dataset_id
int64 0
5.47k
| email_body
stringlengths 800
9.73k
|
|---|---|
3,200 |
Subject: FW: ACR Inviting Comment On DWR/CPUC Proposed Rate Agreement
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/12053.
=====================================
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 07/18/2001 06:42 PM -----
JBennett <[email protected]>
07/18/2001 05:31 PM
To: "Harry Kingerski (E-mail)" <[email protected]>, "Jeff Dasovich
(E-mail)" <[email protected]>, "Jim Steffes (E-mail)"
<[email protected]>, "Sue Mara (E-mail)" <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: FW: ACR Inviting Comment On DWR/CPUC Proposed Rate Agreement
Attached is an ACR issued today requesting comment on the Rate Agreement
reached by the CPUC and DWR (which I will send under separate cover). The
ACR highlights certain aspects of the Agreement and asks for parties to
evaluate the effects of the Agreement and indicate what they believe the
consequences of its adoption would be. Comments are due by August 1st.
The Agreement itself basically calls for DWR to set its revenue requirement
based on "Bond Related Costs" and "Operating Expenses" and for the
Commission to implement such revenue requirement. It is up to DWR to
determine whether the revenue requirement is just and reasonable prior to
submitting it to the Commission.
Please let me know if Enron is interested in Commenting on the Agreement.
Jeanne Bennett
-----Original Message-----
From: Wong, John S. [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2001 10:11 AM
Subject: ACR Inviting Comment On DWR/CPUC Proposed Rate Agreement
Attached is an assigned Commissioner ruling (ACR) inviting comment on the
proposed rate agreement between the California Dept. of Water Resources and
the California Public Utilities Commission. Interested parties may file
comments with the Docket Office on or before August 1, 2001.
Please note that there are three attachments to the ACR. Attachment A, the
proposed rate agreement, is being forwarded to you as a separate PDF
document. Attachment B, the relevant Water Code sections, is contained in
the body of the attached Word document. Attachment C is the two page letter
from the DWR, the Dept. of Finance, and the Treasurer's Office to President
Lynch dated July 2, 2001. Attachment C was previously distributed to the
A.00-11-038 et al service list in the Chief ALJ's ruling dated July 5, 2001.
Today's ACR and all three of the attachments can also be accessed at the
CPUC's web site.
<<A0011038 Lynch Ruling.doc>>
John S. Wong
CPUC - ALJ
(415) 703-3130
- A0011038 Lynch Ruling.doc
=====================================
|
3,201 |
Subject: Understanding Internet Protocol (IP) - June 6 & June 7 - Houston -
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/13112.
=====================================
If anyone is interested in this course, please let Carmen know. I had
registered but will not be able to attend. Thanks.
Sue Nord, Sr. Director
Government Affairs
713 345-4196
----- Forwarded by Sue Nord/NA/Enron on 05/29/2001 08:36 AM -----
Lara Leibman@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS
05/14/2001 08:42 AM
To: Sue Nord/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Understanding Internet Protocol (IP) - June 6 & June 7 - Houston -
Shepherd
Sue,
I would like to take this course. Is that ok? Also, I think this would be a
great class for everyone to take. What do you think? Thanks.
Lara
----- Forwarded by Lara Leibman/Enron Communications on 05/14/01 08:48 AM
-----
EBS Education Center
Sent by: EBS Announcements
05/11/01 05:43 PM
To: All EBS Employees Worldwide
cc:
Subject: Understanding Internet Protocol (IP) - June 6 & June 7 - Houston -
Shepherd
To: All EBS Employees
From: EBS Education Center
Subject: Understanding Internet Protocol (IP) - June 6 & June 7 - Houston -
Shepherd
Understanding the Internet Infrastructure and Internet Protocol (IP)
This one day seminar is designed to introduce the infrastructure of the
Internet and IP network technology. A detailed agenda is provided below.
Dates: June 6, 2001 - Houston - Shepherd Facility
June 7, 2001 - Houston - Shepherd Facility
Time: 8:30 am - 5:00 pm
Cost: $450 (charged to your cost center)
Cancellation Policy: Cancellations must be received 48 hours prior to class
date to avoid being charged.
1. Course Introduction
The Internet Protocol Suite in Enterprise Networks
The Internet Protocol Suite in Public Networks
The Expanding Application Suite
2. Network And Transport Protocols
IP over Local Area Networks (LANs) and Wide Area Networks (WANs)
Modern IP Addressing Methods
Using the Domain Name System
Internetworking with Routers
IP Routing Protocols
Transmission Control Protocols (TCP)
User Datagram Protocol (UDP)
Quality of Service Tools
Internet Protocol version 6 (IPv6)
3. Network Security
Problem Definition
Tools to Protect the Enterprise Network
Screening Routers
Firewalls
Encryption
Authentication
Certification
Security Systems Applied
4. Virtual Private Networks (VPNs)
Outsourcing the Enterprise Network
Solutions for Remote Access VPNs
Solutions for Site-to-Site VPNs
Solutions for Extranet VPNs
To register, click on this link ---->>
=====================================
|
3,202 |
Subject: RE: First Write-Up due for Financial Information Analysis
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/8759.
=====================================
Hi Team,
I did not get much time to work on the case today - got
pulled into a few meetings, and only just got back form
class. BUT, tomorrow looks good...
Jeff, Mark: can you send across what you have? Should
we shoot for a conf call around 12:00?
For Class 5 (i.e. second half tomorrow), didn't Sarah say
she was going to send across a pdf file on email, or put
something on Izio web site ? Did anyone receive this file?
-Anil
-----Original Message-----
From: Sama, Anil
Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2001 8:04 AM
To: '[email protected]'
Cc: '[email protected]'; '[email protected]';
'[email protected]'
Subject: RE: First Write-Up due for Financial Information Analysis
Ok, Great.
I'm in class tonight, but will be working on the case today
around lunch. Sounds like tomorrow AM may be a better
time for a conf call - after everyone sends around their
analysis to each other. I'll take a crack at putting it all
together - as I am relatively free tomorrow.
- Anil
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2001 5:56 AM
To: Sama, Anil
Cc: '[email protected]'; '[email protected]';
'[email protected]'
Subject: Re: First Write-Up due for Financial Information Analysis
Greetings:
I'm in the group (and traveling on the East Coast, returning late tonite).
I can do a conference all today if folks would like. Otherwise, I'll be
working on it on the plane back tonite and will distribute when I get home
or first thing in the AM.
Best,
Jeff
"Sama, Anil"
<anil.sama@in To:
"'[email protected]'"
tel.com> <[email protected]>,
"'[email protected]'"
01/30/2001 <[email protected]>,
11:35 PM "'[email protected]'"
<[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: First Write-Up due for
Financial
Information Analysis
Hey Guys,
Just sat down to read about the first write up that is due
this Thursday, and realized that this is supposed to be a
group assignment!! Ooops - I had no idea... Did you ;-)
Anyone read the case and/or taken a crack at it? Should
we try and co-ordinate a conference call?
Carolyn is out for the week and excused from the
assignment - just had a baby girl last Fri!!
Jeff, did you hear from teacher if OK to join ?
-Anil
=====================================
|
3,203 |
Subject: Re: SOCAL Gas Questions!
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/9869.
=====================================
Michelle: I've verified the information below. If you'd like to drill down
deeper into any particular issue listed below, just let me know.
Best,
Jeff
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 03/12/2001 06:56 PM -----
Jeff Dasovich
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
03/12/2001 04:41 PM
To: Michelle Robichaux/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Artemio Muniz/HOU/EES@EES, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@ENRON, James
Shirley/HOU/EES@EES, Jess Hewitt/HOU/EES@EES, Scott Massey/HOU/EES@EES, Scott
Stoness/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: Re: SOCAL Gas Questions!
Greetings Michelle:
As we talked about it last week---and now that I'm back in the office, I'm
having folks check to make sure that this is 100% accurate:
Rates for core subscription customers are forecasted (I believe based on
previous month's gas prices).
Bills for core subscription customers are lagged (I believe by 30 days after
consumption).
The IOUs face a PBR mechanism that incents them to buy index (though they may
have engaged in a modest amount of hedging).
The California PUC issued an order (about 2 months ago) prohibiting noncore
customers from switching to core subscription status.
I'm back in the office today, and have folks checking on this. I need to pin
down with certainty 1) the forecast period, and 2) the bill lag period. Will
get back to you as soon as we get the info. If there's anything, just let me
know.
Best,
Jeff
Michelle Robichaux@EES
03/12/2001 04:33 PM
To: Artemio Muniz/HOU/EES@EES, Scott Stoness/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Scott Massey/HOU/EES@EES, Jess Hewitt/HOU/EES@EES, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, James
Shirley/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: SOCAL Gas Questions!
Art/Scott
I have been trying to locate the right person in the organization to assist
with some questions about Socal Gas.
Comment/Question: Tricon, an EES gas customer behind Socal, paid
significantly more for marketer gas service (IF SOCAL BORDER) in Q4 00'
when compared to the cost of gas for Socal Gas customers. How does Socal Gas
adjust for its cost of gas? Is there a delayed true-up mechanism??? What
options are available should the customer return to utility service?
Tricon has been asking for the information for over a week. I need an update
as soon as possible.
I appreciate your help. Call me at X35976 if you have any questions,
Michelle
=====================================
|
3,204 |
Subject: RE: Water
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent_items/2270.
=====================================
thanks.
-----Original Message-----
From: Parquet, David
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 1:06 PM
To: Dasovich, Jeff; Wehn, Samuel; Brodbeck, Kelly
Subject: RE: Water
I like it for 2 reasons:
1. The dust has not yet settled on all of our ERCs for Roseville. There are still fantasy issues that EPA and others are thinking about, which if implemented, will make some of the ERC deals we have at best uneconomical.
2. If we got this "gift", it would be nice to be able to sell the ERCs we have so that we can reduce our out of pocket exposure during these fun times. Frankly, if Leslie's idea became law, these ERCs could be sold to projects who did not have access to the waste water that we do, thus facilitating additional new power plant devleopment for the benefit of the state.
Having said all of the above, I have my doubts that something like this would have a chance of working out. The little people in the environmental community have absolutely no concept of the big picture, being instead more worried about detail process over global results. I think that this thing would get bogged down in the reality that projects would get ERCs, but the net result would be a short term decrease in air quality in the local air basin due to not applying specific, coincident ERCs to specific projects. The little people probably cannot get their head around that, even though the very clean modern plants one day would put out of business dirtier, less efficient plants, thus resulting in a net improvement in air quality in the state.
-----Original Message-----
From: Dasovich, Jeff
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 7:35 PM
To: Parquet, David; Wehn, Samuel
Subject: FW: Water
You guys interested?
-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Govenar
Sent: Fri 11/16/2001 5:43 PM
To: Jeff Dasovich; Susan J Mara
Cc:
Subject: Water
Assembly Member Tim Leslie is interested in sponsoring a bill which would
grant air credits to prospective power plant owners in exchange for using
reclaimed water. The bill is in its infancy and none of the details have
been worked out. His office would like to know if Enron would be interested
in providing technical assistance with the measure. They approached Enron
because of the Roseville plant, recognizing that Roseville already has its
air credits and is already scheduled to use reclaimed water.
Thoughts?
=====================================
|
3,205 |
Subject: Re: Utility M&A Seminar
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/5808.
=====================================
John- If this is acceptable to you,Jeff Dasovich would substitute for me-
He'll be great. He can be reached at 425-782-7822. Thanks.
---------------------- Forwarded by Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron on 01/14/2001
02:15 PM ---------------------------
From: Jeff Dasovich on 01/02/2001 10:13 AM
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
To: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Re: Utility M&A Seminar
Yep.
Richard Shapiro
01/02/2001 09:52 AM
To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Utility M&A Seminar
Can you do this?
---------------------- Forwarded by Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron on 01/02/2001
09:52 AM ---------------------------
"JOHN G KLAUBERG" <[email protected]> on 12/07/2000 01:44:52 PM
To: [email protected]
cc:
Subject: Utility M&A Seminar
Rick: it was great to catch up with you the other day in NY. It seems like
it was a very long time ago that we worked together on the PECO deal, doesn't
it?
I look forward to doing the panel with you at the Utility M&A Symposium in NY
on Monday, January 29, 2001. Our panel is set for around 4:00 that
afternoon. I'll get off a brochure to you, but the panel will discuss price
volatility and what strategies there may be for dealing with it. I thought
it would be great if you could address the California situation and your
thoughts on why it occurred and what the causes are and perhaps what remedial
measures should be undertaken. Your thoughts on price caps and the "hard"
and "soft" nature of the various approaches would also be on interest. I
think people would also have a keen interest in the differences between CA
and other markets, such as PA and perhaps the soon to open Texas market.
I'll follow up with more info as the time gets closer, but you probably may
want to think of a talk in the 25 minute range or so. I will let the EXNET
(the seminar sponsor) know of your participation.
As you may also know, LeBoeuf sponsors a dinner that evening at LeCirque for
our energy industry clients. It is usually a good time and many of your
compatriots, including Steve Kean, have attended in the past. If you can
possibly make it, that would be great. My guess is that there also may be
some people in attendance that you may wish to catch up with on various
industry things that you may be working on.
Thanks again, Rick, and I'll be in touch soon. John
=====================================
|
3,206 |
Subject: Re: FERC preparation conference call
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/886.
=====================================
Steve:
I'm not sure how far along you are with the comments, but California's
insistence on micro-managing utility purchases is really standing in the way
of developing a competitive, functional market. The prospect of having Ms.
Lynch in particular and the State of California generally as a counter party
in every transaction is a huge disincentive for the utilities to transact.
(Though the situation in California has now put the utilities into a "damn
the torpedoes" mode and persuaded them to transaction despite the regulatory
risk.)
Clearly, the first best answer is utility-out-of-the-merchant-function. But
given the political climate in California, we're likely to have the utility
in the role of buyer, at least in the near term. For the market to work in a
structure with utility as buyer, the CPUC and California need to get out of
the way. Otherwise, it's a never-ending quagmire.
A couple of PUCs ago, the CPUC set up an incentive mechanism for utility gas
procurement. Under that mechanism, a benchmark is set. If the utility beats
the benchmark, it shares the benefits with consumers. If it does worse than
the benchmark, it shares the pain with consumers. It's a model that works,
that's simple and that's compatible with competitive markets. It ain't
perfect, but it's head and shoulders above the regulator-as-counterparty that
the current PUC has put in place.
Given the brief time you'll have, there may be other more critical issues,
but this one is getting increasing attention out here in the land of lunacy.
Jeff
Steven J Kean
Sent by: Maureen McVicker
11/07/2000 02:26 PM
To: Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J
Mara/SFO/EES@EES, Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, David Parquet/SF/ECT@ECT,
Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Peggy
Mahoney/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: FERC preparation conference call
Although I realize some of you may not be able to join on such short notice,
please try to participate in a conference call in preparation for the FERC
meeting on Thursday. I'd really like to have your input.
Date: Wednesday, November 8
Time: 10 a.m. CST
Call in #: 888-422-7132
Host Code: 239900
Participant Code: 491703
=====================================
|
3,207 |
Subject: UDC Filings
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/522.
=====================================
Note item 2, per our conversation today.
---------------------- Forwarded by Mona L Petrochko/SFO/EES on 09/20/2000
03:12 PM ---------------------------
JMB <[email protected]> on 09/20/2000 02:32:17 PM
To: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: UDC Filings
FYI:
(1) SDG&E filed a petition to modify Decision 00-06-034 (Phase II PTR) with
respect to the decision's implementation schedule for hourly PX pricing for
customers with hourly interval meters. Ordering Paragraph 19 of that
decision requires that all bundled customers with hourly interval meters be
billed using hourly data once the rate freeze ends. As SDG&E's freeze had
already ended, the Commission directed SDG&E to file an advice letter to
implement the hourly pricing. It did so on July 7th, proposing to implement
hourly billing on August 1 for customers above 4500 kW and on October 1 for
customer between 500 and 4500 Kw. The advice letter has not yet been acted
on. SDG&E is now petitioning for authority to implement hourly PX pricing
for customer on a voluntary basis for customers at or above 500 kW starting
December 1, 2000. SDG&E's reasoning is that converting to hourly billing
will increase average bills by 7-8% over current bills. Something which
customers cannot handle given the current price spikes in SDG&E's service
territory. SDG&E also notes that it is now required to implement a
voluntary program that would electric rates at 6.5 cents kWh for large
commercial and industrial customers. It states that it wants to "develop an
hourly pricing program that is complimentary to and consistent with" that
requirement.
I was unsure whether the hourly PX pricing was a big issue for Enron (or
ARM). Please let me know if you want a copy of the petition or would like
to respond to it.
(2) As you know, PG&E filed a petition for writ of review of Commission
Decision 99-10-057 (Phase I PTR) with the Court of Appeals on the issue of
post rate freeze collection of non transition costs. That writ was
summarily denied on September 6, 2000 (i.e., the court declined to hear the
case). PG&E has now filed a Petition with California Supreme Court for
review of the Court of Appeals denial. Of note in the filing, is that PG&E
states that its "uncollected out of pocket purchase costs currently total
approximately $2.2 billion."
Thats all for now.
Jeanne
=====================================
|
3,208 |
Subject: NYSEG's rate freeze campaign
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/12851.
=====================================
Price freeze could well cost electricity consumers
Source: Times Union
Publication date: 2001-05-19
Arrival time: 2001-05-22
New York State Electric and Gas is working hard to convince consumers and the
Public Service Commission that its plan to lock in prices for seven years is
a good thing.
That campaign includes two recent full-page ads in the Times Union taking
issue with a story exploring the ramifications of the proposal that NYSEG
hopes the Public Service Commission will approve by June 27.
A rate freeze sounds good. Nobody wants to see their electric bill climb,
especially when stories about California's energy crisis and a potential
electricity shortage in New York City fill the paper. But as prices fall, as
they may do within the next seven years, NYSEG customers will be stuck with
higher costs.
In fact, NYSEG's freeze request would nullify an existing PSC order directing
the utility to implement a 5 percent rate decrease on March 3, 2002. An April
25 PSC paper clarifying NYSEG's price structure found that the company would,
therefore, get a 5 percent price hike as part of the rate freeze plan. Over
six years this would result in about $55 million more for the company. At the
same time, NYSEG customers would be denied the benefits of lower electric
prices that building new power plants should provide.
This same PSC study also found that NYSEG's current rates are generating
earnings of 35 percent, which according to the PSC is in "excess of returns
authorized for electric, gas or telephone corporations."
NYSEG vows that customers unhappy with its rates will be able to switch
suppliers, but that isn't easy, as Kenneth Aaron, the author of the Times
Union story in question, points out.
As power plants planned for construction come on line, prices should fall.
More plants equal more power. The more plentiful a product is, the cheaper it
becomes.
The best way for NYSEG to provide low-cost power for its customers is to let
New York's still-young competitive energy market run without allowing a major
transmission company to lock in prices for most of a decade.
Companies that take the financial risk of building New York's required power
plants need to know they'll be able to get a fair price for the electricity
they sell. A large chunk of the market must not be shut to them with very
long-term contracts.
=====================================
|
3,209 |
Subject: Re: PUC Seeks Help-Rolling Blackouts in California
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/11157.
=====================================
Blackouts at baseball games are bad- play ceases and people get angry...in
the dark.
From: Jeff Dasovich on 04/16/2001 12:42 PM PDT
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
To: Richard Shapiro, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Harry
Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Janel Guerrero/Corp/Enron@Enron, Alan
Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON,
Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Leslie Lawner/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Re: PUC Seeks Help-Rolling Blackouts in California
FYI.
"Laura Goldseth" <[email protected]>
04/16/2001 10:49 AM
To: <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: PUC Seeks Help-Rolling Blackouts in California
Energy Committee Representatives...please read the following as it may be
something we would like to influence.
-----Original Message-----
From: Elizabeth Treanor [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2001 2:52 PM
To: Elizabeth Treanor
Subject: PUC Seeks ORC Help-Rolling Blackouts in California
Importance: High
April 12, 2001
To: ORC Western Occupational Safety and Health Group
From: Elizabeth A. Treanor
Subject: Consultants on Power Outages
This is a little out of our realm, but ORC received a call from a
strategic planner with the Public Utilities Commission, who
informed us that because of the energy shortage in California,
there will be rolling blackouts this summer. The PUC is looking
for consultants who can provide information in the following
areas:
1. Impact of power outages on chemical processes
2. Impact of power outages on biomedical processes.
3. Impact of power outages at public events (and who
understands current regulations with regard to ballparks).
The PUC is seeking to bypass the state contracting procedures and
finalize contracts within the next few weeks. They asked ORC for
names of consultants with expertise in the above areas. When ORC
volunteered that power outages can have a significant impact on
manufacturing operations as well, they thanked us for sharing but
they are interested in direct impacts on health or safety.
If you have any suggestions for the PUC, please provide them to
me ASAP; the PUC requested a response by April 16, 2001.
Thank you.
--
Elizabeth A. Treanor <[email protected]>
ORC Inc. <http://www.orc-sac.com>
400 Capitol Mall, Ste. 1545
Sacramento, CA 95814
(916) 447-3102
(916) 447-3127 FAX
=====================================
|
3,210 |
Subject: RE: Top Level Energy Person
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/9203.
=====================================
Tom, Kari Dohn has agreed to speak at our March 11, 2001 dinner. Thank you
very much for your help. I look forward to seeing you in Sacramento on
March 11, 2001. Thanks, again. Patricia.
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2001 4:13 PM
To: Patricia Linn
Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: RE: Top Level Energy Person
Patricia,
Good hearing from you.
From our contact with the Governor's office, we feel Kari Dohn, formerly in
the Governor's office, and recently appointed Chair of the Electricity
Oversight Board, would be an ideal candidate.
Kari would likely be most receptive if the request came from the CSU. You
can tell her she was referred to you by Jeff Dasovich of Enron. Kari's
number is 916-324-3501.
Let me know if there is anything else we can assist you with. I look
forward to seeing you in Sacramento next month!
Regards,
Tom Riley
-----Original Message-----
From: "Patricia Linn" <[email protected]>@ENRON@EES
Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2001 2:13 PM
To: <[email protected]>
Subject: Top Level Energy Person
Importance: High
Greetings Tom, in preparation for our upcoming Board of Governors'
meeting,
I would like to ask you for your help in getting a speaker for the
evening.
The March 11 (Sunday) Board meeting in Sacramento is focused around CSU
Legislative Day scheduled for Monday, March 12. The Board meeting is
scheduled to begin at 4:00 pm followed by a dinner. We will invite the
CSU
Trustees to attend the dinner along with other key CSU leaders; we
normally
have about 30-40 individuals attend the dinner.
This year, we would like to invite someone from the Governor's office to
come and talk a little about the energy crises in California. Can you
help
us identify someone in Davis' administration that may be interested in
speaking to this distinguished group of individuals?
Again, briefly,
Meeting date/time: Sunday, March 11, 2001 at 4:00 pm; dinner is
scheduled
for 6:45pm; in Sacramento.
I look forward to hearing from you soon.
Patricia Castillo Linn, CFRE
Senior Director, Advancement Programs
and Vice President, CSU Foundation
The California State University
Office of the Chancellor
401 Golden Shore, 6th Floor
Long Beach, California 90802-4210
562/951-4821
562/951-4983 FAX
- winmail.dat << File: winmail.dat >>
=====================================
|
3,211 |
Subject: Fw: Enron's Secrets Revealed
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/11602.
=====================================
Shall we buy this?
Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854
----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 07/30/2001 09:44 AM -----
"Dan Douglass" <[email protected]>
07/30/2001 08:38 AM
To: "Sue Mara" <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: Fw: Enron's Secrets Revealed
Sue, the attached was somehow sent to me....thoiught you might enjoy it!
Dan
Law Offices of Daniel W. Douglass
5959 Topanga Canyon Blvd. Suite 244
Woodland Hills, CA 91367
Tel: (818) 596-2201
Fax: (818) 346-6502
[email protected]
----- Original Message -----
From: "Global Change Associates" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, July 27, 2001 9:13 PM
Subject: Enron's Secrets Revealed
How has Enron managed to achieve such success while other energy firms have
struggled to deal with the changing market landscape?
Global Change Associates is pleased to announce the publication of a new
corporate profile entitled, "Enron 2001: An Inside View". This objective
study takes an insider's look at Enron, specifically, how the firm operates
and the keys to its success. Much of the information provided comes from
first hand accounts and covers areas such as:
? The firm's structure and operations
? The recruitment and training of new employees
? How Enron empowers and compensates its employees
? The keys to structuring Enron type "risk free" transactions
? How to negotiate with Enron
? Why Enron occasionally forgives counterparty obligations
? Is the Enron model right for your organization?
Enron 2001: An Inside View is a unique publication. It provides valuable
insight into the firm's operations and analyzes its successes and failures.
For those firms dealing directly with Enron, or thinking about adopting some
of Enron's business practices, it is an invaluable, must have tool.
This innovative study is available for purchase at $995.00.
For a detailed Table of Contents please open the attached file,
Enron2001TOC. To order please go to www.global-change.com, click on
"Reports" or complete the attached order form and fax to 212-625-8810.
For more information on this product please contact Alan M. Herbst at
212-625-1711 or via email at [email protected].
To be removed from this distribution list, please reply with the word REMOVE
in the subject line.
- Enron 2001TOC.pdf
- Enron2001Order.pdf
=====================================
|
3,212 |
Subject: CSFB Power Gen Update: EIX Bankrptcy?--Implications for theIPPs
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/inbox/260.
=====================================
<<IPPupdate092201.pdf>>
Good Morning
Attached, please find our Power Generation Update issued this morning.
1. EIX Bankruptcy Filing?-Implications for the IPPs Recent press reports
have suggested there is a growing likelihood that an involuntary bankruptcy
petition will be filed against Southern California Edison, the utility
subsidiary of Edison International (EIX, Not Rated). We thought it would be
timely to analyze the implications of an SCE bankruptcy for the IPPs.
2. SCE Bankruptcy Would be Neutral for the IPPs Our overall conclusion is
that an SCE bankruptcy would be neutral for the sector:
A. Such an event would have no impact on the earnings estimates
or forecasted growth rates for any of the companies under our coverage.
B. In addition, none of the companies have any direct
receivables exposure to SCE.
C. Finally, we believe reserves taken against accounts
receivable balances from the CalISO and PX across the sector adequately
mitigate exposure to potential bad debt writedowns.
3. Updated Accounts Receivables Exposure Included Included in the note are
updated details on the accounts receivables exposure of all the IPPs with
California operations.
Regards,
Neil Stein 212/325-4217
This message is for the named person's use only. It may contain
confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information. No
confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission.
If you receive this message in error, please immediately delete it and all
copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies of it and notify the
sender. You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute,
print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended
recipient. CREDIT SUISSE GROUP and each of its subsidiaries each reserve
the right to monitor all e-mail communications through its networks. Any
views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except
where the message states otherwise and the sender is authorised to state
them to be the views of any such entity.
Unless otherwise stated, any pricing information given in this message is
indicative only, is subject to change and does not constitute an offer to
deal at any price quoted.
Any reference to the terms of executed transactions should be treated as
preliminary only and subject to our formal written confirmation.
=====================================
|
3,213 |
Subject: Request Confidential Information by FERC
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/342.
=====================================
We will be asking for confidential treatment unless and until the FERC
requires similar information to be released by all market participants.
