Spaces:
Sleeping
Sleeping
# User Requirements for GAIA Framework Improvement | |
Based on the provided `pasted_content.txt`, the user's requirements for improving the GAIA multi-agent framework are as follows: | |
## Overall Goal | |
Improve the existing multi-agent framework to maximize performance on the GAIA benchmark. | |
## Specific Objectives | |
1. **Code Quality Review:** | |
* Analyze all source files (`.py`, config, tests, docs if present). | |
* Identify weaknesses such as: | |
* Design smells | |
* Performance issues | |
* Missing type hints | |
* Brittle parsing logic | |
* Insufficient test coverage | |
* Other reliability impairments. | |
2. **Refactor Proposals:** | |
* For each identified weakness, suggest concise improvements. | |
* Provide practical improvements as diff-style patches where feasible. | |
3. **New Feature Implementation:** | |
* **YouTube Ingestion:** | |
* Input: YouTube video URL. | |
* Process: Download audio -> Chunk audio (≤ 60 seconds) -> Transcribe chunks using Gemini 1.5 Pro. | |
* Output: Full transcript and a one-paragraph summary. | |
* **Generic Audio Transcription:** | |
* Input: Local audio file path or remote audio URL. | |
* Process: Transcribe using Gemini 1.5 Pro (preferred for latency tolerance) or Whisper-cpp (fallback). | |
* Output: Expose functionality via a simple Python API. | |
4. **Extra Agent Design:** | |
* Design at least three new specialized agents. | |
* These agents should demonstrably contribute to boosting GAIA benchmark performance. | |
* For each new agent, provide: | |
* Purpose | |
* Key tool calls | |
* Sketch of the agent loop/logic. | |
5. **Migration Plan:** | |
* Define the recommended order for applying the proposed refactor patches and implementing new features. | |
* List all new dependencies required for `requirements.txt`. | |
* Outline the minimal unit and/or integration tests needed to validate each new feature or significant change. | |
## Output Format Requirements | |
* Start the final report with a short ASCII diagram representing the *revised* system architecture (incorporating proposed changes). | |
* For each modified source file or new module: | |
* Provide a one-sentence rationale for the change. | |
* Include any required unified diff patches enclosed in triple backticks with the filename in the header. | |
* Group related changes together. | |
* Use plain paragraphs rather than long bullet lists where appropriate. | |
* Maintain concise prose. | |
* Ask brief clarifying questions if uncertainties arise during the process. | |
## Process Constraint | |
* Wait for user confirmation before starting the review. | |
* The initial phase involves analysis and presenting the improvement plan (including architecture diagram, code review findings, refactor proposals, new feature designs, extra agent designs, and migration plan). | |
* Stop after presenting this initial plan and await further instructions or confirmation. | |