dataset_id
int64 0
5.47k
| email_body
stringlengths 800
9.73k
|
|---|---|
2,400 |
Subject: MEETING VERIFICATION re: Discussion of Rod Wright Meeting in LA
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', 'Cristina Zavala/SF/ECT@ECT', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/840.
=====================================
FYI. We'll get a call in number first think Monday morning. Paul, do you
want to notify Calger, Belden and Thomas in Portland?
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 11/04/2000 05:03 PM -----
Joseph Alamo
11/03/2000 07:11 PM
To: Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@Enron, Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Mona L
Petrochko/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, David
Parquet/SF/ECT@ECT, MBD <[email protected]> @ ENRON
cc: Cristina Zavala/SF/ECT@ECT, [email protected]
Subject: MEETING VERIFICATION re: Discussion of Rod Wright Meeting in LA
Please be advised that the meeting referenced on the attached is now
scheduled as follows:
Date Monday, Nov. 6
Time 12:30 PM PST
Location: Enron Office - 101 California - Suite 1950
SMALL Conference Room
Thanks in advance for your participation.
Joseph
---------------------- Forwarded by Joseph Alamo/NA/Enron on 11/03/2000 05:04
PM ---------------------------
Joseph Alamo
11/03/2000 10:06 AM
To: Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@Enron, Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Mona L
Petrochko/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, David
Parquet/SF/ECT@ECT, MBD <[email protected]> @ ENRON
cc: Cristina Zavala/SF/ECT@ECT, [email protected]
Subject: MEETING REQUEST: Information & Update RE: Rod Wright Meeting in Los
Angeles
Please be advised that Sandi would like to call a meeting Monday, November 6
to discuss
the above-referenced topic.
Please advise me ASAP your availability for said meeting.
Thanks in advance for your assistance.
Joseph Alamo
Sr. Administrative Assistant
Government Affairs - The Americas
San Francisco CA
=====================================
|
2,401 |
Subject: Correction to Pricing in February e.Bulletin
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/9124.
=====================================
Dear Schwab e.Bulletin Subscriber,
In the February 2001 edition of the e.Bulletin sent
on 2/13/2001, there is an error in the section
titled "Redesigned for Your Needs: Schwab
by Phone for Signature Services."
The reference to $14.95 pricing for up to 1,000 shares on
automated equity phone trades is incorrect.
Equity commissions on Schwab by Phone for Signature Services
are $29.95 for trades up to 1,000 shares and 3 cents per share
for trades over 1,000 shares, unless you qualify
for Active Trader Tiered Pricing: $19.95 for 31-60 trades per
quarter and $14.95 for 61+ trades per quarter, for qualifying
equity trades on automated channels up to 1,000 shares.
To learn more about Active Trader Tiered Pricing, just click
here:
http://schwab.ed10.net/ud/Z2B7/5M9/KFG/50/AMYXZ
As a result, for any equity trades you may have placed on Schwab
by Phone that were executed today only, we will honor the $14.95
price for the first 1,000 shares. We apologize for any inconvenience
and appreciate your understanding.
Sincerely,
Schwab e.Bulletin Team
----------------------------------------------------------------
If you would prefer to receive only account service emails,
please reply to this email indicating your preference. Please
note: doing so will not remove you from any Schwab Alerts or
email newsletters to which you have actively subscribed.
Notice: All email sent to or from the Charles Schwab
corporate email system may be retained, monitored and/or
reviewed by Schwab personnel.
(C)2001 Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. All rights
reserved. Member SIPC/NYSE (0201-13168)
[[Z2B7-KFG-AMYXZ-T]]
=====================================
|
2,402 |
Subject: Re: Meeting Info for Thursday
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/3365.
=====================================
Karen:
Here are additional suggestions:
Larry Ellison, Oracle
Carol Baartz, Autodesk
Steve Jobs, Apple
Jim Morgan, Applied Materials
Ko Nishamura, Solectron
Scott Cook or Steven Bennett, Intuit
Brian Halla, National Semi
Eric Benhamou, 3Com
Let me know if you plan to add them and I'll email their government affairs
folks.
Piper
From: [email protected]
Importance: High
X-Priority: 1 (High)
Subject: Meeting Info for Thursday
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Date: Mon, 14 May 2001 19:10:33 -0500
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on ENE-MTA01/Enron(Release 5.0.6 |December
14,
2000) at 05/14/2001 07:05:29 PM
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
Piper -- Thanks so much for your assistance in pulling this meeting
together. Attached is a sample invitation we'll send from Ken Lay to the
CEOs of the companies in the attached spreadsheet. I appreciate your calls
to the policy folks at these companies to supplement the email from Ken --
hopefully, we'll get a good turnout.
Please let me know if you need additional information.
Thank you!
Karen
(See attached file: NoCalCEOInvite.doc)(See attached file:
NoCalCEOinvitelist.xls)
_____________________________________________________________________
_______
/______/\ Piper Cole
/_____ \\ \ Vice President, Global Public Policy
/______\ \\ / Sun Microsystems, Inc.
/______/ \/ / / 901 San Antonio Road, MS PAL1-554
/______/ / \//\ Palo Alto, CA 94303
\______\//\ / /
\______/ / /\ / Phone: 650/336-6633
\______/ \\ \ Fax: 650/336-0835
\______\ \\ E-Mail: [email protected]
\______\/ http://www.sun.com/policy
=====================================
|
2,403 |
Subject: Re: FW: Confidential--PG&E's Going to Announce an Open Season on
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/12635.
=====================================
Duly noted on the email address. Look forward to seeing you when you in
California.
Best,
Jeff
Stephanie Miller/ENRON@enronXgate
05/16/2001 02:15 PM
To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: FW: Confidential--PG&E's Going to Announce an Open Season on
Redwood and Baja (intrastate capacity) end of this next week or early next
week
Thanks for the update! - In the future, you will need to spell my name
completely - there are too many smiller's!
I am planning a trip to San Fran to meet with PG&E (tentatively June 6) -
will make sure I stop by to meet you.
Regards,
Stephanie
-----Original Message-----
From: Tycholiz, Barry
Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2001 2:00 PM
To: Miller, Stephanie
Subject: FW: Confidential--PG&E's Going to Announce an Open Season on Redwood
and Baja (intrastate capacity) end of this next week or early next week
Sensitivity: Confidential
-----Original Message-----
From: Dasovich, Jeff
Sent: Monday, May 14, 2001 7:28 PM
To: Miller, Stephen; Tycholiz, Barry; Gomez, Julie A.; Shapiro, Richard;
Steffes, James; Lawner, Leslie; Cantrell, Rebecca; Fulton, Donna; Hartsoe,
Joe; Corman, Shelley; Fawcett, Jeffery; Harris, Steven
Subject: Confidential--PG&E's Going to Announce an Open Season on Redwood and
Baja (intrastate capacity) end of this next week or early next week
Sensitivity: Confidential
Got a message from PG&E. Open season will be for 2003 and beyond and they'll
be accepting bids up to 30 years. Will talk to PG&E and get back with more
information. If you having any questions give a holler at 415.782.7822.
Best,
JEff
=====================================
|
2,404 |
Subject: Core/Non-Core
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/12400.
=====================================
I have further placed the Core / Non-core pricing (Core & non-core tab) per
the CPUC's March 01 calculation. I also began building an analysis of the
core cost under a scenario where we attempt to examine the cost in the
utility. At this point, the following are not modeled or need refinement:
1. The load figures for PGE are suspect in the MOU.
2. T&D is not split by class. Total CPUC revenue was used and I subtracted
the total gen portion ($'s) derived from the MOU. This was apportioned pro
rata across load. The residential customer should have higher T&D per unit
consumed. Perhaps Robert has some figures and can also validate the
reasonableness of this total dollar plug figure.
3. No value or loss was ascribed to the utility's open short or long position
4. No allocation of the value or loss on future DWR contracts was made.
Based on the DWR forward price path they would have positive MTM value
(remember their contracted price is below their projected spot price path).
Using our or Henwood's curves these would be way out of the money in 02/03.
I am unfortunately out an this seminar I have to go to on Monday and
Tuesday. This is bad timing.
Jeff S. and Kortney can you further read the ancillary MOU materials and see
if we can refine some of the assumptions? This is a priority task. Also
please check the mathematical integrity of our figures. Also Robert, has
there been any revised rate filings indicating different pricing for each of
the categories in Loretta Lynch's March 01 attachment that we used to
populate the spreadsheet?
Regards,
Michael
=====================================
|
2,405 |
Subject: Re: DRAFT talking points for California PUC Hearings on the
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/6019.
=====================================
Looks good w/ comments from Harry and Sue. Thanks!
From: Jeff Dasovich on 12/26/2000 03:15 PM
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Dennis
Benevides/HOU/EES@EES, Eric Letke/DUB/EES@EES, George McClellan/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@ENRON, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@ENRON, Jennifer
Rudolph/HOU/EES@EES, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kevin
McGowan/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Lisa Yoho/NA/Enron@ENRON, Lysa Akin/PDX/ECT@ECT,
Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@ENRON, Roger Yang/SFO/EES@EES, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enron@ENRON, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Scott
Stoness/HOU/EES@EES, [email protected], Stuart Staley/LON/ECT@ECT, Susan J
Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES, Wanda Curry/HOU/EES@EES,
[email protected], Robert C Williams/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Mike D
Smith/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: DRAFT talking points for California PUC Hearings on the 27th/28th
Attached is a draft of the talking points for the Commission's hearings. Few
points:
Our time is likely to be limited to 5-10 minutes.
Mike Day, our outside counsel, will make the presentation on our behalf.
Mike Day is fleshing out the legal details of our presentation and he will
forward that along for folks review later today.
Comments can be forwarded to me via email, pager (888.916.7184), voicemail
(415.782.7822), or home (415.621.8317).
We will finalize the message points on tomorrow's daily call (10 AM CST).
The call in number is 800.713.8600. Code is 80435.
The Commission's hearings begin tomorrow at 10 AM (PST).
=====================================
|
2,406 |
Subject: Re: rumor
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/2554.
=====================================
I'm checking w/ EES to see if they have any generic brochures, etc. on energy
conservation or a glossary of terms.
From: Sandra McCubbin on 12/13/2000 10:15 AM PST
To: Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Mona L Petrochko/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul
Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J
Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Re: rumor
I spent the last few days with Rod at a CFEE conference, and he is definitely
going to run..he doesn't think that the election will occur until June so we
will at least have him in Sacto until then. The CFEE conference was the best
that I have ever attended, there were 10 members of the legislature there,
and though the focus was on air quality and power plants, the members were
expressing their frustation with the administration in not looking for
solutions and only pointing fingers..besides contracts and expidited siting,
a large part of the discussion was on educating the public...Senators Kuehl
and Machado are planning on putting together a public service announcement of
some sort for members to use in their districts on how to conserve
energy..do we have anything that would be helpful? Dion Aaroner , who chairs
the Assembly Democratic Caucus, and Rod will be doing a briefing for the
members on energy in January, do we have any basic information, like a
glossary of energy terms that I could give her, I will be with her next
Thursday. Dion is also talking to the speaker today, briefing him on what
the govenor has been doing, and asking him to call the govenor to talk about
changing his tactics.
=====================================
|
2,407 |
Subject: RE: Silicon Valley Business Ink : Empowering Silicon Valley
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent_items/2221.
=====================================
Hey darlin'. You on this list, too. Crazy, non? Well, what isn't crazy these days? Hope you're OK.
-----Original Message-----
From: Denne, Karen
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 1:25 PM
To: Dasovich, Jeff
Subject: FW: Silicon Valley Business Ink : Empowering Silicon Valley Security and Terrorism Conference
Importance: High
sounds like fun!
-----Original Message-----
From: "Carl Guardino" <[email protected]>@ENRON
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 11:13 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Silicon Valley Business Ink : Empowering Silicon Valley Security and Terrorism Conference
Importance: High
Dear Silicon Valley Leaders:
Please join the Silicon Valley Manufacturing Groupon November 16 for a conference on Security and Terrorism at member company Sun Microsystem's Santa Clara campus. We are partnering with theSilicon Valley Biz Ink to host a timely conference on how Silicon Valley employers and their employees can adequately prepare and respond to the security and terrorism challengesfacing our State and Nation.
Silicon Valley Biz Ink is handling all of the reservations and a space may be reserved by contacting [email protected] << File: http://www.svbizink.com/advertise/empower.htmlmailto:[email protected] >> or by calling #408/535-5642. There is a nominal $35 fee which net profits will go toward the United Way Disaster Relief Fund. The conference is limited to 400 people, so please respond as soon as possible. A list of featured speakers and flyer is attached below for your review.
[IMAGE] << File: http://www.svbizink.com/svbievents/default.asp >>
=====================================
|
2,408 |
Subject: ACR and SDG&E surcharge
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/12034.
=====================================
I have now read the April 30 ACR of Commissioner Wood, and AB43 4 times, and
I still cannot say I fully comprehend the scope of the hearing that will
commence on May 22, but here are some thoughts and questions.
Since the docket includes 00-10-045, it may be appropriate to address: 1.
the 6.5 cent rate freeze, 2. authorization of physical and financial
transactions (this could help ENA do some hedges with SDGE), 3. procurement
guidelines, 4. explain how to offset undercollections with generation
revenues, 5. set an undercollection trigger for reevaluating balancing
account and 6. setting an amortization time table. I assume if we can keep
surcharges from DA customers, we would not be that concerned with the
undercollection recovery issues, except as they affect the ability to switch
between DA and bundled sales. If we do plan to re-DASR our customers, then I
guess we do care about these issues. Then would we likely want a long and
drawn out amortization?
There is also an opening in this case to adjust the ceiling, to implement
tiering or other rate increases that are comparable to the PG&E/SCE rates
that come out of the case Harry testified in two weeks ago, to redefine small
commercial customer and to decide the future of a voluntary stabilization
plan. Where would we stand on the definition of small customer, by the way?
Of course all this is in addition to the surcharge rate design.
I think Harry can eastily tweak the testimony he filed in the PG&E/SCE case
for this case, and the question is how much farther do we need to go, if at
all, on these other issues.
=====================================
|
2,409 |
Subject: nan
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent_items/846.
=====================================
Thanks, Hedy. Barring any strange turn of events, we're likely to be OK with the language. The budget--and the R's desire to mess with Davis--appear to be delaying things somewhat. If tomorrow Loretta holds the DA decision till the 12th, that will buy some additional (and necessary) time to work a deal.
Best,
Jeff
Hedy Govenar <[email protected]> 07/02/2001 06:51 PM To: Sandra McCubbin <[email protected]>, Paul Kaufman <[email protected]>, Sue Mara <[email protected]>, Rick Shaprio <[email protected]>, Bev Hansen <[email protected]>, Jeff Dasovich <[email protected]>, Karen Denne <[email protected]>, Jim Steffes <[email protected]>, Scott Govenar <[email protected]>, Ken Smith <[email protected]>, Mike Day <[email protected]>, Michael McDonald <[email protected]>, Alan Comnes <[email protected]>, Steven Kean <[email protected]>, Harry Kingerski <[email protected]>, Leslie Lawner <[email protected]>, Robert Frank <[email protected]>, Janel Guerrero <[email protected]>, Miyung Buster <[email protected]>, Jennifer Thome <[email protected]>, Eric Letke <[email protected]>, Mary Schoen <[email protected]> cc: Subject: Language on bonds
Senator Burton's office expects bond language back from Legislative
Counsel sometime tomorrow, Tuesday. As soon as we get a copy we will
forward it. If the language is acceptable to Enron, then Bev, Scott and
I need to visit with Republicans to urge their support as soon as
possible.We are continuing to coordinate with the big users and some
other suppliers on this issue.
=====================================
|
2,410 |
Subject: Paaaarty!!!!
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/374.
=====================================
Hello All-
Jeannine Huda has been kind enough to include us in their group picnic. The
details are below. Be sure to RSVP by the specified date!
-April
Thanks Jeannine!
---------------------- Forwarded by April Hrach/SF/ECT on 09/11/2000 12:30 PM
---------------------------
From: Jeannine Huda/Western Region/The Bentley Company@Exchange on 09/07/2000
01:13 PM CDT
To: ~*Everyone At San Ramon/Western Region/The Bentley Company@Exchange,
Andrew Wu/HOU/EES@EES, Michelle Nunes/EFS/EES@EES, April Hrach/SF/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:
The Picnic Committee
would like to invite you to our Summer Picnic in the Fall!!
at
Little Hills Ranch, October 7th, 10:30 am to 5:00 pm
18013 Bollinger Canyon Rd., San Ramon, CA ( directions are
available)
Note: The food will be served from 12:30 to 2:00 p.m.
Please provide the following information (your Entree selection and number
of adults & children & their ages) & RETURN IT BY: September 22nd, 12:00
p.m. Sorry, late R.S.V.P.'s can not be accepted!!
Wristbands will be issued prior to the picnic with your food selection AND
MUST BE WORN FOR ADMITTANCE TO THE PARK!!
#1 The Ranch Special (Sirloin Steak 8 oz.), Chicken, & Rib
#2 Chicken, Hamburger, & Hot
Dog
#3 Veggie burger
#4 Tiny Tot Hot Dog (for ages 0-4)
(The menu includes crisp garden salad, red potato salad, coleslaw, chili
beans, fresh corn on the cob, rolls or buns, chilled watermelon, and
condiments.)
Lots of fun has been planned!! See you there!!
=====================================
|
2,411 |
Subject: Fun with Letters
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/4435.
=====================================
I only forward the good ones; I have very high standards.
?
?
?Subject: New Words of the Week
?
> The Washington Post's Style Invitational asked?readers to take a word
from? the dictionary,??
?alter it by adding, subtracting, or?changing one letter,?and supply a new
definition.
>
> Here are some recent winners:
>
> Intaxication: Euphoria at getting a tax refund,?which lasts until you
> realize it was your money to start with.
>
> Reintarnation: Coming back to life as a hillbilly.
>
> Foreploy: Any misrepresentation about yourself for?the purpose of
getting?laid.
>
> Giraffiti: Vandalism spray-painted very, very high.
>
> Sarchasm: The gulf between the author of sarcastic?wit and the person
who?doesn't get it.
>
> Inoculatte: To take coffee intravenously when you?are running late.
>
> Hipatitis: Terminal coolness.
>
> Osteopornosis: A degenerate disease. (this one got?extra credit)
>
> Karmageddon: It's like, when everybody is sending?off all these really
bad
> vibes, right? And then, like, the Earth explodes and?it's like, a
serious?bummer.
>
> Glibido: All talk and no action.
>
> Dopeler effect: The tendency of stupid ideas to seem?smarter when they
> come at you rapidly.
>
> And, the pick of the literature:
>
> Ignoranus: A person who's both stupid and an?asshole.
>
=====
Insanity is doing the same thing over
and over again and expecting different
results. - Albert Einstein
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail.
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
=====================================
|
2,412 |
Subject: RE: Angelides
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/8277.
=====================================
Thanks, Karen. And please thank Marathon for the info. If this holds true,
sounds like Burton plans to make things pretty messy.
