advance, for your support of this important
and prestigious award.
Joe Tambornino
Chairman - Student Advisory Committee
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Send your FREE holiday greetings online!
http://greetings.yahoo.com
=====================================
|
3,083 |
Subject: FW: bluegrass
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/3572.
=====================================
Let's go to dinner at this place my friend Stacy recommends (that is right
next to Sweetwater). She lives there and I trust her food advice. I am
trying to Molly and Sean to go also. Then I will make reservations for 8.
How does that sound to you guys?
PP, thanks for the call with the info last week.
BTW, who's in the band besides Ed and Steve?
Cameron Sellers
Vice President, Business Development
PERFECT
1860 Embarcadero Road - Suite 210
Palo Alto, CA 94303
[email protected]
650.798.3366 (direct dial)
650.269.3366 (cell)
650.858.1095 (fax)
-----Original Message-----
From: Stacy Miller Azcarate [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, May 07, 2001 2:55 PM
To: Cameron Sellers
Subject: RE: bluegrass
Yes. Let's go to La Ginestra right next door before. Say 7:30? It's fabulous
Italian Food...
-----Original Message-----
From: Cameron Sellers [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, May 07, 2001 2:57 PM
To: 'Stacy Miller Azcarate'
Subject: RE: bluegrass
Cool!!! It's at 8:30 on Thursday and you can call to reserve tickets if you
want (415-388-2820) but I am pretty sure it won't sell out. They are a new
band, but a bunch of people we know that are really good.
I can't wait to see you!! Is there a good place to go to dinner before hand
that you recommend?
Cameron Sellers
Vice President, Business Development
PERFECT
1860 Embarcadero Road - Suite 210
Palo Alto, CA 94303
[email protected]
650.798.3366 (direct dial)
650.269.3366 (cell)
650.858.1095 (fax)
-----Original Message-----
From: Stacy Miller Azcarate [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, May 07, 2001 2:49 PM
To: Cameron Sellers
Subject: RE: bluegrass
Yes. yes. Yes. What time?
-----Original Message-----
From: Cameron Sellers [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, May 07, 2001 2:48 PM
To: 'Stacy Miller Azcarate'
Subject: bluegrass
Not sure if you are interested, but there is a fun bluegrass band playing at
Sweetwater this Thursday night. Since you are in the area it would be great
to see you!! Can you join us????
Cameron Sellers
Vice President, Business Development
PERFECT
1860 Embarcadero Road - Suite 210
Palo Alto, CA 94303
[email protected]
650.798.3366 (direct dial)
650.269.3366 (cell)
650.858.1095 (fax)
=====================================
|
3,084 |
Subject: Re: A pop locations
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/eci/29.
=====================================
Brian,
It is my understanding that the ISO has the right to get flat rate, (no
mileage charge) access into the ISO network from within the LATA of the A
POPs. If this access is at the right price it means that any customer
wanting to get a circuit between say, Redding CA and Orange County, CA would
have VERY cheap access and competitive Long Haul. That being said, at this
point I do not think the A POP information is crucial to our initial meeting.
We need to ascertain the following:
1) Can the ISO nail up discreet circuits on this network? It is currently a
meshed ATM backbone with traffic being routed dynamically.
2) What conditions need to be met by the ISO to scale the network to OC48?
If they cannot scale it we have only about an OC3 of available bandwidth and
that is not worth our time.
3) What are the DS3 and OC3/12 access rated from MCI? This will uncover our
true opportunity in this deal.
Dan Minter
V: (503)886-0452
F: (503)886-0441
Brian Spector@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS
06/13/00 09:02 PM
To: Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES@ECT@ENRON
cc: Dan Minter/Enron Communications@Enron Communications@EES@ECT@ENRON, Dax
Sanders/HOU/AZURIX@Azurix
Subject: Re: A pop locations
Dan/Dax,
Do we need to have the physical addresses for these pops??????
Brian
Jeff Dasovich@EES
06/13/00 01:08 PM
To: Brian Spector@ECT, Dan Minter/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
cc:
Subject: A pop locations
Forgot to mention---please recall that all of the information we're being
provided is covered under an NDA that we and the ISO have signed.
Best,
Jeff
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES on 06/13/2000 11:07
AM ---------------------------
"Windmiller, Michelle" <[email protected]> on 06/13/2000 10:49:52 AM
To: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: A pop locations
Jeff -
Here are the locations for the A and B Pops.