---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Hain/HOU/ECT on 09/08/2000 04:28 PM
---------------------------
To: Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Request Confidential Information by FERC
---------------------- Forwarded by Chris H Foster/HOU/ECT on 09/08/2000
04:19 PM ---------------------------
Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.
From: <[email protected]> 09/08/2000
04:19 PM
To: [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected]
cc: [email protected]
Subject: Request Confidential Information by FERC
To All California Power Exchange Participants:
Notice is hereby provided pursuant to Section 19.3.4 of the California Power
Exchange Tariff that the staff of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
(FERC), as part of its investigation of California markets, has requested
information that my be confidential under Section 19.3.2 of the Tariff. Such
information consists of participant specific schedules and bids. The FERC
staff
has requested the California Power Exchange to provide such information no
later
than 24 business hours after the date of this notice. If you desire to
assert a
claim of privilege or confidentiality pursuant to FERC's regulations or other
legal authority, the California Power Exchange will include your written
assertion of that claim together with its submittal to the FERC staff,
provided
that it is timely received. Your written statement should be directed to FERC
and delivered to:
Karen Koyano
California Power Exchange
1000 S. Fremont Avenue
Building A-9 W, Fifth Floor
Alhambra, CA 91801
626.537.3173 facsimile
Information must be received no later than Tuesday, September 12, 2000, 9:00
A.M. PDT, to be included with any information delivered to the FERC staff.
You
are also free to take any other legal action you may deem appropriate in the
circumstances of this investigation.
Thank you.
=====================================
|
3,214 |
Subject: FW: Draft Application for Rehearing
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/deleted_items/1638.
=====================================
I'm taking a look at this now. Dan says we need to file this Friday to make sure we meet the 10-day requirement in the statute. Will be trying to get individual customers to sign on as well. Already have call in to UC/CSU attorney.
-----Original Message-----
From: Dan Douglass [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Sunday, September 23, 2001 12:08 AM
To: ARM; Gary Ackerman; Vicki Sandler; Anderson, Robert; Merilyn Ferrara; Max Bulk; John Yurkanin; Steve Huhman
Subject: Draft Application for Rehearing
Attached for your review and comment is a draft application for rehearing of the Commission's Thursday Decision 01-09-060 suspending the right of direct access. Although we have prevailed (at least for now) on the issue of retroactivity, the decision still violates various provisions of state and federal law. If any party wishes to preserve the right to legally challenge this decision, it must file an application for rehearing within ten days. The attached draft is tentatively dated September 28, meaning that it would be filed next Friday.
The primary reasons cited for why rehearing should be granted are as follows:
The Decision violates procedural due process guarantees.
The failure to hold hearings violates Public Utilities Code section 1708.5(f).
The Commission's reliance on material outside the record violates due process.
The Decision violates the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution.
The threatened retroactivity is contrary to law and in excess of the Commission's authority.
The Commission acted contrary to law and in excess of its authority.
The Decision's purported findings are not supported.
The Commission has impermissibly converted a ratemaking proceeding into a quasi-legislative proceeding.
Although WPTF members have not had an opportunity to consider whether they wish to support such a filing, WPTF is included as a named party in the attached because of the fact that AReM and WPTF have jointly made numerous other filings in this proceeding. WPTF members will need to determine if they wish to support this effort.
I look forward to seeing your comments. Thanks, and have a gtood weekend!
Dan
Law Offices of Daniel W. Douglass
5959 Topanga Canyon Blvd. Suite 244
Woodland Hills, CA 91367
Tel: (818) 596-2201
Fax: (818) 346-6502
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
=====================================
|
3,215 |
Subject: WineShopper.com has merged with wine.com
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/3213.
=====================================
Dear Jeffrey,
Since you asked us to keep you informed about
WineShopper.com, we have a merry announcement to make:
On the verge of the holiday season, WineShopper.com
has merged with wine.com.
Our combined site will be the ultimate online wine
destination, featuring an increased selection of
wonderful wines from around the world, professional
tips on selection and serving, and feature stories
that will expand your everyday enjoyment of wine. In
the interest of simplicity, the joint company will be
called wine.com.
Hark! 15 percent off
Excited as we are about this scenario, we think the
ultimate winner will be you. Help us celebrate with
15 percent off your next order. To take advantage of
this festive offer, visit us at the link below:
15 percent off your next order
http://p02.com/t.d?FELBuZnoY=wine/home.jsp_0link_2from=110800wsemaila
Oh, one other thing: Our newsletters are merging too.
Very shortly, you'll be receiving a free weekly e-mail
from wine.com, in which you'll find special offers, a
constantly changing selection of wine recommendations,
and entertaining articles on topics from the vast,
varied, and sometimes confounding world of wine.
If you'd prefer not to get the newsletter, you can
unsubscribe by following the instructions below. But
if you give the first one a look, we doubt you'll want
to do that.
In any case, please join us in raising a glass to the
exciting prospects around the corner. Buying wine
online has just gotten easier.
Sincerely,
WineShopper.com & wine.com
=======================================================
This e-mail was sent to:
[email protected]
We sent you this e-mail because you asked to be
notified when WineShopper.com launched in your state,
or you registered at the site. If you would prefer not
to receive any e-mail correspondence from us, you may
unsubscribe by replying to this message and typing
"unsubscribe" (no quotation marks) as the subject line
of the message. To unsubscribe prior to the next
newsletter issue, please respond by 11/15/00, when we
merge systems.
WineShopper.com respects your privacy.
View our privacy statement online.
http://p02.com/t.d?RELBuZnoY=wineshopper/help/privacy_2policy.jhtml
Send us your feedback:
[email protected]
You must be 21 years of age or older to purchase wine
from the wine.com Web site.
=======================================================
=====================================
|
3,216 |
Subject: Additional Gas Item --- RE: Western Wholesale Activities - Gas &
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/13470.
=====================================
Another gas item which I had not gotten around to adding to the table yet:
Docket No. CP01-106
Response to Kern River Petition for Declaratory Order
Due: June 11 (?)
Affects the California Emergency Project to add 135 MM/d of capacity approved
by FERC on April 6 with an expected in-service date of July 1, 2001. On
April 5 SoCal Gas notified Kern River that, pursuant to the terms of a 1989
agreement between them, SoCal Gas was entitled to first rights, and was
asserting such rights, on this or any capacity expansions into California on
Kern's system. We will support Kern River's petition.
Comments are being drafted. SoCal Gas has asked FERC not to approve the
shortened comment period of June 11; FERC has not responded yet.
From: Alan Comnes/ENRON@enronXgate on 06/07/2001 01:03 PM
To: Ray Alvarez/NA/Enron@ENRON, Steve Walton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan J
Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Leslie Lawner/NA/Enron@Enron, Rebecca W
Cantrell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Donna Fulton/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, [email protected]@SMTP@enronXgate, Phillip K
Allen/ENRON@enronXgate, Linda J Noske/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dave Perrino/SF/ECT@ECT,
Don Black/HOU/EES@EES, Robert Frank/NA/Enron@Enron, Stephanie
Miller/ENRON@enronXgate, Barry Tycholiz/ENRON@enronXgate, Steve C
Hall/ENRON@enronXgate, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: RE: Western Wholesale Activities - Gas & Power Conf. Call Privileged
& Confidential Communication Attorney-Client Communication and Attorney Work
Product Privileges Asserted
Western Wholesale Activities Conference Call - Gas & Power
Date: Today and Every Thursday
Time: 1:00 pm Pacific, 3:00 pm Central, and 4:00 pm Eastern time,
Number: 1-888-271-0949
Participant Code: 936022
In Ray's absence, I am facilitating today's call. The proposed agenda (Item
numbers refer to the proceedings document row number):
Electric
1. Responses to ISO and CA utility RTO filings due June 19 (item 9a)
2. ATC Complaint - next steps (item 20)
3. RTO Seams Conference 6/19/01 and request to speak due tomorrow 6/8/01
(item 37)
4. ISO withholding of as-bid and OOM price data
5. Generator data requests - (Hatsoe)
Gas
6. Response to FERC to Re-Impose Transportation Price Caps (item 36)
7. Quarterly reporting requirements (item 35)
8. Gas-related data requests (item 33)
=====================================
|
3,217 |
Subject: Information on ISO conference call to discuss its rate
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/3561.
=====================================
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 03/08/2001 12:12 PM -----
"Katie Kaplan" <[email protected]>
03/08/2001 12:17 PM
To: <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: RE: FW: CAISO Notice - Draft Market Stabilization Plan
ISO Market Participants:
The ISO has developed a market stabilization plan, designed
to stabilize operations and control costs in California, to be implemented
in the next two months. It would remain in place for the near term (through
Summer, 2001 and beyond) and includes changes to existing ISO practices as
well as an expansion of the ISO's responsibilities. Because of the need to
move quickly so that the plan can be implemented by this summer, we will be
unable to hold a full stakeholder review process. But, we do want to
discuss the plan with you so that you can understand the proposal and the
reasoning behind it.
The ISO will post this plan on the ISO web site at
http://www.caiso.com/stakeholders/ <http://www.caiso.com/stakeholders/> , by
COB tomorrow. In addition, we will host a conference call from 10:00 a.m.
to 2:00 p.m. PST this Friday, March 9, to discuss the plan with you and
clarify any outstanding issues. We then plan to request the Board's
approval for this plan on March 15th in order to be able to implement the
plan by summer.
The call in information is as follows:
Market Stabilization Conference Call
Friday, March 9, 10:00 a.m. - 2:00 p.m. PST
Call-In Number: 877-381-6005
Conference ID #: 760357
Leader Name: Byron Woertz
Following the call, you may submit any comments on the plan
to us by close of business on Tuesday, March 13. You may send your comments
to [email protected]. We will do our best to summarize your comments and
present them to the Board at their March 15 meeting. In addition, there will
be a public comment period on the 15th.
Please contact me if you have any further questions.
Byron B. Woertz, Jr.
Director, Client Relations
(916) 608-7066
Katie Kaplan
Manager of State Policy Affairs
Independent Energy Producers Association
(916) 448-9499
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2001 8:42 AM
To: Katie Kaplan
Subject: Re: FW: CAISO Notice - Draft Market Stabilization Plan
Katie:
Thanks so much for the info. Do you have the call-in number for the ISO
call today?
Best,
Jeff
=====================================
|
3,218 |
Subject: RE: CRA Supports PG&E ReOrg Plan
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent_items/395.
=====================================
Pure PG&E. They'll be talking to just about everyone and greasing palms to get more of the same. Can't wait to see who else jumps on the wagon.
-----Original Message-----
From: Mellencamp, Lisa
Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 4:01 PM
To: Dasovich, Jeff
Cc: Tribolet, Michael
Subject: RE: CRA Supports PG&E ReOrg Plan
don't you love it
-----Original Message-----
From: Dasovich, Jeff
Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 3:59 PM
To: Tribolet, Michael; Mellencamp, Lisa
Subject: CRA Supports PG&E ReOrg Plan
California Retailers Association Supports PG&E Reorganization Plan
SACRAMENTO, Calif., Oct. 1 /PRNewswire/ -- California Retailers Association today released the following statement on Pacific Gas and Electric Company's proposal to emerge from bankruptcy:
"The California Retailers Association supports this plan because of the many benefits it offers to California, its consumers, and its businesses."
"We are pleased that this proposal would allow PG&E to pay the tens of thousands of small businesses who are owed money -- in full, with interest. These firms, through no fault of their own, have been hurt by this energy crisis, and should be made whole -- and will be, under this proposal."
"We are particularly pleased that PG&E's plan does not include any kind of rate increase. With our economy hanging in the balance, the last thing California consumers or small businesses need is higher utility rates. The plan also will provide consumers with power pricing stability -- by locking in long-term prices for power at a relatively low price. This will benefit all customers by establishing fair prices that won't spike over time."
"Finally, it is critically important to note that the plan is designed to return PG&E to financial viability so that the State of California can get out of the power procurement business, which has been taking funds away from other economic and social programs. The plan also does not require any legislative action or any financial bailout, so the State's attention and funds may once again be focused on their appropriate objectives."
The California Retailers Association is a trade association representing major California department and specialty stores, mass merchandisers, grocery, chain drug and convenience stores. Our members have more than 9,000 stores in California and account for more than $100 billion in sales annually.
=====================================
|
3,219 |
Subject: Re: Time with Danny
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/9158.
=====================================
I'd vote for 8.
Julie Armstrong
02/15/2001 09:20 AM
To: Jeffery Fawcett/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Susan
Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Re: Time with Danny
I can schedule 8:30 or 2:00 on Danny's calendar tomorrow. Please advise
which time.
Jeffery Fawcett
02/15/2001 09:09 AM
To: Julie Armstrong/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Time with Danny
I'm OK with 8 o'clock, but the gang may have to put up with cell phone static
and the occassional peeps out of my kids in the back seat (I'm off tomorrow
and will be packing the kids up to head out about 7:45 a.m.).
From: Jeff Dasovich on 02/15/2001 09:03 AM
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
To: Julie Armstrong/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jeffery Fawcett/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Susan
Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Re: Time with Danny
Greetings folks:
I have a meeting from 9-1 tomorrow that I must attend. Any chance of doing
at 8 am. Apologies for the conflict.
Jeff
Julie Armstrong
02/15/2001 08:55 AM
To: Jeffery Fawcett/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Susan
Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Re: Time with Danny
I have scheduled 9:30 Friday for a meeting with Danny. The video conference
rooms were booked. How about having the meeting in Danny's office and we
conference in Drew? Please advise.
Jeffery Fawcett
02/14/2001 04:57 PM
To: Julie Armstrong/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Time with Danny
Julie,
We had a great idea (but poor execution) to get together with Danny this
morning. Even though I'm going to be out on Friday, if Danny is available,
could you block off about 30 minutes in the a.m. for Drew, Susan, Jeff
Dasovich and myself to run an idea past him? If Danny asks, let him know
we're trying to weigh the merits of filing to build an expansion into the
state of California. Whether we ultimately build it or not isn't the issue
as much as whether the threat of another pipeline could motivate the
utilities and the CPUC to build additonal take-away capacity for TW
shippers. I think Steve Harris is out of town for the rest of the week. If
not, we'll certainly want to plug him in also. Will you let me know in the
a.m.? Thanks.
=====================================
|
3,220 |
Subject: Trading in Asia
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/5382.
=====================================
FYI
W. Wayne Gardner
Enron Broadband Services
1400 Smith Street
Houston, TX 77002-7361
Phone: 713 853 3547
Fax: 713 646 2532
----- Forwarded by Wayne Gardner/Enron Communications on 08/02/2001 18:28
-----
Wayne Gardner
08/02/2001 09:24
To: Paul Racicot/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
cc: James Ginty/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
Subject: Trading in Asia
Paul, as we discussed this morning, Regulatory is telling us that it is
likely that we will be able to establish a regional trading desk in Singapore
that will hold all the licenses necessary to trade in all of the priority
countries in Asia. Regulatory expects to receive confirmation next week that
the 1% annual Singapore telecom license fee will apply only to Singapore
bandwidth. Given that Asia trading will be centralized in Singapore, we want
to make sure that the activities of traders outside of Singapore do not cause
the Singapore trading operations to be subject to tax outside of Singapore.
In this regard, Asia traders should keep in mind the following general rules:
Traders that regularly engage in the execution of trades outside of Singapore
will create a taxable presence outside of Singapore that will likely result
in double taxation.
Traders that regularly engage in the negotiation of trades outside of
Singapore will create a significant risk that local tax authorities will
assert that such activities created a taxable presence outside of Singapore
that would likely result in double taxation. EBS Tax would want to monitor
such a situation very closely, so please let us know immediately if these
circumstances arise.
Traders engaging only in the solicitation of business and the provision of
product information (including pricing) outside of Singapore will not create
a taxable presence outside of Singapore. In this regard, please note that
even if traders restrict themselves to business solicitation, a large scale
presence in any given country could attract the attention of the tax
authorities who may adopt aggressive positions with regard to the creation of
a taxable presence.
When in doubt as to the application of these general rules to a specific
situation, please do not hesitate to call.
Thanks.
W. Wayne Gardner
Enron Broadband Services
1400 Smith Street
Houston, TX 77002-7361
Phone: 713 853 3547
Fax: 713 646 2532
=====================================
|
3,221 |
Subject: NEWS: Windfall Profits Tax
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/12117.
=====================================
---------------------- Forwarded by Jennifer Rudolph/HOU/EES on 05/07/2001
02:18 PM ---------------------------
Susan J Mara@ENRON
05/07/2001 02:15 PM
This morning Assemblywoman Ellen Corbett held a press conference on her AB
128x. Several print journalists and 3 TV cameras were present at the
conference. Also of interest is that the Senate tax consultants and Burton's
staff were at the event. Assemblywoman Hannah-Beth Jackson showed up late
and gave a few quotes to the media present. A spokesman from Mirant also
gave a few interviews after the press conference.
According to Corbett's staff, they expect to handout the bill amendments at
the hearing.
Among Corbett's comments to the media present:
"This bill is not a negotiating tool. I'm very serious about this bill. I
want to see it through the process. The Governor will sign a bill like this."
The following amendments are to be presented at the committee hearing today
as follows:
AB 128X
1) Creates a Tax on Excess Gross Receipts from Electrical Energy
Distribution (called a "tax on excess greed")
2) Imposes a tax on the first sale of electricity by generators and
middlemen.
3) Establishes as the measure for the tax, the amount by which the
gross receipts exceed a specified price ("the base price"). The measure of
tax is called the excess gross receipts.
4) Creates a 3-tier system of rates as follows:
a) Sales price more than the base price but not more than 150%
of the base price, tax rate = 50%
b) Sales price more than 150% of the base price but not more
than 200% of the base price, tax rate = 70%
c) Sales price more than 200% of the base price, tax rate = 90%
5) Creates a rebuttable presumption that the base price represents a
fair sales price.
6) Adds a mechanism to require withholding of the tax by purchasers.
Residential consumers and small business are exempt.
7) Requires sellers to file annual tax returns to report the tax on excess
gross receipts and pay any remaining tax due.
8) The measure sunsets after five (5) years.
There will be a report after today's Assembly Rev & Tax Cmte hearing.
As opposed to SB 1x that returns the taxes raised to ratepayers, AB 128x
would "repay" the State's General Fund.
Chris Micheli, Esq.
Carpenter Snodgrass & Associates
1201 K Street, Suite 710
Sacramento, CA 95814
(916) 447-2251
FAX: (916) 445-5624
EMAIL: [email protected]
=====================================
|
3,222 |
Subject: FW: HaasWeek Survivor Contest - Vote Now!
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/2606.
=====================================
Sent to the wrong address for evening social the first time...
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Monday, October 23, 2000 12:50 PM
> To: [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]
> Subject: HaasWeek Survivor Contest - Vote Now!
>
> In case you did not read today's issue of HaasWeek yet (what's wrong with
> you?!), today is the official launch of the HaasWeek Survivor contest. I
> won't bore you with all the details here, you can get them on pages 6-7 of
> this week's issue.
>
> But what I will excite you with is the opportunity to make a real
> difference in the world! That's right - this contest is totally driven by
> the votes of the Haas Community. Each week, you, the people of Haas, will
> have the opportunity to vote off one of our contestants, and the last man
> or woman standing on the HaasWeek "island" will win a digital camera. So
> don't let that camera fall into the wrong hands! Take a look at that
> candidate photos and statements in the pages of HaasWeek, make a snap
> judgment, and go to the following link to vote someone off (you may only
> vote once): http://www.opinionpower.com/Surveys/32202046.html
>
> But you must vote between Monday, 9am and Wednesday, 5pm, when the polls
> close so we can tabulate the results!!! The polls are open now!!!
>
> Let's face it, in the national presidential election, your vote isn't
> going to make much of a difference (if you're eligible to vote in the
> first place) - Gore has California locked up. In local political
> elections, you probably don't know a thing about the candidates. But in
> the HaasWeek Survivor Contest, your vote could be critical in determining
> who gets to stay alive in the most exciting contest on the Haas campus
> since the last contest that was held on the Haas campus! (Last I checked,
> only one person had voted so far!) So get online and vote before
> Wednesday at 5:00pm!!!
>
> A link to the voting survey will also be available at www.haasweek.net
> each week. In order to avoid excessive spam abuse, I will post all future
> voting reminders and updates about exciting HaasWeek Survivor Contest
> "Immunity Challenges" to mba_social and evmba_social only. Keep an eye
> out, and remember to vote every week!
>
> Thanks,
> Joe Moss
- winmail.dat
=====================================
|
3,223 |
Subject: RE: Job candidates for Enron
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['James Bushnell', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent_items/2317.
=====================================
Thanks. If we ever get out of this mess, you can rest assured that I'll help out. Can you remind again right after the first of the year, at which time we should have a better idea of where this ship is heading? Thanks.
Best,
Jeff
-----Original Message-----
From: Severin Borenstein [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, November 23, 2001 9:02 PM
To: Dasovich, Jeff
Cc: James Bushnell
Subject: Job candidates for Enron
Hi Jeff:
I'm not sure if hiring is an issue these days for you, but I wanted to let
you know that Jim Bushnell and I will be again teaching a course at
Berkeley this spring called "Energy Market Strategies and Policies." The
course is cross-listed between the Haas School of Business and the Energy
& Resources Group (ERG) at UC Berkeley.
The course is currently limited to 42 students, but it is already
over-subscribed, so we are trying to move it to a larger classroom. We'll
have mostly MBA students from Haas, but also about a dozen masters
students from ERG. There are also usually at least a few PhD students.
The students in the class are were very smart -- many of them
already have experience in the energy industries -- and we believe the
course puts them in a position to immediately contribute to any
energy-related organization that they would join. You can see a copy of
last year's course syllabus at
http://www.haas.berkeley.edu/~borenste/EnergyMarketsSyllabus.pdf
Many of these students are interested in either summer or permanent
employment starting as early as May. If you have openings that you would
like to advertise to these students, please let me know. We will be
setting up a webpage with job announcements in energy-related
organizations. If you send me a job description (or the URL for it), I
can add it to the webpage.
Talk to you soon,
Severin
_________________________________________________________________
Severin Borenstein
E.T. Grether Professor of Business Director
Administration and Public Policy U.C. Energy Institute
Economic Analysis & Policy Group 2539 Channing Way
Haas School of Business Berkeley, CA 94720-5180
University of California (p) 510-642-5145
Berkeley, CA 94720-1900 (main line) 510-642-9588
(p) 510-642-3689 http://www.ucei.org
(f) 707-885-2508
Email: [email protected]
WWW: http://haas.berkeley.edu/~borenste
=====================================
|
3,224 |
Subject: Re: California Power 2/9
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/3168.
=====================================
Thank you. For what it's worth, this tracks well with what I'm hearing.
Best,
Jeff
James D Steffes
02/09/2001 02:19 PM
To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: California Power 2/9
FYI
----- Forwarded by James D Steffes/NA/Enron on 02/09/2001 02:23 PM -----
Robert Johnston@ECT
02/09/2001 11:12 AM
To: John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron, Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Louise
Kitchen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, John L Nowlan/HOU/ECT@ECT, /ECT, Gary
Hickerson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff Kinneman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael W
Bradley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michelle D Cisneros/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jaime
Gualy/NA/Enron@Enron, Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike Grigsby/HOU/ECT@ECT,
[email protected], Kristin Walsh/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Tholan/Corp/Enron@Enron
Subject: California Power 2/9
The following information is from sensitive sources. Please treat with
discretion.
Contact Robert Johnston (x39934) or Kristin Walsh (x39510) for questions or
additional info.
Bankruptcy
Early this week, there was a closed door meeting held by the Western Power
Trading Forum in Arizona. The meeting took place outside California to avoid
press coverage and allow IPPs to maintain a low profile. Association
representatives believe that regardless of what happens with the PUC vs.
Utilities ruling expected on Monday, some IPPs will take the utilities into
involuntary bankruptcy. Our source expects that absent a significant last
minute breakthrough, the filing will happen within the next two weeks, and
"probably" next week. As stated in yesterdays report, the IPPs are very low
on cash and are not able to cover the debts of the PG&E and Socal. Only
three creditors are needed with uncollected debts of more than $10,000 to
file involuntary bankruptcy.
Bail Out
Davis has been meeting with the chief executives of both utilities in a last
ditch effort to make a deal prior to Monday's court ruling. The most likely
scenario is for state ownership of the utilities transmissions assets.
However, coming to an agreed upon price will be very challenging. In
addition, PG&E and Edison appear to have competing agendas in pursuing a bail
out plan. Davis is expect to continue meetings through out the weekend in
hopes of reaching an agreement before Monday.
=====================================
|
3,225 |
Subject: Natural Gas Price Increase
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/420.
=====================================
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 09/28/2000 03:47 PM -----
Miyung Buster@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
09/28/2000 02:50 PM
To: Joe Hartsoe@ENRON, Sandra McCubbin@EES, Susan Mara@EES, Paul
Kaufman@ECT, Karen Denne@ENRON, Jeff Dasovich@EES, Jeannie Mandelker@ECT,
Mark Schroeder@ECT, Peter Styles@ECT, Mona L Petrochko@EES, Peggy
Mahoney@EES, Nicholas O'Day/AP/Enron@Enron, Mike
Dahlke/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Rob Bradley@ENRON, Shelley
Corman@ENRON, Jennifer Rudolph/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Natural Gas Price Increase
Robert Neustaedter@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
09/19/2000 11:44 AM
To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro@EES, James D Steffes@EES,
Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Harry Kingerski@EES
Subject: Natural Gas Price Increase
As discussed in last Friday's meeting on strategies related to higher energy
prices, Harry asked me to develop the attached projection of delivered gas
prices for this winter.
The projection is based upon EIA's monthly analysis of delivered gas prices
for residential, commercial and industrial customers for selected states
(Connecticut, Virginia, Illinois and Texas) for the 1999-2000 winter heating
season (Nov-Mar). Assuming pipeline and LDC mark-ups remain constant, the
delivered prices were adjusted for the NYMEX Henry Hub projection of wellhead
prices for the 2000-2001 winter period. A national projection is also
included.
Because the commodity portion of the gas bill for residential customers is a
smaller percent of the total bill compared to commercial and industrial
customers, the increase for residential customers will be less pronounced
than for commercial or industrial customers. In addition, LDC purchased gas
cost mechanisms will moderate the effect of the price increase to some extent
because monthly price increases are averaged out over an extended period (12
months in some cases). Furthermore, some state public utility commissions
(e.g. Connecticut) are conducting meetings with LDCs to discuss looking for
ways to lessen the impact of the projected increases. That being said, Nipsco
recently announced residential prices are expected to increase 50-60% this
winter over last winter (in line with the projection for Illinois).
If you are interested in a similar projection for other states, or have
comments with respect to the above let me know.
=====================================
|
3,226 |
Subject: RE: Negative CTC -- New West Settles -- New Energy in same position
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/inbox/1602.
=====================================
Can you gain any insight re the haircut they might have taken or how they handled the possibility of future FERC refund impact?