Karen Denne
01/10/2001 09:31 PM
To: Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: RE: Angelides
FYI, here's info from Marathon about who potentially could carry Angelides'
proposal.
---------------------- Forwarded by Karen Denne/Corp/Enron on 01/10/2001
09:28 PM ---------------------------
"Joan Kradin" <[email protected]> on 01/10/2001 12:23:42 PM
Please respond to "Joan Kradin" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: RE: Angelides
Karen -
We believe its going to be John Burton.
We've also heard that any of these bond issue proposals are going to run
into trouble with Kathleen Connell. They all have to go through her office
and she's not prepared to be helpful. She's viewing it as an issue in her
Los Angeles Mayor's race since bond repayments will be spread over all state
taxpayers and she doesn't think muni customers should have to participate.
This may be moot by April 10 if she doesn't make it into the runoff, but she
can make some noise til then.
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2001 5:03 AM
To: Joan Kradin
Subject: Angelides
Any chance you can find out if Angelides has found someone to carry his
proposal in the Legislature? Thanks! kd
=====================================
|
2,413 |
Subject: Re: I.99-07-003
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/2908.
=====================================
Mike: Could you please forward a copy of the document listed below to Ms
Cantrell? Thanks very much.
Best,
Jeff
Rebecca W Cantrell@ECT
01/16/2001 09:25 AM
To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Re: I.99-07-003
Jeff, would this document be publically available, and how could we go about
getting a copy? The CPUC web site doesn't go back that far, although I
assume that copies of the filed documents aren't available online anyway --
just summaries.
Thanks.
---------------------- Forwarded by Rebecca W Cantrell/HOU/ECT on 01/16/2001
09:25 AM ---------------------------
Stephanie Miller@ENRON
01/16/2001 09:19 AM
To: Rebecca W Cantrell/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: I.99-07-003
Dec 27, 1999 - filed by Glen sullivan, atty for Sempra
This relates to intrastate restructuring in CA.
From: Rebecca W Cantrell @ ECT 01/11/2001 03:48 PM
To: Stephanie Miller/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Re: I.99-07-003
Well, I determined that it is a CPUC proceeding, but I can't find this
document. Can you provide a little more information, like date or who
filed? This is the web site that shows the last 100 documents out of the 133
filed in this proceeding:
http://www.cpuc.ca.gov/published/proceedings/I9907003.htm.
Stephanie Miller@ENRON
01/11/2001 03:11 PM
To: Rebecca W Cantrell/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: I.99-07-003
Can you please get a copy of the "Promising Revision to Gas Regulatory and
Market Structure" Joint Motion for approval of Interim Settlement Enhancing
and Enabling Competitive Markets on the Socal Gas System?
=====================================
|
2,414 |
Subject: CQ article on Bilbray
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/1280.
=====================================
---------------------- Forwarded by Cynthia Sandherr/Corp/Enron on 09/08/2000
06:07 PM ---------------------------
Allison Navin
09/08/2000 05:57 PM
To: Cynthia Sandherr/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: CQ article on Bilbray
CQ WEEKLY
Sept. 9, 2000
Page 2059
Bilbray's Power Fight
Emily Pierce, CQ Staff
California's deregulated electricity> market has been a disaster for many
consumers but may be a godsend for Republican Rep. Brian P. Bilbray.
The three-term lawmaker is tied in polls with Democratic state Assemblywoman
Susan Davis, who has outpaced him in fundraising. In 1996, however, she voted
for legislation that opened the state's <electricity> market to competition.
The act was supposed to reduce prices and increase choice. Instead, the power
bills of San Diego residents have doubled since last year.
Bilbray has seized on the resulting unrest, introducing legislation to let
power companies buy some <electricity at cheaper rates. He will host a House
Commerce Energy and Power Subcommittee field hearing on the issue Sept. 11 in
San Diego.
Davis sponsored legislation in the state assembly to reinstate price caps in
San Diego, retroactive to June 1. The bill was signed into law Sept. 6.
Bilbray wrote state lawmakers Aug. 30 in support of the bill, "though it
appears that this legislation was given to my opponent to help her in the
November election."
Davis campaign manager Lisa Sherman said Bilbray is improperly using the
issue, since he signed a 1996 letter supporting deregulation. But of the
field hearing she said, "We wouldn't oppose getting national attention on
this."
=====================================
|
2,415 |
Subject: Register for a great class today! - Clarification
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/138.
=====================================
As first year and evening MBA students cannot register for this course on
line, first years should contact Kim Guilfoyle and all evening MBA students
should contact TJ in the the Evening MBA Office in order to register for this
course.
Hope to see you next Thursday at the Paul Newman visit! - Carrie
At 08:40 PM 8/29/2000 -0700, Rachel Martin wrote:
Confused about where to donate your newly acquired IPO millions?
Want to give back to the community even though you haven't struck it rich?
Eager to learn from the woman who established the non-profit program back in
1989?
Anxious to hear from the amazing guest speakers including PAUL NEWMAN?
Or do you just need a extra unit this semester?
Don't worry!? Professor Van Loo can help!
Come join her 1-unit Contemporary Philanthropy (BA278.2) class which meets
for 10 weeks on Mondays from 4:00-6:00.? The course objectives are to
increase knowledge of the reasons for giving, the variety of ways in which it
takes place, the wide variety of people who participate, and the importance
of it in creating a high quality of life.
This is a thought-provoking and fun class with no pre-reqs or final exam.?
Class attendance, participation and one five page paper is it!? Plus, anyone
who registers by this Thursday using the standard on-line registration
process will be guaranteed admission to the Paul Newman presentation on
Thursday September 7, the next class lecture (a make-up class for Labor Day
holiday).
First Year, Second Year and Evening Students are all welcome!!!?? Sign up now
and Professor Van Loo will confirm your enrollment with an email.
=====================================
|
2,416 |
Subject: Re: Weekly EES meeting
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/3030.
=====================================
FYI. My understanding is that Martin and Doug are going to be focused on DG
in California.
Paul Kaufman@ECT
11/04/2000 09:53 AM
To: Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@Enron, Mona L Petrochko/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Weekly EES meeting
See note below re: Doug Condon.
---------------------- Forwarded by Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT on 11/04/2000 07:56
AM ---------------------------
From: Harry Kingerski@ENRON on 11/03/2000 04:30 PM CST
To: Steve Montovano/NA/Enron@Enron, Janine Migden/DUB/EES@EES, Robin
Kittel/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Weekly EES meeting
Highlights of today's meeting:
Next week there will be a big push to get contracts signed from the First
Energy customers from whom we received commitments. There are approximately
120 MWs of load we hope to sign up, using First Energy's Market Support
Generation. We also need to prepare a PR plan in case our contracted load is
significantly less than our acquired generation.
Cinergy is being targeted as a new commodity opportunity. The intent is to
take advantage of the shopping incentive made available to the first 20% of
load that switches when the Ohio market opens 1/1/01.
The Texas Commission's ruling allowing negative stranded costs will not yet
be marked into the retail curves due to the uncertainty surrounding the
decision.
Personnel issues:
Mark Courtney is now the regional sales lead for Texas, replacing Jay Ferry.
Eric Letke is now the regional sales lead for California, replacing Doug
Condon.
=====================================
|
2,417 |
Subject: FW: Mexico OnLine
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/679.
=====================================
Cameron Sellers
Vice President, Business Development
PERFECT.COM
1860 Embarcadero Road - Suite 210
Palo Alto, CA 94303
[email protected]
650.798.3366 (direct dial)
650.269.3366 (cell)
650.858.1095 (fax)
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2000 1:10 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Mexico OnLine
Dear Cameron
The dates you requested are open.
As you have recognized from our website, we have a lush, lovely, peaceful
garden oasis in an authentic historical pueblo that is also gaining interest
as home to many artists and others interested in living in a most unique
environment. Our aim is to provide a memorable experience with modern
facilities that also reflect the beauty and comfort of Mexican rustic
design. Our casitas have kitchens, baths and covered patios that afford
privacy and a renewing atmosphere. Great care has been taken to provide
service and comfort.
Our prime season is approaching so it is well advised to book early. We have
a number of inquiries for the dates you requested.
The rates as described are $80 USD per night for the casita .which is
separate and very private. The weekly rate is $450 USD. To hold a
reservation we require a 50% deposit when you have your exact dates. Let us
know what they are and I will mail instructions.
If this is your first time to this area or if there are any questions you
might have, please fell free to write. and I will do my best to answer. Our
community site for up to date events is www.todossantos.cc
Mil gracias for your inquiry. Linda Macfarlane for Las Palmas Casitas
=====================================
|
2,418 |
Subject: RE: It's time for a BBQ!
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['alice grubb; carl hedleston; jeff dasovich; jeff walker; lori hom;', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/2602.
=====================================
he exists on the planet! i may not see you at the BQ, we need to get
together and catch up.
p
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 8:00 AM
To: [email protected]
Cc: alice grubb; carl hedleston; jeff dasovich; jeff walker; lori hom;
laura newman; madeleine todd; nora mcgee; luis pine; pat scatena;
michael spear
Subject: Re: It's time for a BBQ!
Haven't checked my calendar, but I plan to come. Been WAY too long.
Best,
Jeff
Kari Ontko
<kontko@home. To: jeff dasovich
<[email protected]>, laura
com> newman
<[email protected]>, lori
hom <[email protected]>, pat scatena
06/03/2001 <[email protected]>,
michael spear
05:28 PM <[email protected]>, carl hedleston
Please <[email protected]>, madeleine
todd
respond to <[email protected]>, alice
grubb
kontko <[email protected]>, nora mcgee
<[email protected]>, jeff
walker
<[email protected]>, luis pine
<[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: It's time for a BBQ!
Hello all, I am having a bbq on Saturday, June 23 at 5:00. It is byob
your own something to barbecue. It is the weekend of the Sonoma County
Fair so those who want to - we can go check out the fair after. Please
respond. Hope everyone will be around it will be great to see
everyone. kari
ps I galloped Oscar around the trails today and he was very happy. He
thinks he has died and gone to horse heaven! Everyone has to come and
visit him and we can gallop around the trails.
=====================================
|
2,419 |
Subject: Gas Accord: Prior Settlements
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/1356.
=====================================
CONFIDENTIAL SETTLEMENT DOCUMENT
PER CPUC RULE 51
Parties --
As we committed in an e-mail transmittal last Friday regarding the upcoming
"Gas Accord II" negotiations for PG&E's California Gas Transmission System
for the period commencing January 1, 2003, we are attaching below, for your
infomation, copies of the following three prior settlements, all of which
bear upon the issues the Parties will be discussing:
* Gas Accord Settlement Agreement, dated August 31, 1996
* Operational Flow Order (OFO) Agreement, dated October 20, 1999
* Gas OII Settlement Agreement, dated January 28, 2000
Also, this will serve as a reminder to you that PG&E is hosting a kick-off
meeting for Settlement Negotiations for Gas Accord II, this THURSDAY,
SEPTEMBER 14, from 9:30 AM until 3:30 PM, at PG&E headquarters in San
Francisco, in Conference Room A, 245 Market Street (on the ground floor).
Please note, the meeting will NOT be held at the PG&E Energy Center as first
announced.
This also will serve as a reminder to please provide us with your own
preliminary list of issues by midday, tomorrow, Wednesday, September 13. We
will compile all the identified issues into a single list and distribute
them at the meeting on Thursday, as a first step in building a working
issues list.
We hope to see you Thursday!
Frank Lindh Ray Williams
Attorney Director
415-973-2776 415-973-3634
[email protected] [email protected]
<<Gas Accord>> <<Gas Accord Rate Tables>>
<<ofo.doc>> <<Gas OII Settlement Agreement January 28.doc>>
- Gas Accord.doc
- Gas Accord Rate Tables.doc
- ofo.doc
- Gas OII Settlement Agreement January 28.doc
=====================================
|
2,420 |
Subject: Re: Hoecker Answers
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/2027.
=====================================
Are you proposing to have a conference call on this? Alan, remember we
talked to Tim about meeting with the traders about this - what is the status
of that?
Here are my comments. In general, I don't think we should refer to WPTF
arguments where we have made our own arguments, in particular on number 5.
We should summarize EES/EPMI's arguments as I did in my proposed draft answer
to this question. With respect to answers to questions 2 and 4, I think we
should make more legally-oriented arguments essentially restating the
arguments we made in EES/EPMI's comments to FERC, along the lines of my
proposed draft answers. Although the Commissioners will not read our
pleadings, they are likely to read our answers to these questions so this
will give us an opportunity to summarize our pleadings. In addition, these
are positions that we have already agreed to and discussed. For those of you
who don't have my suggested draft answers, they are attached.
Susan J Mara@ENRON
11/28/2000 10:43 PM
To: [email protected], Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT,
James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Hoecker Answers
Here's a short but sweet draft. Alan will be providing data and Ron will be
providing some additional language on question 5 (or whichever one talks
about J&R rates). We're also still trying to get the chart referred to in
Question 2 -- so for now we have no answer for that one.
I'm in the office Wed but in a few meetings. Call or e-mail comments. 415
782-7802
=====================================
|
2,421 |
Subject: Final HaasWeek Survivor Contest Voting!!!
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/4262.
=====================================
This is it, folks. This one is for all the marbles. For the whole
enchilada. To separate the wheat from the chaff. It=01,s for all the glor=
y.
We=01,re going for the whole nine yards. Going for the gold. Laying it on=
the
line. We=01,re not playing anymore - this one=01,s for real. Yep, it=01,s=
the last
and final round of voting in the HaasWeek Survivor Contest. (Yes, I know
that =01&last and final=018 is redundant. It=01,s for emphasis.)
Just two contestants are left: Anne Brocchini and Ben Soccorsy. Based on
your decisions, one will win a digital camera and the other will go crying
home to mommy. One will be voted off of the HaasWeek Island and the other,
well, the other will leave the island, too, because the contest will be
over. But the second one will be happier. And maybe we=01,ll make the los=
er
swim back, yeah.
So, there=01,s just one more chance to vote in the inaugural HaasWeek Survi=
vor
Contest. And with our sophisticated online polling process (which you can
access at www.haasweek.net <http://www.haasweek.net>), you know that your
vote will be meaningful and accurately counted. No recounts, no pregnant o=
r
dimpled chad, nothing but real, accurate results. Because in a decision
this important, HaasWeek wants to make sure we accurately reflect the true
will of the people.
Vote now at www.haasweek.net <http://www.haasweek.net>! Polls will be open
until Wednesday evening at 5pm, so don=01,t delay! The fate of the free wo=
rld
is at your fingertips. Or at least the fate of one digital camera. Which
is pretty important, too.
Thanks and enjoy!
HaasWeek
- winmail.dat
=====================================
|
2,422 |
Subject: Re: Natural Gas Basis Differential - Why so Big?
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/4430.
=====================================
Greetings:
Joe, I just ran into some El Paso guys that I know (I'm in L.A.) and asked
them about the Lukens study. They said that they weren't sure that it had
been released yet. They intend to submit it with their testimony in the FERC
case.
Best,
Jeff
James D Steffes
05/02/2001 11:15 AM
To: Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ray
Alvarez/NA/Enron@ENRON, Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Leslie
Lawner/NA/Enron@Enron, Rebecca W Cantrell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert
Neustaedter/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Christi L
Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Natural Gas Basis Differential - Why so Big?
Joe Hartsoe received a call from Commission staff at FERC to try and
understand why basis differentials into California were so big and why the
large basis continues. Clearly with the new Electricity Order, natural gas
is one of the primary factors on electricity prices in California.
Our key fear, however small, is that FERC (or someone else) recognizes the
huge implication of natural gas prices and seeks to cap natural gas sales for
resale of P/L affiliates (such as ENA). There is some fear that the real
monopoly is the holder of LT firm capacity, not the gas production firms.
We need to develop a good story as to why the basis gas continues and
messaging it quietly into the right FERC staff to keep the pressure of
additional Investigations from happening. Joe is trying to get his hands on
the Lukens study presented to the California study Committee on natural gas
abuse to help guide our analysis.
Jim
=====================================
|
2,423 |
Subject: IMPORTANT NOTICE: Loss of Continuity in PX Day Ahead Auction Due to
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/2428.
=====================================
Monday, December 11, 2000
To: All PX Market Participants
From: John Yurkanin
Chief Operating Officer
Re: Loss of Continuity in PX Day Ahead Auction Due to ISO Rule Changes
The emergency tariff filing by the California ISO last Friday has had a
negative
effect on the PX day ahead auction market. The mixture of soft and hard caps
results in a complete disconnect and unacceptable risk to all of our
participants and will probably not provide the ISO with its sought after
reduction in real time energy sales and procurement. The overall effect will
be
that supply will still defer to the higher realized price opportunity the ISO
offers.
The PX is petitioning Terry Winter of the ISO to immediately allow for
adjustment bids on any submitted schedule at any price relevant. The hard cap
retention on adjustment bids has resulted in a nullification of meaningful
forward bids in the day ahead auction. This is not a software failure or
issue
with the ISO; it is a policy issue that may have been overlooked in the ISO
?s
most recent emergency market response.
We all commend the ISO for its efforts in keeping the lights on and share
their
concern of an overworked staff trying to procure energy. But their recent
policy change will not help California and undermines a meaningful reference
price for spot markets.
In addition to asking the ISO to amend its emergency tariff the PX is also
filing directly today directly with the FERC an emergency intervention to ask
for action to correct this market damaging outcome. Your support of our
actions with both the ISO and the FERC would be most appreciated.
=====================================
|
2,424 |
Subject: Layman's Summary of EPMI's FERC White Paper
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/2576.
=====================================
The attached bullets give real-life examples that people will understand. I
also told Karen Denne to reference the bullets at the beginning of our motion
if she needs to know what we're requesting at FERC. Please notify Karen and
me if you see any problems with the message.
---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Hain/HOU/ECT on 10/20/2000 02:25 PM
---------------------------
Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.
From: "Seabron Adamson" <[email protected]>
10/20/2000 02:08 PM
To: <[email protected]>
cc: <[email protected]>
Subject: Layman's Summary of FERC White Paper
Mary:
Please find attached a bried one page summary of the FERC White Paper, as
discussed. I have tried to make it simple and with analogies that are
comprehensible to the press, etc.
Seab
This e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the
addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or
confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this
e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify me at
(617) 354-0060 and permanently delete the original and any copy of any
e-mail and any printout thereof.
Seabron Adamson
Frontier Economics Inc
Two Brattle Square
Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
Ph: (617) 354-0060
Fax: (617) 354-0640
[email protected]
- 00-10-20 SA Summary of White Paper on Completing California's Power
Markets.doc
=====================================
|
2,425 |
Subject: ALERT--NEW WORDING IN CPUC DA DECISION IMPLIES RETROACTIVE ACTIONS
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/inbox/58.
=====================================
Just to alert you. The new CPUC proposed decision to suspend DA to be voted on next week has some language of concern and I wanted you to be aware of it This new language, which was circulated today, implies some retroactive action by the CPUC -- but not on the suspension issue. So, some financial risk is possible. The language follows. We will endeavor to get the language removed (long-shot) or clarified (also long-shot).