A Pops
San Jose
Santa Ana
San Diego (2)
San Francisco
Los Angeles
Sherman Oaks
Plus co-located in the four B Pops below
B Pops
Hayward
Sacramento
Rialto
Dominiguez Hills
<<...>>
Michelle J. Windmiller
Telecommunications
(916)351-2160 (office)
(916)802-5423 (cell)
(916)351-2373 (fax)
=====================================
|
3,085 |
Subject: Re: Changes to Ron's draft IV
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/1910.
=====================================
Ron --
I would not use the word "hard" in the language. How about --
In addition, if the Commission insists on a cap it must at a minimum
establish a higher hard price cap and provide that the refund obligation will
not be applicable to sales below that a reasonable level. Such a safe
harbor is required to prevent disincentives to the development of new
generation and to ensure liquidity and reliability in the California market.
Mary Hain@ECT
11/22/2000 02:54 PM
To: [email protected], James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J
Mara/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Changes to Ron's draft IV
This is my last edit.
I. Market Designs
B.
Paragraph 3 - Should be rewritten as follows:
In sum, the Commission's proposal for a soft cap, combined with the complex
nature of the reporting requirement and refund potential has introduced
substantial uncertainty in the market and therefore substantial risk of and
disincentive to do business in the California market. To ensure
participation, the Commission needs to create clear, uncomplicated review
standards. In addition, if the Commission insists on a cap it must at a
minimum establish a higher hard price cap and provide that the refund
obligation will not be applicable to sales below that level. Such a safe
harbor is required to prevent disincentives to the development of new
generation and to ensure liquidity and reliability in the California market.
---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Hain/HOU/ECT on 11/22/2000 12:45 PM
---------------------------
Mary Hain
11/22/2000 12:31 PM
To: [email protected], James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J
Mara/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Changes to Ron's draft
I. Market Design
A. Delete the clause beginning "at a minimum ...." from the title.
Paragraph 7 beginning "If the Commission insists . . . ."
add "As discussed by Mr. Comnes," at the beginning of the sentence
delete the "at minimum, $250 per MWh - and"
delete the rest of the paragraph (except footnote 4) beginning with "This is
so for several reasons . . . " I would put footnote 4 in as text.
=====================================
|
3,086 |
Subject: Re: California and DOE Order
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/6110.
=====================================
Jeff: Secretary Richardson did that, too. BPA began delivering power
yesterday afternoon under an immediate 2-1 payback arrangement with the
return to have commenced yesterday evening. When no power was returned, BPA
shut off power at 7:00 a.m Pacific Time with immediate Conference Calls
between acting Administrator Steve Wright still on-going to seek remedy.
Jeff Dasovich
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
12/14/2000 12:24 PM
To: Cynthia Sandherr/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Allison Navin/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Donna Fulton/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Greg
Wolfe/HOU/ECT@ECT, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@ENRON, Joe
Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Linda Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Mary
Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@ENRON,
Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@ENRON, Susan J
Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Briggs/NA/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Re: California and DOE Order
Might have perhaps been simpler if Bill "Al Haig" Richardson had announced at
the press conference yesterday that he was ordering his energy company, BPA,
to stop "withholding" and send power to California.
Cynthia Sandherr
12/14/2000 10:37 AM
To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Linda
Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sarah
Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Donna Fulton/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Tom
Briggs/NA/Enron@Enron, Allison Navin/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Greg Wolfe/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: California and DOE Order
DOE and FERC just briefed the Hill and confirmed they never issued the Order
yesterday since Bonneville released a lot more power late yesterday. The
Administration advised that if the situation warrants, they will indeed issue
the Order. This remains a fluid situation with Richardson yesterday
announcing his intent to "sign an Order" which his staff had not yet written
while in the interim BPA acted so as to make his announcement moot.
We will continue to apprise you of the developments including reports of
FERC's surprise site inspections.
=====================================
|
3,087 |
Subject: Summer Seminars in Political Economy (July 9-13 & August 13-17)
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/12516.
=====================================
Dear Jeff,
SUMMER SEMINARS IN POLITICAL ECONOMY: July 9-13 & August 13-17
How sound an economics education are American students getting? If a
recent study of high school history textbooks is indicative, the
answer is very discouraging. The economists who authored that study
examined 12 history texts for their treatment of the Great
Depression. Only two of the texts correctly identified the fall in
the money supply as a cause of the Great Depression, while ten blamed
"overproduction" or "excess capacity" in various industries --
hypotheses that mainstream economic researchers rejected decades ago.