Thanks,
Wanda
-----Original Message-----
From: Mara, Susan
Sent: Thursday, November 8, 2001 3:56 PM
To: Dasovich, Jeff; Williams, Robert C.; Tribolet, Michael; Mellencamp, Lisa; Shapiro, Richard; Steffes, James D.; Kaufman, Paul; Curry, Wanda; Swain, Steve; Huddleson, Diann; '[email protected]'
Subject: Negative CTC -- New West Settles -- New Energy in same position as Enron
New West called to say it had settled with SCE on the PX Credit. I asked if they agreed to the reduction in the pX credit going forward. She said that they have no customers buying commodity from them, so it doesn't apply. I'm guessing this means that they agreed to Edison's proposal, but it has no affect on them. I asked if they would be supporting SCE's plan at the CPUC. She said "no". We'll see.
New Energy and Krogers met with SCE and had the same kind of meeting that we had. Krogers (grocery store chain) had a Sr management person fly out for the meeting and was incredulous with what he heard. So far, they are taking the same position we are.
I'll let you know if I hear more.
-----Original Message-----
From: Dasovich, Jeff
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 12:42 PM
To: Williams, Robert C.; Tribolet, Michael; Mellencamp, Lisa; Shapiro, Richard; Steffes, James D.; Mara, Susan; Kaufman, Paul; Curry, Wanda; Swain, Steve; Huddleson, Diann
Subject: Follow-up Meeting w/Edison re: Negative CTC
As we anticipated, today's call did not advance the ball from where we left off last week with Edison.
Edison is sticking to its guns, claiming that all customers, DA and bundled alike, should pay for Edison's undercollection, i.e., they don't owe us money, we owe them money.
The call was short and ended with an agreement that:
1) we'll both continue plodding along in the PUC process with all the other stakeholders who are arguing over these issues,
2) we'll keep lines of communication open--to the extend that anyone has any new ideas they want to share, contacts will be made, and
3) if nothing has happened at the PUC by the time Edison starts readying itself to pay people in Q1'02, then we'll get together to try to get agreement on a number as the PUC process continues to work itself out.
If anyone has any questions, just let us know.
Best,
Jeff
=====================================
|
3,227 |
Subject: Fw: Will you join Marianne Williamson in a 30 day prayer vigil for
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/inbox/207.
=====================================
30 DAY INTERNATIONAL PRAYER VIGIL
----- Original Message -----
From: Teri Sandison
To: Teresa Cahill ; Sydney Salt ; Sherman Severin ; Sheila Foraker ; [email protected] ; Raj Mohan ; Patt Scarboro ; Patricia Whitt ; Minnie Cancellaro ; Lobsang ; Liz Williams ; Jeanne Cervone ; Janet Stangvik ; Jack Isbell ; Irene Jacobs ; Dotty Hopkins ; Dorothy Lind ; David Lawrence ; Charlie Bloom ; Brother Armando ; Johanna Harding
Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 10:06 AM
Subject: Fw: Will you join Marianne Williamson in a 30 day prayer vigil for the world?
Teri Sandison
----- Original Message -----
From: Church of Today
To: Today's Inspiration from The Church of Today
Sent: Monday, September 17, 2001 3:54 PM
Subject: Will you join Marianne Williamson in a 30 day prayer vigil for the world?
30 DAY INTERNATIONAL PRAYER VIGIL
TO BEGIN TUESDAY, SEPT. 18
Please join with others of faith and spiritual intention around the world, for a thirty day prayer vigil beginning Tuesday, Sept. 18 and continuing through Oct. 18.
For five minutes each day, at noon on the East Coast of the United
States, 9am West Coast, 5pm in London, 7pm in Cairo, etc. (more time zones listed below), please pause for five minutes of sincere and silent prayer.
Let us open ourselves to the wisdom and love of God, asking that His will be done for ourselves, for each other and for future generations.
Amen.
New York City 12:00 Noon
Chicago 11:00 a.m.
Los Angeles 9:00 a.m.
London 5:00 p.m.
Paris 6:00 p.m.
Cairo/Beirut 7:00 p.m.
Johannesburg/ Istanbul 7:00 p.m.
Moscow 8:00 p.m.
New Delhi 10:30 p.m.
Beijing/Singapore 1:00 a.m.
Tokyo 2:00 a.m.
Sydney 3:00 a.m.
Auckland 4:00 a.m.
Dear God,
May love replace all fear.
May peace replace all violence.
May You replace all else.
Amen.
Love,
Marianne Williamson
www.churchoftoday.com
If you have missed any of our recent emails, visit our archival newsgroup at: news://lists.churchoftoday.com
--- You are currently subscribed to affirmation as: [email protected] To unsubscribe send a blank email to [email protected]
=====================================
|
3,228 |
Subject: HELP!! DESPERATE!! DO YOU KNOW THIS PERSON??
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/1457.
=====================================
OR ARE YOU THIS PERSON??
My name is Geri Ulukou, and I've been retained by the VC firm for Vestive
(formerly OrderCare) in Fremont, they desperately need a VP of Engineering
and was hoping you could help!! Vestive enables post-order commerce by
automating the delivery and processes around the post-order services &
flexibilities (like re-route of shipments, defer or cancel, change
quantities, etc. They also have something that other start-ups don't:
CUSTOMERS. Please review the description below and contact me if you have
an interest or an interested friend! Thanks!!
THE VP OF ENGINEERING will work closely with the marketing, business
development and professional services to establish requirements, goals,
schedules and milestones, and will lead the development and deployment of
the systems.
REQUIREMENTS:
Advanced degree in Computer Science (preferred) and 10+ years of
excellent track record.
Experience motivating, leading and managing world-class teams of 20 or
more software architects and engineers.
Experience designing and developing large, highly scalable, distributed
Internet based software systems using rapid development and object
oriented methodologies
In-depth understanding of internet and distributed software engineering
technologies and practices, i.e. ATG Dynamo, EJB, Firewalls, HTML,
Intranet, Java, Javascript, J2EE, JDBC, JSP, Servlets, Weblogic, TCP/IP,
GUI, ODBC, Client/Server, OOD/GUI, Oracle, Packaged Business Solutions,
etc.
Exposure to rule-based systems like iLog and Versata, and adaptive
learning technologies is a big plus
Geri Ulukou (650) 573-6671
Executive Search Consultant
FocusTeam.com
4159 Interdale Way
Palo Alto, CA 94306
To see other job descriptions please click on the following link (contract
positions available also) or feel free to call or email me thanks again and
I hope to hear from you soon:
http://64.60.124.8/FTwcc.nsf
We respect your Online Privacy. This is not an unsolicited mail. Under Bill
s.1618 Title III passed by the 105th U.S. Congress this mail cannot be
considered Spam as long as we include contact information and a method to
be removed from our mailing list. If you are not interested in receiving
our e-mails then please reply to [email protected] with the word remove to
be removed with any e-mail addresses which might be diverting the e-mails
to you. I am sorry for the inconvenience caused to you.
=====================================
|
3,229 |
Subject: Re: IMPORTANT THINGS
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/7934.
=====================================
Looks like scott and cameron are indeed game. sounds like we should rent a
big car--lincoln town or something.
"Scott Laughlin" <[email protected]>
12/22/2000 11:08 AM
To: [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
cc:
Subject: Re: IMPORTANT THINGS
First, Eldon, I just want to tell you how psyched I am for New Year's.
Thanks so much for arranging it. We'll have a great time--and Cameron and I
have already ironed out a nice deal concerning eyeing the Playmates. (I
suggest you do the same, Jeff, or are you above gawking at plastic tits?)
Cameron says: I can stare at whoever I want! Not bad, eh?
Jeff and I have our fig leaves all picked out...
As far as fetching you at LAX... Because Cameron and I (and PP and Jeff?)
are going down on the 30th, we should rent a car then. When Eldon and Nancy
come in, we'll already have a car, and so we can just collect you and go
right to the hotel. Does that sound okay? That way, you guys won't have to
rent a car when you get in. (I'll put Eldon on as a driver so that he can
take over behind the wheel, if he wants to do that.) What kind of car should
I get? Do we drive to the mansion? Now that I think about it, that would
mean we need to squeeze 6 in one car. Anyway, let me know what your thought
are on this.
Have a great time with the Hopkins. Merry Christmas to PP and Jeff. I'll see
the rest of you on the beach!
>From: Nancy Sellers <[email protected]>
>To: Cameron <[email protected]>, Jeff Dasovich <[email protected]>,
>"Prentice @ Berkeley" <[email protected]>, Prentice Sellers
><[email protected]>, Scott Laughlin <[email protected]>
>Subject: IMPORTANT THINGS
>Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2000 08:09:58 -0800
>
>Dad forgot to mention:
>
>* DRESS CODE (strictly enforced): Black tie or lingerie - so Jeff and
>Scott if you do not own a tux you will need to rent one or a peignoir!
>
>* I think we should all try to depart at about the same time so we can go
>to the airport together.
>
>* Can anyone pick us up at the airport when we arrive on Sunday?
>
>
>Nancy
>(707) 251-4870 (phone)
>(707) 265-5446 (fax)
>"Plus je bois, mieux je chante"
>
>
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
=====================================
|
3,230 |
Subject: Anaheim
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent_items/2315.
=====================================
Janelle:
Here's an email and slightly modified PP presentation that I'd like to send to Marcie. Let me know what you think.
Best,
Jeff
*********************************************************************************************************************************
Hi Marcie:
Congratulations again on your new role at Anaheim. Elena tells me that you're having a great time.
Thanks for taking the time to talk a little bit about the strategic alliances Enron is forming with public power. We're excited about our alliance model because it offers a true win-win for municipal power companies and their customers. I've attached a power point presentation that provides an overview of the program.
In sum, the initiative offers public power systems leading edge competitive retail energy and risk management products and services for their commercial and industrial electric customers, using their own brand name. Since EES retains and manages all price and product related risks, our alliance partners are freed up to offer their customers valuable and sought after products and services with no additional risk.
Here are some of the program's highlights:
Enabling our alliance partners to provide their customers with products and services that are superior to what competitive suppliers are offering, reaffirming the value of public power and a strong customer focus.
Our alliance partners maintain exclusive control over customer relationships and continue to market power under their own name.
Our market-tested and accepted products and services allow your customers to better manage costs, reduce operational and financial risks and focus on their core business activities
Our alliance partners do not take on any price risk related to these products.
Products and services customization further enable our alliance partners to spur economic development and maintain customer retention.
Innovative financial solutions that allow companies to upgrade industrial facilities and energy infrastructure, including energy consuming equipment and demand-side management programs, without diverting capital from their core businesses.
Thanks again for taking the time to talk yesterday. If you have any questions, give me a call at 415.782.7822, and I'll call you in the next few days about arranging a time that we can meet with you in beautiful Southern California.
All the best,
Jeff
=====================================
|
3,231 |
Subject: RE:
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/4758.
=====================================
You need to worry less about Cameron, because I think that it's one of those
very deeply rooted Mom/daughter things, and will take time to work out.
And I sense a phase that she's going through that is just like the one that
my older sister went through with my Mom around the same age (which I wasn't
particularly happy about, but I think it's normal, sort of). I'd be happy to
talk about it if you want some time.
I think part of it is going to be that primordial thing where she's starting
her own gig with Scott and it's going to be like a second "breaking away"
(the one that comes after teen-age-dom). So it's less about you and much
more about her (and Scott, to some degree, too).
I hope I'm not confusing matters more.
Hugs,
Jeff
Nancy Sellers <[email protected]>
05/29/2001 04:00 PM
To: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: RE:
Payback is hell for loving ribbing. Of course I love it - I just wish
someone could tell me how to stop making Cameron so angry! My face is fine
thank you.
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2001 1:46 PM
To: Nancy Sellers
Subject: RE:
Yeah, tell me about it. (Payback for what!?!?)
So that means you DON'T enjoy my loving ribbing?
P.S. My butt still feels like there's all these rubberbands wrapped around
it......(:
Nancy Sellers
<Nancy.Sellers@RobertMo To:
"'[email protected]'"
ndavi.com> <[email protected]>
cc:
05/29/2001 03:25 PM Subject: RE:
So you packed up our entire car and left all your stuff - what a concept.
Payback is hell.
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2001 1:24 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject:
The bad news is I left my bag with clothes and toiletries at the Dome. The
good news is it's a great excuse to have to go up again this weekend!
Thanks again for everything. Really nice with only the
principals---smaller, more intimate, less mess---and the ping pong table is
a HUGE hit.
I hope you enjoy my loving ribbing as much as I enjoy yours.
Best,
Jeff
=====================================
|
3,232 |
Subject: EBS - Upcoming Broadband Risk Management Classes
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/5668.
=====================================
----- Forwarded by Sue Nord/NA/Enron on 01/24/2001 03:20 PM -----
Lara Leibman@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS
01/24/2001 01:55 PM
To: Sue Nord/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: [email protected]
Subject: EBS - Upcoming Broadband Risk Management Classes
Sue,
It looks like the bandwidth risk management course will be offered in Houston
on Feb. 16th at the Shepherd location. Please see below. Thanks.
Lara
----- Forwarded by Lara Leibman/Enron Communications on 01/24/01 02:01 PM
-----
EBS Education Center
Sent by: EBS Announcements
01/22/01 03:59 PM
To: All EBS Employees Worldwide
cc:
Subject: EBS - Upcoming Broadband Risk Management Classes
To: All EBS Employees
From: EBS Education Center
Subject: EBS - Upcoming Broadband Risk Management Classes
Below is a schedule of the upcoming Broadband Risk Management Classes.
To register, click on the registration link below.
Introduction To Bandwidth Risk Management Fundamentals
This one day course covers the basic risk management fundamentals in EBS
bandwidth, commercial origination and deal structuring. It is designed as
an introduction to risk management fundamentals, and would be appropriate for
individuals who do not have a comprehensive understanding of these principles.
Dates: February 6, 2001 - Portland (Riverplace Hotel)
February 16, 2001 - Houston - Shepherd
Time: 8:00 am - 5:00 pm
Cost: $350 (charged to your cost center)
Cancellation Policy: Cancellations must be received 48 hours prior to class
date to avoid being charged.
Advanced Broadband Risk Management
This advanced two day Broadband Risk Management course is the companion class
to the Introduction to Bandwidth Risk Management. It covers trading
bandwidth, using options to manage bandwidth risk, and strategic issues in
bandwidth risk management. This class uses case studies for practical
application of bandwidth risk management concepts.
Dates: February 22/23, 2001 - Houston - Shepherd
March 13/14, 2001 - Pleasanton - PG&E Learning Center
April 3/4, 2001 - Houston - Shepherd
Time: 8:00 am - 5:00 pm
Cost: $700 (charged to your cost center)
Prerequisite: Introduction to Bandwidth Risk Management
Cancellation Policy: Cancellations must be received 48 hours prior to class
date to avoid being charged.
REGISTRATION LINK >> -->>
For questions, please call:
John Hay 713-853-1417
Rita Ramirez 713-853-4711
=====================================
|
3,233 |
Subject: CA supply offers
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/4682.
=====================================
Jeff,
I work with Tom Briggs here in Washington, DC. He forwarded your email
regarding the Enron's offers to CA utilities (bottom email). I was hoping
you could write me a quick explaination of what that chart is talking about.
Both Tom and I were a bit confused about what was trying to be relayed.
Thanks!
Carin Nersesian
Legislative Coordinator
Enron Corp.
1775 Eye St. NW, Suite 800
Washington, DC 20006
202-466-9144 (ph.)
202-828-3372 (fax)
----- Forwarded by Tom Briggs/NA/Enron on 03/21/2001 03:53 PM -----
Miyung Buster@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
03/21/2001 03:51 PM
To: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Linda Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Janel
Guerrero/Corp/Enron@Enron, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Tom
Briggs/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Re: Summary of Supply Offers in California
Jim,
here are the articles I found regarding offers made from Enron. Sorry, I
placed these in your chair on Friday, and I didn't realize that you were not
in the office.
James D Steffes@ENRON
03/20/2001 12:02 PM
To: Miyung Buster/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:
Subject: Summary of Supply Offers in California
Any luck on public information about offers last year?
Jim
----- Forwarded by James D Steffes/NA/Enron on 03/20/2001 12:02 PM -----
Jeff Dasovich
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
03/19/2001 08:24 PM
To: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron,
[email protected], Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron,
Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul
Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Janel Guerrero/Corp/Enron@Enron, Karen
Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, [email protected], Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Summary of Supply Offers in California
Jim:
Attached is a fairly distilled summary of the projects Enron's offered to the
utilities, DWR and the ISO over the past 9-12 months, or so. With respect to
the power contracts offered to the IOUs, only the offers accepted by PG&E and
Edison are included---the desk doesn't keep records of offers rejected, only
offers accepted. However, I'm fairly confident that I can dig deeper and get
more info on the other power deals offered to Edison, PG&E and SDG&E if folks
would like that information. Just let me know. Prices are included for the
offers that had prices attached when submitted.
Best,
Jeff
=====================================
|
3,234 |
Subject: REMINDER: Come Meet the Recruitment Center Account Managers on
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/inbox/973.
=====================================
This is just a friendly reminder for the following event (and if you plan to attend, please respond to me directly):
Who are these so called account managers, Rich, Jenny and Mark? What do they do? How can we leverage off their expertise and they, ours? Do they have specific company contacts? Where can they be found? Will the ubiquitous pizza be served to entice you to attend? Strong possibility. Will I have to sign up on Bear Tracks? No. How can attending benefit me? It's up to you.
To answer these questions and many more, we will be scheduling during -
Thu, Dec. 6 during the break as well in the Career Center Conference Room (S420)
an informational session with the account managers.
Here's a description that Rich Wong, the financial services account manager prepared:
"The Haas Career Center staff includes 3 account managers that
can be a valuable resource to those that are exploring job or career
direction changes. Their role is to be the primary liaison for recruiters
in their specific industry sectors, being the one-stop shop point person
for companies interested in connecting with Haas MBA students. They
cover a full spectrum of responsibilities from the logistics of setting up
presentations and interviews to establishing contacts and providing
strategic guidance to recruiters (including both hiring managers as well
as University Recruiting reps within human resource departments).
Through this activity, they gain insights into their company/industry
focus that they are happy to share with Haas students, John Morel,
and the other career advisors in the Haas Career Center."
Feel free to contact them regarding questions on companies and industries
that they represent. Conversely, please provide them with any valuable
contacts that you have in current/former employers that might help them aid your
schoolmates to find employment opportunities. They are located in the Recruitment Center
(S330 by the ATM machine) and their contact information is as follows:
Mark Friedfeld - Financial Services (Investment and Commercial Banking, Real
Estate, Venture Capital)
[email protected]/510-642-6588
Jenny Rowe - Consulting, Consumer Products, Healthcare/Biotech/Medical
Devices, Educations, Not-for-Profit
[email protected]/510-643-4212
Rich Wong - Technology, Entertainment - [email protected]/510-643-4211
Regards, Albert Demery
[email protected]
=====================================
|
3,235 |
Subject: Re: Benefits of competition in electricity
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/8189.
=====================================
thanks mcs
From: James D Steffes@ENRON on 05/01/2001 09:07 CST
To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Mark Schroeder/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Benefits of competition in electricity
Jeff -
Can you please keep Schroeder in the loop on all final documents that we
would use? Europe is talking about how crazy Calif is and we need to make
sure that they are in the loop.
Jim
----- Forwarded by James D Steffes/NA/Enron on 01/05/2001 09:06 AM -----
Mark Schroeder@ECT
01/05/2001 08:44 AM
To: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Re: Benefits of competition in electricity
yes, send me copies of everything, I can sort out what we can use or should
pass on. thanks mcs
From: James D Steffes@ENRON on 05/01/2001 08:34 CST
To: Mark Schroeder/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Benefits of competition in electricity
Mark --
FYI, we gave the following to the Bush Transition team about what is really
happening in California. If there is anyone on your team (you?) who should
be getting copies of the material we generate, let me know so that we can
copy.
Jim
Mark Schroeder@ECT
01/05/2001 07:56 AM
To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Margaret
Carson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Rob Bradley/Corp/Enron@ENRON, govt affairs, Nicholas
O'Day/AP/Enron@Enron
cc: John Sherriff/LON/ECT@ECT, Joseph P Hirl/AP/ENRON@ENRON, Paul
Mead/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: Benefits of competition in electricity
As we all deal with the fallout from the California scene, I wanted to make
sure everyone was aware of the recent report of the UK's National Audit
Office (a highly creible organisation, along the lines of the US's General
Accounting Office, even similar function; independent, too), saying that
household electricity bills had been cut by 750 million pounds (if you are a
Yank, multiply by 1.5 for dollars saved), since the industry was opened to
competition two years ago. Of course, much of this may be attributable to
the divestment of assets in the oligopolistic generation sector, now
competitive, but it is a very fari example of the benefits of competition and
should be cited as a counterweight to those arguing that competition is a
"failed experiment". Paul Dawson, head of our UK regulatory team, can
provide any necessary further insights./details. mcs
=====================================
|
3,236 |
Subject: FW: Energy Action Report
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/28639.
=====================================
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 07/11/2001 06:33 PM -----
=09"Bev Hansen" <[email protected]>
=0907/11/2001 06:21 PM
=09=09=20
=09=09 To: "Jeff Dasovich" <[email protected]>
=09=09 cc:=20
=09=09 Subject: FW: Energy Action Report
=20
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2001 9:18 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Energy Action Report
CEA Campaign Headquarters
RELEASE DATE: July 11, 2001, 16:15:28 PST=20
Energy Action Report=20
MEMORANDUM
<?xml:namespace prefix =3D o ns =3D "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:offi=
ce" />
TO: Californians for Energy Action
FROM: KPC Communications & Woodward & McDowell
RE: First Newspaper Ad, Media Briefing
Californians for Energy Action=0F2s first newspaper ad appeared this mornin=
g in=20
the Sacramento Bee. Jack Stewart, president of the California Manufacturer=
s=20
and Technology Association, and Allan Zaremberg, president of the Californi=
a=20
Chamber of Commerce, conducted a successful briefing for Sacramento-based=
=20
news media this morning as well to introduce the coalition and the business=
=20
community=0F2s perspective on energy issues.
Media that attended the briefing included KCRA TV, California Public Radio,=
=20
KFBK News Radio, the Wall Street Journal, the San Jose Mercury News, the Do=
w=20
Jones News Service (via telephone), and the San Diego Union Tribune. In=20
addition to the briefing, we distributed a news release on the coalition an=
d=20
the ad to the Capitol Press Corps, which includes all of the major newspape=
rs=20
in the state. Additionally, the California Channel taped the entire briefi=
ng=20
and is broadcasting it in its entirety today.
Allan and Jack did a great job focusing the discussion on the issue of dire=
ct=20
access and concerns about maintaining a competitive and healthy business=20
climate in California. The questions were generally informed and seemed=20
accepting of the fact that there are legitimate and serious concerns over t=
he=20
direction some of the energy debate is taking in Sacramento.
The news release, ad copy, and other coalition material is posted on=20
Californians for Energy Action web site soon. The address is=20
www.energyaction.org.
Jason Barnett
[email protected]=20
CEA Campaign Headquarters
Californians for Energy Action=20
=====================================
|
3,237 |
Subject: Re: Enron's Amendments to the Alpert Bill
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/669.
=====================================
I have been told by the author's office that the Assembly is not going to
bring
up the bill today. Governor Davis is having a signing ceremony in Los Angeles
today for the new Caesar Chavez holiday so many of the latino members are out.
They need these members, baring a sudden change of heart by the Republican's,
in order to achieve a 2/3 vote. However, the bill is still on file for
concurrence so we will monitor. I'll let Sandi know.
Scott
[email protected] wrote:
> Thanks a million. That's not good that they don't intend to take a
> position on the bill, since what happens in S.D. could end up happening
> later behind PG&E and Edison, which could affect them significantly and
> negatively. You may want to mention this to Sandi, who may want to follow
> up with Babs. Thanks again for your help. Any word on whether the
> Assembly is going to act today, and what they might act upon?
>
> Best,
> Jeff
>
> Scott Govenar <[email protected]> on 08/18/2000 09:21:58 AM
>
> To: [email protected], Mike Day <[email protected]>
> cc:
> Subject: Re: Enron's Amendments to the Alpert Bill
>
> Done. Per Barbara Barkovich, she believes that the 20kw dividing line is
> too
> low, that in fact many of the businesses the legislators say are going
> broke
> are over 20kw. This doesn't matter to them, but it was just an
> observation.
> More importantly, they don't have any members in San Diego and are
> therefore
> not taking any positions on San Diego specific bills. If it goes statewide
> she'll revisit it. No word from Dorothy yet.
>
> Scott
>
> [email protected] wrote:
>
> > Hi Scott:
> > Sandi, Paul, Jim and I spoke yesterday and thought it would be a good
> idea
> > to contact customer groups about our proposed amendments to the Alpert
> bill
> > to see if we can get some other folks to support them (which we think we
> > can). My plan was to call them, explain what our amendments are
> attempting
> > to do and ask them to sit tight until you and Sandi contacted them. I
> have
> > tried to get phone numbers from here in Houston but have struck out.
> Could
> > you call Bill Booth and Dorothy Rothrock and share the amendments with
> them
> > that Mike Day drafted (and ask them to sit tight until you and Sandi get
> a
> > chance to confer)? Greatly appreciated. If you have any questions you
> can
> > page me at 888.916.7184. Thanks very much.
> >
> > Best,
> > Jeff
=====================================
|
3,238 |
Subject: Re: Comments on ACR re SCE's MOU
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/12105.
=====================================
Team --
My initial response is that this is not a key issue for Enron (given
everything else). I'd rather simply know how the process is to work going
forward, than make a big case either way.
Jim
JBennett <[email protected]> on 05/07/2001 11:15:58 AM
To: "Harry Kingerski (E-mail)" <[email protected]>, "Jeff Dasovich
(E-mail)" <[email protected]>, "Jim Steffes (E-mail)"
<[email protected]>, "Lelie Lawner (E-mail)"
<[email protected]>, "Lelie Lawner (E-mail)" <[email protected]>,
"Robert Neustaedter (E-mail)" <[email protected]>, "Scott Stoness
(E-mail)" <[email protected]>, "Tamara Johnson (E-mail)" <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: Comments on ACR re SCE's MOU
About ten days ago, I sent the attached E-mail containing an Assigned
Cmmr.'s Ruling pertaining to the SCE MOU. The ACR set forth a "model" for
determining revenue requirements for SCE's retained generation. On Friday,
SCE, as directed, filed comments on the Ruling. Comments from other parties
are due this Friday, the 11th.
Of primary importance is that SCE used its comments to promote the
methodology for recovery of retained generation costs it had set forth in
Advice 1534-E-A (forwarded to you last week). This method provides for an
annual rate true-up mechanism and trigger mechanism. Such mechanisms allow
for rate increases (or decreases) with the filing of an advice letter.
If we are opposed to such trigger / true-up mechanisms we need to submit
comments on Friday and/or a protest of the Advice Filing (also due on the
11th).
Jeanne Bennett
> -----Original Message-----
> From: JBennett
> Sent: Friday, April 27, 2001 4:25 PM
> To: Harry Kingerski (E-mail); Jeff Dasovich (E-mail); Robert Neustaedter
> (E-mail); Scott Stoness (E-mail); Sue Mara (E-mail); Tamara Johnson
> (E-mail)
> Cc: MDay
> Subject: FW: Com Lynch & ALJ DeUlloa's Ruling mailed 4/27/01
> (A.00-11-038 et a l.)
>
> Attached is an Assigned Cmmr.' ruling issued this afternoon pertaining to
> SCE's Memorandum of Understanding with the Governor.