The new draft says ..."we suspend the right to enter into new contracts for direct access effective today. All other issues dealing with contracts signed before today remain under consideration by the Commission (in response to the comments already received) and will be resolved in a subsequent decision. In other words, no contracts for direct access may be signed after today; the effect to be given to contracts signed before today, including renewals of such contracts, will be addressed in a subsequent decision."
The "Conclusions of Law include:
"2. The right to enter into new contracts for direct access should be suspended as of the date of this order.
3. The effect to be given to contracts signed before today, including renewals of such contracts, as well as comments of the parties will be addressed in a subsequent decision."
And the "Ordering" paragraph states:
"[3.] The right to enter into new contracts for direct access is suspended as of the date of this order."
"5. This phase of the proceeding remains open for further consideration of comments of the parties, including the effect to be given to contracts signed before today, including renewals of such contracts."
=====================================
|
2,426 |
Subject: Recent Alum
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/13457.
=====================================
I am very, very sad to report that Dave Engelbrecht, EvMBA '00, passed away
on June 4. Dave had a heart attack two weeks ago and was in a coma until
he passed away. Dave was a wonderful, fun, giving, and active person,
who's commitment to charitable works was enormous. Dave was a Vice
President at Schwab and the EvMBA Social Chair for two years while he was
in the program. He will be sorely missed.
For those of you who knew him, I have attached, below, an announcement that
comes from Schwab.
Regards,
Diane
***************
It is with great sadness that we mourn the passing of Dave Engelbrecht, our
colleague and friend. A memorial service will be held next Tuesday, June 12
at 4 PM at The First Unitarian Universalist Church at 1187 Franklin Street
in San Francisco. A reception will follow the service from 5 to 7 PM at the
St. Francis Yacht Club, On the Marina, San Francisco. Directions to follow.
Dave's family has requested that, in lieu of flowers, contributions be made
to the Schwab Fund for Charitable Giving (Dave Engelbrecht Memorial Fund).
The Memorial Fund will establish an endowment to support scholarships at the
Haas School of Business at the University of California at Berkeley where
Dave earned his MBA last June. As you may know, Dave was instrumental in
the creation of the Schwab Fund for Charitable Giving and served as an
officer to the Fund, in addition to his other responsibilities at Schwab.
Contributions can be sent to:
Schwab Fund for Charitable Giving (Dave Engelbrecht Memorial Fund)
101 Montgomery Street
San Francisco, CA 94104
attn: Ann Insley
For questions please call 800 746-6216
=====================================
|
2,427 |
Subject: Messages -- first draft
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/12044.
=====================================
Here is my first take on?a few?key messages.? I'll forward a few more alon=
g=20
shortly.
It is beyond reason that the committee is focusing so heavily on a company =
=20
that represented only a low single-digit percentage of spot market purchase=
s=20
and whose average price was 25%-40% lower than the cost of the state=01,s=
=20
average purchase.
?
The committee appears to be basing its pursuits on politics and geography =
=20
rather than the realities of the marketplace. Enron transactions represent=
=20
less than one=01)half of one percent of alleged overcharges, and Enron sal=
es to=20
the state between January 18 and May 31 represented just one-tenth of the=
=20
dollar value of power purchases made from Los Angeles-area public utilitie=
s =20
alone.
?
If the committee is truly dedicated to finding the causes of increases in =
=20
power prices, it should look closely at what happened within the state=01,s=
=20
borders. California-based public utilities, for example, sold power to the=
=20
state at average prices as high as $100/MWh above Enron=01,s average. It a=
lso=20
should examine why the Administration and PUC did not allow utilities to=
=20
enter into long-term contracts last year that would have saved Californian=
s=20
billions of dollars and increased supply.
?
For the better part of five (?) years, Enron has repeatedly urged Californ=
ia=20
lawmakers and regulators to address the flaws in electric restructuring th=
at=20
led to the current energy crisis. We have, and will continue to, offer our=
=20
resources and experience to help California secure its long-term energy=20
future.
=====================================
|
2,428 |
Subject: Re: California credit issues
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/7903.
=====================================
Thanks. I inferred from John that we may not be able to get or use
information from our own credit people for our market making activities, that
is why he is looking for info in the (reasonably) public domain. mcs
Richard Shapiro@ENRON
21/12/2000 14:24
To: Mark Schroeder/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron@ECT, John Sherriff/LON/ECT@ECT, Bryan
Seyfried/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: California credit issues
Check out WSJ- Page A2. Also,Bill Bradford in Rick buy's group is person
most proficient on credit issues relative to the three calif. utilities. I
will also get back to you this afternoon........The CPUC is scheduled to
issue orders today at 12:00 CST that may dramatically affect credit ratings
of the 3 utilities.
Mark Schroeder@ECT
12/21/2000 08:13 AM
To: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: John Sherriff/LON/ECT@ECT, Bryan Seyfried/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: California credit issues
Rick/Jeff - I just spoke with John Sherriff and mentioned to him how on top
of California you guys were. As you may be aware, we are making markets in
the credit of many utilities and telcomm companies, via EnronCredit.com.
Brian Seyfried is the commercial leader for this business. John has asked me
to ask you, if you become aware of significant developments, in the public
sector (not privileged/insider information), bearing on
creditworthiness/ability to pay by California utilities, would you please
keep us informed, as we will have a keen interest in these developments?
Please forward to this to any others on your team(s) you think appropriate.
thanks mcs
=====================================
|
2,429 |
Subject: Need suggestions on life/work/school balance
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: []
File: dasovich-j/deleted_items/865.
=====================================
THANKS TO EVERYONE WHO HAS SUBMITTED GREAT IDEAS AND SUGGESTIONS!!!!
Subject: Please read if you have suggestions on how to maintain life/work balance while attending the EveMBA program.
Have you ever said "I wish I knew what I know now when I started the Evening MBA program"?
If you have ever had a great mentor or coach in your life you can appreciate the value of a little information at the right time. Or maybe you did not have a mentor/coach, but wished you had.
Well...now is the time to give back to your fellow MBA colleagues and strengthen our collective community by sharing your experience with them.
Specifically we are interested in gathering any:
Lessons learned
Advice
Strategies
Tricks
Great ideas
anecdotes
Any nuggets of wisdom that have helped you to deal with the life/family, work, school-balancing act! These can be ones you came up with, an article or book you read or suggestions given to you by a mentor or coach.
Some possible topic areas are:
Managing visibility at work,
Dealing with competing demands
Friday night date/night--how to make sure your loved ones recognize you
How to strategically say NO!
Minimizing crisis and maintaining some quality of life while being in the EveMBA program.
Please share any and all tips or suggestions. Your help and insight will be greatly appreciated. The results will be used in an evening break seminar on Life Work Balance while in B-school.
To contribute your pearls of wisdom just hit reply and start typing. On behalf of your peers--thanks for sharing.
This is a joint effort by Jon Bain (current EveMBA student) and John Morel.
=====================================
|
2,430 |
Subject: Re: [Fwd: CMUA Market Reform proposal]
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['Laird Dyer/SF/ECT@ECT', '[email protected]', 'Michael McDonald/SF/ECT@ECT', 'Mona L']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/2222.
=====================================
I can't place him either.
Susan J Mara@EES
10/09/2000 03:34 PM
To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Re: [Fwd: CMUA Market Reform proposal]
Do you know this guy? I can't place him.
---------------------- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/SFO/EES on 10/09/2000 01:30
PM ---------------------------
Jeff Shields@ECT
10/09/2000 09:51 AM
To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc: Michael McDonald/SF/ECT@ECT, Laird Dyer/SF/ECT@ECT, Mona L
Petrochko/SFO/EES@EES, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Susan J Mara/SFO/EES@EES
Subject: Re: [Fwd: CMUA Market Reform proposal]
The problem is not "deregulation." The fact is Oregon is not deregulated yet
and rates are going through the roof. Also, one only needs to look back to
1980-85 when rates in the Northwest went up 250% over a five year period
because of nukes. This occurred in a fully regulated environment.
The problem is that many consumers do not have a true choice to secure a
fixed price long-term contract.
You can not put the toothpaste back into the tube!
I hope Enron takes the high road on this issue and pushes for expedited
siting of new generation. The best way to accomplish this is to agree to
compliance with emissions standards and meeting off-sets where they exist.
Where off-sets do not exist, I think Enron can commit to paying for energy
efficiency investments in partnership with utilities or industrial customers
that take the out-put (or take equity) at our new plants.
Paying for conservation, which is running about 19-22 mills in the Northwest,
is a pretty inexpensive way to accomplish good will with end-users and
utilities.
=====================================
|
2,431 |
Subject: nan
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/11835.
=====================================
Thanks, Hedy. Barring any strange turn of events, we're likely to be OK with
the language. The budget--and the R's desire to mess with Davis--appear to
be delaying things somewhat. If tomorrow Loretta holds the DA decision till
the 12th, that will buy some additional (and necessary) time to work a deal.
Best,
Jeff
Hedy Govenar <[email protected]>
07/02/2001 06:51 PM
To: Sandra McCubbin <[email protected]>, Paul Kaufman
<[email protected]>, Sue Mara <[email protected]>, Rick Shaprio
<[email protected]>, Bev Hansen <[email protected]>, Jeff Dasovich
<[email protected]>, Karen Denne <[email protected]>, Jim Steffes
<[email protected]>, Scott Govenar <[email protected]>, Ken Smith
<[email protected]>, Mike Day <[email protected]>, Michael McDonald
<[email protected]>, Alan Comnes <[email protected]>, Steven Kean
<[email protected]>, Harry Kingerski <[email protected]>,
Leslie Lawner <[email protected]>, Robert Frank <[email protected]>,
Janel Guerrero <[email protected]>, Miyung Buster
<[email protected]>, Jennifer Thome <[email protected]>, Eric
Letke <[email protected]>, Mary Schoen <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: Language on bonds
Senator Burton's office expects bond language back from Legislative
Counsel sometime tomorrow, Tuesday. As soon as we get a copy we will
forward it. If the language is acceptable to Enron, then Bev, Scott and
I need to visit with Republicans to urge their support as soon as
possible.We are continuing to coordinate with the big users and some
other suppliers on this issue.
=====================================
|
2,432 |
Subject: Re: you and me
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/8282.
=====================================
P.S. Nice use of "birthday" as the segue to the deal. =20
Speaking of birthdays, Prentice has informed me that, despite my=20
protestations (being a very low-key sort of guy), there "must" be some part=
y=20
for my birthday this year (which I'm still opposed to--and I may be in=20
Houston that MONTH anyway). =20
I was thinking (cuz I hate spotlights), that it might be fun and interestin=
g,=20
since your Dad and I are both hitting interesting birthdays this year, if w=
e=20
had a joint party---double the people, double the fun. (I don't know if he=
'd=20
rather have a solo party for his, though.) And since my dad's met your dad=
,=20
but our mom's ain't been in the mix, I though it might be a good (and=20
hopefully safe) atmosphere to get them together in. =20
Am I smoking crack on the whole idea?
=09Cameron Sellers <[email protected]>
=0901/11/2001 12:16 PM
=09=09=20
=09=09 To: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>
=09=09 cc:=20
=09=09 Subject: you and me
Sorry for surprising you this morning!! Nothing wrong with being
comfortable in your birthday suit.
Speaking of birthdays, I think we should have a goal to get my company
acquired by your company by May 30, 2001. Good goal, huh??
I want to talk to you about the details I have been thinking about while yo=
u
were gone. When should we talk?? Let=01,s set up a meeting so we make sur=
e to
move this all forward.
Welcome back.
-C
Cameron Sellers
Vice President, Business Development
PERFECT
1860 Embarcadero Road - Suite 210
Palo Alto, CA 94303
[email protected]
650.798.3366 (direct dial)
650.269.3366 (cell)
650.858.1095 (fax)
=====================================
|
2,433 |
Subject: DRAFT talking points for California PUC Hearings on the 27th/28th
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/2757.
=====================================
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 12/26/2000 03:20 PM -----
Jeff Dasovich
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
12/26/2000 03:15 PM
To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Dennis
Benevides/HOU/EES@EES, Eric Letke/DUB/EES@EES, George McClellan/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@ENRON, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@ENRON, Jennifer
Rudolph/HOU/EES@EES, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kevin
McGowan/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Lisa Yoho/NA/Enron@ENRON, Lysa Akin/PDX/ECT@ECT,
Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@ENRON, Roger Yang/SFO/EES@EES, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enron@ENRON, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Scott
Stoness/HOU/EES@EES, [email protected], Stuart Staley/LON/ECT@ECT, Susan J
Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES, Wanda Curry/HOU/EES@EES,
[email protected], Robert C Williams/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Mike D
Smith/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: DRAFT talking points for California PUC Hearings on the 27th/28th
Attached is a draft of the talking points for the Commission's hearings. Few
points:
Our time is likely to be limited to 5-10 minutes.
Mike Day, our outside counsel, will make the presentation on our behalf.
Mike Day is fleshing out the legal details of our presentation and he will
forward that along for folks review later today.
Comments can be forwarded to me via email, pager (888.916.7184), voicemail
(415.782.7822), or home (415.621.8317).
We will finalize the message points on tomorrow's daily call (10 AM CST).
The call in number is 800.713.8600. Code is 80435.
The Commission's hearings begin tomorrow at 10 AM (PST).
=====================================
|
2,434 |
Subject: FW: Intention to Challenge the California's PUC's Decision to
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['Sharon', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', 'Dick']
File: dasovich-j/sent_items/1619.
=====================================
Hi Sharon:
Our asst. Joseph Alamo (415.782.7841) will work with you to arrange a call. Thanks to you both for you help.
Best,
Jeff
-----Original Message-----
From: Blachman, Jeremy
Sent: Sat 9/22/2001 5:30 PM
To: Dasovich, Jeff
Cc: Dick, Sharon
Subject: RE: Intention to Challenge the California's PUC's Decision to Suspend DA
Jeff, can you set this up, you can coordinate with my admin, Sharon.
Jeremy
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeremy Blachman/HOU/EES on 09/22/2001 05:29 PM ---------------------------
From: Jeff Dasovich/ENRON@enronXgate on 09/22/2001 10:15 AM
To: Jeremy Blachman/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: RE: Intention to Challenge the California's PUC's Decision to Suspend DA
Sounds good. Just let me know if you'd like to set up the call, or if you'd like me to do it.
Best,
Jeff
-----Original Message-----
From: Blachman, Jeremy
Sent: Sat 9/22/2001 5:00 AM
To: Dasovich, Jeff
Cc:
Subject: Re: Intention to Challenge the California's PUC's Decision to Suspend DA
We must go after this. I need some specific direction with exactly what you would like us to have our clients do. I see this as breaking our market down into the following as each are effected a bit differently:
- a specific alignment with the contracts we signed in August
- those clients we are marketing to, and can't sign a new contract due to the suspension
- existing clients whom we are risk with if there are ANY restrictions on extensions
Suggest that we set-up a call on Mon or Tues. Would like myself, Angela Schwarz, Lamar Frazier, David Cox, Gayle Muench and Michael Mann in attendance
=====================================
|
2,435 |
Subject: California Update 4/9/01
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/10832.
=====================================
Here is what we know so far with the recent announcement of a deal between
Socal and the State for the transmission lines:
? The deal may be enough to save Socal from bankruptcy. This will depend on
the payment terms as well as how soon Socal can receive a positive cash flow.
? We are not sure if the State can really do a deal without PG&E or a deal
for whole grid. It was thought that a transmission asset deal was not
possible without PG&E. This may still be the case; the state may still be
making the deal contingent upon the purchasing of PG&E's assets. A generator
source reports that the state is intending to put pressure on the bankruptcy
court to close the deal on PG&E's lines quickly. However, bankruptcy courts
usually do not operate in this manner. In most cases the court would have to
hold open proceedings, have competitive bids, etc.
? This purchase would need legislative approval, which is not guaranteed.
Previously the plan was for the state to purchase SCE's and PG&E's assets at
a premium so that they would not have to finance power purchases - the
utilities would be able to buy power for themselves. Now they would have to
purchase SCE's lines, but still finance power purchases because of PG&E.
Additionally, it is possible that Socal swapped the clause allowing then to
raise rates in order to recoup past debt in favor for an additional book
price. If this any form of a utility bailout - it would probably no gain
legislative approval.
? The purchase would also need FERC approval. As stated before, if FERC
approves such a plan it would be with several conditions for California.
=====================================
|
2,436 |
Subject: FW: Washington
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['Nord', 'Sue; Landwehr', 'Susan', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/12649.
=====================================
-----Original Message-----
From: Bolton, Scott
Sent: Friday, June 08, 2001 1:50 PM
To: Kaufman, Paul
Cc: Nord, Sue; Landwehr, Susan
Subject: Re: Washington
Paul, your old friend Lew McMurran and I talked about this in Tacoma and I
would be happy to follow up. He is with WSA which was formally the
Washington Software Alliance (now just 3 letters) that has both software and
other tech vendors in its membership. I think we can put something together
without too much difficulty (of course if experience dictates otherwise,
please let me know). I will also sniff around for some other organizations
that may be interested.
You would take back your clothes comment if you were around here today.....
I had to have my wife bring a pair of slacks to work because I forgot I had a
lunch w/ Erik Sten and wore casual Friday jeans (which are more casual than
my Monday dress jeans).
Paul Kaufman/ENRON@enronXgate 06/07/01 02:29 PM To: Scott Bolton/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications cc: Susan M Landwehr/NA/Enron@Enron, Sue
Nord/NA/Enron@Enron Subject: Washington
At one point last year we tried to unite the Washington high-tech community
on energy issues and were unable to do so. Can you look into whether there
is a "Silicon Valley Manufacturer's Association" equivalent in Washington? I
think they meet through a subset of AWB, but they may have their own group.
Maybe we can have sponsor a meeting on energy issues ....? Maybe we can
speak at their annual meeting? Maybe ....
Let me know your thoughts. It seems to me that your'e the best one to look
into this ... you have the best clothes.
=====================================
|
2,437 |
Subject: RE: sce-urgent
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', 'Jeff', 'Dasovich', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent_items/1387.
=====================================
I'll be in the office very shortly. My converstation with Fielder (SCE SVP I've been talking to about the PX credit) yesterday afternoon regarding the settlement was not very fulfilling:
he said there's still disagreement about what they owe us for the PX credit
he made a point to include in our conversation the provision in the settlement that requires Edison to "cooperate" with the AG and the PUC in litigation against generators/marketers
I told him that we needed to get the payment issue resolved very quickly. He said that they needed a day or two to regroup and that they intended to call each and every creditor to discuss next steps.
Michael: I call you soon as I get in--next 15-30 minutes.
Best,
Jeff
-----Original Message-----
From: Mellencamp, Lisa
Sent: Wed 10/3/2001 12:14 AM
To: Tribolet, Michael
Cc: Dasovich, Jeff
Subject: sce-urgent
reliant guy, mike jines, called me about the deal with the cpuc. he thinks they will get injured and that sce will just continue the same path of doing nothing for the generators and the marketers.
he wants to talk mid-morning houston time after we've digested for our view.
with the settlement of the filed rate case, what does that do for us re the ctc claim? presumably they would pay as there would be no argument not to. am i in the right place? i hate to be too logical here. jeff saw your earlier email re your discussions but i've been in another crisis. need to decide what to do tomorrow, or, i realize, TODAY, AS IT IS NOW AFTER MIDNIGHT. michael, can you get with jeff early and start getting our view as i finish the other crisis stuff first in the am???