The bottom line? Even when a student is lucky enough to have a
teacher that teaches valid economic principles, that student is
likely being taught an interpretation of history that contradicts
those principles.
To help high school and college-age students learn to reason about
economics, history and politics, The Independent Institute is
sponsoring two Summer Seminars in Political Economy. These dynamic
seminars will help students learn what economics is, how it affects
their lives, and how understanding its laws can help them achieve the
things they care about.
TOPICS INCLUDE
-- Economics and Liberty: How the West grew richer and politically freer
-- Market Chaos or Hidden Order? How markets coordinate people's plans
-- Monopoly or Competition? How market incentives improve the quality of life
-- Market Failure or Government Failure? Inflation, recession and
government policy
INSTRUCTOR
-- Joseph Fuhrig, Professor of Economics and Finance, Golden Gate University
TIME
-- 8:30 AM - 12 NOON, July 9-13 or August 13-17 (choice of session
depends on availability)
TUITION
-- $175
Room and board and one unit of college credit through Holy Names
College in Oakland, Calf., are also available at extra cost.
WHERE
The Independent Institute
100 Swan Way
Oakland, CA 94621-1428
More information, see
http://www.independent.org/tii/students/SummerSeminar.html or contact
Carl Close, Academic Affairs Director at The Independent Institute at
[email protected] or (510) 632-1366.
For "The Great Depression and History Textbooks," by Thomas F.
Cargill and Thomas Mayer, see http://www.fte.org/teachers/readings.htm
=====================================
|
3,088 |
Subject: Re: DJ Freeman Sees Cal/ISO, PX Merger, Lower Price Cap
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/408.
=====================================
oh. my. gosh. Freeman is again out to save the world...
Jeff Dasovich@EES
09/12/2000 10:50 PM
To: James D Steffes/HOU/EES@EES, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard
Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sarah
Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sandra McCubbin/SFO/EES@EES,
Mona L Petrochko/SFO/EES@EES, Susan J Mara/SFO/EES@EES, [email protected],
Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: DJ Freeman Sees Cal/ISO, PX Merger, Lower Price Cap
I'd say, "What next?", but I'm afraid to ask....
Regarding our California strategy, preventing the merger would seem to be
right up there with "end the price caps" in our list of priorities. At
today's FERC hearing, a hair-brained consumer advocate called for merging the
PX and the ISO. During the panel I was on, I made the point that a merger
would make California's problems worse than they are today. The FERC
Commissioners seemed somewhat responsive to my concerns.
P.S. After the panel, Heber lobbied me hard to support transcos.
DJ Freeman Sees Cal/ISO, PX Merger, Lower Price Cap
Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.
By Jason Leopold
Of DOW JONES NEWSWIRES
SAN DIEGO (Dow Jones) -- David Freeman, seen a likely replacement for
Marcie Edwards on the board of governors of the California Independent System
Operator, said his first order of business would be to try and merge the ISO
and the California Power Exchange.
Edwards resigned her post on the ISO Thursday.
An informal consensus among the board has already approved his
membership.
Freeman told Dow Jones Newswires that the $250 per megawatthour
wholesale power price cap in California is too high, and that he would like
to see it reduced below $100/MWh.
"I think my role (on the board) will help the state solve it's serious
generation shortage problem," Freeman said.
Some market participants said Freeman is expected to run for chair of
the ISO's board of governors, a seat currently held by Jan Smutny-Jones.
The Los Angeles Department of Water and Power has this summer been able
to sell the ISO power in the real time market, and make a great profit for
itself in return.
By Jason Leopold (323)658-3874.
=====================================
|
3,089 |
Subject: Visionary Keynotes
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/4944.
=====================================
Look at who=01,s doing Visionary Keynotes.
?
-----Original Message-----
From: Seybold Seminars [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2001 10:28 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Register for a FREE Expo Pass-A $75 Value!
?
masthead
?
Experience 80,000 Square Feet of Media Technology with your FREE Expo Pass =
to=20
Seybold Seminars Boston
?
We're excited about all we have to offer you at Seybold Seminars Boston=20
2001--one of the largest displays of media technology ever assembled! Join=
=20
hundreds of vendors who'll be showcasing their products and services at thi=
s=20
leading cross-media Expo.=20
?
expoflr
REGISTER NOW
for your FREE=20
Expo pass=20
worth $75.