> The ruling is soliciting comments on the appropriate manner of regulating
> utility retained generation. The Ruling sets forth a specific model and
> asks parties to comment thereon. Comments are due May 11, 2001.
>
>
>
>
> <<CPUC01-#96386-v1-A0011038_ET_AL_LYN_JRD_RULING_.doc>>
- CPUC01-#96386-v1-A0011038_ET_AL_LYN_JRD_RULING_.doc
=====================================
|
3,239 |
Subject: FW: Regulatory Risks Tied to DA in California
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent_items/400.
=====================================
FYI. May be useful for Thursday's meeting.
Best,
Jeff
-----Original Message-----
From: Dasovich, Jeff
Sent: Friday, September 28, 2001 5:27 PM
To: Shapiro, Richard; Mara, Susan; Higgason, Kelly; Wu, Andrew; Smith, Mike; '[email protected]'
Subject: Regulatory Risks Tied to DA in California
Here's a cut at the taxonomy of regulatory risks associated with Direct Access. Please let us know if the list looks about right.
FYI: Sue and I are scheduled to travel to Portland to sit down with Steve Swain & Co. in the attempt to ensure that the folks managing the book are well briefed on the regulatory risks.
Finally, note that though the risks listed below are linked to PUC actions, the California Legislature could take actions that could trigger the same risks. For example, the Legislature could pass a bill directing the PUC how to allocate costs associated with the utilties' undercollection, the bonds issued to recover general fund money used to purchase power, DWR's long term contracts, etc.
Best,
Jeff
1. Retroactive Suspension of DA Contracts: The PUC rules in a subsequent decision that DA is suspended on some date between July 1 and September 20th.
2. Contract renewal forbidden: The PUC includes contract renewal under the suspension of DA.
3. No incremental "DASR'ing": The PUC includes incremental additions and subtractions of DA customer's load under the suspension of DA (e.g., fast food chains, University campus)
4. Cost allocation: The PUC adds new costs to DA accounts and/or disproportionately shifts existing costs to DA accounts. Costs with the greatest risk of being shifted to DA customers include: IOU undercollection, bonds to repay the state general fund, and DWR contracts. The costs associated with these categories are substantial.
5. [Added 10.01.01] Retroactive end to rate freeze: The utilities assert that the rate freeze ended as far back as May 2000 and have sued the PUC in court, asking the court to direct the PUC to end it.
Additional suggestions from Mike Day:
5. DASR processing : If the utilities attempt to implement the Commission-ordered suspension in an onerous way, it may put at risk [Dasovich, Jeff] ontracts executed prior to 09.20.01 but not yet DASR'd.
6. Confidentiality of contract information: The utilities and/or the PUC may require ESPs to show contracts as proof that contracts were executed prior to 09.20.01.
=====================================
|
3,240 |
Subject: FW: Calif Gov To Make 'Important' Energy Announcement Thurs
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/10629.
=====================================
---------------------- Forwarded by Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron on 04/04/2001
11:28 AM ---------------------------
"Hapner, Dede" <[email protected]> on 04/04/2001 11:16:37 AM
To: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: FW: Calif Gov To Make 'Important' Energy Announcement Thurs
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Luo, Jay
> Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2001 8:05 AM
> To: RRQ Revenue Requirements Department
> Cc: Hapner, Dede
> Subject: Calif Gov To Make 'Important' Energy Announcement Thurs
>
> Calif Gov To Make 'Important' Energy Announcement Thurs
> LOS ANGELES (Dow Jones)--In a highly unusual move, California Gov. Gray
> Davis Tuesday requested radio and television stations in the state to
> clear five minutes of time Thursday evening so he can make an important
> announcement regarding the state's energy crisis.
> Davis is expected to deliver a speech at 6:05 p.m. PST and will likely
> talk about the state's conservation efforts, a 4,000 megawatt shortfall
> expected next month, the need to bring new generation online, recent rate
> hikes ordered by the California Public Utilities Commission, and the
> possibility for further rate increases this summer to keep the state's
> three investor-owned utilities solvent, sources close to Davis told Dow
> Jones Newswires.
> The source said Davis is not expected to discuss a final agreement to buy
> the power lines owned by PG&E Corp., unit Pacific Gas & Electric, Edison
> International's unit, Southern California Edison, and Sempra Energy's
> unit, San Diego Gas & Electric.
> Davis' press secretary, Steve Maviglio, would not comment on Davis'
> speech.
> In a memo to the media, Davis' office said the governor will "deliver an
> important live address on energy from his office in Sacramento. During
> this historic address to the people of California, the governor will speak
> in detail about California's energy emergency and make an important
> announcement."
> The last time a California governor interrupted a broadcast schedules was
> in 1992, when Republican Gov. Pete Wilson delivered a speech about the
> state's budget problems, a spokesman in Davis' office said.
> But Davis' staff said "this is the first time in recent memory that a
> Governor has asked for time statewide to deliver a live address to the
> people of California."
> -By Jason Leopold; Dow Jones Newswires; 323-658-3874;
>
=====================================
|
3,241 |
Subject: POWER conference on electricity restructuring
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/8749.
=====================================
Hi Jeff:
March seems a long ways away right now, but we are trying to put together
the program for the sixth annual POWER Conference on Electricity Industry
Restructuring, which will be March 16 in Berkeley. The conference is
divided into 4 sessions, each with two papers. We would like to invite
you to be a discussant in the fourth session (program below). It would
involve just a 10 minute discussion of one or both papers and then
participating in the Q&A. Would you be interested?
Severin
_________________________________________________________________
Severin Borenstein
E.T. Grether Professor of Business
Administration and Public Policy Director
Haas School of Business U.C. Energy Institute
University of California 2539 Channing Way
Berkeley, CA 94720-1900 Berkeley, CA 94720-5180
(p) 510-642-3689 (p) 510-642-5145
(f) 707-885-2508 http://www.ucei.org
Email: [email protected]
WWW: http://haas.berkeley.edu/~borenste
-------------------
Session #1
Greg Crawford (Duke) , Joe Crespo (UNC), and Helen Tauchen (UNC). "Bidding
Asymmetries in Multi-Unit Auctions: Implications of Bid Function Equilibria
in the British Spot Market for Electricity."
Steven Puller (UC Berkeley). "Pricing and Firm Conduct in California's
Deregulated Electricity Market."
Discussants: Peter Carmton (U of Maryland), Anjali Sheffrin (California
ISO)
-----
Session #2
Frank Wolak (Stanford). "Identification and Estimation of Cost Functions
Using Observed Bid Data: An Application to Electricity Markets."
Jeffrey Lien (Maryland). "Forward Contracts and the Curse of Market
Power."
Discussants: Richard Green (University of Hull, UK),
-----
Session #3
James Bushnell and Erin Mansur (UCEI), "The Impact of Retail Price
Deregulation on Electricity Consumption in San Diego"
Julie Berry Cullen (Michigan), Leora Friedberg (Virginia) and Catherine
Wolfram (UC Berkeley). "Consumption and Home Energy Costs: How Prevalent
is the 'Heat or Eat' Decision?"
Discussants:
------
Session #4
Paul Joskow (MIT) and Edward Kahn (Analysis Group). "A Quantitative
Analysis of Pricing Behavior in California's Wholesale Electricity Market
During Summer 2000."
Dallas Burtraw, Karen Palmer, Ranjit Bharvirkar, and Anthony Paul
(Resources for the Future). "Electricity Restructuring and the Cost of
Pollution Reduction."
Discussants:
=====================================
|
3,242 |
Subject: Re: SDG&E is using the CTC rate to pay off their Price Cap to Small
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/1207.
=====================================
Good catch. We have until November 11 to file a protest on SDG&E's ATCP
filing. We have some time to develop a position.
Roger Yang@EES
10/26/2000 08:23 PM
To: Bob Hansen/HOU/EES@EES, Dennis Benevides/HOU/EES@EES, Scott
Stoness/HOU/EES@EES, Tamara Johnson/HOU/EES@EES, Mona L
Petrochko/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J
Mara/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: SDG&E is using the CTC rate to pay off their Price Cap to Small
Customers
In its ATCP filed on October 2, 2000, SDG&E's testimony demonstrates that it
will purposefully overcollect CTCs October 1, 2000 through December 31, 2002,
in order to help subsidize the undercollections due to its Energy Rate
Ceiling. Not only is SDG&E trying to apply the stranded benefits caused by
the high market prices for energy from QFs, SONGS ICIP, and Purchased Power
Agreements with PGE and PNM, SDG&E is trying to artificially keep the CTC
rates charged to retail customers in place in order to accumulate
overcollections to apply against its undercollections due to its Energy Rate
Ceiling. This amounts to a subsidy from customers who do not benefit from
the ceiling, primarily large customers. This is evidenced by the fact that
SDG&E expects a TCBA overcollection of $229 million at the end of December
31. 2001 based on CTC rates designed to collect $115 million in 2001 from
retail customers per their Application. 99-09-011. (Their is not a decision
on this application yet, we may want to file comments if we can.) In the
current application filed on October 2, SDG&E proposed to continue with the
CTC rates designed to collect $115 million plus expects an overcollection in
stranded benefits of $37 million in stranded benefits. An overcollection of
$229 million at the end of 2001 combined with an additional overcollection of
$152 million in 2002, results in a whopping $381 million overcollection that
to apply against their estimated $528 million undercollection from the Energy
Rate Ceiling.
This has to be illegal; overcharging all customers to benefit a few.
Further, I have fundamental problems with the fact the SDG&E is not passing
on stranded benefits to all customers while prices are high, because you know
that all customers will have to pay the stranded costs when commodity prices
are low.
We need to do something about the 2001 and 2002 CTC rates that SDG&E plans to
put into effect.
Roger
=====================================
|
3,243 |
Subject: (BN ) Bush Says California Must Resolve Power Crisis, Sen.
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/8530.
=====================================
----- Forwarded by Sharonda Stephens/Corp/Enron on 01/24/2001 11:11 AM -----
"ANN SCHMIDT, ENRON CORP." <[email protected]>
01/24/2001 11:09 AM
To: [email protected]
cc:
Subject: (BN ) Bush Says California Must Resolve Power Crisis, Sen.
enron story
Bush Says California Must Resolve Power Crisis, Sen. Reid Says
1/24/1 10:51 (New York)
(For more on California's electricity crisis, see {EXTRA
<GO>.})
Washington, Jan. 24 (Bloomberg) -- President George W. Bush
said California can't look to federal help after the expiration in
two weeks of two emergency orders requiring power providers and
natural gas suppliers to sell into California, Senator Harry Reid
said.
``He indicated that the two-week extension was the last,''
Reid told reporters after he and other congressional leaders met
with Bush.
``California's problems are lapping over into other states,''
said Reid, a Democrat who represents neighboring Nevada. Bush
``indicated it was a problem that California had to solve for
itself.''
U.S. Energy Secretary Spencer Abraham said yesterday he
extended the Clinton administration's orders to give California's
lawmakers time to make policy changes needed to resolve the
state's energy supply problems. The orders were extended through
Feb. 6.
After that, California must make its own arrangements with
out-of-state energy suppliers and no extension will be granted,
Abraham said. California Governor Gray Davis, who requested the
extension, agreed with Abraham that no further extensions will be
necessary, the Energy Department said.
--Heidi Przybyla in Washington (202) 624-1884 or
[email protected]/ rdm /wfs
Story illustration: For a chart comparing the performance of
Edison and PG&E with the Dow Jones Utilities for the past year,
click on {UTIL <Index> COMP D <GO>} or enter the command. Enter
EIX US <Equity> in the second box, and PCG US <Equity> in the
third. Press <GO>.
Companies:
PCG US <Equity> CN
EIX US <Equity> CN
DUK US <Equity> CN
ENE US <Equity> CN
CPN US <Equity> CN
REI US <Equity> CN
NRG US <Equity> CN
WMB US <Equity> CN
SO US <Equity> CN
MIR US <Equity> CN
AES US <Equity> CN
DYN US <Equity> CN
13622Z <Equity> CN
SRE US <Equity> CN
NI EXE
NI COS
NI UTI
NI NRG
NI ELC
NI SUM
NI GAS
NI LAW
NI GEN
NI GOV
NI CMD
NI BON
NI WNEWS
NI US
NI CA
NI ERG
NI DC
NI OIL
-0- (BN ) Jan/24/2001 15:51 GMT
=====================================
|
3,244 |
Subject: FW: Action Needed for Veto on Workers' Comp Bill (SB 71)
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent_items/25.
=====================================
FYI.
-----Original Message-----
From: Geri L. Royer [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 5:57 PM
To: undisclosed-recipients
Subject: Action Needed for Veto on Workers' Comp Bill (SB 71)
Importance: High
To: CMTA Members
From: Jack M. Stewart
Date: September 7, 2001
Re: Action Needed for Veto on Workers' Comp Bill (SB 71)
The Senate concurred in the Assembly amendments to the workers'
compensation benefits bill on September 6 . The bill is now on
its way to the Governor. The bill, SB 71 (Burton), would cost employers
$3.6 billion over 5 years with no substantive changes to
help offset the increased cost. The quick passage of the bill by the
Senate ends any speculation that Senator Burton may be in a
negotiating mood.
There was some hope that some negotiation would ensue after the Governor
entered the fray on Thursday, August 30 by revealing a
$1.5 billion proposal that was significantly less expensive and onerous
to employers. However, the proposal caused Senator Burton
and his co-author, Assemblyman Calderon, to call a hasty press
conference where the governor's proposal was characterized as a
slap in the face to labor. Senator Burton predicted that a veto of SB
71 would spark a ballot initiative (that could double employers'
costs). He also thought the veto would be an invitation for injured
workers to vote for former Los Angeles Mayor Dick Riordan or
someone else.
Steve Smith, Director, Department of Industrial Relations and the
governor's point person on workers' compensation said, "the
governor's plan became public only after it was presented to a group of
labor leaders and it was intended to stimulate discussion
about how best to get a workers' compensation bill that the governor is
comfortable with." Smith dismissed the threat of labor
turning to someone else in the next election because the governor has
stood with working Californians on issue after issue and he
would be shocked if they were considering endorsing someone else.
Now that the bill is on the Governor's desk, it is imperative that
employers write the Governor requesting a veto. For information on
SB 71 go to the CMTA web site at http://www.cmta.net/issues/index.
The address for the Governor's Office is:
The Honorable Gray Davis
Governor of California
State Capitol
Sacramento, CA 95814
Phone: 916.445.2841
Fax: 916.445.4633
[email protected]
=====================================
|
3,245 |
Subject: Re: your famous...
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/1763.
=====================================
I will go ahead and send a couple of copies off to you -- it doesn't seem
like their website has the picture. Yes, it is funny that we are back in
Berkeley -- and so close to where we used to live. We were very hesitant
about moving back here, but I am very surprised by how much I like
it. Berkeley is a weird place and I continually see faces that I recognize
from 20 years ago. I am glad to be out of Noe Valley though -- that was a
bit over the top. At this point our house is an eyesore and a very cold
one a that. It is a great old place though -- built in 1906 and we are
only the 2nd owners -- that is amazing. I love the election! and I really
love Katherine "I am ready for my close-up" Harris. She is such a
freak. As of today it seems like Bush is going to be able to grab it. For
God's sakes where is Al Haig when you need him? He must be dead otherwise
he would be in control! OK Babe -- I am off -- I would love to see you and
your gal -- maybe over the holiday season we can arrange to bump into each
other -- a little irish coffee somewhere?
yours,
tc
At 11:45 AM 11/17/00 -0600, you wrote:
>hey darlin' (that's Texas talk). how are ya? so good to hear from you.
>hear you and JC are landed gentry over there in berkeley. next thing you
>know, you'll be complaining about homeless people and how they're bringing
>property values down. (tee hee) love to see you guys some time. what
>about this godfersaken election????
>
>if you have a copy of the Berkeleyan, I'd love to get one. My address is:
>
>Jeff
>Enron Corp
>101 California St., Suite 1950
>SF, CA 94111
>
>How's the Chancelor?
>
>Hugs and kisses,
>Jeff
>
>
>
>
> Patricia
> Cruse
> <Patricia.Cruse To: [email protected]
>
> @ucop.edu> cc:
>
> Subject: your
> famous...
> 11/17/2000
>
> 11:25
> AM
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Hey Jeff,
>What a surprise -- yesterday I was looking at the latest "Berkeleyan" and
>on page three there you were! Have you seen the picture? It is from the
>electricity summit. It is a picture of you and a guy that looks like Burl
>Ives -- It sort of looks like he is telling you an off color joke. (It
>also says that you are director of enron corp.!) Anyway, it was great
>treat to see you in the local rag. Brightened my day.
>
>tc
=====================================
|
3,246 |
Subject: homework (one more time)
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/78.
=====================================
I noticed that many of you were not signed up on this alias, so I apologize
to those of you who are receiving this twice.
-Shawn
Message below from Professor Levine regarding E201B:
Dear Macro class,
This message concerns the first macroeconomics class, which will be held next
week October 21, 22 in C210. Please read in the textbook "The Science of
Macroeconomics" and "The Data of Macroeconomics," Mankiw Chapters 1 and 2.
You should start receiving the Financial Times a few days before class begins.
If you do not receive your first copy before class begins, please contact
Shawn
Allison (allison@haas).
Homework zero. Please do before first class, but do not hand in:
1. List three ways in which GDP over- or understates a nation's typical
standard of living.
2. List 2 reasons why the CPI might over- or understate the true
inflation
rate.
3. What are 3 reasons why it matters if the CPI is accurate?
4. Please look in the Financial Times and find a story that fits your
name.
A) If your first name begins with A-D, find a story concerning why
living standards and output per capita differ so much between one or more
richer and poorer countries.
B) If your first name begins with E-K, find a story concerning
persistently high or low unemployment and inflation.
C) If your first name begins with L-O, find a story concerning
interest
rates and central bank policies.
D) If your first name begins with P-S, find a story concerning
exchange
rates and one or more of trade deficits, the current account, or capital
mobility.
E) If your first name begins with T-Z, find a story concerning
government macroeconomic policy and/or corruption.
I look forward to meeting you all in a few days. Good luck on your finals
this
week. Pleas remind classmates to sign onto the email alias e201b-1 or e201b-2
(they are identical), as only 39 people total have signed up.
Till soon,
- David
David I. Levine Associate professor
Haas School of Business ph: 510/642-1697
University of California fax: 510/643-1420
Berkeley CA 94720-1900 email:
[email protected]
http://web.haas.berkeley.edu/www/levine/
_________________________________________
Shawn Allison, Associate Director
Evening MBA Program, Haas School of Business
University of California, Berkeley
Tel (510) 643-0435 Fax (510) 643-5902
=====================================
|
3,247 |
Subject: FW: STOP THE SPIN!
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/2018.
=====================================
----- Original Message -----
From: <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, November 27, 2000 5:42 PM
Subject: STOP THE SPIN!
>
> Hello,
>
> It has been reported on CNN yesterday (Nov. 27 2000) that 60% of Americans
think Al Gore should stop his fight - now all other media outlets are
picking up this poll and running with it.
>
> WE MUST STOP THIS SPIN NOW BEFORE IT IS TOO LATE
>
> IF you are someone that believes there is a real and right fight still to
be fought by the democrats - if you feel that they should not give up now -
please add your name to this list.
>
> http://63.236.1.169/petition_112700.cfm
>
>
> Don't let the Republican spin and the news media win this battle. We need
to show our support for the democratic process which means that all votes
must be fairly and accurately counted. PLEASE FORWARD THIS TO AS MANY
SUPPORTERS AS POSSIBLE!
>
> Let us remember the basic facts: Al Gore was said to have won the state of
Florida based on exit polls on election night, Al Gore is ahead in the
popular vote by almost 300,000 votes, there are 1000s of votes that sit
still never counted in the state of Florida. Al Gore is the most likely
winner of this election if all the votes are properly counted.
>
> There has been a rush to finish this process by the Bush Campaign not
because the American people are impatient but because they do not want all
the votes to be counted. Thus they are cleverly trying to declare this
desire for a quick finality to this election as the will of the people. They
have been slowly spinning this tale since the day after the election. Don't
let this spin persist. We must stop it in its tracks by making ourselves
heard!
>
> Last night - shortly after declaring victory Bush appointed Cheney the
head of the transition team. Cheney quickly asked for funds from the General
Services Administration in order to proceed with the transition. The GSA
denied this request, saying the election is still undecided. In response to
this the Bush Camp is proceeding with private funding. If this were any
other country we might even call this a coup d'etat.
>
> Fight on!
>
> Revote00
>
> P.S.
> CALL YOUR LOCAL DEMOCRATS
> CALL YOUR CONGRESS MEN AND WOMEN
> CALL YOUR GOVERNORS AND SENATORS
> TELL THEM YOU SUPPORT GORE
> TELL THEM YOU WANT THEM OUT THERE FIGHTING FOR THE TRUTH
>
> We urgently need as many names as possible - so remember to pass this on!
>
>
>
>
=====================================
|
3,248 |
Subject: Utilities, Electric: Deregulation: USA: Calif. utilities seek ISO
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', "nicholas.o'[email protected]", '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/870.
=====================================
----- Forwarded by Miyung Buster/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 10/09/2000 09:27 AM
-----
[email protected]
10/04/2000 04:25 PM
Please respond to nobody
To: [email protected]
cc:
Subject: Utilities, Electric: Deregulation: USA: Calif. utilities seek ISO
power price cap cut to ...
Reuters
USA: Calif. utilities seek ISO power price cap cut to $100.
?
10/04/2000
Reuters English News Service
(C) Reuters Limited 2000.
SAN FRANCISCO, Oct 4 (Reuters) - Pacific Gas and Electric Co (PG&E) said
Wednesday it is joining with Southern California Edison and a California
consumer group to seek a reduction of the Independent System Operator (ISO)
price cap for electricity to $100.00 per megawatt hour (MWh) from the current
$250.00 cap.
PG&E, the utility subsidiary of San Francisco-based PGOCorp. , proposed the
lower price cap as part of a broader package of steps it is taking to "make
sure the California power market can operate more efficiently," a company
official told reporters at a briefing here.
Southern California Edison is the utility subsidiary of Edison International
, based in Rosemead, Calif.
PGOsaid the request was backed by The Utility Reform Network (TURN), a San
Francisco-based consumer group that has protested against soaring electricity
prices as a result of California's bid to deregulate its electricity industry.
The California ISO, established as part of the deregulation effort, oversees
the operation of about 75 percent of the state's power grid, serving some 27
million people.
The move by PGOand Edison follows a summer of chaos in the California power
market, where a shortage of electricity generated within the state and open
market power pricing sent the cost of wholesale power to nearly twice its
historical average, frequently trading above the proposed $100.00 cap.
Folder Name: Utilities, Electric: Deregulation
Relevance Score on Scale of 100: 97
______________________________________________________________________
To review or revise your folder, visit Dow Jones CustomClips or contact Dow
Jones Customer Service by e-mail at [email protected] or by phone
at 800-369-7466. (Outside the U.S. and Canada, call 609-452-1511 or contact
your local sales representative.)
______________________________________________________________________
Copyright (c) 2000 Dow Jones &Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved
=====================================
|
3,249 |
Subject: RE: Rate Agreement between DWR and the PUC Regarding
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/3270.
=====================================
done
-----Original Message-----
From: Dasovich, Jeff
Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2001 12:13 PM
To: Calger, Christopher F.
Subject: RE: Rate Agreement between DWR and the PUC Regarding Creditworthiness
Apologies. Can we make it 4?
Christopher F Calger/ENRON@enronXgate 05/16/2001 12:26 PM To: Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron cc: Subject: RE: Rate Agreement between DWR and
the PUC Regarding Creditworthiness
3:00 PM?
-----Original Message-----
From: Dasovich, Jeff
Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2001 10:23 AM
To: Calger, Christopher F.
Subject: RE: Rate Agreement between DWR and the PUC Regarding Creditworthiness
I'm trying to meet a deadline at the moment, but are you free this
afternoon? I have some information that can help a lot in that analysis.
Best,
Jeff
Christopher F Calger/ENRON@enronXgate 05/16/2001 12:19 PM To: Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron cc: Tracy Ngo/ENRON@enronXgate Subject: RE: Rate
Agreement between DWR and the PUC Regarding Creditworthiness
<< OLE Object: Picture (Device Independent Bitmap) >> << OLE Object:
Picture (Device Independent Bitmap) >>
Thanks Jeff. On a related note, we are trying to put together a financial
"headroom" forecast for DWR/State of California that goes out a few years and
shows:
Rate Revenues
less: Utility gen costs
QF costs
DWR PPA's
DWR spot purchases
Margin
Total Deficit
Bond Issue
Bond Principal & Interest
Would you know how to get something like that?
Regards,
Chris
-----Original Message-----
From: Dasovich, Jeff
Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2001 10:12 AM
To: Calger, Christopher F.; Comnes, Alan; Shapiro, Richard; [email protected];
Steffes, James; Yoder, Christian; Kaufman, Paul
Subject: Rate Agreement between DWR and the PUC Regarding Creditworthiness
Sensitivity: Confidential
FYI: Just got off the phone with Michael Hoffman, who's one of two key
outside financial advisors to Davis on the electricity crisis. The
administration is trying to get a legally binding agreement between the PUC
and DWR to ensure that the PUC doesn't muck around with the money (via
utility rates) DWR requires to be creditworthy. They were shooting for this
Friday to have a draft of the document read for folks to review, but it now
looks like it won't get resolved until (at the earliest) next week----seems
that the one PUC lawyer who can actually do the work is on vacation. Go
figure.
Best,
Jeff
=====================================
|
3,250 |
Subject: Real Estate Finance
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent_items/21.
=====================================
Greetings. You taking the course? It looks very good to me and I've added it. If you're taking it, could you let me know what the assignment is for Tuesday? I'm on vacation, and the course hasn't yet been added to my Izio account.
Best,
Jeff
-----Original Message-----
From: Joseph Tambornino [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 1:49 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Student Advisory Committee
Greetings, Comrades, and welcome back (for two thirds
of you, and for you first years: don't forget to
breathe).
I am compelled (Diane Dimeff stands behind me with a
Louisville Slugger slapping menacingly against one
palm) to tell you that Haas has a Complaint
Department, namely the Student Advisory Committee
(SAC).
The SAC is a formalized conduit for presenting the
School Administration with your thoughts, suggestions,
responses, recommendations, kisses and hugs of
appreciation as well as rants and rodomontades of
angry frustration on any subject with respect to your
experience at Haas. We do this by means of the
Student Survey (more on this later), our distinguished
teacher awards (more on this later, too) and by
listening to you when all others have grown weary of
your whining.
The Committee currently consists of the following
students (we are looking for a couple of
representatives from among the first years, but more
on this later, as you probably suspected):
Eric Jordan, [email protected]
Lesley Keffer, keffer@haas...
Sujan Punyamur, punyanur@haas...
Deepika Shah, dshah@haas...
Joseph Tambornino (me), Chairman, tamborni@haas...
Feel free to flag any of us down (especially Deepika
since she's the easiest to talk to) if you have a
gripe, a brainstorm, or a question about Haas that
Diane and her team have not already triaged for you.
(Be forewarned, however: we will not reveal the secret
formula to Berk's Finance case.)