=====================================
|
2,438 |
Subject: RE: DWR Power Assets
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent_items/2114.
=====================================
I'll get back to you on teh plants as soon as I can.
Best,
Jeff
-----Original Message-----
From: Tycholiz, Barry
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 12:47 PM
To: Dasovich, Jeff
Subject: RE: DWR Power Assets
Meeting with PG&E went OK... they are unable to commit to a letter that I had sent them on swapping out some capacity, but still very much want to trade with us and would like trade access to EOL. PROGRESS I guess....
Flights were good.. got home around 1:45 am houston time, so it was a long day...
IF you think we can get the plant names they they are have the toll on.. .that would be great.
BT
-----Original Message-----
From: Dasovich, Jeff
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 12:40 PM
To: Tycholiz, Barry
Subject: RE: DWR Power Assets
It was good to see you. No thanks needed. I'm pretty sure that I can get you the info on the plants--it's in the contracts and I'm fairly certain that we have that analysis. How'd the meeting with PG&E go? You get back to Houston OK?
Best,
Jeff
-----Original Message-----
From: Tycholiz, Barry
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 12:38 PM
To: Dasovich, Jeff
Subject: DWR Power Assets
Jeff, thanks again for attending the discussions with DWR.
Do you have any recon.... on exactly which plants DWR has the right to bring the fuel on. As Mark indicated, it was about 1/3 of their exposure, and most of that was in the south service area, but I am very interested in the actual facilities and whom used to bring fuel to them or run the units.'
There is a zero sum game on fuel... but the landscape changes depending on who buys it and how they buy it!
Any thoughts.
BT
=====================================
|
2,439 |
Subject: [Fwd: Utilities await Nev. Gov.'s okay to begin choice, Quinn to
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/174.
=====================================
FYI
John J Stauffacher
08/30/2000 02:22 PM
To: Ed Hermann/NGCCorp@NGCCorp, Joseph Paul/NGCCorp@NGCCorp
cc:
Subject: Utilities await Nev. Gov.'s okay to begin choice, Quinn to decide by
end-September
FYI
Aug 30, 2000:
Copyright ? The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2000
Electricity competition in Nevada may be delayed beyond the November
start date mandated by a July settlement agreement between the
state utilities, the Public Utilities Commission and major end-users.
Although definitive between the parties, the agreement remains
subject to the approval of Gov. Kenny Guinn, who has not designated
when competition will begin.
According to his press spokesman, Guin will decide when to start
competition no later than the end of September, and that decision
will be heavily based on a review of the industry he recently
requested of the PUC. Quinn suspended competition in March when
it became clear the industry's computer infrastructure could
not support a robust competitive market.
If Quinn declines to open the market according to the July settlement,
the issue will likely roll over to the 2001 legislature, where
efforts to delay competition even longer will likely be made.
Sierra Pacific Resources said it is largely ready for competition
to begin, although a functional ISO is not formed. Instead, the
utility, which is the holding company for both Nevada Power Co.
and its sister company Sierra Pacific Power, will use a "glass
house system." Under that system the utilities will bring in
outside consultants to monitor the operation of the transmission
system for fairness and other factors.
=====================================
|
2,440 |
Subject: REMINDER: Internal Resource Updates are DUE
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['Joseph Alamo/NA/Enron@Enron', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/804.
=====================================
Jeff, My bad. I forgot to update my address book with your new "migrated"
e-mail address.
---------------------- Forwarded by Lysa Akin/PDX/ECT on 10/04/2000 09:22 AM
---------------------------
Lysa Akin
10/04/2000 09:14 AM
To: Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT, Susan J Mara/SFO/EES@EES, Jeff
Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES, Mona L Petrochko/SFO/EES@EES, Marcie
Milner/Corp/Enron@Enron, Sandra McCubbin/SFO/EES@EES, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Joseph Alamo/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: REMINDER: Internal Resource Updates are DUE
Please consider this a reminder that your "IRT" updates are now due to Rick
Shapiro & Sue Nord.
From this point forward, I have taken over for Joseph in distributing and
updating this report.
In order to facilitate processing this report in a timely manner, please
utilize the attached Excel file (see below), which contains a worksheet that
shows the September report, as well as a worksheet with each individuals
name.
Please use the September report as a reference for your October report.
Also, you can "cut & paste" from the September report to use in your update,
but you are no longer able to change the report as you were previously.
Please call me directly if you have any questions about this new form.
Please complete and return to me by COB Friday, October 6th. I will be
forwarding this document to Rick and Sue first thing Monday morning.
I will be out of the office on Thursday and Friday. If you have questions
regarding the form, please contact me at 503/998-0698. Please do not contact
Joseph, as he will not be able to help you.
Thanks in advance for your assistance.
Lysa
503/464-7927
=====================================
|
2,441 |
Subject: TVA's Solar Project Will Supply 90 kw's
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/27830.
=====================================
Tva's Solar Project Will Power 50 Homes
Source: The Commercial Appeal
Publication date: 2001-06-13
Arrival time: 2001-06-14
The Tennessee Valley Authority plans to build one of the largest urban solar
power projects in the country this summer, with enough panels to cover a
240-space parking lot.
The solar panels will generate up to 90 kilowatts of electricity, enough to
meet the power needs of about 50 homes and shelter football fans at the
downtown Finley Stadium.
"It's a great site," said Gary Harris, manager of TVA's Green Power program.
"It's a very visible location from the highway coming into downtown
Chattanooga and will allow thousands of persons who go to the stadium to see
the solar panels up close."
The panels will provide covered parking and shade on the south side of the
stadium. TVA will spend more than $500,000 to pave the parking lot and erect
the panels.
The project is a part of TVA's Green Power Switch, a pilot launched last
year, allowing customers in select cities to choose electricity generated by
wind, sunlight and landfill gas.
Most of TVA's power comes from nuclear, fossil-fuel and hydroelectric plants.
More than 3,600 TVA customers have agreed to pay more for power generated
from renewable sources. People may buy blocks of "green power" in 150
kilowatt-hour bulks for an extra $4 a month.
TVA has already sold more than 11,000 blocks, or enough to generate more than
$528,000 in extra revenue annually.
TVA, which generates solar power from nine sites across the valley, also has
qualified for federal assistance for its program through the Virginia
Alliance for Solar Energy.
=====================================
|
2,442 |
Subject: As promised
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['Melissa Casey Jos', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/9595.
=====================================
Jeff, I believe is we decide to refute Bethany McLean's garbage, it will
probably take the tone of the attachments below. In fact they are very
interesting and I know Mark plans to meet with this gentleman next week. Of
course, at this point thess documents are completely internal.
Have a great weekend.
Cindy
----- Forwarded by Cindy Derecskey/Corp/Enron on 03/02/2001 02:49 PM -----
Vince J Kaminski@ECT
03/01/2001 04:40 PM
To: Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Hello
Mark,
I think you will like this, especially after the Fortune article.
Vince
---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 03/01/2001
04:40 PM ---------------------------
"John McCormack" <[email protected]> on 02/27/2001 04:05:41 PM
To: <[email protected]>
cc: "Melissa Casey Jos," <[email protected]>
Subject: Hello
Vince:
Please read the attached word document and then peruse the other files.
Best Regards,
John L. McCormack
SVP, Stern Stewart & Co.
212-261-0740
Note: The information contained in this message may be privileged and
confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is
not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for
delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is
strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please
notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your
computer. Thank you. Stern Stewart & Co.
- FGV.ppt
- us_article.pdf
- LettertoVince.doc
=====================================
|
2,443 |
Subject: Re: QUANTIFICATION OF BENEFITS OF OPEN ACCESS ON ELECTRIC
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/4105.
=====================================
You got it. I'll put my thinking cap on and start pondering.
Best,
Jeff
James D Steffes
04/11/2001 05:51 PM
To: [email protected]
cc: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Linda Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Steven J
Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Tom Briggs/NA/Enron@Enron, Rob Bradley/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Margaret Carson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, [email protected], Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Christi L
Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: QUANTIFICATION OF BENEFITS OF OPEN ACCESS ON ELECTRIC TRANSMISSION
NETWORK
In discussions with the Administration, it has become clear that there would
be great political value in being able to demonstrate (a) the economic value
of open access for the US and (b) the impact open access would have on the
current energy crisis.
Enron has developed historical analysis of the impact of deregulation on
natural gas. Margaret Carson is putting together some slides that show (1)
throughput improvements, (2) expansion in pipeline capacity, and (3) cost
reductions in the industry. While not exactly identical, there are some good
reasons to assume that the same would occur in the electricity industry.
It would be great if you could develop a general qualitative framework that
would outline why open access is preferable in the very short-term and work
on a larger quantitative framework over the medium-term.
To that end, Richard Tabors of TCA had earlier analyzed the economic loss
from AEP's abuse of its transmission network last year. He may have
additional insights into developing this concept.
Please call me with further questions at 713-853-7673.
Jim Steffes
=====================================
|
2,444 |
Subject: RE: Weekly Staff Meetings
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent_items/662.
=====================================
Thank very much Joseph. Alan and Sue, I'm comfortable canceling tomorrow's call unless either of you have a burning issue to discuss. We can start with the new arrangements beginning next Thursday, assuming that works for folks.
Best,
Jeff
-----Original Message-----
From: Alamo, Joseph
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 5:58 PM
To: Dasovich, Jeff; Kaufman, Paul; Mara, Susan; Comnes, Alan
Subject: RE: Weekly Staff Meetings
Importance: High
Folks,
to clarify...
1) The recurring call-in number for this weekly call has already been established, which is as follows
(same as last week):
Call-in Toll-free: (800) 998-2462
Passcode: 5549022
2) Just prior to this e-mail going out, Paul had indicated to me that we should cancel the call
as he will be unavailable (enroute/traveling to D.C.).
Thanks,
Joseph
-----Original Message-----
From: Dasovich, Jeff
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 2:08 PM
To: Alamo, Joseph; Kaufman, Paul; Mara, Susan; Comnes, Alan
Subject: Weekly Staff Meetings
Here's the suggested plan to try to make our weekly calls as efficient, painless and useful as possible. All other ideas, thoughts, comments, etc., are welcome.
We'll set up a recurring call-in number (for Thursday's at 8:30 AM, i.e., same number every week)
It will be assumed that everyone will call in; no pre-meeting prep necessary.
If someone doesn't call in, it will be assumed that the person has a conflict and can't make it (giving the benefit of the doubt is a virtue).
Those that do call in will conduct the call. (Again, the assumption is that, save for minor exceptions, everyone will be on the call.)
Thoughts?
Best,
Jeff
=====================================
|
2,445 |
Subject: CAISO Notice: New CPUC subpoena
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/28075.
=====================================
The latest
Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854
----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 06/22/2001 10:58 PM -----
CRCommunications <[email protected]>
06/22/2001 04:53 PM
Please respond to "Sole, Jeanne"
To: ISO Market Participants
<IMCEAEX-_O=CAISO_OU=CORPORATE_CN=DISTRIBUTION+20LISTS_CN=ISO+20MARKET+20PARTI
[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: CAISO Notice: CPUC subpoena
Market Participants and Scheduling Coordinators:
The CA ISO received today a subpoena from the California Public Utilities
Commission (CPUC). The subpoena is attached. The subpoena requires a
response by July 2. Concerns related to the subpoena should be directed
directly to the California Public Utilities Commission. The CPUC contact
related to the subpoena is Robert Cagen who can be reached at (415)
703-2197. The ISO would appreciate being notified also of any concerns.
The ISO contacts are Jeanne Sol, at [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
and Norma Formanek at <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected] both of
whom should be copied on correspondence.
Jeanne M. Sol,
Regulatory Counsel
California ISO
(916) 608-7144
____________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________
The Foregoing e-Mail Communication (Together With Any Attachments Thereto)
Is Intended For The Designated Recipient(s) Only. Its Terms May Be
Confidential And Protected By Attorney/Client Privilege or Other Applicable
Privileges. Unauthorized Use, Dissemination, Distribution, Or Reproduction
Of This Message Is Strictly Prohibited.
- CPUC Subp 0622.pdf
=====================================
|
2,446 |
Subject: Interesting Items from Today's Hearing
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/4063.
=====================================
I will not do as thorough a summary as Leslie has been providing, but below
are a few interesting items from Today's hearings:
1. Update on testimony on Governor's proposal. The governor's office
submitted their testimony. Basically it consisted of a letter from the
Governor urging its consideration, the same handouts passed out at the
workshop a week and a half ago (with a cover page slapped on it stating it
was testimony) and answers written out to the questions asked at the
workshop. The governor's office is not at this time offering a sponsoring
witness. The ALJ took statements as to whether the "testimony" should be
allowed into evidence. PG&E was vehemently opposed; SCE was okay with it.
2. The Commission's expert witnesses will take the stand tomorrow and
Wednesday morning. The idea is that each of them will give an approximate
30 minute presentation, and then parties will have an opportunity to cross
on those statement.
2. ORA witnesses took the stand. A couple of interesting items came out of
Sean Casey's cross examination. First, ORA has changed its position as to
the amortization of the March-June undercollection. They are now saying it
should be amortized over 12 months (rather than three). Second, Sean Casey
would not testify that "as a general rule peak prices this summer would be
higher than off peak." He stated that given the anomalies in the market
this past year, he could not testify to such a statement. Finally, with
respect to the direct access credit, he testified that irrespective of
whether DA customers pay the three cent surcharge, they should get it back
in the credit.
Jeanne Bennett
=====================================
|
2,447 |
Subject: Re: Changes to Ron's draft II
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/3827.
=====================================
My affidavit said review and reset any cap by no later than Oct 1 (which is
11.5 months from now) per call with Mara, Dasovich, and Hain. I did not
recommend a specific cap.
Alan
Mary Hain
11/22/2000 12:18 PM
To: [email protected], James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J
Mara/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Changes to Ron's draft II
Finish off the soft cap paragraph by saying that:
The Commission should also establish a 15-month sunset period on the price
cap and any reporting requirement and refund obligation, subject to an
affirmative Commission finding that futher market intervention is necessary.
---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Hain/HOU/ECT on 11/22/2000 12:22 PM
---------------------------
Mary Hain
11/22/2000 12:11 PM
To: [email protected], James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J
Mara/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Changes to Ron's draft
I will be sending to changes to Ron's draft as I write them. Here's the
first one:
Under the bullet about the soft cap, cross out the language saying "At a
minimum the Commission should raise the cap to $250 per MWh," and insert: "As
detailed in the attached analyses, price caps only interfere with the price
signals so necessary to the proper functioniung of the California markets.
Nonetheless, if the Comission accepts a price cap, the $150 level is too low
and the Commission must determine a level that will ensure the recovery of
costs and give market participants the proper incentives to participate in
the California ISO and PX market."
=====================================
|
2,448 |
Subject: DWR Stranded Cost Update
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/28651.
=====================================
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 07/11/2001 07:14 PM -----
Alan Comnes/ENRON@enronXgate
07/11/2001 05:03 PM
To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Jennifer Thome/ENRON@enronXgate, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J
Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Dave Perrino/SF/ECT@ECT, Ban
Sharma/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Tim Belden/ENRON@enronXgate, Ray
Alvarez/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: DWR Stranded Cost Update
Using information pulled together by Jennifer and BAN, I requested West
Tradings Risk/Structuring Group do a more careful analysis of the
above-market costs associated with the DWR contracts. Attached is their
analysis.
In this analysis we examined only the executed contracts and NOT the
agreements-in principle. (Only executed contracts were released by the state
in the last few weeks.) Also, gas-indexed contracts were examined on their
nongas costs only. Since gas costs are a pass through on some contracts, we
excluded them as a conservatism; i.e., we did not ascribe costs to the gas
portion of the contracts since they will float with market costs over time.
These contracts were marked to market using current, applicable curves.
Finally we discounted at the LIBOR rate, which is around 4%/year.
The stranded cost under these assumptions is approximately $10 billion. The
spreadsheet shows the overmarket costs by contract. Note: a negative
"mark-to-market" equals a positive stranded cost.
As before, this analysis is based upon Enron's confidential forward curves.
Approval from Tim Belden is needed before this analysis can be released.
Alan Comnes
=====================================
|
2,449 |
Subject: Re: Berkeley Policy School Energy Summit
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/1444.
=====================================
You're certainly becoming a regular on the energy speaker's circuit! How'd
your event last Thursday go? I'm sure you charmed their regulatory panels...
From: Jeff Dasovich on 11/06/2000 01:31 PM
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
To: Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Harry
Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Mary
Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@Enron, Mona L
Petrochko/NA/Enron@Enron, Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, [email protected],
[email protected], Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Berkeley Policy School Energy Summit
FYI. I'll be participating in a "round table discussion" on California next
Monday on the Berkeley campus. It's being sponsored by the Policy School and
some folks from the Business School. Laura Tyson and a former FCC mucky-muck
(Howard Shalansky) will moderate the two panels. Alums who now work in the
energy biz are putting up funding for the event (e.g., Columbia, American
Public Power Ass.) We're providing a modest stipend.
There are two "round tables." First one is "Why did we do this?," and the
second one is "Where to from here?" I'll be on the second panel. Go to the
attached website for agenda and other info. I intend to pull from the
messages, filings and other materials that we've developed over the course of
the last several weeks/months. I'll distribute talking points for review and
comment sometime this week. But please feel free to send thoughts,
suggestions, etc. early and often.
Best,
Jeff
http://gspp.berkeley.edu/events/electricity_summit_conference.htm.
=====================================
|
2,450 |
Subject: Flaws Cited in California Electricity Market
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', "nicholas.o'[email protected]", '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/2188.
=====================================
Business/Financial Desk; Section C
Flaws Cited in California Electricity Market
?
10/07/2000
The New York Times
Page 4, Column 1
c. 2000 New York Times Company
PASADENA, Calif., Oct. 6 -- California's electricity market is not ''workably
competitive'' and needs to be fixed, the California Power Exchange said in a
draft report.
Wholesale power prices from May to July more than quadrupled from a year
earlier as demand strained supplies during weather that was hotter than
normal. Some generators appeared to hold back power at times of peak
consumption, waiting until prices surged.
This happened because of ''structural flaws in the design of the California
electricity markets,'' the report said. ''These design flaws need to be
addressed,'' it said. A final report is expected next week.
The exchange recommended easing restrictions on building power plants and
penalizing companies for waiting until the last minute to deliver power. It
did not cite a specific power-plant owner, marketer or utility as responsible
for the problem.
The nonprofit power exchange was created by the state legislature in 1996 to
operate a marketplace where utilities and other big buyers and sellers could
get electricity.
The PG&E Corporation's Pacific Gas and Electric, Edison International's
Southern California Edison and Sempra Energy's San Diego Gas and Electric buy
all their power through the exchange.
Pacific Gas and Electric and Southern California Edison have said they face
billions of dollars of losses because rates they can charge customers are
frozen far below the rates they had to pay for power on the exchange this
summer.