Use priority code EMA2.=20
?
EXPO FLOOR HIGHLIGHTS
?
=01=07
NEW! Digital Media Zone
=01=07
=01=07
E-Content Management Solutions Showcase
?
NEW! Meet the Dream Team
David Carson
Clement Mok
Roger Black
=01=07
IDEAlliance XML in Publishing Showcase
=01=07
And more!
photos
=01=07
NEW! Digital Art Gallery
?
?
?
?
?
UNPARALLELED EDUCATION
Enhance your knowledge and skills--attend critical information-packed=20
educational sessions covering:
?
=01=07
Web strategies and design
=01=07
Media technologies
=01=07
Print publishing developments
=01=07
Content management
=01=07
Digital media--NEW!
?
?
?
Choose from discount packages, individual Conferences, tutorials and Specia=
l=20
Interest Days to customize your schedule. Visit our Web site for more=20
information and a full schedule of educational offerings.=20
VISIONARY KEYNOTES
Christie Hefner, Playboy Enterprises, Inc.
Fred Ebrahimi, Quark, Inc.
And more!
For the full schedule of keynotes, visit our Web site,=20
www.seyboldseminars.com
?
REGISTER TODAY.
Use priority code EMA2 to register and receive your FREE Exposition Pass!
?
footer
?
You are receiving this email because you have participated in a Key3Media=
=20
event or have indicated that you are open to receiving event updates via=20
[email protected]. If you do not wish to receive future updates, please clic=
k=20
here and your address will be removed.
?
?
[IMAGE]
=====================================
|
3,090 |
Subject: FW: GSPP and UCEI
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/gspp_conference/19.
=====================================
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Severin Borenstein [SMTP:[email protected]]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2000 12:14 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: GSPP and UCEI
>
> Rob:
>
> I'd say that nearly all of the course is directly relevant for public
> policy. I'm attaching the most recent syllabus. I'd love to get some
> GSPP students to take it.
>
> I'd be very happy to be part of a policy forum on electricity. It would
> be great if you could get Peace to show up, but he isn't showing much
> interest in debating policy these days. Sounds like a great idea. If I
> weren't completely swamped with other projects, I'd try to organize such
> an event myself. You'd be doing a real service if you would set it up.
>
> s
>
> On Tue, 1 Aug 2000 [email protected] wrote:
>
> > Severin,
> > Usually 2-4 per year choose energy policy as a primary focus at GSPP (yes,
> you
> > can use that abbreviation which we alumni are happy about). It sounds
like
> your
> > course should be a top choice of theirs. How much is public policy
focused
> > versus business focused? How much time is devoted to regulation,
antitrust,
> > deregulation, market failure?
> >
> > We're also interested in developing some lecture series. Alumni would
love
> to
> > hear their school mentioned on NPR,C-span, etc if we can get top academics
> with
> > top policy makers. Dean Nacht is very interested in this. Actually I
think
> an
> > electricity policy seminar would be very timely given this summer's prices
> and
> > reliability issues, and the fact that the consumers are finally feeling
the
> > pinch. A public policy forum with you, Jim, Lee Friedman, Steve Peace, a
> top
> > ISO person or something like that would advance the reasoned debate
> > substantially against what is sure to be another emotional political
> backlash.
> > What do you think? It would probably have more legal and policy issues
and
> > somewhat less economics than the POWER conference, and be California or US
> > focused. If you're willing to participate, I'll check with the Dean and
> > probably get the go ahead to develop it. I would be extremely grateful and
> would
> > make sure the forum suits you.
> > Thanks.
> > Rob <<>>
- syl212.pdf
=====================================
|
3,091 |
Subject: Statement on Energy Crisis
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/8818.
=====================================
PLEASE DO NOT DISTRIBUTE. I haven't read this yet, so I don't know if it's
good bad or indifferent. McFadden is one of the Manifesto signers and a
Nobel Laureate. If folks have comments, please forward them along and I will
get them into the mix. Thanks a bunch.