Best wishes in reacclimating yourself to school. (At
least it gives you something to do if the dotcom bust
has left you "downsized," "rightsized," "laid off" or
otherwise dumped by your old employer. Heck, who
needs them anyway? Go start your own digital
revolution.)
JT
=====
Joseph Tambornino
Vice President
Hall Equities Group
(925) 933-4000
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email alerts & NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo! Messenger
http://im.yahoo.com
=====================================
|
3,251 |
Subject: Greetings: You know this fellow?
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent_items/723.
=====================================
Greetings: Hope all's going well in your new venture (or semi-new venture at this point). You finishing this semester? Anyway, I was reading this press account and was wondering if you new this fellow when you were at Lehman. If so, any insights? Sort of an interesting career path. Say hi to your better half.
Best,
Jeff
**************************************************************************************
California Power Authority Taps SFPUC's Berry as New CFO
SAN FRANCISCO -- Bill Berry will soon leave his job with San Francisco's public utility commission to head up finances for California 's newly formed power authority, which is authorized to issue $5 billion in revenue bonds.
The board of the California Consumer Power and Conservation Financing Authority on Friday selected Berry as its first chief financial officer. He will start in his new position in early November.
The authority was established earlier this year as a result of the state's energy crisis, and is charged with promoting energy conservation efforts and increasing California 's capacity to generate electricity .
Berry is currently the assistant general manager of finance and administration at the utility commission, which provides water and sewer services to the city and some neighboring counties, as well as hydroelectric power for San Francisco government operations.
Berry has been at the SFPUC since 1999, overseeing finance, personnel and training, information technology, and customer service. He also helped develop the commission's long-range strategic plan and 10-year capital improvement program, which may eventually entail requests for voters to approve more than $4 billion in bonds.
Berry worked for a start-up Internet company in Palo Alto from 1996 to 1998 before joining the commission.
From 1985 to 1996, Berry was an investment banker at Lehman Brothers in San Francisco, specializing in financing municipal and state-owned power, water, and wastewater systems, according to a release from the power authority.
He also managed debt financing, financial planning, investment portfolios, and investor relations while a vice president of corporate finance for the New York Power Authority from 1979 until 1985. He helped develop the authority's first conservation program.
In his new postion as CFO, Berry will earn $185,000 annually.
Calls to Berry and the SFPUC seeking comment were not returned by press time.
=====================================
|
3,252 |
Subject: Re: My departure from ETS
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/4283.
=====================================
I found her.
From: Jeff Dasovich on 04/13/2001 04:44 PM
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
To: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Re: My departure from ETS
Nice move. She's a good find. How much is the finder's fee?
Susan Scott/ENRON@enronXgate
04/13/2001 03:00 PM
To: David K Bargainer/ENRON@enronXgate, Staci Holtzman/ENRON@enronXgate,
Frazier King/ENRON@enronXgate, Dorothy McCoppin/ENRON@enronXgate, Janet
Cones/ENRON@enronXgate, Peggy Phillips/ENRON@enronXgate, Candace
Kyle/ENRON@enronXgate, Lee Huber/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Tony
Pryor/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Emily Sellers/ENRON@enronXgate, Jan
Cobden/ENRON@enronXgate, Denise LaGesse/ENRON@enronXgate, Philip
Crowley/ENRON@enronXgate, Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Michelle
Lokay/ENRON@enronXgate, Lorraine Lindberg/Enron@enronXgate, Jeffery
Fawcett/ENRON@enronxgate, Darrell Schoolcraft/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Shelley
Corman/ENRON@enronXgate, Elizabeth Brown/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dennis
Lee/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lindy Donoho/Enron@enronXgate, Lynn
Blair/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Sheila Nacey/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, John
Buchanan/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Ronald Matthews/ENRON@enronXgate, Bob
Burleson/Enron@enronXgate, Steve Weller/ENRON@enronxgate, Mary Kay
Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Glen Hass/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Maria
Pavlou/ENRON@enronXgate, Dari Dornan/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Martha
Benner/ENRON@enronXgate, Ann Smith/ENRON@enronXgate, Donna
Martens/ENRON@enronXgate, Mary Darveaux/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Keith
Petersen/ENRON@enronXgate, Sharon Solon/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Paul
Cherry/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Ted Chavez/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Ruth
Mann/ENRON@enronXgate, Stan Horton/Houston/Eott@Eott, Danny
McCarty/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Julie Armstrong/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Michael P
Moran/ENRON@enronXgate, Louis Soldano/ENRON@enronXgate, Colleen
Raker/ENRON@enronXgate, William E Brown/ENRON@enronXgate, TK
Lohman/ENRON@enronxgate, Don Powell/ENRON@enronxgate, Janet
Butler/ENRON@enronXgate
cc: Drew Fossum/ENRON@enronXgate, (bcc: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron)
Subject: My departure from ETS
As some of you might already have heard, I will move to Enron Corp.
Government Affairs on April 30. My primary responsibility will be to advise
the power traders on regulatory and other matters. While it will be
difficult to leave, I know this is a good opportunity for me. Thank all of
you for your encouragement, advice and support; this is a great group and I
will miss working with you.
=====================================
|
3,253 |
Subject: Re: Declarations
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/4757.
=====================================
Mike, here is the edited document. I have changed references to "Enron's"
meters to "University's" since they either own or lease them. I have also
deleted references to "billing" data, since these meters will no longer be
providing that. For example, if we proceed with installing the adapters, the
billing data will still come from the SCE meter. The data from the
University meter will be used to populate Energy Sense and for any other type
of usage report they may request.
Hope this is clear. Let me know if anyone has questions.
Enron Energy Services
From: Mike D Smith 03/21/2001 03:15 PM
To: Diann Huddleson/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Re: Declarations
Tomorrow would be great
Diann Huddleson
03/21/2001 03:11 PM
To: Mike D Smith/HOU/EES@EES
cc: [email protected], [email protected], Robert C
Williams/Enron@EnronXGate, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Dennis
Benevides/HOU/EES@EES, Tom Riley/Western Region/The Bentley Company@Exchange,
Evan Hughes/HOU/EES@EES, Peggy Mahoney/HOU/EES@EES, Dan Leff/HOU/EES@EES,
Marty Sunde/HOU/EES@EES, Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES, Jeff Messina/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: Re: Declarations
Mike, there are several comments in Natividad's Declaration that I would like
to revise. Maurice Winter is currently reviewing it for accuracy on the
meter aspects. When do you need this?
Enron Energy Services
From: Mike D Smith 03/21/2001 09:47 AM
To: [email protected], [email protected]
cc: Robert C Williams/Enron@EnronXGate, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Dennis
Benevides/HOU/EES@EES, Tom Riley/Western Region/The Bentley Company@Exchange,
Evan Hughes/HOU/EES@EES, Peggy Mahoney/HOU/EES@EES, Diann
Huddleson/HOU/EES@EES, Dan Leff/HOU/EES@EES, Marty Sunde/HOU/EES@EES, Vicki
Sharp/HOU/EES@EES, Jeff Messina/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: Declarations
Attached are my comments to all declarations. For the most part they look
great.
I have no comments on Navidad's (the metering expert)--but I ask Evan and
Diann to review for accuracy. I would also like Peggy and Jeff to review
very carefully Dennis' declaration--there are several direct statements about
our hedging strategy and our financial losses under the UCCSU K that will
become public. We either need to be comfortable with these statements or
tone them down. This is very important.
Please send me any comments. MDS
=====================================
|
3,254 |
Subject: Re: problem set mix-up and brief feedback
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/108.
=====================================
Dear Jeff:
Thank you very much for your feedback. I will try to facilitate future
discussions and keep the class on track. Some of the discussion we had
yesterday are not quite closly relate to the course material (such as
valuation of internet stocks), but I decided to spend some time talking
about that just to enhance students' understanding regarding application of
the model.
I don't think I received the e-mail from your girlfriend. Please ask her
to send it to me again today. I will pass it on to the grader.
Regards,
At 10:56 AM 10/26/99 -0500, you wrote:
>
>
>professor zhang:
>
>first, as i mentioned during the break, i apologize for having forgot to
>bring my homework to class, but my girlfriend (who coincidentally is in the
>day program) should have e-mailed it to you on my behalf during class last
>evening, which i hope meets the deadline. if not, i understand. and if,
>for some reason, you have not received it, please let me know. (in
>addition, i apologize for having mis-labeled the homework as
>"macroeconomics." i do know the difference between financial accounting
>and macro, so don't be alarmed.) i assure you that such mix-ups will not
>happen again.
>
>second, since i'm writing, i thought i would take the opportunity to offer
>a very minor piece of feedback.
>
>first, let me say i'm very much enjoying the course, and from my
>perspective, it is fine that you choose to distribute the notes for a class
>after the class has taken place. with that in mind, i think we as a class
>would benefit if you were a bit more "aggressive" in facilitating class
>discussion. it is a fascinating group of individuals with very interesting
>questions and points of view. and i have already benefited immensely from
>my association with my classmates. but you happen to be fairly interesting
>as well, and some times the discussion can wander or go on for some time,
>which takes away from your instruction. finally, some of us have many
>questions, while others have fewer. striking a balance between the two is
>clearly a challenge, but attempts to do so may have some benefits.
>
>again, i think the course is going very well and this is a minor piece of
>feedback.
>
>best,
>jeff
>
Xiao-Jun Zhang
Assistant Professor
U.C. Berkeley, Haas School of Business
545 Student Services Building, #1900
Berkeley, CA 94720-1900
Tel: (510) 642-4789, Fax: (510) 642-4700
E-Mail: [email protected]
=====================================
|
3,255 |
Subject: Path 15 - FYI
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/13188.
=====================================
SAN FRANCISCO - Pacific Gas and Electric Company released the following
statement in response to today=01,s announcement by the Department of Energ=
y,
directing the Western Area Power Authority (WAPA) to make upgrades to the
congested section of the Path 15 transmission line in Central California:
=01&As more power plants come on-line in California and the Western states =
over
the next few years, the transmission system needs to be enhanced to move th=
e
new power to where it=01,s needed. The upgrades to be pursued by the Depart=
ment
of Energy will help to eliminate the congestion that currently exists, and
provide additional room to move the output from the new power resources tha=
t
are planned and under construction in the Western United States.
=01&We applaud the DOE=01,s efforts to expand Path 15 in order to increase =
the
flow of electricity between Northern and Southern California. The
participation of the federal government in this upgrade will be of
substantial benefit not only to California, but also to the entire Western
grid, particularly in terms of significantly expediting the permitting
process, as well as reducing the overall project cost.
=01&Clearly, in addition to California=01,s retail electricity customers, t=
here
are several other groups that stand to benefit from increased Path 15
capacity - primarily municipally owned utilities, as well as federal and
state agencies like the California Department of Water Resources and the
Western Area Power Authority. Several times over the past decade, Pacific
Gas and Electric Company has attempted to work with these groups on ways to
fairly share the costs and benefits of any upgrade. However, in each case,
these interests have declined to participate in upgrading Path 15, leaving
the cost of making the upgrade to be born only by PG&E=01,s retail customer=
s.
In at least one case, the California Public Utilities Commission determined
the effort to upgrade Path 15 was uneconomic.
=01&In the meantime, the utility has made several low cost, high benefit
upgrades to Path 15, which have successfully increased its capacity.
Furthermore, earlier this year, the utility performed preliminary
environmental studies that should help expedite the development of an
upgrade of Path 15.
=01&Pacific Gas and Electric Company looks forward to working with the DOE =
and
WAPA to accelerate the development of this needed transmission upgrade.=018
=====================================
|
3,256 |
Subject: Re: Clarkson
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/8688.
=====================================
OK gang.
I made some changes to Jeff's memo. See what you think.
Basically, my belief is that Clarkson will be able to make payments, but
the loan is not enough. He will use it all up immediately and that the
cash will not be there in the near future to repay the principle. I also
feel that his real problem is in AR and inventory turnover.
Mark: Let me know if there is a problem putting it all together with the
spreadsheets. I can help out.
Dylan
At 11:26 AM 1/28/01 -0600, [email protected] wrote:
>OK. Jimmie and I duplicated effort just a bit. Attached is the memo and
>the spreadsheet. Note that in the memo, we have a dispute about whether
>$750k is adequate. Therefore, I've left questions 4 and 5 attached to the
>memo for you folks to reconcile (if they take advantage of discounts and
>get A/R and inventory rates back in line with '93 rates, is $750 enough?).
>
>Also, I've included a common-size income statement in exhibit 1, a cash
>flow statement in exhibit 2, and I, too, completed exhibit 3. We may want
>to clean up some of the calculations in the spreadsheet, given that we'll
>likely need to turn them in as attachments.
>
>Hope this helps. I'd do more, but I'm off for the airport and New
>York--won't be in class tomorrow.
>
>Best,
>Jeff
>(See attached file: Clarkson--Dasovich.xlw)(See attached file: Clarkson
>Case Memo 0127.doc)
>
>
>
>
JcjCal02@aol.
com To: [email protected],
[email protected]
01/28/2001 cc:
[email protected],
> 01:01 AM [email protected],
> [email protected],
> [email protected]
>
Subject: Re:
Clarkson
>
>
>
>
>
>To simplify the analysis, I completed Exhibit 3 for 1993, 94, 95 for
>clarkson
>in the attached spreadsheet. Whoever calculated ROA forgot to add interest
>expense and used year end assets instead of average. For ROCE again,
>average
>instead of ending should be used. The level of current liabilities jumps
>out
>when you compare it to the rest of the industry. Dylan is right the growth
>in inventory is also alarming. I will look at the data some more tomorrow.
>Jimmy
>
>(See attached file: CLARKS~1.XLS)
>
>
>
- Clarkson Case Memo 0128.doc
=====================================
|
3,257 |
Subject: PG&E Response to September 15 OFO Settlement Proposal from Partie s
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/16.
=====================================
DEAR OII AND OFO SETTLEMENT PARTIES:
Thank you to the parties who worked very hard to develop the September 15,
1999 OFO Settlement Proposal in response to PG&E's August 18 proposal. We
have carefully reviewed your settlement offer and sought clarification where
needed. As a result, PG&E is able to accept most of the changes and
provisions contained in that proposal, and is offering back a few
modifications which we think should allow us to reach closure on a
multi-party OFO Settlement Agreement. We encourage all parties to sign this
settlement.
Our September 24, 1999 response is attached in two forms. One is a summary
of the items we agree with and those where we have changes, including the
reason for our changes. The second is a revision-marking of the September
15 proposal to show all the specific changes, including some minor edits.
We have not included the tariff revisions to support this package, but will
provide them once we have a final agreement. At this point, the changes to
the prior tariff drafts are straight forward.
Also attached is a draft Joint Motion for your review and approval. Our
suggested approach is to have Settlement Parties sign the motion as the
means of signifying their approval of the Settlement and the need for
expeditious Commission action.
We have scheduled a Settlement Conference next week on Tuesday, September
28, starting at 10:00 a.m. in Room 308, 77 Beale Street, San Francisco.
HOWEVER, the attendance of a couple key parties is problematic, and we may
need to move this settlement meeting to accommodate their schedules so we
can ensure a productive day. We will advise you no later than Monday
morning of the meeting status and possible next steps.
We appreciate your continued active participation in this settlement process
and look forward to your feedback on our modifications.
Sincerely,
Dan Thomas
PG&E California Gas Transmission
Manager, Products and Sales
cc: Kirk Johnson
Ben Campbell
Patrick Golden
Randy Litteneker
Steve McCarty
Chris McManus
Roland Risser
Dave Rubin
Al Torres
Ron Stoner
Eric Eisenman
Geoffrey Bellenger
Attachments
<<Sept 24 Summary of PG&E OFO Settlement Response.doc>> <<Sept 24 PG&E OFO
Settlement Response.doc>> <<Sept 24 Draft Motion for OFO Settlement.doc>>
- Sept 24 Summary of PG&E OFO Settlement Response.doc
- Sept 24 PG&E OFO Settlement Response.doc
- Sept 24 Draft Motion for OFO Settlement.doc
=====================================
|
3,258 |
Subject: RE: Here it is...
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/4352.
=====================================
Don't have my car here. Planned on taking BART, but if possible, might be
useful to carpool--give us additional time to discuss the presentation. I'm
game.
Best,
Jeff
"Sama, Anil" <[email protected]>
04/26/2001 04:07 PM
To: "'Vavrek, Carolyn (US - San Francisco)'" <[email protected]>, "Sama,
Anil" <[email protected]>, "'Guinney, Mark'"
<[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'"
<[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: RE: Here it is...
Haven't heard from Mark yet... Am waiting to hear before
printing and emailing to Tasker...
Mark, Jeff: Are any of you driving over to campus from
the city?
-----Original Message-----
From: Vavrek, Carolyn (US - San Francisco) [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2001 12:45 PM
To: Sama, Anil; 'Guinney, Mark'; '[email protected]'
Subject: RE: Here it is...
Looks great to me (although the slide animation did not work on my machine
so I can't comment on that)!
If we are all in agreement, someone needs to e-mail Sarah a copy and print
one out for her. Can you do that Anil once you get an okay from Jeff and
Mark? Thanks for all the hard work.
See everyone around 5:30pm in Jimmy Bean's.
- cv
Carolyn M. Vavrek
Manager - Human Capital Advisory Services
Deloitte & Touche
50 Fremont Street
San Francisco, CA 94105
phone: 415-783-5137
fax: 415-783-8760
e-mail: [email protected]
-----Original Message-----
From: Sama, Anil [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2001 11:41 AM
To: 'Carolyn Vavrek'; 'Guinney, Mark'; '[email protected]'
Subject: Here it is...
Hi Team,
Here's the final cut.
I added hyperlinks to DCF sheets in backup as well as to
trading comps and deal comps in the backup. And animation
for slide turns.
Also, be sure to preview the 3-legged stool slide I added
after valuations in slide presentation mode with sound
enabled... Totally OK to remove it if any of you don't like
it...
<<E222_Mark_Quaker_presentation1.ZIP>>
Any Qs, call me on my cell: 916 600 1245.
-Anil
This message (including any attachments) contains confidential information
intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is protected by law. If
you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this message and are
hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this
message, or the taking of any action based on it, is strictly prohibited.
=====================================
|
3,259 |
Subject: Re: Urgent - Steve Kean to testify at Senate hearing, need info
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/8654.
=====================================
Dan:
How's things? Happy New Year. Hope all's well with you and yours. Could
you please copy us on the UI details? They will be very useful in what we're
up to out here in electricity Disneyland. Thanks a bunch.
Best,
Jeff
Elizabeth Linnell
01/26/2001 12:24 PM
To: Mary Schoen/NA/Enron@Enron, David Parquet/SF/ECT@ECT, Richard B
Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Neslage/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Margaret Carson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, [email protected],
Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Sandra
McCubbin/SFO/EES@EES, Steve Walton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT,
[email protected]
cc: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Urgent - Steve Kean to testify at Senate hearing, need info
Steve Kean will be testifying at the Senate Energy Committee's hearing on
Wednesday regarding California. Steve and Jim Steffes asked me to contact
you for the following information. I've listed specific requests for several
people, but am copying many more of you for your input as well. Anything you
can provide by sometime on Monday will be appreciated!
Dave Parquet - Siting of new power plants in California. Any insight you can
provide regarding the rules, the current climate, what would fix the current
situation, etc.
Richard Sanders - Steve thinks he might be asked about whether the market was
manipulated. Please provide information on whether this was the case and who
the participants likely were. What's the current climate regarding
sanctions, etc.?
Mary Schoen - Any information you can provide relating to air emission issues
in California, and specific details for our recommendations regarding air
emissions.
Steve Walton - The status on RTO West, Desert Star, Cal ISO and general
information on RO development.
Sue Mara - Specific ordering language requiring the utilities to buy only
from the PX. Was it required through legislation or the CPUC, and what
exactly does it mean. Who was involved in formulating the language?
Information on block forward markets.
Alan Comnes - A copy of the CDWR response and anything they might have
available regarding long term proposals from the government.
Dan Allegretti - We have the e-mail Jim sent regarding the UI deal. Please
provide more specifics on the deal, and information regarding portfolio
management approach.
Thanks for your help!
=====================================
|
3,260 |
Subject: Volume 1 of Final UBP Report
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/3904.
=====================================
Please see e:mail from Nancy Hetrick below.
gngr
713-853-7751
----- Forwarded by Ginger Dernehl/NA/Enron on 11/28/2000 08:53 AM -----
Nancy Hetrick
11/27/2000 08:24 PM
To: Ginger Dernehl/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Volume 1 of Final UBP Report
Ginger, would you please distribute this e-mail to everyone in Government
Affairs. Thanks.
As you all know, Enron has been actively participating in an industry-wide
collaborative effort, working to develop recommended Uniform Business
Practices (UBP) for Retail Energy Markets. This effort was in direct
response to the Coalition for Uniform Business Rules (CUBR) report, which was
published in September 1999. THE UBP released Volume 1 of a two-volume final
report on November 22, 2000. Volume 1 includes recommend business practices
for the following topics: Customer Information, Customer Enrollment &
Switching, Billing & Payment Processing, Exhibit - Billing Services
Agreement, Load Profiling, Supplier Licensing, Market Participant
Interaction( MPI): Governing Documents and Performance Standards, Exhibit -
Outline for Master Service Agreement, Disputes Between Utility and the
Supplier, Customer Inquiries, Exhibit - Customer Account Maintenance and
Glossary. Also included in the document is an Introduction and a Preface.
We would like to promote the use of this UBP report as a key item to be
included in Enron's advocacy efforts for state restructuring legislation and
commission implementation proceedings. This report can be downloaded and
printed from the following website: http://www.ubpnet.org/workshop/index.htm
. If you would prefer to receive a printed copy of this report, please
e-mail me with your request and we will make the necessary arrangments for
the report to be printed and distributed.
Volume 2 which will address unbundled electricity metering will be published
by year-end 2000. I will let you know when this portion of the report is
available.
Also, please feel free to contact me if you have any questions regarding this
report or if you would like assistance in promoting the use of the UBP report
within the various states. Vinio Floris, who has recently joined our group,
will also be working with me to promote the use of this report. Barbara
Hueter is also devoting time to this project by participating with other
Suppliers in developing and implementing a consumer outreach program.
=====================================
|
3,261 |
Subject: Announcing a Better Way to Buy a New Car
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/1855.
=====================================
[IMAGE]
Dear Amazon Customer,
As someone who has purchased from us in the past, you know about the
convenience of shopping online. With that in mind, I invite you to explore
our New Cars store. I think you'll be pleasantly surprised.
Designed to take the hassle out of the car-buying process, our New Cars
store (powered by Greenlight.com) will let you browse among hundreds of
models, compare vehicles side by side in your own personal showroom, and
receive an up-front, haggle-free price instantly.
To see how it works and explore some of our top-selling models, just click
any of the links below:
2001 Dodge Durango - Save $1000
The 2001 Dodge Durango was already a great value in its class, but now it's
outstanding. Simply take delivery by January 8, 2001, and qualified buyers
can take advantage of either a $1,000 rebate or 3.9% financing for up to 36
months.*
Check Dodge Durango prices in your area
2001 Honda Accord
How does the Honda Accord remain the benchmark by which all midsize sedans
are judged? By continually delivering Honda's trademark blend of
reliability, comfort, and performance.
Check Honda Accord prices in your area
2001 Toyota Camry
Every year Americans vote with their pocketbook for the most popular sedan,
and over the past few years this American-built Toyota has established a
formidable record. Available with either a fuel-sipping four-cylinder or a
powerful V6, the Camry routinely maintains the highest resale value in its
class.
Check Toyota Camry prices in your area
It's true--there really is a better way to buy a new car. Drop by our New
Cars store today.
Sincerely,
Mike George
General Manager, Amazon.com
*To qualify for listed special APR rates, consumers must comply with the
guidelines specified by Chrysler Financial Corporation. Please call a
Customer Care representative at 1-877-846-0991 for more information or for
assistance in determining whether you qualify.
PS: We hope you enjoyed receiving this message. However, if you'd rather
not receive future e-mails of this sort from Amazon.com, please use this
link or click the Your Account link in the top right corner of any page.
Under the Your Account Settings heading, click the "Update your
communication preferences" link.
Please note that this message was sent to the following e-mail address:
[email protected]
?
?
=====================================
|
3,262 |
Subject: Re: Conference Call
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/legislation/5.
=====================================
please don't forward this thanks..
---------------------- Forwarded by Sandra McCubbin/SFO/EES on 03/01/2000
03:12 PM ---------------------------
Rich Ferguson <[email protected]> on 03/01/2000 03:04:45 PM
To: Scott Govenar <[email protected]>
cc: Sandra McCubbin/SFO/EES@EES
Subject: Re: Conference Call
Scott, it's hard to say. Hackney indicated there would be a revised
"principles" piece before long, so maybe we'll just have to wait. They do
have some legitimate concerns - if they're going to invest in distribution
system upgrades, they need to know what's going to stay in ratebase and
what's going to be competitive. There is a danger that the rules will
remain so murky that nothing will get done by anyone - something akin to a
reluctance to invest in generation so long as the ISO screws around with
must run contracts and congestion management schemes. We would probably all
benefit by knowing what the rules are going to be going forward.
On the other hand, it's hard to believe that SCE and the others don't want
to nail down everything in sight for themselves. However, there appears to
be a growing understanding that the farther they try to reach, the more
uncertainty they produce - they can't have it both ways.
Sooner or later there is going to have to be some consensus on what stays
regulated and what goes competitive. Don't know what you think the chances
are that it will be sooner, but at least it seems SCE is indicating a
willingness to engage in meaningful discussions that I haven't seen before.
Rich
At 01:32 PM 3/1/00 -0800, Scott Govenar wrote:
>You are absolutely correct Rich. Rick gave us an idea of what Edison's
>evolving positions are. Based upon what we now know, we are still strongly
>opposed to several of their ideas. How do you think those conversations are
>going?
>
>Rich Ferguson wrote:
>
> > John White, Rick Counihan and I met with Edison on Monday, and it appeared
> > that their position is still evolving on many of the issues of concern.
> > Folks in this discussion should be sure they are reacting to current
> > positions, so far as they can be discerned.
> > Rich
> >
> > At 10:47 AM 3/1/00 -0800, you wrote:
> > >We have scheduled a conference call for Monday, March 13 at 4:00 p.m. to
> > >discuss developments surrounding Edison's public goods mandates. The
> > >call-in information is as follows:
> > >
> > >Call-in: 888-399-8606
> > >Passcode: Enron
=====================================
|
3,263 |
Subject: Re: Urgent - Steve Kean to testify at Senate hearing, need info
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/3043.
=====================================
One note: recall that with respect to market manipulation, one of the most
common accusations focused on the problems caused by the PX manipulation the
utilities engaged in thanks to their monopsony (demand-side bidding) market
power.
Jeff
Elizabeth Linnell
01/26/2001 12:24 PM
To: Mary Schoen/NA/Enron@Enron, David Parquet/SF/ECT@ECT, Richard B
Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Neslage/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Margaret Carson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, [email protected],
Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Sandra
McCubbin/SFO/EES@EES, Steve Walton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT,
[email protected]
cc: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Urgent - Steve Kean to testify at Senate hearing, need info
Steve Kean will be testifying at the Senate Energy Committee's hearing on
Wednesday regarding California. Steve and Jim Steffes asked me to contact
you for the following information. I've listed specific requests for several
people, but am copying many more of you for your input as well. Anything you
can provide by sometime on Monday will be appreciated!