=====================================
|
2,451 |
Subject: SVMG Energy Webcast & Action Agenda Questionnaire
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/3137.
=====================================
?
?
[IMAGE]
Higher Energy Costs and Less Reliability
and MANY, MANY Incentive Programs
Silicon Valley Manufacturing Group (SVMG) invites you to a webcast seminar
on California Energy Strategies and incentive opportunities.
SVMG wants to hear from you.
Please take a moment to complete this questionnaire, which will shape
SVMG's energy action agenda on your behalf.
[IMAGE][IMAGE]
Lost Productivity -- Lost Revenues -- Higher Costs
The CPUC proposed rate hikes could mean 40-50% bill increases for some
commercial and industrial loads, and the California ISO is predicting 34
blackout days if consumption this summer keeps pace with 2000.
What can you do?
[IMAGE][IMAGE]
Join Our Web Seminar, Where We'll Discuss:
Updates on the California situation
Risks California businesses face
Ways to reduce risk
Incentive programs that pay for conservation
[IMAGE][IMAGE]
SVMG - NRDC Collaboration Benefits California
Silicon Energy present a webcast seminar, produced on behalf of SVMG's
collaboration with Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC). The SVMG-NRDC
collaboration is designed to deliver strategic consultation on demand
response and energy efficiency opportunities as part of robust strategies
for success in the volatile energy economy.
[IMAGE][IMAGE]
REGISTER ONLINE TODAY!
Thursday, May 24 at 11:00 a.m. - 12:00 p.m. (PDT)
Register ONLINE! click here, or by phone at 1.877.749.9400 x 2644
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
, 2001 Silicon Energy Corp.
- svmg.jpg
- clear.gif
- CircuitHands1.jpg
- CiC_city1.jpg
- CiC_Manufacture1.jpg
- arm.jpg
- banner_bottom.jpg
=====================================
|
2,452 |
Subject: Re: The California ISO Desire to Lay off Some OC-48 Capacity
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['Thomas D Gros@ECT@ENRON', '[email protected]', '[email protected]@EES@ECT@ENRON']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/318.
=====================================
OK, i'm trying this again. Jim, please let me know if you receive this. I'm
attaching the previous notes.
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES on 01/27/2000 06:41
PM ---------------------------
Tom Gros@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS
01/19/2000 08:59 AM
To: Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES@ECT@ENRON
cc: [email protected]@EES@ECT@ENRON, Thomas D Gros@ECT@ENRON
Subject: Re: The California ISO Desire to Lay off Some OC-48 Capacity
John Yurkanin (CA ISO) is my former boss at BP Gas. I'd be happy to talk
with them about excess capacity.
Jeff Dasovich@EES
01/17/00 01:01 PM
To: [email protected], Thomas D Gros@ECT
cc:
Subject: The California ISO Desire to Lay off Some OC-48 Capacity
Hi Jim:
As we discussed, your client, the California Independent System Operator,
contracted with MCI to build a high-speed, broad band network (predominately
OC-48?)as the platform to launch electricity deregulation in California.
Since that time, the ISO has discovered that it has capacity substantially in
excess of what it needs to operate the grid (and certain markets for power,
e.g., ancillary services).
Rather than try to re-negotiate the contract with MCI, the ISO is now looking
at marketing the capacity. Sounds like the capacity runs between Sacramento
(Folsom?) and Southern California (Alhambra?). Please correct any
(unintended) inaccuracies I may have included in this very brief description.
Tom Gros is VP of Enron's global bandwidth trading group and can help
determine the value/feasibility of having the ISO make use of Enron's
bandwith trading platform.
Tom, meet Jim. Jim, meet Tom
Best,
Jeff
=====================================
|
2,453 |
Subject: Re: Edwards AFB Commodity Procurement Requirements
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/133.
=====================================
---------------------- Forwarded by Robert Frank/HOU/EES on 11/03/99 07:15 AM
---------------------------
Robert Frank
11/03/99 07:13 AM
To: William Gang/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Re: Edwards AFB Commodity Procurement Requirements
I think it looks fine - there is one thing I'd consider adding. I'm still
thinking it through but it would go something like this:
"The title to any electricity purchased on behalf of the Government shall
pass from EFSI to the Government at the at the interconnection of facilities
owned by the Utility and those owned and operated by the contractor."
William Gang
11/02/99 03:43 PM
To: Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES, Robert Frank/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Edwards AFB Commodity Procurement Requirements
Mike, attached are the parameters that we would prefer to see in an RFP for
the electrical commodity in California. This approach in any RFP would help
us get the best bid possible for a solicitation.
I understand from our converstaion of last week that Edwards is contemplating
adding the electrical commodity to the RFP that is intended to be used for
privatization of the Edwards electrical distribution system. Given this, we
have put our jurisdictional discussions with the CPUC on hold pending your
resolution of the content of the RFP. We cannot request any dispositive
action from the commission on jurisdiction until we can accurately
characterize the elements of the transaction. Please advise us, as early as
possible whether or not the commodity will be included, and if so, how its
inclusion will be structured.
Jeff/Bob, please comment on the content of the attachment, too.
=====================================
|
2,454 |
Subject: RE: NYT Article about Ex Commissioner Fessler
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/154.
=====================================
glad to hear that you're back, generalissimo. we will follow you up the hill.
seriously, though, you will start seeing/hearing from us quite soon., e.g.,
skilling's at the national press club this thursday.
Jessie Knight <[email protected]> on 09/05/2000 06:04:33 PM
To: "'Jeff Dasovich'" <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: RE: NYT Article about Ex Commissioner Fessler
Jeff,
I chuckled to read about Dan being the center of Dante's Inferno core,
but quickly was overcome more by disdain of the simpleton Mr. Palast's
wretched journalistic license. Why don't you get Skillings, Michaels,
McCrae, Levin et al to answer all the preposterous revisionist pablum that
is saturating the marketplace as we speak? Is there or was there only one
Jessie Knight who lived that 6-year hell to have crap like this spread
about? Where are all the direct access/bilateral
contract/anti-poolco/anti-Hogan/anti-Harvard Electricity Group/anti-command
& control proponents? It is sad for me to hear the deafening silence out of
a community that I helped lead to battle and to leave and see that most have
abandoned the cause to leave it the world to the government infidels that
want to and will certainly re-create the Gulag.
Jessie J. Knight Jr.
President & CEO
San Diego Regional Chamber of Commerce
-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff Dasovich [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2000 3:01 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: NYT Article about Ex Commissioner Fessler
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES on 09/05/2000
05:00 PM
---------------------------
(See attached file: State Deregulates.doc)
=====================================
|
2,455 |
Subject: Bandwidth Market Report
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/515.
=====================================
----- Forwarded by Scott Bolton/Enron Communications on 04/25/00 07:45 AM
-----
[email protected]
04/24/00 04:15 PM
To: Scott Bolton/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
cc:
Subject: Bandwidth Market Report
To: Recipients of McGraw-Hill Energy's Bandwidth Market Report
From: Brian Jordan, Editorial Director, McGraw-Hill Energy power
group
Please accept our invitation to this free trial and take a look at
the attached issue of Bandwidth Market Report, our new daily publication. We
selected you and about 60 others to receive this free trial because of your
interest in the bandwidth business and the developing market for bandwidth
trading.
We hope you not only will find our publication worthwhile--and
continue to receive this free trial for several weeks--but will let us know
what you like and don't like, and what you would like to see. We are aiming
to bring you one concise daily package with the latest news and analysis on
the bandwidth business, plus market commentary and price information on
bandwidth trading.
Please let us know how we're doing. If you do not wish to keep
receiving this free trial, just send a reply message and ask to be dropped
from our list. But we believe you will find Bandwidth Market Report a
must-read for those who want to take advantage of the huge opportunities
unfolding in this market.
Chris Baltimore, editor--phone: 202-383-2185; e-mail:
[email protected]
Matt Spangler, associate editor: 202-383-2279;
[email protected]
- 842-current.pdf
=====================================
|
2,456 |
Subject: San Jose article Criticizing FERC
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/2698.
=====================================
Also quite a lot about how lax FERC is in using what subpoena powers it does
have to get information it needs to really see what's going on.
---------------------- Forwarded by Rebecca W Cantrell/HOU/ECT on 06/04/2001
05:19 PM ---------------------------
Nancy Bagot@ENRON
06/04/2001 04:17 PM
To: Shelley Corman/Enron@EnronXGate, Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew
Fossum/Enron@EnronXGate, Robert Kilmer/Enron@EnronXGate, Janet
Butler/Enron@EnronXGate, Dari Dornan/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Glen
Hass/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Bambi Heckerman/Enron@EnronXGate, Frazier
King/Enron@EnronXGate, Teb Lokey/Enron@EnronXGate, Dorothy
McCoppin/Enron@EnronXGate, Ray Neppl/Enron@EnronXGate, Maria
Pavlou/Enron@EnronXGate, Janet Place/Enron@EnronXGate, Michele
Winckowski/Enron@EnronXGate, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, [email protected],
Linda Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Lora Sullivan/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Ray
Alvarez/NA/Enron@ENRON, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Tom
Briggs/NA/Enron@Enron, John Shelk/NA/Enron@Enron, Pat
Shortridge/Corp/Enron@Enron, Carin Nersesian/NA/Enron@Enron, Rebecca W
Cantrell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leslie Lawner/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: San Jose article Criticizing FERC
Attached is a two-part series article (from this past Saturday and Sunday)
from the San Jose Mercury News on FERC, the energy crisis, and FERC's
inability to monitor the markets (and it's cozy relationship with industry).
Apparently it is making the rounds at FERC and causing quite a bit of agita...
I've read through Part 2, and so far it's all on the power side, but there
are quite a few FERC staff, both policy, enforcement and economists,
mentioned and criticized.
=====================================
|
2,457 |
Subject: Re: California Update--07.24.01
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/12119.
=====================================
That's the best and most accurate description I've heard yet.
Best,
Jeff
Vicki Sharp@EES
07/24/2001 11:15 AM
To: Jeff Dasovich/Na/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Re: California Update--07.24.01
Unbelievable.
From: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON on 07/24/2001 11:02 AM
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON
To: David W Delainey/HOU/EES@EES, Janet R Dietrich/HOU/EES@EES, Marty
Sunde/HOU/EES@EES, Dan Leff/HOU/EES@EES, Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES, Jeremy
Blachman/HOU/EES@EES, Scott Gahn/HOU/EES@EES, Evan Hughes/HOU/EES@EES, Tim
Belden/ENRON@enronXgate, Jeff Richter/ENRON@enronXgate, Stephen
Swain/ENRON@enronXgate, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, [email protected], Susan
J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Paul Kaufman/Enron@EnronXGate, Linda
Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Susan M Landwehr/Enron@EnronXGate, Harry
Kingerski/Enron@EnronXGate, Michael Tribolet/ENRON@enronXgate, Kristin
Walsh/Enron@EnronXGate, Richard Shapiro/Enron@EnronXGate, [email protected],
Louise Kitchen/Enron@EnronXGate, John J Lavorato/Enron@EnronXGate,
Christopher F Calger/Enron@EnronXGate, Lisa Mellencamp/Enron@EnronXGate
cc:
Subject: California Update--07.24.01
The Assembly passed the budget late last night.
The Assembly recessed without passing out any energy bill.
There is some talk of a working group being convened beginning next week
comprised of Legislative staff and industry to continue to try to work out a
deal.
For now, however, the free world is safe from the CA Assembly and the
Senate--they've left and all Legislative activity is on hold until the 20th
of August, unless leadership, or the Governor tries to bring them back early.
The activity now moves to the PUC.
Best,
Jeff
=====================================
|
2,458 |
Subject: Re: Ms Feintsein and California
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/1145.
=====================================
My apologies, Linda. Sometimes it pays to see what name pops up from the
Enron address book before hitting the send button. And thanks, Rick. I'll
note the two r's in Rrobertson.
Best,
Jeff
Richard Shapiro
11/28/2000 01:03 PM
To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Linda Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Re: Ms Feintsein and California
Rrobertson, not Roberts- maybe... Linda Roberts has some stroke w/ Diane
Feinstein!
From: Jeff Dasovich on 11/28/2000 12:59 PM
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
To: Linda Roberts/NA/Enron@Enron, [email protected], Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul
Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Mona L
Petrochko/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Cynthia
Sandherr/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Ms Feintsein and California
Greetings Linda:
Let me open by saying welcome, and by apologizing for the fact that
California has probably made your first days on the job a bit crazy.
Just wanted to pass along some info. I'm sure you've seen Senator
Feinstein's comments to FERC. And I think you're aware that she held a
meeting in California with a group of stakeholders (including Davis staff) on
the day before FERC's recent workshop at which Steve testified. She stated
at the meeting that she is thinking seriously about sponsoring legislation to
place a price cap on the entire WSCC market. Economists in the room
expressed their strong misgivings about caps, but Feinstein seemed fairly
focused on at least sponsoring some sort of legislation. Not sure where it
will go, but wanted to pass it along.
Best,
Jeff
=====================================
|
2,459 |
Subject: Montali enjoins CAISO from filing generation claim in bankruptcy
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/28191.
=====================================
Question is whether DWR steps up and/or ISO's creditors take further pain.
Link to the decision below:
-----Original Message-----
From: "BENNETT YOUNG" <[email protected]>@ENRON
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22BENNETT+20YOUNG+22+20+3CBYOUNG+40LLGM+2ECOM+3E+40ENRON@E
NRON.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2001 1:31 PM
To: Mellencamp, Lisa; Tribolet, Michael; CARL EKLUND; JOHN KLAUBERG
Subject: AP3086-PrelimInjunc6-26.pdf
I enclose Judge Montali's decison in the ISO litigation. Based on the ISO's
concessions at the hearing and the FERC's creditworthiness requirements, the
Judge enjoined ISO from filing an administrative claim for post-petition
power purchases made by it on behalf of PG&E.
http://www.canb.uscourts.gov/canb/Documents.nsf/bf0c3519af9731c88825671d006664
79/4799756092ca99bf88256a4a00045971/$FILE/AP3086-PrelimInjunc6-26.pdf
Bennett G. Young
One Embarcadero Center, Suite 400
San Francisco, California 94111
(415) 951-1167
[email protected]
==============================================================================
This e-mail, including attachments, contains information that is confidential
and may be protected by the attorney/client or other privileges. This
e-mail, including attachments, constitutes non-public information intended to
be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not an intended
recipient, please delete this e-mail, including attachments, and notify me.
The unauthorized use, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this
e-mail, including attachments, is prohibited and may be unlawful.
==============================================================================
- AP3086-P.url
=====================================
|
2,460 |
Subject: Call-in
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/2853.
=====================================
Jeff and Mike,
Please let me know if you would like to call-in so that I can obtain the
necessary information for you guys. Thanks.
Lara
----- Forwarded by Lara Leibman/Enron Communications on 10/31/00 10:21 AM
-----
Wayne Gardner
10/30/00 06:59 PM
To: Phillip D Lord/LON/ECT@ECT, Robbi Rossi/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Donald Lassere/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Sue
Nord/NA/Enron@ENRON, Lara Leibman/Enron Communications@Enron Communications,
Michelle Hicks/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Richard
Anderson/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Rajen Shah/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: James Ginty/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
Subject:
Proposed Agenda for Tax, Accounting, Regulatory and Legal Meeting scheduled
for 11/2/00 at 0830 in EB 4434
Present the basic structural issue (see attached power point presentation) -
WWG
Get input from accounting and legal regarding the issue - Rossi, Christensen,
Lord (by telephone)
Discuss feasible alternatives for resolving the issue - Group
Determine steps needed to make a recommendation as to structure (including
persons responsible) - Group
Determine format and timing for presenting recommended structure to traders -
Group
The attachment is the presentation I made to the regulatory group in
Vancouver that, among other things, sets forth the issue to be discussed.
Please feel free to contact me before the meeting with any questions you may
have or any items you would like to add or change in the agenda.
W. Wayne Gardner
Enron Broadband Services
1400 Smith Street
Houston, TX 77002-7361
Phone: 713 853 3547
Fax: 713 646 2532
=====================================
|
2,461 |
Subject: Revision to the Swap Agreement in Rockefeller
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/inbox/1678.
=====================================
Announcement for E283-1: Real Estate Finance:
Hi All,
The Rockefeller spreadsheet is now on izio. I would also like to revise the wording of the swap agreement that is in the case. The new version is now on izio.
I have added the following footnote to the case:
The Swap contract serves as an inverse floater to the floating rate bonds. If there is a swap contract, then the A-2FL and the B-FL pay as floating rate notes, to the bond holder, with coupons of LIBOR +.36% and LIBOR + .48% per annum respectively. Since the underlying collateral is fixed, there has to be a cap on the payments on these floating rate notes and these caps would be 6.4449% and 6.5710% respectively. Alternatively, there has to be another position, an inverse floater, such that the sum of the two positions pays out the capped coupon as its maximum. In this case Goldman Sachs achieves this using a SWAP contract. The contract is written such that the Trust pay out the two floating rate coupons to the bond holders and also pays the difference between the floating rate coupon and the respective cap to the Swap Counterparty if the floaters are below the caps. If the floating contract rates are above the cap, then the Swap Counterparty pays the trust the diff!
erence. In this way the pool only pays out 6.4449% and 6.5710% on the two positions. There will always be sufficient cash flow to cover those positions.
N.
===========================================
This message was sent from the Izio system at http://haas.Izio.convene.com.
If you have any questions or comments regarding this email or the Izio system, please forward them to [email protected].
=====================================
|
2,462 |
Subject: Re: FERC Order and DWR
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/9836.
=====================================
FYI.
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 03/12/2001 02:14 PM -----
"JOHN G KLAUBERG" <[email protected]>
03/12/2001 01:43 PM
To: [email protected]
cc:
Subject: Re: FERC Order and DWR
Jeff: I am assuming you have already heard back from the FERC experts, but
that generally would be my understanding (subject to a change in the
order)--and, as we discussed, hopefully the bilateral forward market contract
deals with CDWR ultimately will be specificaly excluded from the cap rules,
etc. (Joe Hartsoe indicated this morning that no one has indicated that the
bilaterals should be subject to the FERC order). John
"This e-mail, including attachments, contains information that is
confidential and it may be protected by the attorney/client or other
privileges. This e-mail, including attachments, constitutes non-public
information intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If
you are not an intended recipient, please delete this e-mail, including
attachments and notify me by return mail, e-mail or by phone at 212
424-8125. The unauthorized use, dissemination, distribution or reproduction
of the e-mail, including attachments, is prohibited and may be unlawful.
John Klauberg
LeBoeuf, Lamb, Greene & MacRae, L.L.P.
212 424-8125
[email protected]
>>> <[email protected]> 03/12/01 01:00PM >>>
Quick question to Joe and/or Christian, John and Mary:
I'm assuming that any deal we sign with DWR that falls below the $150/MWH
soft cap is free and clear of the order FERC issued on Friday as well as
any other refund risk associated with FERC's December order. Is that
correct? Thanks.