Best,
Jeff
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 02/02/2001 08:07 PM -----
Dan McFadden <[email protected]>
02/02/2001 04:35 PM
To: David Teece <[email protected]>, [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected]
cc: [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Statement on Energy Crisis
I have prepared a statement on the California energy crisis in response to
a solicitation from the Wall Street Journal, and attach a preliminary first
draft in pdf and Wordperfect formats. This may or may not appear in some
edited form as an op-ed piece in the WSJ. Although this statement is in
my own words, I believe it is consistent with the Manifesto. I would
appreciate feedback from my fellow economists if I have made statements that
contradict the Manifesto, or most critically have made arguments that they
feel are not sound economics. I will try to incorporate suggestions in the
next draft. Thanks for your reaction.
I am also sending copies of this draft to a couple of people in the media
other than the WSJ, and they are welcome to use the content but not the text
if they want a summary of my take on the crisis.
Dan McFadden
- Energy.pdf
- Energy.wpd
=====================================
|
3,092 |
Subject: FW: Calif Consumer Group Steps Up Opposition To SoCal Ed Bill
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent_items/1910.
=====================================
Ditto.
-----Original Message-----
From: Comnes, Alan
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 6:58 PM
To: Dasovich, Jeff; Etringer, Michael
Subject: Calif Consumer Group Steps Up Opposition To SoCal Ed Bill
Calif Consumer Group Steps Up Opposition To SoCal Ed Bill
Updated: Monday, August 27, 2001 04:55 PM ET
LOS ANGELES (Dow Jones)--Three weeks before the state legislature adjourns, a California consumer group is stepping up efforts to oppose a rescue deal for Edison International's (EIX, news, msgs) insolvent utility Southern California Edison, a spokesman for The Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights said Monday.
The group has set up a war room in a hotel one block from the state's capitol, which it will use to organize citizen volunteers from around the state. The volunteers, who will wear black and yellow armbands for easy identification, will meet with lawmakers and report on legislative developments to the media and to community groups, said spokesman Doug Heller.
"We want politicians to know they are being watched and that an Edison bailout is unacceptable," Heller said.
A bill is currently being heard by an Assembly committee to rescue SoCal Ed by allowing it to issue up to $2.9 billion in bonds backed by ratepayer revenue. The utility has $3.5 billion in undercollections because it couldn't pass high wholesale power costs to customers under a rate freeze.
The foundation, which believes the bill will result in rate increases beyond the two already instituted this year, is setting up a telephone line with near-daily updates on legislative developments, Heller said.
The consumer group plans to sponsor a 2002 ballot measure to overturn an Edison bill if it passes. In the past, the group has helped overturn legislation on property taxes and insurance rates through ballot initiatives.
"We've done some test mailing on this and have had a real positive response from the public. We're ready to do a mail-based campaign if the legislature screws up," Heller said.
About 25,000 people have already signed an online "anti-bailout" petition, according to the foundation's Web site.
-By Jessica Berthold, Dow Jones Newswires; 323-658-3872; [email protected]
=====================================
|
3,093 |
Subject: (BN ) 1/17 CALIF. PUC'S LYNCH STATEMENT ON OUTAGES
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/5620.
=====================================
----- Forwarded by Sharonda Stephens/Corp/Enron on 01/26/2001 07:53 AM -----
"ANN SCHMIDT, ENRON CORP." <[email protected]>
01/26/2001 07:50 AM
To: [email protected]
cc:
Subject: (BN ) 1/17 CALIF. PUC'S LYNCH STATEMENT ON OUTAGES
Enron Story
1/17 CALIF. PUC'S LYNCH STATEMENT ON OUTAGES
1/26/1 8:20 (New York)
(The following is a reformatted version of a press release issued by
California
Public Utilities Commission and obtained from www.cpuc.ca.gov. This release
was
not confirmed by the sender.)
January 17, 2001
CPUC PRES. LORETTA LYNCH STATEMENT ON OUTAGES
California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) President Loretta Lynch today
issued the following statement:
Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E) began rotating outages of firm customers
starting at 11:54 a.m. in response to a request from the California
Independent
System Operator (ISO). The ISO made the request late this morning when energy
supplies dipped below demand in Northern California.
Public safety agencies such as police and fire departments, public
transportation agencies such as BART and Muni, hospitals larger than 100 beds,
and other agencies directly involved in public health and safety are exempt
from
this plan and will suffer no interruption of power supply.
Customers in PG&E's service area may experience outages of 60-90 minutes
in
duration on a rotating basis through 9 p.m. this evening. This spreads the
inconvenience equitably but for as short a time as possible for all customers.