Dave Parquet - Siting of new power plants in California. Any insight you can
provide regarding the rules, the current climate, what would fix the current
situation, etc.
Richard Sanders - Steve thinks he might be asked about whether the market was
manipulated. Please provide information on whether this was the case and who
the participants likely were. What's the current climate regarding
sanctions, etc.?
Mary Schoen - Any information you can provide relating to air emission issues
in California, and specific details for our recommendations regarding air
emissions.
Steve Walton - The status on RTO West, Desert Star, Cal ISO and general
information on RO development.
Sue Mara - Specific ordering language requiring the utilities to buy only
from the PX. Was it required through legislation or the CPUC, and what
exactly does it mean. Who was involved in formulating the language?
Information on block forward markets.
Alan Comnes - A copy of the CDWR response and anything they might have
available regarding long term proposals from the government.
Dan Allegretti - We have the e-mail Jim sent regarding the UI deal. Please
provide more specifics on the deal, and information regarding portfolio
management approach.
Thanks for your help!
=====================================
|
3,264 |
Subject: FW: EIX, PCG: Federal Debate on Western Power Crisis Continues
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/2882.
=====================================
-----Original Message-----
From: Schneider, Chip =20
Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2001 7:49 AM
To: Shapiro, Richard; Tribolet, Michael; Steffes, James
Subject: FW: EIX, PCG: Federal Debate on Western Power Crisis Continues
FYI.
-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Patterson <[email protected]>@ENRON=20
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-Paul+20Patterson+20+3CPaul+5FPatterson+40xmr3+2Ecom+3E+4=
0EN
[email protected]]=20
Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2001 7:47 AM
To: Schneider, Chip
Subject: EIX, PCG: Federal Debate on Western Power Crisis Continues
Credit Suisse First Boston
Paul Patterson
Good morning,
to debate amendments to HR 1647, a California emergency relief bill. At the=
=20
core of the debate is a proposal to require western generators to commit 80=
%=20
of their output to long-term bilateral contracts.
? Apparently, talks stalled because of conflicting information related to t=
he=20
amount of power already under contract. In addition there appears to be=20
questions over the 80% benchmark and the length of the contracts.
? The current willingness of House Republicans to consider a compromise=20
amendment is apparently linked to the impending power shift in the Senate t=
o=20
the Democratic caucus. The House Committee Chair, Rep. Tauzin, hopes to bri=
ng=20
the bill to a vote soon after June 11.
? Separately, some key California Assembly Democrats are proposing another=
=20
plan to rescue Edison and PG&E. Under the plan, the state=01,s largest=20
commercial ratepayers would assume responsibility for most of the state=01,=
s net=20
short power position as well as repayment of the utilities=01, undercollect=
ion.=20
The level of support for the proposal is still unclear.
? We believe that the next few weeks will be critical in determining whethe=
r=20
California can reach a political solution to avert another utility=20
bankruptcy. At present, a single viable solution has not yet appeared. =20
Consequently, we recommend that only investors with high risk tolerance=20
should consider investing in the California utilities.
Please call us with any questions.
Regards,
Paul Patterson, 212-325-5876
Neil Stein, 212-325-4217
Wen-Wen Chen, 212-538-0223
If you would prefer not to receive further messages from this sender, pleas=
e=20
click on the following link and confirm your request:
Mailto:[email protected]
You will receive one additional e-mail message confirming your removal.
- ppp052901.pdf
=====================================
|
3,265 |
Subject: Direct Report Mtg in November (Activity)
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/inbox/492.
=====================================
Hi Everyone,
The budget meeting will soon be upon us and I want to keep everyone informed as to what will take place. Day of arrival, November 7th there is nothing planned; everyone is on their own for dinner. Thursday, November 8, the meeting will begin @ 8:00 AM and will conclude by 1:00 PM. I will inform you later as to the meeting location. After the meeting on Thursday there will be an afternoon of activities available. Please note what is available and let me know of your activity choice. Friday, November 9 the meeting will begin @ 8:00 AM and conclude by 3:00 PM, so please make your travel arrangements accordingly.
Golf (I have tee times for 1:32, 1:40 & 1:48 PM)
Spa Services (If interested, I can fax you what services they offer)
Horse Back Riding (I can fax schedule and rates if interested)
Tennis (I have information I can fax if interested)
Transportation:
Airport transportation from the Colorado Springs Airport is available through the Broadmoor Transportation Service. Please call 719-577-5769 to make your transportation arrangements. Airport transportation is b reservation only.
Fares: $16.00/each way (20-30 min travel time)
Thanks and I will keep in touch.
Ginger Dernehl
Administrative Coordinator
Global Government Affairs
Phone# 713-853-7751
Fax# 713-646-8160
-----Original Message-----
From: Dernehl, Ginger
Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 10:09 AM
To: Steffes, James D.; Yoho, Lisa; Nord, Sue; Robertson, Linda; Migden, Janine; Montovano, Steve; Hemstock, Robert; Kaufman, Paul; Ryall, Jean; Assad, Sergio; Kingerski, Harry; Ibrahim, Amr; Dasovich, Jeff; Nicolay, Christi L.; Novosel, Sarah; Linnell, Elizabeth; Petrochko, Mona L.
Cc: Dernehl, Ginger; Noske, Linda J.; Warner, Geriann; Sullivan, Lora; Knight, Laurie; Bellas, Kirsten; Sietzema, Linda; Hunter, Bevin; Braz, Gisele; Buerger, Rubena; Stransky, Joan; Alamo, Joseph; Hawkins, Bernadette; Perez, Carmen
Subject: Reminder:Direct Report Mtg in November
REMNDER!!!!!!!
The next "Budget/Priority" Meeting will take place as follows:
Dates: Arrive evening of Wednesday, Nov. 7, 2001
Meeting Thursday, Nov. 8, 2001 --- 8:00 AM - 1:00 PM
Meeting Friday, Nov. 9, 2001--- 8:00 AM - 3:00 PM
Location: The Broadmoor
One Lake Avenue
Colorado Springs, CO 80906
719-634-7711
Thanks and please call if you have any questions.
Ginger Dernehl
Administrative Coordinator
Global Government Affairs
Phone# 713-853-7751
Fax# 713-646-8160
=====================================
|
3,266 |
Subject: Re: Meeting with CERA next week
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/27983.
=====================================
Let's do it. I'll do my darnedest to make it.
Best,
Jeff
=09Jennifer Thome
=0906/20/2001 02:59 PM
=09=09=20
=09=09 To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
=09=09 cc:=20
=09=09 Subject: Meeting with CERA next week
Jeff:
As I told you I was planning to do, I have arranged a meeting with CERA nex=
t=20
week (I will be in town for the infrastructure conference) on Wednesday, Ju=
ne=20
27 at 9am in the Enron office. We will meet with Mike and Peter (see bios=
=20
below). Please let me know ASAP if this does not work for you. I explained=
=20
to Mike that we really appreciate their research and just wanted a quick=20
meeting with them face to face.
Jennifer
Michael Zenker=20
Director, Western North America Energy=20
Oakland, CA=20
Michael Zenker has over 15 years=01, experience in the energy industry. He =
is an=20
expert on wholesale electricity and natural gas markets in western North=20
America. Mr. Zenker has extensive experience with California=01,s new=20
electricity market and with power generation strategy and asset divestiture=
.=20
He has assisted clients with retail marketing strategies and in procuring g=
as=20
and electricity, and gas and electric transmission capacity. Mr. Zenker was=
=20
most recently the Manager of Energy Trading at Southern California Edison,=
=20
where he was responsible for electricity and gas trading, and dispatching=
=20
Edison=01,s nuclear, coal, gas/oil, hydro, and power contract resources. He=
was=20
also responsible for natural gas transportation and storage at Southern=20
California Edison. Mr. Zenker holds an MBA and a BS in Nuclear Engineering=
=20
from the University of California.=20
Peter F. Moritzburke=20
Associate=20
Oakland, CA=20
Western North American energy=20
Western power markets=20
Western and regional market dynamics=20
Western wholesale electricity markets=20
Generation asset divestiture=20
Generation asset values=20
Western fundamentals analysis=20
Peter Moritzburke specializes in the analysis of western US electricity and=
=20
gas markets and evolving regional energy market dynamics. He has experience=
=20
in analyzing both US and Latin American energy markets. Prior to joining CE=
RA=20
he worked with the Independent Energy Producers Association in California=
=20
assisting in negotiations of agreements for the Western Power Exchange=20
(WEPEX). Mr. Moritzburke holds a master's degree and a BA from the Universi=
ty=20
of California.=20
=====================================
|
3,267 |
Subject: Fw: CSO-This Week In Finance
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/inbox/293.
=====================================
Fellow MBAers,
Dovetailing Ken's email regarding the Finance Firm Night tonight from 7-9, the following might be of interest to you as well, in case you are not subscribed to ftjobs@haas on majordomo.
Albert Demery
[email protected]
----- Original Message -----
From: Mark Frieldfeld
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 11:25 AM
To: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: CSO-This Week In Finance
Lot's going on this week in the world of Haas Finance:
Wells Fargo Bank Monday, Sept. 24 12:30-2:00pm FC, Howard Room
A Day in the Life of an Investment Banker Monday, Sept. 24 12:30-2:00pm Helzel Board Room
Finance Club Firm Night Monday, Sept. 24 7:00-9:00pm Wells Fargo Room
Venture Capital Brown Bag Tuesday, Sept. 25 12:30-2:00pm C-135
Goldman Sachs - Private Wealth Management Wednesday, Sept. 26 6:00-8:00pm Raleigh's
Berkeley Real Estate Club Meeting Wednesday, Sept. 26 12:30-2:00pm F-320
Adams, Harkness and Hill Thursday, Sept. 27 6:00-8:00pm FC, Heyns Room
Merrill Lynch - Latin America & Europe PCS Friday, Sept. 28 12:30-2:00pm FC, O'Neil Room
Real Estate Brown Bag Friday, Sept. 28 12:30-2:00pm Career Center Conference Room
Full-Time Resume Drops Due Today, Monday Sept. 24th:
AMD: Financial Analyst
Andersen: Various International Positions
Banc of America Securities: Equity Research, Leasing Associate
Cambridge Associates: Investment Consultant
Chevron Corporation: Finance MBA Development Program
Franklin Templeton: Research Associate
GE Capital Corporation: International Equities, Sales & Trading Associate
Goldman, Sachs and Company: Private Wealth Management Associate
Houlihan Lokey Howard and Zukin: Financial Analyst
Johnson & Johnson - Lifescan: Global Suppy Chain Analyst
LEK Consulting: Consultant
ZS Associates: Associates
**Remember, for Morgan Stanley, please submit resumes directly to www.morganstanley.com/career/recruiting by end of business today.
Mark Friedfeld
Account Manager
MBA & MFE Recruiting
Haas School of Business
University of California, Berkeley
510.642.6588
[email protected]
=====================================
|
3,268 |
Subject: President Clinton Press Conference Coverage
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/729.
=====================================
Please see following news article and White House press release:
Clinton Offers Federal Funds for Electricity Woes in California
08/23/2000
Dow Jones Business News
(Copyright (c) 2000, Dow Jones & Company, Inc.)
WASHINGTON -(Dow Jones)- President Clinton will direct federal agencies to
provide financial assistance to
low-income families and small businesses in Southern California to help them
cope with high electricity bills, the
White House said.
California utility regulators earlier this week imposed a partial rate cap on
electric bills for San Diego residents,
responding to public panic about power prices that have more than doubled
this summer because of volatility in the
state's deregulated energy market. The deregulation of California's $20
billion power market was supposed to lower
prices by creating greater competition. But demand for electricity has
outstripped supply because of a booming
economy and less power available from other areas.
Clinton ordered the release of $2.6 million from the Low Income Home Energy
Assistance Program to help
low-income families while the Small Business Administration will urge its
lending partners to use SBA credit
programs to help small businesses with their energy costs.
In addition, Mr. Clinton has called on Energy Secretary Bill Richardson to
ask the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission to speed up an investigation into the wholesale market for
electricity "so that state and federal
regulators and policy makers can have the information they need to protect
consumers in a timely fashion."
Mr. Clinton's actions mark the second time this summer the president has
stepped in to help California cope with
its electricity shortages. Earlier, the president called on all federal
facilities in California to cut their power usage and
to direct power back into the electricity grid.
(Compiled from Dow Jones Newswires and other sources)
Copyright (c) 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.
All Rights Reserved.
Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
---------------------- Forwarded by Karen Denne/Corp/Enron on 08/23/2000
10:43 AM ---------------------------
From: Ann M Schmidt 08/23/2000 10:41 AM
To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: President Clinton Press Release
Following is a link to the actual White House page with the statement from
Clinton today.
=====================================
|
3,269 |
Subject: Re: Commission OII Hearings
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/4600.
=====================================
Enron will very vigorously support the CS and I would hope that we could get
as many people as possible to do the same. Let's face it, California's gas
industry is a mess for the same reasons the electricity industry is a mess
(despite, and perhaps contrary to, the substantially more narrow reasoning
offered by the Brattle Group). The CS is a well-thought-out, well-designed
program for moving forward; unlike the "interim," which takes two steps
back. Can we split up the names of all the people who signed on and call
them and try to get them to show up in support?
Best,
Jeff
Tom Beach <[email protected]>
05/14/2001 11:37 PM
To: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
cc:
Subject: Re: Commission OII Hearings
Watson has asked for time to speak. I'm planning to continue to support the
CS. It brings some greater stability and certainty to SoCalGas' noncore
rates. The allocation of backbone capacity might improve shippers'
certainty of being able to move gas through Topock and Wheeler Ridge. In
the short term, it's hard to say how much that might help prices, but I
doubt that it would make them worse. In the longer term, if new generation
on the PG&E and Kern / Mojave systems, plus the North Baja and Questar
lines, actually reduce SoCalGas' throughput, then a SoCalGas city-gate
market might be pretty competitive. Finally, the CS removes SoCalGas'
favorite argument in favor of the peaking rate.
So what are Edison and Enron going to do?
Tom
----- Original Message -----
From: <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>;
<[email protected]>; <[email protected]>;
<[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, May 14, 2001 7:26 PM
Subject: Commission OII Hearings
> I was just wondering what any of you guys are thinking about doing at the
> Gas OII meeting next Tuesday. Are any of you planning on making a
> presentation? If so, do you intend to support the settlement as filed, or
> are there modifications you think are appropriate given the way SoCalGas
> has handled its system in the past few months?
>
> Michael
>
> P.S. FYI, I am out of town, so I am not available by phone until Monday.
>
> --
> Michael S. Alexander
> Southern California Edison
> Energy Supply and Management (ES&M)
> 626-302-2029
> 626-302-3254 (fax)
>
>
=====================================
|
3,270 |
Subject: Rebuttal Testimony in the Hydro Proceeding
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/4436.
=====================================
Roger --
As we talked about yesterday, we need to make a determination as to whether
to file rebuttal testimony in the latest round of the PG&E hydro case. The
sooner we make this determination the better so that MRW will have
sufficient time to conduct any necessary discovery and hone their
preliminary analysis.
On the issue of valuation, there are now basically two "numbers" which have
been presented to the Commission for consideration. The TURN/ORA analysis
sticks with their $2.7 billion valuation (credited to the TRA), with 100% (
or something close there to) of the ongoing profits from the operation of
the facilities (by PG&E) to be flowed through to ratepayer. PG&E (using
Lehman Brothers) has also conducted a DCF analysis which results in a market
value range of $3.7 to $4.5 billion (the analysis was done based on an
assumed date for the transaction was January 1, 2001). The testimony states
that the range of $3.9 to $4.2 billion is most reflective of the valuation
which likely bidders would pay in a competitive auction.
The preliminary analysis done by MRW (which you should have received via
e-mail late in November), resulted in a current market value of the assets
being $4.7 to $4.9 billion. MRW utilized the ORA/Turn model but revised the
underlying price forecasts and the assumptions regarding ancillary services.
Given the way the Commission is leaning these days (as represented by the
recent PD on Mohave), there is a good chance that PG&E will not be allowed
to auction off these assets, but must retain them. Therefore, the issue
then becomes does the Commission go with a low valuation, with ongoing
profits going to ratepayers (as proposed by TURN/ORA), or do they go for a
high valuation, which would allow PG&E to make the valid argument that
ongoing profits go to shareholders.
The rest of the parties in the proceeding are not focusing on the valuation
as much as they are market power and environmental issues. In other words,
the likelihood of alot of opposition coming in on the TURN/ORA proposal is
very low. If we are of the opinion, that the valuation should be high (even
if the assets remain with PG&E), then we need to do some rebuttal.
If you would like me to set up a conference call early next week with MRW
and anybody at Enron you think should be involved, let me know. Given that
the holidays are only a couple of weeks away, we did to reach some
conclusions pretty fast.
Jeanne
=====================================
|
3,271 |
Subject: Gas OII: Draft Tariffs To Implement PG&E Settlement
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/606.
=====================================
Parties to the PG&E Gas OII Settlement:
On June 13th, PG&E held a workshop to discuss proposed tariffs to implement
the Comprehensive PG&E Gas OII Settlement Agreement. At that meeting,
parties raised various issues concerning the draft tariffs we distributed on
May 25th. Attached please find PG&E's proposed response to those issues,
other than metering issues which we will address next week. In addition, we
have included changes to the non-metering draft tariffs from the version we
distributed on May 25th.
We encourage you to provide us with comments on these drafts by Friday, June
30, 2000. We will host a half-day workshop on any unresolved issues on
Thursday, July 6, at 1:30 p.m., in Room 301b, 77 Beale Street, San
Francisco.
We will provide a response to the metering issues on Wednesday, June 28th,
and will host a half-day tariff workshop on these issues on Friday, June 30,
starting at 10:00 a.m., in Room 301b, 77 Beale Street, San Francisco.
Thanks for your help in finalizing these tariffs for our July 17 compliance
filing.
Ron Stoner Randy Litteneker
(415) 973-3606 (415) 973-2179
Issues List with proposed resolutions
<<June 13th Resolutes_.doc>>
Preliminary Statements revisions since 5/25 are shown in italics.
<<GPSL-6-23.doc>> <<GPSC-6-23.doc>> <<PrelimGPSAG-6-23.doc>>
Attachment K revisions since 5/25 are shown using "revisions tool"
<<Draft CTA Billing Agreement 6-23-2000-2.doc>>
Core Transport Tariffs
<<OII_G-CT_6-23.doc>> <<OII_G-CFS_6-23.doc>> <<OII_Att_D_6-23.doc>>
<<OII_Att_I_6-23.doc>> <<OII_Att_J_6-23.doc>>
Core Gas Aggregation Agreement 79-845.
<<OII_79-845_6-23.doc>>
Schedule G-CP. Revisions are in italics.
<<OII_G-CP_6-23.doc>>
Revisions to Rule 21.2, Rule 25, Rule 14, G-Bal and the SB Amendment are
shown in italics.
<<Rule21-2_6-23.doc>> <<RULE25 6-23.doc>> <<G-BAL6-23.doc>>
<<SBAmendment 6-23.doc>> <<RULE14 6-23.doc>>
There were no changes to Schedule G-Cred, the Credit Application, or Rule 23
since the 5/25/00 draft version. These items are not attached.
- June 13th Resolutes_.doc
- GPSL-6-23.doc
- GPSC-6-23.doc
- PrelimGPSAG-6-23.doc
- Draft CTA Billing Agreement 6-23-2000-2.doc
- OII_G-CT_6-23.doc
- OII_G-CFS_6-23.doc
- OII_Att_D_6-23.doc
- OII_Att_I_6-23.doc
- OII_Att_J_6-23.doc
- OII_79-845_6-23.doc
- OII_G-CP_6-23.doc
- Rule21-2_6-23.doc
- RULE25 6-23.doc
- G-BAL6-23.doc
- SBAmendment 6-23.doc
- RULE14 6-23.doc
=====================================
|
3,272 |
Subject: Enron Turns Internal Credit-Risk Tool Into New Product
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/3968.
=====================================
Thought that you might find this interesting.
Best,
Jeff
Enron Turns Internal Credit-Risk Tool Into New Product
2001-04-04 17:19 (New York)
By Christina Cheddar
Of DOW JONES NEWSWIRES
NEW YORK (Dow Jones)--With the number of corporate bankruptcies on the rise,
knowing the creditworthiness of one's customers is becoming more and more
important.
For Enron Corp. (ENE), the world's largest energy trading company, keeping
track of credit risk has always been part of doing business. That became even
more true with the company's launch of EnronOnline, its Internet-based
commodities trading network.
In order to deal with the accelerated volume and speed of transactions on
EnronOnline, the company developed a tool to help its own commercial traders
manage the credit risk.
Early last year, Enron rolled out this tool, Enron Credit, on a limited
basis. Gradually, the company expanded its use and scope. Last month, the
company re-launched Enron Credit in its current format.
Enron Credit tracks more than 10,000 companies, giving each a rating known
as
the "Enron cost of credit." The rating is expressed as an interest rate.
The Web site also provides news, a company's expected chance of bankruptcy
and other related information.
While much of this information is free to registered users, Enron also has
turned the product into a new revenue stream.
Users may download data into a spreadsheet and receive periodic updates for
a
fee.
The site also can sell a user a "digital bankruptcy swap," which is a way to
hedge against credit exposure.
The price of the swap is determined by a rating Enron's staff assigns to a
company and the amount of credit exposure a company needs to protect against.
For a supplier, the main advantage of a swap is that if a customer is unable
to pay due to bankruptcy, the supplier will be paid immediately.
According to Enron Europe President John Sherriff, the goal of Enron Credit
is to create a more efficient credit market by increasing trading liquidity.
The tool is important because "in just a short amount of time, a company's
credit can go from stellar to bad literally overnight."
At present, some analysts haven't factored in revenue from Enron Credit into
their earnings models. However, as the commodity markets Enron trades in
mature, it is possible the need for products such as Enron Credit could
increase.
-By Christina Cheddar, Dow Jones Newswires; 201-938-5166
=====================================
|
3,273 |
Subject: Brief Updates - DSTAR/AISA/WIO
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/931.
=====================================
DSTAR: The Board meeting is being held today and tomorrow. The board
consultants have been working with the six IOU's to submit a joint filing on
the 16th that will consist of a letter and supplemental summaries of each
proposal. They are not asking for approval or submitting tariff language but
simply providing a status report. The consultants indicated that they are
also including a list of unresolved issues which turned out to be a fairly
contentious topic as they are not including a majority of the SWPTF
comments. Our position was to include all issues or none at all. The
consultants are holding meetings next Wed-Friday to discuss the issues and
prepare for a Board briefing on October 30 where all parties will have an
opportunity to be heard. The Board hopes to make final decisions on the
outstanding issues at the November meeting in order to have a tariff filed by
the December deadline.
AISA: Filed an answer in response to the Arizona Irrigation Districts Motion
to Reject the AISAA Filing and other motions to intervene. The AISA
successfully lambasted the irrigation districts citing their substantial
participation in the process and questioning their motive in what is
exclusively a retail access initiative. The irrigation districts are
exclusively wholesale and are in fact not even wholesale transmission
customers of any AISA participating transmission provider. The filing also
requests the FERC to separate approval of Phase I and Phase II features as
the limited concerns raised by the few portesters were focused on Phase II
features of the protocols manual. AISA requests FERC act on Phase I so the
marketplace can immediately take advantage of the pro competitive benefits
associated with Phase I and in particular the temporary transmission rights
allocation and the fast track ADR process. This request includes a
stipulation that if the FERC decide to act in Phases, that it act on Phase II
features no later than April 15, 2001. ** The filing also addresses Judge
Campbell's minute entry on the Retail Electric Competition Rules and
interprets the fair value determination to be associated with retail sales by
ESPs and NOT FERC-jurisdictional services.
WIO: NRTA has confirmed that they do not intend to merge with the other
entities into the WIO but will support its formation. They may have certain
requirements if they wish to be a steering committee member, however.
=====================================
|
3,274 |
Subject: PGE Helps Out
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/10601.
=====================================
Glad to see we're doing our part to help the West's energy crisis... we can
milk the heck out of this story :-) kd
PGE wants to convert manure to methane
04/03/2001
Associated Press Newswires
Copyright 2001. The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved.
SALEM, Ore. (AP) - Oregon's energy future may be chewing cud in Bernie
Faber's pasture.
His 500 cows will provide tons of manure to be converted to methane to
generate electricity in a pilot project operated by Portland General Electric.
The project is expected to generate about 100 kilowatts of electricity -
enough for about 65 homes - by July.
"When you consider how many dairy farms there are in Oregon, this could be a
significant source of power," said PGE spokesman Mark Fryburg.
About 89,000 milk cows were reported on state farms in 1999.
PGE wants to perfect the technology at Faber's Cal-Gon Farm. If the company
succeeds, small-scale power plants could become commonplace at Oregon dairy
farms.
"We would love to be able to engineer and design these things so we could do
them at smaller and smaller dairies over time," said Jeff Cole, PGE'; biogas
program manger.
PGE officials also are interested in developing a 4.5 megawatt,
methane-powered energy facility in Morrow County that could provide energy
for about 3,000 homes. It would depend on manure from dairies relocating to
the area to support a Tillamook County Creamery Association cheese plant.
The disposal of livestock waste has become an expensive and complex problem
for farms as environmental regulations tighten.
A typical dairy cow produces about 150 pounds of waste each day.
Methane-powered generators, such as PGE's project, reduce the odors
associated with dairies and create useful byproducts: a nitrogen-rich liquid
fertilizer and an odorless dry fiber that can be used to make potting soils.
At Faber's farm, construction of a 28-foot high concrete tank where waste
will be converted into methane is nearly complete.
PGE officials compare the tank to a giant stomach, where bacteria in manure
continues the digestion process and produces flammable methane.
A modified, internal combustion engine will burn the methane for fuel and
drive power turbines. After the manure is processed, the leftovers will be
pumped through a solid separator, taken off site, and composted.
Liquids will be stored at a lagoon at the dairy.
Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
=====================================
|
3,275 |
Subject: Re: san diego
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/9930.
=====================================
Here are notes on 43x that Harry Kingerski put together.
Jim
Regarding proposed rate freeze for large SDG&E customers at 6.5 cents:
Adds to DWR's burden of covering the net short positions without any further
clarification of how shortfall will be funded. The incentive these customers
now have to participate in DA and thereby remove burden from DWR is removed.
Creates incentives to increase usage and decrease conservation, exactly at
the time that just the opposite effect is desired. Rate at frozen level
removes all price signal effect in unregulated market.
These are customers who under existing law already have had choice, as an
alternative to paying market price, of 1) voluntarily opting in to a one year
6.5 cent rate freeze, with a true-up, or 2) buying commodity and risk
management products in the competitive market, as many of them have already
done, and 3) reducing usage to save money. This bill takes takes away the
last two choices/incentives.
Adopting "rates by proxy" (in a sense, indexed to PG&E and SCE rates) creates
the potential for a regulatory nightmare.
As an alternative, the Legislature should consider extending the voluntary
opt-in program under existing law. This would preserve existing protection,
keep choices available to customers, and not unduly add to DWR's burden.
I don't think that we have any real facts about usage increases due to the
bill, only the general understanding that if prices don't rise people won't
take any real action.
Jim?