Best,
Jeff
=====================================
|
2,463 |
Subject: Direct Access - Potential Cost Savings
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/11339.
=====================================
Below is the analysis of CDWR savings. Please contact Robert Neustaedter
with any questions. Jennifer
----- Forwarded by Jennifer Thome/NA/Enron on 04/20/2001 02:20 PM -----
Robert Neustaedter@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
04/13/2001 09:42 AM
To: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@ENRON, Jennifer Thome/NA/Enron@ENRON, Susan J
Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Direct Access - Potential Cost Savings
This memo lays out some numbers with regard to the question raised earlier
this week concerning the savings to CDWR if direct access were to be
reinstated.
Using available annual mWh sales figures for PG&E and SCE (1999), commercial
and industrial sales as a percentage of total sales is 63% for PGE and 68%
for SCE, or, in terms of annual mWh purchases, approximately 63,900,000 kWh
for PGE and 61,200,000 kWh for SCE for a total C&I purchase requirement of
125,100,000 kWh.
Assuming that every kWh of C&I load that switches to direct access is an
equivalent reduction in CDWR purchase requirements (which assumes that CDWR
fills 100% of the net short) and bracketing CDWR per unit purchase costs
between its published portfolio cost and an assumed market price of $250 per
kWh, the following cost reductions (stated on a monthly basis) are shown
below:
Per Month Purchase Cost Reduction
Switch to Direct Access CDWR Portfolio Cost - $79/mWh Market Price - $250/mWh
5% $41mm $130 mm
10% $ 82 mm $260 mm
15% $123 mm $390 mm
20% $164 mm $420 mm
If you have any questions with regard to the above or require further
analysis please advise.
=====================================
|
2,464 |
Subject: Re: California White Paper
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/8720.
=====================================
Dave--I suggest you run this document by Jeff Dasovich before it hits the
street. I would want Jeff (and possibly Mike Day) to review to be sure that
it is consistent with our "official" regulatory message in CA. Also, I
wonder if Peggy has any comments.
I'd like to see the final version after regulatory and PR have weighed in.
Thanks. MDS
---------------------- Forwarded by Mike D Smith/HOU/EES on 01/30/2001 10:16
AM ---------------------------
Enron Energy Services
From: Marty Sunde 01/25/2001 11:24 AM
Phone No: 713 853-7797 Phone
888-953-9478 SkyTel Pager
EB 889
To: Dave Childress/SFO/EES@EES
cc: Scott Gahn/HOU/EES@EES, Eric Melvin/HOU/EES@EES, Peggy
Mahoney/HOU/EES@EES, Mike D Smith/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: Re: California White Paper
Dave,
Thanks for a copy. This looks good to me, but please run this by Peggy
Mahoney in PR and/or Mike Smith in Legal to ensure that we are totally
"clean" in a delicate market situation.
Marty
Enron Energy Services
From: Dave Childress 01/24/2001 10:38 AM
Phone No: 562/901-3811
Pager: 888/782-3546
Pager EMail: [email protected]
Mobile: 562/688-9457
To: Marty Sunde/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: California White Paper
Marty,
I heard through the grapevine that you were taking a look at the California
market. I have just completed a "White Paper" that I am going to use as part
of my sales pitch for EEIS. I have shown it to John Woodman and some of the
gas commodity guys; who claim to like it. I am under no allusions that any
of this is new to you, but I thought you might want to take a look.
Dave C.
=====================================
|
2,465 |
Subject: Re: That Joyous Time of Year
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/913.
=====================================
Please send responses to both me and Joseph. Thank you.
Jeff Dasovich
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
10/10/2000 04:37 PM
To: Mona L Petrochko/SFO/EES, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT, Susan J Mara/SFO/EES,
Sandra McCubbin/SFO/EES, [email protected]
cc:
Subject: That Joyous Time of Year
Well, it's upon us again and that means X-Mas party.
Joseph and I have begun (barely) to plan for this year's festivities. But
before we get to far along, tried and true democratic (small "d") principles
call for a wee bit of polling.
Because we're already in the middle of October we need your responses
pronto. If we don't receive your responses by COB Thursday, then democracy's
out the window, and good ol' dictatorship takes over.
Of course, it will be difficult to grant everyone's wishes, but all
suggestions will be given great (and equal) weight. Here are the questions:
Would you prefer just dinner, or dinner plus an activity?
Joseph and I are leaning toward dinner and an activity, but wanted to hear
from other folks. If yes, Joseph has come up with a couple of very fun ideas
for an activity but suggestions are greatly encouraged and welcome. Same
goes for a restaurant (understanding that the choice of activity may
influence where we eat). Sue has put in her vote for Fleur de Lys.
Should we try to organize the event with the rest of the SF office (i.e., EES
and ENA) or confine it to GA?
Should we expand to include Western GA or keep it to SFGA?
We choose for dates the 7th or 8th or 14th or 15th of December. What's your
preference. Is there a day that just won't work?
Joseph, if I've missed anything, please tack on.
Best,
Jeff
=====================================
|
2,466 |
Subject: Math Primer and Introduction
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/deleted_items/1651.
=====================================
Announcement for E283-1: Real Estate Finance:
Dear all:
Let me introduce myself. I am your TA, Barbara Bukhvalova. During this semester you will not see much of me unless you come to my office hours. However, you will be able to read my comments on some of your graded work and will receive occasional messages from me through Izio.
I have TAed this corse before and unlike last semester I am very proud that I have conquered the skill of using finance calculators which is a very hard task for absent minded PhD students. I hold regular office hours which hopefully will fit most, but if for some reason you need alternative arrangements do not hesitate to ask me for an appointment or/and please do communicate with me via email about shorter questions you might have.
I am going to post a math primer momentarily. This document is for (very) optional perusal. It is targeting those of you who had a long break in studies before joining Haas and/or generally are not very friendly with math. The criterion of usefulness of that file is how well you follow the lecture on mortgage math (duration, convexity etc.). If you feel like you are lacking some basic intuition on where the formulas are coming from, you can have a glance at this short (barely 3-page) document. Otherwise you might not benefit from looking at it at all.
I am looking forward to the rest of the semester and wish you all good luck.
Barbara
===========================================
This message was sent from the Izio system at http://haas.Izio.convene.com.
If you have any questions or comments regarding this email or the Izio system, please forward them to [email protected].
=====================================
|
2,467 |
Subject: Regulatory Risks Tied to DA
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/deleted_items/1555.
=====================================
Check this out. I want to get any comments you might have before I sent it around.
-----Original Message-----
From: Dasovich, Jeff
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2001 8:06 PM
To: Dasovich, Jeff
Subject:
Here's a cut at the taxonomy of regulatory risks associated with Direct Access. Please let me know if there are others I missed, or if there are changes needed to the ones listed.
1. Retroactive Suspension of DA Contracts: The PUC rules in a subsequent decision that DA is suspended on some date between July 1 and September 20th.
2. Contract renewal forbidden: The PUC includes contract renewal under the suspension of DA.
3. No incremental "DASR'ing": The PUC includes incremental additions and subtractions of DA customer's load under the suspension of DA (e.g., fast food chains, University campus)
4. Cost allocation: the PUC adds new costs to DA accounts and/or disproportionately shifts existing costs to DA accounts. Costs with greatest risk of being shifted to DA customers include: IOU undercollection, bonds to repay the state general fund, and DWR contracts. The costs associated with these categories are substantial.
Additional suggestions from Mike Day:
5. DASR processing: Related to #1 above, in that, if the utilities attempt to implement the Commission-ordered suspension in an onerous way, it may put at risk contracts executed prior to 09.20.01 but not yet DASR'd.
6. Confidentiality of contract information: The utilities and/or the PUC may require ESPs to show contracts as proof that contracts were executed prior to 09.20.01.
Key risks associated with each category:
Adverse to P/L
Adverse to hedge (demand risk)
=====================================
|
2,468 |
Subject: Craziness in San Diego
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/3963.
=====================================
Hi, Jeff --
I just had to write to someone who understands how CRAZY the electricity
argument is getting. Make sure to check out the Union-Tribune's Web site
today to peruse the articles on dereg (www.uniontrib.com). Jan
Smutney-Jones did a good job responding to Rosenfeld's voter initiative
plan , but the headline and the front page only lead people to believe that
there's no alternative but going back to regulation -- and a state-owned
power authority at that (imagine!). It would have been very good to have
ARM get a mention as well -- but maybe it isn't ready to be public yet.
When the group does put a stake in the ground, it will have to be sure to
craft its messages in a way that avoids the appearance of reacting to
Rosenfeld rather than being the pro-active and pro-consumer ESP's.
I don't know if it's in your best interest, and I'd like to hear your
thoughts on this, but since the reporters are either being very biased or
not hearing enough from the pro-competition side, would an op-ed from Enron
help calm things down and give people a chance to hear about what positive
benefits a competitive market -- if allowed to exist -- can bring? I
thought the WSJ article on Monday was great, but few San Diegans read the
Journal and rely on the UT for their news. However, the editorial pages
are well read and may serve you well. I can help out your team on drafting
this if you're interested. Or if there's any other information gathering
you need, just let me know.
Anyway -- hope you had a good Thanksgiving and that you'll be able to come
down here soon.
Have a good Wednesday,
Dana
Dana Perino
[email protected]
619-234-1300 ext. 238
=====================================
|
2,469 |
Subject: HELP -- CEO email
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/12893.
=====================================
Steve Kirshch
CEO
Propel
1010 Rincon Circle
San Jose CA 95131
ph. 408.571.6317
fax: 408.577.1070
e-mail: [email protected]
Vivek Ranadive
CEO
Tibco
ph. 650.846.5001
e-mail: [email protected]
Kenneth Oshman
President & CEO
Echelon
415 Oakmead Parkway
Sunnyvale CA 94085
ph. 408.938.5244
fax 408.328.3805
e-mail: [email protected]
John Doerr
ph. 650.233.3353
e-mail: [email protected]
---------------------- Forwarded by Joseph Alamo/NA/Enron on 05/22/2001 11:37
AM ---------------------------
From: Jeff Dasovich on 05/22/2001 10:53 AM CDT
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
To: Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Joseph Alamo/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: HELP -- CEO email
I'll have Joseph clean up the letter and send you the email/fax #'s etc. for
the list, for the cards that I gathered.
Best,
Jeff
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 05/22/2001 10:51 AM -----
Karen Denne
05/22/2001 12:45 AM
To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: HELP -- CEO email
Jeff -- Thanks for your phone message. I'm stuck and need your help. My
Microsoft Word isn't working, and I want to send something out to the ceos
asap tuesday. Can you clean up the letter? I'm fine w/ your edits (for the
signature line, add "name, title") Pls send me the final letter so I can
detach. i've left a message for steve and will wait to send until i hear
from him.
I'm didn't collect biz cards from everyone at the CEO meetings, and I need
email and/or fax numbers for:
Tony Ridder
Steve Kirsch
Ken Oshman
Fred Anderson
Dan Scheinman
Vivek Ranadive
John Doerr
Ray Irani
Can you send me the info from their cards? Call me if you have any
questions. THANK YOU!!!
kd
=====================================
|
2,470 |
Subject: RE: Intention to Challenge the California's PUC's Decision to
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent_items/226.
=====================================
Thanks.
-----Original Message-----
From: Dietrich, Janet
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 10:21 AM
To: Dasovich, Jeff; Mara, Susan
Cc: Shapiro, Richard
Subject: Intention to Challenge the California's PUC's Decision to Suspend DA
EES is fully on board with these pursuits...
---------------------- Forwarded by Janet Dietrich/HOU/EES on 09/24/2001 10:18 AM ---------------------------
From: Jeff Dasovich/ENRON@enronXgate on 09/21/2001 03:48 PM
To: Richard Shapiro/ENRON@enronXgate, James D Steffes/ENRON@enronXgate, Paul Kaufman/ENRON@enronXgate, Harry Kingerski/ENRON@enronXgate, Steven J Kean/ENRON@enronXgate, Susan J Mara/ENRON@enronXgate, Jeremy Blachman/HOU/EES@EES, Janet Dietrich/HOU/EES@EES, Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Intention to Challenge the California's PUC's Decision to Suspend DA
? The PUC's decision 1) suspending DA and 2) signaling the PUC's intent to continue to consider nullifying DA contracts signed after July 1 is full of holes.
? We haven't detected any downside in joining with coalitions, and trying to get other coalitions, to appeal the PUC order.
? Sue Mara is working with the ARM coalition to appeal yesterday's order and is taking the lead generally on the effort to reverse things.
? The appeals that we would join, and attempt others to persue on their own, would focus principally on two issues: 1) disabusing the PUC of the notion that it has the legal authority to nullify contracts retroactively, and 2) lifting the suspension on DA altogether (let me know if I've missed anything here, Sue).
Please let us know if folks have any concerns that would cause us to reconsider pursuing these challenges.
Best,
Jeff
=====================================
|
2,471 |
Subject: Calif PUC OKs Increase In SoCal Ed Borrowing Limit To $2 Billion
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/922.
=====================================
Sorry, this article did not reach everyone.
----- Forwarded by Miyung Buster/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 10/11/2000 10:01 AM
-----
Miyung Buster
10/11/2000 09:57 AM
To: Joe Hartsoe@ENRON, Sandra McCubbin@EES, Susan Mara@EES, Paul
Kaufman@ECT, Karen Denne@ENRON, Jeff Dasovich@EES, Mark Palmer@ENRON, James D
Steffes@EES, Richard Shapiro@EES, Elizabeth Linnell@EES, Jeannie
Mandelker@ECT, [email protected], Mark Schroeder@ECT, Peter Styles@ECT,
[email protected], Mona L Petrochko@EES, Peggy Mahoney@EES, Nicholas
O'Day/AP/Enron@Enron, Mike Dahlke/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Rob
Bradley@ENRON, Shelley Corman@ENRON, Jennifer Rudolph/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Calif PUC OKs Increase In SoCal Ed Borrowing Limit To $2 Billion
Calif PUC OKs Increase In SoCal Ed Borrowing Limit To $2 Billion
10/10/2000
Dow Jones Energy Service
(Copyright (c) 2000, Dow Jones & Company, Inc.)
LOS ANGELES (Dow Jones)-State regulators voted Tuesday to allow Southern
California Edison to raise its short-term borrowing ability for the purchase
of wholesale electricity to $2 billion from $700 million, a company spokesman
said.
In its motion, the Edison International (EIX) unit said it needed to increase
its limit due to the recent high price of power in the California Power
Exchange spot market and Independent System Operator real-time market, said
Public Utilities Commission president Loretta Lynch.
State and federal investigations are underway to determine why wholesale
power prices in California spiked to record levels this summer.
-By Jessica Berthold, Dow Jones Newswires; 323-658-3872,
[email protected]
=====================================
|
2,472 |
Subject: conversation with Jeff
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/8699.
=====================================
Sorry. I figured Sandi would have included it. Why would I have figured
that?
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 01/29/2001 12:16 PM -----
Jeff Dasovich
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
01/28/2001 09:08 PM
To: Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: conversation with Jeff
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 01/28/2001 09:07 PM -----
Sandra McCubbin
01/27/2001 08:01 PM
To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: conversation with Jeff
please get back to Jeff or myself on how to respond to Barbara//thanks
----- Forwarded by Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron on 01/27/2001 05:59 PM -----
"Barbara R. Barkovich" <[email protected]>
01/27/2001 07:02 AM
To: [email protected]
cc:
Subject: conversation with Jeff
Hi, Sandi. Per your request, I talked to Jeff yesterday early evening.
I had been in a meeting with Keeley, Wright, et al after the hearing.
Jeff's proposal was not entirely clear to me, but it seemed to focus on
specifying an end date for the rate freeze in the Hertzberg bill. I
noted that the focus of the Friday hearing and the subsequent meeting
was on how much of the short fall the utilities should be able to
recover and agreed that we would probably go from one freeze to
another. Therefore the date of the end of the original freeze is
rapidly becoming irrelevant unless it is used to create a back way into
the first issue. This does not seem very likely right now. Who knows
how this will evolve, of course, but there is a sense of urgency, at
least in the Assembly.
Take care, Barbara
=====================================
|
2,473 |
Subject: Filings in Support of Kern River and El Paso Emergency Expansion
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/10538.
=====================================
----- Forwarded by James D Steffes/NA/Enron on 04/02/2001 07:53 AM -----
Rebecca W Cantrell@ECT
03/30/2001 04:30 PM
To: Barry Tycholiz/NA/Enron@ENRON, Colleen Sullivan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Donna
Greif/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jane M Tholt/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron,
Patti Sullivan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Phillip K
Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Superty/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Roger O Ponce/HOU/EES@EES, Stephanie Miller/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Susan J
Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Suzanne Calcagno/NA/Enron@Enron, Tori
Kuykendall/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jess Hewitt/HOU/EES@EES, Steven P South/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Ed McMichael/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Leslie Lawner/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Filings in Support of Kern River and El Paso Emergency Expansion
Proposals
We have filed comments in support (see attachments) of Kern River's emergency
expansion proposal to add 135,000 Mcf/d of capacity through temporary
compressors and El Paso's request to keep the compressors that had originally
requested to abandon in their oil pipeline conversion application which will
add 230,000 Mcf/d of capacity on their south system. In-service dates would
be July 1 for Kern River and August 1 for El Paso, assuming expeditious
treatment of the applications at FERC and no problems with permits.
Kern River held an open season for their expansion and ENA was awarded about
3,700 Dth/d. The El Paso capacity will not be contracted to individual
shippers, but will be used for system flexibility and to cover outages on the
system this summer when they start testing as required after the explosion
last year.
El Paso
Kern River
=====================================
|
2,474 |
Subject: Get FREE Annual Reports For Over 3000 Companies!
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/12033.
=====================================
******GET FREE ANNUAL REPORTS FOR OVER 3000 COMPANIES**********
Dear Former Subscriber:
Whether you work for an investment firm or you=01,re an individual
investor, you need an unbiased opinion before making an
investment decision. That=01,s how TheStreet.com can help.
In association with World Investor, TheStreet.com is pleased
to provide you access to thousands of annual reports on publicly
traded companies - FREE! Search for a report by either company
name or industry and get it mailed to you or download it when
available. Click here to find a report:
http://thestreet.ar.wilink.com?mkt_code=3DStreetARS1
Get the information you need to succeed when you are making
your investment decisions - FREE!
Sharon Bogan
Marketing
TheStreet.com
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
This email has been sent to you by TheStreet.com because you are
a current or former subscriber (either free-trial or paid)
to one of our web sites, http://www.thestreet.com/or
http://www.realmoney.com/. If you would prefer not to receive
these types of emails from us in the future, please click here:
http://www.thestreet.com/z/unsubscribe.jhtml?Type=3DM If you are
not a current or former subscriber, and you believe you received
this message in error, please forward this message to
[email protected], or call our customer service department
at 1-800-562-9571.
Please be assured that we respect the privacy of our subscribers.
To view our privacy policy, please click here:
http://www.thestreet.com/tsc/about/privacy.html
=====================================
|
2,475 |
Subject: Re: Next Steps for Midwest Gas Strategy
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/3081.
=====================================
Jim:
Got your message. Be happy to be on a call today to discuss California's gas
structure. Just let me know when.