Rotating outages begin only after all efforts have been made to secure
energy supplies and the utilities have curtailed all customers who participate
in interruptible programs where customers have voluntarily agreed to curtail
their energy usage during times of energy shortage in exchange for lower
energy
rates.
Every citizen is urged to conserve as much electric power as possible not
only today but in the future as Californians work together for a permanent,
equitable solution to the power supply problem.
Contact:
Armando Rend?n
415-703-1366
[email protected]
(fb) PN
-END-
<EOT>
-0- (BN ) Jan/26/2001 13:20 GMT
=====================================
|
3,094 |
Subject: Want to save $100 AND have a chance to be Cramer's personal guest
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/deleted_items/466.
=====================================
Please respond to 3 weeks ago we told you that by registering for the August 6th
"Live! From NYC - Cramer's Fall Forecast & Investing Strategy"
conference, you will gain an invaluable set of tools and techniques
that will show you how to build your own investment
strategy & fulfill your financial goals.
We also told you that by registering by today, you would receive an
early bird discount of $100 off the registration price.
As an added bonus, by registering for the conference, you will have the
chance to be in the radio studio while Jim Cramer is on the air with his
new daily financial show, "Jim Cramer's Real Money Talk".
Jim will pick 2 conference attendees names at random the evening of the
conference to come with a guest and watch him conduct the show live
from our studio at TheStreet.com New York City Headquarters.
The limited space at our intimate venue is filling up.
Be sure to register TODAY for this exclusive opportunity!
Again, the conference & cocktail reception is Monday
evening, August 6 in New York City at American
Conference Centers, 780 3rd Avenue between 48th and 49th Streets.
If you do only one thing this summer to advance your
professional standing or secure your personal fortune, be sure
to attend this event! Wednesday is your last day to take advantage
of the early bird discount!
We look forward to seeing you there.
Click here to register
http://www.thestreetevents.com/0803 or call TheStreet.com
Customer Service Department at 1-800-562-9571, Monday-Friday, 8am-6pm EST.
This email has been sent to you by TheStreet.com because
you are a current or former subscriber (either free-trial or paid) to
one of our web sites, www.thestreet.com or www.realmoney.com.
If you are not a current or former subscriber, and you believe you
received this message in error, please forward this message to
[email protected], or call our customer
service department at 1-800-562-9571.
Please be assured that we respect the privacy of our subscribers.
To view our privacy policy, please click here:
http://www.thestreet.com/tsc/about/privacy.html
If you would prefer not to receive these types of emails from
us in the future, please click here:
http://www.thestreet.com/z/unsubscribe.jhtml?Type=M
=====================================
|
3,095 |
Subject: Want to save $100 AND have a chance to be Cramer's personal guest
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/29098.
=====================================
3 weeks ago we told you that by registering for the August 6th
=01&Live! From NYC =01) Cramer=01,s Fall Forecast & Investing Strategy=018
conference, you will gain an invaluable set of tools and techniques
that will show you how to build your own investment
strategy & fulfill your financial goals.
We also told you that by registering by today, you would receive an
early bird discount of $100 off the registration price.
As an added bonus, by registering for the conference, you will have the
chance to be in the radio studio while Jim Cramer is on the air with his
new daily financial show, =01&Jim Cramer=01,s Real Money Talk=018.
Jim will pick 2 conference attendees names at random the evening of the
conference to come with a guest and watch him conduct the show live
from our studio at TheStreet.com New York City Headquarters.
The limited space at our intimate venue is filling up.
Be sure to register TODAY for this exclusive opportunity!
Again, the conference & cocktail reception is Monday
evening, August 6 in New York City at American
Conference Centers, 780 3rd Avenue between 48th and 49th Streets.
If you do only one thing this summer to advance your
professional standing or secure your personal fortune, be sure
to attend this event! Wednesday is your last day to take advantage
of the early bird discount!
We look forward to seeing you there.
Click here to register
http://www.thestreetevents.com/0803 or call TheStreet.com
Customer Service Department at 1-800-562-9571, Monday-Friday, 8am-6pm EST.
This email has been sent to you by TheStreet.com because
you are a current or former subscriber (either free-trial or paid) to
one of our web sites, www.thestreet.com or www.realmoney.com.
If you are not a current or former subscriber, and you believe you
received this message in error, please forward this message to
[email protected], or call our customer
service department at 1-800-562-9571.
Please be assured that we respect the privacy of our subscribers.