Jeff Dasovich
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
03/13/2001 07:12 PM
To: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Janel Guerrero/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Re: san diego
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 03/13/2001 07:10 PM -----
Jeff Dasovich
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
03/13/2001 07:10 PM
To: Janel Guerrero/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Re: san diego
If you're referring to the conversation we had on today's call, it's actually
a bill by Dede Alpert (sp?) that, if signed by the Governor, would cause
demand to go up. Were you referring to that or something more general?
Best,
Jeff
Janel Guerrero
03/13/2001 06:47 PM
To: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: san diego
is it possible to get a one-pager talking points on the san diego situation
and how the govenor is increasing the demand on the system as we head into
summer? who can do this?
=====================================
|
3,276 |
Subject: Re: INFO
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/12343.
=====================================
Great. Thanks. I intended, and will be sure, to include Karen on the stuff
that I pull together today. Karen, if there's anything else I need to do to
coordinate.
Best,
Jeff
Janel Guerrero
05/11/2001 10:56 AM
To: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Jennifer Thome/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Re: INFO
Jeff,
Since Karen and Marathon have been leading on the CEO outreach efforts to
date, I think it's more efficient if ALL CEO-related efforts are coordinated
with Karen and Marathon. Please use karen as your point person. Thanks!
James D Steffes
05/11/2001 09:10 AM
To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Jennifer Thome/NA/Enron@Enron, Janel
Guerrero/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: INFO
Jeff -
I would recommend that you (if needed) use Jennifer to help.
Jim
---------------------- Forwarded by James D Steffes/NA/Enron on 05/11/2001
09:09 AM ---------------------------
Steven J Kean
05/11/2001 08:35 AM
To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul Kaufman/Enron@EnronXGate, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J
Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON
Subject:
Ken Lay spoke with several California CEOs this morning and urged them to get
personally involved in pushing for a comprehensive set of reforms. Three
expressed willingness to help.
Scott McNealy (Sun): contact person - Piper Cole ([email protected]);
[email protected]. Mcnealy wants, by close of business today, a
"cheat sheet" of the talking points to use with politicians (the "8 or 10
elements of the solution") with the expected comeback he may hear from the
political leaders and our response to that comeback. He says he hasn't spent
time working on issues in Sacremento so we may also want to include a list of
suggested contacts.
Kevin Sharer (Amgen): contact person - Sarah Jensen, VP of Engineering and
Operations (805.447.6785); [email protected]. Sharer wants the same
information as McNealy and he and McNealy both indicated their willingness to
call a meeting of other California CEOs. Sharer will also be having
breakfast with Hertzberg one week from today.
Robert Day (Trust Co of the West): said that he is very close to the mayor
of Los Angeles. He urged Ken to call the mayor (mentioning Day). Ken would
like some talking points for that call.
Jeff - please put these items together.
=====================================
|
3,277 |
Subject: RE: PowerPoint info
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/11445.
=====================================
Apology not necessary! However, you are very kind to consider my
perspective on the group and project. I am certainly a bit frustrated with
how this project is turning out. We should have "white boarded" our ideas
and reached consensus in the very beginning I think. It would have saved
all of us time. I'm counting on Mark to drive this home for us smoothly.
But, at the end of the day, I am pleased with how much I learned in Tasker's
class, which is the ultimate point anyway.
Carolyn M. Vavrek
Manager - Human Capital Advisory Services
Deloitte & Touche
50 Fremont Street
San Francisco, CA 94105
phone: 415-783-5137
fax: 415-783-8760
e-mail: [email protected]
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2001 10:05 AM
To: Vavrek, Carolyn (US - San Francisco)
Subject: Re: PowerPoint info
Carolyn:
I wanted to apologize for the way the group dynamic has shaped up. It's
clear to me that you're a bit frustrated, and if I've contributed, I
apologize.
You've done the most work on this project, your contribution has been very
significant, and I personally am not satisfied about the way that the stuff
you've pulled together (and your views) have been included. At some point,
though, it gets tough beating one's head against the wall. Seems to me
that, in a group, everyone should have some of their views
included---that's what groups and compromises are all about. After all,
it's school. We've made a lot of sacrifices to do it, and the point is to
learn.
Anyway, I hope you'll still comment on the presentation, and I'm glad that
you've agreed to do part of it on Thursday. For my part, I felt that I
pushed yesterday about as much as I'm prepared to push and at this point,
I'll put the ratios tables together, offer a few edits, buy don' t see much
use going to the mat.
Overall, I think it'll be an okay presentation, though getting there has
been, well, bumpy.
But thanks very much for all the work you did. It was important, and the
presentation is better off for it.
Best,
Jeff
This message (including any attachments) contains confidential information
intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is protected by law. If
you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this message and are
hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this
message, or the taking of any action based on it, is strictly prohibited.
=====================================
|
3,278 |
Subject: Re: Registration Confirmation: Larry Summers on 12/6 at 1:45pm (was
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/3541.
=====================================
In case you didn't get the information in my first email, my name is Jeff=
=20
Dasovich and I'm in the Evening MBA program.
=09"Dean's Office" <[email protected]>
=0911/16/2000 11:01 AM
=09=09=20
=09=09 To: [email protected]
=09=09 cc:=20
=09=09 Subject: Registration Confirmation: Larry Summers on 12/6 at 1:45pm =
(was Re:=20
)
At 03:42 PM 11/15/00 -0600, you wrote:
I would like to attend the event with Secretary Summers.
PLEASE READ THE FOLLOWING ANNOUNCEMENT CAREFULLY
Thank you for your interest in attending the program at the Haas School of=
=20
Business featuring United States Secretary of the Treasury Larry Summers. =
=20
Secretary Summers will be at the Haas School on Wednesday December 6, 2000 =
as=20
part of the 2000-2001 Haas Business Faculty Research Dialogue. His speech=
=20
will take place in the Haas School=01,s Arthur Andersen Auditorium at 1:45p=
m. =20
Secretary Summers will talk about his experiences as a primary shaper of U.=
S.=20
economic policy during the past eight years, first as Robert Rubin=01,s dep=
uty=20
in the first Clinton Administration and later replacing Rubin as Secretary =
of=20
the Treasury. Secretary Summers will also talk about the prospects for=20
continued growth in the U.S. economy under the next presidential=20
administration.
All seats for the program on Wednesday December 6, 2000 will be allocated o=
n=20
a first-come, first served basis and seating will be limited. All Haas=20
School faculty and students are being requested to reserve a seat in the=20
Auditorium by sending an email to [email protected] by=20
Monday November 20, as you have done. All emailed requests should include =
a=20
full name as well as Haas School affiliation/class. After November 20, sea=
ts=20
will be made available to other members of the UC Berkeley community. =20
Therefore, please remind your colleagues to send their requests soon to=20
guarantee their seating in the Auditorium.
If you have qualified for a seat in the Auditorium for the program with=20
Secretary of the Treasury Larry Summers, you will receive confirmation by=
=20
email no later than Monday November 27. If you were not able to get a seat=
=20
in the Auditorium, you will receive notification about how you may be able =
to=20
view the program via simulcast. If you have additional questions about the=
=20
program, please contact Pam Gleason in the Dean=01,s Office at 510-643-2027=
.
=====================================
|
3,279 |
Subject: Re: CGT Gas Accord II Team
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/8174.
=====================================
Once again I implore you to put at stop to this madness and hold any
further "Gas Accord II" settlement
discussions in abeyance until the current electricity crisis has
abated. There is neither the time nor the mental capacity to deal with all
of these issues at the same time. For God's sake, STOP
IT!!! Mike Florio
At 12:49 PM 1/4/2001 -0800, Lindh, Frank (Law) wrote:
> CONFIDENTIAL SETTLEMENT DOCUMENT
> PER CPUC RULE 51
>
>ALL INTERESTED PARTIES:
>
>This is a reminder that PG&E will hold the first Gas Accord II Workshop of
>the new year on Wednesday and Thursday, January 10 and 11. The workshop
>will be held at PG&E headquarters in San Francisco, 77 Beale Street, in
>Conference Room 300.
>
>Our objective for this workshop is to review and explain PG&E's
>comprehensive settlement proposal, which was distributed by e-mail on
>December 21, 2000, to those parties who have explicitly agreed to abide by
>CPUC Rule 51.
>
>If you did not receive a copy of the December 21 transmittal and would like
>one, please complete the attached Rule 51 form and return it by e-mail to
>Frank Lindh ([email protected]) and Geoff Bellenger ([email protected]), or by FAX to
>Geoff at 415-973-0881.
>
>Because we will be discussing the substance of PG&E's settlement proposal at
>next week's workshop, any party who wishes to attend will be required to
>have completed the Rule 51 form. (Please note, if you received our December
>21 transmittal, then that means PG&E has your Rule 51 form on file, so there
>is no need to fill it out again.)
>
>Also attached below is a proposed Agenda for next week's workshop. We will
>start the sessions at 9:30 a.m. on Wednesday and at 9:00 a.m. on Thursday.
>We will provide coffee and juice in the morning, and lunch each day.
>
>If you do plan to attend next week's workshop, we request that you please
>confirm your attendance, so that we can get a headcount for the food and
>drink orders. Please e-mail a response to Darcy Morrison ([email protected]), or
>telephone Darcy at (415) 973-6644.
>
>We look forward to seeing you next week and having a productive discussion.
>
>
>Frank Lindh Ray Williams
>415-973-2776 415-973-3634
>[email protected] [email protected]
>
> <<Gas Accord II Information Form.doc>> <<Agenda 1-10&11-01 Workshop.doc>>
>
>
>
=====================================
|
3,280 |
Subject: FW: Bilas Proposal
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent_items/639.
=====================================
-----Original Message-----
From: Dasovich, Jeff
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 12:06 PM
To: '[email protected]'
Subject: Bilas Proposal
1)Market concentration limits reduced from 40% to 30 % of available receipt
point capacity. P.44
2)SoCal will be required to make available on a daily basis any unutilized
firm RP capacity. P.45
3)Price Cap for secondary intrastate market set at 120 % of SoCal firm rate.
This is the same cap that applies to SoCal.P.46
4)Bilas mentions support for Hector Rd. as a delivery/receipt at Ferc.
5)PD does not reduce the core's interstate capacity nor their storage
capacities but rather maintains these capacities at current levels. Current
level 1044 MMcfd, proposed 1000 MMcfd on the interstate system and current
storage 70 BCF, 327 MMcfd of injection and 1,935 MMcfd withdrawal Vs
proposed 55 BCF. P.52 &54.
6) CTA's (Core Transport Agents) allowed to reject only their prorata share
of non-reliability storage service.P. 58
7) SoCal directed to present(via Advice Ltr.) how the cost of noncore
default balancing will be allocated ONLY to those noncore customer using
this service and not to the Core customers.P.62
8)PD rejects the requirement that SoCal/SDG&E file an application with a
proposal to address core procurement function as the default provider. P.63
9)Preserves the right for SoCal/SDG&E to seek recovery of expenditures
associated with the transfers of customers from Core to Core Aggregator. P.66
10)PD orders a 10 % cap on ITCS (stranded cost)responsibility borne by
bundled core customers due to unbundled core interstate capacity. P. 75
11) PD orders that the core contribution to noncore ITCS will end effective
the adoption of the PD. Additionally, noncore customers to pay 50% of core
ITCS till the end of the core TW and EPNG agreements. The PD estimates an
additional $18 million over next 5 to 6 years. P. 78 The PD provides an
estimate of increased stranded cost for the noncore between 01 and 06 to be
approx. $ 44.4 Million.
12) PD say NO to an increase in the core brokerage fee of $ 0.0039 (to $2.4
cents).P.83.
13) PD treats Core Subscription service differently on an accounting basis.
P.85-87
14)Generally, the PD makes some administrative changes to the small core/ESP
market rules and SoCal services and consumer protection implementation . P 88-100.
15)Lots of tweaking on how SoCal can recover the cost to implement to
services envisioned under the CSA. P. 103-110.
=====================================
|
3,281 |
Subject: RE: FW: MPAR Team Assignment Change
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['Kimberely Kupiecki (E-mail); Ted Chin (E-mail)', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/1560.
=====================================
1219 Taylor St #24. Clay and taylor (north west quadrant)
call me if you have any questions
491-5572.
Should I order food for all of us, or just Ted and me?
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2000 4:52 PM
To: Jacqueline Kelly
Cc: Kimberely Kupiecki (E-mail); Ted Chin (E-mail)
Subject: RE: FW: MPAR Team Assignment Change
i have no parking. let's meet at your place. kim and i can carpool and
take the "legal" spot. what's the address?
Jacqueline
Kelly To: "'[email protected]'"
<JKelly@FairI <[email protected]>, "Ted
Chin (E-mail)"
saac.com> <[email protected]>, "Kimberely
Kupiecki
(E-mail)"
<[email protected]>
11/08/2000 cc:
06:33 PM Subject: RE: FW: MPAR Team
Assignment Change
We can also meet at my meager apartment. Parking is difficult, although,
there is one spot on the sidewalk in front of my house that the
neighborhood
has deemed a legal spot. Do you have parking Jeff?
Either is fine with me!
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2000 4:26 PM
To: Jacqueline Kelly
Subject: Re: FW: MPAR Team Assignment Change
We can meet at my meager apartment if you like. Around 7?
Jacqueline
Kelly To: "Jeff Dasovich (E-mail)"
<JKelly@FairI <[email protected]>
saac.com> cc:
Subject: FW: MPAR Team
Assignment Change
11/08/2000
01:54 PM
How lame is this e-mail...
(Did you complain about being on my team??)
Where are we meeting tonight? I think I may have your case study...I have
someone's.
See you tonight,
Jackie
-----Original Message-----
From: Meg St. John [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2000 11:32 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: MPAR Team Assignment Change
Jackie,
We have changed your team assignment for the Mid Program Academic
Retreat. You were assigned to Atlantic 5, but that team had more members
than any other and we needed to reshuffle to achieve some parity.
You are now assigned to Atlantic 4.
This means that your Pre-Meeting will occur on Tuesday, and not Wednesday.
Please do not hesitate to contact me with any questions or concerns that
you may have.
Thank you,
Meg St. John
Assistant Director, Evening MBA Program
(510) 527-1406
=====================================
|
3,282 |
Subject: RE: Proposal AREM response to UDC Joint Filing - Implementation of
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent_items/2322.
=====================================
Apologies just got back. Can't make the call, but concur that we ought to stay where we were. Not that the proposal doesn't merit discussion, but it raises many issues and we're down to the wire. So I concur with Bill and Aaron. Perhaps we should try to regroup first thing in the AM?
Best,
Jeff
-----Original Message-----
From: Bill Chen [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 6:00 PM
To: '[email protected]'; [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]; Dasovich, Jeff
Subject: RE: Proposal AREM response to UDC Joint Filing - Implementation
of Su spension DA
All,
Unfortunately, Aaron and I will not be able to make this call. However, we
wanted to let the group know that we are strongly opposed to New West's
proposal and urge the group to adopt the position we agreed to during last
week's call, i.e., oppose the UDCs' proposal for a DASR cut-off date, for
the reasons outlined in Dan's most recent draft.
Thanks.
Bill
925.287.4703
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 11:21 AM
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Proposal AREM response to UDC Joint Filing - Implementation of Su
spension DA
I have had an opportunity to talk to most of you regarding the attached
proposal. I apologize I ran out of time yesterday and didn't catch
everyone.
NWE would like to propose a slightly different take on our AREM filing
having had a chance to think more about it. I wanted to run it by everyone
to get your thoughts before submitting a redline. If you feel this warrants
a conference call I will gladly set one up for today. Time is of the
essence and would appreciate your feedback as soon as possible. If we all
agree, I would like to get the re-write with everyone's blessing to Dan by
tomorrow at 8:00 am. or sooner.
<<arm-puc-plan.doc>>
Proposal Benefits
1. We look more reasonable and agree to much of what UDCs are
proposing.
2. Accommodates most, if not all, of ESP and customer concerns.
3. Strong argument for avoiding any contract review. Our
verification proposal could backfire; PUC could accept our approach, but add
details which goes toward ESPs submitting contracts to the PUC for review
and validation
Thank you,
Janie Mollon
Manager, Legislative and Regulatory Affairs
Office: 602-629-7758
FAX: 602-629-7772
Mobile: 602-625-3892
=====================================
|
3,283 |
Subject: nan
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/deleted_items/179.
=====================================
This ought to be very interesting!!
NGI's Daily Gas Price Index
published : August 24, 2001
FERC's Wood Looking for a Few Good Executives
Chairman designate Pat Wood III is looking for a few good energy executives to teach him and his FERC colleagues the ins and outs of the natural gas and electricity markets, specifically how to detect when something "smelly" is taking place.
He's willing to pay a maximum salary of $133,700 -- which is what he'll be making as chairman -- for up to 10 executives who are interested in the task. That's the "top payment" that Congress will allow, Wood noted. He's also looking to hire an unspecified number of executives at a salary in the $115,000 range. Potential applicants should call him directly at (202) 208-0388, Wood said during an interview with NGI Thursday.
"We've tried like crazy to get people. We can't compete on dollars...Government never competes on dollars. You got to get people who believe in this thing. There are people who want to do...something good for the [public]. I'm going to find those people," he noted, adding that this was a top priority with him.
For interested executives, Wood said, "I'm going to give you the top [salary] I can pay you in the U.S. government, and I'm going to give you a helluva great workload in a critical industry that everybody in America depends on."
He wants the executives to show him and the other four Commissioners "how it works." For example, "hedging and derivatives are great words" that are often tossed around, but Wood would like to know exactly how they work. "All five of us need to know everything about this business."
Wood acknowledged that the new Market Observation Resource Center, which enables FERC to monitor the markets on a real-time basis throughout the day, has been a great addition at the Commission, but he says the agency needs people to decipher the data that it generates. "Getting the data is one thing, but having somebody that can assimilate that into something that tells you a story" is what FERC needs.
He firmly believes that reported incidents of price manipulation and other market-power abuses will drop as the Commission's knowledge of the markets grows. "As we get smart on this, they won't try this stuff," Wood said, adding that it will "let them know [that] we're watching."
Still, he admits that spotting price manipulation won't be easy for the Commission. "I think it's hard...even if you're really good at it."
=====================================
|
3,284 |
Subject: Fiber to India
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/217.
=====================================
Category: Enron India, iNdia, Telecom data network, Fiber optic, Flag Telecom
Description: Enron India Says Company Close To Deal For Telecom Data Network
Detail:
11/29/1999
Dow Jones Business News
(Copyright (c) 1999, Dow Jones & Company, Inc.)
NEW DELHI -(Dow Jones)- U.S. energy giant Enron Corp. has signed a memorandum
of understanding with an undersea-cable operator and is in advanced
negotiations for a separate venture to build a fiber-optic telecommunications
network, Sanjay Bhatnagar, chairman and chief executive officer of Enron
India Ltd., told Dow Jones Newswires.
The two projects are central to an aggressive foray by Enron (ENE), already
known in India for its high-profile energy investments, into communications
services.
Just as it is doing in the U.S., Enron hopes to build in India a national
broadband network to improve data communications, including the use of the
Internet. Initially, Enron aims to build a high-bandwidth backbone connecting
seven large cities, each housing a data center -- a large bank of computer
servers to facilitate Internet applications, such as hosting Web sites to cut
time and cost for Indian Internet users.
Bhatnagar said that Enron has signed an MOU with FLAG Telecom, which operates
a network of submarine cables, to connect Enron's "Indian network to the
world." The first leg of that network will be a high-capacity fiber-optic
connection between India's capital, New Delhi, and the country's financial
center, Bombay. Enron is currently finalizing a joint venture with Ircon, the
construction arm of India's state-owned railways, to build and operate the
New Delhi-Bombay link.
"We are in the process of negotiating the detailed agreement," Bhatnagar
said, adding that he believes the joint venture agreement will be signed
within two months.
Ircon is to hold a 50% stake in the joint venture, with Enron, British
Telecommunications PLC (BTY) and Indian conglomerate Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd.
holding minority stakes.
Bhatnagar said Enron is negotiating with several potential partners, which he
declined to name, on other pieces of the Indian network. Likewise, in
addition to the Indian railways, Enron is speaking with other bodies,
including a highway authority, on gaining the right of way to lay fiber-optic
cable in other areas of India. It is also likely to team up with private
telephone networks and Internet service providers in the target cities.
=====================================
|
3,285 |
Subject: fuel storage tanks
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/deleted_items/454.
=====================================
Diesel Fuel Storage Tanks in Los Angeles
I pieced together some initial information on the prospect of installing diesel fuel storage tanks in the Los Angeles area. Much depends on the location of the storage facility as well as on the type (i.e. above or below ground) and size of the facility. Listed below are a few agencies that have a hand in overseeing fuel storage tanks.
Fire Department
The Fire Department requires permits and review of plans for fuel storage facilities. One of three permits applies - division 4, division 5 or special permit - depending on the facility (above ground, below ground, quantity stored, area of storage facilities, etc). The permit paperwork looks quite comprehensive including a range of information from ownership to geological/groundwater measurements. However, once the application is complete, the Los Angeles Fire Department said they usually turn the permit around in a day. The proper fire department to contact depends on the location of the site. [LAFD - 213-485-7543]
Los Angeles County
Industrial Waste permits are only required for tanks that discharge waste, so for storage, no permit is required. However, the County approves fuel storage for either a spill containment plan or double walled + leak sensor construction. Underground storage of hazardous materials is of concern to the County, but it is unclear where the fire department leaves off and the county picks up. In cities where the fire department does not process permits for fuel storage, the County plays a larger role. [LA County Environmental Programs - 626-458-3517]
California EPA
License/permit processes seem to have been passed down to local levels, though I believe that EPA has installation and/or engineering requirements for fuel tanks. I was not able to reach a contact, but I was advised to speak with the Engineering Unit - 916-341-5775.
Zoning & Building Requirements
Zoning restrictions exist in Los Angeles and building permits are required as in any facility. Narrowing the location or locations under consideration for the tanks will help the information search.
My initial impression is that this is a comprehensive process, but not necessarily any worse than other cities. The process is unlikely to change - for better or worse - any time real soon.
Please contact me with any questions or if you need more in-depth information - x5-2431 or [email protected].
Regards,
Maggy Huson
Government Affairs
=====================================
|
3,286 |
Subject: Re: CLEC Licensing
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/8321.
=====================================
Will do.
Marchris Robinson@ENRON
01/13/01 10:37 AM
To: Mona L Petrochko/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Margo Reyna/NA/Enron@Enron, Barbara A Hueter/NA/Enron@Enron, Donald
Lassere/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Lara
Leibman/NA/Enron@Enron, Marchris Robinson/NA/Enron@Enron, Scott Bolton/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Sue Nord/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan M
Landwehr/NA/Enron@Enron, Tracy Cooper/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Xi Xi/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
Subject: Re: CLEC Licensing
Mona:
I will check on it and get back to you next week.
MR
Mona L Petrochko
01/12/2001 04:50 PM
To: Margo Reyna/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Barbara A Hueter/NA/Enron@Enron, Donald Lassere/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Lara Leibman/NA/Enron@Enron, Marchris
Robinson/NA/Enron@Enron, Scott Bolton/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Sue Nord/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan M Landwehr/NA/Enron@Enron,
Tracy Cooper/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Xi Xi/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications
Subject: Re: CLEC Licensing
Good question, Margo. Yes, we should do as you suggest, check with counsel
about transferring the existing CLEC license to ETI. If not, then naturally,
we will need to refile our application. Marchris, could you check with
counsel in FL and TX counsel? Scott, could you check with OR? I will check
with Dan Clearfield for NY. I will also submit an RCR for tier 1 and tier 2
states for next week. Please let me and Margo know what counsel advises.
Thanks.
Margo Reyna
01/12/2001 04:18 PM
To: Mona L Petrochko/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Barbara A Hueter/NA/Enron@Enron, Donald Lassere/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Lara Leibman/NA/Enron@Enron, Marchris
Robinson/NA/Enron@Enron, Scott Bolton/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Sue Nord/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan M Landwehr/NA/Enron@Enron,
Tracy Cooper/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Xi Xi/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications
Subject: Re: CLEC Licensing
Mona,
How will we proceed in those states where we have obtained CLEC authority for
EBS? Should we first ask counsel to determine whether we can simply transfer
the existing CLEC license to ETI? I imagine we cannot do that, but I'm just
wondering if it is a logical first step in those states to at least ask.
Thanks.
Margo Reyna
Regulatory Analyst
Enron Corp., Government Affairs
Phone: 713-853-9191
=====================================
|
3,287 |
Subject: Re: CA Leg Update
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/941.
=====================================
Summary of Davis/Alpert bill:
1. Retro-active to June 1, 2000 through December 31, 2002, 6.5 cent/kWh cap
on the energy component for residential and small commercial customers (under
100 kW). The Commission has the ability to extend through 2003. The
Commission also has the ability to adjust the cap.
2. Commission can use revenues from utility-owned assets, refunds from FERC
to offset the undercollections. (In addition, a companion bill was passed
that provides $150 million of general fund money to offset undercollections.)
3. Large commercial/industrial/agricultural customers have an opportunity to
"opt-in" to the 6.5 cent/kWh cap with an annual true-up.
4. SDG&E will under a prudence review by the CPUC, which may be another
source of funds to offset the undercollection.
Specific classes subject to cap:
Schedule A, all acute care hospitals, all public and private k-12 schools,
all accounts on AL-TOU under 100 kW.
Mona L Petrochko
08/31/2000 09:46 AM
To: James D Steffes/HOU/EES@EES, Harry Kingerski/HOU/EES@EES, Richard
Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, West GA, Tim Belden@ECT, Dennis Benevides/HOU/EES@EES,
Roger Yang, James M Wood/HOU/EES@EES, Martin Wenzel/SFO/HOU/EES@EES, Douglas
Condon/SFO/EES@EES, Greg Cordell, Edward Hamb/HOU/EES@EES, Jennifer
Rudolph/HOU/EES@EES, Mary Hain@Enron, Joe Hartsoe@Enron, Cynthia
Sandherr/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Karen Denne@Enron, Peggy Mahoney/HOU/EES@EES, Mark
Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Chris Hendrix/HOU/EES@EES, Brian
Dafferner/HOU/EES@EES, Gary Mirich/HOU/EES@EES, George Waidelich/SFO/EES@EES,
Ronald G Mentan/SFO/EES@EES, Chris Hendrix/HOU/EES@EES, Ken Detina/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: CA Leg Update
The Alpert/Davis Bill (AB 265) and AB 1154 were voted out of the assembly
last night. Three bills are now joined together. The Alpert/Davis Bill (AB
265), Ducheny Siting Bill (AB 970) and AB 1154, which provides $150 million
of money from the general fund to offset undercollections resulting from the
Alpert/Davis bill imposition of a rate cap.
AB 970 is being heard in the assembly as we speak. It is expected to be
voted out. Then all three bills will be sent to the Governor to be signed.
There were no revisions to the Alpert/Davis bill.
Green Mountain is working on a letter, that Alpert would sign, saying that
underrecoveries resulting from the rate cap will be recovered from customers
that benefitted from the rate cap and that DA customers will not be
disadvantaged.
=====================================
|
3,288 |
Subject: Introducing NASDAQ-100 Index TIERS (sm)
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/10682.