Best to all,
Jeff
Steve Montovano
02/05/2001 09:12 AM
To: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Roy Boston/HOU/EES@EES, Janine Migden/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan M
Landwehr/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Laura
Luce/Corp/Enron@Enron, Gregg Penman/Corp/Enron@Enron
Subject: Re: Next Steps for Midwest Gas Strategy
Here is a summary of AGL prepared by Tom Chapman.
From: James D Steffes on 01/31/2001 10:54 AM
To: Roy Boston/HOU/EES@EES, Janine Migden/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan M
Landwehr/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Steve
Montovano/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Laura Luce/Corp/Enron@Enron
Subject: Next Steps for Midwest Gas Strategy
I wanted to follow-up with everyone following yesterday's meeting.
It appears to me that we need to develop (1) a better analysis of the four
market models - AGL (Steve M), Columbia of Ohio (Janine), Socal Gas (Jeff),
NICOR (Roy) - based on some key elements and (2) the key Influence parties in
Illinois with 5 layer Influence Circles that we need to be thinking about in
this discussion.
It would be great if we could get this to Laura for distribution by end of
day Friday (realize it's tight).
Key elements for Market Models --
1. Direct Access Allowed? For What customers? What timeline?
2. Upstream Capacity resolution - assignment or otherwise? Are there assets
left to optimize
3. Retail pricing - Fixed price vs. PBR (how?) vs. something else?
4. Role of Wholesale Outsourcing Agent (would ENA sell to marketers or
utilities or both?)
5. Other Issues
Thanks,
Jim
=====================================
|
2,476 |
Subject: RE: Notional NP15 5-year Price
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent_items/351.
=====================================
No problem here. That price is making DWR's contracts look worse and worse every day. Poor California. Jeff, if you have questions or want to discuss further, don't hesitate to call me or Sue, though Paul can likely answer most questions.
Best,
Jeff
-----Original Message-----
From: Kaufman, Paul
Sent: Friday, September 28, 2001 10:34 AM
To: Shields, Jeff
Cc: Dasovich, Jeff; Mara, Susan
Subject: RE: Notional NP15 5-year Price
I don't see an issue with this. I've cc'd Jeff Dasovich and Sue Mara to check in with them (while I can see California's pulse on the monitor, they actually have their hand on California's throat)!!!
-----Original Message-----
From: Shields, Jeff
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2001 1:44 PM
To: Kaufman, Paul
Cc: Calger, Christopher F.
Subject: FW: Notional NP15 5-year Price
Mike & Paul,
I have been asked by a consultant to the San Francisco Local Agency Formation Commission to provide a notional number for a 400 MW power supply at NP-15 starting 01-01-02 for 5 years. I had Jeffrey Oh price this but I do not want to send a term sheet until I am sure your OK with this. The situation is that LAFCO has initiated a "30,000 ft. level feasibility study of a measure that is on the ballot to form a new muni in San Francisco and Brisbane.
Jeff
-----Original Message-----
From: Oh, Jeffrey
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2001 1:29 PM
To: Shields, Jeff
Subject: Notional NP15 5-year Price
The price for 7x24 power for NP15 for Jan-02 through Dec-06, 400 MW, is $35.85.
Jeffrey Oh
Enron North America 503.464.7789
121 SW Salmon Street 503.708.1760 (cell)
3WTC 0306 503.464.3740 (fax)
Portland, OR 97204 [email protected]
=====================================
|
2,477 |
Subject: CALIFORNIA UPDATE-9/20/2001
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/deleted_items/1668.
=====================================
For questions or comments regarding this report please contact G. Britt Whitman at ex:5-4014 or Kristin Walsh at ex:3-9510.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
? CPUC Direct Access Vote
CPUC
LINK TO ? LIVE WEBCAST of CPUC MEETING 10:00 am -@:pm Sept. 20th <http://www.cpuc.ca.gov/static/announcements/010920_audioaccess.htm>
The sun may be setting on Californians' right to customer choice as the CPUC debates the fate of direct access today. We estimate that at this time, the CPUC commissioners will NOT be taking up the DA issue and will instead delay the vote until after the legislature has convened the third special session, called by Gov. Davis last week. Currently, both Commissioners Brown and Wood appear unwilling to support DA; with President Lynch being a swing vote.
Concerning the retroactive suspension of direct access agreements of customers who have already elected alternate service providers, the current CPUC position appears to be that direct access contracts signed by September 20th, 2001 will NOT be nullified. There is rumor that the CPUC may be reviewing several of the contracts signed within the past three to nine months. Many commercial consumers now operating under DA are highly pessimistic about the CPUC supporting DA agreements that have been signed within the past three months. The business community is very conscience that the CPUC now bears the difficult task of weighing California businesses' political and economic interests against the economic interests of California's residential power consumers.
REPORTS TO FOLLOW:
SoCal Bankruptcy Developments
PG&E Emergence from Bankruptcy
Probability of Third Special Session for SoCal Bailout
=====================================
|
2,478 |
Subject: FW: BareStage presents YUMI THOMAS, mezzo-soprano with pianist ER
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/2425.
=====================================
Bummer...forgot to tell you guys about the address: here it is and, sorry
for the inconvenience. Enjoy the show!
Performances are at the Choral Rehearsal hall on campus between Zellerbach
and Dwinelle.
Vince
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wang, Vincent
> Sent: Monday, October 16, 2000 10:18 AM
> To: '[email protected]'
> Subject: BareStage presents YUMI THOMAS, mezzo-soprano with pianist
> ER ICA SCHEINBERG
>
> Hi all:
>
> This is a great opportunity to enjoy a great concert, right at Berkeley,
> at only $5! For those of you who are interested in Classical music but
> have not received much exposure to it, this is a good way to find out
> before you make the commitment of a season ticket. Please read on for
> details.
>
> YUMI THOMAS
> mezzo-soprano
>
> IN CONCERT
>
> with pianist
> ERICA SCHEINBERG
>
> Singing international dramatic music from Japan,
> Brazil, Russia and the United States, from
> Rachmaninoff to Duke Ellington
>
> SATURDAY, OCTOBER 21 @ 8:00pm
> $5 general admission
> ($4 for members of Student Musical Activities)
>
> Yumi Thomas is a rising star who has performed
> extensively in the Bay Area and beyond with the
> San Francisco Girls' Choir, Ars Cantus, UC Chamber
> Chorus,
> Cal Jazz Choir, and others. Her mature voice and
> sensitive, expressive interpretations have earned
> her praise in major Bay Area publications.
>
> Pianist Erica Scheinberg accompanies Ms. Thomas in
> a rich mosaic of songs from Japan, Brazil, Germany,
> France, Russia, and the United States. A complete
> program can be found at the end of this message.
=====================================
|
2,479 |
Subject: Re: Kern River Expansion - Implications for Firm Shippers
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/3616.
=====================================
Jim, et al:
FYI. Lots of expansion plans going on, including TW. We can discuss further
on the call. Expansions generally create some level of concern from shippers
due to the fact that capacity to the boarder exceeds takeaway in California.
It's particularly prickly at Wheeler, through which, I'm assuming, the Kern
expansion will flow. We can discuss further on the call.
Best,
Jeff
James D Steffes
03/13/2001 09:45 AM
To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Rebecca W Cantrell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leslie
Lawner/NA/Enron@Enron, Robert
Neustaedter/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Donna
Fulton/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Marcia A Linton/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Kern River Expansion - Implications for Firm Shippers
Becky --
Can you please find out (a) details about the emergency expansion on Kern
River and (b) key Firm Shippers on Kern River, Mojave, PGT?
Philip Allen called me this morning and asked about our ability to "get a
read" on the potential for other Firm Shippers on Kern River to oppose this
expansion. Can we quietly reach out to our industry contacts (other Govt
Affairs shops) to get their opinions?
His concern is primarily about Kern expanding into CA will limit other Firm
Shippers given the limitations on the SoCal system [Jeff, give me a call to
see how this plays in CA].
While we are not a Firm Shipper (and we probably don't want to get directly
in front of this - Enron fights expansion), how will FERC and its Staff look
at this issue [Donna & Leslie}?
Let's try and have the info and a call on Thursday at 4pm Houston time to get
back to him afterwards.
Jim
=====================================
|
2,480 |
Subject: RE: Quick Update
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/6028.
=====================================
Jeff -- I believe there might be a meeting with Ken Lay next week while the
Gov. is in DC. Could you email me his bio and anything you have on Enron's
operations in CA? Thanks! I have been trying to pull things off the net,
but our internet server is down in the Governor's office.
Thanks for any help you can provide. I am out of here for a few days.
Best!
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2000 12:14 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Quick Update
Hi Kari:
I know that you and I are both swamped, so I'm writing very briefly to give
you a brief update. But first, thank you very much again for meeting last
week. Greatly appreciated, and look forward to working together to help in
any way I can to find solution that is acceptable to all. Here's the
update:
Our "subcommitte" is meeting tomorrow to try to close the deal on a
proposed solution. It focuses on 3 key areas:
Using the utilities retained assets to moderate prices.
Designing a framework for forward contracting that strikes a much more
appropriate balance in CA between state oversight and the need for
utility flexibility.
Rate stabilization/Undercollections (utility solvency)
I will update you tomorrow on the group's progress. If thing's go
according to plan, we may be in a position to submit something to you a
early as Monday. If there's a deadline from your end that I ought to be
aware of, let me know and I'll incorporate it into the subcommittee's work
plan.
In the meantime, if there is anything at all that I can do to help, please
don't hesitiate to contact me.
Thanks again and all the best,
Jeff
=====================================
|
2,481 |
Subject: Fwd: Recipient of the first Kent Wheatland Memorial Award
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/12654.
=====================================
FYI, Sue will receive a special award from the Western Power Trading Forum at
their meeting in Ojai, Calif. on June 21. Scroll to the bottom of this email
to read why they selected her!
Way to go, Sue!!!
---------------------- Forwarded by Karen Denne/Corp/Enron on 06/08/2001
03:04 PM ---------------------------
Susan J Mara
06/08/2001 02:22 PM
To: Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Fwd: Recipient of the first Kent Wheatland Memorial Award
Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854
----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 06/08/2001 12:21 PM -----
"Daniel Douglass" <[email protected]>
04/24/2001 08:41 PM
To: <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: Fwd: Recipient of the first Kent Wheatland Memorial Award
Sue....this is exceptionally well-deserved, for all you do for the causes
which Kent, and all of us, hold dear. Congratulations!!
Dan
----- Message from "Gary Ackerman" <[email protected]> on Tue, 24 Apr 2001
13:19:35 -0400 -----
To:
cc:
Subject: Recipient of the first Kent Wheatland Memorial Award
Sue Mara of Enron has been named the first recipient of the Kent
Wheatland Memorial Award. Sue was selected in consultation with many of
WPTF's Board members because of her tenacity, forth-rightness, and
courage. She will be bestowed the honor on the evening of June 21 at
our General Meeting in Ojai, and presenting the award to Sue will be
Kent's brother, Gregg.
Please join me in congratulating Sue on her selection. You will note
that she is not copied on this memo, but I called her this morning to
tell her the news. She was shocked, and honored, and almost, but not
quite speechless.
gba
=====================================
|
2,482 |
Subject: Legal Issues to be Presented at CPUC Emergency Hearings
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/7968.
=====================================
you were on the original. did you not get it?
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 12/27/2000 10:51 AM -----
MBD <[email protected]>
12/27/2000 01:24 AM
To: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected], MBD
<[email protected]>, [email protected], [email protected]
cc:
Subject: Legal Issues to be Presented at CPUC Emergency Hearings
Enclosed is a draft presentation of legal issues to be presented at the CPUC
emergency hearings in conjunction with regulatory and economic arguments set
forth in the draft comments previously distributed by Jeff Dasovich. Jeff
and I will work to merge the legal issues into the full presentation,
subject to the duscussion on the conference call tomorrow morning. This
presentation has been prepared in anticipation of the fact that we will
likely be limited to a very short verbal presentation tomorrow. A more
extensive legal analysis of all these points is being prepared to accompany
any briefs or written comments which we are permitted to file later. Please
e-mail comments using the reply function to MBD at this address before the
conference call if at all possible. Thank you. Mike Day
<<X19418.DOC>>
=====================================
|
2,483 |
Subject: RE: Rate Agreement between DWR and the PUC Regarding
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/4641.
=====================================
I'm trying to meet a deadline at the moment, but are you free this
afternoon? I have some information that can help a lot in that analysis.
Best,
Jeff
Christopher F Calger/ENRON@enronXgate
05/16/2001 12:19 PM
To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Tracy Ngo/ENRON@enronXgate
Subject: RE: Rate Agreement between DWR and the PUC Regarding
Creditworthiness
Thanks Jeff. On a related note, we are trying to put together a financial
"headroom" forecast for DWR/State of California that goes out a few years and
shows:
Rate Revenues
less: Utility gen costs
QF costs
DWR PPA's
DWR spot purchases
Margin
Total Deficit
Bond Issue
Bond Principal & Interest
Would you know how to get something like that?
Regards,
Chris
-----Original Message-----
From: Dasovich, Jeff
Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2001 10:12 AM
To: Calger, Christopher F.; Comnes, Alan; Shapiro, Richard; [email protected];
Steffes, James; Yoder, Christian; Kaufman, Paul
Subject: Rate Agreement between DWR and the PUC Regarding Creditworthiness
Sensitivity: Confidential
FYI: Just got off the phone with Michael Hoffman, who's one of two key
outside financial advisors to Davis on the electricity crisis. The
administration is trying to get a legally binding agreement between the PUC
and DWR to ensure that the PUC doesn't muck around with the money (via
utility rates) DWR requires to be creditworthy. They were shooting for this
Friday to have a draft of the document read for folks to review, but it now
looks like it won't get resolved until (at the earliest) next week----seems
that the one PUC lawyer who can actually do the work is on vacation. Go
figure.
Best,
Jeff
=====================================
|
2,484 |
Subject: Update on Energy Summit: speakers rolling in
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/365.
=====================================
So far no one has declined, and everyone is interested. Lynch is in,
Littlechild is interested, Harris is interested. Allen, could you work on
Hoecker and Markey? I'll see what I can find out about Markey and Barton.
Lee is making progress on a few more fundraising avenues so GSPP will handle
that.
We'll need to figure out our next tier of speakers soon. I want to make sure
that all of you have all the information you want but I'm getting the sense
that
conference calls are too time-consuming. What if I give a weekly update and
you can all respond to the group if you choose? I think our last call
established a vision of the conference and the rest is day-to-day management
for
which we don't need a committee meeting. I would suggest one modification of
the vision, though. We need a little better balance of policy perspectives to
make sure we get the real decision-makers. To modify the GSPP motto, we can
speak truth with power better if we add a couple big players like Rep. Barton
who is an important figure with conservative views. I think the conference
would be more interesting, attract more of an audience and more sponsorship,
and
make more progress. Comments? I may be out of town the next couple days so
you
won't hear from me.
Rob
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Malcolm, Kim [SMTP:[email protected]]
> Sent: Friday, September 08, 2000 8:28 PM
> To: '[email protected]'; Malcolm, Kim
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: Energy Summit
>
> Rob, Thanks for the detail -- the Commissioner is very interested in
speaking
> and she appears to be available that day. Please call Charlene Lundy at 415
> 7032444. And let's talk soon --
>
>
=====================================
|
2,485 |
Subject: Party! FREE entrance for Club Ibiza on Friday, 10/26/01
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/deleted_items/810.
=====================================
>Subject: FREE entrance for Club Ibiza on Friday, 10/26/01
>Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2001 23:58:00 -0700
>
>
>Hello everyone! This is DJ Dimitris Mykonos.
>
>Let me start by thanking all of you for showing up at the last Ibiza party on Oct. 5th and making it an incredible success. Over 1200 people partied until 3:00am! For those of you who wrote me thank you letters and expressed interest in my next Ibiza party, here is your chance. Prepare yourself for an even bigger night.
>
>On Friday, October 26th, come and experience Southern European Style as we bring you the sounds and unique mixing methods from Europe's party capitals like Ibiza, Mykonos, Majorka, etc..
>
>We will be blending all types of dance music into one ingenuous mix, choosing the best material of Mainstream Dance, House, Progressive, Techno, Trance, Latin House, Disco, Tribal and Hip-Hop.
>
>DJ Donovan and DJ Tony Russell will get the party going. Around midnight, I will take over and spin till you can't take it anymore.
>
>Free entrance 9:00PM to midnight ONLY WITH GUEST PASS
>
>To get your free guest, send email to [email protected] and type RSVP in the subject line. Please also specify your full name and the number guests that are coming with you. You will receive a confirmation guest pass email that you will need to print out and present to the cashier.
>
>You're welcome to forward this email to your friends.
>
>Don't forget to reserve a room at the incredible Club Ibiza! For information, call the hotel directly at 510-383-9888 or visit www.hotelibiza.com <http://www.hotelibiza.com/>.
>
>I can't wait to see all of you there.
>
>Keep on dancing,
>
>DJ Dimitris Mykonos
>
=====================================
|
2,486 |
Subject: Re: California Interstate Pipelines
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/4150.
=====================================
Greetings:
Look forward to it. I've just had two "need them yesterday" requests that I
need to complete today. Are you available tomorow to discuss further?
Best,
Jeff
Kurt Lindahl@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
04/19/2001 01:13 PM
To: Jeff Dasovich@EES
cc: Michael McGarry/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
Subject: California Interstate Pipelines
Jeff,
My name is Kurt Lindahl. I recently joined Enron Global Markets on the LNG
team. I'm the Lead Developer for the West Coast and have been charged with
building a (several) LNG terminal(s) on the west coast. Michael McGarry,
from Enron Engineering and Operational Services Company, is the lead
Development Engineer on the project.
A key question in this effort is, "Where is the best entry point into the
Socal/SG&E/PG&E pipeline systems. In other words, where can we site a LNG
terminal and deliver natural gas into their systems, such that the amount of
facilities they require is minimal? I spoke with Ben Asante who heads up the
optimization department in ETS. He said that if we could get annual flow
diagrams for the California intrastate systems, he could prepare a model in
about 2 weeks time. Interstate pipelines have to file Annual Flow Diagrams
at FERC, but I'm not sure what Intrastates' are obligated to file with the
CPUC? That's where I need your help. This is a hot subject, because the
race to site an LNG terminal is intense.
Could you please call me at 713 345 5044 (O) or 713 515 2759 so that we can
discuss. We want to keep this effort very confidential, so please maintain
secrecy.
I will also want to talk to you about permitting and state approvals.
Regards,
Kurt Lindahl
=====================================
|
2,487 |
Subject: Re: CA New Product Entry - Suspension of DA
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/12653.
=====================================
Current word is that the draft decision will be held over at least to the
June 21 meeting. Enron, along with the members of the Alliance for Retail
Energy Markets, are launching an all-out campaign to get the decision
changed. Commissioner Bilas has indicated that he may draft an alternate
that deletes the language. Of course, we are still flying blind. The draft
has not been released to the public.
Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854
James D Steffes
06/08/2001 09:40 AM
To: Marty Sunde/HOU/EES@EES, Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES, Jeremy
Blachman/HOU/EES@EES, Scott Gahn/HOU/EES@EES, James M Wood/HOU/EES@EES,
Richard L Zdunkewicz/HOU/EES@EES, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J
Mara/NA/Enron, Marcus Dotson/HOU/EES@EES, Lamar Frazier/HOU/EES@EES, Jeff
Richter/Enron@EnronXGate, Dennis Benevides/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul
Kaufman/Enron@EnronXGate
Subject: CA New Product Entry - Suspension of DA
I wanted to make sure that everyone involved with the CA New Product was
aware that the CPUC may consider at its next public meeting (6/14) the
implementation of the Direct Access suspension established in AB1x1.
We are hearing that the CPUC may not have 3 votes in favor of such
suspension, but the topic is on the agenda. It is very difficult to get any
clarity on this issue given the politics and ex parte restricitions.
Even if the CPUC does not take action on this language at the next meeting,
until that provision of the law is modified by the General Assembly, the CPUC
could take action at a later time.
Please call me if anyone has any questions.
Jim
3x7673
=====================================
|
2,488 |
Subject: RE: FW: current events
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/84.
=====================================
call me unreasonable. i can take it. been called worse, though, of course,
coming from you, it hurts more.
"Schultz, Don" <[email protected]> on 08/31/2000 11:13:48 AM
To: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: RE: FW: current events
chicken and egg problem--I think I'd rather try to stimulate customer demand
for these products? (which in many applications are cost-competitive to
purchased power, even with piracy stand-by rates of UDCs), and then
simulanteously get/put pressure on reducing stand-by rates. So---your
position, to answer your question, is unreasonable.
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2000 8:54 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: FW: current events
Nope, not at this point.? Rather than start with money, we'd rather start
with getting the rules (i.e., the IOUs) fixed so that there ain't regulatoy
roadblock after roadblock standing in the way of deployment.? Sound
reasonable?
"Schultz, Don" <[email protected]> on 08/31/2000 10:24:12 AM
To:?? "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject:? RE: FW: current events
so I see ENRON remains in support of PPP extension; what about using these
funds to help buy down the costs (to consumers) of micropower technologies,
such as customer-side of the meter fuel cells and microturbines?
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2000 7:43 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: FW: current events
Don:? See attached from today's WSJ.
(See attached file: Efficiency bill running into opposition from
governor.doc)
=====================================
|
2,489 |
Subject: RE: Press Release and Statement: Ene Announces SEC Request, Pledges
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/deleted_items/837.
=====================================
can't say, but you can connect the dots... Although I got a media call this morning from someone who wanted to know if this related to our relationship with the Republican Party?!
-----Original Message-----
From: Dasovich, Jeff
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 10:24 AM
To: Denne, Karen
Subject: RE: Press Release and Statement: Ene Announces SEC Request, Pledges Cooperation
Forgive my ignorance, but I'm assuming that "related party transactions" refers to the Fastow deals?
-----Original Message-----
From: Denne, Karen
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 9:10 AM
To: Dasovich, Jeff; Mara, Susan
Subject: FW: Press Release and Statement: Ene Announces SEC Request, Pledges Cooperation
fyi...
-----Original Message-----
From: Philipp, Meredith
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 9:03 AM
To: Nord, Sue
Cc: Shapiro, Richard; Palmer, Mark A. (PR); Denne, Karen
Subject: Press Release and Statement: Ene Announces SEC Request, Pledges Cooperation
Sue-
FYI- we issued the attached release this morning. I know our govt affairs teams will have lots of questions and will probably be asked several questions. Unfortunately, given the legal nature of this inquiry, we cannot say anything more than this at this time. We are asking our folks not to engage in conversations or opinion related discussions about this. Also, Ken Lay will be discussing this at an employee meeting tomorrow morning. It would be a good idea for everyone to tune in, if possible (or review the playback later in the day.)
I am also attaching a brief INTERNAL Q&A about the SEC request- just to give a little more information.
Thanks-
Meredith
<< File: 70-LJM final ltr.pdf >> << File: LJMmediaQA.doc >>
=====================================
|
2,490 |
Subject: Your Virtual Classroom in Business
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/67.
=====================================
Dear Colleague:
I am writing to tell you about a free universal website you can use for
all your online coursework and professional services at the University of
California, Berkely. The site provides state-of-the-art Virtual Classrooms
that you can freely join or teach, which include syllabus development and
use, online scheduling, real-time chat, dedicated threaded discussions,
file sharing, online study groups, test generation, online grading, and
grade book accounting. Click here to use it now:
http://universalclass.com/business/business/index.htm?gc=14879
The site also allows you to upload your resume/curriculum vitae,
conference announcements, job postings, and other information of interest
to you and your colleagues within the department of Business and around
the world. The site is freely accessible to all students and faculty at
colleges and universities worldwide.
As you can see, this website only provides free services. We are not
trying to sell you something. The purpose of my e-mail is to inform you of
its location. If you want more information, please contact me. Otherwise,
I will not contact you again as a non-response means unsubscribe.
UniversalClass is dedicated to faculty and students at institutions of
higher education in the United States and abroad. It has over 300
departments specializing in nearly every academic area. To select a
department that interests you, click here:
http://universalclass.com
And go to the section on Schools. If your department is not listed there,
please let us know so that we can add it.
Sincerely,
Dennis Earl, Ph.D.
Public Information Director
http://UniversalClass.com
Connecting Teachers and Learners Worldwide
=====================================
|
2,491 |
Subject: Re: New Izio InfoPier Access Info
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/1693.
=====================================
Dear Jeff,
Yes, the cookie that stores your login will store your most recent attempt
(regardless of whether it worked or not...). So, that will lead to your
login being incorrect if you'd typed it in wrong any time... Thanks for the
pointer; we'll try to see if we can come up with a solution... :)
Cheers,
Izio Support
[email protected]
----- Original Message -----
From: <[email protected]>
To: "Izio InfoPier" <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, September 22, 2000 3:14 PM
Subject: Re: New Izio InfoPier Access Info
>
> Thank you. FYI. Seems that the problem was that the last letter in my
> IZIO login (that comes up automatically when pulling up the page) was
being
> truncated (which may result from my regular work login pre-empting the
IZIO
> login--the two are exactly the same, except that my work login truncates
> the last letter of my name). Thanks very much for your help.
>
>
>
> Izio InfoPier
> <InfoPier@izi To:
[email protected]
> o.com> cc:
> Subject: New Izio InfoPier
Access Info
> 09/22/2000
> 03:10 PM
>
>
>
>
>
> Dear Jeffrey,
>
> We generated a new password for you, as you requested, to use with your
> login on the Izio InfoPier System of Haas School of Business - UC
Berkeley.
> Your new password is 6611030. Please do not forget to change it by going
> to the system's home at haas.infopier.com. Remember to avoid using
regular
> words, which are easy to hack, and sprinkle a few '@$%' just in case.?>?> Best wishes,?> The Izio Team.?>?>?>?>?>?>
=====================================
|
2,492 |
Subject: Holiday Contact Numbers For Your Reference
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/7927.
=====================================
The attachment
---------------------- Forwarded by Wanda Curry/HOU/EES on 12/22/2000 09:32
AM ---------------------------
Wanda Curry
12/22/2000 09:32 AM
To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Scott Stoness/HOU/EES@EES, Evan Hughes/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: Holiday Contact Numbers For Your Reference
Attached is the EES contact list for next week. I will be calling in for the
meeting next week, but Scott Stoness and Evan Hughes will be facilitating the
meeting for me. Should the time of the call conflict with your need to
prepare or attend the CPUC meetings next week, please call Evan Hughes
(713-345-3311). Evan will be in the office all next week.
I am also trying to collect the contact numbers for Rick Buy, Mark Palmer and
Mark Koenig and will forward them to you in a separate notice.
Thanks,
Wanda Curry
---------------------- Forwarded by Wanda Curry/HOU/EES on 12/22/2000 09:28
AM ---------------------------
Enron Energy Services
From: Carol Moffett 12/20/2000 03:43 PM
Phone No: 713-853-6658 Phone
888-782-3518 Pager
EB 810a
To: Sunde Direct Reports, Karen Owens/HOU/EES@EES, Judy G Smith/HOU/EES@EES,
Vivian B Metzger/HOU/EES@EES, Anita Llamas-Granado/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Direct Reports' Assistants, Esmeralda Hinojosa/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: Holiday Contact Numbers For Your Reference
Attached for your reference (and use if an emergency arises) is a report with
the contact phone numbers for:
Marty's direct report team and assistants;
Risk Management's direct report team and assistants'
Dan's direct report team and assistants;
G9 and assistants.
Thanks to Esmeralda for putting this information together for us.
=====================================
|
2,493 |
Subject: Utilities, Electric: Deregulation: Electricity deregulation brings
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/956.
=====================================
----- Forwarded by Miyung Buster/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 10/13/2000 09:56 AM
-----
[email protected]
10/13/2000 10:47 AM
Please respond to nobody
To: [email protected]
cc:
Subject: Utilities, Electric: Deregulation: Electricity deregulation brings
on crisis in California
Electricity deregulation brings on crisis in California
?
09/25/2000
API EnCompass: News
(c) Copyright Elsevier Engineering Information, Inc. All rights reserved.
From: Petrostrategies --
California's power generators blame the 'rigid nature' of the deregulated
energy sector for the prevailing electricity crisis, which has seen wholesale
power prices jump by as much as $500/Mwhr from $150/Mwhr in summer 1999 even
as retail prices have been frozen until March 2002. Meanwhile, since demand
has grown by a mere 3% from mid-1999, some consumers fear that the crisis has
arisen, not from Californian deregulation, but from power generators who are
taking advantage of the crisis to earn more. Tasked to act on the problem,
FERC is to announce the results of its probe on the energy crisis by
11/1/2000.
Folder Name: Utilities, Electric: Deregulation
Relevance Score on Scale of 100: 99
______________________________________________________________________
To review or revise your folder, visit Dow Jones CustomClips or contact Dow
Jones Customer Service by e-mail at [email protected] or by phone
at 800-369-7466. (Outside the U.S. and Canada, call 609-452-1511 or contact
your local sales representative.)
______________________________________________________________________
Copyright (c) 2000 Dow Jones &Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved
=====================================
|
2,494 |
Subject: Berkeley Entrepreneurs Forum, September 28
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/1608.
=====================================
UC Berkeley Entrepreneurs Forum
Thursday, September 28, 2000
6:30 PM
Haas School of Business
Andersen Auditorium
__________________________________________________________________
Topic:??????????Accelerating Early Stage Start-Ups
Speaker: ???????Randy Haykin, founder & Managing Partner, iMinds Ventures;
Neil Cohen, founder & Chief Marketing Officer, CampSix; and Alan Fisher,
founder & General Partner, Wingspring
Founders of new forms of venture management and capital firms discuss their
new creations and how these differing combinations of previously disparate
elements in new venture creation can speed the time to market for the firms
with which they work.
Registration: There are special rates for faculty and staff. Faculty and
staff are encouraged to pre-register by E-mail.
Note registration procedure for students:
a) in person with cash or check in room F450 or F449, weekdays 9AM to 4PM.
b) with Mc/Visa over the phone, please call (510) 642 4255
The fee for pre- registration is $5. There will be a $10 registration fee at
the door. Note: On-site registration is subject to space available. Pre-
registration for students and staff closes at 4PM on Tuesday, September 26 or
earlier if it is sold out.
Students who have purchased season tickets, either directly from the Lester
Center or through the BA 294 Entrepreneurial Cycle class, do not have to
register again for this event.? Your registration is complete.
Information:
For more information on the series, please visit our Website at
http://www.haas.berkeley.edu/~lester/bef.html
If you wish to read more about this particular event, please go to
http://www.haas.berkeley.edu/~lester/sep00.html
=====================================
|
2,495 |
Subject: FW: An Invitation to Attend Financial Reporting Conference
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent_items/164.
=====================================
-----Original Message-----
From: Dayna Haugh [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 10:35 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: An Invitation to Attend Financial Reporting Conference
Dear Evening MBA Students:
The Center for Financial Reporting and Management in the Haas School is hosting it Twelfth Annual Conference on Financial Reporting on Monday, November 5, 2001 at the San Francisco Marriott Hotel, 55 Fourth Street.
As a special offer to Evening MBA Program students, we are offering one seat to each student at the discounted price of $145 per seat. This can be used by you or by a person in your firm whom you wish to designate.
A copy of the program is attached. If you or an associate wish to attend, please register on-line at: <http://www.haas.berkeley.edu/accounting/cfrm/registration.htm> . When filling out the registration form, please write: "EVENING PROGRAM" in the "additional registrants" space on the form. I will contact you regarding payment. If you prefer to pay by check, you may print the registration form and mail it or leave it in Dayna Haugh's mailbox in the student services building mailroom with a check.
If you have questions, feel free to contact me at 642-6334. We hope you or one of your colleagues will be able to attend.
Dayna Haugh
Assistant Director
Center for Financial Reporting and Management
Haas School of Business
University of California
502D Faculty Building, #1900
Berkeley, CA 94720-1900
510-642-6334 (Phone)
510-643-7218 (Fax)
<http://www.haas.berkeley.edu/accounting/cfrm/cfrm.htm>://www.haas.berkeley.edu/accounting/cfrm/cfrm.
<http://www.haas.berkeley.edu/accounting/cfrm/cfrm.htm>
=====================================
|
2,496 |
Subject: Re: State/Local call
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/notes_inbox/2273.
=====================================
FYI - This was announced today.
Steve Burns
SUMMARY: The Rural Utilities Service (RUS) announces a new loan program and
the availability of loan funds under this program to finance the construction
and installation of broadband telecommunications services in rural America.
The President of the United States and the United States Congress have made
$100 million in treasury rate loan funds available, through a one-year Pilot
Program, to encourage telecommunications carriers to provide broadband
service to rural consumers where such service does not currently exist. This
program will provide loan funds, on an expedited basis, to communities up to
20,000 inhabitants to ensure rural consumers enjoy the same quality and range
of telecommunications services that are available in urban and suburban
communities. Loan funds are available immediately and applications will be
processed and approved on a first-come, first served basis throughout FY 2001
until the appropriation is utilized in its entirety.
(more info)
http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=2000_register&docid=
00-30872-filed
Lara Leibman
12/04/2000 01:14 PM
To: Sue Nord/NA/Enron@Enron, Scott Bolton/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Stephen D Burns/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Barbara A
Hueter/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan M Landwehr/NA/Enron@Enron, Marchris
Robinson/NA/Enron@Enron, Margo Reyna/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: [email protected]
Subject: State/Local call
We will resume our state/local initiatives discussion this Wednesday, Dec.
6th at 4pm CST. The call in number will be the normal 1-888-311-9051; pass
code 60396. Thanks very much.
Lara
=====================================
|
2,497 |
Subject: Status Report
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/1222.
=====================================
Hi Sue:
I hope the packing and other move-related things are going well---I know that
something invariably happens that creates havoc. Good luck.
I haven't wanted to bug you too much with all that's going on, so I thought
I'd give you a quick update:
Scott and Bowen and I talked re: getting authority for EBS to dig dirt and
install some facilities in California. With some effort, we persuaded Scott
that having dinner with Loretta Lynch, well, wasn't going to do get the job
done (though Scott's not yet completely convinced). Instead, Scott's going
to get from the network folks substantially more detail on precisely what the
project entails. Once we've got that, we can meet with Commission staff and
take their temperature on what sort of approval hoops we'd need to jump
through in order to get authority to do the project, and what the time frame
for approval would look like. Scott agrees with this approach. He's going
to try to get more info from the network folks in Portland. We likely will
regroup to figure out "next steps" right after the first of the year. Have
any thoughts on this approach?
I do plan on coming every Thursday to the group meetings. However, this
Thursday is my girlfriend's birthday, and her parents (who live in the area)
have had a little "special event" planned for the past 6 months.
Consequently, I will have to miss the GA Xmas party, which I'm very
disappointed about----I really enjoy getting a chance to catch up with
everyone. I'll also therefore have to participate in Thursday's call by
phone. Apologies, but I'm sticking to the tried and true rule: "Family and
relationships first!"
Hope all is well.
Best,
Jeff
=====================================
|
2,498 |
Subject: FW: DA Account Balances
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/sent/4282.
=====================================
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 04/24/2001 05:19 PM -----
Robert C Williams/ENRON@enronXgate
04/24/2001 08:47 AM
To: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Harry
Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, [email protected]@SMTP@enronXgate, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Wanda Curry/HOU/EES@EES, Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES, Mike D
Smith/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: FW: DA Account Balances
As you can see from below, I don't see how we can support the PE Advice
Letter. We reserved our right to oppose it in the stip. I think we should
clarify that SCE will acknowledge our full claim ($124 million) without any
offset in exchange for our cooperation with the MOU.
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]@ENRON
[mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2001 2:52 PM
To: Williams, Robert C.
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: DA Account Balances
Attached is our record of credit balances for Enron DA accounts, as of
April 20. The $84 million or so I referenced this morning is our
calculation of what SCE owed through 1/18. If the PE credit methodology is
approved and applied back to January 19, then Enron would be rebilled for
$68 million (for transmission and distribution charges), which offset
against the earlier credit and the credit calculated for 1/19 - 4/20,
reduces the total credit owed to $62 million.
As we discussed, Jenny is more familiar than I with the details of the
credits and will call you back with someone from our Billing/Credit group
who is even more familiar.
(See attached file: Enron PX Credits as of 4-20-01.xls)
- Enron PX Credits as of 4-20-01.xls
=====================================
|
2,499 |
Subject: Re:
Sender: [email protected]
Recipients: ['[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]', '[email protected]']
File: dasovich-j/all_documents/3893.
=====================================
If I'm reading pages 38 - 40 of the Bilas PD correctly, the Commission's
primary concern over the competitive benefits of city-gate pricing is the
fact that PG&E city-gate prices in October were much higher than border
prices plus transportation. October bidweek PG&E city-gate prices were
high, but only because southern California prices plummeted from the high
levels that they had reached in late August and September, following the El
Paso explosion. In November, the PG&E city-gate moved back into its normal
relationship with Topock and Malin prices. For the Commission to be spooked
by one month of price fluctuations is crazy.
I'm hopeful that my friends at Edison, in particular, can help the
Commission to distinguish what we were trying to achieve in the CS on the
gas side from the mess that is electric restructuring....
Tom Beach
----- Original Message -----
From: <[email protected]>
To: <Paul_Amirault%[email protected]>; <[email protected]>;
<[email protected]>; <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>;
<[email protected]>; <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2000 3:27 PM
> The PD in the Gas Restructuring is out. I have yet to read the whole
> thing, but the title "Approval With Modifications Of The Interim
> Settlement..." does not bode well. According to Steve Watson (and I only
> have Steve's statement second hand), the decision reflects a fear that the
> timing is wrong in light of the current volatile gas price market.
>
> (See attached file: Proposed.doc)
>
> --
> Michael S. Alexander
> Southern California Edison
> 626-302-2029
> 626-302-3254 (fax)
>
=====================================
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.