To view our privacy policy, please click here:
http://www.thestreet.com/tsc/about/privacy.html
If you would prefer not to receive these types of emails from
us in the future, please click here:
http://www.thestreet.com/z/unsubscribe.jhtml?Type=3DM
=====================================
|
3,096 |
Subject: Re: Q2 for Patten Case
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/307.
=====================================
No, I don't think I'd make a better accountant. But I did ask a few
questions of my accountant brother-in-law. You did a great job. I don't
know how much time I'll have, but I'll see if I can throw in a bit of text
and raise the issues. See you tonite.
Kimberly Kupiecki <[email protected]> on 09/18/2000 09:53:30 AM
To: [email protected]
cc: [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected]
Subject: Re: Q2 for Patten Case
Hi Jeff,
I guess you would make a better accountant than me. Your analysis sounds
right. Feel free to make changes as fit.
My apologies for missing out on these items.
At 06:18 PM 9/17/00, [email protected] wrote:
>Hey, nice spreadsheet. Two minor questions:
>
>1) Isn't the provision for taxes on the income statement actually the taxes
>on the 'income' they made from using the sales method (equal to 46%),
>rather than what they pay will actually pay the IRS under the installment
>method? I think the notes show how instead of paying the 4.1$ based on
>their recognized income, they pay some itty bitty amount based on
>installment. If so, I think they actually get a 46% tax break on the 1
>million and change that they lose using a cash basis. Still a loss, just
>not so big. Anyway, I'm not sure if I'm thinking straight on this, but
>that's how I read the numbers.
>
>2) Does the balance sheet have to change a little? For example, does
>shareholder equity change since the income that goes to retained earnings
>is now a loss, rather than a gain? Also, if revenue is recognized on a
>cash basis and is now much smaller, there needs to be another liability to
>equal out the decrease in revenues with the still large notes receivables
>on the asset side (as you note in the answer the notes recievables stays
>the same). Seems like they might need a liability like "deferred profits"
>or some such thing, such that the ["deferred profits" + revenues
>(recognized on cash basis)] = notes receivables.
>
>Anyway, I may not have this right, but thought I'd bring it up to see what
>you think.
>
>Best,
>Jeff
Kimberly Kupiecki
Senior Account Executive
A&R Partners
[email protected]
(650) 762 2800 main
(650) 762 2825 direct
fax (650) 762 2801
=====================================
|
3,097 |
Subject: Re: FW: Los Angeles Chamber of Commerce Speaking Opportunity
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/12187.
=====================================
Thanks -- you're the best! I'll let you know as soon as I get additional
info. kd
From: Jeff Dasovich on 05/08/2001 06:05 PM
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
To: Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Re: FW: Los Angeles Chamber of Commerce Speaking Opportunity
Be happy to if you think it's useful. Just let me know what you'd like me to
do.
Best,
Jeff
Karen Denne
05/07/2001 10:56 PM
To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: FW: Los Angeles Chamber of Commerce Speaking Opportunity
I think this would be a good opportunity to have an Enron rep -- and I think
you would be perfect. Are you available June 5? Let me know so Marathon can
confirm. THANK YOU!!! kd
---------------------- Forwarded by Karen Denne/Corp/Enron on 05/07/2001
10:55 PM ---------------------------
Sandra Yamane <[email protected]> on 05/02/2001 12:00:23 PM
To: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>
cc: Joan Kradin <[email protected]>
Subject: FW: Los Angeles Chamber of Commerce Speaking Opportunity
Karen:
The Los Angeles Chamber of Commerce is hosting a series of meetings on the
power crisis and is interested in having a representative from Enron
participate in a panel discussion with John Stout, Vice President,
California Assets & Commercialization for Reliant Energy, and David Wiggs,
Gen. Mgr, LA Dept. of Water and Power, or Frank Salas from DWP.
The meeting will be held Tuesday, June 5, 2001 from 12:00 noon until 2:00
p.m. at the Chamber's offices located at 350 S. Bixel Street, Los Angeles,
CA
The meeting will be open to LA Chamber Membership. A list of the Chamber's
board of directors is attached for your information.
Let me know if you are interested in sending a representative.
Thanks.
Sandra
-----Original Message-----
From: Zusman, Anita [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, April 30, 2001 7:42 PM
To: '[email protected]'
Cc: Infusino, Melissa
Subject:
Hi Sandra,
Got your voice mail message. Attached below is the roster of our Board of
Directors. I 'm sure Melissa will be in touch with you shortly to discuss
the speaker event. Thanks for your help.