=====================================
Introducing NASDAQ-100 Index TIERS (sm)
Principal-Protected* Trust Certificates
TIERS Nasdaq-100 Principal-Protected* Trust Certificates are
securities whose return is linked to the performance of
the Nasdaq-100 Index. At maturity, the Trust is scheduled to
repay the entire principal amount of the certificates, plus an
amount based on the return of the Nasdaq-100 Index subject to
a quarterly appreciation cap of 12%.
Payment to the trust will be guaranteed pursuant to the
terms of a financial guaranty insurance policy
issued by Ambac Assurance Corporation.
Expected to be Aaa rating by Moody's and AAA rating by
Standard & Poor's.
Expected to be priced April 11, 2001.
Expected offering price is $10 per certificate.
For more information and a copy of the prospectus,
please go to:
http://www.schwabnet.com/tiers/
or
Speak with a Specialized Product Representative at
1-800-551-1001 ext. 33 from 5:30 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. PDT.
* When held to maturity.
----------------------------------------------------------------
A registration statement relating to these securities has been
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission but has not
yet become effective. These securities may not be sold nor may
offers to buy be accepted prior to the time the registration
statement becomes effective. This communication shall not
constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to
buy nor shall there be any sales of these securities in any
jurisdiction in which the offer, solicitation or sale would be
unlawful prior to registration or qualification under the
securities laws of any such State.
"TIERS" is a registered service mark of Salomon Smith Barney
Charles Schwab & Co.
101 Montgomery Street
San Francisco, CA 94104
----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the BondSource emails, please reply to
this message with Unsubscribe in the Message Body.
For your protection, we are unable to accept instructions to
change your email address sent in reply to this message. To
change your address, please log in to your account using the
link below. From there you will be able to update your email
information securely.
https://investing.schwab.com/trading/start?SANC=ROSEmail
Notice: All email sent to or from the Charles Schwab corporate
email system may be retained, monitored, and/or
reviewed by Schwab personnel.
(c)2001 Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. All rights reserved.
Member SIPC/NYSE (0401-6572)
=====================================
|
3,289 |
Subject: FW: workshop notice
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/4707.
=====================================
Very interesting ....
-----Original Message-----
From: Cherry, Brian
Sent: Monday, March 26, 2001 8:08 AM
To: Andrew Niven (E-mail); Benjamin Campbell (E-mail); Dan McLafferty
(E-mail); Dan Thomas (E-mail); David Anderson (E-mail); Dede Hapner
(E-mail); Dennis Gee (E-mail); Donald Petersen (E-mail); Frank Lindh
(E-mail); G Jefferson (E-mail); Gary Guerrero (E-mail); Geoffrey Bellenger
(E-mail); George Clavier (E-mail); J Reidenbach (E-mail); Jerry Miller
(E-mail); John Armato (E-mail); John Clarke (E-mail); Joshua Bar-Lev
(E-mail); Karen Tomcala (E-mail); Kevin Ernst (E-mail); Kirk Johnson
(E-mail); Les Buchner (E-mail); Les Guliasi (E-mail); Linda Agerter
(E-mail); Lisa Lieu (E-mail); Lise Jordan (E-mail); Mark Huffman (E-mail);
Michael Katz (E-mail); Neha Patel (E-mail); Patrick Golden (E-mail); Paul
Sivley (E-mail); Randall Litteneker (E-mail); Ray Williams (E-mail); Richard
Hall (E-mail); Rodney Boschee (E-mail); Sandra Burns (E-mail); Sandy
Dickinson (E-mail); Shaun Halverson (E-mail); Shelly Malekos (E-mail);
Shirley Woo (E-mail); Stuart Tartaglia (E-mail); Todd Arnett (E-mail);
Trista Berkovitz (E-mail)
Subject: FW: workshop notice
Attached for your information is an April 17 Notice of Workshop to Discuss
California Natural gas Infrastructure issued by the Energy Division.? The
Energy Division has scheduled the workshop to gather information on and
obtain analyses of the status of California's natural gas transmission and
storage capacity and the adequacy of that capacity to deliver gas to
California in the future.
The Energy Division is requesting that PG&E, SoCalGas, and SDG&E make
personnel and resources available to discuss and address the status of their
gas systems,? the adequacy of serving demand, and the future adequacy to
meet demand over the near -term (next year), mid-term (2-5 years) and
long-term (over 5 years).?? The notice also mentions that the Commission is
concerned over the adequacy of the 2000 CGR, particularly the electric
generation forecast and requests that the utilities be prepared to bring to
the workshop the most recent and up-to-date EG forecast and address gas
demand from new power projects.
I've been told that this request is coming through the Energy Division from
the President Lynch's office and is in response to legislative concerns over
natural gas infrastructure development.
?
- Notice for gas infrastructure workshop.doc
=====================================
|
3,290 |
Subject: Request for Confidential Information by the US GAO
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/1931.
=====================================
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 09/29/2000 06:04 PM -----
<[email protected]>
09/29/2000 05:53 PM
To: [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected]
cc: [email protected]
Subject: Request for Confidential Information by the GAO
To All California Power Exchange Participants:
Notice is hereby provided pursuant to Section 19.3.4 of the California Power
Exchange Tariff that the United States General Accounting Office (GAO), as
part
of the ongoing investigation of California markets, has requested the same
information to be provided to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC).
Such information may be confidential under Section 19.3.2 of the Tariff. The
manner in which the GAO will treat such confidential information is outlined
in
the attached letter. The GAO states that it has authority under 31 U.S.C. 717
to evaluate programs or activities of the Federal Government, in this case,
deregulation of the electricity markets initiated by FERC.
The GAO has requested the California Power Exchange to provide such
information
no later than Thursday, October 5, 2000. If you desire to assert a claim of
privilege or confidentiality pursuant to legal authority, the California Power
Exchange will include your written assertion of that claim together with its
submittal to the GAO, provided that it is timely received. Your written
statement should be directed to the GAO as follows:
Mr. Jim Wells
Director, Energy Resources, and Science Issues
United States General Accounting Office
Washington, DC 20548
You may deliver your statement to the California Power Exchange as follows:
Karen Koyano
California Power Exchange
1000 S. Fremont Avenue
Unit 20
Alhambra, CA 91801
626.537.3173 facsimile
Any written statement must be received by Ms. Koyano no later than Wednesday,
October 4, 2000, 5:00 p.m. Pacific Daylight Time, to be included with any
information delivered to the GAO. You are also free to take any other legal
action you may deem appropriate in the circumstances of this investigation.
Thank you.
(See attached file: GAO Letter 9-22-00.doc)
- GAO Letter 9-22-00.doc
=====================================
|
3,291 |
Subject: Re:RE: Here it is...
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/3920.
=====================================
I sent a reply a few hours ago. I wonder if there is a problem with my
e-mail.
I'm driving. If you need a ride, let me know and I can meet you on Market
and
Beale.
**********************************************
Mark D. Guinney, CFA
Consultant
Watson Wyatt Investment Consulting
345 California Street, Ste. 1400
San Francisco, CA 94104
(415) 733-4487 ph.
(415) 733-4190 fax
____________________Reply Separator____________________
Subject: RE: Here it is...
Author: "Sama; Anil" <SMTP:[email protected]>
Date: 04/26/2001 5:07 PM
Haven't heard from Mark yet... Am waiting to hear before
printing and emailing to Tasker...
Mark, Jeff: Are any of you driving over to campus from
the city?
-----Original Message-----
From: Vavrek, Carolyn (US - San Francisco) [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2001 12:45 PM
To: Sama, Anil; 'Guinney, Mark'; '[email protected]'
Subject: RE: Here it is...
Looks great to me (although the slide animation did not work on my machine
so I can't comment on that)!
If we are all in agreement, someone needs to e-mail Sarah a copy and print
one out for her. Can you do that Anil once you get an okay from Jeff and
Mark? Thanks for all the hard work.
See everyone around 5:30pm in Jimmy Bean's.
- cv
Carolyn M. Vavrek
Manager - Human Capital Advisory Services
Deloitte & Touche
50 Fremont Street
San Francisco, CA 94105
phone: 415-783-5137
fax: 415-783-8760
e-mail: [email protected]
-----Original Message-----
From: Sama, Anil [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2001 11:41 AM
To: 'Carolyn Vavrek'; 'Guinney, Mark'; '[email protected]'
Subject: Here it is...
Hi Team,
Here's the final cut.
I added hyperlinks to DCF sheets in backup as well as to
trading comps and deal comps in the backup. And animation
for slide turns.
Also, be sure to preview the 3-legged stool slide I added
after valuations in slide presentation mode with sound
enabled... Totally OK to remove it if any of you don't like
it...
<<E222_Mark_Quaker_presentation1.ZIP>>
Any Qs, call me on my cell: 916 600 1245.
-Anil
This message (including any attachments) contains confidential information
intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is protected by law. If
you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this message and are
hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this
message, or the taking of any action based on it, is strictly prohibited.
=====================================
|
3,292 |
Subject: RE: Mendocino
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/deleted_items/656.
=====================================
Please respond to
Hello all,
I made a reservation at Cleone Gardens Inn, just across the street from the ranch. I reserved a room for Pat, Cal and myself, but was unsure what other reservations to make for the rest of the group because some of you are still tentative and I'm not sure who is bringing SOs/dates.
The inn has one room called the Blue Iris room with two double beds that might work for Jeff W. and Jeff D. if going up single; most of their other rooms have a queen or king bed (the Meadow View king room sounded nice for a couple if we have any going up). Both of those are still available for the weekend we are planning to be there. I think there may be some cottages available also for multiple people, but I'm not sure what the configurations of those are. A full breakfast can be ordered from some of the rooms for $14.00 extra. They serve breakfast at 8:00 a.m. Pat, Cal and I have a suite with a small kitchen, so we may also be able to host some minimal meals/snacks/drinks.
The phone number of Cleone Gardens is 1-800-400-2189. Their website, which has pictures and descriptions of their rooms, is cleonegardensinn.com. If the Cleone Gardens Inn does not have the room configuration you want, Lari's website (horse-vacations.com) has links to numerous other hotels and B&Bs.
Tally ho!
Amy
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Sunday, July 08, 2001 7:10 PM
To: Scatena, Pat
Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; Jeff Walker (E-mail); Kari Ontko (E-mail); Lori Hom (E-mail); 'Madeleine Todd'; Nora McGee (E-mail); [email protected]
Subject: RE: Mendocino
Hi All:
Madeleine was kind about me not keeping up with personal emails ....
I am putting the Mendocino dates on my calendar. I would like to ride both days. I would also like to stay where everyone will be happiest ;)
Howard's Creek is great, but I agree with Pat, that we just won't have the time to enjoy the place (or breakfast).
BTW - Are any non-riders coming??
Jeff.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Jeff Walker Office: (650) 632-7648
i2 Technologies Cell: (650) 868-7585
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
=====================================
|
3,293 |
Subject: FW: DWR contracts on-line
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['James; Andrews', 'Neha; Johnson', '[email protected]', 'Richard; Yajnik', '[email protected]', 'Steffes', 'Jeff; Lassander']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/28635.
=====================================
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 07/11/2001 06:02 PM -----
Alan Comnes/ENRON@enronXgate
07/06/2001 03:17 PM
To: Tim Belden/ENRON@enronXgate, Christopher F Calger/ENRON@enronXgate, Tim
Heizenrader/ENRON@enronXgate, Stephen Swain/ENRON@enronXgate, Susan J
Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: FW: DWR contracts on-line
It's worth going to this site just to "flip the switch" and see the redacted
portions appear before your very eyes!
-----Original Message-----
From: Thome, Jennifer
Sent: Friday, July 06, 2001 10:31 AM
To: Comnes, Alan; Sharma, Ban
Cc: Steffes, James; Andrews, Jeff; Lassander, Richard; Yajnik, Neha; Johnson,
Tamara
Subject: DWR contracts on-line
Ken Smith just called my attention to the following. See this link for all
formerly censored language from the DWR contracts:
http://www.sco.ca.gov/power_page/contract_info.htm
Also, see the summary link.
Finally, below is an interesting article about the real cost of the contracts.
Connell: Power cost twice Davis' figure July 6, 2001 By JOHN HOWARD
The Orange County Register SACRAMENTO -- The average cost of electricity
purchased under $43 billion of worth of state contracts is actually more than
double the amount reported by Gov. Gray Davis' administration, state
Controller Kathleen Connell said Thursday. Connell said her staff's analysis
put the per-megawatt average at $170, compared with $69 to $79 estimated by
Davis. Connell stopped short of suggesting that the higher cost could drive
another increase in rates, although consumer groups said the higher amount
likely would require some future increase. The controller, who writes the
state's checks, said her figures assume fixed prices for natural gas over the
duration of the contracts, which range from a few months to 20 years. The
administration, noting that nearly half its contracts are pegged to the
fluctuating market price of natural gas, said costs on many of the contracts
would decline over time. Consumer groups were skeptical of the
administration's numbers. "You could cut these numbers in various ways and
make different averages, long-range or short-range contracts, peak power or
nonpeak, and probably either average could be defended mathematically," said
Nettie Hoge of The Utility Reform Network. "We can't tell you whether it's
$69 or $170 - the contracts are very convoluted and complex."
=====================================
|
3,294 |
Subject: Re: Government Secondee
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/12206.
=====================================
Have him get in touch directly with me for the moment...I agree that the=20
concerns Richard raised can be dealt with- I think Edward will see people w=
ho=20
are actually quite committed and passionate about their work.
From: Paul Dawson/Enron@EUEnronXGate on 07/04/2001 04:37 PM GDT
To: Paul Kaufman/ENRON@enronXgate, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard=20
Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Mark Schroeder/ENRON@enronXgate=20
Subject: Government Secondee
Attached below is the CV for Edward Barker.=01; As discussed previously,=20
Edward's fiancee is finishing a PhD in LA and the DTi are willing to second=
=20
Edward to California for a year.=01; I've got back to them saying that we'r=
e=20
happy to consider it, asking for a CV and passing on the need for Edward to=
=20
be based in either SF or Portland.=01; The latter point is fine, he would b=
e=20
willing to travel.
=01;
From the CV=01;Edward's background is similar to mine on the educational fr=
ont,=20
although he took a turn into Government rather than consulting when he left=
=20
university.=01; I think Edward is excellent.=01; He is one of the best=20
regulators/civil servants I've come across in terms of both his economic=20
knowledge and=01;awareness of commercial issues.=01; He should have a very=
=20
successful career at the DTI and it=01;be good if we=01;were able=01;to hel=
p him.
=01;
So - we've got the CV and the=01;agreement in principle to offering Edward=
=20
something, what's the best way to take this forward and make it happen?=01;=
Who=20
should I liaise with?
=01;
Thanks
=01;
Paul
=01;
PS: Richard Lewis did have one concern, ie, that if Edward gets too close t=
o=20
our reg affairs staff he may develop a cynical view of our regulatory staff=
=20
"arguing the book" rather than crusading for truth, justice and the public=
=20
interest.=01; This could backfire on us when he returns to the UK.=01; Whil=
e this=20
is a potential problem, I don't think we should be unduly=01;concerned beca=
use:
=01;
- Edward is astute enough to realise what drives most regulatory affairs=20
activity
- we generally are arguing in the public interest anyway
- if we're aware of the problem we can circumnavigate it.
=01;
=01;
=01;
=01;
-----Original Message-----
From: Barker Edward (Mr EOR) [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: 04 July 2001 16:03
To: Dawson, Paul
Subject: CV
<<cv26062001.doc>>=20
Paul=20
Further to your conversation with Ian earlier, PSA my CV.=20
Thanks!=20
Edward=20
=====================================
|
3,295 |
Subject: IMPORTANT DOCUMENTS: QF PRICING/NON-PRICING TERM AGREEMENT AND
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/8375.
=====================================
Attached are the latest versions of the PG&E QF Pricing/Non-Pricing Term
Agreement [1/19/01 DRAFT WASHINGTON DC SUMMIT ON CALIFORNIA ENERGY CRISES:
PG&E AND QF PARTIES BLUEPRINT FOR RESTRUCTURING OF ENERGY PRICING] and the
PG&E/QF Forbearance Agreement [DATED 1/19/01]. This documents are
essentially final form, but we recognize the potential need for future
discussions. The goal, however, is to have the QF parties circulate these
documents to their principals, lenders, etc. over the weekend for review.
Regarding the QF Pricing/Non-Pricing Term Agreement AS IT PERTAINS TO
NON-GAS FIRED QFS, we are seeking some type of letter, email, sent by a QF
Party, under cover of Confidentiality, NO LATER THAN 10;00 A.M. (PST) ON
MONDAY, JANUARY 22 which would indicate how many MWs and at what price the
QF industry would be willing to deliver to PG&E pursuant to the QF
Pricing/Non-Pricing Term Agreement. INCLUDED IN THIS ."PROPOSAL: LETTER OF
COMMITMENT" SHOULD BE CLEAR LANGUAGE AS TO WHETHER THE PRICING PROPOSAL IS
CONTINGENT ON THE SUCCESSFUL RESOLUTION OF THE NON-PRICING MATTERS, PERHASPS
SPECIFIYING WHICH ONES INCLUDING CREDIT ENHANCEMENTS. THIS IS IMPORTANT
FOR PG&E TO KNOW WHETHER WE HAVE CRITICAL MASS AND WHAT THE LIKELY AVERAGE
PRICE MIGHT BE FOR NON-GAS FIRED QFS. THIS WILL BE AN IMPORTANT INPUT INTO
THE CPUC "ALL PARTIES" QF MEETING SCHEDULED FOR MONDAY ON JANUARY 22 AT 1:00
TO ADDRESS SRAC MATTERS.
All proposals of "letters of commitment", which will be non-binding pending
signature on January 28, should be forwarded to PG&E as a Good Faith Offer.
These proposals should be sent via email to Keenen O'Brien, PG&E, at the
following email address: [email protected]
Regarding the Forbearance Agreement, all parties understand and agree the
importance of a credit enhancement to make this work. At present, the
concepts of the credit enhancement are undergoing PG&E senior management
review. For now, the concept is provided in the Forbearance Agreement as a
placeholder pending this review. As the documents contemplate signatures no
later than January 28, the lack of this language now hopefully will not
detract from companies' ability to make proposals of commitments under the
QF Pricing/Non-Pricing Terms of Agreement.
The next meeting with PG&E is scheduled for 10:00 a.m. on Monday, January
22, at PG&E.
<<dkknongas1.doc>> <<third forbearance agreement (no guaranty).doc>>
- dkknongas1.doc
- third forbearance agreement (no guaranty).doc
=====================================
|
3,296 |
Subject: Gas Accord II: Next Steps
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/1574.
=====================================
Confidential Settlement Document
CPUC Rule 51
ALL PARTIES:
Thanks to the many parties who attended our Gas Accord II kick-off meeting
on September 14. We thought it was a good start toward a collaborative
settlement process. This e-mail summarizes the next steps identified at the
meeting.
First, the list of the issues identified by the parties is being sent by a
separate e-mail transmittal today to those parties who have agreed to abide
by Rule 51. We are continuing to assemble the issues list, and would like
any more issues that parties wish to raise sent to us by this Friday,
September 22. This is not to limit issues, but rather to build our workshop
presentations and discussions, and ultimately our settlement proposal. If
you are not on the Rule 51 list and wish to be added, please complete the
Mailing List Information form below. Also attached is a copy of CPUC Rule
51.
Second, attached is an updated schedule for the Gas Accord II workshops.
Please note, the November workshop has been moved to November 7-8 (which is
Tuesday and Wednesday), instead of the week following as we had originally
proposed. We request that you please hold the attached dates on your
calendars if you plan to be active in the settlement discussions.
Based on the issues list, we suggest the following topics for the first
three workshops:
* September 27: Reliability, for both facilities and supply.
* October 11-12: Market, cost and rate data.
* November 8-9: Market operations, including core issues, balancing,
open season rules, and information disclosure.
Please let us know if this workshop plan does not work for you.
Third, PG&E will provide a basic set of market data and preliminary cost
data to all of the Rule 51 parties in advance of the October 11-12 Workshop.
This will help parties to identify and analyze their issues. After seeing
this data, to the extent there are other information requests, please send
them to Frank Lindh (e-mail to [email protected] or Fax to 415-973-5520).
Again thank you for your participation in the Gas Accord II Settlement
Process. We look forward to our upcoming workshops and discussions. Please
feel free to call us if you have questions.
Frank Lindh Ray Williams
415-973-2776 415-973-3634
[email protected] [email protected]
Attachments
<<Mailing List Information>> <<CPUC Rule 51>> <<Gas Accord II Settlement
Schedule>>
- Mailing List Information.doc
- CPUC Rule 51.doc
- Gas Accord II Settlement Schedule.doc
=====================================
|
3,297 |
Subject: Enron Support from OC Register Editorial "...side with the law
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/28858.
=====================================
In case you didn't see it 7/16/01 -- Palmer quoted
Senate power play jolts Enron 'The whole thing stinks to high heaven." That
was the assessment Adrian Moore, executive director of Reason Public Policy
Institute, gave of a state Senate committee's recent move to hold Enron Corp.
in contempt for refusing to hand over subpoenaed documents. We're inclined
to agree. The Texas-based energy merchant has filed a countersuit in
Sacramento Superior Court, arguing that the Senate has no right to wield
influence beyond state borders and that putting the documents into public
view "jeopardized confidential business information," the Register reported
Thursday. The court should order the Senate either to make its document
request more specific or to drop the contempt charge and subpoena altogether.
Robert Levy, a constitutional law expert at the Cato Institute, told us that
Enron's point about disclosing confidential information will be its strongest
argument in court. While Enron can't hide behind state borders, Levy says
the Senate's request is not tailored narrowly enough to ensure information
that could damage Enron's market viability is not released. He said the
Senate should have to let a judge decide whether releasing the documents is
necessary for its investigation and avoids unfairly harming Enron. Instead,
the full Senate just has to approve the committee's recommendation for
Enron's executives to become criminals. "It seems to me that's a scary
proposition," Levy said. "Why should the Senate have such plenary power?"
Good question. Moore told us it's because the energy crisis has created an
"all-bets-are-off" situation in Sacramento, where anything goes so long as
it's attacking the energy companies. Because Enron is just a merchant, not a
producer, of energy, it couldn't have had much at all to do with manipulating
the market. "It's impossible," Enron spokesman Mark Palmer told us Friday.
"We don't have anything to withhold. We don't have an interest in high
prices in California. We're just interested in a marketplace that works."
Added Moore, "It's pretty hard to spin a realistic scenario where they
(Enron) engaged in gouging." Moore said a judge's recent ruling that
criticized Davis' allegations against energy producers gives hope the
Sacramento court very likely could side with the law rather than the
witchhunt. Here's hoping he's right.
Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854
=====================================
|
3,298 |
Subject: RTO Filing Conference Call Schedule UPDATE
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/1008.
=====================================
FYI - If you would like to participate.
----- Forwarded by Bernadette Hawkins/Corp/Enron on 10/17/2000 04:59 PM -----
"Jackie Gallagher" <[email protected]>
10/17/2000 11:05 AM
To: <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: RTO Filing Conference Call Schedule UPDATE
MEMORANDUM
TO: Regulatory Affairs Committee
Power Marketers Working Group
FROM: Don Santa, Regulatory Affairs Committee Chair
Joe Hartsoe, Power Marketing Working Group Chair
Julie Simon, Vice President of Policy
Mark Bennett, Senior Manager of Policy
Erin Perrigo, Manager of Policy
DATE: October 17, 2000
RE: RTO Filing Conference Call Schedule UPDATE
In the light of the flurry of recent filings, we have revised the RTO
conference call schedule. Since PJM made its RTO filing on October 11th, and
RTO West has made public its intent to file its substantive RTO proposal one
week after the October 16th deadline, we will discuss the PJM filing on
Friday in place of RTO West. We will schedule a call on RTO West and any
other significant filings that may be made for Friday, October 27th. A
schedule for those calls will follow.
Friday, October 20
? 1:30 PM PJM - Filing available at www.pjm.com, under the "Documents"
link, then under "FERC Filings"
? 2:30 PM SPP/Entergy -SPP's filing available at www.spp.org; Entergy's
filing available at www.entergy.com, under "Company
Information," then under "Transmission Business"
? 3:30 PM Desert STAR - Filing will be available at www.dstarnet.com
Monday, October 23
? 10:00 AM Grid South Transco - Filing available at www.gridsouth.com,
under "FERC Filing Documents"
? 11:00 AM Grid Florida - Filing available at www.flatransco.com, under
"Filing Documents"
? 12:00 AM Southern Gridco - will be at www.southernco.com later this
week
To access the calls, dial 1-800-937-6563 and ask for the Julie Simon/EPSA
call. If you have any questions, please contact Julie Simon at 202-789-7200
or [email protected].
Jacqueline Gallagher
Research/Policy Assistant
Electric Power Supply Association
1401 H Street, NW
Suite 760
Washington, DC 20005
202.789.7200
202.789.7201
[email protected]
=====================================
|
3,299 |
Subject: RE: SBX2 78 - Update
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent_items/1885.
=====================================
With Jim in Sacramento tomorrow, and hearings scheduled to discuss addition=
al amendments, seems like a good opportunity for Jim to testify and knock s=
ome sense into the damn committee. They won't know what hit 'em.
=20
Best,
Jeff
-----Original Message-----=20
From: Scott Govenar=20
Sent: Tue 8/28/2001 8:42 PM=20
To: Sharma, Ban; Leboe, David; Eric Letke; Thome, Jennifer; Ken Smith; Bev =
Hansen; Hedy Govenar; Buster, Miyung; Guerrero, Janel; Robert Frank; Mike D=
ay; Lawner, Leslie; Kingerski, Harry; Karen Denne; Kean, Steven J.; Alan Co=
mnes; Susan J Mara; Kaufman, Paul; Jeff Dasovich; Steffes, James D.; Rick S=
hapiro=20
Cc:=20
Subject: SBX2 78 - Update
The Assembly Energy, Costs and Availability Committee heard and voted on
amendments to SBX2 78 proposed by many interested parties. Some passed,
some failed and most of them served to further confuse the committee
members. Eventually the committee stalled on detailed proposals made by
TURN and other consumer groups.
During the hearing Hedy had the opportunity to speak to Nancy McFadden and
Richard Katz from the Governor=19 s office regarding a couple of issues
highlighted by Jeff and Mike Day. Richard said he is willing to make more
technical amendments when the bill gets to Appropriations. Subsequently,
Hedy and I spoke to D.J. Smith at Jeff=19 s request. D.J. agreed that the =
bill
needs to use the August 24th date as a grandfather date for executed DA
contracts, but specifically asked that we (Enron) not speak to Richard abou=
t
it. He said he will have the business entities request it as a clarifying
amendment. If we request it, he thought Richard would be less likely to
believe it's clarifying since he believes our motives to be too
self-serving. Also, we spent some time with Lenny Goldberg on direct
access. We suggested that =1C shall=1D be changed to =1C may=1D in order t=
o give more
leeway to the PUC on direct access suspension. He didn=19 t necessarily op=
pose
the policy, but his position is not to amend a bad bill unless you can
totally rewrite it (which he later attempted to do).
A lobbyist for a significant generator told us that they are prepared to
push Edison into bankruptcy (along with the Canadian government) if this
bill passes.
There is no consensus that this measure will ever get to the Governor=19 s
desk.
The committee will meet again tomorrow at approximately 1:30 p.m. to vote o=
n
additional amendments and ultimately to vote on the complete bill.
=====================================
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.