Anita
<<2001 ROSTER BOARD OF DIRECTORS.Public.doc>>
- 2001 ROSTER BOARD OF DIRECTORS.Public.doc
=====================================
|
3,098 |
Subject: Welcome New Co-Chair
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/27982.
=====================================
Dear Energy Committee Members:
After nearly a year of acting as one of your two co-chairs, it is time for
me to focus more completely on my duties at Exodus Communications and to
bring in new leadership to the Energy Committee. In light of this change,
John Redding and I felt it important for the Committee to choose a well
qualified and experienced replacement co-chair that will lead the Energy
Committee to continued successes.
After taking nominations for over three weeks, we held formal elections
during yesterday's regular committee meeting. Paul Stephens, Joe Desmond,
and Nayeem Sheikh were nominated, and responded with intelligent answers to
questions given by the committee and it's leadership. After over an hour of
questions and thorough answers from the three nominees, your committee
selected Joe Desmond to replace myself as your new co-chair.
Joe has a wealth of impressive experience in energy and leadership and a
thorough knowledge of energy and the associated issues facing the SVMG
companies. He has been an active and valued member of the Energy Committee,
and has provided much leadership on salient issues, including Blackout
Notification, Real Time Pricing, and Direct Access.
Please welcome and join me in congratulating Joe Desmond as your new
co-chair. Along with John Redding, I am certain these two will lead the
Committee on the important energy issues of your company, and improve upon
the already lengthy list of successes this Committee has achieved for all
SVMG companies. They will help to grow the recognition and stewardship the
SVMG Energy Committee has attained amongst our peer groups and state and
federal policy makers.
I know that Joe will come to speed immediately on leading your Committee.
Nonetheless, I will wane my involvement over the next several weeks and
assist Joe in transitioning into his new role. We are lucky to have such
great leadership by both John and Joe, and I know we will have many more
great successes to come. Congratulations and thank you to all of our three
nominees, and welcome Co-Chair Joe Desmond.
KC Mares
Outgoing Co-Chair, SVMG Energy Committee and
Director of Electrical Energy and Utilities Management
Exodus Communications, Inc.
408-884-6825
[email protected]
=====================================
|
3,099 |
Subject: Western States Wary Of Electric Dereg Amid Calif's Woes
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', "nicholas.o'[email protected]", '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/2052.
=====================================
Western States Wary Of Electric Dereg Amid Calif's Woes
By Jessica Berthold
?
09/27/2000
Dow Jones Energy Service
(Copyright (c) 2000, Dow Jones&Company, Inc.)
OF DOW JONES NEWSWIRES
LOS ANGELES -(Dow Jones)- Electricity customers in several Western states
are getting cold feet about their upcoming deregulation deadlines after
watching San Diegans' bills more than double under deregulation this summer.
The New Mexico Public Regulation Commission held a public meeting Tuesday to
discuss consumers' requests for a delay in that state's scheduled Jan. 1,
2002, deregulation start date.
"Everyone is worried about the fly-up in wholesale and retail prices in San
Diego as the result of a tight market, so they're asking for a delay until
more supply can be secured," said John Curl, director of the PRC's utility
division.
In Nevada, Governor Kenny Guinn has postponed signing that state's
deregulation schedule several times amid pressure from legislators concerned
about higher rates for constitutents. Guinn is expected to make a decision by
early next week, which means deregulation could get underway as soon as Nov.
1, 2000.
Oregon has also taken California's troubles seriously. Under electricity
restructuring rules adopted late last month, large industrial and
nonresidential customers will deregulate starting Oct. 1, 2001, but
residential and small commercial customers will still get a regulated rate.
"This is the first big step in implementing electric restructuring in Oregon
in a unique way that is very different from what California and other states
have done," said Oregon Public Utilities Commission chairman Ron Eachus.
Folder Name: Utilities, Electric: Deregulation
Relevance Score on Scale of 100: 99
______________________________________________________________________
To review or revise your folder, visit Dow Jones CustomClipsor contact Dow
Jones Customer Service by e-mail at [email protected] by phone
at 800-369-7466. (Outside the U.S. and Canada, call 609-452-1511 or contact
your local sales representative.)
______________________________________________________________________
Copyright (c) 2000 Dow Jones &Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved
=====================================
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.